Metal Roofing Design Guide
Metal Roofing Design Guide
Metal Roofing Design Guide
6
CI/SfB (23) JUNE 2004 Nh2
Contents
1.0 Typical construction and assemblies 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Single skin system 1.3 Double skin system 1.4 Secret fix 1.5 Site-assembled composite 1.6 Factory made composite panels 1.7 Under-purlin lining 2.0 Components 2.1 Profiled sheets 2.2 Coatings 2.3 Spacer systems 2.4 Fasteners 2.5 Insulation 3.0 Weathertightness 3.1 Performance requirements 3.2 Roof pitch 3.3 End laps 3.4 Side laps 4.0 Thermal Performance 4.1 Regulations 4.2 U-values 4.3 Thermal bridging 4.4 Air leakage 5.0 Interstitial condensation 5.1 Risks of interstitial condensation 5.2 Design to avoid interstitial condensation 5.3 Breather membranes 5.4 Rooflights 6.0 Acoustics 6.1 Sound reduction 6.2 Sound absorption 7.0 Performance in fire 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Reaction to fire 7.3 External surface 7.4 Cavity barriers 7.5 Building insurance 8.0 Structural performance 8.1 Design loading 8.2 Load span tables 8.3 Spacer systems 8.4 Lateral restraint
Page 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 9 11 13 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18
9.0 Durability 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Materials 9.3 Design details 9.4 Maintenance 10.0 Sustainability 10.1 Sustainable construction 10.2 Life Cycle Assessment 10.3 ISO 14001 11.0 Construction details and accessories 11.1 Junction details 11.2 Rooflights 11.3 Roof drainage 11.4 Small penetrations 11.5 Large penetrations 11.6 Flashings 12.0 Site work 12.1 General 12.2 Transport, handling and storage 12.3 Site cutting 12.4 Health and safety 13.0 Inspection and maintenance 14.0 References
Page 19 19 19 20 20 21 21 21 22 23 23 24 24 24 24 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 28
For up to date information on metal roof and wall cladding, including downloadable construction details, visit www.mcrma.co.uk.
The Metal Cladding & Roofing Manufacturers Association Limited. June 2004
Components
NOTE: For detailed information see MCRMA technical paper No 9 Composite roof and wall cladding design guide
Steel and aluminium roofing sheets are produced by MCRMA members in a wide variety of profile shapes, coatings and colours. The details below are for general guidance and full details of products should be obtained from the individual manufacturers. Component and system durability is discussed in Section 9.0.
Thicknesses vary depending on product and application but the values in Fig 6 are generally regarded as minimum values in mm.
STEEL Weather sheet Liner sheet Walkable liner sheet 0.7 0.4 0.7
Fig 6: Minimum sheet thicknesses The depths of trapezoidal profiles are typically 32mm for the weather sheet and 20mm for the liner, but note that the weather sheet depth in particular might vary considerably. Cover widths vary similarly but are often about 1m.
2.2
Coatings
All steel faces are hot dip galvanised or aluzinc coated and painted to provide the required appearance and durability. Aluminium is supplied with a mill or painted finish. The coatings shown in Fig 7 are commonly available in a wide range of colours. Individual manufacturers may supply others.
Substrate steel steel and aluminium steel and aluminium aluminium steel and aluminium
Fig 7: Typical coatings NOTE: The standard liner specification is for normal internal environments. Higher specification coatings should be used where there are aggressive environments or where hygienic finishes are required. Full details of the range of available coatings can be obtained from the individual manufacturers.
2.3
Spacer systems
Traditional zed spacer and ferrule
The spacer system in a double skin metal roof is used to create a cavity between the liner and weather sheet for the layer of insulation. The spacers are structural items, which support the weather sheet and they are always positioned over purlins or other structural members and must be fixed securely to them. Zed spacers (or minizeds) made of galvanised steel approximately 1.5mm thick and supported on nylon ferrules were the standard solution for many years. They are generally suitable for layers of insulation up to 100mm thick but at greater depths the traditional zed/ferrule arrangement is not adequately stiff or stable. A new generation of spacers consisting of roll formed rails of structural grade steel with plastic blocks or bracket supports and thermal break/ vapour seal pads have been developed and are now commonly used. These are generically known as rail and bracket systems. The designs are engineered to be more stable at a range of depths to suit most insulation thicknesses likely in the future, and they also minimise thermal bridging. Typical spacer systems are shown in Fig 8. Fig 8: Typical spacer systems
2.4
Fasteners
There are many proprietary fasteners available and it is not possible to describe them all in this guide. The details below are for general guidance. For detailed information see MCRMA technical paper No 12 Fasteners for metal roof and wall cladding: design, detailing and installation guide. Further specific details can be obtained from the cladding and fastener manufacturers.
Fasteners can be divided into two distinct categories: a) Primary These fasteners are designed to transfer all loads on the cladding system back to the supporting structure so their strength is particularly important. If the fasteners are exposed they must also provide a weathertight seal. They are normally used in the valley of the profile. If crown fixing is recommended by the manufacturers, saddle washers are usually required.
