Client Child Report Superior Uni Final
Client Child Report Superior Uni Final
Submitted by:
Batch: 2023-2025
Table of Contents
Summary 1
Bio Data 2
Presenting Complaints 2
Background Information 4
Family History 4
Personal History 5
Educational History 6
Psychological Assessment 7
Informal assessment 7
Formal assessment 11
Diagnosis                                             13
                                                        3
Case Formulation 13
Management Plan 15
Post Assessment 23
Outcome of Therapy 24
References 25
Appendices 27
Summary 28
Bio Data 29
Presenting Complaints 29
Background Information 31
Family History 31
Personal History 32
Educational History 34
Psychological Assessment 35
Informal assessment 35
Formal assessment 39
Diagnosis 39
Case Formulation 39
Management Plan                                  40
                                                        4
Post Assessment 48
Outcome of Therapy 49
References 50
Appendices 52
Summary 53
Bio Data 54
Presenting Complaints 54
Background Information 56
Family History 56
Personal History 57
Educational History 58
Psychological Assessment 58
Informal assessment 58
Formal assessment 62
Diagnosis 63
Case Formulation 63
Management Plan 65
Post Assessment 70
Outcome of Therapy 72
References 73
Appendices 75
Summary 76
Bio Data 77
Presenting Complaints 77
Background Information 79
Family History 79
Personal History 80
Educational History 81
Psychological Assessment 82
Informal assessment 82
Formal assessment 85
Diagnosis 88
Case Formulation 88
Management Plan 89
Post Assessment 96
Outcome of Therapy                               96
                                                                                          6
References 97
Appendices 99
CASE Report :1
Client I.F was 05 years old boy who came with complaints of not maintaining eye contact,
not attending to his name, playing in isolation and did not interact with anyone, delayed
speech, psychological assessment was done on two levels. The informal assessment included
a clinical interview, behavioral observations, Portage Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and
reinforcer identification. The formal assessment included the Child Autism Rating Scale. On
the basis of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 299.00 (F84) autism spectrum
disorder. The behavior therapy was proved effective and there was improvement in the
client’s behavior
Bio data
Name I.F.
Gender Boy
Age 05 years
No. of siblings 01
The client came to the Autism Resource Center with complaints of not maintaining
eye contact, for the assessment of his behavioral issues and diagnosis. Playing in isolation
and did not interact with anyone, delayed speech. Odd behavior (jumping) stereo type
behavior, and getting excited in isolation gathering and putting had on ears in sound, keeping
doors closed fixed with moving or round object. He was referred to the trainee clinical
Presenting Complaints
      speech delayed,
      lack of social interaction
      Odd behavior (jumping) stereo type behavior, and getting excited in isolation
       gathering and putting had on ears in sound, keeping doors closed
      Not maintain eye contact.
History of Present Illness
According to the client’s mother, the client’s mother reported that he was restricted to
home for at least 2.5 years. He was provided with a mobile phone on which he used to spend
almost 5 hours daily. He liked watching Korean videos and songs. His mother reported that
he was just into his phone and did not respond to anyone. He was not even attracted to any
toy and used to put everything in his hand into his mouth. His mother reported that when they
first brought the client to the market along with them, he closed his eyes on seeing other
The client did not maintain eye contact with other people and did not respond to
anyone. He had delayed speech and did not interact with anyone who came to his home. His
mother reported that he seemed to not even care about what others were doing or talking. He
The client’s mother reported that the client did not speak a single word. He did not
even do babbling. He used to tell his needs by holding his mother’s hand and pointing it to
                                                                                                  8
the thing he needed. He did not play with other kids and liked to play in isolation. The
developmental milestones of the client i.e., head holding, sitting, crawling, and walking were
age-appropriate, but his speech was delayed. According to the client’s mother, the client was
a pampered child. That’s why, the client’s mother did not notice the client’s behavior as
inappropriate. The client’s parents then took the client to the Autism Center and was referred
to the trainee clinical psychologist for the assessment and management of his problems.
Background History
Family History
The child lives I joint family system. He is first born child among two sibling. He has
a younger brother who is two years old and he has a social personality. His father has private
job. He had heart issue. The client’s mother reported that the client’s father was calm and
friendly toward his children and the client had a congenial relationship with his father.
The client’s mother was 39 years old housewife. She is diabetic. She reported being
calm in nature and used to spend time with the client. She used to play with the client and the
client seemed to have a healthy relationship with her. The client was more attached to his
mother than his father as his father used to stop him from doing certain things. The client’s
mother reported that the client shared a satisfactory relationship with his father and siblings
and a healthy relationship with his mother. The overall home environment was reported to be
healthy.
The client’s mother reported that there is no history of any fever, head injury,
dehydration. His paternal family is positive for ASD .he was born through C-section delivery.
His mother was reported diabetes. He had his first cry present. He child mother took feed.
Personal History
                                                                                                   9
The mother reported that the length of term 9 month. The client was born through c-
section. His prenatal history was normal. His mother was report as diabetic. He had an
immediate cry, and his birth weight was normal. The client’s mother reported that she faced
no pre-natal or post-natal complications. She was not taken medicine in pregnancy. The child
took mother feed. The client achieved his developmental milestones such as head and neck
holding, sitting, crawling, and walking at the appropriate age. But, his speech was not
achieved even at the age of 3 years. He did not even produce sounds.
Table 1
Age
Educational History
The informal education of the client was started at home at the age of 2.5 years. His
mother and father were involved in the teaching process. The client’s mother used to rhyme
                                                                                                 10
the poems with the client. The client also had a little concept of the “circle” shape. Besides
this, he did not have any concept of colors, alphabets, fruits etc.
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
Behavioral Observations
Sensory Checklist
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
Clinical Interview.
A semi-structured clinical interview was done with his mother in which the personal,
developmental, educational, and familial history was taken. A complete account of the
behavioral issues was taken. Verbal informed consent was taken and confidentiality of
information was ensured. From the interview, predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and
prognostic factors were identified which were helpful in determining the diagnosis and the
Covid-19 restrictions
Behavioral Observation. The client was of normal height and weight. He was
dressed neatly in weather-appropriate clothes. During the sessions, it was observed that he
                                                                                               11
was responsive toward his name and did not maintain eye contact. The client was fascinated
by the light in the room. He remain in his seat and used to sit on the table to complete his
ABA activity task. Mouthing behavior was also observed in the client as he used to follow
the command to complete his task. He almost attend to any command of the therapist and was
involved in playing and recognized differentiate between small and big same and different
Some of the rein forcers were identified by asking the client’s mother about his
favorite activities and food while others were identified by observing the client during the
session while performing activities. During the session, the free-operant preference
assessment method was used in which the client was provided access to all the available
stimuli and was allowed to freely engage with any presented stimuli. The engagement was
monitored with the duration. It helped in identifying the most preferable reinforcer. Material
reinforcers were the most preferable reinforcers. Following this helped in identifying the
hierarchy of the most to the least preferred reinforcer. The reinforcers were identified to make
Formal Assessment
scale used for assessing the presence and severity of symptoms of Autism spectrum disorders.
It consists of 15 domains, with each scored on a rating scale from 1 to 4. The total score
ranges from 15 to 60. It has .94 internal consistency and a reliability of .71. It was
                                                                                               12
administered by asking the client’s mother and observing the client during the session. The
childhood autism rating scale was administered to assess the current functioning level of the
client. The scores showed that the client had mildly-moderate autism. (Appendix)
Table 4
Raw Scores, Range, and Corresponding Category on Childhood Autism Rating Scale
The scores on CARS indicated his high scores in the item no. 2, 3, 5, 8, and 11 that
included moderately abnormal imitation, emotional response, object use, listening response,
and verbal communication. The client’s scores fall in the category of mildly to moderately
autistic.
During the interview, it was revealed that the client had some repetitive behaviors,
had problems interacting and communicating, did not maintain eye contact or attend to his
name, and had sensory issues. These symptoms indicated the client’s autistic behavior.
Sensory checklist was administered that showed the client’s gustatory, olfactory, and auditory
sensory issue. The formal assessment was done using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale.
Diagnosis:
According to DSM-V criteria and keeping in view the observation and assessment, the client
was diagnosed with 299.00 (F84) autism spectrum disorder, accompanying language
impairment.
Case Formulation
                                                                                                   13
The client I.F. was 05 years old boy who came with complaints of not maintaining
eye contact, not responding even if called his name 10 times, , playing in isolation and did not
interact with anyone, not doing his self-help tasks, walking on his toes, not speaking a single
word, being lazy, and fascinated with same object. Psychological assessment was done on
two levels. The results on PGEE indicated deficits in language, motor, socialization, self-
help, and cognitive domain. The scores on CARS indicated mildly-moderately autistic in the
client. These results helped in diagnosing the client with an Autism Spectrum Disorder.
The client was not diagnosed with intellectual disability as he had specific repetitive
behaviors that were a feature of Autism. Moreover, he was able to memorize the tasks
learned and was able to perform it in the correct way. He learned his tasks efficiently. He was
not diagnosed with the language and social communication disorder as he had restrictive and
repetitive behavior that were absent in this disorder. The client was not diagnosed with
stereotypic movement disorder as the repetitive behavior was better explained by autism
spectrum disorder. He did not meet the criteria for disorders other than autism spectrum
The client was born via cesarean delivery. Research has indicated that cesarean
delivery was associated with a 26% increased risk of causing autism in the child either due to
stress or some other possible explanation (Chang, 2011). In addition, the client was a boy
which also increased the incidence of having autism as research has indicated that autism
spectrum disorder was four times more common in males than females (Maenner et al.,
2020).
Flusberg (2016), most children with autism are found to have delays in achieving milestones,
especially the onset of words, phrases, and sentences is delayed. They have problems with
receptive and expressive language due to processing deficits. It has also been found that
                                                                                              14
children with autism had difficulties in understanding and responding appropriately to others.
It has been found that the client had sensory issues. These issues were related to
sensory processing. It has been found that over 96% of children with ASD reported hyper and
hypo-sensitivities in multiple domains which ranged from mild to severe ranges (Crane et al.,
2009).
Management Plan
The management plan based on behavior techniques was devised to deal with the
Table 5
Rapport building
 To engage with the child Floor time technique Playing with the lightning
Mirroring
Psych education
 Understanding of Discussion
treatment
 Understanding of skills
development
 Parental training
                                                                                                15
strategies
training
reinforcement of Lollipop
alternate behavior,
Verbal prompts,
modeling
Physical restraint
IEP Development
 Speech and language therapy will be continued for the management of his speech-
related issues.
 Behavioral techniques will be continued to be used by his mother to deal with the
Rapport Building. Rapport building was done in the initial sessions to establish an
effective therapeutic relationship with the client. It was done to make the client comfortable
and to develop trust in the therapist. The techniques used were floor time technique,
The floor time technique is a relationship-based therapy for children with autism. The
intervention is called Floortime because the therapist gets down on the floor with the child to
play and interact with the child at their level. This was done by sitting on the floor with the
child and playing with his favorite toy. The positive reinforcement was used during playing
person in order to build a sense of trust and friendship (Tickle-Degnen & Rosenthall, 1990).
This was accomplished through expressing shared preferences for certain toys and foods. He
& Pease, 2005). When playing with toys, the client’s motions and gestures were replicated.
knowledge for an illness and its treatment, integrating emotional and motivational aspects to
                                                                                                17
enable patients to cope with the illness and to improve its treatment adherence and efficacy
(Ekhtiari et al., 2017). The client’s diagnosis, its primary symptoms, and the variables
influencing the prognosis rate were explained to the client’s parents in order to provide them
with some psychoeducation about the disorder. Additionally, they were informed about the
management strategies and how they could contribute to the therapeutic activity’s success.
