Tender Procedure GO 23 DT 5.3.1999
Tender Procedure GO 23 DT 5.3.1999
ABSTRACT
Public Works _- Reforms in Public Works Departments – Revision and streamling of Tender
Procedure – Orders – Issued.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - --
    IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT (PW:COD) DEPARTMENT
                    Ref:-   1. G.O. Ms. No. 177 TO 182, I&CAD (PW:COD)Department, dt. 27-9-97.
                            2. G.O. Ms. No. 21 to 26 TR &B (B.III) Department, dt. 6-2-98.
                            3. G.O. Ms. No. 99, TR &B (Roads) Department, dt. 9-6-98.
                            4. G.O. Ms. No. 132, TR&B (Roads) Department, dt. 11-8-98.
                                                              ***
ORDER:-
        Government have from time to time initiated several reforms in tendering for public
works with a view to bring in simplification of procedures, greater transparency and to ensure
better quality of works.
2.     Government issued orders in the GOs 1st and 2nd read above introducing comprehensive
reforms streamlining and standardizing the procedures for calling tenders and award of contracts.
4.      Accordingly the Cabinet Sub-Committee had gone into various aspects of the existing
procedures of sanctioning estimates and tendering system and submitted a report to Government.
Based on the recommendations of the Cabinet Sub-Committee, Government issued orders in the
GO 4th read above, ordering further tender reforms with a view to curb collusion and unfair
practices adopted by the Contractors in the tendering process.
5.      After issuance of the aforesaid orders, complaints were received by the Government that
the Contractors were still indulging in unfair practices and colluding in filing the tenders.
Government, therefore, with a view to take stringent action in such cases, convened a workshop
on 10-11-1998 with the representatives of Builders Association, Contractors and Government
Officials to elicit their views on further reforms required to be introduced. The Committee
constituted with the representatives of the builders association and Government officials, after
thorough examination of the consensus emerged in the workshop has made certain
recommendations to Government.
i.     The maximum ceiling of excess tender percentage shall be 15% instead of 20%. The
lower limit and the conditions therefore will be continued. No. negotiations will be conducted
with the tenderers.
ii.    In order to maintain anonymity tender schedules shall be supplied on payment of a cost to
any contractor interested in tendering. The present practice of collecting EMD at the time of sale
of Tender Schedules shall be dispensed with. Hereafter, the contractors shall pay the EMD at the
time of filing their tender documents only. The EMD shall be at the rate of 1% of estimate
contract value and it shall be paid in full, without concession, either in the shape of a Bank
Demand Draft or unconditional Bank Guarantee.
iii.   The contractors shall have the facility of obtaining mobilization advance upto 10% of
contract value on works costing more than Rs.1 crore against bank guarantee which will attract
worksaccounts.com
suitable rate of interest. The advance and interest shall be recovered from the contractor’s bills
in appropriate installments.
iv.      For the works costing upto Rs. 10.00 lakhs the existing procedure of collecting EMD in
the form of crossed Demand Draft at the time of filing tender schedules shall be allowed. The
eligibility criteria shall not be made applicable for these works.
v.      The contractors will no longer be required from now onwards to produce clearance
certificate from the Mines Department and Seigniorage charges will be deducted by the
concerned works department from the bills of the contractors for the materials used on the work
only.
vi.    The contractors will be allowed the facility of deduction of sales tax at the rate of 2% at
source and be exempted from producing the clearance certificate from commercial tax
department.
viii. To resolve the problems of the Contractors vis-à-vis the Government, an institutional
mechanism will be created at the district level with the Collector as the Chairman and at the State
level the Chief Secretary as Chairman to review periodically and to address the difficulties of the
contractors.
ix.    To enforce proper quality control standards in execution of works, the performance of the
Contractors and the Engineers in charge of the work shall be graded by associating professional
bodies and suitable incentive/punitive system will be implemented on the basis of such grading
and stern action will be taken for defective works against both the Engineers as well as
Contractors.
x.     Quality Control shall hereafter be the primary responsibility of the Engineers executing
the works.
xi.     In order to prevent collusion amongst the tenderers, for the first two tender calls if the
premium quoted are found to be high/abnormal, the works shall be entrusted to the reputed
contractors on selection basis by the competent committees at the district level up to Rs. 1 Crore
and at State level above Rs. 1 Crore as per G.O. 4 th read above. The Contractors in five members
each time from out of the published lists of the Contractors in five members each time from out
of the published lists of the Contractors with proven track record shall be called upon to quote
their prices and the lowest among them shall be awarded the work within the maximum ceiling
limit prescribed.
