LẬP TRÌNH HƯỚNG

ĐỐI TƯỢNG
GV: Đặng Ngọc Hoàng Thành
Email: thanhdnh@ueh.edu.vn
 Agenda

• What is Design Pattern

• History of Design Pattern
• Background
– Principles of OOP and OOAD
– What is Good Design
– Other Design Patterns and Principles (SOLID, GRASP)
– Anti Patterns
• Classification of different types of design patterns
• Creational Design Patterns
• Structural Design Patterns
• Behavioral Design Patterns
• Architecture Patterns (Brief)
• Takeaway
 OO Basic Tenants

• Abstraction
• Encapsulation
• Polymorphism
• Inheritance
• Loose/Low Coupling
– low dependency between classes;
– low impact in a class of changes in other classes
– high reuse potential
• High Cohesion
– measure of how strongly-related or focused the responsibilities of a single module
are
– If methods of a class tend to be similar in many aspects, then the class have high
cohesion
– In highly-cohesive system, code readability and the likelihood of reuse is increased,
while complexity is kept manageable
 OO Principles

• Encapsulate what varies

• Favor Composition over Inheritance
• Program to interface not implementation
• Strive for loosely coupled design between objects that interact

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Interface

• Like an abstract base class: any non-abstract type inheriting the

interface must implement all its members.
• Can not be instantiated directly.
• Can contain events, indexers, methods and properties.
• Contain no implementation of methods.
• Classes and structs can inherit from more than one interface.
• An interface can itself inherit from multiple interfaces.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Difference between Interface and abstract base class

• Abstract class can have non abstract methods, methods of an interface are effectively
abstract since they contain only the signature
• A class can implement any no of interfaces, but can subclass at most one abstract
class.
• An abstract class can declare and use variables, an interface can not.
• An abstract class can have methods whose access is public, internal, protected,
protected internal and private. Interface members implicitly have public access.
• An abstract class can declare constructor, an interface can not.
• An abstract class can have delegate, an interface can not.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Interface Example – Implicit Implementation

O
Does compile and work, but should be avoided

P
Object of type Interface should be used

Design Patterns (GoF)

Interface Example – Explicit Implementation

Since the Interface is implemented explicitly,

it does NOT even compile

Object of type Interface should be used – compiles

and works perfectly.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Interface Example – Business Logic Layer

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Generic Interface Example

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Generic Interface Example – making it perfect

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Class Relationship

• Dependency
• Association
• Aggregation
• Composition
• Generalization / Inheritance

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Dependency

CustomerUI CustomerManager CustomerRepository

Uses Uses
Attributes Attributes Attributes
Operations Operations Operations

Dependency - Weaker form of relationship which indicates that one class depends on another because
it uses it at some point of time.
Dependency exists if a class is a parameter variable or local variable of a method of another class.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Association, Aggregation and Composition

Student Course
Association – Loose form of relationship
Student Enrolls in Course (Student can enroll in multiple Course, and A
Attributes
1..* 1..*
Attributes Course can have multiple Student)
Operations Operations

Car Engine Aggregation - Whole part relationship. Part can

Car Has Eng ine exist without Whole.
Attributes
1 1
Attributes
(Engine can exist even if Car is destroyed, the
Operations Operations
same Engine could be used in a different Car)

Order OrderDetail Composition – Stronger form of whole part

Order Contains OrderDetail relationship. Part can not exist without Whole.
Attributes Attributes
1 1..* (OrderDetail can not exist if Order is deleted. If
Operations Operations
Order is deleted, OrderDetail also gets deleted)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Generalization / Inheritance

Person

Attributes
Operations

Employee Customer

Attributes Attributes
Operations Operations

FullTimeEmployee Contractor

Attributes Attributes
Operations Operations

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Design Principles (SOLID)

• SOLID Principles are principles of class design.

• SRP: Single Responsibility Principle
– An object should have only a single responsibility & all the responsibility should be entirely
encapsulated by the class.
– There should never be more than one reason for a class to change
• OCP: Open/Closed Principle
– Software entities should be open for extension, but closed for modification
• LSP: Liskov Substituion Principle
– Objects in a program should be replaceable with instances of their subtypes without altering the
correctness of that program
• ISP: Interface Segregation Principle
– many client specific interfaces are better than one general purpose interface
– once an interface has gotten too 'fat' split it into smaller and more specific interfaces so that any clients
of the interface will only know about the methods that pertain to them. No client should be forced to
depend on methods it does not use
• DIP: Dependency Inversion Principle
– Depend upon Abstractions. Do not depend upon concretions.
– Dependency Injection (DI) is one method of following this principle.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 GRASP Pattern

• Acronym for General Responsibility Assignment Software Patterns.

