1
Unit 3 Assessment Notetaking
Charles Collantes
Herzing University
English Composition II (EN304-7C), 2024 Spring A18
Jaynelle Nixon
January 28, 2024
2
Notetaking
Chapman, B., Erdozaim, M. S., & Powell, D. (2017). Going public: early disclosure of food risks
for the benefit of public health. Journal of Environmental Health, 79(7), 8+. Retrieved
from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?
p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA483929867&asid=b1e06b2cd03c7e93decba66ed572ea3f
II. Summary
Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell explore the importance of early food risk disclosure for
public health in this thorough article. With more food safety issues making news, this study is
current and important. Rapid and honest disclosure of food-related dangers is a regulatory and
public health obligation, according to the authors.
The article opens by emphasizing the delicate balance between investigating a food
concern and notifying the public. The authors note that communication delays pose serious
public health hazards. In the age of social media and immediate communication, regulatory
authorities and public health professionals must communicate danger quickly and accurately.
Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell demonstrate using case studies. Listeriosis was linked to
US commercial ice cream in 2015. The public was alerted after numerous persons had become ill
and died in this case. The authors believe early public notice might have reduced this outbreak's
impact.
Another important topic in the paper is stakeholders' roles in communication. Regulatory
organizations, food corporations, the media, and public health professionals all contribute to
3
knowledge distribution. They emphasize that these agencies must collaborate to provide accurate
and timely food risk information to the public.
The paper also investigates how media affects food safety public opinion. Media sources
promote dramatic tales, which might cause public fear or skepticism regarding risk severity,
according to the authors. They recommend the media work with health professionals to give fair,
truthful information to help the public make health and safety decisions.
Risk communication should be proactive, according to the article. Chapman, Erdozaim,
and Powell recommend unambiguous early risk disclosure rules. They recommend that these
guidelines contain criteria for when and how to alert the public based on risk severity,
probability, and public concern.
In conclusion, Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell's article is a strong plea to increase food
risk disclosure. The authors clearly argue that public health requires timely and open
communication. They stress stakeholder collaboration and risk communication speed and
accuracy. This page helps public health authorities, regulators, and food safety and
communication professionals.
III. Abstract
In the informative and important paper "Going Public: Early Disclosure of Food Risks for
the Benefit of Public Health," Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell discuss the necessity and
technique of exposing food-related dangers to the public. This 2017 Journal of Environmental
Health study emphasizes the need of combining thorough inquiry with rapid public disclosure of
possible food dangers.
4
The writers begin by emphasizing the necessity of fast, open communication in food
safety issues. They show how information distribution is changing, especially in the age of social
media and instant messaging. This development has forced regulatory agencies and public health
professionals to communicate quickly and accurately.
The essay shows how delayed risk communication affects real-world situations through
case studies. One example is the 2015 US Listeriosis epidemic related to commercial ice cream.
Delays in public notice led to an unwarranted increase in affected people and fatalities, as seen in
this occurrence. An early public notice might have reduced the outbreak's impact, according to
Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell.
The paper also discusses risk communication stakeholders' complex roles. It examines
how regulatory authorities, food industry, media, and health officials impact distribution. These
agencies should work together to provide accurate and timely information to the public,
according to the authors.
A careful review of the media shows how sensationalism may distort public perception
and response to food safety hazards. The authors recommend a media-health authority
relationship to provide fair and reliable information to help the public make health decisions.
Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell advise proactive risk communication. They suggest
complete early risk disclosure rules and methods based on risk severity, probability, and public
concern. These rules should balance urgency with accuracy in public notification time and
approach.
In conclusion, "Going Public: Early Disclosure of Food Risks for the Benefit of Public
Health" is a landmark book on food safety public health management. The authors' strong
5
arguments for timely and open risk communication, stakeholder collaboration, and balanced
media reporting provide a roadmap for effective public health risk management. Public health
experts, regulatory agencies, and food safety and public health communication policymakers use
this article as a guide.
IV. Thesis Claim Statement
Effective management of public health risks, particularly in the context of food safety, requires
an immediate and transparent disclosure process, underpinned by a collaborative effort between
regulatory bodies, the media, and public health officials.
Etchegary, H., Bishop, L., Street, C., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Humphries, D., Vat, L. E., & Barrett, B.
(2017). Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through
community town halls. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1). Retrieved from
http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?
p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA485047658&asid=8e2af3a345db1d309573ca163cfc87ad
Summary
I can briefly connect "Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities
through community town halls" by Etchegary et al. (2017) to "Going Public: Early Disclosure of
Food Risks for the Benefit of Public Health" by Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell.
