Introduction
Memory is the fundamental cognitive process that enables individuals to acquire, store, and
retrieve information. It facilitates learning, problem-solving, and adaptation to changing
environments. According to Sternberg (1999), “Memory is the means by which we draw on our
past experiences in order to use this information in the present.”
Stages of Memory as as follows:
1. Encoding: Transforming sensory input into a format that can be stored in the brain.
2. Storage: Retaining encoded information over time.
3. Retrieval: Accessing stored information for use in a cognitive task.
The Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) three-stage model classifies memory into:
1. Sensory Memory: Temporary storage of sensory information, lasting milliseconds.
- Iconic Memory: Visual sensory memory.
- Echoic Memory: Auditory sensory memory.
2. Short-Term (Working) Memory: Temporary storage with limited capacity, involved in
holding and processing information.
3. Long-Term Memory: Stores information indefinitely with potentially unlimited
capacity.PGI Memory Scale 3
- Declarative Memory: Factual knowledge, including episodic and semantic memory.
- Procedural Memory: Knowledge of skills, such as riding a bike or typing.
Memory assessment is essential for understanding cognitive profiles in individuals with
neurocognitive disorders, traumatic brain injuries, psychiatric illnesses, or developmental
conditions. Impairments in memory can significantly affect an individual’s ability to make
decisions, predict outcomes, and perform everyday tasks.
It is a standardized test for assessing various aspects of memory in adults aged 20 to 80
years. It was designed to suit the Indian population, ensuring applicability across diverse
educational and socioeconomic backgrounds, including illiterate individuals.
The PGI Memory Scale (PGI-MS) is a comprehensive tool designed to evaluate both
verbal and non-verbal memory functions. It is particularly effective in identifying memory
deficits caused by organic conditions, such as neurological disorders, or functional causes, such
as psychiatric illnesses. The scale comprises 10 distinct subtests, each targeting a specific aspect
of memory, enabling a detailed assessment across a wide range of memory functions. This
versatility makes the PGI-MS an invaluable resource in clinical and research settings. It provides
a Memory Quotient (MQ), calculated as:
MQ= [Memory Age (MA) / Chronological Age (CA)]*100
Subtests utilised are as follows:
1. Remote Memory: Ability to recall past events.
2. Recent Memory: Memory for recent events.
3. Mental Balance: Temporal sequencing and mental control.
4. Attention and Concentration: Focus and working memory.
5. Delayed Recall: Retention of verbal material after a time delay.
6. Immediate Recall: Short-term memory for sentences.
7. Retention of Similar Pairs: Simple associative learning.
8. Retention of Dissimilar Pairs: Complex associative learning.
9. Visual Retention: Visuo-spatial memory through drawing tasks.
10.Recognition: Ability to identify previously presented stimuli.
Background
PGI MS was developed in 1977 by Dr. Dwarka Pershad and Dr. N.N. Wig at the Postgraduate
Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
It was created to assess memory deficits in the Indian population, addressing the need for a
culturally appropriate cognitive assessment tool.
Historical Background-
Need for an Indian Memory Scale-
Before the PGIMS, most memory assessments were based on Western tools like the Wechsler
Memory Scale (WMS) and the Benton Visual Retention Test.
These tests were not fully applicable to the Indian population due to cultural, linguistic, and
educational differences. Many Western tests assumed a certain level of literacy and familiarity
with specific concepts, which made them less effective for individuals with low literacy levels in
India.
Development at PGIMER
Dr. Dwarka Pershad and Dr. N.N. Wig, leading researchers at PGIMER, Chandigarh, recognized
these limitations and initiated the development of a memory scale tailored for Indian patients.
The test was designed for both literate and illiterate populations, ensuring it could be widely used
across different demographic groups
The PGIMS was one of the first neuropsychological tools developed in India, marking a major
shift from reliance on Western scales. It played a pivotal role in advancing clinical
neuropsychology and memory assessment in India. Over the decades, it became a standard tool
for memory assessment in Indian psychiatric and neurological clinics.
