CA Final - AFM - Super 90 Questions - Bhavik Chokshi
CA Final - AFM - Super 90 Questions - Bhavik Chokshi
CA FINAL
ADVANCED FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
SUPER 90 QUESTIONS
INDEX
Sr. No. of
Contents Page No.
No. Questions
Valuation of Securities
1. 13 1
(Security Analysis and Security Valuation)
2. Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructuring 11 23
hi
3. Portfolio Management 10 54
ks
5. Mutual Funds 7 85
8.
9.
ho
Foreign Exchange Exposure and Risk Management
4
106
144
C
10. Derivatives Analysis and Valuation 12 153
i CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Based on the credit rating of bonds, Mr. Z has decided to apply the following discount rates
hi
for valuing bonds:
Credit Rating Discount Rate
AAA 364 day T bill rate + 3% spread
ks
AA AAA + 2% spread
A AAA + 3% spread
He is considering to invest in AA rated, ` 1,000 face value bond currently selling at ` 1,025.86.
ho
The bond has five years to maturity and the coupon rate on the bond is 15% p.a. payable annually.
The next interest payment is due one year from today and the bond is redeemable at par.
(Assume the 364 day T-bill rate to be 9%).
C
You are required to calculate the intrinsic value of the bond for Mr. Z. Should he invest in the
bond? Also calculate the current yield and the Yield to Maturity (YTM) of the bond.
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
av
a. Discount Rate
AAA = 9% + 3% = 12%
AA = 12% + 2% = 14%
Bh
b. Intrinsic Value
Bo = 150 × 3.4331 + 1,000 × 0.5194
PVAF (14%, 5 Years) PVF (14%, 5th Year)
= 1,034.37
c. Recommendation:
Mr Z should buy the bond as the Market Price of the bond (1,025.86) < Intrinsic Value
(1,034.37)
Annual Interest
d. Current Yield = × 100
Market Price
150
= × 100
1,025.86
1 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
= 14.62%
Reference Note: If the MP was not given, intrinsic value would be considered as the
Market price.
e. Yield to Maturity
Using Trial & Error
PVCO = ` 1,025.86
At 14%, PVCI = 1,034.37 (part b)
hi
At 15%, PVCI = 150 × 3.3522 + 1,000 × 0.4972
PVAF (15%, 5 Years) PVF (15%, 5th Year)
= ` 1,000.03
ks
By Using Interpolation
x − 0.14
0.01
=
8.51
34.34
x = 0.14 + 0.0025
ho
C
x = 0.1425 i.e. 14.25%
Following are the yields on Zero Coupon Bonds (ZCB) having a face value of ` 1,000 :
Maturity (Years) Yield to Maturity (YTM)
av
1 10%
2 11%
3 12%
Bh
Assume that the term structure of interest rate will remain the same.
You are required to
(i) Calculate the implied one year forward rates
(ii) Expected Yield to Maturity and prices of one year and two year Zero Coupon Bonds at
the end of the first year.
Summary
Detailed Solution
2 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
1. Implied forward rate: The forward rate for year 1 would be the same as YTM for year 1
i.e 10%
2. Forward Rate for year 2
(1 + YTM)2 = (1 + r1) (1 + r2)
(1 + 0.11) 2
= (1 + 0.1) (1 + r2)
1.2321 = 1.1r2 + 1.1
0.1321 = 1.1r2
hi
r2 = 0.1201
i.e. 12.01%
3. Forward Rate for Year 3
ks
(1 + 0.12)3 = (1 + 0.11)2 (1 + r3)
1.4049 = 1.2321 + 1.2321r3
1.2321r3 = 0.1728
r3
i.e. 14.02%
Alternatively
(1 + YTM3)3
=
=
0.1402
ho
(1 + r1) (1 + r2) (1 + r3)
C
(1 + 0.12) 3
= (1 + 0.1) (1 + 0.1201) (1 + r3)
1.4049
= 1 + r3
1.2321
ik
1 + r3 = 1.1402
r3 = 14.02%
ii. Actual Position at the end of Year 1:
av
Bond 1: Since the Original Maturity is 1 Year, this bond would have been redeemed & hence
it would not be outstanding Bond at the end of Year 1.
Bh
= 892.8
3 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Reference Note: We take 1 year as the remaining maturity because we are at the end of
the 1st Year and a 2 year bond would be redeemed after 1 more year.
Bond 3: Remaining Maturity: 2 years
(1 + YTM)2 = (1 + r2) ( 1 + r3)
(1 + YTM)2 = (1 + 0.1201) (1 + 0.1402)
Let YTM be x
(1 + x)2 = 1.2771
hi
1+x = 1.1301
x = 0.1301 i.e. 13.01%
Price of bond 3 at end of Year 1 = ` 1,000 × 0.7830
ks
PVF (13.01%, 2 year)
nd
= ` 783
Question 3
Summary
Detailed Solution
4 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
hi
∑ t x PV of CI
(ii) Macaulay Duration =
∑ PV of CI
40,103.35
=
ks
9, 431.50
= 4.25 Years
(iii) Current Market Price = 9,431.50
(iv) Volatility
=
hoMacaulay Duration
4.25
1 + YTM
C
(1 + 0.1)
= 3.864
(v) Convexity
ik
Vo = (` 9,431.50) At 10%
V+ = (10% - 2%) At 8%
V- = (10% + 2%) At 12%
av
Reference Note
As Sub point (v) requires the expected price if YTM changes by 2%, we have calculated V+ and
Bh
V- taking difference of 2%
Alternatively, any other difference (of say 1%) can also be taken
V+ (at 8%) = 850 × 3.993 + 10,000 × 0.681
PVAF (8%, 5 Years) PVF (8%, 5th Year)
V+ (at 8%) = ` 10,204.05
V- (at 12%) = 850 × 3.605 + 10,000 × 0.567
PVAF (12%, 5 Years) PVF (12%, 5th Year)
V- = ` 8,734.25
V+ + V− − 2Vo
Convexity (C) =
( )
2
2Vo × YTM
5 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
=
(
10,204.05 + 8, 734.25 – 2 × 9, 431.50 )
(2 × 9, 431.50 ) × ( 0.02)
2
75.3
=
7.5452
= 9.98
hi
Convexity Effect = C × (YTM)2 × 100
= 9.98 × (0.02)2 × 100
= 998 × 0.0004
ks
= 0.3992% i.e 0.40%
Expected Market Price for 2% fall in YTM
a. Based on Duration
Expected Price
YTM
- 1%
- 2%
=
ho
9,431.5 + 7.73% × 9,431.5
Price
+ 3.864
+ 7.73 (cross multiply)
C
= 10,160.55
b. Based on Intrinsic Value Method
(i.e PV of future CF @ 8%)
ik
Seawell Corporation reported earnings per share of ` 2.10 in 2003, on which it paid Dividend per
share of ` 0.69. As on 01 January, 2004 an analyst expects the earnings to grow at 15% p.a. from
2004 to 2008, and during this period the dividend payout ratio is expected to remain unchanged.
After 2008, the earnings growth rate is expected to drop to a stable rate of 6% and the payout
ratio is expected to increase to 65% of earnings. The firm has a beta of 1.40 currently, and is
expected to have a beta of 1.10 after 2008. The market risk premium is 5.5% and the Treasury
Bond (Risk free) rate is 6.25%.
(a) What is the expected price of the share at the end of 2008
(b) What is the value of the share today (01 Jan 04), using the two stage dividend discount
model
6 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Summary
Detailed Solution
1. Given Data
E0 = 2.10, D0 = 0.69
Earnings growth: 2004 to 2008 = 15%
hi
After 2008
= 6%
0.69
Dividend pay-out: 2004 to 2008 = × 100 = 32.86%
2.1
2008 onwards = 65%
ks
β: 2004 to 2008 = 1.4, After 2008 = 1.1
RM - RF = 5.5%, RF = 6.25%
2. Calculation of dividend & Earnings
YEAR
1 (2004)
2 (2005)
ho EPS
2.42
2.78
DPS
0.80
(2.42 × 32.86%)
0.91
C
3 (2006) 3.20 1.05
4 (2007) 3.68 1.21
5 (2008) 4.23 1.39
6 (2009) 4.48 2.91
ik
3. Calculation of Ke
Using CAPM
av
Ke = RF + (RM - RF) β
2004 to 2008
β = 1.4
Bh
7 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
WN 1: PV of D1-D5
Years Dividend Ke @13.95% PV of Dividend
1 0.8 0.8776 0.70
2 0.91 0.7701 0.70
3 1.05 0.6759 0.71
4 1.21 0.5931 0.72
5 1.39 0.5205 0.72
3.55
hi
WN 2: Terminal Value
ks
D6 th
PV of P5 = × PVF (13.95%, 5 Year )
KE - g
2.91
PV of P5 = × 0.5205
( )
PV of P5
PV of P5
=
=
0.123 − 0.06
2.91
0.063
× 0.5205
46.19 × 0.5205
ho
C
PV of P5 = 24.04
Answer:
a. Expected price at year: 5 (2008) = ` 46.19
ik
A share with par value of ` 100 has current market price of ` 500. Annual dividend is 20%. Bonus
shares are expected to be issued during the 5th year @ one share for 4 held. One shareholder
Bh
intends to sell the shares at the end of 8th year. Price of a share is expected to be ` 900 at the
end of the 8th year. Shareholders are required to bear incidental expenses on sale & purchase
of shares @ 10% of Market Price of share. Dividend rate will remain same even after the bonus
issue. Required rate of return is 10%. Ignore taxation. Should the share be purchased and if
yes, at what maximum price?
Summary
Detailed Solution
8 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
a. PV of dividend from YR : 1 to 8
Year Dividend DF@10% PV
1-4 20 3.1699 63.40
hi
(100 × 1 × 20%) PVAF (10%;1 - 4)
5-8 25 2.165 54.13
(100 × 1.25 × 20%) PVAF (10%;5-8)
` 117.52
ks
b. PV of Net Sale Proceeds (900 × 1.25 shares) : ` 1,125
(-) Incidental Expense @10% (` 112.5)
Net Sale proceeds
* PVF (10%, 8th Year)
PV of Net Sale proceeds
ho ` 1,012.5
0.4665
` 472.33
C
c. PV of all cash inflows.
= 117.53 (a) + 472.33 (b)
= ` 589.86
ik
d. The above workings have not considered the incidental expense on purchase
Let purchase price be ` 100
av
The maximum purchase price of the share (excluding purchase expenses) is ` 536.24.
As this price is greater than the current market price (excluding expenses) that is ` 500, the
share is worth buying today.
Reference Note: Alternatively, ` 589.86 can be compared with ` 550 (500 + 10%) in order to
decide whether the share is worth investing today or not. However, the maximum purchase price
needs to be the standalone price itself (i.e. without considering purchase expenses).
9 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
hi
Long run growth rate of the company 8%
Beta 0.1; risk free interest rate 8.7%
ks
Market returns 10.3%
Capital expenditure per share ` 47
Depreciation per share ` 39
Summary
ho ` 3.45 per share
C
Detailed Solution
1. As all the information is given on a per share basis, we will try to find FCFE/share. In
ik
` 1, 300 Cr
No. of shares = = 32.5 Crore Shares
av
` 40
290
Bh
= = ` 8.92/share
32.5
3. In this question, the debt ratio is given and hence an alternative formula can be used to
calculate FCFE/share
FCFE/Share
= PAT/Share (EPS) + Depreciation/Share (I - D) - CAPEX/Share (I - D) -
in WC/Share(I - D)
= 8.92 + 39 (1 - 0.27) - 47 (1 - 0.27) - 3.45 (1 - 0.27)
= 8.92 + 28.47 - 34.31 - 2.51 = 0.56/shares
In the absence of information, we have assumed that FCFE of 0.56 is for year 0 [in line
with ICAI's solution] alternatively it can also be taken as FCFE for Year 1.
10 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
4. Using CAPM
Ke = RF + (RM - RF)
= 8.7 + (10.3% - 8.7%) 0.1
= 8.7% + 0.16%
Ke = 8.86%
FCFE/Share
5. P0 =
Ke - g
hi
0.56 × 1.08
=
0.0886 − 0.08
ks
0.6048
P0 =
0.0086
P0 = 70.33/Share
Following information is available pertaining to ABC Ltd. which is expected to grow at a higher
C
rate for 3 years after which growth rate will stabilize at a lower level.
Base year information is -
EBIT
ik
Information for high growth and stable growth period are as follows:
av
Stable Growth
Particulars High Growth Stable Growth
Growth in Revenue & EBIT 20% 10%
Bh
Growth in Capital Expenditure and Depreciation 20% Capital Expenditure are offset by
Depreciation
Risk free rate 10% 9%
Equity Beta 1.15 1.00
Market Risk Premium 6% 5%
PreTax cost of Debt 13% 12.86%
Debt Equity Ratio 1:1 2:3
Working capital is 25% of Revenue for all time. Corporate Tax Rate is 30%.
You are requested to find out the value of ABC Ltd.
11 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
9.1%. 9%.
Cost of capital 0.5 x 0.169 + 0.5 x 0.091 = 0.6 x 0.14 + 0.4 x 0.09 =
0.13 or 13%. 0.12 or 12%.
ks
Determination of forecasted Free Cash Flow of the Firm (FCFF)
(` in crores)
Particulars Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Terminal Year
Revenue
EBIT
EAT
Capital Expenditure
ho
1200.00
180.00
126.00
48.00
1440.00
216.00
151.20
57.60
1728.00
259.20
181.44
69.12
1900.80
285.12
199.58
-
C
Less Depreciation
∆ Working Capital 50.00 60.00 72.00 43.20
Free Cash Flow (FCF) 28.00 33.60 40.32 156.38
ik
Present Value (PV) of FCFF during the explicit forecast period is:
FCFF (` in crores) PVF @ 13% PV (` in crores)
28.00 0.885 24.78
33.60 0.783 26.31
40.32 0.693 27.94
` 79.03
12 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
156.38
Terminal Value of Cash Flow =
0.12- 0.10
= ` 7819 Crore
1
PV of the terminal value is = ` 7819 Crore ×
(1.13)3
= ` 7819 Crore x 0.693 = ` 5418.57 Crore
The value of the firm is = ` 79.03 Crores + ` 5418.57 Crores = ` 5497.60 Crores
hi
Question 8 (ICAI Paper May 22)
[Q.55 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.55 - AFM 10]
Closing Values of NIFTY Index from 3rd to 12th day of the month of January 2022 were as
ks
follows:
Days Date Closing Values of NIFTY Index
1 03/01/2022 17626
2
3
4
5
04/01/2022
05/01/2022
06/01/2022
07/01/2022
ho 17805
17925
17746
17813
C
6 10/01/2022 18003
7 11/01/2022 18056
8 12/01/2022 18212
The simple moving average of NIFTY Index for the month of December 2021 was 17174.
ik
Summary
Detailed Solution
= 2 = 0.125
n+1
13 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Date 1 2 3 4 5
NIFTY EMA for Previous EMA 2 + 4
day (EMA (t – 1)) 1-2 3 × 0.125
03/01/2022 17626 17174 452 56.50 17230.50
04/01/2022 17805 17230.50 574.50 71.81 17302.31
05/01/2022 17925 17302.31 622.69 77.84 17380.15
06/01/2022 17746 17380.15 365.85 45.73 17425.88
07/01/2022 17813 17425.88 387.12 48.39 17474.27
hi
10/01/2022 18003 17474.27 528.73 66.09 17540.36
11/01/2022 18056 17540.36 515.64 64.45 17604.82
12/01/2022 18212 17604.82 607.18 75.90 17680.71
ks
(iii) A buy (bullish) signal is generated when actual price line (NIFTY in the give case) rises
through the moving average, while a sell a (bearish) signal is generated when actual NIFTY
level declines through the moving averages. In the case under consideration the price line
Question 9
ho
of NIFTY never breaches the 15 -day EMA line. In-fact it is hovering around the 15-day
The closing value of Sensex for the month of October, 2007 is given below:
ik
3.10.07 2780
4.10.07 2795
5.10.07 2830
8.10.07 2760
Bh
9.10.07 2790
10.10.07 2880
11.10.07 2960
12.10.07 2990
15.10.07 3200
16.10.07 3300
17.10.07 3450
19.10.07 3360
22.10.07 3290
14 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
23.10.07 3360
24.10.07 3340
25.10.07 3290
29.10.07 3240
30.10.07 3140
31.10.07 3260
hi
You are required to test the weak form of efficient market hypothesis by applying the run
test at 5% and 10% level of significance.
Following value can be used :
ks
Value of t at 5% is 2.101 at 18 degrees of freedom Value of t at 10% is 1.734 at 18 degrees
of freedom
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
Date Closing Index Sign of Price Charge
1.10.07 2,800
3.10.07 2,780 -
ik
4.10.07 2,795 +
5.10.07 2,830 +
8.10.07 2,760 -
av
9.10.07 2,790 +
10.10.07 2,880 +
11.10.07 2,960 +
Bh
12.10.07 2,990 +
15.10.07 3,200 +
16.10.07 3,300 +
17.10.07 3,450 +
19.10.07 3,360 -
22.10.07 3,290 -
23.10.07 3,360 +
24.10.07 3,340 -
25.10.07 3,290 -
29.10.07 3,240 -
15 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
30.10.07 3,140 -
31.10.07 3,260 +
1. N1, N2, r
N1: Number of positive sign changes = 11
N2: Number of negative sign changes = 8
r: Number of runs = 8
hi
2. Calculate µ and σ
(2N1N2 ) + 1
µ =
(N + N2 )
ks
1
(2 × 11 × 8)
µ = +1
(11 + 8)
µ
σ
=
=
10.26
(
2n1n2 × 2n1n2 - n1 - n2 )
ho
C
(n ) × (n - 1)
2
1
+ n2 1
+ n2
(2 × 11 × 8) × 2 × 11 × 8 - 11 - 8)
σ =
(11 + 8) × (11 + 8 - 1)
2
ik
27, 632
σ =
av
6, 498
σ = 2.06
3. Limits
Bh
Lower Limit: µ – t × σ
Upper Limit: µ + t × σ
Test at 5% level of significance at 18 degrees of freedom using t - table
Lower limit
= 10.26 – 2.101 × 2.06
= 5.93
Upper limit
= 10.26 + 2.101 × 2.06
= 14.59
Range at 5%: 5.93 – 14.59
16 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
hi
Range at 10%: 6.69 – 13.83
4. Conclusion
As r is 8 which is within the range of lower limit and the upper limit at both 5% and 10%
ks
level of significance, the market is considered to satisfy the weak form of efficient
market hypothesis.
Reference Note:
ho
A market is considered to be efficient if the price changes are random. In case there
are too few runs or too many runs, then an investor can predict the price movements
by merely looking at the past price data and hence the market would be inefficient.
However, in case the number of runs are within the average range of randomness, it is a
C
little difficult to predict the future price movements looking at the past data and hence
in such a case, the markets are considered to be weak form efficient.
ik
Abhishek has a surplus cash of ` 80 lakhs and wants to distribute 30% of it to the shareholders.
The company decides to buy back shares. The finance manager of the Company estimates that
its share price after repurchase is likely to be 10% above the buyback price, if the buyback
Bh
route is taken, The number of shares outstanding at present is 10 lakhs and the current EPS is
` 3. You are required to determine:
a. The price at which the shares can be repurchased if the market capitalization of the
company should be ` 180 lakhs after buyback
b. The number of shares that can be repurchased
c. The impact of share repurchase on the EPS, assuming the net income is same.
Summary
Detailed Solution
17 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
hi
Post buy-back Market capitalisation = Post Buy Back price × Post Buy Back no. of shares
1,80,00,000 = 1.1x × [10,00,000 - 24,00,000/x]
1,80,00,000 = 11,00,000x - 26,40,000
ks
2,06,40,000 = 11,00,000x
x = ` 18.76
Buyback Price = 18.76
b.
No. of shares bought back =
=
ho
` 24, 00, 000
18.76
1,27,932 shares
C
Pre - Buyback PAT
c. Pre-Buyback EPS =
Pre Buyback Shares
The following data is relating 8.5% Fully convertible debentures issued by JAC Ltd at ` 1,000
Market Price of Debenture ` 900
Conversion Ratio 30
Straight Value of Debenture ` 700
Market Price of Equity Shares on date of conversion ` 25
18 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
hi
(f) Favorable income differential per share
(g) Premium payback period
ks
Summary
Detailed Solution
a.
=
=
Conversion Value = ho
Conversion Ratio × MPS
30 × 25
` 750
C
Market Price of debentures
b. Market Conversion Price / Conversion Parity Price =
30
900
=
ik
30
= 30
av
900 - 750
=
30
Bh
150
=
30
= ` 5/share
900 − 750
=
750
= 0.2:1
19 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
= Annual Income - (Annual Dividend / Share × Conversion Ratio) = Annual Income - (Annual
Conversion Ratio
hi
D
ividend Per Share ×
Conversion Ratio
ks
(1, 000 × 8.5%) - (1 × 30)
= = (1,000 × 8.5%) - (1 × 30)
30
85 - 30
= = 85 - 30
30
g.
= ` 1.83/share
900 - 750
=
55
ik
150
= = 2.73 years
55
[Q.1 - Additional Question AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.85 - AFM 10]
The Bank PK enters into a Repo for 9 days with Bank JJ in 6% Government Bonds 2022 for an
Bh
20 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Summary
Detailed Solution
No. of days
(a) Second Leg = Start Proceed x 1 + Repo Rate ×
360
9
` 20,03,17,590 = ` 20,00,67,500 x 1 + Repo Rate ×
hi
360
9
1.00125 = 1 + Repo Rate ×
360
ks
Repo Rate = 0.05 = 5%
Dirty Price 100 - Initial Margin
(b) First Leg (Start Proceed) = Nominal Value x ×
100 100
` 20,00,67,500 = ` 20,00,00,000 x
240
` 101.30 = Clean Price + 100 × × 6%
ik
360
21 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
(SECURITY ANALYSIS AND SECURITY VALUATION)
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
(i) Ex-right price of share and the value of right
(a) Number of shares to be issued : 4,00,000
Subscription price ` 60,00,000/4,00,000 = ` 15
ks
` 240 Lakh + ` 60 Lakh
Ex − =
Right Price = ` 18.75
1.0202
ho
Value of a Right Per Share Basis ` 3.75
= = ` 1.25
(ii) (a) Shareholder’s wealth that is holding 1500 shares when firm offers one share
for three shares held and subscribes the offer.
Value of Shares after right issue (2000 X ` 18.75) ` 37,500
Less: Amount paid to acquire right shares (500 x ` 15) ` 7,500
Bh
` 30,000
Wealth before Right Issue = 1500 x 20 = ` 30,000 Thus, there is no change in
the wealth
(b) Shareholder’s wealth that is holding 1500 shares when firm offers one share for
three shares held and does not subscribe the offer.
Value of Shares after right issue (1500 x ` 18.75) = ` 28,125
Thus, if shareholder does not subscribe right offer there will be loss of wealth
of ` 1,875.
