Edexcel Theme 3 Micro Full Pack
Edexcel Theme 3 Micro Full Pack
Profit-maximisation occurs at
output Q1, where MC=MR
Revenue maximisation occurs
at Q2, where MR=0
Sales maximisation occurs are
Q3, where AC=AR
Profit satisficing
Managers can choose any
output between Q1 and Q2,
depending on their objectives,
For price makers: Marginal Revenue For price makers: Marginal Revenue
because between these (MR) is less than Average Revenue (MR) is equal to Average Revenue (AR),
output levels, there is enough (AR), because to sell additional units, because every unit is sold at exactly
profit to satisfy the the price of all units needs to be the same price. TR is upwards sloping
shareholders. lowered. TR is max when MR = 0 with constant gradient
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Short run costs
Short Run Costs Marginal costs
Fixed costs: costs that do not vary with output; the total costs incurred Marginal cost MC is the
when output is zero change in total costs when
Variable costs: costs that vary directly with output output increases by one
Short-run: the period of time in which at least one factor of production is unit.
fixed MC = change in total
Long-run: the period of time in which all factors of production are variable costs/change in output
Total costs in the short run • Marginal costs are
variable costs; MC is the
Total fixed costs TFC do not gradient of the TC
change with output
Total variable costs TVC increase The relationship between AC and MC
as output rises, but the Short-run explanation: LAW OF
relationship is not linear because DIMINISHING RETURNS as extra
of the Law of Diminishing Returns variable factors are added to fixed
factors, the fixed factors e.g.
Total costs TC = TFC + TVC capital become increasingly scarce
and marginal product falls (from
Q), causing marginal cost to rise
Average costs in the short run
MC always cuts AVC and AC
Average fixed costs AFC = TFC/Q; curves at their minimum
AFC decreases with output point.
Average variable costs AVC ; the • If you add more to the
curve is U-shaped, at lower outputs total than the current
output rises faster than TVC; at average, the average
higher outputs, TVC rise faster than rises; if you add less to
output your total than the
Average total costs ATC = AFC + AVC current average, the
average falls
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Long Run Costs & Economies and Diseconomies of Scale
Economies of scale Long run average cost (LRAC) curve
In the long run, all factors of production are variable, so a firm can 'scale up'. LRAC curve is drawn assuming there
There can be cost advantages when operating at a larger scale known as is an infinite number of plant sizes that a
economies of scale or increasing returns to scale; EoS = falling long run business can use:
average costs (LRAC) • If LRAC is falling when output is
increasing, then the firm is
Internal v external economies of scale experiencing economies of scale.
Internal economies of scale arise because of the growth in output of the • Conversely, when LRAC eventually
firm itself as it expands its own operations; efficiencies in production are starts to rise then the firm experiences
gained reducing LRAC. diseconomies of scale
• If LRAC is constant, the firm is
External economies of scale arise from factors outside the firm because of experiencing constant returns to scale
the growth in the size of the industry or the business environment in which
the firm operates, reducing LRAC for individual firms. External economies of scale; shift down in LRAC
Internal Economies of Scale
External EoS cause the firm's
Technical EoS = use of specialised equipment, automated manufacturing; law of
increased dimensions e.g. containerisation,
LRAC to shift down – lower
Purchasing EoS = lower price per unit from bulk buying, larger firm can use its average costs at every output
monopsony power level.
Managerial EoS = using specialist staff, a form of the division of labour, e.g. specialist External diseconomies of scale
production manager would shift it up
Financial EoS = bigger firms are often less risky and can get bigger loans at lower
interest rates than smaller firms
Risk-bearing EoS = larger firms can diversify to spread risk; makes business more Minimum efficient scale MES)
resilient to changes in market conditions
MES: the lowest output Q1 where the
External Economies of Scale firm is at the lowest point on the LRAC
Sometimes called agglomeration economies or clustering
Infrastructure: industries cluster geographically to benefit from shared infrastructure, The business achieves productive
e.g. Media City in Salford; fishing industry in Grimsby efficiency.