7.     In order to avoid ambiguity in implementing the order, detailed guidelines are formulated
in annexures I and II to this order.
8.      The above orders shall come into force with immediate effect. However these orders
shall be made applicable only for the tenders invited after issuance of the G.O.
10.     This order issues with the concurrence of Finance and Planning (PW) Department vide
their U.O. No. SP/335/F8(2)/99-1, dt. 3-3-99.
worksaccounts.com
       (BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH)
                                            P.K. AGARWAL,
                                  SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (Projects)
To
The Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Wing, Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, Administration Wing, Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, (R&B), Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, (Administration (R&B), Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, (Public Health) MA & UD, Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, (PR&RD), Hyderabad.
The Engineer-in-Chief, CADA, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner, Commissionerate of Tenders, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, Major Irrigation, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, Medium Irrigation, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, VYPP Unit, Dowlaiswaram, East Godavari District.
The Chief Engieer, Nagarjunasagar Project, Vijaypuri North, Nalgonda District.
The Administrator – cum- Chief Engineer, N.S. Right Canals, CADA, Guntur.
The Chief Engineer, Sriramasagar Project, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, (P) Neelam Sanjivareddy Sagar Project, Hyderabad.
The Admn-cum-Chief Engineer, Sriramasagar Project, Jagtial.
The Chief Engineer, Telugu Ganga Project, Cuddapah.
The Chief Engineer, Telugu Ganga Project, Srikalahasthi.
The Chief Engineer, Central Designs Organisation, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, Investigation, Hyderabad.
The Chief Engineer, Mechanical, Hyderabad.
The Principal Accountant General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
The Dy. Accountant General (P) Hyderabad.
The Fin. Plg (Projects Wing) Department.
The Fin. Plg (Finance Wing) Department.
The Chief Technical Examiner, Irrigation & CAD (P.W) Dept. Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of Enquiries, A.P. Sect., Hyderabad.
The TR&R Dept.,/ Panchayati Raj & Rural Development/ M.A. & U.D. Dept.,/ Housing Dept.,/
Revenue Dept. with a request to issue suitable order for adoption of these order.
Copy to All Section Irrigation & CAD/U&CAD (PW) Department.
PS to Min. (Major & Medium Irrigation).
PS to Min. (Minor Irrigation).
PS to Min. (R&B).
PS to Min. (PR&RD).
PS to Min. (MA&UD).
PS to Min. (Home).
PS to Secy. To C.M.
                                  //Forwarded by Order//
                                            Sd/-
                                      Section Officer.
worksaccounts.com
                                           ANNEXURE – I
                      (G.O.Ms. No. 2, I & CAD (PW COD) Department dt. 5-3-99)
a)     The standard data which forms basis for preparation of estimates for all Civil
Engineering, Works shall be updated taking the improved construction technology in to
consideration.
b)    The Chairman Board of Chief Engineers and Engineer-in-Chief (Admn) I & CAD
Department shall complete the updation of Standard data with in a period of six months.
a)     The SSRs shall be finalized before June without exception every year. The preparation
of SSR shall be made more transparent by associating the representatives of Construction
industry, National Academy of Construction and the Institution of Engineers (India) A.P. State
Centre, at the time of finalization. For cities like Hyderabad and Visakhapatnam, Unit rates will
be prepared for various component items.