22 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Following are the financial statements for A Ltd. and B Ltd. for the current financial year. Both
firms operate in the same industry.
hi
Balance Sheet
Particulars A Ltd. B Ltd.
ks
Total current assets ` 14,00,000 ` 10,00,000
Total fixed assets (net) 10,00,000 5,00,000
Total Assets 24,00,000 15,00,000
Equity capital (of ` 10 each)
Retained earnings
14% Long term debt
Total current liabilities
ho 10,00,000
2,00,000
5,00,000
7,00,000
8,00,000
-
3,00,000
4,00,000
C
Total Liabilities 24,00,000 15,00,000
Income Statement
Particulars A Ltd. B Ltd.
ik
Assume that the two firms are in the process of negotiating a merger through an exchange of
equity shares. You have been asked to assist in establishing equitable exchange terms, and are
required to:-
(a) Decompose the share prices of both the firms into EPS and PE components, and also
segregate their EPS figures into return on equity (ROE) and book value / intrinsic
value per share (BVPS) components.
23 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
(d) Calculate the post - merger EPS based on an exchange ratio of 0.4: 1 being offered
by A Ltd. indicate the immediate EPS accretion or dilution, if any that will occur for
each group of shareholders.
ks
(e) Based on a 0.4: 1 exchange ratio, and assuming that A's pre - merger PE ratio will
continue after the merger, estimate the post - merger market price. Show the
resulting accretion or dilution in pre - merger market prices.
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
(a) Calculation of EPS, P/E, ROE, BVPS
Particulars A B
ik
24 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Particulars A B
ROE (r) 0.175 0.1238
× Retention Ratio (b) × 0.6 × 0.4
(1 – pay out) (1 – 0.4) (1 – 0.6)
Growth Rate 10.5% 4.95%
hi
MPS of B
=
MPS of A
ks
` 15
=
` 40
= 0.375:1
=
I.V of B
ho
Exchange Ratio Based on intrinsic value (IV) (Upper Limit)
C
I.V of A
` 20
= → (assumed to be same as MP)
ik
` 40
= 0.5:1
av
A has a higher EPS, P/E Ratio, BVPS and Growth rate as compared to B and hence is in a
stronger bargaining position as compared to B. Therefore, it is Likely that the exchange
ratio would be closer to the lower limits i.e 0.375:1
Bh
2,10,000 + 99,000
Post EPS =
1,00,000 + (80,000 × 0.4)
3,09,000
=
1,32,000
= ` 2.34
25 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
As given, pre-merger P/E (A) = Post-merger P/E = 19.05 times
Post MPS = Post EPS × Post P/E
= 2.34 × 19.05
ks
= 44.58
Impact analysis MPS
A B
Post Merger MPS
(40)
4.58
17.83
(44.58 × 0.4)
(15)
2.83
C
Question 2 (Practice Manual)
[Q.14 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q. 14 - AFM 10]
ik
Bank ‘R’ was established in 2005 and doing banking in India. The bank is facing DO OR DIE
situation. There are problems of Gross NPA (Non Performing Assets) at 40% & CAR/CRAR
(Capital Adequacy Ratio/ Capital Risk Weight Assets Ratio) at 4%. The net worth of the bank is
av
not good. Shares are not traded regularly. Last week, it was traded @ ` 8 per share.
RBI Audit suggested that bank has either to liquidate or to merge with other bank.
Bank ‘P’ is professionally managed bank with low gross NPA of 5%. It has net NPA as 0% and
Bh
CAR at 16%. Its share is quoted in the market @ ` 128 per share. The board of directors of bank
‘P’ has submitted a proposal to RBI for take over of bank
‘R’ on the basis of share exchange ratio.
26 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
It was decided to issue shares at Book Value of Bank ‘P’ to the shareholder of Bank
hi
‘R’. All assets and liabilities are to be taken over at book Value.
For the swap ratio, weights assigned to different parameters are as follows:
ks
Gross NPA 30%
CAR 20%
Market price 40%
Book value
ho
(a) What is the swap ratio based on above weight?
(b) How many shares are to be issued?
10%
C
(c) Prepare Balance Sheet after merger.
(d) Calculate CAR & Gross NPA of Bank ‘P’ after merger.
ik
Summary
Detailed Solution
av
Given Data
Bank R (Target) Bank P (Acquirer)
Bh
27 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
(b) Shares to be issued
= 14 Lakhs × 0.125
= 1.75 Lakhs shares
ks
(c) Balance Sheet Acquisition
Purchase consideration (1.75 Lakhs × ` 120 (BVPS)) 210 Lakhs
(-) Net assets of R (5,100 – 4,000 – 890) (210 Lakhs)
Goodwill / Capital reserve
ho NIL
Reference Note: ICAI has taken the issue price at ` 10 (Face Value) and hence there
is Capital Reserve as per ICAI workings. This does not appear to be correct as we have
C
been clearly told that shares of P will be issued at Book Value. Hence, as per our workings,
there would be no Capital Reserve. Instead, we will have Securities Premium.
Combined Entity (Bank P + Bank R)
ik
53,600
Assets
Cash in hand (2,500 + 400) 2,900
Balance with other banks (2,000 + 0) 2,000
Investment (1,100 + 15,000) 16,100
Advances (3,500 + 27,000) 30,500
Other assets (100 + 2,000) 2,100
53,600
28 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
140 + 70 × 100
BANK R = = 5,250
4
ks
500 + 5,500 × 100
BANK P = = 37,500
16
=
517.5 + 192.5 + 5,500 × 100
42,750
C
6,210 × 100
=
42,750
ik
= 14.53%
Gross NPA (`)
Gross NPA % = × 100
av
Advances
2,750 × 100
=
30,500
= 9.02%
29 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
The following information relating to the acquiring Company Abhiman Ltd. and the target Company
Abhishek Ltd. are available. Both the Companies are promoted by Multinational Company, Trident
Ltd. The promoter’s holding is 50% and 60% respectively in Abhiman Ltd. and Abhishek Ltd.:
Particulars Abhiman Ltd. Abhishek Ltd.
Share Capital (`) 200 lakh 100 lakh
hi
Free Reserve and Surplus (`) 800 lakh 500 lakh
Paid up Value per share (`) 100 10
Free float Market Capitalisation (`) 400 lakh 128 lakh
ks
P/E Ratio (times) 10 4
Trident Ltd. is interested to do justice to the shareholders of both the Companies. For the swap
ratio weights are assigned to different parameters by the Board of Directors as follows:
Book Value
Market Price
ho
EPS (Earning per share)
(c) Calculate:
(i) Promoter’s revised holding in the Abhiman Ltd.
(ii) Free float market capitalization.
av
(iii) Also calculate No. of Shares, Earning per Share (EPS) and Book Value (B.V.), if
after acquisition of Abhishek Ltd., Abhiman Ltd. decided to :
(1) Issue Bonus shares in the ratio of 1 : 2; and
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
30 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
2.
BVPS = Share capital + Reserves/ 200 L + 800 L 100 L + 500 L
No.of shares
2 L shares 10 L shares
= ` 500 = ` 60
3. Non Promoter Holding% 100% – 50% 100% – 60%
= 50% = 40%
4. Total Market Cap.
Free Float Market Cap. 400 L 128 L
=
hi
Free Float % 50% 40%
= ` 800 Lakhs = ` 320 Lakhs
5. MPS = Market Cap./Total Share 800 L 320 L
ks
2 L shares 10 L shares
= ` 400 Lakhs = ` 32 Lakhs
6. MPS = EPS × P/E = 400/10 = 32/4
EPS = MPS/P/E = ` 40 = ` 8
2. SWAP Ratio
Particulars
Book Value
ho
Exchange Rate
0.12:1
Weight
25%
Weighted Average
0.03:1
C
(Favourable) (60/500)
` 80 Lakhs + ` 80 Lakhs
=
2 Lakhs Shares + 1.5 Lakhs Shares
160
=
3.5 L Shares
= ` 45.71
4. Post MPS = EPS × P/E
= 45.71 × 10
` 457.1
31 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
5. Post BVPS
Post BVPS Abhimaan Abhishek
Net Assets 200 + 800 100 + 500
(S.C + Reserves) = 1,000 = 600
1600
Post BVPS =
3.5 L Shares
hi
= 457.14
ks
6. Promoter Holding (Post Acquisition)
=
1,00,000 + 90,000
3,50,000
ho
C
= 54.29%
Non Promoter Holding = 100% – 54.29%
= 45.71%
ik
` 160 Lakhs
Post Bonus and Split EPS =
105 Lakhs Shares
= ` 1.52
32 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
` 1,600 Lakhs
Post Bonus and split BVPS =
` 105 Lakhs
= 15.24
hi
The equity shares of XYZ Ltd. are currently being traded at ` 24 per share in the market. XYZ
Ltd. has total 10,00,000 equity shares outstanding in number; and promoters' equity holding in
the company is 40%.
ks
PQR Ltd. wishes to acquire XYZ Ltd. because of likely synergies. The estimated present value
of these synergies is ` 80,00,000.
Further PQR feels that management of XYZ Ltd. has been over paid. With better motivation,
ho
lower salaries and fewer perks for the top management, will lead to savings of ` 4,00,000 p.a.
Top management with their families are promoters of XYZ Ltd. Present value of these savings
would add ` 30,00,000 in value to the acquisition.
Following additional information is available regarding PQR Ltd.:
C
Earnings per share : `4
Total number of equity shares outstanding : 15,00,000
Market price of equity share : ` 40
ik
Required:
(i) What is the maximum price per equity share which PQR Ltd. can offer to pay for XYZ Ltd.?
(ii) What is the minimum price per equity share at which the management of XYZ Ltd. will be
av
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
33 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Reference Note:
We are not given the cash inflows that XYZ generates each year. Instead, we are given the
market price. Market price can be derived using Gordon formula i.e. D1 /Ke – g. Assuming
the market price is fairly determined, it will represent the PV of all future Dividends and
hence MPS is considered in the absence of information.
(ii) Minimum Purchase Price expected by promoters/top management
In case the merger goes through, the management will give up 40% stake as well as
hi
settle for a lower compensation assuming they continue with the company. Therefore,
the management will at least (minimum) expect to be compensated for both. Further, the
shares held by promoters are 40% i.e. 10,00,000 x 40% = 4,00,000 shares. Hence, the
ks
evaluation should be done for 4,00,000 shares only.
Particulars Per Share Total
MPS/Share ` 24 96,00,000
(+) Remuneration lost
30, 00, 000
4, 00, 000
ho
Minimum price/share for promoter’s stake
` 7.5
` 31.5
30,00,000
1,26,00,000
C
Extra: Incase minimum purchase price is asked for non-promoter shareholders of XYZ,
then it would be ` 24 (MPS) as they are not foregoing any additional compensation.
ik
ABC Co. is considering a new sales strategy that will be valid for the next 4 years. They want
to know the value of the new strategy. Following information relating to the year which has just
ended, is available:
Bh
Income Statement `
Sales 20,000
Gross margin (20%) 4,000
Administration, Selling & distribution expense (10%) 2,000
PBT 2,000
Tax (30%) 600
PAT 1,400
Balance Sheet Information
Fixed Assets 8,000
Current Assets 4,000
Equity 12,000
34 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
If it adopts the new strategy, sales will grow at the rate of 20% per year for three years.
From 4th year onward it will stabilize. The gross margin ratio, Assets turnover ratio, the Capital
structure and the income tax rate will remain unchanged.
Depreciation would be at 10% of net fixed assets at the beginning of the year.
The Company’s target rate of return is 15%.
Determine the incremental value due to adoption of the strategy.
hi
Summary
Detailed Solution
ks
Reference Note
1. Value of Strategy = Value of ABC under New Strategy – Value of ABC under Existing
2.
Strategy
We have been given that under the new strategy (which is applicable for 4 years), growth
C
= 20% for the first 3 years and cash flows stabilize from year 4 onwards. Therefore, in
order to find the Terminal Value at the end of Year 3, we will need to predict the free
cash flows at Year 4 as well.
ik
3. Looking at the current capital structure, assets have been fully financed by equity
(8,000+4,000 = 12,000) and hence there is no debt. Therefore, FCFF = FCFE and Value
of Firm = Value of Equity.
av
Particulars Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
PAT (WN : 1) 1,680 2,016 2,419.2 2,419.2
(+) Depreciation (WN : 2) 800 960 1152 1,382.4
(-) Investment in FA (WN : 2) (2,400) (2,880) (3,456) (1,382.4)
(-) Investment in WC (WN : 3) (800) (960) (1,152) NIL
FCF (720) (864) (1,036.8) 2,419.2
35 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
8,643.08
hi
As the gross margin, admin expense % and tax rate remain constant, PAT Margin:
= (20% - 10%) (1-0.3) = 7%
ks
Profit After Tax
Particulars Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
Sales 24,000 28,800 34,560 34,560
PAT @7%
(20,000 + 20%)
1,680
ho(24,000 + 20%)
2,016
(28,800 + 20%)
2,419.2
+0%
2,419.2
Reference Note: PAT is calculated after deducting all expenses (including depreciation) and
C
hence deprecation would have been implicitly deducted while calculating the above PAT and
hence no separate deduction is done for depreciation.
ik
Sales
FA Turnover =
FA
Bh
20, 000
=
8, 000
= 2.5
Sales
i.e. FA =
FA Turnover
Since the fixed assets turnover remains unchanged at 2.5, closing fixed assets in each year can
be predicted by substituting sales of each year as follows:
FA for YR1 to YR4
36 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Particulars Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
Sales 24, 000 28, 800 34, 560 34, 560
FA =
FA Turnover 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Closing FA 9,600 11,520 13,824 13,824
hi
Fixed Assets a/c
Y1 Balance 8,000 By Depreciation (10%) 800
To Bank* 2,400 By Balance 9,600
ks
10,400 10,400
Y2 Balance 9,600 By Depreciation (10%) 960
To Bank* 2,880 By Balance 11,520
12,480 12,480
Y3
Y4
Balance
To Bank*
Balance
ho 11,520
3,456
14,976
13,824
By Depreciation (10%)
By Balance
By Depreciation (10%)
1,152
13,824
14,976
1,382.4
C
To Bank* 1,382.4 By Balance 13,824
15,206.4 15,206.4
Sales
CA turnover =
av
CA
20, 000
= =5
4, 000
Bh
Sales
CA =
CA turnover (5)
Current Assets Y1 to Y4
Particulars Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
Sales 24, 000 28, 800 34, 560 34, 560
CA =
CA turnover 5 5 5 5
Current Assets 4,800 5,760 6,912 6,912
37 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
Fixed Assets a/c
Particulars Amount Particulars Amount
To Balance 8,000 By Depreciation 800
ks
To Bank 800 By Balance 8,000
The value of FCF under the existing Strategy from year 1 to perpetuity would be
Particulars Amount
PAT
(+) Depreciation
(-) Investment in FA
ho 1,400
(20,000 × 7%)
800
(8,000 × 10%)
(800)
C
(-) Investment in CA NIL
FCF 1,400
ik
1400
Value (F) = = 9,333.33
0.15-0
Incremental value of the new strategy = 8,643.08 – 9,333.33
= (690.25)
av
AFC Ltd. wishes to acquire BCD Ltd. The shares issued by the two companies are 10,00,000 and
5,00,000 respectively:
(i) Calculate the increase in the total value of BCD Ltd. resulting from the acquisition on the
basis of the following conditions:
Current expected growth rate of BCD Ltd. 7%
Expected growth rate under control of AFC Ltd 8%
(without any additional capital investment and without any change in risk of operations)
Current Market price per share of AFC Ltd ` 100
Current Market price per share of BCD Ltd. ` 20
Expected Dividend per share of BCD Ltd. ` 0.60
38 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
(ii) On the basis of aforesaid conditions calculate the gain or loss to shareholders of both the
companies, if AFC Ltd. were to offer one of its shares for every four shares of BCD Ltd.
(iii) Calculate the gain to the shareholders of both the Companies, if AFC Ltd. pays ` 22 for
each share of BCD Ltd., assuming the P/E Ratio of AFC Ltd. does not change after the
merger. EPS of AFC Ltd. is ` 8 and that of BCD is ` 2.50. It is assumed that AFC Ltd.
invests its cash to earn 10%.
hi
Summary
Detailed Solution
ks
(i) BCD
D1
1. Existing Ke = +g
P0
=
0.6
20
+ 0.07
D1
3. P0 = (revised)
Ke - g
ik
= 0.6
0.10 - 0.08
av
P0 = ` 30
4. Increase in value BCD = ` 30 - ` 20
× No of shares. = ` 10/ share × 500,000
Bh
39 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
Total 50,00,000
Cash Acquisition
ks
Reference Note: As the acquisition is in cash, no additional shares of AFC need to be issued.
However, if cash is paid we would lose interest (income) on the cash already invested. However,
we would get the earnings of BCD. Considering this we will have to calculate the post merger EPS
AFC
C
Pre-merger PAT 80,00,000
(10,00,000 × ` 8)
(-) Loss of interest (11,00,000)
[(500,000 × 22) × 10%]
ik
÷ ÷
Post-merger shares (10,00,000 + 0) 10,00,000
Post EPS ` 8.15
(b) Pre-merger PE of AFC
Bh
MPS
PE =
EPS
100
= = 12.5 times
8
40 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
ICL is proposing to take over SVL with an objective to diversify. ICL’s profit after tax (PAT)
has grown @ 18 per cent per annum and SVL’s PAT is grown @ 15 per cent per annum. Both the
companies pay dividend regularly. The summarised Profit & Loss Account of both the companies
ks
are as follows:
` in Crores
Particulars ICL SVL
Net Sales
PBlT
Interest
Provision for Tax
ho 4,545
2,980
750
1,440
1,500
720
25
445
C
PAT 790 250
Dividends 235 125
ICL’s Land & Buildings are stated at current prices. SVL’s Land & Buildings are revalued three
years ago. There has been an increase of 30 per cent per year in the value of Land & Buildings.
SVL is expected to grow @ 18 per cent each year, after merger.
41 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
ICL’s Management wants to determine the premium on the shares over the current market
price which can be paid on the acquisition of SVL. You are required to determine the premium
using:
(i) Net Worth adjusted for the current value of Land & Buildings plus the estimated average
profit after tax (PAT) for the next five years.
(ii) The dividend growth formula.
(iii) ICL will push forward which method during the course of negotiations?
hi
Period (t) 1 2 3 4 5
FVIF (30%, t) 1.300 1.690 2.197 2.856 3.713
FVIF (15%, t) 1.15 2.4725 3.9938 5.7424 7.7537
ks
Summary
Detailed Solution
may be similar to compensating SVL for its goodwill using super profit method.
PAT Estimated
av
Year `
1 287.500
2 330.625
3 380.219
Bh
4 437.252
5 502.839
Total 1,938.435
(Next 5 Years) [Alternatively, 250 × 7.753]
÷ No of Years 5
Average PAT (Next 5 Years) 387.687
42 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
(+) Average Estimated PAT adjustment 387.69
Adjusted Net Worth 1,400.12
(-) Pre Merger Market capital of SVL (12.5 Cr × ` 75) (937.50)
ks
Premium 462.62
Reference Note: We have assumed that the PAT given of ` 250 is the PAT of last year.
Alternatively, we can also assume it to be the PAT for the next year.
Calculation of Ke ho
2. Valuation using Dividend growth method i.e., Gordon method.
i.
Reference Note: We have not been given the data relating to CAPM. Hence Ke
should be calculated using Gordon formula. The existing price of ` 75 is based on the
C
existing growth rates of 15% and hence Ke should be calculated based on 15% growth
rate i.e
ik
D1
Ke = +g
Po
Note: We’ve assumed that given dividends are Do, Alternatively, they can be taken
av
as D1
Further, DPS = 125/12.5
= ` 10/share (Do)
Bh
10 × 1.15
Ke = + 0.15
75
= 30.33%
ii. Calculation of expected price at 18% growth
D1
Po =
Ke − g
10 × 1.18
=
0.3033 – 0.18
= ` 95.70
43 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
3. Premium Analysis
Total value as per dividend growth model (95.70 × ` 12.5) 1,196.25
(-) Pre Merger Market Capital of SVI (12.5 × ` 75) (937.50)
Premium 258.75
iii. Conclusion: ICL (acquirer) will push forward the dividend growth method during
negotiations as it results in a lower payout and lower premium.
hi
Current Assets Y:1 to Y : 4
Particulars Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
ks
Sales 24, 000 28, 800 34, 560 34, 560
CA =
CA turnover 5 5 5 5
Current Assets 4,800 5,760 6,912 6,912
The value of FCF under the existing Strategy from year 1 to perpetuity would be
Particulars Amount
PAT 1,400
(20,000 × 7%)
(+) Depreciation 800
(8,000 × 10%)
(-) Investment in FA (800)
(-) Investment in CA NIL
FCF 1,400
44 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
1400
Value (F) = = 9,333.33
0.15-0
hi
Compute Economic Value Added (EVA) of Good luck Ltd. from the following information:
Profit & Loss Statement
Particulars (` in Lakh)
ks
(a) Income -
Revenue from Operations 2000
(b) Expenses -
Direct Expenses 800
Indirect Expenses 400
(c) Profit before interest & tax(a-b)
(d) Interest
(e) Profit before tax (c - d)
(f) Tax
(g) Profit after tax (e - f)
ho 800
30
770
231
539
C
Balance Sheet
Particulars (` in Lakh)
Equity and Liabilities :
ik
Other Information:
(1) Cost of Debts is 15%.
(2) Cost of Equity (i.e. shareholders' expected return) is 12%.
(3) Tax Rate is 30%.
(4) Bad Debts Provision of ` 40 lakhs is included in indirect expenses and ` 40 lakhs reduced
from receivables in current assets.
45 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Summary
Detailed Solution
Reference Note: As per ICAI workings, in case a provision for bad debt is created, we should
add back the provision while calculating NOPAT as well as invested capital.
EVA = NOPAT - (Invested Capital × WACC)
hi
= 600 - (1,840 × 11.84%)
= 382.14
ks
Working Note 1: NOPAT
NOPAT = EBIT (1 – t) + Provision for bad debt
= 800 (1 – 0.3) + 40
Alternative
=
=
=
560 + 40 = 600
ho
PAT + Interest (1 –t) + provision for bad debts
539 + 30 (1 – 0.3) + 40 = 600
C
Working Note 2: Invested Capital & WACC
ESC 1,000
(+) Reserves (600 + 40) 640
ik
D E
WACC = KD × + Ke ×
D+E D+E
200 1, 640
= 15% × (1 – 0.3) × + 12% ×
Bh
1,840 1, 840
= 11.84%
Reference Note: ICAI has ignored 40 while calculating weights i.e., weights are 200/1,800 and
1,600/1,800. We have reversed 40 of provision for bad debts from profit and therefore, we
have added in Reserves
46 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Following is the information of M/s. DY Ltd. for the year ending 31/03/2021:
Particulars `
Sales ` 1000 Lakh
Operating Expenses Including Interest ` 620 Lakh
8% Debentures ` 250 Lakh
Equity Share Capital (Face value of ` 10 each) ` 250 Lakh
hi
Reserves and Surplus ` 250 Lakh
Market Value of DY Ltd ` 900 Lakh
Corporate Tax Rate 30%
ks
Risk free Rate of Return 7%
Market Rate of Return 12%
Equity Beta 1.4
Detailed Solution
= 7% + 7% = 14%
Cost of Debt kd = 8% (1 – 0.30) = 5.60%
E D 500 250
WACC (ko) = ke x + kg × = 14.00 × + 5.60 ×
E +D E +D 750 750
47 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
8% Debentures 250
Total Capital Employed 750
ks
EVA = ` 280 Lakh – 0.1120 × ` 750 lakhs
EVA = 196.00 lakhs
(iii) Determination of Market Value Added (MVA)
Particulars
ho
Market value of Equity Stock [` 900 Lakh - ` 250 Lakh]
Equity Fund [` 250 Lakh + ` 250 Lakh]
Market Value Added
` Lakh
650
500
150
C
Alternatively, it can also be computed as follows:
Particulars ` Lakh
Market value of DY Ltd. 900
ik
RESTRUCTURING
The following is the Balance-sheet of Grape Fruit Company Ltd as at March 31st, 2011.
