FOREWORD

The Air National Guard (ANG) has been engaged in

continuous combat operations for a quarter century. Over that
time, the ANG has evolved from a strategic reserve for national
emergencies to an essential operational partner in the Total Air
Force. Today's ANG, in addition to providing a reserve surge
capacity, contributes daily to the US Air Force commitment to
Global Vigilance, Global Reach, and Global Power in all five
core missions: Air & Space Superiority; Intelligence,
Surveillance, & Reconnaissance; Rapid Global Mobility;
Global Strike, and Command & Control. If ANG is to continue
to meet its obligations to the Total Air Force, it must maintain
interoperability with the rest of the Air Force and Joint Forces
as we operate much of the Air Force's oldest equipment. Our
continued tactical relevance demands cost-effective
modernization and this book represents the first step in making thoughtful investment decisions.
The 2016 Modernization Book documents the modernization priorities as seen by the operator,
the unit-level tactical experts who gathered at the annual Air Reserve Component Weapons and
Tactics Conference. It is the best starting place when considering modernization options that will
preserve and grow combat capability. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in an operator-
level perspective.
ANG modernization priorities focus on capability and equipment, but, in the end, it is really
about the men and women who stand behind the pages and dedicate themselves to building a
stronger ANG. While standing ready to respond to their governor's call when disaster strikes at
home, they continue to excel as warriors and build partnerships around the world in support of
American interests everywhere.
We are the Air National Guard and we stand ready to support the Governors, United States Air
Force, and Department of Defense.

BRIAN G. NEAL
Major General, USAF
Acting Director, Air National Guard

Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars

 Release Policy:
Information presented in this document is released to the public and may be distributed or
copied; however, it is subject to change without notice. Neither the Air National Guard, nor any
other Department of Defense agency, warrants the accuracy of any funding information
contained in the document. Use of appropriate photo and image credits is requested.
If you have any questions or comments about the information presented here, please forward
them to NGB/A5’s Email: usaf.jbanafw.ngb-a5.mbx.a5-workflow@mail.mil for more
information.

ii
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table Of Contents iii

Introduction viii
Contacts ix
State Matrix x
TAB A - A-10 THUNDERBOLT II OVERVIEW 1
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 2
A-10 Improved Positive Identification, ISR, and Battle Tracking 3
A-10 Improved EA / EP and Full Spectrum Countermeasure Systems 4
A-10 Upgraded Communication Systems which Function in a Contested, Degraded, 5
and Operationally Limited Environment
A-10 Improved Ability to Operate in a Degraded/Denied Global Positioning System 6
Navigation Environment
A-10 Improved Capability to Operate and Employ from Austere Airfields 7
TAB B - COMMAND AND CONTROL OVERVIEW 9
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 10
Air Operations Center Direct Operational Secure Voice Communication 11
Air Operations Center Targeting Application Workstation 12
Air Operations Center Cross-Domain Network Capability 13
Battle Control Center Common Mission System 14
Battle Control Center Cross-Domain Enterprise Service 15
Battle Control Center Air Defense Communications 16
Control and Reporting Center in Garrison Operations Shelters 17
Control and Reporting Center Combat Identification 18
Control and Reporting Center Electronic Attack Training Suite 19
Control and Reporting Center Mission Planning Fly Away Kit 20
TAB C - C-17 OVERVIEW 21
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 22
C-17 Common MAF Mission Computer 23
C-17 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures 24
C-17 Digital Radar Warning Receiver 25
C-17 Forward Area Refueling Point Carts 26
C-17 Extended Range Tanks 27

iii
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
TAB D - C-130H/J OVERVIEW 29
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 30
C-130H Updated Avionics Suite Providing Global Airspace Access and Modernized 31
Cockpit Instrumentation
C-130H Improved Radio Frequency and Infrared Self-Protection 32
C-130H/J Single Pass Precision Airdrop 33
C-130H Integrated Data Link and Defensive Systems Suite 34
C-130H Propulsion System Upgrades 35
C-130J Common MAF Mission Computer 36
C-130J Improved Radio Frequency and Infrared Self-Protection Suite 37
C-130J Tactical Plot Suite 38
C-130J Updated Avionics Suite For Global Airspace Access 39
TAB E - C-130 SPECIAL MISSION OVERVIEW 41
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 42
EC-130J Federated Defensive System Unit 43
EC-130J Electro-Optical / Infrared Sensor 44
EC-130J ARC-210 Line of Sight Antenna 45
EC-130J Ku Band Spread Spectrum System Trainer 46
EC-130J Permanent Ku Spread Spectrum Antenna 47
HC/MC-130P/N Combat Penetration Suite 48
HC/MC-130P/N Enhanced Electro-Optical/Infrared Sensor 49
HC/MC-130P/N Single Pass Precision Airdrop 50
HC/MC-130P/N Combat Rescue Mission Network 51
HC/MC-130P/N Mission Flexible Refueling 52
LC-130 Avionics Obsolescence Solution 53
LC-130 Enhanced Situational Awareness 54
LC-130 Retractable External Arm and Ice Sensors 55
LC-130 Flight Deck Communications Upgrade 56
LC-130 Propulsion Modernization 57
TAB F - E-8C JSTARS AND C-32B GATEKEEPER OVERVIEW 59
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 60
E-8C Non-Cooperative Target Identification 61
E-8C Integrated Broadcast System (IBS) Modernization 62
E-8C Encrypted Maritime Automatic Identification System (AIS) 63
E-8C Personnel Recovery Compatible Interrogation Radio 64
C-32B Enhanced Flight Vision System 65
TAB G - F-15 EAGLE OVERVIEW 67
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 68
F-15 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar 69
F-15 Enhanced Electronic Warfare and Self-Protection 70
F-15 Multi-spectral Search/Track/Target Capabilities 71
F-15 Persistent Air Dominance Enabler 72
F-15 Modernized Cockpit 73

iv
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
TAB H - F-22 RAPTOR OVERVIEW 75
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 76
F-22 Helmet-Mounted Display 77
F-22 Survivability Enhancements 78
F-22 Link 16 Transmit 79
F-22 Rapid Raptor Enablers 80
F-22 Open System Architecture 81
TAB I - F-16 FIGHTING FALCON OVERVIEW 83
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 84
F-16 Radar providing LO detection, A/A and A/G EP/EA, and combat ID capability 85
F-16 Broadband Uplink/Downlink Capability 86
F-16 Improved Jam-Resistant Navigational Systems 87
F-16 Secure Line-of-Sight and Beyond-Line-of-Site With 3D Audio Communication 88
F-16 Integrated Electronic Warfare Suite 89
F-16 Link-16 and 5th to 4th Generation Datalink Interoperability 90
TAB J - HH-60 PAVE HAWK OVERVIEW 91
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 92
HH-60 Advanced Electronic Warfare Penetrator System 93
HH-60 Modernized Integrated Defensive System Suite / Advanced Threat Protection 94
HH-60 Integrated Flight Deck 95
HH-60 Helmet Mounted Heads Up Display 96
HH-60 Aircraft Weapons Modernization 97
TAB K - KC-135 STRATOTANKER OVERVIEW 99
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 100
KC-135 Advanced Infrared Countermeasures Defensive Systems 101
KC-135 Common MAF Mission Computer 102
KC-135 External Overt/Covert Lighting 103
KC-135 Aircraft Ground Cooling Capability 104
KC-135 Jam-Resistant Global Positioning System 105
TAB L - LOGISTICS OVERVIEW 107
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 108
Logistics Multi-MDS Portable Aircraft Maintenance Stands 109
Logistics Multi-MDS Articulating Boom/Man-Lift 110
Logistics JSTARS Flight Control Surface Removal/Installation Device 111
Logistics HH-60 Cribbing 112
Logistics HH-60 Engine Test Cell 113
Logistics Multi-MDS Active Bus Tester 114
Logistics Multi-MDS Fuel Cell Leak Detector 115
Logistics HH-60 Rescue Hoist Test Set 116
Logistics Multi-MDS Improved Armament/Smart Weapons Pre-Load Tester 117
Logistics Multi-MDS SATCOM Tester 118
Logistics Multi-MDS Avionics Back Shop Tester 119
Logistics Electronic Bomb Lift Equipment 120
Logistics Isochronal Inspection and Maintenance Stands 121
Logistics Multi-MDS Situation Awareness Datalink Tester 122
Logistics Multipurpose Lifting Device 123

v
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
TAB M - INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE OVERVIEW 125
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 126
DCGS Imagery Intelligence Electronic Attack Mitigation 127
DCGS Scalable Targeting Processors 128
DCGS Scalable Network Technologies Program Licenses 129
MC-12W LOS Tactical Data Link for Interoperability 130
MC-12W Ability to Operate in GPS-Denied / Degraded AORs 131
MC-12W Exhaust IR Suppressor for Increased Survivability Against the Increasing 132
MANPAD Threat in the AOR
MC-12W Improve PID with the Addition of an HD IR Sensor 133
MC-12W Slim-Fast Weight Reduction to Allow Max Fuel Load and Increased Loiter 134
Time
RC-26B Avionics Modernization 135
RC-26B Block 25R Common Configuration 136
RC-26B Multi-Function Radar Capability in a Configurable Package 137
RC-26B Interoperable Ku / Ka Beyond Line-Of-Sight (BLOS) Data Link 138
RC-26B Aircraft Performance Upgrade 139
TAB N - GUARDIAN ANGEL, SPECIAL TACTICS, AND TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY 141
OVERVIEW
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 142
Guardian Angel Combat Survivability System Modernization 143
Guardian Angel Preservation of the Force and Family Equipment 144
Guardian Angel Aircraft Interoperability System 145
Guardian Angel Medical Modernization System 146
Special Tactics Mobility Systems 147
Special Tactics Situational Awareness Systems 148
Special Tactics Modernized Aerial Delivery Systems 149
Special Tactics Survey System 150
Tactical Air Control Party ASOC Tactical Datalink 151
Tactical Air Control Party Portable Next Generation Power Management 152
Tactical air Control Party Lightweight Dismounted Sensor and Targeting System 153
Tactical Air Control Party Dismounted Audio and Video Mission Recording System 154
Tactical air Control Party Rapidly Deployable Joint Operational Communications 155
System
TAB O - MQ-1 PREDATOR AND MQ-9 REAPER OVERVIEW 157
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 158
MQ-1/MQ-9 Minimal Latency Tactical Data Link 159
MQ-1/MQ-9 Communication Suite with Improved Interface 160
MQ-1/MQ-9 Mission Debrief System 161
MQ-1/MQ-9 Next Generation Tactical Situation Display 162

vi
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
TAB P - SIMULATION, DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS, AND RANGE 163
INSTRUMENTATION OVERVIEW
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 164
Simulation Battle Command Center 4th/5th Generation Training Suite 165
Simulation Security Forces Use-of-Force Simulator 166
Simulation Guardian Angel Full Spectrum Personnel Recovery Simulators 167
Simulation JSTARS Weapon System Trainer Motion Base 168
Simulation Remotely Piloted Aircraft Network Capable Aircrew Training Device 169
Simulation Air Operations Center Joint Range Extension / Link Training Tool 170
Simulation Space Live, Virtual, Constructive Networked Training Solution 171
Simulation Air & Operations Center Distributed Mission Operations Training 172
Capability
Simulation Special Tactics High Angle Training System 173
Distributed Mission Operations: Cross-Domain Solutions 174
Distributed Mission Operations & Enhanced Live-Fly Training with Virtual-Constructive 175
Representation
Distributed Mission Operations ARCNet Live Radar Feed, Datalink, and Two-Way 176
Radio Capability
Distributed Mission Operations Multi-Spectral Imaging Capability 177
Ranges Mobile Fidelity EW Threat Emitters 178
Ranges Communications Instrumentation Systems, Architecture and Infrastructure 179
Ranges Realistic, Static, Multispectral Targets 180
Ranges Integrated Weapons System Scoring System 181
TAB Q - SPACE OPERATIONS AND CYBER OPERATIONS OVERVIEW 183
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 184
Cyber Virtual Interconnected Training Environment 185
Cyber Secure Infrastructure Collaborative Capability 186
Cyber Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation 187
Cyber Warfare and Information Operations Infiltration Kit 188
Cyber Combat Communications Small Communication Package 189
Space Tactical Shelters for Space Missions 190
Space Control Satellite Emulation Suite 191
Space Secure Crew Communications System 192
Space Secure Crew Force Management System 193
TAB R - SECURITY FORCES OVERVIEW 195
2016 Weapons and Tactics Requirements List 196
Security Forces Small Arms Ranges 197
Security Forces Close Quarter Combat Training Safety Kit 198
Security Forces Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Night Observation Equipment 199
Security Forces Active Shooter Response Kit 200

vii
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Introduction

The 2016 Air National Guard (ANG) Weapons Systems Modernization Priorities Book
documents capability priorities identified during the Oct 2015 Air Reserve Component Weapons
and Tactics (WEPTAC) Conference. WEPTAC hosted representatives from all ANG and Air
Force Reserve (AFR) units, as well as representation from the active component.

The 2016 Book is organized into 18 weapon system mission sets. Each Tab begins with a
summary page of capabilities identified at WEPTAC, categorized as Critical (Crucial -
within the next one to three years), Essential (Vital - within the next three to five years), or
Desired (Enhances mission success in the five-year timeframe).

For each Critical capability identified, an information paper is included within the weapon
system Tab. A header within each information paper identifies its appropriate Service Core
Function or functional category as one of the following:

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack / Rapid Global Mobility

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority / Command and Control
Global Integrated ISR / Special Operations / Personnel Recovery
Agile Combat Support / Simulation and Distributed Mission Operations

Applicable Funding Appropriation Definitions

0350 – National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account

3840 - ANG Operations and Maintenance, one-year funding
3010 - Aircraft Procurement, three-year funding
3600 - Research and Development, two-year funding
3080 - Other Procurement, three-year funding
(NOTE: In most cases, Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs are paid for with 3600
Research, Development, Test and Engineering (RDT&E) money, but in some cases they can be
paid for with 3010 Procurement money.)

The State Matrix on each Tab page identifies ANG weapons systems locations by state/territory.
These depictions reflect the force structure as of 1 Dec 2015.

viii
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Contacts

Col Kevin Campbell NGB/A5 Brig Gen Kirk Pierce NGB/A2/3/6

Director, Plans & Requirements Director, Operations
240-612-9366 DSN 612-9366 240-612-9454 DSN 612-9454
kevin.j.campbell20.mil@mail.mil kirk.s.pierce.mil@mail.mil

Mr. Frank Ballinger NGB/A5 Col Keith MacDonald NGB/A4

Associate Director, Plans & Director, Logistics
Requirements 240-612-8470 DSN 612-8470
240-612-9351 DSN 612-9351 keith.g.macdonald2.mil@mail.mil
franklin.f.ballinger.civ@mail.mil
LtCol Dan Begin NGB/A5R Col Craig Rezac NGB/A7
Chief, Operational Requirements Acting Director, Installations &
240-612-9365 DSN 612-9365 Mission Support
daniel.j.begin.mil@mail.mil 240-612-8078 DSN 612-8078
craig.a.rezac.mil@mail.mil
Col Ian Bryan NGB/A5P Brig Gen Bradley Swanson
Chief, Program Integration NGB/A8/9Director, Plans &
240-612-9367 DSN 612-9367 Programs
ian.bryan@ang.af.mil 240-612-9382 DSN 612-9382
bradley.a.swanson6.mil@mail.mil
Mr. Michael Regan NGB/A5X Col Mathew Manifold AATC/CC
Chief, Strategy and Plans Commander
240-612-9356 DSN 612-9356 520-295-6900 DSN 844-6900
michael.d.regan2.civ@mail.mil matthew.j.manifold.mil@mail.mil

Col John Russo NGB/A1

Acting Director, Manpower,
Personnel and Services
240-612-9223 DSN 612-9223
john.p.russo.mil@mail.mil

2016 Weapons Systems Modernization Priorities Book Edited by NGB/A5X

An online version of this document is available at: http://www.ang.af.mil/angprioritiesbooks/

ix
 State Matrix
Weapons System Reference Table by State (1 Dec 2015)
Refer to Weapon System Tabs for Specific Information (Classic Associate Units are shown in red.)

Mission C-

MC-12W,
C-130H/J

GA / ST /
RC-26B
KC-135
MQ-1/9
Special

DCGS,
C-32B,

HH-60

Cyber,

Range
TACP
Space
AOC,

DMO
BCC,
E-8C

CRC

LVC
A-10

C-17

F-15
F-16
F-22
130
B-2

AK ● H HC-130 ● ● BCC Space GA

AL ● ● RC-26B /DCGS

AR H ● DCGS Range
AZ ● ● ● RC-26B
CA J HC-130 ● ● ● CY /SP RC-26 / DCGS GA
CO Space Range
CT H CRC
DC ●
DE H
FL ● AOC Space
GA H E-8C CRC DCGS TACP Range
GU
HI ● ● AOC/BCC DCGS
IA ● ● CRC Cyber DCGS / RC-26 DMO
ID ● TACP
IL H ● AOC TACP
IN ● DCGS TACP Range
KS ● CRC CY /SP DCGS TACP Range
KY H STS
LA ● TACP
MA ● DCGS
MD ● CY (3)
ME ●
MI ● ● AOC Range
MN H ●
MO ● H AOC Range
MS ● ● AOC/CRC RC-26B TACP Range
MT H
NC H TACP
ND ● DCGS
NE ●
NH ●
NJ C-32B ● ● Cyber TACP Range
NM ● RC-26B /DCGS
NV H DCGS
NY ● HC / LC-130 ● ● AOC/BCC Space GA/TACP Range
OH H ● ● ● CRC
OK ● ● MC-12W TACP
OR ● CRC STS
PA EC-130J ● ● AOC TACP Range
PR 2 H CRC
RI 6 J Cyber
SC ●
3 ●
SD
TN 5● ● ● Cyber DCGS
TX 5 H ● ● Cyber RC-26B TACP Range
UT 6 ● CRC DCGS
VA ● DCGS
VI
VT ● Cyber
WA ● BCC CY (2) RC-26B TACP
WI ● ● CRC RC-26B Range
WV ● H RC-26B
WY H Space

x
 A-10
A-10
 Close Air Support
 Forward Air Controller – Airborne
 Combat Search and Rescue
 ANG Units Provide 40% of the Total Fleet

The A-10’s combat survivability, long range, and ability

to land at and operate from austere airfields provide
flexibility beyond that of other fixed wing Air Force CAS
assets. The A-10 minimizes collateral damage with
precision munitions and its 30-millimeter cannon. Its
extensive loiter time and targeting pod capabilities provide
superior support capabilities for ground forces in its
forward air controller-airborne (FAC-A) role.

The Air National Guard (ANG) operates 72 A-10s at Boise

AP, Boise, ID; Selfridge ANGB, MI; Ft. Wayne IAP, IN;
and Martin State AP, MD. ANG aircraft have the helmet-
mounted integrated targeting modification, drastically
reducing the time required to acquire targets. This
ultimately increases both survivability and lethality.
The Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) is a
unique ANG A-10 aircraft capability contributing toward
successful combat search and rescue.

Current A-10 modernization priorities include a

high-resolution center display, which allows
pilots to see the high definition picture provided
by targeting pods. Display upgrades improve
A-10 pilots’ ability to positively identify
friendly forces while aiding in the search,
identification, surveillance, and tracking of
enemy personnel. Additional upgrades to
increase OCO effectiveness include an
integrated noise-cancelling, three-dimensional
cockpit audio system and an anti-jam
embedded Global Positioning System.
Tab A

1
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 A-10
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Improved Positive Identification, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance, and
Battle Tracking
 Improved Electronic Attack/Protection and Full Spectrum Countermeasure Systems
 Upgraded Communication Systems which Function in a Contested, Degraded, and
Operationally Limited Environment
 Improved Ability to Operate in a Degraded/Denied Global Positioning System
Navigation Environment
 Improved Capability to Operate and Employ from Austere Airfields

Essential Capabilities List

 Aircraft Operational Flight Program Upgrade
 Targeting Pod Incremental Development
 Smart Triple Ejector Rack
 Find, Fix, and Identify Targets/Threats Through the Weather (Synthetic Aperture Radar)
 Improved Survivor Defense/Concealment

Desired Capabilities List

 Electronic Flight Bag
 Laser Threat Protection for Eyes and Sensors
 Airframe Sustainment and Propulsion Improvement
 Full AIM-9 Integration
 Instrument Flight Rules Head-Up Display
 Longer Range Precision-Guided Munitions with Moving Target Capability

2
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION, INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE,

AND RECONNAISSANCE, AND BATTLE TRACKING
1. Background. The A-10 requires improved positive identification (PID), intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance, and battle tracking capabilities. Friendly forces and enemy
combatants PID is crucial in any conflict. Tremendous effort is exerted to minimize fratricide
and civilian casualties. Currently, three capabilities can immediately help A-10 pilots improve
PID. The first capability is an improved helmet-mounted cueing system (HMCS). HMCS
reduces the time to acquire targets with aircraft sensors from minutes to seconds, and allows
pilots to quickly and accurately locate the position of friendly ground forces. The next
component is the ability to generate and display high-resolution video. Advanced targeting pod
(ATP) digital output upgrades with color video provide high-resolution feeds, coupled with high
definition displays, enable visual identification of friendly and enemy forces from greatly
increased standoff ranges. The additional situational awareness afforded to pilots provides a
more accurate three-dimensional picture of the battlefield, thereby lowering risk to friendly
forces, civilian personnel, and property. Installation of high-resolution displays in the A-10
enables full utilization of targeting pod improvements. Refinements, through ARC-210
connections, to the display system allow pilots to securely share data, including any ATP
imagery, with Joint Tactical Air Controllers (JTACs). These actions lesson the likelihood of
fratricide or collateral damage.
2. Source of Need. Combatant Command Urgent Operational Need dated 26 Sep 2008; 2012-
2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 124 FW Boise Air Term, ID 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI
175 WG Martin State APT, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
HMCS Improvements (3010) N/A $3,000,000
Display Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) N/A $9,000,000
(3010)
106 Color Displays * (3010) $326,000 $34,556,000
169 Targeting Pod Upgrades * ** (3010) $250,000 $42,250,000
Total $88,806,000
* Includes 10% spares
** Quantities and Program Costs are shared with F-16s (see F-16 Information Paper)

3
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED ELECTRONIC ATTACK/PROTECTION AND FULL SPECTRUM

COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEMS
1. Background. The A-10 electronic warfare (EW) suite requires considerable modernization to
keep pace with surface-to-air threat technology advancements and proliferation. The Air Force
identified these vulnerabilities in the 2012 A-10C Operational Viability and Sustainment Gap
Analysis Report, but due to continuing budget battles over retiring the aircraft, very little has
been done to address them. Accordingly, A-10 EW modernization requires re-initiation with a
focus on several critical capabilities in the radio frequency (RF) spectrum: radar warning
receiver modernization, improved chaff program development, integration with digital radio
frequency memory (DRFM) jamming pods, ability to record and playback aircraft EW
information, and the expansion of the aircraft Ethernet architecture to allow rapid EW
reprogramming and communication with advanced pods. A-10 vulnerabilities in the infrared
(IR) spectrum must also be addressed through the development of infrared countermeasures
which reliably decoy modern IR threats, as well as by replacing the AAR-47 with a missile
warning system capable of detecting those threats more reliably and at greater
distances. Modernized EW suite subsystems, architecture, and countermeasures will allow the
A-10 to conduct full spectrum combat operations in the vast majority of today’s contested
environments.
2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command A-10C Operational Viability and Sustainment Gap
Analysis Report, 2012; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 124 FW Boise Air Term, ID 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI
175 WG Martin State APT, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 027131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
94 ALR-69A Radar Warning Receivers (RWR) $600,000 $56,400,000
(3010)
ALR-69A RWR Non-Recurring Engineering N/A $5,000,000
(NRE) (3010)
40 ALQ-131A Electronic Attack (EA) Pods $1,000,000 $40,000,000
(3010)
94 Electronic Warfare (EW) Architecture Kits $50,000 $4,700,000
(3010)
EW Architecture Kit NRE (3010) N/A $2,000,000
94 Advanced Infrared Countermeasures (IRCM) $600,000 $56,400,000
Systems (3010)
Advanced IRCM NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
Total $174,500,000

4
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

A-10 UPGRADED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS WHICH FUNCTION IN A

CONTESTED, DEGRADED, OR OPERATIONALLY LIMITED ENVIRONMENT
1. Background. An improved A-10 communication suite consists of satellite communications
(SATCOM), three-dimensional (3-D) audio, enhanced data link, and Single-Channel Ground and
Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS) situational awareness (SA) waveform. Two multi-band
and multi-mode digital radios with SATCOM capability meet the need for simultaneous beyond
line-of-sight (BLOS) and secure line-of-sight (SLOS) communications. Integration of the
SINCGARS SA waveform allows Global Positioning System (GPS) data, transmitted by existing
tactical radios, to be displayed on the A-10 tactical awareness display (TAD), the targeting pod
field of view, and within the helmet-mounted cueing system (HMCS) display. Utilization of the
SA waveform capability reduces the risk of fratricide in combat search and rescue (CSAR) or
close air support (CAS) scenarios by providing immediate and constant awareness of friendly
positions. The integration of noise-cancelling and 3-D audio in the cockpit increases situational
awareness by spatially separating aural warning and radio signals and providing angular cueing
to ground and air threats when used in conjunction with a HMCS. Spatial separation and
reduction in ambient noise significantly increases the pilot’s ability to process information
simultaneously arriving from multiple radios and warning systems. Continued advancements in
data link architecture and the proliferation of data link systems to multiple aircraft and ground
parties requires the A-10 to upgrade its data link system. This ensures interconnectivity and
security with all fielded data link variants.
2. Source of Need. 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 124 FW Boise Air Term, ID 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI
175 WG Martin State APT, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Directional Audio Non-Recurring Engineering N/A $5,000,000
(NRE) (3010)
106 Directional Audio Kits * (3010) $50,000 $5,300,000
159 Directional Audio Pilot Equipment * (3010) $7,000 $1,113,000
10 Unit Test Equipment (3010) $43,800 $438,000
SINCGARS SA Waveform Retrofit (3010) N/A $1,000,000
Total $12,851,000
* Includes 10% spares

5
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED ABILITY TO OPERATE IN A DEGRADED/DENIED GLOBAL

POSITIONING SYSTEM NAVIGATION ENVIRONMENT
1. Background. The A-10 uses an embedded Global Positioning System (GPS)/inertial
navigation system (INS) for precision navigation and weapons employment. Virtually every
system on the A-10 depends on the highly accurate position, orientation, and velocity data the
embedded GPS/INS (EGI) provides. Adversary attempts to deny GPS capability may degrade or
limit the precision of A-10 navigation solutions, decreasing positional awareness and weapons
employment accuracy. The first step to counter or minimize this threat is the installation of a
controlled reception pattern antenna to nullify the effects of jamming systems.
The integration of Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Modules (SASSM) reduces the impacts
of jamming and protects GPS’ civil Standard Positioning Service and military Precise
Positioning Service accuracies. Additionally, current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
regulations mandate compliance with automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast by 2020. The
A-10 requires greater surveillance precision and reliability in order to comply with the national
aerospace system’s transition to the satellite-based air traffic control system. Upgrading the A-
10’s current EGI supports the FAA mandate and provides increased capability to preserve GPS
integrity in a contested or degraded electromagnetic environment.

2. Source of Need. FAA Rule - 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No. FAA-2007-29305; Amendment
No.91-314], RIN 2120-AI92 - Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out
Performance Requirements to Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Services, 28 May 2010; 2012
ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 124 FW Boise Air Term, ID 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI
175 WG Martin State APT, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Anti-Jam EGI Non-Recurring Engineering N/A $9,000,000
(NRE) (3010)
106 Anti-Jam EGI * (3010) $195,000 $20,670,000
Total $29,670,000
* Includes 10% spares

6
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED CAPABILITY TO OPERATE AND EMPLOY FROM AUSTERE

AIRFIELDS
1. Background. The A-10 is the only fighter aircraft in the Air Force inventory with the ability
to land at austere, unimproved airfields. This capability gives Combatant Commanders
flexibility to pre-deploy A-10s closer to the expected battlespace, and enables rapid response
during close air support, forward air controller-airborne, and combat search-and-rescue
sorties. Emerging capabilities further improve the A-10’s ability to operate from austere airfields
by reducing the number of maintenance and logistics personnel required to support
operations. Combat fuel tanks provide additional endurance and minimize the need for
additional refueling operations. On-board oxygen generating system eliminates liquid oxygen
refill and reduces maintenance requirements between missions. A parking brake allows pilots to
remain in the aircraft during prolonged ground operations without the need for additional
personnel to place and remove wheel chocks. An electronic flight book (EFB) increases the
flexibility to instantly establish austere field operations without the restriction of additional paper
flight information publications. The EFB allows pilots to download essential mission data and
provides a digital inflight reference of the battlespace, including charts and maps. Triple ejector
rack modifications permit carriage of additional GPS-guided munitions.
2. Source of Need. A-10 Operational Requirements Document (ORD); 2012 ARC WEPTAC
Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 124 FW Boise Air Term, ID 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI
175 WG Martin State APT, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
63 Combat Fuel Tanks * (3010) $111,000 $6,993,000
94 OBOGS * (3010) $210,000 $19,740,000
Smart Triple Ejector Rack Non-Recurring N/A $2,000,000
Engineering (NRE) (3010)
126 Smart Triple Ejector Racks * (3010) $100,000 $12,600,000
Total $41,333,000
* Includes 10% spares

7
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 Command and Control
Command and Control
 Air Defense and Surveillance for North America
 Air Battle Management
 C-NAF Integration/Augmentation
 Military Range Control
 Ground Controlled Intercept
 Flight Safety Monitoring

The Air National Guard (ANG) Command and Control (C2) weapons systems play an integral
role in Homeland Defense, Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) and Overseas
Contingency Operations (OCO).

Air Operations Center (AOC) - The AOC weapon system is employed by the Joint Forces Air
Component Commander (JFACC), facilitating operational control and direction of theater air,
space and cyber forces. Air National Guard AOC and Air Force Forces (AFFOR) staffs are
comprised of personnel and facilities postured to support Homeland Defense, Overseas
Contingency Operations and Defense Support of Civil Authorities. AOC personnel are
organized as divisions specializing in in integrated / distributive C2 processes / products. The
AFFOR Staff is organized as special / functional directorates that provide planning teams to the
Commander, Air Force Forces (COMAFFOR), in support of a Joint Forces Commander or
Combatant Commander.

Battle Control Center (BCC) - A BCC is a fixed Battle Management Command and Control
(BMC2) surveillance system. BCC refers to the aerospace warning and control “system,” which
integrates surveillance radars and communications systems with computer processing and
display / control equipment at four fixed facilities for mission execution. At the tactical level,
BCCs provide surveillance, communication, control, data links, and combat-related air battle
management in support of Homeland Defense operations in the Continental United States,
Alaska, and Hawaii.

Control and Reporting Center (CRC) The CRC, at operational and tactical level, provides
surveillance, tactical communications, data links, and combat-related air battle management of
joint air operations with real-time networked situational awareness.
Tab B

9
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control
2015 Weapons and Tactics Council
 Pocket J Link 16 software upgrade with
Critical Capabilities List dynamic filtering/smart forwarding
capability.
AOC  Point defense and wide area surveillance
 Secure Voice Capabilities sensors.
 Joint Range Extension and Link  Communications architecture that
Training Tool (see Tab Q) allows BCCs to flexibly assign mil-spec
 Distributed Mission Operations and radios through an Internet Protocol (IP)
Training Capability (see Tab Q) or serial network to deployed/fixed,
 Targeting Application Workstations to distributed antennas in their assigned
Support Air Operations Center area of responsibility.
 Cross Domain Network Capabilities CRC
 SAASM Embedded Global Positioning
BCC System/Inertial Navigation System
 Common Battle Management Command (EGI).
and Control (BMC2) mission system  Maintaining internal and external
 Cross-Domain Enterprise Solution simulator capability.
 Live-Virtual-Constructive Distributed  Countering low flying threats with a
Mission Operations Mission Training highly-mobile medium range radar.
Center (see Tab Q)  Integrated Automatic Dependent
 Defense Information Systems Agency- Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B)
compliant communications nodes sensor suite.
CRC  Decoy system capable of replicating
 In-Garrison Operations Facility organic radar parameters to increase
 Combat Identification Capability sensor survivability.
 Electronic Attack Training Suite  Cross-domain operations within the
Battle Management Command and
 Mission Planning Fly Away Kit
Control (BMC2) enterprise.

Essential Capabilities List Desired Capabilities List

AOC
AOC
 None
 None
BCC
BCC
 Multifunctional Information
 Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System
Distribution System (MIDS)/Joint
(UAS) Threat Mitigation.
Tactical Radio System (JTRS) terminal.
 Integrated Passive Detection,
 Joint Engagement Zone (JEZ) Battle
Identifying, And Tracking System For
Management Command and Control
Semi-Cooperative Targets.
(C2) Systems.
CRC
 None

10
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

AIR OPERATIONS CENTER DIRECT OPERATIONAL SECURE VOICE

COMMUNICATION
1. Background. Air Operations Centers (AOC) continue to primarily use Radio Frequency (RF)
as a means to communicate with other services, allies, aircraft, associate units and state
emergency response agencies for domestic response coordination. Air National Guard (ANG)
AOC units lack the capability to communicate directly via radio frequency to supported
commanders, fielded units, and state emergency management agencies. The lack of a Core
Radio Package (CRP) leads to training shortfalls by not allowing units to adequately train and
employ. The Core Radio Package allows an enhanced disaster response capability while
providing real-world training between multiple in-state units during domestic responses and
exercises. ANG AOC units must train and operate on the same systems as their aligned active
duty AOCs they support. Without this; without radio communication capability, ANG, units
cannot execute or train to full mission expectation. Also, an included radio-to-Internet Protocol
(IP) bridge can be used by ANG AOCs to simulate and train realistic Tactical Air Control
System (TACS) control procedures, participate in real-world events, distributed operations,
interface with aligned units, and increase readiness training. Moreover, a radio-IP bridge
provides digital voice communications that route live radio voice traffic between multiple sites
over local and wide area data networks for additional capabilities. The AOC Core Radio
Package should consist of at least three PRC-117 Mobile User Objective System (MUOS)
Tactical Satellite (TACSAT) compatible radios, one HF radio, one Multifunction Information
Distribution System (MIDS) associated antenna at each unit.
2. Source of Need. AFPD 13-1, ANNEX A; 2012-2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference, 2014-2015
ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 152 AOG Syracuse, NY 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, MO
112 AOG State College, PA 183 AOG Springfield, IL 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI
286 AOG Meridian, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
21 PRC 117Gs (3080) $20000 $420,000
7 MIDS (3080) $20000 $140,000
7 HF Radios $2500 $175,000
Total $577,500

11
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

AIR OPERATIONS CENTER TARGETING APPLICATION WORKSTATION

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Air Operations Groups (AOGs) lack an effective
solution to train and support advanced target development in accordance with Chairman Joint
Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 3370.01 Target Development Standards, and are resultantly
unable to train to active duty standards or engage in distributed operational support. Advanced
Target Development is defined by CJCSI 3370.01 as the minimum information required to
effectively engage a target, and requires the generation of highly accurate coordinates which can
be utilized by today’s coordinate seeking weapons. Per CJCSI 3505.01b Target Coordinate
Mensuration Certification And Program Accreditation, and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 14-126
Target Coordinate Mensuration Training And Certification Program, this process of generating
precise coordinates known within the USAF as the Precise Point Positioning Program (AFP4) or
Precision Point Mensuration (PPM) can only be accomplished using systems and software
specifically accredited by the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA). The Targeting
Application Workstation (TAW) is the current System of Record for AFP4 / PPM within the Air
Operations Center (AOC). Collateral Damage Estimates can only be produced using the
TAW. The Air Force Targeting Center, as the USAF lead agent for AFP4 training and
certification, has recommended a ratio of 1:1 TAW to AFP4 certified analysts due to the number
of man-hours required (8-12) to maintain certification each month. ANG AOGs have been
allocated two TAWs per unit, some units are UTC tasked to provide as many as 12 AFP4
certified analysts at a ratio of one workstation for every six analysts. This is insufficient to meet
the ANG’s training needs. The ANG AOGs require a total of five TAWs per unit (three
additional allocations per unit) to effectively train assigned personnel. Procuring a total of 15
more TAWs will meet this requirement across the ANG enterprise.
2. Source of Need. AFPD 13-1, ANNEX A; AFPD 14-1, AFPD 14-2, AFPD 36-26, CJCSI
3160.01, CJCSI 3370.1, CJCSI 3505.01b, AFTTP 3-3AOC, AFI 14-117, AFI 14-126, AFI 13-
1AOC v3, USAF Greybeard Targeting Study (2008), USAF Targeting Roadmap (2012), USAF
Targeting Center, ACC 20th IS, 2012-2014 ARC WEPTAC, 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted.
101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 109 AOG JB Pearl Harbor- 112 AOG State College, PA
Hickam, HI
152 AOG Syracuse, NY 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, 183 AOG Springfield, IL
MO
217 AOG Battle Creek, MI 286 AOG Meridian, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
15 TAW Hardware (3080) $3,600 $54,000
15 Socet GXP Software License (3080) $15,000 $225,000
Total $279,000
*Does not include sustainment

12
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

AIR OPERATIONS CENTER CROSS-DOMAIN NETWORK CAPABILITY

1. Background. Air Operations Center (AOC) operators and Air Force (AF) contingency
planners use multiple cyber domain networks, some with classified and some with unclassified
information, to conduct operations and training. Information across networks needs to be visible
simultaneously to provide effective training and operational support to Component-Number Air
Force (C-NAF), as well as to their state Joint Force Headquarters Joint Operations Center (JFHQ
JOC) to conduct Domestic Operations (DOMOPS). Timeliness of access to data in response to
life threatening events is crucial to contingency planners. During mission operations, critical
unclassified data required for mission accomplishment may be located on classified
systems. Switching between multiple level security level information systems presents
unnecessary risk of error when executing mission operations. These limiting factors could be
solved with a Cross Domain Solution (CDS). A CDS is an automated high assurance guard
system that protects and transfers approved information between two different security domains /
enclaves, allowing for direct exchange of information between Top Secret / Sensitive
Compartmented Information (TS/SCI), Secret Collateral systems, and NIPRNet systems. It also
sanitizes, guards, and downgrades higher classified formatted data to lower security
classifications. A single integrated CDS glass interface would provide simultaneous views of
NIPR, SIPR, C2ANG, SECRET, TS and COALITION networks on a single client, enhancing
operator effectiveness. Operations security would be improved through the reduction of printed
products used to compare information. An immediate return on investment would be realized
due to the reduction of current infrastructure, hardware, office space, power, cooling
requirements, lifecycle and administration of systems needed to support various systems that
would be merged into a single system. Information Assurance and Protection benefits would be
greatly enhanced as multiple individual desktop systems for each network would be replaced by
a single terminal with no data being stored on the local device.
2. Source of Need. AFPD 13-1, ANNEX A, 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2014-
15 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 109 AOG JB Pearl Harbor- 112 AOG State College, PA
Hickam, HI
152 AOG Syracuse, NY 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, 183 AOG Springfield, IL
MO
217 AOG Battle Creek, MI 286 AOG Meridian, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
8 Server Hardware (3080) $80,000 $640,000
8 Client Hardware (3080) $37,000 $296,000
8 Software (3080) $230,000 $1,840,000
8 Installation and Certification (3080) $150,000 $1,200,000
Total $3,976,000

13
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

BATTLE CONTROL CENTER COMMON MISSION SYSTEM

1. Background. Battle Control Center (BCC) and Control and Reporting Center (CRC)
missions are increasingly interchangeable. Traditionally, CRCs have deployed to austere
environments lacking power and communication infrastructure. Due to dwindling mobility
resources and advanced distributed network technology, CRCs are increasingly employed on
main operating bases and utilize existing infrastructure for power, communication, and
integration of distributed radars and radios across assigned battle management areas. BCCs have
already mastered the capability of integrating hundreds of radar and radio sites across the United
States. The future of tactical Command and Control (C2) is an amalgamation of these two
weapons systems with a common mission, vision and platform. Currently CRCs and BCCs lack
a common mission system. A common mission system allows the interchangeability of
missions, manpower, and tactics techniques and procedures across weapons systems.

