Chapter One - Understanding The Important of Development
Chapter One - Understanding The Important of Development
The failure of the First Development Decade to bring about qualitative changes in the human
welfare and improve the levels of living of the masses of people brought about a rethinking of
the concept of development. Notable scholars provided the initiatives and influence to redefine
what development is. Among those who are considered to have a profound influence in
redefining development are Seers, Dag Hammarskjold Foundation and Todaro whose ideas on
development emphasized social dimensions and espoused the centrality of man not only as
recipient but as active participant in development.
Dudley Seers (1969) averred that “development” is the “realization of the potential of human
personality” which necessitates substantial improvements in eradicating: poverty,
unemployment, and inequality. Based on this point of view development must somehow be able
to justify that there is dramatic decline in poverty incidents, should be able to provide adequate
opportunities for productive employment and that unemployment rates are substantially down
historical levels, and that there isn’t much disparity between levels of income of the rich and the
poor. Apparently, Seers definition is a complete departure from the classical-economic growth
view of development, which only points to the centrality of growth in income of a country.
The model or perspective advanced by Seers can be lamped into what Khan characterized as
“Basic Needs Model” of development as it puts forward the significance of developing human
capital through provision of basic needs to address poverty, unemployment and inequality.
Michael Todaro (1977), on the other hand, stressed that development must be regarded as
“multi-dimensional process involving major changes in social structures, popular attitudes,
1|Page
2|Page
institutions, as well as the acceleration of economic growth, the reduction of inequality, and the
eradication of absolute poverty.” He further explained that development must represent the
whole gamut of change by which the entire social system, tuned to the diverse basic needs and
desires of individuals and social groups within that system, moves away from a condition greatly
perceived to be unsatisfactory toward a situation or condition of life regarded as materially and
spiritually “better”. Todaro emphasized the “good life” that individuals and societies ought to
pursue as based on three (3) core values: 1) life sustenance, 2) self-esteem, and 3) freedom from
servitude.
Todaro here, thus provide a normative philosophical and humanistic dimension to development
but taking on a much holistic integrative perspective by emphasizing the need for accelerated
economic growth along with social and institutional component. By this, he points out that the
problem of underdevelopment and inequality is largely structural in nature and proliferated by
existing institutions in society the promotes rather than prevents inequality, inadequate
redistribution of wealth, blocks access to basic services, and are the very cause of deprivation
thereby impeding attainment of development objectives on top of efforts and interventions being
done. Thus, he defines development as a holistic cultural, social and institutional transformations
(multi-dimensional) largely brought about by substantial changes in existing institutions into
ones that takes cognizance of the importance of the human person and thereby provides adequate
services to support life-sustaining, basic human needs, promotes self-respect and dignity thru the
entire society’s and the government’s respect of rights and liberties of individuals and thereby
changing the attitudes and culture of a mass of people, rendering them free and capable to live
productive meaningful lives or what he refers to as the “good life”.
The same theme of improved quality of life is carried by the Dag Hammarskjold Foundation’s
(DHF) “Another Development”. ‘Another Development’ ‘is people-centered, geared to the
satisfaction of basic human needs for all – both material and, in its broadest sense, political; it is
self-reliant, endogenous, ecologically sound and based on democratic, political, social and
economic transformations which alone will make possible the attainment of the other goals.
Another development also encompasses the search for societies overcoming discrimination of
any kind – be they social, sexual, ethnic or economic. It is a participatory and pluralistic process.