Both publications stress health-related public involvement and openness. Etchegary et al.
emphasize town hall meetings to involve patients in research goals, while Chapman, Erdozaim,
and Powell emphasize early food risk disclosure for public health. These methods recognize the
6
importance of direct public engagement in health communication and policy-making and
encourage more inclusion and transparency.
"Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community
town halls" by Etchegary et al. (2017) certainly emphasizes the importance of patient and
community involvement in health research decision-making. The study possibly held
neighborhood town halls to get varied opinions on health science research priorities. This
technique democratizes research priorities and assures community-beneficial studies. Patients in
research planning might improve health interventions and targeting.
Abstract
The journal abstract should cover the use of community town halls for patient
involvement in health research, the outcomes of these talks, and the influence on research
priorities. It would likely stress community engagement in health research and how it may lead
to more relevant and focused studies that improve public health.
Staniforth, J. (n.d.). Transparency: The Must-Have Ingredient for Food Companies. Food Quality
& Safety. Retrieved from https://www.foodqualityandsafety.com/article/transparency-the-
must-have-ingredient-for-food-companies/
Summary
Staniforth's paper stresses that customers want food business openness. It tackles food
firms' transparency concerns, notably in conveying food safety, quality, provenance, and
7
sustainability. This subject of openness supports Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell's thesis of
early and transparent food risk notification for public health. Both authors agree that timely,
clear, and honest food safety communication is desirable and necessary for public confidence and
health. Staniforth's insights on practical obstacles and consumer expectations complement
Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell's emphasis on food risk disclosure urgency and technique.
Abstract
In "Transparency: The Must-Have Ingredient for Food Companies," Jesse Staniforth
addresses the food industry's growing need for openness. Consumers want food safety, quality,
provenance, and sustainability information, according to the report. It tackles the difficulties food
firms encounter in harmonizing internal procedures and engaging with suppliers for
transparency. According to Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell, proactive and honest food safety
communication is essential for consumer trust and public health. Staniforth's investigation
illuminates’ food industry transparency's practicalities and effects on public image and safety.
Public health management and openness in food safety and health research are
highlighted in Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell, Etchegary et al., and Staniforth. They emphasize
the need of timely information, public involvement, and openness to protect public health.
Extract the main points from each article.
The article by Chapman, Erdozaim, and Powell strongly supports early food risk
disclosure. Their public health-regulatory claim resonates. They demonstrate the dangers of
delayed disclosure with case studies like the 2015 Listeriosis epidemic. This essay stresses that
risk communication must balance speed and accuracy, and clear criteria for early risk disclosure
are essential.
8
Etchegary et al. advances public participation in health research. They promote more
inclusive and relevant health research by including patients and the community in town hall
meetings to define research priorities. The decision-making process is democratized, ensuring
that research activities meet public demands. It gives a new viewpoint on honest, helpful health
research.
Although focused on the food business, Staniforth's piece highlights openness and
customer expectations. Transparency about food safety, quality, provenance, and sustainability is
crucial for food firms. It shows that people demand openness, not luxuries. This fits Chapman,
Erdozaim, and Powell's concept of early dietary risk disclosure.
These papers suggest a paradigm change in public health and food safety. They stress
openness, early risk disclosure, and public participation as essential to individual and community
well-being. The articles emphasize the necessity of clear and timely communication in health
domains, notwithstanding their specialized topics. The complicated world of health research and
food safety requires us to heed these ideas and work toward a future were openness and public
engagement guide decision-making. This develops confidence and ensures our approaches are
effective and helpful to public health.
9
References
Chapman, B., Erdozaim, M. S., & Powell, D. (2017). Going public: early disclosure of food risks
for the benefit of public health. Journal of Environmental Health, 79(7), 8+. Retrieved
from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?
p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA483929867&asid=b1e06b2cd03c7e93decba66ed572ea3f
Etchegary, H., Bishop, L., Street, C., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Humphries, D., Vat, L. E., & Barrett, B.
(2017). Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through
community town halls. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1). Retrieved from
http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?
p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA485047658&asid=8e2af3a345db1d309573ca163cfc87ad
Staniforth, J. (Year). Transparency: The Must-Have Ingredient for Food Companies. Food
Quality & Safety. Retrieved from
https://www.foodqualityandsafety.com/article/transparency-the-must-have-ingredient-for-
food-companies/