        In order to prepare realistic estimates, the following provisions are permitted to be added
in the estimate.
a)      Turnover tax at the rate of 1 percent for items relating to canal digging lining repairing
road works etc., where the earth work excavation and embankment is involved and for works
other than the above, turnover tax at 3 percent shall be added in the data.
d)       A lumpsum provisions shall be made in the abstract estimate towards Bankers, Charges
for obtaining Bank guarantees for payment of E.M.D., performance security and release of
retention amount as per prevailing procedure based on the period i.e. period of completion plus
defect liability period. The Chief Engineer concerned shall assess duly obtaining the details
thereof from the Scheduled Banks and suitable provision shall be made. Till than, no provision
for this item need be provided.
1.04 At the time of preparation of estimates, proper case should be taken to provided the
lumpsum provisions for the @ conditions also should be incorporated in the tender document for
suitable reimbursement to the contractors from out of the above provisions, however not
exceeding the amounts indicated against each, on production of the insurance policies, copies of
appointment orders with payments vouchers, bank guarantee etc., Failing to comply with the
above, reimbursement shall not be allowed but suitable penalty shall be imposed for not
engaging technical personnel and the Engineer-in-Charge shall taken insurance policy at the cost
of contractor duly deducting the premium from the contractors bills . Contractor has to take
policy in favour of the employer i.e. department.
worksaccounts.com
1.05 As per orders issued earlier in G.O. Ms. No. 53, dated. 17-4-1998 for earthwork
excavation and embankment upto 10000 Cu. Mtrs., the manual rate shall be provided and if the
quantity exceeds 10000 Cu.Mtrs., the machinery rates shall be adopted. However, the contractor
will be given and option either for manual of machine operations, irrespective of the quantities,
following items of works shall be taken up manually.
        Administrative approvals to the estimates for major and medium irrigation schemes as
well as schemes relating to R&B Department will be accorded in two stages.
a) in stage –I, the administrative approval will be accorded for the following items which will
help in preparation of detailed project reports.
i) Detailed investigation
ii)          Preparation of EIA and EMP reports, R&R plan, forest clearance etc.
iii)         Preparation of detailed designs/drawings.
iv)          Obtaining of necessary clearances
v)           Acquisition of minimum lands required
vi)          Completion of R&B, EMP etc.
vii)         Shifting of utilities for R&B works
b)       In stage –II projects will be prioritized and adequate funds be provided to complete them
in realistic time frame. The second stage administrative approval will be issued only after
designs are finalized, detailed investigations completed and lands are acquired for taking up
works without interruption for the first two years. However, in respect of certain works such two
approvals will be given straightway on certification by the Engineer-in-Chief/Chief Engineer
concerned that the stage – I approval is not needed and that the designs are finalized, detailed
investigations completed, lands are acquired and designs are finalized, detailed investigations
completed, lands are acquired and utilities are shifted for taking up the work without interruption
in the first two years.
a)    Now with standing anything contained in the relevant codal provisions, APSS and
Government order with regard to the procedure of according the technical sanction, enhanced
powers are delegated to the field officers as follows.
        The tender notice or notice inviting tenders (NIT) will be approved by the engineers for
the works for which they are competent to accord technical sanction. The tender documents will
be prepared by the concerned Engineers, bringing greater transparency. The provisions made in
the estimate for items which are reimbursable to the Contractors with conditions therefore and
other relevant conditions relating to the implementation of contract and other eligibility criterion
both physical and financial requirements in addition to the conditions not with standing any thing
worksaccounts.com
contained in the APSS, APWD code and, government order the following will be incorporated
wherever necessary.
        In partial modification of G.O. Ms. No. 132 dated. 11-8-1998, the defect liability period
is increased to two years for the original works and one year for maintenance works, duly taking
in to account normal wear and tear.
       The liquidated damages are imposed on the contractors as per the present practice basing
on the milestones.
        The Seigniorage charges will be recovered from contractor’s bills as per the rates
prescribed in the contract documents for the materials used on the work only. The present
practice of insisting for production of documentary evidence for having paid the seigniorage
charges in items of G.O. Ms. No. 243, dated. 8-5-1986 and in the absence of such production of
the evidence, the imposition of five times penalty is dispensed with.
