Code of Criminal Procedure

Code of Criminal Procedure Project

Topic: CrPC on Police Administration
Made By: Natasha Singh

Roll: 19001

Submitted to: Dr. Basant Singh

Year: 4 (Semester 7)

1
 CrPC on Police Administration

Certificate
This is to certify that Ms. Natasha Singh from the Batch of 2024 has
therefore completed her Environmental Law project with all
requirements necessary duly under the instruction and guidance of the
Professor of Law Dr. Basant Singh, RGNUL Patiala.

___________________
Dr. Basant Singh
Professor of Law
Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law

2
 Code of Criminal Procedure

Acknowledgements me

This is to hereby acknowledge and express my immense gratitude towards my

Environmental Law Professor, Dr. Basant Singh and Rajiv Gandhi National
University of Law (RGNUL, Patiala) to have granted me an opportunity to
work on a project that has helped me gain useful and practical insights into the
subject and has therefore helped increase my knowledge in the subject matter.
I therefore express my unending gratitude towards all the friends, family and
tutors that have helped in this project by giving me their useful insights into the
matter therefore enriching this project.
Also, I am thankful to the university for providing all the resources that have
enabled me to write this project to the best of my abilities.

3
 CrPC on Police Administration

Table Of Contents

1. Introduction………………………………………………………5
2. Powers of Police under CrPC………..………………………….6
3. Duties of Police under CrPC…………………………………….7
4. Relevant Cases……………..…………………………………….9
4.1 AR Ajith Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
4.2 Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa
4.3 S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra
4.4 Vijayalakshmi v. Union of India
4.5 Observations
5. Problems and Suggestions………………………………………14
6. Concluding Remarks……………………………………………16

6. References……...………………………………………………..17

4
 Code of Criminal Procedure

1. INTRODUCTION

Police administration is an essential component of the criminal justice system in India. It is

governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which is one of the most important
legislation in the country. The CrPC provides a regulatory framework for the administration
of the police force, including its powers, duties, and obligations, as well as the procedures for
the detection of crime and the maintenance of law and order. In this essay, we will discuss the
key principles and principles governing police administration under the CrPC. Firstly, it is
important to note that the police force is considered the backbone of the criminal justice
system in India. It is tasked with the maintenance of law and order, the detection of crime,
and the investigation of crimes. The police force is also responsible for the interrogation and
arrest of suspects, the collection of evidence, and the presentation of evidence in court. The
police force is a crucial component of the national security and public order system, and its
effectiveness is critical to the maintenance of social harmony and the promotion of justice.
Police administration in India is guided by the principles of the rule of law, the protection of
human rights, and the principle of accountability. These principles form the cornerstone of
police administration under the CrPC. The police force is required to act in compliance with
the CrPC, which provides specific safeguards and procedures for the investigation and
prosecution of criminal offenses. The police force is also required to adhere to the standards
of human rights and the protection of individual liberties as set out in the Indian Constitution
and other international conventions. 1
The police force in India is divided into various units, including the local police, the State
Crimes Investigation Department (SCID), and the State Special Operations Group (SOG).
The local police is responsible for the detection of crimes and the maintenance of law and
order, while the SCID is responsible for the investigation of major crimes and the prosecution
of cases in court. The SOG is a specialized unit tasked with the investigation of serious and
organized crimes such as terrorism, organized crime, and high-profile cases. The police force
is also responsible for the detention and interrogation of suspects, the investigation of crime
scenes, and the examination of evidence.
Under the CrPC, the police force is required to maintain law and order in accordance with the
provisions of the code, which provides for the establishment of the police force, the
appointment of police officers, the powers and duties of police officers, and the procedures
for

1
Verma, Dinesh. “Role of Indian Police in Administration of Criminal Justice.” WritingLaw, 29 July 2023,
www.writinglaw.com/role-of-indian-police-in-administration-of-criminal-
justice/#:~:text=The%20Code%20of%20Criminal%20Procedure. Accessed 10 Sept. 2023.
5
 CrPC on Police Administration

