AQA Micro Course Companion 2019
AQA Micro Course Companion 2019
MICROECONOMICS
STUDENT COMPANION
WWW.TUTOR2U.NET/ECONOMICS
COMPANION CONTENTS
Models in Economics
Economists develop models and theories to help explain the multiple choices we make in our daily lives. These
models are built on assumptions that can help to simplify analysis, and allow us to think about links between
one variable and another. However, many of the assumptions that economists make risk being criticised for
not being sufficiently realistic – the real world is far more complex than most economic models suggest.
Other assumptions
Most of the economics that we study is based on a “neo-classical” approach. Neo-classical economists make
a number of key assumptions in their analysis, including:
Examiner Tip
Try to note down at least one assumption when you are writing analysis points in exam answers. This then
allows you to critique and evaluate your analysis later in the answer by simply questioning the assumptions
that have made. For example:
“An increase in real income should cause an increase in demand for products, assuming that they are normal
goods and have a positive income elasticity of demand. However, some goods and services are classified as
inferior goods and have a negative income elasticity of demand, so demand for them will fall when income
rises.”
Positive Statements
Normative Statements
Normative statements are subjective statements – i.e. they carry value judgements. For example:
• High unemployment is more harmful to a country such as the UK than high rates of inflation
• The retirement age in Britain should be raised to 70 to combat the effects of an ageing
population.
• Scarce resources are best allocated by allowing the price mechanism to work without any
intervention
• The government should enforce a minimum price for beers and lagers sold in supermarkets and
off-licences to help control alcohol consumption and reduce the number of pubs that are closing
The role of value judgements
Most economic decisions and policy are influenced by “value judgements”. These vary from person to person,
from company to company, from government to government, and from country to country. Value judgements
help us to explain why economic policies vary from place to place, and from time to time.
Examiner Tip
Deciding whether a statement is positive or normative is a common multiple-choice question. Examiners may
include words such as ‘should’ in statements that are actually positive (this is done to make students think that
they are normative). The rule-of-thumb is that students should always consider whether the statement can be
tested. If it can be tested, then it is a positive statement. It is important to remember that positive statements
can be incorrect – they can still be tested, therefore they are regarded as “positive”.
It is often said that the main purpose of economic activity is the production of goods and services to satisfy
the ever-changing needs and wants of consumers. Economics is concerned with converting inputs to outputs;
in other words, the resources that we need to use to be able to produce the goods and services that we want.
In order to do this, some key questions have to be answered such as:
• What goods and services to produce? Does the economy use its resources to build more hospitals, roads,
schools or luxury hotels? Can the National Health Service afford free IVF treatment for childless couples
or offer new but expensive cancer treatments? How should we source our energy in the years to come?
• How best to produce goods and services? What is the best use of our scarce resources? Should
government land be sold off to provide more land for affordable housing? Should we subsidize the electric
vehicles as a strategy to reduce carbon emissions from transport?
• Who is to receive goods and services? Who will get hospital treatment - and who not? Which areas get
the go-ahead for major transport infrastructure projects such as CrossRail, HS2 and HS3 and which regions
might miss out?
Quick question
Can you think of five more economic questions, similar to those shown above?
Economics is concerned with how resources are best allocated in order to satisfy needs and wants – deciding
whether to satisfy needs or wants is important.
• Economists classify resources in different ways: land, labour, capital, enterprise (factors of
production)
• The environment is a scarce resource
Factors of Production
Economists call inputs into the production process “factors of production”. The four main categories of factors
of production are land, labour, capital and enterprise (also known as entrepreneurship). You can remember
the four main categories by using the acronym CELL.
• Land: the stock of natural (environmental) factor resources available for production. Remember that
this is any natural resource so this could, for example, include the sea or oil.
• Labour: the quantity and quality of the human input into the production process.
• Capital: goods made by people that are used to supply other products e.g. machines, technology,
factories, plant and software.
• Enterprise: entrepreneurs organise factors of production and also take risks when seeking to exploit
market opportunities.
What are capital goods?
These are goods that are used to make consumer goods and services. Capital inputs include plant and
machinery, hardware, software, new factories and other buildings. Capital also includes working capital e.g.
stocks of finished products and component parts (intermediate products).
What is automation?
Automation is a production technique that uses capital machinery / technology to replace or enhance human
labour. Replacing labour is known as capital-labour substitution. There have been many recent examples, for
example robots in Amazon warehouses and grocery suppliers such as Ocado, that carry out “picking and
packing”.
Working capital Transport Bulky units of Digital platforms Servers for cloud Air traffic control
Infrastructure capital enables such as computing systems
mass production Instagram networks
to happen
Many students struggle with the concept of ‘capital’ in economics, especially in relation to the term ‘investment’
(which you will also meet in your macroeconomics).
Investment, for an economist, is the purchase of capital, or the addition to an economy’s capital stock.
Investment is not about saving money in a bank or buying shares/stocks. The term is often used in a different
way in the media, so do be careful!
Quick question
Think about a business that you are familiar with (e.g. a coffee shop, a clothes shop, car manufacturer etc).
Can you think of 5 examples of each type of factor of production in that business?
Non-renewable (finite)
Renewable resources
resources
Resources can also be categorised according to whether they are renewable or not.
• Renewables are replaceable if the rate of extraction is less than the natural rate at which a resource
renews
• Examples of renewable resources are solar energy, tidal power, oxygen, biomass, fish stocks and
forestry
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Scarcity
We are always uncovering new wants and needs. Because of scarcity / finite resources, all consumers,
businesses and governments must make choices. For example, five million people travel into London each
day, they make decisions about when to travel & whether to use the bus, tube, walk or cycle or work from
home.
Quick question
Note down five economic choices that you have made already today.
Emerging technologies might be changing our perception of scarcity, for example open access to the internet
& freely-available services such as Google, Twitter, Instagram & Facebook. These services are free to use but
there is an opportunity cost involved (i.e. what else we could have been doing with our time) – for example
the productive hours lost when people become addicted to social media on a daily basis.
Opportunity Cost
In economics, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Even if we are not asked to pay money for something,
scarce resources are normally used up in production and there is an opportunity cost involved. Opportunity
costs describe the unavoidable trade-offs in the presence of scarcity: satisfying one objective more means
satisfying other objectives less. In short, opportunity cost is the “cost of the alternative that is given up /
foregone, when a choice is made”
• Work-leisure choices: The opportunity cost of deciding not to work an extra 10 hours is the lost wages
foregone. If you are being paid £8 per hour to work in a shop, if you take a day off you could lose £80
of income before tax.
• Government spending priorities: The opportunity cost of the government spending nearly £10 billion on
investment in National Health Service might be that £10 billion less is available for spending on education
or improvements to the road and rail transport network.
• Investing today for consumption tomorrow: The opportunity cost of an economy investing resources in
capital goods is the production of consumer goods given up for today. Conversely, the opportunity cost
of an economy investing more in capital goods today is the production of consumer goods – living
standards may fall in the short term in order to allow long term living standards to rise.
• Making use of scarce farming land: The opportunity cost of using farmland to grow wheat for bio-fuel
means that there is less wheat available for food production causing food prices to rise and increasing the
risks of food poverty and malnutrition for world’s most vulnerable people.
Students frequently use the concept of opportunity cost as part of their evaluation – but you won’t get
much credit for it unless you give a sensible application of what might have been ‘given up’. For example,
it is better to write “Should the government choose to increase spending on higher education, then the
opportunity cost may be that there is less money available to spend on primary or secondary education,
assuming that the government doesn’t borrow more” than writing “Should the government choose to
increase spending on higher education then there might be an opportunity cost”.
Quick question
What is the likely opportunity cost of you choosing to study A-level Economics?
• Production possibility diagrams can be used to illustrate different features of the fundamental
economic problem such as:
o Resource allocation
o Opportunity cost and trade-offs
o Unemployment
o Economic growth
• All points on the boundary are productively efficient but they are not all allocatively efficient.
• Using production possibility diagrams to illustrate these features.
We usually use production possibility diagrams (or production possibility frontiers - PPFs) to show the
maximum potential output combinations of two goods that an economy can achieve when all its resources
are fully and efficiently employed. We can also use them to show the maximum potential output combinations
of two goods that a firm can achieve, when it uses all of its resources (i.e. “factors of production”) efficiently.
• We normally draw a PPF as concave to the origin (in other words, bowed outwards)
• This is because when we move down along the PPF, as more resources are allocated towards
Consumer Goods (on the macroeconomic version) or Good X (on the microeconomic version), then
the extra output as we lose production of Capital Goods/Good Y, gets smaller – you can see this on
the following PPF diagram:
Examiner tip
Explaining the shape of a PPF might be a multiple-choice question, but many students struggle to gain the
marks because it is such a small part of the syllabus covered so early in the course that they have simply
forgotten it! Always make sure that you review the topics you covered early in the course.
Reallocating resources from producing one good to producing a different good will involve an opportunity
cost.
If we increase our output of cotton (i.e. moving along the PPF from point A to point B) fewer resources are
available to produce wheat – there is an opportunity cost of 40 tonnes of wheat.
Because the PPF is concave, this means that the opportunity cost of expanding output of cotton measured in
terms of lost units of wheat is increasing i.e. each extra tonne of cotton that we produce, we give up even
more wheat.
A PPF will shift outwards if the firm, or economy, gains more factors of production, or the quality of those
factors of production improves (e.g. the economy has the same number of workers but they have received
more training and education, so are more productive). If we draw a macroeconomic PPF and it shifts outwards,
then we can say that there is economic growth.
A straight line PPF is an indication of perfect substitutability of resources such as labour or capital – we
sometimes make this assumption to make our analysis look a little tidier. Examples are given below. In the PPF
on the left, the economy has experienced an improvement in the technology available for producing capital
goods but not consumer goods – there is growth but it is not ‘balanced’, as the economy’s PPF moves from
A to B. In the PPF on the right, the economy has experienced an increase in the factors of production available
to make all types of goods – there is ‘balanced growth’ as the PPF moves from A to C.
Cause of an outward shift in the PPF Brief comment on the cause of the shift in
the PPF
Higher productivity / efficiency of factor This increases the output per unit of an input
inputs used in production
Better management of factor inputs Improved management reduces waste and
also improves quality
Increase in the stock of capital and labour e.g. from inward labour migration /
supply increased capital investment
Innovation and invention of new products Improved production processes help to lift
and resources efficiency
Discovery / extraction of new natural Discovery of commercially viable land drives
resources (land) extraction
This is caused by a fall in the productive potential of a country i.e. something that causes a decrease in the
factors of production. This could perhaps be due to:
1. The damaging effects of severe natural disasters such as a tsunami, floods, persistent drought and
other extreme weather events
Resource depletion
This is a decline in the total stock of resources available, for example arising in the long run from the effects
of de-population, climate change and low rates of investment in new capital inputs.
Resource depreciation
This is when the productivity / efficiency of resources diminishes with age and also with repeated use when
producing goods and services.
Examiner tip:
Questions relating to the short-run and long-run impacts on PPFs of an economy producing more capital
goods are reasonably common. In the short-run, there will be a movement along the PPF so that more
capital goods are produced and fewer consumer goods are given up. However, in the long-run, the
economy now has more capital goods and so can produce more of everything – this causes a shift outwards
of the PPF. PPFs can also be used to good effect in some analysis questions. Drawing on material from
the start of the syllabus in the final exams shows an excellent synoptic knowledge.
Quick question
What reasons can you think of that might explain why an economy would be operating at a point inside
its PPF?
Quick question
What possible policies could a government introduce to try and shift its economy’s PPF outwards?
• The chart shows that UK productivity in 1994 Q2 was about 77% of what it was in 2007 Q1
• At the end of 2018, UK productivity was only about 2% higher than it was in 2007 Q1
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
Q1 2008
Q2 2008
Q3 2008
Q4 2008
Q1 2009
Q2 2009
Q3 2009
Q4 2009
Q1 2010
Q2 2010
Q3 2010
Q4 2010
Q1 2011
Q2 2011
Q3 2011
Q4 2011
Q1 2012
Q2 2012
Q3 2012
Q4 2012
Q1 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
Q4 2013
Q1 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
Q1 2015
Q2 2015
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
Q3 2016
Q4 2016
Q1 2017
Q2 2017
Germany Japan United Kingdom United States
As well as using base years, we can also set up index numbers in relation to base countries. This chart shows
an index of GDP per worker for a selection of advanced, high-income countries in 2015. The level of
productivity for the UK is taken as the base value, hence – UK = 100 on the chart.
Relative productivity differences can then easily be seen e.g. output per worker employed is 38% higher in the
United States than it is in the UK. But in Japan, labour productivity is 14% lower than in the UK.
Information is often shown in index number form and you may be asked to interpret it, perform calculations
using it or calculate index numbers from raw data. Costly, unnecessary marks are lost by candidates
unfamiliar with this essential part of the syllabus.
Quick question
Research other types of information shown in index number form and perform simple calculations such as
percentage changes.
Rational behaviour
Orthodox economic theory assumes that economic agents are rational. This means that they:
The key assumption is that people make choices to maximise the satisfaction (utility) they get from spending
their income. Furthermore, and similarly, businesses aim to maximise their profits.
Utility
Utility measures the satisfaction obtained from purchasing and consuming a product.
1. Marginal benefit – is the change in total private benefit from one extra unit
2. Marginal cost – is the change in total private cost from one extra unit
Rational consumers for example are assumed to calculate the marginal cost and the marginal benefit of each
decision. In reality, these choices are subject to constraints. One such constraint is income.
Quick question
Marginal analysis features throughout the syllabus – for example in the theory of the firm and labour market
analysis.
Utility maximisation
Consumers are assumed to attempt to maximise utility. With a single product, this will be at the point of
satiation, assuming the budget of the consumer allows this point to be reached. Economists also assume that
businesses aim to maximise their profits.
Uncertain quality of Knowledge of the Cowboy builders or other Tourist Bazaars or buying
second hand products nutritional content of “rip-off merchants” and selling antiques
foods
Moral Hazard
• Moral hazard occurs when insured consumers are likely to take greater risks, knowing that a claim will
be paid for by their cover
• The consumer knows more about his/her intended actions than the producer (insurer)
A good example of moral hazard is the bail out of the banking system after the 2007 crash.
Adverse Selection
• The adverse selection problem is seen in health insurance
• Those most likely to purchase health insurance are those who are most likely to use it, i.e.
smokers/drinkers/those with chronic health conditions
• The health insurance company knows this and so raises the average price of insurance cover
• This may price some healthy low-risk consumers out of the market, meaning that mainly higher risk
individuals gain insurance – this causes a market failure
Quick question
Think about goods and services you have bought or used today. Are there any in which you think you may
have been affected by an information gap? If so, which goods/services, and why?
• Behavioural economics questions the assumption that individuals are rational maximisers
• Some of the reasons include bounded rationality and bounded self-control.
• As a result, rules of thumb are employed, resulting in biases.
• Altruism and perceptions of fairness are also important.
Bounded rationality
• Most consumers and businesses do not have sufficient information to make fully-informed
judgements when making their decisions in markets
• The increasing complexity of products makes life difficult
• People have limited attention spans
• Many consumers and businesses opt to satisfice rather than maximise
• They will use rules of thumb and approximations when making their choices
These rules of thumb or approximations are called heuristics. Their use can lead to biases. Decisions are
biased when there are systematic errors.
Bounded self-control
This concept is closely linked to bounded rationality. According to traditional/ neo-classical theory, when a
consumer knows that the price of a good exceeds the marginal utility they gain from consuming it, then if
they are rational they will stop consuming it. There is plenty of evidence that in reality, consumers do not stop
consuming even when it makes sense. Examples include over-eating, excessive investment in a particular
stock or share and so on. One explanation is that people are myopic or shortsighted. Another phrase for this
is hyperbolic discounting when the present is given a much greater value than the future. A good example is
people’s inability to save effectively for retirement.
Social norms
Respecting seat belt laws Social norms when queuing Not smoking in public places
Habitual behaviour
This is another common heuristic and is closely linked to loss aversion and default choice.
Most of us choose the Our menu choices are A default opt-in (or auto
same breakfast! predictable enrollment) e.g. for
pensions organ
donations can have a
powerful effect
• Most people carry on behaving as they have always done.
• Repeat choices / purchases often become automatic because default choices don’t involve mental
effort
• To get people to change their behaviour may require compelling incentives or introducing a form of
mandated choice (also known as a default rule)
• Examples of habitual behaviour:
o Your choice of daily breakfast cereal / razor / sandwich preference
o Many consumers of energy, broadband and banks stay with the same provider
Herd Behaviour
Closely linked to social norms is herd behaviour. Herd behaviour is very important in explaining bubbles in
asset prices. We are herd animals and we often make decisions based on who is around us plus the choices
they make
• Examples:
o Choosing items off a menu in a restaurant
o Herd behaviour in financial markets
o Binge drinkers going on holiday with each other
• Some anchors establish in our mind a low price, others help to establish a higher basic price that we
should be prepared to pay
• Examples:
o “Big Price Drop” campaigns by supermarkets
o Refereeing decisions might be anchored by the size (and noise!) of home crowd
o Price anchors used in menus at restaurants and in coffee shops
Availability
This refers to the tendency of people to judge the likelihood of an event by the ease with which examples and
instances come easily to mind.
• Mosr consumers are poor at risk assessment and will for example over-estimate the likelihood of
attacks by sharks or accidents.
• Smokers see one elderly heavy smoker and exaggerate the likely healthy life expectancy of this group.
• Periods of very warm weather affect beliefs about the causes of climate change.
Examiner tip:
Altruism
This is the phenomenon in behavioural science for humans to behave with more kindness and fairness than
would be the case if they behaved rationally. Altruism is often linked to the concept of inequity aversion - i.e.
humans do not like highly unequal outcomes. Whilst this is usually seen as positive, it can also result in a
negative outcome - e.g. a person being willing to forego a gain / reward if it means that someone else won’t
gain an even better reward.
Loss Aversion
Closely linked to some of the heuristics above, especially inertia, is loss aversion.
Loss aversion is used extensively in marketing strategies. Marketing emphasises discounts rather than avoiding
a surcharge. Examples could include:
1. Renew a season ticket before 1st July to get a discount of £50
2. Season ticket renewed after 1st July increases in price by £50
Some policymakers have successfully used this concept to improve economic outcomes, for example, the
“Save More Tomorrow” pension plan from Nobel-winner Professor Richard Thaler
• Richard Thaler created a pension plan where investors signed up for a pension that costs nothing
until they receive a pay rise
• At which point a percentage of their pay rise would automatically be directed into their pension
fund
• By making sure the saver never saw a reduction in his disposable income, pension contributions
among this group rose 200%
Choice architecture
Choice architecture describes how decisions are affected by the design/ sequencing/ range of choices
available. It is often most effective when it encourages simplicity in the decisions that people must make and
in which the benefits and costs are made clear.
• Examples of framing:
o Framing of privacy settings on social networks such as Facebook
o Presumed consent for human organ donations to increase the supply of organs
o Framing of referendum questions
o Framing of interest paid on loans
o Asymmetric framing
o Involves including an obviously inferior 3rd choice or a hyper-expensive 3rd option rather
than a simple expensive/cheap choice can guide consumers to more expensively-priced
items
• There is often a divide between intention and action especially for people with limited resolve and
those vulnerable to temptation!
• The more public our position, the less willing we are to change it
• We feel strongly about activities where we have made a personal commitment
o Commitment contracts can reinforce decisions to adopt healthful behaviors
o They impose a penalty if people do not reach a goal – invoking loss aversion
o Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become popular in many poorer countries
o Examples:
§ Committing yourself to a diet using an online app
§ Commitment to joining a local savings scheme /credit union
§ Commitment signals to a partner using an expensive gift
A restricted choice situation often exists because humans have bounded rationality. When faced with too
many choices and too many decisions, it can be stressful and cause indecision. Restricting the number of
choices available may, therefore, actually improve efficiency. The 2004 book “The Paradox of Choice” by Barry
Schwarz noted that:
“Autonomy and Freedom of choice are critical to our well being, and choice is critical to freedom and
autonomy. Nonetheless, though modern Americans have more choice than any group of people ever has
before, and thus, presumably, more freedom and autonomy, we don't seem to be benefiting from it
psychologically.”
Nudges
A nudge is something that impacts an irrational economic agent but would have no impact on someone who
is rational. A nudge is used by choice architects to change someone’s behaviour in a low-cost and easy way
(usually without changing the number of choices available), towards behaviour that is preferred by society.
What is demand?
Demand is the quantity of a good or service that consumers are willing and able to buy at a given price in a
given time period. Effective demand is when a desire to buy a product is backed up by an ability to pay. When
economists write about ‘demand’, they usually mean ‘effective demand’.
Derived demand is the demand for a factor of production used to produce another good or service. For
example, steel - the demand for steel is linked to market demand for cars and construction of new buildings
Law of Demand
There is usually an inverse relationship between the price of a good and demand.
1. As prices fall, we see an expansion/extension of demand.
2. As prices rise, there will be a contraction of demand.
Quick question
Can you think of any products that people are more likely to buy when they are more expensive?