2. Source of Need. 2015 NORAD WEPTAC, 2014 NORAD C2 Ops Conference #2/11
Operational Needs; 2014 NORAD WEPTAC #2 of 12 Operational Needs out-briefed to the
CDRNORAD in the Executive Session; BCC Information Sharing Capabilities Request Form
FY14; AF Form 1067 Global Earth Capability; AFF 1067 2-way TacChat integration, AFF 1067
ADSB integration, AFF 1067 Multi-Source Correlation, AFNORTH Capabilities Request Form
Multi-Source Correlation, AFF 1067 Front End J-Chat, AFF 1067 ID Matrix, #1 operational
need at 2013-15 CAF WEPTAC, BCC Tactics Review Board; 2014-15 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
169 ADS Wheeler Army Air 176 ADS JB Elmendorf- 224 ADG Rome, NY
Field, HI Richardson, AK
225 ADG Joint Base Lewis-
McChord, WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Common Mission System (3080) $1,000,000 $4,000,000
Total $4,000,000

14
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

BATTLE CONTROL CENTER CROSS-DOMAIN ENTERPRISE SERVICE

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Battle Control Centers (BCCs) execute the North
American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and Northern Command (NORTHCOM)
Homeland Defense, Air Sovereignty, and Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) missions
across the Continental United States (CONUS), Alaska and Hawaii. The BCCs lack the ability
to integrate joint service tactical data links, provide functional redundancy to the Air Event
Information Sharing Service (A/EISS), and support DSCA missions through the Situational
Awareness Geospatial Enterprise (SAGE) application. The cross-domain enterprise service is the
application layer data filter that assures tactical integration of assets in cyberspace for homeland
defense operations. A cross-domain enterprise service at the BCC provides tactical-to-tactical
information sharing, increased cybersecurity, and redundancy. The cross-domain enterprise
service passes data from United States only Not Releasable (NOFORN) classified tactical data
systems to classified SECRET REL ACGU (an intelligence alliance comprising Australia,
Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) information systems. This
solution is required to integrate tactical data links, provide functional redundancy to the Air
Event Information Sharing Service (A/EISS), integrated joint service tactical data links, and
facilitate defense support to civil authorities (DSCA) missions through the Situational Awareness
Geospatial Enterprise (SAGE) application. The full package includes two additional Joint Range
Extensions (JREs) in each BCC providing functional redundancy for information exchange and
assurance within the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) enterprise.

2. Source of Need. 2014-15 NORAD C2 Ops Conference #1/11 Operational Needs; 2014
NORAD WEPTAC #3 of 12 Operational Needs out-briefed to the CDRNORAD in the
Executive Session; AFNORTH Information Sharing POM for FY16/17; AF Form 1067 CDES;
#1 operational need at 2014 CAF WEPTAC, BCC Tactics Review Board, 2014-15 ARC
WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
224 ADG Rome, NY 225 ADG Joint Base Lewis- 176 ADS JB Elmendorf-
McChord, WA Richardson, AK
169 ADS Wheeler Army Air
Field, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Firewall Hardware / Software Packages (3080) $500,000 $2,000,000
4 Joint Range Extension 3 Generation Gateways $180,000 $720,000
(3080)
4 Software Licenses for JREs (3080) $45,000 $180,000
Total $2,900,000

15
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

BATTLE CONTROL CENTER AIR DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS

1. Background Air National Guard (ANG) Battle Control Centers (BCCs) execute the North
American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and Northern Command (NORTHCOM)
Homeland Defense mission across the Continental United States (CONUS), Alaska and Hawaii.
The two CONUS Battle Control Centers lack seamless radio communications with Aerospace
Control Alert (ACA) aircraft throughout the Continental United States during out of area
operations (operations within the other sector’s area of operation). As of 2015 the Defense
Information Security Network (DISN) is being phased out of service and replaced with
connections to the FAA Telecommunications Infrastructure (FTI) IP-based network. Also, the
current communications infrastructure is eight years past its originally projected end-of-life
cycle. If the communications infrastructure at 100 land-based US radios sites are upgraded to
allow the BCCs to connect to the FAA radios and use the FTI IP-based network while providing
simultaneous connections and remote access. This also allows remote cyber security software
updates and provides seamless access to radio communications for both BCCs. The routers,
servers, circuits and Federal Aviation Agency connections requested allow both BCCs to
maintain communications with ACA aircraft for continuous air sovereignty and defense
operations in the CONUS.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council, NORAD Instruction 10-18, NORAD
NORTHCOM Theater Campaign Plan, NOBLE EAGLE EXORD and CONPLAN 3310.
3. Units Impacted.
224 ADG Rome , NY 225 ADG Joint Base Lewis-
McChord , WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
100 Routers, (3080) $2,200 $220,000
100 Servers, (3080) $3,700 $370,000
100 Power Supply’s (3080) $1,800 $180,000
100 Circuits (3080) $3,000 $300,000
100 2.5GB RAM Upgrade (3080) $400 $40,000
100 2GB Flash Upgrade (3080) $700 $70,000
100 Enhanced EtherSwitch Module (3080) $1,000 $100,000
100 Security Bundles (3080) $3,800 $380,000
100 Next Gen Signal Processor (3080) $1,200 $120,000
100 G-A-G Restoration System (3080) $3,400 $340,000
100 Associated Cables/Connectors (3080) $2,500 $350,000
100 Misc Installation Accessories (3080) $1,200 $120,000
Total $2,500,000

16
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER IN GARRISON OPERATIONS SHELTERS

1. Background.
The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) is a mobile Battle Management Command and Control
(BMC2) capability with deployable radar elements of the Theater Air Control System
(TACS). The Air National Guard (ANG) CRC units do not have adequate space within their
current facilities to set up Operations Module (OM) Mod workstations for in-garrison use. The
CRC community is in the process of getting a BMC2 system upgrade. The upgrade includes 18
operator consoles designed to deploy and are housed in two “Alaskan shelters” in a back-to-back
configuration, 20’ x 65’ (1300 sq. ft.) or a building. The Alaskan shelters have fabric exteriors
with a vinyl liner that include lights, electric, Environmental Control Units (ECUs), and
personnel doors. They do not support environmental conditions for personnel and equipment for
longer than 30 days. The equipment being replaced (Modular Control Equipment) provided
hardened shelters that could also be used for in-garrison operations and were much more suited
for long term operations. The CRC needs a shelter of approximately1300 sq. ft. that provides
adequate environmental controls, weather resistance and information assurance characteristics to
house the OM Mod workstations for in-garrison use.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
103 ACS Orange, CT 109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 116 ACS Warrenton, OR
117 ACS Savannah, GA 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 128 ACS Volk Field, WI
133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR
255 ACS Gulfport, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 502672

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
10 Facilities (3080) $625,000 $6,250,000
Total $6,250,000

17
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER COMBAT IDENTIFICATION

1. Background.
The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) is a mobile battle management Command and Control
(C2) capability with deployable radar elements of a theater air control system. CRCs utilize the
Modular Control Equipment (MCE) and the AN / TPS-75 as the primary weapon system
equipment. The AN / TPS-75 radar system is a mobile, tactical radar system capable of
providing radar azimuth, range, height and Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) information for a
240-nautical-mile radius. The radar system supports Identification, Friend, or Foe / Selective
Identification Feature (IFF / SIF) integrations. However, the AN / TPS-75 radar system does not
have the capability to passively identify aircraft. The CRC relies on controlled aircraft and other
assets to disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant identification information to allow
engagement of hostile targets. The CRC needs a passive early warning, identification and
direction finding capability for airborne threats. Without this capability the CRC survivability is
degraded in the event of a contested or degraded operational environment. The system should
provide full threat band frequency coverage, instantaneous azimuth coverage, and have an on-
line library of emitter types for rapid combat ID.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council

3. Units Impacted.
103 ACS Orange, CT 109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 116 ACS Warrenton, OR
117 ACS Savannah, GA 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 128 ACS Volk Field, WI
133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR
255 ACS Gulfport, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 502672

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
10 Combat Identification Suites (3080) $100,000 $1,000,000
Total $1,000,000

18
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER ELECTRONIC ATTACK TRAINING SUITE

1. Background. The primary Control and Reporting Center (CRC) sensor is the AN / TPS-75
radar, a 1970s era mobile, tactical system capable of providing azimuth, range, height and
identification information of aircraft in support of surveillance operations and control of tactical
aircraft. The Electronic Protection Technician (EPT) is primarily responsible for countering
enemy electronic attack (EA) through the use of the AN / TPS-75 radar electronic protection
(EP) features, while other operations crew members are responsible for recognizing EA and
mitigating its impact on command and control operations. The EPT must be able to recognize
and counter the effects of EA while maintaining the radar’s presentation and emissions and a
thorough understanding of EA to apply the proper EP procedures to combat it. Currently, the
CRCs lack a viable solution to simulate real world EA and provide the EPT and other crew
members the necessary training to operate in contested environments against advanced threats.
The CRCs require a low power steerable antenna ground based jammer to rectify this training
shortfall. To ensure proper EP training, the jammer must provide Barrage / Spot / Doppler noise,
velocity gate pull off, range-gate pull off, multiple false targets, and Digital Radio Frequency
Memory (DRFM) generated EA waveforms against the AN / TPS-75. This capability will greatly
enhance operator performance / effectiveness in a contested environment and meet the necessary
training requirements in accordance with MACJOM directives.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council, AFI 13-1CRC Volume 3, CRC Ready
Aircrew Program (RAP) Tasking Memorandum (RTM) Aviation Schedule (AS)-15, CRC Ready
Aircrew Program (RAP) Tasking Memorandum (RTM) Aviation Schedule (AS)-16.
3. Units Impacted.
103 ACS Orange, CT 109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 116 ACS Warrenton, OR
117 ACS Savannah, GA 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 128 ACS Volk Field, WI
133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR
255 ACS Gulfport, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 502672

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
10 AN/TPS-75 Jammers (3080) $100,000 $1,000,000
Total $1,000,000

19
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER MISSION PLANNING FLY AWAY KIT

1. Background. The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) is a mobile Battle Management
Command and Control (BMC2) capability with deployable radar elements of the Theater Air
Control System (TACS). Air Combat Command (ACC) has tasked the Air National Guard
(ANG) to provide 10 Air Control Squadrons (ACSs) to execute mission functions and
capabilities of a CRC. CRC personnel will be called upon to provide theater Command and
Control (C2) planning. The time sensitive nature of crisis action planning requires a technical
solution to assist in planning, coordinating and executing joint and combined air operations. The
CRCs lack Information Technology (IT) to meet mission planning requirements in a deployed
environment. The CRC require mission planning fly away kits that will provide the necessary
software, hardware, and geospatial data in a small, portable, lightweight kit. The kit should
consist of four stand-alone laptops with mass storage capability, locally networked and housed in
plastic transit cases. It should be designed to require no dedicated IT Support Staff and be able
to run Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS). This capability will enable CRC mission planners
the capacity to provide higher headquarters with real-time information regarding the CRC’s
sensor coverage and operation crew’s ability to execute the daily Air Tasking Order (ATO).

2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
103 ACS Orange, CT 109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 116 ACS Warrenton, OR
117 ACS Savannah, GA 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 128 ACS Volk Field, WI
133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR
255 ACS Gulfport, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 502672

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
40 Laptops (3080) $2,500 $100,000
40 external hard drives (3080) $300 $12,000
40 8-Port Network Switches (3080) $50 $2,000
10 Cases $500 $5,000
10 sets Assorted Cables/Accessories $500 $5,000
Total $124,000

20
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-17
C-17
 Strategic Airlift
 Outsized or Oversized Cargo Airlift
 Aeromedical Evacuation Missions
 ANG C-17 Units Provide 16% of the Total Fleet

The Globemaster III is the nation’s newest strategic

military airlifter and continues to excel in a wide
range of operational missions. The C-17 carries
combat-ready military units to any point in the
world on short-notice, and provides critical field
support to sustain the fighting force. It’s short-field
capability permits it to support both inter- and intra-
theater missions. Using C-17s as an intratheater
airlift platform provides relief to the C-130 fleet and
reduces ground forces’ dependence on vehicle
convoys. The Air National Guard (ANG)
operates 32 C-17 aircraft assigned to the 105
AW, Stewart ANGB, NY; 164 AW, Memphis
IAP, TN; 167 AW, Eastern WV RAP; and the
172 AW in Jackson, MS. The 154 AW at
Hickam AFB, HI and the 176 WG at
Elmendorf AFB, AK are ANG associate
units.

Tab C

21
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-17
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Common MAF Mission Computer
 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures
 Digital Radar Warning Receiver
 Forward Area Refueling Point Carts
 Extended Range Tanks

Essential Capabilities List

 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) Enhanced Situational Awareness
(LESA).
 Replacement Heads-Up Display (RHUD).
 Heads-up Countermeasures Dispenser Control.
 Remote Countermeasures Dispenser System
 Aircrew Improved Seat Armor

Desired Capabilities List

 Hostile fire indicator (HFI)
 Active Noise Reduction (ANR) headsets
 Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures System (ASACMS)
 Mission Computer (MC) upgrade
 AERO-I replacement

22
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 COMMON MAF MISSION COMPUTER

1. Background. Current information-based dynamic battlespace environments require secure
airborne data communications with other aircraft, command and control (C2) agencies, and
ground-based forces. Data link and data transfer provide aircrews the ability to report and
receive from monitoring C2 agencies battlespace information such as position of other aircraft,
weather, threat, mission events, mission status, task completion, resource status, etc. This
increased situational awareness allows C2 agencies the ability to track mission progress and
facilitate rapid decisions and adjustments during mission execution. Next generation military
ultra-high frequency satellite communication radios provide both data and voice using satellites
operating outside of traditional data link bandwidths. This enables the crew to get real-time
updates for weather, departure and landing information, as well as provides C2 reach-back
capability. Electronic flight bags can electronically store and retrieve documents required for
flight operations, such as technical orders, Air Force Instructions, flight operations manual,
minimum equipment lists, as well as providing the most current flight information publications.
To reduce crew workload, these solutions require integration with other aircraft systems.
Purchasing 36 of each set of components will equip the entire ANG fleet and provide 10% spare
capability.
2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council; 2012-
2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN
105 AW Stewart IAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 041130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
36 C-17 Group A (3010) $100,000 $3,600,000
36 C-17 Data link Radios (3010) $330,000 $11,880,000
36 C-17 Data link Processors (3010) $100,000 $3,600,000
36 Electronic Flight Bags (3010) $240,000 $8,640,000
36 UHF SATCOM Kits (3010) $475,000 $17,100,000
Total $54,820,000

23
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES

1. Background. ANG C-17s operate worldwide in environments where man- portable air
defenses (MANPADs) proliferate. MANPADs represent a significant threat during takeoff and
landing phases of flight because many are designed to defeat flare-based defensive systems. The
Block 30 large aircraft infrared countermeasures (LAIRCM) system provides the most effective
countermeasures against MANPADs. C-17s transferring to the ANG may not arrive with
LAIRCM installed, while those that do usually require upgrade to the Block 30 version.
LAIRCM and its sensors are a prerequisite to having the next generation AAR-54 missile launch
detector. The upgraded AAR-54 provides better IR threat detection and significantly increases
flare and LAIRCM effectiveness. New sensors allow high fidelity detection of IR missile
engagements, as well as detection of small arms fire. This system also aids low visibility ground
operations and provides better references during low visibility approaches.
2. Source of Need. LAIRCM Operational Requirements Document (ORD) 314-92, Aug 1998;
AF Form 1067 AMC 11-170, 11-169 and 11-168; Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements
and Planning Council; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN
105 AW Stewart IAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Next Generation NRE (3600) N/A $12,000,000
32 LAIRCM Group A Kits (3010) $2,100,000 $67,200,000
32 LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $3,000,000 $96,000,000
Total $175,200,000

24
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 DIGITAL RADAR WARNING RECEIVER

1. Background. C-17 missions into radio frequency (RF) based threat regions drive a dire need
for RF threat awareness and avoidance. For threat awareness, current operations rely heavily on
off-board assets and command and control. Air National Guard C-17s have no onboard radar
warning receiver (RWR) and therefore, lack onboard RF threat detection capability. A digital
RWR is critical for C-17 missions into advanced/contested RF emitting threat areas.
2. Source of Need. AN/ALR-69A Capabilities Production Document; 2014 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted.
172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN
105 AW Stewart IAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
32 RWR Systems (3010) $700,000 $22,400,000
Total $32,400,000

25
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 FORWARD AREA REFUELING POINT CARTS

1. Background. Forward arming and refueling point (FARP) carts provide ground vehicles and
aircraft the ability to fuel directly from a C-17 on the ground. This ability supports the warfighter
abroad and domestic operations. The carts can be airlifted by a C-17. This new ability gives the
combatant commander or incident commander a new capability to respond to warfighter
demands to include major natural disasters, humanitarian events, and other needs that the Air
National Guard is uniquely tasked to support. This capability is critical in an anti-access, area
denial environment. Fighters, helicopters, and other vehicles that use fuel increase their
operational radius through the use of FARP carts. With fuel provided directly from the C-17,
aircraft and support vehicles operate from austere locations without the problems associated with
conventional over the road fuel delivery.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN
105 AW Stewart IAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Forward Area Refueling Carts (3010) $2,200,000 $8,800,000
Total $8,800,000

26
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 EXTENDED RANGE TANKS

1. Background. ANG C-17A Globemaster IIIs routinely transport troops and equipment around
the world, provide humanitarian relief and perform aeromedical evacuation (AE) missions. The
C-17A, with extended range (ER) fuel tanks, has the capability to carry an additional 65,000
pounds of fuel, enabling an additional 1,800 NM of range when compared to non-ER equipped
C-17As. This added range reduces the need for fuel stops, enables faster cargo delivery, and
results in fewer landing and takeoff cycles. ER fuel tanks also reduce the demand for air-to-air
refueling. ER modified C-17As are required in most AE missions departing from European bases
due to patient requirements prohibiting fuel stops. The ER modification is mandatorily
performed in conjunction with on-board inert gas generating system II, which reduces the
vulnerability of fuel explosion due to small arms fire.
2. Source of Need. 2014 AMC C-17 Requirements and Planning Council; 2013 ARC WEPTAC
Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
105 AW Stewart IAP, NY 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV
172 AW Jackson IAP, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
18 Extended Range Fuel Tanks (3010) $12,000,000 $216,000,000
Total $216,000,000

27
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Page Intentionally Left Blank

28
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-130H/J
C-130H/J
 Tactical Airlift
 ANG C-130 Units Provide 49% of the Total Fleet

With a legacy lasting over 61 years now,

the C-130 Hercules remains the U.S.
Military's primary combat transport
aircraft. In addition to its primary role in
tactical airlift, Air National Guard (ANG)
C-130s support humanitarian,
peacekeeping, and disaster relief
operations. Procurement efforts continue
to address needed updates to the avionics
suites, propulsion modernization,

improved self-protection, single-pass precision

airdrop, and enhanced situational
awareness. These improvements ensure that the
ANG C-130 fleet remains capable of safely and
effectively executing its missions globally and
maintains relevance in tomorrow's fight.

Tab D

29
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-130J
Critical Capabilities List  Data Link Capability for Weapons
System Trainer/Multi-Mission
C-130H
Cockpit Trainers
 Updated Avionics Suite Providing  Improved Heads-Up Display
Global Access And Modernized Readability During Night Vision
Cockpit Instrumentation Instrument System Mode
 Improved Radio Frequency and  Virtual Electronic Combat Training
Infrared Self-Protection System (VECTS)
 C-130H/J Single Pass Precision  GPS Jam-Resistant Embedded
Airdrop GPS/INS and Streamlined
 Integrated Data Link and Defensive Notification
Systems Suite  Cargo Compartment Camera
 Propulsion System Upgrades

C-130J Desired Capabilities List

 Common MAF Mission Computer
 Improved Radio Frequency and C-130H
Infrared Self-Protection Suite  Hostile Fire Indicator with Geo-
 Tactical Plot Suite Reference Capability
 Updated Avionics Suite for Global  Active RF Protection System
Airspace Access  Permanent 115V AC, 60 Hz Flight
Deck
 Wireless Fidelity Systems
Essential Capabilities List  Cargo Compartment Modernization
 Helmet-Mounted Display/Cueing
C-130H
 Back-Up Camera
 Improved Intercom System  Real-Time Weather Sampling and
 Military Secure Precision Global Modeling
Position System Tightly Coupled  Hard-Kill Self Protection
with Inertial Navigation System and
Jamming Notification C-130J
 Tactical Data Link Included in the C-
 Wireless Fidelity Systems
130 Multi-Mission Cockpit Trainers
 Mission Recording and
 Enhanced Beyond Line-of-Sight
Reconstruction Capability
Voice
 Vertical Situation Awareness
 Improved Dual-Mode External LED
Lighting

30
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H UPDATED AVIONICS SUITE PROVIDING GLOBAL ACCESS AND

MODERNIZED COCKPIT INSTRUMENTATION
1. Background. The C-130 fleet faces severe sustainment challenges with current avionics and
cockpit instrumentation, and will be out of compliance with Communications, Navigation and
Surveillance/Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) mandates if not modernized. The lack of C-
130H improved communications and avionics technology, including 8.33 kHz frequency spacing
capability, prohibits operating in European airspace. Additionally, tactical night operations
continue to suffer with non-NVIS compliant lighting. Any further delay of the Avionics
Modernization Program will result in Air Reserve Component (ARC) C-130H models failure to
meet the 2020 deadline for international CNS/ATM mandates. In order to eliminate critical
sustainment issues due to Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS), and to meet required
mandates and Air Force Instructions, this modernized cockpit will include: a multifunction
Engine Instrument Display System (EIDS), automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-
B) capability, Night Vision Imaging System (NVIS) compatibility and a modern Flight
Management System (FMS) with Global Positioning System (GPS) approach and polar
navigation capabilities. Updated avionics address CNS/ATM mandates and increase operational
efficiency by opening up airspace routes with stringent navigational requirements and allow the
use of GPS approaches. An NVIS-compatible and modernized glass cockpit reduces crew
workload, lowers maintenance costs and increases capability and sustainability to operate safely
at night.
2. Source of Need. FAR 91.225/91.227; Air Mobility Command AF Form 1067 #14-013 and 14-
018; C-130H Viability and Airspace Access Program CDD 19 March 2015; FAA Directive
Order 260B, 27 May 2010; 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Councils.
3. Units Impacted.
153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 130 AW Yeager APT, WV 136 AW Ft Worth NAS, TX
156 AW Luis Munoz Marin IAP, PR 179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT, OH 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV
145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT 139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, MO
133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 182 AW GTR Peoria APT, IL
165 AW Savannah IAP, GA 166 AW New Castle APT, DE 103 AW Bradley IAP, CT

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
154 Avionics Kits (3010) $5,700,000 $877,800,000
NRE (3600) N/A $50,000,000
154 NVIS (3010) $465,000 $71,610,000
Total $999,410,000

31
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H IMPROVED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INFRARED SELF-PROTECTION

1. Background. C-130H aircraft operate within range of infrared (IR) man-portable air defense
systems (MANPADS). ANG C-130Hs have inadequate missile launch detection. Air Mobility
Command (AMC) is fielding all of its combat aircraft (i.e., C-17, C-5, KC-135, and C-130J) with
a baseline of Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) Block 30 to improve missile
warning and defense; no plan exists to upgrade the C-130H beyond its current configuration. To
remain relevant the C-130H must be able to better detect, degrade and defeat IR MANPADS.
The AN/AAQ-24 LAIRCM Block 30 system improves detection against advanced MANPADS
threats, while the Block 30’s IR suppression system would degrades the ability to engage C-
130H aircraft. Future conflicts will include a wide spectrum of radio-frequency (RF) threats, in
addition to a robust IR threat from man-portable and vehicle-born systems. Operational plans
rely heavily on airlift to support front-line troops. C-130H aircraft can expect to face or operate
near RF-based threats. Most ANG C-130H aircraft have limited or no RF detection capability.
To survive, C-130H aircraft require a geo-locating Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) capable of
processing signals in a dense RF environment and automatically direct countermeasures to defeat
those threats. Increased situational awareness is needed to correlate onboard and off-board threat
detection, terrain masking, and optimized dynamic rerouting capabilities to minimize exposure to
threats. Only 24 C-130H1 aircraft have ALR-69A installed, leaving the remainder of the H
model fleet without this needed capability.
2. Source of Need. AMC Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures CDD, Jan 2008;
2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conferences; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Councils.
3. Units Impacted.
153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 130 AW Yeager APT, WV 136 AW Ft Worth NAS, TX
156 AW Luis Munoz Marin IAP, PR 179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT, OH 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV
145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT 139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, MO
133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 182 AW GTR Peoria APT, IL
165 AW Savannah IAP, GA 166 AW New Castle APT, DE 103 AW Bradley IAP, CT

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
155 C-130H LAIRCM Group A Kits (3010) $1,500,000 $232,500,000
78 C-130H LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $4,400,000 $343,200,000
155 C-130H NexGen Group A Kits (3010) $420,000 $65,100,000
78 C-130H NexGen Group B Kits (3010) $774,855 $60,438,690
145 C-130H ALR-69A* (3010) $1,000,000 $145,000,000
Total $1,227,477,380
* Includes 10% spares.

32
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H/J SINGLE PASS PRECISION AIRDROP

1. Background. The ARC C-130 fleet has several shortfalls in its ability to accurately deliver
airdrop loads in combat in both instrument and visual meteorological conditions (IMC/VMC).
The US Army’s objective for airdrop accuracy is 50 meters circular error average, but traditional
methods only provide 300-meter accuracy. Best accuracy with current precision airdrop methods
require multiple passes (increased exposure to threats) over the drop zone for atmospheric
calculations before dropping actual bundles. Effective airdrop operations require early
identification of the drop zone by the flight crew, real time airdrop damage estimates, real-time
wind sensing (altitude to surface), displayed continuously computed impact point and launch
acceptability region, and post-drop assessment. Targeting pods with light detection and ranging
provide the necessary capabilities during VMC operations. Software and hardware upgrades to
the APN-241 radar provide synthetic aperture radar to meet these requirements in IMC airdrops.
Radar upgrades coupled with targeting pods and off-board cueing provide a highly accurate all-
weather single-pass airdrop capability that can be used to support domestic and contingency
operations. With 13 pods already purchased for the C-130H/J fleet, 77 additional pods would
provide each of the ANG’s 18 combat-coded C-130 units 5 pods to train with and employ.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 AMC 13-116 and 13-117; Mission Need Statement Air
Mobility Command/Combat Air Forces/Air Education and Training Command/Air Force Special
Operations Command/Air Force Materiel Command 301-97; C-130 Avionics Modernization
Program System Requirement Document, 31 March 2000; Required Theater CEA/Mitigate
ADE; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conferences; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Councils.
3. Units Impacted.
152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 166 AW New Castle APT, DE 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA
182 AW GTR Peoria APT, IL 123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN
139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, 103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP,
MO NC
179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT, 156 AW Luis Munoz Marin IAP, 136 AW Ft Worth NAS, TX
OH PR
130 AW Yeager APT, WV 153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT
102 NWS Quonset ANGB, RI 109 AW Schenectady Co APT, 146 AW Channel Islands AGS,
NY CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115, 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Targeting Pod NRE (3010) N/A $16,000,000
APN-241 Radar Upgrade (3010) N/A $3,000,000
77 Targeting Pods (3010) $2,000,000 $154,000,000
Total $173,000,000

33
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

C-130H INTEGRATED DATA LINK AND DEFENSIVE SYSTEMS SUITE

1. Background. Combat operations have highlighted the need for comprehensive and networked
battle space awareness for C-130s. The C-130 real-time information in the cockpit (RTIC)
system allows C-130 aircraft to participate on multiple data link networks using technologies
already fielded on other DoD assets. The system must provide growth capability for future TDL
networks. Upgrades to the C-130 RTIC system increase the overarching network capability and
provide a common processing and display platform for previously federated systems, resulting in
a consolidated situational awareness picture. Integration with the Advanced Integrated Electronic
Combat System (AIECS) provides the capability for on-board/off board threat correlations, data
sharing, on-board radar threat system geo-location, route re-planning, and automated
countermeasures. Combining the control and outputs of multiple systems into one common
graphical interface reduces crew workload, decreases “heads-down” time, and provides
improved decision support for aircrews operating in the tactical environment. Lack of this
capability creates a detriment to safety due to shortfalls in situational awareness, such as the lack
of terrain awareness warning system and electronic takeoff and landing data systems. Lastly, the
integration of noise-cancelling and three-dimensional audio in the cockpit increases situational
awareness by spatially separating aural warning and radio signals such as angular threat
information or terrain awareness cues.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 AMC 09-093 and 13-013; Mobility Air Forces Network
Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; AMC MAF Data Link Integration Technical Requirements
Document, 25 Oct 2006; Tactical Data link Transformation Capabilities Development
Document, Increment 1, JROCM, 23 Jun 2004; AMC Advanced Situational Awareness
Countermeasures CDD, Jan 2008. 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conferences; 2014-2015 ARC
WEPTAC Councils.
3. Units Impacted.
153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 130 AW Yeager APT, WV 136 AW Ft Worth NAS, TX
156 AW Luis Munoz Marin IAP, PR 179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT, OH 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV
145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT 139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, MO
133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 182 AW GTR Peoria APT, IL
165 AW Savannah IAP, GA 166 AW New Castle APT, DE 103 AW Bradley IAP, CT

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
155 AIECS Kits (3010) $150,000 $23,250,000
AIECS NRE (3010) N/A $10,000,000
Directional Audio NRE (3600) N/A $5,000,000
155 Directional Audio Kits (3010) $50,000 $7,750,000
Total $46,000,000

34
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H PROPULSION SYSTEM UPGRADES

1. Background. The C-130H fleet’s missions require a comprehensive propulsion upgrade for
increased performance, efficiency, and reliability. Incorporating modular blade technology
(NP2000), electronic propeller control system (EPCS), and in-flight propeller balancing system
(IPBS) provide increased performance and reliability. The 3.5 engine upgrade, to include a
necessary Oil Cooler Augmentation (OCA), results in significant fuel savings and reliability
improvements. The modular design of NP 2000 eight-bladed propellers decrease propeller
maintenance time, increases airlift efficiency during transportation by taking up less pallet space,
and increases operational performance. EPCS improves safety by accelerating response time
when throttles are rapidly advanced, an issue in previous mishaps. The legacy propeller control
system uses 1950’s technology and consumes significant maintenance resources. EPCS
improves propeller system reliability by 50 percent. IPBS eliminates the need for regular
maintenance as the propeller is continuously balanced during flight operations. As a result, it
virtually eliminates propeller balance-induced vibration, which equates to reduced noise, less
damage, and improved aircraft availability. Upgrading the T-56 engine with the Rolls Royce 3.5
modification, with redesigned compressors and turbines, increases engine life-cycle and
improves fuel economy.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 AMC 11-138 and 14-089; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference;
2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 166 AW New Castle APT, DE 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA
182 AW GTR Peoria APT, IL 123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN
109 AW Schenectady Co APT, 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, 179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT,
NY NC OH
156 AW Luis Munoz Marin IAP, 136 AW Ft Worth NAS, TX 130 AW Yeager APT, WV
PR
153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT
MO
176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
EPCS/IPBS NRE (3010) N/A $8,000,000
135 NP2000 (3010) $2,000,000 $270,000,000
135 EPCS (3010) $825,000 $111,375,000
135 IPBS (3010) $550,000 $74,250,000
540 T-56 3.5 Mod Engines (3010) $1,400,000 $756,000,000
135 OCA (3010) $667,000 $90,045,000
Total $1,282,670,000

35
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J COMMON MAF MISSION COMPUTER

1. Background. Global mobility operations highlight the need for integrated battlespace
awareness. AMC implemented the current C-130J data link system, Dynamic Re-tasking
Capability (DRC), to address an Urgent Operational Need (UON) but didn’t field this solution
for all of the C-130Js. Only one-half of Air Reserve Component (ARC) C-130Js were modified
with the DRC A-kits, and due to limited B-kit availability and sustainment issues, less than one
quarter of the ARC aircraft can employ at once with data link capability. Real-Time Information
in Cockpit (RTIC) is an existing ARC solution for global data link communications, providing
secure beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) and line-of sight (LOS) capabilities. An RTIC-type solution
is acceptable for the C-130J as it offers a permanent modification to the aircraft, has the ability to
change data link radios as mission needs arise, and does not require a C-130J Mission Computer
(MC) change to implement. RTIC also includes the Airborne Executive Processor (AEP), which
offers a federated mission computer capability. The government-owned software used to
manage the AEP is the Tactical Airlift Mission Software Suite (TAMSS). TAMSS is a
MAJCOM 1067 approved software program for the C-130H and provides an open architecture to
implement mission needs not tied to the C-130J Block Upgrade cycle. Examples of emerging
systems processed by TAMSS include global data link, Single Pass Precision Airdrop (SPPAD),
and Airdrop Damage Estimation (ADE). The Air National Guard employs 16 C-130J
aircraft. In order to ensure units are able to effectively train, operate and deploy with secure
global data link capability, all aircraft should be modified with RTIC utilizing the TAMSS
software suite.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability; 2014 Combat Planning Council
(CPC). Mobility Air Forces (MAF) Network Enabling Concept , 26 Apr 2006; Air Mobility
Command (AMC) MAF Datalink Integration Technical Requirements Document (TRD) 25 Oct
2006; Tactical Datalink Transformation Capability Development Document (CDD), Increment 1,
Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM), 23 Jun 2004; AMC
Requirements and Planning Council Mission Essential 2007 and 2008.
3. Units Impacted.
143 AW Quonset St APT, RI 146 AW Channel Is ANGS, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $5,000,000
16 C-130J RTIC Group A Kits (3010) $150,000 $2,400,000
16 C-130J RTIC Group B Kits (3010) $1,000,000 $16,000,000
Total $23,400,000

36
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J IMPROVED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INFRARED SELF-PROTECTION

SUITE
1. Background. C-130 aircraft perform demanding missions within the Weapons Engagement
Zone (WEZ) of Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) and Radio Frequency (RF)
threats. Combatant Command (COCOM) plans rely heavily on C-130s for logistical support to
front-line troops and to operate closer to adversary tactical Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM)
systems. The AN/AAQ-24 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) Block 30
system provides the most capable countermeasures against MANPADS threats with the latest
Infrared (IR) sensors. The Block 30 configuration, being fielded on Air Mobility Command
(AMC) C-17 aircraft, delivers greater warning, lower false alarm rates and higher reliability. At
present, USAF C130Js have no RF geolocation capability, which limits their ability to best avoid
the threat in some cases. Increased Situational Awareness is needed to correlate onboard and off
board threat detection, terrain masking, and optimized dynamic rerouting capabilities to avoid
the WEZ. An advanced Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) is critical for C-130J aircraft to
effectively employ near these threats.
2. Source of Need. AMC Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures (ASACM)
Capability Development Document (CDD), Jan 2008; 2012-2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical
Capability.
3. Units Impacted.
143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 146 AW Channel Is ANGS, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 C-130J LAIRCM group A Kits (3010) $970,000 $15,520,000
8 C-130J LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $4,400,000 $35,200,000
16 C-130J NexGen Group A Kits (3010) $420,000 $6,720,000
8 C-130J NexGen Group B Kits (3010) $774,855 $6,198,840
NRE (3600) N/A $5,000,000
16 C-130J ALR-69A (3010) $1,000,000 $16,000,000
Total $84,638,840

37
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J TACTICAL PLOT SUITE

1. Background. The C-130J’s software suite permits the use of only 10 Tactical Plots (TAC
PLOT), which are limited to a circular shape only. Aircrews currently use these TAC PLOTs to
display factor airspace and threats “under the glass” on the C-130J Digital Map, the Navigation
Radar Display, the Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS) display, and Coordinated
Aircraft Position / Station Keeping Equipment (CAP/SKE). The 10 circular TAC PLOTS are
not adequate to display the robust tactical airspace picture where killbox / keypads, political
borders, Restricted Operating Zones (ROZs), and departure and arrival corridors exist. A TAC
PLOT software suite meeting this capability exists for the C-5M, which uses the same hardware
components as the C-130J. This software can be easily interfaced with the C-130J Mission
Computer (MC), Communication Navigation Interface-Management Unit (CNI-MU) and Heads-
Down Displays (HDD). This TAC PLOT suite allows the plotting of accurate killbox-keypads,
arrival and departure sectors, and zone plotting where pilots can use multiple waypoints to draw
uniquely structured airspace. Lastly, this software allows 50 entries of each type of TAC PLOT.
2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Tactics Review Board (TRB) 2012-2013;
ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability 2013-2015
3. Units Impacted.
143 AW Quonset St APT, RI 146 AW Channel Is ANGS, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $4,000,000
16 TAC PLOT Suite Software Update (3010) $62,500 $1,000,000
Total $5,000,000

38
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J UPDATED AVIONICS SUITE FOR GLOBAL AIRSPACE ACCESS

1. Background. The delay of the C-130J Block Update Cycle for Block 7.0 / 8.1 means that Air
Reserve/Air National Guard (ARC) C-130J aircraft will not meet the 2020 deadline for
international Communications, Navigation and Surveillance / Air Traffic Management
(CNS/ATM) mandates established by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Directive Order
260B, and by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Also with this delay, Block
6.0 C-130Js will not meet Precision and Area Navigation (P-RNAV) and Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) requirements to operate worldwide beyond 1 June 2020.
Updated avionics with ADS-B Out will address CNS/ATM mandates and increase operational
effectiveness and efficiency by opening up airspace that requires more stringent navigational
requirements. If this critical item is not met by the 2020 mandate, the result could be denial of
airspace access for C-130J aircraft.
2. Source of Need. FAA Directive Order 260B, 27 May 2010; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical
Capability.
3. Units Impacted.
143 AW Quonset St APT, RI 146 AW Channel Is ANGS, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $30,000,000
16 C-130J Updated Avionics /ADS-B Out Group $1,300,000 $20,800,000
A Kits (3010)
16 C-130J Updated Avionics/ADS-B Out Group $1,200,000 $19,200,000
B Kits (3010)
Total $70,000,000

39
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Page Intentionally Left Blank

40
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-130 Special Mission
C-130 Special Mission
 Commando Solo
 SOF/CSAR
 Special Mission (Airborne Firefighting, Antarctic Logistics)
 ANG Commando Solos Provide 100% of the Total Fleet
 ANG CSAR H/MC-130 Units Provide 38% of the Total Fleet
 ANG LC-130s Provide 100% of the Total Fleet

C-130 Special Mission aircraft include:

EC-130J - The EC-130J “Commando Solo” conducts information

operations, psychological operations, and civil affairs
broadcasts. This year, procurement efforts included secure line-of-
sight and beyond line-of-sight capabilities and radio communication
upgrades.

HC/MC-130 - ANG HC/MC-130 units continue to deploy in support

of overseas contingency operations and provide emergency rescue
and relief support during domestic operations. Modernization efforts
for the ANG HC/MC-130 fleet include loadmaster crashworthy
seats, aircrew flight equipment racks, external arm mounts and heavy
equipment airdrop capability.