Parental Training. Parental training was done to guide the behavior modification
techniques that would help in the development of skills in the client. The mother was trained
to deal with the behavioral issues of the client. During each session, ten to fifteen minutes
were reserved for the mother in which she was trained to deal with the behavioral issues and
her concerns regarding the application of techniques were catered. The mother was also asked
to observe some of the sessions to have an idea to apply the techniques. She was asked to
conduct a formal session with the client at home. She was shown how to conduct a session at
home, and was informed about the required material such as colored balls, similar objects,
alternate behavior, positive reinforcement, verbal and physical prompts, joint attention,
modeling, and extinction along with the concept of extinction burst and stimulus control.
plan for parents, teachers, and school administration to work together to design instructions,
accommodations, and services for children with special needs (Kamens, 2004). They all work
together to meet the needs of the individual requiring a range of support. The goals based on
the child’s current needs and skills are developed (Dotson, 2016). It was formed to meet the
idiosyncratic needs of the client. It was made to develop and strengthen early readiness skills,
and developmental skills which included cognitive skills, language skills, socialization skills,
self-help skills, motor skills. The work on the individualized educational plan was continued
throughout the sessions and his mother was asked to work on it at home as well. The early
                                                                                                   18
readiness skills that were worked on included increasing on-seat behavior and eye contact,
increasing the response to his name, imitation and attending. The tasks focused on providing
things to the client by maintaining eye contact with him, pointing to one body part, imitating
high-five, hand shaking, and bye-bye, attending to his name, following the commands of start
The eye contact and response to name was increased using reinforcers, verbal and
of providing a clue to the person about the next step to be done. Prompting can be verbal,
gestural or physical. Verbal prompting usually consists of giving a directive command about
the next step. Most-to-least intrusive prompting is usually followed, which means that the
teacher starts with maximal support and ends with minimal prompting (Miltenberger &
Perkins, 2020). To get the attention of the client, his favorite activities were used which were
playing with the lighting toys. He was given reinforcement for sustaining attention and
completing the tasks. The side gaze of the client was managed by using tunnel vision. The
side of the eyes was blocked either by placing hands on the side of his eyes or using objects
on the sides so that the client could look straight in front of him and at the tasks in front of
him. The attending to his name was increased using these activities and snacks. He would
attend the therapist mostly on the account of getting the lightning toy or lays. This positive
The on-seat behavior was increased using physical restraints and differential
reinforcement of alternate behavior. The client was made to sit on the seat in the corner of the
room and he was blocked using the table. He was unable to get out of the seat and even if he
tried, he was verbally asked and physically forced to sit back on the seat.
The compliant behavior was achieved using physical and verbal prompts, modeling,
and differential reinforcement of alternate behavior. The task was modeled and then the client
                                                                                                19
was asked to do the same. One-word and two-word commands were used such as stop, start,
give me, put there, and not now. Social and edible reinforcers were provided for the
complaint behavior. The client was asked to place the toys in a toy box and place the rings in
the stacker. This was done while keeping the edible reinforcer in the therapist’s hands. He
was not given until he completed the tasks. After the completion of each activity, the client
The sensory issues were dealt with by educating the mother about the alternatives.
Differential reinforcement of alternate behavior, physical restraints, and verbal prompts were
used for this purpose and the appropriate response was positively reinforced. During the
session, verbal prompting and differential reinforcement for alternative behavior were
behavior that serves as a viable alternative for the problem behavior but is not necessarily
incompatible with the problem behavior (Speigler & Guevremont, 2015). The client was
provided with the sucking toys and lollipop for the management of his mouthing behavior
and physical restraints and response prevention was used for the management of his behavior
Forty structured sessions were conducted with the client. Each session had been of
half an hour to 45 minutes. The initial 15 sessions were of one hour. The sessions included
history taking, observations, assessment, and management of problematic behaviors. The last
ten to fifteen minutes of each session was reserved to discuss the concerns of the mother and
to train her to deal with the problematic behaviors. The sessions were conducted in a
collaborative manner involving the mother along with the trainee in dealing with the client’s
problems.
Post Assessment
                                                                                         20
Table 6
Assessment
Eye-contact
name
On-seat
Attending
it
Imitation
Compliance
Developmental Skills
Socialization
Seeks eye contact often when attended for 2-3 min 0% 50%
Self-help
Takes spoon filled with food to mouth without help 10% 80%
Cognitive
Motor
Stop putting his fingers into his ears on hearing 10% 50%
loud noise
Outcome of Therapy
                                                                                               22
The therapy proved to be helpful in improving early readiness skills of the client. The
individualized educational plan was designed for the client. The on seat behavior and
compliance of the client was improved and eye contact was also maintained a bit. Some of
the tasks were achieved by practicing during the sessions and at home. The client was able to
show a little compliance towards the commands, started cooperating with the requests, and
pointed some objects. He started responding to his name a little buy, imitating simple
gestures of an adult, and doing handshaking and bye-bye in imitation. The client showed
progress during the sessions. The client’s mother also reported his better behavior at home.
The therapy proved to be effective in dealing with the problems of the client.
References
Crane, L., Goddard, L., & Pring, L. (2009). Sensory processing in adults with autism
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309103794
Cook, J., Hull, L., Crane, L., & Mandy, W. (2021). Camouflaging in autism: A systematic
Dotson, R. (2016). Goal setting to increase student academic performance. Journal of School
https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v1i1.1908
Ekhtiari, H., Rezapour, T., Aupperle, R. L., & Paulus, M. P. (2017). Neuroscience-informed
Kamens, M. W. (2004). Learning to write IEPS. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(2), 76–
     80. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512040400020201
                                                                                             23
Maenner, M. J., Shaw, K. A., Baio, J., Washington, A., Patrick, M., DiRienzo, M.,
Christensen, D. L., Wiggins, L. D., Pettygrove, S., Andrews, J. G., Lopez, M., Hudson,
A., Baroud, T., Schwenk, Y., White, T., Rosenberg, C. R., Lee, L.-C., Harrington, R.
A., Huston, M., … Dietz, P. M. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1
Miltenberger, R. (2015). Behavior modification: Principles and practices (6th ed.). Academic
Internet Publishers.
Case Report: 2
Client W.A was 5 years and 5 months old boy who came with complaints of delayed speech,
avoid maintaining eye contact, not attending after calling his name, not play or interact with
other children, unusual hand movements, eating inedible objects, and hit other children.
Psychological assessment was done on two levels. The informal assessment included a
the Child Autism rating scale. On the basis of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with
299.00 (F84.0) autism spectrum disorder (Level I) requiring support. The management of the
client’s problems was focused on using behavioral therapy techniques to modify the client’s
behavior. A total of 11 sessions were conducted with the client. The therapy was proved
Bio data
Name W.A
Gender Male
No. of siblings 3
The client came to the autism center Lahore with complaints of delayed speech, avoid
maintaining eye contact, not attending after calling his name, not play or interact with other
children, unusual hand movements, eating inedible objects, and hit other children. He was
referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for assessment and management of his problems.
Presenting Complaints
Poor compliance
Speech delay
Aggression
                                                                                                                25
Self-hitting
Drooling
Self-biting
دورانیہ شکایات
تین سال سے اس کی سپیچ کم ہے۔ایک دو لفظ سے زیادہ نہیں بولتا۔
دو سال سے اسے چیزیں جلدی یاد نہیں ہوتی۔ بہت وقت لگاتا ہے۔
تین سال سے چار پانچ بار آوازدو تو اس کے بعد بات سنتا ہے۔
تین سال سے  اکیلا ہی کھیلتا رہتا ہے۔،کسی کے ساتھ گھلتا ملتا نہیں ہے
چار سال سے ہر چیز کو منہ میں ڈال لیتا ہے اور چوستا رہتا ہے۔
Background History
The client’s mother reported that one of the client’s paternal uncles was having
Personal History
The client was born through cesarean section after prolonged labor. He was a twin
brother. He had an immediate cry, and his birth weight was normal i.e. 6 pounds. The client’s
mother reported that she faced no pre-natal or post-natal complications. The client was
breastfed for 2-3 days. After that, his mother started bottle feeding along with breastfeeding.
When the client was one month of age, he suffered from a severe chest infection for which
The client’s mother reported that the client did not do burping. Because of this, he
used to vomit milk. When the client was of 2 months, he suffered from severe diarrhea but
                                                                                             26
got recovered after proper treatment and care. The client’s developmental milestones of head
and neck holding, sitting, crawling, walking, and bladder and bowel control were achieved
appropriately for his age, but he was significantly delayed in speech. The client started
babbling at the age of 9 months, but his speech was regressed after two months. His mother
reported that his screen-time was increased up to 6-7 hours. He stopped saying mama, baba.
History of fits No
Table 1
Age
Educational History
His mother and father were involved in the teaching process. As the client’s speech
was delayed, his parents consulted a speech therapist at RCL, where he was diagnosed with
autism spectrum disorder and delay speech disorder was referred to the clinical psychologist.
He took the therapy based on early readiness skills and developmental skills for almost 6
months. His teachers used to complain about his behaviors as he used to hit his class fellows
and did not sit calmly on the chair. He avoids maintaining eye contact and did not respond to
his name. Where session of 30 minutes was taken based on developmental activities and
academics.
The client had not the concept of shapes, recognition and naming of English alphabets
(A-Z) and Urdu alphabets ()ا تا خ, could write English alphabets (A & B), and Urdu alphabets
( آ, )ا. He only speck two words AAA, BAAAA He had not recognition of numbers (1-10),
and could not write numbers (1-2), match numbers by counting objects (1-4), and matching
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
 Behavioral Observations
                                                                                                 28
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
Clinical Interview. A semi-structured clinical interview was done with his mother in
which the personal, developmental, educational, and familial history was taken. A complete
account of the behavioral issues was taken. Verbal informed consent was taken and
perpetuating, and prognostic factors were identified which were helpful in determining the
birth therapist
Behavioral Observation.
The client was of normal height and weight. He was dressed neatly in weather-
appropriate clothes. During the sessions, it was observed that he was not much responsive
toward his name and did not maintain eye contact. The client was easily distracted by the
activities around him such as the child playing with pegboards or taking therapeutic sessions.
In the first session, it was bit difficult to build rapport with him. He want to continue
activities of his own choice. He seemed calm. He was not fellow simple commands. His
activity level was lower than any other child of his age.
                                                                                               29
The client had poor on-seat as he roams around in the session room. He avoids
maintaining eye contact. He continuously went towards switches to switch on and off the
button. Mouthing behavior was also observed as he used to put pencil or eraser in his mouth.
Table 2
Eye-contact 2
Imitation 3
Respond to name 2
Onset 4
Compliance 3
Mouthing 8
Lining up objects 5
Side gaze 3
Fixation (switches) 6
Teeth grinding 7
The rating of the problematic behaviors of the client was done by asking the client’s
mother and observing the client during the session. The client was observed in the initial
Portage Guide to Early Education (Sturmey & Crisp, 1986). It was administered
on the client to assess his current functioning level in five domains. (Appendix)
Table 3
Developmental Areas, First Crossed Item with Age Range, Last Correct Item with Age Range
The results showed that the client lacked behind his chronological age in language,
cognition, socialization, and self-help. The client was taking therapy sessions for the last 2
years, and many of his PGEE items were achieved. The socialization of the client was not
age-appropriate as it was evident from the history and observation that he did not attend to
other individuals immediately and respond to them after calling him 4-5 times, and did not
wait for his turn The scores on the self-help domain revealed his lack of skills in dressing up
himself, tying and untying laces, and buttoning and unbuttoning his jacket. The result of the
motor domain revealed his normal development in fine motor and gross motor skills.
