Evaluation of Anxiolytic Activity of The Essential Oil of The Aerial Part of Miller in Mice
Evaluation of Anxiolytic Activity of The Essential Oil of The Aerial Part of Miller in Mice
Abstract
Background: Foeniculum vulgare locally known as ensilal, is an aromatic plant widely cultivated in temperate and
tropical regions. The anti-anxiety activity of the crude extract of F. vulgare has been reported. However, the fraction
responsible for anxiolytic activity is not known and there is no any report on the anti-anxiety activity of the essential oil
of F. vulgare. The objective of study was to evaluate the anxiolytic activity of the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare Miller.
Methods: Adult Swiss albino male mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6). Groups I and II received
Tween 80 (5%, v/v) and diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, ip), respectively, while groups III to V received orally 50, 100, and 200 and
400 mg/kg doses of the essential oil of F. vulgare, respectively. The mice were then individually placed in animal anxiety
models: elevated plus maze (EPM), staircase test (SCT) and open field test (OFT) and evaluated for various parameters.
Results: In EPM test, 100 and 200 mg/kg doses of the essential oil significantly increased percent number of entries
and time spent in open arms compared to control. In SCT these doses also reduced rearing significantly compared
to controls, while only the 200 mg/kg dose significantly increased number of squares crossed at the center in the
OFT test.
Conclusion: The essential oil of F. vulgare was found to exhibit a promising anxiolytic activity.
Keywords: Anxiolytic activity, Foeniculum vulgare, Essential oil, Mice
© 2014 Mesfin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated.
Mesfin et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014, 14:310 Page 2 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/310
test, the maze was cleaned with ethyl alcohol to eliminate Results
any olfactory cues to the next animal [34]. Acute toxicity test
After the administration of 2000 mg/Kg dose of the
essential oil of F. vulgare, the animals didn’t show loss of
Elevated plus maze (EPM)
weight, autonomic behavioral changes or other signs of
The test was conducted using apparatus validated by
toxicity. There was also no mortality observed in the
Lister [35]. After each mouse was placed in the centre of
study period, suggesting that the LD50 (median lethal
the maze facing one of the open arms, the number of
oral dose) of the essential oil is higher than 2000 mg/kg
entries made into the open and closed arms and the
when given orally [33].
time spent in them was recorded, using a video camera
for the next five min. From these data, the percentage of
Anxiolytic effects
entries and the percentage of time spent in each arms
In the EPM paradigm (Table 1), the essential oil at
was calculated.
200 mg/kg dose showed significant increase in the number
of entries into the open arms compared to the negative
Staircase test (SCT) control, while all other doses of the oil did not significantly
SCT was carried out as used by Simiand et al. [36]. Each affect the parameter compared. On the other hand, none of
mouse was placed on the floor of the box with its back the doses of the oil or diazepam significantly affected the
to the staircase, then the number of steps climbed and the number of closed arm entries except the 400 mg/kg dose
numbers of rears were recorded over 3 min period using a which significantly decreased the parameter. The time the
video camera placed over head. A step is considered to be mice spent in the open arms was significantly increased in
climbed only if the mouse had placed all four paws on animals treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg doses of the oil
the step, the number of steps descended was not taken compared to the control group. Mice treated with 100 and
into account. 200 mg/kg doses significantly increased the percentage of
open arm entry compared to the vehicle (Figure 1) and at
a dose of 200 mg/kg the oil produced a significant reduc-
Open field test (OFT)
tion in the percentage of time spent in the closed arms
The test was conducted as described by Aragao et al.
(Figure 2).
[37]. Briefly, the mice were placed individually in a cor-
In SCT (Table 2), mice treated with the 100 and
ner square of the OFT apparatus and the total number
200 mg/kg doses of the oil showed significant reduction
of squares crossed at the periphery, number of central
of rearing compared to control group, however, only
squares crossed, total number of squares traveled, and
200 mg/kg dose of the oil showed statistically significant
the time the mouse spent in the center were video
reduction in rearing compared with diazepam. The reduc-
recorded for 5 min.
tion in the number of climbing was produced by the
essential oil only at 400 mg/kg dose compared with
Statistical analysis control, while other doses were not effective.
