TARC - Stock Report 2025
TARC - Stock Report 2025
270
Market Cap: 51.1B Avg Daily Volume: 186.5K
NSE | Jan 09, 2025 01:56 PM
DVM SUMMARY
Expensive Performer D V M
These stocks are with medium quality and mid-range technical aspects. However, their financials make them little expensive so choose the right moment to buy them.
Durability Score (D) Medium Financial Strength Valuation Score (V) Expensive Valuation Momentum Score (M) Technically Neutral
40 13 45
0 35 55 100 0 30 50 100 0 35 60 100
Total : 1 Ownership 4
Strong Buy Buy Hold Sell Strong Sell
Peer Comparison 1 2
Current Price
173
Value & Momentum 2 5 1
Total 7 15 1
340
Avg.
Est.
The consensus recommendation is based on 1 analyst recommendations. The Consensus Estimate is The Trendlyne Checklist checks if the company meets the key criteria for financial health and
the aggregate analyst estimates for listed companies. consistent growth.
KEY STATISTICS
Ratios Financials
TTM PE Ratio ROE Annual % ROCE Annual % Operating Revenue TTM Revenue Growth Annual YoY Net Profit Annual
%
-27.9 -6.0 2.3 31.3 -77.0
-67.6
Negative PE TTM Negative ROE Annual % Below industry Median Negative Net Profit Annual
Negative Revenue Growth
Annual YoY %
EBIT Annual Margin % TTM PEG Ratio Long Term Debt To Equity
Annual
44.9 - Net Profit TTM Growth % Dividend yield 1yr % EPS TTM Growth %
0.7
-1758.9 - -1758.9
High in industry
Negative Net Profit TTM
Growth %
250
200
200
100
150
100 0
MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN JUL JAN
Durability Summary
Durability Score TARC Ltd. has a durability score of 40, which indicates Medium Financial Strength.
40 / 100
A High Durability Score (greater than 55) indicates good and consistent financial performance : stable revenues, cash flows, and low debt.
The Durability score looks at many different metrics, including long-term performance data, to identify stocks that have stood the test of time.
40
0 35 55 100
Durability Trend TARC Ltd. : Jan '24 - Jan '25 Durability v/s Peers
80
TARC 40.0
60 DLF 75.0
GOOD
20
Godrej Properties 45.0
0
Feb '24 Mar '24 Apr '24 May '24 Jun '24 Jul '24 Aug '24 Sep '24 Oct '24 Nov '24 Dec '24 Jan '25
Phoenix Mills 65.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum TARC Ltd. (40) has lowest Durability score amongst its peers, behind Godrej Properties Ltd.
9.7% 90.3% 0% 65.0 (12 Feb '24) 40.0 (08 Jan '25) (45)
Financial Metrics
Total Revenue Annual Net Profit Annual Tax Annual Revenue Growth Annual YoY %
121.408 -67.6% YoY Mar'24 -77.046 -478.8% YoY Mar'24 -8.968 -143.2% YoY Mar'24 -67.6% -374.7% YoY Mar'24
400 200 40 50
53.1 24.6
300.7 374.7 20.3
6.2 5.5 36.1
0 20.8
209.4 220.9 20 0
200 11.6
121.4 -77 3.4 4.5
-200
-183.3 0 -50
36.8 -232.7 -67.6
0 -400 -5.2
-9
-20 -100
0
M
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'2
TT
TT
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
ar
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 TTM Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24
M
Operating Profit Margin Annual % Net Profit TTM Growth % Operating Revenues Qtr Net Profit Qtr
38.4% -9.9% YoY Mar'24 -478.7% -540.2% YoY Mar'24 4.313 -85.5% YoY Sep'24 -67.349 -6346.4% YoY Sep'24
50 2.5k 75 50
62.9
12.2 42.6 38.4 7.1
108.8 1.1
-0.1 0
0 0 -478.7 50
4
2
'2
'2
2
n'
p'
n'
p'
ec
ar
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Jun'23 Sep'23 Dec'23 Mar'24 Jun'24 Sep'24
Se
Se
Ju
Ju
M
D
Operating Revenues Qtr is falling faster than Net Profit Qtr is falling faster than historical
historical averages. averages.
