Market Structure

Market Structure
How different industries are classified and differentiated based on their degree and nature
of competition for services and goods
What is Market Structure?

Market structure, in economics, refers to how different industries are classified and
differentiated based on their degree and nature of competition for goods and services. It is
based on the characteristics that influence the behavior and outcomes of companies
working in a specific market.
Some of the factors that determine a market structure include the number of buyers and
sellers, ability to negotiate, degree of concentration, degree of differentiation of products,
and the ease or difficulty of entering and exiting the market.
Understanding Market Structures

In economics, market structures can be understood well by closely examining an array of
factors or features exhibited by different players. It is common to differentiate these
markets across the following seven distinct features.
1. The industry’s buyer structure
2. The turnover of customers
3. The extent of product differentiation
4. The nature of costs of inputs
5. The number of players in the market
6. Vertical integration extent in the same industry
7. The largest player’s market share
By cross-examining the above features against each other, similar traits can be
established. Therefore, it becomes easier to categorize and differentiate companies across
related industries. Based on the above features, economists have used this information to
describe four distinct types of market structures. They include perfect competition,
oligopoly market, monopoly market, and monopolistic competition.
Types of Market Structures
1. Perfect Competition
Perfect competition occurs when there is a large number of small companies competing
against each other. They sell similar products (homogeneous), lack price influence over the
commodities, and are free to enter or exit the market.
Consumers in this type of market have full knowledge of the goods being sold. They are
aware of the prices charged on them and the product branding. In the real world, the pure
form of this type of market structure rarely exists. However, it is useful when comparing
companies with similar features. This market is unrealistic as it faces some significant
criticisms described below.
● No incentive for innovation: In the real world, if competition exists and a company
holds a dominant market share, there is a tendency to increase innovation to beat
the competitors and maintain the status quo. However, in a perfectly competitive
market, the profit margin is fixed, and sellers cannot increase prices, or they will
lose their customers.
● There are very few barriers to entry: Any company can enter the market and start
selling the product. Therefore, incumbents must stay proactive to maintain market
share.
Advantages of Perfect Competition
 Allocative Efficiency:
● Explanation: In perfect competition, goods and services are produced up to the

point where the price equals the marginal cost (P = MC). This means resources are
allocated in a way that maximizes total welfare, with no excess or shortage in the
market.
● Benefit: Consumers pay the lowest possible price for the goods and services they
demand, ensuring maximum consumer satisfaction.
 Consumer Sovereignty:
● Explanation: In perfect competition, the market is driven by consumer preferences.

Firms must adapt to consumer demand or risk going out of business.
● Benefit: Consumers have a wide variety of choices and can influence the market by
choosing products that best meet their needs, leading to a greater level of
satisfaction.
 Innovation and Dynamic Efficiency:
● Explanation: Although traditionally associated with other market structures, the

pressure to minimize costs and improve efficiency can lead to innovation even in
perfectly competitive markets.
● Benefit: Firms that can innovate may temporarily gain an edge, though any new
technology or process tends to spread quickly through the market.
Disadvantages of Perfect Competition

1. Lack of Product Differentiation:
o Explanation: In perfect competition, products are homogeneous, meaning
there is no difference between products from different firms.
o Drawback: Consumers may find the lack of variety unappealing, and firms
have little incentive to innovate or improve their products beyond cutting
costs.
2. Assumption of Perfect Knowledge:

o Explanation: Perfect competition assumes that all consumers and producers
have full knowledge of market conditions, prices, and technologies.
o Drawback: In reality, information asymmetries often exist, leading to market
inefficiencies where consumers may make suboptimal choices or firms may
exploit these gaps in knowledge.
3. Inability to Achieve Economies of Scale:

o Explanation: Firms in a perfectly competitive market are typically small and
cannot expand enough to achieve significant economies of scale.
o Drawback: This can result in higher average costs compared to monopolistic
or oligopolistic firms, where larger-scale production can lower per-unit
costs.
2. Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic competition refers to an imperfectly competitive market with the traits of

both the monopoly and competitive market. Sellers compete among themselves and can
differentiate their goods in terms of quality and branding to look different. In this type of
competition, sellers consider the price charged by their competitors and ignore the impact
of their own prices on their competition.
When comparing monopolistic competition in the short term and long term, there are two
distinct aspects that are observed. In the short term, the monopolistic company maximizes
its profits and enjoys all the benefits as a monopoly.
The company initially produces many products as the demand is high. Therefore, its
Marginal Revenue (MR) corresponds to its Marginal Cost (MC). However, MR diminishes
over time as new companies enter the market with differentiated products affecting
demand, leading to less profit.
3. Oligopoly
An oligopoly market consists of a small number of large companies that sell differentiated
or identical products. Since there are few players in the market, their competitive
strategies are dependent on each other.
For example, if one of the actors decides to reduce the price of its products, the action will
trigger other actors to lower their prices, too. On the other hand, a price increase may
influence others not to take any action in the anticipation consumers will opt for their
products. Therefore, strategic planning by these types of players is a must.
In a situation where companies mutually compete, they may create agreements to share
the market by restricting production, leading to supernormal profits. This holds if either
party honors the Nash equilibrium state and neither is tempted to engage in the prisoner’s
dilemma. In such an agreement, they work like monopolies. The collusion is referred to as
cartels.
4. Monopoly
In a monopoly market, a single company represents the whole industry. It has no

competitor, and it is the sole seller of products in the entire market. This type of market is
characterized by factors such as the sole claim to ownership of resources, patent and
copyright, licenses issued by the government, or high initial setup costs.
All the above characteristics associated with monopoly restrict other companies from
entering the market. The company, therefore, remains a single seller because it has the
power to control the market and set prices for its goods.

Market Structure - lecture Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Market Structure - lecture Notes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Market Structure - lecture Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is Market Structure?

Understanding Market Structures

Advantages of Perfect Competition

● Explanation: In perfect competition, goods and services are produced up to the

● Explanation: In perfect competition, the market is driven by consumer preferences.

 Innovation and Dynamic Efficiency:

● Explanation: Although traditionally associated with other market structures, the

Disadvantages of Perfect Competition

2. Assumption of Perfect Knowledge:

3. Inability to Achieve Economies of Scale:

Monopolistic competition refers to an imperfectly competitive market with the traits of

In a monopoly market, a single company represents the whole industry. It has no

You might also like