Topic I: Prevention of Inhumane Treatment or
Mistreatment of Prisoners
Introduction
Almost 11.5 million people around the globe are currently incarcerated, almost a third of
whom are still awaiting trial.2 Despite this climbing number of incarcerated, prisoner
circumstances and treatment have remained relatively stagnant, without any significant
improvements. A finite amount of resources for prison systems coupled with increasing
incarcerations has led to poorer quality of living for prisoners. Moreover, this lack of resources
allows for mistreatment of prisoners through both inadvertent and advertent actions. Both a lack
of ability to provide the materials needed for a proper standard of living and lack of standardized
oversight of such circumstances lead to mistreatment of prisoners.
Additionally, such high incarceration rates permit for inhumane treatment of prisoners
depending on the circumstances of incarceration. Detention of excessive prisoners, many of
whom have not yet been convicted for any crime, often leads to overcrowding, degrading
treatment, and broken infrastructure of the prison system. There is an immense lack of
standardization across prison systems both domestically and internationally. Such lack of
standardization even allows for individual prison systems to potentially strip the incarcerated of
their basic human rights. According to the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners which
was passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1990, prisoners are to retain all of their
basic human rights apart from those inherently impossible due to incarceration; however, the
reality of many prison systems make such a basic principle impossible
https://www.prisonstudies.org/#:~:text=See%20the%20International%20Prison%20Publications,of%2011.
5%20million%20prisoners%20worldwide.
Chronology
The concept of treatment of prisoners was explored early on in the first meetings of the
United Nations. Founded in 1945, the United Nations was a response to the horrifying aftermath
of World War II and the need for global stability. In specific, these meetings discussed the
treatment of the millions of incarcerated throughout the Holoucaust. This was one of the first
significant discussions about the treatment of prisoners. This focus on humane treatment of all
individuals led to the publishing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.3 Stating
the inherent rights of all humans, this document set the standards of humane treatment of
individuals which include “the prohibition of torture, the right to a fair trial and the presumption
of innocence.” 4
The consequences for many of the actions perpetrated throughout World War II,
including inhumane imprisonment, were detailed in the Nuremberg trials, in which Nazi leaders
were prosecuted and sentenced for their crimes against humanity “on political, racial, or religious
grounds.” 5
In the 1950s, the first resolution to address the treatment of prisoners was officially
passed, entitled the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.6 Passed by the First
United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, this
document details a global consensus on the components necessary to maintain a penal system
that protects the rights of its prisoners while providing fair and just convictions.
3
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
4
https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/nelson-mandela-rules-protecting-rights-persons-deprived-liberty
5
https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/topics/nuremberg-trials
6
https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/UN_Standard_Minimum_Rules_for_the_Treatment_of_Prisone
rs.pdf
Beyond this initial move to protect human rights, international prison reform was widely
undiscussed until the late 1960s. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
published in 1966, detailed political rights, a major cause of incarceration and mistreatment of
prisoners. 7This charter essentially states political and social freedoms as components of
maintaining a life of freedom and human rights.
Explicit mentions of prison conditions and inmate treatment came forth in the 1990
General Assembly resolution, Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners. 8 This charter
emphasizes the specific rights that prisoners should retain despite their incarceration. This
includes the right to religious practices, lack of discrimination, and the opportunity to maintain
social and cultural practices.
The Nelson Mandela Rules are one of the most recent additions to the United Nations’
guidelines on treatment of prisoners. 9An expansion on the Standard Minimum Rules for the
Treatment of Prisoners, this 2005 addition is inspired by the decades long civil and political
prisoner, Nelson Mandela. These revisions updated the expectations for prisoner treatment to
match the human rights that have been defined since the 1950s.
Actors & Interests
● Office of the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights
○ The OHCHR was founded in 1993, in order to address and oversee human rights.
The HRC is a council under the OHCHR, designated to carry out a specific
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-ri
ghts
8
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-treatment-prisoners
9
https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/nelson-mandela-rules-protecting-rights-persons-deprived-liberty
sub-branch of the OHCHR’s mission. The treatment of prisoners greatly depends
on human rights and thus, OHCHR has a vested interest in improving prison
conditions.
● United States
○ As the nation with the highest incarceration rate, the United States has a vested
interest in improving its prison system.10 With more than 2 million incarcerated
and an overcrowded prison system, the United States needs improved prison
infrastructure to improve quality of life inside prisons.
● Norway
○ Norway is noted as the nation with the most efficient prison system.11 In an
attempt to balance the economic benefits of a reformed prison system with the
actual need for incarceration, Norway’s prison system has low numbers of
prisoners and high reform rates internally. Strong infrastructure and training
promote fair treatment of prisoners.