Self tapping
Fig 9: Typical primary fastener positions The most common fasteners are self-drilling and self-tapping which can be installed in one simple operation into a variety of materials. Self-tapping screws (with no drill point) are also available and may be preferred in some applications. Most screws are now available in plated carbon steel or stainless steel, they come complete with a 16mm or 19mm diameter sealing washer and they can have integral colour matched plastic heads or separate push-on plastic caps. The strength of a fixing depends on the fastener design and the thickness and yield strength of the purlin. Fastener manufacturers and suppliers can supply strength data for their products installed in a range of materials and thicknesses. b) Secondary These fasteners are used to connect side laps, flashings etc. and they are not normally considered as structural. However, where the fasteners are providing lateral restraint or in a stressed skin design, their strength would have to be considered in the structural calculations.
Rivets
Weathertightness
In most cases these fasteners are exposed so they must provide a weathertight seal. The most common types are self-drilling and self-tapping stitcher screws with sealing washers and plastic heads/caps, or sealed rivets with or without plastic caps. When selecting the fasteners for a roof, the structural performance, environmental conditions, corrosion resistance (including bi-metallic corrosion), weathertightness and ease of application must all be considered.
2.5 Insulation
The majority of site-assembled double skin roof constructions use mineral fibre (glass or rock) quilt insulation supplied in rolls. When unrolled on site the material expands to at least its required thickness and normally fills the cavity created by the spacer system between the liner and weather sheet. The material is normally quite soft and deforms around the small profiled ribs on the liner, and under and around the spacer system. Rigid mineral fibre insulation slabs are also used in some circumstances but this is less deformable than the quilt and the roofing system has to be designed and installed with this in mind so that no gaps are left in the insulation layer. Site-assembled composite constructions do not use spacer systems and rely on the rigidity of the insulation and special fasteners to support the outer sheet. In this case rigid profiled polyurethane, polyisocyanurate, and mineral fibre insulation are used.
150mm mm 15
It is common to see specifications recommending that side laps should be arranged away from the prevailing wind. This is sensible in principle but is often not practical. The joint must be weathertight in all circumstances.
Two runs of sealant Alternative seal positions
Fig 12: End lap detail for roof pitches greater than 4 Aluminium weather sheets may require a slightly different end lap arrangement to allow for the coefficient of linear expansion, which is twice that of steel. The actual arrangement will depend on the length and colour of the sheets. The colour determines the maximum temperature that the sheets reach and therefore the maximum degree of expansion. Fig 13 shows a typical detail, which allows some movement at the end lap joint without affecting the fasteners. Special sealants need to be used to provide a suitable sliding joint, and the overlap may be increased to 200mm. When aluminium profiles are being considered the manufacturers recommendations should be followed.
200mm
Fig 14: Typical side lap detail Typically, a continuous run of 6 5 or 6mm diameter butyl sealant strip is used on the centre of the underlapping rib or on the weather side of the lap on all trapezoidal sheets. All trapezoidal roof sheets should be stitched through the centre of the top of the side lap at typically 450mm centres using sealed stitcher screws or rivets.
Fig 13: End lap detail to allow some movement in the joint For increased reliability the number of end laps should always be minimised as far as possible.
3.4
Side laps
A typical side lap between trapezoidal sheets is shown in Fig 14. This arrangement is ideal because the outer rib of the underlapping sheet is complete and provides the optimum support for the overlapping sheet so that the side lap can be sealed and stitched effectively.
Thermal Performance
4.1 Regulations
The thermal performance of the roof cladding is important because it affects the amount of energy required to heat the building and will influence the running costs and the comfort of the occupants. Approved Document L2 to the Building Regulations (2002 Edition) Conservation of Fuel and Power defines the required levels of performance in terms of U values, thermal bridging, and air tightness, and explains how the requirements can be achieved. Site testing of the completed building is required in many cases, to ensure the design performance has been achieved. It means that the building designer and cladding contractor need to pay more attention to the thermal performance of individual details of the construction, which were not previously defined. The Approved Document refers to MCRMA technical paper No 14 Guidance for the design of metal roofing and cladding to comply with Approved Document L2:2001, for further more detailed information.
by specialist consultants. A number of system manufacturers provide U-values of their systems for different insulation thicknesses, fixing spacings, etc that have been calculated by independent bodies. A range of simplified methods has been developed for use in specific cases; these can be obtained from the following sources: Twin-skin systems with zed spacers are covered in BRE Information Paper IP 10/024. Twin skin systems with rail and bracket spacers are covered in SCI Technical Information Sheet P3125. A software package KOBRA, which allows the calculation of the thermal properties of a range of wall and roof systems is used by members of the MCRMA. A U-value calculator, which covers all types of walls, roofs and floors, is available and can be downloaded from http://projects.bre.co.uk/ uvalues/.
4.2 U-values
4.2.1 Methods of determining U-values The elemental U-value or thermal transmittance specified in Approved Document L2 for industrial and commercial roofs is 0.25 W/m2K. Approved Document L2 requires that profile shapes, and repeating thermal bridges, such as metal spacers and other fixings, are taken into account when a U-value is calculated using the combined method, which is specified in BS EN ISO 69461 and CIBSE Guide A32. However, this method is designed to deal with the type of thermal bridges such as timber studs, which distort the heat flow relatively little, and it specifically excludes elements in which the insulation layer is crossed by thin metal components. Ultimately, the U-value of this type of element has to be calculated by developing a full two- or three-dimensional thermal model of the structure to calculate the heat flows. This is a complex task requiring software, which complies with BS EN ISO 10211:19963, and is usually carried out only
The appropriate methods that should be used to calculate U-values in all instances are specified in BRE Report BR4436. Alternatively the thermal transmittance (U) of a roof cladding construction can be measured using a calibrated hot box, in accordance with EN ISO 8990. 4.2.2 Insulation thickness required The following table indicates the approximate insulation thicknesses required to achieve a Uvalue of 0.25 W/m2K using a typical type of rail and bracket, liner and outer sheet. The effect of different insulation materials and varying purlin and bracket centres is also indicated.
