NATIONAL CRIME RESEARCH CENTRE

SUMMARY OF A STUDY ON ORGANIZED CRIMINAL

GANGS IN KENYA

0
 Copyright© 2012 by National Crime Research Centre
Nairobi; Printed in Kenya

Part of this publication may be copied for use in research and education
purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. This publication
may not be produced for other purposes without prior permission from
the National Crime Research Centre

1
 Table of Contents
Page
Copyright…………………………………………………………………………………..1
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………….2
List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………4
Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………..5
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..7
About the National Crime Research Centre (NCRC)……………………………………..9
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………11
1.1 Background of the Study……………………………………………………………..11
1.2 Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………………….12
1.3. Objectives of the Study……………………………………………………………...12
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………14
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY…………………………….19
3.1 Location of the Study………………………………………………………………...19
3.2. Research Design……………………………………………………………………..19
3.3 Population and Sampling Design…………………………………………………….19
3.3.1 Population………………………………………………………………………….19
3.3.2 Sampling Techniques………………………………………………………………20
3.3.3 Sample Size………………………………………………………………………...20
3.4 Sources of Data and Methods of Data Collection……………………………………21
3.4.1 Sources of Data…………………………………………………………………….21
3.4.2 Data Collection Methods and Tools……………………………………………….21
3.4.3 Methods of Data Analysis…………………………………………………………22
3.4.4 Limitations of the Study…………………………………………………………...22
3.4.5 Ethical Considerations……………………………………………………………...23
CHAPTER FOUR: KEY FINDINGS OF THE STUDY……………………………….24
4.1 Identified Organized Criminal Gangs in Kenya……………………………………..24
4.2 Key Socio-Cultural, Demographic, Economic and Political Factors in the
Operation of Organized Criminal Gangs in Kenya…………………………………..26
4.2.1 Division of labour in Organized Criminal Gangs………………………………….27
4.2.1.1 Division of labour on the basis of Gender……………………………………….27
4.2.1.2 Division of labour in Organized Criminal Gangs on the basis of Age…………..28

2
4.2.2 Ethnic and Intra-Gang Members Support………………………………………….29
4.2.3 Use of Violence by Organized Criminal Gangs……………………………………30
4.2.4 Conflict between Organized Criminal Gangs……………………………………...30
4.2.5 Economic Factors in Organized Criminal Gang Activities………………………...31
4.2.6 Political and Government Factors………………………………………………….32
4.2.6.1 Political Factors…………………………………………………………………..32
4.2.6.2 Government Factors……………………………………………………………...32
4.3 Case Studies………………………………………………………………………….33
4.4 Effects of Organized Crime in Society………………………………………………34
4.4.1 Fear among the population…………………………………………………………34
4.4.2 Changes in Behavior Patterns……………………………………………………...34
4.4.3 Economic cost of increased insecurity……………………………………………..34
4.4.4 Effect on business………………………………………………………………….35
4.5 Key Challenges Facing Interventions to Address the Problem of Organized
Criminal Gangs in Kenya…………………………………………………………….35
4.5.1 The complex nature of the crimes and organized criminal gangs………………….35
4.5.2 Inadequate capacity of law enforcement agencies…………………………………35
4.5.3 Corruption within concerned institutions…………………………………………..36
4.5.4 Interference and intimidation of combat efforts……………………………………36
4.5.5 Legal limitations……………………………………………………………………36
4.5.6 High poverty and unemployment levels……………………………………………36
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………..37
5.1 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………..37
5.2 Recommendations……………………………………………………………………37
Selected Bibliography……………………………………………………………………41

3
 LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Table 3.1 Sample size of survey respondents per Region………………………………..20
Table 3.2 Case Studies and Main Region of Operation………………………………….21
Table 4.1 Organized Criminal gangs in Kenya…………………………………………..24
Table 4.2 Criminal activities of the organized criminal gangs…………………………..26
Table 4.3 Role of male members in organized criminal gangs…………………………..27
Table 4.4 Role of female members in organized criminal gangs………………………...28
Table 4.5 Role of children in organized criminal gangs…………………………………28
Table 4.6 Role of elderly people in organized criminal gangs…………………………...29
Table 4.7 Intra-group support in organized criminal gangs……………………………...30
Table 4.8 Source of funds for operation in organized criminal gangs…………………...31
Table 4.9 Types of Support to organized criminal gangs from Business persons……….32

4
 FOREWORD

There has been a sharp increase in the number of organized crime in the country in recent
years. The National Crime Research Centre’s ultimate goal is to conduct research into the
causes of crime, its prevention and to communicate its findings and recommendations to
the agencies of Government concerned with the administration of criminal justice with a
view to assisting them in their policy formulation and planning.

In recognition of the existence of organized criminal gangs in Kenya and the serious
threat posed by crime, the Centre decided to carry out research into the modus operandi
of members of these outlawed organizations engaged in criminal activities.

It is encouraging to note that the Government is tackling the problem as evidenced by the
proscription of 33 organized criminal groups in the country vide a gazette notice dated
18th October, 2010 issued by the Minister of State for Provincial Administration and
Internal Security. Out of 33 organized criminal groups, the Centre conducted a study on
six major ones comprising of Mungiki, Al Shabab, Sungusungu, Angola Msumbiji,
Mombasa Republican Council and the 42 Brothers. An in-depth study was conducted in
order to understand the methods adopted by members of the groups in engaging in
criminal activities. The study also delved into the source of funds utilized by the criminal
gangs to facilitate their criminal activities.

There is no doubt at all that the criminal activities these groups are engaged in have
deleterious consequences on our society. It causes fear and desperation in the lives of
law-abiding citizens. To ensure a secure social, political and economic environment for
investment, there must be commitment on the part of the Government to confront the vice
head-on in order to spur economic growth in the country.

This study focused on the main causes of crime and its prevention as opposed to
unsuccessful deterrent methods applied in the criminal justice system to fight crime. The
findings would be disseminated by the Centre to stakeholders in the criminal justice
system for their policy formulation and planning. Qualitative and authentic data were
gathered through field research, questionnaires and key informants interviews into the

5
characteristics of organized criminal gangs in Kenya and subsequently analyzed in order
to understand the impact of crime on life and business in the country.

It is an undisputed fact that organized crime poses a real challenge in the security of this
country. It is therefore the responsibility of the Government agencies concerned with the
administration of criminal justice to formulate sound policies geared to preventing the
causes of crime. The private sector should supplement the effort of Government in crime
prevention. As researchers have found, lack of employment amongst the youth is a
catalyst for their induction into the organized criminal gangs. This problem should be
tackled through engaging the youth in gainful employment. The second finding giving
credence to the belief that there are collusions between the police and members of the
organized criminal gangs resulting to their triumph, should be investigated with the
utmost urgency in order to restore the public’s confidence in the police.

Using crime statistics, researchers were able to access information on the characteristics
and proliferation of gangs in Kenya, which in turn assisted in recognizing the local areas
prone to this type of criminal activity. In the interest of economic development of the
country, it is imperative that the stakeholders, investors and members of the public be
privy to the research findings and recommendations of the Centre for their safety and
business interests. The study has contributed immensely to the implementation of the
Constitution of Kenya 2010 and realization of Kenya Vision 2030 whose main aim is to
achieve a secure environment for sustainable social, economic and political development.

In conclusion, I wish to thank the Governing Council, researchers, and members of staff
and stakeholders who contributed to the successful completion of this study. I am also
deeply indebted to the Director of National Crime Research Centre, Mr. J. Oriri Onyango
for his oversight role during the design and implementation of the study.

PROF. GITHU MUIGAI, FCIArb, EGH, MP.

ATTORNEY GENERAL/CHAIRMAN,
GOVERNING COUNCIL
NATIONAL CRIME RESEARCH CENTRE

6
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The National Crime Research Centre (NCRC) and its members of staff wish to thank the
almighty God for giving the Centre the opportunity to undertake a study on organized
criminal gangs in Kenya. There is no doubt that the menace of organized criminal gangs
has been and continues to be a threat to peace and security of law abiding citizens of our
country. The outcome of this successful study and recommendations will go a long way
to assist the agencies of Government concerned with the administration of criminal justice
to formulate sound policies to eliminate the vice with a view to achieving a crime-free
society.

The Centre would like to acknowledge the Governing Council for its efforts in approving
the funds towards the study.

