0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 29 views 8 pages Execution of Decrees & Order
The document discusses legal procedures regarding execution orders in the High Court of Uganda, referencing various sections of the law. It outlines the requirements for applying for execution, including timelines and conditions under which execution may be granted or denied. Additionally, it highlights the importance of compliance with legal protocols and the implications of failing to meet these requirements.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Execution of Decrees & Order For Later cunby Mio veel
Cour 1 gerforud.
ALMrting to Section 35() due Ui! pro wedi
Ke Copia duuw Mut le tkeuted Lil
9). Tinw Moy Wy cxtudded if tho ju
| Ba pavautid cffter by poud or fory (Section 4
Aucovdi y \ :
to Sutiow 32 @ tly ull paudue Ay
Hw lout nowy On opt ation Q te docrgsh
GrdW pxxewtion F to deuw,
Scanned with CamScannermph Lotion, 11 danas tat Cpe
Wott i T atiplea
fplylve for Javwol” modea GQ brxwuutyon. |
1B Disouza wv. Souodina [146
[Over 22 rudy Rt Provoua tho |
efile poyrrunt Mwovwy 02 an aldematl
Othe Ud of Mow 10 oe
Ja thy vil prilon thw Judgment ielebter| or |
bylottalmint od Joly 6) Giner properbaiior by
boty oletentiion ow othactwent SS
—— Oe ke) Ge
Povwer Under Ordov 22 nuwih the Court
han dNurtion t0 fe wxwotlen at the
aun tw ogounit Hw perion Gud property p+
sjadlgvasat ottoter 5 aes
arse ; si. A
Pantie to Zwustion “aii aa
er (guslgesat (edlito) plo rau a OF
aint ty person Golled. §
iv luwlnt to Tue Obligation
Gee Rett
ia Boowel H Cut No. 1035
[ln Razimpen vs. Na i owad Te
H (78 (UR) lourt
Wun ogouindt a rone|
Scanned with CamScannergit owl lawititize © acl anes
lor pudlgnuut vloletor Hay by reanon ee
bakicrty or dually doisluy per Jomw 0
Who Hag tun iu OF be tw dupjert G A
p KOTO, on)
ag
~ | Ud Suaion 36 GF tho Gul paudwe ht Cap 7
Biter, tvantire F a duuew holduy Hw dete fubut
[3 tw eguillia if omy, Winia The pudgurwt
ote vngtit wow eufrud dgsivt they Og lel)
dywen bald. : ¢ { 4
ACvor wy to Jution 3H)G thw Ul prowdue wt
Wn Lame o judo debtor oliva Iwfor tho delw
Wan) bun dated thy bolder Gf thy ou iw. May =
Apply to Come Whi pana it to exeute Fay
Som ogomit qo ppmrutoti G duh olvearal
or oy banit Jun padorn Who wad lntwnvddld
With Dare Qa vuuw dewaad,
Hae OF
Usdir jection Bt) ta hollty § tw lusal
ofrepveout one Ge tw duavad. iW Oty lima bed to HW
|
Scanned with CamScanner
—oxowt @ fhe “Popirly & thy owwared Whicn hodeer: A
eee vay thes appli Count
ae ‘bw follenings (Kuvovdiing TO Qroler 22 ruled
P WM wun t
Doty tw Couw — Oe) WAG MOlGqAL
Wi batowe appeal io prefered
WD) beter any pot Paunabuts nova) lowen offecred
bette tee i peviowe’ apphitetion .
Kinet clue With ludweat if ouy ov often pelieg
| Qrowtea
Di Fivent Use orAd
TiN) New [thw penton agent vilom Lyeutiay
— lis fo t
ba 4
DY} The Heder Which +l Ads iron & Lewit Wt
[regu Cora 22 pu 89 (D
SR ceentiva, to Dads 2a Irate HS), Tout to
lidar oor opp tation i Mody Uncle dusorue (3)
—|6 Ovder 22 rude @ May Veguive lw OP pli Count to
——HProdue oa Uvtifiod Copy
aed
Scanned with CamScanner| Appiivation for Ie.