Liabilities (` in lakhs) Assets (` in lakhs)
Equity shares of ` 100 each 600 Land and Building 200
14% preference shares of 200 Plant and Machinery 300
` 100/- each
13% Debentures 200 Furniture and Fixtures 50
Debenture interest accrued and 26 Inventory 150
payable
Loan from bank 74 Sundry debtors 70
Trade creditors 340 Cash at bank 130
Preliminary expenses 10
48 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Cost of issue of 5
debentures
Profit and Loss account 525
1440 1440
The Company did not perform well and has suffered sizable losses during the last few
years. However, it is felt that the company could be nursed back to health by proper financial
restructuring. Consequently the following scheme of reconstruction has been drawn up :
hi
(i) Equity shares are to be reduced to ` 25/- per share, fully paid up;
(ii) Preference shares are to be reduced (with coupon rate of 10%) to equal number of
shares of ` 50 each, fully paid up.
ks
(iii) Debenture holders have agreed to forgo the accrued interest due to them. In the future,
the rate of interest on debentures is to be reduced to 9 percent.
(iv) Trade creditors will forego 25 percent of the amount due to them.
ho
(v) The company issues 6 lakh of equity shares at ` 25 each and the entire sum was to be paid
on application. The entire amount was fully subscribed by promoters.
(vi) Land and Building was to be revalued at ` 450 lakhs, Plant and Machinery was to be
C
written down by ` 120 lakhs and a provision of ` 15 lakhs had to be made for bad and
doubtful debts.
Required:
ik
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
Reference Note: The restructuring case given is very similar to an internal reconstruction
scenario. In order to assess the impact of restructuring, we need to prepare a capital reduction/
restructuring account. The impact can be shown in the form of a ledger or can also be shown as
a statement. Further, the Balance Sheet needs to be prepared in this case. It need not be in
schedule 3 format. As a general rule, we use the format given in question to prepare our Balance
Sheet in AFM.
49 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
Working Note 1: Journal entries for items not affecting capital reduction account.
13% Debentures A/c Dr. 200
To 9% Debentures 200
Bank A/c (6 × 25) Dr. 150
To Equity Share Capital A/c 150
1. Impact of Restructuring
hi
Capital Reduction/Restructuring A/c
To Plant and Machinery 120 By equity share capital
(6,00,000 × (100 – 25) 450
ks
To Sunday Debtors 15 By Preference share capital
(Provision for bad debts) (2,00,000 × (100 – 50) 100
To Preliminary Expense 10 By debentures interest
Accrued 26
To cost of issue of Debentures
525
By trade creditors
(340 × 25%)
By land and building
(450 – 200)
85
250
C
To Capital Reserve 236
911 911
Reference Note: The objective of restructuring scheme is to write off accumulated losses and
ik
fictitious assets. Thus, even if it is not separately given, we will write off the fictitious assets
and accumulated losses.
av
50 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
GEARED BETA
ABC, a large business house is planning to sell its wholly owned subsidiary KLM. Another large
business entity XYZ has expressed its interest in making a bid for KLM. XYZ expects that after
hi
acquisition the annual earning of KLM will increase by 10%.
Following information, ignoring any potential synergistic benefits arising out of possible
acquisitions, are available:
ks
Profit after tax for KLM for the financial year which has just ended is estimated to be ` 10
crore.
KLM's after tax profit has an increasing trend of 7% each year and the same is expected to
continue.
ho
Estimated post tax market return is 10% and risk free rate is 4%. These rates are expected
to continue.
Corporate tax rate is 30%.
C
Particulars XYZ ABC Proxy entity for KLM in the same
line of business
No. of shares 100 lakhs 80 lakhs --
ik
Assume gearing level of KLM to be the same as for ABC and a debt beta of zero.
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
51 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
4
= 1.1 ×
1 (1 − 0.3) + 4
4.4
=
4.7
hi
= 0.936
Assuming βA = 0.936 for KLM
ks
E
βA = β E × [KLM]
D(1 − t) + e
0.936 = βE ×
0.936×3.7 = βE
3
3
1 (1 − 0.3) + 3
ho
C
βE = 1.15
Using CAPM,
Ke = RF + (RM – RF) β E
ik
In this case, we have not been given the pay-out ratio for KLM. Hence the range of
values have been calculated considering both pay-out ratios i.e., 40% and 50%.
Further, the synergy benefits are 10% and hence the adjusted profits considering
Bh
the synergies would be 10 Cr + 10% = 11 Cr. In any case, going forward the growth
rate would be 7%
Total Divided
Value =
Ke – g
52 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
hi
that KLM’s business is different from XYZ in which case its valuation should be done based on
the proxy company’s P/E Ratio. The range of values can be found as follows:
Particulars XYZ P/E (10×) Proxy P/E (12×)
ks
1. Pre-synergy 10 × ` 10 = 12 × ` 10
= ` 100 = ` 120
2. Post synergy = 10 × ` 11 = 12 × ` 11
= ` 110 = ` 132
53 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
hi
M Ltd. 1,000 (` 100 each) 2,00,000
N Ltd. 500 (` 10 each) 1,50,000
In September, 2005, 10% dividend was paid out by M Ltd. and in October, 2005, 30% dividend
ks
paid out by N Ltd. On 31.3.2006 market quotations showed a value of ` 220 and ` 290 per
share of M Ltd. and N Ltd. respectively. On 1.4.2006, investment advisors indicate (a) that the
dividends from M Ltd. and N Ltd. for the year ending 31.3.2007 are likely to be 20% and 35%,
Probability factor
0.2 220
ho
respectively and (b) that the probabilities of market quotations on 31.3.2007 are as below:
Price / Share of M Ltd. Price / Share of N Ltd.
290
C
0.5 250 310
0.3 280 330
You are required to:
(i) Calculate the average return from the portfolio for the year ended 31.3.2006;
ik
(ii) Calculate the expected average return from the portfolio for the year 2006-07; and
(iii) Advise X Co. Ltd., of the comparative risk in the two investments by calculating the
standard deviation in each cases.
av
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
P1 – P0 + D
a. RM = × 100
P0
=
220 – 200 + (100 × 10% )
× 100 (P0 = 2,00,000/1,000 = ` 200)
200
= 15%
54 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
P1 − P0 + D
b. RN = × 100
P0
290 – 300 + (10 × 30% )
= 300
× 100 (P0 = 1,50,000/500 = ` 300)
= (2.33%)
c. Weight
hi
Particulars Amounts (01/04/05) Weights
M 2,00,000 20/35
N 1,50,000 15/35
ks
3,50,000
=
20
35
× 15% +
7.57%
15
35
× (2.33%)
Thus,
253 − 220 + (100 × 20% )
× 100 = 24.09%
220
P2 – P1 + D
Bh
b. RN = × 100
P1
= 8.79%
55 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
c. Calculation of weights
Share Value at start of the year(p1) Weights
M 2,20,000 220/365
(1,000 shares × ` 220)
N 1,45,000 145/365
(500 shares × ` 290)
3,65,000
hi
d. RMN = WMRM + WNRN
220 145
= × 24.09 + × 8.79
365 365
ks
= 14.52 + 3.49
= 18.01%
56 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
hi
M% N%
0.2 9.09 45.00 1.21 11.49
0.5 22.73 0.92 8.10 0.24
0.3 36.36 45.17 15.00 11.57
ks
∑P (M - M) = 91.09 ∑P (N- N )2 = 23.30
σM =
=
∑P ( M − M )
91.09
σM = 9.54%
2
ho
C
∑p( N − n )
2
σN =
= 23.30
= 4.83%
ik
Conclusion: Based on the standard deviations only : M has a higher risk as it has the higher
derivation as compared to N.
av
An investor has decided to invest ` 100,000 in the shares of the two companies, namely, ABC
and XYZ. The projections of returns from the shares of the two companies along with their
probabilities are as follows:
Probability ABC (%) XYZ (%)
0.20 12 16
0.25 14 10
0.25 -7 28
0.30 28 -2
57 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
proportions
c. Find out the proportion of each of the above shares to formulate a minimum risk portfolio.
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
Calculation of σ Covar
Probability R (A)% R(x)% P(A – 12.55) (X – 12.1) P(A –A )2 P (X – X )
0.2 12 16 0.2 × (0.55) × 3.9 = (0.429) 0.06 3.04
ks
0.25 14 10 0.25 × 1.45 × (2.1) = (0.761) 0.53 1.10
0.25 -7 28 0.25 ×(19.55) × 15.9 = (77.71) 95.55 63.2
0.3 28 -2 0.3 × 15.45 × (14.1) =(65.35) 71.61 59.64
(144.25) 167.75 126.98
ho
A = Σ pA = 12 × 0.2 + 14 × 0.25 + (7) × 0.25 + 0.3 × 28 + = 12.55%
X = Σ pX = 16 × 0.2 + 10 × 0.25 + 28 × 0.25 + (2) × 0.3 = 12.1%
C
( )
2
σA= ΣP A − A 167.75 = 12.95%
=
( )
2
σX= ΣP X - X
ik
= 126.98
= 11.27%
av
Solution
Particulars ABC XYZ
Expected Return 12.55% 12.10%
Bh
COR(AX) =
Co var(AX )
=
(144.25 )
s AX s X 12.95×11.27
58 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
= (0.99)
hi
On combining XYZ & ABC, the return remains almost the same i.e 12.32% but the risk reduces
significantly i.e it becomes 1.2%
ks
Minimum Risk Portfolio
Wabc =
=
s X2 – CovarAX
s A2 + s X2 – 2 CovarAX
(11.27 ) - ( −144.25 )
2
ho
C
(12.95) + (11.27) – 2 × ( −144.25 )
2 2
271 .26
=
583.21
ik
= 0.4651
Wabc = 46.51%
Wxyz = 1 – Wabc = 1 – 0.4651
av
= 53.49%
In order to get the minimum risk portfolio, we should invest 46.51% in ABC and 53.49 in XYZ
Bh
59 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Calculate the Beta and the expected Return for ABC Ltd using CAPM.
Summary
Detailed Solution
Reference Note:
hi
1. Whenever share prices and dividends are given, we should always convert them into % return
P1 − P0 + D
using × 100 and we should try to calculate b based on % returns only
P0
2. Market (NIFTY/SENSEX) is an index which is a combination of various securities. The
ks
market does not have a separate Face Value and incase a market dividend % is given, it
should be a % of the opening market price only i.e dividend % for a market is interpreted as
D1
dividend yield i.e
P0
RM =
P1 − P0
P0
× 100 +
D1
P0
( given )
ho
In such case, the return formula can be broken up as follows:
C
(i) Calculation of returns ABC
P1 − P0 + D1
R = × 100
ik
P0
279 − 242 + 25
2001 = × 100 =
25.62%
242
av
305 − 279 + 30
2002 = × 100 =
20.07%
279
322 − 305 + 35
2003 = × 100 =
17.05%
305
Bh
Market
P1 − P0 D1
RM = × 100 + × 100
P0 P0
1950 − 1812
2001 = × 100 + 5%
= 7. 62% + 5%
= 12.62%
1812
2258 − 1950
2002 = × 100 + 6%
= 15.79% + 6%
= 21.79%
1950
2220 − 2258
2003 = × 100 + 7% =
−1.68% + 7% =
5.32%
2258
60 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
∑A 62.74
(a) A == = 20.91%
hi
N 3
∑M
(b) M = = = 13.24%
39.73
N 3
ks
(c) COVARAM=
∑(A − A) (M − M ) = 20.47 = 6.82
N 3
∑ ( M=
- M)
2
136.21
(d)=
s 2
= 45.40
β=
M
COVARAM
=
N
6.82
= 0.15
3
ho
C
2
sM 45.40
5% + 4% + 5%
RF = = 4.667 ≅ 4.67%
3
Reference Note:
Bh
Market return is based on the years 2001, 2002 and 2003. Further β is also calculated by
comparing the returns of ABC and the market during 2001, 02 & 03. Hence, RF should be
calculated as the average RF for a comparable period i.e 2001,2002 & 2003.
Ke = 4.67 + (13.24 - 4.67) 0.15
= 5.96%
The rates of return on the security of Company X and market portfolio for 10 periods are given
below:
61 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
1 20 22
2 22 20
3 25 18
4 21 16
5 18 20
6 -5 8
hi
7 17 -6
8 19 5
ks
9 -7 6
10 20 11
(i) What is the beta of Security X?
ho
(ii) What is the characteristic line for Security X?
Summary
C
Detailed Solution
i. Calculation of β
ik
2 22 20 7 × 8 = 56 64
3 25 18 10 × 6 = 60 36
4 21 16 6 × 4 = 24 16
5 18 20 3 × 8 = 24 64
Bh
X =
∑x =
150
= 15%
n 10
M=
∑M = 120 = 12%
n 10
62 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
COVAR ( XM ) =
∑ ( X − X )( M −=
M) 357
= 35.7
N 10
∑ ( M − M=
))
2
706
s M2
= = 70.6
N 10
COVARXM 35.7
b = = = 0.51
s M2 70.6
ii. Characteristic line
hi
X = a + bM
Where, a= X + b M
a = 15 - 0.51 × 12
ks
= 15 – 6.12
= 8.88
Characteristic Line : x = 8.88 + 0.51M
Reference Note:
ho
Characteristic line is plotted taking the market (m) on the x-axis and the security (X) on y –axis.
This line measures the characteristic (quality) of β i.e., how well the β can predict the past
C
returns.
Let M = 10
Therefore, X = 8.88 + 0.51M
ik
Let M = 0
Therefore, X = 8.88 + 0.51M
= 0.88 + 0.51 (0)
Bh
= (0,8.88)
We can try to find the values of X at any two random values of M. For example, we have taken
M as 10 and 0. We can draw a line connecting the above points which is called as characteristic
line. Subsequently, we can plot the actual value of X.
In case the plotted points are very close to the characteristic line, it shows a good predictive
capability of β, whereas, if these are points are dispersed widely, it shows poor predictive
capability of β.
63 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
The following details are given for X and Y companies' stocks and the Bombay Sensex for
a period of one year. Calculate the systematic and unsystematic risk for the companies' stocks.
If equal amount of money is allocated for the stocks what would be the portfolio risk ?
hi
Particulars X Stock Y Stock Sensex
Average return 0.15 0.25 0.06
Variance of return (s) 2
6.30 5.86 2.25
ks
β 0.71 0.27
Correlation Co-efficient with Sensex 0.424
Co-efficient of determination (r) 2
0.18
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
1. Systematic & Unsystematic risk
Stock X
Systematic Risk = CORXM × s X
2 2
ik
= 0.18 × 6.3
= 1.134
( 0.71)
2
Or b X2 × s=
2
× 2.25
av
= 1.134
Total Risk = s X = 6.3
2
Stock Y
( 0.27 )
2
Systematic Risk = bY2 × s=
2
M
× 2.25 = 0.164
64 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
= 3.2556
sXY = 1.80%
hi
A study by a mutual fund has revealed the following data in respect of 3 securities
Security Std deviation (%) Correlation with Index, pm
A 20 0.60
ks
B 18 0.95
C 12 0.75
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
av
sA 20
βA = CORAM × = 0.6 × = 0.8
sM 15
Bh
sB 18
βB = CORBM × = 0.95 × = 1.14
sM 12
sc 12
βC = CORCM × = 0.75 × = 0.6
sM 15
65 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
2
COVARAB = β A × βB × s M
= 0.8 × 1.14 × 152 = 205.2
COVARAC = βA × βC × s M2
= 0.8 × 0.6 × 152 = 108
2
COVARBC = β B × βC × s M
= 1.14 × 0.6 × 152
= 153.90
hi
3. σABC
= WA2s A2 + WB2s B2 + WC2s C2 + 2WAWB COVARAB + 2WAWC COVARAC + 2WBWc COVARBC
ks
2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
= ×20 + ×18 + × 12 +2 × × ×205.2 + 2 × × ×108 + 2 × × ×153.9
2 2 2
= 200.24
4.
= 14.15%
βABC =
=
=
WA βA + WA βB + WC βc ho
1/3 × 0.8 + 1/3 × 1.14 + 1/3 × 0.6
0.85
C
5. Portfolio (with equal weight of A,B,C)
2 2
Systematic Risk = bABC × s M
ik
= (0.85)2 × 152
= 162.56
Total risk = σabc = 14.15 i.e., s ABC = 200.2
2
av
= 37.66
Extra: Random Error = 37.66
= 6.14
66 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
hi
Summary
ks
Detailed Solution
F1
(a) Portfolio β [ bAB and bAB
F2
]
1. Calculation of Weights
Security
A
B
Amountho
1,00,000 + 50,000
(50,000)
`
1,50,000
(50,000)
Weight
1.5
(0.5)
C
RF 0 0 0
1,00,000 1
AB A B
WA bAF 1 + WB bB
F1 F1
bAB
av
AB A B
F2
bAB WA bAF 2 + WB bBF 2
Bh
67 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
i. Calculation of Weights
Securities Amount ` Weight
A 1,00,000 + 50,000 + 1,00,000 + 50,000 3,00,000 3
B (50,000) + (50,000) (1,00,000) (1)
RF (1,00,000) (1,00,000) (1)
1,00,000 1
ii. F1
bABR = WA bAF 1 + WB bBF 1 +WR bRF 1
hi
= 3 × 0.8 + (1) × 1.5 + (1) × 0
= 0.9
= WA bA + WB bB + WR bR
F2 F2 F2 F2
b ABR
ks
= 3 × 0.6 + (1) × 1.2 + (1) × 0
= 0.6
(c) Calculation of return/risk premium of factor-2 (λF2)
ho
We have been given that the returns are generated by a 2 factor model and hence the
expected return for each security would be similar to the required return generated by a 2
factor model i.e.,
Ke = RF + λF1 β F1 + λF2 βF2
C
Thus, A : 15 = 10 + λF1 0.8 + λF2 0.6
i.e 5 = 0.8 λF1 + 0.6 λF2
B : 20 = 10 + λF1 1.5 + λF2 1.2
ik
68 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Mr. Nirmal Kumar also estimated the weights of the above categories of stocks in the market
index. Further, more the sensitivity of returns on these categories of stocks to the three
important factor are estimated to be:
hi
Category of Stocks Weight in the Factor I (Beta) Factor II Factor III
Market Index [Market] (Book Price) (Inflation)
Small cap growth 25% 0.80 1.39 1.35
ks
Small cap value 10% 0.90 0.75 1.25
Large cap growth 50% 1.165 2.75 8.65
Large cap value 15% 0.85 2.05 6.75
Risk Premium
[l]
ho
The rate of return on treasury bonds is 4.5% Required:
6.85% -3.5%
(a) Using Arbitrage Pricing Theory, determine the expected return on the market index.
(b) Using Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), determine the expected return on the market
0.65%
C
index.
(c) Mr. Nirmal Kumar wants to construct a portfolio constituting only the “small cap value”
and “large cap growth” stocks. If the target beta for the desired portfolio is 1,
ik
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
Bh
MARKET INDEX
Small Capital Growth Small Capital Value Large Capital Growth Large Cap Value
(A) (B) (C) (D)
25% 10% 50% 15%
Reference: Where RF, λF1, λF2, λF3 are given in Question. Thus we need to calculate
portfolio beta for each of the three factors separately and then substitute it in the
69 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
above formula in order to find the required return for the market portfolio.
Factor 1: Market
bFABCD
1
= WA bFA1 + WB bFB1 + WC bFC1 + WD bFD1
hi
2
ks
Factor 3: Inflation
bFABCD
3
= WA bFA3 + WB bFB3 + WC bFC3 + WD bFD3
Using APT
= 5.8
K = RF + λF 1 bF 1 + λF 2 bF 2 + λF 3 bF 3
ABCD ABCD ABCD ABCD ABCD
ho
ABCD
C
e
= 4.5% + 6.85% × 1
= 11.35%
70 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
hi
Question 9 (RTP May 21)/(MTP May 20)
[Q.52 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.52 - AFM 10]
Equity of ABC Ltd. (ABCL) is ` 500 Crores, its debt, is worth ` 290 Crores. Printer Division
ks
segments value is attributable to 64%, which has an Asset Beta (βp) of 1.55, balance value is
applied on Spares and Consumables Division, which has an Asset Beta (βSC) of 1.40 ABCL Debt
beta (βD) is 0.28.
You are required to calculate:
(i) Equity Beta (βE), ho
(ii) Ascertain Equity Beta (βE), if ABC Ltd. decides to change its Debt Equity position by
raising further debt and buying back of equity to have its Debt to Equity Ratio at 1.50.
C
Assume that the present Debt Beta (βD1) is 0.45 and any further funds raised by way of
Debt will have a Beta (βD2) of 0.50.
(iii) Whether the new Equity Beta (βE) justifies increase in the value of equity on account of
ik
leverage?
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
Bh
D D
Thus, βA = βD × + βE ×
D+E D+E
290 500
1.496 = 0.28 × + βE ×
290 + 500 290 + 500
71 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
81.2 500
1.496 = + βE ×
790 790
1.393
βE = βE = 2.20
0.633
hi
We have been told, that some additional debt would be raised. However, the proceeds
generated from additional debt are not separately added to the investment in the
business. Instead they have been used to buyback existing equity. Thus, in case, debt to
ks
equity ratio needs to be 1.5:1
Particulars Total Existing Add/Buyback
Debt 1.5 474 ? 290 184
Equity
Total
1
2.5
ho 316 ?
790
500
790
(474- 290)
(184)
(316 – 500)
C
βA = 1.496 → From 1
Since, ABC is still in the printer’s business (64%) and spares business (36%), the asset β
continues to be 1.496. Further we have been given that the existing debt (D1) has a β of
ik
E D1 D2
βA = bE × + bD × + bD ×
av
D1 + D2 + E 1
D1 + D2 + E 2
D1 + D2 + E
1.2143 = 0.4 βE
βE = 3.036
(iii) In case the price per share of equity increase due to increase in Beta, then the higher
leverage (debt) in justified, else not.