The concerted effort of the previous Attorney General and Chairman of Governing
Council, Hon. S. Amos Wako, EGH, FCIArb, SC, MP., to come up with an idea of
setting up a National Crime Research Centre in the Country cannot go unrecognized. The
idea has impacted on crime and disorder and has helped to generate programmes that
have assisted criminal justice agencies in their policy formulation and planning. His
successor Prof. Githu Muigai, FCIArb, EGH, MP., has continued offering his invaluable
support to the Centre in its aspiration to be a World Class Crime Research Institution.

The Centre wishes to express thanks for the services provided by North Consult Company
Ltd comprising of Dr. Beneah Mutsotso and Dr. Karatu Kiemo who led the research team
in gathering and analyzing the necessary data towards the preparation of this report.

Special acknowledgement goes to members of the Research and Development Committee

at the time of the study led by Chairperson Prof. Collettee Suda, EBS and comprised of
Prof. Paul P.W. Achola, Prof. Octavian N. Gakuru, Mr. Mathew K. Iteere, MGH, CBS
and Dr. Francis Machira Apollos, MBS. Their continued advice, meticulous, thorough
and keen review of the report from its inception stage to the final one, contributed
immensely to the success of the study. Special thanks also go the current Governing
Council members who, upon assuming office, further reviewed the report and gave very
useful suggestions for incorporation in the final draft.

7
The Centre is equally grateful for the service and participation of its staff namely, Mr.
David Ngondi and James Njogu together with Research Assistants for their role in data
collection and combination of ideas which greatly enhanced professionalism during the
conduct of research. The Centre also appreciates the contribution of its newly recruited
research officers Mr. Alexander Luchetu Likaka and Mr. Stephen M. Muteti for helping
shape the report to its present form.

Last, but in no way least, the Centre would like to thank members of the public,
Government Officers, business people, religious and civil society organizations whose co-
operation in availing information during the study enabled researchers to understand the
modus operandi of various organized criminal gangs in Kenya.

To all those who participated in one way or the other in facilitating this study, the Centre
remains indebted to them.

J.ORIRI ONYANGO
DIRECTOR
NATIONAL CRIME RESEARCH CENTRE

8
 ABOUT THE NATIONAL CRIME RESEARCH CENTRE (NCRC)
The need for research and database for the management of crime in Kenya was
recognized by the Government sometimes back following the serious threat posed by
crime. The then Attorney General Mr. S. Amos Wako came up with an idea of setting up
a National Crime Research Centre (NCRC) with the overriding objective of carrying out
research into the causes of crime and its prevention and to disseminate research findings
to Government agencies charged with administration of criminal justice with a view to
assisting them in their policy formulation and planning. The commitment to establishing
the Centre was subsequently captured in the 1994-1996 National Development Plan.

An inter-ministerial committee comprising representatives from the Police, Prisons,

Probation Services, Judiciary and the Office of the Attorney General to explore ways and
means of setting up a crime research centre was later established. The output of the
Committee was a Background Research Paper, a Draft Cabinet Memo and a Draft Bill,
The National Crime Research Centre Bill (1993). These efforts culminated in the
enactment of the National Crime Research Act No. 4 of 1997, Cap. 62 Laws of Kenya
which provides the legal framework for the establishment of the National Crime Research
Centre (NCRC). The Centre is a state corporation in the State Law Office.

Vision
To be a World Class Crime Research Institution.

Mission
To provide quality and authentic research into causes of crime and its prevention with a
view to achieving a crime-free society.

Objectives
The primary object of the Centre is to carry out research into the causes of crime and its
prevention and to disseminate research findings and recommendations to the Government
agencies concerned with the administration of criminal justice.

Core Functions
As provided for in Section 5 of the NCR Act, for the attainment of its objects, the Centre
shall:

9
 carry out coordinated research into, and evaluate the impact of, programmes
pursued by the agencies responsible for the administration of criminal
justice;
 collate all crime related data;
 carry out research into any criminal activity and in particular-
(i) crime causation and prevention;
(ii) group or culture related crimes;
(iii) socio-political and economic causes of criminal behavior including
drug trafficking, peddling or addiction;
(iv) the modus operandi of persons engaged in any criminal activity;
(v) juvenile delinquency;
 carry out research into deviations from the criminal justice system with a
view to increasing the awareness and responsibility of the community in the
rehabilitation of criminal offenders;
 carry out research into the efficacy and adequacy of criminal investigation
and prosecution agencies, the penal system and the treatment of criminal
offenders;
 disseminate its research findings through publications, workshops, seminars,
the mass media and other appropriate means of dissemination;
 communicate its research findings and recommendations to the agencies of
Government concerned with the administration of criminal justice, with a
view to assisting them in their policy formulation and planning;
 liaise with any other research bodies within or outside Kenya engaged in the
pursuit of similar or related research.

10
 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Since Independence, Kenya has witnessed a number of positive strides in the social,
political and economic fronts. However, it is indisputable that the country has witnessed,
especially in the recent years, a substantial level of political and economic instability
(such as the 2007-2008 post-election violence and the rising inflation). Along with
political and economic instability comes an increase in crime and disorder in society.
Some local and international sources such as the U.S Department of State and United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) have indicated that East Africa in general
and Kenya in particular is a region of high and increasing crime rates due to factors such
as increasing poverty levels and inadequate economic opportunities available especially
to the youth.

Crime trends in Kenya are evolving in unprecedented rates and measures, thus giving law
enforcement agencies the difficult task of remaining vigilant and containing the situation.
One of the most serious challenges facing the country in general and criminal justice
agencies in particular is that of insecurity occasioned by the emergence and rise in
number of dangerous organized criminal gangs.

Like other nations in the world, Kenya recognizes that a crime and offender-free society
is important in the whole process of its national social welfare and economic
development. While cognizant of the assertion that crime is an ‘industry’, it is common
knowledge that crime negatively affects society in many ways. For example: socially, the
lives of individuals and families are traumatized and destroyed through crimes such as
killings and drug trafficking. Economically, Labour racketeering and infiltration of
legitimate businesses by illegitimate groups and market forces leads to higher food prices,
low quality goods/products and services, forced closure of enterprises, establishment of
monopolies, retrenchment of workers (leading to increased rates of unemployment and
consequently to crime commission) and higher taxation. Politically, through corruption of
public officials, the legitimacy of government becomes questionable which may lead to
protests and political instability.

11
Among the initial attempts to address the problem of organized crime in Kenya was the
enactment of the Prevention of Organized Crimes Act in August, 2010. The then Minister
for Provincial Administration and Internal Security issued a Gazette Notice on 18th
October, 2010 banning 33 organized criminal groups. A study commissioned by the Panel
of Eminent Persons in 2010 and conducted in Nairobi, Central and Nyanza regions
identified 32 illegal groups, of which 27 were not listed in the 33 banned criminal groups.
A recent study by the National Crime Research Centre identified at least 46 organized
criminal gangs. These statistics are a pointer to the increasing magnitude of the problem
in Kenya and unless correct efforts are put in place by the relevant players in the
administration of criminal justice, Kenya may become a land controlled by criminal
gangs.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The increase in the number of organized gangs in Kenya, their mutations and serious
negative effects to society is a reason enough for necessary and immediate action to be
taken. Organized criminal gangs have terrorized many Kenyans and disrupted livelihoods
in many parts of the country. Organized crime undermines development, creates fear and
certainly negates the efforts towards attainment of Vision 2030 targets. This type of crime
needs to be adequately understood and appropriate ways devised to exterminate it.
Therefore, the provision of up to date information to the players in the administration of
criminal justice in general and law enforcement agencies in particular is necessary in
controlling the crime.

1.3. Objectives of the study

The general objective of the research was to carry out coordinated research and evaluate
the impact of organized criminal gangs on the Kenyan society. The specific objectives of
the study were to: identify the nature of the organized criminal gangs and prioritize the
types of crime committed by them in Kenya; conduct an in-depth analysis on the modus
operandi, command structure and network of six leading organized criminal gangs;
identify the sources of funding for the organized criminal gangs; provide a rapid
assessment of public perception of the organized criminal gangs and the effect of the
criminal activities in the areas of their operation; identify the extent (if any) to which the
organized criminal gangs have infiltrated the public/security sector; find out the paradigm

12
network applied by the organized criminal gangs in their operations; and identify methods
of preventing organized crime in Kenya.

