The document outlines the progress and data analysis for the ABA 624 SAFMEDS Deck 2 during week 4, highlighting an upward trend in acquisition and fluency data with zero incorrect cards. The intervention involved daily study sessions and note-taking, which proved effective as evidenced by improved performance metrics. No adjustments to the study methods were deemed necessary due to successful outcomes.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views4 pages
ABA624 Week 4 Assignment
The document outlines the progress and data analysis for the ABA 624 SAFMEDS Deck 2 during week 4, highlighting an upward trend in acquisition and fluency data with zero incorrect cards. The intervention involved daily study sessions and note-taking, which proved effective as evidenced by improved performance metrics. No adjustments to the study methods were deemed necessary due to successful outcomes.
Table 1.2 ABA624 Acquisition Deck Knowledge Builder Data
Figure 1.3 Fluency Deck 2 Progress Chart
Table 1.3 Fluency Deck 2 Best of the Day Data
Data Analysis Figure 1.1 displays the acquisition data collected for the ABA 624 SAFMEDS deck 2 progress chart with successive calendar days on the X-axis and the number of cards per minute on the Y- axis. Table 1.1 represents the best of the day data for deck 2 after intervention is applied. My intervention for week 4 is same as last week to take notes on the terms in acquisition deck 2 in a Word document from SAFMEDS study mode, and I revise the document twice a day to improve my knowledge of the terms to reach the aim. Figure 1.2 represents the knowledge builder chart for acquisition deck 2, which includes the baseline data and the intervention slice redline. Once intervention is applied Figure 1.2 shows the upward trend in the Accel data with low variability from 15 correct cards on Day1 to 16 correct cards on Day 5 of week 4. Decel data has downward trend low variability with zero incorrect cards. Figure 1.3 displays the progress chart of ABA624 Fluency Deck 2 which shows upward trend in Accel data with low variability. I ran 5x30 sec trials on fluency data on five days. Data path shows upward trend with low variability 16 cards on Day 1 to 16 correct cards on day 5. Decel data is 0 incorrect cards. Table 1.3 shows the best of the day for Fluency Deck 2. Study Approach and Adjustments Antecedent My goal for week 4 of ABA 624 SAFMEDS acquisition deck2 was to produce an upward trend in acquisition accel data and a downward trend in acquisition decel data. My aim for this week is to increase the number of correct cards and zero incorrect cards. My reinforcer for reaching these goals was a personal sense of accomplishment and pride in seeing improvement in my acquisition data, as I am intrinsically motivated to do well in this course. My intervention for this week is studying SAFMEDS deck 2 by creating a Word document with the terms. I spent 30 minutes daily in the evening in SAFMEDS to revise the decks and understand the terms. Behavior On day one of this week SAFMEDS deck applied the intervention using study mode in SAFMEDS and ran 30 seconds in timing mode. For the remainder of the week, I ran five 30- second acquisition deck timings and graphed my best day in Knowledge builder chart. Once the intervention is applied, my first best of the data is 15 correct cards and 0 incorrect cards. I continued my intervention plan throughout the week, which showed an upward trend in my Accel data, with my highest best of the day data being 16 correct cards in 30 seconds and 0 incorrect cards and 0 skipped cards. Consequence After completing the five acquisition trials in the CR Institute/SAFMEDS app, I entered the best data point recorded into knowledge builder chart everyday and examined the data progression. After evaluating the data and observing an upward trend resulting in reaching aim, I concluded that my current methods of studying were effective. I examined the data reflecting an upward trend and determined no adjustments to my study methods were necessary. Adjustments Due to the acquisition of access data for deck 1 ending at high levels, with AIM met in the data collection period, there are no proposed changes to intervention at this time.