LC-130 - The LC-130 operates on snowfields in remote areas of the

Polar Regions in support of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
In order to keep the aircraft up-to-date, several modification efforts
are underway including eight bladed propellers and 3.5 engine
modification. The ANG is working with the NSF to support a pod-
based scientific payload capability.
Tab E

41
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 C-130 Special Mission
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
 Special Operations Forces Air
Critical Capabilities List Mission Suite - Enhanced Situational
Awareness
EC-130J
 Super J Special Operations Forces
 Federated Defensive System Unit Air Mobility Requirements
 Electro-Optical / Infrared Sensor  Single-Pass Precision Guided
 ARC-210 Line of Sight Antenna Airdrop
 Ku Band Spread Spectrum System
Trainer HC/MC-130P/N
 Permanent Ku Spread Spectrum  Electronic Flight Bag with
Antenna Automatic Dependent Surveillance-
Broadcast (ADS-B)
HC/MC-130P/N  Computer Navigation Surveillance /
 Combat Penetration Suite Air Traffic Management
 Enhanced Electro-Optical/Infrared (CNS/ATM) compliant avionics
Sensor  Distributed Mission Operations
 Single Pass Precision Airdrop (DMO) simulator
 Combat Rescue Mission Network  Moving Target Indicator (MTI)
 Mission Flexible Refueling integrated in EO/IR sensor

LC-130 LC-130
 Avionics Obsolescence Solution  Mission Specific Simulator
 Enhanced Situational Awareness
 Retractable External Arm and Ice
Sensors
Desired Capabilities List
 Flight Deck Communications
EC-130J
Upgrade
 Propulsion Modernization  Emergency Equipment Bins

HC/MC-130P/N
Essential Capabilities List  Flare Launch Tubes
 Global Position System (GPS)
EC-130J Internal Repeater
 Weapon System Trainer (WST) /  Scanner Windows
Simulator Training Device  Encrypted Wireless Network
 Removable Airborne Military  Internal Palletized Fuselage Tank
Information Support Operations
System LC-130
 None

42
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

EC-130J FEDERATED DEFENSIVE SYSTEM UNIT

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js perform a variety of missions at various
threat levels, which require the use of chaff and flares to defend the aircraft. The existing ALE-
47 Countermeasures Dispensing System (CMDS) limits chaff and flare dispenses and requires
the Combat Systems Operator (CSO) to switch CMDS settings based upon the engagement to
ensure the proper expenditures are used without wasting invaluable chaff and flare stores. Due
to current CMDS limitations, the CSO must control the system via program settings within the
Communications Navigation Identification-Management Unit (CNI-MU) and the defensive
system master panel, often during the engagement when speed is crucial. The addition of the
federated defensive systems panel will not only allow the CSO to dispense flare, chaff, or both
with a single button push without the need to switch settings on the defensive systems master
panel but will also align the EC-130J with the MC-130J fleet configuration, maximizing the
interoperability between active duty and Guard aircrews within AFSOC . One Federated
Defensive System Unit is needed for each of the seven ANG EC-130Js.
2. Source of Need. AFSOC AF Form 1067 SOC #05077 (EC-130J Countermeasure Dispense
Panel; ARC 2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
7 Federated Defensive System Panel (3010) $160,700 $1,124,900
Total $1,124,900

43
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

EC-130J ELECTRO-OPTICAL / INFRARED SENSOR

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js (Commando Solo) perform demanding
missions worldwide in a wide range of environments to include low level altitudes at nights into
austere, airfields. Terrain and obstacles present a threat. The ANG requires eight (seven aircraft
and one spare) AN/AAS-52 Multi-Spectral Targeting System (MTS). The MTS, currently on
AFSOC’s MC-130Js, utilizes advanced forward looking infrared radar (FLIR) technology that is
vital for terrain avoidance and target acquisition at austere airfields. Like the AFSOC MC-130J,
the EC-130J is being tasked to fly low level missions into austere airfields. In order to reduce
the risk of controlled flight into terrain, the ANG EC-130Js require the same MTS as the MC-
130Js. One AN/AAS-52 System is needed for each of the seven ANG EC-130Js along with one
spare.
2. Source of Need. AFSOC AF Form 1067, USSOCOM Lesson Learned; 193 SOW Strategic
Plan FY12-37; ARC 2013 WEPTAC Conference, 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $2,000,000
8 AN/AAS-52 Systems (3010) $750,000 $6,000,000
Total $8,000,000

44
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

EC-130J ARC-210 LINE OF SIGHT ANTENNA

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js perform a variety of missions, which
require the use of both Line Of Sight (LOS) and Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS)
communications. Adding an ARC-210 LOS antenna allows aircrew to have an additional radio
while preserving the capability of BLOS communications contributing to enhanced situational
awareness within the AOR. Current aircraft configuration prohibits simultaneous use of VHF 1
radio and BLOS communications due to the ARC-210 not having a LOS antenna.

2. Source of Need. USSOCOM Lessons Learned; EC-130J Communications Situational

Awareness Suite; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $300,000
7 ARC-210 Line of Sight Antenna (3010) $30,000 $210,000
Total $510,000

45
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

EC-130J KU BAND SPREAD SPECTRUM SYSTEM TRAINER

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js perform a variety of missions which
require the use of the Airborne Ku Band Spread Spectrum (KuSS) satellite system. The 193rd
Special Operations Wing (SOW) uses the KuSS to send and receive Full Motion Video (FMV),
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) feeds, audio/video content for Military
Information Support Operation (MISO) broadcasts, and also provides a datalink for other critical
Command and Control (C2) functions. The system consists of off the shelf C-130 KuSS In
Vehicle Equipment (IVE) and an escape hatch mounted antenna assembly. Four of seven
aircraft presently have KuSS installed. Due to aircraft and equipment shortages, aircrews do not
have regular access to KuSS systems for mission qualification, continuation or proficiency
training. The KuSS System Trainer will integrate with the currently operational Commando
Solo Partial Task Trainer, and greatly enhance its abilities to reduce operational flying
requirements. Due to aircraft and equipment shortages, aircrews do not have regular access to
KuSS systems for mission qualification, continuation or proficiency training. Current training is
accomplished on an “as available” basis with no more than two of seven aircraft configured for
KuSS training. The KuSS System Trainer will integrate with the currently operational
Commando Solo Partial Task Trainer, and greatly enhance its abilities to reduce operational
flying requirements. Only one training device is needed for the 193rd SOW.
2. Source of Need. USSOCOM Lessons Learned; EC-130J Communications Situational
Awareness Suite; ARC 2013 WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
KuSS Training System (3010) N/A $400,000
Total $400,000

46
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

EC-130J PERMANENT KU SPREAD SPECTRUM ANTENNA

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js perform a variety of missions, which
require the use of the Airborne Ku Band Spread Spectrum (KuSS) satellite system. The 193rd
Special Operations Wing (SOW) uses the KuSS to send and receive airborne Full Motion Video
(FMV), Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) feeds, audio/video content for
Military Information Support Operation (MISO) broadcasts, and the KuSS also provides a
datalink for other critical Command and Control (C2) functions. The system consists of off-the-
shelf C-130 KuSS In Vehicle Equipment (IVE) and an escape hatch mounted antenna
assembly. Four of seven aircraft presently have KuSS installed. Aircrew do not have access to
the center escape hatch when the KuSS is installed. Due to the design of the current KuSS hatch
mounted antenna, the airflow over the antenna is causing damage to the VH1 antenna. It is
causing an oscillation which fatigues the antenna and eventually causes cracks. The VH1 radio
has to therefore be turned off and causes the EC-130 to be less capable. The installation of a
permanently installed KuSS antenna allows for access to the center escape hatch for crew egress
and permits capability enhancement. In addition, the permanent installation of the KuSS antenna
will eliminate structural cracking resulting from the Hatch Mounted Antenna.

2. Source of Need. USSOCOM Lessons Learned; EC-130J Communications Situational

Awareness Suite; EC-130J Maintenance Advisory 1C-130(E)JMA-20120504001; 2015 ARC
WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE KuSS Permanent Mount Antenna (3600) N/A $200,000
7 KuSS Permanent Mount Antenna (3010) $30,000 $210,000
Total $410,000

47
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130 COMBAT PENETRATION SUITE

1. Background. The HC/MC-130 rescue platform is unprepared to survive a combat rescue in a
peer-on-peer conflict due to its inability to counter current and emerging threats. In order to
operate in a high threat environment the HC/MC-130 requires a Radio Frequency (RF) jammer,
and improved radar detection capability (ALR-69A), along with a Terrain Following and Terrain
Avoidance (TFTA) radar system. The ALR-69A provides more sensitivity and improved range
and accuracy for supplying the crew with information on radar threat type and location. An RF
jammer allows the Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) Task Force (TF) to perform rescues in an
elevated radar threat environment. When penetrating an elevated threat environment, the aircraft
requires TF/TA radar in order to utilize terrain by navigating at low altitude to defeat a radar
threat. When the ALQ-213 is coupled with data link advancements, survivability extends to the
greater Personal Recovery Task Force (PRTF). The ALQ-213 enables crews to load a multitude
of engagement specific programs that allow the HC-130 to utilize new flare types. The HC-130
currently employs MJU-64 flares as part of the defensive system. Units need allotments of
advanced MJU-66 and MJU-71 flares for both training and operational use increasing
survivability in current and future engagements. Furthermore, an upgrade of the AAR54 and
AAR47 external sensors provides providing acoustic sensing, octant- detection, 2 color IR
detection and integrated IR jamming equips the HC/MC-130 to ensure survivability in a
contested environment. Finally, updated GPS with the latest anti-jam technology is necessary
for continued precision employment of CSAR operations. For each of the 13 HC-130s in the
ANG, one RF Jammer, ALR-69A, and Hostile Fire Indicator is needed. 117 3D audio kits are
needed to provide nine devices for each of the 13 aircraft. Three 3D Audio test devices are
needed to provide one for each of the three ANG HC-130 squadrons.
2. Source of Need. ARC 2012 WEPTAC Critical Requirement; Lessons Learned from
Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); 2015 ARC
WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Directional Audio (NRE) (3600) N/A $6,000,000
117 3D Audio Pilot Kits (3010) $7,000 $819,000
3 Unit Test Equipment (3080) $58,500 $175,500
RF Jammer NRE (3600) N/A $5,000,000
ALR-69A NRE (3600) N/A $2,000,000
13 RF Jammer (3010) $5,000,000 $65,000,000
13 ALR-69A (3010) $1,300,000 $16,900,000
13 Hostile Fire Indicator (3010) $270,000 $3,510,000
Total $99,404,500

48
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130 ENHANCED ELECTRO-OPTICAL/INFRARED SENSOR

1. Background. HC/MC-130 aircraft must provide the Combat Search and Rescue Task Force
(CSARTF) with situational awareness. The current aircraft configuration does not provide the
equipment to digitally communicate, provide adequate video imagery, or be able to find, fix, and
track points of interest. An enhanced Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) sensor will provide; Full
Motion Video (FMV), Video Data Link (VDL), increased Field of View (FOV), cursor-on-
target/infrared cueing, low-light television, hyper multi-spectral sensors, thermal imaging and a
target laser range finder/designator capabilities. Personnel Recovery (PR) forces are trained and
equipped to utilize stand-alone ROVER technology to enhance battle space awareness when
forward deployed away from tactical operations centers. However, no airborne reception /
broadcast capability is fielded by PR forces. With the above technology HC/ MC-130s will now
be able to organically collect and disseminate real time images of survivor for dissemination to
other PR forces and command and control agencies. For each of the 13 HC-130s in the Air
National Guard, one targeting pod, Moving Target Indicator, External Retractable Arm, and
High Definition Multi-Functional Color Display are needed.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 ACC 11-357; The Personnel Recovery (PR) Core Function
Master Plan (CFMP); AMCRMC and OSC duties as outlined in AFTTP 3-3.HC/MC-130; AMC
R&PC Mission Essential 07/08; CAF MNS 316-92, Real-Time Information in the Cockpit
(RTIC); Global Information Grid CRD; JROCM 134-01, 30 Aug 2001; ARC 2012 WEPTAC
Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Targeting Pod NRE (3010) N/A $4,000,000
13 Targeting Pod (3010) $2,000,000 $26,000,000
13 Moving Target Indication Enhancement $50,000 $650,000
(3010)
13 External Retractable Arm (3010) $1,000,000 $13,000,000
13 High Definition Multi-Functional Color $200,000 $2,600,000
Display (3010)
Total $46,250,000

49
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130 SINGLE PASS PRECISION AIRDROP

1. Background. The ANG HC/MC-130 fleet has several shortfalls in its ability to accurately
deliver airdrop bundles in combat in both instrument and visual meteorological conditions
(IMC/VMC). The US Army’s objective for airdrop accuracy is 50 meters circular error average,
but traditional methods only provide 300-meter accuracy. Current precision airdrop methods
also require multiple passes (increasing exposure to threats) over the drop zone for atmospheric
calculations before dropping actual bundles. Effective airdrop operations require early
identification of the drop zone by the aircrew, real-time airdrop damage estimates, real-time
wind sensing (altitude to surface), display to the crew of a continuously computed impact
point/launch acceptability region, and post-drop assessment. Targeting pods with light detection
and ranging provide these capabilities in VMC combat operations. Software and hardware
upgrades to the APN-241 radar provide synthetic aperture radar and wind sensing to meet these
requirements in IMC airdrops. Radar upgrades coupled with targeting pods provide a highly
accurate all-weather single-pass airdrop capability that can be utilized to support domestic and
contingency operations. For each of the 13 HC-130s in the ANG, one targeting pod is needed.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 ACC 10-114 ; Mission Need Statement Air Mobility
Command/Combat Air Forces/Air Education and Training Command/Air Force Special
Operations Command/Air Force Materiel Command 301-97; C-130 Avionics Modernization
Program System Requirement Document, 31 March 2000; Required Theater CEA/Mitigate
ADE; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Targeting Pod NRE (3010) N/A $4,000,000
APN-241 Radar Upgrade (3600) N/A $3,000,000
13 Targeting Pods (3010) $2,000,000 $26,000,000
Total $33,000,000

50
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130 COMBAT RESCUE MISSION NETWORK

1. Background. Multiple efforts in technological advancement have resulted in a task saturated
workload for HC-130 aircrews because those multiple efforts were accomplished independently.
Integration of radios, datalinks, rescue devices, and defensive systems is necessary to keep the
primary focus on safe and successful mission accomplishment and not electronic management.
Moreover, HH-60 and HC-130 do not share a common operating picture due to the diverging
nature of their respective SA enhancement technology. The Combat Rescue Mission Network
(CRMN) would include Blue Force Tracker (BFT), Link-16, AFTRS-R, LARS (v)12 w/CSEL,
SADL, FMV and ADS-B In/Out, and it would combine these in a single operating picture
similar to the HH-60 These systems provide LOS/BLOS interactive data communication
between Combat Search and Rescue Task Force (CSARTF) assets across the range of military
operations. In order for rescue forces to fully support information superiority operations, they
require the ability to utilize the internet while on board the aircraft. The integration of the
organic unencrypted and encrypted Internet on Board (IOB) allows for efficient information
sharing across a digital network using mIRC, SIPR, and NIPR architectures. Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out will provide aircraft position information in the
civilian aviation environment. ADS-B In allows aircraft to receive traffic and weather
information. Link 16 will give the aircrew situational awareness regarding other Link 16
equipped platforms. For each of the 13 HC-130s in the Air National Guard, one device of each
is needed.

2. Source of Need. The Personnel Recovery (PR) Core Function Master Plan (CFMP); AMC,
RMC and OSC duties as outlined in AFTTP 3-3.HC/MC-130; AMC R&PC Mission Essential
07/08; CAF MNS 316-92, Real-Time Information in the Cockpit (RTIC); Global Information
Grid CRD; JROCM 134-01, 30 Aug 2001; 14 CFR Part 91; ARC 2012 WEPTAC Critical
Requirement; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $2,000,000
13 IOB (3010) $50,000 $650,000
13 ADS-B In and Out (3010) $30,000 $390,000
13 Link 16 (3010) $100,000 $1,300,000
Total $4,340,000

51
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130 MISSION FLEXIBLE REFUELING

1. Background. During Personnel Recovery (PR) and Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR)
events, the HC/MC-130P/N is consistently tasked to provide refueling capability to the rescue
vehicle (HH-60, Tiltrotor, CH-53, etc…). The scope of these operations require levels of fuel
significantly higher than the standard configuration of the HC-130 and in refueling envelopes the
HC/MC-130 is not equipped to perform. The HC/MC-130P/N has been equipped with up to 2
removable fuselage fuel tanks (Benson). The current tank requires in excess of 6 hours to install,
reducing the flexibility of configuring the aircraft in a dynamic PR tasking environment.
Additionally, the next generation HC-130J is not compatible with the current Benson tank. This
ability to tanker extra fuel (33% increase) above standard configuration enables more assets
more time on station to effect the recovery of isolated personnel during CSAR operations. This
need affects air-to-air refueling, Forward Area Refueling Point (FARP) operations and extending
the unrefueled range of the HC-130 in environments where tankers for the HC-130J are
consistently unavailable. The HC/MC-130P/N is T.C.T.O. compliant up to, but not including the
drogue of the refueling system for high speed aircraft refueling. The current locations PR is
tasked to support face a significant problem: distance. All of these locations have tiltrotor assets
from separate MAJCOMs and DOD services tasked to or capable of supporting PR. The
HC/MC-130 is tasked on missions with these aircraft, but is unable to provide air refueling
support due to a lack of an interchangeable drogue for high speed refueling. What is needed is
a palletized fuel tank, compatible with legacy and J model aircraft that matches the existing
additional fuel capability while rapidly able to be installed and removed from the aircraft and the
High Speed Drogues(HSD). For each of the 13 HC-130s in the Air National Guard, one
Palletized Fuel Tank and two Variable Speed Drogues are needed.
2. Source of Need. ARC 2012 WEPTAC Critical Requirement; Class A Mishap MC-130P
20020213FTEV016A SIB2 Recommendation; 20020612FTEV033A Report, ORS 6, Fall
04/05/06/07; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
13 Palletized Fuel Tanks (3010) $1,800,000 $23,400,000
26 Variable Speed Drogue (3010) $100,000 $2,600,000
Total $26,000,000

52
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130 AVIONICS OBSOLESCENCE SOLUTION

1. Background. Avionics modernization program delays have decreased the likelihood that
ANG LC-130H aircraft will meet international communication navigation surveillance and air
traffic management (CNS/ATM) mandates by 2020. The LC-130 fleet is also facing
sustainability challenges with mission required avionics equipment. Currently, the ANG’s C-
130H models do not meet 2020 precision and area navigation (P-RNAV) requirements to operate
worldwide. In addition, current cockpit lighting is substandard for night vision goggle
operations; requiring intensive pre-mission preparation and reducing crew visual acuity. A
modern flight management system with Global Positioning System (GPS) approach capability
and a modern “glass” flight deck increases mission capability, training effectiveness rates, higher
equipment reliability, lower maintenance costs, and enhanced safety. Updated avionics comply
with CNS/ATM mandates when the new regulations are effective. Operational effectiveness and
efficiency increase with access to airspace that requires more stringent GPS aided approaches
and P-RNAV. In addition, situational awareness increases and crew workload decreases with a
glass cockpit due to a consolidated picture when used in conjunction with a system integrator
such as the airlift integrated electronic combat system. Improving the night vision instrument
system (NVIS) lighting compatibility ensures compliance with AFI 11-2C130 V3/MIL-STD-
3009 and increase capability to operate safely at night. NVIS upgrades are required immediately
prior to CNS/ATM upgrades.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $25,000,000
10 Avionics Kit (3010) $7,000,000 $70,000,000
10 NVIS Kits (3010) $500,000 $5,000,000
Total $100,000,000

53
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130 ENHANCED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) LC-130Hs from Schenectady, NY have ski-
equipped landing gear to enable landings and takeoffs on snow and ice. As the only ski equipped
large transport aircraft in the DOD inventory, the LC-130’s unique capabilities are required to
support military operations in the Polar Regions. In addition to the DOD mission the LC-130
has a secondary operational support mission for the National science Foundation (NSF)
Greenland and Antarctica. Recent operations have highlighted the need for comprehensive,
networked, command and control awareness, and integration of aircraft systems. The C-130
Real-Time Information in the Cockpit (RTIC) increases data link capability, provides on-
board/off-board data sharing, and performs route re-planning. Situational awareness
improvements include near real-time inflight updates, allowing aircrew and command, control,
communications, computers and intelligence nodes to monitor and adjust mission conditions and
profiles to increase mission effectiveness. Without a data link, aircrew are largely unable to
track and locate friendly forces and civil aircraft without extensive communications
relays. RTIC reduces communication transmission time and provides aircrew with the
situational awareness necessary to adjust mission profiles in accordance with changing
battlefield conditions and air component commander’s guidance. Without tactical data link
upgrades, C-130 aircrews continue to lack the situational awareness and flexibility to operate
efficiently with joint and coalition forces in dynamic situations.
2. Source of Need. Mobility Air Forces Network Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; AMC Data
Link Integration Technical Requirements Document, 25 Oct 2006; Tactical Data link
Transformation CDD, Increment 1, JROCM, 23 Jun 2004; AMC R&PC Mission Essential 2007
and 2008; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $350,000
10 RTIC Hardware Installations (3010) $510,000 $5,100,000
Total $5,450,000

54
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130 RETRACTABLE EXTERNAL ARM AND ICE SENSORS

1. Background. Over the last four decades, numerous LC-130H aircraft have sustained damage
after landing on ice and snow covered areas that were not thoroughly surveyed. Current methods
to identify hazards using national imaging assets entail long lead-times and are often
unreliable. LC-130 aircraft require crevasse detection radar (CDR) with survivability
enhancements, polar search and rescue, and airborne sensing. ANG evaluated and fielded an X-
band radar, but additional modifications are required to improve the CDR performance. In
addition, the CDR is mounted on the aircraft using a flexible external articulating arm. More
effort is required to establish the retractable external arm as a permanent modification in the LC-
130H fleet.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 A4MY 07-007; AF Form 1067 A4MY 11-012; 2014-2015
ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Ice Survey Radar (3010) N/A $2,500,000
Retractable External Arm Modifications (3010) N/A $2,000,000
Total $4,500,000

55
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130 FLIGHT DECK COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE

1. Background. The LC-130H uses a portable Iridium-based phone system that is functional but
lacks the robustness and reliability necessary to operate in extreme environments. Remote LC-
130H operating locations, especially polar mission support, require long-range beyond-line-of-
sight communications. Satellite communication is limited at polar high latitudes and High
Frequency (HF) radios are unreliable during periods of high solar flare activity. A
communication system such as the Iridium network is necessary for weather, air traffic control,
and command and control communications (voice and text) to increase safety of flight. The
current configuration of suction cup window-mounted antennas have poor reception and the
sextant port antenna needs to be frequently removed for celestial navigation. A permanently
installed Iridium voice and data solution with an external flush-mount antenna, capable of secure
communication is required. Without this upgrade the LC-130Hs are subject to safety issues and
operational concerns associated with the short term fix currently in place for the Iridium radio
and the inconsistent performance of HF communication.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 NGB/A4MA 20070212; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $1,000,000
10 Flight Deck Communications Upgrade (3010) $200,000 $2,000,000
Total $3,000,000

56
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130 PROPULSION MODERIZATION

1. Background. ANG LC-130Hs have ski-equipped landing gear to enable landings and takeoffs
on snow and ice. The C-130H fleet requires increased performance, efficiency, and reliability
from a comprehensive propulsion upgrade. The present method to takeoff from deep snow field
runways requires Jet Assisted Take-Off (JATO) rocket motors, which are no longer
produced. Current operations require increased performance, efficiency, and reliability which
highlight the need for a comprehensive propulsion upgrade to the C-130H fleet. Incorporating
NP2000 modular blade technology, electronic propeller control system (EPCS), in-flight
propeller balancing system (IPBS), and the 3.5 engine upgrade provides the increased
performance and reliability. The NP2000/EPCS is an eight-bladed, composite propeller and
improved synchronization system that improves thrust 20 percent over the current C-130 engine
during takeoff. The benefits of the eight-bladed propeller are additional power, reduced
vibration, and reduced JATO use. IPBS reduces routine maintenance because the propeller is
continuously balanced inflight. As a result, it nearly eliminates propeller balance induced
vibration, which equates to lower noise, less vibration damage, and improved aircraft
availability. Upgrading the T-56 engine with the Rolls Royce 3.5 modification, with redesigned
compressors and turbines, increases engine life-cycle and improve fuel economy. If these
propulsion upgrades are not funded for the LC-130H, the resulting loss of capability seriously
reduces polar operations.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067, A4MY 11-066; AF Form 1067, 09-003; AF Form AMC
1067 05-042; AF Form AMC 14-089; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NP2000 NRE (3010) N/A $5,000,000
10 NP2000 (3010) $2,700,000 $27,000,000
IPBS NRE (3010) N/A $3,000,000
10 IPBS Installs (3010) $550,000 $27,500,000
Total $125,000,000

57
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 E-8C and C-32B
E-8C and C-32B
 Robust "Sensor-To-Shooter" C2 Battle Management
 Wide-Area Ground, Littoral, and Maritime Surveillance/Tracking
 ANG E-8 Unit Provide 100% of the Total Fleet

E-8C: The E-8C Joint Surveillance, Target Attack Radar

System (JSTARS) is the world’s premier wide-area
surveillance moving target indicator, airborne, manned battle
management command and control aircraft. It brings a
unique combination of robust communication and real-time
surveillance to air, ground, and surface domains. The
aircraft’s ability to find, fix, track, and orient shooters to air,
ground, and surface targets allows friendly forces to respond rapidly to a changing battlefield.

The Air National Guard (ANG) 116 ACW at Robins AFB, GA is home to 16 E-8C’s and the
only E-8(T)C. Team JSTARS is the premier example of Total Force Integration. They have
accrued more than 92,000 combat hours and 8,700 combat sorties over Kosovo, Iraq,
Afghanistan, and Libya. In fiscal year 2013, JSTARS provided 8,800 hours of simultaneous
battle management, command and control, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance,
supporting all six combatant commanders. As an Active Association, there are approximately
750 full-time and 350 traditional ANG personnel within the 116 ACW (ANG) host unit, and over
1,300 active duty airmen, soldiers and individual mobilization augmenters within the 461 ACW
associate unit. Modernization efforts enhance warfighting capabilities and include integrated
broadcast service, personnel recovery compatible radios, integrated automatic identification
system, and non-cooperative target combat identification.

C-32: The C-32B provides dedicated rapid response worldwide

airlift to the Commander, United States Special Operations
Command, in support of the domestic and overseas crisis
response activities. The 150 SOS of the New Jersey ANG
operates the C-32B from Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst,
NJ.
Tab F

59
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 E-8C and C-32B
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
E-8C
 Non-Cooperative Target Identification
 Integrated Broadcast System (IBS) Sustainment
 Encrypted Maritime Automatic Identification System (AIS)
 Personnel Recovery Compatible Interrogation Radio
 Weapon System Trainer (WST) Motion System Sustainment (See Tab Q)
C-32B
 Enhanced Flight Vision System

Essential Capabilities List

E-8C
 Tactical Datalink (TDL) Interoperability/Multi-TDL Gateway
 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)/Mode 5 Identification Friend or
Foe (IFF)
 Bridge/Relay Dissimilar Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA)/Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Voice and Data Networks
 Operational Employment in a Contested Environment
 Access to Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) (Top Secret)
on the Aircraft
C-32B
 Blended Wings
 Improved Worldwide Navigation Database

Desired Capabilities List

E-8C
 Common Datalink (CDL)
 Network-Enabled Weapons
 Human Machine Interface (HMI) Standardization
 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
 Self-Defense Suite
C-32B
 None

60
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

E-8C NON-COOPERATIVE TARGET IDENTIFICATION

1. Background. The E-8C needs the ability to identify objects of interest detected by onboard
sensors. An on-board combat identification capability on the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target
Attack Radar System (JSTARS) aircraft increases lethality of other weapons systems by
reducing the length of the sensor-to-shooter kill chain. This capability enables an accurate
characterization of detected objects in the joint battlespace and provides decision quality data to
the operator for the timely application of military options. Potential solutions include: Blue
Force Tracker with passive detection, radar signatures, inverse synthetic aperture radar imagery,
and/or electro-optical-infrared sensors. These sensors are cued by the radar and incorporate an
aided target recognition upgrade to the current radar system.
2. Source of Need. 2004-2007 ARC WEPTAC Conference, 2009-2013 ARC WEPTAC
Conference, 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Combat Identification (CID) Non-Recurring N/A $10,000,000
Engineering (NRE) (3010)
16 CID (3010) $15,000,000 $240,000,000
Total $250,000,000

61
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

E-8C INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) MODERNIZATION

1. Background. Integrated broadcast service (IBS) is the primary threat warning system on the
E-8C JSTARS aircraft and a key distribution network for critical battlefield
information. Additionally, IBS provides reports of electronic intelligence, signals intelligence,
and human intelligence for fusion with local sensor information to support a single operating
picture for target nomination and identification. The legacy IBS system (Commander’s Tactical
Terminal/Hybrid - Receive Only (CTT/H-R) terminal) is no longer produced and cannot be
repaired. The current interim capability uses a commercial satellite to garner the information and
thus is more susceptible to adversary interference. The required cryptographic capability
requires replacement with a modernization program compliant device and algorithm. Air Force
tactical receiver system-ruggedized (AFTRS-R) terminals are fully capable of supporting IBS
requirements as functional replacements for CTT/H-R terminals. AFTRS-R National Security
Agency certified Block II terminals are readily available for JSTARS; however, these assets
require integration and test with the aircraft.
2. Source of Need. JSTARS Operational Requirements Document - Rev 5, Dec 2004; 2012-
2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 IBS (3010) $550,000 $8,800,000
3 IBS for Training Systems (3010) $400,000 $1,200,000
Total $10,000,000

62
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

E-8C ENCRYPTED AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)

1. Background. The E-8C JSTARS recently expanded its maritime surveillance capabilities by
adding the enhanced land maritime mode. As a result, JSTARS operational taskings have
increased to support real-world maritime missions. JSTARS requires an organic, integrated
capability to provide near real-time identification of maritime vessels broadcasting both
encrypted and unencrypted Automatic Identification System (AIS) data. AIS is the system of
record to provide a tracking system used on ships and by vessel tracking services (VTS). This
system identifies and locates vessels by electronically exchanging data with nearby ships and
VTS stations. Interrogating a vessel’s identity, position, course, and speed greatly enhances
JSTARS’s ability to distinguish between friendly, neutral, enemy and suspect maritime
entities. AIS provides the mission crew with the capability to focus on enemy and suspect
vessels and to expedite cross cueing of potential targets with external agencies. The E-8C
requires an AIS system, which receives both unencrypted and encrypted AIS transponder signals,
then overlays the reports on the JSTARS operator work station. This will allow expeditious
comparison of organic moving target indicator data with AIS transponder returns allowing for
the filtering of friendly vessels and known commercial ships with neutral, enemy, and suspect
vessels.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
AIS Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) (3010) N/A $3,970,000
16 Encrypted AIS Kits (3010) $250,000 $4,000,000
3 AIS Kits for Training Systems (3010) $210,000 $630,000
Total $8,600,000

63
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

E-8C PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMPATIBLE INTERROGATION RADIO

1. Background. The E-8C JSTARS supports combat search and rescue by providing over-watch
of potential hostile extraction areas, guiding isolated personnel and extraction teams via secure
messaging, and providing command and control (C2) to strike assets when needed to support
extraction operations. JSTARS has an operational requirement to support CSAR operations
using a personnel recovery (PR) compatible radio capable of interrogating isolated
personnel. The overall objective of the PR program is to provide isolated personnel and
extraction teams with enhanced surveillance, connectivity, and security through interoperability
with the E-8C via the secure PR data link. JSTARS, with PR capability, provides a persistent
airborne C2, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance node to support isolated personnel
and extraction teams. A fully integrated PR system offers interoperability with all US and many
North Atlantic Treaty Organization deployed combat survival radios, to include the
PRC-112B/G, PRC-434, and PRQ-7 Combat Survivor Evader Locater (CSEL) and is the
preferred solution for an E-8C Personnel Recovery Compatible Interrogation Radio. While not
as capable, a non-integrated carry-on system, similar to QUICKDRAW, that is interoperable
with the PRQ-7 and is able to receive and transmit text messages to the survivor in the same
manner as the QUICKDRAW interoperates with the PRC-112B/G and PRC-434, improves on
the current capability.
2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command JSTARS Requirements List (CSAR Support); 2012-
2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 Integrated Radios (3010) $562,500 $9,000,000
2 Integrated Radios for Training Systems (3010) $500,000 $1,000,000
Total $10,000,000

64
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

ENHANCED FLIGHT VISION SYSTEM

1. Background. The ANG C-32B mission requires worldwide airlift with little to no advance
warning. The C-32B flies a vital US Government crisis response mission requiring success in all
meteorological environments. To ensure success, an Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS)
technology is needed to enable the flight crew to operate in reduced weather minimums
conditions In addition, the EFVS increases situation awareness and safety. The EFVS package
includes a heads up display (HUD) fused with an enhanced vision system (EVS). The HUD is a
means to provide all primary flight display information to the pilot allowing heads up and eyes
out, increasing pilot situational awareness and decreasing pilot workload. This technology is
commercially available and FAA approved in a supplemental type certificate (STC) for Boeing
757 installation and operation.
2. Source of Need. ARC 2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
150 SOS McGuire AFB, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 160408

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 HUD/EFVS (3010) $6,500,000 $13,000,000
Spare HUD (3010) N/A $1,000,000
Total $14,000,000

65
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Page Intentionally Left Blank

66
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 F-15
F-15
 Air Dominance
 Homeland Defense
 ANG F-15 Units provide 58% of the Total Combat Fleet

The F-15C Eagle has been the backbone of our nation’s

Air Superiority fleet for over 30 years and will continue to
be a key asset through 2045. Air National Guard (ANG)
F-15C units provide 31 percent of the nation’s aerospace
control alert (ACA) assets, spanning five alert sites in the
continental United States (CONUS). These alert sites
provide 24-hour homeland defense. Active Electronically
Scanned Array (AESA) radars on ANG F-15C/Ds provide
combatant commanders (COCOMs) essential updated air
superiority and homeland defense capability.

In FY15, ANG F-15s executed a foundational Quick

Reaction Force (QRF) NORTHCOM VIGILANT SHIELD
tasking to Goose Bay, Canada and took part in joint &
international exercises Red Flag, Sentry Aloha, and Sentry
Savannah. ANG Eagles also deployed overseas in support
of a European Theater Security Package (TSP) tasking, as
well as Operation Atlantic Resolve, enhancing advanced
tactical interoperability with our NATO allies.

Over half of USAF F-15C combat capability resides within the Air National Guard, which
possesses 39% of all air superiority assets (F-15C & F-22) available for air expeditionary forces
(AEF) commitments and ACA tasking. The ANG also operates the USAF’s only F-15C formal
flying training unit at the 173 FW, Klamath Falls IAP, OR where all Active and Reserve
Component Eagle drivers are trained.

Modernization and sustainment programs are vital to improve aircraft capabilities for both
overseas contingency operations and homeland defense. These programs include the AESA
radar, a modern electronic warfare and self-protection suite, multi-spectral search and track,
persistent air dominance-enabling technologies, and a modern, integrated cockpit.
Tab G

67
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 F-15
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radar
 Enhanced Electronic Warfare and Self-Protection
 Multi-Spectral Search/Track/Target Capability
 Persistent Air Dominance Enabler
 Modernized Cockpit

Essential Capabilities List

 Realistic Training Opportunities
 Agile Operational Flight Program Development
 High-Fidelity Networked Simulators at Air National Guard Bases
 Program Support for Joint Mission Planning System and Common Mission Debrief
Program
 Tactical Satellite Communications System

Desired Capabilities List

 Air- Launched Hit-to-Kill Munition
 Next Generation Air-to-Air Weapon
 Crypto Loading Port Relocation
 Beyond Line- of- Sight Data Transfer System

68
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-15 ACTIVE ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ARRAY RADAR

1. Background. Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar technology increases
detection and track ranges of airborne targets and improves identification capability. AESA
radar gives the F-15C multi-target track and attack capability, and vastly increases capabilities
against advanced electronic attack from enemy systems. AESA radars are critical for Homeland
Defense (HD) missions because the system enables pilots to locate a target of interest in a
saturated air traffic environment, as well as detect and track small, asymmetric threats. The
APG-63(v)3 AESA meets or exceeds performance capabilities in these environments, and with
no moving parts has demonstrated a MTBF over 30 times greater than the APG-63(v)0. The
AESA’s high reliability represents a drastic reduction in future sustainment costs, allowing for
direct reinvestment in additional game-changing air dominance technologies such as the new F-
15 mission computer. In late 2019, the USAF will begin fielding the Advanced Display Core
Processor (ADCP-II) on all F-15 models (C/D/E). ADCP-II replaces the existing central
computer in the F-15C/D/E aircraft, placing all F-15s on a single, common operating system with
enough processing power and software agility to enable the next generation of advanced
offensive and defensive systems. ADCP-II is, however, incompatible with the APG-63(v)0 due
to both physical space and OFP limitations. Therefore, any F-15 with a legacy (v)0 radar and
central computer will be rendered non-combat-capable as well as inadequate for effective combat
training, as the ADCP-II upgrade represents the largest pilot-vehicle-interface (PVI) paradigm
shift in the history of the F-15C. The long-term cost-effective, full-spectrum solution is to outfit
each F-15C/D aircraft with a v(3) AESA radar ahead of scheduled ADCP-II modification to
properly phase in this capability, in parallel with a very robust conversion training plan for Eagle
drivers. There are 16 F-15C and 2 F-15D aircraft shared among the Active Component and
ANG (previously scheduled for retirement) that require re-engineering to incorporate an M-
coded Embedded GPS/INS (EGI) which enables the APG-63(v)3 upgrade.
2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Radar Improvement Program; APG-63(v)3 Capability
Development Document (CDD), 21 Apr 2005; 2012-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 142 FW Portland IAP, OR
MA
144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 159 FW New Orleans JRB, LA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 2071303

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
18 APG-63(v)0 AESA Conversions (3010) $9,500,000 $171,000,000
M-code EGI/APG-63(v)3 Upgrade NRE N/A $20,000,000
(3600)
Total $191,000,000
* Includes installation, spares, and program costs.

69
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-15 ENHANCED ELECTRONIC WARFARE AND SELF-PROTECTION

1. Background. The F-15’s internal electronic warfare (EW) suite has been defunded and
disconnected since 2012 while the aircraft awaits its next generation EW upgrade. Whether
through the program of record or separate initiatives, modernization upgrades for the EW suite
require the following capabilities: proactive and directed offensive electronic attack, electronic
warfare situational awareness improvements, and self-protection capabilities that include radar
cross section (RCS) reduction, infrared countermeasures, and defensive jamming. The Air Force
identified and validated defensive shortfalls in the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability
System (EPAWSS) Capability Development Document and initiated funding in FY13; however,
sustainment funding of the legacy EW suite was terminated in FY12, leaving the F-15C without
an integrated EW system. Accordingly, EW sustainment funding must be reinstated and legacy
obsolescence addressed with interim capabilities for the 105 combat-coded Air National Guard
(ANG) F-15 aircraft. Capabilities should include: digital radar warning receiver, digital radio
frequency memory electronic attack, ALE-58 back of launcher (BOL) countermeasure dispenser,
Proactive/Directed Jammer System, and towed decoy. Interim capability of 10
Proactive/Directed Jammer Systems, 10 towed decoy systems, and 24 BOL-IR systems per ANG
combat-coded location are adequate in the near-term. EPAWSS and interim solutions provide
adequate defensive measures, but the F-15C/D also requires an offensive (proactive and directed)
EW system and radar cross section (RCS) reduction initiatives. Offensive EW systems must be
able to proactively suppress specific enemy threat systems and should include fiber-optic towed
decoys. RCS reduction initiatives will further enable interoperability with 5th generation aircraft
in Anti-access/Area denial (A2/AD) environments and should increase the effectiveness of EW
systems. Interim measures, EPAWSS, offensive EW systems, and RCS reduction would allow
the ANG to support continued air dominance in A2/AD scenarios.
2. Source of Need. Tactical Air Forces 304-80-I/II/III-C System Operational Requirements
Document for the F-15A-D Tactical Electronic Warfare Suite, 7 Apr 1992; EPAWSS Capability
Development Document, Jun 2007; 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
104 FW Westfield-Barnes, MA 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 142 FW Portland IAP, OR
144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 159 FW New Orleans JRB, LA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 2071303

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
105 EPAWSS* (3010) $6,600,000 $693,000,000
105 Radar Warning Receiver Upgrades (3010) $500,000 $52,500,000
F-15 Towed Decoy NRE (3600) N/A $5,500,000
50 F-15 Towed Decoy Systems (3010) $2,500,000 $125,000,000
120 BOL-IR* (3010) $90,000 $10,800,000
F-15 Proactive/Directed Jammer NRE (3600) N/A $50,000,000
50 F-15 Proactive/Directed Jammers (3010) $2,000,000 $100,000,000
F-15 RCS Reduction NRE (3600) N/A $100,000,000
105 F-15 RCS Reduction Kits (3010) $1,000,000 $105,000,000
Total $1,241,800, 000
* Includes required spares, support equipment, and technical orders.