The data are presented as mean ± S.E.M (standard error In the OFT model, the number of central squares crossed
of mean) of six mice. Statistical analysis of the data was was increased in all groups treated with the essential
performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) oil, however, statistical significance was reached only in
followed by Tukey posthoc test. Significant differences the groups treated with 200 mg/kg compared to the
were set at P values lower than 0.05. control (Table 3). In mice treated with 400 mg/kg the
Table 1 The behavior of mice treated with the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare and reference compounds in the
elevated plus maze model
Treatment Dose, Number of entries (counts/5 min) Time spent (sec/5 min)
mg/kg
Open arm Closed arm Total Open arm Closed arm Center
Vehicle - 3.17 ± 1.33 8.50 ± 2.59 11.67 ± 3.66 44.17 ± 20.19 137.83 ± 38.24 118.00 ± 41.25
FV 50 4.83 ± 1.72 6.83 ± 0.75 11.66 ± 1.37 68.00 ± 25.69 117.50 ± 46.78 114.50 ± 50.03
FV 100 7.50 ± 4.59 5.83 ± 3.31 13.66 ± 3.78 109.67 ± 48.64a* 99.83 ± 43.32 90.50 ± 33.59
a* c*
FV 200 11.00 ± 5.48 8.00 ± 4.90 19.00 ± 9.87 112.67 ± 35.62a* 71.33 ± 37.17a* 119.00 ± 36.87
a* (b, d)*
FV 400 4.01 ± 2.10 4.00 ± 1.4 8.00 ± 2.76 87.50 ± 36.32 93.33 ± 35.27 119.17 ± 27.13
Diazepam 0.5 10.83 ± 9.06a* 6.50 ± 2.59 17.50 ± 8.53 c* 123.67 ± 50.67a** 67.33 ± 34.63a* 84.67 ± 44.23
a b c d
Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M, n = 6, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, against control, against 200 mg/kg, against 400 mg/kg, against diazepam; FV = Foeniculum
vulgare essential oil.
Mesfin et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014, 14:310 Page 4 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/310
Figure 1 Effects of the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare and controls on percentage of arm entries in the elevated plus maze (EPM)
test in mice. Data are mean ± S.E.M (n = 6); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with vehicle. FV = Foeniculum vulgare essential oil.
oil, a significant reduction in the number of squares approach-avoidance conflict and rodents consistently
crossed at the periphery compared to both vehicle and spend greater time in the closed arms when placed in
200 mg/kg dose was noted. Mice treated with 100 and mazes comprising of open and closed arms [40]. Based
200 mg/kg dose of the essential oil spent more time in on these assertions, EPM tests are reliable means of
the central squares compared to the control group. identifying selective anxiolytic effect of drugs and used
as a tool in the investigation of the psychological and
Discussion neuro-chemical basis of anxiety, for screening anxiety-
The present work has evaluated the anxiolytic activity of modulating drugs or mouse genotypes [41]. The EPM
various doses of the essential oil of F. vulgare in mice test has been validated pharmacologically, physiologically
employing three non-conditioned behavioral animal models and behaviorally, and has become one of the most
of anxiety; EPM model, OFT and SCT. These tests are widely used behavioral tests for anxiety [34]. Anxiety is
classic and standard models for screening central nervous induced by a fear due to height in rodents when placed
system actions providing information about anxiety and on the EPM. The ultimate manifestation of anxiety is
psychomotor performance [38]. Further, these models can exhibited by preference to remain at safer places and a
create an anxiety state in normal rodents in a reproducible decrease in the motor activity.
paradigm while minimizing some of the confounding Treatment of mice with the essential oil of F. vulgare
factors of other conditioned assays [39]. resulted in significant alterations on the behavioral
The EPM test is principally based on the behavior that responses measured in the EPM test. Experimental
exposure of animals to an elevated maze alley evokes an animals treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg doses of F.
Figure 2 Effects of the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare and controls on the percentage of duration in arms in the elevated plus maze
test in mice. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to control. FV = Foeniculum vulgare essential oil.
Mesfin et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014, 14:310 Page 5 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/310
Table 2 Effect produced by administration of the vulgare (100 and 200 mg/kg) in relieving anxiety in this
essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare and reference model may suggest a possible positive modulation of
compounds to mice in the staircase test the GABA-A/benzodiazepine receptor complex.