Some of the rein forcers were identified by asking the client’s mother about his favorite
activities and food while others were identified by observing the client during the session
while performing activities. The engagement was monitored with the duration. It helped in
identifying the most preferable reinforce. The reinforces were identified to make it contingent
Social rein forcer Praise(hi ten low ten , good boy, wow)
Formal Assessment
It is a behavioral rating scale used for assessing the presence and severity of symptoms of
autism spectrum disorders. It consisted of 15 domains, with each scored on a rating scale
from 1 to 4. The total score ranges from 15 to 60. It has .94 internal consistency and a
reliability of .71. It was administered by asking the client’s mother and observing the client
during the session. The childhood autism rating scale was administered to assess the current
functioning level of the client. The scores showed that the client had mildly to moderate
Object use 2
Visual response 2
Table 5
Raw Scores, Range, and Corresponding Category on Childhood Autism Rating Scale
Diagnosis
                                                                                              32
According to DSM-V criteria and keeping in view the observation and assessment,
the client was diagnosed with on the basis of history, test result and clinical observation W.A
developmental delay”
Management Plan
A management plan based on behavior techniques was devised to deal with the
1. Rapport building
2. Psycho-education
3. Parental Training
4. Behavior therapy
 Rapport building was done with the client to make him at ease with the therapist
 Psycho-education was done with the client’s mother to give him the understanding of
diagnosis, prognosis, and management of the problem. She was informed about her
role in the management of the client’s behavioral problems. This helped in motivating
 Positive parental training was given to the client’s mother. She was trained to deal
 Individualized education plan was developed to work on the client’s early readiness
 Behavioral modification techniques were used to teach the client the tasks of IEP.
1. Reinforcement was used to increase the likelihood that a behavior will occur
2. Physical and verbal prompts were used to assist the client in performing a
specific task. These prompts were given before and during the tasks to help the
3. Modeling was used to show the client about a particular task so she would
learning.
5. Shaping was used to teach the client particular tasks by reinforcing successive
academic skills.
 Speech and language therapy will be continued for the management of his speech-
related issues.
 Behavioral techniques will be continued to be used by her mother to deal with the
relationship with the client. It was done to make the client comfortable and to develop trust in
person in order to build a sense of trust and friendship (Tickle-Degnen & Rosenthall, 1990).
This was accomplished through expressing shared preferences for certain toys and foods. He
knowledge for an illness and its treatment, integrating emotional and motivational aspects to
enable patients to cope with the illness and to improve its treatment adherence and efficacy
(Ekhtiari et al., 2017). The client’s diagnosis, its primary symptoms, and the variables
influencing the prognosis rate were explained to the client’s parents in order to provide them
with some psychoeducation about the disorder. Additionally, they were informed about the
management strategies and how they could contribute to the therapeutic activity’s success.
Parental Training. Parental training was done to guide the behavior modification
techniques that would help in the development of skills in the client. The mother was trained
to deal with the behavioral issues of the client. During each session, ten to fifteen minutes
were reserved for the mother in which her concerns regarding the application of techniques
were catered. The mother was also asked to observe some of the sessions to have an idea to
apply the techniques. She was asked to conduct a formal session with the client at home. She
                                                                                               35
was shown how to conduct a session at home, and was informed about the required material
The client's mother was instructed to do the exercises at home to maintain the client’s
eye-contact and improve his attending to his name. She was also taught the techniques,
including verbal, physical, and gestural prompting strategies, positive reinforcement, joint
plan for parents, teachers, and school administration to work together to design instructions,
accommodation and services to children with special needs (Kamens, 2004). They all work
together to meet the needs of the individual requiring a range of support. The goals based on
the child’s current needs and skills are developed (Dotson, 2016). It was formed to meet the
idiosyncratic needs of the client. It was made to develop and strengthen early readiness skills,
and developmental skills which included cognitive skills, language skills, socialization skills,
self-help skills, motor skills, and academic skills. The work on the individualized educational
plan was continued throughout the sessions and his mother was asked to work on it at home
as well.
Early Readiness Skills. The early readiness skills that were worked on included
maintaining eye-contact, increasing on-seat behavior, attending to his name, imitation and
compliance. The eye contact and response to name was increased using reinforcers, verbal
and gestural prompts and joint attention. To get the attention of the client, his favourite
activities were used that were ring stackers and peg boards. He was given reinforcement for
sustaining attention and completing the tasks. The side gaze of the client was managed by
using tunnel vision. The side of the eyes were blocked either by placing hands on the side of
                                                                                               36
his eyes or using objects on the sides so that the client could look straight in front of him and
The on-seat behavior was increased using physical restraints and differential
reinforcement of alternate behavior. The client was made to sit on the seat in the corner of the
room and he was blocked using the table. He was verbally and physically prompted to sit on
the chair and finish the task. The attending to name was increased using academic activities
and snacks. The technique used for increasing the client’s attending was positive
reinforcement, joint attention, and verbal prompts. He would attend the therapist mostly on
the account of getting snacks. The positive reinforcement technique was proved to be helpful.
The compliant behavior was achieved using verbal prompts, modeling, and
differential reinforcement of alternate behavior. The task was modeled and then the client
was asked to do the same. One-word and two-word commands were used such as stop, start,
give me, put there, and not now. Social and edible reinforcers were provided for the
complaint behavior. The client was asked to place the pegs in peg boards, rings in the stacker,
match the letters with pictures, and do academic tasks. This was done while keeping the
edible reinforcer in therapist’s hands. He was not given the reimforcer until he completed the
tasks. After the completion of each activity, client was given some of the biscuits or his
lunch.
Sensory Issues. The sensory issues were dealt by educating the mother about the
alternatives. Differential reinforcement of alternate behavior techniques was used for this
purpose and the appropriate response was positively reinforced. During the session, verbal
prompting and differential reinforcement for alternative behavior were used to address the
Developmental skills. For socialization skills, the client was taught the tasks including
sharing pencil or eraser with peers, taking permission from other people before using their
                                                                                                37
things, and saying please and thank you. The techniques used for these tasks were
Reinforcement, verbal prompts, and modeling. The client was trained to share his pencil and
eraser with his peers. The behavior was first modeled by the therapist. Then the therapist
asked the client to share his eraser to his peer. The client was verbally prompted to share his
Asking permission to use objects was taught to the client through modeling and
prompting. The therapist modeled this task by asking for permission to the client for using his
material like pencil, book, and eraser. After that, verbal prompts were used and the client was
only given desirable objects when he sought permission for them to use. The client was
trained to say please and thank you. For this, the therapist modeled the behavior in front of
the client by saying please and thank you herself while using ring stacker with the client. The
client was then verbally prompted on it. He was given a reinforcement when he said please
The cognitive skills taught to the client included differentiating heavy and light and
identifying shapes. For the purpose of categorization, identification and naming of shapes
(triangle, circle, square, and rectangle) were used. Verbal and gestural prompts and
reinforcements were used and later the client would categorize it himself on the command.
The client was given the concept of heavy and light objects by using verbal and gestural
prompts, and reinforcement. The client was provided with the heavy and light objects on both
Academic Skills. The client was taught the academic skills including English, Urdu,
and Mathematics. These tasks included writing English alphabets A-E, counting numbers 1-
20, writing numbers 1-5, matching Urdu alphabets with objects, and pointing from early
learners English and Urdu alphabets book. The techniques used for these tasks were physical
and verbal prompts, shaping, and reinforcement. He was taught these tasks in chunks.
                                                                                                 38
Positive Reinforcement
that makes it more likely that the behavior will occur again in the future (Premack, 1959).
Positive reinforcement was used to develop new desirable behaviors and strengthen the
previously learned behaviors in the client. Social and material reinforcers were used with the
client. Social reinforcers included praise, clapping, and smile, whereas material reinforcers
Prompting
Prompting is a method of providing a clue to the person about the next step to be
done. Prompting can be verbal or physical. Verbal prompting usually consists of giving a
directive command about the next step. Most-to-least intrusive prompting is usually followed,
which means that the teacher starts with maximal support and ends with minimal prompting
Fading
Fading is a process of gradually removing prompts until the behavior starts occurring
(Miltenberger, 2015). The various types of prompts including physical prompts, verbal
prompts, gestural prompts, visual prompts and model prompts were gradually faded so that
Chaining
The process of analyzing a behavioral chain by breaking it down into its individual
the child self-help skill i.e. Laces shoes, and academic skills i.e., writing English and Urdu
Modeling
learner or observer who then may learn that behavior and carry it on (Sam, 2013). This
technique was used to teach the client socialization, self-help, and cognitive tasks by first
showing the client how the task would be done, and after that the client was asked to imitate
it.
Eleven structured sessions were conducted with the client. Each session was of 1 to
1½ hour. The sessions included history taking, behavioral observations, assessment, and
management of the problematic behaviors. In the last ten to fifteen minutes of each session,
the client’s mother was guided and trained to deal with the client’s problematic behaviors.
The mother was involved in the therapy by giving homework assignments in dealing with the
client’s problems.
Post Assessment
were obtained on a 10-point rating scale. The therapist and the mother of the client rated the
presenting complaints 0 to 10 severity rating scale, “0” means “not present”, and “10” means
“severe”. The subjective ratings of the symptoms of the client rated by his mother were;
Table 6
Pre and post assessment rating by the client’s mother on problematic symptoms on 0-10
rating scale
Eye-contact 2 4
Imitation 3 6
 Respond to name                                            2                     5
                                                                                             40
Onset 4 6
Compliance 3 5
Mouthing 8 5
Lining up objects 5 4
Side gaze 3 2
Fixation (switches) 6 4
objects
Teeth grinding 7 5
Table 7
PGEE Items Pre and Post Assessment showing Missed and Achieved Items
Areas
Socialization 27, 31, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 42, 46, 49, 37, 42, 47
Cognitive 31, 35, 41, 44, 50, 60, 66, 68, 69, 71, 44, 71
Outcome of Therapy
The behavior therapy was found to be effective in addressing the client's problematic
behaviors. The post-assessment showed improvement in the client’s behavior. The client’s
eye-contact, om-seat, attending, and compliance was improved. His mother reported that the
client’s socialization and cognitive skills were also improved as he started asking for
permission before using anyone’s things, saying thank you, and please, and also got the
concept of long and short, colors and shapes recognition. His academic skills were also
                                                                                                  41
improved. He started writing English alphabets A-E, numbers 1-4, and Urdu alphabets ( )ا تا پ
with verbal prompts and started matching letters to objects. He started counting numbers
from 1-15 and pointing Urdu alphabets from the mathematics and Urdu book for early
learners. The client was referred to another clinical psychologist to continue his
individualized education plan and work on his early readiness, developmental, and academic
skills.
References
Ben-Sasson, A., Soto, T. W., Martínez-Pedraza, F., & Carter, A. S. (2013). Early sensory
impairment and parenting stress. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(8),
846–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12035
Cook, J., Hull, L., Crane, L., & Mandy, W. (2021). Camouflaging in autism: A systematic
Dotson, R. (2016). Goal setting to increase student academic performance. Journal of School
https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v1i1.1908
Ekhtiari, H., Rezapour, T., Aupperle, R. L., & Paulus, M. P. (2017). Neuroscience-informed
Case Summary
Client A. A was 5 years and 6 months old girl who came to the outpatient department of
children hospital with complaints of being aggressive, not doing classwork or homework
while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty paying attention, lack of concentration,
restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking and mis-consuming household things,
not listening to anyone’s commands, and stubborn. Psychological assessment was done on
two levels. The informal assessment included a clinical interview, behavioral observations,
Portage Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer identification. The formal
assessment included Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) and Conner’s rating scales. On the basis
of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 314.01 (F90.2) Attention
management of the client’s problems was focused on using behavioral therapy techniques to
modify the client’s behavior. A total of 11 sessions were conducted with the client. The
therapy was proved effective and the client’s behaviors were improved.
