See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368676218
IMPACT OF MID-DAY MEAL PROGRAMME ON THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF
PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN
Article in Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies · September 2022
DOI: 10.21922/srjis.v10i72.11612
CITATION READS
1 1,885
2 authors, including:
Santosh Arora
M.J.P. Rohilkhand University Bareilly
19 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Santosh Arora on 03 December 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies,
Online ISSN 2278-8808, SJIF 2021 = 7.380, www.srjis.com
PEER REVIEWED & REFEREED JOURNAL, JULY-AUGUST, 2022, VOL- 10/72
https://doi.org/10.21922/srjis.v10i72.11612
IMPACT OF MID-DAY MEAL PROGRAMME ON THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS
OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN
Ravi Shanker1 & Santosh Arora2, Ph. D.
1
Research scholar, department of B.Ed/M.Ed, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University Bareilly.
2
Professor department of B.Ed/M.Ed, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University Bareilly.
Paper Received On: 25 AUGUST 2022
Peer Reviewed On: 31 AUGUST 2022
Published On: 01 SEPTEMBER 2022
Abstract
Children have the right to get the primary education, as stated in the Indian Constitution. The
government has proposed an amendment to allow as children between the ages of 6 and 12 to get free
and compulsory education. The Government of India has launched a multifaceted programme called
the Mid-Day Meal Scheme. It addresses difficulties with access to education, inadequate nutrition,
and food security. The population in this particular research study includes all children aged 6–11
and studying in Primary Schools of Utter Pradesh. 509 subjects were chosen. 263 boys and 246 girls
were selected through random sampling. According to the Waterlow Classification, children are more
wasted, stunted and wasted and stunted than normal students in physical health. Waterlow
Classification indicates low levels of physical health of primary school children. The average weight
of urban boys and girls was more than the rural boys and rural girls. The overall height of all boys
and girls is considered below ICMR standards of height. There was found a significant difference in
height and weight between boys and girls of urban and rural areas.
Keywords: Mid-Day Meal, Primary School, Anthropometric Measurement, Water- low Classification.
Scholarly Research Journal's is licensed Based on a work at www.srjis.com
Introduction: All children have the right to get a primary education, as stated in the Indian
Constitution. Even while it hasn't always been a complete success, it has consistently made
great progress. Therefore, the government has proposed an amendment to allow children
between the ages of 6 and 12 to get free and compulsory education. The Government of India
has created a multifaceted programme called the Mid-Day Meal Scheme to address
difficulties with access to education, inadequate nutrition, and food security. The department
of elementary education and literacy, ministry of human resources development, Government
of India, introduced this programme on August 15, 1995, across the country. An attempt was
made in September 2002 to reform the mid-day meal programme, which served 450 kcal. and
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17388
(Pg. 17387-17397)
8–12gm. of protein to all students in grades I–V in government and government-aided
schools. With all of those positive outcomes, the scheme was expanded in October 2007 to
include the upper primary classes (grades VI to VII). On working days, it offers both primary
and upper Primary classes a free lunch. With a clear goal to promote school children's
nutrition in both rural and urban settings. This programme is the world’s largest school
lunch programme.
The early years of school are a time of rapid physical and intellectual development for
children. Children contribute to the essential human potential and are the backbone of the
economy and development of the country. Importantly, proper nutrition is essential at this
time because it influences factors like health, productivity at work, and brain development.
For the sake of learning, maturation, and physical development, their nutritional state and
health are monitored. Anthropometric measurements, particularly weight and height, are a
good indicator of a child's physical development, and children's height and weight are an
effective indicator of their nutritional status.
Chethana & Archana (2018) conduct a study on the effect of the mid-day meal
programme on the nutritional status of school children. This study revealed that for some
children from low-income families, it was preferable since the school lunch might start to
take the place of the family meal rather than just be an addition to it.
Nutan & Preja (2014) also conducted a study on the nutritional status of the mid-day
meal consuming rural School Going Girls ( 7-10 years). The subjects are divided into
categories under socio-economic status based on their family structure, occupation, and
educational standing of their parents. The 24- hour recall method and interviews were used to
study the food intake pattern. Anthropometric measurements and a clinical evaluation survey
were used to physical health assessment. All food groups' average dietary intake and mean
nutrient consumption were found to be lower than the required nutrients. Priya & Dhevi
(2015) conducted a study on the nutritional status of school children in rural, semi urban and
urban areas of Tamilnadu. The study revealed that Malnutrition affects a child's physical and
intellectual development. Children in rural areas consumed significantly fewer calories on
average than those in urban areas. The study shows that children from rural areas and those
from lower socioeconomic strata are less nourished than their urban counterparts. This
distinction emphasizes the need for a unique strategy to tackle malnutrition.
