AMBITION LAW INSTITUTE

ID No. : ____________________ Date : _____________________

Name : _____________________

BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM

CLASS TEST- 4 [Sections 6 to 7]
1. Which of the following is incorrect with respect to of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam:
conduct under section 6 of Bharatiya Sakshya (a) Section 4 (b) Section 5
Adhiniyam of Indian Evidence Act? (c) Section 6 (d) Section 7
(a) The conduct must be in reference to the facts 6. Test identification parade is primarily meant for the
in issue or the facts relevant to them (a) Trial court (b) Investigating agency
(b) It need to be contemporaneous (c) Accused (d) None of the above

ON
(c) A conduct is relevant if it influences or is 7. Which of the following assures the investigating
influenced by a fact agency that they are proceeding in the right direction?
(d) Only those statements which accompany and (a) First Information Report
explain acts other than statements can be
(b) Inquest
regarded as conduct.
(c) Test identification
2. A is running out besmeared with blood and crying
(d) None of the above
helplessly to the people of vicinity to save his life
from B who had wounded him and is about to beat 8. No test identification parade is called for
more. The cries of A is – (a) If the accused is well known to the witnesses
(a) a statement under section 6 of BSA (b) If the accused is not known to the witnesses
(b) a complaint under section 6 of BSA (c) If there is only one accused in the case

3.
(c) Either (a) or (b)
(d) Neither (a) nor (b)
‘A’ leisurely walks down from a place with injuries
on his person and when intervened and asked by a
bystander he says that ‘B’ has assaulted him. This
TI 9.

10.
(d) None of the above
Identification parades are held during the course of
(a) Investigation
(c) Trial
(b) Enquiry
(d) None of the above
Failure to hold the test identification parade
would amount to– (a) Makes the evidence of identification inadmissible
(a) Relevant under section 6 of BSA in court
BI
(b) A statement under section 7 of BSA which is (b) Does not make the evidence of identification
inadmissible inadmissible in court
(c) Oral statement only (c) Is of no consequence
(d) None of the above (d) None of the above
4. The Supreme Court held in Kartar Singh vs. State of 11. Identification of the accused before the police is
Punjab 1994(3) SCC 569 that ‘If the evidence (a) Admissible
regarding the identification on the basis of a (b) Not admissible
AM

photograph is to be held to have the same value as (c) Relevant and admissible
the evidence of a test identification parade, we feel (d) None of the above
that gross injustice to the detriment of the persons 12. Evidence of identification, produced for the first time
suspected may result. Therefore, we are inclined to in court is
strike down this provision and accordingly we strike
(a) Not admissible
down S.22 of the Act’. Here the ‘Act’ refers to:
(b) Corroborative only
(a) The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
(c) A weak piece of evidence
Substances Act
(d) None of the above
(b) Prevention of Terrorism Act
13. ‘The accused has no right to claim a test identification
(c) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)
parade’. The statement is
Act
(a) True (b) False
(d) None of the above
(c) Partly Correct (d) None of the above
5. A superimposed photograph of the deceased over
the skeleton of a human body to prove that the 14. In which of the following cases did the Supreme
skeleton was of the deceased is relevant under section Court hold, that showing parts of the body by way
of identification are not included in the expression

Since 2001
OUR WEBSITE BUY BEST BARE ACTs. WE ARE
ambitionlawinstitute.com Ambitionpublications.com ALSO ON
1
 to be a witness, and hence not violative of Article suggesting an alternative possibility is not
20(3) of the Constitution of India? conclusive
(a) State of Bombay vs. Kathikalu (b) In case of conflict between ocular evidence and
(b) Yousufali vs. State of Maharashtra the medical evidence, ocular evidence shall be
(c) State of U.P vs. Ram Sewak preferred to the medical evidence in case ocular
(d) None of the above evidence is acceptable, trustworthy and reliable.
15. Which of the following is true and correct regarding (c) Both (a) & (b)
the evidence of sniffer dogs, as laid down by the (d) None of the above
Supreme Court in Mangaraju vs. State of A.P. AIR 20. Which of the following cases held that Court
2001 SC 2677? identification is a good identification in the eyes of
(a) Criminal courts need not bother much about the law and no straight jacket formula can be adopted?
evidence based on sniffer dogs due to the (a) Ravi Kapur vs. State of Rajasthan (2012) 9 SCC
inherent frailties 284.
(b) The Supreme Court disapproved the investigating (b) R. Shaji vs. State of Kerala AIR 2013 SC 651
agency employing such sniffer dogs for helping (c) Daya Singh vs. State of Haryana, AIR 2001 SC

N
the investigation to track down criminals 1188
(c) Both (a) and (b) (d) None of the above
(d) None of the above 21. Test identification parade is relevant under section
16. In which of the following cases did the Supreme of the BSA:
Court hold that ‘ a criminal trial is not an enquiry (a) Section 4 (b) Section 5

IO
into the conduct of an accused for any purpose other (c) Section 6 (d) Section 7
than to determine whether he is guilty of the offence 22. Which of the following is a substantive piece of
charged’? evidence?
(a) Palwinder Kaur vs. State of Punjab (a) Test identification parade
(b) Anantha Chintaman Lagu vs. State of Bombay (b) Identification before the police
(c) Guddu vs. State of M.P (c) Identification before a court
(d) None of the above (d) All of the above
17. What is the evidentiary value of the identification of 23. Illustration (f) of section 9 of the Indian Evidence
T
the accused by witness for the first time in Court Act [Section 7 of BSA] is incorporated on the basis
without being tested by a prior identification parade? of the celebrated decision in
(a) Identification of accused in Court for the first (a) Pakala Narayana Swamy’s case
time is reliable (b) Lord Gorden’s case
(b) Identification is a substantive piece of evidence
BI
(c) Baskerville case
(c) Without prior test identification parade, (d) None of the above
Identification of accused for the first time in
24. Identification of which of the following is allowed
Court is valueless
under Section 7?
(d) None of the above
(a) Identification of accused
18. In which of the following cases, the Court held that
(b) Identification by photo
failure to hold Test Identification Parade was not
(c) Identification of arms and bullets
fatal to the prosecution case?
AM

(d) All of the above

(a) Pammi vs. State of M.P.
25. Identification of a suspect by photo is:
(b) Lakshmi Raj Shetty vs. State of Tamil Nadu
(a) Not admissible in evidence
(c) Dana Yadav vs. State of Bihar
(b) Section 7 of BSA excludes identification by
(d) None of the above
photo
19. Which of the following is true?
(c) Section 6 of BSA excludes identification by photo
(a) In case the eye witness account if found to be
(d) Admissible in evidence
credible and trustworthy, the medical opinion

1. a b d 6. a b d 11. a b d 16. a b d 21. a b d

2. a b d 7. a b d 12. a b d 17. a b d 22. a b d
3. a b d 8. a b d 13. a b d 18. a b d 23. a b d
4. a b d 9. a b d 14. a b d 19. a b d 24. a b d
5. a b d 10. a b d 15. a b d 20. a b d 25. a b d

Since 2001
OUR WEBSITE BUY BEST BARE ACTs. WE ARE
ambitionlawinstitute.com Ambitionpublications.com ALSO ON
2