                                                                                                  43
Biodata
Name A .A
Gender Female
No. of siblings 3
The client came to the Iffat Anwar medical Hospital, Lahore with complaints of being
aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk,
difficulty paying attention, lack of concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her
turn, breaking and mis-consuming household things, not listening to anyone’s commands,
and stubborn. She was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for assessment and
Presenting Complaints
                                                                                                 44
دورانیہ شکایات
The client’s mother reported that when she was pregnant, the fetus was not growing
properly. So, the doctors prescribed her injections. The dosage of these injections was 2
injections/month during the first trimester and 1 injection/month during the second and third
trimesters. The client’s mother faced complications during the client’s birth. She was born
through C-section. She had an immediate cry after birth but her weight was low. One month
after birth, the client suffered from jaundice. The client achieved all her developmental
milestones at the appropriate age. Her mother reported that after one year of age, when the
client started crawling, she used to pick the household things and mis-consume them. When
the client was 3 years of age, her screen time was increased up to 5 hours a day. Her mother
reported that whenever she took the mobile from the client, she behaved stubbornly. She used
to lay on the floor or hit the elders if her need was not met. When the client was 3.5 years old,
her mother started teaching her at home. At this time, the client’s mother noticed that the
client did not pay attention to studies, got easily distracted, and was restless.
                                                                                                 45
The client’s mother took the client to the children hospital in Aug, 2022. The client was
referred to trainee clinical psychologist for assessment and management of her problems.
Background History
Family History
The client’s father A.M was 38 years old, educated up to MBA, and worked in a bank.
He reported being calm and friendly toward his children and the client had a healthy
The client’s mother was 34 years old, housewife and educated up to bachelors. She
reported being calm in nature but sometimes got irritated by the client’s behavior and beat
her. The client seemed to have a healthy relationship with her mother.
The client’s parents were first cousins. Their relationship was reported to be
satisfactory, but the client’s mother also reported that her husband physically abused her
when they had a fight on any issue. This also had an impact on the client’s behavior as after
seeing her father beating her mother, she thought that beating someone is an acceptable
behavior and she used to beat her cousins and fellow kids when they did not listen to her.
The client had 2 siblings, one brother, and a sister. Her elder sister was 8 years old,
studying in 2nd class. The client’s mother reported that the client shared a healthy relationship
with her sister. The client’s younger brother was 3 years old. The client shared a healthy
The client lived in a joint family with her grandparents. The overall home
Personal History
The client was born through cesarean section after prolonged labor. She had an
immediate cry, but her birth weight was low. The client’s mother faced pre-natal and post-
natal complications. She reported that when she was pregnant, the fetus growth was not
                                                                                              46
normal so the doctors prescribed her injections. During childbirth, the mother faced intestinal
malrotation. Within one month of the client’s birth, she suffered from jaundice and fever.
The client achieved her developmental milestones i.e., head holding, sitting, crawling,
walking, speech, bowel and bladder control, dressing, and taking bath without help at the
appropriate age.
Table 1
Showing Developmental Milestones, Normal Age of Achievement, and Client’s Acquired Age
Educational History
The informal education of the client was started at home by her mother at the age of
4.5 years. The client’s mother reported that the client used to get easily distracted while
studying and was involved in playing. She had difficulty paying attention and completing the
tasks. She did not sit on her seat. The client did know some of the body parts and animals’
The client did not receive any formal education. Her parents were deciding to start her
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
Behavioral Observations
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
Clinical Interview.
A semi-structured clinical interview was done with her mother in which the personal,
developmental, educational, and familial history was taken. A complete account of the
Lactose intolerance
Behavioral Observation. The client was of normal height and weight. She was
dressed neatly in weather-appropriate clothes. She was very active during the whole session.
She explored the things and roam here and there in the session room. During the sessions, the
client was easily distracted by the activities around her such as the child playing with
pegboards or bubbles. After being asked three to four times, she used to focus on the task but
still was distracted after sometime. The client had poor on-seat during the session. The client
was excessively talking during the session. She was talking about her family members, her
Behavior Rating Scale. The client’s on-seat behavior and not waiting for her turn
Table 2
Behavior Rating
Portage Guide to Early Education (Sturmey & Crisp, 1986). It was administered
on the client to assess her current functioning level in five domains. (Appendix)
Table 3
Developmental Areas, First Crossed Item with Age Range, Last Correct Item with Age Range
The results showed that the client lacked behind her chronological age in majorly
three domains of PGEE. The socialization of the client was not age-appropriate as it was
evident from the history and observation that she had a stubborn attitude and did not
cooperate with the parental requests. She used to engage in inappropriate social behaviors.
She immediately wants the object of her choice if she has seen it somewhere. She rarely
listens to the commands of elders, wait for her turn, or request an object. The scores on the
cognitive domain revealed her lack of skills in naming colors, categorization, differentiating
heavy and light, identifying the missing part, and academic tasks (alphabets, counting). She
had a problem with cutting straight lines and shapes and pasting, printing letters, standing on
client’s mother about her favorite activities and food while others were identified by
Formal Assessment
Conners Rating Scale (Conners, 1997). The Conners Behavior Rating Scale was
used to better understand certain behavioral, social, and academic issues. It was used to help
diagnose the client. The parent’s rating and teacher’s ratings were obtained. The observations
                                                                                                 50
were also taken into account when the parent’s version was administered with the help of her
mother. The teacher’s version was filled by the client’s school teacher. (Appendix)
Table 5
Raw scores and t Scores on Parent’s Rating of Oppositional, Inattention, Hyperactivity and
                                                             Parent’s Rating
              Subscale
                                          Raw scores             t score             Category
Total 41
The scores of the parent’s ratings indicated that the client obtained mildly atypical
markedly atypical scores on hyperactivity making the client moderately atypical on ADHD
index. It provided a strong indication towards diagnosing the client and indicated that
Table 6
Raw scores and t Scores on Teacher’s Rating of Oppositional, Inattention, Hyperactivity and
                                                            Teacher’s Rating
             Subscales
                                        Raw scores             t scores              Category
Total 38
The scores on the teacher’s rating were in accordance with the scores on parent’s
rating. It indicated the client’s moderately atypical scores on oppositional showing the
the client.
Diagnosis
According to DSM-V, the diagnosis of the client was 314.01 (F90.2) Attention Deficit
Case Formulation
The client was 5 years and 6 months old and came with the presenting complaints of
being aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk,
difficulty paying attention, lack of concentration, being easily distracted, restless, having
difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking and mis-consuming household things, not listening to
anyone’s commands, and stubborn. The client was diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/
Management Plan
A management plan based on behavior techniques was devised to deal with the
1. Rapport building
2. Psycho-education
    3. Parental Training
                                                                                                 52
4. Behavior therapy
 Rapport building was done with the client to make her at ease with the therapist
 Psycho-education was done with the client’s mother to give her the understanding of
diagnosis, prognosis, and management of the problem. She was informed about her
role in the management of the client’s behavioral problems. This helped in motivating
 Positive parental training was given to the client’s mother. She was trained to deal
with the client’s hyperactivity and inattention, stubborn behavior, her excessive talks,
 Individualized education plan was developed to work on the client’s early readiness
 Behavioral modification techniques were used to teach the client the tasks of IEP.
academic skills.
 Behavioral techniques will be continued to be used by her mother to deal with the
Rapport Building. Rapport-building was built with the client to create a successful
therapeutic relationship with the client. It was done to help the client feel at ease and gain
                                                                                                53
confidence in the therapist. The methods employed were mutual attentiveness and
is believed that nonverbal conduct is a potent form of successful communication (Segal et al.,
2022). The client was given thorough attention, her narratives were carefully listened to, and
she was questioned about her favorite meals, cartoons, and plays.
The commonality technique was used to establish trust and a friendly relationship with the
client.
patients and their families that gives knowledge and assistance to help them understand and
After the evaluation and client diagnosis was complete, the client’s mother was
signs and symptoms, and management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The client’s
diagnosis, its primary symptoms, and the variables influencing the prognosis rate were
explained to the client’s mother in order to provide her with some psychoeducation about the
disorder. Additionally, she was informed about the management strategies and how she could
contribute to the therapeutic activity’s success. She was psycho-educated about the benefits
of early management of her problems. In order to deal with these symptoms, behavioral
techniques were introduced. Moreover, the client’s mother was told about adherence to
Parental Training. Parental training was done to guide the behavior modification
techniques that would help in the development of skills in the client. The mother was trained
to deal with the behavioral issues of the client. During each session, ten to fifteen minutes
were reserved for the mother in which her concerns regarding the application of techniques
were catered. The mother was also asked to observe some of the sessions to have an idea to
                                                                                               54
apply the techniques. She was asked to conduct a formal session with the client at home. She
was shown how to conduct a session at home, and was informed about the required material
control the stubbornness of the client during the sessions. Either the client was ignored or
used to encourage the compliant behavior. The client was requested to complete the work
once it had been modeled for them. The laying down on the floor of the client was managed
using differential reinforcement of alternate behavior and physical and verbal prompts. She
was distracted from and asked to come sit on the seat in order to play the game, perform the
document that outlines how parents, educators, and the school administration will collaborate
to create guidelines, accommodations, and services for kids with special needs (O’Shea,
2022). They all collaborate to address the requirements of the person needing a variety of
assistance. Goals are formed based on a student's current requirements and abilities (Dotson,
2016). It was created to satisfy the idiosyncratic needs of the client. It was designed to build
and enhance developmental abilities, including cognition, socialization, self-help, motor, and
academic skills. Throughout the sessions, the work on the individualized education plan was
Developmental skills. For socialization skills, the client was taught the tasks including
asking permission before taking things from other people, turn-taking, saying please and
thank you, and saying sorry on reminder after doing mistake. The techniques used for these
                                                                                                55
tasks were Reinforcement, verbal prompts, and modeling. The client was trained to say please
and thank you. For this, the therapist modeled the behavior in front of the client by saying
please and thank you herself while using ring stacker with the client. The client was then
verbally prompted on it. She was given a reinforcement when she said please and thank you
on taking something from anyone. Asking permission to use objects was taught through
For self-help tasks, the client was taught about using dustbin and tying and untying
shoe laces. The client was asked to use dustbin to throw the waste. The techniques used were
Academic Skills. The client was taught the academic skills including English, Urdu,
and Mathematics. These tasks included recognizing and writing English alphabets A-C,
counting and writing numbers 1-5, matching Urdu alphabets, and pointing letters with objects
from early learners Urdu alphabets book. The techniques used for these tasks were physical
and verbal prompts, shaping, and reinforcement. She was taught these tasks in chunks.
Positive Reinforcement
that makes it more likely that the behavior will occur again in the future (Premack, 1959).
Positive reinforcement was used to develop new desirable behaviors and strengthen the
previously learned behaviors in the client. Social and material reinforcers were used with the
client. Social reinforcers included praise, clapping, and smile, whereas material reinforcers
Prompting
                                                                                                  56
Prompting is a method of providing a clue to the person about the next step to be
done. Prompting can be verbal or physical. Verbal prompting usually consists of giving a
directive command about the next step. Most-to-least intrusive prompting is usually followed,
which means that the teacher starts with maximal support and ends with minimal prompting
Fading
Fading is a process of gradually removing prompts until the behavior starts occurring
(Miltenberger, 2015). The various types of prompts including physical prompts, verbal
prompts, gestural prompts, visual prompts and model prompts were gradually faded so that
Chaining
The process of analyzing a behavioral chain by breaking it down into its individual
the child self-help skill i.e., Laces shoes, and academic skills i.e., writing English and Urdu
Modeling
learner or observer who then may learn that behavior and carry it on (Sam, 2013). This
technique was used to teach the client self-help, and cognitive tasks by first showing the
client how the task would be done, and after that the client was asked to imitate it.
Eleven structured sessions were conducted with the client. Each session was of 1 to
1½ hour. The sessions included history taking, behavioral observations, assessment, and
management of the problematic behaviors. In the last ten to fifteen minutes of each session,
                                                                                                 57
the client’s mother was guided and trained to deal with the client’s problematic behaviors.
The mother was involved in the therapy by giving homework assignments in dealing with the
client’s problems.