Purlin spacing : m Insulation conductivity : W/mK 0.035 Bracket spacing : m 0.5 1.0 0.9 175 160 1.4 160 150 1.8 155 150
0.04
0.5 1.0
210 190
195 180
185 175
0.045
0.5 1.0
220 205
210 200
200 195
Fig 15: Insulation thickness in mm necessary to achieve a U-value of 0.25 W/m2K (Assuming a liner sheet with 18mm profiles at 200mm centres and an outer sheet with 35mm profiles at 167mm centres)
These are the theoretical minimum insulation thicknesses required. In practice, the insulation quilt used is normally selected from a range of standard thicknesses such as 80mm, 100mm etc. and a building might contain a variety of purlin spacings so the construction and materials have to be specified with care. No matter which insulation is used it is vital that the material is installed carefully throughout, ensuring there are no gaps particularly at apertures, ridge, eaves, corners etc. The continuity of insulation is specified in the Regulations, and a thermographic survey might be used to check the consistency of the insulation in the completed building. Individual manufacturers literature provides details of their systems. In some cases it may only be necessary for the roofing supplier to demonstrate that the system U-values are less than or equal to the value of 0.25 W/m2K required in Approved Document L2. However a more detailed knowledge of the specific U-values of all the elements of the building will be necessary if it is proposed to trade off areas, assess the contribution of thermal
bridges or trade off heating system efficiency with improved fabric performance (see below). In these cases it will be necessary for some member of the design team, generally the architect, to take responsibility for collating the heat loss from all the plane areas (U-values), and thermal bridges at junctions between the plane areas (-values), and dimensions of the individual components, from a number of different suppliers. 4.2.3 Trading off U-values and areas Within certain constraints, Approved Document L2 allows trading between the elemental U-values and the areas of components specified in the Approved Document, provided that the overall heat loss from the building is less than that from a notional building of the same size and shape, with the elemental U-values and areas. The various constraints are: a. The U-value of any opaque part of a roof is no worse than 0.35 W/m2K. This constraint is designed to reduce the risk of surface condensation. It accommodates situations, such as the need to include more fixings, which raise the U-value, in areas of a
roof subject to greater wind uplift. The area weighted average U-value of the roof should meet the 0.25 W/m2K limit. b. If the area of openings in the proposed building is less than the values shown in the Approved Document, the area weighted average U-value of the opaque parts of the roof cannot exceed the appropriate value in Table 1 of Approved Document L2 by more than 0.02 W/m2K. c. No more than half the allowable rooflight area can be converted into an increased area of windows and doors. The possibilities for trading off and the constraints may be illustrated by some specific examples: A) Table 1 of Approved Document L2:2002 gives the elemental U-values for a roof with integral insulation as 0.25 W/m2K and for rooflights as 2.2 W/m2K. Table 2 gives the maximum allowable roof light area as 20%. This means that the average U-value for the roof will be 0.8 0.25 + 0.2 2.2 = 0.64 W/m2K. If the rooflight area was only 10%, the rooflight U-value could be increased to Url so long as the relationship: 0.9 0.25 + 0.1 Url 0.64 was satisfied. This means that Url can be as high as 4.1 W/m2K. It is not, however possible to carry out the similar calculation: 0.9 Urf + 0.1 2.2 0.64 to allow a U-value of the opaque parts of the roof up to 0.47 W/m2K; constraint b), above, limits this to 0.27 W/m2K. B) If, for structural reasons, more fixings are used near the eaves and ridge, raising the U-value of 25% of the opaque area of the roof to 0.35 W/m2K, the maximum allowed by constraint a), the U-value of the remaining 75% of the opaque part of the roof has to be reduced to satisfy: 0.75 Urf + 0.25 0.35 0.27, i.e. to 0.24 W/m2K. 4.2.4 Responsibility for calculation of U-values The U-values of the individual components of a building should be specified during the design stage. These will often follow the elemental values specified in Table 1 of Approved Document L2, however there may be circumstances in which
lower (better) values may be specified in certain areas to allow trading off with other areas. The responsibility for calculating the U-values of cladding systems usually lies with the supplier of the system, who should be in a position to justify the values quoted by reference to the documentation discussed above or by producing results from calculation carried out to BS EN ISO 6946 or BS EN ISO 10211-1 as appropriate. The values for other cladding elements such as smoke vents or rooflights should be provided by the appropriate manufacturer.