70
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-15 MULTI-SPECTRAL SEARCH/TRACK/TARGET CAPABILITY

1. Background. Adversary aircraft and integrated air defense networks employ sophisticated
detection and electronic attack (EA) methods that complicate F-15C employment and leave the
F-15 vulnerable to attack. Exploitation of less- contested or degraded sections of the
electromagnetic spectrum enhances operational effectiveness. Multi-spectral search/track/target
systems and enhanced Electronic Warfare Warning Set (EWWS) on all 105 combat-coded F-15s
must be procured to supplement on-board threat detection, identification, and tracking as part of
a time-synchronized, integrated function of the existing sensor systems for detection and
weapons cueing. Incorporating features such as an infrared search and track (IRST) capability
initially on 10 airframes at each combat-coded ANG F-15 location (supporting both Homeland
Defense and COCOM taskings) ensures system track files are maintained in any contested or
degraded EA operating environment. IRST and related capabilities are not employed in lieu of
active electronically scanned array radars or as stand-alone functions. They are a family of
systems producing integrated fire-control that dramatically increases the probability of threat
detection when EA and advanced digital radio frequency and infrared counter-measures are
used. Additionally, any multi-spectral system must be coordinated with threat warning to
provide robust threat alerts to friendly aircraft, which will require developmental funding for
proper testing and integration. Therefore, capabilities such as IRST should be procured in the
near term for immediate integration while multi-spectral systems that enable integrated 4th and
5th generation fighter operations, theater missile detection, and asymmetric threat defense are
developed.
2. Source of Need. F/A-18 Infrared Search-and-Track System Capability Development
Document, Mar 2011, US Air Force Annex; 2012-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
104 FW Westfield RAP, MA 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 142 FW Portland IAP, OR
144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 159 FW New Orleans JRB, LA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 2071303

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
50 Infrared Search and Track Systems (3010) $3,500,000 $175,000,000
Infrared Search and Track System NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000

105 Electronic Warning Warfare Sets (3010) $450,000 $47,250,000

Electronic Warning Warfare Sets NRE (3010) N/A $50,000,000
Total $282,250,000
* Assumes Full Rate Production.

71
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-15 PERSISTENT AIR DOMINANCE ENABLER

1. Background. Integrating conformal fuel tanks (CFTs) and additional weapons stations to all
105 combat-coded ANG F-15s effectively and immediately doubles the combat radius, loiter
time, and firepower critical to gathering offensive mass required to achieve air dominance
against numerically superior threat in the battlespace of tomorrow. Additional weapon stations
mounted on CFTs or Multi-Rail Missile Launchers (2 per aircraft, 210 total) installed in place of
previously necessary external fuel tanks, are modular and can be used for a variety of advanced
air-to-air weapons, multi-spectrum search/track/targeting pods, and updated electronic & infrared
countermeasures. The standardized weapons communication terminals in advanced CFTs will
also help streamline weapons development and integration among all versions of the F-15, and
allow Combatant Commanders to quickly exploit the advantages of a common fleet when all
aircraft (with common central processors, weapons buses, and racks/launchers) can readily
accommodate advanced weapons or off-the-shelf defensive countermeasure upgrades, such as a
pylon-mounted fiber-optic towed decoys. No other fighter aircraft in the US inventory can
deliver the same capability and mix of lethality at significant combat range without an extensive
aerial refueling bridge. Incorporating CFT-equipped F-15s into NORAD CONUS Tactics,
Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) will allow for significantly increased intercept ranges of
unknown/suspect/foreign military aircraft, in many cases allowing for intercept completion and
follow-on action in oceanic airspace outside of any potential standoff missile ranges. With an
aging air refueling fleet, evolving anti-access/area denial challenges, and a static number of air
superiority platforms, F-15C/D aircraft should be configured to allow overlapping, persistent air
dominance.
2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Operational Requirements Document, 7 Apr 1992; LF10-054
Revision A Tasking; 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
104 FW Westfield-Barnes, MA 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 142 FW Portland IAP, OR
144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 159 FW New Orleans JRB, LA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 2071303

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
105 F-15 Conformal Fuel Tanks (3010) $3,700,000 $388,500,000
210 Multi-Rail Missile Launcher (3010) $250,000 $52,500,000
Total $441,000,000
* Includes required spares, support equipment and technical orders.

72
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-15 MODERNIZED COCKPIT

1. Background. The current displays and communication/navigation functionality in the F-15C
cockpit are based on outdated 1970s technology. Eagles have experienced steady growth in
capability and lethality in their 30+ years of combat-proven service due to the modernization of
radars, weapons, and sensors, as well as the addition of data link and helmet-mounted cuing
systems. However, fully utilizing these enhancements requires a fairly complex pilot-vehicle-
interface, imposing a demanding workload on the pilot. With current and required future
mission system upgrades, the legacy displays and communication architecture are inadequate due
to display size, outdated technology, and minimal audio integration. Replacement of legacy
displays in all F-15C and F-15D (front cockpit) aircraft (130 total) with larger color and/or smart
color display systems increases Air National Guard (ANG) F-15C lethality by displaying
offensive and defensive data more intuitively to the pilot. An updated helmet mounted cueing
system will facilitate day to night transition missions, provide compatibility with Night-Vision
Goggles (NVGs), and decrease pilot fatigue by lowering the system weight. The addition of
three-dimensional (3-D) audio separation allows the pilot to spatially separate and process
multiple radio frequencies in addition to directional self-protection warning tones. The central
hub of comm/nav information throughput and control would be a single Integrated Radio
Controller (IRC) that minimizes pilot workload and “heads down” time. An updated, digital IRC
would necessitate a new datalink terminal which would take advantage of modern cryptological
and algorithm advances, providing the F-15 with secure 5th to 4th-generation datalink
connectivity. These upgrades allow the pilot to maximize current and future capabilities and
increase the situational awareness necessary in the modern battlespace.
2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Operational Requirements Document, 7 Apr 1992; 2013-2015 ARC
WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 142 FW Portland IAP, OR
MA
144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 159 FW New Orleans JRB, LA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 2071303

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
F-15 Display Upgrade NRE (3010) N/A $3,000,000
130 F-15 Display Upgrades* (3010) $20,000 $2,600,000
Controller NRE (3010) N/A $5,000,000
130 Radio Controller with 3-D Audio* (3010) $60,000 $7,800,000
130 Upgraded Data Link Terminals* (3010) $300,000 $39,000,000
Total $57,400,000
*Assumes installation, program costs and 10% spares.

73
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 F-22
F-22
 Air Dominance
 Homeland Defense
 ANG F-22 Units Provide 11% of the Total Fleet

The Air National Guard (ANG) operates F-22s at

three locations. The ANG has two F-22 classic
associate units: Joint Base (JB) Langley-Eustis, VA
and Tyndall AFB, FL. Additionally, the Hawaii ANG
based at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI, is the
first operational ANG F-22 squadron. The Hawaii
ANG provides Aerospace Control Alert (ACA)
support for the Hawaiian Islands and air dominance
for the Pacific theater. In 2015, ANG F-22s flew in
combat operations in support of Operation Inherent
Resolve as well as participated in several major
exercises.

Primary ANG F-22 modernization focuses on a

common configuration and increment
3.2C. Enhancements in utilizing the infrared
spectrum, such as missile launch detectors, will
increase survivability. Communication
upgrades, including 4th to 5th and 5th to5th
generation aircraft data link, and a helmet-
mounted display enable the F-22 to efficiently
and effectively accomplish alert and combatant
command tasks.

Tab H

75
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 F-22
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Helmet-Mounted Display
 Survivability Enhancements
 Link 16 Transmit
 Rapid Raptor Enablers
 Open System Architecture

Essential Capabilities List

 Improved Air and Surface Threat Replicators
 Multi-Spectral Sensor Capabilities
 Munitions Improvements for Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground
 Combat Identification Software and Hardware Improvements
 Synthetic Aperture Radar Map Enhancements

Desired Capabilities List

 External Low-Observable Carriage for Weapons, Fuel, and Sensors
 Improved Non-Kinetic Effects
 New Integrated-Forebody with Advanced Radar
 Improved Radar Warning Hardware
 Deployable Simulator

76
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-22 HELMET-MOUNTED DISPLAY

1. Background. F-22 pilots critically require a night vision goggle compatible, color helmet-
mounted display (HMD). Multiple simulations and an operational utility assessment conducted
by the 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron demonstrated that using a Helmet Mounted Display
(HMD) provides a distinct first-shot, first-kill advantage. This advantage applies primarily to
within visual range engagements, but also substantially increases situational awareness during
beyond visual range intercepts. HMD technology provides the capability to cue and verify off-
boresight sensor and weapon information through the display of weapons employment zone
symbology and visual cues of target and friendly aircraft locations. Originally conceived as a
weapons cueing system, the HMD has evolved into a force multiplier because of its ability to
enhance situational awareness during all phases of flight and across all mission sets. For
example, the HMD provides threat information visual cues while the pilot is "eyes-out" of the
cockpit, warning of dangers and providing critical information to allow the pilot to maneuver the
aircraft away from terrain or threats. Similarly, F-22s tasked with identifying targets of interest
during homeland defense missions would be better able to quickly and efficiently visually locate
and identify small aircraft or unmanned systems. This capability would be fielded on all 20 F-
22 aircraft at the Hawaii Air National Guard.

2. Source of Need. JHMCS ORD CAF-USN 308-93-II-A Dec 1996; Operation Requirements
Document CAF 304-83-I/II/IIIA, paragraph 4.2.7.3 “Helmet Mounted Displays” Mar 2004;
Operational Capability Definition Document (OCDD) for Increment 3 Dec 2011; 2011 – 2014
ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 27138

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Helmet Mounted Display NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
20 Helmet Mounted Displays (3010) $200,000 $4,000,000
Total $14,000,000
*Includes required spares, support equipment, and technical orders.

77
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-22 SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENTS

1. Background. The F-22 is the nation’s most technologically advanced air superiority
fighter. Defeating evolving threats requires rapid modernization of aircraft countermeasures,
ensuring that the F-22 and other 5th generation aircraft remain capable of surviving. Two key
aspects to rapid modernization of aircraft countermeasures and enhanced survivability are robust
simulation technologies and diverse lab facilities to evaluate solutions earlier in the development
cycle. Unlike legacy aircraft support, 5th generation aircraft advanced lab facilities and
simulation technologies are highly centralized. This centralization permits consistent test
patterns, but it does not enable rapid analysis and fielding of effective
countermeasures. Therefore, funding is required to develop survivability analysis tools that
enable efficient analysis of potential solutions during or immediately following operational test
events.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 27138

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Simulation Development (3600) N/A $10,000,000
Threat Lab Development (3600) N/A $10,000,000
Total $20,000,000

78
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-22 LINK 16 TRANSMIT

1. Background. The F-22 currently has the ability to receive information in the primary datalink
network Link-16. As the nation’s first 5th generation fighter the F-22 was designed with the most
advanced sensor capabilities. Unfortunately, due to the inability for the F-22 to transmit on Link-
16 none of the data is passed to any other assets. The ability to share high fidelity data of air and
surface tracks from an F-22 significantly increases the combat capability of every asset that is
Link-16 capable. In addition, all Air Operations Centers (AOC) use Link-16 information to
maintain battlespace situational awareness. Link-16 has been proven to increase lethality in the
air to air environment allowing fighters to have positional information on friendly forces. An F-
22 that is not passing positional information on Link-16 degrades other fighter’s capability to
employ weapons on enemy forces without first identifying F-22 position by means of multiple
radio calls. This problem is compounded by the inability with other fighters to track the F-22
with their own sensors. One of the core missions for the F-22 is fighter integration, which has
been demonstrated as most effective for advanced adversary threats. Link-16 transmitters on the
F-22 would vastly improve fighter integration. A Link-16 transmitter on the F-22 that has the
capability to revert to receive-only mode allows all the increased information flow for all assets
without any degraded capabilities. This capability would be fielded on all 20 F-22 aircraft at the
Hawaii Air National Guard.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 27138

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Link-16 Transmit NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
20 Link-16 Transmit Modules (3010) $175,000 $3,500,000
Total $13,500,000

*Includes required spares, support equipment, and technical orders.

79
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-22 RAPID RAPTOR ENABLERS

1. Background. A rapid deployment concept called “Rapid Raptor” is being explored for the F-
22. Rapid Raptor permits flexible operations from dispersed, semi-austere airfields. Rapid
Raptor training exercises have been conducted from Joint Bases Elmendorf-Richardson, AK and
Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI. The concept can be broken down into three distinct problem
sets: sustainment, bed-down, and re-armament. The sustainment challenge includes deploying a
small number of F-22s and a single C-17 to a remote airfield with no additional military support,
with little or no notice. The bed-down element entails establishing limited contingency
operations at semi-austere airfields not originally designed to support fighter and combat
operations. Re-armament challenges include F-22s departing from home station or a deployed
airfield with live ordnance, conducting combat operations, landing at a remote airfield with only
C-17 support, re-arming and refueling, then launching for another combat mission. F-22s could
execute combat missions out of a semi-austere airfield for up to several weeks. Ongoing Rapid
Raptor events are identifying challenges in order to establish proper techniques and procedures
for worldwide applications. A beyond line of sight (BLOS) radio would allow the F-22 to
communicate to command centers for important tasking information without a large
communication footprint. Rapid Raptor may include short notice deployments to unexpected
AORs and airfields, making it difficult to acquire and carry hardcopy flight information
publications (FLIP). EFB is a low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf solution for accessing and
maintaining current worldwide FLIP. This capability would be fielded on all 20 F-22 aircraft at
the Hawaii Air National Guard.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 27138

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
BLOS NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
20 BLOS Radios (3010) $175,000 $3,500,000
EFB NRE (3080) N/A $2,000,000
30 EFB* (3080) $800 $24,000
Total $15,524,000
*Includes required spares, support equipment, and technical orders.

80
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-22 OPEN SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

1. Background. The F-22 operational flight program (OFP) modernization plan is robust due to
highly advanced systems. OFP changes are often solicited several years prior to implementation.
Most of the OFP changes require a thorough process. Some OFP changes need to be made
outside of the normal OFP cycle. Examples include changes to the pilot vehicle interface (PVI),
and bug fixes. Open system OFP architecture (OSA) allows these changes to be made faster.
OSA would allow programmers at the developmental and operational test units to more
effectively troubleshoot proposed OFP changes and test multiple options. OSA is an enabler to
modernize the F-22 to counter emerging threats. Examples of other benefits of OSA are a helmet
mounted display (HMD) and electronic flight bag (EFB). HMD and EFB technology has existed
for years in other aircraft. This capability would be fielded on all 20 F-22 aircraft at the Hawaii
Air National Guard.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
Hickam, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 27138

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
OSA NRE (3080) N/A $10,000,000
20 OSA Modules* (3080) $200,000 $4,000,000
Total $14,000,000
* Includes 10% spares, TCTO’s, installs & support equipment.

81
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 F-16
F-16
 Close Air Support / Interdiction / Precision Strike
 Suppression / Destruction of Enemy Air Defense
 Homeland Defense
 ANG F-16 Units Provide 37% of the Total Fleet

Air National Guard (ANG) F-16s are engaged

around the globe in operations including NOBLE
EAGLE, IRAQI FREEDOM, ENDURING
FREEDOM, and NEW DAWN. Since 2003 ANG
F-16Cs have fulfilled many of Allied Air
Command’s precision-guided munitions and close
air support (CAS) tasking's, including convoy escort,
dedicated infrastructure defense, border patrol, and
raid support.

The ANG operates 336 Block 25/30/32/40/42/50/52 F-16C/Ds. The ANG F-16 aircraft makeup
56% of the nation’s aerospace control alert (ACA) fighter force and provide a near-constant
presence in operational theaters conducting CAS and armed reconnaissance. Capability
enhancements to the Block 40/42 and Block 50/52 aircraft make them the Air Force’s only
suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD)-capable aircraft.

Modernization efforts are underway to improve ANG

F-16s by fielding affordable systems with secure line-
of-sight and beyond line-of-sight communication
suites, smart displays with data processing capability,
advanced helmet-mounted target cueing for air and
ground weapons employment, enhanced self-protection
suites, and improved radar performance and reliability.
Tab I

83
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 F-16
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Radar Providing Low Observable Detection, Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground Electronic
Protection and Electronic Attack, and Combat Identification Capability
 Continued Development of Targeting Pod With High-Definition Display and Broadband
Uplink
 Improved Jam-Resistant Navigational Systems
 Communication Suite Enhancements
 Automated Digital Threat Detection Suite Incorporating Missile Warning
 Link 16 Capability With Growth for 5th and 4th Gen Fighter Interoperability

Essential Capabilities List

 Proliferation and Sustainment of High Fidelity Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) Quality
Simulators
 Night Capable Color Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD)
 Automated Ground Collision Avoidance System (AGCAS)
 Conformal Fuel Tanks
 Low Collateral Damage Precision Guided Weapons

Desired Capabilities List

 Boresight Program Enhancement
 Ability to Fly GPS Approaches
 Live Virtual Construct Training
 DVR Storage and Capability Improvement

84
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

RADAR PROVIDING LOW OBSERVABLE DETECTION, AIR-TO-AIR AND AIR-TO-

GROUND ELECTRONIC PROTECTION, ELECTRONIC ATTACK, AND COMBAT
IDENTIFICATION CAPABILITY
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 25/30/32/40/42/50/52 aircraft require
Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars to effectively execute doctrinally tasked
mission sets, including Homeland Defense. AESA radars provide the capability to detect and
track multiple airborne Targets of Interest (TOI) in dense civilian air traffic environments
prevalent around major population centers, a critical capability for Aerospace Control Alert
(ACA). Simultaneously, AESA radars will drastically improve the capability of ANG F-16’s to
succeed in a diverse set of missions, including Close Air Support, Surface Attack and Defensive
Counter-Air. AESA radars can perform detection, tracking, communication, combat
identification and jamming functions in multiple directions simultaneously. Additionally, AESA
radars eliminate several components associated with mechanical radars, thus dramatically
improving reliability and maintainability costs.
2. Source of Need. NORTHCOM JUON NC-008, TAF 303-76-I/II/III-A SORD for the F-
16C/D, CAF ORD 303-76-I/II/III-D F-16C/D MSIP ORD (14 Aug 00); CDD 17 Feb 05, ARC
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 WEPTAC Critical Requirement.
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 169 FW McEntire AGS, SC
162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT 149 FW Kelly Fld, TX
148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK 115 FW Truax Fld, WI
114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 52716

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Radar NRE Integration (3600) N/A $40,000,000
336 Radar Upgrades (3010) $3,500,000 $1,176,000,000
Total $1,326,000,000

85
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-16 BROADBAND UPLINK/DOWNLINK CAPABILITY

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 30/40/42/50/52 aircraft require the
ability to uplink and download data with broadband (10Mbps+) speed. This will allow the ANG
F-16 to relay in real-time the exceptional digital targeting pod video and any other sensor
information to other critical nodes in the kill chain. With this upgrade, the combatant
commander will be able to real-time view the Target-of-Interest (TOI) of the F-16, whether it is a
High Value Individual (HVI) in a moving vehicle in a remote location, or a suspect aircraft TOI
over the continental United States. This capability can be achieved using an LITENING Digital
Port (LDP) Targeting Pod equipped with NET-T to transmit both live video and still images to
other nodes in the kill chain using the current data-link and antenna in the most current LDP
TGP. This modification would affect all 205 combat coded F-16C’s in the Air National Guard
inventory.
2. Source of Need. 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Development and Integration (3600) N/A $10,000,000
205 A/C upgrades (3010) $125,000 $25,625,000
Total $35,625,000

86
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-16 IMPROVED JAM-RESISTANT NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEMS

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 25/30/32 requires an update to the
Embedded Global Positioning System and Inertial Navigation System (EGI) to provide increased
Anti-Jam (AJ) and Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) capability. The
navigation equipment in the F-16 needs to operate with Global Positioning System (GPS)
accuracy in an increasingly contested electro-magnetic environment. The design and operation
of the current F-16 Block 30 EGI did not anticipate the current threat environment and its
continued performance at the required operational level is at serious risk. Available GPS signal
processing technology has made great improvements, enabled by increased speed, memory and
computer processing, along with corresponding improvements to GPS signal processing software
algorithms. The demonstrated results of these advances provide order of magnitude improvement
in rejection capability and will provide an increased navigational performance in the GPS denied
environment. This modification would affect all 205 combat coded F-16C’s in the Air National
Guard inventory.
2. Source of Need. CAF 301-01-B, F-16C/D Block 25/30/32 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC
Council
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Jam Resistant Navigational System NRE (3600) N/A $5,500,000
217 Jam Resistant Navigational Systems* (3010) $155,000 $33,635,000
Total $39,135,000
* Includes required spares, support equipment and technical orders.

87
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-16 SECURE LINE-OF-SIGHT AND BEYOND-LINE-OF-SITE WITH 3D AUDIO

COMMUNICATION
1. Background. Current upgrades to F-16s provide Secured-Line-of-Sight (SLOS) and Beyond-
Line-of-Sight (BLOS) communications through the installation of one ARC-210 radio. The
ARC-210 modification provides an improved ability to securely communicate with ground
forces and Command and Control (C2) nodes, but does not allow simultaneous operations on
SLOS and BLOS frequencies. Aerospace Control Alert (ACA) and combat theater operations
require simultaneous SLOS and BLOS communications to concurrently maintain contact with
C2 nodes and friendly forces. Standard F-16’s are configured with a legacy radio and one ARC-
210. Jets are being modified now with a 2nd ARC-210 (three total) to allow concurrent SLOS /
BLOS communication. This 2nd ARC-210 radio, when linked to an advanced display (Center
Display Unit or equivalent) will provide the broadband uplink capability desired. The
combination of two ARC-210s plus a legacy radio (three radios total) allows in-theater
communications on a C2 frequency, a secure tactical frequency with ground forces, and an intra-
flight frequency. In the Homeland Defense (HD) mission, this radio configuration enables
monitoring C2, air traffic control, and intra-flight frequencies simultaneously. The integration of
noise-cancelling and directional (3D) audio simplifies interpretation of simultaneous radio calls
by spatially separating aural warning and radio signals and provides angular cueing to ground
and air threats when used in conjunction with a helmet mounted cueing system. These
capabilities are critical to operations in remote areas, dense threat environments, and dynamic
HD missions. The BLOS modification would affect all 205 combat coded F-16C’s in the Air
National Guard inventory. The 3-D audio modification will affect 255 aircraft that already have
ALQ-213 installed, which is a requirement for 3-D audio.
2. Source of Need. TAF 303-76-I/II/III-A SORD for the F-16C/D; CAF ORD 303-76-I/II/III-D
F-16C/D MSIP ORD, 14 Aug 2000; CENTCOM UON; NORTHCOM Integrated Priority List;
2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference, 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost * Program Cost
BLOS NRE (3600) N/A $5,000,000
200 BLOS Radios* (3010) $150,000 $30,000,000
Three Dimensional NRE (3600) N/A $6,000,000
255 Three Dimensional Audio Upgrades (3010) $100,000 $25,500,000
Total $66,500,000
* Includes 10% spares.

88
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-16 INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC WARFARE SUITE

1. Background. Current F-16 Block 30/32/40/42/50/52 Electronic Warfare (EW) suite is
comprised of a series of EW equipment designed in the 1980s, which are incapable of providing
adequate defensive situational awareness and countermeasures against some present and most
future radar systems. Today, F-16 electronic attack and electronic protection systems suffer
from sustainment issues and have significant capability issues against modern threat systems. A
robust integrated electronic attack suite would enable all F-16 blocks to counter current and
many radars likely to appear in the future. This integrated suite would incorporate an upgraded
digital radar warning receiver (RWR), a digital radio frequency memory upgraded electronic
attack (EA) pod, a pylon missile warning system (MWS) and the ALQ-213 legacy Electronic
Combat (EC) integration system. The F-16 fleet has two legacy analog RWRs (ALR-69 and
ALR-56M) and two legacy analog EA pods (ALQ-131 and ALQ-184). All require sustainment
as well as digital based performance upgrades. A robust integrated electronic warfare suite is
required on all ANG aircraft. The ALQ-213 EC integration system is installed on all remaining
80 F-16 post-block aircraft. Modifying all 290 of our aircraft with ALR-69 and 70 aircraft with
ALR-56M will enhance survivability in a complex threat arena. Finally, with 60 upgraded EA
pods and 75 missile warning systems, roughly 3-4 squadrons can effectively deploy with better
offensive and defensive systems.
2. Source of Need. AN/ALR-69A CPD approved by AFROC, 17 Nov 05, CAF 301-01-B, F-16
C/D Block 25/30/32 MSIP ORD (15 Dec 04), CAF ORD 303-76-I/II/III-D F-16C/D MSIP ORD
(14 Aug 00). 2006-2012 ARC WEPTAC Conference, 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
ALR-69 NRE (3600) N/A $22,840,000
290 ALR-69 Upgrades (3010) $82,000 $23,780,000
ALR-56M NRE (3600) N/A $50,000,000
70 ALR-56M Upgrades (3010) $340,000 $23,800,000
EA Pod NRE (3600) N/A $31,000,000
60 EA Pod Upgrades (3010) $1,320,000 $79,200,000
ALQ-213 NRE (3600) N/A $35,320,000
80 ALQ-213 Upgrades (3010) $490,528 $39,242,240
75 MWS (3010) $1,330,000 $99,750,000
MWS GSE (3080) N/A $41,200,000
Total $446,132,240
*Includes 10% spares

89
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Air Superiority/Global Precision Attack

F-16 LINK-16 AND 5TH TO 4TH GENERATION DATALINK INTEROPERABILITY

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 25/30/32 aircraft require LINK16
datalink capability to effectively employ in the current operational environment. Legacy
Situational Awareness Data Link (SADL) equipment has proven inadequate due to lack of
support infrastructure, frequency band constraints, and Joint Interface Control Cell (JICC)
support. Pre-block A/C (Block 32 and prior) only have SADL and unable to communicate with
Link-16. Post block A/C only have Link-16 but are unable to communicate with 5th generation
aircraft. The transition of F-16 Block 25/30/32 aircraft to LINK16 will allow seamless
deployment, connectivity and interoperability of the entire Total Force F-16 fleet. All ANG F-
16’s (Block 25/30/32/40/42/50/52) require growth potential in datalink equipment to foster 5th to
4th generation aircraft datalink communications. With this modification, all 217 F-16C pre-
block aircraft would have the capability to have datalink communication with other Link-16
aircraft.
2. Source of Need. 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 52716

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Data Link NRE (3600) N/A $10,000,000
217 Data Link Upgrades (3010) $250,000 $54,250,000
Total $ $64,250,000

90
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 HH-60G
HH-60G
 Combat Search and Rescue
 ANG HH-60 Units Provide 18% of the Total Fleet

Air National Guard (ANG) Personnel Recovery (PR)

helicopters and aircrews play a critical role in support
of overseas contingency operations while responding
to an increasingly high demand for domestic
operations. These ANG PR helicopters are located in
Alaska, California, and New York. There is also a
PR training unit collocated with an active duty unit in
New Mexico.

In 2015, ANG PR units deployed in support of

Combined Joint Task Force- Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA). While not deployed overseas, these
units supported their respective states. The 101 RQS in New York worked with Army units in
support of their pre-deployment training. The 129 RQS from California flew numerous
counterdrug missions and operations against the wildfires. The 210 RQS held 24-hour state-
wide, rescue alert in Alaska resulting in 64 missions and 72 lives saved. In New Mexico, the 188
RQS supported aircrew training for the 58 Special Operations Wing and provided personnel in
support of CJTF-HOA.

The HH-60G modernization priorities included

improvements to the smart multi-functional color display,
which merges information from multiple systems into an
easily interpretable picture of the battlefield. Additional
upgrades completed in FY15 focused on the modernization
of the aircraft communication systems.

Tab J

91
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 HH-60
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Advanced Electronic Warfare Penetrator System
 Modernized Integrated Defensive System Suite and Advanced Threat Protection
 Integrated Flight Deck
 Helmet Mounted Heads Up Display
 Aircraft Weapons Modernization

Essential Capabilities List

 Distributed Mission Operations Capable HH-60G Aircraft Simulator
 Helicopter Underwater Egress Lighting
 Federal Aviation Administration Global Positioning System Certified Aircraft
 Maritime Ship Locator/Information
 Rotor Brake

Desired Capabilities List

 Improved Aircraft Generators
 Aircrew Flight Equipment Enhancements
 Electronic Flight Bag
 Instrumentation Upgrade
 Wireless Intercom

92
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HH-60 ADVANCED ELECTRONIC WARFARE PENETRATOR SYSTEM

1. Background. HH-60G helicopters and crews are tasked to recover personnel in a contested
environment. The HH-60G does not have a defensive system with the ability to penetrate into
modern missile envelopes and safely recover an isolated person. The APR-39Bv2 Radar
Warning Receiver presently installed on the HH-60G is an analog system with limited
processing capability. This system is not capable of displaying radio frequency (RF) threats
without ambiguity. HH-60G crews may need to operate within the RF threat engagement zones
to recover an isolated person. In order to operate in the RF threat environment, an integrated RF
jammer that inhibits the ability to engage the aircraft is also needed to increase
survivability. The HH-60G requires a precise, integrated defensive system that detects, jams and
defeats RF guided weapons. Crews also require training software integrated into the Electronic
Warfare Suite to effectively train for combat scenarios. Test Equipment is needed for all three
units for maintenance personnel to train on the equipment. The ANG requires one Radar
Warning Receiver with an integrated jammer for each of its eighteen HH-60G helicopters.
2. Source of Need. Lessons from current operations Personnel Recovery (PR) OPLAN and
CONPLANS require forces to penetrate near-peer contested airspace with advanced surface-to-
air threat systems to recover isolated personnel in contested environments; PR Core Function
Master Plan; Air Combat Command Validated AF Form 1067 10-252; ARC 2012-2013 ARC
WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Defensive System NRE (3600) N/A $2,000,000
3 Unit Test Equipment (3080) $58,400 $175,200
18 Radar Warning Receivers (3010) $1,240,000 $22,320,000
Total $24,495,200

93
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HH-60 MODERNIZED INTEGRATED DEFENSIVE SYSTEM SUITE / ADVANCED

THREAT PROTECTION
1. Background. HH-60G helicopters and crews have been lost while performing combat rescue
operations due to their inability to detect and react to hostile enemy fire. The HH-60G requires a
precise, hostile fire indicator integrated defensive system that detects and defeats current and
future threat systems such as small arms fire, Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs), and Man-
Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS). The current method employed to detect RPGs and
small arms fire is visual detection or radio notification from a ground party that does not provide
crews the required time to react and defeat enemy threats. Three dimensional (3D) audio
capability is required to integrate the audio warnings from a Missile Warning System, hostile fire
indicator, or Radar Warning Receiver, with communication and mission equipment. 3D audio
equipment will permit crews to rapidly return precise and immediate defensive fire, effectively
suppressing or destroying the enemy threat. Crews also require training software integrated into
the EW Suite to train for combat. The ANG requires one Hostile Fire Indicator and an ALQ-213
with 3D audio capability for each of its 18 HH-60G helicopters. 108 3D audio kits are required
to provide a device to all six personnel on the 18 ANG HH-60Gs.
2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from current operations Personnel Recovery (PR) OPLAN
and CONPLANS require forces to penetrate near-peer contested airspace with advanced surface-
to-air threat systems to recover isolated personnel in contested environments; PR Core Function
Master Plan; Air Combat Command Validated AF Form 1067 10-252; ARC WEPTAC
Conference 2012-2013; ARC WEPTAC Council 2014-2015.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Defensive System NRE (3600) N/A $2,000,000
Directional Audio NRE (3600) N/A $6,000,000
18 Hostile Fire Indicators (3010) $270,000 $4,860,000
108 3D Audio Kits (3010) $7,000 $756,000
3 Unit Test Equipment (3080) $58,400 $175,200
18 ALQ-213 w/3D Audio Kits (3010) $234,000 $4,212,000
Total $18,003,200

94
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HH-60 INTEGRATED FLIGHT DECK

1. Background. Combat and domestic operations require HH-60G crews to process a great deal
of information from many sources and they must do it quickly. To manage this information, the
current Smart Multi-Function Color Display installed on Air National Guard (ANG) and Air
Force Reserve Command HH-60Gs need to be fully integrated with Situational Awareness
Datalink (SADL), Lightweight Airborne Recovery System Version 12 (LARS), Air Force
Tactical Receive Segment-Ruggedized (AFTRS-R), Blue Force Tracker 2 (BFT2), Full Motion
Video (FMV), Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast (ADS-B) In/Out, and Link-
16. The capability to quickly access mission essential data from one centralized display will
enable HH-60G aircrews to reduce “heads down” time and vastly improve situational awareness.
Secure Internet Protocol data will enable aircrews to receive Near Real-Time BFT2 data and text
messaging from the battlefield. BFT2 is a modernized joint tracking system which is
cooperative with SADL and Link-16 and provides Beyond Line of Site interactive data
communication between aviation assets and Command and Control. ADS-B In/Out is a
cooperative surveillance technology which determines aircraft position, surrounding weather,
and flight information. Link-16 is a tactical data link which enables digital situational awareness
sharing. A securable multi-spectrum radio capable of supporting Soldier Radio Waveform
(SRW) ensures military and civil command authorities that rescue helicopters will be ready for
any and all relief operations. This also increases the Combat Search and Rescue capability by
filling an existing secure radio shortfall. The ANG requires one device for each of its 18 HH-
60Gs.
2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from current operations, Personnel Recovery OPLAN, and
CONPLANS, and Defense Support to Civil Authorities necessitate the requirement for
LOS/BLOS situational awareness and modernized communications management; Air Combat
Command Validated AF Form 1067 04-043, 05-078, 09-153 and 10-229; Combat Air Force
Urgent Operational Need 306-09; ARC WEPTAC Council 2012-2013; ARC WEPTAC
Conference 2014-2015
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
18 Full Motion Video (3010) $200,000 $3,600,000
18 Blue Force Tracker - 2 (3010) $100,000 $1,800,000
18 Link-16 (3010) $120,000 $2,160,000
18 ADS-B In/Out (3010) $30,000 $540,000
18 Soldier Radio Waveform (3010) $15,000 $270,000
Total $8,370,000

95
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HH-60 HELMET MOUNTED HEADS UP DISPLAY

1. Background. The addition of day and night helmet mounted cueing and display capability in
the HH-60G would significantly increase aircrew Situational Awareness (SA) and weapons
employment capability, enhance terminal area search and rescue operations, speed internal
communication during critical mission phases, and enable crews to safely land a helicopter in a
degraded visual environment (DVE). A Helmet Mounted Heads up Display Cueing System
(HMCS) allows all crewmembers to share information –minimizing voice
communication. Information must be integrated together between all crewmembers onboard the
aircraft, as well as crewmembers within the formation. Sensor and datalink symbols are visible
on the helmet mounted display superimposed over the geographic location of friendly, hostile,
and survivor positions. Additionally, the ability to display sensor pictures and datalink
information while maintaining a heads-up, eyes out posture will greatly enhance safety while
flying in the low-level (<500ft) environment. The display must also be available at night without
the use of NVGs. Information must be selectable (i.e., video feed, aircraft flight information,
SADL display, etc) per individual. Solutions are urgently needed for brown-out, white-out, and
other restricted visibility conditions, which can cause issues during helicopter landing and take-
off operations. Three-Dimensional (3D) Landing Zone (LZ) symbology integrated into HMCS
provides crews with sufficient situational awareness to maneuver the aircraft in reduced visibility
conditions. Helmet must be lightweight to reduce fatigue and not cause injury. Cables and
tethers for the helmet must not restrict freedom of movement in the cabin. The ANG requires
one Helmet Mounted Cueing System kit and 3D Landing Zone kit for each of its 18 HH-60G
helicopters. 108 helmets with the Helmet Mounted Cueing System capability and compatible
Night Vision units are required to provide a device to all six personnel on the 18 ANG HH-60Gs.
2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) Validated AF Form 1067 09-258; ARC
WEPTAC Conference 2012-2013; ARC WEPTAC Council 2014-2015; Critical Requirement;
Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF),
and INHERENT RESOLVE (OIR).
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
HMCS NRE (3600) N/A $6,000,000
18 HMCS Aircraft Kits (3010) $335,294 $6,035,292
108 HMCS Helmet Kits (3010) $87,843 $8,959,986
108 Night Vision Units (3010) $65,882 $7,115,256
3D Landing Zone (3600) N/A $20,000,000
18 3D Landing Zone Symbology (3010) $1,000,000 $18,000,000
Total $66,110,534

96
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

HH-60 AIRCRAFT WEAPONS MODERNIZATION

1. Background. The HH-60G has a requirement to provide defensive firepower to support
various combat mission operations often at the aircraft’s maximum gross weight. In order to
save weight while maintaining lethality, the HH-60G needs a lighter mini-gun. The GAU-2B is
the current 7.62 mm weapon system used on the HH-60G. The M134D-H mini-gun is a GAU-
2B weapon system that, once updated with the improved weapon components, will provide
overall weight savings and bring the weapon system to an up-to-date capability. Improved
weapons components include an ergonomic designed grip, safing sector housing cover, 3,000-
round firing trigger, direct current drive motor with battery and cable set, low-drag ammo feed
chute, titanium rotor assembly, rigid expended brass link chute, and a barrel clamp safety
retainer. These upgraded components provide increased corrosion protection, which is vital
based on the location of ARC HH-60G squadrons. The new system would also no longer rely on
an electronic control unit, permitting operation when AC power is unavailable. Removal of the
electronic control unit will increase cabin space, reduce aircraft overall gross weight, and permit
defensive firepower with a loss of aircraft AC power. Requirement is 2 per aircraft for 18 HH-
60Gs.
2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) Project 96-012A HH-60G Cabin
Configuration FOT&E Final Report dated Apr 1997, and Combat Air Forces (CAF) ORD 306-
00-I/II/III HH-60G Block 152 both state the requirement for a .50-caliber machine gun on the
Rescue HH-60Gs; ACC / CENTCOM C-MNS 02-501; Air Combat Command (ACC) Validated
AF Form 1067 08-115; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
36 M134D-H Minigun Components (3010) $30,000 $1,080,000
36 M134D-H Miniguns (3010) $60,000 $2,160,000
Total $3,240,000

97
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 KC-135
KC-135
 Air Refueling
 Aeromedical Evacuation
 Airlift
 ANG KC-135 Units Provide 44% of the Total Fleet

The KC-135 Stratotanker is Air Mobility

Command’s primary air refueling platform
providing approximately 87 percent of air
refueling in support of US, allied, and coalition
military aircraft. The KC-135 supports
deployment, employment, sustainment, and
redeployment of joint forces across the full
range of military operations including nuclear
warfare, routine military activities and irregular
warfare. The KC-135 is tasked to operate close
to high-threat areas. Defensive systems are
necessary to prevent shoulder-fired surface-to-air
missile systems from destroying aircraft during
takeoff, landing, and in low altitude flight over
mountainous terrain. Tactical data link
technologies and situational awareness displays
that bring real-time threat information, as well as
secure radio capability, greatly enhance KC-135
air refueling, airlift, and aeromedical evacuation
missions.