Need and significance of the study: In Uttar Pradesh, 39 percent of children aged 0 to 4
years are stunted, 19 percent are wasting, and 37 percent are underweight, according to a
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17389
(Pg. 17387-17397)
report published in 2019 by the Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey. The Mid-Day
Meal programme is a student welfare scheme for school- going children. Numerous studies
demonstrate that the Mid-day Meal Scheme has a favorable effect on enrollment, retention,
and attendance at school. The goals of MDM include addressing young children's nutritional
deficiencies. This study's main objective was to comprehend the Mid-day Meal Scheme's role
in enhancing children's nutritional status.
Objective of the study
1. To compare the physical health status between rural boys and urban boys.
2. To compare the physical health status among rural and urban girls.
3. To study the nutritional health among rural and urban children.
Ho1: There is no significant difference between in physical health between rural and urban
boys.
Ho2: there exists no significant difference in physical health between rural and urban girls.
Ho3: There is no significant difference between rural and urban school children in the
reference of their nutritional health.
Methodology: It was a cross-sectional research conducted on 509 children who regularly eat
MDM. Height, weight, and the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) were measured
anthropometrically and compared to ICMR reference values. Three days in a weak were used
to study daily nutritional intake and eating habits. It was a cross-sectional research conducted
on 509 students who regularly eat lunch. Height & weight were measured
anthropometrically and compared to ICMR reference values. Three days in a weak were used
to study daily nutritional intake and eating habits.
Sample: All the primary school students of district Bareilly constitutes the population of the
present study. The population in this particular research study includes all children aged 6–11
and studying in primary schools which is regulate by U.P. Government. Selection of
participants for the investigation, 509 subjects were chosen. 263 boys and 246 girls were
selected through random sampling.
Tools Used
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17390
(Pg. 17387-17397)
Following tools were used for data collection:
Table- 01
S.No. Variable Measuring Instrument
1. a)Anthropometric Measurement.
Physical Health
b) Water-low classification.
Nutritional Health a) 24 Recall Method.
2.
b) Food Frequency Questionnaire.
Assessment of Physical Health
Assessment of Anthropometric measurements includes height and weight. Then mean
values are compared with ICMR standard. The height of the students was measured by using
soft measuring tape. Then the weight of the individual was measured using digital SECA
weighing machine. Recorded height and weight was compared with Standard values.
Standard norms of height and weight for boys and girls are represented in the tabular form:
Table- 02: ICMR Standard Height & Weight for boys and girls.
Age years Boys Girls
Weight (kg.) Height (cm.) Weight (kg.) Height (cm.)
6 20 116 19 114
7 23 121 21 120
8 25 127 24 126
9 28 132 28 132
10 31 137 32 138
11 32 140 33 142
12 37 147 38 148
Assessment of Nutritional Health
By using the 24-hour recall method of the diet survey for three consecutive days, data
on eating patterns were gathered. Every meal eaten over the course of three days was covered
by the recall. For assessment of nutritional health 24 hr. recall method and food frequency
questionnaire were used.
Table -03: Quantity of the food items used in the Mid-Day meal of primary school of
Utter Pradesh
Sr. Item Quantity used per day per student
No.
1 Rice/ wheat flour 100gms.
2 Pulses 20gms.
3 Vegetables 50gms.
4 Oil 5ml.
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17391
(Pg. 17387-17397)
Results and Discussion
First objective of study is to compare the physical health among rural and urban boys. The ‘t’
value were computed in table-04
Table – 04: Comparison between Rural boys and urban boys based on Height as per
ICMR standard
Age ICMR height Rural boys Urban boys ‘t’ value
In Years standard (cm.)
M M
9 132 122.20 7.44 120.03 7.38 1.12
10 137 124.31 6.48 128.8 10.78 2.64**
11 140 132.94 10.32 135.84 10.31 1.17
Boys from rural and urban areas are compared in terms of their height according to
age in table -4 the computed‘t’-value (1.12) between 9-year-old boys from rural and urban
areas was not found significant. Boys from rural areas were found to have a better mean
height (122.20) than their urban counterparts. While both urban and rural male groups fall
short of the ICMR recommended height, There was a substantial difference in the computed
't' value (2.64) between urban and rural boys 10 years old. The average height of urban boys
was found to be superior than that of rural boys (128.8). Boys from rural and urban areas
were found to be shorter than the ICMR height guideline. Among 11-year-old boys from
rural and urban areas, the computed "t" value (1.17) was not significant. The average height
of boys in rural areas was found to be lower (132.94) than that of boys in urban areas
(135.84). Boys from both urban and rural areas were found to be shorter on average than the
ICMR height requirement.