4.3.2 Design to avoid condensation and mould growth In buildings, especially housing, which have absorbent internal surfaces, the lowered surface temperatures at thermal bridges can cause mould growth, which is a major cause of respiratory allergies such as asthma. Mould growth, which occurs at a surface relative humidity of 80%, is, however, very rare on the impermeable internal surfaces of metal faced roofs. Condensation, depositing drops of water on the surface, which does not occur until the surface relative humidity has reached 100%, is much more likely in this case. Even when condensation occurs, often less than 10 grams per square metre accumulate, seen as a fine mist on the surface, which rapidly disperses as temperatures rise. At least 70 g/m2 must accumulate before it will run down a sloping surface and 150g/m2 before dripping will occur from a horizontal surface. The concept of surface temperature factor, or f-value, is used to separate the performance of the structure from the imposed environmental conditions; this is defined by: f where = Ts - Te Ti - Te
Humidity class 1 2 3 4
Building type Storage areas Offices, shops Dwellings with low occupancy Dwellings with high occupancy, sports halls, kitchens, canteens; buildings heated with un-flued gas heaters Special buildings, e.g. laundry, brewery, swimming pool
0.90
Fig 16: Internal humidity classes and the minimum temperature factor necessary to prevent condensation through the junction, over and above the heat loss through the adjoining plane elements. BRE IP 17/01 contains a table of -values for thermal bridges in typical domestic constructions; if the calculated -values in the building under design are less than or equal to these values, then no further action is necessary. If the thermal bridges under investigation do not appear in this table, which is most likely in the case of industrial buildings, the total heat loss for the building fabric must be calculated, and compared with the permitted maximum heat loss from a notional building with the same size and shape. The permitted heat loss through thermal bridges is 10% of the sum of the heat loss through the plane areas of the notional building. So to satisfy the Regulations: AacUac + L < 1.1 AelUel Where: Aac and Uac are the elemental areas and U-values of the real building. L is the sum of the heat loss through junctions. Ael and Uel are the elemental areas and Uvalues of a notional building with the same size and shape as the real building.
Ts is the local surface temperature Te is the external air temperature Ti is the internal air temperature.
Surface temperature criteria, which define fmin and which are more appropriate to industrial buildings have been established based on BS EN ISO 13788:20019. Different building types fall into the different classes shown in Fig 16, with the minimum f-values, which are required to avoid condensation in the different internal environments. The f-value for a particular construction can be established by computer modelling, as part of the heat loss calculation (see 4.3.4). 4.3.3 Design to reduce heat loss through thermal bridges Heat loss through linear thermal bridges (at junctions and openings) is expressed in terms of the linear thermal transmittance or -value (pronounced psi). This is the extra heat loss
10
The fact that the heat loss from the real building is compared with that from the notional building means that, provided that the surface temperature criteria in Fig 16 are met, it is possible to trade off areas and U-values against thermal bridges. So that if it was not possible to design out a severe thermal bridge, the criterion could, for example, be met by reducing the rooflight area from 20%, while retaining the rooflight U-value at 2.2 W/m2K. (See example in MCRMA technical bulletin No 11). The calculation of -values and f-values is not required by Scottish Technical Standard J. 4.3.4 Sources of -values and f-values Because thermal bridges occur at junctions, complex two dimensional calculations using software that complies with BS EN ISO 102111:1996 are needed to determine the -values and f-values. These can be carried out by specialist contractors, but are time consuming and expensive. A number of manufacturers have commissioned calculations of the necessary values and publish them in catalogues of standard details. These are generally accepted by building control authorities. There are however, no generally accepted conventions for carrying out these calculations, and it is possible that cases of dispute will arise. While cladding suppliers can generate the necessary thermal bridge parameters for their systems, there may be particular difficulties where different systems meet, for example where a twin skin roof from one manufacturer meets a composite panel wall from another. In these cases it will be necessary for the building designer/ architect to arrange for the -values and f-values to be calculated for the particular instance. Calculating the total heat loss for the building requires information on the areas and U-values, and details of junctions of all the various components of the building, which will have been provided by a number of suppliers and trades. This means that realistically it can only be done by the building designer/architect. Some typical junction details for twin skin metal roofing are shown in section 11. Many of these
have no additional metal crossing the layer of insulation and the insulation is effectively continuous, and as a result the values are very low. Any details which incorporate these design principles would be expected to have low values, and contribute very little to the total heat loss from the building.
11
a pressure difference across the building envelope see Fig 17 and Fig 18. The fan speed is varied to create a range of pressure differences up to about 50 Pa (1Pa = 1N/m2) and the flow rate recorded at each stage. The flow rate at 50 Pa, Q50, normally in m3/h, which is found from a plot of the flow rate against pressure difference, is reported as the parameter which defines the leakiness of the building.
high stack pressure differences that distort the test results, especially in very tall buildings, and high wind speeds cause random pressure differences, which make accurate readings difficult. During a test, all internal doors should be wedged open and, where appropriate, combustion appliances must be switched off and any open flues and air supply openings temporarily sealed (flues from room-sealed appliances, such as balanced flues in domestic appliances, do not need to be sealed). External doors and other purposemade openings in the building envelope should be closed and mechanical ventilation systems turned off, with the inlet and outlet grilles sealed. Fire dampers and ventilation louvres should be closed. Drainage traps should contain water. The cladding or roofing system is only one of the possible leakage routes from a building and a simple fan pressurisation test quantifies the total air leakage of a building, but does not directly identify the leakage paths. A number of methods can be used to provide more information, including releasing smoke from smoke pencils or puffers to visualise specific flow paths; an internal infra-red survey of a depressurised building in cold weather will rapidly reveal areas that are being chilled by incoming air; repeated testing of a building as successive specific components are sealed, and isolating and testing specific components. 4.4.2 Required air tightness The parameter that is specified in Approved Document L2 to quantify the air leakage rate through the building envelope is the air permeability. This is measured by the fan pressurisation technique and is expressed in terms of the volume flow of air per hour (m3/h) supplied to the space, per square metre (m2) of building envelope (including the ground floor area) for a specified inside to outside pressure difference of 50 Pa. Section 2.4 of Approved Document L2 requires that the air permeability should be less than 10 m3/h/m2 at 50 Pa.