13
 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

Modern organized crime is generally understood to have begun in Italy in the late 19th
Century. The secretive Sicilian group La Cosa Nostra, besides other Sicilian Mafia,
remained very powerful up to the early 20th Century. As early as 1924 Benito Mussolini
initiated a crackdown on the Italian Mafia. From the 1920s to the present, organized
crime has either been organized within ethnic groups or across ethnic lines. In 1970 the
USA passed the Organized Crime Control Act whose purpose was to eradicate organized
crime by expanding evidence gathering techniques for law enforcement, providing for the
forfeiture of property owned by criminal enterprises and expanding the range of crimes.
Modern organized criminal enterprises make money by specializing in a variety of crimes
including extortion, blackmail, gambling, loan sharking and political corruption.
Extortion in particular is a time-tested aspect of organized crime which involves the
acquisition of property through use of threats or force. For example, a criminal enterprise
located in a certain neighborhood may visit shopkeepers and demand for protection
money. Blackmail works in a similar way. Many crime syndicates use violence, murder,
torture, assault and other related strategies to keep themselves powerful and profitable
and the constant threat of violence keeps victims and witnesses silent and so without them
prosecutors will be hard pressed to prefer charges against members of organized criminal
gangs. Oath taking is one of the reasons that make members committed. This
commitment is demonstrated by members who state that they join criminal gangs alive
but will leave them dead. Gang life has several characteristics. It may be ethnic gangs or
turf gangs based on the territory they control. It has been observed that people enter
organized criminal gangs for a variety of reasons like poverty hence the reasons they exist
in poor neighborhoods. Peer pressure is another reason as most members tend to be
young. Boredom is another cause since they tend to populated by idlers largely due to
unemployment.

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC, 2002) in many
countries across the world, there exist organized criminal groups which vary in activities,
and may be similar in their consequences. Common to all countries is that these groups
are a threat to peace, stability and development and therefore there is need to control
and/or eradicate their activities. Effective management of the groups requires
understanding of the nature of their existence such as root causes, goals,

14
size/membership, sources of funding and protection. Whereas conducting research into
such groups is a challenge owing, in part, to the fact that they are generally closed
systems (they would be operating in secrecy to avoid police detection) and a risk to
probing outsiders, few studies (such as UNODC, 2002) have been conducted on them.
Consequently, effective conceptual frameworks and methodologies are still not yet
established.

In a study of forty organized criminal groups in sixteen countries, (UNODC, 2002)

adopted the Transnational Organized Crime (TOC) Convention, Article 2 (a) definition
which states that an organized criminal group is:
“a structured group of three or more persons existing for a period of time and
acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes or
offences in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material
benefit. By “serious crime” is meant “conduct constituting a criminal offence
punishable by a maximum deprivation of liberty of at least four years or a more
serious penalty” (UNODC, 2002:9).
UNODC (2002) provides a useful framework for understanding organized criminal
groups comprising of ten factors namely:
i) Structure
ii) Size
iii) Activities
iv) Identity
v) Level of violence
vi) Use of corruption
vii) Political influence
viii) Penetration into the legitimate economy
ix) Level of cooperation with other criminal groups
x) Level of trans-border operations

Much has been written on organized crime and its effects in society. However, the review
established that, like the concept of crime, organized crime is itself a concept whose
definition has always been problematic. Organized crime is defined as crime committed
by structured groups typically involving the provision of illegal goods and services to
others. According to The U.S. Comptroller General, (1981) organized crime refers to
15
those self-perpetuating, structured and disciplined associations of individuals or groups,
combined together for the purpose of obtaining monetary or commercial gains or profits,
wholly or in part by illegal means, while protecting their activities through a pattern of
graft and corruption. The California Commission on Organized Crime (1948) observed
that the operations of two or more persons who combine to obtain financial advantages or
special privileges by such unlawful means as terrorism, fraud, corruption of public
officers or by a combination of such methods constitute organized crime. Though varied,
all definitions insinuate that organized crime is a syndicated criminal activity by an
enduring structure or organization developed and devoted primarily to the pursuit of
profits through illegal means.

Organized crime is not a preserve of a particular or some societies. In this contemporary

world, organized crime is not confined to the boundaries of any one country and has
become a transnational problem. The world over, most countries have had organized
criminal gangs which have had devastating effects and threatened national security, socio-
political and economic stability. The most notable organized criminal gang is the Italian
Mafia that infiltrated the Italian society and other countries including the United States.
The Sicilian Mafia was formed in the mid-1800s to unify the Sicilian peasants against
their enemies. In Sicily, the word Mafia tends to mean “manly.” The Sicilian Mafia
changed from a group of honorable Sicilian men to an organized criminal group in the
1920s. In the 1950s, Sicily enjoyed a massive building boom. Taking advantage of the
opportunity, the Sicilian Mafia gained control of the building contracts and made millions
of dollars. Today, the Sicilian Mafia has evolved into an international organized crime
group. The Sicilian Mafia specializes in heroin trafficking, political corruption and
military arms trafficking—and is also known to engage in arson, frauds, counterfeiting,
and other racketeering crimes.

Asian organized criminal enterprises have also been thriving not only in Asia but also in
various parts of the world. Asian criminal enterprises have been operating in the US since
the early 1900s. The first of these groups evolved from Chinese tongs—social
organizations formed by early Chinese-American immigrants. FBI notes that these
enterprises rely on extensive networks of national and international criminal associates
that are fluid and extremely mobile. They adapt easily to the changes around them, have
multilingual abilities, can be highly sophisticated in their criminal operations, and have
16
extensive financial capabilities. Some enterprises have commercialized their criminal
activities and can be considered business firms of various sizes, from small family-run
operations to large corporations.

In the Middle East, FBI observes that the groups, though loosely organized, have been
active since the 1970s. They have mainly been involved in schemes such as automobile
theft, financial fraud, money laundering, interstate transportation of stolen property,
smuggling, drug trafficking, document fraud, health care fraud, identity fraud, cigarette
smuggling, and the theft and redistribution of infant formula (food). These enterprises
rely on extensive networks of international criminal associates and can be highly
sophisticated in their criminal operations. Organizations often engage in joint criminal
ventures with one another.

African criminal gangs have developed quickly since the 1980s due to the globalization
of the world's economies and the great advances in communications technology. Easier
international travel, expanded world trade, and financial transactions that cross national
borders have enabled them to branch out of local and regional crime to target
international victims and develop criminal networks within more prosperous countries
and regions. The unstable political, social, and economic conditions in African countries
like Nigeria, Ghana, and Liberia also have helped some gangs expand globally.

In Kenya, there are a number of known organized criminal groups. In October 2010, the
Minister of State for Provincial Administration and Internal Security following the
enactment of the Prevention of Organized Crimes Act in August, 2010, issued a Gazette
Notice banning 33 organized criminal groups on October, 18, 2010. These were: Al
Shabaab, Amachuma, Angola Msumbiji, Banyamulenge, Baghdad Boys, Charo Shutu,
Chinkororo, Coast Housing Land Network, Congo By Force, Dallas Muslim Youth, Forty
Brothers, Forty Two Brothers, Jeshi La Embakasi, Jeshi La Mzee, Jeshi La King’ole, Japo
Group, Kamjesh, Kamukunji Youth Group, Kaya Bombo Youth , Kenya Youth Alliance,
Kosovo Boys, Kuzacha, Makande Army, Mombasa Republican Council, Mungiki
Movement, Mungiki Organization, Mungiki Sect, Republican Revolutionary Council ,
Sabout Land Defence Force (SLDF), Sakina Youth, Siafu, Sungu Sungu and Taliban. A
2010 study commissioned by the Panel of Eminent Persons conducted in Nairobi, Central
and Nyanza provinces identified 32 illegal groups, of which 27 were not listed in the 33
17
banned criminal groups. Further, the study indicated that the illegal groups were taking a
low public profile and speculated the leaders of the groups were seeking to shed their
negative image and present themselves as candidates for public office. These illegal
groups were found to be spread throughout the country although more common in urban
environments and particularly in Nairobi’s large slum areas.