Treatment Dose (mg/kg) Number of rearing Number of The SCT for screening anxiolytic activity is a simple and
stairs climbed
rapid procedure for preliminary screening of anxiolytic
Vehicle - 19.67 ± 2.50 16.17 ± 6.11 agents [45]. Step climbing reflects exploratory or locomotor
FV 50 15.00 ± 1.67 d** 18.00 ± 4.19 e** activity, while rearing behavior was a manifestation of
FV 100 13.33 ± 4.93 a* d*
13.34 ± 1.37 anxiety state [46]. The present study showed that exposure
FV 200 8.00 ± 3.03 (a, b, e)**. (c, f)*
11.50 ± 3.56 of the experimental animals to the essential oil of F. vulgare
d** significantly reduced rearing activity at doses (100 and
FV 400 18.33 ± 3.44 9.50 ± 4.09 a*. b**
200 mg/kg) that did not suppress climbing, aligning with
Diazepam 0.5 14.00 ± 3.29(a*.d*) 12.00 ± 4.56
a behavior of an anxiolytic compound in a staircase model
Data are mean ± S.E.M, n = 6, compared with vehicle, to 50 mg/kg, cto
a b
100 mg/kg, dto 200 mg/kg, eto 400 mg/kg, fto diazepam, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
[47]. At a dose of 400 mg/kg, the essential oil produced
FV = Foeniculum vulgare essential oil. a significant reduction in the number of steps ascended
indicating suppression of locomotor activity, which is
vulgare essential oil showed significantly increased interpreted as a sedative, rather than anxiolytic effect in
percentage of number of entries into the open arms. different studies [46,48]. Only GABA receptor complex
This decreased aversion to open arms compared to active agents have been shown to reduce rearing at
control group indicated its anxiolytic activity [40]. The doses that do not reduce climbing in the SCT. Other
decrease in aversion to open arms by the 100 and non-benzodiazepine compounds induce non-specific sup-
200 mg/kg doses of the oil was also verified by the pression of both rearing and climbing behavior [49],
increased percentage of time spent in the open arms strengthening the suggested possible mechanism of the oil.
compared with the negative control. The OFT is a classical animal model used to evaluate
Time spent in the central platform of EPM appears to effects of drugs on anxiety, general motor activity and
be related to decision making and/or risk assessment. exploratory behavior. It uses the normal aversion of rodents
A decreased time spent on the central platform serves to an open, brightly lit area, as the confrontation with the
as indicator of a reduced decision making behavior, a situation induces anxiety behavior in rodents [50]. Rodents
parameter accepted as reliable indicators of anxiety and normally spend more time in the protective corners,
fearfulness [42]. However, neither doses of the essential suggesting that the walls confer anxiety-relieving body
oil nor diazepam altered the parameter significantly contact. When animals are placed in OFT, they express
compared to control. At a dose of 400 mg/kg, however, their anxiety by a decrease in exploratory behavior [51].
the oil showed a significant decrease on the number of Increased entry and the time spent in the center of the
entries in the closed arms. The absence of significant arena in the OFT reflects decreased anxiety altered by
modification in the number of closed arm entries, in anxiolytic property, as measures of central exploration are
the anxiolytic doses of the oil, in the EPM indicated often regarded as anxiety-related indices [52]. Diazepam
that the anxiolytic activity was observed at doses that significantly increased the total number of squares traveled
did not impair motor activity [43]. at the periphery, which may be an increase in exploratory
The EPM test is one of the most popular tests for activity on reduced anxiety. The anxiolytic activity of the
search of new benzodiazepine-like anxiolytic agents [44]. essential oil at the effective doses (100 and 200 mg/kg),
In this context, the activity of the essential oil of F. could not be confirmed by this parameter, as the increase
Table 3 Effect of the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare and reference compounds on the behavior of mice in the open
field model
Treatment Time spent in Number of squared crossed
central squares
Center Periphery Total
(sec)
Vehicle 2.17 ± 1.33 2.00 ± 1.26 85.17 ± 19.37 87.16 ± 19.31
FV50 3.33 ± 5.92 c* 3.67 ± 7.12 d* 80.83 ± 25.34 84.50 ± 25.99
(a, b)* f**
FV100 10.67 ± 4.32 9.00 ± 7.54 79.33 ± 10.32 88.33 ± 17.81 f**
a* (a,b,e)* (e, f)*
FV200 10.50 ± 4.04 14.50 ± 3.27 87.50 ± 19.67 102.00 ± 21.87 e*
FV400 4.50 ± 5.92 3.34 ± 4.55 d* 53.00 ± 4.94 (a ,d)* 56.33 ± 7.76 d*
a* a* (a, d)*.c**
Diazepam 9.33 ± 5.32 12.83 ± 10.66 122.67 ± 31.6 133.83 ± 34.93(a, c)**
The data are mean ± S.E.M, n = 6, aagainst control, bagainst 50 mg/kg, cagainst 100 mg/kg, dagainst 200 mg/kg, eagainst 400 mg/kg, fagainst diazepam, *P < 0.05
and **P < 0.01. FV = Foeniculum vulgare essential oil.
