[구매] 고등 EBS 수능특강 - Unit 003 - 240420 185720 4
1. 다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은? [3-3] ① Diverse Sets of Criteria Utilized in Evaluating the
Abilities of Individuals
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of ② Creating Systems and Facilities That Accommodate
Individuals with Disabilities
nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an average
blind person with an average sighted person. Who will ③ Developing Improved Settings to Highlight the Abilities
be more competent in walking from one place to of Individuals with Disabilities
another? You might think that the sighted person will ④ The Reason Why Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
be more competent because the sighted person can Those Socially Disadvantaged Is Crucial
see where he or she is going, but this is using an ⑤ The Importance of Using Fair Standards to Judge the
unfair criterion. If you think about competence based Capabilities of Individuals with Disabilities
on the fairer criterion of who can best walk with the
eyes closed, then the blind person will definitely be
more competent. Such knowledge about people who 3. 다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은? [3-3]
are blind and, by extension, other socially marginalized Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
people, can make us appreciate them and celebrate using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of
their unique abilities as they really are, rather than nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an average
discriminate against, pity, or patronize them for some blind person with an average sighted person. Who will
incompetence that does not exist except as a figment be more competent in walking from one place to
of our traditional, prejudiced imaginations. another? You might think that the sighted person will
be more competent because the sighted person can
① People with disabilities are often evaluated using see where he or she is going, but this is using an
criteria of competence biased toward non-disabled unfair criterion. If you think about competence based
individuals.
on the fairer criterion of who can best walk with the
② When comparing an average blind person with an eyes closed, then the blind person will definitely be
average sighted person, the sighted person is typically more competent. Such knowledge about people who
considered more competent in walking from one place
are blind and, by extension, other socially marginalized
to another.
people, can make us appreciate them and celebrate
③ The text suggests that if walking competence were their unique abilities as they really are, rather than
evaluated with eyes closed, the blind person would likely
discriminate against, pity, or patronize them for some
be more competent.
incompetence that does not exist except as a figment
④ Understanding the abilities of people who are blind can
of our traditional, prejudiced imaginations.
lead to discrimination and pity towards them.
⑤ Celebrating the unique abilities of socially marginalized ① The challenges faced by the disadvantaged stem from
individuals is a key aspect of combating prejudice and inherent societal contradictions.
discrimination.
② Ensuring that socially disadvantaged individuals have
equal opportunities is essential.
③ It's important to foster a societal environment where
2. 다음 글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은? [3-3]
diverse values can thrive together.
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
④ It's important to restructure systems and facilities with
using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of
the needs of individuals with disabilities in mind.
nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an average
blind person with an average sighted person. Who will ⑤ Recognizing the abilities of individuals with disabilities
requires understanding them without bias or prejudice.
be more competent in walking from one place to
another? You might think that the sighted person will
be more competent because the sighted person can
see where he or she is going, but this is using an 4. (주관식) 윗 글을 아래와 같이 요약할 때, 빈칸에 들어갈 알맞
unfair criterion. If you think about competence based 은 단어를 본문에서 찾아 쓰시오. 필요시 어형변화 가능. [3-3]
on the fairer criterion of who can best walk with the
eyes closed, then the blind person will definitely be
more competent. Such knowledge about people who
are blind and, by extension, other socially marginalized
people, can make us appreciate them and celebrate
their unique abilities as they really are, rather than
discriminate against, pity, or patronize them for some
incompetence that does not exist except as a figment
of our traditional, prejudiced imaginations.
너른터 -1- nernter.com
[구매] 고등 EBS 수능특강 - Unit 003 - 240420 185720 4
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of 6. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한
nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an average 곳은? [3-3]
blind person with an average sighted person. Who will If you think about competence based on the fairer
be more competent in walking from one place to criterion of who can best walk with the eyes closed,
another? You might think that the sighted person will then the blind person will definitely be more
be more competent because the sighted person can competent.
see where he or she is going, but this is using an
unfair criterion. If you think about competence based
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
on the fairer criterion of who can best walk with the
using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of
eyes closed, then the blind person will definitely be
nondisabled people. ( ① ) Compare, for example, an
more competent. Such knowledge about people who
average blind person with an average sighted person.
are blind and, by extension, other socially marginalized
Who will be more competent in walking from one place
people, can make us appreciate them and celebrate
to another? ( ② ) You might think that the sighted
their unique abilities as they really are, rather than
person will be more competent because the sighted
discriminate against, pity, or patronize them for some
person can see where he or she is going, but this is
incompetence that does not exist except as a figment
using an unfair criterion. ( ③ ) Such knowledge about
of our traditional, prejudiced imaginations.
people who are blind and, by extension, other socially
marginalized people, can foster appreciation and
Judging people with disabilities by (A)
celebration of their unique abilities. ( ④ ) It helps us
standards of competence overlooks their unique
avoid discrimination, pity, or patronization towards
abilities; understanding and appreciating these abilities
them, which often stems from unfounded perceptions
is crucial to avoid (B) and prejudice.
of incompetence that are rooted in traditional,
prejudiced imaginations. ( ⑤ ) Recognizing their true
capabilities enables us to respect and honor their
diversity.
5. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은? [3-
3]
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
using criteria of competence that are biased in favor of 7. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은? [3-3]
nondisabled people.
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
using criteria of competence that ① are biased in favor
(A) If you think about competence based on the fairer of nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an
criterion of who can best walk with the eyes closed, average blind person with an average sighted person.
then the blind person will definitely be more Who will be more competent in walking from one place
competent. Such knowledge about people who are to another? You might think ② that the sighted person
blind and, by extension, other socially marginalized will be more competent because the sighted person
people, can foster appreciation and celebration of their can see where he or she is going, but this is using an
unique abilities. unfair criterion. If you think about competence based
(B) It helps us avoid discrimination, pity, or on the fairer criterion of who can best walk with the
patronization towards them, which often stems from eyes ③ closing, then the blind person will definitely be
unfounded perceptions of incompetence that are more competent. Such knowledge about people who
rooted in traditional, prejudiced imaginations. are blind and, by extension, ④ other socially
Recognizing their true capabilities enables us to marginalized people, can make us appreciate them and
respect and honor their diversity. celebrate their unique abilities as they really are,
(C) Compare, for example, an average blind person rather than discriminate against, pity, or patronize
with an average sighted person. Who will be more them for some incompetence that ⑤ does not exist
competent in walking from one place to another? You except as a figment of our traditional, prejudiced
might think that the sighted person will be more imaginations.
competent because the sighted person can see where
he or she is going, but this is using an unfair criterion.
① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A) ④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)
너른터 -2- nernter.com
[구매] 고등 EBS 수능특강 - Unit 003 - 240420 185720 4
8. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않
은 것은? [3-3]
Consider people with disabilities often they are judged
using criteria of competence that are ① biased in favor
of nondisabled people. Compare, for example, an
average blind person with an average sighted person.
Who will be ② more competent in walking from one
place to another? You might think that the sighted
person will be more competent because the sighted
person can see where he or she is going, but this is
using an ③ unfair criterion. If you think about
competence based on the fairer criterion of who can
best walk with the eyes closed, then the blind person
will definitely be more competent. Such knowledge
about people who are blind and, by extension, other
socially marginalized people, can make us ④
appreciate them and celebrate their unique abilities as
they really are, rather than discriminate against, pity,
or patronize them for some ⑤ competence that does
not exist except as a figment of our traditional,
prejudiced imaginations.
너른터 -3- nernter.com
(정답지) [구매] 고등 EBS 수능특강 - Unit 003 - 240420 185720 4
1번- ④ '시각 장애인, 더 나아가 다른 사회 소외계층에 관한
지식은 그들의 가치를 인정하고 그들의 고유한 능력을 있는 그대
로 기념할 수 있게 한다'고 했으므로 ④ ‘시각 장애인의 능력을 이
해하는 것은 시각 장애인에 대한 차별과 연민을 유발할 수 있다’는
글의 내용과 일치하지 않는다.
2번- ⑤ 장애인을 편향된 능력의 기준으로 판단하는 것은 그
들의 고유한 능력을 간과하는 것이며, 이러한 능력을 이해하고 인
식하는 것은 차별과 편견을 피하기 위해 중요하다는 내용의 글이
므로 글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은 ⑤ ‘장애인의 능력을 판단하
기 위해 공정한 기준을 사용하는 것의 중요성’이다.
3번- ⑤ 장애인을 편향된 능력의 기준으로 판단하는 것은 그
들의 고유한 능력을 간과하는 것이며, 이러한 능력을 이해하고 인
식하는 것은 차별과 편견을 피하기 위해 중요하다는 내용의 글이
므로 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은 ⑤ ‘장애인 개인의 능력을 인
식하기 위해서는 편향이나 편견 없이 이해할 필요가 있다’이다.
4 번 - (A) biased, (B) discrimination 편견 없이 장애인
을 이해하면 그들의 능력을 제대로 인정할 수 있다는 내용의 글로
‘장애인을 편향된 능력의 기준으로 판단하는 것은 그들의 고유한
능력을 간과하는 것이며, 이러한 능력을 이해하고 인식하는 것은
차별과 편견을 피하기 위해 중요하다’로 요약하는 것이 적절하다.
5번-④ 원문 일부 변형
6번-③ 원문 일부 변형
7번-③ 부대상황 즉 ‘~하면서, ~채로’의 뜻을 나타내는
‘with+명사(구)+분사/형용사(구)/부사(구)’의 구조로 전치사
with의 목적어인 명사구 the eyes와 수동관계이므로 과거분사
closed가 적절하다.
8번- ⑤ 장애인을 편향된 능력의 기준으로 판단하는 것은 그
들의 고유한 능력을 간과하는 것이며, 이러한 능력을 이해하고 인
식하는 것은 차별과 편견을 피하기 위해 중요하다는 내용의 글로
‘시각 장애인, 더 나아가 다른 사회 소외계층에 관한 이러한 지식
은 실재하지 않는 무능함을 이유로 그들을 차별하거나, 동정하거
나, 아니면 깔보는 듯한 태도로 대하는 것이 아니라 그들의 가치를
인정한다’는 흐름이 적절하므로 competence(능력)을
incompetence(무능함)등으로 바꿔야 한다.
너른터 -1- nernter.com