Mr. A is holding 1000 shares of face value of ` 100 each of M/s. ABC Ltd. He wants to hold
these shares for long term and have no intention to sell. On 1st January 2020, M/s XYZ Ltd. has
made short sales of M/s. ABC Ltd.’s shares and approached Mr. A to lend his shares under Stock
Lending Scheme with following terms:
72 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
hi
Date Share Price in Share Price in
Scenario - 1 Bullish Scenario - 2 Bearish
01-01-2020 1000 1000
ks
31-01-2020 1020 980
29-02-2020 1040 960
31-03-2020 1050 940
(i) Earning of Mr. A through Stock Lending Scheme in both the scenarios,
(ii) Total Earnings of Mr. A during 01-01-2020 to 31-03-2020 in both the scenarios,
C
(iii) What is the Profit or loss to M/s. XYZ by shorting the shares using through Stock
Lending Scheme in both the scenarios?
ik
Summary
Detailed Solution
av
73 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Note:
Apart from the lending fees, Mr.A continues to have the right of an owner and hence
dividend earned during the 3 months will also be enjoyed by Mr. A. However, this dividend
would be earned, irrespective of the stock lending scheme and hence dividend is not
considered in Part – 1. However, it is considered while calculating total earnings in Part-2.
(ii) Total Earnings:
Particulars BULLISH BEARISH
hi
Lending Fees 31,100 28,800
+ Dividend Income 25,000 25,000
[(₹ 100 × 25%) × 1000]
ks
Total Earning 56,100 53,800
74 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
Following are the estimates of the net cash flows and probability of a new project of M/s X Ltd.:
Particulars Year P = 0.3 P = 0.5 P = 0.2
hi
Initial investment 0 4,00,000 4,00,000 4,00,000
Estimated net after tax cash inflows per year 1 to 5 1,00,000 1,10,000 1,20,000
Estimated salvage value (after tax) 5 20,000 50,000 60,000
ks
Required rate of return from the project is 10%. Find:
(i) The expected NPV of the project.
(ii) The best case and the worst case NPVs.
(iv) Standard deviation and coefficient of variation assuming that there are only three
streams of cash flow, which are represented by each column of the table with the given
C
probabilities.
(v) Coefficient of variation of X Ltd. on its average project which is in the range of 0.95 to
1.0. If the coefficient of variation of the project is found to be less risky than average,
ik
100 basis points are deducted from the Company’s cost of Capital Should the project be
accepted by X Ltd?
av
Summary
Detailed Solution
Bh
75 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
hi
(iii) (a) Required probability = 0.3
(b) Required probability = (0.3)5 = 0.00243
(iv) The base case NPV = (-) 4,00,000 + (1,10,000 x 3.79) + (50,000 x 0.621)
ks
= ` 47,950/-
ENPV = 0.30 x (-) 8580 + 0.5 x 47950 + 92060 x 0.20 = ₹ 39,813/-
Therefore,
s ENpv =
The Easygoing Company Limited is considering a new project with initial investment, for a product
“Survival”. It is estimated that IRR of the project is 16% having an estimated life of 5 years.
Financial Manager has studied that project with sensitivity analysis and informed that annual
fixed cost sensitivity is 7.8416%, whereas cost of capital (discount rate) sensitivity is 60%.
Other information available are:
Profit Volume Ratio (P/V) is 70%, Variable cost ` 60/- per unit Annual Cash Flow ` 57,500/-
Ignore Depreciation on initial investment and impact of taxation.
Calculate
(i) Initial Investment of the Project
76 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
hi
Summary
ks
Detailed Solution
x
Thus NPV of the project
= Annual Cash Flow x PVAF (10%, 5) – Initial Investment
= ` 57,500 x 3.791 – ` 1,88,255
av
` 60
Selling price per unit = = ` 200
100% − 70%
` 57500 + ` 100000
= ` 225000
0.70
77 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
` 225000
Sales in units = = ` 1125 units
` 200
(v) Break Even Units
Fixed cost 100000
= = 714.285 Units
Contribution per unit 140
hi
XYZ Ltd. requires ` 8,00,000 for an unit. Useful life of project - 4 years. Salvage value - Nil.
Depreciation Charge ` 2,00,000 p.a. Expected revenues & costs (excluding depreciation) ignoring
inflation.
ks
Year 1 2 3 4
Revenues ` 6,00,000 ` 7,00,000 ` 8,00,000 ` 8,00,000
Costs ` 3,00,000 ` 4,00,000 ` 4,00,000 ` 4,00,000
1
ho
Tax Rate 60% cost of capital 10% (including inflation premium).
Calculate NPV of the project if inflation rates for revenues & costs are as follows:
Year Revenues
10%
Costs
12%
C
2 9% 10%
3 8% 9%
4 7% 8%
ik
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
78 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
hi
1 6,60,000 3,36,000 3,24,000 1,94,400 1,29,600
2 8,39,300 4,92,800 3,46,500 2,07,900 1,38,600
3 10,35,936 5,37,172 4,98,764 2,99,258 1,99,506
ks
4 11,08,452 5,80,124 5,28,328 3,16,997 2,11,331
1
2
profit
(`)
1,29,600
1,38,600
ho
Depreciation
(`)
1,20,000
1,20,000
(`)
2,49,600
2,58,600
@10%
0.909
0.826
(`)
2,26,886
2,13,604
C
3 1,99,506 1,20,000 3,19,506 0.751 2,39,949
4 2,11,331 1,20,000 3,31,331 0.683 2,26,299
9,06,738
A company has an old machine having book value zero – which can be sold for ` 50,000. The
company is thinking to choose one from following two alternatives:
(i) To incur additional cost of ` 10,00,000 to upgrade the old existing machine.
Bh
(ii) To replace old machine with a new machine costing ` 20,00,000 plus installation cost
` 50,000.
Both above proposals envisage useful life to be five years with salvage value to be nil. The
expected after tax profits for the above three alternatives are as under:
Year Old existing Machine (`) Upgraded Machine (`) New Machine (`)
1 5,00,000 5,50,000 6,00,000
2 5,40,000 5,90,000 6,40,000
3 5,80,000 6,10,000 6,90,000
4 6,20,000 6,50,000 7,40,000
5 6,60,000 7,00,000 8,00,000
79 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
Summary
hi
Detailed Solution
ks
(A) Cash Outflow
Particulars `
(i) In case machine is upgraded:
(ii)
Upgradation Cost
In case new machine installed:
Cost
ho 10,00,000
20,00,000
C
Add: Installation cost 50,000
Total Cost 20,50,000
Less: Disposal of old machine
` 50,000 – 40% tax 30,000
ik
Working Note:
av
` 20,50,000 ÷ 5 = ` 4,10,000
(iii) Old existing machine – Book Value is zero. So, no depreciation.
(B) Cash Inflows after Taxes (CFAT)
Old Existing Machine Upgraded Machine
= (iv)-(i)
Year (i) EAT/CFAT (ii) EAT (iii) DEP (iv) CFAT
Incremental
` ` ` `
CFAT `
1 5,00,000 5,50,000 2,00,000 7,50,000 2,50,000
2 5,40,000 5,90,000 2,00,000 7,90,000 2,50,000
3 5,80,000 6,10,000 2,00,000 8,10,000 2,30,000
4 6,20,000 6,50,000 2,00,000 8,50,000 2,30,000
5 6,60,000 7,00,000 2,00,000 9,00,000 2,40,000
80 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
hi
4 7,40,000 4,10,000 11,50,000 5,30,000
5 8,00,000 4,10,000 12,10,000 5,50,000
ks
*Acquisition Cost (including installation cost) ` 20,50,000
Less: Salvage Value of existing machine net of Tax ` 30,000
` 20,20,000
Year Incremental
CFAT
`
PVF ho
Upgraded Machine
Total P.V.
`
Incremental
CFAT
New Machine
PVF Total PV
`
C
1 2,50,000 0.870 2,17,500 5,10,000 0.870 4,43,700
2 2,50,000 0.756 1,89,000 5,10,000 0.756 3,85,560
3 2,30,000 0.658 1,51,340 5,20,000 0.658 3,42,160
4 2,30,000 0.572 1,31,560 5,30,000 0.572 3,03,160
ik
As the NPV in both the new (alternative) proposals is negative, the company should
Bh
A machine used on a production line must be replaced at least every four years. Costs incurred
to run the machine according to its age are:
Age of the Machine (years)
0 1 2 3 4
Purchase price (in `) 60,000
81 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
Future replacement will be with identical machine with same cost. Revenue is unaffected by the
age of the machine. Ignoring inflation and tax, determine the optimum replacement cycle. PV
factors of the cost of capital of 15% for the respective four years are 0.8696, 0.7561, 0.6575
and 0.5718.
hi
Summary
ks
Detailed Solution
Working Notes
Year
0
Replacement Cost
(60,000)
ho
First of all, we shall calculate cash flows for each replacement cycle as follows:
One Year Replacement Cycle
Maintenance & Repair
-
Residual Value
-
Net cash Flow
(60,000)
C
1 - (16,000) 32,000 16,000
0 (60,000) - - (60,000)
1 - (16,000) - (16,000)
2 - (22,000) 24,000 2,000
av
2 - (22,000) - (22,000)
3 - (28,000) 16,000 (12,000)
82 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
hi
4 0.5718 - - - 0 0 -28,000 -16,010
-46,086 -72,402 -98,438 -1,24,968
ks
Replacement Cycles EAC (₹)
46086
1 Year 0.8696
52,997
2 Years
3 Years
ho 72402
1.6257
98438
2.2832
124968
44,536
43,114
C
4 Years 43,772
2.855
Since EAC is least in case of replacement cycle of 3 years hence machine should be replaced
ik
Note: Alternatively, Answer can also be computed by excluding initial outflow as there will be
av
L & R Limited wishes to develop new virus-cleaner software. The cost of the pilot project
would be ` 2,40,000. Presently, the chances of the product being successfully launched on a
commercial scale are rated at 50%. In case it does succeed. L&R can invest a sum of ` 20 lacs
to market the product. Such an effort can generate perpetually, an annual net after tax cash
income of ` 4 lacs. Even if the commercial launch fails, they can make an investment of a smaller
amount of ` 12 lacs with the hope of gaining perpetually a sum of ` 1 lac. Evaluate the proposal,
adopting decision tree approach. The discount rate is 10%.
83 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
ADVANCED CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISIONS
Summary
Detailed Solution
Invest 20L
Success 0.5 Income 4L perpetuity
hi
C Not to Invest
) B Invest 12L
,000
(2,40 Failure 0.5 Income 1L perpetuity
ks
st D Not to Invest
Te
A
No
Te
st
Evaluation
ho
At Decision Point C: The choice is between investing ` 20 lacs for a perpetual benefit of ` 4 lacs
C
and not to invest. The preferred choice is to invest, since the capitalized value of benefit of ` 4
lacs (at 10%) adjusted for the investment of ` 20 lacs, yields a net benefit of ` 20 lacs.
At Decision Point D: The choice is between investing ` 12 lacs, for a similar perpetual benefit
ik
of ` 1 lac. and not to invest. Here the invested amount is greater than capitalized value of
benefit at ` 10 lacs. There is a negative benefit of ` 2 lacs. Therefore, it would not be prudent
to invest. At Outcome Point B: Evaluation of EMV is as under (` in lacs).
av
84 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Mr. D had invested in three mutual funds (MF) as per the following details:
Particulars MF ‘A’ MF ‘B’ MF ‘C’
hi
Amount of Investment 2,00,000 5,00,000 4,00,000
NAV at the time of purchase 10.00 25.00 20.00
Dividend Yield up to 31.03.2022 3% 5% 4%
ks
NAV as on 31.03.2022 10.50 22.80 20.80
Annualized Yield as on 31.03.2022 9.733% - 11.185% 15%
(vi) Assuming past performance of all three schemes will continue for next one year, what
action the investor should take? What will be the expected return for the next one year
after the above action?
av
(vii) Will your answer as above point no. (vi) changes if the Mutual fund charges exit load of
5% if the investment is redeemed within one year? If so, advise the investor what and
when the action to be taken to optimise the returns.
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
` 5, 00, 000
MF ‘B’ 20,000
` 25.00
` 4, 00, 000
MF ‘C’ 20,000
` 20.00
85 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
hi
(iii) Yield on each Fund
Scheme Capital Yield Dividend Yield Total Yield (%)
MF ‘A’ ` 2,10,000 - ` 2,00,000 ` 6,000 ` 16,000.00 8.00
ks
= ` 10,000
MF ‘C’
Total
= ` 16,000
` 29,000.00
8.00
C
MF ‘A’ MF ‘B’ MF ‘C’
Period of Holding (Days) 8.00 -3.80 8.00
×365 ×365 ×365
9.733 -11.185 15.00
ik
` 29, 000
(v) Total Yield = × 100 = 2.636%
` 11, 00, 000
Bh
(vi) If past of all three schemes will continue for next one year, the investor should redeem
the units of MFs ‘A’ and ‘B’ and invest the proceeds in MF ‘C’. The expected return next
will be 15%.
(vii) If the Mutual funds are charging exit load of 5%, if investment is redeemed within one
year, then investor should get redeemed units of MF ‘B’ now and units of MF ‘A’ after 65
days.
Mr. X on 1.7.2000 during the initial offer of some Mutual Fund invested in 10,000 units having
face value of ` 10 for each unit. On 31.3.2001 the dividend offered by the M.F. was 10% and
86 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Mr. X found that his annualised yield was 153.33%. On 31.3.2002, 20% dividend was given.
On 31.3.2003 Mr. X redeemed all his balance of 11,296.11 units when his annualised yield was
73.52%. What are the NAVs as on 31.3.2001, 31.3.2002 and 31.3.2003?
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
Reference Note: In this Question, we can infer that the given plan is the dividend re-investment
plan because we have originally invested in 10,000 units only. However, on 31/3/03 - 11,296.11
ks
units have been redeemed. In absence of information about fresh investment or bonus issue, the
increase in numbers of units can be attributed to dividend re investment plan.
2001
Let NAV as on 31/3/01 be ` x per unit ho
Dividend is distributed on 31/3/01 and in case of dividend re-investment plan, new units would
be allotted based on NAV as on 31/3/01 i.e., x
C
Total dividend
Thus, Additional units = NAV on date of distribution
ik
` 10, 000
=
av
x
1, 00, 000
87 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
2002
There is no dividend distribution in year 3 (2003). Hence, any additional units will have to be
attributable to the dividend of year 2002.
New units (2002) = 11,296.11 – 10,487.80
hi
= 808.31
Total Dividend
New units (2002) = NAV on 31 / 3 / 02
ks
Let NAV (31/3/02) be ` y
y = ` 25.95
2003
(NAV as on 31/03/02)
73.52 =
(11, 296.11 × z ) – 1, 00, 000
× 100 ×
12
1, 00, 000 33
3,02,180 = 11,296.11z
Therefore, z = ` 26.75/unit
Bh
M/S. Corpus an AMC, on 1.04.2015 has floated two schemes viz. Dividend Plan and Bonus Plan. Mr.
X, an investor has invested in both the schemes. The following details (except the issue price)
are available:
Date Dividend (%) Bonus Ratio NAV
Dividend Plan Bonus Plan
1.04.2015 ? ?
31.12.2016 1 :4 (One unit on 4 47 40
units held)
31.03.2017 12 48 42
88 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
31.03.2018 10 50 39
31.12.2018 1 :5 (One unit on 5 46 43
units held)
31.03.2019 15 45 42
31.03.2020 - - 49 44
Additional details
Investment (`) ` 9,20,000 ` 10,00,000
Average Profit (`) ` 27, 748.60
hi
Average Yield (%) 6.40
You are required to calculate the issue price of both the schemes as on 1.04.2015.
ks
Summary
Detailed Solution
(f) Number of units at the end of the period as on 31.03.2019 (d/e) 21607
1 2 3 4 = (2×3) 5 6 = (1×4) 7
(4+5)
av
Period Units Rate Unit Dividend NAV New Units* Balance Units Pre
held value Dividend
89 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
hi
(RTP Nov 20)/(RTP May 19)/(MTP April 23)/
(MTP Nov 21)
[Q.20 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.20 - AFM 10]
ks
There are two Mutual Funds viz. D Mutual Fund Ltd. and K Mutual Fund Ltd. Each having close
ended equity schemes.
NAV as on 31-12-2014 of equity schemes of D Mutual Fund Ltd. is ` 70.71 (consisting 99% equity
balance in cash).
Following is the other information:
ho
and remaining cash balance) and that of K Mutual Fund Ltd. is 62.50 (consisting 96% equity and
Equity Schemes
C
Particulars
D Mutual Fund Ltd. K Mutual Fund Ltd.
Sharpe Ratio 2 3.3
Treynor Ratio 15 15
ik
There is no change in portfolios during the next month and annual average cost is ` 3 per unit
for the schemes of both the Mutual Funds.
av
If Share Market goes down by 5% within a month, calculate expected NAV after a month for
the schemes of both the Mutual Funds.
For calculation, consider 12 months in a year and ignore number of days for particular month.
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
1. D Mutual Fund
NAV0 = ` 70.71 (31/12/14)
NAV1 = ? (31/01/15)
In order to find the change in the value of equity investments, we need to find the β
i.e
90 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
RD − RF
2. Sharpe ratio =
sD
RD - RF
2=
11.25
RD – RF = 22.5
RD - RF
Treynor’s Ratio =
hi
bD
22.5
15 =
bD
ks
bD = 1.5
3. Break – up of NAV
Equity Investments: 70.71 × 99%
Cash: ` 70.71 × 1%
= ` 0.71
= ` 70
ho
C
4. Expected NAV
Equity Investments: ` 70 – (` 70 × 7.5%)
= ` 64.75
Cash: 0.71 – (3/12) = 0.71 – 0.25
ik
= ` 0.46
Expected NAV1 = ` 65.21
av
Reference Note: We have been given that the market falls by 5%. The Equity portfolio of the
DMF has a β of 1.5 and hence the fall in D mutual fund’s equity component equals = 5% × 1.5 =
7.5%
Bh
Further, the cash component Changes as the expenses of ` 3 is the expense per annum per unit,
1
hence the monthly expense = ` 3 × = ` 0.25
12
Mr. Abhishek is interested in investing ` 2,00,000 for which he is considering following three
alternatives:
(i) Invest ` 2,00,000 in Mutual Fund X (MFX)
(ii) Invest ` 2,00,000 in Mutual Fund Y (MFY)
(iii) Invest ` 1,20,000 in Mutual Fund X (MFX) and ` 80,000 in Mutual Fund Y (MFY)
91 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Average annual return earned by MFX and MFY is 15% and 14% respectively. Risk free rate of
return is 10% and market rate of return is 12%.
Particulars MFX MFY Mix
MFX 4.800 4.300 3.370
MFY 4.300 4.250 2.800
Mix 3.370 2.800 3.100
Covariance of returns of MFX, MFY and market portfolio Mix are as follows:
hi
You are required to calculate:
(i) variance of return from MFX, MFY and market return,
(ii) portfolio return, beta, portfolio variance and portfolio standard deviation,
ks
(iii) expected return, systematic risk and unsystematic risk; and
(iv) Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Alpha of MFX, MFY and Portfolio Mix
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
Given data
Particulars MF- X MF-Y Market (MFX)
Return 15% 14% 12%
ik
Variance
s X2 = 4.80 (Intersection of x with itself)
Bh
s Y2 = 4.25
s M2 = 3.10
Solution:
(i) Variance
Reference: In this question, COVAR (X,X), COVAR (Y,Y) and COVAR (M,M) is given
∑ ( x - x )( x - x )
Thus, COVAR (x,x) =
N
∑ (x − x )
2
=
N
= s X2
92 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
hi
3.37
=
3.10
ks
bX = 1.087
= 14.6%
93 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
hi
= 1.137
Alternative 2: 100% Y
a. Expected return (using CAPM)
ks
Ke = RF + (RM - RF) βY
Ke = 10% + (12% - 10%) × 0.903
= 11.806%
b. Systematic Risk
= β2Y × σ2M
= (0.903)2 × 3.10
= 2.528
ho
C
c. Unsystematic Risk
Unsystematic Risk = Total Variance (σ2y) – System Risk (E2y)
= 4.25 – 2.528
ik
= 1.722
Alternative 3
Ke = 10% + (12% -10%) × 1.013 (βXY) = 12.026%
av
Systematic Risk
= (1.013)2 × 3.10
= 3.181
Bh
Unsystematic Risk
= 4.472 – 3.181
= 1.291
Particulars Share Ratio Treynor’s Ratio Jensen’s Alpha
RX – RF/σX Rx – RF/βX Rx - KE
MF - X 15 - 10/2.19 15 - 10/1.087 15 - 12.174
= 2.283 = 4.600 = 2.826
MF - Y 14 - 10/2.06 14 - 10/0.903 14 - 11.806
= 1.942 =4.430 = 2.194
Portfolio 14.6 – 10/2.11 14.6 - 10/1.013 14.6 - 12.026
= 2.180 = 4.541 = 2.574
MTX(Market) 12 - 10/ 3.10 12-10/1 12 - 12
= 1.136 = 2.000 = 0
94 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Indira has a fund of ` 3 lakhs which she wants to invest in share market with rebalancing
target after every 10 days to start with for a period of one month from now. The Present
NIFTY is 5326. The minimum NIFTY within a month can at most be 4793.4. She wants to
know as to how she should rebalance her portfolio under the following situations, according to
hi
the theory of constant proportion portfolio insurance policy, using “2” as the multiplier:
(i) Immediately to start with
(ii) 10 days later being the 1st day of rebalancing if NIFTY falls to 5122.96. 10 days further
ks
from the above date if NIFTY touches 5539.04
For the sake of simplicity, assume that the value of her equity component will change in
tandem with that of the NIFTY and the risk free securities in which she is going to invest will
have no Beta.
Summary
ho
C
Detailed Solution
= (10%)
2. Floor Value = ` 3,00,000 – 10% × 3,00,000
= 2,70,000
Bh
Ref → Since the equity changes in tandem with Nifty, the fall in Nifty would help us calculate
the fall in the equity component as well.
3. Cushion = 3,00,000 – 2,70,000
= ` 30,000
4. Allocation to equity (Day 0)
= 30,000 × 2
= 60,000
Thus allocation to debt
= 3,00,000 - 60,000
= 2,40,000
95 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Day 10
1. Revised Portfolio
60,000 5,326
Equity = ` 57,713
? 5,122.96
hi
2. Revised Cushion = ` 2,97,713 – ` 2,70,000 = ` 27,713
3. Rebalancing Portfolio
ks
Equity (27,713 × 2) 55,426 For Reference : [-2,287]
Debt (balancing) 2,42,287 For Reference : [+2,287]
(2,97,713 – 55,426)
Day 20
1.