        For sale tax/ tax on works contract, contractors are given an option to opt for the
composing schemes under section 5 (g) of the APGST Act and those opting for it are subject to a
tax deduction of 2% at source on the total value of the contract. In such case, the departments
will not insist on production of clearance and no assessment of tax will be needed.
         The contractors for works exceeding more than Rs. 1 crore of estimated cost value are
permitted to avail the facility of mobilisation advance upto 10% of the value of the contract
against an unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantee. the advance will attract a suitable rate
of interest (as per Government borrowing rate) and be deducted in suitable installments from the
bills of the contractors.
        The Contractors will be permitted to submit their work bills once in a month and payment
will be made after proper check of quantity and quality with in a reasonable time limit. The final
payment of the contractor should not be delayed for want of certificate from the quality control
staff.
        Emphasis on the quality will be paramount. The concerned Departments are directed to
strengthen the quality Control Machinery of the Government by keeping a separate Chief
Engineer for Quality control under the direct control of Government. The Chief Engineer,
quality control should see that quality audit is done periodically and also evolve suitable punitive
action against contractors as well as Engineers in charge of the work who violate proper quality
standards.
       The present practice that the Contractor has to procure at his own cost the principal
construction materials like cement, steel, bitumen, sand, metal soils etc., shall continue.
worksaccounts.com
3.01.9 Price Escalation
        The price escalation is permitted in contracts for works costing over Rs. 200 lakhs with a
period of completion exceeding 18 months and the formula evolved by Board of Chief Engineers
shall be made applicable.
       The qualification criteria at para 3.02 as well as modified procedure of collecting EMD in
the shape of Bank Guarantee will not be made applicable for the works costing Rs. 10 lakhs
(ECV) and below. For above works single cover system shall be followed and the EMD shall be
submitted along with the completed tender schedule.
3.01.12 Subletting
        The subletting of the work is strictly prohibited, unless it is permitted in the Tender and
in the event it is found that any portions of the work is sublet, action will be taken against the
contractor by debarring him from participating in the tenders for the period as decided by the
Engineer-in-Chief/Chief Engineer concerned. However, the debarring period shall not be less
than one year.
A. To qualify for award of the Contract, each bidder in its name should have, during the last fiver
years (specified financial years i.e. they should be immediately preceding the financial year in
which tenders are invited).
a).    Satisfactorily completed (not less than 90 percent of Contract value) as a prime
contractor, similar works of value not less than Rs. /-@ (usually not less than 50% of Estimated
value of contract) in any one year.
worksaccounts.com
-
Note: (Based on the studies carried out by the Engineer, the minimum suggested major
equipment to obtain the completion of works in accordance with the prescribed construction
schedule/mile stones are shown in the above list).
b) Availability of the Key personnel with adequate experience as required should be indicated
based on the requirement for the work to be executed.
c) Liquid assets/credit facilities of not less than Rs. lakhs (credit lines/letter of credit/solvency
certificate from banks etc., shall be equivalent of the estimates cash flow for three month in peak
construction period).
d) EMD in the shape of Bank Guarantee in the standard format enclosed, for Rs…. (one percent
of the estimated contract value) to be valid for the period as indicated at para 1.03 (d) i.e., period
of completion plus defect liability period.
        The sub contractors/GPA holders experience shall not be taken into account in
determining the bidder’s compliances with the qualifying criteria. The tenderers who meet the
requirement qualification criteria will be qualified only if their available bid capacity is more
than the estimated contract value. The available bid capacity will be calculated as under.
- Where
A= Maximum value of civil engineering works executed in any one year during the last five
years (updated……*price level) taking into account the completed as well as works in progress.
N= Number of years prescribed for completion of the works for which tenders are invited.
B= Value of existing commitments and ongoing works to be completed during the period of
completion of works for which tenders are invited.
Note:- The statement showing the value of existing commitments and ongoing works as well as
the stipulated period of completion remaining for each of the works listed should be issued by
the Engineer-in-Charge of Government department/undertaking not below the rank of Executive
Engineer or equivalent and countersigned by the rank of SE of equivalent. The statement to the
above effect will be clearly enclosed to the bidding document, and the tenderer shall furnish the
particulars invariably in the same format failing which the tender shall be treated as incompleted
and summarily rejected.