Demand Curve
A demand curve shows the inverse relationship between the price of an item and the quantity demanded over
a period of time. There are two reasons why more is demanded as price falls:
1. The Income Effect: When the price of a good falls, the consumer can maintain the same consumption
for less expenditure; effectively, this increases ‘real income’. Provided that the good is normal (i.e.
one for which demand rises when income rises, and demand falls when income falls), some of the
increase in real income is used to buy more.
2. The Substitution Effect: When the price of a good falls, ceteris paribus, the product is now relatively
cheaper than an alternative and some consumers will switch their spending from the alternative good
or service. The more substitutes there are in the market and the lower the cost/inconvenience of
switching, the bigger the substitution effect is likely to be.
It is really important to label and annotate economics diagrams correctly. You need to:
- Label the axes – in this case, price and quantity
- Label the curve – in this case, a D to stand for ‘Demand’
- Keep your numbering consistent e.g. P2 corresponds to Q2
- Keep your diagrams as tidy and clear as possible!
REMEMBER:
• As price falls, a person switches away from rival products towards the product
• As price falls, a person’s willingness and ability to buy the product increases
• As price falls, a person’s opportunity cost of purchasing the product falls
Note: Many demand curves are drawn as straight lines; this is to make the diagrams easier to draw and
interpret. In the ‘real world’ they are unlikely to be perfectly linear!
Shifts in the demand curve are due to changes in “non-price factors” i.e. anything that might affect the demand
for a good other than its prices. An increase in demand is represented by a shift to the right (an outwards
shift) of the demand curve. A decrease in demand is shown by a shift to the left (an inwards shift) of the
demand curve. Non-price factors could include:
• Changing prices of a substitute good or service (also known as goods in competitive demand)
• Changing price of complements (also known as products in joint demand)
• Changes in the real income of consumers
o When real income goes up, our ability to purchase goods and services increases, and this
causes an outward shift in the demand curve for ‘normal goods’
o When real incomes fall there will be a decrease in demand (except for inferior goods i.e.
those that we buy less of as our income rises and more as our income rises)
You also need to know how demand for one god or service might be related to another.
Joint demand
Joint demand is when demand for one product is positively related to demand for a related good or service.
Two complements are said to be in joint demand. Examples of joint demand include: fish and chips, iron ore
and steel, apps for smartphones
Composite demand
Composite demand exists where goods have more than one use, and so an increase in the demand for one
product leads to a fall in supply of the other. An example is milk which can be used for cheese, yoghurts,
butter and other products including fertilizer. Another example is land e.g. farmland can be developed in
many different ways and urban land has different uses (houses, offices etc). Oil is used in many different
industries such as plastics
Derived demand
Derived demand is the demand for a factor of production used to produce another good or service. For
example, steel is strongly linked to the market demand for cars and construction of new buildings. In the
labour markets, the demand for labour is derived from the goods and services it will produce. An increase in
air travel will lead to a derived demand for airline pilots.
One of the most frequently seen errors by examiners is students wanting to shift the demand curve to the
right or left when there is a change in the price. It is vital that you understand that a change in the price causes
a movement along the demand curve. Only a change in non-price factors will cause a shift of the demand
curve to the right or left.
All goods with downward sloping demand curves will have a negative coefficient of PED.
Examiner tip
It is important that you can use and rearrange the PED formula. You may also need to carry out % change
calculations to calculate % change in Qd and / or % change in P.
Availability of close Cost of switching Breadth of Degree of necessity Time frame when
substitutes suppliers definition of making a choice
product
1. Number of close substitutes – the more substitutes there are in the market, the more elastic is demand
because consumers find it easy to switch. For example, air travel and train travel are weak substitutes
for inter-continental flights but closer substitutes for journeys of 200-400km between major cities.
2. Cost of switching between products – there may be costs involved in switching. In this case, demand
tends to be inelastic. For example, mobile phone service providers may require a contract that has
the effect of locking-in some consumers once a choice has been made.
3. Degree of necessity or whether the good is a luxury – necessities tend to have an inelastic demand
whereas luxuries tend to have a more elastic demand. An example of a necessity is rare-earth metals
that are an essential raw material in the manufacture of solar cells, batteries. Another example might
be essential medicines such as insulin for people with diabetes.
4. Proportion of a consumer’s income allocated to spending on the good – products that take up a high
% of income will have a more elastic demand.
5. Time period allowed following a price change – demand is more price elastic, the longer that
consumers have to respond to a price change. They have more time to search for cheaper substitutes.
6. Whether the product is subject to habitual consumption – consumers become less sensitive to the
price of the good when they buy something out of habit (it has become the “default choice”).
7. Peak and off-peak demand - demand is price inelastic at peak times and more elastic at off-peak
times – this is the case for transport services.
8. Breadth of definition of a good or service – if a good is broadly defined, i.e. the demand for petrol or
meat, demand is often inelastic. Individual brands of petrol or beef are likely to be price elastic.
9. Method of payment – people tend to notice price changes more when they pay in cash rather than
card, or direct debit.
Examiner tip:
The best candidates use economic language and terminology with high accuracy. It is much more effective to
write that a product has price elastic demand rather than simply writing that the product has elastic demand
(because there are different types of demand elasticity). Definitely avoid writing phrases such as “petrol is
inelastic”!
Examiner tip:
Make sure that you can explain the relationships stated above, rather than merely repeat the relationships –
this will help you to pick up analysis (AO3) marks and not just knowledge (AO1) marks.
Quick question
Can you think of businesses that have recently a) raised their prices and b) lowered their prices? Using your
knowledge of the relationship between PED and total revenue, can you give an explanation of these business
choices?
Now consider a price change further down the estimated demand curve – from £10 per unit to £8 per unit.
What you have seen in the above table is that the price elasticity of demand changes along the demand curve.
As we move from left to right along the demand curve, PED becomes increasingly more price inelastic. This is
because we are looking at proportional changes and not absolute changes. This is illustrated in the diagram
below, which also illustrates how we can represent total revenue on a demand curve:
We can illustrate the impact of price changes on total revenue at different price elasticities of demand using
this diagrammatic approach:
Ped is inelastic (<1) and a firm raises its price. Total revenue increases
Ped is elastic (>1) and a firm lowers its price. Total revenue increases
Ped is elastic (>1) and a firm raises price Total revenue decreases
Ped is unit elastic (=1) and a firm raises price Total revenue remains the same
Ped is -1.5 (elastic) and the firm raises price by 4% Total revenue decreases
Ped is -0.4 (inelastic) and the firm raises price by 30% Total revenue increases
Ped is -0.2 (inelastic) and the firm lowers price by 20% Total revenue decreases
Ped is -4.0 (elastic) and the firm lowers price by 15% Total revenue increases
In reality, though, it is really difficult for businesses to estimate the PED for their goods – this is because we
can only calculate it assuming that ‘ceteris paribus’ holds. In reality, many factors affect the amount of a good
or service bought, and it is difficult to ‘isolate’ the effect of a price change alone.
Income elasticity of demand (YED) measures the responsiveness of demand following a change in real income.
The formula used for calculating income elasticity of demand is:
Normal goods have a positive income elasticity of demand so as consumers’ income rises, more is demanded
at each price i.e. there is an outward shift of the demand curve
Economists usually describe normal necessities as having an income elasticity of demand of between 0 and
+1 for example, if income increases by 10% and demand for fresh fruit increases by 4%, income elasticity is
+0.4. Demand is rising less than proportionately to income – demand is income inelastic
Inferior goods have a negative income elasticity of demand meaning that demand falls as income rises.
Typically, inferior goods or services exist where superior goods are available if a consumer has money to be
able to buy it. Examples include demand for cigarettes, economy own label foods in supermarkets and
demand for council-owned rented properties. In the aftermath of the 2008/2009 recession experienced in the
UK, there was some surprising evidence of the goods that came to be regarded as ‘inferior’. For example, as
national income fell, there was a large increase in demand for goods such as home-delivered pizza (which
was a substitute for eating out in restaurants) and lipstick (as many women swapped more expensive spa
treatments for a little ‘pick-me-up’).
Inferior goods
Own label
Urban bus transport Cigarettes Economy class travel
discounters
Just because an economist might categorise a particular good or service as ‘inferior’ does not necessarily
mean that the good/service is poor quality – it is just less desirable than other alternatives. You must refer to
negative income elasticity of demand as the main feature of inferior goods.
Substitutes Complements
Cross elasticity of demand (XED) measures responsiveness of demand for good X following a change in the
price of good Y (a related good). With cross elasticity, we make an important distinction between substitute
products and complementary goods and services.
Substitutes:
Substitutes have a positive cross price elasticity of demand. An increase in the price of one product will lead
to a rise in demand for its substitute, as consumers swap away from the more expensive good. A high value
suggests both products are close substitutes.
Complements:
When there is a strong complementary relationship, cross elasticity will be negative. An increase in the price
of Good T will lead to a contraction in demand for T and a fall in demand for a complement, good S.
Unrelated products:
Unrelated products have zero cross price elasticity of demand
Supply
Supply is the quantity of a good or service producers are willing and able to supply at a given price in a given
time period. The law of supply is that as price rises, so businesses expand supply. Higher prices provide a profit
incentive for firms to expand production. A supply curve shows the relationship between market price and
how much a firm is willing and able to sell. The key to understanding market supply is to be aware of the
importance of the profit motive. Suppliers will be looking to get the best price for their product. Note - supply
is not necessarily the amount sold, if consumers do not wish to buy the product, it will remain unsold.
Market supply is total supply brought to market by producers at each price. To calculate, we sum individual
supply schedules for each producer. An example is shown in the table below.
Price (£) Firm A’s supply + Firm B’s supply + Firm C’s supply + = Market Supply
10 30 0 5 35
20 45 10 15 70
30 65 20 40 125
40 100 30 70 200
Supply Curves
A supply curve is drawn assuming ceteris paribus (other factors held constant) so that if price varies, we move
along a supply curve. In the diagram that follows, as price rises from P1 to P2, there is an expansion / extension
of quantity supplied. If market price falls from P1 to P3, there is a contraction of quantity supplied. Businesses
are responding to market price signals when making output decisions.
Shifts in supply
If supply shifts to the right (from S1 to S2) this is an increase in supply; more is provided for sale at each price.
If supply moves inwards from S1 to S3, there is a decrease in supply i.e. less will be supplied at each price
Here are the key factors that can cause a shift in the supply curve:
1. Changes in production costs
a. Lower costs of production mean that a business can supply more at each price. For example,
a magazine publisher might see a reduction in the cost of imported paper and inks. These
cost savings can be passed through the supply chain to wholesalers and retailers and may
result in lower prices for consumers.
b. If costs of production increase, for example following a rise in price of raw materials or a firm
having to pay higher wages, businesses cannot supply as much at the same price and this
will cause an inward shift of the supply curve.
c. A fall in the exchange rate causes an increase in prices of imported components and raw
materials and will lead to a decrease in supply. For example, if the pound falls 10% against
the Euro, it becomes more expensive for British car manufacturers to import rubber, glass,
steel and paint from overseas suppliers
2. Changes in technology
Examiner tip:
As with demand, it is vital to use language / terminology appropriately and correctly. So, a change in the price
of a product leads to an extension or contraction along the supply curve i.e. a change in the price leads to a
change in the quantity supplied.
A change in any non-price factor leads to a change in supply at each and every price.
Quick question
Think about a good or service that you buy regularly e.g. bus tickets, coffee etc. What non-price factors might
cause a) an increase in supply and b) a decrease in supply?
In a perfectly competitive market structure (covered later in this course companion), no firm has any market
power or influence over the market price. This means that their demand curve is perfectly elastic i.e. horizontal.
If supply is price elastic, producers can increase their output without a rise in cost or a time delay. If supply is
price inelastic, firms find it hard to change their production in a given time period.
P1 S1 P2
D2
P1
D1 D2 D1
Q1 Q2 Quantity Q1 Quantity
• Spare production capacity: If there is plenty of spare capacity, a business can increase output without
a rise in costs and supply will be elastic in response to a change in demand
• Stocks of finished products and components: If stocks of raw materials and finished products are at a
high level, a firm is able to respond to a change in demand - supply will be elastic. Perishable goods
are often harder/more expensive to store
• Ease and cost of factor substitution/factor mobility: If capital and labour are occupationally mobile,
the elasticity of supply for a product is likely to be higher as resources can be mobilised to supply the
extra output e.g. the reallocation of workers to new tasks. This is more likely to be the case if the skill
level required for the job is relatively low.
• Time period and production speed: Supply is more price elastic the longer the time that a firm is
allowed to adjust its production levels
o The short-run for an economist refers to the period of time in which at least one factor of
production is fixed; in the short-run, PES will be relatively inelastic
o The long-run for an economist refers to the period of time in which all factors of production
are variable; in the long-run, PES will be relatively elastic
• Complexity of the production process: if a production process is particularly complex (e.g. building
an aircraft carrier) then supply will be relatively price inelastic; for a product with a relatively simple
production process (e.g. pencil manufacturing) then supply is more likely to be price elastic.
P1
P1
D2
D1
D1
Q1 Q2 Quantity Q1 Q2 Quantity
In exams, many students often confuse the factors that affect PED and PES, and this can lead to a significant
loss of marks…be careful!
Quick question
Can you think of a) 5 goods/services that are likely to have price elastic supply and b) 5 goods/services that
are likely to have price inelastic supply? Justify your choices.
Many exam questions present the student with an event(s) that causes either the demand or supply curve (or
both) to shift. The student is expected to find and analyse the new equilibrium.
Examiner tip:
Frequently, there may be two changes on a demand and supply diagram (one affecting demand and one
affecting supply). Many students fail to gain full marks because they only shift one curve. Always keep an eye
out for possible double shifts!
The equilibrium price in this situation is £16 where quantity demanded and supplied = 8,000 tickets. Supply
and demand are in balance at this number of tickets sold.
Examiner tip:
For exam questions that specifically state that a diagram is required as part of the answer, it is impossible to
gain full marks without the diagram. Those marks will only be awarded if the diagram is ACE, that is, includes
labelling for all Axes, Curves and Equilibrium.
Market Supply
Pe is also known as
Pe the “market clearing
price”
Market
Demand
Qe Quantity of wheat
Price per kg Quantity demanded (1) Quantity supplied Quantity demanded (2)
Market
Supply (2)
Market
Supply (1)
P2
Pe
0
Q2 Qe Quantity supplied
Price of Coffee An outward shift of market demand (ceteris paribus) leads to a rise in
equilibrium price and an expansion of market supply
Market Supply
P2
P1
Market
If price did not rise from P1 after
a shift in demand from D1 to D, Market Demand (2)
there would be excess demand Demand (1)
Q1 Q2 Quantity of Coffee
Examiner tip:
Much of the economics A level is assessed in terms of ‘levels of response’. This means that answers are judged
in terms of their quality. Generally speaking, the quality of analysis is enhanced if there are longer ‘chains of
analysis’ providing deeper explanation as to why certain results have occurred. One way to strengthen these
analytical chains in questions relating to market diagrams is to provide an explanation of how a new
equilibrium is reached – it does not happen immediately or ‘by magic’! The so-called ‘invisible hand’ (a phrase
coined by Adam Smith) must be explained. This is shown below.
Moving from one market equilibrium to another
So, an outward shift of demand (depending upon supply conditions) initially leads to a shortage at the existing
market price (i.e. “excess demand”) – at the existing price, quantity demanded is greater than quantity supplied.
The market is now in disequilibrium. There will be waiting lists and queues. This then leads to a short-term
rise in price and a fall in available stocks. This acts as a signal to suppliers. The higher price is then an incentive
for suppliers to raise their output by allocating more resources to this market (termed as an expansion of
supply) causing a movement along the supply curve towards the new equilibrium point. At the same time,
the higher price acts as an incentive for some consumers to ration as price now exceeds their marginal utility.
• Excess demand is when quantity demanded exceeds available supply and is a state of disequilibrium
in a market.
• Excess demand happens when the current market price is set below the equilibrium price.
• This will result in queuing and an upward pressure on price.
• Higher prices ration demand to those consumers with effective demand
• Higher prices – in theory – stimulate an expansion of supply as producers respond to higher profits
If&the¤t&market&price&was&P1,&there&would&be&an&excess%demand%– of&Q1&
– Q4,&this&will&put&upward%pressure%on%price
Price&of&Wheat
Market&
Supply
Pe
P1
Market&
Excess&demand
Demand
Q1 Qe Q4 Quantity&of&Wheat
Market&
Excess&supply
Supply
P2
Pe
Market&
Demand
Q2 Qe Q3 Quantity&of&Wheat
Quick question:
Take a look at the business section of a newspaper or news website. See if you can find 2 or 3 headlines
relating to price changes. Using your knowledge of demand and supply theory, can you give an explanation
of each price change? Can you draw a demand and supply diagram to illustrate those changes?
Examiner tip:
When drawing demand and supply (market) diagrams, always think about the PED and PES of the good /
service in question – can you reflect that in your diagram?
Furthermore, when there is a shift in the demand curve or supply curve, it is always also worth considering
whether there may be a change in the PED or PES.
Adam Smith described the invisible hand of the price mechanism in which the hidden hand of the market
operating through the pursuit of self-interest allocated resources in society’s best interest. This remains a view
held by free-market economists who believe in the virtues of an economy with minimal state intervention.
The price mechanism describes how decisions taken by consumers and businesses interact to determine the
allocation of scarce resources between competing uses. The price mechanism plays three important functions:
Signalling function
Prices perform a signalling function – i.e. they adjust to demonstrate where resources are required. Prices rise
and fall to reflect scarcities and surpluses:
• If prices are rising because of high demand from consumers, this is a signal to suppliers to expand
production to meet the higher demand
One feature of a free-market system is that decision-making is decentralised, i.e. there is no single body
responsible for deciding what to produce and in what quantities.
Rationing function
Prices ration scarce resources when demand outstrips supply. When there is a shortage, price is bid up –
leaving only those with willingness and ability to pay to purchase a product.
Examiner tip:
Exam questions can sometimes ask which of the price functions is failing in a particular circumstance e.g. –
incentive, signaling etc., so be sure you know them well!
Not all markets experience volatile prices. They tend to be markets with products where the conditions of
supply and demand are stable from year to year and where the price elasticity of demand and the elasticity
of supply are both high. We can see this in the diagram below.
High land prices and Low level of new house Incentives such as Help
other building costs building to Buy Scheme
220000
200000
180000
160000
140000
120000
100000
2005 Jul
2006 Jul
2008 Jul
2009 Jul
2011 Jul
2014 Jul
2007 Jan
2005 Jan
2006 Jan
2008 Jan
2009 Jan
2010 Jan
2012 Jan
2013 Jan
2015 Jan
2016 Jan
2017 Jan
2011 Jan
2014 Jan
2007 Jul
2010 Jul
2012 Jul
2013 Jul
2015 Jul
2016 Jul
The impact of indirect taxes and subsidies on markets
The incentives that consumers and producers have can be changed by government intervention. For example,
there may be changes in relative prices brought about by subsidies and indirect taxation. The government
might also intervene through imposing maximum and minimum prices (which you will meet later in the
syllabus).
Indirect taxes
Value Added Plastic Bag Fuel Duties Alcohol Duties Tobacco Duties Sugar Tax
Tax Charge
An indirect tax is a tax imposed by the government that increases the supply costs faced by producers. The
amount of the tax is always shown by the vertical distance between the two supply curves. Because of the tax,
less can be supplied at each price level.
An indirect tax will increase the price of a product reducing the quantity demanded i.e. there is a MOVEMENT
ALONG THE DEMAND CURVE (but importantly the demand curve DOES NOT SHIFT!).
• An indirect tax on suppliers will have no effect on market price if demand is perfectly elastic, although
the equilibrium quantity will fall significantly
An ad valorem tax is a percentage tax e.g. 20% on the unit price – this causes a pivot shift i.e. non-parallel
shift in the supply curve
Examiner tip
Always read the data and questions in exams carefully to check whether any indirect tax that you need to
analyse is a specific or ad valorem tax.
• If co-efficient of price elasticity of demand >1 i.e. PED is elastic, most of an indirect tax will be absorbed
by the supplier. Economists say that the “incidence” of the tax is mostly borne by suppliers. This is
shown on the diagram to the left, below.
• If co-efficient of price elasticity of demand <1 i.e. PED in inelastic, most of an indirect tax can be
passed on to the consumer. Economists say that the “incidence” of the tax is mostly borne by
consumers. This situation is shown by the diagram to the right, below.
Paid0by0supplier
S10+0tax Tax0Per0Unit
P2
P2 S1 S1
P1
P1
D P3 Paid0by0consumer
P3
Paid0by0supplier
Demand
Q2 Q1 Quantity Q2 Q1 Quantity
Perfectly inelastic and perfectly elastic demand and the burden of a tax
Tax.Per.Unit
P1
P1 S1
Total.Tax.
Revenue.
(paid.by.the.
consumer) Demand
Quantity Q1 Quantity
Ad-valorem taxes
An ad-valorem tax is an indirect tax based on a percentage of the sales price of a good or service. An increase
in an ad-valorem tax causes an inward shift in the supply curve.
Value&Added&Tax&(the%standard%rate%in%the%UK%
is%20%)%is%an%example%of%an%ad%valorem%tax.