Balance Sheet
Total Assets Annual Total ShareHolders Funds Annual Working Capital Annual
3,465.6 9.8% YoY Mar'24 1,274.6 -5.7% YoY Mar'24 389.4 -52.4% YoY Mar'24
4k 2k 1k
3333 3400.1 3465.6
3080.3 3157.3 1557.6 1564.3
818.5 389.4
1331.8 1351.6 1274.6
162.9 170
2k 1k 0
-428
0 0 -1k
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24
Cashflow
Cash from Operating Activity Annual Cash from Investing Activity Annual Cash from Financing Annual Activity Net Cash Flow Annual
158.2 295.3% YoY Mar'24 -39.1 -152.4% YoY Mar'24 -166.1 -273.2% YoY Mar'24 -47 -152.5% YoY Mar'24
200 500 250 100
158.2 367
144.3 95.9
116.4 89.4
100 250 0
6.5 6.8
74.5 0
17.5 23
-143.1 -160.8 -166.1 -9.3
0 0 -250
-39.1 -279 -47
-81.2 -81
-100 -250 -500 -100
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24
Financial Ratios
-6.0% -502.7% YoY Mar'24 2.3% -64.4% YoY Mar'24 -2.2% -446.9% YoY Mar'24 1.3 -41.3% YoY Mar'24
10 10 5 3
3.4 3.5 2.3 1.6 2.2
0.4 1.5 0.8 6.3 0.2 0.6
0 0 0 2
-2.2
-6 1.3
1.2 1.2
-10.6
-10 -10 -5 1 0.8
-7.5
-17.5
-20 -20 -10 0
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24
Net Profit Margin Annual % Interest Coverage Ratio Annual EBIT Annual Margin %
-69.1% -1352.4% YoY Mar'24 0.4 -70.6% YoY Mar'24 44.9% 4.5% YoY Mar'24
100 6 100
65.5
38.7 3.9 42.9 44.9
4
3.2 5.5 11.3
0 2 1.4 1.4 0
0.4
-57.1
-69.1 0
-92.9 -1.6
-100 -2 -100
Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24 Mar'20 Mar'21 Mar'22 Mar'23 Mar'24
COMPARISON
TARC LTD. DLF LTD. MACROTECH DEVELOPERS LTD. OBEROI REALTY LTD. GODREJ PROPERTIES LTD. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD. PHOENIX MILLS LTD.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
P/E Ratio TTM -27.9 53.7 63.6 35.1 54.5 97.2 56.2
Forward P/E Ratio 288.3 54.3 53.3 33.4 55.4 61.8 48.5
PEG Ratio TTM 0.0 0.9 1.8 1.9 0.5 -1.6 3.9
Price to Book Value 4.3 4.8 7.2 5.5 7.0 4.0 5.9
Price to Sales TTM 163.0 27.7 10.6 16.0 21.1 8.1 14.4
Price to Sales Annual 37.0 34.6 10.9 11.9 21.1 6.0 12.4
Market Cap to Sales 37.0 34.6 10.9 11.9 21.1 6.0 12.4
Price to Free Cash Flow -47.0 1186.7 516.2 131.1 485.6 718.3 3.4
Valuation Summary
Valuation Score TARC Ltd. has a valuation score of 13, which indicates an Expensive Valuation.
13 / 100
A High Valuation Score (greater than 50) indicates the stock is competitively priced at current P/E, P/BV and share price.
The Valuation helps you identify stocks which are still bargains, and whose strengths are not fully priced into the share price.