The definition provides a wider more integrative and holistic meaning than earlier proposed but
on the other hand build from these earlier conception especially on the social and humanistic
component of development thereby putting the human person and the human condition as the
primary gauge of whether development is attained or not. It departs from the classical and
“diffusionist” definition which supports massive importation of technology capital and cultural
elements from developed to non-developed countries even as “Another Development” gives
importance to “self-reliant” or “endogenous” change—that is, harnessing the core of the
country’s rich cultural heritage, resources, and human energies and creativity. Most importantly,
this definition of development mainstreams the importance of the environment (which is not
present in previous definitions) as it advocates for sustainable utilization of existing natural
2|Page
3|Page
resources such that society does not transgress the regenerative limits or “carrying capacity” of
the environment. The definition of development advanced by DHF builds from Todaro’s
institutional perspective by grounding development on democratic, political and social
transformation. Meaning, it also advocates substantial change and restructuring the way existing
institutions operate to serve developmental aims and thus also calls for dramatic change in
popular attitudes guided by democratic principles of participation and political and social
transformations based on human rights. These various elements of the definitions apparently
flows thru current conceptions of rights-based approach to development as well as sustainable
human development and also informed the various “models” of development that have emerged
in last couple of decades.
We may conclude that development is both a physical reality and a state of mind in which
society has, through some combination of social, economic, and institutional processes, secured
the means for obtaining a better life. Whatever the specific components of this better life,
development in all societies must have at least the following three objectives and the reaming:
To increase the availability and widen the distribution of basic life-sustaining goods such as
food, shelter, clothing, and other services to members of the society. Satisfying the basic
needs of human being should be the core objectives of development process;
To raise levels of living, including, in addition to higher incomes, the provision of more jobs,
better education, and greater attention to cultural and human values, all of which will serve
not only to enhance material wellbeing but also to generate greater individual and national
self-esteem.
3|Page
4|Page
To expand the range of economic and social choices available to individuals and nations by
freeing them from servitude and dependence not only in relation to other people and nation-
states but also to the forces of ignorance and human misery;
Improving family income of an adequate level for subsistence package of basic human needs
and other expenditures;
Enhancing access to better education that also serves to increase material wellbeing and
generate greater individual and national self-esteem;
Promoting cultural and humanistic values and social discipline (positive attitude to work),
improving conditions of work and production.
Underdevelopment
• In the post-war period, there have been several contrasting perceptions of development.
• In the 1940s, the less affluent countries, located in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, were
usually described as backward.
• By the 1950s, the term backward, with its pejorative connotations, had been generally
discarded in favour of the term underdeveloped, which implied the existence of a potential
that could be realized and did not suggest directly, at least, an attitude of superiority on the
part of the industrialized nations.
4|Page
5|Page
• In the 1960s, these countries began to be referred to as less developed, which was an even
more acceptable term, since the countries in question were somehow to be regarded as
developed but only less so than some others.
• At the same time, the expression Third world became prominent and was used to distinguish
these nations from the Western industrialized countries (First World), on the one hand, and
the Eastern socialist nations (Second World), on the other.
• In the 1970s, several new terms came to be commonly used. One was the expression
developing nations, which seemed to have removed all implications of inferiority.
• A distinction was also made between the oil producing and non-oil-producing nations. In the
1980s, the term newly industrializing countries emerged, referring primarily to four Asian
nations - Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan - that were experiencing sustained
industrial growth and economic development. At the present time, the appellations less
developed nations, developing countries, and Third World countries are the most widely used
and are usually employed interchangeably.
Characteristics of Underdevelopment
Extreme poverty;
Disparity in delivery of social services including formalized education systems,
medical facilities, and safe drinking water;
Poor or lacking infrastructures;
Poor or lacking governance capacity and
An environment of physical insecurity.
All of these factors can collectively lead to a poverty trap, in which poverty is
widespread, cyclical, and intractable. The combination of these challenges
contributes to a vicious circle of underdevelopment and fragility, which can
overwhelm a state’s operational capacity to deliver services and hinder long-term
economic growth.
Growth means an increase in numbers or size such as more jobs, businesses, population,
housing or higher levels of income and profits. It is generally associated with quantitative
changes.
Economic growth refers to increases in a country’s production or income per capita. Production
is usually measured by gross national product (GNP) or gross national income (GNI), used
interchangeably, an economy’s total output of goods and services.
5|Page
6|Page
1. Capital accumulation, including all new investments in land, physical equipment, and human
resources through improvements in health, education, and job skills.
Economic Growth is the increase in the real output of the country in a particular span of
time. Whereas, Economic Development is the increase in the level of production in an
economy along with enrichment of living standards and the advancement of technology.