Portfolio
Revised Portfolio
ho
2,97,713
C
55, 426 → 5,122.96
Equity ` 59,928 =
? ← 5, 539.04
Debt ` 2,42,287
ik
Portfolio ` 3,02,215
2. Revised Cushion
= ` 3,02,215 – ` 2,70,000
av
= ` 32,215
3. Rebalancing Portfolio
Equity (32,215 × 2) 64,430 (Ref + 4,502 - 4,502)
Bh
On 1st April, an open ended scheme of mutual fund had 300 lakh units outstanding with Net
Assets Value (NAV) of ` 18.75. At the end of April, it issued 6 lakh units at opening NAV plus
2% load, adjusted for dividend equalization. At the end of May, 3 Lakh units were repurchased
96 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
at opening NAV less 2% exit load adjusted for dividend equalization. At the end of June, 70%
of its available income was distributed.
hi
Income for May 34.425
Income for June 45.450
ks
(i) Income available for distribution;
(ii) Issue price at the end of April;
(iii) repurchase price at the end of May; and net asset value (NAV) as on 30th June.
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
(i) Income available for distribution
Particulars `
ik
102.717
Dividend = = ` 0.339/u
303
Income available for distribution will also include adjustments for dividend equalisation
received/paid. However, unlike NAV, the amount available for distribution is based on
realised income only and hence portfolio appreciation (unrealised) is not a part of the
income available for calculation.
(ii) Issue price at end of April
Opening NAV 18.750
(+) Entry load (2% × 18.75) 0.375
97 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
22.95
WN – 1: April: = 0.0765
300
Ref: Gross proceeds received in April from new unit holders = (` 19.2015 × 6)
= ` 115.209
hi
Out of which, proceeds attributable to dividend equalisation = ` 0.0765 x 6 = ` 0.459
ks
(iii) Redemption/repurchase price at the end of May:
Opening NAV 18.75
(-) Exit Load at 2% (0.375)
(+) Dividend equalisation
22.95 34.425
300
April
+
306
=
0.189
May
ho
0.189
C
Redemption Price 18.564
= 3,00,000 × ` 18.564
= ` 55.692 Lakhs
Out of which, proceeds attributable to dividend equalisation
av
= 3 × ` 0.189
= ` 0.567 Lakhs
Bh
Extra: There had been no new issue/redemption in June. Hence, we don’t need to find
issue price/redemption price in June. However, in case the dividend equalisation per unit
was to be calculated for June, it would be:
22.95 34.425 45.45
+ +
300 306 303
98 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
MUTUAL FUNDS
Add: Income
April 22.95
May 34.42
June 45.45
Less: Dividend distributed (102.717×70%) (71.90)
Net Assets (30/6) 6,140.91
÷ Units (30/6) 303
NAV (30/6) ` 20.27
hi
Reference Note:
1. We have taken the issue price and redemption price of the new units issued and units
redeemed including dividend equalisation and load adjustments. Therefore, no separate
ks
adjustment needs to be done for dividend equalisation/load at the time of NAV calculation
on 30th June.
2. NAV includes all possible changes in net assets which can arise due to portfolio
ho
appreciation, incomes earned and dividend distribution and also changes in cash balances
due to issue/redemption.
C
ik
av
Bh
99 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
RISK MANAGEMENT
Mr. Bull is a rational risk taker. He takes his position in a single stock for 4 days in a week. He
does not take a position on Friday to avoid weekend effect and takes position only for four days
hi
in a week i.e. Monday to Thursday. He transfers the amount on Monday morning and withdraws
the balance on Friday morning. He desires to make a maximum investment where Value At Risk
(VAR) should not exceed the balance lying in his bank account. The position by his manager, as
ks
per standing instructions, is taken on the free balance lying in the bank account in the morning
on each Monday.
On Monday morning (before opening of the capital market) he has transferred an amount of
ho
` 11 Crore to his bank account. A fixed deposit also matured on this Monday. The maturity
amount of ` 63,42,560 was also credited to his account by the bank in the morning of the
Monday. However, Mr. Bull received the intimation of the same in the evening. The bank needs
a minimum balance of ` 1,000 all the time. The value of Z score, at the required confidence level
C
of 99 percent is 2.33.
The other information with respect to stocks X and Y, which are under consideration for this
week, is as under:
ik
The other information with respect to stocks X and Y, which are under consideration for this
week, is as under:
X Y
av
9 0.25 10 0.20
10 0.10 12 0.10
You are required to recommend a single stock, where maximum investment can be made
Summary
Detailed Solution
Working Notes:
(1) Security X
Return (1) Prob. (2) (1) x (2) Deviation2 Deviation2 Deviation2 x Prob.
6 0.10 0.60 -2 4 0.40
7 0.25 1.75 1 1 0.25
8 0.30 2.40 0 0 0
9 0.25 2.25 1 1 0.25
10 0.10 1.00 2 4 0.40
8.00 1.30
hi
Expected Return (Rx) = 8.00% Variance (s X ) = 1.30
Standard Deviation (s X ) = 1.30 = 1.14
(2) Security Y
ks
Return (1) Prob. (2) (1) x (2) Dev. Dev.2 Dev.2 x Prob.
4 0.10 0.40 -4 16 1.60
6 0.20 1.20 -2 4 0.80
8
10
12
0.40
0.20
0.10
CHAPTER 7 BUSINESS
BUSINESS VALUATION
VALUATION
H Ltd. agrees to buy over the business of B Ltd. effective 1st April, 2012. The summarized
Balance Sheets of H Ltd. and B Ltd. as on 31st March 2012 are as follows:
hi
Balance sheet as at 31st March, 2012 (In Crores of Rupees)
Particulars H. Ltd B. Ltd.
Liabilities
ks
Paid up Share Capital
- Equity Shares of ` 100 each 350.00 --
- Equity Shares of ` 10 each -- 6.50
Reserve & Surplus 950.00 25.00
Total 1,300.00 31.50
Assets
Net Fixed Assets
Net Current Assets
Deferred Tax Assets
ho 220.00
1,020.00
60.00
0.50
29.00
2.00
C
Total 1,300.00 31.50
H Ltd. proposes to buy out B Ltd. and the following information is provided to you as part of the
scheme of buying:
ik
(1) The weighted average post tax maintainable profits of H Ltd. and B Ltd. for the last 4
years are ` 300 crores and ` 10 crores respectively.
(2) Both the companies envisage a capitalization rate of 8%.
av
(3) H Ltd. has a contingent liability of ` 300 crores as on 31st March, 2012.
(4) H Ltd. to issue shares of ` 100 each to the shareholders of B Ltd. in terms of the
exchange ratio as arrived on a Fair Value basis. (Please consider weights of 1 and 3
Bh
for the value of shares arrived on Net Asset basis and Earnings capitalization method
respectively for both H Ltd. and B Ltd.)
You are required to arrive at the value of the shares of both H Ltd. and B Ltd. under:
(i) Net Asset Value Method
(ii) Earnings Capitalisation Method
(iii) Exchange ratio of shares of H Ltd. to be issued to the shareholders of B Ltd. on a
Fair value basis (taking into consideration the assumption mentioned in point 4 above.)
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
Net Assets 1,000 31.5
Divided: Shares ÷ 3.5 0.65
(` 350 ÷ 100) (` 6.5 ÷ 10)
ks
NAV ` 285.71 ` 48.46
Note – 1:
We have assumed that the contingent liability will settle in full i.e., 300 and hence
ho
considered while calculating NAV. (In line with ICAI’s solution)
Alternatively, it can be assumed that the contingent is not expected to be settled in
which case we can take NIL in the above workings.
2. Earning Capitalization Method.
C
` 300 Cr
H = 3,750
0.08
` 10 Cr
ik
B = 125
0.08
3, 750
H = 1,071.43
3.5
125
B = 192.31
Bh
0.65
V .P .S ( NAV ) × 1 + V .P .S (Earnings ) × 3
Fair Value =
1 + 3
285.71 × 1 + 1, 071.43 × 3
H =
1 + 3
3, 500
=
4
= 875
48.46 × 1 + 192.31 × 3
B =
1 + 3
625.39
=
4
= 156.35
hi
Fair value of B
Exchange Ratio (Based on fair value) =
Fair value of H
156.35
=
ks
875
= 0.1787:1
Question 2
ho (MTP Nov 24)
[Q.1 - Additional Question AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.11 - AFM 10]
The ABC Startup has the following expected profits under different scenarios along respective
probabilities:
C
Year Best Case Base Case Worst Case
Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses
1 ` 100,00,000 ` 80,00,000 ` 100,00,000 ` 90,00,000 ` 100,00,000 ` 95,00,000
ik
You are required to suggest the value of ABC Startup using First Chicago Method assuming that:
(i) Applicable discounting rate is 20%.
(ii) Startup is located in Tax-free Zone.
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
PV ` 16,66,600 ` 19,16,544 ` 20,83,320 ` 2,08,33,200
Value of Startup ` 2,64,99,664
(ii) Best Case Scenario
ks
Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Revenue ` 100,00,000 ` 110,00,000 ` 121,00,000
Expenses ` 90,00,000 ` 95,70,000 ` 102,85,000
Cash Flow/ Earnings
Terminal Value
PVF @ 20%
PV
` 10,00,000
0.8333
` 8,33,300
ho
` 14,30,000
0.6944
` 9,92,992
` 18,15,000
0.5787
` 10,50,341
` 181,50,000
0.5787
` 105,03,405
C
Value of Startup ` 133,80,038
(iii) Worst Case Scenario
Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Revenue ` 100,00,000 ` 102,00,000 ` 104,04,000
ik
The following table shows interest rates for the United States dollar and French francs. The
spot exchange rate is 7.05 francs/$. Complete the missing entries:
hi
3 Months 6 Months 12 Months
Dollar interest rate (annually compounded) 11 ½ % 12 ¼ % ?
Franc interest rate (annually compounded) 19 ½ ? 20 %
ks
Forward franc per dollar ? ? 7.5200
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
F
=
(
1 + rF × M /12 )
S (
1 + r$ × M /12 )
ik
S −F 12
Forward discount on French Francs (Non – Base) = × 100 ×
F M
(i) 3 Months
av
F (1 + 0.195 × 3 / 12)
Using IRP = =
FF 7.05 / $ (1 + 0.1150 × 3 / 12 )
Bh
1.04875
F = FF 7.05 / $ ×
1.02875
FF 7.1871/$
∴ Forward Discount on FF
FF 7.05 / $ − FF 7.1871 / $
= × 100 × 12 / 3
FF 7.1871 / $
(ii) 6 Months
Forward Discount
FF 7.05 / $ − x 12
(6.3) = × 100 × [Let forward rate be x]
X 6
6 1 FF 7.05 / $ − x
∴ (6.3) × × =
12 100 x
hi
∴ (0.0315 x) = FF 7.05 / $ - x
∴ 0.9685 x = FF 7.05 / $
∴ x = FF 7.2793/$
ks
Using IRP,
FF 7.2793 / $
=
(
1 + x × 6 /12 ) [Let the French interest rate p.a. be x]
( )
FF 7.05 / $
∴ 1.0325 =
1 + 0.1225 × 6 /12
1 + 0.5 x
1.06125
ho
C
∴ 1.0957 = 1+0.5 x
∴X = 0.1914
i.e. = 19.14% p.a.
ik
(iii) 12 Months
Using IRP,
( )
av
Thus, 1 + x = 1.1250
Thus, x = 0.1250
i.e., 12.5% p.a.
S −F
= × 100
F
7.05 – 7.52
= × 100
7.52
hi
Bombay $/` 100 : 3.15 - 3.10 3.12 - 3.07
London $/£ : 1.7250/60 1.7175/85
DG/£ : 3.9575/90 3.9380/90
ks
The bank wishes to retain an exchange margin of 0.125%. How much does the customer stand
to gain or lose due to the delay?
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
Re-Stated Rates
Rate Dec 27 Jan 3
$/` (Divide by 100) 0.0310/0.0315 0.0307/0.0312
ik
Reference Note:
av
1. We have been given $/` 100 rate. This can be re-stated as the $/ ` rate by dividing it by
100. As a general rule, we should try to write the bid rate (lower rate) on left hand side
and the ask rate (higher rate) would be written on right hand side.
Bh
1
= × $1.7260 / £ × 1/DG 3.9575/ £
$ 0.0310 /`
= ` 14.0688/DG
`
1. Remittance (DG 2,50,000 × ` 14.0688/DG) 35,17,200
Add: Exchange margin at 0.125% 4,396.5
Total cost of remittance (27/12) 35,21,596.5
January 03
hi
Rs Rs $ £
= × ×
DG A $ A £ A DG A
1 1
= $0.0307 / ` × $ 1.7185 / £ ×
ks
DG 3.9380 / £
= ` 14.2146/DG
2.
Add: exchange margin @ 0.125%
Total cost of remittance (03/01)
ho
Remittance (DG 2,50,000 × ` 14.2146/DG)
`
35,53,650
4,442.06
35,58,092.06
C
Therefore, The total loss due to the bank strike = 35,58,092.06 – 35,21,596.5
ik
= ` 36,495.56
In case the given question pertains to an exporter, then the transaction would be at the BID
rate. Further, exchange margin represents transaction cost and it will need to be deducted in
order to find the net cash inflow for the exporter.
Bh
Suppose you are a treasurer of XYZ plc in the UK. XYZ have two overseas subsidiaries, one
based in Amsterdam and one in Switzerland. The Dutch subsidiary has surplus Euros in the
amount of 725,000 which it does not need for the next three months but which will be needed
at the end of that period (91 days). The Swiss subsidiary has a surplus of Swiss Francs in the
amount of 998,077 that, again, it will need on day 91. The XYZ plc in UK has a net balance of
£75,000 that is not needed for the foreseeable future.
Given the rates below, what is the advantage of swapping Euros and Swiss Francs into Sterling?
hi
£ € CHF
0 – 100,000 1 ¼ 0
100,001 – 500,000 2 1½ ¼
ks
500,001 – 1,000,000 4 2 ½
Over 1,000,000 5.375 3 1
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
Individual Basis
Particulars Interest Amt. after 91 Conversion in £
ik
days
Holland £502,414.71
€ 725,000 x 0.02 x 91/360 € 3,665.28 € 728,665.28 (728,665.28 x 0.6895)
av
Swap to Sterling
Particulars Amount
Sell € 7,25,000 (Spot at 0.6858) buy £ £ 4,97,205.00
Sell CHF 9,98,077(Spot at 2.3326) buy £ £ 4,27,881.76
Independent GBP amount £ 75,000.00
£ 1,000,086.76
Interest (£ 1,000,086.76 x 0.05375 x 91/360) £ 13,587.98
Total GBP at 91 days £ 1,013,674.74
Less: Total GBP at 91 days as per individual basis £ 1,010,255.80
Net Gain £ 3,418.94
Reference Note:
1) In all such questions, ICAI always converts the currency balances into a single currency
(usually parent’s currency) and then compares the cash balance at a single date in a
single currency.
This is irrespective of whether money is needed by the subsidiary or not at a later date
and hence we will also follow the same.
2) The interest rates given will be applicable to the entire principal and hence we will take
hi
the applicable interest rate based on the deposit made.
We should not use the Slab Method like done in Income tax.
ks
Question 4 (RTP May 20)/(Practice Manual)
[Q.18 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.18 - AFM 10]
A inc and B inc intend to borrow $ 2,00,000 and $ 2,00,000 in yen respectively for a time
Company
A Inc
B Inc
ho
horizon of one year. The prevalent interest rates are as follows:
Yen Loan
5%
8%
$ Loan
9%
10%
C
The Prevalent exchange rate is $1 = Yen 120
They entered in a currency swap under which it is agreed that B inc will pay A inc @ 1% over
the yen loan interest rate which the latter will have to pay as a result of the agreed currency
ik
swap whereas A inc will reimburse interest to B inc only to the extent of 9%.
Keeping the exchange rate invariant, quantify the opportunity gain or loss component of
the ultimate outcome, resulting from the designed currency swap.
av
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
Option - 2: Swap
hi
At interest payment Date B
ks
Option 1:
A : $ 2,00,000 × 9%
= $ 18,000
B: ¥ 2,40,00,000 × 8%
= ¥ 19,20,000
ho
C
Option 2:
ik
av
Solution:
Bh
hi
C.I from A – SWAP ($ 18,000)
[$ 2,00,000 × 9%]
Net C.O $ 2,000
ks
× Exchange rate (year – 1) × ¥ 120/$
Net C.O ¥ 2,40,000
Add: C.O to A – SWAP ¥ 14,40,000
[¥ 2,40,00,000 × 6%]
Net C.O
ho
Net cost to B in case of a direct borrowing =
=
¥ 16,80,000
¥ 2,40,00,000 × 8%
¥ 19,20,000
C
Thus, Ultimate gain to B = ¥ 19,20,000 - ¥ 16,80,0000
= ¥ 2,40,000
ik
ZX Ltd. has made purchases worth USD 80,000 on 1st May 2020 for which it has to make a
av
payment on 1st November 2020. The present exchange rate is INR/USD 75. The company can
purchase forward dollars at INR/USD 74. The company will have to make an upfront premium
@ 1 per cent of the forward amount purchased. The cost of funds to ZX Ltd. is 10 per cent per
Bh
annum.
The company can hedge its position with the following expected rate of USD in foreign
exchange market on 1st May 2020:
Exchange Rate Probability
(i) INR/USD 77 0.15
(ii) INR/USD 71 0.25
(iii) INR/USD 79 0.20
(iv) INR/USD 74 0.40
You are required to advise the company for a suitable cover for risk.
Summary
Detailed Solution
$ 80,000
ZX Indian Co.
(After 6 Months)
hi
Reference Note: The rates are given in 3 alphabet terms and hence we can consider applying
the market convention. However, USD is stronger as compared to INR and the given rates
ks
already reflect that. Hence, we are directly taking INR/USD to be `/$
Solution:
1. C.O after 6 months under forward hedge.
A
Particulars
ho
Upfront premium (fees) [$80,000 × ` 74/$ × 1%]
Add: Time value adjustment (Interest))
[` 59,200 × 10% × 6/12]
`
59,200
2,960
C
Effective cost after 6 months (A) 62,160
B Cash outflow after 6 months at forward rate (B) 59,20,000
[$ 80,000 × ` 74/$]
∴ Total cash outflow after 6 months = 62,160 + 59,20,000
ik
(A + B) = 59,82,160
2. C.O after 6 months if unhedged
C. Expected Spot = 77 × 0.15 + 71 × 0.25 + 79 × 0.20 + 74 × 0.40
av
= ` 74.7/$
D. Cash outflow expected after 6 months = $ 80,000 × ` 74.7/$
= ` 59,76,000
Bh
It is advised that ZX Ltd should keep the transaction unhedged as it results in a lower
cash outflow after 6 months.
You, a foreign exchange dealer of your bank, are informed that your bank has sold a T.T. on
Copenhagen for Danish Kroner 10,00,000 at the rate of Danish Kroner 1 = ` 6.5150. You are
required to cover the transaction either in London or New York market. The rates on that
date are as under:
In which market will you cover the transaction, London or New York, and what will be the
exchange profit or loss on the transaction? Ignore brokerages.
hi
Summary
Detailed Solution
ks
Original Transaction: Sell –DKK 10,00,000 at ` 6.575/ DKK (S.P)
Cover Transaction: Spot buy – DKK 10,00,000 at ?
Reference Note:
1.
2.
London: ` → £ → DKK
NY: ` → $ → DKK
ho
The cover in this question can happen through any of the following modes.
C
We can cover in the market where the rates are lower.
Solution:
ik
` ` £
= ×
DKK ASK A DKK A
£
av
1
= ` 74.32/£ ×
DKK 11.42 / £
Bh
= ` 6.5079/DKK
` ` $
= ×
DKK ASK $ A DKK A
1
= ` 49.2625 / $ ×
DKK 7.5670 / $
= ` 6.5102/DKK
As it is cheaper to cover (buy) through London, we will use the London market to cover our
transaction.
Thus, gain / (loss) on covering = [(` 6.5150 / DKK – ` 6.5079) × DKK 10,00,000
= ` 0.0071 / DKK × DKK 10,00,000
= ` 7,100 (Gain)
Reference Note:
In this question, we can see that the entity covering is the bank itself. However, in case the
banker wants to cover, they will have to approach another banker and hence for the purpose of
hi
such a question, our banker who is approaching the other bankers for covering is treated as the
customer.
ks
Question 7 (RTP May 21)/(RTP May 19)/(MTP March 19)/
(Practice Manual)
[Q.46 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.46 - AFM 10]
Currency Futures
C
US $/` US $/` Contact size `4,72,000
Spot 0.02140 June 0.02126
1 Month Forward 0.02136 September 0.02118
ik
On September 1, 2005 the spot rate US $/` is 0.02133 and currency future rate is 0.02134.
Bh
Comment which of the following methods would be most advantageous for XYZ Ltd.
(a) Using forward contract
(b) Using currency futures
(c) Not hedging currency risks.
It may be assumed that variation in margin would be settled on the maturity of the future contract.
Summary
Detailed Solution
a. Forward Contracts
1
C.I after 3 months = $ 1,00,000 × = ` 47,01,457
$ 0.02127 / `
b. Futures
hi
Invoice : $ 1,00,000
Contract : ` 4,72,000
∴ Invoice currency ($) is different from contract currency (`)
ks
1. Strategy : Buy ` futures (i.e. equivalent to selling $) (Base: `)
2. Maturity : Sept at $ 0.02118/` (C.P.)
3. No. of contracts
Particulars
Invoice ($)
Divide: September Future Rate
Equivalent Invoice (`)
ho `
$ 1,00,000
÷ $ 0.02118/`
` 47,21,435
C
Divide: Contract Size ÷ ` 4,72,000
No of Contracts 10.003
i.e., 10 Contracts
ik
1
$1, 00, 000 ×
$ 0.02133
`
Bh
As the margin is refundable/adjustable, the margin in itself is not a cost. However, the
relevant cost to consider is the opportunity cost on account of the margin.
c. Unhedged
1
C.I on 01/09/05 = $ 1,00,000 × = ` 46,88,233
$0.02133 /`
(i.e. After 3 months )
As the Cash Inflow under the futures contract is the highest, XYZ limited is suggested
hi
to opt for the futures contract.
ks
[Modified])/(Practice Manual [Modified])
[Q.47 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.47 - AFM 10]
Nitrogen Ltd, a UK company is in the process of negotiating an order amounting to €4 million
ho
with a large German retailer on 6 months credit. If successful, this will be the first time that
Nitrogen Ltd has exported goods into the highly competitive German market. The following
three alternatives are being considered for managing the transaction risk before the order is
finalized.
C
a. Invoice the German firm in Sterling using the current exchange rate to calculate the
invoice amount,
b. Alternative of invoicing the German firm in € and using a forward foreign exchange
ik
Required:
a. Calculate to the nearest £ the receipt for Nitrogen Ltd, under each of the three
proposals.
b. In your opinion, which alternative would you consider to be the mostappropriate and the
reason there of.
Summary
Detailed Solution
Nitrogen € 4 Million
German Co.
UK Co 6 months (b and c) 6 Months
hi
Exporter
ks
(UK Co) 6 months (b and c) 6 Months
Alternatively, since the rates are given in Indirect quotes, we can convert them into
C
direct quotes and then solve taking € as base currency.