Tab K

99
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 KC-135
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Advanced Infrared Countermeasures Defensive Systems
 Common MAF Mission Computer
 External Overt/Covert Lighting
 Aircraft Ground Cooling Capability
 Jam-Resistant Global Positioning System

Essential Capabilities List

 Quick Reaction Handbook
 Block 45 Electronic Engine Instrument Display Integrated Handset Control Software
 Fuel Tank Fire Explosion Protection
 Digital Radar Warning Receiver
 Advanced Radio Frequency Countermeasures Defensive System

Desired Capabilities List

 Improved Crew Bunks
 Soft Basket Quick Connect Boom Drogue Adapter

100
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 ADVANCED INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES DEFENSIVE SYSTEMS

1. Background. Changes in tactics place KC-135 aircraft in high threat areas. Missions such as
low altitude refueling and forward positioning subject the KC-135 to increasingly hostile
environments. This threat environment is widely populated with shoulder-fired, infrared (IR)
based man-portable air defenses (MANPADs). MANPADs are a significant threat during
takeoffs, landings, and low-altitude refueling missions. Due to mission constraints, an advanced
IR countermeasures system that does not rely on pyrotechnic expendables is needed to counter
MANPAD threats.
2. Source of Need. Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) ORD 314-92, Aug
1998; LAIRCM Equipage Study; AMC Requirements and Planning Council; AF Form 1067
AMC 10-137 and 12-053; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP,
TN UT
141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 186 ARW Key Fld, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $10,000,000
180 Group A Kits (3010) $500,000 $90,000,000
42 Group B Kits (3010) $1,600,000 $67,200,000
Total $167,200,000

101
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

COMMON MAF MISSION COMPUTER

1. Background. Recent combat operations highlighted the need for comprehensive, networked
command and control (C2) throughout all theaters of operation. A robust, secure, tactical data
link (TDL) provides this C2 link and maximizes KC-135 aircrew situational awareness with
beyond line-of sight and line-of-sight capabilities. TDL provides critical real-time information to
KC-135 aircrews such as friendly aircraft position, weather conditions, and hostile threat
locations. This greatly increases the KC-135’s ability to effectively participate in the present day
network-centric battlespace. These C2 elements provide for near-real-time monitoring of mission
events, mission status, task completion, and resource status. TDL also enhances the situational
awareness of all participant aircraft, including tanker aircraft, receiver aircraft, joint and coalition
network participants. The capability is needed for all 180 aircraft and 198 radios includes spares.
2. Source of Need. Draft annex to Tanker Operational Requirement Document (AF/A5R);
Mobility Air Forces Network Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; AMC MAF Data link Integration
Technical Requirements Document, 25 Oct 2006; TDL Transformation CDD, Increment 1,
JROCM, 23 Jun 2004; AMC Requirements and Planning Council; AF Form 1067 AMC 11-143;
2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP,
TN UT
141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 186 ARW Key Fld, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $9,000,000
180 Group A Kits (3010) $120,000 $21,600,000
198 TDL Radios and Processors* (3010) $380,000 $75,240,000
Total $105,840,000
*Includes 10% spares

102
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 EXTERNAL OVERT/COVERT LIGHTING

1. Background. Current KC-135 exterior lighting does not meet military specification
illumination standards. This deficiency has been highlighted during ground testing conducted by
the Air Force Research Lab. By replacing the existing incandescent lighting with updated Light
Emitting Diode (LED) lighting, the KC-135 combat and peacetime operations benefit in three
areas: safety, survivability, and sustainability. LED lighting increases safety by making the
aircraft easier to see during ground and airborne operations. The covert mode allows KC-135
crews the ability to operate in accordance with operational requirements. Covert lighting
drastically reduces the potential of a mid-air collision, which has been highlighted as a safety
concern during night combat missions. The upgraded lighting increases mean time between
failures (MTBF) from 40 to 60 hours for incandescent bulbs to over 10,000 hours with LEDs.
This reduces supply costs and decreases maintenance requirements. 198 external overt/covert
light kits are required to install on all 180 ANG KC-135s and provide one spare kit at each ANG
KC-135 base.

2. Source of Need. AMC Requirements and Planning Council; AF Form 1067 AMC 10-044;
ARC 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP,
TN UT
141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 186 ARW Key Fld, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
198 LED Light Kits (3010) $70,000 $13,860,000
Total $13,860,000

103
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 AIRCRAFT GROUND COOLING CAPABILITY

1. Background. KC-135 aircraft have no cockpit or cabin cooling when below 2,000 feet above
ground level, which is the point at which the cockpit becomes pressurized and cooling systems
become effective. Temperatures at deployed locations routinely result in cockpit temperatures of
140° F and cargo compartment temperatures of 170° F. Crews generally spend greater than one
hour in these conditions, which is not conducive to mission accomplishment. Ground cooling
carts are the primary method for temperature reduction. Ground cooling carts are removed prior
to engine start and are not usable if mission delays occur. Roll-on/roll-off Vapor cycle air
conditioning units placed onboard can provide ground cooling. These ground cooling units can
produce 24,000 British Thermal Units (BTUs) of cooling at 600 cubic feet per minute;
approximately a normal house-sized air conditioner, within normal aircraft power and weight
requirements. This system provides crews and aircraft a more robust operating capability,
reduces crew fatigue, and minimizes unsafe temperature conditions. 107 aircraft ground cooling
kits are required to provide a cooling capability for 60% of the ANG KC-135 fleet. The ground
cooling kits are a roll-on/roll-off system that will ensure a ground cooling capability is available
when required.

2. Source of Need. AMC AF Form 1067 06-131; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014
ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP,
TN UT
141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 186 ARW Key Fld, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
107 Ground Cooling Units (3010) $40,000 $4,280,000
Total $4,280,000

104
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 JAM-RESISTANT GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM

1. Background. Current employment tactics place KC-135 aircraft in high threat areas. Forward
positioning, forward air refueling and other missions subject the KC-135 to increasingly hostile
operational environments. Precise navigation is essential and ensures the KC-135 remains within
designated safe areas of operation. ANG KC-135 aircraft do not possess jam-resistant GPS
processors. Primary navigation relies on Global Positioning System (GPS); therefore, the KC-
135 requires a robust jam-resistant GPS-based navigation system. To equip all ANG KC-135s
each aircraft requires two GPS antennas and two electronic units. There are currently 170 KC-
135s in the ANG inventory, therefore 340 GPS antennas and electronic units are required for the
fleet. The additional 17 GPS antennas and electronic units provide spares at the 17 ANG KC-
135 locations.
2. Source of Need. 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP,
TN UT
141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 186 ARW Key Fld, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $1,000,000
357 GPS Antennas (3010) $34,878 $12,451,446
357 Electronic Units* (3010) $30,139 $10,759,623
Total $24,211,069
*Includes 10% spares

105
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 Logistics
Logistics
Air National Guard (ANG) logistics is integral to all
combat and mobility air forces, affecting each of
the Mission Design Series (MDS) represented at
WEPTAC. The ANG logistics team accomplishes
sustainment tasks ranging from aircraft
maintenance and inventory management, to traffic
management and petroleum, oils, and lubricants
management. Maintainers and logisticians are key
to getting people and supplies to where they need to
be, when they need to be there, to generate sorties
supporting domestic response and overseas
contingency operations.

The ANG operates and maintains many of the

oldest aircraft in the Air Force
inventory. Aircraft support and test equipment
is critical to daily maintenance operations at all
ANG flying units. Much of the equipment used
in testing aircraft systems is nearing the end of
its designed life, and is increasingly difficult to
sustain and expensive to repair.

Equipment such as the maintenance inspection

platforms, leak detectors, and digital test
equipment reduce aircraft downtime, allow
logistics personnel to maintain a high rate of
sortie generation, and ensure the longevity,
relevance, reliability, and responsiveness of the
aging fleet.
Tab L

107
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Logistics
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
 USM-670 Couplers
Critical Capabilities List  Secondary Power Tester F-15
 Dual Rail Assembly Tester
 Multi-MDS Portable Aircraft
 TTU-205 Replacement
Maintenance Stands
 Cabin Pressure Tester
 Multi-MDS Articulating Boom/Man-
Lift  LITENING TGP Power Box
 JSTARS Flight Control Surface
Removal/Installation Device Desired Capabilities List
 HH-60 Cribbing
 HH-60 Engine Test Cell  Wireless Intercom System
 Multi-MDS Active Bus Tester  Scissor Lift
 Multi-MDS Fuel Cell Leak Detector  Enhanced Structural Repair
 HH-60 Rescue Hoist Test Set  Aux/Ext Fuel Tank Storage
 Multi-MDS Improved  Improved Electronic Diagnostics
Armament/Smart Weapons Pre-Load  Thermal Imaging
Tester  Cockpit Engine Instrument Tester
 Multi-MDS SATCOM Tester  Improved Fire Loop Tester
 Multi-MDS Avionics Back Shop  C-300 Bottom Loading
Tester
 Electronic Bomb Lift Equipment
 Isochronal Inspection and
Maintenance Stands
 Multi-MDS Situation Awareness
Datalink Tester
 Multipurpose Lifting Device

Essential Capabilities List

 Universal Hydraulic Test Stands
 Fall Protection greater than 4 feet
 Improved Loading Ramps
 Equipment Transport Trailer
 75kw Flightline Generator
 Power Transformer/Rectifier
 Alternative Towbarless Tow Vehicle
 Engine Installation And Removal
Vehicle
 670A RWR Tester

108
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS PORTABLE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE STANDS

1. Background. Current B-series maintenance stands no longer meet Air Force Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (AFOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), or American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards. Many stands in use are
over 40 years old and require frequent maintenance repair actions to maintain their
serviceability. These B-series stands are critical to accomplishing periodic inspection
maintenance requirements, but are not inherently safe due to the lack of fall protection, fall
arrest, and rescue capabilities. Maintenance personnel require deployable self-supporting
maintenance platforms that are towable, easily transportable, and eliminate fall protection
concerns associated with the use of legacy B-series stands. The multi-MDS improved portable
aircraft maintenance stand capability required is inherently safe and comes equipped with fall
protection measures throughout, including fall arrest and self-rescue devices. In order to meet
the needs of multiple airframes, the maintenance stands must be equipped with height leveling to
accommodate uneven floors, have height adjustments of less than or equal to 48 inches (4 feet)
through greater or equal to 192 inches (16 feet), and have adjustable decks measuring 54 by 130
inches to 78 by 130 inches. The minimum working load of the stand should be no less than1000
pounds at all working heights, in order to allow for multiple maintainers with equipment. The
stand’s maintenance platform should be accessible via built-in stairs throughout the entire range
of height adjustment on this system and permit maintenance personnel to transport components
and tools without hoisting or overhead lifting. In order to support deployment, these stands
must have a smaller footprint than the B-series stands, and completely collapse for easy roll-on
roll-off air transportability. Specifically designed Davit fall arrest and fall restraint systems
must be part of the stand design, meeting ANSI Z359.6 standards for engineered systems in
order to permit maintenance personnel limited access off the stand to structural surfaces while all
fall protection is maintained. Projected logistics requirement for each flying wing is estimated
between three and six of these stands.
2. Source of Need. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards, 29 CFR
1910 Subpart D; American National Standards Institute Standards Z359.6; 2013-2015 ARC
WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted. All ANG Flying units

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
307 Multi-MDS Portable Aircraft Maintenance $55,000 $16,885,000
Stand (3080)
Total $16,885,000

109
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS ARTICULATING BOOM/MAINTAINER-LIFT

1. Background. Current maintenance operations depend upon equipment with outdated
technology or inadequate safety devices. Current maintenance man lift equipment exceeds 20
years of age, and no longer meets Air Force Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(AFOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) standards. The Mobility Air Force aircraft fleet has working height
requirements that exceed existing maintenance man lift capabilities for activities such as life raft
changes, emergency locator transmitter (ELT) maintenance, aircraft structural integrity program
(ASIP) inspections, and additional work above the wing. Units have daily requirements to use
man lifts to accomplish maintenance tasks. Maintenance activities currently use man lifts with
no fall protection capability while performing maintenance activities outside hangars and/or
flightline maintenance operations that exceed 38 feet in height. A man lift with a horizontal
reach greater than 40 feet and a vertical reach exceeding 80 feet is required. The maintenance
man lift facilitates: tail maintenance actions, including horizontal stabilizer repairs or remove
and replace activities, life raft changes, ELT maintenance, ASIP inspections, and additional work
above the wing. Man lift must have certified built-in fall protection, meet AFOSH, OSHA, and
ANSI Standards, as well as all requirements spelled out in AFI 91-203. The logistics community
needs one articulating boom/maintainer lift at each base with mobility aircraft, which totals 47.
2. Source of Need. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards, 29 CFR
1910 Subpart D; American National Standards Institute Standards Z359.6; 2014 - 2015 ARC
WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY
106 RQW Gabreski Airport, NY 108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 109 AW Schenectady Co APT, NY
113 FW JB Andrews, MD 117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT
121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS, OH 123 AW Louisville, KY 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL
127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, TN
136 AW Forth Worth JRB, TX 137 AW Will Rogers Wld APT, OK 139 AW Rosecrans Mem APT, MO
143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 146 AW Channel Islands AGS, CA
152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 153 AW Cheyenne MPT, WY 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI
155 ARW Lincoln MAP, NE 156 AW Muniz AB, PR 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH
161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor IAP, 164 AW Memphis IAP, TN 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA
AZ
166 AW New Castle County AP, DE 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK
179 AW Mansfield-Lahm APT, OH 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL 185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, IA
186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
47 High Reach Maintainer Lift (3080) $200,000 $9,400,000
Total $9,400,000

110
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

JSTARS FLIGHT CONTROL SURFACE REMOVAL/INSTALLATION DEVICE

1. Background. In 2013, the E-8C Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) interval was
extended from an 18- to 24-month cycle. In order to extend this cycle, field units have to
perform additional Supplemental Structural Inspections and Service Bulletins during the
Isochronal (ISO) Inspection. There are approximately 15 to 20 inspections required, which
increases the workload as it relates to flight control surface removal. In addition to the
inspections in ISO, the workload on the flight line for removing flight control surfaces has also
increased as a result of the aging fleet. The Air Force does not have a standard crane to meet the
maintenance requirements for E-8C aircraft. In most cases, the cranes are rented or borrowed,
causing significant maintenance delays due to the lead time required to get the crane on site. For
the last 15 years, the E-8C maintenance activity has borrowed a crane from the Robins AFB
Depot; and depot management requires that two depot employees operate the crane for the E-8C
maintenance personnel. It can take anywhere from 24 hours to one week to coordinate the use of
the crane. This results in a significant increase of aircraft downtime and degradation of mission
effectiveness. Due to the increase in required crane use, maintenance can no longer afford the
delays and needs its own crane to better support the mission and decrease the down time created
by the process of leasing or borrowing a crane. The crane must be capable of operating in open
areas, across rough terrain, and in austere weather conditions. It will require a rugged structure
for a versatile response, a 30-foot boom horizontal extension, and a 2500 pound operating load
capacity.
2. Source of Need. E-8C PDM and ISO requirements, 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 Multipurpose Lifting Device (3080) $84,000 $168,000
Total $168,000

111
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

HH-60 CRIBBING
1. Background. HH-60 aircraft require the use of shoring kits (cradles) to support the aircraft in
a stable and level configuration with weight off the landing gear to inspect, maintain and replace
structural components, execute hoist repairs, perform phase maintenance, correct damage, and
support depot-level repair maintenance. TO 1H-60(H)G-2-6 authorizes the local manufacture or
procurement of cradles. Locally manufactured cradles are typically made of wood and are not
adjustable. Some hangar floors are built with intentional slope for drainage, which makes
leveling difficult. An improved HH-60 cradle system provides the maintainer with a rugged,
adjustable cradle kit that allows for quick airframe leveling and easy set-up and break-
down. The kit consists of a Folding Adjustable Tail Stand, three Airframe Stands, and a Cabin-
to-Tail Section Support Stand. Additionally, a Pylon Support Stand, which is used to support the
tail pylon when removed from the airframe to facilitate maintenance, is needed. The cradle
system must be safe, reusable, and enable maintenance personnel to complete HH-60 inspections
and maintenance. There is no current Air Force effort to modernize the HH-60 cradle
system. This equipment will be sustained at the field level and no additional manpower or
support equipment requirements are anticipated. Two cribbing sets are recommended per unit,
plus one additional as a spare.
2. Source of Need. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards, 29 CFR
1910 Subpart D; 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 maintenance stands and
platforms industry day.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski Airport, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
7 HH-60 Cradle Systems (3080) $20,000 $140,000
Total $140,000

112
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

HH-60 ENGINE TEST CELL

1. Background. Air National Guard HH-60 units lack ability to test their GE T700 engines after
repairs have been made. HH-60 units package and ship their engines to a repair facility to be
tested, or install the engine on the helicopter and hover a few feet off the ground to determine if
it’s serviceable. Shipping engines to a repair facility and receiving an engine in return takes
between three to five days in the continental United States, and well over a week for overseas
locations, and requires two to three maintainers to travel with the engines. The process of
shipping the engine requires the use of operation and maintenance funds as well as the use of
engine shop manpower to transport the engines to a contracted repair center. This reduces the
amount of available manpower to work other engine issues and prolongs the time it takes to
determine if an engine is serviceable after a repair. Units do not have the ability to test
overhauled engines before installing them onto the aircraft; this has resulted in occasions where
engine problems are not discovered until after installation, and resulted in engines needing to be
removed again for further trouble-shooting. Also, catastrophic loss of the engine during
troubleshooting while installed could cause considerable damage to the aircraft, as well as to the
engine. The ability to test uninstalled HH-60 engines at the unit will increase engine availability,
reduce engine repair man-hours, and improve safety, which all lead to greater aircraft availability
and mission accomplishment.
2. Source of Need. 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski Airport, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
3 HH-60 Engine Test Stands (3080) $6,000,000 $18,000,000
Total $18,000,000

113
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS ACTIVE BUS TESTER

1. Background. The Bus Characterization and Integrity Toolset (BCIT) tester provides the
capability to rapidly and accurately troubleshoot aircraft 1553 bus issues while the aircraft
systems are powered. It is a portable, ruggedized analyzer designed to test, analyze cables, and
monitor operations of a MIL-STD-1153 data bus network. The software toolset maps any MIL-
STD-1153 data bus network and can act as a bus controller. The BCIT can also be used as a
Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) to find the distance to wiring faults (opens or shorts). The
BCIT’s software is customizable within the Windows operating system, permitting future
integration of additional MIL-STD BUS’s. The tester’s embedded software enable users to save
and recall bus topology, test data, and historical references that can be used later for preventative
maintenance and prognostics of an airframe’s BUS. The TDR function provides guidance to
maintenance personnel to within six inches of a fault in wiring. The ANG is working with Air
Force Research Labs to acquire these bus testers on existing ANG airframes that utilize the MIL-
STD-1553 bus. The Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) system program
office approved this device on the E-8C, and the ANG plans to adapt the capability to other
airframes such as the C-17 and KC-135 aircraft. The ANG is leading an effort to test the BCIT
on additional mission and design series aircraft. Logistics recommends two BCITs per wing of
E-8C, C-17, and KC-135.
2. Source of Need. 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL
OH
127 WG Selfridge AGB, MI 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT,
TN
145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, 154 WG JB Pearl Harbor-
NC UT Hickam, HI
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
164 AW Memphis IAP, TN 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 186 ARW Key Fld, MS 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
48 BCIT Bus Testers (3080) $70,000 $3,360,000
NRE (3080) N/A $600,000
Total $3,960,000

114
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS FUEL CELL LEAK DETECTOR

1. Background. Current methods require technicians to refuel aircraft to determine the validity
of a fuel system repair. If a leak is still noted, the aircraft must be defueled, repaired, and then
refueled again to check the validity of the repair. The Hydrogen Leak Detector (HLD) uses
tracer gas to identify fuel leaks, enabling maintenance personnel to trouble shoot and repair these
leaks in a fraction of the time compared to legacy tools and methods. In addition, HLD reduces
the physical footprint of the fuel cell equipment needs. The ANG is purchasing HLD equipment
for F-16 maintenance, and is also moving to buy the HLD for other aircraft in the ANG
fleet. The basic HLD requires an accessory kit for optimum utilization. The accessory kit
includes a low-pressure regulator, a calibrated leak (used to calibrate the HLD in the field),
various nozzles and rubber adapters used for blow-back procedures, and aircraft pressurization
adapters. Current estimates place need of two testing units per aircraft wing.
2. Source of Need. 2011-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 117 ARW Birmingham APT, AL 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS
IA
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 186 ARW Key Fld, MS 108 WG Joint Base MDL, NJ
155 ARW Lincoln MPT, NE 157 ARW Pease AGS, NH 121 ARW Rickenbacker AGS,
OH
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 134 ARW McGhee-Tyson APT, 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK
TN
138 FW Tulsa IAP, OK 180 FW Toledo Express AP, OH 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ
169 FW McEntire AGS, SC 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 158 FW Burlington IAP, VT
151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA
UT
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 114 FW Joe Foss Fld, SD 113 FW JB Andrews, MD
154 WG JB Pearl Harbor- 127 WG Selfridge AGB, MI 187 FW Dannelly Fld, AL
Hickam, HI
149 FW Kelly Fld, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
153 Hydrogen Leak Detector (3080) $33,000 $5,049,000
306 Hydrogen Leak Detector MDS Accessory $4,500 $1,377,000
Kits (3080)
NRE (3080) N/A $150,000
Total $6,576,000
*Only KC-135 Units and F-16 units are listed because approval to use on other MDS is pending; plan is to adapt
across all airframes.

115
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

HH-60 RESCUE HOIST TEST AND MAINTENANCE SET

1. Background. A commercially available automated cable testing and maintenance system can
be adapted to the HH-60 hoist cable. A rescue hoist tester needs to provide: the ability to
tension the wire rope on the cable drum and ensure proper wrap layering; condition a new cable
as part of its initial installation on a hoist; magnetically inspect a cable and provide a permanent
record of its condition; ability to wash, dry and lubricate the cable; store the cable in an
unstressed state that facilitates removal and storage of the cable; perform everything mentioned
with only one operator; operate in a remote location without any external power, water or air
supply; and can be transported manually or by using ground carts or forklifts. An HH-60 rescue
hoist cable tester enables hoist maintainers to detect indications of internal and external
anomalies on the cable more quickly and make a determination on whether the wire rope should
remain in service until the next inspection. A rescue hoist cable tester not only provides cable
conditioning and inspection more efficiently, it also can be used with the 600-pound hook test
per TM 1-1520-280-23. All of these capabilities reduce the time and manpower required to
sustain rescue hoists, and lead to more efficient and safe rescue hoist cable maintenance.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
6 Rescue hoist Ground Support Equipment $65,000 $390,000
(3080)
2 Adapter for Ski Equipped HH-60 (3080) $5,000 $10,000
Total $400,000

116
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS IMPROVED ARMAMENT/SMART WEAPONS PRE-LOAD TESTER

1. Background. A replacement for the pre-load armament tester, also known as a stray voltage
50/60 tester, is needed. The replacement of existing, obsolete and uneconomical-to-repair pre-
load testers with an enhanced model that retains the basic functions allows interaction with the
aircraft weapons bus and perform operational checks of multiple breeches at the same
time. Additionally, the tester must provide the capability to emulate smart weapons on
stations. The replacement, a digital armament circuit preload test set (ACPTS), will be used
prior to loading munitions to ensure the presence of firing voltage only when appropriate. This
ensures the system is in a safe state prior to installation of ejection carts. The voltage detector
shall be a reusable, repairable, hand held tester. It shall verify the absence of stray voltage on
critical aircraft circuitry in an un-energized state, the presence of voltage in an energized state,
and the presence of a voltage under load for firing electro-explosive devices. The voltage
detector shall have the capability to perform tests and display the results of the test through the
use of switches, indicators, and a numeric display. The voltage detector shall have the ability to
perform a self-test of its own circuitry and an adapter test of interface cables and adapters to
ensure correct operation of the test set. The ACPTS shall contain any MDS-specific accessories
necessary to perform functions listed as system requirements on aircraft guns and racks. Need
estimated at four per Close Air Support unit and an average of one spare per two units.
2. Source of Need. 2011-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted. All ANG CAF units

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
160 Armament Circuit Preload Test Set (3080) $30,000 $4,840,000
Total $4,840,000

117
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS SATCOM TESTER

1. Background. The Aeroflex 3515AR test set provides the maintainer a new tool to evaluate the
aircraft Radio Frequency (RF)systems over-the-air, saving man-hours and reducing erroneous
receiver and transmitter removals. However, the test set lacks accessories that enable the test set
to be used over-the-air and in the direct connect mode coupled with scripting that automates the
entire process. Without the accessories and scripting the maintainer cannot use the equipment
effectively on aircraft radio maintenance, increasing down time. The accessory kit contains 2
crossover cables for loading MDS specific scripts into the 3515AR; a new connector for the
ARC-210, 3 broadband antennas that cover the entire frequency range of the test set when used
for ARC 164, ARC 190 and ARC 210 radios eliminating the need to continually change antennas
during testing of specific frequencies; 1 script CD, a placard for all 3515AR connectors and 2
supplemental adapter kit documents detailing turn-in instructions. Integrated software for the
Aeroflex 3515AR provides an automated user interface with on-screen instructions and
automated test functionality to simplify and expedite test capabilities of the 3515AR. The
accessory kit items along with the scripting enable a maintainer to conduct standoff testing of
any radio frequency (RF) system and get instant details on system integrity; such as specific
details (radio power output and frequency deviation) when completing "like" tests of the specific
radio and frequency in question. If a failure is verified on ARC 164 and 210 radios during over-
the-air tests, the test set can connect directly to the receiver/transmitter terminal and wire path in
question to run the troubleshooting test, which will inform the maintainer with pass fail results
for the radio, wire path and the antenna. Anticipate a need of two Aeroflex kits per flying wing.
2. Source of Need. 2011-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted. All ANG Flying units

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
176 Aeroflex Kits (3080) $10,000 $1,760,000
NRE (3080) N/A $300,000
Total $2,060,000

118
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS AVIONICS BACK SHOP TESTER

1. Background. Improved Avionics Intermediate Stations (IAIS) are critical to maintenance
troubleshooting and repair capabilities at ANG units. However, the current IAIS equipment has
reached the end of its designed useful life. It faces diminishing manufacturing sources that
causes increased difficulties in procuring and maintaining the current systems, which causes
maintenance delays and reduces fully mission capable (FMC) rates. The very high speed
improved avionics intermediate station (VXI-IAIS), a mid-life upgrade to the current system,
rectifies these issues. VXI-IAIS eliminates diminishing manufacturing source issues and
provides room for the future expansion and sustainability of repairable assets. VXI-IAIS
provides onsite repair capability and assists validation and verification of unserviceable Line
Replaceable Units (LRUs). VXI-IAIS equipment not only saves countless man hours in
troubleshooting and on-sight repair, it also reduces unnecessary asset replacement costs and
depot retests of serviceable components, saving the ANG millions of dollars annually. In
addition, VXI-IAIS reduces the physical footprint of the IAIS, which increases unit deployment
capabilities. There are currently eight test stations remaining in the ANG at A-10 units that
require this upgrade.
2. Source of Need. 2011-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
127 WG Selfridge AGB, MI 175 WG Martin State APT, MD 122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN
124 FW Boise Air Term, ID

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
8 VXI-IAIS Upgrade Kit (3080) $2,000,000 $16,000,000
Total $16,000,000

119
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

ELECTRONIC BOMB LIFT EQUIPMENT

1. Background. Combat Air Force (CAF) Load crew exposure to the munitions jammer (MJ-
1B/C) diesel engine emissions can cause headaches and dizziness can lead to long-term health-
related issues. A common practice at northern tier locations is to use the diesel jammers with
hanger doors closed during winter. Closing hangar doors prevents adequate ventilation and
increases exposure to contaminants. Procurement of updated equipment enhances maintenance
efficiency and safety while improving aircraft availability. The MJ-1E electric bomb lift truck,
improves load crew effectiveness and safety by eliminating noise and pollution from diesel
engines. This equipment is identical to the current munitions jammer used by the Air Force
except the drive train consists of a 240-volt direct current 8-horsepower electric motor, onboard
battery management system (charger), two trays of ten 12-volt Optima dry-cell batteries that are
wired in series, and other minor associated components. Physical dimensions and operational
characteristics of the MJ-1E are identical to the MJ-1B, MJ-1C, and MJ-1B/C, including lift
capacity, table dimensions, table configuration capabilities, lift arm limits and performance, and
vehicle speed and braking specifications. The MJ-1E onboard battery charger requires standard
industrial 220-volt alternating current 3-phase power that is commonly available in aerospace
ground equipment (AGE) shops and weapons load hangars. The charging system regulates
incoming current and terminates charge when batteries are fully charged. It does not require
external support equipment except for a power cord to connect it to the AC power source. Two
to three MJ-1E electric bomb lift trucks are needed to safely support load crew training and
operational needs at each CAF unit in the Air National Guard. Each unit will have a mix of
electric and diesel powered MJ bomb lift trucks to support their Wing’s missions. Independent
air quality testing showed levels of diesel particulate matter (DPM) from the diesel MJ-1
exceeded the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) standard by
approximately three and a half times. Air Force munitions systems specialists are regularly
exposed to this jammer’s diesel exhaust. Use of the MJ-1E eliminates the exhaust fumes from
the diesel jammers and reduces the noise, which enhances communication and safety among load
crew members.
2. Source of Need. Presidential Directive on Energy Conservation; 2011-2015 ARC WEPTAC
Conference
3. Units Impacted. All ANG CAF units

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
62 Munitions Loaders MJ-1E (3080) $140,000 $8,680,000
Total $8,680,000
*CAF Flying Units

120
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

ISOCHRONAL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE STANDS

1. Background. The Air National Guard does not possess C-17 home station check (HSC)
inspection stands. C-17 aircraft maintenance is accomplished using a mix of ladders and B-
series stands. These maintenance workaround activities do not meet Air Force Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (AFOSH) or Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) standards. Current KC-135 isochronal (ISO) inspection stands no longer meet AFOSH
or OSHA standards, since many are over 40 years old and require frequent maintenance actions
and numerous man-hours to maintain their serviceability. Additionally, no standard KC-135 ISO
stand exists in the Air Force inventory, and because of do not have a centrally managed supply
chain for replacement parts. Stand sets for the C-17 and KC-135 are critical to accomplishing
periodic inspection requirements, since C-17 maintenance workarounds and KC-135 stand
maintenance delay completion of inspection requirements. Full wing and engine stands and
platforms are critical for C-17 HSCs, and full wing, nose, and cargo door platforms are critical to
accomplishing KC-135 ISOs. Inspection platforms and stands provide the capability to perform
maintenance actions in conjunction with the inspection process. The stands must be safe,
incorporate enhanced fall protection measures, and allow maintainers to complete aircraft
specific tasks more efficiently; stands incorporate power, lighting, and pneumatics to the point of
use, enabling maintainers to more effectively complete inspections and maintenance in a reduced
time frame, leading to increased aircraft availability and enhanced mission effectiveness. By
standardizing stands for maintenance activities, a smaller, more efficient supply chain with
common parts and stock numbers can be established.
2. Source of Need. AFOSH and OSHA Standards; 29 CFR 1910 Subpart D; 2013-2015 ARC
WEPTAC Conference; 2014 Stands and Platforms industry day.
3. Units Impacted.
101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 105 AW Stewart IAP, NY 108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ
117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, 126 ARW Scott AFB, IL
OH
127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 134 ARW McGee Tyson AP, TN
145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI
NC UT
155 ARW Lincoln MAP, NE 157 ARW Pease AP, NH 161 ARW Phoenix-Sky Harbor
IAP, AZ
164 AW Memphis IAP, TN 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK
171 ARW Pittsburg IAP, PA 172 AW Jackson IAP, MS 176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK
186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS 185 ARW Sioux Gateway APT,
IA

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
6 C-17 Platforms and Stands (3080) $4,000,000 $24,000,000
9 KC-135 Platforms and Stands (3080) $2,000,000 $18,000,000
Total $42,000,000

121
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTI-MDS SITUATION AWARENESS DATALINK TESTER

1. Background. The installation of situation awareness datalink (SADL) on C-130 and HH-60
aircraft has created a requirement for maintenance support equipment needed to perform
operational checks, troubleshooting, and radio firmware loading. The drawdown of F-16 aircraft
has made some existing SADL support equipment (SSE) available to the C-130 community as an
interim solution. However, the existing SSE is slowly becoming obsolete due to its aging and
diminishing maintenance sources. There is also a growing need to provide additional support
equipment with the same capability to maintenance organizations to maintain SADL-equipped
aircraft. Advanced technology allows for a more compact and transportable solution, which
makes some of the existing SADL equipment obsolete and changes the way software and
firmware is loaded. An example is the replacement of the user readout unit (URO) with a virtual
URO embedded within the SADL software. This new capability makes it possible to sustain
multiple platforms with Common SSE (CSSE). The only variation necessary is the host Ethernet
cable, which is specific to the model of radio receiver transmitter (R/T) being used. The CSSE
consists of a wheeled transport/storage case, enhanced dual power adaptor (EDPA), EDPA AC
power cable, manpack antenna, two attenuators (40Db), a commercially-available laptop with
DVD/CD Reader/Writer, radio frequency cable (20ft), and Ethernet cables for SADL R/T 1719,
1720 and 1915. Two CSSE per C-130 unit provides the necessary tools and accessories,
enabling maintenance personnel to trouble shoot and repair SADL-equipped aircraft faster than
using the legacy SSE.
2. Source of Need. 2013-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 106 RQW Gabreski Airport, NY 109 AW Schenectady Co APT,
NY
120 AW Great Falls IAP, MT 123 AW Louisville, KY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA
130 AW Yeager APT, WV 133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 136 AW Forth Worth JRB, TX
139 AW St. Joseph AP, MO 143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP,
NC
146 AW Channel Islands AGS, 152 AW Reno IAP, NV 153 AW Cheyenne MAP, WY
CA
156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA 166 AW New Castle APT, DE
176 WG Elmendorf AFB, AK 179 AW Mansfield RAP, OH 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL
189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR 193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
49 Common SADL Support Equipment (3080)*) $11,225 $550,025
Total $550,025
* Includes 5 percent spares

122
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

MULTIPURPOSE LIFTING DEVICE

1. Background. Current maintenance operations routinely depend upon equipment with
technology from the 1970s and 1980s, or specifically designed for other purposes such as the
commercial cranes that are leased for assembling remotely piloted aircraft (RPA). This
equipment is cumbersome and requires workarounds, is expensive to operate and lease, and often
causes significant safety concerns because it is not specifically designed with the RPA mission in
mind. The Air Force does not have a standard crane for performing many of the routine
maintenance activities required to maintain the currently fielded RPAs. In most cases, the cranes
are acquired through short term leases, but access varies on equipment availability. This lead
time required to get suitable equipment causes significant maintenance delays. Sometimes it
takes days, and other times it takes weeks to acquire the necessary crane suitable for the
maintenance required. These cranes are used in a variety of maintenance activities from
operational checks to packing and unpacking of the aircraft. A ruggedized multi-use telescopic
material handling crane, capable of efficiently performing all required RPA maintenance actions
is needed to ensure maximum aircraft availability on a daily basis. A crane is required for the
majority of maintenance actions, including aircraft setup, software upgrades, testing or replacing
landing gear servos, and various operational checks. The ruggedized multi-use telescopic
material handler crane will meet all the lifting requirements and will also be capable of operating
in open areas, across rough terrain, and in austere weather conditions. It will require a rugged
structure for a versatile response, a 30-foot horizontal extension, a 41-foot vertical extension, and
a minimum operating load capacity of 12,500-pounds. This crane is also required at each of the
units that possess a geographically separated Launch and Recovery Element (LRE).
2. Source of Need. 2014 - 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
118 ISRG Nashville, TN 119 WG Fargo, ND* 147 RW Ellington Field JRB, TX*
162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ 163 RW March ARB, CA* 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY*
178 ISRG Springfield, OH 214 RG Tucson, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834, 52844, 72834, 207133

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
12 Multipurpose Lifting Device (3080) $300,000 $3,600,000
Total $3,600,000

* Also required at units LRE

123
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Page Intentionally Left Blank

124
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Overview
Intelligence, Surveillance, and
Reconnaissance
RC-26B Condor - The RC-26B provides manned Incident
Awareness and Assessment (IAA) and Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capability with
11 aircraft in two configurations: Block 20 and Block 25.
Additionally, the Air National Guard has acquired two C-
26As that will be upgraded to the fleet baseline. This
common configuration will include modern avionics, an
upgraded EO/IR, advanced multi-mode mission radar,
beyond line-of-sight communication, and a new mission
management system. The RC-26B is a low density/high
demand platform operating in the US and overseas,
supporting COCOM overseas contingency operations and Title-10 CONUS missions as well as
domestic IAA requirements for disaster response, national special security events, counter-drug
and border operations.

MC-12W –Thirteen aircraft with training,

communications, and intelligence support are now
based out of Will Rogers IAP, Oklahoma City,
OK. The aircraft were delivered in the Block 3.1
configuration, to include Extended Range (ER),
day/night full motion video (FMV), Line-Of-Sight
(LOS) and Beyond-Light-Of-Sight (BLOS) video
down links (VDL), and digitally integrated radios
and mission management systems. Future
modifications will allow a modular ISR capability,
air-to-air data links, and self-protection systems
conforming to combatant command requirements,
along with enabling future domestic IAA operations.

Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) - The AF DCGS, designated the AN/GSQ-272
Sentinel, is the primary ISR processing, exploitation, and dissemination system. The DCGS
provides all source intelligence derived from ISR platforms to Combatant Commands
(COCOMs), component numbered air forces (C-NAF), and national command authorities
worldwide 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Spread across the globe, DCGS personnel enable the
AF to engage in multiple, simultaneous military operations worldwide. ANG DCGS locations
include AL, AR, CA, GA, HI, IN, KS, MA, NV, UT, and VA.
Tab M

125
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance
2015 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List Essential Capabilities List
DCGS DCGS
 Integrate an IMINT electronic attack  None
mitigation capability
 Scalable Targeting Processors MC-12W
 Scalable Network Technologies  Second LOS Full Motion Video Data
Program Licenses Link and Two Digital Video Encoders
 Second Modular High-Definition Full
MC-12W Motion Video Sensor with
 Line-Of-Sight (LOS) Tactical Data Link Interchangeable Synthetic Aperture
for Interoperability Radar (SAR) and Ground Movement
 Ability to Operate in Global Positioning Target Indicator (GMTI)
System Denied / Degraded AORs  Automated Dependent Broadcast-
 Exhaust Infrared (IR) Suppressor for Surveillance (ADS-B) Capable Military
Increased Survivability Against the Transponder
Increasing Man Portable Air Defense  Add WESCAM Kinetic “Speed” And
Threat in the Area Of Responsibility “MTI” Firmware Upgrades for The MX-
(AOR) 15DiD
 Improve Positive Identification with the  TOLD Performance Improvement
Addition of an High Definition IR Package with Advanced Propellers
Sensor
 Slim-Fast Weight Reduction to Allow RC-26B
Max Fuel Load and Increased Loiter  Full Spectrum Battlespace Awareness
Time Link
 Modern Weather Radar with Mission
RC-26B Capabilities
 Avionics Modernization  Airborne Mobile Ad Hoc Data
 Block 25R Common Configuration Distribution Network
 Aircraft Performance Upgrade  Full Crew DMO / LVC Simulator
 Multi-Function Radar Capability in a  Single Sensor for Wide Area Overwatch
Configurable Package
 Interoperable Ku / Ka Beyond Line-Of-
Sight (BLOS) Data Link
Desired Capabilities List
In an effort to conserve excess pages, desired
lists for the MC-12W and RC-26B are available
upon request from NGB/A5. DCGS did not
identify any desired capabilities.