Theoretical Framework
Multi-Store Model
The Atkinson-Shiffrin model, also known as the multi-store model or modal model, is a
model of memory proposed in 1968 by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin. It states that
human memory has three separate components: sensory register, short-term memory (also called
working memory), and long-term memory. Sensory memory briefly holds sensory input,
short-term memory temporarily stores informations that are actively processed, and long-term
memory stores information over extended periods. The model describes a linear flow where
information moves from sensory memory to short-term memory and then to long-term memory
through attention, coding, rehearsal, and retrieval (Fletcher, 2024).
The PGIMS assesses different stages of memory processing which align with the sensory
register, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM) components of this model. It
includes subtests for immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition memory, which parallel
the encoding, storage, and retrieval processes.
Working Memory Model
Developed by Baddeley and Hitch in 1974, this model describes short-term memory as a
system with multiple components. It includes the phonological loop for auditory information, the
visuospatial sketchpad for visual and spatial information, and the central executive, which
coordinates cognitive processes. The episodic buffer integrates various perceptual and semantic
features to form holistic units, relying on attentional resources and executive functions. Some
tasks in PGIMS, like digit span and immediate recall, engage the phonological loop and central
executive functions.
Reliability Validity - Sharvari
The test was readministered on 40 subjects after an interval of one week, the test retest reliability
ranged between .70 to .84. Split half reliability was found to be 0.91-0.83 respectively. PGMIS
has good internal consistency and high inter rater reliability. Through the study it was found that
PGMIS has high construct validity, it has reasonable criterion validity with the correlation of
.071 with boston memory scale and .85 with wechsler's memory scale, PGMIS uses a
comprehensive range of memory related tasks and mix of subsets which gives it a strong content
validity.
Procedure
The subject is seated comfortably and a rapport is established. The following subject details will
be recorded: name (initials), age, sex and education along with other necessary background
information. After the basic orientation about the test, the subject is asked to follow the
instructions for every sub-test as given by the examiner and the results are noted. First, rapport
with the participants should be established and informed consent should be obtained. The
purpose of the test was explained and the researcher ensured a distraction-free environment. The
researcher then administered the 10 subtests in sequence, assessing remote and recent memory,
attention, concentration, recall, retention, visual memory, and recognition. A stopwatch was used
for timed tasks and recording responses accurately. Each subtest was scored according to the
manual and the total score was calculated. Finally the participant was debriefed, and addressed
any concerns, and ensured ethical considerations like confidentiality and voluntary participation
were upheld.
Scoring
The PGI Memory Scale (PGI-MS) is a psychometric test which consists of 10 subtests
evaluating different memory aspects. Each subtest has a specific scoring method, and the total
score is the sum of all subtest scores:
Subtest 1 (Max Score: 6)
● Each correct response earns 1 point.
● If items 5 and 6 are not applicable, the following scoring adjustments apply:
○ All four items correct → Score: 6
○ Three items correct → Score: 5
○ Two items correct → Score: 3
○ One item correct → Score: 1
○ None correct → Score: 0
Subtest 2 (Max Score: 5)
Subtest 3 (Max Score: 9)
● Alphabet Recitation:
○ Completed correctly within 15 seconds → Score: 3
○ Completed correctly after 15 seconds → Score: 2
○ One mistake → Score: 1
○ More than one mistake → Score: 0
● Counting backward from 20:
○ Scored the same as Alphabet Recitation
● Counting backward in intervals of 3:
○ Correct within 30 seconds → Score: 3
○ Correct after 30 seconds → Score: 2
○ One mistake → Score: 1
○ More than one mistake → Score: 0
Subtest 4 (Max Score: 15)
● Each correctly recalled digit earns 1 point.
Subtest 5
● Each correctly recalled digit earns 1 point.
Subtest 6 (Max Score: 12)
● Points are awarded for each correctly reproduced clause:
○ Sentence 1: 0-3 points
○ Sentence 2: 0-4 points
○ Sentence 3: 0-5 points
Subtest 7 (Max Score: 5)
● Each correct reproduction of a word pair association earns 1 point.
Subtest 8 (Max Score: 15)
● Each correctly recalled word from the pair earns 1 point, assessed separately for each
trial.