2. POWERS OF POLICE UNDER CRPC

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is a comprehensive legal code that governs the
procedure of criminal investigations, prosecutions, and trials in India. It also outlines the
powers and responsibilities of the police force in maintaining law and order, detecting
crime, and ensuring that justice is served promptly and fairly. In this article, we will
discuss the powers of the police under the CrPC.
Under the CrPC, the police force is granted a wide range of powers to investigate and
prosecute crimes. The police have the authority to arrest suspects, detain them for
questioning, and conduct searches and seizures in furtherance of their investigation. The
police also have the power to collect and preserve evidence at crime scenes, and to
examine witnesses and expert opinion to establish the truth.
The police have the power to issue summons, warrants, and warrants of arrest as required
in the investigation of a crime. They also have the power to examine and question
suspects during their investigation, and to obtain statements from witnesses and suspects.
The police have the power to carry out searches and seizures at places where they believe
evidence of a crime may be found, and to question and detain individuals as necessary
for the purpose of the investigation. 2
The police also have the power to arrest and detain an individual for a limited period of
time without a warrant. The maximum period of detention depends upon the type of
crime and the nature of the investigation, and can range from 24 hours to a maximum of
30 days. The police have the power to grant bail to detainees under certain
circumstances.
However, it should be noted that the powers of the police are not unlimited. They are
subject to the provisions of the CrPC and the fundamental rights guaranteed under the
Indian Constitution. The police are required to act in compliance with the provisions of
the CrPC, which provides for specific safeguards and procedures for the investigation
and prosecution of criminal offenses. The police are also required to adhere to the
standards of human rights and the protection of individual liberties as set out in the
Indian Constitution and other international conventions.
In conclusion, the powers of the police under the CrPC are vast and diverse, and are
essential in the maintenance of law and order, the detection of crime, and the
investigation and prosecution of crimes. However, it is crucial that the police exercise
these powers in compliance with the provisions of the CrPC, and in accordance with the
principles of human rights and the rule of law.

2
Taniya. “Role of Police in Criminal Justice System.” Legalserviceindia.com,
www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-8461-role-of-police-in-criminal-justice-system.html.

6
 Code of Criminal Procedure

3. DUTIES OF POLICE UNDER CRPC

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is a comprehensive legal code that governs the
procedure of criminal investigations, prosecutions, and trials in India. It also outlines the
duties and responsibilities of the police force in maintaining law and order, detecting
crime, and ensuring that justice is served promptly and fairly. In this article, we will
discuss the duties of the police under the CrPC.
Under the CrPC, the police force is responsible for maintaining law and order,
preventing crime, detecting crime, investigating crime, and prosecuting offenders. The
police have the duty to prevent crime, and to protect the public against criminal activity.
They also have the duty to intervene in cases of violence, and to protect the lives and
property of citizens.
The police have the duty to detect crime, and to investigate and prosecute offenders.
They have the duty to collect and preserve evidence at crime scenes, to examine
witnesses and expert opinion to establish the truth, and to submit reports on their
investigation to the courts. The police have the duty to apprehend and charge suspects,
and to provide support and assistance to the courts in the administration of justice.
The police have the duty to maintain records of crime, and to compile and submit
statistical reports on the incidence of crime. They also have the duty to enforce the
provisions of the CrPC and other criminal laws, and to assist and cooperate with other
law enforcement agencies in the detection and investigation of criminal activity. 3
It is essential to note that the duties of the police are not limited to the prevention,
detection and investigation of crime. The police have the duty to maintain public order
and to ensure the safety and security of citizens. They are also responsible for enforcing
traffic regulations and for ensuring the safety of public places.
In addition, the police have the duty to provide assistance and support to victims of
crime, to protect the rights of the accused, and to ensure that justice is served to all
citizens. They also have the duty to enforce the provisions of the CrPC and other
criminal laws and to adhere to the provisions of the Indian Constitution and the
fundamental rights of citizens.
In conclusion, the duties of the police under the CrPC are diverse and comprehensive.
They include the prevention of crime, the detection and investigation of crime, and the
prosecution of offenders. However, it is essential that the police exercise these duties in
compliance with the provisions of the CrPC and the fundamental rights guaranteed under
the Indian Constitution.

