Q1.

Analysis of participation in Political Protest

on the basis of Gender

Gender Count of Gender Count of Gender%

Female 52 32.50%
Male 108 67.50%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Figure 1.1

120

100

80

60
Count of Gender

40

20

0
Female Male

Figure 1.2

Interpretation:- The Figure (1.1) and Figure (1.2) shows a table and a bar chart
representing the gender distribution in a given sample.
Key observations:
➢ The Figure (1.1) represents the table which interpret the followings:-
➢ Gender categories: The table includes two gender categories: Female and Male.
➢ Count of Gender: This column indicates the number of individuals in each gender
category.
➢ Count of Gender%: This column shows the percentage of individuals in each gender
category relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160) and
confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Specific findings in the Figure (1.1):-
a) Female: 52 females are present in the sample, accounting for 32.50% of the total participants
in political protest.
b) Male: 108 males are present in the sample, accounting for 67.50% of the total
participants in political protest.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The Figure (1.1) and Figure (1.2) represent the table and bar chart which reveals a gender
imbalance in the sample, with a significantly higher proportion of males compared to female
[i.e. more than twice].This imbalance might reflect broader social or cultural norms where
males are more encouraged to participate in political protest while females might face more
constraints due to safety concerns, societal expectations or different type of political interest.
This gender disparity highlights the barriers to female participation, such as lack of support or
resources. So this interpretation helps in figuring out the gender dynamics within the protest.
 Q2:- Analysis of participation in Political Protest
on the basis of Age

Age Group Count of Age Count of Age%

18-20 14 8.75%
21-23 132 82.50%
24-26 14 8.75%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Figure (2.1)

150
Y-axis
100

50 Count of Age

0 X-axis
18-20 21-23 24-26 (blank)

Figure (2.2)

Interpretation: The Figure (2.1) and Figure (2. 2) shows a table and a bar chart
representing the age distribution in a given sample.

Key observations:
➢ Age Group: This column lists the age groups: 18-20, 21-23, and 24-26.
➢ Count of Age: This column indicates the number of individuals in each age group.
➢ Count of Age%: This column shows the percentage of individuals in each age group
relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.

➢ Specific findings in the above Figure (2.1):-

a) 18-20: 14 individuals (8.75%) fall into this age group.
b) 21-23: The majority of the sample,132 individuals (82.50%), belong to this age
group.
c) 24-26: 14 individuals (8.75%) are in this age group.
k
➢ Chart in the above Figure (2.2) represents
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the age groups.
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals in the respective age
group.

➢ Overall interpretation:
The above Figure (2.1) and Figure (2.2) indicates that the majority of the individuals
in the sample are in the 21-23 age group, with relatively small proportions in the
younger (18-20) and older (24-26) groups which shows that persons of age group
(21-23) are more politically active and having more strong political awareness and
motivation in respect to others category (Age group which shows a decline in political activism)
 Q3:- Analysis of participation in Political Protest
on the basis of Monthly Family Income

Monthly Family Income Family Income Status Family Income Status%

Less than Rs 25000 22 13.75%
Rs 25000 to 50000 40 25.00%
Rs 50,001 to 100000 56 35.00%
More than Rs 100000 42 26.25%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Figure (3.1)
Y-axis 60
50

40
30
20 Income Status
10

00
Less than RS25001
Rs 25000toto RsRs50001
50,001
to Morethan
More X-axis
Rs 25001 50000
Rs 50000 Rs 100000 than
Rs Rs
100000
1000000
00 than
Figure (3.2)
Interpretation:- The Figure (3.1) and Figure (3.2) shows a table and a bar chart
representing the family income distribution in a given sample.
Key observations:-
➢ Monthly family income: This column lists the income categories: Less than Rs 25000,
Rs 25000 to 50000, Rs 50,001 to 100000, and More than Rs 100000.
➢ Income Status: This column indicates the number of individuals in each income category.
➢ Income Status%: This column shows the percentage of individuals in each income category
relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160) and
confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart in the above Figure (3.2) represents:-
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the income categories.
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals in the
respective income category.
➢ Specific findings in the above Figure (3.1) shows:-
a) Less than RS 25000: 22 individuals (13.75%) fall into this income category.
b) RS 25000 to 50000: 40 individuals (25.00%) belong to this income category.
c) Rs 50,001 to 100000: 56 individuals (35.00%) are in this income category.
d) More than 100000: 42 individuals (26.25%) have an income higher than
➢ Overall Interpretation:-
The data from the above Figure (3.1) and Figure (3.2) reveals a relatively balanced income
distribution among the sample, with no single income category dominating. The majority of
individuals fall into the Rs 50,001 to 100000 income category, followed closely by the More
than 100000 income category are the middle class and upper middle class category which
holds the majority in participating in the protest just because of concerns over government
policies that affect their financial security, taxation or access to better living standards and also
for better governance, civil liberties and economic reforms. Other category involved because of
rising cost of living, education and healthcare.
Q:- 4 Analysis of participation in Political Protest
on the basis of Educational Status