@=at….* price level. Financial turnover and cost of completed works of previous years shall be
given weightage of 10% per year to bring them to…… price level*
3.02.4 Even though the tender meets the above qualification criteria, he/she is subject to be
disqualified if he/she is found to have misled or made false representation in the forms,
statements submitted in proof of the qualification requirements or record of poor performance
such as abandoning works not properly completed in the contract, inordinate delays in
completions, litigation history and or financial failures and/or participated in the previous
tendering for the same works and had quoted unreasonably high bid prices. In addition to the
above, even while execution of the work, if found that the contractor had produced false/fake
certificates of experience, he/she will be blacklisted and work will be taken over invoking clause
60 (a) of PS to APSS.
worksaccounts.com
3.02.5 Tenders shall be valid for a period of 1/2/3 months as the case may be. Before the expiry
of the validity, the authority competent to call for tenders shall seek for further extension of
validity from the contractors and in case the validity is not extended his/her tender will not be
considered and the EMD shall be returned. During the period of validity if any tenderer
withdraws his tender, his/her EMD shall be forfeited.
        The Tender schedules shall be issued upto one day prior to the last day of submission of
Tenders. The tenders shall be received at the place and time as specified in the Tender Notice.
The contractor shall be allowed to submit the tender either personally or through his agent or by
post. In case of submission of tender by post the risk and responsibility for either loss of delays
in transit of the same is to be borne by the contractor. The tender opening authority will not
consider any tender received by him after the expiry of date and time fixed for receipt of tenders.
4.01.1 Tenders will be received in two parts in 2 different sealed covers. Cover-A and Cover-B.
The Cover-‘A’ shall contain the qualification data viz., Annual Turnover and value of works
under execution etc., as at para 3.02. The Cover ‘B’ will contain the financial bid for the work in
question. The Cover ‘A’ and Cover ‘B’ will be sealed and kept in another sealed enveloped
(Cover’C’) supplied by the department while issuing Tender Schedules.
4.01.2 The EEs and SEs delegated with the power to invite the tenders will open and evaluate the
tenders as per the qualification criteria. While opening the tenders care should be taken to first
open Cover – C in the presence of the tenders or their authorized representatives and other
officials concerned on the specified date and time and also to verify whether the Cover-A and
Cover-B are properly sealed and minutes be recorded to this effect then and there only. In case
the Covers A&B or any one of them are found/unsealed, such tenders will not be opened and
summarily rejected.
4.01.3 First Cover (cover-A) with superscription as “TECHNICAL BID” which shall contain the
qualification data as described at para 3.02 will be opened.
4.01.4 SECOND COVER (Cover-B) with the superscription of “PRICE BID” shall contain the
Schedule – A i.e., the statement of description of work, quantity, estimate rate and amount. Price
bid (Cover-B) of those tenderers who are determined as qualified as per eligibility criteria will be
opened on the date specified in the tender notice and the Cover-B of un-qualified tenderers will
not be opened and kept in the safe custody till the tenders are finalized and there after shall be
returned to them along with EMD. the Schedule – A of price bid shall contain the working items
indicated as part-I and LS provisions as Part-II. The premium or discount quoted by the
Contractor shall be applicable only for Part-I. However, the provisions contained in the Part-II
will be operable basing on the conditions provided in the tender schedules. The tenderers will
have to state clearly their willingness to execute the work at the percentage excess or less or at
par over the ECV indicated at Part-I at the space provided therein.
4.01.5 Before recommending/accepting the tender the tender accepting authority shall verify the
correctness of certificates submitted to meet the eligibility criteria and specifically for experience
the authenticated agreements of previous works executed by the lowest tenderer, shall be called
for.
        The EMD will be returned to the qualified but unsuccessful tenderer either after
finalization of tenders or on expiry of validity of tenders which ever is earlier.
worksaccounts.com
4.02 Finalisation Tenders
4.02.01 Tenders will be finalized by the EEs/SEs for the works costing upto their powers to
accord technical sanctions.