Knowledge & labour pool: in some regions there may be a strong knowledge sharing If the MES is low relative to total market
environment e.g. City of London, Cambridge Uni & Science Park output, then it is likely there will be a
Supplier networks: clusters of related businesses can lead to a strong supplier large number of small firms in the
network e.g. specialised components in automotive industry
industry and vice versa
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Profits & Shut Down Points
Profit (TR-TC = profit) Shut down points
Profit = total revenue (TR) - total costs (TC) If a firm is making losses it may decide to shut down. In the short run, it is
Normal profit: the profit that the firm could make by using its resources in assumed it will still have to pay its fixed costs.
their next best use; it is the profit needed to keep the firm in business; it is The firm will shut down in the short run if:
effectively a cost of production. Normal profit is earned when TR=TC Price per unit (AR) < average variable cost (AVC) or when total revenue (TR)
Supernormal profit: also called abnormal profit is any profit over and above < total variable cost (TVC)
normal profit In the long run, all costs are variable, so the firm will shut down in the long
Profit run if:
Price per unit (AR) < average total cost (ATC) or when total revenue (TR) <
Supernormal profit exists total cost (TC)
when TR>TC; it is maximised
when the vertical difference Diagrams showing short run shut down points
between TR and TC is For a price taker For a price maker
greatest
In the long run, because there are no barriers to entry, new firms will join
the market to gain some of the supernormal profit. This causes the market
supply curve to shift right and the market price falls to P2. The firm now
has to take the new lower price P2: the profit-maximising output falls to
Q2, where the firm is making normal profit only.
All supernormal profit is competed away by the entrance of the new firms.
If the firm had been making losses in the short run, some firms would leave the
market & market supply shifts left; the market price would rise until the long run
equilibrium is restored.
In perfect competition, the firm 'takes' the market price P. Assuming
profit-maximisation, the firm will produce the output Q where MC=MR. Perfect competition & efficiency
At Q, AR is greater than AC, so profit per unit is AB. Total supernormal Allocative efficiency (P=MC): firms are allocatively efficient in both the short and
profit is the shaded area ABCP. long run; as a price taker P=MR so when MC=MR, P=MC
Productive efficiency (min LRAC): in the long run, the firm will produce where the
Minimum losses in the short run long run AC curve is at its minimum, so firms are productively efficient
If the firm faced higher costs, so AC>AR at the output where MC=MR, then Dynamic efficiency; we assume firms make homogenous goods so there is little
the firm is making losses. scope for innovation and differentiated to try to establish some market power.
• The firm will shut down if its revenue does not cover its variable costs (if However, it is worth noting that in the real world, firms in competitive markets
AR< AVC) in the short run. often are very entrepreneurial and innovative, but these markets may not fully
• The firm will stay open in the short run if AR>AVC meet the theoretical criteria for perfect competition
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Monopoly
Characteristics of monopoly Monopoly in the long run
• Single seller In the long run, because there are high barriers to entry, no new firms can
• Unique products (with no/few substitutes) join the market so the monopolist can earn the supernormal profits in the
• High barriers to entry long run.
• Firms are price makers - they can set the market price though are The diagram for the long run is the same as for the short run.
constrained by demand – a higher price means a lower quantity If the firm had been making losses in the short run, it would have to shut down in
demanded. Demand slopes downwards to the right D = AR , but MR is the long run unless demand increases (boosting revenue) or the firm is able to cut
twice as steep because to sell more the firm has to reduce the price its costs.
• Supernormal profit can be earned in the long because barriers to entry Monopoly v monopoly power
are high In theory, there is one supplier in a monopoly, but a firm that has more than
Monopoly in the short run 25% of a market can wield monopoly power
Natural Monopoly
Assuming profit- Natural monopoly: a single firm can efficiently serve the entire market due
maximisation, the firm to significant economies of scale e.g. utilities, transportation networks
will produce the output • High fixed costs relative to variable costs and declining average costs
Q where MC=MR. It can • High minimum efficient scale
charge price P according Natural monopolies can benefit consumers by providing services at lower
to the demand curve. At costs than multiple competing firms would achieve, but they require
Q, AR is greater than AC, regulation to prevent potential abuse of market power.
so profit per unit is AB. Monopoly and efficiency
Total supernormal profit
Allocative efficiency (P=MC): a monopoly is NOT allocatively efficient in
is the shaded area ABCP
either the short nor long run; P>MC.