• Assigning responsibilities to classes is a critical aspect of object-oriented
design.
• Appropriate assignment of responsibilities to classes is the key to
successful design.
• There are fundamental principles in assigning responsibilities that
experienced designers apply.
• These principles are summarized in the GRASP patterns.
• Has nine core principles that object-oriented designers apply when
assigning responsibilities to classes and designing message interactions.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 GRASP Patterns (Cont’d)

• Expert.
• Creator.
• Controller.
• Low Coupling.
• High Cohesion.
• Polymorphism.
• Pure Fabrication.
• Indirection.
• Don’t Talk to Strangers.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Smell of good code

• What is good code?

• What is good design?
– Maintainable/Readable/Easily understandable
– Reusable
– Easier to change if requirement chages
– Performs better
– Modular/Componentized
– Takes care of all “ility” concerns
– …
– …
– …

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Smells within Class
• Comments
– Should only be used to clarify "why" not "what". Can quickly become verbose and reduce code clarity.
• Long Method
– The longer the method the harder it is to see what it’s doing.
• Long Parameter List
– Don't pass everything the method needs. Pass enough so that the method gets everything it needs.
• Duplicated Code
• Large Class
– A class that is trying to do too much can usually be identified by looking at how many instance variables
it has. When a class has too many instance variables, duplicated code cannot be far behind.
• Type Embedded in Name
– Avoid redundancy in naming. Prefer Schedule.Add(course) to Schedule.AddCourse(course)
• Uncommunicative Name
– Choose names that communicate intent (pick the best name for the time, change it later if necessary).
• Inconsistent Names
– Use names consistently.
• Dead Code
– A variable, parameter, method, code fragment, class is not used anywhere (perhaps other than in tests).
• Speculative Generality
– Don't over-generalize your code in an attempt to predict future needs.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Smell Between Classes

• Primitive Obsession: use small objects to represent data such as money (which combines quantity and currency) or a date
range object
• Data class: Classes with fields and getters and setters and nothing else (aka, Data Transfer Objects - DTO)
• Data Clumps: Clumps of data items that are always found together.
• Refused Bequest: Subclasses don't want or need everything they inherit. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) says that you
should be able to treat any subclass of a class as an example of that class.
• Inappropriate Intimacy: Two classes are overly enter twined.
• Lazy Class: Classes that aren't doing enough should be refactored away.
• Feature Envy: Often a method that seems more interested in a class other than the one it's actually in. In general, try to put
a method in the class that contains most of the data the method needs.
• Message Chains: this is the case in which a client has to use one object to get another, and then use that one to get to
another, etc. Any change to the intermediate relationships causes the client to have to change.
• Middle Man: When a class is delegating almost everything to another class, it may be time to refactor out the middle man.
• Divergent Change: Occurs when one class is commonly changed in different ways for different reasons. Any change to
handle a variation should change a single class.
• Shotgun Surgery: The opposite of Divergent Change. A change results in the need to make a lot of little changes in several
classes.
• Parallel Inheritance Hierarchies: Special case of Shotgun Surgery. Every time you make a subclass of a class, you also have
to make a subclass of another
 What is Design Pattern

• A pattern is a recurring solution to a standard problem, in a

context.
• General reusable solution to a commonly occurring problem in software
design.
• Extension of OOP and OOAD.
• Description or template for how to solve a problem that can be used in
many different situations.
• Mostly documented with the following sections
– Intent
– Motivation (Forces)
– Structure
– Participants
– Implementation
– Known Uses
– Related Patterns
Design Patterns (GoF)
 History of Design Patterns

• Patterns originated as an architectural concept by Christopher Alexander - 1977

• Kent Beck and Ward Cunningham applied patterns to programming and presented
their results at OOPSLA conference - 1987
• Gained popularity after the book Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-
Oriented Software was published by "Gang of Four" (Erich Gamma, Richard Helm,
Ralph Johnson & John Vlissides) – 1994
• First Pattern Languages of Programming Conference was held – 1994
• Following year, the Portland Pattern Repository was set up for documentation of
design patterns.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 List of Design Patterns - 23