● The total score is the sum of points across three trials.
Subtest 9 (Max Score: 13)
● Points are assigned for accurately reproducing geometric figures in sequence and
number:
○ Cards 1-3: 2 points each
○ Card 4: 3 points
○ Card 5: 4 points
Subtest 10 (Max Score: 10)
● Each correctly identified and named object earns 1 point.
● If an object is identified but not named or named incorrectly, it earns 0.5 points.
● Incorrectly identified objects result in a deduction from the earned score, but no negative
scores are given.
Applications
The PGI Memory Scale is widely used in clinical settings to assess various aspects of
memory functioning.
Diagnosis of Neurological and Psychiatric Conditions
PGIMS plays a crucial role in diagnosing memory deficits associated with various
conditions. It helps identify memory impairments in dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease,
vascular dementia, and other forms of cognitive decline. It is also beneficial in diagnosing
amnestic disorders caused by trauma, infections, or neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, it
assesses cognitive deficits, particularly memory impairments.
Assessment Of Brain Damage
The scale is instrumental in evaluating the impact of neurological injuries such as
traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and brain tumors on memory functions. It is often used in
pre- and post-surgical evaluations to monitor cognitive changes following neurosurgical
procedures.
Monitoring Cognitive Decline
PGIMS is useful in detecting early signs of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and
tracking progressive neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease.
Regular assessments can help monitor cognitive decline and facilitate timely interventions.
Assessment In psychiatric Disorders
Memory impairments are commonly observed in psychiatric conditions, and PGIMS
helps evaluate their severity. In depression, individuals often struggle with attention and recall,
while anxiety disorders can negatively affect concentration and memory retrieval. The test aids
in understanding these cognitive disruptions and their impact on daily functioning.
Pre and Post Treatment Evaluation
PGIMS is frequently used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions, including
pharmacotherapy, cognitive rehabilitation, and psychotherapy. It helps determine whether
treatments have improved memory functioning, allowing clinicians to adjust therapeutic
approaches accordingly.
Rehabilitation Planning
PGIMS provides crucial baseline data for developing personalized cognitive
rehabilitation programs aimed at improving memory function in individuals with impairments. It
helps professionals track progress, modify treatment plans, and assess recovery over time.
Criticism
Overgeneralization of Use
Originally developed for diagnosing personality traits, the PGI-MS is now often used in a
generalized manner beyond its intended purpose. This has led to concerns about its
appropriateness in diverse settings, such as employment screening and general personality
assessment.
Limited Initial Sample Size
The original research supporting the PGI-MS was based on a relatively small sample,
raising concerns about the reliability and validity of the scale. A more extensive and diverse
sample would have strengthened its psychometric properties.
Outdated Norms
The test's norms were established decades ago, and since then, significant socio-cultural,
educational, economic, and technological changes have taken place. These shifts may impact
personality assessment, making the existing norms less applicable to the current population.
Issues with Elderly Populations
Research has shown that elderly individuals (aged 50 and above) tend to score
significantly lower on various subtests, except for attention-concentration measures. This
suggests that the test may not be fully reliable or valid for older populations without appropriate
age-related adjustments.
Reliability and Validity Concerns
While the PGI-MS has demonstrated reliability and validity in clinical settings, its
application in broader contexts has been questioned. Differences in population characteristics,
including literacy levels and socio-economic backgrounds, may impact the accuracy of the
results.
References
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.
Human Memory, 7-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-121050-2.50006-5
Baddeley & hitch (1974) | Working memory | Psychology unlocked. (2017, April 6). Psychology
Unlocked.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200106183747/www.psychologyunlocked.com/baddel
Fletcher, J. (2024). Understanding the Atkinson–shiffrin memory model. Psych Central.
https://psychcentral.com/health/atkinson-and-shiffrin-model
Nehra, A., Sreenivas, V., Kaur, H., Chopra, S., & Bajpai, S. (2014). Are Educated Better in
Cognition than Their Ancestors? An Indian Flynn Effect Study. Activitas Nervosa
Superior, 56(1–2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03379607