Literature on crime and deviance presents a consensus that there does not exist one theory
about them. Each theory has its own history and supported by a distinct body of
knowledge. Wilson (1975) was most pessimistic of all theories that made no manifest
contribution on how to control crime yet crime is distressing and disruptive to the social
order, it inflicts pain, subverts trust and community. Durkheim (1965) in anomic theory
argues that, the source of high crime rate in organic societies lay in normlessness,
modernization and urbanization. Neo-classical explanations of crime emphasize the free-
will and rationalistic hedonism. Social contract theorist’s position constructed ideas that
included a purposive approach, natural and rational basis for explaining crime and the
state’s response. Beccarias contributions to the study of criminology and punishment is
largely summarised in the following prescriptions; seriousness of crime in terms of harm
it inflicts on society; proportionate punishment in terms of crime committed, severity of
punishment vis a vis the crime committed, promptness of punishment following
commission of crime and the certainty of punishment.

Biological theories of crime causation focus on the genetic make up of criminals (Goring,
1913). However, Sharh and Roth (1974) favoured environmental factors in crime
causation. Merton (1968) in strain theory showed that social conditions in which
individuals find themselves force them to commit crime as it limits the appetites of those
individuals to satisfy them using legitimate means. Crime then becomes a rational
response to overcome the limitations. It is closely associated with anomic theory which
explains urban, lower class and male gang delinquency behaviour. Learning theories
imply that habits and knowledge develop as a result of the experiences of the individual
learning (Bower and Hilgard, 1981). Learnt behaviour can be reinforced or not through
punishment as in operant conditioning. Tarde (1943-1904) in the law of imitation showed
that crime is a normal learnt behaviour (Vine, 1972). Sutherland (1924) in differential
association theory posits that associative interaction generates criminality.

18
 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

3.1 Location of the study

The study was conducted in all the eight regions of the country (that is, the former eight
provinces); Nairobi, Eastern, Central, Rift Valley, Coast, North Eastern, Western and
Nyanza.

3.2. Research design

The research on organized criminal gangs was a descriptive study. The aim was to
capture the dynamics of organized criminal gangs as they operated especially after the
government outlawed them in 2010. A triangulated methodological approach combining
quantitative and qualitative approaches was used to ensure data capture was
complimentary. The strength in triangulation is that the weaknesses and strengths of each
method are combined to provide valid data. The social survey was particularly useful in
capturing the attitudes and perception of the members of the public (male and female
above 18 years) about their knowledge and/or experience of organized criminal gangs and
how they have affected their everyday life. In the survey research, adult members of
households were randomly sampled to take part in the study. The survey provided the
quantitative information. Qualitative information was provided by key informants who
included senior Government Officials from the Kenya Police Service, CID, Provincial
Administration and business people. Ordinary members of the public participated in the
focused group discussions. Other respondents were members of organized criminal
groups (both active and inactive), victims and relatives.

Secondary data was obtained through review of judicial and police records about arrests
and convictions of members of organized criminal gangs.

3.3 Population and Sampling Design

3.3.1 Population
The primary population in this study was adult male and female community members.
They may have or have not been directly or indirectly victims or perpetrators of organized
crime. Members of organized criminal gangs were also targeted. Key informants from

19
government, civil society and business people were also involved. At the national level,
they were senior officers in the CID, Kenya Police Service and Provincial Administration.
At the provincial levels, all OCPDs and OCS in the relevant police stations were
interviewed. In the Provincial Administration, the District Commissioners and Divisional
Officers were interviewed. Business people and prominent religious leaders were also
interviewed. The interviews were conducted by the Lead Researchers.

3.3.2 Sampling Techniques

Purposive sampling was used in the selection of the six case studies on the basis of
prominence of their criminal activities and impact on the local population. Out of the 33
proscribed groups, six were purposively selected. Regional representation was also
considered. Given that the criminal activities of the organized criminal groups are not
uniform in the regions, counties in which the activities were concentrated were
purposively selected following preliminary discussions with the residents of the
respective counties. Further, specific locations that are the epicentre of organized crime
were eventually selected and community interviews held. This was done to ensure that the
respondents are people with a high probability of having been directly or indirectly
affected or have factual information about organized crime. At county level, Heads of
Police, Provincial Administration, Judiciary, religious leaders and members of organized
criminal gangs were purposively selected for key informant interviews.

3.3.3 Sample Size

The sample size of the survey respondents was 1343. They were randomly selected and
distributed per region as shown in Table 3.1 below.

Table 3.1 Sample size of survey respondents per Region

Region No. of Respondents
i) Nairobi 176
ii) Central 176
iii) Rift Valley 176
iv) Coast 176
v) Nyanza 176
vi) Western 176
vii) Eastern 176
viii) North Eastern 111
Total 1343

20
3.4 Sources of Data and Methods of Data Collection
3.4.1 Sources of Data
Primary and secondary sources of data were utilized in the study. Primary data was
obtained from the 1343 sample respondents. Secondary data materials that were used
included journals and books on the subject of organized criminal gangs.

3.4.2 Data Collection Methods and Tools

The study employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in data gathering
and analysis. The quantitative method employed was the survey and the qualitative
approach employed was key informant interviews and focus group discussions.

The study conducted in-depth investigations of six organized criminal gangs to

understand their structures and operating mechanisms. Based on the 33 criminal groups
proscribed by the government, the six case studies are as presented in Table 2 below.

Table 3.2 Case Studies and Main Region of Operation

Group Region
1. The 42 Brothers Emuhaya, Luanda, Maseno
2. Mombasa Republican Council Mombasa
3. Angola Msumbiji Kakamega, Khwisero, Butere
4. Sungu Sungu Kisii
5. Mungiki Nairobi, Central Region
6. Al Shabaab North Eastern

Data about the Case Studies was obtained from key informants using a structured and
unstructured questionnaire, members of the public and members of the organized criminal
gangs. Formal and informal approaches were adopted given the sensitivity of the topic.
Secondary data was used to augment primary data.

Two questionnaires were used to collect data from the public individual respondents and
key informants. The questionnaire was administered by trained enumerators. A total of
40 enumerators were recruited and trained for 3 days on data collection, interviewing
techniques and ethnical aspects of the research. A pretest was undertaken on the 4th day.
The purpose of the pretest was to assess the applicability of the tools in data capture. The
experiences obtained during the pretest were shared and used to revise the tools. The
challenges encountered were also taken into consideration in planning for the data
21
collection. Each region was under the oversight of a Lead Researcher whose main tasks
were to supervise and ensure quality data as well as conduct key informant
interviews/questionnaire and facilitate focused group discussions.

The public individual questionnaire had several subsections: informed consent,

background information, knowledge of organized criminal gangs, law enforcement and
organized criminal gangs, ethnic/national identity, gender, political influences, activities,
and effect on the community. The questionnaire for key informants was divided into the
following subsections; respondent information, general questions about organized crime
in the area, specific questions on the organized criminal group, organized crime and law
enforcement, ethnic and gender composition, general characteristics of the group,
violence of the group, professionalism of the group, general influence of the group,
political influence of the group, transnational links of the group and the groups in the
legitimate economy. Focus group discussion guide for business people and focus group
guide for members of the public were used to facilitate the discussions. Informal
unstructured discussions were held with members of organized criminal gangs.

3.4.3 Methods of Data Analysis

The study combined both qualitative and quantitative methods in data analysis. Data was
cleaned and entered into an SPSS package for analysis. The cleaning focused on
consistency of the responses and completeness. Descriptive statistics using totals,
frequencies and percentages were used in data analysis. Qualitative data was organized
into themes and used to augment quantitative data.

3.4.4 Limitations of the Study

The topic of study was a particularly sensitive one in terms of interaction with members
of the public. The sensitivity of the topic made many people decline interviews for fear of
identification or reprisals from members of the organized criminal gangs. In some
instances researchers were suspected to be either police officers or informers, and this
made some people to remain skeptical. In parts of Rift Valley region researchers were
suspected to be a disguise for the International Criminal Court (ICC) collecting
information about some of the suspects of the 2008 post election violence. In other parts
of the research study, there was outright hostility from the gang members, some of whom
thought we were collecting information to identify them to the police. In Maseno area in
particular, there were physical threats. The fear of discussing organized criminal groups

22
made the research work take longer than anticipated since the refusal rate was high and/or
it took more time trying to explain the motive of the study to convince respondents to
accept to be interviewed.

Generally, while members of the public were more willing to provide information in spite
of the possible reprisals, government officers were the most difficult especially in
Western Kenya, Coast and Eastern Regions. More often, they out rightly declined to
provide information since to their knowledge there were no organized criminal gangs
even when there was overwhelming evidence of their presence. This considerably slowed
down the progress of work. In some cases government officers returned half filled
questionnaires while in others they never returned them even after several physical trips
to their offices and phone calls.