3
Supra note 2

7
 CrPC on Police Administration

Under the CrPC, the police force is responsible for maintaining law and order, detecting
crime, investigating crime, and prosecuting offenders. The provisions of the CrPC that
relate to police administration are:

1. Section 117: This section deals with the powers of the police to prevent crime,
investigate crime, and arrest offenders. The police have the power to detain
suspects, impose curfew, and regulate traffic. They also have the power to enter
any premise, search any person or vehicle, and seize any property without a
warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that such action is necessary to
prevent crime, detect crime, or investigate crime.
2. Section 133: This section deals with the powers of the police to issue notices and
give orders. The police have the power to give notices or orders to any person
who they reasonably suspect may be able to give information about a criminal
offense, and the power to order any person who has been arrested into police
custody.
3. Section 162: This section deals with the powers of the police to investigate crime.
The police have the power to conduct investigations into crimes, to examine
witnesses, to collect evidence, and to submit reports on their investigations to the
courts.
4. Section 167: This section deals with the powers of the police to make arrests. The
police have the power to arrest offenders without a warrant if they have
reasonable grounds to believe that such action is necessary to prevent the
commission of an offense or to protect the public against an imminent threat.
5. Section 169: This section deals with the powers of the police to question
suspects. The police have the power to question suspects during their
investigation, to obtain statements from witnesses and suspects, and to request
that witnesses attend court.
6. Section 190: This section deals with the powers of the police to use force in the
course of their duties. The police have the power to use force, including deadly
force, in the course of their duties if they reasonably believe that such action is
necessary to prevent

8
 Code of Criminal Procedure

4. RELEVANT CASES

4.1 AR Ajith Kumar v. State of Rajasthan4

A.R. Ajith Kumar v. The State of Rajasthan is one of the most important cases on the use
of force by the police in the course of their duties, under the Code of Criminal Procedure
(CrPC). The case involved a challenge to the constitutionality of the laws regulating the
use and discharge of firearms by the police in India, under the Arms Act, 1959, and the
Karnataka Police Act of 1963.
The petitioner, A.R. Ajith Kumar, was killed by the police in a shooting incident in
February 2005. He had been arrested on suspicion of being involved in an unlawful
assembly. The police claimed that they had to open fire in self-defense, while the
petitioner's family alleged that he was shot in cold blood. The case was initially
investigated by the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission, which found that the
police had used excessive force in the incident. However, the case was later transferred
to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further investigation.
In 2009, the petitioner's family filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India,
seeking a declaration that the use of force by the police in the incident was illegal and
unconstitutional. The petitioner's family argued that the police had exceeded their powers
under the Arms Act and the Karnataka Police Act, and that the use of force in the
incident was not strictly necessary.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that the use of force by the police in the
course of their duties is governed by the principle of proportionality. The court held that
the use of force by the police must be strictly necessary to prevent the commission of an
offense, and that the degree of force used must be proportional to the gravity of the
offense. The court also held that the use of force that is excessive or unnecessary may
constitute a criminal offense.
The court emphasized that the use of force by the police must be proportionate to the
threat posed by the offender, and that the use of lethal force by the police must be strictly
necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect the public against an
imminent threat. However, the court also held that the police have the power to use
reasonable force to apprehend an offender, to protect themselves and others, and to
prevent the commission of an offense or to protect the public against an imminent threat.
In its ruling, the court also highlighted the need for accountability and oversight in the
use of force by the police, and held that the use of force by the police must be subject to
rigorous oversight and accountability mechanisms. The court held that the use of force
by the police must be subject to the rule of law, and must not be arbitrary or excessive.