Expensive Valuation
13
0 30 50 100
Valuation Trend TARC Ltd. : Jan '24 - Jan '25 Valuation v/s Peers
100
TARC 13.2
75 DLF 25.3
GOOD
Macrotech Developers 21.8
50
24
24
24
24
5
'2
'2
'2
l '2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'
g'
'
b
ar
ay
ct
ov
ec
n
Ju
Ap
Au
Fe
Ju
Se
Ja
O
M
D
M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum TARC Ltd. (13) has lowest Valuation score amongst its peers, behind Prestige Estates Projects
0% 0% 100.0% 13.5 (26 Dec '24) 5.2 (06 Nov '24) Ltd. (20)
Valuation Metrics
-27.9 -519.9% YoY Jan'25 37 759.0% YoY Jan'25 NaN% YoY Jan'25
100 40 30
93 37 21.6
50 20
20
-4.5
0 10
-27.9 4.5 4.3
-50 0 0
Mar'22 Mar'23 Jan'25 Mar'22 Mar'23 Jan'25 Mar'22
CAGR 2Y 29.9%
3Y -
5Y -
Momentum Summary
Momentum Score TARC Ltd. has a Momentum score of 45, which indicates that it is Technically Neutral.
45 / 100
A High Momentum Score indicates the stock is seeing buyer demand, and is bullish across its technicals compared to the rest of the stock universe.
Momentum is a very effective short term score, while Durability and Valuation help assess the stock’s health over the long term.
Technically Neutral
45
0 35 60 100
Momentum Trend TARC Ltd. : Jan '24 - Jan '25 Momentum v/s Peers 08 Jan '25
100
TARC 44.6
75 DLF 37.8
GOOD
Macrotech Developers 53.5
50
24
24
24
24
5
'2
'2
'2
l '2
'2
'2
'2
'2
'
g'
'
b
ar
ay
ct
ov
ec
n
Ju
Ap
Au
Fe
Ju
Se
Ja
O
M
D
M
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Good Medium Bad Maximum Minimum TARC Ltd. (45) has third-highest Momentum score amongst its peers, behind Macrotech
69.1% 30.9% 0% 78.4 (09 Jan '24) 39.5 (01 Jan '25) Developers Ltd. (54)
Day ATR
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300
9.4
TARC Ltd. is trading below 8 out of 8 SMAs. TARC Ltd. is trading below 8 out of 8 EMAs.
BEARISH BEARISH
8/8 8/8
5Day SMA 178.8 50Day SMA 205.3 5Day EMA 176.9 26Day EMA 189.4
10Day SMA 176.8 100Day SMA 222.5 10Day EMA 178.7 50Day EMA 201.2
20Day SMA 184.6 150Day SMA 215.3 12Day EMA 179.9 100Day EMA 207.9
30Day SMA 197 200Day SMA 200.5 20Day EMA 185.4 200Day EMA 196.1
TARC Ltd. is trading below 5 out of 9 Oscillators in bearish zone. TARC Ltd. at 173.00 is trading below it's Pivot 176.38.
PIVOT - 176.4
RSI(14) 37.0 MACD(12, 26, 9) -9.5 175
LTP - 173.0
Stochastic Oscillator 30.3 Stochastic RSI 68.8 S1 - 170.9
170
Volatility Metrics
Beta
1 month 3 month 1 year 3 year Day ADX Day Bollinger Bands Mid_20_2
beta value for 3 month indicates price tends to be more volatile than the market
Checklist Summary
31.8% pass 7 | 15
=
Financial
|8
+
Value & Momentum
2|1|5
+
Ownership
4
+
Peer Comparison
1|2
Company has seen consistent profit growth in the last eight The stock is in the Buy Zone according to its historical P/E?
quarters? No
No
The stock is in the Buy Zone according to its historical P/E
Stock has seen consistent profit growth in the last eight quarters
FII/FPI or DIIs are buying the stock? Company is giving better long term returns than the industry?