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA fi
IN THe HGH CouRT OF UGANDA AT. Kamp
No OF 2016-5
Kato SIMU APPLIGANT ©
véadus Wh
MutineD AtrmeD RESPONDENT _
Appucatir For Zxzuurtion a
Scanned with CamScannerQovwed ly the Retiprocal trefor :
Copa Oud Hy fidguut Extewnous Aw E
avd appliva t0 Courts in thy lommion Heat
[le Shoud be noted hove that (vtein ty
Orbibal owldmdl govured toy te 1452 Neely
Comeution Undw thy dupler @ the litem at
Contre for Settee Of lnweotment Dispute s (108
Com Still by exter ud in Ugeruele, Urol Grtad
Cireumionus Inapotie Ff Whetn owe,
Common yest Covutry. Thi, Owe leriever Cove
Under thy Subj 9 Louftie 9 bends Whitr faut b
[the clivtiplin OF privoty lubwnotioual low.
4 a Ae |
Thy Gowt Whur passed adviw May Sud fi
lexetution to oof Court if thy perjon ag aut
Whow dw lwo Wh padred Aiteily ov Voluntary ¥
Or Copriva om busivyss Or povsoraily Woks fir Q
Hien Hho oval Gow G wolidiaion G dtu
[Cams or f
Scanned with CamScannerParre|
Aa, Qvale fer eaten, Po be vo Laut IN
Fowiving te Opphlotion for Lieushon the | |
auton hater Tho requiviun cuts Gr Order 2a |
f 8 to(o lowe oxen Courplied wit Ouncls Haw
[foie It Ov Ovolr Coupauw. If tle application |
ied, the Lomt May then Ovlov exeusdion
we Order 22 PUI by iui @ rawaut bene
sa Court eal. ) k 2d
Bt 4 boon all
Ot Care, the Court Lefoe [iitng ibe oveler
euwation is regund to Jaw a notes to shou)
[lous ny wxeution Ghouid not Wiue- Thi iy Nonually
Hluw the application for execution iS nade
flow Ov Year After te date @ tho ceuw
Orel the Lxecution Wh to Gu Made Ougouit thw
2 vaitohive & panty to the ceive (Onder a2
ii}
vor
br Guiding We Paw Kaviowga S. [199i] Hoe 72.
Wan but, that o notiw ¢o Slow eee cainy
ani f ial.)
Rule 34 Spe
MO idyug 4 notiw to sion Carus
Scanned with CamScanneropplivation, thuy Louvh Moy, Indteou{ G- [duu
Wawroatss ovr slave [Ire 201 026) 1S EAL Or noth
lun pr wow to! Opptor bofew thy
On d Olen Wpelifitd inte notiw oud vi
Why ho Gr diw Slrowtd not la Coma tied to
prion.
i j
Unreler Jubruln (2) hiwe appeduoute Wont.
in Obedionw to fiw notier, tw lout yuyatl if)
olotars bstdero go-ourivea,) [dieu a yloueut fa
omnd. G the quolgnrunt olustor.
Kemdlgisina Mbabazi Vs. ding ut
Teasing Ltd HuT-00- col MA S44 — 201K i
uot GY Guobtrw Kiryarwive, hetd that, «| \evgis
Pith) tly owmouitiv2 rufemrd 10 by |code
for thy appliilowt to tle ofut et erforw, sher'y
[eictor W emeated bw Should a2 G Cowbtion peli
ole ude a) Puke BLL) Grithy UPR le Since
Tonoties to Shen Cour Why hefiie Sorte not!
Coumlted fo Ut Picon orca] thet tlw Wane
i lowacbt Cade Order 22, ruler 84(2) 15 fddved haloes
jpolqwunt dota hon fou bed oto oppor iin obowolied
Ww nota to Ghoul Come Udy
Scanned with CamScanner