Post Assessment
were obtained on a 10-point rating scale. The therapist and the mother of the client rated the
presenting complaints 0 to 10 severity rating scale, “0” means “not present”, and “10” means
“severe”. The subjective ratings of the symptoms of the client rated by her mother were;
Table 8
Pre and post assessment rating by the client’s mother on problematic symptoms on 0-10
rating scale
Stubbornness 9 7
Hitting elders 8 6
Inattentiveness 9 7
Table 9
Pre and Post Assessment of Baseline for Wait Training and On-seat Behavior
Table 10
PGEE Items Pre and Post Assessment showing Missed and Achieved Items
Areas
 Socialization         39, 40, 44, 53, 55, 56, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67,     40, 44, 56, 57,
                                                                                                  58
Self Help 48, 50, 51, 52, 54, 58, 59, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 55, 68, 70
Cognitive 18, 22, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 18, 22, 32, 33,
49, 50, 53, 54, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 34, 39, 41, 44,
68, 71, 73, 74, 76, 78, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 49, 63, 64
Motor 79, 88, 90, 92, 95, 96, 98, 101, 104, 108, 109, 110 -
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 124, 126, 127,
128
Outcome of Therapy
The behavior therapy was found to be effective in addressing the client's problematic
behaviors. The post-assessment showed improvement in the client’s behavior. The client’s
attention was improved and she sat on the chair for 10 minutes without moving back and
forth. Her mother reported that her hitting behavior and stubbornness was reduced and her
attention was improved. Her mother also reported that the client’s socialization and cognitive
skills were also improved as she started asking for permission before using anyone’s things,
saying sorry, thank you, and please, and also got the concept of long and short, colors and
shapes recognition. Her academic skills were also improved. She started matching letters to
letters and letters to objects. The client was referred to another clinical psychologist to
continue her individualized education plan and work on her academic and developmental
skills.
                                                                                              59
References
Amor, L. B., Grizenko, N., Schwartz, G., Lageix, P., Baron, C., Ter-Stepanian, M.,
Zappitelli, M., Mbekou, V., & Joober, R. (2005). Perinatal complications in children
Cherry, K. (2022, October 24). Positive reinforcement can help favorable behaviors.
what-is-positive-reinforcement-2795412
psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 467–
Curran, E. A., Khashan, A. S., Dalman, C., Kenny, L. C., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., &
532–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw001
Dotson, R. (2016). Goal setting to increase student academic performance. Journal of School
jsard.v1i1.1908
Garner, A. A., O'Connor, B. C., Narad, M. E., Tamm, L., Simon, J., & Epstein, J. N. (2013).
                                            Appendices
                                                                        60
Compliance
On-seat
Developmental Skills
Socialization
 Turn-taking
Self-help
 Laces shoes
Cognitive
Academics
English
Mathematics
Urdu
Maenner, M. J., Shaw, K. A., Baio, J., Washington, A., Patrick, M., DiRienzo, M., Christensen,
D. L., Wiggins, L. D., Pettygrove, S., Andrews, J. G., Lopez, M., Hudson, A., Baroud, T.,
Schwenk, Y., White, T., Rosenberg, C. R., Lee, L.-C., Harrington, R. A., Huston, M., …
Dietz, P. M. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years
       https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1
                                                                                                62
Case Report: 3
Client j. A was 5 years and 6 months old boy who came to the ARCL with complaints of being
aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty
paying attention, lack of concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking
and miss-consuming household things, not listening to anyone’s commands, and stubborn.
Psychological assessment was done on two levels. The informal assessment included a clinical
interview, behavioral observations, Portage Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer
identification. The formal assessment included Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) and Conner’s
rating scales. On the basis of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 314.01 (F90.2)
The management of the client’s problems was focused on using behavioral therapy techniques to
Bio data:
Name j.A
Gender Male
No. of siblings 1
The client came to the autism center, ARCL Lahore with complaints of being aggressive,
for the assessment and management of behavioral issue and diagnosis Not doing classwork or
homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty paying attention, lack of
concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, not listening to anyone’s
commands, and stubborn. She was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for assessment
Presenting Complaints
Speech delay
Self-stimulatory behavior
History of fits No
History of fever NO
support
Family history:
He was born to non-carmangtaineous parent and only born child. His mother is a housewife. His
primary language is Urdu. His family history was positive for psychological dysfunction.
Clinical observation:
At first visit, it was observed that he was young child with average height. According to his age.
He was wearing eat and press cloth. When he enter the room he seemed lost, and did not explore
his environment .he did not interact with people around him.it was difficult to build report him as
he is lost in his self-stimulatory behavior. He was involved in jumping and trampoline. He was
level
Cognitive 1year
Socialization 11 months
Quantitative analysis
communication Autism 04
Autism spectrum 02
Play 04
Stereotyped behavior 06
Qualitative Analysis:
The score classification of Autism diagnosis observation schedule model 1include that the child
Communication:
The obtain score of the child indicated that he has single word speech through words. He is
He maintains eye contact during activity, physical interaction and when he needs nothing. He
responds to initial greeting but does not initiate a social interaction. Social interaction is
restricted and he has no peer play. He has interest in different sensory toys like musical and
lightening toys. He also took interest in peg boards but unable to use it properly as he put
everything in mouth. He is more interested in object like lip gloss and nail polish.
His stereotype behavior is spinning, finger wiggling, hand clapping and shouting.
Management Plan
A management plan based on behavior techniques was devised to deal with the
6. Rapport building
7. Psycho-education
8. Parental Training
9. Behavior therapy
 Rapport building was done with the client to make him at ease with the therapist during
the sessions.
 Psycho-education was done with the client’s mother to give him the understanding of
        diagnosis, prognosis, and management of the problem. She was informed about her role
                                                                                                   67
in the management of the client’s behavioral problems. This helped in motivating the
 Positive parental training was given to the client’s mother. She was trained to deal with
 Individualized education plan was developed to work on the client’s early readiness
 Behavioral modification techniques were used to teach the client the tasks of IEP. These
6. Reinforcement was used to increase the likelihood that a behavior will occur
7. Physical and verbal prompts were used to assist the client in performing a specific
task. These prompts were given before and during the tasks to help the client
8. Modeling was used to show the client about a particular task so she would engage
consuming household things, and increase positive behavior, such as asking for a
10. Shaping was used to teach the client particular tasks by reinforcing successive
 The continuation of short-term goals to enhance the client’s developmental, and academic
skills.
 Speech and language therapy will be continued for the management of his speech-related
issues.
 Behavioral techniques will be continued to be used by her mother to deal with the
relationship with the client. It was done to make the client comfortable and to develop trust in the
person in order to build a sense of trust and friendship (Tickle-Degnen & Rosenthall, 1990). This
was accomplished through expressing shared preferences for certain toys and foods. He was
Mirroring is a nonverbal method when a person imitates another person’s body language,
frequently done unconsciously. It is a potent form of nonverbal communication (Pease & Pease,
2005).
defined as an intervention with the systematic, structured, and didactic transfer of knowledge for
an illness and its treatment, integrating emotional and motivational aspects to enable patients to
cope with the illness and to improve its treatment adherence and efficacy (Ekhtiari et al., 2017).
The client’s diagnosis, its primary symptoms, and the variables influencing the prognosis rate
                                                                                                   69
were explained to the client’s parents in order to provide them with some psychoeducation about
the disorder. Additionally, they were informed about the management strategies and how they
Parental Training. Parental training was done to guide the behavior modification
techniques that would help in the development of skills in the client. The mother was trained to
deal with the behavioral issues of the client. During each session, ten to fifteen minutes were
reserved for the mother in which her concerns regarding the application of techniques were
catered. The mother was also asked to observe some of the sessions to have an idea to apply the
techniques. She was asked to conduct a formal session with the client at home. She was shown
how to conduct a session at home, and was informed about the required material such as colored
The client's mother was instructed to do the exercises at home to maintain the client’s
eye-contact and improve his attending to his name. She was also taught the techniques, including
verbal, physical, and gestural prompting strategies, positive reinforcement, joint attention,
modeling, and differential reinforcement of alternate behaviors. These techniques were also used
for parents, teachers, and school administration to work together to design instructions,
accommodation and services to children with special needs (Kamens, 2004). They all work
together to meet the needs of the individual requiring a range of support. The goals based on the
child’s current needs and skills are developed (Dotson, 2016). It was formed to meet the
idiosyncratic needs of the client. It was made to develop and strengthen early readiness skills,
and developmental skills which included cognitive skills, language skills, socialization skills,
                                                                                                     70
self-help skills, motor skills, and academic skills. The work on the individualized educational
plan was continued throughout the sessions and his mother was asked to work on it at home as
well.
Early Readiness Skills. The early readiness skills that were worked on included
maintaining eye-contact, increasing on-seat behavior, attending to his name, imitation and
compliance. The eye contact and response to name was increased using reinforcers, verbal and
gestural prompts and joint attention. To get the attention of the client, his favourite activities
were used that were ring stackers and peg boards. He was given reinforcement for sustaining
attention and completing the tasks. The side gaze of the client was managed by using tunnel
vision. The side of the eyes were blocked either by placing hands on the side of his eyes or using
objects on the sides so that the client could look straight in front of him and on the tasks in front
of him.
The on-seat behavior was increased using physical restraints and differential
reinforcement of alternate behavior. The client was made to sit on the seat in the corner of the
room and he was blocked using the table. He was verbally and physically prompted to sit on the
chair and finish the task. The attending to name was increased using academic activities and
snacks. The technique used for increasing the client’s attending was positive reinforcement, joint
attention, and verbal prompts. He would attend the therapist mostly on the account of getting
The compliant behavior was achieved using verbal prompts, modeling, and differential
reinforcement of alternate behavior. The task was modeled and then the client was asked to do
the same. One-word and two-word commands were used such as stop, start, give me, put there,
and not now. Social and edible reinforcers were provided for the complaint behavior. The client
                                                                                                    71
was asked to place the pegs in peg boards, rings in the stacker, match the letters with pictures,
and do academic tasks. This was done while keeping the edible reinforcer in therapist’s hands.
He was not given the reimforcer until he completed the tasks. After the completion of each
Sensory Issues. The sensory issues were dealt by educating the mother about the
alternatives. Differential reinforcement of alternate behavior techniques was used for this
purpose and the appropriate response was positively reinforced. During the session, verbal
prompting and differential reinforcement for alternative behavior were used to address the
Developmental skills. For socialization skills, the client was taught the tasks including
sharing pencil or eraser with peers, taking permission from other people before using their
things, and saying please and thank you. The techniques used for these tasks were
Reinforcement, verbal prompts, and modeling. The client was trained to share his pencil and
eraser with his peers. The behavior was first modeled by the therapist. Then the therapist asked
the client to share his eraser to his peer. The client was verbally prompted to share his things
Asking permission to use objects was taught to the client through modeling and
prompting. The therapist modeled this task by asking for permission to the client for using his
material like pencil, book, and eraser. After that, verbal prompts were used and the client was
only given desirable objects when he sought permission for them to use. The client was trained
to say please and thank you. For this, the therapist modeled the behavior in front of the client by
saying please and thank you herself while using ring stacker with the client. The client was then
                                                                                                     72
verbally prompted on it. He was given a reinforcement when he said please and thank you on
The cognitive skills taught to the client included differentiating heavy and light and
identifying shapes. For the purpose of categorization, identification and naming of shapes
(triangle, circle, square, and rectangle) were used. Verbal and gestural prompts and
reinforcements were used and later the client would categorize it himself on the command. The
client was given the concept of heavy and light objects by using verbal and gestural prompts, and
reinforcement. The client was provided with the heavy and light objects on both hands and
Academic Skills. The client was taught the academic skills including English, Urdu, and
Mathematics. These tasks included writing English alphabets A-E, counting numbers 1-20,
writing numbers 1-5, matching Urdu alphabets with objects, and pointing from early learners
English and Urdu alphabets book. The techniques used for these tasks were physical and verbal
Positive Reinforcement
makes it more likely that the behavior will occur again in the future (Premack, 1959). Positive
reinforcement was used to develop new desirable behaviors and strengthen the previously
learned behaviors in the client. Social and material reinforcers were used with the client. Social
reinforcers included praise, clapping, and smile, whereas material reinforcers included lays and
juice.