Yes
Yes
Institutions have been increasing stake in the company over the past Company is giving better long term returns than the industry
four quarters
Forecaster
340 340.0
1 1 1 1 1 1
The consensus recommendation from 1 analyst for TARC Ltd. is STRONG BUY
TARC Ltd.'s share price target is above the current price, with an upside of 96.5%
130 2k
128.3 1708.6
8.9 8.9
90.2%
120 8.9 1k
111.6 167.5
-15.0%
110 0
FY25 FY26 FY25 FY26 FY25 FY26
0% -15.0% 0% 0% 0% 90.2%
Estimate Estimate Estimate
200
196.8
500.0 500.0 50.0 50.0
23.3%
175 150.9
500 50
150
125
FY25 FY26 FY25 FY26 FY25 FY26
0% 23.3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
75%
65.0% 65.0% 65.0% 65.0% 65.0%
Promoter 65.0%
FII 2.7%
25%
Public 29.0%
1.9% 1.9% 2.4% 2.9% 2.7%
0%
Others -% Sep 2023 Dec 2023 Mar 2024 Jun 2024 Sep 2024
Retail investors (Promoter) form the biggest shareholding segment Promoter , FII , DII , over the Sep 2024 quarter
21.0
20.0 Mutual Funds have increased holdings from 0.92% to 2.34% in Sep 2024 qtr.
20
17.0
16.0 16.0
Number of MF schemes increased from 5 to 6 in Sep 2024 qtr.
15
12.0
11.0 FII/FPI have decreased holdings from 2.89% to 2.72% in Sep 2024 qtr
10 9.0
5.0
6.0 Number of FII/FPI investors increased from 68 to 77 in Sep 2024 qtr.
5 4.0
3.0 3.0
1.0 Institutional Investors have increased holdings from 4.84% to 6.03% in Sep 2024
0 qtr.
Jul-2024 Aug-2024 Sep-2024 Oct-2024 Nov-2024
Promoters
Date Client Name Deal Type Action Avg Price Qty Exchange
19 Oct'23 GRAVITON RESEARCH CAPITAL LLP Bulk Sell 99.3 1,567,459 NSE
19 Oct'23 GRAVITON RESEARCH CAPITAL LLP Bulk Purchase 99.2 1,567,459 NSE
20 Sep'21 JMVD FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLP Bulk Sell 44.8 2,555,783 NSE
Reporting Date Insider Name Insider Type Regulation Action Avg Price Qty Mode
04 Mar'23 Amar Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Acquisition 37 90,000,000 Inter-se Transfer
04 Mar'23 Anil Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Disposal 37 90,000,000 Inter-se Transfer
12 Sep'22 Mr. Amar Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Acquisition 45.3 40,241 Market Purchase
12 Sep'22 Mr. Amar Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Acquisition 45.9 259,759 Market Purchase
29 Aug'22 Amar Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Acquisition 41.5 17,903 Market Purchase
29 Aug'22 Amar Sarin Promoter & Director Insider Trading Acquisition 41.4 232,920 Market Purchase
TARC Ltd.
TARC is engaged in carrying business of construction and development of residential projects, commercial projects, township projects, SEZ, IT Park, malls etc. and also derives rental income from investment properties.
website: www.tarc.in
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Executive Officer
10.7M 2024-3-31 7.9M 2024-3-31 6.8M 2024-3-31
Gross Remuneration Year Gross Remuneration Year Gross Remuneration Year
12.0M 2024-3-31
Gross Remuneration Year
DIRECTOR INFORMATION
Durability scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero the worst and 100 the best. Trendlyne Checklist evaluates a stock based on its financial performance, ownership,
Durability scores above 55 are considered good(G) and below 35 are considered bad(B). peer comparison, value and momentum. This helps give an overall performance of the
Scores between 35-55 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M). company based on the score.
Stocks with a high durability score (top 20 percentile) are companies that have
consistently and over time, demonstrated good growth and cash flow, stable revenues
and profits, and low debt. PE buy/sell zone
The durability score considers several different metrics and ratios around earnings and
models these over time. Our stocks with high durability scores outperform the index The PE buy/sell zone is calculated based on how many days a stock has traded at its
significantly current PE level. The current PE is compared to the stock’s historical PE performance, to
find out how often (for how many days in the past) the stock has traded at its current PE
value.