Fig 18: Large fan for testing industrial buildings A pressure test relies on the assumption that the pressure difference is uniform over the entire building envelope. This imposes certain restrictions on the external climate parameters that prevail during the test. Ideally the internal to external temperature difference should be less than 10C and the wind speed should be less than 3 m/s. Higher temperature differences lead to
12
Interstitial condensation
4.4.3 Important leakage routes To minimise air leakage through twin skin metal roofing, the liner side of the construction must be sealed as effectively as possible. This involves sealing: - Liner end laps typically with butyl sealant strip and additional fasteners - Liner side laps and side joint at perimeter typically with a wide butyl faced tape - Fasteners with normal washers - Perimeter or ends of sheets with profiled liner fillers and additional fasteners - Any penetrations such as pipes With a good standard of construction and good attention to detail it is easy to achieve a twin skin metal roof structure that is tight enough to pass the Approved Document L2 criterion. However, as noted above, the cladding system is only one of the areas of the building envelope that contribute to air leakage. Junctions and openings such as doors, loading bays, windows, rooflights, smoke vents and service penetrations, may be more important. The typical junction details shown in section 11 indicate where air seals have to be fitted, but reference should be made to manufacturers information for details of their particular systems. In every case, satisfactory sealing will only be achieved by good workmanship on site.
Interstitial condensation means condensation that occurs inside a construction, usually hidden from view. In normal metal clad industrial building applications it is not an important issue, but in some more specialist applications it can be a critical issue.
13
General guidance for the design of structures to minimise the risks of interstitial condensation is given in BS5250:2002 and a procedure for calculating the accumulation of condensate in any climate is given in BS EN ISO 13788:2002.
5.2.2. Ventilation No matter how well the vapour control layer is constructed, some moisture vapour may get into the construction and there must be provision in the design to deal with it. The smaller the roof voids and the insulation cavity the less moisture there is likely to be present to condense. The roof voids should therefore be the minimum required and the weathersheet should be in contact with the insulation. In site-assembled double skin constructions with standard trapezoidal sheets ventilated fillers must be used at the ridge and eaves to allow some breathing through the ribs in the profiled weathersheet. This helps to disperse any moisture vapour which is in the construction. Other types of profiled sheets, such as secret fix, use different methods of ventilation. See individual manufacturers details.
5.2.1 Vapour control layer To minimise the potential for interstitial condensation in double metal skin construction the most critical part of the construction is the vapour control layer. This is used to minimise the amount of moisture vapour which can enter the construction by diffusion and air leakage. It must be positioned on the warm side of the insulation. The vapour control layer can be made by carefully sealing the profiled metal liner or by providing a separate polythene membrane on top of the liner. In either case it is essential that the vapour control layer is continuous throughout the roof and all laps are sealed, including at abutments, rooflights, penetrations, gutters, ridge etc. Note that constructing the liner to minimise air leakage (see section 4.4) will automatically provide the vapour control layer. The same principles apply to all the other types of metal roof construction shown in section 1. All systems require attention to detail in their design and construction on site.
14
Acoustics
5.4 Rooflights
Ensuring continuity of the vapour control layer and ventilation through profiled ribs normally means that site-assembled rooflights should be used with site-assembled double skin cladding systems. Factory-assembled rooflights are used with composite panels. Compared to the surrounding insulated cladding, rooflights have a significantly worse thermal performance, there is therefore an increased potential for condensation at rooflights. Misting of all factory or site-assembled rooflights can be anticipated from time to time, but it generally dissipates without harmful effects. However, if condensation is unacceptable rooflights should be avoided completely. NOTE: For detailed guidance refer to MCRMA technical paper No 1 Recommended good practice for daylighting in metal clad buildings.
The acoustic performance of a building can be an important aspect of the design and the roof construction can play a major role in the performance. For detailed guidance see MCRMA technical paper No 8 Acoustic design guide for metal roof and wall cladding. There are two potential acoustic requirements:
15
Performance in fire
insulation, followed by the main layer of thermal insulation. The acoustic insulation should be faced with a glass fibre tissue or similar, to reduce the risk of dust falling through the perforated liner. The exact acoustic performance of a roof cladding cannot be assumed from data for a similar construction and must be determined by test.
7.1 Introduction
The manner in which all elements of building construction perform in the event of a fire is of prime concern to the designer, the occupant, the building owner and the building insurance company. Profiled metal cladding constructions must therefore conform to specific requirements which are defined in the Building Regulations Approved Document B. They may also have to comply with other requirements defined by building insurance organisations, such as the Loss Prevention Council (LPC). The purpose of the Building Regulations is to ensure the health and safety of people in or about the building. The main requirements are: a) To provide a safe means of escape for the building occupants by preventing internal fire spread. b) To prevent the spread of fire to neighbouring property. c) To prevent an external fire from setting fire to the building. d) To provide access for the Fire Brigade. Generally metal roof cladding has to limit the spread of fire on its internal liner face, prevent the spread of fire through any cavity, and resist the spread and penetration of fire on its weathersheet side. Roofs do not usually need to provide any period of fire resistance. European Standard test methods have now been published, and it is now possible to claim compliance with Approved Document B using either the original BS 476 tests or the new European tests.
