Management Accounting 2
Management Accounting 2
Management Accounting 2
To convert this into a Common Size Balance Sheet, we express each item as a percentage of
Total Assets:
Items 2022 (Rs.) 2022 (%) 2023 2023 (%)
(Rs.)
Total Assets 10,00,000 100% 12,00,000 100%
Fixed 4,00,000 40% 5,00,000 41.67%
Assets
Inventory 2,00,000 20% 3,00,000 25%
Formula Operating Profit / Net Sales × 100 Net Profit / Net Sales × 100
Influence of Not affected by taxes and interest Reduced if interest expenses and
Taxes & Interest expenses. taxes are high.
Impact on Helps assess the efficiency of the Indicates how much profit
Business company's core operations. remains for shareholders after
all expenses.
Relationship Forms the base for net profit. A Always lower than Operating
higher Operating Profit can lead to Profit since additional expenses
a higher Net Profit. are deducted.
2. Trend Analysis – It helps in identifying trends over time within a single company.
In a common size balance sheet, each item is expressed as a percentage of total assets (for
assets section) or total liabilities and equity (for liabilities and equity section). This helps in
analyzing the financial structure of a company.
Helps in analyzing the company’s capital structure (debt vs. equity financing).
Ratio analysis is purely quantitative and does not consider qualitative factors such as
brand reputation, employee skills, customer satisfaction, or market conditions.
For example, two companies with similar financial ratios may differ significantly in
terms of management efficiency or product quality.
Ratios are based on past financial statements, which may not accurately reflect a
company's current or future performance.
Companies may use different accounting methods (e.g., FIFO vs. LIFO inventory
valuation, depreciation methods), affecting the comparability of financial ratios.
International companies may follow different accounting standards (GAAP vs. IFRS),
making cross-company comparisons difficult.
4. Inflation Distortion
Inflation can distort financial ratios, especially when comparing long-term financial
statements.
Asset values and revenues recorded at historical cost may not reflect their real
market value, leading to misleading ratio calculations.
5. Industry Differences
Ratio benchmarks vary across industries, making it inappropriate to compare
companies from different sectors.
6. Seasonal Fluctuations
This can create an illusion of strong financial health even when the company is
struggling.
While some ratios have general benchmarks, there is no absolute standard for what
makes a ratio "good" or "bad."
A ratio that looks strong in one context may indicate a problem in another, requiring
additional analysis.
Ratio analysis does not account for external economic factors like inflation, interest
rates, exchange rates, or regulatory changes.
A company may have strong financial ratios but still face risks due to economic
downturns or government policies.
A company might have strong financial ratios but still fail due to poor long-term
strategic decisions.
While ratio analysis is a valuable tool for evaluating a company's performance, it should not
be used in isolation. Investors and managers should complement ratio analysis with
qualitative insights, industry benchmarks, and external market conditions for a more
accurate assessment of financial health.
THE RELEVANCE OF USING BOTH COMMON SIZE AND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS
TOGETHER.
Common size statements and comparative statements are essential financial analysis tools
that, when used together, provide a more comprehensive understanding of a company's
financial performance and trends over time.
Common size statements convert these figures into percentages, making it easier to
identify trends and structural shifts.
Common size analysis helps compare companies of different sizes within the same
industry by expressing all financial items as percentages.
Example: Two companies may have different revenue figures, but by using common
size statements, an analyst can compare their profit margins, cost structures, and
debt levels in a standardized way.
Example: If operating expenses are rising in absolute terms but remain stable as a
percentage of revenue, it indicates proportionate growth rather than inefficiency.
Example: If revenue grows by 20% but cost of goods sold (COGS) increases by 30%, a
common size statement will reveal that profit margins are shrinking, signaling
potential cost-control issues.
Both comparative and common size statements provide the necessary data for
financial ratio calculations.
Common size percentages make it easier to interpret profitability ratios (e.g., gross
profit margin, net profit margin), liquidity ratios, and debt ratios in a meaningful
way.
Comparative statements allow analysts to see how these ratios change over time,
adding further depth to financial evaluation.
Hence, using both common size and comparative statements together provides a balanced
and detailed financial analysis. Comparative statements highlight growth trends and
financial changes, while common size statements provide structural insights and allow for
industry comparisons. Together, they help management, investors, and analysts make more
informed financial decisions.