Prompting
                                                                                                     73
Prompting is a method of providing a clue to the person about the next step to be done.
Prompting can be verbal or physical. Verbal prompting usually consists of giving a directive
command about the next step. Most-to-least intrusive prompting is usually followed, which
means that the teacher starts with maximal support and ends with minimal prompting
Fading
Fading is a process of gradually removing prompts until the behavior starts occurring in
the presence of the discrimination stimulus without any supplemental stimuli (Miltenberger,
2015). The various types of prompts including physical prompts, verbal prompts, gestural
prompts, visual prompts and model prompts were gradually faded so that the client could
Chaining
The process of analyzing a behavioral chain by breaking it down into its individual
stimulus–response components is called chaining (Miltenberger, 2015). It was used to teach the
child self-help skill i.e. Laces shoes, and academic skills i.e., writing English and Urdu alphabets
and numbers.
Modeling
or observer who then may learn that behaviors and carry it on (Sam, 2013). This technique was
used to teach the client socialization, self-help, and cognitive tasks by first showing the client
how the task would be done, and after that the client was asked to imitate it.
Eleven structured sessions were conducted with the client. Each session was of 1 to 1½
hour. The sessions included history taking, behavioral observations, assessment, and
management of the problematic behaviors. In the last ten to fifteen minutes of each session, the
client’s mother was guided and trained to deal with the client’s problematic behaviors. The
mother was involved in the therapy by giving homework assignments in dealing with the client’s
problems.
Post Assessment
The post-assessment subjective ratings of the problematic symptoms of the client were
obtained on a 10-point rating scale. The therapist and the mother of the client rated the
presenting complaints 0 to 10 severity rating scale, “0” means “not present”, and “10” means
“severe”. The subjective ratings of the symptoms of the client rated by his mother were;
Table 6
Pre and post assessment rating by the client’s mother on problematic symptoms on 0-10 rating
scale
Eye-contact 2 4
Imitation 3 6
Respond to name 2 5
Onseat 4 6
Compliance 3 5
Mouthing 8 5
Lining up objects 5 4
Side gaze 3 2
 Fixation (switches)                                       6                    4
                                                                                                 75
objects
Teeth grinding 7 5
Table 7
PGEE Items Pre and Post Assessment showing Missed and Achieved Items
Areas
Socialization 27, 31, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 42, 46, 49, 37, 42, 47
Cognitive 31, 35, 41, 44, 50, 60, 66, 68, 69, 71, 44, 71
Outcome of Therapy
The behavior therapy was found to be effective in addressing the client's problematic
behaviors. The post-assessment showed improvement in the client’s behavior. The client’s eye-
contact, om-seat, attending, and compliance was improved. His mother reported that the client’s
socialization and cognitive skills were also improved as he started asking for permission before
using anyone’s things, saying thank you, and please, and also got the concept of long and short,
colors and shapes recognition. His academic skills were also improved. He started writing
English alphabets A-E, numbers 1-4, and Urdu alphabets ( )ا تا پwith verbal prompts and started
matching letters to objects. He started counting numbers from 1-15 and pointing Urdu alphabets
from the mathematics and Urdu book for early learners. The client was referred to another
                                                                                                 76
clinical psychologist to continue his individualized education plan and work on his early
References
Ben-Sasson, A., Soto, T. W., Martínez-Pedraza, F., & Carter, A. S. (2013). Early sensory over-
and parenting stress. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(8), 846–853.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12035
Cook, J., Hull, L., Crane, L., & Mandy, W. (2021). Camouflaging in autism: A systematic
Dotson, R. (2016). Goal setting to increase student academic performance. Journal of School
Portfolio
                                   Case Summary
                                                                                                77
Client M.A was 5 years and 1 month old boy who came to the ARCL with complaints of having
difficulties in learning anything, speech delay not interacting with other individuals and not
understanding how to behave in a certain situation, psychological assessment was done on two
levels. The informal assessment included a clinical interview, behavioral observations, Portage
Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer identification. The formal assessment included
the Colored Progressive Matrices, Slosson Intelligence Test, and Child Adaptive Behavior Scale.
On the basis of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 319 (F71) Intellectual Disability
Disorder, Moderate. The management of the client’s problems was focused on using behavioral
techniques to modify behavior. The techniques used included positive reinforcement, physical
and verbal prompts, shaping, task analysis, and modeling. A total of 20 sessions were conducted
with the client. The therapy was proved to be effective and the client behavior was improved.
Biodata
Name M.A.
Gender Male
 No. of siblings                                 2
                                                                                                                           78
The client came to the OPD of Center for Clinical Psychology with complaints of having
difficulties in learning anything, not interacting with other individuals and being shy, not
understanding how to behave in a certain situation, forgetting learned material even after
learning it for one month, his parents have to assist him in his daily life functioning, not have the
concept of practical things in daily life such as colors differentiation, the concept of money, and
fruits categorization, and delayed speech. He was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for
Presenting Complaints
دورانیہ شکایات
پانچ سال سے اسے بار بار یاد کروانے پر بھی کوئی چیز یاد نہیں ہوتی۔
پانچ سال سے  اور ایک دن کا گیپ دو تو یہ بھول جاتا ہے۔، پورا مہینہ اسے کوئی ایک چیز یاد کراؤ
چھ سال سے اس نے بولنا بہت لیٹ شروع کیا اور ابھی بھی پورے جملے نہیں بولتا۔
چار سال سے اسے سمجھ نہیں آتی کہ کون سے موقع پر کیسا رویہ رکھنا ہے۔
چار سال سے  کئی بار بیٹھے بیٹھے ہنسنے لگ جاتا ہے۔،عجیب سا رویہ ہے اس کا
پانچ سال سے  ہر کام میں اسے کسی کی مدد کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔،اپنے کام خود نہیں کر پاتا
چار سال سے  نہ اسے رنگوں کی پہچان ہے اور نہ،اسے روزمرہ کی زندگی کی معمولی چیزوں کا بھی نہیں پتا
پانچ سال سے  لوگوں کی آنکھوں میں نہیں دیکھتا۔،بہت شرمیلا ہے
According to the client’s mother, when the client was one month of age, he suffered from
severe diarrhea, but it was treated by taking medicines. The developmental milestones of the
He did not have any concept of colors, fruits, counting, alphabets, and other practical things.
Background History
Family History
The client’s father A.A. was 45 years old, educated up to F.A., and worked as an
shopkeeper. The client shared a healthy relationship with his father. He liked spending time with
The client’s mother was 42 years old housewife. She was educated up to matriculation.
She reported being calm in nature and used to spend her time with her children. The client shared
a healthy relationship with his mother, but was more attached with his father.
The client had 2 siblings, i.e., two sister. His elder sister was 18 years old, studying in
BS(Hons.). The client’s mother reported that the client shared an unhealthy relationship with his
sister. He used to be feared of her as she had a strict nature. The second-born sister was 15 years
old, and did take any formal education. The client lived in a nuclear family along with his parent
and siblings. He belonged to a middle-class family. The overall home environment was healthy
The client’s mother reported that the client’s elder sister also had the same problem. She
was delayed in speech and her developmental milestones. She was not taken to any clinical
psychologist, but when the client came for therapeutic sessions, his parents also took his sister
Personal History
The client was born through cesarean delivery after prolonged labor. He had an
immediate cry, and his birth weight was normal. The client’s mother reported that she faced no
pre-natal or post-natal complications. The client was breastfed for 6 months. After that, his
mother started him bottle feeding along with breastfeeding. When the client was one month of
age, he suffered from severe diarrhea for which the doctors prescribed him medicines at that
time.
The client’s developmental milestones were significantly delayed. He achieved neck and
head holding at the age of 8 months. He started sitting at the age of 14 months and walking at the
age of 3 years. His one-word speech was achieved at the age of 4.5 years.
Table 1
Showing Developmental Milestones, Normal Age of Achievement, and Client’s Achievement Age
Educational History
The informal education of the client was started at home at the age of 4 years. His mother
and elder sister were involved in the teaching process, but the client did not learn many things.
At the age of five, he started his formal schooling. He continued his formal schooling for one
year only. After that, his parents withdrew him from school as the teachers complained to them
about his learning problem. The client had difficulty in learning academic tasks and his speech
was also not appropriate of his age. His parents then sent him to the tuition center near their
home. The client was going to his tuition teacher at the time of starting therapy. He did not have
any concept of color identification, categorization of fruits, counting, alphabets, and shapes. His
teacher reported that even if she taught the client one color name for one month and a gap of
only one day was taken, the client would forget that. She had to start it from the beginning.
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
                                                                                                   82
Clinical Interview. A semi-structured clinical interview was done with his mother, sister,
and tuition teacher in which the personal, developmental, educational, and familial history was
taken. A complete account of the behavioral issues was taken. Verbal informed consent was
taken and confidentiality of information was ensured. From the interview, predisposing,
precipitating, perpetuating, and prognostic factors were identified which were helpful in
Behavioral Observation. The client was of normal height and weight. He was dressed
neatly in weather-appropriate clothes. During the sessions, it was observed that he did not
understand instructions at one-time. He was shy and did not maintain eye contact without asking.
He used to smile at the therapist when she asked him anything. When he was given two
commands at a time (i.e., to touch the table and close the door), he did not perform even one
command. He asked again and again and still did not get them. He was not much interested in
doing session work and wanted the therapist to finish the session earlier. His speech was also not
appropriate of his age. He could not speak complete sentences and skipped some words.
Portage Guide to Early Education (Sturmey & Crisp, 1986). It was administered to
the client to assess his current functioning level in five domains. Some of the items were asked
by his mother while for other items, the client was asked to perform the given task. (Appendix)
Table 2
                                                                                                      83
Developmental Areas, First Crossed Item with Age Range, Last Correct Item with Age Range
The results showed that the client lacked behind his chronological age in all the domains
i.e., language, socialization, self-help, cognitive, and motor. The socialization of the client was
not age-appropriate as it was evident from the history and observation that he did not know how
to behave appropriate to the situation, not playing with other children, not greeting familiar
adults without reminder, and was shy. The scores on the language domain indicated his lack of
speaking complete sentences, not using past present tenses, ing in the sentences, and usually
skipped some words from the sentences as evident from the history. The scores on the cognitive
domain revealed his lack of skills in identifying colors, shapes, categorizing fruits and
vegetables, pre-writing skills, counting, and differentiating objects. The scores on the self-help
domain revealed his lack of skills in dressing himself independently, zip unzips jackets, tying
shoe laces, buttoning and unbuttoning his shirt, and cleaning his table. The result of the motor
domain also revealed his delay in fine motor and gross motor skills.
Reinforces Identification. Some of the rein forcers were identified by asking the client’s
parents and his sister about his favorite activities and food while others were identified by
                                                                                                    84
observing the client during the session while performing activities. It helped in identifying the
most preferable reinforcer. Following this helped in identifying the hierarchy of the most to the
Formal Assessment
that has been developed for evaluating mental development and intellectual maturity. CPM was
Table 4
The scores of the client indicated that the client falls in the category of intellectually
impaired. His subnormal IQ was 50, which indicated the client has an intellectual disability. The
scores were to be affected by inattention as the client was not paying much attention and was
oral questions assessing six cognitive domains that are, vocabulary, general information,
similarities and differences, comprehension, quantitative ability, and auditory memory. It was
                                                                                                   85
administered to the client to assess the verbal intelligence and intelligence quotient and to assess
Table 5
Shows Chronological Age, Basal Age, Mental Age, IQ Ratio, and Category
Ratio IQ 47
IQ range Below 70
The client’s chronological age was 10 years and 1 month whereas his mental age as
calculated was 4 years and 9 months which indicated his delayed development. The IQ of the
client as calculated through the Slosson intelligence test was 47 which indicated his deficit in
intellectual functioning.