Productive efficiency (min LRAC): the monopoly is NOT productively
Minimum losses in the short run efficient – it produces to the left of the minimum AC
If the monopolist faced higher costs, so AC>AR at the output where MC=MR, Dynamic efficiency; the monopoly has supernormal profits it can reinvest in
then the firm is making losses. the business – it can use the profits for R&D and product and process
• The firm will shut down if its revenue does not cover its variable costs (if innovation. The monopoly can therefore be dynamically efficient.
AR< AVC) in the short run. A monopoly that does not innovate may lose its market dominance and the
• The firm will stay open in the short run if AR>AVC barriers to entry in the market may weaken
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Barriers to entry & monopsony
Barriers to entry Barriers to exit
Barriers to entry: factors that make it difficult or impossible for firms to Barriers to exit: Make if difficult or impossible for firms to cease production
enter an industry and compete with existing firms. and leave an industry
Natural barriers: the nature of the industry makes it efficient for one or a Examples include: asset write-offs, closure costs and lost reputation
small number of large firms to operate in the industry If barriers to exit are high, this can act as a deterrent to enter an industry i.e.
Legal barriers: laws and regulations make it difficult for firms to join the the barrier to exit = a barrier to entry
industry. Monopsony
Strategic/artificial barriers: barriers put in place by firms already in the Monopsony: a single buyer
industry to prevent an increase in competition. These can be anti- Buying power: a firm or group of firms have a dominant position as the buyer
competitive and may be illegal. of a product/service
Barriers to entry are important because they help determine how Firms can use their buying power to get better prices from their suppliers,
competitive a market is likely to be. The higher the barriers to entry, the helping to reduce costs
more likely there will be less competition and more market concentration Benefits of monopsony power
• Firms can gain purchasing economies of scale reducing long run average
Types of barriers to entry costs
Natural barriers include: high capital start-up costs or high sunk costs; high • Lower costs help increase supernormal profits
economies of scale (as for natural monopoly); geographical barriers • Better returns to shareholders
Legal barriers include: patents, copyrights & trademarks; licencing; public • Extra profit may be re-invested to improve dynamic efficiency
franchises; import controls • Consumers may gain from lower prices (as costs are lower); increase in
Strategic barriers include: ownership or control of the factors of production the consumer surplus
needed (via vertical integration); control of the technology needed; limit • Better value for money, e.g. NHS can buy drugs more cheaply and give
pricing, predatory pricing; marketing barriers e.g. brand more treatments
proliferation; advertising barriers that create brand loyalty; other anti- Problems with monopsony power
competitive practices
• Business use their buying power to squeeze lower prices from suppliers
Limit pricing & predatory pricing
• Some suppliers may have to leave that industry if they make losses,
Limit pricing: the monopolist cuts its price and increases output so it is
causing job loss; future supply chains may be less reliable
making normal profit only (AC=AR = P), then a new firm with potentially
• If supplying firms leave, consumers may end up with less choice and/or
higher AC will not be able to compete.
higher prices
Predatory pricing: the monopolist cuts its price and increases output so it is
• Monopsony employers can use their labour market power to depress
running at a loss; a new firm with potentially higher AC will not be able to
wages and negatively affect the real incomes of their workers
compete. Once the threat of competition is gone, it puts its prices up again.