• Creational Patterns • Behavioral Patterns

– Singleton – Chain of Responsibility
– Abstract Factory – Command
– Builder – Interpreter
– Factory Method – Iterator
– Prototype – Mediator
• Structural Patterns – Memento
– Adapter – Observer
– Bridge – State
– Composite – Strategy
– Decorator – Template Method
– Façade – Visitor
– Flyweight
– Proxy
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Singleton Builder
Factory Abstract
Method Factory

Adapter Proxy Template

Composite Command Method
Bridge Observer Strategy

Creational Design Patterns

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Singleton Pattern

• Used to implement the mathematical concept of a singleton, by restricting the

instantiation of a class to one object.
• Useful when exactly one object is needed to coordinate actions across the system.
• The concept is sometimes generalized to systems that operate more efficiently when
only one object exists, or that restrict the instantiation to a certain number of objects
(say, five).
• Common Uses:
– Abstract Factory, Builder and Prototype patterns can use Singletons in their implementation.
– Facade objects are often Singletons because only one Facade object is required.
– Singletons are often preferred to global variables because:
• They don't pollute the global name space (or, in languages with namespaces, their containing
namespace) with unnecessary variables.
• They permit lazy allocation and initialization, whereas global variables in many languages will always
consume resources.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Singleton Class Diagram

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Singleton in .NET BCL

• HttpContext class in ASP.NET implements Singleton

– The class can not be instantiated using new. The current instance of HttpContext could be
retrieved using HttpContext.Current property.
– HttpContext.Current represents current ASP.NET Request context and this context is
available throughout the course of an ASP.NET request starting with the
HttpApplication.BeginRequest pipeline event all the way through
HttpApplication.EndRequest
• OperationContext class in WCF (System.ServiceModel)
– Provides access the current operation execution environment.
– Used to access callback channels in duplex services, to store extra state data across portions
of the operations, and to access incoming message headers and properties as well as add
outgoing message headers and properties.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implement Singleton in .NET (GoF way)

• Advantages:
– Because the instance is created inside the Instance property method, the class can exercise
additional functionality.
– The instantiation is not performed until an object asks for an instance; this approach is referred
to as lazy instantiation. Lazy instantiation avoids instantiating unnecessary singletons when the
application starts.
• Disadvantages:
– Not safe for multithreaded environments. If separate threads of execution enter the Instance
property method at the same time, more that one instance of the Singleton object may be
created.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Thread Safe Singleton in .NET (using Static)

• In this strategy, the instance is created the first time any member of the
class is referenced. CLR takes care of the variable initialization. The class is
marked sealed to prevent derivation, which could add instances.
• In addition, the variable is marked readonly, which means that it can be
assigned only during static initialization (which is shown here) or in a
class constructor.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Multithreaded Singleton in .NET

• In some cases we cannot rely on the CLR to ensure thread safety,

as in the Static Initialization example – should use specific
language capabilities to ensure that only one instance of the
object is created in the presence of multiple threads.
• One of the more common solutions is to use the Double-Check
Locking idiom to keep separate threads from creating new
instances of the singleton at the same time.
• Ensures only one instance is created and only when the instance is
needed. Variable is declared volatile to ensure that assignment to
instance variable completes before instance variable can be
accessed.
• Lastly, it uses a syncRoot instance to lock on, rather than
locking on the type itself, to avoid deadlocks.
• Double-check locking approach solves thread concurrency
problems while avoiding an exclusive lock in every call to the
Instance property method. Also allows you to delay
instantiation until the object is first accessed.

• In practice, an application rarely requires this type of implementation. In most cases, the static
initialization approach is sufficient.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Factory Method

• Define an interface for creating an object, but let subclasses decide which class to
instantiate.
• Factory Method lets a class defer instantiation to subclasses.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Factory Method in .NET BCL Collection

GetEnumerator() returns
an specific enumerator
type based on the collection
class

Design Patterns (GoF)

Factory Method in .NET BCL Collection
How to implement Factory Method in .NET
 Abstract Factory Pattern

• Provides a way to encapsulate a group of individual factories that have a common

theme.
• In normal usage, the client software creates a concrete implementation of the abstract
factory and then uses the generic interfaces to create the concrete objects that are
part of the theme.
• Client does not know (or care) which concrete objects it gets from each of these
internal factories since it uses only the generic interfaces of their products. It separates
details of implementation of a set of objects from their general usage.

