Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
Policy Brief – May 2024
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific:
The Korean issue
Kuanysheva Akerke
 Research Overview                                                 Introduction
  The Korean Peninsula remains divided           The Korean Peninsula remains a divided
   between North and South Korea, with
   significant implications for regional          nation, its citizens separated by a heavily
   security. North Korea's nuclear ambitions
   and military tension with South Korea          fortified border. North Korea which is
   create a volatile situation with potential
   for devastating consequences.                  considered one of the last left dictatorship
  The Korean issue is divided into four
   chapters: Pre-Division Era, Division and       countries with a huge social problem within
   Cold War, Post-War Development, and
                                                  the border and huge military potential and the
   Modern Era. Regional and global powers
   such as the US, China, Japan, and Russia
                                                  owner of nuclear weapons, and South Korea
   play critical roles in the security equation
   of North and South Korea.                      – one of the Asian Tigers whose economy is
  Experts advocate for a calibrated
   approach combining pressure with               booming day to day along with its military
   potential rewards for denuclearization,
   managing expectations, and addressing          power are long been in a prolonged conflicted
   North Korea's security concerns and
   economic needs.                                relationship. Both promise to have a
  Progress towards peace and reconciliation
   depends on North Korea's willingness to        substantial impact on events in the coming
   denuclearize, successful diplomacy from
                                                  year. This unresolved conflict presents a
   regional and global powers, and increased
   cooperation within the Korean peninsula.
                                                  significant security threat in the region. North
                                                  Korea's nuclear ambitions and the constant
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
2
military tension between North and South raise concerns about potential escalation and create a
volatile situation with the potential for devastating consequences. The recent South Korea’s
rapprochement with Japan and North Korea’s embrace of Russia significantly shaped events on
the Korean Peninsula in 2023.
This article will examine the current challenges on the Korean Peninsula, the historical context
that fuels them, and the enduring hope for peace and reconciliation. What are the changes for the
two nations to be united again?
Methodology
This research will employ a multi-pronged approach to analyze security issues surrounding the
Korean Peninsula:
    Historical Analysis: Examining historical events and political decisions that led to the
       division of Korea and the subsequent rise of tensions.
    Strategic Assessments: Evaluating military capabilities and strategies of North and South
       Korea, along with the role of regional and global powers in the security equation.
    Expert Opinions: Consulting scholarly articles, reports from reputable think tanks, and
       interviews with security analysts specializing in the Korean Peninsula.
How did Korea end
up being divided?
 The Korean issue can be divided into 4            Despite some periods of dialogue and
 chapters: The pre-Division Era,                   limited economic cooperation, efforts
 Division and A Cold War, Post-War                 towards reunification have largely
 Development, and Modern Era.                    stalled.
 Pre-Division. For centuries, Korea existed as a       Modern Era
 unified kingdom with a rich cultural heritage.         Decades of division and hostility have
 The latter part of the Joseon Dynasty was              fostered deep distrust between North
 marked by internal strife, foreign invasions           and South Korea. The threat perception
 (such as the Japanese invasions of Korea in the        on both sides has led to a significant
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
2
What is the military power?
 The military Potential of both countries varies. Briefly, North Korea has a larger army (active
personnel) but lags in tech. South Korea has a smaller but more advanced military with a
stronger air force and navy. The big unknown is North Korea's nuclear capability.
                  Millitary Power of South and North Korea
 4000000
 3500000
 3000000
 2500000
 2000000
 1500000
 1000000
  500000
       0
             South Korea           North Korea
                     Total Personnel   Active Personnel   Reserve Personnel
Regional and global powers play                            China. It shares a border with North
a critical role in the security                            Korea and maintains a complex
equation of North and South                                relationship. China provides some
Korea.                                                     economic aid to North Korea but also
  United States (US). Main military ally of                pressures them on nuclear weapons
  South Korea, with around 28,500 troops                   development. Acts as a potential check
  stationed there as a deterrent against North             on North Korean actions while also
  Korean aggression [Council on Foreign                    having some leverage over South
  Relations] It provides South Korea with             Korea. China's stance can influence the
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
2
Japan.it views North Korea's missile tests as a threat and maintains close security ties with the
US. Offers financial and technological support to South Korea and advocates for stronger
sanctions against North Korea.
     Russia: Has some economic ties with North Korea but generally avoids close
        involvement. Can act as a spoiler in international efforts to pressure North Korea.
What do experts say?
Scott Snyder (Senior Fellow at the Council     Most experts believe some form of gradual
on Foreign Relations) argues for a             reconciliation is the most likely scenario.
calibrated approach that combines pressure     However, the path forward is uncertain and
with potential rewards for                     depends on various factors
denuclearization. Soo Kim who is the                North Korea's internal politics and
Nonresident Fellow at the Stimson Center               economic situation.
emphasizes the importance of managing               The effectiveness of international pressure
expectations and avoiding grand bargains               and diplomacy.
that may not be achievable. Chung Min               The domestic political climate in South
Lee who is International Relations expert              Korea.
at Yonsei University highlights the need       Overall Experts offer a mix of cautious optimism
for a long-term strategy that addresses        and realism. Progress depends on North Korea's
both North Korea's security concerns and       willingness to denuclearize, successful diplomacy
its economic needs.                            from regional and global powers, and a shift
                                               towards greater cooperation within the Korean
peninsula.
In conclusion, the security issues surrounding the Korean Peninsula represent a complex and
enduring challenge in the Asia-Pacific region. The division of Korea following World War II,
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
2
exacerbated by ideological differences and the Korean War, has left a legacy of deep distrust and
military tension between North and South Korea. North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons and
aggressive military posturing, combined with South Korea's economic prosperity and advanced
military capabilities, create a volatile situation with potentially devastating consequences.
Will peace ever be
regained in the region?
 Despite efforts towards peace and
                                                        Ultimately, achieving lasting peace and
 reconciliation, including inter-Korean summits
                                                        stability on the Korean Peninsula remains a
 and diplomatic initiatives, progress has been
                                                        shared goal and a critical priority for the
 slow and often hindered by various factors,
 including North Korea's internal politics,             international community.
 international pressure, and the domestic political
 climate in South Korea. However, there is
 cautious optimism among experts that gradual
 reconciliation is possible, contingent upon North
 Korea's willingness to denuclearize, successful
 diplomacy from regional and global powers, and
 a shift towards greater cooperation within the
 Korean peninsula.
 Moving forward, addressing the security issues
 in the Asia-Pacific region requires a
 multifaceted approach that combines diplomatic
 engagement, economic incentives, and strategic
 deterrence.
 Regional and global powers must continue to
Security issues in the Asia-Pacific: The Korean issue
2
Resources
Carr, Andrew, and Joanne Wallis, eds. Asia-Pacific security: an introduction. Georgetown University Press, 2016.
Cronin, P. M., & Lee, S. (2022). Expanding South Korea's Security Role in the Asia-Pacific Region. Council on
Foreign Relations
Park, Jae Jeok. "The US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific: hedge against potential threats or an undesirable
multilateral security order?." The Pacific Review 24, no. 2 (2011): 137-158.
Cronin, Patrick M., and Seongwon Lee. Expanding South Korea's Security Role in the Asia-Pacific Region. Council
on Foreign Relations., 2022.
Carr, A., & Wallis, J. (Eds.). (2016). Asia-Pacific security: an introduction. Georgetown University Press.
Park, J. J. (2011). The US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific: hedge against potential threats or an undesirable
multilateral security order?. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 137-158.