126
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

AIR FORCE DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM INTEGRATE AN IMINT

ELECTRONIC ATTACK MITIGATION CAPABILITY
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Air Force Distributed Common Ground Station
(AFDCGS) units are tasked to provide Imagery Intelligence (IMINT) in support of Combatant
Commands (CCMDs) within Contested & Degraded Operations (CDO) environments. Given the
limited capability and resiliency of current ISR assets to mitigate imagery sensor electronic
attack (EA), AFDCGS units lack the effectiveness needed to deliver IMINT to CCMD requests
in a CDO environment. By providing a computer system that mitigates jamming by detecting,
removing and characterizing EA, ANG AFDCGS units will be able to provide IMINT during all
contingency operations in all CCMD environments. There are currently three multiple
intelligence medium and high altitude AFDCGS mission sites. These are the only AFDCGS
units that require EA mitigation to perform their mission.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical Item.
3. Units Impacted.
184 ISRG McConnell AFB, KS 101 ISRG Otis AFB, MA 181 ISRG Terra Haute, IN

4. Program Details. PEC: 55208, 53115, 53117, 53218, 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
3 EA Detection, Removal & Characterization $5,000 $15,000
Computer Systems (3080)
Total $15,000

127
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

AIR FORCE DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM SCALABLE TARGETING

PROCESSORS
1. Background. Integrated Munitions Effects Assessment (IMEA) is used for producing
weaponeering solutions by ANG targeting units. IMEA models the effects of specified
munitions, fusing, and impact options against a target and delivers a probability of desired
effects. IMEA scenarios are computationally intensive, often causing computer crashes, over-
heating, and lengthy processing times on standard Targeting Application Workstations
(TAW). Units have upgraded random access memory (RAM) in TAW workstations and utilize
the built-in distributed capabilities of IMEA to spread across networked workstations. However,
the built-in distributed computing features of IMEA are insufficient to reliably produce results
and upgraded RAM produces only nominal improvements. By providing six processing servers
that are capable of handling the high computation loads of running targeting models, each ANG
targeting unit will be better able to provide weaponeering solutions for Combatant Commands
(CCMDs).
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
119 ISRG Fargo, ND 153 IS Ft. Smith, AR 250 IS Kirtland AFB, NM
118 ISRG Nashville, TN 194 IS Camp Murray, WA 132 ISRG Des Moines, IA

4. Program Details. PEC: 55208, 53115, 53117, 53218, 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
6 Processing Servers (3080) $75,000 $450,000
Total $450,000

128
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

AIR FORCE DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM SCALABLE NETWORK

TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM LICENSES
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) non-kinetic targeting units are tasked with
development of non-kinetic targeting solutions in support of target systems analysis and entity-
level (person, place, or thing) target development. The products take the form of short and
concise target vulnerability and effects assessments that recommend specific non-kinetic attack
capabilities against a target vulnerability to achieve a specific effect. These products do not
comprehensively assess complex scenarios of multiple partners working in sync against a
complex target vulnerability. Further, current research tools do not make it possible for the
targeting analyst to assess second and third order effects that may result from a targeting solution
because the volume of data provided by the research tools is impractical for the targeting analyst
to analyze. Consequently, it is a constant challenge to produce a target intelligence product that
accurately assesses the effect and resulting collateral effects to a high degree of fidelity. Five
scalable network technologies software programs are needed at two Cyber Targeting Units will
provide the ability to inject behavior into target models and give the analyst the ability to create a
high fidelity non-kinetic targeting solutions along with a more accurate assessment of actual
effects.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
153 IS Ft. Smith, AR 177 IS Fargo, ND

4. Program Details. PEC: 55208, 53115, 53117, 53218, 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
10 Scalable Network Technologies Program $10,000 $100,000
Licenses (3080)
10 Maintenance for One License Per Year (3840) $2,500 $25,000
Total $125,000

129
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

MC-12W LOS TACTICAL DATA LINK FOR INTEROPERABILITY

1. Background. MC-12W Tactical Data Link (TDL) communication and information transfers
are routed through the beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) system, which requires another ground or air
based station to then pass the information to the supported units. This method creates significant
latency delays to end-user agencies and delayed aircraft and sensor point of interest locations. If
no such ground or air node exists in that Line-of-Sight (LOS) area of operations (AOR), then
MC-12 track data will not be rebroadcast to participating air and ground stations, and conversely,
the MC-12W crew will not see any local tracks. MC-12W aircrews need to share aircraft
position, targeting data, sensor point of interest, cursor-on-target, and target track information
derived from the multiple mission sensors onboard with various air and ground assets. The lack
of a TDL on the MC-12W reduces situational awareness, increases time in the kill chain, and
delays information to the supported units. A (LOS) tactical data link (TDL) radio is needed, with
associated top and bottom L/S/C Tri-band antennas, to adequately employ across multiple AORs
in the current operational environment. The system must be compatible with all current data link
architectures in both domestic and combat areas of responsibility, to include Situational
Awareness Data Link (SADL) and Link-16 with gateway capable software. This TDL system
must include provisions for consistent, reliable, timely, and unrestricted TDL communications,
and have open architecture for growth and advances in the TDL technology. This modification /
upgrade will be applied to all thirteen aircraft and the parts required includes 10% spares.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference, MIL-STD 6016D, MIL-STD 3011.
3. Units Impacted.
137 AW Will Rogers Wld
APT,OK

4. Program Details. PEC: 52601F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $500,000
14 TDL Radios* (3010) $135,000 $1,890,000
28 L/S/C Tri-Band Antennas* (3010) $5,000 $140,000
Total $2,530,000
*Includes 10% spares

130
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

MC-12W ABILITY TO OPERATE IN GPS-DENIED / DEGRADED AREAS OF

RESPONSIBILITY
1. Background. MC-12W aircrews cannot adequately accomplish their mission in areas of
denied or degraded Global Positioning System (GPS) signals. The design of the original
commercial GPS antenna and receiver subsystem did not consider the threat of GPS jamming or
GPS spoofing. Subsequently, its performance is insufficient during contested or degraded
operations. MC-12W aircraft require an anti-jam and Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing
Module (SAASM) capability with signal splitters for the aircraft navigation system and
embedded mission equipment. In order to have full SAASM capability, this system must include
an anti-jam Advanced Digital Antenna Production (ADAP) kit with a Controlled Reception
Pattern Antenna (CRPA), the associated Antenna Electronics (AE), a Low Noise Amplifier
(LNA), and by-pass filters. The protected positioning data this system provides will be available
to all of the aircraft mission and navigational systems to ensure reliable and accurate navigation
and mission performance. This system will allow MC-12W aircrews to continue to employ and
provided accurate information to the supported units using the military Precise Position Service
(PPS) P(Y) and M-coded signal while in a GPS compromised area. This modification / upgrade
will be applied to all thirteen aircraft and the parts required includes 10% spares.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference, Joint Program Office-GPS GRAM-S
standard, DO-229 standard, TSO-C129A standard, CENTCOM AOR lessons learned.
3. Units Impacted.
137 AW Will Rogers Wld APT,
OK

4. Program Details. PEC: 52601F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $500,000
14 ADAP (CRPA+AE) GPS Antenna (3080) $5,000 $70,000
14 SAASM and Signal Splitters (3010) $5,000 $70,000
Total $640,000

131
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

MC-12W EXHAUST INFRARED SUPPRESSOR FOR INCREASED SURVIVABILITY

AGAINST MAN PORTABLE AIR DEFENSES
1. Background. MC-12W aircraft are operating in areas with advanced infrared (IR) man-
portable air defenses (MANPADs). The aircraft does not have any IR suppression system and
due to size and weight carry only a small amount of flares. The addition of an IR suppression
system will allow MC-12W aircrews the ability to operate at typical employment altitudes and
ranges while degrading a MANPAD’s ability to lock-on and engage the aircraft. The IR
suppression system should not add significant weight to the aircraft nor should it negatively
affect aircraft performance by more than 10%. Two kits per aircraft, with spares, are needed to
outfit the 13 aircraft in the Air National Guard. IR suppressors will allow MC-12W aircrews to
employ in areas of advanced MANPADs with reduced risk. This modification / upgrade will be
applied to all thirteen aircraft and the parts required includes 10% spares.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference, CENTCOM JUON 15-01.
3. Units Impacted.
137 AW Will Rogers Wld APT,
OK

4. Program Details. PEC: 52601F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
28 IR Suppressor Kits* (3010) $125,000 $3,500,000
Total $3,500,000
*Includes 10% spares

132
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

MC-12W IMPROVED POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION WITH THE ADDITION OF A

HIGH DEFINITION INFRARED SENSOR
1. Background. The MC-12W visual sensor includes high definition (HD) electro-optical wide
(EOW) and narrow (EON) cameras but only a standard definition (SD) infrared (IR) camera.
HD full motion video (FMV) is now the Special Operations Command minimum requirement for
tactical Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) applications, allowing both the
aircrew operator and ground command and control (C2) personnel to view a picture with over
twice the resolution of SD. An HD camera facilitates positive identification of threats or hostile
intent and an improved target description for follow, reacquisition, and targeting at longer
aircraft ranges. An HD IR camera will show disturbed earth and trip wires leading to improvised
explosive devices (IED) more readily. Additionally, the HD camera has a wider field of view.
This modification / upgrade will be applied to all thirteen aircraft and the parts required includes
10% spares.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference, CENTCOM JUON 15-01.
3. Units Impacted.
137 AW Will Rogers Wld APT,
OK

4. Program Details. PEC: 52601F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
15 HD Cameras* (3010) $250,000 $3,750,000
Total $3,750,000
*Includes 10% spares

133
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

MC-12W SLIM-FAST WEIGHT REDUCTION TO ALLOW MAX FUEL LOAD AND

INCREASED LOITER TIME
1. Background. The MC-12W cannot take a full fuel load due to heavy components. This
disparity ranges from 800 lbs. with a standard combat crew of 4 to 1400 lbs. with a full training
crew, equaling 1.4 hours to 2.5 hours of lost loiter, cruise, or training time. Most combat
missions require maximum fuel load to provide flexibility and enable pursuit of enemy
forces. Other small manned tactical ISR platforms have undergone Slim-Fast weight reduction
programs as part of normal spiral development. The goal of this initial MC-12W weight
reduction program is a weight savings and of 1000 lbs. This modification will be applied to all
13 aircraft.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference
3. Units Impacted.
137 AW Will Rogers Wld APT,
OK

4. Program Details. PEC: 52601F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3010) N/A $1,300,000
13 Slim-Fast Weight Reduction (3010) $750,000 $9,750,000
Total $11,050,000

134
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

RC-26B AVIONICS MODERNIZATION

1. Background. RC-26B avionics are obsolete and unsustainable due to diminishing
manufacturing sources. Honeywell Bendix, the manufacturer of the RC-26 Flight Management
System (FMS) KNS 660 stopped supporting navigational data updates to the outdated system in
December 2015, rendering the fleet capable of only basic VOR to VOR navigational operations.
Specifically, the Global Positioning System (GPS), electronic flight information system displays,
flight management system (FMS), as well as the navigation and communication radios need to
be modernized in part to comply with the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) 2020
NextGen and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Communication, Navigation,
and Surveillance / Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) mandate. In addition to the FMS, the
RC-26B navigation and communication radios are also obsolete. The navigations radiosRC-26B
do not have frequency modulation immunity, leaving the aircraft vulnerable to congestion and
potentially unsafe aircraft operations when flying terminal area approaches and departures. The
communication radios do not meet the frequency spacing required for operation in the European
Command area of operations. Lastly, battlefield operations now demand the use of night vision
compatible cockpits and utilization of certified GPS navigations systems to safely depart and
land at austere and remote airfields. Modern avionics, to include a new FMS, new EFIS
displays, an updated and certified GPS system, NVG compatibility, and upgraded radios are
necessary to allow the aircraft to operate within all foreign and domestic airspace safely,
efficiently, and comply with FAA/ICAO mandated navigation/communication requirements. The
upgrade will be applied to all 13 aircraft.
2. Source of Need. FAA and ICAO mandates, 2009-2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ
125 FW Jacksonville IAP FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL
132RW Des Moines IAP, IA 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM

4. Program Details. PEC: 52889

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
13 Shipsets (3010) $1,570,000 $20,410,000
NRE (3600) N/A $1,700,000
Total $22,110,000

135
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

RC-26B BLOCK 25R COMMON CONFIGURATION

1. Background. The RC-26B is routinely tasked for both domestic and overseas missions and
has two configurations: Block 20 for domestic operations (DOMOPS); Block 25 for overseas
contingency operations (OCO). Each configuration has a different sensor, mission management
system (MMS), and communications suite for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
(ISR) operations. Split configurations create inefficient aircraft and manpower utilization in
addition to the training and planning difficulties brought about by the acute capability differences
between aircraft. All issues resulting from Block-specific differences can be remedied through a
common aircraft configuration. Currently, six Block 25 aircraft are under contract to be
reconfigured into the Block 25R, with a high definition (HD) electro-optical-infrared (EO/IR)
full motion video (FMV) sensor, a Situational Awareness Data Link (SADL), mission
equipment, and communications capability for DOMOPS and OCO mission sets. However, this
upgrade does not include a laser designator or Link-16 tactical data link. With current COCOM
requirements, these capabilities are critical for mission execution. The remaining five Block 20
and two C-26A aircraft must be added to this effort to standardize the fleet with the Block 25R
configuration to include the laser designator and Link-16.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067, 22 Oct 2008; USSOCOM Manned Airborne Intelligence
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Capability Production Document, 23 Apr 2014; 2009-2015
ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ
125 FW Jacksonville IAP FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL
132RW Des Moines IAP, IA 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM

4. Program Details. PEC: 52889

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 NRE (Block 20 and C-26A) (3600) $550,000 $1,100,000
5 Block 20 --> 25R Reconfiguration (3010) $1,150,000 $5,750,000
2 C-26A Block 25R Reconfiguration (3010) $1,500,000 $3,000,000
Total $9,850,000

136
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

RC-26B MULTI-FUNCTION RADAR CAPABILITY IN A CONFIGURABLE

PACKAGE
1. Background. An advanced multi-mode radar is needed for ground moving target indication,
dismounted moving target indication, coherent change detection, and maritime search
capabilities. This technology will allow the RC-26 to find and fix people, vehicles, water craft,
vehicles in the open, through weather, and obscured by foliage, as well as the ability to detect
the passage of ground targets over land both in real-time and after the movement has
occurred. For the maritime mode, the system must also incorporate the ability to interact with
the US Navy ship tracking and position reporting Automated Information System (AIS),
allowing the RC-26 to fully integrate with the maritime mission set. The radar will augment the
current EO/IR sensor, allowing for multi-int capability and organic self-cueing. A configurable
package is needed to ensure that the system can be upgraded or swapped with a different sensor
and system module as new or upgraded systems, sensor, or radars become available or required
for operations. This re-configurable aspect will help drive lower cost and minimal integration
efforts, providing quick-turn capability for the wide array of technologies needed for the varied
missions the RC-26 is called upon to perform. This modification will be applied to all thirteen
aircraft
2. Source of Need. NGB/J32; SOCOM, SOUTHCOM, NORTHCOM, JTF-N, JIATF-S; 2014-
15 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ
125 FW Jacksonville IAP FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL
132RW Des Moines IAP, IA 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM

4. Program Details. PEC: 52889

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $500,000
13 Advance Multi-Mode Radars (3010) $1,000,000 $13,000,000
Total $13,500,000

137
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

RC-26B INTEROPERABLE KU / KA BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT (BLOS) DATA LINK

1. Background. The intelligence community utilizes real-time, seamless interoperable
communication architectures in a network-centric battlespace, the standard for airborne
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets. The RC-26B has no capability to
interact with the global information grid using broadband beyond line-of sight (BLOS)
technology or to communicate within a common data link (CDL) environment. In addition, the
supported warfighter on the ground is increasingly operating in remote locations where the
ability to exchange real-time data and transmit full motion video (FMV) via line-of-sight only
means is a severe combat capability restriction. BLOS CDL and high definition (HD) FMV
downlink capability to command and control (C2) nodes and ground forces are critical
capabilities for all airborne ISR platforms. The proposed upgrade to the RC-26 with a Ku- and
Ka-band BLOS kit – antenna, antenna bubble, aircraft wiring and integration – gives the aircraft
a wideband data link providing both intelligence data and HD FMV to BLOS users and
customers. This modification enables the enhancement of operational situational awareness for
intelligence gatherers and ground elements in any area-of-operations. It also permits platform-
to-platform and platform-to-C2 data exchange and sensor slewing. These upgrade kits will also
provide a vast amount of HD awareness and assessment imagery for domestic operations.
2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 A4MY 10-024, 9 Apr 2010; 2011 - 2015 ARC WEPTAC
Conference;. US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Manned Airborne Intelligence
Surveillance Reconnaissance (MAISR) Capability Production Document, 23 Apr 2014.
3. Units Impacted.
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ
125 FW Jacksonville IAP FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL
132RW Des Moines IAP, IA 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM

4. Program Details. PEC: 52889

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $1,000,000
13 BLOS Antennas and installation kits (3010) $750,000 $9,750,000
Total $10,750,000

138
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

RC-26B AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE UPGRADE

1. Background. The RC-26B airframe is an effective, low-cost, and capable manned aircraft for
Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance (ISR) and Incident Awareness and Assessment (IAA)
missions. The Air National Guard fleet consists of eleven B model and two A model
aircraft. The numerous incremental modifications on all these aircraft, with added weight,
airframe changes (antennas, fuselage mounted sensors and equipment), and increased power
consumption have reduced overall aircraft performance and impact mission effectiveness. An
aircraft performance upgrade will provide greater range and increased endurance, reduce ground
acoustic signature, and increase sensor and airframe life. High-efficiency composite propellers
and installation of airflow vanes and vortex generators will greatly reduce the overall aircraft
drag. Additionally, the high-efficiency propellers will increase fuel efficiency as well as reduce
the noise signature of the aircraft, lowering the risk of detection by ground surveillance targets
and allowing for smaller reconnaissance orbits and lower mission altitudes, or greater stand-
off within the constraints of the sensors, depending on them mission. Additionally, the
reduction in vibration due to these new propellers will increase the mean time between failure of
sensitive aircraft sensors and increase the lifetime of the airframe itself. New, higher output
generators will increase the load limit, increasing safety margins and allow for additional sensors
and mission equipment. Lastly, in order to match the rest of the fleet, the two C-26A aircraft
will also need to be upgraded to the higher power Honeywell TPE 331-12G engines currently on
the eleven B models. Overall, these upgrades create a more effective ISR and IAA platform,
with increased utility to combatant commanders, domestic operations, and special mission
customers.
2. Source of Need. SOCOM MAISR CPD Briefing, 23 Apr 2014; 2014-15 ARC WEPTAC
Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
115 FW Truax Fld, WI 141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ
125 FW Jacksonville IAP FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS
130 AW Yeager AP, WV 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL
132RW Des Moines IAP, IA 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM

4. Program Details. PEC: 52889

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $1,200,000
26 5-Blade High Efficiency Propellers (3010) $240,909 $6,263,634
26 400-Amp Generators (3010) $27,300 $709,800
4 Honeywell TPE 331-12G Engines and Mounts $700,000 $2,800,000
(3010)
Total $10,973,434

139
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 Guardian Angel, Special Tactics, and Tactical Air Control Party
Guardian Angel, Special
Tactics, and Tactical Air Control
Party
 Combat Search and Rescue
 Special Operations
 ANG GA Units Provide 30% of the Total Force
 ANG ST Units Provide 25% of the Total Force
 ANG TACP Units Provide 35% of the Total Force

The ANG has three Guardian Angel

squadrons: the 103 RQS, Francis S. Gabreski
Airport, NY; 131 RQS, Moffett Federal Airfield,
CA; and 212 RQS, Joint Base Elmendorf-
Richardson, AK, which consists of Combat
Rescue Officers (CROs) and Pararescue Jumpers
(PJ). Their primary mission is to recover downed
and injured aircrew members in
combat. Pararescue personnel provide recovery
and emergency medical treatment necessary to
stabilize and evacuate injured personnel.

The ANG has two Special Tactics Squadrons (STS): the 123 STS, Standiford Field, KY and 125
STS, Portland IAP, OR. Special Tactics Teams (STT) are quick-reaction, deployable SOF units,
which are uniquely organized, trained, and equipped to conduct joint special operations and
sensitive recovery missions. Special tactics personnel, including Combat Controllers (CCT), PJ,
and Special Operations Weathermen (SOWT), provide quick-reaction Command and Control
(C2), Close Air Support (CAS), positive air traffic control, and casualty recovery, treatment and
evacuation staging during joint air, ground, and maritime operations including short notice,
sensitive contingencies.

TACPs provide airspace integration and terminal attack control of CAS firepower onto enemy
ground targets. TACPs also provide the planning and employment of assets, in full spectrum
combat, in support of US Army ground combat units. TACPs advise Army ground commanders
on the best use of airpower. They establish and maintain Command, Control, and
Communications (C3) of all combat air assets, including the integration of surface-to-surface and
air-to-surface fires.
Tab N

141
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Guardian angel, Special Tactics and Tactical Air
Control Party
 Single Pass Precision Airdrop
Critical Capabilities List
Special Tactics
Guardian Angel
 Handheld Link-16 Radio
 Combat Survivability System
 Dual-Channel Multi-Band Voice &
Modernization
Data
 Preservation of the Force and Family
 MPU-4 Wave-Relay Radios
Equipment
 Full Spectrum Personnel Recovery TACP
Simulators (see Tab Q)
 Advanced JTAC Training Simulator
 Guardian Angel Aircraft
Interoperability System  JTAC Targeting pod
 Medical Modernization System  Low Profile Vehicle and Dismounted
Antennas
Special Tactics  Handheld Link-16 Terminals
 White Phosphorous Night Vision
 Mobility Systems
Goggles
 Situational Awareness Systems
 Home Station Training solutions (see
Tab Q) Desired Capabilities List
 Survey System
 Modernized Aerial Delivery Systems Guardian Angel
 Physical Augmentation
TACP  Air Deployable Recuse Vehicle
 ASOC Tactical Datalink  Communications and Weapon
 Portable Next Generation Power Enhancements
Management  Search and Rescue Vehicle
 Dismounted Audio and Video
Mission Recording System Special Tactics
 Rapidly Deployable Joint  Compact Light Weight Air Traffic
Operational Communications System Control Gun
 Lightweight Dismounted Sensor and
Targeting System TACP
 Enhanced ROVER Capability
Essential Capabilities List  Clip-On Short Wave Infrared Device
 Video Down Link Movement
Guardian Angel Identification Software
 Search Enhancement  Multi-Channel Radios
 Terminal Area Simulator
 Signature Management Capabilities

142
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL COMBAT SURVIVABILITY SYSTEM MODERNIZATION

1. Background. Guardian Angels (GAs) require enhancements to the combat survivability
suite. Lessons learned show that in prosecution of the GA mission it is extremely difficult for
the operator to determine the direction of incoming fire. To alleviate this limitation, a light-
weight, man-portable, hostile fire indicator is essential. Similarly, countering threats designed to
deny Global Positioning System service requires enhanced equipment that is less susceptible to
jamming and is capable of providing improved navigation accuracy in both mounted and
dismounted vehicle applications. Another requirement is the capability to see into areas of
reduced visibility (low ambient light, fog, smog or concealment measures). A range of NVGs
for different mission sets will operate day or night, incorporating thermal and night vision
technology, provide improved field of view, and provides the operator “heads-up” information
such as distance and bearing to a chosen objective will fill this capability gap. GA success on
the battlefield also depends heavily on its ability to designate threats to combat support
equipment and personnel; a handheld day/fusion goggles, night target designator is
essential. Additionally after action reports and trending injuries to necks from extended night
operations reveals a need for a more capable lighter NVG to replace the legacy version of the
PVS-15 AN/PVS-31. The combat survivability system for modernization should include: 73x
AN PVS31 BNVD, 36x Night/Day Target Designator, 30x Optics 1 E-COSI, and SOPMOD
Block three for modernization of the M-4 Optics.
2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI
FREEDOM; Mission Required Equipment; Shortfalls identified in the Guardian Angel
Modernization Initial Capabilities Document and the Capabilities-Based Assessment Final
Report; 2010-2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
73 AN PVS-31 BNVD (3080) $10,000 $730,000
36 Night/Day Target Designators (3080) $18,500 $666,000
30 Optics I E-COSI (3080) $14,750 $442,500
120 SOPMOD Block Three (3080) $20,000 $2,400,000
Total $4,238,500

143
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL PRESERVATION OF THE FORCE AND FAMILY EQUIPMENT

1. Background. ANG Guardian Angels (GA) have fallen behind in progressive methods of
fitness, rest, and rehabilitation of injuries sustained while executing or training for missions that
are consistent with other Special Operations Forces weapon systems. Injuries negatively impact
the health and readiness of the Guardian Angel weapon system and result in excessive and
unnecessary lost work-days and subsequently impact mission-ready status. The current medical
system does not provide a detailed initial medical screening for special operations operators, nor
does it address past injuries and structural concerns. In order to enhance human performance and
mitigate injuries, GA require Preservation of the Force and Family (POTFF) systems that consist
of both contracted physical training personnel and physical training equipment. Human
Optimization System Phase Three is the procurement of physical training and strength
conditioning/reconditioning equipment and a Human Performance Optimization (HPO) database.
The HPO database will allow all ARC squadrons to record data points documenting a baseline,
injury trends, and physical improvement of the participants. This can be used a tool to measure
the success of the HPO program.
2. Source of Need. The HPO requirement identified by the GA Senior Leaders Working Group
and supported by the Weapon System Council; Guardian Angel Vision 2020 document currently
in coordination; Tactical Human Optimization, Rapid Rehabilitation, and Reconditioning
Program THOR 3; AFSOC HPO Program; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015
ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 123 STS Standiford Field, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR
129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
5 Phase Two Units (3080) $355,700 $1,778,500
5 Phase Three Units (3080) $300,000 $1,500,000
Total $3,278,500

144
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL AIRCRAFT INTEROPERABILITY SYSTEM

1. Background. Guardian Angel (GA) operators are tasked to perform mission and aircrew
duties aboard legacy Air Force rescue C-130s, HH-60G as well as Joint and Coalition
aircraft. The replacements for legacy rescue aircraft, as they are being currently fielded, are
missing important features/capabilities of the legacy aircraft which reduce both GA’s ability to
effectively operate with the aircrew, and perform required mission duties. For example, the HC-
130J lacks the mission planning table, scanner windows, and flare tubes that are present in the
HC-130P/MC-130P aircraft. The fielded Intercom System (ICS) cord configuration and
electrical power available also affect GA interoperability with the flight crew and
capability. Without the mission planning area and scanner windows, the GA is limited in
Situational Awareness (SA), search and scanning ability, and enroute planning and preparation
capability. ICS cord location and availability can significantly affect Jumpmaster duties, and
degrades situational awareness for the entire GA team onboard. A/C electrical power location
and availability can affect patient treatment during long flights when extended care and patient
monitoring is needed. GA’s require modular approaches to enhance current SA and capability
that can be transferred to newly fielded airframes. The GA community will work with the other
rescue C-130 and HH-60G communities to find a modular solution that will ensure the best
interoperability and use of existing airframes and technologies, while remaining transferable to
newly fielded aircraft and upgradable for future requirements. Each affected unit should have a
minimum of three complete systems capable of being easily transferred from one aircraft to
another in order to cover future missions.
2. Source of Need. Active Duty 1067 dated 04 September 2014, submitted by 48 RQS. Lessons
learned from 2014 long over water SAR mission. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski Airport, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
3 Mission Planning / Situational Awareness $150,000 $450,000
Station (3080)
3 Aircraft Interoperability System (3080) $150,000 $450,000
3 Wireless ICS System (3080) $30,000 $90,000
3 A/C Power Inverter System (3080) $60,000 $180,000
Total $1,170,000

145
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL MEDICAL MODERNIZATION SYSTEM

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Guardian Angel (GA) missions require modern
medical real time telemetry. Patient vitals and treatment can be monitored by definitive care real
time worldwide via Inmarsat transmission via standard internet. Acquisition of a lightweight and
compact modernized medical monitoring system will dramatically improve GA capability. The
fly away kit will provide the GA member the ability to interact through telemedicine with care
professionals while operating from disconnected or austere locations. This will include the
computer, screens, camera, microphone, diagnostic tools, and case to transport the medical
modernization equipment. The system will significantly improve patient care and increase
survivability.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from real world extended care over water SAR. Lessons
learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF);
Mission Required Equipment Shortfalls identified in the Guardian Angel Modernization Initial
Capabilities Document and the GA Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) Final Report; 2010-
2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
40 Propaq MD Cardiac Resuscitation Device $30,000 $1,200,000
(3080)
6 MCD 4800 Inmarsat Terminal (3080) $13,000 $78,000
3 Fly Away Kit (3080) $20,000 $60,000
Total $1,338,000

146
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS AND GUARDIAN ANGEL MOBILITY SYSTEMS

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) and Guardian Angel tasked squadrons consist
of Combat Controllers (CCT), Pararescue (PJ), and Special Operations Weather Teams (SOWT)
who require unique mission support and mobility assets in order to infiltrate, execute, and exfil
missions. With AFSOC increasing the unilateral mission sets for STS in the areas of assault
zone establishment, survey, recovery, reconnaissance, and strike, STS must evolve and adapt to
support these missions sets. The Multi-mission Unilateral Transporter (MUT) will provide an
immediate response and critical mobility platform to Special Tactics Teams (STT) to support
both permissive and low-visibility missions. The MUT is a systematically modified van that
would create sufficient storage for tactical gear, weapons, and communications equipment for a
multi-faceted and seamless interface with all levels of command and control. A 4-wheel drive
chassis will be a key component of this response platform to ensure the vehicle’s performance in
unimproved terrain and on hazardous road conditions. The SOCOM Ground Applications
Program Office has already made an initial procurement for other SOCOM AF/JSOC units in a
standard configuration that provides air-load tie downs with C-130 certification, tactical seating
for 6 to 8 personnel in the back, radio interface panels for user radios with cabling to discrete
roof mounted antennas, video display screens for real time VDL feeds, and blackout IR lighting.
Five each required for STS and two each per Rescue Squadron (RQS).
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and INHERENT
RESOLVE; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 123 STS Standiford Field, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR
129 RQW Moffett FAF, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 Modified Vans (3080) $200,000 $3,200,000
Total $3,200,000

147
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS SITUATIONAL AWARENESS SYSTEMS

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) consist of Combat Controllers (CCT),
Pararescue (PJ), Special Operations Weather Teams (SOWT), and Tactical Air Control Parties
(TACP) who engage the enemy at close range while coordinating precision air and indirect fire
on targets from two hundred meters to three thousand meters distant. Based on Operation
ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) lessons learned, the next-generation Two-way Tactical ROVER
(TACNET) will enhance fratricide prevention and target acquisition capability with no additional
weight penalty. The TACNET ROVER provides the warfighter increased situational awareness
and the ability to broadcast friendly position and targeting information to currently fielded
Generation 4 targeting pods, in addition to receiving full-motion video. The solution fully
integrates with existing battlefield airman situational awareness tablets in inventory and utilizes
existing communications architecture to receive and transmit critical targeting information. The
requirement is 5 per Air Support Operations Squadron (ASOS) and 10 per STS. The Handheld
Precision Targeting Device (HHPTD) combines superior optics with advanced electronics and
will be utilized to support the myriad of Special Tactics capabilities. This proven system is
capable of detecting and identifying threats in real time while managing defensive systems and
providing operators with passive search, surveillance, observation, and warning solutions. Two
HHPTD’s are required per unit to meet requirements. The Enhanced Clip-on short-wave
infrared (SWIR) E-COSI injects an SWIR image overlay into current night vision device
technology. This optics solution provides out of band illumination in order to enhance
situational awareness without activating visible or near-infrared illumination, minimizing
detection while delivering dynamic ranges of imaging beyond thermal capabilities and
resolution. These situational awareness components use augmented reality technology that
increases effectiveness through enhanced detection capability and definitive identification of
friendly and enemy forces. Each STS requires 10 ECOSIs.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and INHERENT
RESOLVE; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
123 STS Standiford Field, KY 111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 113 ASOS Terre Haute, IN
116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 118 ASOS New London, NC 122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA
124 ASOS Gowen Field, ID 125 STS Portland IAP, OR 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK
146 ASOS Will Rodgers, OK 147 ASOS Ellington Fld, TX 148 ASOS Indian Town Gap, PA
165 ASOS Garden City, GA 169 ASOS Peoria, IL 168 ASOS Peoria, IL
227 ASOS Atlantic City, NJ 238 ASOS Meridian, MS 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY
284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
110 TACNET ROVER (3080) $35,000 $3,850,000
24 HHPTD (3080) $85,000 $2,040,000
20 E-COSI (3080) $40,000 $800,000
Total $7,705,000

148
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS MODERNIZED AERIAL DELIVERY SYSTEMS

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) consist of Combat Controllers (CCT),
Pararescue (PJ), and Special Operations Weather Teams (SOWT) who require multiple unique
mission support equipment items in order to infiltrate and execute their various mission
sets. Ten-person oxygen consoles allow Special Tactics Teams (STT) to field a higher number
of military freefall (MFF) jumpers while reducing the number of consoles required. 4 consoles
at each of two squadrons fulfills UTC requirements. This new system also provides greater
mobility for the jumpers as well as the jumpmaster. The legacy system can only support 6
personnel at one time and is no longer compatible with current oxygen masks. The acquisition
of 20 new MFF parachute systems for the 125 STS standardize them with the 123 STS by
providing similar, state-of-the-art Bottom-of-Container (BOC) parachutes. Current systems in
use at the 125 STS are ripcord activated. BOC systems are predominately used in commercial
parachuting and have a much lower malfunction rate than the rip cord counterpart. This lowers
risk associated with MFF operations by ensuring both teams can train and operate together while
utilizing the same, safer equipment. At a recent domestic exercise, members of the 125 STS had
not received training on 123 STS specific parachutes and were forced to ship their own
parachutes to the training site for 125 STS personnel’s parachute training. If both teams respond
to contingency operations, there is no guarantee which set of equipment will arrive
first. Therefore, it is imperative to ensure configuration control of shared equipment sets. In
addition to the precision parachuting capabilities that freefall systems provide, precision delivery
of equipment by parachute is also required. Four Microfly automated aerial delivery systems
allow pinpoint accurate delivery of vital support equipment to ground personnel in the event an
operator is unable or unavailable to execute the jump. Four of these systems (2 per squadron)
will provide the needed capability.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and INHERENT
RESOLVE; 2014-105 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
123 STS Standiford Field, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
8 Ten Person Oxygen Console (3080) $55,000 $440,000
4 Microfly Parachute Devices (3080) $28,500 $114,000
20 Freefall Parachute Systems (3080) $20,000 $400,000
Total $954,000

149
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS SURVEY SYSTEM

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) consist of Combat Controllers (CCT),
Pararescue (PJ), and Special Operations Weather Teams (SOWT) who are called on to complete
a range of detailed survey missions for drop zones, helicopter landing zones, and improved and
semi-improved landing zones in permissive and denied environments. Current collection
equipment consists of survey grade GPS system with a base station, laser range finders
connected to GPS units, and a clinometer. This new survey system would allow the survey team
to downsize from five operators to two and enable them to autonomously complete necessary
survey data collection in the span of 20 minutes using passive collection without the need for all
terrain vehicles or a GPS base station. Active collection of similar data takes 1.5 hours by a 5-
person team maneuvering around the survey area with a handheld GPS and laser range
finder. The new survey system has a high-performance laser scanner, inertial measurement unit,
and color sensor. This system produces photo realistic 3D imagery of large regions. The system
has a large field of view and a high measurement rate for fast mapping that creates a 3D image
with 1 cm accuracy out to 1 km from the sensor. The time savings alone with the new system
allows for collection 5 times faster than the current method, and since the collection is automated
the operators are free to complete other supporting tasks. Mission enhancements: very fast (one
pass) survey collection in 3D; Reduced manpower and equipment footprint; Increased ability to
conduct operations in low-visibility semi-denied environment; Ability to collect large complex
areas in minimal ground time; Significant reduction to warfighter exposure to the enemy. The
system includes a LiDaR camera, an autonomous mini-copter, and post-collection processing
software. Affected mission sets: Assault Zone establishment, Integrated Survey Program
support, and Non-Combatant Evacuation Operations. Risk to mission if not provided:
unnecessary exposure to force due to need for personnel to physically cover terrain on foot or
vehicle to collect measurements, longer time for collection, and potential need to return to survey
site for additional collection.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and INHERENT
RESOLVE; 2014 Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) conference
after-action report; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
123 STS Standiford Field, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit cost Program Cost
4 LiDAR Survey Systems (3080) $350,000 $1,400,000
Total $1,400,000

150
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER

TACTICAL NETWORK SYSTEM
1. Background. Air Support Operations Centers (ASOC) serve as the principal air control
agency of the Theater Air Control System (TACS), and are responsible for the direction and
control of air operations supporting the ground combat element. They process and coordinate
requests for immediate air support, and coordinate air missions requiring integration with other
supporting air and ground forces. They normally collocate with the US Army tactical
headquarters’ senior Fire Support Coordination Center (FSCC) within the ground combat
element. The ASOCs organic long-haul voice and data communications serve as the primary
link between the Air Operations Center, Senior Army Echelon, and the operational Joint
Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) and airborne assets. The ASOC’s lack a lightweight,
transportable, tactical network suite capable of linking JTACs, aircrews, and senior echelons in
the TACS. This tactical network must include NIPR, SIPR, CENTRIX, DSN, and Secure
Voice. The solution needs a Voice-Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) server and VOIP phones to
support voice demand, and must support a minimum bandwidth of 6 megabytes per second. It is
also vital that this new system be tailored to the specific mission needs and to allow for
expansion and modification as the ASOC mission evolves to meet the needs of the future
warfighter. Additionally, a proper solution should reduce our overall footprint and be more cost
effective.
2. Source of Need. AFRL request for solutions solicitation number BAA-RWK-10-0003;
USSOCOM sponsored recommendation for deployable C4I requirements; Lessons learned from
Operations IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING FREEDOM; 2012- 2013 ARC WEPTAC
Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 168 ASOS Peoria, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27418

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Tactical Network Systems (3080) $1,000,000 $4,000,000
Total $4,000,000

151
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY PORTABLE NEXT GENERATION POWER

MANAGEMENT
1. Background. Dismounted Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) lack a lightweight
portable power storage solution for man-portable and handheld radios. JTACs require a large
number of batteries to maintain radio communications during field operations. Rechargeable
battery systems offer reduced weight, extended battery life, and reduced long term costs both
monetarily and to the environment. In the current configuration, JTACs carry several different
batteries while performing dismounted operations. The batteries can add up to 25 pounds to a
combat load. JTACs require a battery that can be used and recharged while conducting
dismounted operations. The rechargeable batteries must withstand wet conditions (rain and
humidity) for an extended period of time and not endanger the JTAC and their equipment. The
batteries must also be rechargeable from a variety of sources (AC/DC power, NATO plugs from
vehicles, 110/220 power output sources, trickle charge from other battery devices, alternate
means of charging such as solar, etc.) without being removed from the radio. They must power
PRC-117G, PRC-148, and PRC-152A radios, dismounted lasers, and other JTAC peripheral
equipment. The battery must have an efficiency rating greater than 90%, weigh less than 1.50
kilograms, and meet all Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) transportation regulations for
civilian and military air travel. Enhancing the portable power solutions currently used by JTACs
will help decrease fatigue and injuries to JTACs by reducing the amount of weight taken into
combat. Fielding requirements are one power source per UTC required dismounted radio system.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned from Operations IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING
FREEDOM. Department of Transportation Regulations (49 CFR, SEC. 175.10); 2010-2011
WEPTAC Conference and 2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 113 ASOS Terre Haute, IN 116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA
118 ASOS New London, NC 122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, 123 STS Standiford Field, KY
LA
124 ASOS Gowen Field, ID 125 STS Portland IAP, OR 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK
146 ASOS Will Rodgers, OK 147 ASOS Ellington Fld, TX 148 ASOS Indian Town Gap, PA
165 ASOS Garden City, GA 168 ASOS Peoria, IL 169 ASOS Peoria, IL
227 ASOS Atlantic City, NJ 238 ASOS Meridian, MS 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY
284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 27418

Remaining Units Required Unit Cost Program Cost
424 PRC-117G Portable Power (3080) $10,150 $4,303,600
288 PRC-148/152 Radio Batteries (3080) $5,440 $1,566,720
Total $5,870,320

152
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY LIGHTWEIGHT DISMOUNTED SENSOR AND