4.02.2 The Chief Engineer shall finalise the tenders for the works costing upto Rs.1 crore. The
tenders for the works costing more than Rs.1 Crore will be referred to COT along with Technical
Bid evaluation and Price Bid evaluation for consideration. The COT shall scrutinize the tenders
submitted by Engineer-in-Chief/Chief Engineers/Project Administrators in accordance with the
conditions stipulated in the Tender document and in case of any discrepancy or non-adherence to
the conditions, the same shall be communicated which will be binding both on the tender
concluding authority and the contractor. In case of any ambiguity, the decision taken by the
COT on tenders shall be final.
4.02.4 The time allowed from the date of publication of tender notices to the date of receipt of
tenders is 14 days for the first call and 7 days for the second call. The tenders will be received
following three box system i.e., at SEs office, Office of the SP of the District where the SEs
office is located and one in the office of the ENC of by post to the SE concerned.
a) Maximum Ceiling
The maximum permissible tender excess is reduced from 20% to 15% over the estimated
contract value in partial modification of G.O. Ms. No. 132 dt. 11-8-1998 and in case excess is
more than 15% the tenders shall be summarily rejected. At the same time, the tenders received
with the maximum permissible percentage excess are not necessarily to be accepted, they may be
accepted basing on the trend of tenders accepted either in the project or in near vicinity for
similar works. In case the trend of tender available relates to considerable time gap., the
accepted premium of the tenders be updated with reference to the present price index and with
justifiable reasons only the tenders shall be accepted.
4.02.6 The tenders received are found to have abnormally high percentage of within the
permissible ceiling limits prescribed but under collusion or due to unethical practices adopted at
the time of tendering process, shall be rejected.
4.02.7 When such situation arises that even for second tender call, the reasonable percentage in
fair and free environment is not received, the works will be entrusted on selection basis from out
of the list of contractors who are possessing the eligibility criteria as specified in the tender
document will proven track record prepared as per the procedure laid down in the Annexure-II
will be selected in turns of 5 contractors at each time and will be asked to file their price bids at a
specified place and time before the competent committees as stated at para 4.03 to entrust work.
The committee assessing the reasonableness of excess percentage quoted will recommend to
award the work to the lowest of all the contractors participated. The contractor to whom the
work is entrusted on selection basis will be provided necessary security and protection if
requested at his cost.
worksaccounts.com
4.03 Committees to Entrust Works on Section Basis
For the purpose of above selection and entrustment of works to contractors the composition of
the committees at District and State level and powers delegated to them are as under.
a) For the works costing upto Rs. 1 crore, a committee consisting of the Collector of the District
in which work is located, the SE concerned with the work and two SEs of two other works
b) For the works costing above Rs. 1 crore, the committee consisting of the C.O.T., and the C.E.,
concerned and Engineer-in-Chief (Irrigation) will recommend and award the works on the
selection basis.
In order to expedite execution of works and to remove any difficulty that contractors may face in
obtaining clearances and other infrastructure facilities from various departments such as shifting
of power lines, procurement of blasting materials, power supply connection etc., at the District
level, the Collector will formulate Committees and take necessary steps. The Chief Secretary
will have periodical review with the concerned Secretaries and Chief Engineers in order to
resolve the difficulties which could not be sorted out at District level. The Heads of the
Departments are directed to constitute suitable committees at different levels for speedy
settlement of the different kinds of or levels of disputes of technical nature by the C.Es
concerned.