Solution:
ik
1
= € 40,00,000 ×
av
€1.1770 / £
= £ 33,98,471
Bh
As the invoice is in £ under this alternative, there is no requirement for hedging and
hence the cash inflow after 6 months will be £ 33,98,471 (credit period of 6 months)
Reference Note: As per the deal, the customer has agreed to pay us € 4 millions. If we
notionally receive € 4 million today and go to the banker to sell the €, the transaction
would happen at the € BID rate since the banker will be buying the €. However, since the
base currency is in £, evaluation would be based on pounds. Banker is buying the € which
is equivalent to selling the £ and hence the £ ASK rate is selected.
b. Invoice in € and take the forward hedge
1
C.I after 6 months = € 40,00,000 ×
€1.1715 / £
= £ 34,14,426
hi
Reference Note: Nitrogen sells € to bank i.e., Bank Buys €, Base currency is £. Banker
buys € and at the same time sells £. Therefore, £ ASK Rate.
ks
General Reference:
In case we are not confident in the bid/ask selection, we can adopt the trial-and-error
method i.e., calculate the cash flow using both rates. In case the entity gets a cash
c.
ho
inflow, the rate which gives us a lower cash inflow should be selected and in case there
is a cash outflow, the rates that gives us a higher cash outflow should be selected.
Conclusion:
Nitrogen Ltd should invoice in € and take the forward hedge as it results in the highest
cash inflow after 6 months.
A bank enters into a forward purchase TT covering an export bill for Swiss Francs 1,00,000
hi
at ` 32.4000 due 25th April and covered itself for same delivery in the local inter bank market
at ` 32.4200. However, on 25th March, exporter sought for cancellation of the contract as the
tenor of the bill is changed.
ks
In Singapore market, Swiss Francs were quoted against dollars as under:
Spot USD 1 = Sw. Fcs. 1.5076/1.5120
One month forward
Two months forward
Three months forward
ho 1.5150/1.5160
1.5250/1.5270
1.5415/1.5545
C
and in the interbank market US dollars were quoted as under:
Spot USD 1 = ` 49.4302/.4455
Spot/April .4100/.4200
ik
Spot/May .4300/.4400
Spot/June .4500/.4600
Calculate the cancellation charges, payable by the customer if exchange margin required by
av
the bank is 0.10% on buying and selling. Exchange margin to be adjusted in `/$ rate only.
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
hi
Adjusted (`/$)1M(April)ASK ` 49.9154/$
Reference Note: The above rate is going to be used to calculate the C.P and hence the margin
ks
will effectively increase the cost and hence it is to be added. Further, in line with ICAI’s
Solution, we have modified the question and considered the exchange margin to be applicable on
`/$ rate and not CHF/$ rate.
`
=
1M
`
= ` 49.9154/$ ×
1M
$
×
CHF ASK $ ASK CHF ASK
1
1M
ho
C
CHF .1.5150/$
= ` 32.9475/CHF (C.P)
Gain/(Loss) for customer on cancellation (After 1m)
ik
Therefore, the cancellation charge payable by the customer would be ` 54,750 after 1 month.
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
Thus, Net Cancellation rate (Net S.P)
= ` 41.50/$ - 0.075%
= ` 41.4689/$
ks
Thus, Gain / (Loss) on cancellation
= (` 41.4689/$ - ` 42.32/$) × $ 20,000
= (` 17,022) [Loss to importer]
Reference Note:
1.
ho
Transaction cost (margin money) will always increase the cost/reduce the sale
proceeds for the customer. Further the buying / selling rate given in the question will
C
always be the buying / selling rate from the banker’s perspective.
2. At the time of cancellation, the banker buys (customer sells) and hence margin money
for buying rate i.e., 0.075% should be applied. Further as the customer is selling, this
ik
margin money would reduce his sale proceeds and hence needs to be deducted from
the cancellation rate of ` 41.50/$.
b. New Forward Rate:
av
Reference Note: The importer originally intended to buy $. Thus, on extension, the
importer would still continue to take a forward buy contract i.e. the customer buys /
banker sells i.e. ask rate.
Bh
The swap points (%) are given in the ascending order and hence we add. Further margin
money is at the banker’s selling rate i.e. 0.2% will also be added (as it is a cost, it will
increase the customer’s purchase rate)
Spot ($ Ask) (on 30/10/10) ` 41.5200/$
Add: 3 month Forward premium ` 0.3861/$
(` 41.52 × 0.93%)
3 month Forward ($ Ask) ` 41.9061/$
Add: Margin
(41.9061 × 0.2%) ` 0.0838/$
New forward rate ` 41.9899/$
(Under extension)
Reference Note:
We have been told that the customer agrees to pay the required margin money on
extension. An extension implies a cancellation + a new forward. Therefore, the transaction
charges will be levied on both the cancellation rate as well as the new forward rate.
hi
On 1 October 2019 Mr. X an exporter enters into a forward contract with a BNP Bank to sell
US$ 1,00,000 on 31 December 2019 at ` 70.40/$ and bank simultaneously entered into a cover
deal at ` 70.60/$. However, due to the request of the importer, Mr. X received amount on 28
ks
November 2019. Mr. X requested the bank the take delivery of the remittance on 30 November
2019 i.e. before due date. The inter-banking rates on 28 November 2019 were as follows:
Spot ` 70.22/70.27
One Month Swap Points 15/10
ho
If bank agrees to take early delivery, then determine the net inflow to Mr. X assuming that the
prevailing prime lending rate is 10% and deposit rate is 5%.
C
Note:
(i) While exchange rates to be considered upto two decimal points the amount to be rounded
off to Rupees i.e. no paisa shall be involved in computation of any amount.
ik
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
Bh
Mr. X (Exporter)
Original: Forward sale after 3 months @ ` 70.40/$ (S.P → Customers)
for $ 1,00,000
$BID
` 70.22 /$ ` 70.40/$
$ 1,00,000 $ 1,00,000
Solution:
Particulars `
hi
1. Forward settled $ 1,00,000 × ` 70.40/$
(Cash outflow) = ` 70,40,000
2. Spot sale $ 1,00,000 × ` 70.22/$
(Cash inflow) = ` 70,22,000
ks
3. Cover forward cancelled $ 1,00,000 × ` 70.17/$*
(No cash flow) = ` 70,17,000
1 Month forward = ` 70.22/$ - ` 0.15/$/` 70.27/$ - ` 0.1 / $
1.
ho
= ` 70.07/$ / ` 70.17/$
Thus, Swap gain to be paid to the customers = Spot sell (S.P) – Forward buy (C.P)
[Reference Note: Additional actions which BNP Bank had to take to honour the early
C
delivery]
= ` 70,22,000 – ` 70,17,000
= ` 5,000 [A]
ik
31
(Cash outflow – Cash inflow) × Borrowing rate ×
365
(1) (2) (Since cash outflow)
Bh
31
= (` 70,40,000 – ` 70,22,000) × 10% p.a ×
365
31
= ` 18,000 × 10% ×
365
(Net cash outflow)
= ` 153 [B] (To be recovered from customer)
hi
10th June @ ` 64.4000. The bank covered its position in the market at ` 64.2800.
The exchange rates for dollar in the interbank market on 10th June and 13th June were:
ks
Particulars 10th June 13th June
Spot USD 1 ` 63.8000/8200 ` 63.6800/7200
Spot/June ` 63.9200/9500 ` 63.8000/8500
July
August
September
ho
` 64.0500/0900
` 64.3000/3500
` 64.6000/6600
` 63.9300/9900
` 64.1800/2500
` 64.4800/5600
Exchange Margin 0.10% and interest on outlay of funds @ 12%. The importer requested on 13
th
C
th
June for extension of contract with due date on 10 August.
Rates rounded to 4 decimal in multiples of 0.0025.
th
On 10 June, Bank Swaps by selling spot and buying one month forward.
ik
Calculate:
(i) Cancellation rate
av
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
= ` 63.6163/$
Reference Note: Ideally, as given this rate should be rounded off to the nearest 0.0025
i.e., ` 63.6175/$. However, ICAI has ignored the rounding – off in subsequent workings
ks
and hence we have also ignored the same.
ho
= (` 63.6163/$-` 64.4000/$)×$ 2,00,000
= (` 1,56,740) (A) Loss i.e. amount payable due to exchange difference to Bank.
63.9500
Forward Buy [CP] ($2, 00, 000 × ` (` 1,27,90,000)
$
(iv) Interest
Cash outflow on original off – setting contract
Bh
64.2500 ` 64.2500
@` + 0.1 % $
$
= ` 64.3143/$
hi
Question 13 (ICAI SM)/(MTP Oct 19)
[Q.62 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.62 - AFM 10]
NP and Co has imported goods for US $ 7,00,000. The amount is payable after 3 months.
ks
The company has also exported goods for US $ 4,50,000 and this amount is receivable in two
months. For receivable amount a forward contract is already taken at ` 48.90.
Spot
Two Months
Three Months
ho
The market rates for rupees and dollars are as under:
` 48.50/70
25/30 points
40/45 points
C
The company wants to cover the risk and it has two options as under:
a. To cover payables in the forward market, and
ik
b. To lag the receivables by one month and cover the risk only for the net amount. No
interest for delaying the receivables is earned. Evaluate both the options if cost of
rupee funds is 12%?
av
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
hi
(+) Time value adjustment (Interest) 2,20,050
[2,20,05,000 × 12% × 1/12]
Effective C.I after 3 months (B) ` 2,22,25,050
ks
Thus, Net C.O after 3 months (A - B)
= ` 3,44,05,000 – ` 22,225,050
= ` 1,21,79,950 C.O
Reference Note:
ho
(b) Option-2: Lag receivables (without interest) and take forward for net payable.
If we lag the receivables by 1 month, we will have to first cancel the original forward
C
contract which we have already taken. Further, there is no extension required for this
contract as we will net off the $4,50,000 cash inflow with the amount payable.
Since we have been specifically given that no interest is earned for delaying the
ik
receivables, time value adjustment is not needed and hence time value adjustment is
ignored on lagging.
Net C.O after 3 months (c) (` 1,22,87,500)
av
Conclusion:
It is advised to go with option – 1 i.e, take forward cover for $ 7,00,000 as it results in
a lower cash outflow after 3 months.
hi
XYZ Ltd. a US firm will need £ 3,00,000 in 180 days. In this connection, the following
information is available:
Spot rate 1 £ = $ 2.00
ks
180 days forward rate of £ as of today = $1.96
Interest rates are as follows :
U.K US
180 days deposit rate
180 days borrowing rate ho 4.5%
5%
5%
5.5%
A call option on £ that expires in 180 days has an exercise price of $ 1.97 and a premium
C
of $ 0.04.
XYZ Ltd. has forecasted the spot rates 180 days hence as below:
ik
$ 2.05 15%
Summary
Detailed Solution
£ 3,00,000
XYZ (US Firm)
180 Days
a. Forward Contract
C.O after 180 days = £ 3,00,000 × 1.96 / £
= $ 5,88,000
hi
b. Money Market (Question modified, % interest rates are flat rates and not % p.a)
Borrow $ $2/£ Invest £
↓ 5.5 % (flat) ↓ 4.5 % (Flat)
ks
£ 3,00,000 → £ 3,00,000 (Liability)
Leg 1:
Particulars `
Investment in £ today
[£ 3,00,000/1.045 × 1]
× Spot rate
Borrowing in $ today
ho £ 2,87,081
× $ 2/£
$ 5,74,162
C
Add: Interest @ 5.5% (flat) $ 31,579
C.O after 180 days $ 6,05,741
Leg 2:
ik
Particulars `
Investment in £ today £ 2,87,081
Add: Interest @ 4.5% (flat) £ 12,919
av
c. Option Contract
In this case, we have been given the contract size and hence we will assume that the options
are available for the entire £ 3,00,000 and hence there will be no unhedged portion.
1. Strategy: Long (BUY) call.
2. Maturity: 180 days @ $ 1.97 / £
3. C.O after 180 days.
Spot Exercise Expected Probability Weighted average
cash outflow
$ 1.91 / £ No $ 5,73,000 0.25 $ 1,43,250
(£ 3,00,000 × $ 1.91/ £)
$ 1.95 / £ No $ 5,85,000 0.60 $ 3,51,000
(£ 3,00,000 × $ 1.95 / £)
hi
Add: Time value adjustment $ 660
[$ 12,000 × 5.5%] US Borrowing
Effective C.O after 180 days [B] $ 12,660
ks
Unhedged portion -
Effective C.O after 180 days (A + B) $ 5,95,560
Reference Note:
ho
1. In this case, we need to pay the premium in $ today and hence we need to do
a time value adjustment for the premium. In the absence of information about
surplus funds, we have assumed that the entity will borrow £ 12,000 and hence
the interest rate will be 5.5%.
C
2. In case of options, we need to calculate the cash outflow at each rate independently
and then apply the probabilities. We should not calculate the average rate as it
will wrongly assume that the rate after 6 months is $ 1.955/£. Instead the rates
ik
Alternatively:
Expected spot rate
= $ 1.91/£ × 0.25 + $ 1.95/£ × 0.60 + $ 2.05/£ × 0.15
= $ 1.955/£
C.O = $ 1.955/£ × £ 3,00,000
= $ 5,86,500
Conclusion:
It is advisable to keep the transaction unhedged as it results in the lowest possible cash outflow
after 6 months.
hi
SPOT GBP/USD 1.7645/60 GBP/USD 1.7640/50
3 months 25/20
6 months 35/25
ks
Calculate:
(i) How much minimum CHF amount you have to pay for 1 Million GBP spot?
(ii) Considering the quotes from Bank A only, for GBP/CHF what are the Implied Swap
points for Spot over 3 months?
Summary
ho
C
Detailed Solution
Reference Note:
ik
1. The exchange rate quotes are given in capital (and not currency symbols) hence we need
to check for the application of market convention.
GBP and USD are commonly traded currencies and the GBP is stronger than the USD.
av
Based on the exchange rate quotes, the GBP /USD rate is implied to be the $/£ rate.
The same bank is also quoting USD/CHF rate and hence for consistent application, this
rate will also be inferred to be CHF/$ rate (treatment consistent with ICAI solution).
Bh
2. As a customer, we intend to buy 1 million £ and hence the banker would sell the pound.
Hence the transaction would happen at CHF/£ ask rate(£ base currency).
3. Since the customer needs 1 million £ Spot, the forward rates are irrelevant in the 1st
part.
4. The intermediate currency ($) is the same in both the Banks. Therefore, we can individually
take each of the currency needed from the bank where it is the cheapest. For eg: the
CHF
1st rate is lower in Bank A and hence we can buy $ in bank A whereas the 2nd rate
$ $
is lower in Bank B and hence we can use the $ purchased from Bank A to buy the £
£
from Bank B. There is no need to do the entire transaction from a single Bank Only. The
above actions will result in the lowest CHF to be paid for 1 million £.
Solution:
hi
= £ 10,00,000 × CHF 2.5866/£
= CHF 25,86,600.
(ii) CHF/£ : 3 Month forward points (Bank –A)
ks
spot spot spot
CHF CHF $
a. = ×
£ $ £
CHF
£
=
SPOT
CHF
=
$ BID
ho
SPOT
$
×
SPOT
£ BID
CHF
−
$ ASK
£ $ £
M/s Omega Electronics Ltd. exports air conditioners to Germany by importing all the components
from Singapore. The company is exporting 2,400 units at a price of Euro 500 per unit. The cost
of imported components is S$ 800 per unit. The fixed cost and other variables cost per unit are
` 1,000 and ` 1,500 respectively. The cash flows in Foreign currencies are due in six months. The
current exchange rates are as follows:
hi
`/Euro 51.50/55
`/S$ 27.20/25
After six months the exchange rates turn out as follows:
ks
`/Euro 52.00/05
`/S$ 27.70/75
ho
(1) You are required to calculate loss/gain due to transaction exposure
(2) Based on the following additional information calculate the loss/gain due to transaction
and operating exposure if the contracted price of air conditioners is ` 25,000:
(i) the current exchange rate changes to
C
`/Euro 51.75/80
`/S$ 27.10/15
(ii) Price elasticity of demand is estimated to be 1.5
ik
(iii) Payments and receipts are to be settled at the end of six months.
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
Bh
hi
2. Transaction exposure
a. Profit Calculation
Particulars Current spot rate Spot rate after 6 months
ks
Selling Price per unit ` 25,000 ` 25,000
Less: Cost of Importer (` 21,720) (` 22,200)
component (S$ 800 × ` 27.15/S$) (S$ 800 × ` 27.75/S$)
Less: Fixed Cost per unit (` 1,000) (` 1,000)
Less: Variable Cost per unit
Profit per unit
× No. of units
Total Profit
ho (` 1,500)
` 780
× 2,400
` 18,72,000
(` 1,500)
` 300
× 2,400
` 7,20,000
C
Loss due to transaction exposure = (` 7,20,000 – ` 18,72,00)
= (` 11,52,000) (loss)
Alternative: Cash Outflow
ik
i.e., 2,400 units. A change in the quantity demanded will be expected in the future and
hence will not impact the exposure for the transaction already done.
b. Profit/loss due to expected changes in demand
Bh
€480.77 − € 483.09
(ii) % fall in price = × 100
€ 483.09
= € 483.09
= - 0.48%
(iii) % increase in quantity demanded
= (0.48 %) × – 1.5 (Inverse relationship. Hence negative)
= 0.72%
(iv) Change in units
= 2,400 u × 0.72%
= 17.28
hi
= 17 units (increase)
(v) Increase in profit expected due to increase in demand
= 17 units × ` 300 (note 2)
ks
= ` 5,100 (Gain)
(vi) Operating exposure = Transaction exposure ± Changes in profit due to changes in
Quantity demanded.
= (` 11,52,000) + ` 5,100
= ` 11,46,900) ho
(loss)
Note – 2 : The incremental profit on 17 units would be earned after 6 months once the demand
C
changes. Hence, the relevant profit is to be considered after 6 months. However, fixed cost will
not ideally be incurred for the additional 17 units and hence the incremental profit per unit can
also be calculated as 300 + 1,000 = 1,300
ik
= (` 11,52,200) + 22,100
= (` 11,29,900)
Bh
ICAI has shown both the methods. However, the 2nd method is more appropriate.
You as a dealer in foreign exchange have the following position in Swiss Francs on 31st October,
2009:
Particulars Swiss Francs
Balance in the Nostro A/c Credit 1,00,000
Opening Position Overbought 50,000
Purchased a bill on Zurich 80,000
What steps would you take, if you are required to maintain a credit Balance of Swiss Francs
30,000 in the Nostro A/c and keep as overbought position on Swiss Francs 10,000?
hi
Summary
ks
Detailed Solution
NOSTRO A/C
Cash position as on 31/10/2009
Particulars
Opening
ho Debit
(withdrawal)
-
Credit
(in CHF)
(Deposit)
1,00,000
C
Spot Remittance (paid) 75,000
Total 75,000 1,00,000
Add: Spot deposit (Note :1) 5,000
1,75,000 1,75,000
Note: 1
The balances in the cash A/c is CHF 25,000. In order to attain a credit balance of CHF 30,000,
we need to buy in the spot market (30,000 – 25,000 = 5,000). Forward purchases do not affect
the cash position and hence in order to alter the cash position, we need to do a spot deposit.
Note: 2
The cash deposit of 5,000 will also alter the exchange position. After considering the 5,000
deposit, the exchange position becomes NIL (1,65,000 – 1,65,000 = 0). However, in order to
hi
ensure an overbought balance of CHF 10,000, we need to enter into a forward purchase contract
of CHF 10,000. We should not do a spot CHF deposit as it would affect the cash position as well.
ks
Question 18 (RTP May 22)/(MTP Oct 22)
[Q.79 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.79 - AFM 10]
Mr. Mammen, an Indian investor invests in a listed bond in USA. If the price of the bond
(v) Will your answer differ if Mr. Mammen invests in the bond just before the interest payable.
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
Bh
i. USD is flat:
Therefore, the USD value remains the same, the return for an investor is the returns
generated from the bond only i.e.
( $103 − $100 ) + $3 × 100
Return from Bond investment =
$100
composite return from the bond as well as currency because we are investing in the bond
as well as currency.
Therefore, the return can be calculated as: [(1 ± r) ( 1 ± r) – 1]
Therefore, (1 + 0.06BOND) (1 + 0.03$) – 1
= 0.0918
i.e. 9.18%
Alt: We can assume notional rates, say the spot today equals ` 100/$. Therefore, after 1
hi
year, the expected spot would be ` 103/$. In such a case, the return can be calculated as
ks
10, 600 − 10, 000 + 309
= × 100
10, 000
= 9.18%
Additional information:
(i) Expected market price of share at the time of issue of GDR is ` 360 (Face Value ` 100)
(ii) Each GDR will represent two underlying Shares.
(iii) The issue shall be priced at 10% discount to the market price.
(iv) Expected exchange rate is INR/USD 72.
(v) Dividend is expected to be paid at the rate of 20% with growth rate of 12%.
hi
(1) You, as a financial consultant, are required to compute the number of GDRs to be issued
and cost of the GDR.
(2) What is your suggestion if the company receives an offer from a US Bank willing to
ks
provide an equivalent loan with an interest rate of 12%?
(3) How much company can save by choosing the option as recommended by you?
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
8.82
(i) (a) Issue size = × 100 =
9m
98
2 × (360 − 10% )
Issue price = =9m
ik
` 72 / $
$9
∴ No. of GDR = = 1 mill
$9
av
` 100 × 20%) × 2
(b) KGDR = $9 × ` 72 / $) − 2% + 0.12
= 0.1829
Bh
= 18.30%
(ii) In case a bank is offering the funds @ 12%, we should accept the offer from the bank
since it is cheaper as compared to GDR keeping all other factors constant.
(iii) If the offer from the bank is accepted, there would be a Net saving of 6.3% (18.3% - 12%)
A Japanese company imports hi-tech printer cartridges from US worth $ 1 million. The chief
financial officer of the company wishes to know the best strategy for protection against
uncertainty, for the payment that has to be made at the end of 3 months. Financial team of the
hi
Table 2: Options Market rates for European options with 3 months expiry.
Type of Option Strike Price (X) (¥/$) Premium (%) for Call & Put Options
Call & Put 145.20 1.6766% (Call) & 1.7414% (Put)
ks
Call & Put 146.00 1.3505% (Call) & 2.1006% (Put)
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
av
(iv) Buying Call and selling Put at X = ¥ 146 Net Premium receipt
Premium paid on call option = ¥ 146.00 x 1.3505% ¥ 1.9717 million
Premium Receipt on Put option = ¥ 146.00 x 2.1006% ¥ 3.0669 million
¥ 1.0952 million
If expected spot Rate expiry happens to be ¥ 144.90/145.05, then call option will be
lapsed and Put option by buyer will be exercised. Accordingly, the import bill will be:
Buying US$ under Put Option ¥ 146.00 million
hi
Less: Receipt of Net Premium ¥ 1.09520 million
¥ 144.905 million
Decision: Since expected outflow is least in case of selling Put option, the same strategy
is recommended.
ks
ho
C
ik
av
Bh
XY Limited is engaged in large retail business in India. It is contemplating for expansion into
a country of Africa by acquiring a group of stores having the same line of operation as that
hi
of India. The exchange rate for the currency of the proposed African country is extremely
volatile. Rate of inflation is presently 40% a year. Inflation in India is currently 10% a year.