Economic growth does not consider the Income from the Informal Economy. The Informal
economy is unrecorded economic activity. Whereas, Economic Development takes
consideration of all activities, whether formal or informal, and eases people with low
standards of living a suitable shelter and with proper employment.
Economic Growth does not reflect the depletion of natural resources. Depletion of resources
such as pollution, congestion and disease. Governments are under pressure due to the
environmental issues, majorly the problem is due to Global warming. However, Economic
Development is concerned with Sustainability, which means meeting the needs of the
present without compromising. Economic growth is the subset of economic development.
Economic growth indicates the expansion of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the
country and the concept of Economic Growth is basically related to the developed countries.
Economic Development is a broader concept than Economic Growth. Economic
Development refers to the increase of the Real National Income of the economic and socio-
economic structure of any country over a long period of time. Economic Development is
related to underdeveloped or developing countries of the world.
6|Page
7|Page
Both Economic Growth vs Economic Development have different indicators for their
measurement. Economic Growth can be measured through an increase in the GDP, per
capita income, etc. However, Economic Development can be measured through
improvement in the life expectancy rate, infant mortality rate, literacy rate, and poverty
rates.
7|Page
8|Page
Productivity is a measure that gauges the efficiency of the production process, i.e. in
transforming inputs such as raw material, labour, capital, etc. into the output of finished goods. It
can be expressed in terms of the ratio of outputs produced to inputs consumed, in the given
period. It tends to determine the overall production performance of the firms by ascertaining how
efficiently the firm utilized its resources in the production of goods and services, with minimum
wastage. Productivity can be enhanced by controlling factors of production, improving process
and technology.
Productivity means an economic measure of output per unit of input. Output refers to the total
production in terms of units or in terms of revenues while input refers to all the factors of
production used like capital, labor, equipment, etc.
Output implies total production while input means land, labor, capital, management, etc.
Productivity measures the efficiency of the production system. The efficiency with which
resources are utilized is called productive efficiency. Higher productivity means producing more
from a given amount of inputs or producing a given amount with lesser inputs.
8|Page
9|Page
Productivity has become almost synonymous for progress. The resources of a country are
generally limited. Therefore, higher productivity is essential for improving living standards
and for the prosperity of a nation.
Higher productivity requires elimination of waste in all forms. Higher productivity leads to
economic growth and social progress.
It is only by improving productivity that employees can get better wages and working
conditions and more employment opportunities.
Higher productivity brings lower prices for consumers and higher dividend for shareholders.
It improves the exports and foreign exchange reserves of a country. Thus, productivity is the
key to prosperity.
Higher productivity has a special significance in underdeveloped countries. Mass poverty
and unemployment cannot be eliminated without increasing productivity in agriculture,
industry and all other areas of human activity.
Productivity is the outcome of several factors. These factors are so interrelated that it is difficult
to identify the effect of any one factor on productivity.
1. Human:
Human nature and human behaviours are the most significant determinants of productivity.
Human factors may further be classified into two categories as given below:
(a) Ability to work – Productivity of an organization depends upon the competence and caliber
of its people—both workers and managers. Ability to work is governed by education, training,
experience, aptitude, etc. of the employees.
(b) Willingness to work – Motivation and morale of people is the second important group of
human factors that determine productivity. Wage incentive schemes, labour participation in
management, communication system, informal group relations, promotion policy, union
9|Page
10 | P a g e
management relations, quality of leadership, etc., are the main factors governing employees’
willingness to work. Working conditions like working hours, sanitation, ventilation, schools,
clubs, libraries, subsidized canteen, company transport, etc., also influence the motivation and
morale of employees.
2. Technological:
3. Managerial:
The competence and attitudes of managers have an important bearing on productivity. In many
organizations, productivity is low despite latest technology and trained manpower. This is due to
inefficient and indifferent management. Competent and dedicated managers can obtain
extraordinary results from ordinary people.