TARGETING SYSTEM
1. Background. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) are required to carry multiple single
use function devices to provide ranging, covert marking, designating, and
detection. Simultaneous use of these devices is prohibitive due to their capability, weight, size,
and power limitations. JTACs need a combined Laser Target Marker (LTM) / Laser Target
Designator (LTD) / Laser Range Finder (LRF) that should weigh less than 5lbs and have the
capability to identify and designate a tank-sized target at distances greater than 2 kilometers and
ability to mark greater than 3 kilometers. The LRF function should have integrated eye-safe
magnified optics, capable of target identification at 5 kilometers for day and 1 kilometer for night
and natively generate CAT II coordinates. The LTD must be capable of pulse interval
modulation (PIM) encoding. The ability to visually determine the location of pulse-coded
frequency lasers is paramount in order to confirm that aircraft-based lasers are tracking the same
intended target that ground forces are designating / marking. JTAC sensor and targeting
solutions are tied to equipment which requires numerous cables for connectivity. A secure
Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN) would increase the combat capability of JTACs while
decreasing the weight carried and potential for equipment failure. The Fielding proposal for the
Day/Night Spot Trackers is 10 per operational unit, and two each at the Air National Guard Test
Center and Combat Training Flight. Fielding requirements for the WPAN capability are 20 each
per operational unit in order to meet dismounted operator needs. Fielding requirements for the
Lightweight Range Mark Designator are three per supported Army Brigade and four each per
Special Tactics Squadron in order to meet mission needs.
2. Source of Need. ACC TACP RWG validated requirement; Air Force Research Lab request
for solutions solicitation number BAA-RWK-10-0003; AFMC RFP Solicitation Number
TACPCASS061512; ARC 2012-2013 WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 WEPTAC Council;
Lessons learned from Operations IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING FREEDOM.
3. Units Impacted.
111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 113 ASOS Terre Haute, IN 116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA
118 ASOS New London, NC 122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, 123 STS Standiford Field, KY
LA
124 ASOS Gowen Field, ID 125 STS Portland IAP, OR 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK
146 ASOS Will Rodgers, OK 147 ASOS Ellington Fld, TX 148 ASOS Indian Town Gap, PA
165 ASOS Garden City, GA 168 ASOS Peoria, IL 169 ASOS Peoria, IL
227 ASOS Atlantic City, NJ 238 ASOS Meridian, MS 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY
284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 27418

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
164 Day/Night Spot Trackers (3080) $60,000 $9,840,000
340 WPAN Capability (3080) $15,000 $5,100,000
120 Lightweight Range Mark Designator (3080) $120,000 $14,400,000
Total $29,340,000

153
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY DISMOUNTED AUDIO AND VIDEO MISSION

RECORDING SYSTEM
1. Background. Joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs) have historically utilized hand-written
notes as the sole source of reference for mission debrief. This has led to substandard debriefs
with critical elements of the mission either remembered incorrectly or overlooked
completely. Much like aircrew, JTAC-Instructors and evaluators play multiple roles for the
student (such as notional aircraft, Army ground elements, etc.) limiting the time they have to take
thorough notes and decreasing the likelihood that mission details will be remembered for the
debrief phase of the mission. The result of these limitations is that mission debriefs lack fidelity,
reducing their effectiveness, limiting the ability of a JTAC to improve as a result of every
training mission. A lightweight, wearable recording device for the dismounted JTAC will
provide the fidelity needed to improve JTAC mission debrief. The system must record traffic for
up to two radios, ambient sound, and “HUD” video (both day and night capable). It must be
capable of time stamping significant event for quick reference. It also must be able to play all
recorded channels synchronously (internally and in conjunction with aircraft recording systems)
with little configuration required by the operator. Optimal fielding is one device per training and
evaluation position, for a total of seven devices per operational unit. Additionally, the two Air
Support Operations Centers (ASOC), the Test Center and the JTAC Combat Training Flight have
a requirement for two devices per unit.
2. Source of Need. 66WPS JTAC Weapons Instructor Course (WIC) white paper titled JTAC
Debriefing Guide; Lessons learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI
FREEDOM, ARC 2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK 169 ASOS Peoria, IL
113 ASOS Terre Haute, IN 146 ASOS Will Rodgers, OK 227 ASOS Atlantic City, NJ
116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 147 ASOS Ellington Field, TX 238 ASOS Meridian, MS
118 ASOS New London, NC 148 ASOS Fort Indiantown Gap, PA 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY
122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 165 ASOS Garden City, GA 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS
124 ASOS Gowen Field, ID 168 ASOS Peoria, IL 123 STS Louisville, KY
125 STS Portland, OR AATC Tucson, AZ
238 ASOS Meridian, MS 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 27418

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
120 JTAC MSN Recording and Debrief System $5,000 $600,000
(3080)
Total $600,000

154
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Special Operations/Personnel Recovery

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE JOINT

OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
1. Background. The legacy Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) vehicular communications
system has proven unsustainable, highly unreliable and incompatible with current battlefield
technologies. These limitations force TACPs to rely upon the use of non-amplified man-portable
communications systems from within vehicles resulting in both unsafe conditions and ineffective
communications. An integrated radio suite providing modern amplified multi-band and High
Frequency (HF) radios is required to ensure mission critical communication with tactical and
disaster response agencies. It should be modular in nature so that it can be installed, operated
and maintained in various highly-mobile tactical vehicles. The system should be integrated and
designed around amplified man-portable radios, compatible antennas, cables and human
interfaces devices that allow centralized control of the entire suite. Joint Terminal Attack
Controllers (JTACs) are also in an ever-evolving communications-intensive operating
environment under direct combat conditions. They require the ability to maintain persistent,
secure, voice and data communications with aircraft and other remote sites in a non-permissive
environment. JTACs vehicle crews require the ability to communicate internally within a single
vehicle, externally to additional vehicles, command and control elements, and to combat aircraft
operating on a broad spectrum between 2MHz-2GHz. Additionally, various tactical scenarios
will require multiple JTACs to be able to utilize and control the communications system
remotely from both static and dynamic tactical environments. Optimal fielding places 12 systems
at each operational squadron to meet front line US Army battalion support UTC requirements.
Also, the two Air Support Operations Centers require two systems each to meet Unit Type Code
(UTC) deployment requirements.
2. Source of Need. ACC TACP RWG and LOGDET Review validated requirement; Air Force
Material Command Pre-Solicitation reference number R1550; Air Force Research Lab request
for solutions solicitation number BAA-RWK-10-0003; Lessons learned from Operations
ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI FREEDOM; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference;
2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 113 ASOS Terre Haute, IN 116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA
122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 124 ASOS Gowen Field, ID 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK
146 ASOS Will Rodgers, OK 147 ASOS Ellington Fld, TX 148 ASOS Indian Town Gap, PA
168 ASOS Peoria, IL 169 ASOS Peoria, IL 227 ASOS Atlantic City, NJ
238 ASOS Meridian, MS 274 ASOS Syracuse, NY 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 27418

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
44 JTAC Intra Vehicle Comm System (3080) $120,000 $5,280,000
Total $5,280,000

155
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Page Intentionally Left Blank

156
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 MQ-1 and MQ-9
MQ-1 and MQ-9

The MQ-1 and MQ-9 remotely piloted aircraft make

up the largest Major Weapons System (MWS) and
Formal Training Unit (FTU) community in the Air
Force. These aircraft have poor cockpit
configurations and the constraints of the aircraft and
Ground Control Station (GCS) Operational Flight
Programs (OFP) inhibit the rapid capability
evolution demanded by Combatant Commands.

The MQ-1 Predator is a medium-altitude, long endurance, remotely piloted system. The MQ-1’s
primary mission is to act as an Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) asset,
employing sensors to provide real-time data to commanders and intelligence specialists at all
levels. The MQ-1 conducts interdiction and armed reconnaissance with a system integrating
electro-optical-infrared laser designator and laser illuminator into a single sensor package. The
aircraft employs two laser-guided AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. The MQ-1 Predator is flown by
ND, AZ, TX, and OH Air National Guard (ANG) units. The NV ANG supports active duty MQ-
1 operational and training sorties.

The MQ-9 Reaper is a medium-to-high altitude, long-

endurance, remotely piloted system. Because of its
robust weapons payload capacity, long endurance, and
on-station times, the MQ-9’s primary mission is hunter-
killer operations against emerging targets. The MQ-9’s
secondary mission is to act as an ISR asset, employing
sensors to provide real-time data to commanders and
intelligence specialists at all levels. It is larger, faster,
and more lethal than the MQ-1 Predator and is designed
to prosecute time-sensitive targets using precision
targeting and long endurance capability to find, fix, and
destroy or disable those targets. AR, CA, IA, MI, NY,
PA, and TN ANG units operate the MQ-9 Reaper. The NV ANG supports Active Component
MQ-9 operational and training.
Tab O

157
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 MQ-1 and MQ-9

Critical Capabilities List

 Minimal Latency Tactical Data Link
 Communication Suite with Improved Interface
 Mission Debrief System
 Next Generation Tactical Situation Display
 Network-Capable Aircrew Training Device (See Tab Q)

Essential Capabilities List

 Deployable Launch and Recovery Capability
 Enhanced Survivability in Contested Environments - Ku, Global Positioning
System (GPS), and Muti-Spectrum Targeting System (MTS)
 Electronic Warfare (EW) Suite – Electronic Attack, Imminent Threat Warning, and Self-
Protection
 Beyond Line Of Sight (BLOS) Bandwidth Enhancement
 Airborne Sense and Avoid

Desired Capabilities List

 Isolated Personnel Locator
 Near Real-Time Inflight Weather Update Capability
 Targeting Pod (TGP) with Directed Energy Counter-Countermeasures
 All-Weather Weapon
 Mobile Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF)
 Weapon Simulate Mode
 Auto Takeoff Land
 High Definition Full Motion Video

158
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

MINIMAL LATENCY TACTICAL DATA LINK

1. Background. MQ-9 aircraft lack the means to establish and maintain direct Tactical Data
Link (TDL) communications with command and control, tactical agencies, and other TDL users.
TDLs are used to share aircraft position, targeting data, sensor points of interest, cursor-on-target
data, and target-track information derived from various intelligence sources via an airborne
network. The lack of a TDL capability on board the aircraft slows the kill chain, delays effects
for supported commanders, and poses a safety issue with regard to aircraft position and airspace
deconfliction. This lack of direct information sharing with other TDL participants degrades
overall situational awareness in all operations utilizing TDL information and networks. Current
MQ-9 TDL communication and information transfers are not routed directly through the existing
airborne TDL network but instead are routed through multiple ground-based servers outside of
the RPA architecture. This method of TDL data routing limits data-link communication with
end-user agencies and TDL players, causing significant delays of critical information, such as
aircraft position and targeting data. A line-of-sight (LOS) tactical data link (TDL) radio is
needed, with associated hardware and antennas, to adequately employ across multiple AORs in
the current operational environment. The system must be compatible with all current data link
architectures in both domestic and combat areas of responsibility, to include Situational
Awareness Data Link (SADL) and Link-16 with gateway capable software. All tracks, icons and
messages must be integrated into current and future RPA Tactical Situation Displays (Zeus,
Google Earth, Siris, Ares, etc). It must also have the ability to receive, transmit, and relay
Variable Message Format (VMF) data. This TDL system must include provisions for consistent,
reliable, timely, and unrestricted TDL communications, and have open architecture for growth
and advances in the TDL technology. In order to be a stand-alone TDL platform, each MQ-1/9
will require one TDL capability per aircraft (36).
2. Source of Need. MIL-STD 6016D, MIL-STD 3011, 2014-15 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
214 RG Davis-Monthan AFB, 188 RW Ft. Smith, AR 178 WG Springfield-Beckley
AZ MPT, OH
174 ATKW Hancock IAP, NY 163 RW March ARB, CA 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX
132 RW Des Moines IAP, IA 119 WG Hector IAP, ND 118 AW Nashville IAP, TN
111 AW Willow Grove, PA 110 AW Battle Creek, MI 107 AW Niagara Falls ARS, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3600) N/A $500,000
36 TDL Radios and Installation Hardware (3010) $200,000 $7,200,000
Total $7,700,000

159
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

COMMUNICATION SUITE WITH IMPROVED INTERFACE

1. Background. The MQ-1 / 9 functions across multiple domains and mission sets
simultaneously. Tasks often involve ISR, Strike, Special Operations, and Command & Control
(C2). Recent conflicts have reinforced the need for the MQ-1 / 9 to execute across the full range
of military operations, in both contested and uncontested environments with multiple mission
players simultaneously. It requires a flexible tactical voice system that interconnects all mission
players. This should be an Internet Protocol (IP)-based communications solution that integrates
intercom, line-of-sight (LOS) radios, and telephone into a single headset with spatial audio. The
system should feature an intuitive interface that does not increase aircrew workload through
additional buttons, switches, or actuators. Any user should be able to talk directly to any other
user on the system. Furthermore, the system should allow use of in-theater LOS repeater towers
via the push of a button. This system would be ideal for MQ-1 / 9 crews who are limited by a
single LOS radio on the aircraft, a single point of failure that suffers from poor reception and up
to a two-second satellite relay delay. In order to effectively fulfill its cross-domain role as a C2
node, MQ-1 / 9s require access to multiple in-theater radios and direct voice access to key C2
players. Additionally, this integrated suite would give MQ-1 / 9 crews what is standard across
the rest of the Air Force fleet: the ability able to monitor several LOS radio frequencies
simultaneously—a key factor in mission effectiveness. Lastly, as MQ-1 / 9s are increasingly
tasked to perform multi-ship tactics, the system would allow any GCS to talk directly to other
geographically separated GCSs, vastly improving combat capabilities and situational
awareness. A central server is needed to control the system, either one per unit, or a large central
server for the enterprise hosted at one unit, with a back-up hosted at another. Operator stations
are needed in each Ground Control Station (GCS), one each for the pilot and sensor operator,
plus nine additional operator stations in each Squadron Operations Center. The operator station
is a touchscreen interface that allows the user to select communication channels and graphically
shows the status of each channel.
2. Source of Need. Capability Production Document (CPD) for MQ-9 HUNTER-KILLER
paragraph 14c(2)(c), 8 Aug 06; AFCENT UON CAF 301-12, 17 Feb 12; ARC 2013 WEPTAC
Critical Requirement.
3. Units Impacted.
214 RG Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 188 RW Ft. Smith, AR 178 WG Springfield-Beckley MPT,
OH
174 ATKW Hancock IAP, NY 163 RW March ARB, CA 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX
132 RW Des Moines IAP, IA 119 WG Hector IAP, ND 118 AW Nashville IAP, TN
111 AW Willow Grove, PA 110 AW Battle Creek, MI 107 AW Niagara Falls ARS, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
36 GCS Operator Stations (3080) $150,000 $5,400,000
12 Central Servers (3080) $250,000 $3,000,000
108 SOC Operator Stations (3080) $150,000 $16,200,000
NRE (3080) N/A $1,000,000
Total $25,600,000
includes 10% spares
160
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

MISSION DEBRIEF SYSTEM

1. Background. The MQ-1 / 9 cockpit contains multiple computer screens displaying flight
parameters, mission data, weapons status, sensor information, maps, video feeds, and other
data. The displays consist of the Ground Control Station (GCS) Heads Up Displays (HUD),
Tracker Displays, four Heads Down Displays (HDD), two Multifunction Work Station (MWS)
repeaters, and multiple peripheral computer repeaters. In all, the crew may have up to 16 screens,
each containing a critical piece of situational awareness. Only two of these screens are recorded,
the Pilot HUD and Sensor Operator HUD. For effective debriefs on the same level as the rest of
the tactical aircraft in the USAF and ANG inventory, a 16-channel Digital Video Recorder
(DVR) system is needed to simultaneously record each screen in a consistent format and send it
to a central server for later viewing. The system will be able to time-sync the recordings and
play them back in an intuitive way on a screen setup that mimics the setup of the cockpit. This
will enable the capture of mission data and easy playback for debrief and application of lessons
learned quickly and efficiently. One DVR will be needed for each GCS with the GCS screen
setup for full playback to be installed in each RPA unit briefing room (approximately three per
unit). Additionally, the server must be accessible from any computer in the Secure
Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) at each unit for viewing of individual and
multiple recording for review, reference, and academics.
2. Source of Need. AFI11-2MQ-1&9V3, 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council
3. Units Impacted.
214 RG Davis-Monthan AFB, 188 RW Ft. Smith, AR 178 WG Springfield-Beckley
AZ MPT, OH
174 ATKW Hancock IAP, NY 163 RW March ARB, CA 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX
132 RW Des Moines IAP, IA 119 WG Hector IAP, ND 118 AW Nashville IAP, TN
111 AW Willow Grove, PA 110 AW Battle Creek, MI 107 AW Niagara Falls ARS, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
NRE (3080) N/A $750,000
36 Digital Video Recorders (3080) $3,000 $108,000
36 GCS Screen Layouts (3080) $5,000 $180,000
12 Central Servers (3080) $175,000 $2,100,000
60 Mission Debrief System Software Applications $45,000 $2,700,000
(3080)
Total $5,838,000

161
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Global Integrated ISR

NEXT GENERATION TACTICAL SITUATION DISPLAY

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) MQ-1/MQ-9 Common Operating Picture
(COP) provides a web-based framework enabling a collaborative, fused framework that
effectively supports the warfighter. The fusion, synchronization and simultaneous access of real-
time communications, video and data it offers are often the difference between mission success
and failure. However, the awkward and inefficient Human Machine Interfaces (HMI) in the
current MQ-1/9 cockpit limits aircrew ability to fly the aircraft and manage the mission with
maximum efficiency and effectiveness. The MQ-1/9 cockpit is fed information from the
Squadron Operation Cell (SOC), which is connected to multiple sources of information and
programs running on separate networks. The COP resides in the SOC and needs further
integration with the cockpit to increase the efficiency of the current work flow. This in turn will
reduce redundant manual inputs and present information in an intuitive way for the operator so it
can be effectively acted upon. Enhancements to the Full-Motion Video (FMV) will include the
ability to telestrate (share drawings on our video), extract CAT-1 targetable coordinates from the
video and map, and depict synthetic mission participant ownship data inside the video, friendly
and enemy locations, and other critical information. There is also a need for integration with a
cross-domain solution to enable participants on different classification levels the ability to view,
share, and transfer mission-critical data. Lastly, there is a need to integrate several critical
applications that are currently stove-piped. These include PEX, ISR Tempal, SKYNET,
MAT/ROME, and UNICORN. These improvements will save thousands of man-hours and
provide significant combat capabilities.
2. Source of Need. ARC 2008-2010; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability; CAF WEPTAC
2015 Requirement; 2015 DCP Book Master - Information and Planning (ESF 5).
3. Units Impacted.
214 RG Davis-Monthan AFB, 188 RW Ft. Smith, AR 178 WG Springfield-Beckley
AZ MPT, OH
174 ATKW Hancock IAP, NY 163 RW March ARB, CA 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX
132 RW Des Moines IAP, IA 119 WG Hector IAP, ND 118 AW Nashville IAP, TN
111 AW Willow Grove, PA 110 AW Battle Creek, MI 107 AW Niagara Falls ARS, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
COP Integration Enhancement (3080) N/A $4,200,000
12 FMV / Cross-Domain Solution Add-On (3080) $670,000 $8,040,000
Total $12,240,000

162
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations, and Range Instrumentation
Simulation, Distributed
Mission Operations, and Range
Instrumentation
The Air National Guard’s (ANG) simulator program spans the spectrum from immersive high
fidelity to medium fidelity trainers. Although the ANG partners with the Air Force on some
programs, the ANG has the internal capability to field both mission crew and flight simulators in
direct partnership with industry. This approach has demonstrated innovative solutions that result
in reduced risk, cost, and schedule.

ANG programs include the KC-135R Boom Operator Simulation System (BOSS), the Advanced
ANG JTAC Training System (AAJTS); C-130 Multi-Mission Crew Trainer (MMCT); and the
next generation F-16C Full Mission Trainer (FMT). In addition, the HH-60G MMCT will enter
service in 2016 to support the school at Kirtland AFB.

Live, Virtual, Constructive Operational Training (LVC-OT) is a key component of readiness

training. The Distributed Training Operations Center (DTOC), located at the 132WG, provides
persistent networks, modeling and simulation expertise, and operational support for daily DMO
by linking a wide array of simulators at Guard, Reserve, and Active AF units. In 2015, DTOC
began supporting live-fly exercises with manned-constructive forces, and will continue to grow
live training support as infrastructure is established.

The ANG Operational Training Enterprise (Airspace, Primary Training Ranges (PTR) Regional
Training Centers (RTC), and Forward Operating Locations (FOL)) field realistic static,
multispectral target surrogates to replicate real-world complex target sets, realistic simulators to
replicate an Integrated Air Defense (IADS) environment, standardized, full spectrum, and
immersive electronic training environments that include appropriate levels of communications
and data link systems to support all current weapons systems in the Department of Defense
(DoD) inventory. The constant evolution of these technologies requires new training space,
equipment, infrastructure, and instrumentation to evolve and remain relevant. Further evolution
of this enterprise will adapt to the Live, Virtual and Constructive environment through the
Distributed Mission Operations construct.
Tab P

163
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations & Range
Instrumentation
 CRC Internal and External Simulator
Critical Capabilities List Capability
 F-15 High Fidelity Networked Simulators
Simulation  RC-26 Full Crew DMO Simulator
 Battle Command Center 4th/5th Generation  TACP / ASOC JTAC Training Simulator
Training Suite
 Security Forces Use-of-Force Simulator Distributed Mission Operations
 Guardian Angel Full Spectrum Personnel  Range Instrumentation Live-Virtual-
Recovery Simulators Constructive Operational Training
 JSTARS Weapon System Trainer Motion  Distributed Training Operations Center 5th
Base Generation Environment Generation
 RPA Network Capable Aircrew Training  Live-Virtual-Constructive Operational
Device Training and Cyber Security
 AOC Joint Range Extension / Link Training  Virtual-Constructive Representation in
Tool Weapon System Displays
 Space Live, Virtual, Constructive  Distributed Training Operations Center Joint
Networked Training Solution Information Operations Node
 AOC DMO Training Capability
 Special Tactics High Angle Training System Range Instrumentation
 None
Distributed Mission Operations
 Cross-Domain Solutions
 Enhanced Live-Fly Training with Virtual- Desired Capabilities List
Constructive Representation
 ARCNet Live Radar Feed, Datalink, and Simulation
Two-Way Radio Capability  RPA Weapon Simulation Mode
 Multi-Spectral Imaging Capability  F-22 Deployable Simulator
 MC-12 Distributed Mission Operation
Range Instrumentation Capable Full Mission Simulator
 Mobile High Fidelity EW Threat Emitters
 Range Communications Instrumentation Distributed Mission Operations
Systems, Architecture and Infrastructure  Distributed Training Operations Center
 Realistic, Static, Multispectral Targets Virtualization
 Integrated Weapons Scoring Systems  TS/SCI ARCNet DMO Network
 Holographic Live-Virtual-Constructive
Operational Training Capability
Essential Capabilities List
Range Instrumentation
Simulation  None
 LC-130 Mission Specific Simulator
 MC-12 DMO Capable Full Mission * Note: Simulation did not have a separate breakout
Simulator session at the 2014 WEPTAC. Capabilities are
 F-16 High Fidelity Ready Aircrew Program extracted from the referenced weapon system Tab
Quality Simulators and consolidated, without priority order, in this Tab
 EC-130J Weapon System Trainer for clarity.
 Guardian Angel Terminal Area Simulator
 HH-60G DMO Capable Simulator
 HC-130J DMO Simulator

164
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: BATTLE COMMAND CENTER 4TH/5TH GENERATION TRAINING

SUITE
1. Background. The Battle Control Centers (BCC) provides surveillance, identification, and
aircraft control / intercept to defend North America. The BCCs train the direction, deconfliction
and employment of ground, surface and air assets for Homeland Defense in a sim over live
operational environment. The BCC’s are also tasked with executing mandated initial
qualification, upgrade and monthly training requirements to ensure operations personnel meet
local, Major Command (MAJCOM) and North American Aerospace Defense Command
(NORAD) requirements. The current training environment degrades daily mission operations
capability by forcing simultaneous simulated training over the live air picture during real world
operations. This does not allow for a robust and realistic training atmosphere. A BCC Mission
Training Center (MTC) at each Air Defense Sector (ADS) will provide a separate operations
center mirroring that of the BCC, creating a standalone virtual environment. The MTC will be
housed in a Relocatable Simulation Shelter (RSS) certified for classified operations until
permanent facilities are constructed. The MTC will support all training requirements while
ensuring 4th and 5th generation fighter integration, providing a means to establish and evaluate
Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTP). Most importantly, a BCC MTC provides integrated
battle management training with other tactical Command and Control (C2) engagement
platforms. BCC MTC’s will be designed to train with and integrate all fighter, C2 and future
platforms on the Combat Air Force (CAF) Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) Network
(DMON) in a Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) environment. This long term vision for a “multi-
level/multi-use” LVC capability allows mission planning, briefing, mission execution and
debriefing within the current BCC facilities. Relocatable Simulation Shelters (RSS) would be
needed to conduct DMO training until permanent facilities are procured via MILCON. The four
BCC’s that require a MTC are the 176 ADS, 224 ADS, 225 ADS and the 169th ADS.
2. Source of Need. Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 1322.18 Military Training; Air
Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2251 Management of Air Force Training Systems; USAF DMO
CONOPS Oct 2003; Contingency Plan (CONPLAN) 3310-12 Aerospace Defense and Maritime
Warning; BCC RRB #2 FY18 POM; 1AF #7 FY18 POM; NORAD Master Gap List #4; 2009-
2014 CAF WEPTAC Critical RDA; ACC training waiver for BCCs 2009-2014; 2011-2013 ARC
WEPTAC Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
224 ADG Rome, NY 225 ADG Joint Base Lewis- 169 ADS Wheeler Army Air
McChord, WA Field, HI
176 ADS JB Elmendorf-
Richardson, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 BCC MTC (3080) $1,300,000 $5,200,000
4 RSS (3080) $625,000 $2,500,000
Total $7,700,000

165
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: SECURITY FORCES USE-OF-FORCE SIMULATOR

1. Background. Due to the increase in active shooter incidents, a substantial need has been
identified to provide Security Forces (SF) with a simulator that provides realistic, interactive
training environments with force options and escalation of force scenarios. This interactive
simulation system will be used to train single or multiple personnel in every aspect of defensive
and judgmental, immediate threat discrimination decision making. In simulation, a trainee’s
verbal commands, defensive tactics, situational awareness and integrated weapons systems,
within the given scenario, determine the computer generated adversary actions displaying
responsive video scenes and graphical target reactions. Additionally this Use-of-Force (UOF)
system will incorporate a haptic discomfort feedback system to discourage improper tactics and
reinforce performance under pressure. The force option aspect of these simulator systems can be
used for mission-specific preparatory training, Air Force mandated recurring training, and Just-
in-Time (JIT) training. Moreover, these systems enhance each installation's integrated home-
station training capability. Security Forces need a mix of high, medium and low fidelity systems,
which will offer a fully immersive, semi-immersive or lower, advanced interactive system. One
option would be to modify the 16 currently fielded ANG Advanced Joint Terminal Attack
Controller (JTAC) Training Systems (AAJTS) with a simulation capability to meet SF training
requirements. Additionally, there is a need for 10 specialized, six-meter diameter, 320-degree
simulators, incorporating AAJTS software, to provide dedicated regional immersive training
capability. The Air National Guard (ANG)’s Relocatable Simulator Shelter (RSS) program
provides a purpose built shelter to house simulators where on-base facilities are not available or
programmed for Military Construction. To complete a triad of force option simulation, a low
cost, portable, mobile upgradable system is needed for the remaining 65 SF units. This system
would provide advanced interactive shoot / no shoot programs that challenge the user’s judgment
and decision-making abilities in use-of-force scenarios in a smaller footprint. The triad of ANG
trainers insures that all ANG SF units will have on-base training capability.
2. Source of Need. AFI 36-2226 Combat Arms Program, AFI 36-2646 Security Forces Training
and Standardization Evaluation Program, AFI 31-101 Integrated Defense, AFI 31-117 Arming
and Use of Force, DODD 5210.56, Air Force Security Forces Center Shoot Move Communicate
Concept of Operations, Department of Homeland Security Active Shooter guidelines, National
Summit on Multiple Casualty Shootings, Lessons Learned from Domestic Operations
(DOMOPS), Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF), and NEW
DAWN (OND), 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted. 91 SF units will receive one of the UOF trainers.

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 AAJTS Modifications (3080) $165,000 $1,980,000
10 SF Simulator Systems (3080) $1,000,000 $10,000,000
65 Portable Simulator Systems (3080) $75,000 $4,875,000
5 Relocatable Simulator Shelters (3080) $350,000 $1,750,000
Total $18,605,000

166
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: GUARDIAN ANGEL FULL SPECTRUM PERSONNEL RECOVERY

SIMULATORS
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Guardian Angels (GA) lack the ability to get highly
intensive training like other weapon systems that utilize simulators for Crew Resource
Management (CRM), emergency procedures and refresher training. The Guardian Angel
Simulator Skill Enhancer (GASSE) package focuses on core tasks within the GA career field.
One GASSE is needed for the Battlefield Airmen Center at Gulfport MS that will support all GA
simulator training. The GASSE package consists of: (1) Small Unit Tactics and Combat
Marksmanship trainer that allows operators to effectively shoot, move and communicate.
Limited ranges, munitions, and logistics limit the amount of live training available. (2) Terminal
Control simulators that will allow Combat Rescue Officers (CRO) to ensure Joint Tactical Air
Controller (JTAC) skills stay current and proficient. (3) SCUBA dive and search pool; the GA
mission encompasses deep water scuba diving, lift procedures, dry suit and cold water
operations. GA units lack a pool trainer with mockups that will enable GA to effectively train
underwater recovering personnel and equipment from the ocean. (4) Proximity Combat Military
Freefall (wind tunnel); with parachutes, tactical gear, jumping with Night Vision Goggles (NVG)
and other mission specific equipment; training in a wind tunnel is the safest way to practice
Tactics Techniques and Procedures (TTPs), emergency procedures (EP) and different equipment
sets while in a freefall position. (5) High Angle Trainer; a tower to practice infiltration and
exfiltration from a helicopter mock-up as well as practicing rope rescue work (raising and
lowering patients and teams) in mountainous environments. GA require the resources and
facilities to better train to meet Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP) requirements
and TTPs in a controlled training environment.
2. Source of Need. The GASSE requirement identified by the GA Senior Leaders Working
Group and supported by the Weapon System Council; Wing Commanders identified as a critical
need; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
Battlefield Airmen Center
Gulfport, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
1 Small Unit Tactics and Combat $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Marksmanship (3080)
1 Terminal Control Simulators (3080) $2,400,000 $2,400,000
1 Proximity Combat Military Freefall Wind $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Tunnel (3080)
1 High Angle Trainer (3080) $1,500,000 $1,500,000
1 SCUBA Dive Search and Recovery Pools (3080) $7,000,000 $7,000,000
Total $14,900,000

167
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: JSTARS WEAPON SYSTEM TRAINER MOTION BASE

1. Background. 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 60, also known as Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 60, Table A1B requires full
flight simulators to have a motion system, along with other requirements, to qualify a simulator
for creditable approaches and landings. This means that pilots cannot update their currencies nor
log takeoff and landings in the simulator if the motion system is not working properly. Since
initial delivery of the E-8 Weapon System Trainer (WST), the hydraulic motion system
components have failed and have become outdated due to technological obsolescence. In fact,
modern motion systems no longer use hydraulic fluids due to the high cost of maintenance and
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety requirements. Instead, they use
electro-mechanical actuators that more accurately replicate aircraft aerodynamic conditions and
significantly reduce maintenance costs. E-8C WST #1 no longer has an operable motion system
and WST #2’s motion system cannot be repaired if it fails in the future. Once this motion system
stops working, pilots will only be able to log takeoffs and landings, and update their currencies,
in the aircraft. This will have an adverse impact on pilot training, significantly increase the costs
of keeping pilots current, increase the wear and tear on the operational aircraft, and negatively
impact aircraft availability for operational missions.
2. Source of Need. 14 CFR Part 60, 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 WST Electric Motion System Bases and $1,300,000 $2,600,000
Integration (3080)
Total $2,600,000

168
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: RPA NETWORK CAPABLE AIRCREW TRAINING DEVICE

1. Background. Air National Guard MQ-1/9 equipped units lack an Aircrew Training Device
(ATD) that integrates with Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) networks within the Live
Virtual Constructive (LVC) environment. Aircrew are expected to be tactically proficient
during integrated kinetic strike events but have limited training opportunities. Additionally,
since Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) execute combat operations 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
squadrons are unable to use embedded training on mission equipment. This limitation prevents
realistic kinetic strike training elements not accomplished during current employment operations.
A Continuation Training (CT) program that meets proficiency demands requires a standalone
training system. MQ-1/9 crews require an ATD that is accredited at multiple levels of
classification, is Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) / DMO compliant, accurately
replicates aircraft weapons employment capabilities, and captures Operational Flight Program
(OFP) characteristics. This ATD must be a certified simulator to allow for accurate emergency
procedures training and satisfy Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) currency requirements, to include
check rides. Since MQ-1/9 systems change frequently, it is critical for the ATD to accept rapid
concurrency updates, OFPs, upgrades and modifications. To maximize training opportunities,
two ATDs are needed at each RPA unit.
2. Source of Need. 2015 ARC WEPTAC Conference.
3. Units Impacted.
107 AW Niagara Falls ARS, NY 119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATKW Hancock IAP, NY
110 AW Battle Creek IAP, MI 132 RW Des Moines IAP, IA 178 FW Beckley MAP, OH
111 TKW Horsham ANGS, PA 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 188 FW Ft. Smith RAP, AR
118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
24 RPA Aircrew Training Device (3080) $1,000,000 $24,000,000
NRE (3080) N/A $465,000
Total $24,465,000

169
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: AIR OPERATIONS CENTER JOINT RANGE EXTENSION / LINK

TRAINING TOOL
1. Background. Air Operations Center (AOC) Joint Interface Cell (JIC) operators lack the
ability to train in a simulated environment. Unlike the Active Duty, Air National Guard (ANG)
units cannot consistently accomplish training using “live” data and thus require a training
simulation capability. Joint-Range Extension (JRE) and Air Defense Systems Integrator (ADSI)
are hardware and software systems that receive information transmitted on a live tactical data
link in a particular area of operations and forward that information to another tactical data link
terminal beyond the line of sight. A JRE / Link training tool is needed to operate the software
systems associated with JRE in a non-operational environment. This JRE / Link training tool
would allow the JIC within the AOC Combat Operations Division (COD) to build, initiate,
manage, manipulate, track, and link data. The current the simulation tools of record, Theater
Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) and Part Task Trainer (PTT),) do not support link
degradation and manipulation training. Consequently, ANG AOC units cannot conduct in-
garrison training on a significant number of Air Combatant Command (ACC) mandated COD
Joint Interface Cell Controllers (JICC) Task Training List (TTL) items. Air Force Instruction
(AFI) 13-1 AOC Vol. 1 mandates continuation training on link systems by members of the CJIC
Cell. Furthermore, the part task trainer is not forecast to support this critical link training
requirement. AOCs therefore require a system which will support daily link training for its JIC
and allow its team to remain current, qualified and proficient in link management systems.

2. Source of Need. AFI 13-1 Vol. 1, AFPD 13-1, ANNEX A; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC
Conference; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 112 AOG State College, PA 152 AOG Syracuse, NY
157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, 183 AOG Springfield, IL 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI
MO
286 AOG Meridian, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
7 AOC JRE Link Training Tools (3080) $40,000 $280,000
7 Help Desk / Support * (3840) $11,600 $81,200
Total $361,200
* Recurring annual expense.

170
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: SPACE LIVE-VIRTUAL-CONSTRUCTIVE NETWORKED TRAINING

SOLUTION
1. Background. Due to a lack of dedicated training equipment, Space operators cannot conduct
interconnected training scenarios. By connecting local space trainers to the Joint Information
Operations Range (JIOR), space units are able to utilize the Distributed Mission Operations
Center - Space (DMOC-S) to train with each other and integrate training effects into Large Force
Exercises (LFE) that effect intelligence units and Combat Air Force (CAF) aircraft. As an
example, space forces can have an effect on the ability of an Integrated Air Defense System
(IADS) to communicate between sites. Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) nodes would allow
space forces to integrate effects and then provide those effects to a live range where participants
could see the effects of the space units, allowing for realistic training scenarios and the ability to
integrate effects with other units in a safe and secure manner. Additionally, if space forces have
the ability to integrate effects with other Air Force systems (Cyber units, EC-130, RC-135),
space units could practice integrating effects from distributed locations. Each Air National
Guard (ANG) space squadron requires two sets of connectivity nodes to accommodate multi-
scenario simultaneous training.
2. Source of Need. Air Force space Command (AFSPC) and Air Combat Command (ACC) LVC
training memos; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
114 SPCS Patrick AFB, FL 137 SWS Greeley AGS, CO 216 SPCS Vandenberg AFB, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
6 JIOR Connectivity Node (3080) $20,000 $120,000
6 Fiber Runs (3080) $50,000 $300,000
Total $420,000

171
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: AIR OPERATIONS CENTER DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS

TRAINING CAPABILITY
1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) Air Operation Centers (AOCs) require
Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) training capabilities through realistic, focused virtual
training events. ANG AOCs can best meet this requirement through increased joint training
events offered through Distributed Mission Operations (DMO), similar to the F-15, F-16,
AWACS and JSTARS, who currently use this system. The ARCNet-1 data network provides
access to existing training networks that provide AOC operators with standardized training
capabilities and reduce training expense through the ANG’s Distributed Training Operations
Center (DTOC). These systems offer real-time multi-platform aircraft integration and up to date
exercise scenarios for AOC members. The distributed network called ARCNet-1 is managed by
the DTOC located at the Des Moines, Iowa ANG Base. The Web / Application Delivery
Controller cloud within ARCNet 1 provides ANG AOCs the capability to extend their local AOC
Weapon System applications to AF Reserve and Active Duty units across existing networks
through the DTOC. This gateway allow external access to AOC hosted applications and provide
data compression for increased performance over the network, and secures remote user
connections by encrypting and encapsulating all network traffic.
2. Source of Need. AFPD 10-3 paragraph 1.3; 2012-2014 ARC WEPTAC, 2014-2015 ARC
WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 112 AOG State College, PA 152 AOG Syracuse, NY
157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, 183 AOG Springfield, IL 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI
MO
286 AOG Meridian, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
7 ARCNet-1 Gateways (3080) $35,000 $245,000
Total $245,000

172
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION: SPECIAL TACTICS HIGH ANGLE TRAINING SYSTEM

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) consist of Combat Control Teams (CCT),
Pararescue (PJ), and Special Operations Weather Teams (SOWT) that are tasked with adverse
terrain, high angle rescue, confined space, and Alternate Insertion and Extrication (AIE)
operations. Training for these core-skillset tasks can be accomplished on a multipurpose climb
and repel tower. 123rd STS operators currently travel 1.5 - 3.0 hours to train for these operations
at off-base locations, minimizing effective use of training time and resources. All other active
duty and Air National Guard (ANG) Special Tactics units have nearby or dedicated towers to
meet training requirements. Training efficiency would be enhanced with an on-base training
tower that can be utilized at a moment’s notice and support full mission profile scenarios. The
training system should include a minimum of a 75 foot multi-level tower with a mixed angle
climbing wall, repel platform with anchors, FRIES (Fast Rope Insertion/Extraction System) bar,
helicopter mock-up with floor anchors and a FRIES bar, and a confined space extraction area.
2. Source of Need. Multiple lessons learned from Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) and
Domestic Operations (DOMOPS) events. ARC 2014-2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
123 STS Standiford Field, KY

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
Climbing Wall (3080) N/A $750,000
Total $750,000

173
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS: CROSS-DOMAIN SOLUTIONS

1. Background. Warfighters that employ together as a team in combat should train together in
both live and virtual environments. Network security requirements do not allow many
simulators to connect to other mission simulators without technical solutions that protect
network. These technical solutions are called Cross Domain Solutions (CDS). CDS are defined
as information assurance solutions that provide the ability to access or transfer data between two
or more differing security domains. They are integrated systems of hardware and software that
enable connections between different security domains or classification levels. CDS hardware
and software have been developed and are in use by Air Combat Command (ACC) and other
DoD agencies. Each type of simulator intended to connect via CDS must have a solution
tailored for it, thereby requiring integration testing. In addition, this effort will integrate the
Expert Common Immersive Theatre Environment (XCITE), a software driven environment
generator, common to nearly all ANG simulators. ANG CDS solutions would be hosted and
managed at the Air National Guard (ANG) Distributed Training Operations Center (DTOC) at
the 132 Wing, Des Moines IA.
2. Source of Need. 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council; Persistent ANG unit capability requests;
USAF LVC-OT Plan, March 2013; CAF LVC Vision, June 2013; MDS RAP Tasking Messages
and Volume 1 Training Requirements.
3. Units Impacted.
6 F-15C Units with connected simulators
12 F-16 Units (All Blocks) with projected connected simulators
2 ANG Mission Training Centers with connected simulators
4 A-10 Units with connected simulators
12 CRC/BCC Units with connected simulators
16 Air Support Operations Squadrons / Special Tactics squadrons with AAJTS Simulators
1 F-22 Unit with connected simulators

4. Program Details. PEC: 81380

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
CDS 1-4(3080) $650,000000 $2,600,000
F-15 Aircraft Simulators Integration (3080) N/A $500,000
F-16 Aircraft Simulators Integration (3080) N/A $1,500,000
XCITE Integration (3080) N/A $500,000
Air Defense Sector Integration (3080) N/A $250,000
Total $5,350,000

174
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS: ENHANCED LIVE-FLY TRAINING WITH

VIRTUAL-CONSTRUCTIVE REPRESENTATION
1. Background. This requirement includes components that will enable virtual and constructive
entities to be represented in live aircraft cockpits and on live Command, Control, Intelligence,
Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C2ISR) system displays. Advanced threat environments and
improved aircraft capabilities have made realistic and robust training difficult to achieve with
live aircraft, existing equipment, and existing airspace. Representation of virtual or manned-
constructive assets in the live fly environment allows for robust threats, readily available joint
blue air, and neutral entities to create a realistic picture in training airspaces. Similarly, injected
man-in-the-loop surface threats, datalink messaging, and other Command and Control (C2)
capabilities in daily live-fly training greatly enhance the value of that training. As 4th generation
capabilities advance and the demand for 5th generation integration increases, Live-Virtual-
Constructive (LVC) capability is essential to meet the training needs. Several Combat Air Force
(CAF) active and Air National Guard (ANG) units have demonstrated enhanced live fly LVC
training using off-the-shelf technology. Though the representation uses existing tactical
datalinks and represents entities with link only, the capability provides a robust training
capability compared to local intra-unit training using only live assets. In addition to the datalink
representation, voice capability from virtual-constructive control stations to the live-fly airspace
is essential to realistically integrate into live fly training. Existing templates in the USAF exist to
connect digital radios of the Virtual-Constructive environment to live radio networks, and the
requirements is to establish that connection at the Distributed Training Operations Center
(DTOC), the ANG nexus for Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) activity. This capability
benefits any Link 16 or Situational Awareness Datalink (SADL) capable aircraft, as well as
Command and Control, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C2ISR) platforms and
agencies needing enhanced live fly capabilities.
2. Source of Need. Persistent ANG unit capability requests; USAF LVC-OT Plan, March 2013;
CAF LVC Vision, June 2013; MDS RAP Tasking Messages and Volume 1 Training
Requirements; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
24 F-22, F-15C, F-16, and A-10 Units
12 CRC / BCC Units
16 Air Support Operations Squadrons / Special Tactics Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 81380

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Live-Constructive Gateway Systems * (3080) $500,000 $2,000,000
4 Integrated L-V-C Systems for CRTC (3080) $1,800,000 $7,200,000
8 ARCNet Gateway Racks (3080) $20,000 $160,000
Total $9,360,000
* Battlefield Operational Support System (BOSS), or equivalent, plus MIDS terminal or EPLRS Radios and
connection components.