Table-5: Comparison between Rural boys and urban boys on the basis of Weight as per
ICMR standard.
Age ICMR weight Rural boys Urban boys ‘t’ value
In Years standard (kg.)
M M
9 28 23.10 3.64 22.22 3.28 0.95
10 31 24.14 3.32 26.80 5.72 2.96**
11 32 28.36 5.02 29.62 4.71 1.09
* significant on .05 level of significance.
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17392
(Pg. 17387-17397)
Table-5 shows a comparison of the weights of boys in rural and urban areas. In 9-
year-old boys, the computed 't'-value between rural and urban boys was 0.95, which is not
statistically significant. Those from rural areas were heavier on average (23.10) than boys
from urban areas (22.22). While both groups of boys (rural and urban) were found to be
under the ICMR weight standard. There was a substantial difference between rural and urban
10-year-old boys according to the computed ‘t’ value (2.96). The average weight of urban
boys (26.80) was higher than that of rural boys (24.14). Boys from rural and urban areas were
found to weigh less than the ICMR weight requirement. 11-year-old boys from rural and
urban areas had an estimated 't' value of 1.09, which was not significant. The average weight
of rural boys was found to be lower than the average weight of urban boys (28.36). (29.62).
Boys from both rural and urban areas were found to weight less on average than the standard
weight suggested by ICMR standard.
Second objective of the study is to compare the physical health among rural and urban girls.
The ‘t’ value were computed describe in table -5.
Table-6: Comparison between Rural girls and Urban girls on the basis of Height as per
ICMR standard.
Age ICMR Height Rural girls Urban girls ‘t’ value
In standard (cm.)
Years
M M
9 132 121.02 9.03 118.05 6.51 1.08
10 138 122.75 17.33 131.81 13.64 2.51*
11 142 130.78 11.97 132.99 10.30 1.03
* significant on .05 level of significance.
According to age-appropriate ICMR guidelines, Table-6 compares the height of girls
in rural and urban areas. Among 9-year-old girls, the computed 't' value between rural and
urban girls is 1.08; this value was not significant. Girls from rural areas had a higher average
height (121.02) than those from urban areas (118.05). While both groups of girls (rural and
urban) were found to be shorter than the height recommended by ICMR. There was a marked
significant difference between urban and rural 10-year-old girls as computed "t" value (2.51)
is significant at .o5 level of significant. Urban girls' mean height (131.81) was higher than
that of rural girls (122.75). Girls from rural and urban areas were found to be shorter than the
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17393
(Pg. 17387-17397)
standard height suggested by ICMR. There was no significant difference found between 11-
year-old females from rural and urban areas according to the determined’-value (1.03). The
average height of rural girls was found to be lower (130.78) than that of urban girls (132.99).
Both urban and rural girls' average heights were found to be below than the standard height
suggested by ICMR.
Table-7: Comparison between Rural girls and Urban girls on the basis of Weight as per
ICMR standard.
Age ICMR Weight Rural girls Urban girls ‘t’ value
In Years standard (Kg.)
M M
9 28 22.36 9.41 22.45 11.12 0.03
10 32 21.55 3.91 25.47 4.48 4.19**
11 33 24.16 3.95 26.05 4.65 1.84
* significant at .05 level.
Table-7 revealed the weight of girls in rural and urban areas. among 9-year-old girls,
the calculated ‘t’-value between rural and urban girls was 0.03. Girls from rural areas were
found to weight less on average (22.36) than girls from urban areas (22.45). Both the rural
and urban girls were found to be under the ICMR weight criterion. There was a substantial
difference between urban and rural 10-year-old girls according to the computed "t" value
(4.19). The average weight of urban girls (25.47) was found to be higher than that of rural
girls (21.55). Girls from rural and urban areas were found to weight less than the ICMR
weight standard among 11-year-old girls from rural and urban areas, the computed "t" value
(1.84) was not significant. The average weight of rural girls (24.16) was found to be lower
than the average weight of urban girls (26.05). Both urban and rural girls' average weights
were found to be below the ICMR weight criterion.
