[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views5 pages

Complaint

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

Republic of the Philippines

METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT


National Capital Judicial Region
Branch 1
City of Manila

MICHAEL MAKATA
Plaintiff
CIVIL CASE NO. 14324
-versus- For: Collection of a Sum of
Money with Damages
DANIEL DATINGGAWA and
HUNGRY CHAN RESTAURANT
(HCR)

Defendant
X------------------------------------------------------X

COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF, thru the undersigned Counsel, unto this Honorable


Court, respectfully alleges:

1. That Plaintiff Michael Makata is of legal age, Filipino,


single, a resident of No. 153 Rose Drive, Fairview Park, Fairview,
Quezon City, Philippines;

2. That Defendant, Daniel Datinggawa, is likewise of legal


age, Filipino, single, owner of Hungry Chan Restaurant (HCR) with
address at 31-M Maharlika Street, The Gold Bar Building, Tondo,
Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines, where summons and court
processes may be served;

3. That Defendant, Hungry Chan Restaurant (hereinafter


“HCR”) is a domestic corporation duly recognized and existing under
Philippine laws with address at 31-M Maharlika Street, The Gold Bar
Building, Tondo, Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines per last General
Information Sheet filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
where summons and court processes may also be served;

Page 1 of 5
4. That on February 7, 2021, the Defendant, Daniel,
borrowed a sum of money from the Plaintiff amounting to Three
Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Pesos (PhP 315,000.00), and
made an undertaking that a Promissory Note in favor of Plaintiff shall
be executed to secure the former's creditor position as owner of HCR,
and as a security of the loan. This promissory note is to be the joint
obligation of HCR and the Defendant;

5. That in recognition of Defendant's HCR obligation in favor


of the Plaintiff, the former executed a Promissory Note in favor of the
Plaintiff on February 7, 2021, a copy of the promissory note is hereto
attached as Annex "A";

6. That as shown in the promissory note, the obligation was


to become due and demandable one year from its execution and said
obligation is also to be interest-bearing at 25% per annum;

7. That after the lapse of one year from its execution, no


payment was made to the Plaintiff;

8. That Plaintiff sent separate letters to the Defendants


containing the demand for the payment of its obligation, copies of
which are hereto attached as Annex "B";

9. That notwithstanding Plaintiff's repeated demands, both


written and verbal, Defendants failed, neglected and refused to fulfill
its obligations without just and valid grounds to the continued
damage and prejudice of plaintiff, leaving no other recourse but to
litigate and file this action;

10. That Defendants have, as of this date, defaulted in the


payment of an aggregate amount of Four Hundred Seventy Two
Thousand Five Hundred (PhP 472,500.00);

11. That the Plaintiff in order to enforce his rights and


interests, has sought the services of a legal counsel with attorney's
fees amounting to Fifty Thousand Pesos (PhP 50,000.00) and an
appearance fee of Five Thousand Pesos (PhP 5,000.00) per
hearing;

12. That the plaintiff has paid for litigation expenses


amounting already to Eighty Five Thousand Pesos (PhP
85,000.00);

13. That by reason of defendant's unjustified acts as well


as bad faith and intentional refusal to pay his overdue obligation,
Plaintiff is entitled to the award of moral damages in the amount of
Page 2 of 5
Fifty Thousand (PhP 50,000.00);

14. That by reason of defendant's violation and disregard


of Plaintiff's rights, the award of exemplary damages in the amount
of Fifty Thousand (PhP 50,000.00) is likewise warrant to serve as
a deterrent to the commission by the defendants and to others
similarly-minded of similar acts in the future.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

15. Plaintiff intends to present the following documentary


exhibits to prove his claim:

A. Promissory Note dated February 7, 2021;


B. Final Demand Letter dated February 16, 2022;
C. Contract for Legal Services;
D. Official Receipt.

WITNESSES

16. Plaintiff intends to present the following witnesses to his


cause:

A. Michael D. Makata (Plaintiff) – to testify on the fact of


the loan, the signing of the promissory note, the amount
currently due, and the non-payment of the amount by
the defendant;
B. Herbert H. Osgado of Fairview, Quezon City – to testify
on the signing of the promissory note dated February 7,
2021;
C. Teresa T. Estigo of Fairview, Quezon City – to
corroborate the testimony of the plaintiff and witness
Herbert H. Osgado;

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is most


respectfully prayed of this Honorable Court that, after due hearing,
judgment be rendered against the defendant ordering the latter to
pay the Plaintiff as follows:

1. The amount of THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN


THOUSAND PESOS (P315,000.00) representing the unpaid principal
obligation as evidenced by the Promissory Note duly executed dated
February 7, 2021;
Page 3 of 5
2. The amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (P157,500.00) representing the
interest of 25% per annum as evidenced also by the Promissory Note
duly executed dated February 7, 2021;

3. The amount of FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS


(P50,000.00) as and by way of moral damages;

4. The amount of FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS


(P50,000.00) as and by way of exemplary damages;

5. Litigation Expenses amounting to EIGHTY FIVE


THOUSAND PESOS (P85,000.00)

Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for.

Manila, December 11, 2023

EFREN JOSEPH PADUA


Counsel for the Plaintiff
Padua Law Office, RM 1, 2nd flr. Amigable Bldg.,
Rose Lane, Fairview, Quezon City
Roll of Attorneys No. 134236
IBP No. 02353, 01/ 5/2019, Quezon City
PTR No. 321654, 01/7/2019, Quezon City
MCLE Compliance No. V-65432, 01/15/2019
Mobile No. +639164060994
ejpadualaw@gmail.com

Page 4 of 5
VERIFICATION/CERTIFICATION
OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING

I, MICHAEL MAKATA, FILIPINO, a resident of No. 153 Rose


Drive, Fairview Park, Fairview, Quezon City, Philippines after having
been duly sworn in accordance with law depose and say:

1. That I am the plaintiff in the above-entitled case;

2. That I caused the preparation of the foregoing Complaint


and I have read the allegations therein and certify that the same are
true and correct of my own personal knowledge;

3. That I further certify that I have not commenced any


other action involving the same issues before the Supreme Court,
Court of Appeals or any division thereof or any tribunal or agency;
and to the best of my knowledge no such action is pending before
the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals or any division thereof or any
tribunal or agency;

4. That in the event that any action involving the same


should be made known, I hereby bind myself to report the same
within five (5) days from knowledge thereof to this Honorable Court.

WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand this 11th day of


December, 2023 at Fairview, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.

MICHAEL MAKATA
Plaintiff

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 11th day of


December, 2023 at Fairview, Quezon City, Philippines affiant having
exhibited to me his Driver's License with No. 14307352 issued on 01-
08-19 at Quezon City.

Doc. No. 3 ; EFREN JOSEPH PADUA


Page No. 4 ; Padua Law Office, RM 201, Amigable Bldg.,
Rose Lane, Fairview, Quezon City, Philippines
Book No. 36 ; Roll of Attorneys No. 134236
IBP No. 02353, 01/ 5/2019, Quezon City
Series of 2023. PTR No. 321654, 01/7/2019, Quezon City
MCLE Compliance No. V-65432, 01/15/2019
Mobile No. +639164060994
ejpadualaw@gmail.com

Page 5 of 5

You might also like