3.4.5 Ethical considerations

Given the sensitivity of the topic, permission was sought beforehand from the relevant
government agencies at the national level. On the ground, the local administration was
informed about the purpose of the research and permission granted. All the respondents
were assured of the confidentiality of the information and no personal identity was
required. Permission was sought after explaining to them the purpose of the research
before interviews were undertaken. No coercion or false representations were made.
Those who declined to be interviewed were respected for their views. There was neither
voice recording nor photography of the respondents. All the information obtained was
solely used for writing the report of the study and not for any other purpose. No child was
interviewed whatsoever.

23
 CHAPTER FOUR: KEY FINDINGS OF THE STUDY

4.1 Identified Organized Criminal gangs in Kenya

The study identified at least 46 organized criminal gangs as indicated on Table 4.1 below.
From the findings, the majority (55.2%) of the 1343 respondents were aware of the
existence of an organized criminal group in the area of their abode.

Table 4.1 Organized Criminal gangs in Kenya

No. Name of Criminal Principal area of Main type of activities (including
Gang operation criminal activities)
1. Mungiki Central region, Extortion, illegal levies, violence, hire
Nairobi for revenge, executions, illegal oathing.
2. Sungu Sungu Kisii, Nyamira Expulsion of offenders, hire for revenge,
body guards, security, settlement of
disputes, executions, illegal detention.
3. Mombasa Kwale, Ukunda, Illegal oathing, violence, promoting
Republican Council Mombasa, Kilifi hatred, extortion, threats of eviction,
secession.
4. Jeshi La Embakasi Embakasi Hire by politicians for illegal activities
Constituency
5. 42 Brothers Emuhaya, Burglary, drugs, theft, violence, murder,
Ebukasami, hire as body guards, extortion
Luanda, Maseno
6. Al Shabaab Eastleigh, North Human trafficking, trafficking of
Eastern weapons, violence, maritime piracy
7. Kamjeshi Nairobi Eastlands Extortion of businesses, public service
transport
8. Jeshi La Mzee Kangemi Hire by politicians as body guards
campaigners
9. Baghdad Boys Kisumu Extortion, hire by politicians, body
guards, campaigners
10. Angola Msumbiji Butere, Khwisero Cattle rustling, burglary, murder, hire by
businessmen/politicians for protection
or intimidation of opponents
11. Taliban Central, Kayole, Extortion, illegal levies, murder, hire by
Dandora politicians
12. Kenya Youth Nairobi Burglary, extortion
Alliance
13. Shigololi Emuhaya Robbery, burglary
14. Sabaot Land Mt. Elgon Murder, extortions, evictions
Defence Force
15. Kamukunji Boys Kamukunji-Nairobi Hire by politicians for campaign and
body guards
16. Munyipi Mathare Extortion
17. Damy Dalas (Mombasa) Burglary, robbery

24
18. Funga File Mombasa Burglary, theft
19. Congo By Force Kisauni Burglary, pick pocketing
20. Kaya Bombo Kwale, Kilifi Eviction, extortion
21. Tia Nazi Kilifi Burglary, extortion
22. Sri Lanka Kisii, Kisumu Robbery, burglary
23. Nuyuki Mombasa Burglary
24. Charo Shutu Malindi Robbery, burglary
25. Kimya Mombasa Burglary, extortion
26. Bad Squad Kisii, Mombasa, Burglary, extortion
Kisauni
27. Super Power Eastleigh Theft, burglary
28. Chinkororo Kisii, Nyamira Murder, defence
29. Amachuma Kisii, Nyamira Murder, defence
30. Nubians Kibera Protection of Nubian community
31. Kalenjin Warriors of Molo Eviction, murder, livestock rustling
1992
32. Kibera Battalion Kibera Extortion, hire by politicians, violence
33. Kumi Kumi Kisii Extortion
34. Bamba 40 Kisii Robbery, burglary
35. Loma Oyan Garissa Town Pick pocketing, robbery on the streets
and dark alleys
36. Haki La Kuishi Khwisero Burglary, theft
37. Land Lord Khwisero Burglary, theft
38. Mafia Luanda, Emuhaya Drug trafficking, theft
39. Down Town Luanda, Emusire, Stealing motorcycles, power saw
Kombewa engines
40. Waka Waka Maseno Hills Drugs, pick pocketing, attacking
mourners at night
41. Al Qaeda Maseno Hills Drug trafficking, planting of drugs
42. Siafu Kibera Extortion, provide security, mobilize
people to attend political rallies, resolve
disputes, provide water and electricity
illegally
43. Kamukunji Pressure Kibera Extortion, provide security, mobilize
Group people to attend political rallies, resolve
disputes, provide water and electricity
illegally
44. Yes We Can Kibera Extortion, provide security, mobilize
people to attend political rallies, resolve
disputes, provide water and electricity
illegally
45. J-10 Kibera Extortion, provide security, mobilize
people to attend political rallies, resolve
disputes, provide water and electricity
illegally
46. 40 Brothers Emuhaya, Lwanda Burglary, theft, drugs

25
From the findings of the study, members of the public knew that organized criminal
gangs were engaged in a number of crimes as shown on Table 4.2 below.

Table 4.2 Criminal activities of the organized criminal gangs

Type of criminal activity(ies) Percentage of respondents
who knew the type of
criminal activity
Illicit Drug trafficking 50.2%
Intellectual property theft 10.3%
Computer crime, internet fraud 7.6%
Counterfeiting 18.5%
Large scale fraud, embezzlement 9.1%
Insurance scams 8.8%
Money laundering 28.8%
Armed robbery 56.6%
Vehicle theft and trafficking 43.5%
Theft of antiques, jewellery 25.7%
Smuggling of cultural artifacts 7.4%
Trafficking in women/children for sex industry 9.5%
Trafficking in human beings for labour 12.4%
Illegal activities in prostitution 19.7%
Kidnapping for ransom 33.2%
Extortion, including protection money 34.4%
Loan sharking 16.1%
Firearms smuggling 22.7%
Illegal trafficking of explosives 12.4%
Environmental crimes 12.7%
Trading in human body parts 13.0%
Livestock theft 23.3%

An analysis of the crimes committed by organized criminal gangs revealed that the gangs
in Kenya mainly focused more on crimes that did not require technological and/ or
software applications. This could be explained by the fact that most members of
organized criminal gangs had low levels of formal education. The most highly educated
of the organized criminal gangs were secondary school dropouts.

4.2 Key Socio-Cultural, Demographic, Economic and Political Factors

in the Operation of Organized Criminal Gangs in Kenya
Organized Criminal Gangs are run like institutions with interdependent units which work
to support the whole. The socio-cultural, demographic, economic and political factors in

26
the operation of Organized Criminal gangs translate into major challenges faced by
government agencies in combating organized crime.

4.2.1 Division of Labour in organized criminal gangs

4.2.1.1 Division of labour on the basis of gender
The male gender dominates membership in the organized criminal gangs, that is, they
account for 60.8%. Therefore, organized crime is presented or manifested as a largely
male issue. However, there exists gender mix in the membership. Mixed gender
organized criminal gangs were particularly identified among the Mungiki, Angola-
Msumbiji and the 42 Brothers. Each gender has its specific roles in the organized criminal
gangs. Tables 4.3 and 4.4 below indicate the role of male and female members of
organized criminal gangs respectively.

Table 4.3 Role of male members in organized criminal gangs

Gender Main activity (including criminal activity)
Male - Execute criminal plans
- Offer security/protection to members
- Facilitate oath taking
- Extortion
- Recruitment and training
- Kidnapping and hijacking
- Drug trafficking
- Collection of illegal levies/taxes/payments
- Execute, punish traitors or those who offend them
- Livestock theft
- Punish law breakers
- Enforce rules of conduct
- Spying
- Engagement of the law enforcers

27
Table 4.4 Role of female members in organized criminal gangs

Gender Main activity (including criminal activity)

Female - Identify clients
- Spying
- Cooking for the male members
- Drug trafficking
- Raise false alarm to create confusion when male members raid and
victims raise alarm
- Provide sexual services to male members
- Act as agents
- Masquerade as prostitutes to identify potential targets
- Keep and transport stolen goods
- Carry chicken to dupe victims to open doors

4.2.1.2 Division of labour in organized criminal gangs on the basis of age

It is important to note that children of members of criminal gangs are socialized from
early childhood by their parents through demonstrations and other forms of experiential
learning. The use of children in criminal activities is child abuse and is therefore an
offence under the Children’s Act of 2001 (CAP 141) Laws of Kenya. Tables 4.5 and 4.6
below indicate the role of children and elderly persons in organized criminal gangs
respectively.