Management of XY Limited expects these rates likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
ks
Estimated projected cash flows (for the combined operating project), in real terms, in India
as well as African country for the first three years of the project are as follows:
You are required to calculate the net present value of the proposed investment considering
the following:
(i) African Rand cash flows are converted into rupees and discounted at a risk adjusted
av
rate.
(ii) All cash flows for these projects will be discounted at a rate of 20% to reflect it’s high
risk.
Bh
Summary
Detailed Solution
Calculation of NPV
Year 0 1 2 3
Inflation factor in India 1.00 1.10 1.21 1.331
Inflation factor in Africa 1.00 1.40 1.96 2.744
hi
Net Cash Flow in ` ‘000 (1)+(2) -83,333 7517 11697 16,637
PVF@20% 1 0.833 0.694 0.579
PV -83,333 6,262 8,118 9,633
ks
NPV of 3 years = -59,320 (` ‘000)
Total NPV of the Project = -59,320 (` ‘000) + 48,164 (` ‘000) = -11,156 (` ‘000)
C
Question 2 (ICAI SM)/ICAI Paper Nov 19 [Modified])/(RTP
Nov 18)/(MTP Oct 18)/(MTP May 20)/(MTP Oct 22/
(Practice Manual)
ik
The initial project cost (consisting of Plant and Machinery including installation) is estimated to
be US$ 500 million. The net working capital requirements are estimated at US$ 50 million. The
company follows straight line method of depreciation. Presently, the company is exporting two
Bh
million units every year at a unit price of US$ 80, its variable cost per unit being US$ 40.
The Chief Financial Officer has estimated the following operating cost and other data in
respect of proposed project:
(i) Variable operating cost will be US $ 20 per unit of production;
(ii) Additional cash fixed cost will be US $ 30 million p.a. and project's share of allocated
fixed cost will be US $ 3 million p.a. based on principle of ability to share;
(iii) Production capacity of the proposed project in India will be 5 million units;
(iv) Expected useful life of the proposed plant is five years with no salvage value;
(v) Existing working capital investment for production & sale of two million units through
exports was US $ 15 million;
(vi) Export of the product in the coming year will decrease to 1.5 million units in case the
company does not open subsidiary company in India, in view of the presence of competing
MNCs that are in the process of setting up their subsidiaries in India;
(vii) Applicable Corporate Income Tax rate is 35%, and
(viii) Required rate of return for such project is 12%.
Assuming that there will be no variation in the exchange rate of two currencies and all profits
will be repatriated, as there will be no withholding tax, estimate Net Present Value (NPV) of
the proposed project in India.
hi
Present Value Interest Factors (PVIF) @ 12% for five years are as below:
Year 1 2 3 4 5
PVIF 0.8929 0.7972 0.7118 0.6355 0.5674
ks
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
Financial Analysis whether to set up the manufacturing units in India or not may be carried
C
using NPV technique as follows:
I. Incremental Cash Outflows
Particulars $ Million
Cost of Plant and Machinery 500.00
ik
hi
$ Million
Through setting up subsidiary in India 210.50
Through Exports in India 39.00
ks
CFAT (1-5 years) 171.50
Question
3 (RTP May 24)
ik
[Q.1 - Additional Question AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.13 - AFM 10]
Mr. Vishwas, a friend of Mr. Pramod who is one of the Directors of Ashirwad Limited, is a citizen
of Mauritius. His immediate family members including his parents, born in India are residing in
av
India. He has many friends in different parts of India, due to which he happens to visit India
on frequent basis. He along with Mr. Pramod evince interest in setting up business in India and
formally incorporate a company to commence their operations. Accordingly, a company is called
Bh
80 lakhs. Depreciation of the plant shall be charged on the basis of straight-line method.
40% of the investment shall be through debt funds from Mauritius at the cost of 10% (post
tax) while remaining funds shall be arranged by him and his friends. They expect a rate of
return of 12% on their funds.
Expected revenues & costs (excluding depreciation) in real term are as under:
Year 1 2 3 4
hi
Revenues (` Crore) 6.00 7.00 8.00 8.00
Costs (` Crore) 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Assume that applicable tax rate in India is 30%. Since there is Double tax avoidance agreement
ks
between India and Mauritius, the company is not required to pay tax in Mauritius if tax has been
paid in India.
Year
1
2
ho
The applicable inflation rates for revenues & costs are as follows:
Revenues
10%
9%
Costs
12%
10%
C
3 8% 9%
4 7% 8%
He wants an expert opinion for the same investment proposal. Demonstrate whether investment
ik
Summary
Bh
Detailed Solution
D E
ie WACC = KD × +KE ×
D+E D+E
We have been given that the debt funds are raised in Mauritius and Mr. Vishwas is also based in
Mauritius and hence the equity funds are also likely to be raised in Mauritius.
Hence, the above WACC would be the Mauritian WACC and hence we should ultimately find the
Mauritian cash flows to be discounted at this WACC.
Further, unless given the WACC would be nominal and hence we will convert the real cash flows
into nominal and then solve.
(2) Calculation of Forward Rates
hi
Using IRP,
F (1 + iIND )
=
S (1 + iMUR )
ks
End of Year INR INR/MUR
1.06
1 F = ` 1.88 / MUR × ` 1.8979
1.05
3
F = ` 1.8979 / MUR ×
F = ` 1.9169 / MUR ×
ho 1.06
1.05
1.06
` 1.9160
` 1.9343
C
1.05
1.06
4 F = ` 1.9343 / MUR × ` 1.9537
1.05
ik
Working Capital
Y1 – MUR 2M × ₹ 1.8979/MUR = ₹ 8.7958 M = ₹ 0.37958 cr
Y2 - MUR 2M × ₹ 1.9160/MUR = ₹ 3.832 M = ₹ 0.3832 cr
Y3 – MUR 2M × ₹ 1.9343/MUR = ₹ 3.8686 M = ₹ 0.38686 cr
Y4 – MUR 2M × ₹ 1.9527/MUR = ₹ 3.9054 M = ₹ 0.39054 cr
hi
= 0.37958 + 0.3832 + 0.38686 + 0.39054
= ₹ 1.54 cr
ks
Reference Note:
(1) We have been given that the initial investment is effectively ₹ 18.8 crores out of which
₹ 8 crore is for plant.
(2)
ho
The remaining ₹ 8 crore of investment maybe in any other asset. It is not assumed to be
working capital (ICAI).
We were given the above values in MUR. However, the release would happen in rupees
and hence we need the calculate the above cash flows is rupees.
C
(3) Calculation of NPV
Y0 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
Initial Investment (A) (18.80) - - - -
ik
4
1.44 1.665 3.187 3.483
(-) Tax @ 30% (0.432) (0.4995) (0.9561) (1.0449)
Bh
hi
Question 4 (MTP March 24)
[Q.2 - Additional Question AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.14 - AFM 10]
DK Ltd. is considering an investment proposal in Sri Lanka involving an initial investment of LKR
ks
25 billion. The current spot exchange rate is INR/LKR 0.370. The risk free rate in India is 6%
and the same in Sri Lanka is 5.02%.
The project will generate a cash flow of LKR 5 billion in the first year. The cash flow will increase
ho
by LKR 1 billion each year for the next 4 years. The project will wind up on completion of 5 years
with no salvage value. The required rate of return for the project is 8%
(i) You are required to find out the investment worth of the project by using
(1) Home Currency Approach (2) Foreign Currency Approach
C
(ii) Compare the outcome under both the approaches
Given:
PVIF (8%, t) 0.92593 0.85734 0.79383 0.73503 0.68058
ik
Note: Excepts rates show all calculations in Billion upto four decimal points.
av
Summary
Detailed Solution
Bh
Working Notes:
Calculation of Forward Exchange Rates
End of Year ` `/LKR
1.06
1 0.37 x 0.373
1.052
1.06
2 0.373 x 0.376
1.052
1.06
3 0.376 x 0.379
1.052
1.06
4 0.379 x 0.382
1.052
1.06
5 0.382 x 0.385
1.052
hi
Year Cash Flow `/LKR Cash flow PVF @ 8% PV
Billion LKR Billion ` Billion `
1 5 0.373 1.865 0.92593 1.7269
2 6 0.376 2.256 0.85734 1.9342
ks
3 7 0.379 2.653 0.79383 2.1060
4 8 0.382 3.056 0.73503 2.2463
5 9 0.385 3.465 0.68058 2.3582
2.
Less: Investment
Calculation of NPV
Year Cash Flow PVF @ 7% PV
(Billion LKR) (Billion LKR)
av
1 5 0.93457 4.6729
2 6 0.87344 5.2406
3 7 0.81630 5.7141
4 8 0.76290 6.1032
Bh
5 9 0.71299 6.4169
28.1477
Less: Investment 25.0000
NPV 3.1477
On Aug. 2, Mr. Tandon buys 5 contracts of December Reliance futures at 840. Each contract
covers 50 shares. Initial margin was set at ` 2400 per contract while maintenance margin was
hi
fixed at ` 2000 per contract. Daily settlement prices are as follows:
Aug. 2 818
Aug. 3 866
ks
Aug. 4 830
Aug. 5 846
Mr. Tandon meets all margin calls. Whenever he is allowed to withdraw money from the
1.
2.
3.
Margin call;
Profit & (Loss) on the contracts;
ho
Margin Account, he withdraws half the maximum amount allowed. Compute for each day:
Summary
av
Detailed Solution
As given, the amount can be withdrawn from the margin account whenever there is a gain and
the amount to be withdrawn (if any) = 50% of gain.
Date Opening Profit/loss Withdrawal Closing Margin Adjusted
Balance Balance Call Closing
Aug 2 12,000 (818-840) × 50 × 5 - 6,500 5,500 12,000
= (5,500) (12,000-6,500)
Aug 3 12,000 (866-818) × 50 × 5 (6,000) 18,000 - 18,000
= 12,000
hi
Mr Tilak (Short 5 reliance futures)
Initial : 12,000 (same)
ks
Maintenance : 10,000 (same)
Date Opening Profit/loss Withdrawal Closing Call Adj Closing
Balance Balance
Aug 2
Aug 3
Aug 4
12,000
14,750
12,000
(840-818) × 50 × 5
= 5,500
(818-866) × 50 × 5
= (12,000)
(866-830) x 50 x 5
ho (2,750)
(4,500)
14,750
2,750
16,500
-
9,250
(12,000-2,750)
-
14,750
12,000
16,500
C
= 9,000
Aug 5 16,500 (830-846) x 50 x 5 - 12,500 - 12,500
= (4,000)
1,500
ik
Net Loss
Or
[(840-846)*50]*5
av
As can be seen the overall loss of Mr. Tilak (1,500) is the same as the overall gain of Mr. Tandon
i.e. (1,500).
Bh
The CEO is of opinion that the portfolio is carrying a very high risk as compared to the market
risk and hence interested to reduce the portfolio’s systematic risk to 0.95. Treasury Manager
has suggested two below mentioned alternative strategies:
(i) Dispose off a part of his existing portfolio to acquire risk free securities, or
(ii) Take appropriate position on Nifty Futures, currently trading at 8250 and each Nifty
points multiplier is 210.
You are required to:
(a) Interpret the opinion of CEO, whether it is correct or not.
(b) Calculate the existing systematic risk of the portfolio,
(c) Advise the value of risk-free securities to be acquired,
hi
(d) Advise the number of shares of each company to be disposed off,
(e) Advise the position to be taken in Nifty Futures and determine the number of Nifty
contracts to be bought/sold; and
ks
(f) Calculate the new systematic risk of portfolio if the company has taken position in
Nifty Futures and there is 2% rise in Nifty.
Note: Make calculations in Rs lakh and upto 2 decimal points.
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
(a) Calculation of Portfolio β
Shares Amount Invested Weights Β β × Weights
ik
No of shares × MP
X 6,000 0.3 1.5 0.45
(6 × ` 1,000)
Y 12,000 0.6 1.3 0.78
av
(8 × ` 1,500)
Z 2,000 0.1 1.7 0.17
(4 × ` 500)
20,000 1.40
Bh
The β of the market is always 1. The portfolio of A Ltd has a β of 1.4 and hence has a
higher risk as compared to the market. Therefore, the opinion of the CEO is correct.
(b) The systematic risk of the portfolio is 1.4 times that of the market
(Reference Note: Usually, the systematic risk can be calculated as β2 × σ2m) σm is not
available in the question and hence we have commented that the systematic risk will be
1.4 times that of the market. Further, we square the terms in order to calculate the
unsystematic risk. Unsystematic risk is not asked in the question and hence we ignore.
(c) Risk free securities in order to have a target β of 0.45:
Reference Note:
In this question, we have been clearly given to dispose off a part of the existing investment
in order to acquire the risk-free securities. Hence, the total portfolio value will continue
to be ` 20,000 Lakhs.
Let the proportion of risk-free securities in the total portfolio be x. Therefore, the
weights of the portfolio of existing securities will be 1 – x
Thus, 0.95 = 0 × x + 1.4 x (1 – x) [β of risk free securities = 0]
0.95 = 0 + 1.4 – 1.4x
hi
1.4x = 0.45
Thus, x = 0.32
i.e., 32%
ks
Thus, 1 – x = 1 – 0.32 = 0.68
i.e., 68%
Thus, value of risk-free Securities to be acquired = ` 20,000 Lakhs × 32%
= ` 6,400 Lakhs
(d) No of shares to be disposed. ho
We have assumed that X,Y,Z will be disposed proportionately i.e., in the ratio of 0.3 : 0.6
: 0.1 . In order to purchase risk free securities worth 6,400 Lakhs, we will have to dispose
C
the existing shares worth 6,400 lakhs (in the ratio of 0.3 : 0.6 : 0.1)
Shares Value to be disposed Market price / shares No. of shares
X 1,920 L 1,000 1.92 Lakhs
ik
(6,400 × 0.3)
Y 3,840 L 1,500 2.56 Lakhs
(6,400 × 0.6)
Z 640 L 500 1.28 Lakhs
av
(6,400 × 0.1)
6,400
(e) In order to hedge using the NIFTY futures (instead of the risk-free rate) we need to
Bh
hi
= 519.48
i.e., 519 Contracts
ks
(f) Portfolio position if Nifty rises by 2%
Ignoring the Nifty futures, the existing 20,000 Lakhs portfolio has a β of 1.4. Therefore,
if the Nifty rises by 2% the portfolio will rise by 2% × 1.4 = 2.8%
Thus, gain on underlying portfolio
(20,000 Lakhs × 2.8%)
Less: Loss on Nifty futures
[(8,250 – 8,415*) × 210] × 519
ho 560 Lakhs
(179.83 Lakhs)
C
S.P C.P
1,00,000 (in order to show answer in lakhs)
*8,250 + 2% × 8,250
ik
380.17
Thus, Net Return = × 100 = 1.90%
20, 000
Bh
Nifty return 2%
= 0.95
The new systematic risk 0.95
Reference Note:
On shorting a nifty future (or even stock future), we don’t get any immediate cash inflow
and hence the investment continues to remain 20,000 Lakhs. In case we buy/sell in the
spot market, there is an immediate cash outflow/cash inflow. However, in case of futures,
there would be no immediate cash flow.
On April 1, 2015, an investor has a portfolio consisting of eight securities as shown below:
Security Market Price No. of Shares b Value
A 29.40 400 0.59
B 318.70 800 1.32
C 660.20 150 0.87
hi
D 5.20 300 0.35
E 281.90 400 1.16
F 275.40 750 1.24
G 514.60 300 1.05
ks
H 170.50 900 0.76
The cost of capital for the investor is 20% p.a. continuously compounded. The investor fears a
Summary
Detailed Solution
1. Portfolio β
Security Amount Invested b Value Weight Average
A (29.4 × 400) 11,760 0.59 0.0069
hi
2. Theoretical Futures price
a. June Futures (3 months) [01/04/15 – 30/06/15]
ks
As per cost of carry model
F = S (e)rN
= 8,500 × e0.2 x 3/12 (N = 3)
(given)
= 8,500 × e0.05
= 8,500 × 1.05127
F = ` 8935.80
ho
C
b. May Futures (2 months) [1/4/15 – 31/5/15]
F = S × erN
= 8,500 × e 0.2 x 2/12
(N = 2)
ik
= 8,500 × e 0.03333
WN 1 - e0.03333
We are not given the value for e 0.0333
. However, we are given the values for e 0.03
and e 0.04. e0.03333 lies in between these 2 values and hence we can use interpolation in
Bh
3. No. of Contracts
Strategy : Sell
Maturity : June futures @ 8,850
Reference Note:
In order to hedge, we need to sell the futures on the exchange and the actual price
prevailing on the exchange is 8,850. In case the actual price was not given, we can take
the theoretical price assuming it to be the same as actual i.e.,
hi
Contract Size
= ` 8,850 × 25
` 2,21,250
ks
a. No. of Contracts for fully hedging (100%)
= 4.94 i.e
b. 50% Hedging
ho
5 Contracts
C
9, 94, 450 × 1.1
= × 50%
2, 21, 250
= 2.47
ik
i.e 2 Contracts
c. 120% Hedging
av
A Rice Trader has planned to sell 22000 kg of Rice after 3 months from now. The spot price
of the Rice is ` 60 per kg and 3 months Future on the same is trading at ` 59 per kg. Size of
the contract is 1000 kg. The price is expected to fall as low as ` 56 per kg, 3 months hence.
Required:
(i) to interpret the position of trader in the Cash Market.
(ii) to advise the trader should take in Future Market to mitigate its risk of reduced profit.
(iii) to demonstrate effective realized price for its sale if he decides to make use of future
market and after 3 months, spot price is ` 57 per kg and future contract price for
closing the contract is ` 58 per kg.
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
(i) Since the trader has planned to sell rice in the futures market after 3 months, it implies
that he needs to have the rice in order to sell it and hence he should be long in the cash
(Spot) market.
ks
(ii) In case the trader wants to sell the rice after 3 months, it is advisable to use the futures
market and sell at ` 59/kg instead of keeping it unhedged, in which case the expected
selling price would only be ` 56/kg.
ho
(iii) A future’s contract can be settled by taking an off-setting position in a similar futures
contract for the balance unexpired period. In this case, the trader has originally shorted
the rice futures i.e 22 contracts of 1,000 kg each.
On the date of settlement, the futures contract price for closing the contract is ` 58/
C
Kg and hence,
Gain on futures (Net settlement) = (` 59/kg – ` 58/kg) × 1,000 kg × 22 (contracts)
(S.P) (C.P)
ik
= ` 22,000 C.I
Sell 22,000 kg in spot market = ` 12,54,000 C.I
(22,000 kg × ` 57/kg)
av
X Baking company's equity share has a present market price per share of ` 28. A 6 month call
option has been written on the stock with an exercise price of ` 30. Presently the option has
a market value of ` 3. At the end of 6 months, you estimate the market price of the stock to
be ` 24 per share with a probability of .1, ` 28 with aprobability of .2, ` 32 with a probability
of .4, ` 37 with a probability of .2, and ` 43 with a probability of. 1.
(a) What is the expected value of share price 6 months hence? What is the expiration
value of the option if that expected value of share price should prevail?
(b) What is the expected value of option price at expiration, assuming that the option is
Summary
Detailed Solution
hi
a. Expected share price after 6 months
(Based on probability based weighted average)
= 24 (0.1) + 28 (0.2) + 32 (0.4) + 37 (0.2) + 43 (0.1)
ks
= ` 32.5
If expected value of 32.5 is to prevail at expiry, then the holder of the call option would
= 32.5 – 30
= ` 2.5
ho
exercise his right to buy at ` 30 and hence the payoff would be:
C
Therefore, at expiration the holder will receive 2.5.
Reference note: Premium is to be paid upfront and hence is not considered in the above
working.
ik
b. Spot at expiry
Spot Price Exercise (Sx > 30) Option payoff Probability
24 No Nil (24 - 30) 0.1
av
Exam Notes:
1. In the absence of information on interest rates, we have ignored the present value
calculation in order to determine theoretical value.
2. The value of an option can be minimum 0 and it cannot be negative.
hi
Consider a stock which is quoted at ` 84. A call option on this available at a strike price of
` 87.50. The stock can take values of ` 89 or ` 79 in 3 months. If it takes a value of ` 89, it can
go to either ` 94 or ` 84 in another 3 months and if it takes the value of ` 79 after 3 months, it
ks
can go to either ` 84 or ` 74 in another 3 months. The stock is not expected to pay any dividend.
It is given that the risk free rate is 4%. Find the price of the call option using binomial model.
Using the value of put option, verify the put call parity theorem.
Summary
ho
C
Detailed Solution
ik
av
Bh
WN-1
At N1, N3, N4
S3 × P + S4 × (1 − P )
S1 =
3
1 + r ×
12
94 × p + 84 × (1 − p )
89 =
3
1 + 0.04 ×
12
94p + 84 − 84p
89 =
1.01
89.89 = 10p + 84
hi
5.89 = 10p
P = 0.589
ks
1 – p = 1 – 0.589 = 0.411
C3 × P + C4 (1 − P )
C1 =
3
C1 =
1 + r ×
12
C1 = 3.79
ik
79 = 3
1 + 0.04 ×
12
79.79 = 10q + 74
5.79 = 10q
q = 0.579
1 – q = 1 – 0.579
= 0.421
0 × 0.579 + 0 × 0.421
C2 =
1.01
0
C2 =
1.01
C2 = 0
Reference Note:
The above calculation for C2 Can be avoided and C2 can directly be taken as 0 irrespective of the
probabilities as C5 and C6 are both 0.
89 × s + 79 × (1 − s )
84 =
3
hi
1 + 0.04 ×
12
89s + 79 − 79s
84 =
ks
1.01
84.84 = 10s + 79
5.84 = 10s
S = 0.584
1 – S = 1 – 0.548
= 0.416
ho
C
3.79 × 0.584 + 0 × 0.416
CO =
ik
1 + 0.01
CO = 2.21 + 0
1 + 0.01
av
CO = 2.19
Reference Note:
The process remains the same for the put option. However, the pay-offs at the final nodes can
be calculated as XP - SX and hence pay-off values would change.
Further, since the probabilities are based on spot prices, they would remain the same
irrespective of whether it is a call option or a put option.
hi
ks
WN-4. At N1, N3, and N4
P1 =
P3 × P + P4 × (1 − p )
3
1 + r ×
ho
C
12
0 + 1.44
P1 =
1.01
av
P1 = 1.43
WN - 5. At N2,N5, N6
Bh
2.03 + 5.68
P2 =
1.01
7.71
P2 =
1.01
P2 = 7.63
0.84 + 3.17
P0 =
1.01
hi
P0 = ` 3.97
ks
P0 + S0 = C0 + PV of XP
LHS : P0 + S0
= 3.97 + 84
RHS
= 87.97
: C0 + PV of XP
ho
C
4 × 0.5
87.50 0.04
= 2.19 + → Alternative : 1 +
(1 + 0.04 × 6 / 12) 4
= 2.19 + 85.78
ik
= 87.97
Exam Reference:
In case the value of both call and put are asked in the question, we can solve for the call option
Bh
using binomial and directly calculate the value of the put option using call-put parity theory.