Design Patterns (GoF)

Factory in .NET: DbProviderFactory
 Factory in .NET: DbProviderFactory

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Factory in .NET: DbProviderFactory

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implement Factory in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Configuration based Abstract Factory

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder Pattern

• Separate construction of a complex object from its representation so that the same
construction process can create different representations.
• Parse a complex representation, create one of several targets.
• Difference Between Builder and Factory
– Builder focuses on constructing a complex object step by step. Abstract Factory emphasizes
a family of product objects - simple or complex.
– Builder returns the product as a final step, but as far as the Abstract Factory is concerned,
the product gets returned immediately.
• Builder often builds a Composite.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder Design Pattern

• Builder focuses on constructing a complex object step by step. Abstract Factory

emphasizes a family of product objects (either simple or complex). Builder returns the
product as a final step, but as far as the Abstract Factory is concerned, the product
gets returned immediately.
• Builder often builds a Composite.
• Often, designs start out using Factory Method (less complicated, more customizable,
subclasses proliferate) and evolve toward Abstract Factory, Prototype, or Builder (more
flexible, more complex).
• Sometimes creational patterns are complementary: Builder can use one of the other
patterns to implement which components are built. Abstract Factory, Builder, and
Prototype can use Singleton in their implementations.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder Pattern in .NET BCL

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder: SqlConnectionStringBuilder in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder: StringBuilder & UriBuilder in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implement Builder Pattern in .NET (non Generic)
Implement Builder Pattern in .NET (Generic)
 Implement Builder Pattern in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Builder Pattern in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Prototype Design Pattern

• Specify the kinds of objects to create using a prototypical instance, and create new
objects by copying this prototype.
• Co-opt one instance of a class for use as a breeder of all future instances.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Prototype in .NET BCL

• Prototype is achieved in .NET BCL in two ways –

– Using Object.MemberwiseClone protected method
• Performs Shallow Copy of members
• Shallow Copy is provided out-of the box by .NET BCL
– Using ICloneable BCL interface
• Need to be implemented by classes implementing ICloneable
• Provides a method called Clone
• Should provide Deep Copy of members

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Deep Copy vs. Shallow Copy

Before

originalEmployee originalAddress
:Employee :Address
After
newEmployee newEmployee newAddress
:Employee :Employee :Address

Shallow Copy Deep Copy

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implement Prototype in .NET

Non Generic version

Better Generic version
 Prototype (Shallow Copy)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Prototype (Deep Copy)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 DI Example - Unity

• Lightweight, extensible dependency injection container

• Supports interception, constructor injection, property injection, and method call
injection
• Part of MS Enterprise Library Application Block

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Unity Example

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Unity Example

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Singleton Builder
Factory Abstract
Method Factory

Adapter Proxy Template

Composite Command Method
Bridge Observer Strategy

Structural Design Patterns

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Adapter Design Pattern

• Adapter pattern (also called wrapper pattern or wrapper) translates one interface for a
class into a compatible interface.
• Allows classes to work together that normally could not because of incompatible
interfaces, by providing its interface to clients while using the original interface.
• The adapter translates calls to its interface into calls to original interface. Amount of
code necessary to do this is typically small.
• The adapter is also responsible for transforming data into appropriate forms.
• Often used while working with existing API/code base and while adapting code for
which no source is not available.
• Could be of two types
– Object Adapter
– Class Adapter

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Adapter Class Diagram

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Adapter Pattern in ADO.NET

• Data Adapters adapts data from different source (SQL Server, Oracle, ODBC, OLE DB)
to dataset which is data-source unaware
• Different Data Adapter classes are used
– SqlDataAdapter
– OdbcDataAdapter
– OleDbDataAdapter

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Adapter Pattern in ADO.NET – Cont’d

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implement Adapter Pattern in .NET

Object Adapter

66
 Implement Adapter Pattern in .NET

Class Adapter
 Adapter for extracting data

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Composite Design Pattern

• Describes that a group of objects are to be treated in the same way as a

single instance of an object. Intent is to "compose" objects into tree
structures to represent part-whole hierarchies.
• Implementing the composite pattern lets clients treat individual objects
and compositions uniformly
• Compose objects into tree structures to represent whole-part
hierarchies. Composite lets clients treat individual objects and
compositions of objects uniformly.
• Recursive Composition
• “Directories contain entries, each of which could be a directory.”
• 1-to-many “has a” up the “is a” hierarchy