● Russian Federation
○ The Russian Federation has long been the subject of concerns over unfair legal
proceedings and inhumane imprisonment. This system especially has had issues
regarding social and political imprisonments and inhumane treatment of these
prisoners through labor camp style prison systems. This issue has come to the
forefront of global news in the past few years due to the sentencing of political
opposition leader Navalny and athlete Brittney Griner.
10
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/incarceration-rates-by-country#:~:text=The%20United
%20States%20leads%20the,2021%20by%20World%20Prison%20Brief).
11
https://borgenproject.org/norways-prison-system/
● Iran
○ Iran has come to the forefront of global news through the recent imprisonment
and abuse of protestors. Thousands of prisoners have entered the system and have
exited with signs of torture and abuse. Both the reasons for imprisonment and the
conditions of imprisonment are at the forefront of global human rights concerns.
● Myanmar
○ Years of religious, social, and political unrest in Myanmar have been marked by
the imprisonment of political and social prisoners in a brutal prison system. Run
and used by the military government, Insein prison is known for its harsh
treatment of prisoners, involving torture. 12
Possible Causes
A primary cause of inhumane treatment of the incarcerated stems from a lack of
resources to maintain facility and standard of living. Many of the violated human rights for
prisoners directly pertain to basic living conditions. Maintaining decent living conditions in
penal institutions is often impossible due to low amounts of funding and the increasing rate of
incarceration worldwide. Additional prisoners without additional resources leads to
overcrowding and crumbling prison infrastructure.13
Moreover, a majority of these prisoners do not have a fair right to legal proceedings and
representation. Almost 30% of all detainees are pre-trial, meaning they have yet to receive a
conviction and instead are awaiting legal proceedings.14 This high amount of detainees pre-trial
12
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/29/world/asia/myanmar-prison-coup.html
13
https://www.unodc.org/res/justice-and-prison-reform/nelsonmandelarules-GoF/UN_System_Common_Po
sition_on_Incarceration.pdf
14
https://www.penalreform.org/issues/pre-trial-justice/issue/
as well as the lack of a standardized procedure worldwide for due process results in unfair
incarceration. These detainees often wait long periods of time in jails despite a lack of
wrongdoing on their parts. Moreover, many of these detainees are unable to receive the
representation and due process they need in order to be freed from their conviction; thus, they
end up unfairly incarcerated.
One of the most common causes of mistreatment and inhumane treatment in jails stems
from various biases. Racially motivated mistreatment is a common theme across jails and penal
institutions worldwide. The Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners states that there
“shall be no discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or
other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.” 15However, a 2018 report
to the UN on the United States’ prison system, the largest in the world, the racial composition of
the incarcerated is greatly asymmetrical. 16 Additionally, sexual orientation, religion, and
ethnicity are further causes of mistreatment within prison systems. Religion, ethnicity, sexual
orientation, and political/social opinions are some of the highest causes of inhumane treatment of
prisoners. Ranging from political prisoners to domestic prisoners, inhumane prison treatment
generally affects prisoners of any of these specific categories.
Projections and Implications
The role of the Human Rights Council in the issue of prison reform and treatment of
inmates focuses on the maintenance of human rights and the prevention of mistreatment. Thus,
further progress in standardizing the prison system to preserve such rights allows for the
15
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-treatment-prisoners
16
https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/report-to-the-united-nations-on-racial-disparities-in-the-u-s-crimi
nal-justice-system/
elimination of inhumane treatment in specific prison systems. Worldwide, inhumane prison
treatment is kept silent and continued behind closed doors. The prevention of inhumane
treatment in prisons also has potential to reduce or eliminate wrongful incarceration and protect
the rights of individuals whether they are incarcerated or not.
The guarantee of fundamental human rights even in a prison setting is key to the
protection of human rights in regular society, as prison cannot be used as an excuse to strip
individuals of rights such as self-expression and autonomy. 17
The continuation of mistreatment of prisoners also condones human rights violations
across the world, particularly in countries with social and political unrest. In a vicious cycle,
situations of social and political unrest are handled through systematic stripping of human rights
within prison systems. Thus, prison systems become institutions of human rights violations and
wrongful imprisonment rather than systems of punishment for crimes committed and locations
for behavioral correction. 18
Discussion Questions
1. What are some of the challenges in standardizing worldwide prison systems?
2. How can resource allocation for prison systems be prioritized?
3. How can we combat the worldwide trend of increased incarceration?
4. How do religious, sexual, ethnic, racial, political, and social discrimination play a role
mistreatment of prisoners and how can such biases be eliminated from the prison system?
5. What are some worldwide situations related to or leading to mistreatment and inhumane
treatment of inmates?
17
https://www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k/Issues-12.htm
18
https://www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k/Issues-12.htm