Price S1%+%tax
Insurance&Premium&Tax&is%a%tax%on%general%
insurance%premiums.%There%are%two%rate%
Tax%Per%Unit bands,%the%standard%rate%of%9.5%,%and%a%higher%
rate%of%20%%which%applies%to%travel%insurance,%
P2
S1 appliance%insurance%and%some%car%insurance.
VAT Insurance%Premium%Tax
P1
Demand
Q2 Q1 Quantity
• The effect of an ad valorem tax is to cause a pivotal shift in the supply curve
• This is because the tax is a percentage of the unit cost of supplying the product.
• So, a good that could be supplied for a cost of £50 will now cost £60 when VAT of 20% is applied
• A different good that costs £400 to supply will now cost £470 when the same rate of VAT is applied
• The absolute amount of the tax will go up as the market price increases
Students sometimes get confused between direct and indirect taxes. This is a topic that they will meet in their
macroeconomics. Direct taxes are taxes that are taken straight from income (e.g. income tax). A rise in direct
tax i.e. an increase in the rate of income tax, is likely to shift the demand curve left for normal goods. Indirect
taxes will always shift the supply curve.
Quick question
Can you draw a demand and supply diagram to illustrate what will happen if the rate of indirect tax on a
good/service is reduced?
Subsidies
Subsidies for wind Food / fuel subsidies Child Care for Subsidies to the rail
farm investment for consumers working families industry
Supply+pre+
subsidy
Subsidy Supply+post+
subsidy
P1
P2
Subsidy+per+unit+is+
shown+ by+the+
vertical+distance
Demand
Q1 Q2 Quantity
Total spending on the subsidy equals the subsidy per unit multiplied by output
Price
Total spending on the subsidy equals the subsidy per unit multiplied by output
Market Supply
Producer pre subsidy
receives
this price
P3 Market Supply
post subsidy
P1
P2
Consumer
pays this Market
price Demand
Q1 Q2 Quantity
In the diagram above, the shaded area shows the total amount spent by the government on the subsidy.
Consumers benefit from lower prices (P2 is lower than P1….and so the total benefit to consumers is the
rectangle bounded by this price difference). Producers also benefit, and get to keep some of the subsidy
themselves (the difference between P1 and P3).
Examiner tip:
Help poorer families e.g. Encourage output and Protect jobs in loss- Make some health care
food and child care investment in fledgling making industries e.g. hit treatments more
costs sectors by a recession affordable
Reduce the cost of Achieve a more Reduce some of the Encourage arts and
training & employing equitable income external costs of other cultural services
workers distribution transport
Subsidy
P1 Subsidy P1
S2
S2 P2
D1
P2
D1
Q1 Q2 Quantity Q1 Q2 Quantity
How an increase in supply in one market may impact upon other markets
Price& Price&of&coal
S1 S2 S1 Coal&is&a&
of&
P1 substitute& source&
solar
of&energy&– if&
P1 solar&power&is&
cheaper,&then&
P2
market&demand&
An&outward&shift& for&coal&used&in&
P2 in&supply&of&solar& power&stations&
power&e.g.&due& might&fall&–
to&improved& causing&an&inward&
technology&or& shift&of&demand
economies&of&
scale&in&solar&
power&output
D1 D2 D1
Quantity&of&solar&power Quantity&of&coal
Examiner tip:
Notice how carefully the above diagram has been labelled, so that it is clear to see which diagram refers to
which market, and the nature of PED and PES in each market.
Price& Price&of&bricks
S1
of&
P1
new& Falling&demand& Leads&to&an&
homes for&new&homes inward&shift&of&
demand&for&
S1 P2 bricks&– as&bricks&
have&a&derived&
P1 demand
P2
D1
D2 D2 D1
Q2 Q1 Qty&(housing) Q2 Q1 Qty&(bricks)
Quick question:
Think of 2 or 3 different inter-related markets. Now think of possible changes in each of those markets, and
draw relevant demand and supply diagrams to analyse the impact on equilibrium price and quantity in each
market.
Derived demand
Derived demand is the demand for a factor of production used to produce another good or service, for
example:
• Steel: The demand for steel is strongly linked to the market demand for cars and the construction of
new buildings
• Wood: Wood is a product where much of the demand comes from the uses to which it can be put
such as furniture & fencing
• Labour: In factor markets, the demand for labour is derived
• Transport: An increase in the demand for air travel will lead to a rise in the demand for airplane pilots.
• Minerals: Demand for and prices of cobalt and lithium has surged as production of electric vehicles
has grown
Joint demand
Joint demand is when demand for one product is positively related to market demand for a related good or
service. Two complements are said to be in joint demand. The cross (price) elasticity of demand is negative
Examples of joint demand include: fish and chips, iron ore and steel, apps for smartphones
Composite demand
Composite demand is where goods have more than one use. With composite demand, an increase in the
demand for one product (X) leads to a fall in supply of the other (Y).
An example is milk which can be used for cheese, yoghurts, cream, butter and other products including
fertilizer. Another example is land – e.g. farmland can be developed in many different ways, urban land has
different uses. Oil is used in many different industries such as plastics. Straw can be used for animal feed and
also as a bio-fuel
Joint supply is when an increase or decrease in the supply of one good leads to the increase or decrease in
supply of a by-product. Examples include beef production leading to a rise in the market supply of beef hides.
Another example is wheat and straw.
Competitive demand
Competitive demand refers to goods that compete with each other i.e. substitutes. These are goods that have
a positive cross elasticity of demand.
Production
Production refers to the output of goods and services produced by businesses. To simplify the idea of the
production function, economists create a number of time periods for analysis.
Short run production: The short run is a time period when there is at least one fixed factor input - usually
capital such as machinery and technology. In the short run, the output of a business expands when more
variable factors such as raw materials and extra workers are brought into use
Long run production: In the long run, all of the factors of production can change allowing a business to change
the scale of its operations.
The length of time between the short and the long run will vary from industry to industry. For example, how
long would it take a newly created business delivering sandwiches around a local town to move from the short
to the long run? Let us assume that the business starts off with leased premises to make the sandwiches to
leased vehicles for deliveries and five full-time and part-time staff. In the short run, they can increase
production by using more raw materials and by bringing in extra staff as required. But if demand grows, it
won’t take the business long to perhaps lease another larger building, buy in some more capital equipment
and also lease some extra delivery vans – by the time it has done this, it has already moved into the long run!
Productivity
Productivity is a measure of the efficiency of a factor input. The basic measure of productivity is output per
person employed. Economists usually focus on labour productivity, rather than productivity of other factors
of production.
In general, a better measure of productivity is total factor productivity. This takes into account changes in the
amount of capital in use as well as change in the size of the labour force.
• If the size of an economy’s capital stock grows by 3% and the employed workforce expands by 2%
and output rises by 8%, then total factor productivity has risen by approximately 3%
Why is productivity important?
• Lower unit costs: these cost savings might be passed onto consumers in the form of lower prices,
which encourages higher demand, rising output and an increase in employment
• Improved competitiveness and trade performance: lower unit costs can lead to reduced international
prices
• Higher profits: if firms can operate more efficiently then this can be a source of higher profits, which
can be reinvested to support long-term growth
• Higher wages: when linked with Marginal Revenue Productivity theory (you will meet this later in the
course), more productive workers can be paid higher wages
• Economic growth: rising productivity can lead to an increase in the trend rate of economic growth
(i.e. higher long-run growth)
One reason for low productivity, according to the OBR, could be low investment following the financial
crisis, as businesses found it more challenging to borrow and suffered lower profits, therefore slashing 2
possible sources of investment finance. At most, though, the OBR reckons weak investment only accounts
for around 1.5 percentage points of the productivity slowdown. Add in concerns over Brexit and the impact
on UK domestic businesses, and there is probably another reason there why investment is lower than we
might expect.
A second reason might be that the UK economy has shifted structurally away from high-productivity sectors
(e.g. finance and construction) to lower-productivity sectors (such as retail). The apparent fall in productivity
could be heightened because of the difficulty in measuring productivity in many service-based jobs. Again,
though, the OBR does not believe this to be a significant reason, contributing just 1 percentage point to the
shortfall in UK productivity.
Other reasons could relate to changes in the UK labour market. Some firms might be ‘hoarding’ labour i.e.
hanging onto workers even though there is not quite enough work for them to do, because it’s cheaper
than paying redundancy or future recruitment when markets pick up. An increasing number of workers are
self-employed, and are generally regarded as less productive – but it is difficult to measure this with any
accuracy.
So-called “zombie” firms may also offer some explanation. These are firms that, ordinarily, would have shut
down, but the availability of very cheap credit due to historically low interest rates means that they can
continue to operate.
What is specialisation?
Specialisation is when we concentrate on producing a specific product or task. Specialisation happens at all
levels:
• Specialisation of tasks within extended families in many of the world’s poorest countries
• Within businesses and organisations, for example, specialist buyers employed by supermarkets
• In a country – Bangladesh is a major producer and exporter of textiles; Norway is a leading oil and
gas exporter. And Ghana is one of the biggest global producers of cocoa.
• In a region of a country – for many years the West Midlands has been a centre for motor car assembly,
there has been huge investment in recent years in the Mini plant at Oxford
• Unrewarding, repetitive work that requires little skill can lower motivation and eventually causes lower
productivity.
• Workers may take less pride in work and quality suffers.
• Dissatisfied workers cause absenteeism to increase
• People move to less boring jobs creating a problem of high worker turnover and increased
hiring/training costs
• Increased risk of repetitive strain injuries at work
• Some workers receive little training and may not be able to find alternative jobs when out of work –
they suffer structural unemployment / occupational immobility
• Mass-produced standardized goods may lack variety
Functions of money
1. A medium of exchange - money is any asset widely acceptable as a medium of exchange. It facilitates
transactions between buyer & seller. Specialisation and the division of labour require a means of
exchanging goods and services.
2. A store of value - an asset that holds its value over time.
3. A unit of account – money is a unit of measure used to value/cost products, assets (e.g. houses),
debts, incomes and spending.
4. A standard of deferred payment - the accepted way, in a given market, to settle a debt.
Quick questions
a) What does the chart show in terms of the trends in cash transactions?
b) What factors do you think explain this trend?
c) Why might it be the poorest people in society that lose out as the use of cash declines?
Forecasted number of cash transactions in the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2026, by denomination (in
billions)
< £1 < £5 < £10
20
Number of transactions in
15
10
billions
0
2006 2016 2026*
Examiner tip
Be careful not to confuse the functions of money with the characteristics of money!
• The difference between the short run and the long run
• The difference between average and marginal returns
• The law of diminishing returns
• Returns to scale
• The difference between increasing, constant and decreasing returns to scale
• The implication of these production theories for costs
The concept of diminishing marginal productivity, or diminishing marginal returns, is a short run concept. It is
a production theory concerned with the relationship between inputs and outputs. We use it to explain the
shape of cost curves, but in the short run only.
- Total product = total output (sometimes known as returns), or total units produced
- Marginal product = the additional output produced when an extra worker (or other factor of
production) is employed
- Average product = total output ÷ number of workers. This is also the same as productivity
In the short run, at least one factor of production is fixed. Let’s assume that this is capital. The only way to
increase output is to employ more workers. Initially, adding an additional worker will cause productivity to rise,
as the workers can use some division of labour and focus on tasks that they are relatively better at. However,
as more workers are added to the fixed amount of capital, the capital becomes increasingly scarce – there
may not be enough to go round, causing workers to get delayed and in each other’s way. This causes
productivity to fall. At the point where marginal product start to fall, we say that “diminishing returns has set
in”.
• When diminishing returns set in then the marginal product of labour starts to fall
• When marginal product of labour declines below existing average product then the average product
of labour will fall – e.g. in this case when the 5th worker is employed
Do not confuse the law of diminishing returns (which explains short-run cost curves) with the concept of
diminishing marginal utility (which explains the shape of demand curves)
Relationship to cost
When the marginal product of extra labour is falling – assuming that each worker is paid the same wage rate
– then the marginal cost of supplying extra output will increase. Diminishing returns help to explain the
conventional shape of the short-run marginal cost curve (see below).
Units of Capital Units of Labour Total Output % Change in Inputs % Change in Output Returns to Scale
20 150 3000
40 300 7500 100 150 Increasing
60 450 12000 50 60 Increasing
80 600 16000 33 33 Constant
100 750 18000 25 13 Decreasing
Consider the table above that shows added capital (K) and labour (L) inputs:
• When we double factor inputs from (150 units of labour + 20 units of capital) to (300 units of labour
+ 40 units of capital) the % change in output is 150% i.e. increasing returns
• Increasing returns to scale occur when the % change in output > % change in inputs
• When we consider the impact of this on average costs, we call it economies of scale
• Decreasing returns to scale occur when the % change in output < % change in inputs
• When we consider the impact of this on average costs, we call in diseconomies of scale
• Constant returns to scale occur when the % change in output = % change in inputs
The nature of the returns to scale affects the shape of a business’s long run average cost curve – when there
are sizeable increasing returns to scale, we expect to see economies of scale from long run expansion.
Fixed Costs
• Fixed costs do not vary at all as the level of output changes in the short run
• Fixed cost has to be paid, whatever the level of sales achieved. Fixed costs are incurred even if output
is zero in the short run
• The higher the level of fixed costs in a business, the higher must be the output in order to break-even
Marketing
Consulting fees Rental costs Research projects
budgets
Variable Costs
• Variable costs are costs that relate directly to the production or sale of a product.
• An increase in short run output (Q) will cause total variable cost to rise (TVC).
• Average variable cost (AVC) = total variable cost / output (i.e. TVC divided by Q).
• Variable cost is determined by the marginal cost of extra units as more labour is hired.
Exam questions could refer to an increase in rent – this would be an increase in fixed costs! Fixed costs can
change – this does not make them a variable cost.
Students need to be careful when considering the cost of employing workers – this can sometimes be fixed
and sometimes be variable. For example, a salaried employee pay would count as a fixed cost – they get paid
that amount regardless of output. However, if they are eligible for a bonus then that might be related to
output in which case the bonus is a variable cost. Some employees get paid per hour i.e. receive a wage – this
is likely to count as a variable cost.
Take a look at the table below – make sure you can work out where all the figures come from.
Output per Total Fixed Total Variable Total Cost Marginal Cost Average Cost
week Costs Costs (£)
(£) (£) (£) (£)
500 300 200 500 0.40 1.00
1000 300 350 650 0.30 0.65
1500 300 450 750 0.20 0.50
2000 300 500 800 0.10 0.40
2500 300 700 1000 0.40 0.40
3000 300 1000 1300 0.60 0.43
3500 300 1600 1900 1.20 0.54
4000 300 2600 2900 2.00 0.73
AC will fall
when
MC < AC
Average cost is at a
minimum when it is
intersected by the
MC curve
Output
Examiner tip:
You need to know that AC = MC at the lowest point of the AC curve. Practice drawing these diagrams so that
you can use them accurately and with confidence in exam questions!
Cost MC
AFC will fall as AC
the level of
output
expands
AVC
AFC
You must be able to explain the shapes of the curves that you draw, and not simply be able to ‘repeat’ the
diagram.
Examiner tip:
Sometimes you may be asked to identify different types of costs from a table of data. Remember that you can
easily spot the Total Fixed Costs, as this will be the Total Cost when output is zero.
Earlier, you studied the factors that causes shifts in the supply curve. The MC curve is the same as the supply
curve – so factors that would shift supply will also shift MC.
Cost MC AC2
AC1
AVC
Output
MC2
Cost MC1
AC2
AC1
Output
Examiner Tip
Also remember that information on changing costs may be given in a qualitative way i.e. in words, in the
case study. It will be your task to work out whether the costs described are fixed or variable – do not expect
the examiner to explicitly point it out!
Ways in which changes in government economic policy can influence the costs of businesses
1. Changes in value added tax (VAT) and other indirect taxes on producers such as the Sugar Levy
2. Environmental taxes (including a possible carbon tax) and introducing a minimum price for each
tonne of carbon emitted within the EU carbon trading scheme
3. Changes in labour market interventions such as the National Minimum Wage
4. Government subsidies targeting producers such as an employment subsidy or guaranteed minimum
payment
Economies of scale are the unit cost advantages from expanding the scale of production in the long run. The
effect is to reduce average costs over a range of output. In other words, economies of scale exist when long
run average costs fall as output rises. Internal economies of scale are specific to a business whereas external
economies of scale are achieved when a whole industry grows. These lower average costs represent an
improvement in productive efficiency and can give a business a competitive advantage in a market.
• They can also lead to lower prices (if the firm chooses to pass on the cost savings) and higher profits
• As long as the long run average total cost curve (LRAC) is declining, then internal economies of scale
are being exploited by a business.
Average
Cost
(Unit Economies of
Cost) scale cause
AC to fall
Lowest point on LRAC LRAC
is output of
productive efficiency
Q1 Q2 Q3 Output
Diseconomies of scale are mentioned in the diagram above, but you can find more detail on the theory
underpinning this concept a little later in this chapter.
The shape of the SRAC and the LRAC curves are the same, and it is not surprising therefore that many students
get confused that there are different explanations of their shapes. SRAC is explained by the Law of Diminishing
(Marginal) Returns. LRAC is explained by economies/diseconomies of scale. In many cases, this links closely
to returns to scale but remember this is a production theory.
You must look very carefully at exam questions and identify if there is any reference to the SR or LR, and then
consider the theory that might apply.
Examiner tip:
Exam questions relating to economies of scale occur frequently, especially in data response questions when
students could be asked to analyse or discuss possible reasons for economies of scale in a given industry /
market. The best answers drill down into the detail and give specific types of economies of scale, such as
technical or purchasing (see below), that are fully applied to the industry in question. For example, suppose
the industry was chocolate manufacturing, then producers will likely buy cocoa beans and milk in bulk, and
may benefit from technical economies such as high-volume chocolate wrapping machines.
• Expensive (indivisible) capital inputs: Large-scale businesses can afford to invest in specialist capital
machinery. For example, a supermarket might invest in database technology that improves stock
control and reduces transportation and distribution costs. A smaller independent store may not be
able to justify this initial cost.
• Specialisation of the workforce: Larger firms can split the production processes into separate tasks to
boost productivity. Examples include the use of division of labour in the mass production of motor
vehicles and in manufacturing electronic products.
• Law of increased dimensions (known as the container principle) This is linked to the cubic law where
doubling the height and width of a tanker or building leads to a more than proportionate increase in
cubic capacity
o The application of this law opens up the possibility of scale economies in distribution and
freight industries and also in travel and leisure sectors with the emergence of super-cruisers
o The law of increased dimensions is important in energy sectors, office rental and
warehousing. It is also significant in long haul airlines and cruise-ships
• A large firm can purchase factor inputs in bulk at lower prices if it has monopsony power – we can
call these purchasing economies. Large food retailers have monopsony power when purchasing their
supplies from farmers and wine growers and in completing supply contracts from food processing
businesses.
• For example, Amazon has huge buying power in the publishing industry. It has a 30 per cent share
of the physical book market in the US and more than 60 per cent of eBooks, and uses this power to
reduce the prices it pays publishers for the books sold on the Amazon web site
• Better management and increased investment in human resources and the use of specialist
equipment, such as networked computers can improve communication, raise productivity and
thereby reduce unit costs.
• Smaller firms often pay higher interest rate on overdrafts and loans. Businesses quoted on the stock
market can normally raise new financial capital more cheaply through the sale of equities to the capital
market.
• In most cases, the marginal cost of adding one more user or customer to a network is close to zero,
but the resulting financial benefits may be huge because each new user to the network can trade with
the existing members or parts of the network.
• Given the high fixed costs of establishing a network, the more users there are the lower are the fixed
costs per unit. As a network expands, not only are there gains from extra revenues, but the long run
cost per user diminishes – this is an internal economy of scale and a key factor behind the profitability
of network businesses such as Netflix, Google, Amazon and Facebook.
Diseconomies of Scale
Higher Regulatory Costs Office Politics / Industrial Risk aversion among Waste / Inefficiency in
for bigger Businesses Relations salaried staff large organisations
Price
and Producing an output beyond the minimum efficient scale e.g.
Cost at Q2 leads to lower total profits. Diseconomies of scale
cause unit costs to be higher than at output Q1.
P1
LRAC
P2
C2
C1 AR
Q1 Q2 Output
LRAC
Output
Internal economies of scale occur when the business itself expands, causing a movement along its LRAC
curve as average costs fall. They are associated with large businesses.
External economies of scale occur when the industry expands, causing the LRAC curve for every firm in the
industry to shift downwards. Businesses can benefit if they are large or small.
The LRAC curve for such firms could look like this:
Numerical Example 1
The example below is a relatively simple example of how to calculate TR and MR. Make sure that you can
calculate the same numbers as shown below!
Note on the table above that for each number of units demanded, average revenue equals price. This
demonstrates that the average revenue curve is the firm’s demand curve.
Numerical Example 2
This is a slightly more challenging example, because as the price (or AR) falls, the quantity demanded does
not just rise by 1 unit, but instead rises by 50 units at a time. This means you will need to be extra careful when
calculating MR! In this case, you cannot simply calculate the difference in TR, because this would give you the
addition to TR as a result of quantity demanded increasing by 50 units. So, you need to divide the change in
TR by the change in quantity demanded.
