Net Zero Strategy PWC
Net Zero Strategy PWC
Developers Ltd.
Net Zero Strategy
PwC
November 2023
Agenda
1. Introduction 03
2. Carbon Inventory 07
3. Scope 1,2 reduction initiatives 10
4. Scope 3 reduction initiatives 17
5. Internal Carbon Pricing 42
Company Processing of
Employee
vehicles sold products
commuting
Purchased goods Capital Fuel and Transport and Waste from Business Use of sold End-of-life treatment Leased assets Franchises Investments
and services goods Energy Distribution operations travel product of sold products
Scope 3 Macrotech Developers Ltd. commits to reduce Scope-3 GHG emissions 51.6% per Sq.m. by 2030
INT 2
Near Term from a FY-2022 base year.
Scope 3 Macrotech Developers Ltd. commits to reduce Scope-3 GHG emissions 97.9% per sq.m. by 2050
LT INT 1
Net Zero from a FY-2022 base year.
Macrotech Developers Limited commits to increase annual sourcing of renewable electricity from
O1 Renewable Electricity
19% in FY2022 to 100% by 2027.
Scope 1, 2 Scope 3
• Considering BAU scenario, with CAGR projections the combined Scope- • Considering BAU scenario, with CAGR projections the Scope-3
1,2 emissions are supposed to reach to levels of 33790 tCO2e by FY emission intensity is supposed to be at level of 0.86 tCO2e/Sq.m of are
2027 developed by FY 2050.
• By committing to SBTi Net Zero targets, the leftover Scope-1,2 emissions • By committing to SBTi Net Zero targets, the Scope intensity should be
should be 257 tCO2e by FY 2027 0.0266 tCO2e/ Sq.m by FY 2050
18,032 0.7
15,411.8 0.6
12,381 9,350 6,319 0.5
3,288 0.4
257
0.3
2022 2023 2024 202 2026 2027 0.2
0.1
0
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
Projected Emissions Emission Scenario for Netzero Emission Intensity (SBTi) tCO2e/Sq.m
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. November 2023
PwC 9
Scope 1,2
Emission Reduction
Initiatives
Scope 1,2 Carbon Reduction
• Following are the various initiatives that can be taken for achieving the Net Zero target
Total Cost Total Savings
(Capex+ Opex) Ease of
Initiatives Till FY 2027 Implementation constraints
(Till FY 2027) Implementation
Crore INR (Crore INR)
Scope 1
Purchase of High-quality carbon credits - Carbon credit prices are subject to High
0.171
fluctuation in market prices
Use of Low GWP Refrigerants - Medium
Electrification of Fleet 0.5 - High
Scope 2
1. Solar or Wind Energy Procurement through Regulatory authorities do not permit direct Medium
9.192 10.03 3
Open Access (31 MW) RE procurement above certain limit.
Any of the below option can be selected
Procurement of Green Tariffs is additional High
2a. Procurement of Green Tariffs3 3.19 - cost burden.
(This is cumulative cost)
Green Tariffs to be procured every year.
Procurement of I-REC is additional cost Medium
2b. Procurement of I-Rec5 1.94 - burden.
(This is cumulative cost)
I-REC to be procured every year.
1. Cost of Carbon credit is considered on conservative side as 8.5 $/Ton . Carbon credits to be procured every year after the target year for maintaining the Net Zero.
2. The investment is computed for group captive mode of open access. The cost per MW under group captive is 0.43 Crore INR/MW
3. Per unit saving of 1 INR/kWh is assumed for solar OA and 2 INR/kWh for Solar rooftop.
4. Cost of green tariffs is 0.66 INR/kWh
5. Cost of I-REC is considered as 0.40 INR/kWh.I-Recs to procured every year
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. November 2023
PwC 11
Roadmap for Scope 1,2
• The roadmap for scope 1,2 is mentioned below.
• The company is targeting to achieve Net Zero by FY 27.