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Monopoly v Competition
Monopoly v competitive market Disadvantages of monopoly
Wage differential: the difference in wages between workers with different Pay gap: the difference in earnings between different groups of
skills in the same industry, or between workers with comparable skills in people e.g. women, ethnic minorities earning less
different industries or localities. Gender pay gap: the difference between average hourly earnings
Compensating wage differentials: a reward for risk-taking, working in poor (excluding overtime) of men and women as a proportion of average
conditions and during unsocial hours. hourly earnings (excluding overtime) of men’s earnings
Reward for human capital: differentials compensate workers for Other pay gaps: there can be disparities in income based on factors such
(opportunity and direct) costs of human capital acquisition. as race and ethnicity, and disability
Differences in labour productivity and revenue creation: workers whose Discrimination: due to gender, race, age, sexual orientation,
efficiency is high and generate revenue for a firm often have higher pay. socioeconomic groups
Trade unions' collective bargaining power: used to achieve a mark-up on Causes of pay gaps:
wages compared to non-union members • Discrimination
Artificial barriers to labour supply: such as professional exams, migration • Occupational segregation
controls • Educational and occupational choices
Employer discrimination: employers may perceive older workers as less • Work experience and seniority
able to learn new tasks, less flexible, and less ambitious & pay lower wages • Negotiation and salary transparency
• Unconscious bias
Diagram showing wage differentials • Parental and caregiving responsibilities
• Lack of workplace flexibility and inclusion
Discrimination diagram
• DL is the labour demand curve
without discrimination or
unconscious bias; the wage is W
• With discrimination, employers
'assume' the group is less
productive and so the demand is
less at DL* reducing the wages
for the group to W*
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Labour markets: non-competitive labour markets
Trade unions Factors influencing trade union power
Trade union: an organised group of employees who work together to Macroeconomic climate
represent and protect the rights of workers, usually by using collective Public support and sympathy
bargaining techniques. Union density
Trade unions aim to gain better wages, protect jobs, improve non-monetary TU legislation
aspects of jobs e.g. pension rights, protect against unfair dismissal, ensure Financial consequences of industrial action
health and safety at work, counterbalance any monopsony power etc. Globalisation (MNCs can outsource to other parts of the world)
Trade union wage effect Benefits of costs of trade unions
If the trade union gains a Arguments for TUs: Arguments against TUs:
wage above the market Better wages and working conditions Reduces employment flexibility
equilibrium, the wage for its Trade union wage premium = higher Prevents efficient working of labour
members rises to WTU, but it wages markets
may cause some real wage Lower wage inequality Adds to business costs if wage is
unemployment of Q2Q3. Ensure real wages are not eroded higher with no improvement in
The gap between wages of TU Counterbalances monopsony power productivity
members and non-members = of employers Reduces profits of companies
the trade union wage Can improve industrial relations if Can delay introduction of new
premium union works well with management technology
Monopsony employers
Some employers have monopsony (buying) power in some labour markets,
Factors making it easier for a trade union to gain a pay increase with no job loss
e.g. the government is the main employer health care workers.
• Labour is a small percentage of total costs Just as a monopoly can increase its profits by reducing output and raising the
• Impossible or difficult to substitute labour with other factors of price in a product market, a monopsonist can depress wages and restrict
production employment in a labour market to make more profit from employing workers.
• Demand for the final product is price inelastic (costs can be passed on by • A trade union can push wages AND employment up in a monopsony labour
firm to consumers) and/or increasing market because it is effectively making it more competitive
• Trade unions control the supply of labour (closed shops) • The introduction of a minimum wage also can achieve this in a monopsony.
• Firm is already making substantial profits TUs and the NMW can act as a way of counterbalancing monopsony power
• Pay claim is accompanied by a productivity rise (labour demand may shift and achieving fairer pay and less exploitation of workers, though it the
right too) wage rise is rapid it can still cause unemployment
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Labour markets: efficiency and policies
Competitive labour market Policies to reduce discrimination
For a labour market to be competitive it has: Anti-discrimination laws and regulations: enforce and strengthen existing
• Many buyers (employers) and sellers (workers) anti-discrimination laws that prohibit discrimination (the Equal Pay Act)
• Perfect information Affirmative action / diversity initiatives by employers
• Homogeneous labour Access to quality education and training: provide opportunities for
• Mobility of labour individuals from marginalised groups to acquire the skills needed to access
• No monopsony power higher-paying jobs. Reform entry to universities.
Wages are determined by the interaction of demand and supply; the market
The gig economy
will adjust to changes in the conditions of labour demand and supply.
Gig economy: businesses that operate digital platforms/apps – which allow
Non-competitive labour markets
individuals to undertake jobs, or ‘gigs’, for end-user e.g. Uber and Deliveroo.
Most labour markets are not competitive because of: The gig economy has grown with the rise of technology and the increased
• Monopsony employer demand for flexible work arrangements, including zero hours contracts.
• Barriers to entry It benefits employers who can offer lower wages and reduce their costs. It
• Information asymmetry between employer and workers offers workers more flexible hours, but there is less employment protection
• NMW and fewer employment benefits; a lack of job security.