Maximising revenue
• Maximum total revenue occurs where marginal revenue is zero: i.e. no more added revenue can be
achieved from producing and then selling an extra unit of output.
o You can see this point in Numerical Example 1 (above), where revenue is maximised between
units 7 and 8
• The point where MR=zero is directly underneath the mid-point of a linear demand curve.
• When marginal revenue is zero, the coefficient of price elasticity of demand = 1
o That is, PED is unitary when TR is maximised
• When marginal revenue becomes negative, if prices were cut further, then total revenue would fall
o When MR is positive, PED is relatively elastic
§ A fall in price is proportionately smaller than the increase in quantity demanded
o When MR is negative, PED is relatively inelastic
§ A fall in price is proportionately larger than the increase in quantity demanded
Price takers:
• Price takers operate in highly (perfectly) competitive markets
• They have no pricing power and have to accept the prevailing market price and do as well as they
can
o This means that they have a perfectly elastic demand curve
o AR will be identical to MR, because every unit will be sold at exactly the same price
• Price takers have a low percentage market share
• Their TR curve will simply be an upwards sloping line, starting from the origin
Price makers:
• Price makers have the ability / power to set their own prices for the goods and services they sell
• This happens in all imperfectly competitive markets
• The demand curve (AR curve) is downward sloping
• Marginal revenue (MR) will lie below AR
Examiner tip:
Look out for the phrase ‘price taker’ or ‘price maker’ in exam questions, as it gives you clues as to the shape
of the AR (i.e. demand) and MR curves.
Diagrams to illustrate AR, MR and TR for Price Making Firms and Price Taking Firms
P2 Fall in price
from P3 to P4
causes
spending to
fall as PED <1
P3
P4
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Qty
When demand is price inelastic, i.e. coefficient of price elasticity < 1, a fall in price will lead to a drop in total
revenue. A summary of price elasticity of demand and its relationship to revenue is shown in the table:
Price per unit Demand (units) Total Revenue Co-efficient of price elasticity of demand (PED)
(Price x Quantity)
£20 200 £4000 2.5
£18 250 £4500 (elastic demand, revenue rises)
£16 300 £4800 1.3
£14 350 £4900 (elastic demand, revenue rises)
£12 400 £4800 0.75
£10 450 £4500 (inelastic demand, revenue falls)
£8 500 £4000
Examiner tip
Earlier, you covered the factors that will increase or decrease demand (i.e. shift demand curves right or
left). Because the AR curve is the same as the demand curve, exactly the same factors will affect AR as
demand! It is worth you reviewing this topic at this point.
One extra thing to remember, if you move the AR curve, the MR curve that accompanies it must also shift!
Supernormal profit
• Profit achieved in excess of normal profit.
• Profit when AR > AC
• When firms are making supernormal profits, there is an incentive for other producers to enter a
market
• Note that you may sometimes see supernormal profits referred to as abnormal profits – this is the
same thing!
Subnormal profit
• This is profit less than normal (i.e. price per unit < average cost)
• Also known as an economic loss
• If we looked at a business’s accounts, it may appear that they are making an “accounting profit”
(remember that accountants do not include opportunity cost in the business’s costs of production)
Importance of Profit
In a simple accounting sense, the business has total revenue of £320,000 and total costs of £145,000 giving an
accounting profit of £175,000.
• But profit according to an economist should take into account the opportunity cost of the capital
invested and the income that the owner could have earned elsewhere.
• Taking these two items into account we find that the economic profit is lower equal to £123,000.
Marginal)
profit)is)
negative
Marginal)
profit)is)
positive
MR
Q1 Output
Innovation in markets
Innovation is putting a new idea or approach into action. Innovation is 'the commercially successful exploitation
of ideas.'
Product innovation
• Small-scale and frequent subtle changes to the characteristics and performance of a good or a service
Process innovation
• Changes to the way in which production takes place or is organised
• Changes in business models and pricing strategies
Innovation has demand and supply-side effects in markets and the economy as a whole
Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter coined the term creative destruction which refers to the upheaval of
the established order in the pursuit of innovation. Smaller disruptive businesses often challenge existing firms
with market power.
Market Conduct
Market conduct refers to how businesses actually behave in the industries in which they operate. How does
market structure affect the pricing, output and other decisions of businesses within the market? Examples of
conduct issues include the following:
• Are there dominant firms?
• Is there evidence of anti-competitive behaviour?
• How much control do businesses have over the supply chain?
• How important is non-price competition in the market?
• Is there interdependence between firms?
• Do businesses behave strategically to retain profits by deterring the entry of new competitors in the
long run?
Note: Be aware also that the market structure will then affect the behaviour of firms especially in contestable
industries.
Number of Nature of the Are there How strong What is the What is the What is the
firms likely to product significant is the potential to likely likely
exist in the available to barriers to pricing earn outcome for outcome
industry consumers entry for power of supernormal allocative for
new firms? individual profits in the efficiency? productive
firms in the long run? efficiency?
market?
Contestable Any number Differentiated No – in a Depends Low if the High – the High –
market is possible products are a contestable on the market is strength of competitive
key part of market, degree of highly competition pressures
non-price entry and actual contestable is likely to likely to get
competition exit costs competition – new firms encourage firms to
are low and the may be able firms to price control
threat of to enter the competitively their costs.
new cream skim
competition any
supernormal
profits
Market Power
Barriers to entry and exit then help to sustain market power of existing firms in the long
Summary of objectives
Profit Profits are maximised at an output level where marginal cost = marginal revenue
maximisation (MR=MC)
Revenue Revenues are maximised at an output where marginal revenue = zero
maximisation
Sales (volume) Supplying the largest output possible consistent with earning at least normal profits
maximisation where AR=AC
Satisficing Satisficing involves the owners of a business (shareholders) setting minimum
behaviour acceptable levels of achievement of either revenue or operating profits
• State-owned corporations
o State-owned corporations are likely to have a range of different economic and political
objectives
Quick question
Take a look at the business pages in a reputable newspaper or news website. There is often information
on the latest profits and accounting figures of well-known companies. Jot down a few notes on which
companies appear to be profitable and which appear to be struggling. Can you think of reasons why this
might be the case?
Economics students often confuse revenue with profit, assuming that a rise in demand will always, for
example, lead to a rise in profits. Unfortunately, it is impossible to assume this! If you only have information
relating to revenue, then you can only consider the impact on revenue – without additional information
relating to costs, you cannot confidently say anything at all about profit!
Price, MC
Cost Profit
maximised
here
Marginal
profit is
negative
Marginal
profit is
positive
MR
Q1 Output
• Firms producing differentiated products choose price and quantity to maximise their profits,
considering the product demand curve and the cost function
• If MR > MC, the firm could increase profit by raising output – look on the diagram above, where you
should be able to see that this occurs at output levels less than Q1
• If MR < MC, the marginal profit is negative. It would be better to decrease output. On the diagram
above, this occurs at all output levels above Q1
Price
and
Cost MC
P1
AC
C1
AR
MR
Q1 Output
At profit maximising level of output Q1, the price given by the demand curve (remember this is the same as
the AR curve) is P1. Price x quantity gives total revenue. At level of output Q1, average total cost is C1. C1 x
Q1 gives total cost. The difference between these two rectangles on the diagram gives profit.
Benefits and drawbacks of businesses aiming to maximise profits rather than pursue alternative objectives
Loss minimisation
Losses are minimised at the same output as profit maximisation – the same condition applies i.e. firms making
a loss should produce at an output where marginal revenue = marginal cost.
C1
P1
AR
MR
Q1 Output
Revenue Maximisation
• The objective of maximising sales revenue rather than profits was developed by economist William
Baumol whose work focused on the decisions of manager-controlled businesses
• His research found that salaries & rewards for mangers were closely linked to sales revenue rather
than profits
• A business might also aim to maximise sales revenue rather than profits because it wishes to deter
the profitable entry of new firms / rivals into an industry and therefore maintain more market power
• If a firm decides to aim to maximise sales revenue rather than profits, one consequence of this can
be a reduction in the price of the firm’s shares since operating profit is likely to be lower
Quick question
Remind yourself of how PED changes along a demand curve: where is it elastic? Inelastic? Unitary?
P1 AC
C1
AR
Output
Profit Max: MC=MR MR
It is worth being aware of the other important aspects to the revenue-maximising level of output. MR is zero
at the ‘halfway’ point along the AR curve; this is also the point where PED is unitary (i.e. equal to -1).
In this example, sales maximisation / maximising market share occurs at an output of 5 where AC and AR both
equal £30
AC
P1
AR
If you also study Business, then you might feel slightly confused at this point! In Business, reference to ‘sales’
is exactly the same as referring to ‘revenue’. For an economist, when discussing revenue maximisation and
sales maximisation, these are different things!
What is satisficing?
• Maximisers behave in a traditional economic way and always try to make the best possible choice
from all available alternatives (the implicit assumption being made here is of rational choice)
• Satisficers examine only a limited set of alternatives, and choose the best option between them
• Satisficing is generally concerned with ‘keeping a range of stakeholders happy’ and ensuring that the
business is earning ‘enough’ profit to do so
• Many businesses who adopt satisficing use simple rules of thumb rather than complex pricing policies.
Instead of trying to find the optimum profit-maximising price and output, they rely on simpler “cost
plus approaches” e.g. they charge the unit cost of supply + 10%
• Satisficers might be the managers of a business who are more concerned with increasing sales
revenue and/or their market share instead of seeking pure profit maximisation.
P1
AC
P2
C2
AR
MR
Q1 Q2 Output
Divorce between Ownership and Control & the Principal Agent Problem
Managers & Rewards, including basic pay and other financial incentives
Employees Job security & working conditions
Promotion opportunities + job satisfaction & status – motivation,
roles and responsibilities
In most businesses there is a divorce between ownership and control. In other words, the owners of a business
may not be the same people as those who are taking key day-to-day decisions.
Activist shareholders
• Activist shareholders look to put pressure on existing management or force through changes to
management boards.
• Some insist on businesses using profits to buy-back shares to increase returns to existing shareholders.
• An activist shareholder uses an equity stake to put pressure on existing management.
• The goals of activist shareholders can range from financial (e.g. increase of shareholder value through
changes in dividend decisions, plans for cost cutting or investment projects etc.) to non-financial (e.g.
dis-investment from particular countries with a poor human rights record, or pressuring a business to
speed up the adoption of environmentally friendly policies and build a better reputation for ethical
behaviour, etc.)
The Divorce between Ownership & Control and Business Conduct / Objectives
Quick question
Can you think of other ‘real world’ business objectives that businesses might choose to pursue?
Quick question
Take a look at the business news. Can you find examples of businesses that you think are focused on:
- Profits
- Revenue
- Market share (sales volume)
- Satisficing
- Another objective of your choice?
Perfect competition describes a market structure whose assumptions are strong and therefore unlikely to exist
in the vast majority of real-world markets. We can however take some insights from studying a world of perfect
competition and comparing and contrasting with imperfectly competitive markets and industries. Perfect
competition provides a yardstick for judging the extent to which real world markets perform efficiently and
the extent to which a misallocation of resources occurs.
Key point: If there are many firms producing identical products, and consumers can easily switch from one
firm to another, then firms will be price-takers in equilibrium. They will have to accept the prevailing market
price.
• When drawing perfect competition diagrams, remember to make a clear distinction between the
market and a representative individual firm i.e. you must draw two diagrams
• The market price is set by the interaction of market supply and demand
• Each individual firm is a price taker in a perfectly competitive market
• The ruling market price becomes the AR and MR curve for the firm
• Average revenue equals marginal revenue at every level of output
• We assume that the aim of each firm is to find a profit-maximising output
Price, Market Supply and Price, Revenues, Costs and Profits for a
Cost Demand Cost Competitive Firm
S
MC
Supernormal
profits
AR=MR
P1
AC
C1
Output Q1 Output
Examiner tip:
Firms can also make losses in the short run in perfect competition – this will happen if the ruling market price
is less than the average cost for a particular firm. Practice drawing diagrams in which the individual firm is
initially making a loss rather than earning supernormal profit. This causes firms to leave the industry, raising
the market price. Sub normal profits are shown below.
Price, Market Supply and Price, Revenues, Costs and Profits for a
Cost Demand Cost Competitive Firm
MC
S AC
C1
P1
AR1 = MR1
Output Q1 Output
In the short run, a Variable costs are costs Providing that price per
business will continue to that vary directly with unit (AR) > average
supply products as long output such as raw variable cost (AVC), then
as their revenues at materials, component a contribution is being
least cover variable parts and employees made to cover some
costs. Revenue = AR x Q. paid an hourly wage. fixed (overhead) cost
Price, Market Supply and Price, Revenues, Costs and Profits for a
Cost Demand Cost Competitive Firm
S1
MC
S2
AR1=MR1
P1
AC
P2
AR2=MR2
Output Q2 Output
Price, Market Supply and Price, Revenues, Costs and Profits for a
Cost Demand Cost Competitive Firm
S1
MC
S2
AC
P2
AR2=MR2
Output Q2 Output
How sub-normal profits affects the adjustment to market equilibrium in the long run
Price, Market Supply and Price, Revenues, Costs and Profits for a
Cost Demand Cost Competitive Firm
S2 MC
S1 AC
P2
P1
AR1 = MR1
Output Q1 Output
Firms making sub-normal profits are likely to leave the industry. This causes an inward shift of market supply
which then leads to a rise in the market equilibrium price. In the long run the net exit of firms will allow the
remain firms to earn normal profits where price = AC.
Allocative efficiency:
In both the short and the long run, price is equal to marginal cost (P=MC) and thus allocative efficiency is
achieved.
Productive efficiency:
Productive efficiency occurs when the equilibrium profit maximising output is supplied at minimum average
cost. This is attained in the long run for a competitive market. Output is at lowest point of AC. If a firm is
Dynamic efficiency:
We assume that a perfectly competitive market produces homogeneous products – in other words, there is
little scope for innovation designed to make products differentiated from each other and allow one or more
suppliers to establish monopoly power. Furthermore, the lack of any supernormal profit suggests that firms
will not have the funds available to reinvest. Therefore firms in perfect competition are unlikely to be
dynamically efficient.
However:
• Consumers face a lack of choice, and cannot necessarily find a product that perfectly meets their
needs
• Firms are unlikely to be able to grow large enough to benefit from economies of scale
Shoe repairs and key Taxi and minibus Sandwich bars and
makers companies coffee stores
Dry-cleaners and
Hairdressing salons Bars and Nightclubs
launderettes
Key assumptions
• Many buyers and sellers – the industry concentration ratio is low
• Perfect information
• Very low barriers to entry/exit – this allows firms to respond to profit signals
• All products are in the same ‘market’ but are slightly differentiated i.e. consumer think that there are
some ‘non-price’ differences between products
• Firms aim to maximise profit; consumers aim to maximise utility
• Firms have a little price-making power over their own brand
Examiner tip:
In an exam, remember to write that a market structure is monopolistically competitive, not monopolistic, to
avoid confusion with monopoly!
P1 AC
Supernormal
Profit
C1
AR
Q1 Output
MR
AC
P2
AR2
Q2 Output
MR2
Examiner tip: This diagram can be tricky to draw – therefore it needs a lot of practice before the exam!
M&S 7.6%
9.7%
Primark 7%
4.4%
Next 6.6%
6.7%
Arcadia 3.8%
5.3%
Asda 3.5%
3.5%
TK Maxx 3.1%
2.2%
Tesco 2.9%
2.5%
JD Sports 2.7%
1.1%
Debenhams 2.7%
3.3%
Sports Direct 2.4%
1.3%
In this example, the 3-firm concentration ratio is 21.2% and the 5-firm concentration ratio is 28.5%. This is well
below the C5 concentration ratio of sixty per cent needed for a market to be an oligopoly.
Firms in retail clothing sector will use a range of different types of non-price competition to drive sales and
protect their market share – these include:
1. Efficiency and ease of use of online ordering, collection and delivery
2. Making clothing available in a wider range of sizes
3. Customisation of product e.g. personalisation of tee-shirts and trainers
4. Returns policies for customers wishing to bring back purchases
5. Outlet shops to offer some excess stock at discounted prices
6. Effective use of social media such as Instagram
7. Taking steps to address corporate social responsibility including reducing waste associated with fast
fashion
Examiner tip
Be prepared to work out the concentration ratio for an industry using the data provided for easy marks!
Quick question
Think about your local high street or shopping centre. How many examples of firms in monopolistically
competitive market structures can you think of?
Quick question
Compare and contrast perfect competition with monopolistic competition. Remember to think about
impacts on consumers, the firms themselves, suppliers, the government, the environment, and any other
stakeholders you think might be relevant.
When drawing the long-run diagram, remember that the difference between the SR and the LR is that
demand for each firm has fallen (as more firms have entered the market, attracted by the supernormal
profits) i.e. AR and MR shift to the left. It can be tempting to think that the cost curves have shifted, because
the diagram is fiddly to draw!
Characteristics of oligopoly
• An oligopoly is an imperfectly competitive industry where there is a high level of market
concentration.
• Oligopoly is best defined by the actual conduct (or day-to-day behaviour) of firms within a market
• A rule of thumb is that an oligopoly exists when the top five firms in the market account for more
than 60% of market sales i.e. the C5 concentration ratio is above 60 percent.
• Key features of oligopolistic industries include price rigidity, lots of non-price competition,
interdependent decision making, and some attempts to collude and fix price or perhaps share out
the market.
Oligopoly is a form of imperfect competition – some of the key assumptions are as follows:
i) A market dominated by a few large firms each with a significant / large market share
ii) High market concentration ratio
iii) Each firm supplies branded products, which may or may not be properly differentiated
• Petrol retailers sell identical products (petrol / diesel has to be the same at every retailer)…but
they try to attract consumers by making other products available to buy (e.g. sweets, milk,
newspapers) and also compete on location
• Some oligopoly markets sell products that are more noticeable differentiated e.g. coffee
shops, banks
iv) High barriers to entry and exit
v) Interdependent strategic decisions by firms (this is the crucial aspect of modelling oligopoly)
Remember that when discussing oligopoly, it is vital that you refer to the concept of interdependence!
Whilst it is true that oligopolies are defined by there being a small number of dominant firms, it is also true
that there can be large numbers of firms in this market structure – just think of coffee shops in the UK, with
the major chains of Starbucks, Pret, Costa (now bought by Coca Cola) and Caffe Nero, along with thousands
of other independent or smaller chains. The key is to remember the dominance of a small number of firms
with the largest five firms having at least sixty per cent of the market.
It is also important not to assume that all firms in oligopoly are necessarily large.
Market share
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
Tesco 16.1%
15.2%
Shell 13.5%
11.4%
Sainsburys 10.3%
9.8%
Asda 7.6%
5.4%
Certas Energy * 2.8%
2.2%
Unbranded 0.9%
0.8%
Minor brands 0.7%
0.6%
Harvest Energy 0.5%
The 3 firm concentration ratio = 44.8% and the 5 firm concentration ratio = 62.5%
Oct 18 Jan-15
All behaviour / conduct by businesses in an oligopoly is strategic and will depend on the key objectives of
businesses. These can vary:
• Maintaining a satisfactory rate of profitability
• Protecting market share
• Growing their user base
• Reacting to the decisions of rival firms
Exclusivity / Loyalty
Branding and advertising Sales Promotions
Schemes
Non-price competition is a key aspect of oligopoly especially when prices are sticky/rigid between competing
suppliers (rigid prices is a common feature of firms in oligopoly)/
Sky 197.1
Procter & Gamble 196.8
BT Ltd 144.1
Unilever 116.8
McDonald's 96.2
Tesco 89.5
Reckitt Benckiser 88.2
Virgin Media 72.1
Lidl 71.1
Samsung 66.6
Product branding is a really significant feature of non-collusive competition in all types of imperfect
competition but especially in oligopoly where building and maintaining market share is often a dominant
business objective.
Collusion usually refers to businesses working together to agree to jointly set prices high and/or restrict output.
Key Aims of Business Collusion in an Oligopoly
1. Businesses in a cartel recognise their interdependence and act together – the aim is to maximise joint
profits
2. Collusion lowers the costs of competition e.g. wasteful marketing wars which can run into millions of
pounds
3. Collusion reduces uncertainty – and higher profits increases producer surplus / shareholder value –
leading to higher share prices
Cartels in an oligopoly frequently break down after a while – there are several possible causes of this:
• Enforcement problems:
o The cartel aims to restrict production to maximize total profits.
o But each individual seller finds it profitable to expand their production.
o Other firms who are not members of the cartel may take a free ride by selling under the
cartel price
• Falling market demand – for example during a recession – which creates excess capacity in the
industry and this then puts downward pressure on profits and cash-flow in the cartel
• The successful entry of non-cartel firms into an industry undermines a cartel’s control of the market
• The exposure of price-fixing by whistle-blowing firms – i.e. firms engaged in a cartel that pass on
information to the competition authorities in the hope of more lenient treatment from the regulatory
competition authorities
“Cartels are a major barrier to competition and can lead to significantly increased prices and reductions of
output, efficiency, innovation and choice, all of which are harmful to consumers.”
There are significant penalties for UK businesses found to be engaged in price-fixing cartels and other forms
of anti-competitive behaviour.