Mesfin et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014, 14:310 Page 6 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/310
20. Gulfraz M, Mehmood S, Minhas N, Jabeen N, Kausar R, Jabeen K, Arshad G: 44. Akindele AJ, Adeyemi OO: Anxiolytic and sedative effects of Byrsocarpus
Composition and antimicrobial properties of essential oil of Foeniculum coccineus Schum. and Thonn. (Connaraceae) extract. Int J Appl Res Nat
vulgare. Afr J Biotechnol 2008, 7:4364–4368. Products 2010, 3:28–36.
21. Food and Drug Administration: Health and human services. 1976:582. 45. Emmanouil DE, Quock RM: Effects of benzodiazepine agonist, inverse
sec.409. agonist and antagonist drugs in the mouse staircase test.
22. Swann P or Debby: Fennel essential oil. www.tracesetc.com, accessed Psychopharmacology 1990, 102:95–97.
online on .2008. 05/02/2011. 46. Milman A, Weizman R, Rigai T, Rice KC, Pick CG: Behavioral effects of
23. Wynn SG: Case report: chronic abdominal pain in a dog. J Am Holist Vet opioid subtypes compared with benzodiazepines in the staircase
Med Assoc 2004, 23:33–39. paradigm. Behav Brain Res 2006, 170:141–147.
24. Ozcan MM, Sagdiç O, Ozkan G: Inhibitory effects of spice essential oils on 47. Õkva K, Lang A, Nevalainen T, Maurane K, Väli M, Pokk P: Effects of litter
the growth of Bacillus species. J Med Food 2006, 9:418–421. origin and weight on behaviour of outbred NIH/S mice in plus-maze and
25. Barros L, Heleno SA, Carvalho AM, Isabel CFR: Food and chemical staircase tests. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 2008, 35:127–134.
toxicology systematic evaluation of the antioxidant potential of different 48. Bellavite P, Magnani P, Marzotto M, Conforti A: Assays of homeopathic
parts of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Ferreira 2009, 47:2458–2464. remedies in rodent behavioural and psychopathological models.
26. Chainy GB, Manna SK, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB: Anethole blocks both Homeopathy 2009, 98:208–227.
early and late cellular responses transduced by tumor necrosis factor: 49. Weizmann R, Pazc L, Peter Y, Toren P, Pick CG: Behavioral effects of agents
effect on NF-κB, AP-1, JNK, MAPKK and apoptosis. Oncogene 2000, active at the γ-aminobutyric acid receptor complex in the staircase
19:2943–2950. paradigm. Brain Res 2001, 901:137–142.
27. Oulmouden F, Saïle R, Gnaoui NE, Benomar H, Lkhider M: Hypolipidemic 50. Hossain M, Raquibul HSM, Mukta M, Akter R, Mazumder EH: Anxiogenic
and anti- atherogenic effect of aqueous extract of fennel (Foeniculum activity of methanol extracts of Artocarpus Lacucha Buch.-Ham. fruit
Vulgare) extract in an experimental model of atherosclerosis induced by parts and leaf in mice. Eur J Sci Res 2010, 46:592–603.
triton WR-1339. Eur J Sci Res 2011, 52:91–99. 51. Hliňak Z, Hynie S, Krejči I, Klenerova V: Novel and simple behavioral
28. Birdane FM, Cemek M, Birdane YO, Gulcin I, Buyukokuroglu ME: Beneficial paradigm for assessing anxiety in rats: effect of diazepam.
effects of Foeniculum vulgare on ethanol/induced acute gastric mucosal Neuroendocrinol Lett 2009, 30:25–31.
injury in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2007, 13:607–607. 52. Ramos A: Animal models of anxiety: do I need multiple tests? Trends
29. Ozbek H, Ugras S, Dülger H, Bayram I, Tuncer I, Ozturk G: Hepatoprotective Pharmacol Sci 2008, 10:493–498.
effect of Foeniculum vulgareessential oil. Fitoterapia 2003, 74:317–31. 53. Prut L, Belzung C: The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of
30. Wright CI, Van-Buren L, Kroner CI, Koning MM: Herbal medicines as diuretics: drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol 2003, 463:3–33.
a review of the scientific evidence. J Ethnopharmacol 2007, 114:1–3. 54. Shipochliev T: Pharmacological research into a group of essential oils - effect
31. Divekar A, Oswal RJ, Bagul YR, Antre RV: The pharmacological evaluation on the motor activity and general state of white mice in separate applications
of Foeniculum vulgare Miller for antianxiety. Imperial J Pharmacol Toxicol or after iproniazid phosphate. Veterinarno-Meditsinski Nauki 1968, 5:87–92.