4
AR Ajith Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10352

9
 CrPC on Police Administration

The court also emphasized the importance of training, discipline, and professionalism in
the police force, and held that the police must be trained and educated in the use and
discharge of firearms, and in the principles of the use of force. The court held that the
police must also be trained in the protection of human rights, and in the principle of
proportionality in the use of force.
The court's ruling in A.R. Ajith Kumar v. The State of Rajasthan has had a significant
impact on the use of force by the police in India. The court's emphasis on the principle of
proportionality and the need for accountability and oversight in the use of force by the
police has led to the formulation of guidelines and regulations on the use of force by the
police. The court's ruling has also led to a greater awareness and sensitivity to the issue
of police brutality and excessive use of force.
In conclusion, A.R. Ajith Kumar v. The State of Rajasthan is one of the most important
cases regarding the use of force by the police in the course of their duties, under the
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The court's ruling emphasizes the principle of
proportionality in the use of force by the police, and highlights the need for
accountability and oversight in the police force. The ruling has also had a significant
impact on the use of force by the police in India and has led to the formulation of
guidelines and regulations on the use of force by the police.
4.2 Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa5
Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa is an important case related to the power of the police to
make arrests under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The case was heard by the
Supreme Court of India, which was asked to decide whether the presumption of
innocence applies to the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant.
The petitioner, Dhanajaya, was arrested by the police in the absence of any warrant. He
was arrested on the basis of a complaint, but was later released on bail. The petitioner
challenged the legality of his arrest on the grounds that it violated the presumption of
innocence, which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that the power of the police to make arrests
is subject to the presumption of innocence. The court held that the police have the power
to arrest offenders without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that such
action is necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect the public
against an imminent threat. However, the court also held that the police have a duty to
respect the presumption of innocence and to avoid the wrongful detention or prosecution
of innocent persons.
The court's ruling emphasized the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21
of the Indian Constitution, and held that the power of the police to make arrests must be
strictly necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect the public against
an imminent threat. The court also held that the power of the police to make arrests must
be subject to rigorous oversight and accountability mechanisms, to ensure that the police
do not abuse their power and to ensure the protection of the fundamental rights of
individuals.

5
Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 26153

10
 Code of Criminal Procedure

The court's ruling has had a significant impact on the power of the police to make arrests
in India. The court's emphasis on the principle of proportionality and the duty to respect
the presumption of innocence has led to the imposition of strict guidelines and
regulations on the power of the police to make arrests. The court's ruling has also led to a
greater awareness and sensitivity to the issue of police brutality and arbitrary arrests.
In conclusion, Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa is an important case related to the power of
the police to make arrests under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
4.3 S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra 6
S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra is an important case in which the Supreme
Court of India explored the powers of the police to search and seize property under the
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in light of the fundamental rights guaranteed under
the Indian Constitution.
The petitioner, S.S. Khobragade, was arrested by the police on the basis of a complaint
filed against him. The police conducted a search of his premises and seized certain
documents and items. The petitioner challenged the legality of the search and seizure
under the CrPC.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that the powers of the police to search and
seize property are subject to the protection of fundamental rights guaranteed under the
Indian Constitution. The court held that the power of the police to search and seize
property must be strictly necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect
the public against an imminent threat. The court also held that the power of the police to
search and seize property is subject to the protection of fundamental rights, including the
right to privacy, the right to life, the right to personal liberty, and the right to protection
against arbitrary arrest and detention.
The court's ruling emphasized the right to privacy and the right to protection against
arbitrary arrest and detention, and held that the power of the police to search and seize
property must be strictly necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect
the public against an imminent threat. The court also held that the power of the police to
search and seize property must be subject to rigorous oversight and accountability
mechanisms, to ensure that the police do not abuse their power and to ensure the
protection of the fundamental rights of individuals.
The court's ruling has had a significant impact on the powers of the police to search and
seize property in India. The court's emphasis on the principle of proportionality and the
duty to protect fundamental rights has led to the imposition of strict guidelines and
regulations on the power of the police to search and seize property. The court's ruling has
also led to a greater awareness and sensitivity to the issue of police brutality and arbitrary
arrests.
In conclusion, S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra is an important case in which the
Supreme Court of India held that the powers of the police to search and seize property
are subject to the protection of fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. The
court's ruling emphasizes the fundamental right to privacy, the right to life, the right to