Description FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27
Total Investment Required (Cr. INR) 2.58 3.91 3.05 3.6
Total Savings (Cr. INR) 0.74 1.88 3.05 4.36
Carbon reduction achieved (tCO2e) 18,012 20,231 22,723 28,011
• Current situation – Split AC in most officess with R-22 and R410a refrigerant, that
have very high GWP of 1760, 1923 respectively.
Future Procurement–
Capacity addition every 3-4 years. Vehicles to be EVs only
Greening of grid due to renewable energy capacity addition to decrease future emissions • MDL to transition to Electric Vehicles
• Overall greening of grid would result in significant reduction of
emissions from the company owned vehicles
• A small range (Ex Tata Nexon) EV
• average emission reduction of 64%
• 90% lower OPEX (INR/Km)
• A medium range vehicle (Mahindra XUV Electric)
• emission reduction of around 63%
• 90% lesser OPEX (INR/Km)
Transition to • CAPEX :
Clean Fuel • Small EV Car : INR 17 Lac
• Mid Sized Vehicle: 20 Lacs
• Car EV Fast Charging station- 4 Lacs
• Bike EV Charging station – 0.76 Lacs
• OPEX :
• Charging Cost – 0.43 Lacs
• Small Sized EV Maintenance : 0.07 Lacs
Strategy: Shift to Electric Vehicles • Mid Sized EV Maintenance : 0.1 Lacs
Description UoM FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27
Grid Emission Factor kgCO2e/kWh 0.79 0.76 0.73 0.70 0.67 0.6
Total Electricity demand kWh/Year 18,072,152 21,144,418 24,738,969 28,944,593 33,865,174 39,622,254
Solar Roof Top Units kWh/Year 2,473,897 4,341,689 6,773,035 7,924,451
Total Capacity Required MW 1.49 1.12 1.46 0.69
Investment Cr.INR 0.64 0.48 0.63 0.30
Savings Cr.INR 0.49 0.87 1.35 1.58
Solar OA Units kWh/Year 2,473,897 10,130,608 16,932,587 27,735,578
Total Capacity Required MW 1.49 4.60 4.09 6.49
Investment Crore INR 0.64 1.97 1.75 2.78
Savings Cr. INR 0.25 1.01 1.69 2.77
Green Tariffs Units kWh/Year 19,791,175 14,472,297 10,159,552 3,962,225
Cost of Green Tariffs Cr INR 1.31 0.96 0.67 0.26
Total Investment
Cr. INR 1.28 2.45 2.38 3.08
(W/o considering cost of Green Tariffs)
Total Savings Cr. INR 0.74 1.88 3.05 4.36
Step-1
• Conducting LCA Cycle Step-5
analysis of Building • Procurement of
• Identification of the We are sustainable Material.
material with high here Step-3 • Accounting the
embodied carbon. • Focus on Circular Step-4 reduction in carbon
Economy. • Supplier Assessment emissions.
Reduce- Reuse- for Low Carbon
Recycle practices Step-6
• Geo mapping of the • Involving suppliers in • Continuous
suppliers the process of Net improvement in the
Step-2 Zero reduction of carbon
• Drafting a policy for emissions.
sustainable
procurement
● Longer term
● Peer
Financial
investments
benchmarking
●Carbon
● Carbon reduction pricing
clauses
●Decarbonization
criteria in procurement
Levers in this category focus ● Financial Levers in this category is to
on embedding penalties impose monetary payments
●Mandate carbon
decarbonization as a result of inaction or
reporting ● Contract
commitments into underperformance.
termination
procurement processes.
