Frères Mentouri University – Constantine 1
Discourse Analysis /First Year Master (Applied Linguistics)
Amel SOUCHA 2024- 2025
Objective of the Module:
This module is an introduction to discourse analysis and it aims at making students familiar
with the basic notions, concepts and approaches in this interdisciplinary area of study.
Contents:
Lecture One: The Scope of Discourse Analysis
Lecture Two: Spoken Discourse versus Written Discourse
Lecture Three: Conversation Analysis
Lecture Four: Discourse Grammar and the Notion of Texture
Lecture Five: Discourse and Pragmatics
Lecture Six: Discourse and Genre
Lecture Seven: Critical Discourse Analysis
Discourse Eight: Doing Discourse Analysis
References Used in the Lectures:
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Celce- Murcia, M. and Olshtain, E. (2000) Discourse and Context in Language Teaching.
Cambridge University Press
Crystal, D.(1987) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press
McCarthy, M.(1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Paltridge, B. (2012) Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. BLOOMSBURY
Rossi, G. (2021) “Conversation Analysis”-The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic
Anthropology- Edited by James Stanlaw
Thornbury, S. and Slade,D. (2006) Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy. Cambridge
University Press
1
Frères Mentouri University – Constantine 1
Discourse Analysis /First Year Master (Applied Linguistics)
Amel SOUCHA 2024- 2025
Lecture One: The Scope of Discourse Analysis
Discourse analysis can be simply defined as the study of language in use. Discourse analysis
deals with how real people use real language as opposed to studying artificially created
sentences. In other words, discourse analysis refers to the study of naturally occurring spoken
and written data.
Discourse analysis is an interdisciplinary field of study; discourse analysis is used to describe
activities at the intersection of different disciplines such as sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics,
linguistics and philosophical linguistics (Brown and Yule, 1983). Scholars working centrally
in these different disciplines tend to concentrate on different aspects of discourse.
Sociolinguists are particularly interested in the nature and structure of social interactions such
as those occurring in conversations, interviews and other forms of talk in interaction.
Psycholinguists are concerned mainly with issues related to language comprehension; they
typically employ methods derived from experimental psychology in order to examine
comprehension problems in spoken or written texts. Linguists and the philosophers of
language maintain that discourse analysis is basically grounded on the notion that discourse is
only significant and meaningful in context. Linguistic features, whether phonological,
grammatical or semantic cannot be interpreted out of their context of their context of
occurrence.
Discourse analysis is often defined as the study of language use above and beyond the
sentence. For a long time, linguistics perceived the sentence as the upper unit of linguistic
description. Linguists focused mainly on the forms of language (phonemes, morphemes,
words and sentences); how language was used in context was not explored. That is to say,
speakers, hearers and situations were outside the realm of analysis. It is by examining units
larger than sentences that discourse analysts go above the sentence, and it is by examining
2
Frères Mentouri University – Constantine 1
Discourse Analysis /First Year Master (Applied Linguistics)
Amel SOUCHA 2024- 2025
aspects of the world or setting in which language is used that discourse analysts go beyond
the sentence. Discourse analysis is not only concerned with the description and analysis of
spoken language; discourse analysts are interested in all human interaction whether spoken
or written. In addition to all our verbal encounters, we are daily exposed to hundreds of
written and printed words (written data): newspaper articles, emails, messages, notices,
billboards, leaflets, and so on. The terms discourse and text can be used in a much broader
sense to include all language units with a specific communicative function, whether spoken
or written. The discourse analyst is committed to an investigation of what language is used
for. The term discourse analysis is usually to cover the study of spoken and written
interaction. Some scholars talk about ‘spoken and written discourse’; others about ‘spoken
and written text’. Discourse analysts regard language as a dynamic interactive phenomenon.
The overall aim of discourse analysis is to come to a much better understanding of how
natural spoken and written discourse looks and sounds. Roughly speaking, it can be said
that discourse analysis attempts to analyze language above and beyond the sentence level
and it is, therefore, concerned with the study of larger linguistic units such as conversational
exchanges or written texts.
Language cannot be interpreted outside the communicative contexts in which it occurs.
Discourse analysts are interested in REAL instances of language in use. Here are the basic
differences between sentence linguistics data and discourse analysis data (Cook, 1989: 12)
3
Frères Mentouri University – Constantine 1
Discourse Analysis /First Year Master (Applied Linguistics)
Amel SOUCHA 2024- 2025
Sentence linguistics’ Data Discourse analysis’ Data
Isolated sentences Any stretch of lg felt to be unified
Grammatically well –formed Achieving meaning
Without context In context
Invented or idealized Observed
All in all, it can be said that discourse analysis is concerned with language use above and
beyond the boundaries of the sentence level. Discourse analysts are concerned with the
interrelationships between language and situational context in which it occurs as well as the
interactive or dialogic properties of everyday communication.