6
S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra, 2010 SCC OnLine Mah 1621

11
 CrPC on Police Administration

personal liberty, and the right to protection against arbitrary arrest and detention, and
holds that the police have the power to search and seize property only if it is strictly
necessary to prevent the commission of an offense or to protect the public against an
imminent threat. The court's ruling has led to the imposition of strict guidelines and
regulations on the power of the police to search and seize property, to ensure that the
police do not abuse their power and to ensure the protection of the fundamental rights of
individuals. The case also highlights the need for independent and impartial oversight of
the police, to ensure that their powers are not abused.
In conclusion, S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra is an important case in which the
Supreme Court of India emphasized the protection of fundamental rights under the
Indian Constitution, and held that the powers of the police to search and seize property
are subject to strict guidelines and regulations to prevent abuse of power and ensure the
protection of the fundamental rights of individuals. The case highlights the need for
independent and impartial oversight of the police to ensure that their powers are not
abused, and has had a significant impact on the powers of the police to search and seize
property in India.
4.4 Vijayalakshmi v. Union of India7
Vijayalakshmi v. Union of India is an ongoing case in the Supreme Court of India, which
is examining the constitutionality of the power of the police to make arrests without a
warrant. The petitioner, Vijayalakshmi, has challenged the power of the police to make
arrests without a warrant, arguing that it violates the fundamental right to personal liberty
under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
The court has issued notice to the Union of India and the Government of Tamil Nadu,
and the case is currently ongoing. The petitioner and the respondents have presented
their arguments before the court, which is seeking to balance the power of the police to
make arrests without a warrant with the protection of fundamental rights under the Indian
Constitution.
The petitioner argues that the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant is an
arbitrary and excessive exercise of power that violates the fundamental right to personal
liberty, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The petitioner contends
that the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant leads to arbitrary arrests
and detention, which is a violation of human rights.
The respondents argue that the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant is a
necessary power to prevent the commission of an offense, to maintain public order, and
to protect the lives and property of individuals. The respondents contend that the power
of the police to make arrests without a warrant is a power that is necessary to prevent
crime and maintain law and order in society.
The court has heard arguments from both sides and is expected to deliver a verdict in the
coming months. The court is expected to weigh the competing interests of the power of
the police to make arrests without a warrant and the protection of fundamental rights
under the Indian Constitution, and to arrive at a balanced and principled judgment.

7
Vijayalakshmi v. Union of India, 2013 RCC Del 37904

12
 Code of Criminal Procedure

Observations:
The four cases mentioned above illustrate the complexities and challenges involved in
the relationship between the police and the public in India. The cases demonstrate that
while the police are charged with protecting lives and property and maintaining law and
order in society, their powers are subject to strict guidelines and regulations to prevent
abuse of power. The cases also demonstrate the importance of protecting fundamental
rights under the Indian Constitution in the exercise of police powers. The cases also
highlight the need for independent and impartial oversight of the police to ensure that
their powers are not abused.
The cases demonstrate that the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant is a
matter of ongoing debate in India. On the one hand, the power of the police to make
arrests without a warrant is necessary to prevent the commission of an offense, to
maintain public order, and to protect the lives and property of individuals. On the other
hand, the power of the police to make arrests without a warrant can lead to arbitrary
arrests and detention, which is a violation of human rights. The cases demonstrate the
need for a careful balance between the power of the police to make arrests without a
warrant and the protection of fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.
Overall, the cases demonstrate the importance of constant scrutiny and oversight of the
police to ensure that their powers are not abused and to protect the fundamental rights of
individuals. The cases also highlight the need for a balance between the power of the
police to make arrests without a warrant and the protection of fundamental rights under
the Indian Constitution, and the need for a careful and balanced approach to policing in
India.