Leveraging Enforcing
Penalty
procurement performance
Source: WBCSD Report Reaching net zero: incentives for supply chain decarbonization
Supplier Category
Third step
Put systems in place that support the business
to analyze emissions data on a more
granular level (e.g.- breaking down travel data
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. or interrogating data by Business Unit) November 2023
PwC 29
Targets taken by Supply Chain Partners
Target achievement by vendors will directly benefit MDL in reduction of embodied carbon in use of raw
materials. The list of vendors with emission reduction target is mentioned below-
% Reduction in % Reduction in
Raw Material Vendor Base Year Target Year SBTi Validation
Scope 1 Scope 2
Cement Ambuja Cement 2020 2030 20% per ton 43% per ton ✓
Cement J K Cement 2020 2030 20.4% per ton 44.7% per ton ✓
Cement Shree Cement 2019 2030 12.7% per ton 27.1% per ton ✓
Cement Ultratech Cements FY 2017 FY 2032 27% per ton 69% per ton ✓
Steel
Mahindra Sanyo
Special Steels
2016 2030 35% per ton ✓
Steel Tata Steel Carbon Neutral by 2045
Paint Indigo Paints Net Zero by 2050
Paint Asian Paints FY 14 FY 22 51% 38%
Glass Saint Gobain Net Zero by 2050 ✓
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. November 2023
PwC 30
Initiatives under implementation Reducing the consumption
These are various initiatives under implementation for reducing the emissions for PG&S
Contribution
Initiatives Component Reduction by 2027
(kgCo2e/sqm.)
• Greener concrete mixes
• Use of GGBS
Cement/Concrete 185 45%
• Use of LC3 cement
• Use of geopolymer concrete
• Use of recycled aluminum
• Reduce the use of aluminum and test and
Glass and aluminum 89 22%
implement alternatives
• Use high recycled content glass
• Higher usage of recycled steel
• Zero wastage of steel
Steel 25 6%
• Use of alternatives like GFRP rebars in suitable
applications, etc..
• MDL should start capturing emissions for every business travel individually • MDL should create a travel policy that considers environmental aspects into
• Most of the flights give flight specific emissions MDL should negotiate the considerations while ensuring employee well being during travel
travel partner to provide emissions for every travel (air travel) • Promote Policy among employees
• While calculating business travel specific emissions – emissions should be • Monitor Travel behaviour
computed directly from emissions shared by travel partner (accurate results) • Engage employees for feedback and suggestions for policy improvement
• Presently business travel emissions are as follows - • Engage with travel partner in terms of selecting flights, stay options etc..
Emissions
Mode of Transport
(tCO2e) 3 Green Travel Policy
Flight - BUSINESS class 15
Flight -ECONOMY class 191 • Virtual First Policy – Develop a policy wherein MDL takes a virtual first policy
for all internal and client delivery work
Flight -PREMIUM ECONOMY class 4
• Book Direct flights instead of flights with layover; more stops means more
Bus 1 take-offs and landings – resulting in higher CO2 emissions
Total 210
• While booking flights – prefer airlines which show lower carbon footprint
• Prefer economy seats over business class seats; economy seats have lower
emissions compared to business travel seats, MDL to look at creating
following rules
❑ Trips less than 4 hours to be taken as economy
❑ Only trips greater than 8 hours to be considered for business class
❑ Travel that takes during the day (4-8 hours) to be considered only for
economy, only nigh travel to be considered for business class
• Reduce 1- 2 days travel; instead, group meetings together to reduce
frequent travels
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. November 2023
PwC 33
Business Travel Decarbonization
Clean Skies for Tomorrow Initiative (CST) Emissions In setting for by buying SAF
• CST initiative started in the year 2019 and is a global, cross value chain coalition which is targeting 2 Buy equivalent amount of SAF
that the global aviation sector achieves net zero by 2050 by accelerating Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Supply (and use) by 2030
• The Coalition brings in Airlines, Airports , SAF producers, Corporate buyers (support to CST 3 SAF delivered to the airlines of your choice
programme), OEMs and Institutes and researchers who support the technology development
• Signatory – India specific Airlines: SpiceJet, Vistara Receive SAF certificates (can be used from
4
• Signatory – International Airlines: Delta, United, Etihad, Qatar Airlines, British Airways, Emirates, insetting emissions
Lufthansa, Qantas, Air Canada etc.. Presently cost of SAF is almost 200 -300%
• IT companies signatory to SAF – Accenture, Google, Salesforce, Microsoft, Infosys, Wipro 5
more than normal aviation fuel
• The CST India community has set a goal of transporting 100 million passengers on SAF on a 10%
blend by 2030 Insetting Vs Offsetting
• SAF when compared to normal aviation fuel reduces the emissions by up to 80%
• Cost Impact per PAX travel could be negligible, rough estimates indicate a cost increase of USD 1.8
In insetting, the SAF is a direct solution to reduce the
for a typical domestic flight
in-sector emissions from aviation. Carbon offsets
• The blending of 10% SAF could result in an overall emission reduction of 6 - 8%
means compensation for emissions through buying
carbon credits from projects that reduce GHG
emissions in other sectors.
