[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
25 views1 page

Adjudicating Form

The Debating Adjudicating Sheet outlines the criteria for evaluating speakers in a debate, focusing on three main areas: Matter, Manner, and Method. Each area has specific considerations, such as the quality of arguments, persuasiveness, and the structure of presentations. The total score for each speaker is out of 100 points, with Matter and Manner each contributing 40 points and Method contributing 20 points.

Uploaded by

English Hub
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views1 page

Adjudicating Form

The Debating Adjudicating Sheet outlines the criteria for evaluating speakers in a debate, focusing on three main areas: Matter, Manner, and Method. Each area has specific considerations, such as the quality of arguments, persuasiveness, and the structure of presentations. The total score for each speaker is out of 100 points, with Matter and Manner each contributing 40 points and Method contributing 20 points.

Uploaded by

English Hub
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Debating Adjudicating Sheet

Motion: Prime Deputy Governme Leader of Deputy Oppositio


Minister Prime nt Whip the Leader of n Whip
Minister Oppositio the
n Oppositio
n
Name of Speakers
Matter (40 points)
Logic, relevance, and proof are the cornerstones of matter.
Consider:
o Impact of opening
o Purpose
o Relevance
o Quality argument
o Examples/evidence
o Quality rebuttal (not first speaker)
o Effective closure

Manner (40 points)


The test of effective manner is persuasiveness.
Consider:
o Gesture o Vocal dynamics
o Persuasiveness o Grammar and
o Fluency elocution
o Correct use of o Body language
notes o Empathy-
o Emotional appeal Audience
Method (20 points)
The structure and organization of Vocabulary
o each individual speech and
of the team case and the ability of the team to react to the
dynamics of the debate.
Consider:
o Reasserting of case
o Structure of
o Time allocation
presentation
o Team - easy to o Summary
follow o Speaking time
o Individual - easy o Failure to rebut is a
to follow fault
o Adherence to plan
o Team consistency
TOTAL 100 points

You might also like