1. Businesses in breach of competition law can face fines of up to ten per cent of their worldwide
turnover.
2. Those convicted of a cartel offence can face up to five years of imprisonment, unlimited fines, director
disqualification for a period of up to fifteen years and potential confiscation of their assets.
• Fairer prices for producer cooperatives in lower and middle-income developing countries
o Competing more effectively with powerful corporations who have monopsony power
o This may help in reducing rates of extreme income poverty
• Firms sell homogenous products (or products that are very close substitutes)
• Firms compete on price
• Firms have predictable patterns of behaviour i.e. if one firm raises price then no others will, or if one
firm lowers price then all firms will copy that behaviour
In the kinked demand curve model, the associated MR curve is discontinuous i.e. it ‘leaps’ at the kink. When
demand is price elastic (i.e. the top part of the AR curve), a fall in price leads to a larger proportionate increase
in quantity demanded, which in turn results in an increase in total revenue. This means that in the elastic
portion of the AR curve, MR must be positive i.e. TR has risen. When demand is price inelastic (i.e. the bottom
part of the AR curve), a fall in price leads to a less than proportionate increase in quantity demanded, which
in turn results in a fall in total revenue. This means that in the inelastic portion of the AR curve, MR must be
negative i.e. TR has fallen.
A change in the firm’s costs, in this case, will have little impact on the price and output chosen. The diagram
that follows can be used to illustrate this point. The firm is aiming to profit-maximise, and so operates at a
level of output where MR = MC. Even if costs change, causing the MC/AC curves to shift up or down, they will
have to alter significantly for this to change the point where MC = MR.
Game theory is not required for the AQA specification but is interesting and can bring depth to analysis or
evaluation.
• Display of payoffs: row first, column second e.g. if Firm A chooses a high output and Firm B opts for
a low output, Firm A wins £12m and Firm B wins £4m.
• In this game, the reward to both firms choosing to limit supply and thereby keep the price relatively
high is that they each earn £10m. But choosing to defect from this strategy and increase output can
cause a rise in market supply, lower prices and lower profits - £5m each if both choose to do so.
• A dominant strategy is one that is best irrespective of the other player’s choice. In this case the
dominant strategy is competition between the firms.
• The Prisoner’s Dilemma can help to explain the breakdown of price-fixing agreements between
producers – this is because there is an incentive to ‘cheat’ because of the potential for higher profits.
This can lead to the outbreak of price wars among suppliers, the breakdown of other joint ventures
between producers and also the collapse of free-trade agreements between countries when one or
more countries decides that protectionist strategies are in their own best interest.
• The key point is that game theory provides an insight into the interdependent decision-making that
lies at the heart of the interaction between businesses in a competitive market.
In reality, it is very difficult to apply simple 2 x 2 payoff matrices (i.e. 2 firms with 2 strategies) as the world is
more complicated that that. It is also very difficult to work out what the possible payoffs might be, as a result
of different interdependent choices.
• If both businesses chose to collude on price rather than act competitively, the two firms would be
able to increase their joint profits by £24m.
• However, if they agree to collude at the higher price of £20, there is an incentive for one business to
under-cut the other, charge a lower price of £8 and inflicts a small loss of -£2m on the other business,
whilst increasing their own profit (temporarily) from £12 to £16.
Winners
• Regular consumers who will see an increase in consumer surplus
• Managers – sales revenues will increase if demand is price elastic (i.e. PED>1) which might lead to
higher sales bonuses
Losers
• Shareholders – if a prolonged price wars leads to lower profits
• Suppliers – who may get squeezed if a firm uses monopsony power to lower the prices of their
supplies – for example, farmers have complained that supermarket price wars have led to delays in
them getting payment
• Smaller firms - who may not be able to absorb possible losses from an intense price war
• The government - if lower profits causes a decline in corporation tax revenues
Pricing strategies
Here is a summary of pricing strategy common in concentrated markets where one or more firms have pricing
power:
Break-even price Break-even price is when price = average total cost (P=AC)
Cost-plus pricing Where a firm fixes the price by adding a fixed percentage profit margin to the
average cost of production
Limit pricing Limit pricing is pricing by a firm to deter entry or the expansion of fringe firms.
The limit price is below the short run profit maximising price but above the
competitive level
Peak pricing When a business raises its prices at a time when demand has reached a peak
might be justified due to higher marginal costs of supply at peak times
Penetration pricing Pricing policy used to enter a new market, usually by setting a low price
Predatory pricing Predatory pricing is a deliberate strategy of driving competitors out of the
market by setting low prices or selling below average variable cost.
Quick question
Why might different firms choose different pricing strategies? Can you think of any examples of each of
the strategies listed above?
analysis
diagram MC AC
P1
AC of rival
AC of rival
P2
If the new low price P2 is
below the estimated average C2
cost of the potential rival AR
firm, and assuming that firms
in the market sell at similar
MR
prices, then the rival firm
may face the risk of big
losses if they enter. Q1 Q2
Output
Abnormal profit Any profit in excess of normal profit - also known as supernormal profit
Altruism Disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others
Collusive oligopoly When several large firms in an industry act to restrict price or output or share out the
market
Concentration ratio Measures the combined market share of threading firms in an industry
Duopoly Market dominated by two rival firms
Duopsony Two major buyers of a good or service in a market
First mover When a business can develop a competitive advantage through early entry into an
advantage industry
Interdependence When firms must take into account the likely reaction of rivals to changes in price
and output
Joint profit Price fixing with the aim of achieving an outcome associated with pure monopoly
maximisation
Limit pricing When a firm sets average revenue just low enough to discourage possible new
entrants
Non-price Advertising and marketing strategies to increase demand and develop brand loyalty
competition among consumers.
Price leadership When other businesses accept the p rice changes established by a dominant firm
Tacit collusion When businesses co-operate but not formally, e.g. quiet or implied co-operation
Characteristics of monopoly
• A pure monopolist is a single supplier that dominates the entire market
• In reality – the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) deems that:
o A working monopoly is any firm with greater than 25% of the industries' total sales
o A dominant firm is a firm that has at least 40% market share
• Price-making power is available to any business with a downward-sloping demand curve
• There are assumed to be high entry and exit barriers into a monopoly market
• Firms in a monopoly, as in other market structures, aim to maximise profit (i.e. operate where MR =
MC)
• Because firms are price makers, they will have a downward-sloping demand curve (AR)
• If AR is falling, marginal revenue (MR) is below AR (and is twice as steep)
35.0%
30%
Market share in percentage
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0% 11% 11%
9% 9% 8% 8%
10.0%
5.0% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1%
0.0%
y
o
ON
s
ia
F
se
er
gy
rs
er
Ga
it
Ov
ED
SS
t
ie
ow
ou
er
ili
til
E.
pl
Po
ish
En
Ut
tU
eh
NP
up
h
it
ar
rs
e
tis
ls
Br
iv
W
Fi
RW
al
at
ot
y
Sm
er
Sc
t
ili
op
Ut
Co
There are few examples of pure monopolies i.e. 100% market share – bear in mind that one firm can be
dominant but that overall the market structure may be more like oligopoly. Assessing the market structure of
a given industry depends on how we define that market. For example, we could say that South Western
Railway has a monopoly on train travel between Hampshire and London, but if we broaden the market to be
travel using any mode between Hampshire and London then there is greater degree of competition e.g. using
National Express coaches, driving be car etc.
Price per Quantity Total Marginal Total Cost Marginal Average Profit
unit demanded Revenue Revenue Cost Cost
30 200 6000 2700 13.5 3300
28 240 6720 18 3100 10 12.9 3620
26 280 7280 14 3380 7 12.1 3900
24 320 7680 10 3580 5 11.2 4100
22 360 7920 6 3700 3 10.3 4220
20 400 8000 2 3780 2 9.5 4220
18 440 7920 -2 3900 3 8.9 4020
16 480 7680 -6 4100 5 8.5 3580
14 520 7280 -10 4380 7 8.4 2900
It is helpful to understand precisely why MR is less than AR. In simple terms, it is because that in order to sell
an additional unit, a firm is assumed to lower the price of all units sold and not just the marginal unit sold –
this is the case unless a firm is able to practise first degree / perfect price discrimination.
AC
Supernormal Profit
The monopoly is
a price-maker
C1 AR
although it is
also constrained
by their demand
curve
Q1 Output
Profit Max: MC=MR MR
AR
C1
LRAC
LRMC
MR
Q1 Output
A natural monopoly occurs when a large business can supply a market at a lower price than smaller ones. A
natural monopoly is a situation in which there cannot be more than one efficient provider of a good. It is an
industry where the minimum efficient scale is a large share of market demand.
• A natural monopoly is characterised by increasing returns to scale at all levels of output
• Thus, the long run cost per unit (LRAC) will drift lower as production expands
• LRAC is falling because long run marginal cost is always below LRAC
• There may be room only for one supplier to fully exploit economies of scale, reach the minimum
efficient scale and achieve productive efficiency
Examiner tip
The easiest way to understand this diagram is that the demand curve / AR / MR are the same as in any other
imperfectly competitive industry. The cost curves, on the other hand, have been ‘stretched out’ because of the
significant economies of scale.
Quick question
Can you explain why the following industries / firms could be considered examples of natural monopoly?
- British Airports Authority
- Royal Mail
- National Grid
- Network Rail
There is increasing interest in the rise of platform businesses such as Google, Amazon, Facebook and Netflix
– all of whom have grown rapidly and achieved economies of scale in their pursuit of market dominance.
Should economists be concerned about the economic and social consequences of these types of businesses?
This means that long Therefore, the average As a result, fixed costs
run average cost (LRAC) total cost will continue are enormous but the
may fall across all ranges to fall as extra users are marginal cost of adding
of output. Only one firm added to the network. an extra user is very low
might reach the This is an internal
minimum efficient scale. economy of scale.
Examiner tip:
Use the natural monopoly argument as a theoretical and practical piece of evaluation for essays relating to
the pros and cons of monopoly i.e. if a natural monopoly did not exist in a particular market then it may be
the case that there would be a missing market. Furthermore, many natural monopolies operate in the national
interest. The quality of service provided makes a big difference to the everyday lives of millions of households
and businesses.
Quick question
Why might it be beneficial for firms that have the characteristics of natural monopoly to be nationalised, or
run in the public interest?
Examiner tip
You do need to be able to compare and contrast market structures in terms of efficiency, both in theoretical
terms and in practical terms for example applying information that appears in data response questions.
Price Deadweight
and loss of welfare
Cost MC
= area ABC
A
P1
B
AC
Supernormal Profit
C1 AR
Examiner tip:
Essays relating to the pros and cons of concentrated markets are incredibly common, especially when tied in
with the effectiveness of policies to reduce exploitation by firms in concentrated markets.
Arbitrage Simultaneous buying and selling of securities, currency, or commodities in different markets
to take advantage of differing prices for the same asset.
Bi-lateral monopoly Where a monopsony buyer faces a monopsony seller in a market
Concentration ratio Measures the proportion of an industry's output or employment accounted for by the
largest firms
Dominant firm Business with more than 40 percent of market share
Entry barriers Strategies used to protect the market power of established firms whilst maintain
supernormal profits
Industry regulator Appointed by government to oversee how a market works and the outcomes that result for
producers and consumers
Legal monopoly A monopoly that is protected by law from competition e.g. through patents or government-
awarded franchise
Limit pricing When a firm sets price low enough to discourage new entrants into the market.
Market liberalisation Introducing competition in previously monopolistic sectors such as energy supply, retail
banking and postal services
Market power Power to raise price above marginal cost without fear of losing supernormal profits to new
entrants
Market Splits up a market into different types (segments) to enable a business to better target its
segmentation products to the relevant customers
Monopoly profit Supernormal profit to a firm with market power, achieved when price (AR) > average cost
Benefits to firms:
1. Monopsony power allows bigger firms to achieve purchasing economies of scale leading to lower
long run average costs
2. Lower purchase costs bring about higher profits and increased returns for shareholders
3. The extra profit might be used to find capital investment or research and development
Benefits to consumers:
1. Consumers gain from lower prices e.g. supermarkets negotiate better prices from manufacturers that
are then passed on to consumers
2. Improved value for money – for example the NHS can use its bargaining power to cut the prices of
drugs used in treatments. Cost savings allow for more treatments within the NHS budget
Paul Krugman has been heavily critical of the monopsony power of Amazon in the publishing industry. In 2014
he wrote “Amazon is acting as a monopsony, a dominant buyer with the power to push prices down. By
putting the squeeze on publishers, Amazon is ultimately hurting authors and readers”
Examiner tip
Firms that are monopolies (i.e. dominant sellers) may also be monopsonies (i.e. dominant buyers) – this
allows them to raise prices and reduce costs, leading to very large supernormal profits.
Price discrimination
Price discrimination is when a business charges different consumers different prices for the same good or
service
Price variations do not fully reflect the marginal cost of supplying a product e.g. higher costs for parcels
delivered over short and long-haul distances in the UK and overseas might be built into the price
Price discrimination is not the same as product differentiation where the quality / characteristics of a
good/service vary by the type of customer. Price discrimination moves us away from the assumption in theory
of the firm that there is a single profit-maximising price for the same product. A firm can charge different
prices for one item
• First degree price discrimination is hard to achieve unless a business has full information on every
consumer’s individual preferences and their willingness-to-pay. Accessing this information could
cause the business’s (transaction) costs to be very high, which might outweigh the gains of increased
revenued. However, dynamic pricing in online-based markets gives businesses a stronger chance of
achieving this.
o In reality, it is more straightforward and cost-effective for firms (and consumers) to work with
price lists / menus, since this can enable trade / transactions to take place more quickly
without individual negotiations having to take place
• When a firm with monopoly power is able to perfectly segment the market into individual consumers,
its average revenue (AR) curve becomes the same as the marginal revenue (MR) curve.
• The firm will continue to sell additional units so long as the extra revenue exceeds the marginal cost
of production
What benefits and drawbacks for consumers are there of a firm choosing to perfectly price discriminate?
Price discrimination is One way that some E.g. a bus company may
the charging of different groups of consumers charge students a lower
prices to different may benefit comes from price. Students typically
groups of consumers on third degree have lower income so
the basis of variations in discrimination pricing their demand is more
people’s ability to pay. based on age or income. price elastic.
The consequence can As a result, they can This means that student
be an increase in afford to travel more passengers get a
consumer surplus which regularly within their discounted ticket price
is one measure of budget constraint. It which has the effect of
economic welfare from might make attending increasing their real
market activity. college more affordable. purchasing power.
• Uber is a fast-growing taxi service app that operates in more than 50 countries
• Uber uses surge pricing – also known as dynamic pricing
• When market demand exceeds available supply e.g. at peak times, then Uber raises the average fare
on their app
• The aim is to encourage more drivers to take to the roads to expand supply
• The business is taking advantage of low price elasticity of demand at busy times
• Some economists have criticised this policy especially during emergencies such as freak weather
events
Advantgaes
Advantages of competition
• Consumers can benefit from lower prices, leading to an increase in consumer surplus
• Consumers can also potentially benefit from innovation, leading to greater choice and improved
quality, which increases satisfaction and welfare
• Can increase a firm’s customer base, if they offer something very attractive to customers as a result
of competition
Disadvantages of competition
• Some businesses may lose market share – this could cause job loss, and reduced income
• The drive for new products might lead to some products becoming obsolete / unsupported very
quickly, so consumer spending might rise if they need the ‘latest version’ – this can cause
environmental problems too
• The market may become ‘flooded’ due to over-production and so stocks may build up
• Excess choice can lead to the ‘paradox of choice’, and slow down consumer decision-making
For all but pure monopoly, where barriers to entry cannot be overcome, the competitive market process gives
firms an incentive to innovate to gain a cost advantage, improve the quality of the service provided or
introduce new products. Even in monopoly, there is an incentive for firms to undertake R&D to innovate and
overcome barriers to entry.
Process innovation can refer to changes to the way in which production takes
place or is organised, or changes in business models and pricing strategies.
Innovation has demand and supply-side effects in individual markets and the economy as a whole
Dynamic efficiency
Creative destruction should lead to improvements in dynamic efficiency. This type of efficiency focuses on
changes in the choice in a market together with the quality/performance of products that we buy. We usually
identify a close link between dynamic efficiency and the pace of innovation in a market. Dynamic efficiency
can cause a firm’s cost curves to shift downwards, and /or demand (revenue) curves to shift to the right.
Examiner tip:
A key way to gain evaluative marks is to consider what is happening to the resources previously employed in
the firms that have been replaced. If they are unemployed for a period of time, then the outcome is far less
favourable.
Food retailing Fast Food Hotel / Room City Transport Shaving products
Industry Sharing Sector Services
Contestable markets are characterised by there being the threat of competition – there might only be 1 or
2 firms in the market/industry but they cannot behave as though they have monopoly power, even though
on the face of it there appears to be no competition. There can be any number of firms in a contestable
market!
Price
and Profit maximising
Cost price MC
AC
P2
C1 AR
If the market is highly contestable which level of price and output is probable?
• If a monopoly decides to operate at the profit-maximising output (i.e. output Q1 in the diagram
above), there is an opportunity for new entrants to engage in “hit and run” competition to undercut
the established dominant firm and perhaps lower market prices and profits.
• Q2 is an output where price = average cost and only normal profits are made. Here there would be
no incentive for firms to enter the market. At Q2, the price is the “limit price”
• The price and output in a contestable market is likely to be somewhere between the profit-maximising
and normal profit equilibria. The more contestable is the market, the higher the likelihood that price
charged will be closer to normal profits only i.e. closer to the limit price
Most markets are contestable to some degree, but few come close to being perfectly contestable. The most
important condition for contestability is having low entry barriers and exit costs including low sunk costs. It is
often easier to enter a market when a new rival is already scaled and have access to the latest technology
alongside a brand that consumers recognise and trust and which can be extended into new markets. Amazon
Logistics is a good example of this, so too the use of click and collect services by national supermarket / retail
chains. If sunk costs are high this makes it difficult for new firms to enter and leave the market. Therefore, it
will be less contestable
Strategic entry deterrence refers to ways in which firms with market power can make life difficult for new
entrants:
Examples:
1. Hostile takeovers and acquisitions – i.e. taking a stake in a rival firm or buying it up completely!
2. Product differentiation through brand proliferation (i.e. developing new products and spending on
marketing and advertising to reinforce brand loyalty).
3. Capacity expansions designed to achieve lower unit costs from exploiting internal economies of scale.
4. Predatory pricing: This happens when a dominant company sustains losses in the short run in the
knowledge it can recoup them and raise prices if competition is forced to exit
Examiner tip:
Contestable markets are different to other market structures – they are not defined by the number of firms in
the industry. In the exam, look for evidence of barriers to entry; clearly there are entry barriers in all industries,
but judge whether you think they are falling. Use the concept of contestability as a fantastic evaluation tool
e.g. on the surface, a market may look like a monopoly with just one dominant firm, but if entry barriers are
low, then the market could instead be described as contestable.
Some markets have become more contestable as a result of there being less regulation
• E.g. parcel delivery: EU directives meant that parcel delivery had to be opened up to competition by
2011 (or 2013 for some EU countries), and could no longer be controlled by a government monopoly
i.e. the legal / statutory barrier to entry was removed
o However, removing the legal barrier to entry was only part of the reason for growth in this
area. Delivery firms needed there to be enough deliveries in certain geographical areas to
justify operating a service…helpfully, the rise of internet shopping meant that ever more
households were buying online and needed parcel delivery.
o i.e. removing barriers to entry will only make a market truly more contestable if there is
enough demand to justify the need for new entrants
• Open Skies Agreement in air travel in Europe in the 1990s and the ongoing discussions over Open
Skies between the EU and US
o Led to the rise of low-cost budget airlines (e.g. Easyjet, Ryanair etc), causing incumbents such
as BA to lower their prices and behave more competitively
o However – there remain plenty of barriers to entry in this market so it is not truly contestable!
o Banning cross-subsidisation i.e. an existing company using profits in one part of their firm to
subsidise entry into a new market
o Requiring incumbents to provide ‘network access’
o Removing legal barriers to entry
o Preventing mergers & acquisitions, especially vertical integration that reduces access to
supply chains for new firms (n.b. only 12 have been blocked in the UK between 2004 and
2018!)
o Reducing protectionist measures
ESSENTIAL EVALUATION! There are many other reasons, other than the changing nature of regulation, that
cause markets to become more contestable!
Quick question
Can you think of examples where technology has made markets more contestable?
Can you think of examples where government intervention has made markets more contestable?
Static efficiency
This refers to how well scarce resources are being used at a point in time. The key measures are allocative
and productive efficiency.
Allocative efficiency
• Allocative efficiency occurs when the value that consumers place on a good or service (reflected in
the price they are willing and able to pay) equals the cost of the factor resources used up in
production.
• The main condition required for allocative efficiency in a market is that market price = marginal cost
of supply
• This can also be expressed as AR = MC
Productive efficiency
• A firm is productively efficient when it is operating at the lowest point on its average cost curve i.e.
unit costs have been minimised (lowest AC occurs when AC = MC)
• Productive efficiency exists when producers minimize the wastage of resources
• Productive efficiency relates to when an economy is on their production possibility frontier
• An economy is productively efficient if it can produce more of one good only by producing less of
another.