Ref: Clean Sky for Tomorrow , World Economic Forum
• Considering the existing emission scenario, emissions due to 4-wheeler • Green Car Loan - MDL to subsidize 1% interest rate on loans.
(owned or cab) contribute to around 52%. • The change in interest rate can take place next year based on interest
• These emissions can be reduced by providing the Metro/Train passes to of employee
employees and providing the EV from the nearest station to the office. • The loan terms can be considered as below –
• This will promote use of public transport and there by reduction in the a. Max Loan amount – Rs. 12 Lacs
emissions. b. Max interest rate – 10%
c. No. of years – 5
1 Emission reduction through Company provided EV bus 2 EV Cab fleet via vendor
• MDL to lease / partner with EV bus provider. • MDL can provide EV cab facilities to its employees.
• These EVs can be used for business travel purposes as well as for pick • Advantages – Employees preferring working from office over WFH,
up and drop of the employees from nearest Metro/Train station. reduced emissions, Zero Capex - no asset ownership required.
• Operational Cost - Rs. 12.5 per km • Examples-
• Each trip will have up to 15 employees (Utilization factor – 40% of ❑ Wipro – EV fleet in Bengaluru and Hyderabad
capacity) ❑ SE2 – Lithium partnership
• MDL can provide subsidized metro card to shift employees to public • MDL can tie-up with banks to provide subsidized loans to its
transportation. employees, for buying EVs.
• Advantage – Asset lite model, No dependence on vendors, limited • Advantage – Low/No cost, as bank may be willing to provide facility to
liabilities improve customer acquisition.
• 5% discount on corporate pass available in few cities • Examples-
❑ HSBC partnership with Tata Motors for employees in corporate
sector.
Passive design features • Implement passive design measures such as natural ventilation, envelope shading and insulation,
maximization of green cover, cool roofs
HVAC System 20
16 14 12 11.3 10.6 10
Contributors to EPI 20 5 20 Lighting and Common
Area
Others FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 FY 29 FY 30
Under MDL’s EPI (kWh/Sq.m)
operational control
Model for
Initiatives Energy Savings Payback Period Set up Time
implementation
~ 25 -30% w.r.t to
Can be done in small Green Buildings, Self
Installation of Energy Efficient Lighting conventional ~ 1.5 years
lead time financed
lightings
ESCOs or Self
~ 30 – 50% savings financed or
Installation of Energy Efficient BLDC fans in place of existing
w.r.t conventional ~ 2.5 years 2-3 days collaboration with
conventional AHU fans
Fans owner and other
tenants
Evaluation Parameters
RE PROCUREMENT ROUTES
Economics
Risks
Reliability of
supply
Ease of
Implementation
Pros
• No investment needed by the consumer. Only a per unit
cost of power will have to be paid
• Generator can be chosen from large number of
PPA 1
PPA 2
PPA 3
competitors based on tariff
Cons
• All open access charges are applicable in this mode
(Some relief is provided for OA charges for RE sources)
C&I consumer 1 C&I consumer 2 C&I consumer 3
• No control on the operations of the asset
Pros
Cons
Pros
• No upfront investment required by the consumer
• Good control on the asset and operations
C&I consumer
• Cheaper power available as CSS is waived off
Cons
• The EPC contract price (The investment) will be collected from the consumer • Annuity paid can be unviable and costlier to implement
than a pure captive/group captive mode
in the form of annuity
• Very few developers provide this option of implementation
• Payment done through an Escrow account
• Captive - A captive solar power plant refers to a solar power plant that has been implemented by a company for
Godrej
its own captive consumption. That is, the power generated by the solar power plant is consumed entirely by the Aditya Birla Apollo Tyres
Cipla Industries
Group Ltd.
developing company itself. Ltd.