Particulars Educational Status Educational Status %

Bachelor's 100 62.50%
Master's 60 37.50%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Figure (4.1)

120

100

80

60
Educational Status
40

20

0
Bachelor's Master's (blank)

Figure (4.2)
Interpretation:- The Figure (4.1) and Figure (4.2) shows a table and a bar chart
representing the educational status distribution in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Particulars: This column lists the educational levels: Bachelors and Masters.
➢ Educational Status: This column indicates the number of individuals with each
educational level.
➢ Educational Status %: This column shows the percentage of individuals with each
educational level relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample
(160) and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%

➢ Specific findings in the above Figure (4.1) shows:-

a. Bachelors: 100 individuals (62.50%) have a Bachelor's degree.
b. Masters: 60 individuals (37.50%) have a Master's degree.

➢ Chart in the above Figure (4.2) represents:-

a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the educational levels.
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals with the
respective educational level.

➢ Overall Interpretation:
The data from the above Figure (4.1) and Figure (4.2) reveals a majority of
individuals in the sample holding a Bachelor's degree, with a smaller proportion
having a Master's degree. Bachelor’s degree holder shows high level of participation
which suggests that undergraduate students, often younger and more exposed to new
ideas during their formative years, are highly engage in political activism. Their
involvement could be driven by concerns about their future prospects, including job
opportunities, education policies, and social justice issues that resonate with their
generation. Master’s degree holder shows low level of participation due to their
involvement influenced by some specific issues related to professional development.
Q:- 4 Analysis of participation in Political Protest
on the basis of Educational Status
Row Labels Hosteller Hosteller %
Yes 30 18.75%
No 130 81.25%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 5

140
120
100
80
60 Hosteller
40
20
0
Yes No (blank)

Chart no. 5
Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the hostel status
distribution in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the hostel status categories: Yes and No.
➢ Hosteller: This column indicates the number of individuals in each hostel status
category.
➢ Hosteller %: This column shows the percentage of individuals in each hostel status
category relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the hostel status categories.
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals in the
respective hostel status category.
➢ Specific findings:
a) Yes: 30 individuals (18.75%) are hostellers.
b) No: 130 individuals (81.25%) are not hostellers.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a significant majority of individuals in the sample are not hostellers.
This information can be useful for various purposes, such as understanding the living
arrangements of a population, studying the factors influencing hostel choices, or
evaluating the demand for hostel facilities.
Q8.

Row Labels Protesting with Family Protesting with Family %

No, I will not 16 10.00%
Yes definitely 16 10.00%
May participate if issue is important 128 80.00%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 6

140
120
100
80
60 Protesting with Family
40
20
0
No, I will Yes defini I may part (blank)

Chart no. 6
Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the willingness to
protest with family in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the responses to the question: "Protesting with Family."
The options are "No, I will not," "Yes definitely," and "May participate if issue is
important."
➢ Protesting with Family: This column indicates the number of individuals who selected
each response.
➢ Protesting with Family %: This column shows the percentage of individuals who
selected each response relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the responses to the question "Protesting with Family."
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals who
selected the respective response.
➢ Specific findings:
a) No, I will not: 16 individuals (10.00%) would not protest with family.
b) Yes definitely: 16 individuals (10.00%) would definitely protest with family.
c) May participate if issue is important: 128 individuals (80.00%) would consider
protesting with family if the issue is important.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a strong majority of individuals in the sample are willing to protest
with family if the issue is important. Only a small percentage would not protest under
any circumstances. This information can be useful for understanding social attitudes
towards family involvement in protests, studying the factors influencing individual
decisions about participation, or evaluating the potential for collective action.
Q10.