Table 4.5 Role of children in organized criminal gangs

Age Main activity (including criminal activity)
Children - Opening windows and doors
- Spying
- Being sneaked into closed houses through narrow entries to unlock or
unbolt doors and/or windows from inside
- Conveying arms and drugs from one point to another for adult
criminals especially in points where law enforcers are likely to detect
the adults
- Prompting potential victims to react negatively so that the adult
criminal can intervene.
- Keep and transport stolen goods

28
Majority (55.2%) of the respondents was aware of elderly persons who were members of
organized criminal gangs but they did not know them (the elderly persons) in person.

Table 4.6 Role of elderly people in organized criminal gangs

Age Main activity (including criminal activity)

Elderly - Providing advice to the younger members
people - Cleansing
- Spearheading negotiations
- Facilitation and administration of oath
- Recruitment
- Training of recruits
- Providing spiritual support and guidance
- Counselling
- Spying
- Selling drugs
- Solving disputes

4.2.2 Ethnic and Intra-gang members support

As reported by 39.7% of the respondents, organized criminal gangs obtained support of
their ethnic groups. In all the organized criminal gangs, ethnic support was largely in the
form of concealing members’ identity, failing to provide information to authorities and
moral support when confronted by outside forces such as the police. Among the six case
studies, Al Shabaab, Mombasa Republican Council, Mungiki and Sungu Sungu had the
most ethnic support. However, Sungu Sungu in Kisii enjoyed the strongest ethnic support
for the “good” work it did where police had “failed” even after persistent crimes and
reports had been presented. It was also established that organized criminal gangs were
successful in supporting their members against the police. Table 4.7 below indicates intra-
group support in organized criminal gangs.

29
Table 4.7 Intra-group support in organized criminal gangs

No. Type of intra-group support Main criminal groups

1. Financial support All
2. Advisory services All
3. Food All
4. Transport All
5. Protection and shelter All
6. Employment especially in the transport industry Mungiki
7. Bailing out of police and court of arrested members All
8. Paying fines for arrested members All
9. Hiring of defense lawyers All
10. Hide identity and destroy evidence All
11. Not telling truth to non-group members All
12. Punishing those suspected of betrayal All
13. Payment of medical bills All
14. Facilitate escape All
15. Gather information/intelligence All
16. Payment of house rent Mungiki, Al Shabaab

4.2.3 Use of Violence by Organized Criminal Gangs

The use of violence and/or threats of violence by Organized Criminal Gangs is both intra
and inter group. Majority (68.3%) of the respondents confirmed that organized criminal
groups frequently used violence against members of the public while 26.4% reported that
the groups also used intra-violence against their own members especially those who were
suspected of leaking information or failing to disclose part or the entire booty. The
violence and/or threats of violence ranged from attack of victims, robbing or ransacking
premises and domestic houses to intimidation of political opponents and rival business
people. In some cases, organized criminal gangs such as Bamba 40 in Kisii indulged in
domestic issues like settling domestic disputes through administration of violence,
imposing fines and corporal punishment as a disciplining measure.

4.2.4 Conflict between Organized Criminal Gangs

Inter group disagreements, power struggles and/or conflicts were frequently reported
between organized criminal gangs as was indicated by 30.7% of the respondents. Conflict
between the criminal gangs was low but it was reported in Nairobi between Mungiki and

30
Kamjeshi and Talibaan over control of Matatu routes in Eastlands. The majority (53.2%)
of the respondents were aware of some people they personally knew who had been killed
by the organized criminal gangs. Most of the victims killed were business people,
farmers/livestock keepers, artisans/craftspeople, employees of private enterprises and
government employees.

4.2.5 Economic factors in organized criminal gang activities

Organized criminal gangs are involved in both formal and informal business activities
(and employment by extension). These activities include: ownership of public service
vehicles and motorcycles, car wash, rental houses, retail exhibition shops, kiosks, video
theatres/dens, scrap metal and gambling. Tables 4.8 and 4.9 below indicate the source of
funds for operation and the types of support from business persons respectively in
organized criminal gangs.

Table 4.8 Source of funds for operation in organized criminal gangs

No. Source
1. Extortion from public
2. Stealing/theft
3. Robbery
4. Politicians
5. Selling stolen goods
6. Funds from Somalia
7. Business people (for hire services, protection and support)
8. Levies/illegal taxes
9. Group members contribution
10. Drug trafficking
11. Hijacking/piracy
12. Terrorism
13. Rent collection
14. Government officials
15. Family members

31
Table 4.9 Types of Support to organized criminal gangs from Business persons

No. Type of support

1. Financial
2. Protection
3. Security
4. Bailing out of arrested members
5. Offering advice and moral support
6. Legal aid
7. Fire arms
8. Material support
9. Transport services

4.2.6 Political and Government Factors

4.2.6.1 Political Factors
The study indicated that politics played a role in the survival of organized criminal gangs,
for example by:
(i) Some politicians giving funds to the organized criminal gangs for support
(ii) Some politicians soliciting support from organized criminal gangs
(iii) Some supporters of organized criminal gangs being elected into political positions
(iv) Some members of organized criminal gangs being elected into political positions

4.2.6.2 Government Factors

The government has employed a lot of resources into addressing the problem of
organized criminal gangs. This is evident from the annual recruitment of police officers,
purchase of equipment such as motor vehicles and the enactment of the Prevention of
Organized Crimes Act in 2010. However, from the findings of the study by the NCRC,
58.0% of those interviewed were of the view that there were no adequate efforts from the
Government of Kenya to fight organized criminal gangs. The majority (66.0%) of the
respondents were of the view that some police officers do not take seriously the problem
of organized criminal gangs in the areas they were posted. For instance, some police
officers’ collusion was cited by the respondents who reported that: some police officers
collude with members of organized criminal gangs (50.4%); some police officers ignore
useful information from the public on organized crime (55.5%); and some police officers
and some members of organized criminal gangs have friendly interactions (35.1%).

32
According to most (49.1%) of the respondents, there had been no arrests of members of
criminal gangs in their areas in the three years preceding the research even when serious
and multiple crimes had been committed and the offenders were known. A number of
factors were also reported to contribute to the lack and/or inadequate arrest of members of
organized criminal gangs. These included: corruption among some members of the police
force who help the criminals to bribe their way out; corruption among some officers in
the judiciary; some political influence on such gangs; lack of cooperation from some
police officers; difficulties in identifying members of the gangs; tip off by some police
officers; delayed arrival of the police; failure of some members of the public to report for
fear of reprisals/revenge; police ‘fear’ of the gangs; frequent movement of the gangs from
one area to another; lack of genuine police patrol by some officers; support by some
powerful community members and chiefs; destruction of evidence and giving of false
information; lack of unique identity of such members; alleged government ‘support’ for
some organized criminal gangs.

The majority (56.7%) of the respondents were not aware of convictions of the members
of organized criminal gangs. Unsatisfactory prosecution of members of organized
criminal gangs has been attributed to: lack of willing witnesses/disappearance of
witnesses; support by some senior members in government; corruption among some
officers in the judiciary and police (including collusion with law enforcers); unqualified
court prosecutors; and interference by some politicians.

4.3 Case Studies

The study focused on six organized criminal gangs namely; Mombasa Republican
Council, Mungiki, The 42 Brothers, Angola Msumbiji, Al Shabaab and Sungu Sungu.
Each of the six gangs was profiled based on: origin, activities, organized crime and law
enforcement, structure, ethnic and gender composition, size, funding, violence,
professionalism of the gang, general influence of the gang, political influence, trans-
border operations and the role of the group in legitimate economy.