•
Group Captive - A group captive scheme is where someone develops a power plant for the collective use of UltraTech
HPCL
Mahalaxmi Mahindra &
Cement TMT Mahindra
multiple commercial consumers. The consumers should have at least a 26 per cent equity and has to consume
at least 51 per cent of the produced power.
INOX Air
Asahi India
Products
The existing provisions and proposed amendments for Group captives are as follows:
• First rule of a group captive power plant: The group captive users should hold more than 26% of the
ownership corresponding the group captive units. As per the latest proposed amendment to the Electricity Rules
2005, ownership shall not be limited to voting rights - it shall include proportionate paid up equity capital with full Key Group Captive Generators in India
rights.
OPGS Sai Wardha
• Implication of Proposed amendment – Equity shares would need to be issued to the individual shareholders. Power Pvt. Tata Power Power
Ltd. Generation
• Second rule of a group captive power plant: The group captive users should consume more than 51% of the
energy generated from the group captive generation units in the proportion of their shares in the ownership of Awarpur
Reliance
the power plant within a variation not exceeding 10% . The latest proposed amendment to the Electricity Rules Cement
Energy Ltd.
works
2005, extends the applicability of proportionality.
• Implications: The applicability of the Proportionality Test has been widened to cover a larger group.
• Accelerated Depreciation Benefit – lower tax outlay • Low initial investment outlay (~ 8 % of • No investment or capital outlay in the project
in the initial years Project Cost) • To pay cost of power on per unit basis
• Exemption of Cross Subsidy Surcharge and • Exemption of Cross Subsidy Surcharge and • Entire assets is owned by the Third Party with no
Additional Subsidy Surcharge – lower landed cost of Additional Subsidy Surcharge – lower tariffs stake of company in the assets
power vis-à-vis discom tariffs and vendor tariffs vis-à-vis discom tariffs and vendor tariffs • Arrangement of debt towards the project is made
Benefits
• Ownership of Asset with life of ~ 25 years – Assured • Entire contribution in form of equity. No debt by the Third party. With no debt on the books of
supply at landed tariff for 25 years on the books of the company company
• No legal/contractual obligation for minimum • Dealings with only 1 counterparty with no • Option to choose the generators (i.e. Third Party)
consumption of generated power – More operational construction related risks to be borne based on tariff
flexibility • Easy exit option (via sale of shares)
MDL
Key Considerations
• The first option is to source maximum possible power from a RE
source (solar/wind/hybrid) and get the balance from the State
26% Project
PPA for Discom
Equity under
supply of group captive • In all the possible models, a 26% ownership is suggested (under a
Power structure group captive structure) for Lupin and the balance 74% coming
from the RE developer and the debt component can be funded by a
separate bank/funding institution
RE SPV Project Debt Component
Discom Supply (Solar/Wind//Hy • Based on the banking requirements applicable in respective states*
brid) (in which the plant located) to adjust the peak surplus or deficit in
the peak duration itself, the estimated maximum consumption that
• Supply from a discom can be met from the RE source is mentioned in the report.
connection
Balance 74% Equity *The financial consideration for the same has been further discussed in the
report.
Lending
RE Holding Institution
Company
MDL
Power Exchange Key Considerations
(GTAM) • Getting the sizing right to meet the consumption profile
– Typical combination for meeting 85% PLF round the clock
26% Project supply – Generation from the RE plant as 70-80% and rest
PPA for Equity under
Balance power from GTAM market (instead of grid supply as provided in first
supply of captive
procurement option)
RTC Power structure
• Managing open access connectivity shall be important
• Regulatory charges – Cross subsidy charges shall be applicable
RE SPV Project Debt Component for the power consumed from GTAM market. However,
Trading company Additional surcharge shall be exempted
(Solar/Wind/Hybrid)
• Setup of a trading company will require license applications with
Internal the CERC which may be done by the RE developer itself.