Design Patterns (GoF)

Composite Pattern Class Diagram

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implement Composite in .NET
Implement Composite in .NET (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

Composite Pattern in .NET – Org Tree
Composite Pattern in .NET – Org Tree
 Decorator Pattern

• Attach additional responsibilities to an object dynamically. Decorators provide a

flexible alternative to subclassing for extending functionality.
• Client-specified embellishment of a core object by recursively wrapping it.
• Wrapping a gift, putting it in a box, and wrapping the box J
• You want to add behavior or state to individual objects at run-time. Inheritance
is not feasible because it is static and applies to an entire class.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Decorator in .NET BCL - System.IO

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Decorator in WPF

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Decorator in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Decorator in .NET (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implementing Decorator in .NET (Cont’d)
 Bridge

• Decouple an abstraction from its implementation so that the two can vary
independently.
• Based on the principle “Prefer Composition (and Association, Aggregation) over
Inheritance”
• Publish interface in an inheritance hierarchy, and bury implementation in its own
inheritance hierarchy
• Beyond encapsulation, to insulation

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Bridge Pattern – Thread Scheduler

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Bridge Pattern – Thread Scheduler (Cont’d)

• A new type of Platform (JVM) is added.

• What happens if another type of scheduler is added and No of Platforms increase to four from
three
• No of classes increases exponentially - Inheritance Hierarchy become complex, bloated and
difficult to maintain.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Bridge Example

• Decompose the component's interface and implementation into orthogonal class hierarchies.
• Abstract/Interface class contains a pointer to abstract implementation class. This pointer is initialized with an
instance of a concrete implementation class, but all subsequent interaction from the interface class to the
implementation class is limited to the abstraction maintained in the implementation base class.
• Client interacts with interface class - "delegates" all requests to implementation class.
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Bridge

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Proxy Design Pattern

• Provide a surrogate or placeholder for another object to control access to it.

• Use an extra level of indirection to support distributed, controlled, or
intelligent access.
• Add a wrapper and delegation to protect the real component from undue complexity.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Proxy in .NET (WCF)

Contract

Contract Implementation

Host

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Proxy in .NET (WCF) – Cont’d

Proxy

Client

Cannot have two operations in the same contract with the same name, methods Add and Add in type
ConsoleApplication1.ICalculatorService violate this rule. You can change the name of one of the operations by
changing the method name or by using the Name property of OperationContractAttribute.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Solution

Design Patterns (GoF)

 How to implement Proxy in .NET

Client

Online

Offline

Not Public (Protected/Private)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Singleton Builder
Factory Abstract
Method Factory

Adapter Proxy Template

Composite Command Method
Bridge Observer Strategy

Behavioral Design Patterns

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Command Design Pattern

• Encapsulate a request as an object, thereby letting you parameterize clients with

different requests, queue or log requests, and support undoable operations.
• Design Pattern in which an object is used to represent and encapsulate all infos
needed to call a method later - info include method name, object that owns the
method and values of method parameters.
• Promote “invocation of a method on an object” to full object status
• An object-oriented callback

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Observer Design Pattern

• Define a one-to-many dependency between objects so that when one object changes
state, all its dependents are notified and updated automatically.
• Encapsulate the core (or common or engine) components in a Subject abstraction, and
the variable (or optional or user interface) components in an Observer hierarchy.
• The “View” part of Model-View-Controller.

View Model

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Observer design pattern in .NET

• delegates and events provides a powerful means of implementing the

Observer pattern.
• As delegates and events are first class members of CLR, the foundation
of this pattern is incorporated into core of .NET Framework.
• FCL makes extensive use of Observer pattern throughout its structure.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implement an Event

3. Determine when to raise the event in the class. Call

OnEventName to raise the event.

1.Define a public event member in class. Set the type of event

member to System.EventHandler delegate.

2.Provide a protected method in the class that raises the event.

Name the method OnEventName. Raise the event within the
method

Client can register for the events they are

interested.

Client can un-register for the events they have

already registered.