                                    ANNEXURE – II
 Annexure to G.O. Ms. No. 23, Irr & CAD (PW: COD) Department dated. 5th March, 1999
       The basis for the above criteria and procedure to furnish the details required therefore are
discussed below.
ii. Standing in Civil Contract Field: The experience of the contractor in the civil contract field is
considered as one of the important criterian in as much as the experienced contractor will have
greater exposure to the working environment, procedure of execution of public works and also
have quality consciousness. Considering the above aspects the total length of experience as well
as the experience in the present class of contract are assigned with suitable credits.
worksaccounts.com
iii. Record of Execution of Works: in addition to the experience in execution of Civil
Engineering works a contractor may possess experience in certain specialized fields such as
irrigation works, R&B works, water supply and sanitary works etc. In case a contractor files an
application for either registration or renewal or upgradation in a particular field of specialization,
his record of execution of works should be assessed. Therefore in this criterian, credits have
been assigned for executing similar nature of works during the last 5 years from the year in
which he files application so as to evaluate is upto date knowledge of the work culture since the
last five years. Similarly credits are also assigned for having completed the similar nature of
works within the agreement period unless and other wise it is extended for the reasons beyond
the control of the contractor. However if a contractor completes the works ahead of the
agreement period additional weightage will be given by the suitable methodology indicated
therein.
iv. Plant and Machinery: It is expedient that a contractor should possess necessary plant and
machinery of his own that are required to execute the nature of work for which his performance
is evaluated, in order to assess his capability of executing the works within the stipulated period.
Hence suitable credits have been assigned to this criterian, however the required plant and
machinery will be indicated for the different works by the concerned engineers who evaluate the
performance.
v. Financial Status: Since the Government have been implementing the works in various public
works departments with huge outlays, it is necessary to assess the financial capability of a
contractor to commence the work and continue the work at least for a minimum period of 3
months without waiting for the bills to be paid by the concerned authorities. The criterian has
therefore been given importance and suitable credits are assigned for different components viz.,
annual average turnover availability of liquidated assets such as solvency/over draft facility and
other credit lines etc.
vi. Contractors Trained in NAC: In case the contractor himself is trained in the National
Academy of Construction it is expected that he will be able to possess better skills in execution
of works as well as contract management, hence suitable credits are assigned to this criterian.
vii. Membership in BAL and other professional Bodies: This criterian would reveal that the
contractors access to interact or to have interface with different professional experts for up-
dating his technical skills. Keeping this inview suitable credits are assigned.
viii. History of Litigation: This criterian is introduced to assess character and professional ethics
of a contractor. Various items have been identified under this criterian which are assigned
suitable credits for each of them. The sum total of credits under this criterian will be substracted
from the total credits achieved by a contractor for all the above seven criteria. It is imperative to
mention that in case the concealment of misleading/false information is furnished, the contractor
shall face very severe action such as blacklisting or debarring from the contracting field.
The contractor shall submit an affidavit to the effect that the history of litigation furnished by
him is true and incase it is detected at any stage he will abide by the action taken by the
Government without approaching to any Court whatsoever for redressal. Before taking action
against the contractor the engineers will, after through probe and enquiry will give suitable
opportunity to the contractor for offering his explanation and then initiate action against him.
worksaccounts.com
4. Procedure to Furnish the Particulars for each of the above Evaluation Criteria:
       The contractors shall furnish the information for each of the criterian (from I to vii)
mentioned above following the formats supplied to them by the concerned engineers who
evaluate their performance, however the formats will broadly contain the particular to be
furnished as stated below.
ii. The copies of registration right from the inception, to date shall be furnished.
iii. With regard to execution of works during the last 5 years the contractor shall produce the
copies of experience certificates issued by the competent authority not below the rank of
Executive Engineer and counter signed by the Superintending Engineer of equivalent indicating
description of work, date of agreement, agreement value/revised agreement value date of
commencement, agreed date of completion, actual date of completion, total value of work done,
reasons for delay if any, the physical quantities executed during each financial year etc.
iv. The copies of relevant document in proof of possessing the equipment shall be produced.
v. The audited balance sheet, income tax returns for the past 5 years shall be submitted along
with solvency, overdraft facility etc., in proof of the credit facility available to him.
Note: The copies of all the certificates documents shall invariably be attested by a serving
Executive Engineer of any works department of govt. of Andhra Pradesh. For incorrectness of
the copies of certificates/documents when compared with the original action will be taken
against EE who attested the copies and the contractor.
worksaccounts.com