Third objective of study is to compare the nutritional health between rural and urban
children. Described in table 9-
24- Hour recall method: As a part of the goal of the current study, the 24-hour recall
method was used to evaluate the nutrient consumption of primary school students.
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17394
(Pg. 17387-17397)
Table- 09: Percentage of children according to deficient nutrient intake with in
last 24 hrs.
Sr. No. Nutrients Total Students
1. Protein 14.73%(75)
2. Fat 18.07%(92)
3. Carbohydrate 79.37%(404)
4. Energy 51.86%(264)
5. Calcium 53.43%(272)
6. Iron 44.59%(227)
Nutrients
Protein
80.00%
60.00%
Iron 40.00% Fat
20.00%
0.00% Nutrients
Calcium Carbohydrate
Energy
The 24-recall technique was used to calculate how much of the vital nutrients pupils
had consumed. The aforementioned table-09 displays the percentage of children who are
lacking in six essential nutrients and was evaluated on a six-dimensional grid. The
respondents' daily nutrient consumption is best represented by the grid. The table-09 and grid
display the percentage deficiency matrix for respondents. 14.73 percent children claimed that
they did not get enough protein on a daily basis. Not all of the respondents' diets were high in
fats. Additionally, 18.07% of the respondents didn't consume the required amount of fat. One
nutrient that was lacking in 79.37 percent of respondents was carbohydrate. 51.86 percent of
respondents reported not meeting their daily energy needs. Protein, fat, and carbohydrates are
combined to meet the daily energy needs. The development and growth of stature depend on
calcium. 44.59 percent of those surveyed did not consume the daily required quantity of iron,
while 53.43 percent had calcium deficiency.
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17395
(Pg. 17387-17397)
Food Frequency Questionnaire
The frequency with which primary school students consume various food groups was
ascertained using the food frequency questionnaire.
Table-10: Rural and Urban children based on frequency of food groups intake. (Rural
N-341, Urban N-168)
Frequency of intake
Sr.no Food Groups Daily Weekly Twice a Monthly
month
R U R U R U R U
1 Pulses and 25% 75% 60% 20% 10% 5% 5% -
legumes
2 Cereals 100% 100% - - - - - -
3 Milk and Milk 7% 8% 32% 19% 8% 1% 18% -
product
4 Green leafy 63% 90% 32% 8% 5% 2% - -
Vegetables
5 Fats and Oil 35% 35% 23% 23% - - - -
6 Meat, Fish and 15% 25% 35% 49% 7% 9% 13% 11%
Poultry
The frequency of food consumption by the groups of rural and urban people is shown
in table 10 above. Only 5% of respondents in rural areas reported eating pulse and legumes
just once per month, compared to 25% who eat them daily, 60% eat them once per week, and
10% who eat them twice per month. Daily consumption of pulses and legumes among
students in urban areas is 75%; weekly consumption is 20%. And just 5% twice per month.
All primary school children in both rural and urban areas receive cereal, however only 7% of
rural students receive milk and milk products on a daily basis and 32% of urban students
receive milk and milk products along with green leafy vegetables on a weekly basis. 90% of
urban children and 63% of rural children frequently eat green and leafy vegetables during the
midday meal that is provided in primary schools. In both rural and urban elementary schools,
35% of students eat fat and oil during lunch. Meat, fish, and poultry are consumed by
students in urban primary schools at a rate of 25% daily, 49% weekly, and 11% monthly. On
the other hand, primary school students in rural areas consume 15% of meat, fish, and poultry
daily, 35% weekly, 7% twice a month, and 13% monthly. A study of Mint that was
published June 1, 2007, provides strong support for the researcher's conclusions in this
particular study about the inadequate nutrient intake among youngsters in rural and urban
areas. The report states that protein consumption dropped from 59 gm. to 57 gm. /day. Intake
of calories has decreased in both rural and urban population. Protein consumption in urban
population fell from 58.5 gm. /day to 57 gm./day. In rural area, Consumption of fat declined
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17396
(Pg. 17387-17397)
from 36.0 to 35.5 gm. per day and from 50.0 to 47.5 gm. per day in urban areas. In a different
study, Yadav P. and Kumar A. (2014). Mid-day meal provides protein for only 5 to 9 year
old children but not enough protein for 10 to 12 year old children. Expert’s recommendations
that one third of the RDA of nutrients must be provided by the MDM were met. All of the
youngsters surveyed had iron and energy intakes that were below the RDA by 1/3. In general,
the MDM has few micronutrients.