175
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS: ARCNET LIVE RADAR FEED, DATALINK,

AND TWO-WAY RADIO CAPABILITY
1. Background. This requirement includes components that will enable live-fly radar feed and
communication into the virtual environment. Availability of a variety of assets for realistic
operations requires combinations of Live and Virtual participants in regular training. An
essential technical capability to facilitate this persistent interoperability is the addition of a live
radar feed into the virtual environment, as well as two-way radio capabilities. The live radar
feed will populate displays in relevant simulators, as well as Consolidated Operating Pictures
(COPs) at Distributed Training Centers (DTCs) such as the Distributed Training Operations
Center (DTOC). Radio communications between virtual and live participants, as well as
exercise control players and white forces, is provided through connection to Virtual-
Constructive Environments. Twelve Air National Guard (ANG) tactical ranges will receive the
Radio Bridge equipment. In addition, four ANG Air Defense Squadrons will receive the Radar
System Interface Units.
2. Source of Need. Persistent ANG unit capability requests; USAF LVC-OT Plan, March 2013;
CAF LVC Vision, June 2013; MDS RAP Tasking Messages and Volume 1 Training
Requirements; ARC 2014-2015 WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
24 F-22, F-15C, F-16, and A-10 Units
12 CRC/BCC Units
16 Air Support Operations Squadrons / Special Tactics Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 81380

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
12 Radio Bridge Solutions (3080) $50,000 $600,000
4 Radar System Interface Units and Track $555,000 $2,220,000
Correlators (3080)
Total $2,820,000

176
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS: MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGING

CAPABILITY
1. Background. Many Air National Guard (ANG) simulator systems, including aircraft and
Battlefield Airmen, need an unclassified Digital Airborne Multi-spectrum Multi-use Imaging
Technology (DAMMIT) that captures both daytime Electro-Optical (EO) and nighttime Infra-
Red (IR) cultural entity images in high sub meter resolution and with high thermal sensitivity for
Night Vision Goggle (NVG) applications. In addition, a secondary role supports emergency
responders including firefighters, security forces, search and rescue, explosive ordnance disposal,
Homeland Response Force, CBRNE Enhanced Response Force Package, domestic operations
such as pre- and post- disaster management. DAMMIT should address a variety of ANG
applications, high fidelity geo-specific imagery, correlated terrain and automatic 3D feature
extraction for enhanced training and simulation, mission rehearsal, search and rescue operations,
firefighting, and object identification under canopy. ANG units, first responders, military
planners, intelligence analysts, and decision-makers lack a single combined EO/IR imaging
capability able to automatically capture, process, manage, and disseminate high fidelity
geospatial data. DAMMIT imagery will be automatically processed, producing high quality and
highly accurate data in near real-time. The system can be used for creating accurate orthophotos
and high-resolution 3D models, fire mapping, search and rescue, interpretation and
more. National Geospatial Agency (NGA) imagery, generally satellite based, does not provide
the geospecific 3D imagery required for modeling cultural areas, such as airfields, for simulator
use. Central management of the DAMMIT equipment will allow more cost effective acquisition
of specialized visual database imagery at significant less cost than commercial sources.
DAMMIT will be compatible with SABIR Arm currently in use by ANG C-130 aircraft.
2. Source of Need. Lessons learned for Hurricane KATRINA in 2005, Hurricane IKE in 2008,
Superstorm SANDY in 2012; California Wildfires in 2007-2015, 2014-2015 Domestic
Capability Priorities Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
All ANG C-130 equipped units.

4. Program Details. PEC: 81380

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
1 DAMMIT Camera System (3080) $1,400,000 $1,400,000
SABIR Arm Integration (3080) N/A $465,000
3rd Party 3D Modeling Software (3080) N/A $100,000
Total $1,965,000

177
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

RANGES: MOBILE HIGH FIDELITY ELECTRONIC WARFARE THREAT

EMITTERS
1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) has a shortfall in realistic Electronic Warfare
(EW) threat training. To support Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) requirements, the ANG
Operational Training Enterprise (Airspace, Primary Training Ranges (PTR) Regional Training
Centers (RTC) and Forward Operating Locations) require realistic simulators to replicate an
Integrated Air Defense (IADS) environment. ANG owned and operated ranges have the
airspace, real-estate and infrastructure necessary to fully utilize EW assets. EW system
infrastructure consists of three major components: EW threat emitter, Identification Friend or
Foe (IFF) radar systems to provide tracking and a Command and Control Unit (C2U) to provide
system control and monitoring. The ANG currently has fixed systems at four of the twelve
ranges listed below. Acquisition of the EW systems listed below will provide deployable
capability for ANG flying unit to regional access to accomplish robust, realistic IADS training
from home station and during deployments to the RTCs. The accurate re-creation of adversary
threat signals will allow aviators to hone their EW skills and add increasingly difficult threat
scenarios to simulate a constantly changing battlefield. Adding the Mobile Command and
Control Unit (MC2U,) with the IFF trackers and JTEs, provides a deployable EW threat system
that can be mobilized, set up and operated within any of the range complexes listed below to
provide deployable threat capability to all ANG ranges. The quantity reflects the ability to either
integrate within a range with existing fixed capability or in a standalone tactical deployed
configuration using the MC2U.

2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking messages; ANG Training Ranges and Airspace Roadmap, FY
15; ANG Mission Directive 10.01; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Bollen Range, PA
Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI Hardwood Range, WI
Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX Razorback Range, AR
Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS Warren Grove Range, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
1 MC2U (3080) N/A $2,600,000
4 EW Emitters (3080) $6,500,000 $26,000,000
2 IFF Tracking systems (3080) $1,500,000 $3,000,000
Total $31,600,000

178
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

RANGES: COMMUNICATIONS AND TACTICAL DATALINK ARCHITECTURE

SUPPORT
1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) continues to modernize range instrumentation
and system integration. To support Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) requirements, the ANG
Operational Training Enterprise (Airspace, Primary Training Ranges (PTR), Regional Training
Centers (RTC), and Forward Operating Locations (FOL)) require realistic, standardized, full
spectrum, and immersive electronic training environments that include appropriate levels of
communications and data link systems. Range instrumentation systems are required to replicate
the operating environment, record, score employment and relay data in a useable format back to
the warfighter. Acquisition of these systems will provide ANG units the ability to accomplish
realistic full-spectrum training from home station. Range instrumentation systems fully
integrated with voice and data systems provide a range environment for ANG aircrew to exercise
the full kill chain. It increased sortie effectiveness and provides a environment for multiple
aircrews and joint training opportunities for ANG warfighters. It also provides capability to
provide training within distributed mission operations in an LVC environment. The systems will
be located at the RTC’s, PTRs and FOL’s with distributed AAR to the squadron level.
2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking messages; ANG Operational Training Enterprise Roadmap,
FY 15; Training Range Infrastructure Connectivity CONOPS FY 09, ANG Mission Directive
10.01; 2014-2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
Adirondack Range, NY Warren Grove Range, NJ Jefferson Range, IN
Bollen Range, PA Smoky Hill Range, KS Shelby Range, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
6 Link-16 Radios (3080) $360,000 $2,160,000
Battlefield Operational Support Systems (3840) N/A $297,000
6 Joint Range Extension Systems (3840) $132,000 $792,000
6 Range Radio Systems (3080) $150,000 $900,000
Total $4,149,000

179
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

RANGES: HIGH AND MEDIUM FIDELITY SURROGATE TARGETS

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) continues to field realistic target acquisition and
identification training. To support Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) tasking requirements, the
ANG Operational Training Enterprise (Airspace, Primary Training Ranges (PTR) Regional
Training Centers (RTC), and Forward Operating Locations (FOL)) field realistic static,
multispectral target surrogates to replicate real-world complex target sets. These ranges have the
airspace and real estate infrastructure necessary to fully utilize surrogate assets. High-value
complex target arrays mimicking unique vehicles, tanks, mobile communication equipment and
other targets require the physical characteristics to include visual footprint, density, and heat
signatures to simulate real systems. High and medium fidelity surrogate target arrays, used in
conjunction with complex mission scenarios, advanced aviation targeting pods, electronic
sensors and range instrumentation, provide a cost effective solution to providing visual target
density as well as targeting pod identification and acquisition associated with physical and heat
signatures of real systems. Acquisition of these systems will provide local access to ANG units
to accomplish realistic training from home station and during deployments to ANG Regional
Training Centers. Target density in conjunction with a constructive data link picture will support
exercise of the full kill chain. This accurate re-creation of target systems will allow aviators to
hone their skills and add increasingly difficult training scenarios for a constantly changing
environment. These high-fidelity target arrays are used at ANG training ranges to support
primary users (both air and ground forces) during all phases of training to include air-to-ground
gunnery, laser operations, and Close Air Support (CAS) training and large force exercises. The
remaining sixteen high fidelity targets complete the initial fielding plan developed through the
Range and CRTC Councils working groups. The total fielding plan is based on a range
minimum of two full EW threat systems per range. Ranges with additional EW threat system
capabilities received additional systems based on a combination of number and type of EW
threats they can generate with the simulators and the scenarios supporting the ANG regional
large force exercises hosted. The medium fidelity target fielding is based on a similar logic. All
ANG owned and operated Primary Training Ranges will be fielded with the minimum targets to
support standard training scenarios.
2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking messages; ANG Operational Training Enterprise Roadmap
FY15; ANG MD 10.01; 2014 and 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Atterbury Range, IN
Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI
Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX
Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
16 High Fidelity Targets (3080) $150,000 $2,400,000
250 Medium Fidelity Targets (3080) $18,000 $4,500,000
Total $6,900,000

180
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

RANGES: JOINT ADVANCED WEAPON SCORING SYSTEM

1. Background. The Joint Advanced Weapon Scoring System (JAWSS) upgrades the Tactical
Ordnance Scoring System (TOSS) by providing night and laser scoring capabilities for
pilots. JAWSS also provides greater accuracy and strafe scoring capability. JAWSS provides
virtual reality Imaging Weapons Training System (IWTS), No-Drop Weapon Scoring (NDWS),
and automated remote feedback for home-station debrief. JAWSS consists of five
systems: Weapon Impact Scoring System (WISS), Laser Evaluation System-Mobile (LES-M),
Large Scale Target Sensor System (LSTSS), Remote Strafe Scoring System (RSSS), and the
Imaging Weapons Training System (IWTS). Upgrading systems at our 14 Air Gunnery Ranges
would provide pilots immediate feedback while training to meet training and Ready Aircrew
Program (RAP) requirements. The Fielding plan below reflects a system requirement for each
ANG owned and operated Primary Training Range.
2. Source of Need. Range Advisory Council, Combat Training Range Group; Combat air Forces
Ready Aircrew Program; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Grayling Range, MI
Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO McMullen Range, TX
Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN Smoky Hill Range, KS
Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Warren Grove Range, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
12 Replacement WISS Systems (3080) $500,000 $6,000,000
12 Site Communications Infrastructure (3080) $250,000 $3,000,000
12 JAWSS Spares/Upgrade (3840) $200,000 $2,400,000
Total $11,400,000

181
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 Space Operations and Cyber Operations
Space Operations and Cyber
Operations
 Missile Warning, Satellite Control, and Launch Operations
 Network Warfare and Information Operations

Space Operations - The Air National Guard (ANG) provides support to Air Force Space
Command with over 900 personnel in seven squadrons located in CO, CA, NY, AK, FL, and
WY. Missions include missile warning, space situational awareness, command and control,
space control and satellite communications. Units provide direct support to the nuclear command
and control community and combatant commands through the employment of personnel, support
equipment and space weapon systems. Space operations provide targeting decisions, non-kinetic
effects, and mission essential communications.

Cyber Operations - The ANG cyber operations force includes fourteen units in DE, KS, PA,
MD, NJ, RI, TN, TX, VT, CA, and WA. Cyber capabilities support federal- and state-level
agencies, the Air Force, and combatant commands. Cyber units provide cyberspace offensive
and defensive capability to support operational and planning activities along with other
cyberspace support as requested. Guardsmen participating in these missions draw upon skills
from their related civilian careers. Specific missions assigned to ANG units include network
vulnerability assessments, digital media and network analysis, and full-spectrum cyber warfare
support in both exercises and operations. Execution of these activities occurs from home station
and national facilities through distributed operations.

Tab Q

183
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Operations, Cyber Warfare & Information
Operations
Critical Capabilities List Space
 Family of Beyond Line of Site
Cyber
Terminal Simulator
 Cyberspace Operations Virtual  Prime mover / tractor trailers
Interconnected Training
 Radio Frequency Site Survey
Environment
Equipment
 Cyberspace Operations Secure
Infrastructure Collaborative
Capability Desired Capabilities List
 Cyber Combat Maneuvering
Instrumentation Cyber
 Cyber Infiltration Kit  None
 ANG Combat Communications
Squadron Small Comm Package Space
Capability  None
Space
 Tactical Shelters for Space Missions
 Space Control Satellite Emulation
Suite
 Space Live, Virtual, Constructive
Connectivity (See Tab Q)
 Secure Headset Based Crew
Communications System
 Secure Crew Force Management
System

Essential Capabilities List

Cyber
 Portable / Temporary Secret
Compartmented Information
Facilities (SCIFs) for all ANG
Cyberspace units
 Mission Mapping Tool to Enhance
Cyber Protection Teams Capabilities
 Standardization of Cyber Protection
Team and National Mission Team
Facilities, Equipment, and Systems

184
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS VIRTUAL INTERCONNECTED TRAINING

ENVIRONMENT
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Cyberspace Operations (CO) units require a Virtual
Interconnected Training Environment (VITE) to support Tier 1, 2, and 3 exercises, conduct
training, and maintain combat mission ready proficiency as required by 24th Air Force. VITE
provides a persistent training environment supporting implementation of the Cyber Mission
Force construct and permit distributed training for integrated warfighter operations in both
kinetics, and non-kinetics. The VITE is a scalable capability configurable to any cyber
environment. It provides realistic network environments with the ability to simulate adaptive
opposing forces and threats. It simulates the internet-based critical infrastructure and key
resources with add-on modules to provide more realistic cyberspace threats, targets, and terrain.
The VITE provides simulation for commercial and government networks. This includes the non-
secure internet protocol router network, secret internet protocol router network, and Joint
Worldwide Intelligence Communications System, representing a wide variety of DoD
information network environments. The VITE operates as a standalone training environment and
connects to the information operations ranges, the distributed training operations center (DTOC),
or any other distributed environment. The VITE hosts a wide variety of software and integrates
with other weapon system training environments without additional licensing costs. Four hubs
will be needed to connect each of 17 VITE systems and four industrial control system modules.
Additionally, the PICO node hardware and connection fees will allow each site to connect the
VITE to the internet for distributed training operations.
2. Source of Need. Air Force Space Command Guidance Memorandum 10-1, -2 and -3; Air
Force Cyber Command Cyberspace Requirement Number, Jul 2011; 10th Air Force 2013
Prioritized Requirements, Aug 2013; 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2014 - 2015 ARC
WEPTAC Council.

3. Units Impacted.
102 NWS Quonset ANGB, RI 143 IOS Camp Murray, WA 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA
111 COS Willow Grove, PA 166 NWS New Castle, DE 273 IOS Lackland AFB, TX
119 CACS McGhee-Tyson, TN 175 NWS Fort Meade, MD 275 COS Martin State, MD
127 COS McConnell AFB, KS 229 IOS Burlington, VT 275 OSS Martin State, MD
132 NWS Des Moines, IA 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 276 COS Martin State, MD
140 COS Joint Base MDL, NJ 261 NWS Sepulveda, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Cyber Training Internet Simulator Hubs (3080) $452,000 $1,808,000
17 VITE System (3080) $390,000 $6,630,000
4 Industrial Control System Modules (3080) $10,000 $40,000
17 Information Operation Range Pico Nodes (3080) $125,000 $2,125,000
17 Interconnection Fee (3080) $72,000 $1,224,000
17 Interconnection Fee (3840) $20,000 $340,000
Total $12,167,000

185
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS SECURE INFRASTRUCTURE COLLABORATIVE

CAPABILITY
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Cyber Operations (CO), Information Operations
(IO) and Network Warfare (NW) squadrons and cyber groups operate from locations that are
distant from military and national cyber locations. The majority of planning, operations activities
and cyber warfare information sharing, occur in classified, collaborative environments, primarily
through the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communication System (JWICS) and National
Security Agency-Network (NSA-Net) infrastructure. ANG units lack the capability to access the
secure, classified, real-time communications and networks used by the Air Force and US Cyber
Command (USCYBERCOM) for collaboration, as well as threat and unique cyber situational
awareness. The Secure Infrastructure Collaborative Capability (SIC2) provides a shared
situational awareness in a secure collaborative environment and common operations picture to
support near real-time full spectrum cyberspace operations and training opportunities. The SIC2
will result in travel and manpower cost reduction, while providing a system to conduct briefings,
debriefings, and information sharing in a collaborative environment that is distributed amongst
all cyber mission areas in the ANG. One SIC2 system is required for each of the 17 units.
2. Source of Need. USCYBERCOM Cyberspace Operations Capabilities, Dec 2013; Air Force
Cyber Command (AFCYBER) Cyberspace Requirement Need (CRN), Aug 2011; Enabling
Concept for Cyberspace Common Operations Picture, Aug 2011; 2013, 2014, 2015 ARC
WEPTAC Critical Capability.
3. Units Impacted.
102 NWS Quonset ANGB, RI 143 IOS Camp Murray, WA 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA
111 COS Willow Grove, PA 166 NWS New Castle, DE 273 IOS Lackland AFB, TX
119 CACS McGhee-Tyson, TN 175 NWS Fort Meade, MD 275 COS Martin State, MD
127 COS McConnell AFB, KS 229 IOS Burlington, VT 275 OSS Martin State, MD
132 NWS Des Moines, IA 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 276 COS Martin State, MD
140 COS Joint Base MDL, NJ 261 NWS Sepulveda, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
17 SIC2 Systems (3080) $345,000 $5,865,000
Total $5,865,000

186
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

CYBER COMBAT MANEUVERING INSTRUMENTATION

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Cyberspace Operations (CO) are conducted in a
team environment where multiple operators sit on an operations floor working in tandem to
accomplish their mission. Each operator works off an individual computer with little situational
awareness of what is going on outside his or her individual screens. Additionally, little data is
available to visually represent the cyberspace environment and the network traffic moving
through it. ANG CO units require the ability to visualize the cyber battlespace at the tactical and
operational levels through the presentation of information via a live feed to an operational
display (data wall). This capability will enable training, planning, debrief, and Cyber Combat
Maneuvering Instrumentation (CCMI) (like Air Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation (ACMI)
but for cyber). The CCMI will provide the following capabilities: playback and/or real time
situational awareness, ability to ingest external cyber telemetry data from multiple sources,
display (aka. data wall), mission analysis modeling/display, shot validation, dependency based
planning, kill-chain visualization, and operational and tactical display/instrumentation. The
solution will work at the unclassified, secret, and top secret levels of classification. Of the 17
cyber units, 15 have an operational requirement and two have a support mission that do not
require CCMI. One CCMI is needed for each operational unit’s operational floor.
2. Source of Need. Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) Guidance Memorandum 10-1, 2 and 3;
Air Force Cyber Command (AFCYBER) Cyberspace Requirement Number (CRN), Jul 2011;
10th Air Force 2013 Prioritized Requirements, Aug 2013; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical
Capability; Optic Fusion White Paper (Weapon System Council 2015)
3. Units Impacted.
102 NWS Quonset ANGB, RI 140 COS Joint Base MDL, NJ 261 COS Sepulveda, CA
111 COS Willow Grove, PA 166 COS New Castle, DE 262 COS McChord AFB, WA
119 CACS McGhee-Tyson, TN 175 COS Fort Meade, MD 275 COS Martin State, MD
127 COS McConnel AFB. KS 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 275 OSS Martin State, MD
132 COS Des Moines, IA 229 IOS Burlington, VT 276 COS Martin State, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
15 Operations Center Display (3080) $342,000 $5,130,000
15 Dependency Modeling Software (3080) $577,000 $8,655,000
15 Cyber Tactical Visualization (3080) $75,000 $1,125,000
Total $14,910,000

187
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

CYBERSPACE WARFARE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS CYBER

INFILTRATION KIT
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) cyber offensive and defensive forces have a
requirement for commercially available system vulnerabilities and access tools in order to
provide training and increase situational awareness of the battlespace. Currently, cyberspace
threat emulation teams (CTE) within Cyberspace Protection Teams (CPT) as well as cyberspace
aggressor units lack an internal mechanism for generating realistic, threat-representative tactics
against USAF cyberspace forces. CPT CTE have a requirement to train operators to detect
enemies with the most current threat-representative capabilities, while cyberspace aggressor
units are tasked with maintaining current, realistic threat replication. Providing these cyberspace
units with the most up-to-date database of vulnerabilities will allow them to create training
programs based upon current threats, improve tactics, and increase the overall defensive
capabilities of the USAF. Of the 17 cyber units, 13 units have an operational mission requiring
awareness of cyberspace threats. One infiltration kit is needed for each of these 13 units.
2. Source of Need. USCYBERCOM Cyberspace Operations Capabilities, Dec 2013; Air Force
Cyber Command (AFCYBER) Cyberspace Requirement Need (CRN), Aug 2011; Executive
Order to Incorporate Realistic Cyberspace Conditions into Major DOD Exercises, CJCSI
6510.01F dated 09 Feb 2011; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
111 COS Willow Grove, PA 166 COS New Castle, DE 262 COS McChord AFB, WA
127 COS McConnel AFB. KS 175 COS Fort Meade, MD 273 IOS Lackland AFB, TX
132 COS Des Moines, IA 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 275 COS Martin State, MD
140 COS Joint Base MDL, NJ 261 COS Sepulveda, CA 276 COS Martin State, MD
143 IOS Camp Murray, WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
11 Cyber Infiltration Kits (3080) $500,000 $6,500,000
Total $6,500,000

188
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

ANG COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS SQUADRON SMALL COMM PACKAGE

CAPABILITY
1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Combat Communications Squadrons (CBCS) lack
Small Communication Package (SCP) equipment which provides command, control, and
communication capability to ASOS, Contingency Response Forces, Partners for Peace and other
directed missions. Current ANG CBCSs are postured to provide LCP (Large Comm. Package)
and MCP (Medium Comm. Packages) which have large logistical footprints, require 12 to 18
personnel and 60Kw generator support. SCP provides initial communications to Combatant
Commanders without burdening TRANSCOM with logistics requirements. SCP requires only 3
personnel to operate and uses standard commercial power. The system is designed to be airline
transportable which reduces shipping costs. The SCP manpower requirements alleviates
excessive CBCS personnel deploy-to-dwell ratio which is currently exceeding Air Force
standards. One SCP is required for each of four CBCS’.
2. Source of Need. PAD 12-07, AMC Build the Base; Contingency Response Forces; ACC
Deployable Radar Sites, Other Directed Mission and ASOS/ASOC; PACAF Other directed
missions; ANG Partners for Peace; 2015 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.
3. Units Impacted.
242 CBCS Fairchild AFB, WA 264 CBCS Peoria, IL 291 CBCS Keaukaha, HI
292 CBCS Kahului, HI

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Small Comm Package (3080) $500,000 $2,000,000
Total $2,000,000

189
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

TACTICAL SHELTERS FOR SPACE MISSIONS

1. Background. Air National Guard Space Units support domestic operations and federal
missions in space control, missile warning and satellite command and control. The National
Military Strategy 2015 has called for further investments to space, and six of seven ANG space
units have undergone, or are undergoing, weapon systems upgrades. In order to fulfill mission
and training requirements, space units require mobile, temporary shelters that may act as
classrooms, evaluation centers, and deployed operations centers. Shelters will house mission
activities up to Top Secret and Special Access Program security levels. Rapid acquisition of
portable structures will allow space units to continue upgrade, conversion, and training activities
to achieve Initial Operations Capability (IOC) and permit on-time delivery of mission
employment to supported COCOM and Joint Planning. Up to two tactical shelters are needed for
each unit depending on their size and configuration.

2. Source of Need. AFSPC Commander’s Annual Prioritized Air Reserve Component (ARC)
Initiatives; 2015-2016 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.
216 SPCS Vandenberg AFB, CA 114 SPCS Patrick AFB, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
4 Tactical Shelters (3080) $1,400,000 $5,600,000
Total $5,600,000

190
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

SPACE CONTROL SATELLITE EMULATION SUITE

1. Background. The 114th and 216th Space Control Squadrons (SPCS) support domestic
operations, global, and theater space control campaigns. The Space Control units have no ability
to generate targets and threat environments for operators to train against. These units require a
satellite emulation suite in order to maintain Combat Mission Ready (CMR) certification (to
include training, evaluation, and proficiency), to support development and operational test
events, and to support both service and joint exercise events. The system must be able to connect
to multiple space and intelligence weapons systems while also supporting connectivity to live
and virtual test and training ranges. The system must be ground mobile to allow transportability
to support deployable weapons systems when tasked to participate in service and joint exercises
such as Red Flag 16-3, Terminal Fury, and Austere Challenge.
2. Source of Need. Air Force Space Command Commander’s Annual Prioritized Air Reserve
Component Initiatives, 21 October 2015, Attachment 1, Priority #1; 2015 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted.
216 SPCS Vandenberg AFB, CA 114 SPCS Patrick AFB, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 Satellite Emulation Suites (3080) $40,000 $80,000
2 Help Desk/Support (3840) $11,600 $23,200
Total $103,200

191
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

SPACE SECURE HEADSET BASED CREW COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM

1. Background. The 114th and 216th Space Control Squadrons (SPCS), and the 137th Space
Warning Squadron (SWS) support domestic operations, global, and theater space control
campaigns. These units require a headset based secure voice communications system with
passive or active noise cancelling features in order to securely communicate tasking orders and
facilitate crew coordination for between 5 to 7 crew positions in a high decibel operating
environment. This will ensure accurate communication between crew positions, space units and
their respective C2 agencies while reducing the risk of miss-communication and increasing
COMSEC in a contested environment. Finally, a secure, headset based voice crew
communication system will improve training, evaluation, and exercise events by allowing event
coordinators to communicate between themselves and trainees.
2. Source of Need. Air Force Space Command Commander’s Annual Prioritized Air Reserve
Component Initiatives, 21 October 2015, Attachment 1, Priority #1; 2016 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted.
216 SPCS Vandenberg AFB, CA 114 SPCS Patrick AFB, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 Secure Crew Communication Systems (3080) $185,000 $370,000
Total $370,000

192
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Space Superiority/Cyberspace Superiority

SPACE SECURE CREW FORCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1. Background. The 114th and 216th Space Control Squadrons (SPCS) support domestic
operations, global, and theater space control campaigns. These units require a secure crew force
management system in order to track Combat Mission Ready (CMR) certification to include
training, evaluation, proficiency, readiness, and scheduling events. The required servers and
software must reside and be managed at the Top Secret level with the ability to interface with Air
Force Space Command’s Secure Global Network.
2. Source of Need. 2016 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted.
216 SPCS Vandenberg AFB, CA 114 SPCS Patrick AFB, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
2 Crew Force Management Servers (3080) $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Total $2,000,000

193
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
Page Intentionally Left Blank
 Security Forces
Security Forces
 Integrated Base Defense
 Combat Arms Support
 Law Enforcement

Air National Guard security forces comprise over 7,500

defenders from the 54 states and territories. Security
forces support worldwide contingencies and home-station
installations; they defend personnel and resources through
the principles of integrated base defense. Security Forces
protect, defend, and fight to enable Air Force, Joint and
Coalition missions at home station and abroad.

The security forces missions include installation access

control, asset security, suspect apprehension and
detention, high-risk vehicle inspections, heavy weapons
support with military operations in urban terrain, mounted
and dismounted individual and team patrols, convoy
operations, detainee movement operations, personal
security details, fly-away security, raven tasking, close
precision engagement teams and active shooter response.

To ensure defenders meet an evolving

threat and deter, detect, and defend
installations globally, it is paramount
to modernize security forces
capabilities with small arms ranges,
close quarter combat training and
safety kits, force options simulators,
surveillance, target acquisition and
night observation equipment, and
active shooter response platforms.
Tab R

195
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Security Forces
2016 Weapons and Tactics Conference
Critical Capabilities List
 Modular Small Arms Ranges
 Close Quarter Combat Training Safety Kit
 Use of Force Simulator (See Tab Q)
 Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Night Observation Equipment
 Active Shooter Response Kit

Essential Capabilities List

 Fly-Away Security Kits
 Precision Engagement and Assessment Suite
 Next Generation Lightweight Level 4 Small Arms Protective Insert
 Remote-Controlled Moving Target Training System
 Integrated Defense Enhancements

Desired Capabilities List

 Non-projectile force-on-force feedback firearms system
 Modular Multi-Purpose Training Container
 Small Form Factor, Squad-Level Remotely Piloted Aircraft with Video Surveillance
 Security Forces Modernized Helmet Initiative
 Weapons Modernization Suite

196
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES MODULAR SMALL ARMS RANGES

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) has 28 installations with a small-arms range of
which only three are compliant with the Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 11-18: Small Arms
Range Design and Construction. Of the remaining 25 ranges, eight are permanently closed and
the other 17, although degraded and operating with waivers, are operational until repairs become
too costly or waivers are withdrawn. The remaining ANG Wings lack organic range capability
and must find offsite locations to train and qualify. For most Wings, this involves lengthy
preparation and travel time for both Combat Arms (CA) personnel and students in addition to
substantial cost. This deficiency affects the ability for the CA personnel who are tasked with the
training of all Air Force’s combat personnel—Security Forces (SF), Battlefield Airman, and
Civil Engineering Red Horse units as well as all personnel deploying to a contingency operation
( just-in-time qualifications)—an average of over 250 personnel per installation. Because of
significant health and safety concerns, the ETL states that “New partially contained ranges or
fully contained outdoor ranges will not be designed or constructed. If planned major range or
component repairs of an existing range will cost more than 50 percent of the estimated range
replacement cost (plant replacement value), the entire facility must be upgraded to comply with
this ETL”. The ETL identifies and authorizes only one replacement option that will meet a
majority of ANG bases, a fully contained indoor range. A modular containerized indoor range
will provide a fully enclosed zero Surface Danger Zone (SDZ) and Vertical Danger Zone (VDZ)
environment, safely allowing personnel to train and qualify 365 days a year both Day and Night,
regardless of external environmental conditions. The ANG assessed all small arms ranges and
determined that at least 12 require replacement in accordance with the ETL.
2. Source of Need. AFI 36-2226 Combat Arms Program, Engineering Technical Letter (ETL)
11-18 Small Arms Range Design and Construction; lessons learned from Operations
ENDURING FREEDOM, IRAQI FREEDOM, and NEW DAWN; 2013 ARC WEPTAC
Conference; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Council.
3. Units Impacted. 12 ANG SF Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
12 Small Arms Ranges (3080) $3,700,000 $44,400,000
Total $44,400,000

197
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT TRAINING SAFETY KIT

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Security Forces (SF) units have a critical need to
respond to various situations that require different levels of force. The Close Quarter Combat
Training Safety Kit is comprised of multiple components, each providing differing levels of
weapons and hand-to-hand use of force across the threat spectrum. The first of these
components is the Close Combat Mission Capability Kit (CCMCK) and associated training
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). CCMCK provides the capability to fire simulated
munitions in small unit tactics training, force on force scenarios, and weapons systems
proficiency evolutions; allowing dispersed forces to train to a common standard on the
application of ground based warfare tactics. The 2760 training PPE kits ensure that directed
safety measures are accomplished where Operational Risk Management techniques are not
practical. The other components provide the hand-to-hand and apprehension combative training
and safety tools necessary to hone the escalation of force skills of SF personnel. The equipment
identified will be evenly divided throughout the 92 SF squadrons.
2. Source of Need. AFI 36-2646, AFI 31-101, Integrated Defense, AFI 31-117, Arming and Use
of Force By Air Force Personnel, AFI 31-118, Security Forces Standards and Procedures, Air
Force Security Forces Center Shoot Move Communicate Concept of Operations, Lessons
Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF), and NEW
DAWN (OND).
3. Units Impacted. All 92 ANG SF Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
552 M-4 CCMC Kit (3080) $531 $293,112
552 M-9 CCMC Kit (3080) $390 $215,280
368 M-249 CCMC Kit (3080) $835 $307,280
2760 Training PPE Kits (3080) $212 $585,120
920 Safety Mats (3080) $380 $349,600
184 Combative Suits (3080) $1,000 $184,000
920 Safety Training Bags (3080) $200 $184,000
920 Batons (3080) $80 $73,600
184 TASER Training Safety Suit (3080) $600 $110,400
92 Cuffman (3080) $3,400 $312,800
920 Training Cuffs (3080) $50 $46,000
1196 M-4 Blue Guns (3080) $150 $179,400
1196 M-9 Blue Guns (3080) $45 $53,820
184 Shock Knives (3080) $500 $92,000
184 Body Opponent Bags (3080) $350 $64,400
Total $3,050,812

198
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES SURVEILLANCE, TARGET ACQUISITION, AND NIGHT

OBSERVATION EQUIPMENT
1. Background. ANG Security Forces (SF) personnel require detection devices that provide
imagery in both daytime and nighttime operations through the use of active or passive
surveillance, target acquisition, and night observation. This enhanced night vison (ENV)
equipment increases the SF combat capability to navigate, identify targets, distinguish friend
from foe, and effectively engage targets in low signature environments. These imaging devices
need to work in adverse conditions both day and night. SF personnel lack the capability to
transition between a night vision mode and thermal mode in one optic. This capability is
specified by SF standard squad and smaller Unit Type Code (UTC) packages, postured at the
unit level in concert with Headquarters, Air Force and Combatant Commander requirements at
the time of writing. Each unit gets a minimum of one for home-station training, the rest are
distributed among the 92 units based on wartime taskings.
2. Source of Need. AFI 31-101 Integrated Defense; Security Forces Logistics Detail: Mission
Capability Statement; lessons learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM, IRAQI
FREEDOM, and NEW DAWN; 2014 ARC WEPTAC Conference; 2015 ARC WEPTAC
Council.
3. Units Impacted. All 92 ANG SF Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
376 Enhanced Night Vision (3080) $17,000 $6,392,000
Total $6,392,000

199
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars
 Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES ACTIVE SHOOTER RESPONSE KIT

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Security Forces (SF) units must be better equipped
to respond to an active shooter situation. Due to recent domestic real world events, SF unit
personnel require additional individual personal protection equipment (PPE). The Department of
Defense (DOD) Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert (ESAPI) ballistic plates, lightweight soft
ballistic inserts and body armor meet or exceed the DOD standards for responder
PPE. Additional safety items include a maxillofacial mandible shield with visor that provides
protection to the head and face and advanced hearing protection to enable
communications. Other items include combat shirts and individual first aid kits. The combat
shirt is designed to wear under the body armor and tactical vests, which reduce bulk for
responders operating in extreme conditions. These shirts replace the ABU top, increasing
mobility and assisting in regulating body temperature. The individual first aid kits will allow for
the immediate treatment of wounds during a dynamic event before medical responders can enter
an active shooting area. The maxillofacial mandible shield with visor, the advanced hearing
protection, the combat shirts and individual first aid kits constitute the Personal Response Kits
(PRK) and provide enhanced responder safety and mission effectiveness. There is an additional
need for a breaching kit that includes a tool to penetrate locked rooms and a ballistic shield that
provides a critical layer of protection for the entry team. Each of the 7649 defenders in the ANG
will receive one PRK including; body armor (ESAPI Plate sets and Level III Soft armor), face
shield and mandible kits, advanced communications headsets and individual first aid kits, as well
as two (2) combat shirts. Additionally, each of the 92 SF squadrons will receive one (1) each of
the ballistic shields and entry kits. The Active Shooter Response Kit seamlessly integrates with
the less-than-lethal kit.
2. Source of Need. AFI 31-101 Integrated Defense, AFI 31-117 Arming & Use of Force,
Lessons Learned from Domestic Operations, Operations ENDURING FREEDOM, IRAQI
FREEDOM, and NEW DAWN.
3. Units Impacted. All 92 ANG SF Squadrons

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost
7649 ESAPI Plate Sets (3080) $1,225 $9,370,025
7649 Level IIIA Soft Armor Insert Sets (3080) $358 $2,994,865
7649 Face Shield and Mandible Kits (3080) $793 $6,065,657
7649 Advanced Communication Headsets (3080) $217 $1,659,833
7649 Individual First Aid Kits (3080) $137 $987,633
15298 Combat Shirts (3080) $54 $826,092
92 Ballistic Shields (3080) $3,833 $352,636
92 Entry Kits (3080) $311 $28,612
Total $21,519,541

200
Defend the Homeland – Win the Nation’s Wars