Childhood Adaptive Behavior Scale (Kicklighter & Richmond, 1983). The Childhood
Adaptive Behavior Scale (CABS) was used to assess the adaptive functioning of the client.
Table 6
                                                                                                    86
(EMR) (Regular)
The scores on the five domains of the Childhood Adaptive Behavior Scale indicated
significant delay in the client’s adaptive functioning. His language was significantly delayed as
the functional age of the client in language development was -6 years. The minus sign indicated
that the client’s scores were below 6 years in language development. His independent
functioning, family role performance, economic vocational activity, and socialization scores also
Portage Guide for Early Education was administered to assess the current functioning
level of the client which revealed delays in the cognitive, socialization, self-help, language, and
motor domains. Colored progressive matrices and Slosson Intelligence Test were administered to
assess the intellectual functioning of the client. The subnormal IQ on CPM was 50, and scores on
SIT indicated IQ of 47. The scores on these assessment tests indicated that the client’s IQ was
                                                                                                      87
below borderline. This indicated his deficit in intellectual functioning. The Childhood Adaptive
Behavior Scale was administered to assess the adaptive functioning of the client. The scores on
the five domains indicated a significant deficit in the client’s adaptive functioning. The client’s
scores on these assessment tests indicated the diagnosis of Intellectual Disability Disorder
(Moderate).
Diagnosis
According to DSM-V, the diagnosis of the client was 319 (F71) Intellectual Disability
Disorder, Moderate.
Case Formulation
The client was 10 years and one month old who came with complaints of having
difficulties in learning anything, not interacting with other individuals and being shy, smiling on
seeing people and not maintaining eye contact without asking, not understanding how to behave
in a certain situation, forgetting learned material even after learning it for one month, his parents
have to assist him in his daily life functioning, not have the concept of practical things in daily
life such as colors differentiation, the concept of money, and fruits categorization, and not have
complete sentences speech. The psychological assessment done included informal and formal
assessment. The scores on Portage Guide to Early Education indicated his developmental delays
in language, cognitive, self-help, socialization, and motor domain. The scores on CPM and SIT
                                                                                                    88
indicated deficit in intellectual functioning. The scores on CABS revealed deficit in the adaptive
functioning. After thorough assessment, the client was diagnosed with 319 (F71) Intellectual
The client was not given the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder as non-verbal
communication behaviors such as eye contact, facial expressions, and attending were present in
the client. His problem in communicating and interacting with others was due to his deficit in
adaptive functioning. This was the characteristic of Intellectual Disability Disorder. The client
was not given the diagnosis of Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder. The lack of concentration
in the client was not due attention deficit as in ADHD. This is because he was not properly
understanding the instructions. This factor made him inattentive of what he was not
understanding. This was due to his deficit of Intellectual Functioning. Considering these factors,
As evident from the history, the client was born through C-section. Research findings
revealed that those children born through C-section have 10-30% increased risk of being
diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (Zhang et al., 2021). The child’s gender also
DSM-5, males are more likely than females to be diagnosed with intellectual disability. This can
also be a predisposing factor of the client diagnosing with Intellectual Disability Disorder.
                                                                                           89
Portfolio
Client I.F was 05 years old boy who came with complaints of not maintaining eye contact, not
attending to his name, playing in isolation and did not interact with anyone, delayed speech,
psychological assessment was done on two levels. The informal assessment included a clinical
interview, behavioral observations, Portage Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer
identification. The formal assessment included the Child Autism Rating Scale. On the basis of
the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 299.00 (F84) Autism Spectrum Disorder. The
behavior therapy was proved effective and there was improvement in the client’s behavior
Bio data
Name I.F.
 Gender                                         Boy
                                                                                                   90
Age 05 years
No. of siblings 01
The client came to the Autism Resource Center with complaints of not maintaining eye
contact, for the assessment of his behavioral issues and diagnosis. Playing in isolation and did
not interact with anyone, delayed speech. Odd behavior (jumping) stereo type behavior, and
getting excited in isolation gathering and putting had on ears in sound, keeping doors closed
fixed with moving or round object. He was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for
Presenting Complaints
      speech delayed,
      lack of social interaction
      Odd behavior (jumping) stereo type behavior, and getting excited in isolation gathering
       and putting had on ears in sound, keeping doors closed
      Not maintain eye contact.
History of Present Illness
According to the client’s mother, the client’s mother reported that he was restricted to
home for at least 2.5 years. He was provided with a mobile phone on which he used to spend
almost 5 hours daily. He liked watching Korean videos and songs. His mother reported that he
was just into his phone and did not respond to anyone. He was not even attracted to any toy and
used to put everything in his hand into his mouth. His mother reported that when they first
                                                                                                    91
brought the client to the market along with them, he closed his eyes on seeing other people. He
The client did not maintain eye contact with other people and did not respond to anyone.
He had delayed speech and did not interact with anyone who came to his home. His mother
reported that he seemed to not even care about what others were doing or talking. He just
The client’s mother reported that the client did not speak a single word. He did not even
do babbling. He used to tell his needs by holding his mother’s hand and pointing it to the thing
he needed. He did not play with other kids and liked to play in isolation. The developmental
milestones of the client i.e., head holding, sitting, crawling, and walking were age-appropriate,
but his speech was delayed. According to the client’s mother, the client was a pampered child.
That’s why, the client’s mother did not notice the client’s behavior as inappropriate. The client’s
parents then took the client to the Autism Center and was referred to the trainee clinical
Background History
Family History
The child lives I joint family system. He is first born child among two sibling. He has a
younger brother who is two years old and he has a social personality. His father has private job.
He had heart issue. The client’s mother reported that the client’s father was calm and friendly
toward his children and the client had a congenial relationship with his father.
The client’s mother was 39 years old housewife. She is diabetic. She reported being calm
in nature and used to spend time with the client. She used to play with the client and the client
seemed to have a healthy relationship with her. The client was more attached to his mother than
                                                                                                    92
his father as his father used to stop him from doing certain things. The client’s mother reported
that the client shared a satisfactory relationship with his father and siblings and a healthy
relationship with his mother. The overall home environment was reported to be healthy.
The client’s mother reported that there is no history of any fever, head injury,
dehydration. His paternal family is positive for ASD .he was born through C-section delivery.
His mother was reported diabetes. He had his first cry present. He child mother took feed.
Personal History
The mother reported that the length of term 9 month. The client was born through c-
section. His prenatal history was normal. His mother was report as diabetic. He had an
immediate cry, and his birth weight was normal. The client’s mother reported that she faced no
pre-natal or post-natal complications. She was not taken medicine in pregnancy. The child took
mother feed. The client achieved his developmental milestones such as head and neck holding,
sitting, crawling, and walking at the appropriate age. But, his speech was not achieved even at
Table 1
Showing Developmental Milestones, Normal Age of Achievement, and Client’s Achievement Age
Educational History
The informal education of the client was started at home at the age of 2.5 years. His
mother and father were involved in the teaching process. The client’s mother used to rhyme the
poems with the client. The client also had a little concept of the “circle” shape. Besides this, he
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
Behavioral Observations
Sensory Checklist
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
Clinical Interview.
A semi-structured clinical interview was done with his mother in which the personal,
developmental, educational, and familial history was taken. A complete account of the
behavioral issues was taken. Verbal informed consent was taken and confidentiality of
                                                                                                   94
information was ensured. From the interview, predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and
prognostic factors were identified which were helpful in determining the diagnosis and the
Covid-19 restrictions
Behavioral Observation. The client was of normal height and weight. He was dressed
neatly in weather-appropriate clothes. During the sessions, it was observed that he was
responsive toward his name and did not maintain eye contact. The client was fascinated by the
light in the room. He remain in his seat and used to sit on the table to complete his ABA activity
task. Mouthing behavior was also observed in the client as he used to follow the command to
complete his task. He almost attend to any command of the therapist and was involved in playing
and recognized differentiate between small and big same and different object. His imitation is
Some of the rein forcers were identified by asking the client’s mother about his
favorite activities and food while others were identified by observing the client during the
session while performing activities. During the session, the free-operant preference assessment
method was used in which the client was provided access to all the available stimuli and was
allowed to freely engage with any presented stimuli. The engagement was monitored with the
duration. It helped in identifying the most preferable reinforcer. Material reinforcers were the
most preferable reinforcers. Following this helped in identifying the hierarchy of the most to the
                                                                                                   95
least preferred reinforcer. The reinforcers were identified to make it contingent on the
Formal Assessment
Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS, Schopler 1980). It is a behavioral rating scale
used for assessing the presence and severity of symptoms of Autism spectrum disorders. It
consists of 15 domains, with each scored on a rating scale from 1 to 4. The total score ranges
from 15 to 60. It has .94 internal consistency and a reliability of .71. It was administered by
asking the client’s mother and observing the client during the session. The childhood autism
rating scale was administered to assess the current functioning level of the client. The scores
Table 4
Raw Scores, Range, and Corresponding Category on Childhood Autism Rating Scale
The scores on CARS indicated his high scores in the item no. 2, 3, 5, 8, and 11 that
included moderately abnormal imitation, emotional response, object use, listening response, and
verbal communication. The client’s scores fall in the category of mildly to moderately autistic.
During the interview, it was revealed that the client had some repetitive behaviors, had
problems interacting and communicating, did not maintain eye contact or attend to his name, and
had sensory issues. These symptoms indicated the client’s autistic behavior. Sensory checklist
was administered that showed the client’s gustatory, olfactory, and auditory sensory issue. The
formal assessment was done using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale. The scores on CARS
Diagnosis
According to DSM-V criteria and keeping in view the observation and assessment, the
client was diagnosed with 299.00 (F84) Autism Spectrum Disorder, accompanying language
impairment.
Case Formulation
The client I.F. was 05 years old boy who came with complaints of not maintaining eye
contact, not responding even if called his name 10 times, , playing in isolation and did not
interact with anyone, not doing his self-help tasks, walking on his toes, not speaking a single
word, being lazy, and fascinated with same object. Psychological assessment was done on two
levels. The results on PGEE indicated deficits in language, motor, socialization, self-help, and
cognitive domain. The scores on CARS indicated mildly-moderately autistic in the client. These
The client was not diagnosed with intellectual disability as he had specific repetitive
behaviors that were a feature of Autism. Moreover he was able to memorize the tasks learned
and was able to perform it in the correct way. He learned his tasks efficiently. He was not
diagnosed with the language and social communication disorder as he had restrictive and
repetitive behavior that were absent in this disorder. The client was not diagnosed with
                                                                                                  97
stereotypic movement disorder as the repetitive behavior was better explained by autism
spectrum disorder. He did not meet the criteria for disorders other than Autism Spectrum
The client was born via cesarean delivery. Research has indicated that cesarean delivery
was associated with a 26% increased risk of causing autism in the child either due to stress or
some other possible explanation (Chang, 2011). In addition, the client was a boy which also
increased the incidence of having autism as research has indicated that autism spectrum disorder
was four times more common in males than females (Maenner et al., 2020).
Flusberg (2016), most children with autism are found to have delays in achieving milestones,
especially the onset of words, phrases, and sentences is delayed. They have problems with
receptive and expressive language due to processing deficits. It has also been found that children
with autism had difficulties in understanding and responding appropriately to others. They
It has been found that the client had sensory issues. These issues were related to sensory
processing. It has been found that over 96% of children with ASD reported hyper and hypo-
sensitivities in multiple domains which ranged from mild to severe ranges (Crane et al., 2009).
                                                                                                98
Portfolio
Case Summary
Client j. A was 5 years and 6 months old boy who came to the ARCL with complaints of being
aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty
paying attention, lack of concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking
and miss-consuming household things, not listening to anyone’s commands, and stubborn.