• Trade unions & collective bargaining
• Lack of labour mobility (geographical & occupational) Labour Migration
• Discrimination Labour migration: cross-border migration of people from one country to
• Employment laws/regulations another
Policies to increase labour mobility Immigration: people entering a country to live/work/study
Emigration: people leaving a country to live/work/study
Geographical mobility is the ability of labour to move around an area, region Benefits of net immigration: more skilled workers & higher productivity;
or country in order to work. increase in labour supply (LRAS shifts out); can drive innovation and
Policies to improve geographical mobility: regional policy, investment in entrepreneurship; migrants can add to AD; positive multiplier effects; fill
transport infrastructure, addressing difference in house prices etc. skills gaps; remittances sent home may be used to buy exports; higher tax
Occupational mobility is the ability of labour to switch between different revenue.
occupations. Occupational mobility is affected by the level of transferable Costs of net immigration: welfare costs and greater demand for public
skills and educational requirements of jobs etc. services; possible displacement of some domestic workers; social tensions;
Policies to improve occupational mobility: more & better education and higher demand for housing raising house prices and rents; risk of poverty
training, investment in schools and universities etc. and exploitation for migrants.
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Competition Policy & Regulation
Aims of Competition Policy Competition policy in UK
Approach is pragmatic – case-by-case regulation
• Promote competition for the benefit of consumers
• Tax incentives/grants to attract FDI and promote small business activity
• Consumers get lower prices and better quality
• Deregulation/privatisation/competitive tendering
• The most innovative, consumer-focused companies are the
• Trade liberalisation
ones that survive; promotes dynamic efficiency
• Break-up monopolies (though may lose economies of scale)
• Investigate (potential) mergers to ensure that the
• Nationalise; impose marginal cost pricing on natural monopolies
outcome won’t reduce consumer welfare
• Local sourcing and employment laws to reduce monopsony power
• Investigate entire markets if there are problems for consumers,
• Regulations and laws (e.g. Competition Act)
especially in concentrated markets
• Block/approve mergers
• Initiate action against companies involved in cartels or other illegal Price regulation
anti-competitive practices e.g. bid-rigging, collusion, predatory pricing
• Encourage market liberalisation e.g. deregulation, to improve UK uses an RPI-x formula for pricing
contestability, make markets work more efficiently • If business costs rise at RPI, then profits will fall incentivising greater
• Analyse “state aid” measures to make sure it is fair and doesn’t distort productive efficiency
competition • For some industries, an RPI+k formula is used; encourages more
• Protect consumers from “unfair” trading practices investment
• Encourage the government and regulators to promote competition • RIIO = revenue = incentives, innovation and outputs
Advantages of price regulation: reduces monopoly power, less consumer
exploitation; greater efficiency, helps control inflation
Competition Policy in the UK: Regulation
Disadvantages of price regulation: possible job loss, distorts price
Overseen by the independent Competition and Markets Authority mechanism, there may be information failure & regulatory capture; lower
(CMA) and supported by a range of regulators, e.g. OFCOM, OFWAT, FCA, profits may mean less investment
OFGEM etc. Profit regulation
The role of the CMA & the regulators is: Profit regulation considers the size of firms and evaluates a 'reasonable' rate
• Monitor & regulate prices via price caps of return from the capital base; more common in USA.
• Set standards for services/performance If profit exceeds this rate, the regulator imposes price cuts or a one-off
• Ensure competition/contestability increases; reduce barriers to entry (windfall) tax.
• Correct market failure by acting as a 'surrogate competitor' to bring Advantages: prevents profiteering; less consumer exploitation
prices and profits to those similar to a competitive market Disadvantages: discourages profits; encourages 'cost padding'; no efficiency
• Arbitrate between producers' and consumers' interests incentive' scope for regulatory failure
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Regulatory failure and nationalisation
Policy interventions Arguments against nationalisation
Interventions can be evaluated by considering their impact on price, profit, • Diseconomies of scale
efficiency, quality/performance, choice, jobs, the environment, R&D, • Lack of competition (higher prices, less choice)
investment etc. • Lack of incentives to minimise costs (X-inefficiency)
• Lack of supernormal profit (less innovation, less dynamic inefficiency?)