16
Structural performance
of these two results means that liner sheets can be designated Class O according to the Building Regulations, and their use is unrestricted. Alternatively, the reaction to fire classification can be determined using the Single Burning Item (SBI) test BS EN 13823 and the classification to BS EN 13501-1. Profiled steel liner with 25 micron polyester coating achieves a classification A1, which is the best classification, and means use of the liners is unrestricted.
8.1
Design loading
Roof cladding systems and their fixings must be strong enough to withstand the worst combinations of wind, snow, imposed and dead loads calculated in accordance with BS6399 see Fig 20.
Load case (1) Dead + imposed Dead + snow drift Dead + wind Dead wind Attachment(3)
Load factors (2) 1.4 Wd + 1.6 Wi 1.4 Wd + 1.05 Wsnow 1.4 Wd + 1.4 Wind 1.0Wd 1.4 Wind 1.0Wd 2.0 Wind
Notes: 1. Wd = deadload Wi = imposed load (BS6399:Part 3) Wsnow = snowdrift load (BS6399:Part 3) Wind = wind load (BS6399:Part 2) 2. These load factors are mostly from BS5950: Part 5 and are also adopted in BS5427. They apply to the metal profile. 3. Attachment refers to the fixing assembly (fasteners or clips). A minimum factor of 2 should be used and may be increased for timber and other non-steel substances. Fig 20: Load factors There are two other special load cases for roofs: Foot traffic: For many roof constructions point loading due to foot traffic is one of the critical load cases. The minimum thicknesses specified in section 2 are generally required to enable the roof to withstand foot traffic during assembly, but even these are not immune from damage, if care is not taken. Metal roof cladding is normally only designed for cleaning and maintenance loading. If regular access is required special walkways should be provided. The appearance of some roofs, particularly if made of aluminium, may be impaired by excessive foot traffic.
17
Impact loading Non fragility: When people walk on roofs during construction or to carry out maintenance, there is always a risk of falling over, and this can cause an impact load on the roof. For the safety of the individuals, the roof construction must be able to withstand this loading without failure, and be classed as non fragile. The non fragility of profiled sheet roof constructions is determined using the method in ACR[M]001:2000. The test involves dropping a 45kg sand bag from 1.2m onto a sample of the construction, built on a special test frame. Provided the bag is retained on the construction, no matter where the bag is dropped, the sample can be classed as non fragile. A classification system A, B, C, is used to show how many impacts the sample will withstand and how much damage is caused: Class C is one impact, with damage Class B is two impacts, with damage Class A is two impacts, with no damage For the whole of a particular roof to be classed as non fragile, all the various elements, such as roof sheets and rooflights, and the junctions between the elements, must be non fragile. This must include any special details on the roof, such as hips, curves, and varying purlin centres. The performance depends on the assembly of components, and not just the sheet material, so details at supports such as fasteners are normally important. Correctly assembled profiled steel outer roof sheets with a thickness of 0.7mm would normally be expected to achieve Class B, either as single skin or as part of a double skin system. Correctly fixed profiled liner can also be classed as non fragile, which can be an advantage during construction and maintenance, but because the material is only typically 0.4mm thick, the construction is
much more sensitive to correct fixing details and correct installation. The manufacturers of the individual roofing elements and systems should provide non fragile specifications for their products.
18
Durability
500mm centres using 5.5mm diameter fasteners generally provide sufficient restraint to light gauge purlins. Some 0.7mm thick aluminium liner profiles of certain alloy grades can give lateral restraint and the manufacturers guidance should be sought. Perforated liner sheets used in acoustic absorption constructions may not be strong enough to provide sufficient restraint, depending on metal thickness, profile and the perforation pattern. Each case should be considered carefully. It is the responsibility of the cladding contractor to ensure that the correct fastener system is used as recommended by the cladding or fastener manufacturer.
9.1 Introduction
Durability is the ability of a building and its parts to perform its required function over a period of time (see BS7543). Virtually all materials will change physically when subjected to UV radiation, moisture and atmospheric pollution, and this will affect their performance. The designer must therefore ensure not only that the materials and details used are suitable initially but also that they will have a satisfactory life, given the necessary maintenance.
9.2 Materials
The materials selected for the roof can have a significant effect on its durability and the amount of maintenance that will be necessary during its life. The components which are exposed to the weather are particularly important. The type of sheeting material, coating and colour must all be considered. The performance might also depend on the shape and orientation of the building and the environment. Generally, light coloured coatings are preferable because they do not absorb as much sunlight as dark colours, and they are therefore cooler. This means they tend to have the best life and they optimise the thermal performance of the roof. The table in Fig 21 gives an indication of the life of some coated sheets on a typical 5 roof slope, in an inland, non-polluted environment. The life-in-years shown concern the appearance and the condition of the coating and it can be extended by repainting. The data has been taken from manufacturers literature and is for general guidance only. Material Steel Coating Plastisol - light Plastisol - dark Pvf2 Multicoat Pvf2 ARS Life-in-years 23 10 15 20 20 15
Aluminium
19
Note that failure to repaint aluminium will not significantly affect the ultimate life of the material. More detailed information can be obtained from the individual manufacturers. Rooflights are also subject to gradual deterioration, which will cause fading and embrittlement. PVC is particularly susceptible. These changes can be minimised by careful attention to detail and regular cleaning and discussion should take place with the manufacturer regarding life span. Replacement may be anticipated during the life of the building. Both plated carbon steel and stainless steel fasteners are available. In most situations involving coated steel cladding, plated steel fasteners provide acceptable performance as long as their heads are protected from the weather. Integral plastic heads are more reliable than push on caps and are preferable. Stainless steel fasteners can be used for improved durability and must be used when fixing aluminium sheets, to prevent bimetallic corrosion. The durability of sealants and fillers is also an important issue, for the long term performance of the building. Various grades of these materials are available, and some are more durable than others. They should be specified carefully to ensure their performance will be consistent with the other components in the roof, as most are built into the construction and are very difficult to replace.
with high humidity, and the roof cladding has been constructed correctly with an effective vapour control layer and ventilation (where appropriate), the standard materials and coatings will be satisfactory.