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implement an Event with Event specific data
 IObserver<T> and IObservable<T> in .NET 4

• .NET 4.0 introduces two new interfaces in BCL that implements Observer pattern - are
part of larger Reactive/Rx framework
• The IObserver<T> and IObservable<T> interfaces provide a generalized mechanism
for push-based notification
– IObservable<T> interface represents the class that sends notifications (the provider)
– IObserver<T> interface represents the class that receives them (the observer)

Push
IObserver IObservable

View Model

Design Patterns (GoF)

 IObserver<T> and IObservable<T>

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method Pattern

• Define the skeleton of an algorithm in an operation, deferring some steps to client

subclasses. Template Method lets subclasses redefine certain steps of an algorithm
without changing algorithm’s structure.
• Base class declares algorithm ‘placeholders’, and derived classes implement
the placeholders.
• Has similarity with Strategy pattern.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method Pattern in .NET BCL (Sorting)

Since String class implements IComparable Array.Sort (and Sort method of all collection classes including
Generic and non-Generic collection classes) uses string's IComparable implementation to sort the array
(String.CompareTo is used).

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method Pattern in .NET BCL (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method in .NET BCL – IComparable

Employee class now implements IComparable interface which has a

single method – int CompareTo(object)

Design Patterns (GoF)

Template Method in .NET BCL – IComparable<T>

Employee class implements two interface –

•IComparable (non Generic) which has a single method – int
CompareTo(object)
•IComparable<T> (Generic) which has another overload of
CompareTo – int CompareTo(T)

• Generic version of CompareTo is used by CLR if both non

generic and generic versions are present.
• Always prefer implementing IComparable<T> for better
performance (no boxing, unboxing overhead)
 Template Method in .NET BCL - IComparer

Design Patterns (GoF)

Template Method in .NET BCL - IComparer<T>

•Generic version of IComparer is used

by CLR if both non Generic and
Generic version is present.
•Always prefer implementing
IComparer <T> for better performance
(no boxing, unboxing overhead)

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implement Template Method Pattern in .NET
 Implement Template Method Pattern in .NET (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method Pattern – Example 2

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method Pattern – Example 2

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Alternate Template Method Implementation (using Interface)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Strategy Design Pattern

• Strategy pattern (also known as the policy pattern) is a design pattern, whereby
algorithms can be selected at runtime.
• Intended to provide a means to define a family of algorithms, encapsulate each one as
an object, and make them interchangeable.
• The strategy pattern lets the algorithms vary independently from clients that use
them.
• For example, while sorting has many algorithm (like binary sort, quick sort), the sorting
algorithm is independent of how to objects/elements are compared. So the sorting
algorithm can vary/change independent of compare algorithm.

Design Patterns (GoF)

Before using Strategy
 After Refactoring with Strategy

Design Patterns (GoF)

 After Refactoring with Strategy

Design Patterns (GoF)

 After Refactoring with Strategy (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Template Method in ASP.NET Controls

• Different options for custom controls

– For simple controls used in single project, user control is best choice.
– Control used in several Web applications or requires more functionality, a custom server
control may be a better fit. There are two general types:
• Controls that combine the functionality of several existing controls (called composite controls),
• Controls with a unique visual representation.
• Process for creating both of these types is very similar. For composite controls, create a new class
that inherits from control base classes (like Control or WebControl) and then override the
CreateChildControls method. In this method add controls whose functionality you are combining to
the collection of child controls, called Controls.
• For other custom controls, you override Render instead and use the HtmlTextWriter parameter to
output the HTML for your control directly.
• Regardless of which style of custom control you choose, you don't have to write any code to handle
the functionality that's common to all controls, like loading and saving ViewState at the right time,
allowing PostBack events to be handled, and making sure the control lifecycle events are raised in
the correct order. The main algorithm for how a control should be loaded, rendered, and unloaded
is contained in the control base class.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Difference between Template and Strategy

• Strategy is used to allow callers to vary an entire algorithm, like how to compare two
objects, while Template Method is used to vary steps in an algorithm.
• Because of this, Strategy is more coarsely grained.
• There can be vast differences between different client implementations, while with
Template Method the algorithm remains fundamentally the same.
• Strategy uses delegation while Template Method uses inheritance. In the sorting
example of Strategy, the comparison algorithm is delegated to the IComparer
parameter, but with custom controls you subclass the base and override methods to
make changes. Both, however, let you easily alter processes to fit your specific needs.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 AntiPatterns