PPA • Specialized teams may be required for purchasing and
Balance 74% Equity scheduling power at the right price
Lending Institution
RE Holding
Company
Mechanism
RE Project Developer
• MDL to procure the Renewable Purchase Certificates from the international
market
• This implies to the procuring the power at a premium over the electricity
I-REC procurement
Premium for I-Rec landed tariff
Pros
MDL
• The rates of I-Rec can be fixed for as long as 8 years.
• Presently the cost of I-REC varies from 0.2-0.4 INR/kWh.
Procurement of
Bills Payment Cons
Electricity
REC denomination 1 MWh (with multiplier) 1MWh (no multiplier) • The ceiling price of a solar REC came down from USD
215/MWh in 2010-12 to under USD 30/MWh in 2017-21.
Categories Solar RECs and Non-Solar RECs Solar and Non-Solar
• The traded price has come down by more than 90%, from
Issuance Grid – India Accredited by 3rd party issuers about USD 121/MWh in 2011 to about USD 13/MWh in
2023.
Validity 1,095 days after issuance i.e., 3 years
• REC price of non-solar, which started at a lower cap of
USD 19/MWh, has also come down by about 30%, to USD
Trading Platform Power exchanges only Over the counter
13/MWh, during the same period.
DISCOMs, Open access, Captive
Buyers Voluntary buyers International RECs (I-RECs)
consumers, Voluntary buyers
Single transfer through power • I-REC prices are significantly lower than the local REC
Transfer type exchanges only, repetitive trade of the Single transfer only prices.
same certificate is not possible • In 2022, the price of I-RECs that originated from India
ranged between USD 0.7/MWh and USD 1.7/MWh,
Banking Not Allowed
whereas local RECs are priced about 10 times the value
Price Guarantee Through ‘Floor’ Price (Minimum Price) of I-RECs in India, at about USD 13/MWh.
• VPPAs involve medium to long-term contracts • The buyer can claim the environmental benefits,
• Brown electricity produced by the renewable
between the renewable energy generator and such as renewable energy usage or reduced
project is sold in the merchant market.
the buyer. emissions, corresponding to the purchased EACs.
• The buyer purchases the associated EACs or
• VPPAs often provide predetermined-price • By purchasing the EACs or environmental
environmental attributes, separate from the
arrangements, which can protect the buyer attributes, the buyer can claim the environmental
physical electricity.
from volatile energy prices. benefits of the renewable energy generation
• I-RECs are the internationally accepted EACs that conveys information about
the production of a unit of electricity, such as where the electricity was
produced, the capacity of the production facility, and the energy source.
Why enter VPPA instead of purchasing I-RECs directly from the market?
• Even though I-RECs are currently available in market at INR 0.30-0.40 per unit, they are
still subject to demand risk and price volatility.
• Considering the increasing need to achieve 100% RE of the MNCs, it is pertinent to
mitigate price risk and supply risk of I-RECs by entering into VPPA.
• MDL to set up a trading company which will trade the RECs and electricity.
Premium for I-Rec • Trading entity will keep the I-REC for Lupin and will sell the electricity as brown
I-REC procurement
electricity in the open market.
• A base price of the electricity will be fixed. The profit and losses above-below
base prices will be shared amongst the developers and Lupin based on the
Sell of Electricity
Trading License mutual agreement.
• Organizations with Revenue Sharing Mechanisms– Sunsure, Cleantech , etc..
I-REC for MDL
Pros
• Risk of decrease in industrial tariffs offered by • Assessment of optimum capacity required to be tied-
the discoms, opportunity cost of tying up with a up
Market Risk Low Medium
source at cheaper tariffs such as exchange • Termination clauses in the PPA to be linked to discom
market etc.. tariffs
“
• Carbon offsets are measurable, verifiable emission reductions from certified climate
action projects.