Conclusion: The researcher concludes in the compression of physical health status of rural
and urban students of primary school. It is evident from the above data that the students in the
rural areas have moderate category they have less weight than the standard according to their
height. Wasting depends on the food consumption on an individual. The water low
classification does not consider stunted only children as malnourished since height is
determined by genetic factors as well. It is concluded that the average height of urban boys
and girls of 9 years old is found lower than rural boys. On the other hand, average height of
10 and 11 years old urban boys and girls is higher than rural boys and girls but overall height
of all boys and girls is considered below than ICMR standards of height. The literacy rate of
rural women is less than the urban women. Therefore, they have lack of awareness towards
health. Nutritional supplements are easily available for the urban boys in comparison to rural
boys. Hospitality in urban area is better than rural area. It is revealed that the average weight
of urban boys and girls of 9 years old is found less than rural boys. On the other hand, the
average weight of urban boys and girls of 10 and 11 years old is more than rural boys. The
overall weight of boys and girls in rural and urban area is below than ICMR standards. The
literacy rate of rural parents is less than the urban parents. Therefore, they have lack of
awareness towards health of boy and girls. The orthodox family discriminate between boys
and girls in rural families therefore they do not provide proper supplement. Hospitality in
urban area is better than rural area.
Educational implication
• The physical health of rural children is poor. Therefore it is a need to provide nutrition
education to them.
• The nutritional health analysis shows sign of deficiencies among rural children. The
frequency of essential food to take like milk and complex carbohydrate which also
poor among rural children in study. Therefore, their energy requirement is not
fulfilled by their daily diet. After doing this detailed study, it is recommended that the
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
Ravi Shanker & Dr. Santosh Arora 17397
(Pg. 17387-17397)
supplementary meal provide by the government under mid-day meal scheme by
which the deficiency of nutrients can be fulfilled.
References
Kulshrestha, K. A. (2011). A study of Mid- Day Meal scheme and its impact
on health of primary classes (6 To 11 Yrs) in meerut region (Uttar
Pradesh). Food science research journal, 122-124.
Mansukhlal, J. K. (2012). a study of effectiveness of the mid-day meal scheme implemented in primary
education. singhania university pacheri bari, jhunjhunu(raj.), india, 1-10.
Mehta, B. K. (2013). Nutritional contribution of mid-day meal to dietary intake of school children in
ludhiana district of panjab. Journal of nutrition food science, 1-183.
Sushma tripathi, A. C. (2013). Assessment of height, weight and bmi of school going children in
varanasi. asian journal of home science, 496-498.
Yadav, P.A. (2014). Nutrition adequacy of mid-day meal in allahabad schools. Asian journal of home
science, 655-657.
C. Priya, Praveen, and S. Dhevi(2015). A study on nutritional status of school children in rural ,
semi urban and urban areas of Tamilnadu.
Karunakaran, K. T. (2015). Impact of mid-day-meal-scheme (mdms) on nutritinal level, enrolment
rate and dropout rate of school children in kerala: a case study. Journal of economic &
social development, 1-5.
Cynthia, S. (2015). Nutritional status of government primary school children in an urban
kurnool, andhra pradesh. International journal of current medical and applied ciences, 167-
170.
Sintayehu Hailu, M. W. (2016). Iodine deficiency and associated factors among school children:a
cross sectional study in ethiopia. the official journal of the belgian public health association,
1-46.
Abdel Wahed W. A., Hassan S., and Eldessouki R. (2017). Malnutrition and its associated factors
among rural school children in Fayoum Governorate Egypt. Journal of environmental and
public health, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/4783791.
Nutan, P. (2014). To assess the nutritional status of the mid-day meal consuming rural school going
girls(7-10years). International journal of engineering science invention, 31-33.
Maiti s. and et.al (2011). A comparative study on nutritional status of urban and Rural early
adolescent school girls of west Bengal, India. J nepal paediatr so 2011;31(3):169-174.
Srivastava A. and et.al. (2012). Nutritional status of school age children a scenario of urban slums in
india. the official journal of the belgian public health association, 1-8.
Chakraborty M. and Ghosh S.(2020). Influencing the nutritional status among children of 6–11
years of age: a case study from an indian megacity. Journal of health management.
doi:10.1177/0972063420908394.
Shanker, R. & Arora, S.(2021). Nutritional analysis of mid day meal of utter
paradesh. European journal of molecular & Clinical Medicine.8(2), 1718-1724
Copyright © 2022, Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies
View publication stats