Dynamic efficiency
• Dynamic efficiency occurs when businesses supplying a market successfully meets our changing
needs and wants over time. Crucial to dynamic efficiency is whether the market generates rapid
innovation both in the processes of supply and the range of products available
• Most people associate dynamic efficiency with innovation:
Innovation is putting a new idea into action. Innovation is 'the commercially successful exploitation of ideas'
• Product innovation
o Small-scale and subtle changes to the characteristics and performance of a good or a service
• Process innovation
o Changes to the way in which production takes place or is organised
o Changes in business models and pricing strategies
Innovation occurs as the result of research and development bringing about technological change. Investment
may be required to implement these innovations.
Pareto efficiency and X-inefficiency are not part of the syllabus but are useful nonetheless.
Allocative efficiency Producing what is demanded by consumers at a price that reflect the marginal
cost of supply
AR = MC
Dynamic efficiency Changes in the choices available in a market together with the
quality/performance of products that we buy. Linked closely to the rate of
innovation/invention
Price
and
Cost MC
Q1 – Productive efficiency
where AC=MC
AC Q2 – Allocative efficiency
MR where AR=MC
AR
Q1 Q2 Output
Quick question
Using the previous diagram, for each of the productive and allocatively efficient levels of output, can you
work out:
- The price
Do go back and review the material on efficiency in different market structures in section 4.1.5.1
Consumer surplus
Consumer surplus is a measure of the welfare that people gain from consuming goods and services. Consumer
surplus is the difference between the maximum that consumers are willing and able to pay for a good or
service and the total amount that they actually do pay. On a demand and supply diagram, it is represented
by the area underneath the demand curve and above the market price. Consumer surplus rises or falls as the
market price for a good or service changes
Total consumer surplus if this person buys 4 cans will be £2.40 from a total spending of £4.
• When demand for a good or service is perfectly elastic, consumer surplus is zero because the price
that people pay matches what they are willing to pay.
• In contrast, when demand is perfectly inelastic, consumer surplus is infinite. Quantity demanded does
not respond to a price change. Whatever the price, the quantity demanded remains the same.
• The majority of demand curves are downward sloping. When demand is price inelastic, there is a
greater potential consumer surplus because there are some buyers willing to pay a high price to
consume the product.
Examiner tip
You might choose to illustrate consumer surplus on a demand and supply diagram, or show how it has
changed following a change in demand and/or supply. Because you can only use black ink on your exam
paper, you need to practice either a) using “hatching” to indicate different areas on a diagram or b) labelling
the corners of shapes you want to describe e.g. “Triangle ABC represents the initial consumer surplus”.
If you need to calculate consumer surplus, either as in the table shown above, or by calculating the area of a
triangle shown on a demand and supply diagram, remember that the formula for calculating a triangle’s area
is (base x height / 2)
• Airlines and train companies are expert at this, extracting from consumers the price they are willing
and able to pay for flying to different destinations are various times of the day, and exploiting
variations in elasticity of demand for different types of passenger service.
• You will always get a better deal with airlines such as EasyJet and Ryan Air if you are prepared to book
in advance. The airlines are happy to sell tickets more cheaply because they get the benefit of cash
flow together with the guarantee of a seat being filled. The nearer the time to take-off, the higher the
price
• If someone is desperate to fly from Newcastle to Paris in 24 hours’ time, his or her demand is said to
be price inelastic and the corresponding price for the ticket will be much higher.
Changes in supply and demand, market price and consumer surplus
Consumer surplus rises or falls as the market price for a good or service changes – here are two examples:
S2
B I S1
D E G
S1 A C D2
A C
Demand
Demand
Q2 Q1 Quantity Q1 Q2 Quantity
Lower2supply2costs2cause2price2 An2increase2in2market2demand2
Price to2fall2and2equilibrium2quantity2 Price leads2to2a2higher2price2&2
to2rise.2Producer2surplus2 quantity2leading2a2rise2in2
increases2from2area2ADB2to2 producer2surplus2from2area2
area2FEC2 ABC2to2DEC
S1 S1
D E
A D
E B
S2 A D2
F
B C
D1
D1
C
Q1 Q2 Quantity Q1 Q2 Quantity
Quick question:
You can now illustrate total revenue and producer surplus (“profit”) on a demand and supply diagram. One
‘triangle’ of the total revenue area is producer surplus – can you explain why the remaining ‘triangle’ in that
total revenue rectangle must represent total costs?
Price
Consumer6and6producer6
R
surplus6are6important6
concepts6to6use6when6
Supply discussing6the6effects6of6
Consumer6 different6government6
surplus S interventions6in6markets6such6
P as6taxes6&6subsidies6
Producer6
surplus Demand Changes6in6conditions6of6
market6supply6and6demand6
will6bring6about6changes6in6
the6level6of6consumer6and6
Q producer6surplus6(economic6
welfare)
O
T Quantity
Some students can get confused with the labour market because the economic agents are effectively the
opposite way around compared to product markets i.e. it is firms that are demanding labour, and households
are supplying their labour.
Labour
Demand
E3 E1 E2
Employment E2 E1 E3 Employment
The demand curve for labour is derived from the marginal revenue product of labour. This in turn comes
from the marginal physical product which is closely related to the law of diminishing returns.
• Let us assume that each worker employed costs the firm $160 per day – this is the marginal cost of
labour
• At this wage rate of $160 the firm should employ 6 workers
• A profit maximising firm should employ workers up to the point where the marginal revenue product
of labour = the marginal cost of labour. In this case, when 6 people are employed MRPL and MCL
both equal $160. Employing the 7th worker would lead to a fall in total profits
Note: This theory assumes competitive labour markets and also competitive product markets i.e. where the
final price of output is the same so that AR=MR.
Wage% Wage%
Rate Rate
W3 W3
W2
W1 W1
LD1
LD2
E2 E1 Employment E3 E1 Employment
Shifts in the Labour Demand curve
The labour demand curve shifts when there is a change in:
1. A rise in final consumer demand which means that a business needs to take on more workers
2. A change in the market price of the output that labour is making
3. An increase in the productivity of labour which makes labour more cost efficient than capital (higher
productivity increases the marginal product of labour)
4. A government employment subsidy which allows a business to employ more workers
Wage%
Rate
W1
E3 E1 E2
Shifts%in%labour%demand% Employment
are%caused%by%factors%other%
than%the%wage%rate
The construction industry is a good example of a sector where employment is cyclical. When demand for new
buildings is growing quickly, there will be an expansion of demand for many different types of jobs within the
industry. However, in a cyclical downturn, construction employment is likely to fall.
Forecasted number of people employed in the construction industry in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2022, by
occupation
Manufacturing 45%
Wholesale and retail trade 42%
Construction 23%
Human heath and social work 18%
Education 8%
Automation, robotics and the extension application of artificial intelligence / machine learning will create
significant changes in the pattern of employment. Routine, less well-paid work, has been and remains most
susceptible to automation. In the USA, according to a 2013 paper by two Oxford academics, 47% percent of
jobs are at “high risk” of being automated within the next 20 years – 54% of lost jobs will be in finance.
Technology also has the potential to create more and better jobs. Some of them come in the new sectors,
such as app designers and software engineers.
Examiner tip
Wage elasticity of labour demand (or supply) is a really useful concept to introduce into your answers
because it can allow you to make more evaluative comments and indicate that you have really thought
about the context you have been given.
Labour supply: Hours that people are willing and able to supply at a given wage rate.
1. Real wage rate on offer in the industry itself plus extra pay – e.g. overtime, productivity pay, share
options
2. Wages on offer in substitute occupations: e.g. increase in the earnings for plumbers and electricians
may cause people to switch their jobs
3. Barriers to entry: Artificial limits to an industry’s labour supply (e.g. minimum qualifications might be
needed) can restrict supply and increase average wages compared to other jobs
4. Improvements in the occupational mobility of labour and stock of human capital e.g. as result of
expansion of apprenticeships and other types of work experience – increases numbers who can work
in a given job
5. Non-monetary characteristics of specific jobs – e.g. job risk, need to work anti-social hours, job
security, working conditions, career progression, the chance to live & work overseas, quality of in-
work training, occupational pension schemes.
6. Net migration of labour – e.g. net inward migration expands the active / available labour supply in
many occupations such as people working in the National Health Service, construction and farming
7. Demographic factors affecting the overall size of the working population
8. People’s preferences between work/leisure and desire for work flexibility
Wage Wage
Rate In relatively lower-skilled jobs, the Rate
labour supply is elastic because a LS2
pool of labour is available to be W2
employed at a fairly constant market
wage rate.
W1
LS1
W2
Where jobs require specific skills and
W1 training, the labour supply will be
more inelastic.
E1 E2 Employment E1 E2 Employment
Extension material - market failure in labour markets: the geographical and occupational mobility of labour
There are many root causes of labour market failure and these have consequences not only for individuals
and households concerned but also due to the wider impact on business performance and macro
competitiveness.
High cost of
Family ties Migration controls Language barriers
property
Skills lacking among staff with skills gaps in the United Kingdom in 2017
At the industry level, market forces determine the equilibrium wage rate. As shown, the wage rate is W. In
perfect competition, firms are wage takers and the assumption that they can employ as much labour as they
like at the prevailing wage means that they face a perfectly elastic supply curve S. Profit maximising employers
will employ labour to the point where MC = MRP. This is EF in the example shown.
Clearly, the assumptions underpinning the perfectly competitive labour market model are unrealistic – and
so therefore all labour markets are, to some extent, imperfect.
W2 Labour%Supply%
(=%ACL)
W1
W3
Total%
wages% Labour%Demand%
=%MRPL
E2 E1 Employment
Compared with the perfectly competitive market outcome of E1, W1, both wages and employment are lower.
Imperfect information
Imperfect information could lead to a number of labour market imperfections. Information failure on the part
of an employer regarding marginal revenue product might lead them to adopt heuristics, or simple rules of
thumb which could be associated with discrimination (discussed below). Labour may be unaware of their own
MRP, again making discrimination possible. Information failures of the requirements for particular occupations
or the employment opportunities available, might limit labour market flexibility.
32.0%
Percentage of employees
30.0%
28.0%
26.0%
24.0%
22.0%
20.0%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
There has been a long-term decline in union membership. Membership is ageing and is focused in public
sector occupations. Factors behind trade union decline include:
Collective
Employee rights Pension entitlement Protecting jobs
bargaining
Trade unions, wages and employment – using standard labour market analysis
• Trade Unions may bid for employers to pay a premium wage above the normal competitive market
wage.
• This might lead to an excess supply of labour and a contraction of total employment
• Unions will have more success in raising wages for members if demand for labour is relatively wage
inelastic
• Unions also more influential when they represent a high % of all workers in a given
industry/occupation
• Pay might also rise if unions and employers agree a pay deal based on better productivity
Wage% • Trade%Unions%may%bid%
Rate
for%employers%to%pay%a%
Labour%Supply premium%wage%(or%
“wage%mark?up”)%
W2 above%the%normal%
Union%negotiated%
competitive%market%
W1 wage wage
• This%might%lead%to%an%
excess%supply%of%labour%
and%a%contraction%of%
total%employment
Labour%Demand
E2 E1 Employment
Higher%wage%income%from%
Wage% • Trade%Unions%may%bid%
union%collective%bargaining
Rate
for%employers%to%pay%a%
Labour%Supply premium%wage%(or%
“wage%mark?up”)%
W2 above%the%normal%
Union%negotiated%
competitive%market%
W1 wage wage
• This%might%lead%to%an%
excess%supply%of%labour%
and%a%contraction%of%
total%employment
Labour%Demand
E2 E1 Employment
Higher%wage%income%from%
Wage% • Whether%or%nor%higher%
union%collective%bargaining
Rate
Lost%wage%income% wages%achieved%by%
from%contraction% Labour%Supply unions%from%collective%
in%employment bargaining%lead%
W2 increased%total%income%
Union%negotiated%
depends%on%what%
W1 wage happens%to%the%
employment%of%people%
in%this%particular%labour%
market.
Labour%Demand
E2 E1 Employment
• Unions will have more success in raising wages for their members if the demand for labour is relatively
wage inelastic
• Unions also more influential when they represent a high % of all workers in a given
industry/occupation
• Pay might also rise if unions and employers agree a pay deal based on success in lifting productivity
If a trade union is successful in introducing productivity improvements a better outcome may be achieved. In
this case, MRP increases, shifting the demand curve, possibly to the point where a new equilibrium is achieved
at the trade union wage rate
Wage Wage
rate rate
Labour supply Labour supply
W2
W2
W1 W1
LD2 (higher
productivity)
If instead (as is more likely), a trade union is introduced into a monopsony labour market, then the outcome
is rather different. If wage W2 is the trade union wage, the profit maximising level of employment is now L2.
Both wages and employment have increased.
In considering the impact of introducing a trade union, it is critical to consider the conduct of the trade
union and the comparator – are you comparing with monopsony or perfect competition?
Trade unions and the labour market – some key evaluation points
• Long term decline in union membership – which reflects the growing flexibility of the UK labour
market including zero-hour contracts + decline of heavy industry and shrinking public sector
• Trade union influence on pay depends in part on trade union density in an industry and also the
credible threat power they have with possible industrial action (e.g. London Tube drivers)
• New Unionism focuses less on wage bargaining and more on protecting employment, pension rights,
health and safety, workplace training, addressing gender & other discrimination
• Don’t assume that trade unions successfully negotiating higher wages will inevitably lead to a
contraction in employment / jobs (this is lazy economics!) – challenge theoretical assumptions!
• Trade Unions may negotiate a combined pay and productivity deal with employers – a positive-sum
game! Use some game theory!
Median full time gross weekly pay of the lowest paid occupations in the UK (April 2016)
Wage% Wage%
Rate Rate LS1
LS1
W2 Min%Wage
W1
W1
LD1
LD1
E1 Employment E2 E3 Employment
Wage% Wage%
Rate Labour%Rate Labour%
Supply Supply
MW MW
W1
W1
Labour% Labour%
Demand Demand
E2 E1 E3 Empl E2 E1 E3 Empl
National living wage compared to national minimum wage (21 years and over) in the UK from 2011 to 2017
Living wage Minimum wage
10
8.75
9 8.25 8.45
7.65 7.85
8 7.45 7.5
7.2 6.95
6.5 6.7
7 6.31
Wage per hour in £s
6.08 6.19
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Case for a higher minimum wage Arguments against a rise in the minimum wage
• Equity justification: Every job should give fair • Jobs: Higher minimum wage adds to the costs
pay linked with skills/experience of an of employing workers and might cause higher
employee. unemployment
• Poverty reduction: A minimum wage boosts the • Small businesses: Many smaller businesses
take-home pay of thousands of lower paid struggle to make a profit - risk of a rise in
workers business closures
• Training: It encourages firms to up-skill their • Training: There are better incentives for training
workers and can lead to higher labour than a minimum wage e.g. tax relief on
productivity apprenticeships
Average pay is higher in the public sector than in the private sector. In 2017, median weekly earnings for full-
time employees in the public sector were £599 in the public sector compared to £532 in the private sector. In
part because sector workers tend to be older and more highly-educated. Another factor is that there is a
higher share of jobs in the private sector paying close to the minimum wage.
Supporters of getting rid of public sector wage controls argue that capping pay rises has led to worsening
recruitment problems which now threatens the delivery of public services. Labour shortages may get bigger if
there is a sharp reduction in net inward migration into the UK which would impact on the NHS in particular.
Two counter arguments are that firstly, the pensions are more generous for public sector employees and
secondly, job security is greater.
Wage% • When%discriminating,%
Rate
employers%may%
Labour%Supply perceive%that%that%the%
marginal%revenue%
productivity%of%
W1 “favoured%groups”%is%
relatively%higher%than%
people%subject%to%the%
discrimination
Labour%Demand%(nonB
discriminated%group)
E1 Employment
W2
LD1
LD%for%discriminated%
group
E2 E1 Employment
Men Women
700 640
620.2
600 578
536.6 526.6
Median weekly earnings in £s
507.1
500 465.5
435
414.5 411.4
400
301.8
279.9
300
200 164.2
133.8
100
0
16 to 17 18 to 21 22 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 and over
Median UK gender pay gap of full-time employees in the UK as of April 2017, by industry
Extension material
1. Compensating wage differentials – these might be a reward for risk-taking, working in poor conditions
and during unsocial hours.
2. Reward for human capital – differentials compensate workers for (opportunity and direct) costs of
human capital acquisition.
3. Different skill levels – market demand for skilled labour (with inelastic supply) grows more quickly than
for semi-skilled workers.
4. Differences in labour productivity and revenue creation - workers whose efficiency is high and
generate revenue for a firm often have higher pay.
5. Trade unions who might use their collective bargaining power – to achieve a mark-up on wages
compared to non-union members
6. Artificial barriers to labour supply e.g. professional exams, migration controls
For workers
1. Doubts over the true flexibility of hours offered by employers
2. Lack of paid vacation/sick leave/employment rights
3. Job and income uncertainty make it harder to get a mortgage – many people are in precarious jobs
4. Inadequate investment in worker training
5. Workers bear most of the risk in their job – often incomes are lower for the self-employed
Wider downsides
1. Shrinking of the tax base will hit revenues
2. Reductions in road safety / more accidents e.g. from delivery drivers using un-licenced vehicles
3. Are platform businesses creating high-quality jobs?
Forecasted population of United Kingdom in 2015, 2025 and 2035, by age group (in million people)
0-14 15-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
80
70
Population (in million people)
16.9
13.95
60 11.85
50 8.99 8.28
7.53
40 9.25 8.47 9.17
10
11.5 12.19 11.86
0
2015 2025 2035
Labour Migration
After a number of years of high levels of net inward migration of labour, the net flow of workers entering the
UK labour market has slowed which is in part the result of the June 2016 Brexit referendum. A decline in net
inward migration has an impact on both the demand and the supply-side of the labour market and can affect
both real wages and employment in a large number of different occupations and industries.
Net migration into the UK peaked in 2015 at 336 thousand, when the number of migrants coming into the
country was estimated to have been 644 thousand, compared with 308 thousand leaving.
336 327
400 236 243 271
184 175
200
0
-200
-400
-352 -318 -316 -308 -311 -349 -344
-600
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017* 2018*
Possible microeconomic effects of a fall in net Possible macroeconomic effects of a fall in labour
labour migration migration
Shortages of skilled labour e.g. in the National Fall in net outflow of remittances – impact on UK
Health Service, construction current account of BoP
Impact on demand for and prices of properties to Impact on employment and unemployment if
buy and to rent aggregate labour supply contracts
Effects on dynamic efficiency e.g. with a brain Consequences for economic growth and inflation
drain of entrepreneurs / scientists e.g. from slower growth of AD + possible fall in
LRAS
There has been an increase in the number of people employed on zero-hour contracts in the UK labour
market. In 2000, there were 225 thousand people on zero-hour contracts, with this number increasing to
approximately 780 thousand by 2018.
700 624
585
600
500
400
300 225 252
176 166 189 168 190
200 156 147 143
124 108 119
100
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Age dependency Age dependency = (people younger than 15 and older than 64) / (working age
ratio people ages 15-64).
Capital labour Replacing workers with machines in a bid to increase productivity and reduce the unit
substitution cost of production
Demand for The number of workers a firm is willing and able to employ at each wage rate
labour
Derived demand Demand for a factor of production as a result of demand for the final product that
that factor of production can produce
Discouraged People out of work for a long time who may give up on job search and leave the
workers labour market
Discrimination Different treatment of people based on age, gender, race, sexual orientation,
ethnicity
Economic People who are out of work and not looking for a job
inactivity
Economic rent Any amount earned by someone above the minimum amount they require to work
Full employment When there enough unfilled job vacancies for all the unemployed to take paid work
Gender pay gap Percentage difference between men's and women’s median hourly earnings
Geographical Barriers to people moving within and between areas and regions to find work
immobility of
labour
Gig economy Fragmented work where someone is given a task for a certain amount of time e.g.
delivery couriers
Gini coefficient A measure of income inequality in a country, where 0 represents complete equality
and 1 represents complete inequality.
Human capital The amount of skill, knowledge, talent, experience and ability of workers.
Labour force All people who are of working age, and able and willing to work. It includes both the
employed, and the unemployed.
Labour supply The quantity of people willing and able to work in an occupation or industry at the
prevailing wage rate
Labour-intensive Labour-intensive production relies mainly on labour e.g. food processing,
production hairdressing, fruit farming
Living wage Hourly pay that provides enough money for a working person to live decently and
provide for their family.
Long term People who have been out of work for at least one year
unemployed
Marginal revenue Extra revenue generated when an additional worker is employed.
product
Minimum wage A statutory (legal) pay floor in the labour market
Money wages Also known as "nominal wages"; the actual hourly rate of pay - it is not adjusted for
inflation
Monopsony A labour market structure in which there is a single powerful buyer of a particular
employer type of labour.
Participation rate Proportion of the population of working age that is in the labour force (either
employed or unemployed).