9.4 Maintenance
The coating life shown above, and therefore the durability of the roof, is always dependent on regular maintenance. This will involve inspection, removal of debris, cleaning and repair of any damage found. Gutters are likely to require the most frequent attention because debris tends to collect in them and can restrict their capacity, whilst increasing the potential for corrosion.
20
Sustainability
assessments are usually referred to as Life Cycle Assessments, and are typically time consuming and onerous to undertake. They are not included directly in Building Regulations at present and there are few direct financial incentives to follow them. However, increasing concern about climate change, the cost benefits in terms of reduced energy consumption, and the use of recycled materials and the risks of companies being sued due to real or perceived health problems affecting employees or the occupants of neighbouring buildings are combining to make these issues increasingly relevant to building designers and owners. A set of generic life cycle assessments for typical UK constructions has been published in the Green Guide to Specification produced by BRE and Oxford Brookes University. This document assesses each building type in terms of its environmental impact on: Climate change. Fossil fuel depletion. Ozone depletion. Human toxicity to air and water. Acid deposition (i.e. the emission of gasses that contribute to acid rain). Ecotoxicity (that is, the emission of substances, usually heavy metals, that impact on neighbouring ecosystems). Eutrophication (that is, the production of nitrates and phosphates, which cause excessive algal growth and consequent oxygen depletion in water courses). Summer smog. Mineral extraction.
All of the above factors need to be addressed for construction to become sustainable. As one driver for this, Building Regulations and legislation are requiring that the minimum performance standards are improved, and initiatives like Rethinking Construction are working to drive change throughout the industry.
To properly evaluate the environmental impact of different design decisions a cradle to grave assessment is needed where all of the processes from material extraction, product manufacture, installation, maintenance and finally removal and disposal need to be accounted for. Such
Each of these is awarded a grading from A (best) to C (worst) and an overall grade is given to the building type. Industrial metal buildings and roofs achieve overall A ratings and score highly for most of the above impacts. The high sustainability rating of these products reflects the particular
21
advantage of using a comparatively low mass roofing system with less material resource input than other commercial systems. Generally, metal cladding systems have relatively good sustainability credentials as a result of the opportunities for recycling. Although metal sheeting systems would not be routinely reused at the end of a roof systems life, the material itself can be processed and recycled for other applications. Similarly, the materials used for the manufacture of the metallic components can contain some recycled material. Both of these factors reduce the environmental impact of metal cladding systems, and the growing recycling industry will help to continue to reduce this in future. Correctly specified metal cladding and roofing systems competently installed should have good thermal performance and achieve a consistently good air tightness standard. This will ensure that the heat loss through the structure will be consistent with that set by the designer, rather than being reliant on the performance of site workers which can often let masonry construction down.
ensure compliance with environmental laws and regulations; seek certification of its environmental management system by an external third party organisation
Awareness of the issues in these documents can help clients meet the increasingly complex demands in a world where environmental concerns are growing in importance.
22
Fig 23: Eaves typically fmin = 0.95 = 0.01 W/mK 11.1.3 Verge The thermal bridge can be minimised by taking the roof liner back to the wall liner, so that it does not cross the wall insulation, and ensuring that any void between the wall and roof insulation is fully filled with insulation as shown in Fig 24.
Fig 22: Roof typically fmin = 0.91 = 0.01 W/mK 11.1.2 Eaves The thermal bridge can be minimised by taking the roof liner back to the wall liner, so that it does not cross the wall insulation, and ensuring that any void between the wall and roof insulation is fully filled with insulation as shown in Fig 23.
Fig 24: Verge typically fmin = 0.95 = 0.02 W/mK 11.1.4. Valley gutter This detail can cause a very severe thermal bridge if the metal outer layer of the gutter top and roof liner cut across the gutter insulation. Making the gutter liner more robust and replacing part or all of the gutter outer with a lower conductivity material such as plastic where it cuts across the insulation will reduce the thermal bridge; if the roof liner is stopped short as well so that the
23
insulation layer is continuous, the thermal bridge can be largely eliminated (Fig 25)
sleeving for use with profiled cladding. These should always be positioned at the profile crown as shown in Fig 26 to ensure they do not create a dam across a trough. If this cannot be achieved, an apron flashing should be fitted on top of the profiled sheets upslope to the ridge to prevent ponding behind the penetration, or a site applied GRP flashing could be formed. (See 11.5). The manufacturers recommendations should always be followed.
Fig 25: Valley gutter with thermal break across the gutter insulation Typically fmin = 0.95 = 0.17 W/mK
11.2 Rooflights
Rooflights are used in many industrial and commercial buildings. Typically a rooflight area of approximately 10% of the total roof area is used. Great care should be taken in their specification and installation, and the manufacturers guidance should always be followed. See also MCRMA technical paper No 1 Recommended good practice for daylighting in metal clad buildings.