• Pattern that may be commonly used but is ineffective and/or counterproductive in

practice.
• The term was coined in 1995 by Andrew Koenig inspired by Gang of Four's book
Design Patterns,
• The term was widely popularized three years later by the book AntiPatterns

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Organizational AntiPatterns

• Analysis paralysis: Devoting disproportionate effort to the analysis phase of a project

• Cash cow: A profitable legacy product that often leads to complacency about new products
• Design by committee: The result of having many contributors to a design, but no unifying vision
• Moral hazard: Insulating a decision-maker from the consequences of his or her decision.
• Stovepipe or Silos: A structure that supports mostly up-down flow of data but inhibits cross
organizational communication
• Vendor lock-in: Making a system excessively dependent on an externally supplied component

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Software Design AntiPatterns

• Abstraction inversion: Not exposing implemented functionality required by users, so that they
re-implement it using higher level functions
• Ambiguous viewpoint: Presenting a model (usually Object-oriented analysis and design (OOAD))
without specifying its viewpoint
• Big ball of mud: A system with no recognizable structure
• Database-as-IPC: Using database as message queue for interprocess communication where a
more lightweight mechanism would be suitable
• Gold plating: Continuing to work on a task or project well past the point at which extra effort is
adding value
• Inner-platform effect: A system so customizable as to become a poor replica of the software
development platform
• Input kludge: Failing to specify and implement the handling of possibly invalid input
• Interface bloat: Making an interface so powerful that it is extremely difficult to implement
• Magic pushbutton: Coding implementation logic directly within interface code, without using
abstraction.
• Race hazard: Failing to see the consequence of different orders of events
• Stovepipe system: A barely maintainable assemblage of ill-related components

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Object Oriented Design AntiPattern

• Anemic Domain Model: Use of domain model without business logic. The domain model's objects
cannot guarantee their correctness at any moment, because their validation logic is placed
somewhere outside (most likely in multiple places).
• BaseBean: Inheriting functionality from a utility class rather than delegating to it
• Call super: Requiring subclasses to call a superclass's overridden method
• Circle-ellipse problem: Subtyping variable-types on the basis of value-subtypes
• Circular dependency: Introducing unnecessary direct or indirect mutual dependencies between
objects or software modules
• Constant interface: Using interfaces to define constants
• God object: Concentrating too many functions in a single part of design (class)
• Object cesspool: Reusing objects whose state does not conform to the (possibly implicit) contract for
re-use
• Object orgy: Failing to properly encapsulate objects permitting unrestricted access to their internals
• Poltergeists: Objects whose sole purpose is to pass information to another object
• Sequential coupling: A class that requires its methods to be called in a particular order
• Yo-yo problem: A structure (e.g., of inheritance) that is hard to understand due to excessive
fragmentation
• Dependency hell: Problems with versions of required products
• DLL hell: Inadequate management of dynamic-link libraries (DLLs), specifically on Microsoft Windows

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Programming AntiPattern

• Accidental complexity: Introducing unnecessary complexity into a solution

• Action at distance: Unexpected interaction between widely separated parts of system
• Blind faith: Lack of checking of correctness of a bug fix or result of a subroutine
• Boat anchor: Retaining a part of a system that no longer has any use
• Busy spin: Consuming CPU while waiting for something to happen, usually by repeated checking instead of
messaging
• Caching failure: Forgetting to reset an error flag when an error has been corrected
• Cargo cult programming: Using patterns and methods without understanding why
• Coding by exception: Adding new code to handle each special case as it is recognized
• Error hiding: Catching an error message before it can be shown to the user and either showing nothing or
showing a meaningless message
• Hard code: Embedding assumptions about environment of a system in its implementation
• Lava flow: Retaining undesirable (redundant or low-quality) code because removing it is too expensive or has
unpredictable consequences
• Loop-switch sequence: Encoding a set of sequential steps using a switch within a loop statement
• Magic numbers: Including unexplained numbers in algorithms
• Magic strings: Including literal strings in code, for comparisons, as event types etc.
• Soft code: Storing business logic in configuration files rather than source code[7]
• Spaghetti code: Programs whose structure is barely comprehensible, especially because of misuse of code
structures