P0 + 84 = 2.19 + 87.5/1.02
P0 = 2.19 + 85.78 – 84
P0 = 3.97
[Instead of doing the entire workings)
AB Ltd.'s equity shares are presently selling at a price of ` 500 each. An investor is interested
in purchasing AB Ltd.'s shares. The investor expects that there is a 70% chance that the price
will go up to ` 650 or a 30% chance that it will go down to ` 450, three months from now. There
is a call option on the shares of the firm that can be exercised only at the end of three months
at an exercise price of ` 550.
Calculate the following:
(i) If the investor wants a perfect hedge, what combination of the share and option should
he select ?
(ii) Explain how the investor will be able to maintain identical position regardless of the
hi
share price.
(iii) If the risk-free rate of return is 5% for the three months period, what is the value of
the option at the beginning of the period?
ks
(iv) What is the expected return on the option?
Summary
Detailed Solution
Reference Note:
ho
C
1. We are asked to find the ratio of the share and the options in order to achieve a perfect
hedge. Hence, we solve considering the riskless hedge approach. Further, we can show
identical position regardless of the share price only under the riskless hedge approach
ik
probabilities as expected by AB. These may be different as compared to the risk neutral
probabilities which we calculate by applying the methods solved in the earlier question.
Bh
Solution:
1. Riskless Hedge
hi
Thus, x = 0.5…..Part (i)
C1 − C2 100 − 0
= = 0.5
S − S 650 − 450
1
ks
2
4. Substituting x = 0.5 at
N1 = 650 × 0.5 – 100 = 225
5.
N2 = 450 × 0.5 – 0 = 225 (Part ii)
ho
Since position is risk-free, we will earn a risk-free rate and hence,
PV of position today =
225
C
(1 + 0.5 (flat ) )
= 214.29
6. Amount invested today 500x – C0 (Step – 2) = 214.29 (step – 5)
ik
(i)
In order to have a perfect hedge, we should hold the shares and the options in the
ratio of 0.5:1 i.e., 0.5 shares to be bought for every call option sold.
(ii)
As can be seen, irrespective of whether the price is 650 or 450, the hedged position
Bh
hi
[Q.38 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.38 - AFM 10]
(i) The shares of TIC Ltd. are currently priced at ` 415 and call option exercisable in three
month's time has an exercise rate of ` 400. Risk free interest rate is 5% p.a. and standard
ks
deviation (volatility) of share price is 22% and assuming there is no dividend over the
next three months, is the option worth buying for ` 25?
(ii) Calculate value of aforesaid call option based on Black-Scholes valuation model if the
current price is considered as ` 380.
ho
(iii) What would be the worth of put option if current price is considered ` 380?
(iv) If TIC Ltd. share price at present is taken as ` 408 and a dividend of ` 10 is expected to
be paid in the two month’s time, then, calculate value of the call option.
C
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
1. Given S0 = ` 415
av
Xp = 400
σ = 22% i.e., 0.22
r = 5% p.a
Bh
S
ln 0
Xp
(i)
415
i.e., ln
400
ln [1.0375]
i.e., loge 1.0375
Applying the change of base rule,
log10 1.0375
ln [1.0375] =
log10 e
0.01598
=
0.4343
= 0.0368
S ó2
In o + r + ×t
Xp 2
2. D1 =
t ×s
hi
0.22
2
ks
0.05535
=
0.11
= 0.50
Therefore, D2 = D1 – ( t × σ)
= 0.50 – ( 0.25 × 0.22)
= 0.50 – 0.11
= 0.39
ho
C
3. N(D1) = N (0.50)
= 0.5 + 0.1915
= 0.6915
ik
N(D2) = N (0.39)
= 0.5 + 0.1517
= 0.6517
av
4. ert:
= e0.05 × 0.25
= e 0.0125
Bh
Let x = e0.0125
Taking log on both sides
log x = 0.0125 log e
= 0.0125 × 0.4343
= 0.0054
x = Antilog 0.0054
x = 1.0125
5. C0 = S0 × N(D1) – [Xp/ert × N(D2)]
= 415 × 0.6915 – [400/1.0125 × 0.6517]
= 286.97 – 257.46
= 29.51
S
(ii) In 0
:
Xp
380
= In
400
hi
= ln (0.9500)
Applying changes of base rule,
ks
log10 0.95
1. ln (0.9500) =
Log10 e
− 0.0223
=
2. D1
=
0.4343
(0.0513)
= ln
S s2
ho
C
0
+ r + × t
Xp 2
t ×s
(0.0513) + 0.01855
=
ik
0.11
( 0.03275 )
=
0.11
av
= (0.2977)
Thus, D2 = D1 – ( t ×s )
Bh
= (0.2977) – 0.11
= (0.41)
3. N (D1) = N (- 0.30)
= 0.5 – 0.1179
= 0.3821
N (D2) = N (-0.41)
= 0.5 – 0.1591
= 0.3409
hi
ks
4. ert
5. C0 = S0 × N (D1) –
ho
= e0.05×0.25 = 1.0125 (same as part i)
Xp
( )
× N D2
C
ert
400
= 380 × 0.3821 - × 0.3409
1.0125
ik
= 145.198 – 134.68
= 10.52
(iii) Using call put parity theory
av
S0 = 380
Xp = 400
C0 = 10.52
Bh
P0 = ?
R = 5% p.a
t = 3 months
P0 + S0 = C0 + Xp / ert
[Since C0 based on continuous compounding, PV of Xp should also be based on continuous
compounding]
Thus, P0 + 380 = 10.53 + 400/e0.05 × 0.25
Thus, P0 = 10.52 + 400/1.0125 - 380
Thus, P0 = 25.58
hi
t = No. of years (Months / 12) after which dividend is going to be received.
Adjusted S0 = S0 – PV of dividend
= S0 – D/ert
ks
= 408 – 10/e0.05 × 2/12
= 408 – 10/e 0.00833
398.08
ln
400
ln (0.9952)
Applying the change of base rule,
loge0.9952 = log100.9952/log10e
= - 0.0021/0.4343
= (0.0048)
s2
ln + (Adjusted S0 /Xp) + (r + ) ×t
2. D1 = ln + 2
t ×s
0.222
(0.0048) + 0.05 + × 3/12
2
=
3
× 0.22
12
=
( 0.0048) + 0.01855
0.11
0.01375
=
0.11
hi
= 0.125
i.e 0.13
ks
Thus D2 = D1 - t ×s
= 0.13 - 0.25 × 0.22
3. N(D1)
= 0.13 – 0.11
= 0.02
= N (0.13)
= 0.5 + 0.0517
ho
C
= 0.5517
ik
av
Bh
N (D2) = N (0.02)
= 0.5 + 0.0080
= 0.5080
175 CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI
DERIVATIVES ANALYSIS AND VALUATION
Xp
5. C0 = Adjusted S0 × N (D1) - × N (D2)
ert
hi
Question 9 (ICAI SM)
[Q.49 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.40 - AFM 10]
ks
Suppose MIS Ltd. is considering installation of solar electricity generating plant for light the
staff quarters. The plant shall cost ` 2.50 crore and shall lead to saving in electricity expenses
at the current tariff by ` 21 lakh per year forever.
ho
However, with change in Government in state, the rate of electricity is subject to change.
Accordingly, the saving in electricity can be of ` 12 lakh or ` 35 lakh per year and forever.
Assuming WACC of MIS Ltd. is 10% and risk-free rate of rate of return is 8%.
C
Decide whether MIS Ltd. should accept the project or wait and see.
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
Note: In this case we have not been told the time horizon for a possible change in the government.
av
Particulars Amount
` 21 Lakhs ` 210 Lakhs
PVCI (As per Gordon’s formula) =
0.10 − 0
(-) PVCO (` 250 Lakhs)
NPV (` 40 Lakhs)
Therefore at the current level, if there is no expected change in the government, the NPV is
negative and it is not worth accepting the project.
35 Lakh
= = ` 350 Lakhs
0.10 − 0
hi
12 Lakh
= = ` 120 Lakhs
0.10 − 0
ks
Reference Note: The evaluation is done in a manner similar to binomial since there are 2
possibilities. It is like saying that on an investment is a share worth 250 today, the share may
possibly become either 350 or 120 after 1 year
ho
C
ik
Reference Note: The binomial evaluation is based on a risk less / risk neutral set up and hence
the relevant rate is binomial would be the risk free rate.
av
Let the probability of up move be ‘p’ and the probability of downmove would be ‘1-p’
350 × p + 120 × (1 − p )
Therefore, 250 =
1 + 0.08
Bh
65.2 − 45.24
=
1.08
19.96
=
1.08
= 18.48
Since the expected NPV is positive, it is advisable to wait for 1 year
Reference Note: In this Question, there is no separate option given to us by any party. However,
the decision to be made is whether it is worth waiting for a year or not. Hence, if the cash flows
were 12 lakhs, the NPV would be negative. We should not write 0 like we do in case there were
options. Further, the project starts after 1 year and hence the relevant discount rate would be
to compensate for the time value i.e. 8%.
hi
Question 10 (ICAI SM)
[Q.48 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.50 - AFM 10]
ks
IPL already in production of Fertilizer is considering a proposal of building a new plant to produce
pesticides. Suppose the PV of proposal is ` 100 crore without the abandonment option. However,
if market conditions for pesticide turns out to be favourable the PV of proposal shall increase
ho
by 30%. On the other hand, market conditions remain sluggish the PV of the proposal shall be
reduced by 40%. In case company is not interested in continuation of the project it can be
disposed of for ` 80 crore.
If the risk-free rate of interest is 8% then what will be value of abandonment option.
C
Summary
ik
Detailed Solution
Reference Note: In this case, the date when uncertainty pertaining to market condition is
av
resolved is not given. Further, the date when abandonment option would be available has also
not been given. In line with ICAI solutions, we have assumed that the uncertainty is likely to
be resolved after 1 year and the abandonment option is also available for exercise after 1 year.
Bh
Alternatively, any other time horizon can also be assumed. Further, since there are, exactly
2 possibilities, we can use binomial method. (Since Standard deviation is not available, Black
Scholes method is not possible.)
hi
ks
Reference Note: An abandonment option gives us a right to sell (exit) and hence is similar to a
ho
put option. After 1 Year if the project is given us 130, we will not exercise the put option which
gives us only 80 and hence the payoff will be nil. However, in case the project is likely to give
only 60, it is advisable to exercise the option and get ` 80 instead of 60 thereby resulting in a
payoff of ` 20.
C
Let the probability of up move be P
Therefore, the probability of downmove be 1 – p
ik
130p + 60 (1 − p )
100 =
(1 + 0.08)
av
0 × 0.686 + 20 × 0.314
P0 =
1.08
0 + 6.28
= = 5.81
1.08
Suppose MIS Ltd. is considering installation of solar electricity generating plant for light the
staff quarters. The plant shall cost ` 2.50 crore and shall lead to saving in electricity expenses
at the current tariff by ` 21 lakh per year forever.
However, with change in Government in state, the rate of electricity is subject to change.
Accordingly, the saving in electricity can be of ` 12 lakh or ` 35 lakh per year and forever.
Assuming WACC of MIS Ltd. is 10% and risk-free rate of rate of return is 8%.
Decide whether MIS Ltd. should accept the project or wait and see.
Summary
hi
Detailed Solution
Note: In this case we have not been told the time horizon for a possible change in the government.
ks
We have assumed it to be 1 year.
` 210 Lakhs
(` 250 Lakhs)
C
NPV (` 40 Lakhs)
Therefore at the current level, if there is no expected change in the government, the NPV is
negative and it is not worth accepting the project.
ik
35 Lakh
= 0.10 − 0 = ` 350 Lakhs
Therefore, NPV = 350 - 250 = 100
Bh
(b) Similarly, if the savings are ₹ 12 Lakhs p.a, then the present value of these savings after
1 year
12 Lakh
= = ` 120 Lakhs
0.10 − 0
hi
ks
Reference Note: The binomial evaluation is based on a risk less/risk neutral set up and hence
the relevant rate in binomial would be the risk free rate.
Therefore, 250 =
350 × p + 120 × (1 − p )
1 + 0.08
ho
Let the probability of up move be ‘p’ and the probability of downmove would be ‘1-p’
C
270 = 350p + 120 – 120p
Therefore, 150 = 230p
Therefore, p = 0.652
ik
1 + 0.08
65.2 − 45.24
=
1.08
Bh
19.96
= = 18.48
1.08
i.e. Rf = Ru. P Rd (1-p) , Alternative Method are possible giving same assurer
Reference Note - 2
Ideally if there was a timing option, then after 1 year if the NPV was negative, we would not
enter into the project and hence the result ant NPV would be nil.However, ICAI has ignored this
and taken the NPV as negative 1.3 and hence we have solved accordingly. This is probably because
ICAI is considering that there are no separate option after 1 year ie we have to go ahead with
the project after 1 year, if we don’t go ahead with the project today. If we necessarily go ahead
hi
with the project we will get +1 cr (65% chance) or – 1.3 cr (35% chance).
ks
[Q.63 - AFM 8 (Fast Track) & 9, Q.52 - AFM 10]
ho
Maximum Price (₹) expected in next 3 months’ time
Minimum Price (₹) expected in next 3 months’ time
Continuously Compounded Rate of Interest (p.a) (%)
` 450.00
` 525.00
` 378.00
8.00%
C
ert 1.0202
Are the calculated values under both the models are same?
(ii) State also clearly the basis of Valuation of option under these models.
av
Summary
Detailed Solution
Bh
` 525 (75)
` 420
` 378 (0)
` 525 – ` 378
= = 0.51
` 75 – 0
Initial Investment = 0.51 x 420 = 214.20
Value of Portfolio if Price goes down to ` 378 Value of holding 0.51 x ` 378 =
192.78 Accordingly Let ‘P’ be the option price, then
` 214.20 - P = ` 192.78/1.0202 = ` 188.96
P = ` 25.24
hi
(2) Value of Call Option using Risk Neutral Method
Let ‘’P’ be the probability of Price increase, then p x 525 + (1 - p) x 378 = 420(1.0202)
147p = 50.48
ks
p = 0.34
Probability of Price increase = 0.34 Probability of Price decrease= 0.66
(ii)
0.34 × 75 + 0.66 × 0
1.0202
ho
= ` 25.24
TM Fincorp has bought a 6 x 9 ` 100 crore Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) at 5.25%. On
fixing date reference rate i.e. MIBOR turns out be as follows:
hi
Period Rate (%)
3 months 5.50
6 months 5.70
ks
9 months 5.85
Summary
(Assume 360 days in a year) ho
C
Detailed Solution
ik
TM Fincorp
FRA : 01/01/09
Actual borrowing : 01/07/09 (fixing date)
av
Repayment : 30/09/09
FRA : 6 × 9 : Buy interest @ 5.25% C.P
On 01/07/09 : Actual borrowing: 3 months @ 5.50%
Bh
Reference Note:
Fixing date refers to the date when the actual borrowing is intended to be taken i.e. assuming
that the FRA is entered on 01/01/09 and in case of 6 × 9 FRA the fixing date would be 01/07/09
and the borrowing along with interest is to be repaid within 3 months from the date of fixing
i.e. 30/09/09.
Solution
a. The original strategy : Bought FRA [i.e., buy 6 × 9 FRA @ 5.25% (C.P)]
On the fixing date (after 6 months) the spot rate for a 3 months borrowing comes to
5.5%. An existing buy FRA position would be settled through a sell FRA position i.e. we
would take the settlement rate at 5.5% (S.P) i.e.,
hi
ideally happen after 3 months from the fixing date.
b. Settlement Amount
(i) Settlement amount at the end of borrowing term (i.e., 9th month)
ks
= 100 Crs × (5.50% – 5.25%) % × 3/12
= ` 6,25,000
(ii)
=
ho
On fixing date (i.e., 6th month)
= ` 6,16,523
ik
Electra space is consumer electronics wholesaler. The business of the firm is highly seasonal in
nature. In 6 months of a year, firm has a huge cash deposits and especially near Christmas
time and other 6 months firm cash crunch, leading to borrowing of money to cover up its
Bh
hi
out as mentioned in part (a) above.
Summary
ks
Detailed Solution
Reference Note:
€1.485 12
Effective Interest Rate = × 100 ×
€ 50 6
= 5.94% p.a
As can be seen, irrespective of the spot rate, the effective interest rate is € 1.485
million (5.94%).
b. Interest rate futures:
1. Strategy : Sell bond futures
2. Maturity : 3 months futures contract maturing after 3 m at 94.15 SP
hi
± Gain/loss on futures (€ 0.3375 m) € 0.1625 m
[(94.15-95.5)% x 3/12 x € 50,000] [(94.15-93.5)% x 3/12 x € 50,000]
× 2,000 × 2,000
ks
Net Interest Cost (€ 1.4625) (€ 1.4625)
Reference Note:
Effective interest rate
€1.4625
€ 50
× 100 ×
12
6
= 5.85% ho
Irrespective of the spot rate, the interest cost continues to be € 1.4625 (5.85%).
C
It is advisable to hedge using futures as it results in a lower interest cost.
XYZ Limited borrows £ 15 Million of six months LIBOR + 10.00% for a period of 24 months.
av
The company anticipates a rise in LIBOR, hence it proposes to buy a Cap Option from its
Bankers at the strike rate of 8.00%. The lump sum premium is 1.00% for the entire reset
periods and the fixed rate of interest is 7.00% per annum. The actual position of LIBOR
Bh
You are required to show how far interest rate risk is hedged through Cap Option.
For calculation, work out figures at each stage up to four decimal points andamount nearest
to £. It should be part of working notes.
Summary
Detailed Solution
Reference Note:
Premium is paid upfront whereas the settlement happens at the end of each reset period. In
order to make the settlement amount at each reset date comparable with the premium, they
hi
need to be brought at the same point of time. This can be done by bringing the payoffs to the
present value or taking the premium to the future value.
ICAI usually converts the upfront premium into the future value by converting it into an
ks
annuity i.e. hypothetically if instead of an upfront premium, the premium was payable in equal
instalments over the settlement period, then what would be the equal instalment payable in each
period for such a premium. This can be calculated as follows:
ho
Premium (upfront) = Z × PVAF (x %, y years)
Where, the discount factor is to be the fixed rate of interest on the date when cap is taken.
If the reset periods are at one year intervals then we will take the discount factor on a per
annum basis and years. However, in case the reset periods are at 6 months intervals then we will
C
take the half yearly interest and also the number of half years.
Upfront premium = £ 1,50,00,000 × 1%
= £ 1,50,000
ik
24 months
Thus, no of half yearly payments = =4
av
6 months
x= £ 40,837
Reference Note: This implies that an entity should be indifferent paying £ 150,000 upfront or
£ 40,837 pounds over 4 half years.
Calculation of the effective pay off under cap (LIBOR > 8%)
Reset LIBOR Cap Cap Pay off Half yearly Effective Pay-off
Period Exercise premium
1 9% Yes 75,000 (£40,837) 34,163
£1, 50, 00, 000 × ( 9% − 8% ) × 6 / 12
2 9.5% Yes 1,12,500 (£40,837) 71,663
£1, 50, 00, 000 × ( 9.5% − 8% ) × 6 / 12
hi
3 10% Yes 1,50,000 (£40,837) 109,163
£1, 50, 00, 000 × (10% − 8% ) × 6 / 12
£ 3,37,500 £ 214,989
ks
Reference Note:
1. The above workings for annualised premium needs to be done if:
2.
on 01/10/12 in Q 15)
ho
a. Premium is paid upfront (Q8 Premium NIL)
b. Fixed rate of interest on the date when cap is taken is given (this rate was not given
Unless given, the strike rate (8%) needs to be compared to LIBOR (and not LIBOR +10%)
C
3. In this case, the reference rate is 6 months LIBOR and hence for a 24 month loan,
there would be 4 reset periods. However, in absence of LIBOR on fourth reset date we
have assumed that the fourth reset date has not yet arrived and the position cannot be
ik
period
1 14,25,000 (34,163) 13,90,837
6
19% × £1, 50, 00, 000 ×
12
Bh
↓
(9% + 10%)
IF an Indian firm has its subsidiary in Singapore and SF a Singapore firm has its subsidiary in
India and face the following interest rates:
Company IF SF
INR Floating Rate BPLR + 0.5% BPLR + 1.5%
SGD (fixed rate) 3% 3.50%
SF wishes to borrow Rupee loan at a floating rate and IF wishes to borrow SGD at a fixed rate.
The amount of loan required by both the companies is same at the current exchange rate. A
Bank arranges a swap and requires 50 basis points as its commission, which is to be shared
equally. IF requires a minimum gain of 20 basis points and SF requires a minimum gain of 10 basis
hi
points for structuring the deal. The Bank is very keen to structure the deal, even if, it has to
forego a part of its commission.
You are required to find out:
ks
(i) Whether there are any advantages available to IF and SF?
(ii) Whether a swap can be arranged which may be beneficial to both the firms
(iii) What rate of interest will they end up paying? Show detailed working.
Summary
Detailed Solution
ho
C
(i) If seems to be the relatively stronger party as it can barrow at a cheaper rate in both
the markets.
ik
However, for the possibility of swap, we need to check whether there exists interest
saving which can be shared after considering banker’s commission
IF SF
av
Combined
Desired: 3% + BPLR + 1.5% = BPLR +4.5%
Alternative: BPLR + 0.5% +3.5% = BPLR +4.0%
Savings = 0.5%
Incase the banker is given 0.5% commission there would be no further interest savings
left for IF and Sf – If requires a minimum 0.2% and SF requires a minimum 0.1%. The
banker is willing to forego some of its commission.
Therefore, incase IF gets 0.2% & SF gets 0.1% there is still 0.5 -0.2- 0.1 = 0.2%
Remaining for the banker.
Hence, the swap can be structured.
hi
ks
Assume SF pays BPLR & IF pays x (Fixed)
ho
We have been told that the banker’s commission of 0.2% will be shared equally.
C
i.e. 0.1 – 1 each – borne by IF & SF
Hence, while SF pays “BPLR”, IF will receive “BPLR – 0.1% and when IF pays “ x SF will
receive “ x - 0.1%”
∴ Net cost of financing:
ik
SF (BPLR + 1.4%)
Verification Pay to Bank – Receives under swap + Pay under swap
= 3.5% - (|x| – 0.1-1%) + BPLR
Bh
As can be seen, the ultimate cost of financing for IF is 2.8% and for SF is BPLR + 1.4%
under the swap IF agrees to Pay fixed 2.2% and SF agrees to pay BPLR.
Any other alternative arrangement which gives the same ultimate cost can also apply.
ICAI has assumed that SF reimburse exactly IF’S borrowing cost i.e. BPLR + 0.5% and hence
our x would proportionately adjust to 2.7% (2.2 % + 0.5%)
Ultimate cost of financing would remain the same.