Poverty trap Situation in which there is no incentive for workers earning a low income to earn
extra income, because it would result in having to either pay higher tax and/or losing
some of their benefit payments
Real wage The hourly rate of pay adjusted for inflation
Examiner tip
Make sure that you stay completely up to date with developments and trends in labour markets. It will be
helpful for you in both microeconomics and macroeconomics!
Income Wealth
Income is a flow of money going to factors Wealth is the current value of a stock of
of production assets owned by someone or society as a
whole
Wages and salaries from jobs Savings in bank accounts
Rental income from property Ownership of property
Interest from savings Shares / stocks in businesses
Profits flowing to shareholders Wealth held in pension schemes
• Skills bias arising from technological change – super-high pay for some people
• Rising share of capital income – concentrated among the rich (Piketty)
• Tax systems have become less progressive + Welfare cuts
• Executive pay and bonuses rising faster than for ordinary employees
• Rise in scale of in-work poverty, reduced employee bargaining power
• Increasing urban-rural and deep regional economic inequalities
• Hollowing out of employment in manufacturing, increasing economic inactivity
Measuring Inequality
• Gini Coefficient
o Overall measure of income equality, a value of 1 is perfect inequality; a value of zero means
no inequality
• Palma Ratio
o Ratio of income of the top 10% of income households divided by the income to the poorest
40%
Recent publications from Parliament and the ONS suggest that the tax and benefits redistribution system in
the UK does not reduce the value of the Gini coefficient by as much as it does in other countries that have a
similar “original income” Gini coefficient. The impact of the tax and benefits system in the UK can be seen on
the following chart.
50
40
30
20
10
0
1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Quick question
How has the UK’s Gini coefficient, and therefore level of inequality, changed over time? How effective do
you think the tax and benefit system is at reducing inequality?
The chart below shows the UK’s average income over time. Clearly income has risen over the period shown.
But there is an increasing divergence between the mean income and the median income, as the mean
continues to be ‘pulled upwards’ by a small number of very high earners.
91
to 6
20 to 2 4
87
2
79
4
83
85
89
20 to 2 0
20 to 2 2
11 010
18
77
97 99
17 01
09 00
13 01
05 00
07 00
95 99
99 99
01 00
03 00
15 01
19
19
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
20 to 2
20 to 2
20 o 2
20 to 2
19 to 1
20 to 2
1
19 to 1
20 to 2
t
19
Median Mean
It is widely believed that persistent deep poverty is a major barrier to economic growth and development.
Hence the importance attached by many countries to introducing effective poverty-reduction strategies.
The impact of high rates of extreme poverty and deep inequality include:
• Low life expectancy and fewer years of healthy life expectancy
• Low school enrolment rates as families cannot afford education - widens the gender opportunity gap
• Low access to basic health care
• Vulnerability to loan sharks for families mired in debt
• Limited access to technology
• Threats to democracy and stable institutions
• Low real spending power limits the size of markets for consumer goods and services
• White British households had the largest percentage of households in the highest income quintile
(21%), and the smallest percentage in the lowest income quintile (17%)
• Bangladeshi households had the smallest percentage of households in the highest income quintile
(4%), and the largest percentage in the lowest income quintile (44%)
• the ethnic groups with the largest percentage of households in the 2 lowest quintiles were Pakistani
(76%), Bangladeshi (74%) and Black (62%)
• by comparison, 37% of White British households fell into the 2 lowest income quintiles
Decile 10 (Highest)
Decile 9
Decile 8
Decile 7
Decile 6
Decile 5
Decile 4
Decile 3
Decile 2
Decile 1 (Lowest)
50%
Lorenz*Curve*
(Low*Inequality)
Lorenz*Curve*
(High*Inequality)
0%
Poorest Richest
Households* by*Income*– Quintile* Distribution
Extension material: using the Lorenz Curve to measure the Gini Coefficient
• The Gini coefficient condenses the entire income distribution for a country into a single number
between 0 and 1: the higher the number, the greater the degree of income inequality.
• The Gini coefficient ranges from zero, when everyone has the same income, to 1, when a single
individual receives all the income
• A Gini coefficient above 0.4 is often seen as an important point. Inequality above this level is frequently
associated with political instability and growing social tensions.
Cumulative*%*of*Income
100%
Line*of* Equality
Gini*coefficient*=*
Area*A
Divided* by
Area*A*+*Area*B
A
Lorenz*Curve
B
0%
Poorest Richest
Households* by*Income*– Quintile* Distribution
• Available policies to influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty
• The economic consequences of such policies, including recognising the moral and political
perspectives
How taxes and welfare affect the final distribution of income in the UK
1. Original income is income before government intervention e.g. from wages and salaries and
investment incomes including rent and interest.
2. Final income is income after taxes and benefits.
Economic systems
An economic system is a network of organisations used to resolve what, how much, how and for whom to
produce i.e. a way of solving the basic economic problem (when there are infinite demands on finite
resources).
1. Free market economy: Markets allocate resources through the price mechanism. An increase in
demand raises price and encourages businesses to put more resources into the production. The
quantity of products consumed by people depends on their income and income itself depends on
the market value of an individual’s work. In a free market system, there is a limited role for the
government, indeed in a pure free market system, the government limits itself to protecting property
rights of people and businesses using the legal system and protecting the value of money or the
value of a currency.
2. Planned or command economy: in a planned or command system associated with a socialist or
communist system, the government owns scarce resources. The state allocates resources and sets
production targets and growth rates according to its own view of people's wants. Market prices play
little or no part in informing resource allocation decisions and queuing rations scarce goods.
3. Mixed economy: In a mixed system, some resources are owned by the public sector (government)
and some are owned by the private sector. The public (or state) sector typically supplies public, quasi-
public and merit goods and intervenes in markets to correct market failure. Nearly all economies in
the world are mixed although that mix changes over time for example as some industries are
privatised (sold to the private sector) or nationalised (taken back into state ownership).
1. An efficient allocation of scarce resources – factor inputs tend to go where the expected profit is
highest, and in turn this represents the goods/services most desired by consumers (economists often
link this to idea of consumer sovereignty).
1. Some members of society may be unable to work e.g. the elderly, those with disabilities or additional
needs, parents with young children etc. Without government intervention, these people will likely live
in poverty. This can create significant inequality in an economy.
2. Goods that are bad for us (often called demerit goods) may be over-produced; these could include
products such as cigarettes and alcohol. Similarly, products that are very good for us (often called
merit goods) may not be consumed in large enough quantities; these could include healthcare and
education (which will not be provided by the government in a completely free-market system).
3. Because of the profit motive, firms may be tempted to cut costs, and so exploit labour (e.g. paying
low wages or using child labour), use environmentally-unsound production methods etc.
4. Some firms may grow so large that they gain significant monopoly power, which allows them to
charge very high prices to consumers, which could be unfair. Without government intervention, there
may be no easy way to prevent this from happening.
5. Public goods (which you will meet later in Theme 1) will not be provided. Examples include streetlights,
free-to-use roads, lighthouses, flood defences etc.
Quick question
1. There is generally a low level of inequality and a low level of unemployment. Many command
economies have had strong gender equality.
2. Resources are allocated according to the ‘common good’ rather than according to the ‘profit motive’.
This is likely to result in universal provision of healthcare and education, amongst other things.
3. It may be more straightforward / fast to get large-scale infrastructure projects built.
1. Bureaucratic costs of central planning of resources – petty officialdom can lead to wasteful
inefficiencies and therefore higher costs.
2. Problems in fixing prices of goods and services – planners are unlikely to be as accurate as the market
in determining suitable prices.
3. Absence of incentives for both workers (i.e. no wage ‘differentials’) and businesses (i.e. no ‘profit
motive’) can damage productivity and also lead to large levels of over-employment.
4. Low productivity and weak incentives lead to rising losses for many state-owned businesses. The
incentive to innovate is also limited.
5. Changing consumer needs and wants are not expressed as preferences in markets – the state is often
slow to react to these
6. The state can suffer from information failures and corruption
7. State-run economies are at higher risk of mal-investment driven by political motivations rather than
market-assessed cost-benefit analysis
In reality, most economic systems are “mixed”. That is, some resources are allocated using the market
mechanism, and others by the government. The precise combination of private versus public resource
allocation depends on the economy in question – there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ combination. This is a good
example of a normative issue in economics. Typically in a mixed economy, the government will collect taxes
to a) help ‘redistribute’ income from the rich to the poor, and b) to provide the goods and services its regards
as essential.
Quick questions
Are there are resources currently provided by the market mechanism that you think would be better
provided by the government?
In his 1776 book ‘Wealth of Nations’, Adam Smith (amongst many other things!) wrote about the ‘invisible
hand’ of resource allocation, and the role of ‘self-interest’, in an early reference to free-market economies.
The key quotes from Wealth of Nations on this topic are:
“[Every individual] generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much
he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his
own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value,
he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote
an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of
it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he
really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the
public good.”
At the same time, however, Adam Smith warned that we should be wary of businesses that become too
large (i.e. monopolies) because of their tendency to raise prices. He recognised that the government should
keep an eye on their activities, but believed it was dangerous for large businesses to influence politics and
legislation.
Smith also recognised that in a free market economy, some people would be rich ‘property owners’ i.e.
owners of the factors of production, and there would be far fewer of these people than labourers. He said
that one important role of government in this type of economic system would be to maintain law and
order, because the many poor would want to take over the property of the rich.
Other roles for the government, identified by Smith, include the issuing of patents and copyright (to protect
invention), providing national defence, regulating the banking sector, building infrastructure, and public
goods.
Smith is now regarded as the founder of free market (or laissez-faire) economics, despite recognising the
need for some government intervention.
Marx developed many of Adam Smith’s ideas on capitalism / free-market economics, but mostly considered
the negative consequences. He agreed that free markets would lead to large increases in productivity and
output, but also thought that the impact on labourers would be terrible. Marx believed that the drive for
profit by business owners in the capitalist system would push worker wages to ‘subsistence’ levels and that
they would be exploited. He said that, ultimately, exploited workers would work together and overthrow
capitalism in a revolution. Capitalism would be replaced by socialism. In this system, production would be
coordinated centrally, and distribution of the goods made would be “to each according to his contribution”.
Beyond this, though, Max gave very little indication of how he thought a centrally-planned command
economy would operate in practice.
Hayek is probably the best-known member of what is known as the Austrian School of economics, in which
there is a strong belief in the role and importance of the individual in the economy, rather than any
collective group or government. During the 1930s, he engaged in lively debate with the economist Keynes
– Keynes supported significant government intervention in the economy to stimulate growth whereas
Hayek did not.
Whereas Adam Smith saw a role for government intervention in money markets and financial markets,
Hayek disagreed, arguing that intervention in money markets was one of the main causes of economic
instability (the pattern of booms and recessions). In other words, Hayek saw less of a role for governments
in an economy than even Smith. For Hayek, the only possible role for a government was to maintain law
and order. Later in life, he did suggest that the state could provide a small ‘safety net’ for those who found
themselves unable to work.
Quick question
Which of the three economists just mentioned do you think you most closely agree with, and why?
Examiner tip
Referring to the work of economists in exam answers is often a very good way to build strong knowledge
marks.
Partial market failure occurs when the market functions / exists, but it supplies either the wrong quantity of a
product or at the wrong price. Examples needed for your A level include externalities from production and
consumption, some information gaps, market concentration and frictions, and irrationality (such as that
identified by behavioural economics). Inequality can also be a cause of partial market failure, particularly
regarding allocative efficiency, as some groups are not able to express their preferences through effective
demand. When prices are very volatile, this may also be thought of by some as leading to a market failure if
some, particularly vulnerable groups in society are affected. Merit and demerit goods are particular types of
goods that combine a number of these characteristics. A merit good for example is associated with an
irrational (and incorrect) evaluation of benefits, positive consumption externalities and it is a good that society
feels individuals should be able to consume irrespective of their ability to pay.
Sanitation Flood defence Crime control for Reduced risk of Freely available Public service
infrastructure projects a community disease from knowledge e.g. broadcasting
vaccinations online learning
Public goods cause market failure due to the problem of missing markets. Public goods are also sometimes
referred to as collective consumption goods. Public goods are characterised as being both non-rival and non-
excludable.
Private Goods
A private good or service has two main characteristics:
1. Excludable: A ticket to the theatre or pay-per-view sporting events are private goods because buyers
can be excluded from enjoying the product if they are not willing and able to pay for it. Excludability
gives the seller the chance to make a profit. When goods are excludable, the owners can exercise
property rights.
2. Rival in consumption: If you enjoy a pizza from Dominos, that pizza is no longer available to someone
else. Likewise driving a car on a road uses up road space that is no longer available at that time to
another motorist. With a private good, one person's consumption of a product reduces the amount
left for others to consume and benefit from - because scarce resources are used up in supplying the
product.
We can also describe private goods as being rejectable. So,if you don't like the soup on the school menu, you
can use your money to buy something else! You can choose not to travel on Virgin Rail and go instead by
coach, or you can choose not to buy a season ticket for your local football club and instead use the money to
finance a subscription to a health club. The consumer can reject private goods and services if their needs and
preferences or their budget changes.
Examiner tip:
Many students get confused about the definition and nature of public goods in exams. Too frequently,
students write that public goods are provided by the government as their defining feature – however, public
sector provision is usually the solution to this market failure and in no way constitutes the nature of a public
good. A public good is not one that is provided by the public sector!
Every time you see the phrase ‘public goods’ in an exam, the first two things you should write down are that
public goods are both non-rival and non-excludable. Questions often ask about “the extent to which a
particular good is public or not”. Students need to then establish whether the good in question is both non-
rival and non-excludable, and then consider circumstances in which it might not e.g. a busy beach on a hot
sunny day. Public goods can sometimes be quasi-public i.e. either non-rival or non-excludable, but not both.
This is covered in more detail below.
Quasi-Public Goods
A quasi-public good is a near-public good. It has some of the characteristics of a public good. Quasi-public
goods are:
1. Semi-non-rival: up to a point, more consumers using a park or road do not reduce the space available
for others. But beaches can become crowded as do parks/leisure facilities. Open-access Wi-Fi
networks become crowded
2. Semi-non-excludable: it is possible but difficult or costly to exclude non-paying consumers. E.g.
fencing a park or beach and charging an entrance fee; or toll booths
So, quasi-public goods are either non-rival or non-excludable, but not both.
Downloading /
Tax evasion
sharing
Because public goods are non-excludable it is difficult to charge people for benefitting once a product is made
available. People who use the good/service once it is provided and do not pay are known as free riders. Free
riders have no incentive to reveal how much they are willing and able to pay for a public good. The free rider
problem leads to under-provision of a good and thus causes market failure; in the case of public goods,
because everyone would be a free rider, the good is not provided at all by the private sector because they
would be unable to supply it for a profit.
Technological progress also reduces the cost of smart metering used in road pricing – this makes roads more
of a private (excludable) good. The open source / creative commons movement has made much information
public good in nature.
Failure to protect property rights may lead to what is known as the Tragedy of the Commons - examples
include the over-use of common land and the long-term decline of fish stocks caused by over-fishing which
leads to long term permanent damage to the stock of natural resources. In this situation, individual users of
the asset (e.g. grazing land, the sea) aim to maximise their own utility, but in doing so, reduce the benefits for
everyone, and ultimately themselves, as the resource is over-used.
Quick question
Think about some of the goods and services provided by the government. Which of them are public goods?
Which of them are more likely to be goods with positive externalities, that the government has decided to
provide?
Because externalities lie outside the initial market transaction, they are not reflected in the market price.
Externalities cause market failure if the price mechanism does not take account of the full social costs and
benefits of production and consumption. Externalities can be positive and/or negative i.e. the impacts on third
parties can be good or bad.
The terms ‘social cost’ and ‘external cost’ are often confused by students. External costs simply affect third
parties whereas social costs affect third parties and those directly involved in the market transaction.
Multiple choice questions on this topic often consider this common error, so be careful!
Examiner tip:
AQA like you to show production externalities on the supply curve. Refer to the externalities as costs.
Consumption externalities are shown on the demand curve and are referred to as benefits.
If you are taking an AS exam, the terminology used is different. See the diagrams below:
1. Shadow pricing: e.g. the external cost of road congestion can be calculated by multiplying the number
of hours lost by the average wage e.g. 1m lost working hours x £12 average hourly wage = £12m
2. Compensation: estimate the cost of ‘putting right’ an externality e.g. includes the cost of installing
double-glazing in houses affected by increased road noise from a new motorway. If 200 houses are
affected each with £5,000 double glazing cost, increased road noise is estimated at £1m
3. Revealed preference: how much people are willing to pay to avoid an externality e.g. if 200
householders are willing to pay £2,000 each to avoid noise, the externality is valued at £0.4m
Noting that it is virtually impossible to put a price on externalities helps with evaluation of the effectiveness of
policies to tackle externalities. For example, governments may decide to use an indirect tax to reduce
production to the socially optimal level, but this requires them to set the indirect tax equal to the value of the
external cost – this is not possible if we cannot value the external cost, so as a result the government
intervention may be ineffective.
• Marginal private cost (MPC): cost to the producing firm of producing an additional unit of output or
costs to an individual of any economic action
• Marginal external cost (MEC): cost to third parties from the production of an additional unit of output
• Marginal social cost (MSC): total cost to society of producing an extra unit of output. MSC = MPC +
MEC
In this example, the largest net social benefit is highest for building new hospitals. Net social benefit may be
considered by a government when deciding which project offers the best potential return for society.
• If there are negative externalities, then we must add the external costs to the firm’s supply curve (i.e.
it’s marginal private cost (MPC) curve) to find the marginal social cost curve (MSC)
• If the market fails to include these external costs, the private equilibrium output is Q1 and the price P1
where marginal private cost = marginal private benefit.
• The socially efficient output would be Q2 with a higher price P2. At this price level, the external costs
have been considered, and marginal social cost is equal to marginal social benefit
• We have not eliminated the pollution – but at least the market has recognised them and priced them
into the price of the product.
• For economists, it is rarely the case that products generating external costs should have production
levels of zero – we recognise that there are usually some benefits to these products being provided!
Costs,( The(equilibrium(
Marginal(
Benefits output( delivered(
Social(Cost(
£s by(a(free$market is(
(MSC)
at(Q1 where(MPB(=(
MPC(and(it(is(
P2 allocatively$
Marginal( inefficient.
Private(Cost(
P1 (MPC)
Note We(assume(here(
If(MSC(pivots( that(there(are(no(
away(from( externalities(from(
MPC(then(the( consumption,(
marginal$ therefore(
Marginal(
external$cost$ MSB=MPB
Private(Benefit(
of$extra$
(MPB)
output$is(
increasing Q2 Q1 Output/Quantity
Costs,(
Marginal(
Benefits
Social(Cost
£s
P2 This(is(the(area(of(
Marginal( social'welfare'loss'
Private(Cost because(the(
P1
market(output( (Q1)(
supplied(is(higher(
than(the(social(
optimum(position(
Note (Q2)
The(
deadweight' Marginal(
loss'of'social' Private(Benefit
welfare'
happens(when(
MSC(>(MPC( Q2 Q1 Output/Quantity
Students frequently draw the welfare loss triangle in the wrong place! One piece of advice is to put your pencil
on the free market equilibrium and then draw a vertical line in whichever direction you can to create a triangle.
A second piece of advice is that the triangle always creates an ‘arrow’ that points towards the desired socially
optimal equilibrium.
• Private benefits are the benefits faced by the producer or consumer directly involved in a transaction
• External benefits are the benefits enjoyed by third parties as a result of a transaction that they are not
directly involved in (note - “external benefits” is a synonym for positive externalities)
• Social benefit = private benefits plus external benefits
• Therefore, when positive (consumption) externalities exist, social benefits exceed private benefits
• External benefits occur when the activity of one agent has a positive effect on the wellbeing of a third
party
• External benefits are good for third parties, but the consumer and producer don’t take this into
account, meaning that output will be too low. In the case of positive consumption externalities, the
market price will therefore be too high
Additional key terms that are needed for understanding positive consumption externalities are:
• Marginal private benefit (MPB): benefit to the consumer of consuming an additional unit of output
• Marginal external benefit (MEB): benefit to third parties from the consumption of an additional unit
of output
• Marginal social benefit (MSB): total benefit to society of consuming an extra unit of output. MSB =
MPB + MEB
• With positive (consumption) externalities, marginal social benefit is higher than marginal private
benefit
• If there are positive externalities, then we must add the external benefits to the demand curve (i.e. the
marginal private benefit (MPB) curve) to find the marginal social benefit curve (MSB)
• If the market fails to include these external benefits, the private equilibrium output is Q1 and the price
P1 where marginal private cost = marginal private benefit
• In a free market, there is under-consumption of this good or service
• The socially efficient output would be Q2 with a higher price P2. At this output level, the external
benefits have been considered, and marginal social cost is equal to marginal social benefit
P2
P1
Marginal&Social&
Benefit
If&the&market&
price&ignores&
positive& Social&optimum&position& Marginal&Private&
externalities,& is&output& Q2&whereas&the& Benefit
there&will&be& market&equilibrium&is&Q1
underF
consumption Q1 Q2 Output/Quantity
Health Early years Subsidised Bike Public libraries / Museums and Free school
programmes education e.g. Schemes in community Galleries meals /
e.g. HNS nursery urban areas spaces nutritional
services provision advice
Note that it is also possible to consider positive externalities in production (rather than consumption, as we’ve
done so far). For positive production externalities, the marginal social cost of production is less than the
marginal private cost of production. A good example arises from universities making their research available
as a public good. Positive production externalities shift the supply curve to the right.