Psychological assessment was done on two levels. The informal assessment included a clinical
interview, behavioral observations, Portage Guide to Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer
identification. The formal assessment included Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) and Conner’s
rating scales. On the basis of the assessment, the client was diagnosed with 314.01 (F90.2)
The management of the client’s problems was focused on using behavioral therapy techniques to
Bio data:
Name j.A
Gender Male
No. of siblings 1
The client came to the autism center, ARCL Lahore with complaints of being
aggressive, for the assessment and management of behavioral issue and diagnosis Not doing
classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty paying attention, lack
of concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, not listening to anyone’s
commands, and stubborn. She was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for assessment
Presenting Complaints
Speech delay
Self-stimulatory behavior
History of fits No
History of fever NO
support
Family history:
He was born to non-carmangtaineous parent and only born child. His mother is a housewife. His
primary language is Urdu. His family history was positive for psychological dysfunction.
Clinical observation:
                                                                                                101
At first visit, it was observed that he was young child with average height. According to his age.
He was wearing eat and press cloth. When he enters the room, he seemed lost, and did not
explore his environment. he did not interact with people around him.it was difficult to build
report him as he is lost in his self-stimulatory behavior. He was involved in jumping and
level
Cognitive 1year
Socialization 11 months
Quantitative analysis
communication Autism 04
Autism spectrum 02
 Play                                                              04
                                                                                                 102
Stereotyped behavior 06
Qualitative Analysis:
The score classification of Autism diagnosis observation schedule model 1include that the child
Communication:
The obtain score of the child indicated that he has single word speech through words. He is
He maintains eye contact during activity, physical interaction and when he needs nothing. He
responds to initial greeting but does not initiate a social interaction. Social interaction is
restricted and he has no peer play. He has interest in different sensory toys like musical and
lightening toys. He also took interest in peg boards but unable to use it properly as he put
everything in mouth. He is more interested in object like lip gloss and nail polish.
His stereotype behavior is spinning, finger wiggling, hand clapping and shouting.
Diagnosis:
Portfolio
Case summary
M. shayyan tariq came to the iffat hiospital visin for the special need children for children with
He was born at full term by c-section on mothers will with the birth weight of 3 kg. immediate
cry was present. There was no history of jaundice and fits. History of pneumonia was present at
the age of 4.5 months. Appendectomy was done at the age of 8 year. His vaccination was up to
date. His eating was age appropriate but he gulped food in hurry.
1 word = 3 year
2 words = 3 years
Current status:
x.y.z was born to consanguineous parents and was younger than two brothers. There was history
child. He took speech therapy at the age of 2.5 years. He took consultation at 2.5 years from
mayo hospital and was diagnosis as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and took therapy for some
month. After that she move to iffat anwar hospital Lahore at the age of 3 year and took therapy
for 5-6 month. The child basically belongs to Chakwal so went there in vacation and
                                                                                                104
discontinued therapy. He starts schooling at the age of 6 year in play group and promote to next
class after 1 year 5 months. At came to the iffat hospital for therapy and academic skill.
During consultation x.y.z have good response to name and eye contact. He was hyperactive, he
covered ears on hearing loud sounds. Hand flapping was observed wich was present in
excitement and aggression. Hair cutting and nail cutting were not problematic. History of toe
walking was present but settled at present. He followed the given instruction. Head banging was
present in presenting. interactive play was started from last 3-4 years. He took big bits and then
gulped them in hurry. He used to watch TV, mobile and tab for 2 to 2.5 hours per day at the age
of 5 year till 8 years and it got 3-4 hours per date from 8 years of age till 10 years
Assessment:
For assessment purpose (clinical psy) has done the given test
   1   : developmental profile
   2   Childhood autism rating scale (CARS)
   3   Behavior rating scale
       Informal assessment:
       During assessment x.y.z was given eye contact and response to name. He could follow
       two step instruction, imitation and pointing was present. Pretend play was present. Hand
       flapping was present during excitement. He could communication his feeling with other.
       He sometimes threw tantrums if his desire did not be fulfilled. He followed and behavior
       like his brother. Attention seeking behavior was present. He got excite in gathering. He
       took food too much. He was interested in cooking. He used to arrange his room properly
       and put things at their proper place. He was fixed his routine.
       1: developmental profile:
       CA = 11-year 4 month
         Areas                                          Developmental age level
         socialization                                  4-year 5 month
         Self help                                      4-year 6 month
         cognition                                      4-year 8 month
                                                                         105
motor 6 years
Areas Score
Imitation 1
Emotional response 2
Visual response 2
Listening response 2
Verbal communication 2
Non-verbal 1.5
Total 33
       Feeding: independent
       Dressing:
        Independent
        Couldn’t tie his shoes laces
        Diagnosis:
        According to DSM 5TR on the basis of above history, clinical observation, & test result
        x. y. z was diagnosed as having autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
Recommendation:
Case Summary
Client A. A was 5 years and 6 months old girl who came to the outpatient department of children
hospital with complaints of being aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on
the chair, excessive talk, difficulty paying attention, lack of concentration, restless, having
difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking and mis-consuming household things, not listening to
anyone’s commands, and stubborn. Psychological assessment was done on two levels. The
Early Education (PGEE), and reinforcer identification. The formal assessment included Slosson
Intelligence Test (SIT) and Conner’s rating scales. On the basis of the assessment, the client was
Presentation, Severity Level Moderate. The management of the client’s problems was focused on
using behavioral therapy techniques to modify the client’s behavior. A total of 11 sessions were
conducted with the client. The therapy was proved effective and the client’s behaviors were
improved.
                                                                                                 108
Biodata
Name A .A
Gender Female
No. of siblings 3
The client came to the Iffat Anwar medical Hospital, Lahore with complaints of being
aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk, difficulty
paying attention, lack of concentration, restless, having difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking
and mis-consuming household things, not listening to anyone’s commands, and stubborn. She
was referred to the trainee clinical psychologist for assessment and management of her problems.
Presenting Complaints
دورانیہ شکایات
دیتی ہے۔
The client’s mother reported that when she was pregnant, the fetus was not growing
properly. So, the doctors prescribed her injections. The dosage of these injections was 2
injections/month during the first trimester and 1 injection/month during the second and third
trimesters. The client’s mother faced complications during the client’s birth. She was born
through C-section. She had an immediate cry after birth but her weight was low. One month after
birth, the client suffered from jaundice. The client achieved all her developmental milestones at
the appropriate age. Her mother reported that after one year of age, when the client started
crawling, she used to pick the household things and mis-consume them. When the client was 3
years of age, her screen time was increased up to 5 hours a day. Her mother reported that
whenever she took the mobile from the client, she behaved stubbornly. She used to lay on the
floor or hit the elders if her need was not met. When the client was 3.5 years old, her mother
started teaching her at home. At this time, the client’s mother noticed that the client did not pay
The client’s mother took the client to the children hospital in Aug, 2022. The client was referred
Family History
The client’s father A.M was 38 years old, educated up to MBA, and worked in a bank.
He reported being calm and friendly toward his children and the client had a healthy relationship
The client’s mother was 34 years old, housewife and educated up to bachelors. She
reported being calm in nature but sometimes got irritated by the client’s behavior and beat her.
The client’s parents were first cousins. Their relationship was reported to be satisfactory,
but the client’s mother also reported that her husband physically abused her when they had a
fight on any issue. This also had an impact on the client’s behavior as after seeing her father
beating her mother, she thought that beating someone is an acceptable behavior and she used to
beat her cousins and fellow kids when they did not listen to her.
The client had 2 siblings, one brother, and a sister. Her elder sister was 8 years old,
studying in 2nd class. The client’s mother reported that the client shared a healthy relationship
with her sister. The client’s younger brother was 3 years old. The client shared a healthy
The client lived in a joint family with her grandparents. The overall home environment
Personal History
The client was born through cesarean section after prolonged labor. She had an
immediate cry, but her birth weight was low. The client’s mother faced pre-natal and post-natal
complications. She reported that when she was pregnant, the fetus growth was not normal so the
                                                                                                 111
doctors prescribed her injections. During childbirth, the mother faced intestinal malrotation.
Within one month of the client’s birth, she suffered from jaundice and fever.
The client achieved her developmental milestones i.e., head holding, sitting, crawling, walking,
speech, bowel and bladder control, dressing, and taking bath without help at the appropriate age.
Table 1
Showing Developmental Milestones, Normal Age of Achievement, and Client’s Acquired Age
Educational History
The informal education of the client was started at home by her mother at the age of 4.5
years. The client’s mother reported that the client used to get easily distracted while studying and
was involved in playing. She had difficulty paying attention and completing the tasks. She did
not sit on her seat. The client did know some of the body parts and animals’ names, but couldn’t
The client did not receive any formal education. Her parents were deciding to start her
Psychological Assessment
The formal and informal assessment was done to assess the client’s problems;
Behavioral Observations
Reinforcer Identification
Informal Assessment
Clinical Interview.
A semi-structured clinical interview was done with her mother in which the personal,
developmental, educational, and familial history was taken. A complete account of the
Lactose intolerance
Behavioral Observation. The client was of normal height and weight. She was dressed
neatly in weather-appropriate clothes. She was very active during the whole session. She
explored the things and roam here and there in the session room. During the sessions, the client
was easily distracted by the activities around her such as the child playing with pegboards or
bubbles. After being asked three to four times, she used to focus on the task but still was
distracted after sometime. The client had poor on-seat during the session. The client was
excessively talking during the session. She was talking about her family members, her favorite
Behavior Rating Scale. The client’s on-seat behavior and not waiting for her turn was
Table 2
Behavior Rating
Portage Guide to Early Education (Sturmey & Crisp, 1986). It was administered on
the client to assess her current functioning level in five domains. (Appendix)
Table 3
                                                                                                    114
Developmental Areas, First Crossed Item with Age Range, Last Correct Item with Age Range
The results showed that the client lacked behind her chronological age in majorly three
domains of PGEE. The socialization of the client was not age-appropriate as it was evident from
the history and observation that she had a stubborn attitude and did not cooperate with the
parental requests. She used to engage in inappropriate social behaviors. She immediately wants
the object of her choice if she has seen it somewhere. She rarely listens to the commands of
elders, wait for her turn, or request an object. The scores on the cognitive domain revealed her
lack of skills in naming colors, categorization, differentiating heavy and light, identifying the
missing part, and academic tasks (alphabets, counting). She had a problem with cutting straight
lines and shapes and pasting, printing letters, standing on one foot, and copying complex shapes.
Reinforcers Identification. Some of the reinforcers were identified by asking the client’s
mother about her favorite activities and food while others were identified by observing the client
Formal Assessment
Conners Rating Scale (Conners, 1997). The Conners Behavior Rating Scale was used
to better understand certain behavioral, social, and academic issues. It was used to help diagnose
the client. The parent’s rating and teacher’s ratings were obtained. The observations were also
taken into account when the parent’s version was administered with the help of her mother. The
Table 5
Raw scores and t Scores on Parent’s Rating of Oppositional, Inattention, Hyperactivity and
                                                             Parent’s Rating
              Subscale
                                          Raw scores             t score               Category
Total 41
The scores of the parent’s ratings indicated that the client obtained mildly atypical scores
atypical scores on hyperactivity making the client moderately atypical on ADHD index. It
provided a strong indication towards diagnosing the client and indicated that behavioral and
Table 6
Raw scores and t Scores on Teacher’s Rating of Oppositional, Inattention, Hyperactivity and
                                                           Teacher’s Rating
             Subscales
                                       Raw scores              t scores              Category
Total 38
The scores on the teacher’s rating were in accordance with the scores on parent’s rating.
It indicated the client’s moderately atypical scores on oppositional showing the client’s
Diagnosis
According to DSM-V, the diagnosis of the client was 314.01 (F90.2) Attention Deficit
Case Formulation
The client was 5 years and 6 months old and came with the presenting complaints of
being aggressive, not doing classwork or homework while sitting on the chair, excessive talk,
difficulty paying attention, lack of concentration, being easily distracted, restless, having
difficulty waiting for her turn, breaking and mis-consuming household things, not listening to
anyone’s commands, and stubborn. The client was diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/