24
Most flashings used on roofs are open and can be lapped, typically including stitching fasteners at a maximum spacing of 100mm, and sealant on the weatherside of the fasteners. Closed sections, such as some eaves gutters, use butt straps behind the joint. These should be at least 150mm long. For detailed guidance see MCRMA technical paper No. 11 Flashings for metal roof and wall cladding: design detailing and installation guide.
Fig 27: Large penetration Site applied GRP (or similar liquid applied system) can provide a good solution for all sizes and shapes of penetration. This must be carried out by specialist sub contractors to ensure satisfactory adhesion to the profiled weather sheeting. Contact MCRMA members for further details. Whenever a penetration is fitted to the roof it is essential that the vapour control layer, insulation and breather membrane (if fitted) are correctly detailed and constructed. Further typical details are available on the MCRMA web site at www.mcrma.co.uk
11.6 Flashings
Flashings are normally manufactured in the same material and thickness as the cladding, at least 0.7mm for steel and 0.9mm for aluminium. Where the leg length of a flashing exceeds approximately 200mm, it will be difficult to maintain a flat appearance and it is advisable to introduce a bend or stiffener to straighten and strengthen the material. See examples in section 11.1) Exposed edges should be stiffened using one of the details shown in Fig 28.
Lock roll
Welt
Stiffened edge
Fig 28
25
Site work
12.1 General
Metal roof cladding should be fully detailed on cladding drawings for each individual building. The drawings should include all the necessary dimensions, components, fasteners, seals etc. to enable the sheeters to install the cladding in accordance with the designers requirements, in order to achieve the specified performance. Responsible supervision and regular inspection is essential to ensure structural integrity, satisfactory performance, acceptable appearance and quality in general. Deviations in steel frame construction, rafters and purlins etc. can often be greater than those acceptable for the cladding material, especially at critical bearing positions such as end laps, or at junctions. The steel framework should be surveyed prior to handover to the roofing contractor. Any deviations in line, level and plumb must be acknowledged by all parties and the necessary adjustments made to suit the cladding requirements before starting the installation.
Stacks should be carefully positioned and stored on site to prevent damage or deterioration. Particular attention should be paid to the following points: a) Position away from vehicle and pedestrian routes b) Site on bearers on firm flat ground c) Cover and ventilate d) Ensure labelling is intact Some sheets and panels are supplied with a protective plastic film on the weatherface to help prevent minor damage to the coating. This must be removed as soon as possible after the cladding has been installed because if it is left in place for long periods the film will become very difficult to remove. Individual manufacturers instructions should always be followed.
26
27
References
1.
2. 3.
4.
5.
6. 7.
8.
9.
BS EN ISO 6946 : 1997, Building components and building elements Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance Calculation method. CIBSE Guide A3, Thermal properties of building structures, CIBSE 1999. BS EN ISO 10211-1: 1996, Thermal bridges in building construction - Heat flows and surface temperatures, Part 1. General calculation methods. BRE Information Paper IP 10/02, Metal cladding : assessing the thermal performance of built-up systems which use Z spacers. SCI Technical Information Sheet, P312 2002, Assessing thermal performance of built-up metal roof and cladding systems using rail and bracket spacers. BRE Report BR443, Conventions for calculating U-values, BRE 2002. BRE IP 17/01, Assessing the effect of thermal bridging at junctions and around openings, BRE August 2001. MCRMA technical paper No. 14, Guidance for the design of metal roofing and cladding to comply with Approved Document L2 : 2001. BS EN ISO 13788:2001, Hygrothermal performance of building components and building elements - Internal surface temperature to avoid critical surface humidity and interstitial condensation Calculation methods.
No 1 Recommended good practice for daylighting in metal clad buildings No 2 Curved sheeting manual No 3 Secret fix roofing design guide No 4 Fire and external steel-clad walls: guidance notes to the revised Building Regulations, 1992 (out of print) No 5 Metal wall cladding design guide No 6 Profiled metal roofing design guide No 7 Fire design of steel sheet clad external walls for building: construction performance standards and design No 8 Acoustic design guide for metal roof and wall cladding No 9 Composite roof and wall cladding design guide No 10 Profiled metal cladding for roofs and walls: guidance notes on revised Building Regulations 1995 parts L and F (out of print) No 11 Flashings for metal roof and wall cladding: design, detailing and installation guide No 12 Fasteners for metal roof and wall cladding: design, detailing and installation guide No 13 Composite slabs and beams using steel decking: best practice for design and construction No 14 Guidance for the design of metal roofing and cladding to comply with Approved Document L2: 2001 No 15 New Applications: composite construction No 16 Guidance for the effective sealing of end lap details in metal roofing constructions
Other publications
The Complete Package CDROM Manufacturing tolerances for profiled metal roof and wall cladding CladSafe latent defects insurance scheme: basic guide Liability
Whilst the information contained in this design guide is believed to be correct at the time of going to press, the Metal Cladding and Roofing Manufacturers Association and its member companies cannot be held responsible for any errors or inaccuracies and, in particular, the specification of any application must be checked with the individual manufacturer concerned for a given installation. The diagrams of typical constructions in this publication are illustrative only.
Composite flooring systems: sustainable construction solutions Please note: Publications can be downloaded from the MCRMA web site at www.mcrma.co.uk
28
incl. P&P
12.00