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Methodological AntiPatterns

• Copy and paste programming: Copying (and modifying) existing code rather than creating
generic solutions
• Golden hammer: Assuming that a favorite solution is universally applicable
• Improbability factor: Assuming that it is improbable that a known error will occur
• Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: The tendency towards reinventing the wheel (Failing to
adopt an existing, adequate solution)
•• Premature optimization: Coding early-on for perceived efficiency, sacrificing good design,
maintainability, and sometimes even real-world efficiency
Programming by permutation (or "programming by accident"): Trying to approach a solution by
successively modifying the code to see if it works
• Reinventing the wheel: Failing to adopt an existing, adequate solution
• Reinventing the square wheel: Failing to adopt an existing solution and instead adopting a
custom solution which performs much worse than the existing one.
• Silver bullet: Assuming that a favorite technical solution can solve a larger process or problem
• Tester Driven Development: Software projects in which new requirements are specified in bug
reports

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Resources

• Discover the Design Patterns You're Already Using in the .NET Framework
• Exploring the Observer Design Pattern
• Observer Design Pattern in .NET 4
• AntiPattern
• AntiPattern: Wikipedia

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Facade

• Facade or Façade is generally one side of the exterior of a building, especially the
front, but also sometimes the sides and rear.
• The word comes from the French language, literally meaning "frontage" or "face".

Carlo Maderno's monumental façade of Saint Peter's basilica in Vatican City

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Façade Pattern

• A facade is an object that provides a simplified interface to a larger body of code, such
as a class library. A facade can:
– Make a software library easier to use, understand and test, since the facade has convenient
methods for common tasks
– Make code that uses the library more readable, for the same reason
– Reduce dependencies of outside code on the inner workings of a library, since most code
uses the facade, thus allowing more flexibility in developing the system
– Wrap a poorly-designed collection of APIs with a single well-designed API

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Façade in .NET Visual Basic - My namespace

• My namespace
– Application: Gets access to Application object
– Computer: Contains info about computer like Audio, Clock Clipboard, File
System, Registry, Keyboard, Mouse, Screen, Network, Ports etc
– Forms: Provides access to all Forms in a Win Forms App
– Settings: Provides access to Settings collection
– User: Points to the current logged in user (Principal, Role)
– WebService: Provides access to all Web Services referenced

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Façade in .NET

Sub System A

Sub System B

Sub System C

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Façade in .NET (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Iterator in .NET: Enumerator

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Mediator class diagram

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Mediator

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Mediator

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Mediator

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Flyweight in .NET BCL

• String Interning in .NET (Java also does the same)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Flyweight in .NET BCL (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF)

 State Design Pattern

• Supports an object that has several states

• The state an object determines the behavior of several methods. Without State
pattern could be implemeted with if else / swicth case statements in each method
• Better solution: state pattern
• Have a reference to a state object
– Normally, state object doesn’t contain any fields
– Change state: change state object
– Methods delegate to state object

Design Patterns (GoF)

Without State Pattern
 Implementing State Pattern in .NET

• Different classes representing different states of the object (CD Player)

• Each State specific class implements an interface (ICDPlayerStateChange)
•Each State specific class contains the code for the state change. The object (CDPlayer) simply delegates the call
to these state specific classes.
• State of the object (CD Player) is managed by new State specific classes.

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing State Pattern in .NET (Cont’d)

Design Patterns (GoF) 140

 Implementing State Pattern in .NET (Cont’d)

Closed

[Press]

SwitchedOff

[Press]
[Press]

Opened

[Press]

Playing
Design Patterns (GoF)
 Chain of Responsibility

• Decouples the sender of the request to the receiver. The only link between sender and
the receiver is the request which is sent. Based on the request data sent, the receiver is
picked. This is called “data-driven”.
• Avoid coupling the sender of a request to its receiver by giving more than one object a
chance to handle the request. Chain the receiving objects and pass the request along
the chain until an object handles it.
• Launch-and-leave requests with a single processing pipeline that contains many
possible handlers.
• Promotes the idea of loose coupling.

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implementing Chain of Resp. in .NET

Handler abstract base class

Concrete Handler classes

Design Patterns (GoF)

Implementing Chain of Resp. in .NET
 Implementing Chain of Resp. in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Chain of Resp. in .NET

Design Patterns (GoF)

 Implementing Chain of Resp. in .NET

•ApprovalManager class acts like a Façade. You may not use

this class - you can directly instantiate SeniorManager class
from client.
•The advantage of using a Façade is any change in hierarchy
would be encapsulated from the client, as it would be
handled in ApprovalManager class.

Design Patterns (GoF)