• These projects reduce, remove or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and can also
bring a host of positive co-benefits, e.g., empowering communities, protecting
ecosystems, restoring forests or reducing reliance on fossil fuels
Companies and the investment community are
• They can be used to compensate for an organisation’s emissions by cancelling out increasingly focused on supporting the transition to a
emissions somewhere else
net zero economy and developing credible transition
• Projects must adhere to a rigorous set of criteria to pass verification by third-party plans. To achieve net zero, they will need to
agencies and a review by a panel of experts at leading carbon offset standards e.g., Verra decarbonize, and many will need to offset some
or Gold Standard emissions as part of the transition.”
• After an organization or an individual buys a carbon offset, it is permanently retired so it
can't be reused - Mark Carney
Task Force on Scaling
Voluntary Carbon Markets
From 2015 –
• These basically result in avoidance of CO2 generation. These include 2021 > 80% were
Renewable energy , Energy Efficiency, Avoided deforestation etc.. of avoidance type
• These credits play a key role in limiting the build-up of greenhouse gases
(GHGs) in the atmosphere by limiting or offsetting new emissions.
• Since 2015, they have accounted for more than 80% of the market and
are expected to continue representing around 65% of the market by 2030.
Removal
Removal market
gaining fast
• These are the once which remove CO2 from atmosphere. These include
momentum
Nature based solutions like forestation and some tech-based solutions like
BECCS , DAC.
• Removals directly lower the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere by
removing historical emissions.
• These credits have accounted for less than 20% of the market since 2015, Expected to reach
but are expected to grow to 35% by 2030 driven by maturing technologies 35 % of overall
and methods, improving affordability, and net-zero requirements market share
7 140
• Demand has increased for all credit types, but especially Nature
6 120 Based Solutions and project with co-benefits aligned to Sustainable
Development Goals witnessed higher prices.
Price USD/tCO2e
MtCO2e demand
5 100
Transportation
Industrial Manufacturing
Renewable energy
Forestry and land use
Waste disposal
Household devices
support for indigenous people.
• The figure shows a summary of average prices in 2021 for credits
projects in Forestry and land use, renewable energy, energy
efficiency and other NBS/waste disposal, transportation and
household devices.
Offsetting
End buyers/
Offsets
Reseller
Get your PD
Choose the VCS validated by Apply for
methodology for independent Implementation of verification
your carbon offset experts at the project approval with
project Control Union activities Verra
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Lay out your plans Register your Get the amount of Carbon
for reducing validated emission reductions credits are
emissions in the carbon offset verified by independent issued by
project description project with experts at Control Verra and
Verra Union may be sold
• Registration fees (INR 10 to 15 lacs) • Carbon issuance fees (may vary as per registry.
For VCS: INR 20 per VER)
• Verification of carbon reductions by project (INR 3
to 3.5 lacs) • Brokerage (if any) (on percentage basis)
*Costs presented are approximate, and indicative for VCS process, which may change as per time, project, and any other carbon markets (e.g., Gold Standard or CDM, etc..)
Key Stakeholders
Client Buyer
• The potential buyers are being identified at this stage.
• The accumulated carbon credits from the seller’s registry account are transferred to
the buyer's registry account after signing the ERPA.
02 Transfer of Carbon Credits • The transfer timeline is ideally 24-48 hours from the time of signing ERP and the registry
account is updated after 48 hours.
• Once the credits are transferred, the buyer transfers the funds to the seller after
deducting the transaction charges.