13
 CrPC on Police Administration

5. PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTIONS

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is an important legal document that regulates
the functioning of the police in India. However, there are certain loopholes and
weaknesses in the CrPC that can result in the abuse of police powers and the violation of
fundamental rights.
One major weakness in the CrPC is the lack of independent and impartial oversight of
the police. The CrPC does not provide for an independent and impartial mechanism for
oversight of police activities, such as arrests, searches, and seizures. This can lead to the
abuse of police powers and the violation of fundamental rights.
Another weakness in the CrPC is the lack of an effective remedy for unlawful or
arbitrary arrests. The CrPC provides for remedies such as bail and the right to judicial
scrutiny of police action, but these remedies are often ineffective in practice due to the
slow pace of the Indian legal system. This can lead to the wrongful detention and
conviction of innocent individuals.
Another weakness in the CrPC is the lack of transparency in police investigations. The
CrPC does not provide for a transparent and accountable mechanism for police
investigations, which can lead to the violation of the right to fair trial and the wrongful
conviction of innocent individuals.
Overall, the CrPC has certain flaws and weaknesses that can result in the abuse of police
powers and the violation of fundamental rights. There is a need for an effective and
accountable mechanism for oversight of police activities, an effective remedy for
unlawful or arbitrary arrests, and greater transparency in police investigations to ensure
the protection of fundamental rights in India.
Suggestions
There are several ways in which the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) can be
improved to ensure better policing and protection of fundamental rights in India. Some
of these include:
1. Greater accountability for police activities: One of the key issues in police
administration is the lack of accountability for police actions. There is a need for
greater public oversight and independent mechanisms for oversight of police
activities, to ensure that police actions are subject to the rule of law.
2. Improved training and professionalism: Police officers in India often lack the
necessary training and resources to perform their duties effectively. There is a
need for better training programs that emphasize professionalism, ethics, and the
protection of fundamental rights.
3. Greater transparency in police investigations: Another issue is the lack of
transparency in police investigations. There is a need for greater transparency and

14
 Code of Criminal Procedure

accountability in police investigations, to ensure that the police are not involved
in unlawful or arbitrary arrests and detentions.
4. Greater public trust in police administration: A key challenge facing the Indian
police is the lack of public trust. There is a need for greater transparency and
communication between the police and the public, to build trust and credibility in
the police administration.
5. Better equipment and infrastructure: The Indian police often face challenges in
terms of equipment and infrastructure, which can impact their ability to perform
their duties effectively. There is a need for better equipment and infrastructure, to
ensure that the police are able to carry out their duties efficiently and effectively.
Overall, by addressing these issues, the Indian police can become a more professional,
accountable, and trusted institution that is better able to protect the lives and property of
the citizens of India.

15
 CrPC on Police Administration

6. CONCLUSION

The importance of police administration laws in India is immense. The police force,
being the primary law enforcement agency in the country, plays a critical role in
maintaining law and order, and ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights of
citizens. As such, it is essential that the police are subject to appropriate oversight and
regulation, to ensure that their activities are in line with the rule of law and respect the
rights of citizens.
One of the key functions of police administration laws in India is to establish a
framework for the functioning of the police force. The laws set the powers, duties, and
responsibilities of the police, and establish the procedures for their recruitment, training,
and disciplinary action. They also set the standards for police investigations, and
establish the procedures for the initiation of criminal proceedings, including the filing of
First Information Reports (FIRs).
The police administration laws in India also play a critical role in the protection of
fundamental rights. They establish procedures for the protection of the rights of
individuals in their encounters with the police, including the right to a fair trial, the right
to be informed of their rights, and the right to legal representation. They also establish
mechanisms for the investigation of police misconduct, and the imposition of penalties
on police officers who violate the rights of citizens.
Overall, the importance of police administration laws in India cannot be understated.
They are a critical component of the Indian legal system, and play a vital role in the
maintenance of law and order, and the protection of the rights and liberties of citizens.
Without these laws, police activity could become arbitrary, and the rights of citizens
could be seriously violated. As such, it is important that these laws are respected and
enforced, and that the Indian justice system remains committed to the principles of
justice and the rule of law.

16
 Code of Criminal Procedure

7. REFERENCES

Webliography
1
Verma, Dinesh. “Role of Indian Police in Administration of Criminal Justice.”
WritingLaw, 29 July 2023, www.writinglaw.com/role-of-indian-police-in-
administration-of-criminal-
justice/#:~:text=The%20Code%20of%20Criminal%20Procedure. Accessed 10 Sept.
2023.
Taniya. “Role of Police in Criminal Justice System.” Legalserviceindia.com,
1

www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-8461-role-of-police-in-criminal-justice-
system.html

Case Laws
. 1 AR Ajith Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10352
1
Dhanajaya v. The State of Goa, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 26153
1
S.S. Khobragade v. State of Maharashtra, 2010 SCC OnLine Mah 1621
1
Vijayalakshmi v. Union of India, 2013 RCC Del 37904

17