33
4.4. Effects of Organized Crime in Society

4.4.1 Fear among the population

Majority of the respondents argued that many people were more afraid today than before
the emergence of the organized criminal gangs (75.1%), did not feel secure as a result of
the organized criminal gangs (76.1%) and were now more restless than before these
criminal groups emerged (66.9%). Similarly, 18.2% of the respondents indicated that a
close relative had been murdered by an organized criminal gang or killed a person
personally known to them, 34.5% said that organized criminal gangs had hurt or maimed
a person known to them, 16.8% of the respondents reported that they had been forced to
change their residences to places where they felt safer, 36.0% had been forced to keep a
weapon all times or within easy of reach as a defensive mechanism. All the female
respondents reported that they were particularly more cautions, that they returned to their
homes earlier than they used to (at least by 6.30 p.m) and did not leave their houses any
time at night. Wives were also more restless when their husbands were out of their houses
at night.

4.4.2 Changes in Behavior Patterns

According to 33.2% of the respondents, the organized criminal gangs had forced them to
change their normal ways of life. For instance, those who consumed alcohol stated that
they stopped drinking much earlier than before. Women who did business indicated that
they closed business early than they used to about five years ago leading to loss of
business. Other respondents (43.9%) were consequently forced to change and /or revise
their travel patterns while others (49.1%) no longer went to places they perceive to be the
bastion of organized criminal gangs.

4.4.3 Economic cost of increased insecurity

In response to the danger posed by organized criminal groups, at least 25.8% of the
respondents had been forced to install security lights at their premises due to the dangers
posed by organized criminal groups, 30.8% of the respondents reported that fares in
public transport had often been increased arbitrary out of what PSV operators alleged to
be as a result of payments made to members of organized criminal gangs, 20.1% said that
they have been forced to pay for private security services and raise money to erect

34
barriers to reduce exit and entry points into their areas of residence thus implying that the
cost of living had gone up due to the effect of organized criminal gangs in the
neighborhood.

4.4.4 Effect on business

Some organized criminal gangs have forced the closure of enterprises due to losses
following late opening and early closing of business, demand of money from business
people by the gangs and the requirement from businesses to pay protection and/or start-
of-business fees to the gangs. The increased costs of doing business have also been
passed on to consumers.

4.5 Key Challenges Facing Interventions to Address the Problem of

Organized Criminal Gangs in Kenya

4.5.1 The complex nature of the crimes and organized criminal gangs
The tendency to ‘go underground’ where they buy time (after police is ruthless on them)
before resurfacing/resurrecting again and/or mutating continues to present law
enforcement agencies with challenges as sometimes they attack unsuspecting citizens,
particularly under the cover of darkness, leaving a trail of death and destruction.

The initial use of legal products, services and processes just like law abiding citizens
blackmails law enforcers (for example when carjackers board matatus (public service
transport) boarding as ordinary passengers; when criminals engage in legal businesses as
real estate; when criminals acquire normal fertilizers and prepare explosives as in the case
of terrorism).

4.5.2 Inadequate capacity of law enforcement agencies

Law enforcement agencies lack of the required equipment and infrastructure to detect and
investigate organized crime/criminals. Inadequate law enforcement personnel who are
also inadequately trained to handle sophisticated crime especially in the wake of use of
modern technology in committing crime (as in the case of terrorists using remote devices
to detonate explosives; cybercrime) poses a serious challenge in addressing the menace of
organized criminal gangs.

35
4.5.3 Corruption within concerned institutions
Corruption within the institutions responsible for investigation, prosecution, sentencing
and corrections is a key challenge. As criminal enterprises grow, the necessity of finding
helpful government officials willing to shield many criminal activities from the prying
eyes of investigators grows. Hence, corruption becomes a vital tool for organized criminal
groups to continue.

4.5.4 Interference and intimidation of combat efforts

Interference and intimidation of efforts aimed at combating organized crime is a
stumbling block to eliminating organized criminal gangs. The interference may come
from some local politicians, senior government officials, prominent business persons and
foreigners.

4.5.5 Legal limitations

This has mainly to do with weak laws and limited jurisdiction of the laws of a country.
For example, prosecutions are based on written laws which frequently contain numerous
contradictions that can be used as loopholes to effective prosecution. The result may be
the charging of offenders with less serious offences (as in the case of pirates or terrorists)
and meting out of lenient sentences.

Organized crime ignores borders but law enforcement cannot. Some organized criminals
can conduct business in any number of cities, states and nations. This creates problems
for law enforcement in municipalities, states and nations.

4.5.6 High poverty and unemployment levels within the community

Some organized criminal gangs draw their members from poor communities and give the
members a sense of purpose, cultural and political identity, as well as income. As much as
the Prevention of Organized Crimes Act provides law enforcers with sharper claws to
crack down on organized criminal groups, the prevailing poverty levels and
unemployment amongst the youth appears to be an underlying root cause requiring
intervention measures.

36
 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusions
The emergence of organized crime in Kenya poses a challenge. The scale, number and
their proliferation creates an even greater dynamic to the law enforcement authorities in
particular. Public knowledge of organized crime is widespread from rural to urban areas
which imply that it is a widespread phenomenon. The public view appears to support the
contention that there is less commitment on the part of government to confront it with the
vigour and dedication it deserves. Although organized crime is largely presented as a
male problem, this study found considerable and active proportions of women and
children. Since the structure of organized crime in Kenya appears ethnic in character, it
was found that ethnic support is crucial for it to thrive. Cross cultural/ethnic tendencies
are equally observed. Intra-gang support is an organized and coordinated activity
especially for those apprehended or in the danger of apprehension. Although there have
been arrests and convictions of members of organized criminal gangs over a couple of
years, public perception is that law enforcement has been lethargic.

Conflict between organized criminal gangs, involvement in legitimate business and

drawing membership from neighbouring ethnic groups are some of the survival tactics
now being employed. Most of the groups’ funds are obtained from diverse sources, but
extortion from the public, theft and donations from some politicians are the principal
sources. Some politicians and business people support and receive support from
organized criminal gangs.

Organized crime has deleterious consequences on society. It causes fear and changes
people’s travel, leisure and business/livelihood patterns. Besides it is now more expensive
to transact business, which translates into a higher cost of living. They operate hierarchal
structures and the mutating characteristic is now prominent among them. The high
unemployment rate among the youth is a principal factor in terms of ease of recruitment
hence avenues of engaging the idle youth in productive activities is one way of
controlling the proliferation of organized crime in Kenya.

37
There is a conducive environment in Kenya for organized criminal gangs to flourish: the
weakening social fabric, rapid social changes, increasing poverty, unemployment,
corruption, political antagonism and ethnic politics. All these factors function to make a
conducive environment for organized crime to be a viable alternative livelihood activity
for many Kenyan youth. Unless they are addressed in a wholesome and non-partisan way,
the problem may magnify itself in the long run.

Organized criminal gangs are a product of society. They come up and develop because
society accepts them but society turns against them only when their negative effects begin
to weigh too heavily on it. The general conclusion is that the number of organized
criminal gangs is increasing as new ones are formed or break from existing ones. For
security and economy and for the general society this implies need for increased
surveillance, increased investment in crime prevention and continued research into
conditions that generate their growth. The impact of organized crime can be felt at both
individual and collective levels. In particular the negative impact or business and peoples
freedom is considerable. More people now walk in fear than ever before.

In the context of prevention of organized crime, individual, community and public and
private sector organizational crime prevention initiatives and involvement is mandatory.

5.2 Recommendations
Addressing the problem of organized criminal gangs requires a multidimensional strategy
that safeguards citizens, breaks the financial strength of criminal networks, disrupts illicit
trafficking networks, defeats transnational criminal organizations, fights government
corruption, strengthens the rule of law, bolsters judicial systems, and improves
transparency. Specifically, the following recommendations may be followed towards
addressing the problem of organized criminal gangs in Kenya.
1. Enact the required and/or fully implement relevant legislations (e.g the Counter-
terrorism Act, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act), put in place other Crime
Prevention policies and strengthen existing programmes (such as the Witness Protection
Programme since prosecutors indicate witness intimidation is a key hindrance that must
be addressed in many gang cases).
2. Enhance intelligence gathering and information sharing among the relevant players.