As a result, the
A social optimum
MSB output is lower than
the free market
MPB equilibrium output.
A: Where MPB=MPC
B: Where MSB = MSC Q2 Q1 Output/Quantity
In the next diagram, there are net social benefits from producing and consuming the product. This is because
there are substantial external benefits from consumption. The free market mechanism might under-provide
this product again leading to market failure.
Benefit,
Social optimum is In this example, there
Cost
where MSB = MSC
are net social benefits
from producing and
consuming the
MSC product. This is
MPC because there are
B
substantial external
benefits from
consumption.
A
MSB
The free market
mechanism might
under-provide this
MPB product again leading
A: Where MPB=MPC to market failure.
B: Where MSB = MSC Q1 Q2 Output/Quantity
Quick question
How many more examples can you think of for a) negative production externalities and b) positive
consumption externalities?
It is an excellent idea when answering exam questions on externalities to make sure that you carefully identify
who the third party is that is being affected by the market. For example, suppose you are given a scenario of
a production process creating atmospheric pollution; instead of just writing that “pollution is a negative
externality” you would be better to write that “people living close to the factory may be inhaling air containing
particles that are likely to make them ill, which may result in them taking time off work and losing income as a
result”.
In an exam situation where externalities are mixed, you could also consider acknowledging this fact but for
simplicity illustrating just one on a diagram. Congestion is a good example of a mixed externality where
analysis is made considerably easier by considering it simply as a production externality.
The reason that the market mechanism cannot solve the market failure of externalities is that externalities lack
property rights and therefore have the characteristics of a public good. The market in externalities is missing.
In the case of pollution for example, if any one individual were to pay the polluters to stop polluting, they
cannot confine the benefit to themselves. Since the benefit is also non-rival, they are better therefore to wait
for someone else to pay the polluter and free-ride. The result is that no one acts. The Coase theorem
discusses situations where the parties to an externality are limited and negotiation costs are small. Here the
market may very well find a solution. With the carbon-trading scheme, polluters are required to accept
property rights over their emissions. This allows a market-based solution to exist.
Previously the condition for allocative efficiency was P=MC. When there are externalities, the condition
becomes P=MSC. Quite apart from the welfare losses shown in the diagram, markets fail on grounds of
allocative efficiency. Key functions of the price mechanism have broken down. In the case of negative
production externalities, the prices signaled by the market are too low and provide the wrong incentive to
consumers and producers. Consumers have insufficient incentive to ration and producers have an incentive
to allocate too many resources to the market in question.
Examiner tip
Discussing allocative efficiency can be a great way to gain extra credit. It can be tricky to show this on a
diagram. With the diagrams preferred by AQA, it works with production externalities but not for consumption.
Merit goods
Merit goods are goods & services the government feels people will under-consume, and which might be
subsidised or made free. Both the state and the private sector provide merit goods. With merit goods
individuals may not act in their own interest because of imperfect information – i.e. they do not fully
understand the private benefits of their consumption. Information failure is an important aspect of the merit
goods issue. Merit goods can be rival, excludable and rejectable. Consumption of merit goods generates
positive externalities -
where the social benefit exceeds the private benefit. A merit good is a product that society values and judges
that people should have regardless of their ability to pay.
Demerit goods
A demerit good is a product that generates negative externalities in consumption. It is a good for which the
social optimum level of consumption is less than the private level of consumption and which society judges is
undesirable and whose consumption should be restricted irrespective of ability to pay. As before, consumers
may be unaware of the negative externalities
that these goods create – they have imperfect information.
E-cigarettes raise a number of issues. Certainly, there are externalities, but the balance of positive and negative
is difficult to judge. There are also information failures. The information failures associated with merit and
demerit goods is of a particular type – a failure to take adequate account of longer-term costs and benefits
compared with immediate impacts. In this case though, the longer-term consequences are very uncertain.
With the first death now reported, does this shift the balance of argument?
Imperfect Information
The diagram below splits out the different characteristics of a demerit good. D is the valuation made by an
individual of marginal utility or marginal private benefit used to assess their willingness to pay. Especially
where benefits and costs are long term, individuals may be irrational in making these assessments. The
“correct” valuation lies at D1. It is important to recognise that this is in part a value judgment. The extent of
the information failure is the distance a. Any number of policies such as conventional campaigns through to
nudges might be used to address this aspect. The distance b represents the externality. Correcting the
Examiner tip
Behavioural economics provides compelling reasons why individuals might adopt the irrational behaviour
implicit in the information failure discussed above.
Risks from using tanning Addiction to painkillers & Gaining entry to elite Complexity of pension
salons other drugs degree courses schemes
Uncertain quality of Knowledge of the Cowboy builders or other Tourist Bazaars or buying
second hand products nutritional content of “rip-off merchants” and selling antiques
foods
Moral Hazard
• Moral hazard occurs when insured consumers are likely to take greater risks, knowing that a claim will
be paid for by their cover
• The consumer knows more about his/her intended actions than the producer (insurer)
Adverse Selection
• The adverse selection problem is seen in health insurance
• Those most likely to purchase health insurance are those who are most likely to use it, i.e.
smokers/drinkers/those with chronic health conditions
• The health insurance company knows this and so raises the average price of insurance cover
• This may price some healthy low-risk consumers out of the market, meaning that mainly higher risk
individuals gain insurance – this causes a market failure
Quick question
Think about goods and services you have bought or used today. Are there any in which you think you may
have been affected by an information gap? If so, which goods/services, and why?
As shown on the diagram, the main case against monopolies is that its low price elasticity of demand means
that profits can be increased by restricting output and elevating price. Not only is there a welfare loss but
It may be though that the economies of scale experienced by the monopolist more than offset this impact. In
addition, higher profits may allow greater dynamic efficiency gains. In reality, any abuse of monopoly power
may be limited by the actions of the regulatory authorities and competition from international firms.
Factor Immobility
Factor immobility causes market failure because resources are unable to move quickly and without cost in
response to price signals and incentives. Again, one of the functions of the price mechanism has broken
down. Immobile factors of production therefore lead to market failure. There are two broad types:
occupational and geographic immobility.
Occupational immobility
One of the main causes of unemployment is that workers lack the skills required by expanding industries in
the economy. Occupational immobility exists when there are barriers to the mobility of factors of production
between different sectors of the economy, leading to these factors being unemployed or used in ways that
are not efficient.
Some capital inputs are occupationally mobile – a compute can be put to use in many different industries.
And commercial buildings such as shops and offices can be altered to provide a base for many businesses.
However, some units of capital are specific to the industry they have been designed for e.g. a printing press
or a nuclear power station.
People often experience occupational immobility. For example, workers made redundant in the steel industry
or in heavy engineering may find it difficult to find a new job. They may have specific skills that are not
necessarily needed in growing industries which causes a mismatch between the skills on offer from the
unemployed and those required by employers looking for workers. This problem is called structural
unemployment. Clearly this leads to a waste of scarce resources and represents market failure.
Geographical immobility
This refers to barriers to people moving from one area to another to find work. There are good reasons why
geographical immobility might exist:
This section looks at government intervention in markets especially imperfectly competitive markets where
questions and issues of economic efficiency and welfare arising from the conduct and behaviour of businesses
are important.
Competition Policy
The aims of competition policy in countries such as the UK are to promote competition; make markets work
better and contribute towards improved efficiency in individual markets and enhanced competitiveness of
businesses in overseas markets.
Examiner tip:
The topic of competition policy is often done poorly by students in exams because they lack useful current
examples – this is an applied topic, and so you need to know examples of interventions, names of the main
industry regulators, etc.
Market in Focus: CMA investigates competition and prices in the UK funeral industry
The Competition and Markets Authority is investigating price inflation in the costs of funerals and crematorium
services. Prices have increased by nearly two thirds over the last decade, many times higher than the increase
in the consumer price index. The CMA is concerned about the lack of competition in what is largely an
Tax on monopoly A one-off windfall tax on supernormal Risk of tax avoidance / loss of
profits profits for firms with significant market capital investment spending
power
Liberalization of Break up monopolies – allow smaller Smaller businesses may struggle
markets businesses to enter and increased to scale up and compete
contestability
Introduce price Encourages cost efficiency + increases Monopolists may find revenues
capping policies consumer surplus in other ways
Nationalisation Take some monopoly utilities back into Possible loss of productive
public ownership efficiency
Industry regulators
• Regulators are the rule-enforcers
• Regulators are a surrogate for competition
• They are appointed by the government to oversee how a market works and the outcomes in efficiency
and welfare that result for producers and consumers.
• The main competition regulator in the UK is the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
• The CMA has responsibility for carrying out investigations into mergers, markets and the regulated
industries and enforcing competition and consumer law.
P1
MC
Capped
Price
Supernormal Profit AC
C2 C1
Price AR
and
MR
Cost
Examiner tip:
Students should be very wary of simply rote-learning diagrams without really understanding them. The very
best candidates in exams are those who are able to adapt the standard diagrams for new / different purposes,
as is the case in the diagram to the left.
Examiner tip:
It is vital that you adopt a ‘case by case basis’ approach when considering regulation – there is no standard
way for regulators to regulate or impose restrictions. Regulations can be in the form of price-caps, but can
also be in terms of limits / quotas on production, age restrictions on purchase, health and safety issues, labour
market issues etc. In exam questions, it is a good idea to target the choice of regulation to the specific industry
being considered
De-regulation of markets:
• Attempts to liberalise a market to encourage new entrants to act as challengers to established firms
• Deregulation usually involves lowering some of the statutory barriers to entry to reduce the hurdles
for new firms to enter and make at least normal profit
• A good example of deregulation / liberalisation in recent years has been the opening up of the UK
parcels / letters market ending the legal monopoly of the Royal Mail. The Royal Mail has also been
fully privatised after their part privatisation in 2013.
• The UK bus industry was also deregulated nearly thirty years ago and industries such as opticians and
telecoms have also been the subject of deregulation.
Nationalisation
UK Nuclear
Network Rail
Decommissioning Authority
Broader issues in this debate over state v private in the rail industry:
1. A successful UK rail industry is needed to sustain and improve competitiveness / support tourism /
regional economic balance
2. UK rail network is expensive to run – in part a legacy from the Victorian age. Huge investment needs
– unlikely that the private sector can provide sufficient funds
3. Market failure issues are also important e.g. positive externalities from encouraging an increase in
mass transport / reducing traffic congestion, affordable rail and geographical mobility of labour
4. Much of the UK rail industry is already under state control / or direct regulation e.g. nearly half of
fares, Government sets terms of franchises
5. Affordability of rail travel is a major issue although dynamic pricing cuts fares for many segments of
the market (e.g. student rail cards)
Government intervention
Government intervention is when the state gets involved in markets and takes action to try to correct market
failure, improve economic efficiency, impact upon the macroeconomic performance of the economy, and/or
change the distribution of income and wealth. The government can use regulations, taxes, subsidies, maximum
and minimum prices to change price signals, better information or direct provision to change resource
allocation. In recent years, several governments have also tried to use interventions designed to create
behavioural nudges to change the behaviour of consumers and businesses.
Examiner tip
A free market economist might argue that the consequences or costs of such action might offset any gain. If
this is the case then this would be an argument against intervention.
• The decisions of government, businesses and other organisations inevitably affect groups within
society. Increasingly, many businesses are taking into account the effects of their actions not just on
the value that such decisions create for shareholders – but also to a broader range of stakeholder
groups.
• Typically, stakeholder issues come into play on major infrastructural projects where a cost benefit
analysis might be undertaken to assess the likely social costs and benefits – it is important to bring as
many stakeholders into the picture as possible – many people might be affected
Examples of stakeholders you might think of bringing into a discussion include:
Examiner tip:
Students should avoid concluding that a particular policy will always tackle a particular type of market failure.
Instead, they should consider the impact of a policy type on a case-by-case basis i.e. subsidies might help
provision of rural bus services which have positive externalities because bus-users are often quite price-
sensitive (low income or elderly households, for example), whereas subsidising healthy fruit and vegetables
which also have positive externalities may be less effective because there is usually a wider choice available
and a more competitive market, which should lead to lower prices anyway. Furthermore, policies rarely work
on their own – it is nearly always better for students to consider possible policy combinations.
This statistic shows the results of a survey in which respondents were asked how much the price of soft drinks
would have to increase by to discourage them from buying any in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2016.
The average price of a 330ml can of sugary carbonated soft drink is 69p. What price would discourage you
from buying it?
Share of respondents
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
Maximum prices
This is a legally-imposed maximum price (or price ceiling) in a market that suppliers cannot exceed - in an
attempt to prevent the price from rising above a certain level. To be effective a maximum price has to be set
below the existing free market equilibrium price.
Rent controls to Energy Price Caps to Caps on CEO Pay Cap on Mobile
improve affordability control fuel bills /Bonuses in the labour Roaming Charges in
market the EU
Price capping for Cap on interest rates Cap on annual charges Currency pegs e.g. the
regional monopoly charged by pay-day to occupational Hong Kong / US dollar
water companies lenders pension plans
Price
Free.Market. Market.Supply
Equilibrium
P1
Max.Price Max.Price.(price.ceiling)
Market.
Demand
Q3 Q1 Q2 Quantity
In the diagram above the free market price is P1. If a maximum price is imposed, quantity supplied contracts
from Q1 to Q3 whilst quantity demanded expands from Q1 to Q2. Therefore, a maximum price drawn beneath
the equilibrium price leads to a disequilibrium with excess demand equal to the quantity Q3-Q2.
A maximum price also involves a normative judgement on behalf of the government about what that price
should be
Rent If,quantity,is,restricted,to,Q3,,then,some,consumers,will,be,willing,to,pay,a,
higher,“unofficial,price”,at,P2
Producers,can,extract,extra,consumer,surplus,at,higher,price
P2 Possible,unofficial,
Market,Supply
price,above,the,ceiling
P1
Extracted,
Max,Price Max,Price consumer,
surplus,above,
the,official,price,
ceiling
Market,
Some,rationing( Demand
or(auction(
process(may,be,
needed,if,market,
output,limited,to, Q3 Q1 Q2 Quantity
a,level,of,Q3
Other possible issues with rent controls (i.e. maximum prices on rent) include:
o Lack of incentive by the landlord to properly maintain properties and keep them safe to live
in (e.g. carrying out gas safety checks and fitting safety locks may no longer be affordable)
o It could lead to some landlords leaving the property rental market, which reduces the
available supply of housing, especially for those households unable to afford to buy property
themselves
o Fewer properties will be available (quantity supplied falls from Q1 to Q3) and so some families
may become homeless, which creates other market failures and issues for the economy
Minimum prices
A minimum price is a price floor. It is a legally imposed price floor below which the normal market price cannot
fall. To be effective the minimum price has to be set above the normal equilibrium price.
Minimum prices are most commonly associated with minimum wages in the labour market or guaranteed
price support schemes for farmers or other producers. There is much debate at the moment about introducing
minimum prices for consumers in an attempt to reduce sales of high fat, salt and sugar foods and high calorie
drinks. The UK government introduced a ban on the sale of alcohol below cost price from May 2014. A can of
Litres of alcohol consumed per capita in the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2016
14
11.1 11.3 11.6 11.4 11 11.1
Average litres per head
12 10.8
10.1 10.1 9.9 9.6 9.5 9.5
9.4 9.4
10
8
6
4
2
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Students often confuse maximum and minimum prices, putting the maximum price above the free market
equilibrium rather than below, and the minimum price below the free market equilibrium rather than above.
Keep practising these diagrams
Examiner tip
Take a look back at the evaluation of specific examples in the previous section (e.g. sugar taxes, maximum
prices on rent and minimum prices on alcohol). Can you see that the points made are very specific to those
Carbon pricing either through emissions trading or a carbon tax is becoming more common in a number of
countries:
• Sweden’s CO2 tax (first introduced in 1991, Euro 137 per tonne)
• European Union emissions trading scheme (ETS) began in 2005 – the UK remains a part of this
• China launched an emissions cap & trade system in 2017
• India (2010) introduced a carbon tax of 50 rupees per tonne of coal produced and imported to India
• Chile (2014) became the first country in South America to impose a climate pollution tax
• South Korea introduced carbon emissions trading in 2015
• Australia repealed its carbon tax in 2014
• 2017 – Alberta (Canada) started a new carbon tax
• 2017 – Iceland announced intention to double their carbon tax
• 2019 – Singapore plans to introduce a carbon tax
The main problem with the EU carbon trading scheme is that the price per tonne of CO2 has been volatile
and, in recent years, extremely low at less than Euro 5 per tonne. This is partly because initially there were
simply too many permits – the cap was set too high. This means that incentives to use renewable energy are
weak and some power companies have gone back to burning imported coal.
A
C
MPB=%MSB
Q1 Q2 Quantity%
Over=production supplied
Advantages of a carbon tax
1. A pollution tax internalizes the externality and makes the polluter pay – it is fairly easy to administer,
and the tax is predictable for businesses affected
2. Carbon fee on imported products will help reduce risk of domestic businesses re-locating to avoid
paying a national carbon tax
3. A tax raises extra revenue which can be ear-marked for other uses e.g. research in cleaner energy
4. Might be offsetting tax cuts on employment / child care or tax rebates to lower-income families
Disadvantages of a carbon tax
1. Low price elasticity of demand – the tax may not change behaviour, there might be more effective
alternative policies on offer
2. Risk of higher structural unemployment among workers in carbon intensive sectors such as mining,
oil and gas – renewables employs relatively few people
3. Risk that the burden of new / higher carbon taxes will fall more heavily on lower-income families
4. Might damage the competitiveness of domestic businesses in overseas markets e.g. UK steel industry
complaining about carbon price floor
Overall, comparing the two instruments, most economists favour a carbon tax over tradeable permits. But
public support for carbon taxes, however, is generally low and people tend not to believe that they are
environmentally efficient.
Pure public goods are usually provided – perhaps to a basic standard – by the state on the grounds of:
1. Fairness – the (normative) view that everyone should have equitable access to good quality public
goods such as sanitation systems, public service broadcasting, flood defence systems, the rule of law
and open access to justice.
2. Efficiency – collective provision funded through taxation can lead to economies of scale and a more
efficient use of scarce resources.
3. Social welfare – there are positive externalities (social benefits) from good quality public services not
all of which can be measured by a market price
However, there might also be inefficiencies in relying on the state to provide public goods. Those who favour
a smaller role for the government believe that the private sector is more efficient and innovative and that high
government spending on public goods leads in the long run to a rising tax burden which might crowd-out or
hinder the growth of private sector businesses. Technological change is also changing the degree to which
public goods are non-excludable. Not all public goods need providing – think of fireworks displays, for
example. And some can be provided on a local small scale by local organisations able to collect fees. Others
are provided by charitable organisations, for example the RNLI.
Provision of Information
There are many examples of intervention designed to change the perceived benefits and costs for consumers
when making their choices in markets. These include:
Regulation of the behaviour of businesses and consumers is a “command and control” approach to
intervention in a market - backed up by inspection and penalties for non-compliance. You will meet this topic
again in Theme 3, when you study competition policy.
1. Regulations act as a spur for business innovation e.g. to cut the level of carbon emissions
2. Regulations may be more effective if demand is unresponsive to price changes
3. Regulations can be gradually toughened each year – this will help stimulate capital investment
4. They are often straightforward to understand and for businesses to apply e.g. minimum purchase
age for cigarettes, alcohol, lottery tickets etc.
5. Regulations can often be imposed quickly – other policies, such as taxes and subsidies, may take a
long time to be approved by government / parliament
Quick question
Choose one regulation from the graphic above. Can you note down 3 specific advantages and 3 specific
disadvantages of THAT regulation?
• Government failure occurs when government intervention leads to a worse allocation of resources
• Inadequate information, conflicting objectives and administrative cost are possible sources of
government failure as are unintended consequences and market distortions that governments
may create.
Political self interest / Policy myopia – search for Regulatory Capture Information failures
lobbying “quick fixes”
Minimum Wage Smoking ban Tariffs on steel Price caps on texts Targets for treating
leads to a reduction encouraged causes damager to leads to higher patients might lead
in staff non-wage widespread use of car makers prices for mobile to a lower quality of
benefits patio heaters handsets care
Regulators may limit Capping prices might Regulation becomes May lack the powers
innovation in fast- prevent new firms bureaucratic & costly to be truly effective in
growth markets entering a market protecting consumers
Many students confuse market failure and government failure – always think carefully about what the
question is asking you to consider. Students also often think that just because a policy has downsides then
government failure is inevitable. In the case of environmental market failures, the welfare loss is
considerable. A policy might be associated with considerable costs and still improve welfare overall. It is
highly likely though that some policies might be better than others.
Examiner tip:
Many microeconomic exam essay questions relate to the effectiveness of government intervention to tackle
a particular market failure. An excellent way to push your answer into the very top level of response for
evaluation (AO4) is to consider whether the welfare gain as a result of government intervention is likely to
exceed (or not) the welfare loss as a result of the market failure i.e. will government failure outweigh the
market failure.