Regulatory failure • Risk of moral hazard (e.g. bail outs for banks post-GFC)
Key reasons why regulation may fail: • Taxpayers 'fund' any losses
• Regulatory capture: a form of government failure; it happens when a • Regulation of privatised industries may work better than full
government agency operates in favour of producers rather than nationalisation
consumers. Also known as a form of political capture or "cronyism." How marginal cost pricing works
• Asymmetric information/information gap: the industry may have more
information than its regulators and use this to reduce regulation Private monopoly charges P1
• Inadequate resources for the regulators and produces Q1 (at
• Insufficient power given to the regulators MC=MR); supernormal profit
shaded blue
Government intervention: nationalisation Nationalised monopoly sets
Nationalisation: the transfer of ownership of assets/businesses from the P=MC; price falls to P2 and
private sector to the state (public) sector. Reasons for output increases to Q2, but
nationalisation include: supernormal profits are
• Improve health & safety standards lower (pink shaded)
• National interest / strategic industries
• Improve equality (of opportunity)
Natural monopoly has falling LRAC
• “Too big to fail” i.e. collapse / failure would be too risky for the
and MC curves. If private, it charges
economy
P1 and produces Q1 (at MC=MR);
• To gain economies of scale (productive efficiency)
supernormal profit shaded blue
• To increase allocative efficiency (MC pricing)
Nationalised natural monopoly sets
• May take externalities into account in decision-making
P=MC; price falls to P2 and output
• Better industrial relations
increases to Q2, but minimum
Examples of industries that have been nationalised include public utilities
losses are shaded pink
such as water, energy, rail, though these are all currently privatised in the
UK.
EDEXCEL ECONOMICS (A) KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER: THEME 3 Privatisation
Privatisation Deregulation
Privatisation: the transfer of ownership of assets / businesses from the state
Deregulation of industries: reducing or removing government-imposed
(public) sector to the private sector. It can be ‘partial’ or full. Forms of
restrictions and regulations on businesses, with the aim of promoting
privatisation include:
competition, efficiency, and innovation
▪ Contracting out/outsourcing Advantages include increased competition, Disadvantages include: reduced safety and
▪ Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) lower prices and better services for quality as companies may prioritise
▪ Private Finance Initiative (PFI) consumers, improved allocative efficiency; profits; increased inequality, large
more innovation, improved dynamic companies may dominate the market and
▪ Competitive tendering efficiency; more economic growth, increased small businesses may struggle to compete;
capital investment , new jobs, improved long reduced consumer
Advantages of privatisation run aggregate supply protection; environmental costs, negative
• Profit motive can lead to improved efficiency and more focus on (LRAS); greater consumer choice, new externalities, such as pollution, and social
companies can enter the market and existing problems, such as job losses, as companies
consumer needs, which supports long-term growth companies can expand their offerings; may not be held accountable for their
• Can lead to greater competition and in turn innovation contestability can lead to an improvement in actions.
• Potential for lower prices, higher quality and more choice for consumers economic welfare
• Potential for less bureaucracy State ownership v private ownership
• Investment decisions are market-led
• Ownership of a business (state or private) is probably less significant than the extent
• May disperse share ownership; businesses have to deliver shareholder to which an industry is genuinely contestable
value • Quality of regulation is also important – a regulator can act as a surrogate consumer
• Short term boost to government finances • Distinguish between network (natural monopoly) and final mile service (can be more
• May create firms that can become global competitors competitive) e.g. water & telecoms
• Try not to assume that the private sector is always more efficient & innovative than
Disadvantages of privatisation the state
• Government can lose an important revenue source • Does more competition always lead to benefits for consumers? Are there examples of
• May lead to privatised natural monopolies which struggle to survive where less competition might be better?
• Risk of private monopolies exploiting consumers, and needing • Who gains and who loses from rising contestability?
(expensive and often ineffectual) regulation • Why might competition authorities not always “get it right”?
• May be a short-term focus because shareholders are focused on • What are the best methods that competition authorities can use to improve consumer
welfare in different markets?
dividends • What is the impact of privatisation on markets, consumer welfare, equality and the wider
• Essential public services should arguably not be run for profit economy?
• Externalities may be ignored in decision-making • What factors might a government consider when thinking about nationalising
• May be unclear whether objective is more competition or more profit an industry/firm?