2011, 1:16–20. 55. Jenck F, Moreau JL, Martin JR, Kilpatrick GJ, Reinscheid RK, Monsma FJ Jr,
32. Kishore RN, Anjaneyulu N, Ganesh MN, Sravya N: Evaluation of anxiolytic Nothacker HP, Civelli O: Orphanin FQ acts as an anxiolytic to attenuate
activity of ethanolic extract of Foeniculum vulgare in mice model. Int J behavioral responses to stress. Neurobiology 1997, 94:14854–14858.
Pharm Pharm Sci 2012, 4:584–586. 56. Dhar SK: Anti-fertility activity and hormonal profile of trans-anethole in
rats. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1995, 39:63–67.
33. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: OECD Guidelines
57. Osterlund MK, Witt MR, Gustafsson JA: Estrogen action in mood and
for the Testing of Chemicals. Acute Oral Toxicity -Up-And-Down-Procedure.
neurodegenerative disorders: estrogenic compounds with selective
UDP; 425. France: OECD Publishing; 2008.
properties-the next generation of therapeutics. Endocrine 2005, 28:235–242.
34. Garg DV, Dhar VJ, Sharma A, Dutt R: Experimental model for antianxiety
58. Donner N, Handa RJ: Estrogen receptor beta regulates the expression of
activity: a review. Pharmacologyonline 2011, 1:394–404.
tryptophan-hydroxylase-2 mRNA within serotonergic neurons of the rat
35. Lister RG: The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse.
dorsal raphe nuclei. Neuroscience 2009, 163:705–718.
Psychopharmacology 1987, 92:180–185.
59. Alexandrovich I, Rakovitskaya O, Kolmo E, Sidorova T, Shushunov S: The
36. Simiand J, Kean PE, Morre M: The staircase test in mice: a simple and
effect of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seed oil emulsion in infantile colic:
efficient procedure for primary screening of anxiolytic agents.
a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Altern Ther 2003, 9:58–61.
Psychopharmacology 1984, 84:48–53.
60. Aoshima H, Hamamoto K: Potentiation of GABAA receptors expressed in
37. Aragao GF, Carneiro LMV, Junior APF, Vieira LC, Bandeira PN, Lemos TLG,
Xenopus oocytes by perfume and phytoncid. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem
Viana GS: A possible mechanism for anxiolytic and antidepressant effects
1999, 63:743–748.
of alpha-and beta-amyrin fromProtium heptaphyllum(Aubl.). Pharmacol
61. Lima NG, De Sousa DP, Pimenta FC, Alves MF, De Souza FS, Macedo RO,
Biochem Behav 2006, 85:827–834.
Cardoso RB, de Morais LC, Melo Diniz Mde F, de Almeida RN: Anxiolytic-like
38. Sousaa FCF, Meloa CTV, Monteiroa AP, Limaa VTM, Gutierrezb SJC, Pereiraa activity and GC-MS analysis of (R)-(+)-limonene fragrance, a natural
BA, Barbosa-Filho JM, Vasconcelos SM, Fonteles MF, Viana GS: Antianxiety compound found in foods and plants. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012,
and antidepressant effects of riparin III fromAniba riparia (Nees) Mez 3:450–454.
(Lauraceae) in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004, 78:27–33.
39. Eguchia J, Inomatab Y, Saitoa K: The anxiolytic-like effect of MCI-225,
doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-310
a selective NA reuptake inhibitor with 5-HT3 receptor antagonism.
Cite this article as: Mesfin et al.: Evaluation of anxiolytic activity of the
Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2001, 68:677–683. essential oil of the aerial part of Foeniculum vulgare Miller in mice. BMC
40. Saivasanthi V, Gowthamigoud SK, Aakruthi SR, Gupta A, Rao AS: Evaluation Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014 14:310.
of Caralluma fimbrita for analgesic, anti inflammatory and anxiolytic
activities. Int J Pharm 2011, 1:40–45.
41. Bourin M, Petit-Demouliére B, Dhonnchadha BN, Hascoet M: Animal models
of anxiety in mice. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007, 21:567–574.
42. Gagan S, Richa S, Avninder M, Sandeep R, Vivek P: Anxiolytic effects of
Elaeocarpus sphaericus fruits on the elevated plus-maze model of anxiety
in mice. Int J PharmTech Res 2010, 2:1781–1786.
43. Griebel G, Simiand J, Gal CS, Wagnon J, Pascal M, Scatton B, Maffrand J,
Soubrié P: Anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of the non-peptide
vasopressin V1b receptor antagonist, SSR149415, suggest an innovative
approach for the treatment of stress-related disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci
2002, 99:6370–6375.