Valuation Score If the stock has usually traded above its current PE level (it’s at a higher PE for the
majority of trading days), then the stock is cheaper than usual and in the PE buy zone.
Valuation scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero the worst and 100 the best. If the stock has usually traded below its current PE level (it’s at a lower PE for the
Valuation scores above 50 are considered good(G) and below 30 are considered bad(B). majority of trading days), then the stock is more expensive than usual and in the PE sell
Scores between 30-50 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M) zone.
Stocks with a high valuation score (top 20 percentile) are companies whose business
and financial advantages have not yet been priced into their share price. These
companies typically have strong earnings but are currently flying under the radar, and Price Volume Charts
Trendlyne’s valuation score helps shine a spotlight on these companies.
Firms with a low valuation score (bottom 20 percentile) are expensive stocks that have Price volume charts are a type of financial chart that combines two key pieces of
good broker coverage and already have their strengths priced in. They are popular but information about a stock: its price and trading volume. They are commonly used in
pricey. If you are buying them now it would be for a steep price tag: valuation scores technical analysis to identify trends and patterns in the market.
help you identify that. In a price volume chart, the price of the security is plotted on the vertical axis, while the
trading volume is shown on the horizontal axis. Each data point on the chart represents
a single trading day, and the size of the data point may be proportional to the trading
Momentum Score volume.
Scores are calculated from 0-100, with zero being the worst and 100 the best.
Momentum scores above 59 are considered good(G) and below 30 are considered Peer Comparison
bad(B). Scores between 30-59 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle(M)
Momentum score or momentum score identifies the bullish/bearish nature of the stock. Peer comparison in financial analysis is a method of comparing the financial
Stocks with a high momentum score (which is calculated daily from over 30 technical performance and position of one company to its competitors or peers in the same
indicators) are seeing their share price rise, and increase in volumes and sentiment. industry or sector. The purpose of this comparison is to gain insights into how the
A low and falling momentum score indicates a falling share price. The pace at which this company is performing relative to its competitors and to identify areas where it may be
is changing is also important for the momentum score. underperforming or overperforming. In Trendlyne’s stock report, DVM scores are also
included in the peer comparison section.
Analyst recommendation
Technical Analysis
Analyst recommendation of a stock is an assessment made by financial analysts or
brokerage firms about the investment potential of a particular stock. It is usually based Technical analysis is a method of analyzing stocks and other financial instruments that
on a thorough analysis of the company's financial performance, market trends, industry relies on charts and statistical indicators to identify trends and patterns in price and
outlook, and other factors that may impact the stock's value. trading volume.
The analyst recommendation of a stock typically takes the form of a rating or a Key momentum metrics included - relative strength index (RSI), Stochastic RSI, Ultimate
recommendation, such as "buy," "hold," or "sell." The recommendation is usually Oscillator, moving average convergence divergence (MACD), average true range (ATR),
accompanied by a price target, which is the analyst's estimate of the stock's fair value. money flow index (MFI), William, CCI 20 and Awesome Oscillator. Simple and
A low and falling momentum score indicates a falling share price. The pace at which this exponential moving averages are also included.
is changing is also important for the momentum score. To analyse the volatility of the stock, Beta over different periods of time, Average
Directional Movement Index and Bollinger bonds are used. Along with this, active
candlesticks, daily volume analysis is also provided in the rapport.
Disclaimer
© 2025 Giskard Datatech Pvt Ltd
Republication or redistribution of Giskard content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Giskard. All information in this report is assumed to be
accurate to the best of our ability. Giskard is not liable for any errors or delays in Giskard content, or for any actions taken in reliance on such content. Any forward-looking statements included in the
Giskard content are based on certain assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.