Row Labels Family Reaction for Protest Family Reaction for Protest %
Not supportive 46 28.75%
Neutral 54 33.75%
Somewhat supportive 54 33.75%
Very supportive 6 3.75%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 7
60
50
40
30
Family Reaction For Protest
20
10
0
Not suppo Neutral Somewha Very supp (blank)
Chart no. 7
Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the family reaction to
protest in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the responses to the question "Family Reaction for
Protest." The options are "Not supportive," "Neutral," "Somewhat supportive," and
"Very supportive."
➢ Family Reaction for Protest: This column indicates the number of individuals who
selected each response.
➢ Family Reaction for Protest %: This column shows the percentage of individuals who
selected each response relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the responses to the question "Family Reaction for Protest."
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals who
selected the respective response.
➢ Specific findings:
a) Not supportive: 46 individuals (28.75%) received no family support for protest.
b) Neutral: 54 individuals (33.75%) received a neutral response from their family
regarding protest.
c) Somewhat supportive: Another 54 individuals (33.75%) received some support
from their family for protest.
d) Very supportive: 6 individuals (3.75%) received strong support from their
family for protest.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a mixed response from families regarding protest. While a majority of
individuals either received neutral or somewhat supportive responses, a significant
portion did not receive any support. Only a small minority received strong support from
 their families. This information can be useful for understanding the social dynamics
surrounding protest, studying the factors influencing family reactions, or evaluating the
potential for social mobilization.

Q12.

Row Labels Membership in Political Clubs Membership in Political Clubs %

Yes 18 11.25%
No 142 88.75%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 8

150

100

Membership in Political Clubs

50

0
Yes No (blank)

Chart no. 8

Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the membership in
political clubs in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the responses to the question "Membership in Political
Clubs." The options are "Yes" and "No."
➢ Membership in Political Clubs: This column indicates the number of individuals
who selected each response.
➢ Membership in Political Clubs %: This column shows the percentage of individuals
who selected each response relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample
(160) and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the responses to the question "Membership in Political
Clubs."
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals who
selected the respective response.
➢ Specific findings:
a) Yes: 18 individuals (11.25%) are members of political clubs.
b) No: 142 individuals (88.75%) are not members of political clubs.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a significant majority of individuals in the sample are not members
of political clubs. This information can be useful for understanding political
participation, studying the factors influencing club membership, or evaluating the
effectiveness of political organizations.
Q13.

Row Labels Political Awareness Level Political Awareness Level%

High 34 21.25%
Moderate 100 62.50%
Low 26 16.25%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 9

120
100
80
60
Political Awareness Level
40
20
0
High Moderate Low (blank)

Chart no. 9
Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the political awareness
level in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the political awareness levels: High, Moderate, and
Low.
➢ Political Awareness Level: This column indicates the number of individuals in each
political awareness level.
➢ Political Awareness Level %: This column shows the percentage of individuals in each
political awareness level relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the political awareness levels.
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals in the
respective political awareness level.
➢ Specific findings:
a) High: 34 individuals (21.25%) have a high level of political awareness.
b) Moderate: 100 individuals (62.50%) have a moderate level of political
awareness.
c) Low: 26 individuals (16.25%) have a low level of political awareness.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a majority of individuals in the sample have a moderate level of
political awareness, with a smaller proportion having high or low levels. This
information can be useful for various purposes, such as understanding political
engagement, studying the factors influencing political awareness, or evaluating the
effectiveness of political education programs.
Q14.

Row Labels Engagement in political Engagement in political Activism%

Activism
No, never 84 52.50%
Only once 26 16.25%
A few times 40 25.00%
Several times 10 6.25%
Grand Total 160 100.00%
Table no. 10

100

80

60

40 Engagement in political Activism

20

0
No, never Only once A few tim Several ti (blank)

Chart no. 10
Interpretation:- The image shows a table and a bar chart representing the engagement in
political activism in a given sample.

Key observations:

➢ Row Labels: This column lists the responses to the question "Engagement in political
Activism." The options are "No, never," "Only once," "A few times," and "Several
times".
➢ Engagement in political Activism: This column indicates the number of individuals
who selected each response.
➢ Engagement in political Activism %: This column shows the percentage of
individuals who selected each response relative to the total sample size.
➢ Grand Total: This row summarizes the total number of individuals in the sample (160)
and confirms that the percentages add up to 100%.
➢ Chart:
a) Y-axis: Represents the count of individuals.
b) X-axis: Represents the responses to the question "Engagement in political
Activism."
c) Bars: The height of each bar corresponds to the number of individuals who
selected the respective response.
➢ Specific findings:
a) No, never: 84 individuals (52.50%) have never engaged in political activism.
b) Only once: 26 individuals (16.25%) have engaged in political activism only
once.
c) A few times: 40 individuals (25.00%) have engaged in political activism a few
times.
d) Several times: 10 individuals (6.25%) have engaged in political activism several
times.
➢ Overall interpretation:
The data reveals a majority of individuals in the sample have never or only rarely
engaged in political activism. This information can be useful for understanding political
participation, studying the factors influencing activism, or evaluating the effectiveness
of political mobilization efforts.