38
3. Since members of organized criminal gangs are revengeful, there is need for the Police,
Judiciary and Corrections to hide the identities of those who pass on intelligence
information.
4. The Police, Judiciary and Corrections need to partner with the media to publicize
information about arrests, prosecution, conviction and punishment of members of
organized criminal gangs so that would-be gang members can realize the futility of
criminality.
5. Protect the financial system and strategic markets against transnational organized
crime.
6. There is need for enhanced facilitation of the supervision of non-custodial and aftercare
rehabilitation/correction of offenders in the community.
7. Strengthen the investigation (such as the formation of a highly specialized anti-
organized crime system and police units) and prosecution of organized crime.
8. Identification of a permanent funding source for the implementation of the highly
specialized anti-organized crime system. Similarly, there is need for identification of an
ongoing funding source, both at the national and county government, for the
establishment and/or replacement and update of electronic surveillance equipment
especially on border points in tracking the Al Shabaab group.
9. Disrupt drug trafficking and its facilitation of other threats.
10. Constant training and review of training curriculum for police officers in line with the
dynamics of crime commission is mandatory.
11. Community leaders and community education are critical in prevention of organized
crime. Religious and educational institutions can play a key role in educating people
about the dangers of organized crime.
12. Criminals are becoming increasingly astute in concealing their identities, criminal
activities, and assets earned from their illegal enterprises. As a result, it is often difficult
for law enforcement agencies to track investigative leads and identify these criminals and
businesses involved in criminal activities. There is therefore an ardent need for the
National Crime Research Centre and the law enforcement agencies to work closely in
order to scour various public records for this vital information. On-line database records
would provide investigators and prosecutors with the criminals’ current and former
addresses, aliases, telephone numbers, banking and financial histories, business and
corporate records and real estate transactions. This information would also be useful to
help identify well hidden assets obtained with proceeds from illegal organized criminal
39
gang activities. Adequate funding for the National Crime Research Centre, intelligence
and law enforcement agencies would be critical.
13. Build and/or strengthen international capacity, cooperation and partnerships in dealing
with especially transnational organized criminal groups.

40
 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Beccaria, C. (1963) On Crimes and Punishment. Translated by Herny Paolucci, Bobs-Merrill.
Indianapolis

Becker, J. (1968) Hitler’s Children. London

Bernard, T.J (1987) “Testing Structural Strain Theories” Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency 24(4): 264-270

Bittner, E. (1963) “Radicalism and Organization of Radical Movements, American Sociological

Review. 28

Block, A and Chambliss, W. (1981) Organizing Crime. Elsevier. New York.

Bower, G. H. & Hilgard, E.R.(1981) Theories of Learning. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.

California Commission on Organized Crime (1948).” First Interim Report of the Special Crime
Study Commission on Organized Crime”. Sacramento. California Board of Corrections.

Chambliss, W. (Ed) (1973) Sociological Readings in the Conflict Perspective. Addison. Wesley.
London

Chambliss, W. (1978) On the Take: From Petty Crooks to Presidents, Indiana University Press.
Bloomingtone.

Cleaver, E. (1968) Soul on Ice. Ramparts Press Inc. New York.

Clinard M.B. (1964) Anomie and Deviant Behavior. New York. The Free Press.

Cloward, R.A. and Ohlin, F.L. (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquency
Gangs. New York. The Free Press.

Cohen, K.A. (1955) Delinquent Boys: The Culture of The Gang. Free Press. New York

41
Davis, K. (1961) “Prostitution”, In Merton, R and Nisbet,, R. (Eds) Contemporary Social
Problems. New York

Diana, F. (1990) “Biological Perspective in Criminology” Criminology (28(1):27-72

Douglas, J (1972) “The Experience of the Absurd and the Problem of Social Order in Scott, R. &
Douglas, J. (eds), Theoretical Perspectives on Deviance. New York

Durkheim, E. (1965) The Division of Labour in Society (Translated By George Simpson).

New York. The Free Press.

Ellis, H. (1900) The Criminal. New York. Cribner.

Ferraro, G.L. (1911) Criminal Man According to the Classification Of Cesare Lombroso.
Pitman. New York

Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline And Punish: The Birth Of Prison. London

GoK (2010). Prevention Of Organized Crimes Act, 2010.

Gordon, R.H. (1967) “ Issues in Ecological Study of Deliquency” American Sociological Review.
36.927-944.

Goring, C. (1913) The English Convict: A Statistical Study. Patterson Smith. New Jersey

Hay, et.al (1975) Albinos Fatal Tree. Crime and Society in 18th Century England. London

Kenya Association of Manufacturers. “Policy Brief” (2006) Nairobi.

Kenya National Dialogue and Reconciliation. “Review Report” (2010). Nairobi.

Lukes, S. (1967) “Alienation and Anomie” In Las Let, P. and Runciman, W. (Eds). Philosophy,
Politics and Society. Oxford
42
Matza, D. (1969) Becoming Deviant. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey

Merton, K.R. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. He Free Press. Glencoe

Merton, R.K. (1959) “Social Conformity, Deviation and Opportunity Structures: A Comment on
the Contributions of Dubin and Claward” American Sociological Review 24:188

Morris, N. & Hawkins, G. (1970) The Honest Politician’s Guide. Tosa Crime Control. Chicago

Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space. People and Design in the Violent City. London

Pambazuko. Gazeti Rasmi La Pwani. August 29-September 4, 2011. Mombasa

Pearce, F. (1976) Crimes of the Powerful. London

Rude, G. (1964) Primitive Rebels. Manchester

Sharh, A.S. & Roth, L. H. (1974) “Biological and Psychological Factors in Criminality” in
Daniel Glaser (Ed) Handbook of Criminology. Rand McNally. Chicago

Sutherland, E. (1924). Principles of Criminology. Chicago

The East African Standard. The Underworld August 10, 2011

The Kenya Gazette. Vol. CXII-No.104. October 18, 2010. Government Printer. Nairobi

The National Crime Research Act , CAP 62. Government Printer. Nairobi

Thompson . E. (1971) “The Moral Economy of the English Crown in the 18th Century” Past and
Present, 50

Thompson, F. (1975) Whigs and Hunters. The Origin of the Black Act. London.

43
Toby, J. (1965) “ Is Punishment Necessary” Journal Of Criminal Law, Criminology And Police
Science. 55:332-337

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Results of a Pilot Survey of Forty Selected
Organized Criminal Groups in Sixteen Countries. September, 2002.

United Nations Special Rapporteur (2009). “Report on Extra Judicial, Summary or Arbitrary
Executions” (dated May 2009)

United Nations Habitat (2007) “Global Report on Human Settlements: Crime and Violence at a
Glance”. United Nations. Nairobi.

Von Hirsch, A. (Ed) (1976) Doing Justice. New York

Vine, M.S. (1972) “Gabriel Tarde” In Hermann Mannheim, (Ed) Pioneers in Criminology. Mont
Clair. New Jersey.

Wilson, J. (1975) Thinking about Crime. New York

Yarrow, M. et.al (1968) “The Psychological Meaning of Mental Illness in the Family” in
Rubington, E. and Winberg, M. (eds), Deviance. New York

44
Preventing Crime through the Research Approach
The increasing incidents of crime and insecurity perpetrated by both individual and
organized criminals in the country continue to worry many Kenyans and foreigners alike.
Lives and property continue to be lost and/or destroyed while injuries are sustained in the
hands of these dangerous criminals. Emerging crime trends are evolving in unprecedented
rates and measures, thus giving law enforcement agencies the serious challenge of
containing the situation in the backdrop of insufficient resources. The “reactive” approach
in dealing with crime appears not bear any meaningful results in solving the problem even
in the developed economies such as Japan and the U.S.

The challenges experienced by law and order enforcement agencies have forced
progressive nations of the world to change tact and adopt evidence-based approaches
informed by scientific research into the problem of crime. Fighting crime through the
research approach is in line with the international best practice where research has
provided critical information on what works to impact on crime and disorder and has
helped to generate programmes that can assist criminal justice agencies. The National
Crime Research Centre strives to foster coordination in local, regional and international
research, sharing information, infrastructure and mutual assistance. The Centre will
continue to offer practical cost effective solutions to the problem of crime in Kenya.
These solutions will continue to be informed by quality and authentic research on the
causes and prevention of crime in the effort to improve people’s lives by way of sound
policies geared towards improved, efficient and effective administration of criminal
justice.

In the continued execution of its mandate, the National Crime Research Centre will soon
be releasing the findings of two other recently concluded research studies on “Gender
Based Violence in Kenya” and “Election Crimes and Offences in Kenya”.

National Crime Research Centre

NSSF Building, Block A, 19th Floor, Western Wing
P.O Box 21180-00100
NAIROBI-KENYA

Tel: +254-20-2716762/64
Email: ncrckenya07@gmail.com