• The fund transfer from the buyers account to seller's account ideally takes 7-10 working
03 Fund Transfer days.
• Once the carbon credits are transferred, the block of transferred credits are retired from
the registry
1
carbon offset Internal Carbon Price play an
different business opportunities and strategy and
growth scenarios assessing important role in execution
facilitating
technical, carbon market of net zero strategy
economic and transactions
regulatory Internal carbon pricing gives
2
feasibility
them an incentive to shift
investments to low-carbon
alternatives
Internal Carbon Pricing can
Estimating
GHG
Aligning
emission
reduction targets
Developing
marginal
abatement
Finalizing
implementation
3 become an integral part of
industry’s climate risk
mitigation strategy
with Science roadmaps, ICP can be used by
4
emissions curves and
using
Based Target
roadmap for
processes and companies to prepare for
globally
setting approach
Net Zero target
governance future policy regulations
accepted mechanisms restricting carbon emissions
achievement
standards
Shadow Pricing Implicit Pricing Internal Carbon Tax/ Fee Internal Trading
• Hypothetical Cost • An implicit carbon price is • An internal carbon tax/fee Mechanism
assigned to each ton of an ex-post measure is a fee per tonne of • In these different business
CO2 calculated based on the carbon dioxide (tCO2) units are put with a cap on
emissions abatement imposed on organization- their emissions, if the
• This is an estimate of
achieved by an existing wide emissions business units exceed the
future cost of emissions
project(s) and the cost emissions, they must buy
which may happen due to • This revenue stream which
associated with the same emission allowances from
policy and regulatory is outcome of emissions by
changes • This could either be from the organization fund other units
projects (EE, RE) future emission reduction • This is similar to emission
• This supports companies
completed by projects or it projects cap and trade system
in long term business
could be from cost of followed by several
planning and investment
offsets purchased by countries – like EU ETS,
strategies
companies California ETS etc..
80.0%
Of those 1,312 companies (55%) also
disclose they are currently subject to
727 carbon pricing regulation or expect to be
70.0%
within three years
60.0%
50.8%
351 Of those 727 companies (48%) are 50.0%
currently implementing an internal
price on carbon 40.0%
30.0%
19.3%
196 20.0% 15.0%
Additional companies (27%) plan to put an 8.6%
internal price on carbon within two years 10.0% 6.8%
2.0%
0.0%
Shadow Implicit Internal Offsets Other Internal
Price Price Fee Trading
Companies Evaluating / Considering Internal
Carbon Pricing Types of Internal Carbon Pricing adopted by
Companies
Net Zero Strategy - Macrotech Developers Ltd. November 2023
PwC 81
Recent Trends in Internal Carbon Pricing…
Company Price in INR Price in $ Type of ICP Used
Sector wise adoption of ICP in India ACC 2545 33.1 Implicit price; shadow price
others Adani Green Energy 800 10.4 Shadow price
ITES Ambuja Cements 2246 29.2 Implicit price
Arvind Ltd 192.3 2.5 Shadow price
Cement
Creative Group of Industries private private private
Metals
Dalmia Bharat Ltd 846 11 Shadow price
Chemicals Dr. Reddy's Laboratories 937 12.2 Implicit price
Types of ICP adopted by companies Coverage of Emissions while JSW Energy 750 9.75 Shadow price
ICP involvement in
Become increasingly influential to have a
Depth company’s overall Time : Development
material impact on business decisions Journey
decision making
Markets
Carbon RE Market Based Instruments
Carbon Offsets Offsets
based
• Purchasing Carbon Offsets from Voluntary Markets instruments • RE purchase from grid like GTAM, GDAM etc.
• Implementing Carbon offset projects – Afforestation, • Impact of purchasing REC’s, IRECs
cookstove projects, biogas projects etc.. Other Market Based Instruments
• ESCERTS
• Coal Cess (regulatory requirements)
pwc.com
© 2023 PwC. All rights reserved. Not for further distribution without the permission of PwC. “PwC” refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited (PwCIL), or, as the context requires, individual member firms of the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity and does not act as
agent of PwCIL or any other member firm. PwCIL does not provide any services to clients. PwCIL is not responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of any of its
member firms nor can it control the exercise of their professional judgment or bind them in any way. No member firm is responsible or liable for the acts or omissions of
any other member firm nor can it control the exercise of another member firm’s professional judgment or bind another member firm or PwCIL in any way.