[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

TE Ch-2 Part IV

Uploaded by

Htet Lwin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

TE Ch-2 Part IV

Uploaded by

Htet Lwin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

2.9.

5 Practical Stopping Distance


15B

The basic physics equation on rectilinear motion, assuming constant deceleration,


is chosen as the basis of a practical equation for stopping distance:

V22  V12  2ad (2.44)

where

V2 = final vehicle speed in ft/s,


V1 = initial vehicle speed in ft/s,
a = acceleration (negative for deceleration) in ft/s2, and
d = deceleration distance (practical stopping distance) in ft.
Rearranging Eq. 2.44 and assuming a is negative for deceleration
For comparison, average drivers have perception/reaction times of approximately 1.0 to 1.5 seconds.
Thus, the total required stopping distance is a combination of the braking distance, either theoretical
(Eq. 2.42 or 2.43) or practical (Eq. 2.47), and the distance traveled during perception/reaction (Eq. 2.49),
as shown in Eq. 2.50:
ds  d dr (2.50)
where

ds = total stopping distance (including perception/reaction) in ft,


d = distance traveled during braking in ft, and
dr = distance traveled during perception/reaction in ft.

XAMPLE 2.10 THEORETICAL MINIMUM STOPPING DISTANCE WITH AND


WITHOUT ANTILOCK BRAKES
A car is traveling up a 3% grade on a road that has good, wet pavement. The
engine is running at 2500 revolutions per minute. The radius of the wheels is
15 inches, the driveline slippage is 3%, and the overall gear reduction ratio is
2.5 to 1. A deer jumps out onto the road and the driver applies the brakes 291
ft from it. The driver hits the deer at a speed of 20mi/h. If the driver did not
have antilock brakes, and the wheels were locked the entire distance, would a
deer-impact speed of 20 mi/h be possible?

EXAMPLE 2.11 BRAKING EFFICIENCY AND STOPPING DISTANCE


A car [W = 2200 lb, CD = 0.25, Af = 21.5 ft2] has an antilock braking system that gives it a
braking efficiency of 100%. The car’s stopping distance is tested on a level roadway with poor,
wet pavement (with tires at the point of impending skid), and  = 0.00238 slugs/ft3. How
inaccurate will the stopping distance predicted by the practical-stopping-distance equation be
compared with the theoretical stopping distance, assuming the car is initially traveling at 60
mi/h? How inaccurate will the practical-stopping-distance equation be if the same car has a
braking efficiency of 85%?

EXAMPLE 2.12 PRACTICAL STOPPING DISTANCE AND PERCEPTION/REACTION


TIMES
Two drivers each have a reaction time of 2.5 seconds. One is obeying a 55-mi/h speed limit
and the other is traveling illegally at 70 mi/h. How much distance will each of the drivers cover
while perceiving/reacting to the need to stop, and what will the total stopping distance be for
each driver (using practical stopping distance and assuming G = 2.5%)?

You might also like