10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
Job performance of employees depends on their ability and willingness to work. Management is
the catalyst to create both. Advanced technology requires knowledge workers who in turn work
productively under professionally qualified managers. No ideology can win a greater output with
less effort. It is only through sound management that optimum utilization of human and technical
resources can be secured.
4. Natural:
Natural factors such as physical, geological, geographical and climatic conditions exert
considerable influence on productivity, particularly in extractive industries. For example,
productivity of labour in extreme climates (too cold or too hot) tends to be comparatively low.
Natural resources like water, fuel and minerals influence productivity.
5. Sociological:
Social customs, traditions and institutions influence attitudes towards work and job. For instance,
bias on the basis of caste, religion, etc., inhibited the growth of modern industry in some
countries.
6. Political:
Law and order, stability of government, harmony between States, etc. are essential for high
productivity in industries. Taxation policies of the government influence willingness to work,
capital formation, modernization and expansion of plants, etc. Industrial policy affects the size,
and capacity of plants. Tariff policies influence competition. Elimination of sick and inefficient
units helps to improve productivity.
7. Economic:
Size of the market, banking and credit facilities, transport and communication systems, etc. is
important factors influencing productivity.
11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
Sustainable development is the organizing principle for meeting human development goals
while at the same time sustaining the ability of natural systems to provide the natural
resources and ecosystem services upon which the economy and society depend.
The desired result is a state of society where living and conditions and resource use continue
to meet human needs without undermining the integrity and stability of the natural systems.
While the modern concept of sustainable development is derived mostly from the 1987
Brundtland Report, it is also rooted in earlier ideas about sustainable forest management and
twentieth century environmental concerns.
As the concept developed, it has shifted to focus more on economic development, social
development and environmental protection for future generations.
Sustainable development ties together concern for the carrying capacity of natural systems
with the social, political, and economic challenges faced by humanity.
In 1987 the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development released
the report Our Common Future, commonly called the Brundtland Report.
The report included what is now one of the most widely recognized definitions of
sustainable development.
Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It contains within it
two key concepts:
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
-The concept of 'needs', in particular, the essential needs of the world's poor, to which
-The idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the
Since the Brundtland Report, the concept of sustainable development has developed
beyond the initial intergenerational framework to focus more on the goal of "socially
inclusive and environmentally sustainable economic growth.
It emphasizes that in sustainable development everyone is a user and provider of
information. It stresses the need to change from old sector-centered ways of doing business
to new approaches that involve cross-sectorial co-ordination and the integration of
environmental and social concerns into all development processes.
Furthermore, Agenda 21 emphasizes that broad public participation in decision making is a
fundamental prerequisite for achieving sustainable development.
Under the principles of the United Nations Charter the Millennium Declaration identified
principles and treaties on sustainable development, including economic development,
social development and environmental protection.
The term sustainable development as used by the United Nations incorporates both issues
associated with land development and broader issues of human development such as
education, public health, and standard of living.
13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
Gross National Product (GNP) means the value of output produced within a country plus net
property income from abroad.
Growth Rate it is a value (GDP, turnover, wages, etc.) measures its change from one period
to another (month, quarter, year). It is very generally expressed as a percentage.
Human Development Index (HDI) an index measuring national socioeconomic development,
based on combining measures of education, health, and adjusted real income per capita.
HDI which attempts to rank all countries on a scale of 0 (lowest human development) to 1
(highest human development) based on three goals or end products of development:
longevity as measured by life expectancy at birth, knowledge as measured by a weighted
average of adult literacy (two-thirds) and gross school enrollment ratio (one-third), and
standard of living as measured by real per capita gross domestic product adjusted for the
differing purchasing power parity (PPP) of each country’s currency to reflect cost of living
and for the assumption of diminishing marginal utility of income.
The Economic Dimensions of development deals with the use of limited resources. An
economically sustainable system enables continues output of goods and services, avoiding
sectorial inequalities that threaten agriculture and industrial production, and ensuring
sustainability in the effective management of a country’s internal and external debt. Economic
development that focus about in terms of economic growth and aware of non-economic factors.
14 | P a g e
15 | P a g e
15 | P a g e