[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views6 pages

Finance Notes

Uploaded by

poral.kisselann
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views6 pages

Finance Notes

Uploaded by

poral.kisselann
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

‭BASICS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING‬

‭DEFINITION OF CAPITAL BUDGETING‬

‭ apital‬ ‭budgeting‬ ‭refers‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬‭process‬‭businesses‬‭use‬‭to‬‭evaluate‬


C
‭potential‬ ‭major‬ ‭projects‬ ‭or‬ ‭investments,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭constructing‬ ‭new‬
‭plants‬‭or‬‭investing‬‭in‬‭long-term‬‭assets.‬‭This‬‭decision-making‬‭process‬
‭is‬‭critical‬‭as‬‭it‬‭determines‬‭the‬‭future‬‭growth‬‭and‬‭financial‬‭health‬‭of‬‭the‬
‭company.‬

‭KEY CONCEPTS AND METHODS‬

‭1. Net Present Value (NPV)‬


‭●‬ D
‭ efinition:‬‭NPV is the sum of the present value of a project's‬
‭cash inflows and outflows, discounted at the cost of capital. It‬
‭measures the profitability of an investment in dollar terms.‬

‭Decision Rule:‬
‭●‬ ‭Accept if NPV > 0 (project adds value).‬
‭●‬ ‭For mutually exclusive projects, select the one with the highest‬
‭NPV.‬

‭Advantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Accounts for the time value of money.‬
‭●‬ ‭Considers all cash flows.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provides a direct measure of added value to the firm.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Assumes a constant discount rate.‬
‭●‬ ‭Not useful when comparing projects of unequal lifespans or‬
‭sizes.‬
‭2. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)‬
‭●‬ D
‭ efinition:‬‭The IRR is the discount rate that makes the NPV‬
‭of a project equal to zero. It represents the expected annual‬
‭return on a project.‬

‭Decision Rule:‬
‭●‬ ‭Accept‬‭the‬‭project‬‭if‬‭IRR‬‭>‬‭WACC‬‭(Weighted‬‭Average‬‭Cost‬‭of‬
‭Capital).‬
‭●‬ ‭For‬‭mutually‬‭exclusive‬‭projects,‬‭select‬‭the‬‭one‬‭with‬‭the‬‭highest‬
‭IRR, provided IRR > WACC.‬

‭Advantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Easy‬ ‭to‬ ‭understand‬ ‭and‬ ‭communicate‬ ‭as‬ ‭it‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬
‭percentage return.‬
‭●‬ ‭Considers the time value of money.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Assumes‬‭reinvestment‬‭at‬‭the‬‭same‬‭rate‬‭as‬‭IRR,‬‭which‬‭can‬‭be‬
‭unrealistic.‬
‭●‬ ‭Can‬ ‭result‬ ‭in‬ ‭multiple‬ ‭IRRs‬‭with‬‭non-normal‬‭cash‬‭flows‬‭(cash‬
‭flows with more than one sign change).‬
‭3. Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)‬
‭●‬ D
‭ efinition:‬ ‭MIRR‬ ‭adjusts‬ ‭the‬ ‭IRR‬ ‭to‬‭assume‬‭reinvestment‬‭at‬
‭the‬‭firm’s‬‭cost‬‭of‬‭capital‬‭(WACC),‬‭solving‬‭the‬‭issue‬‭of‬‭multiple‬
‭IRRs.‬

‭Advantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Avoids the multiple IRR problem.‬
‭●‬ ‭More realistic assumption about reinvestment rates.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭More complex to calculate than IRR.‬
‭●‬ ‭Does‬ ‭not‬ ‭solve‬ ‭the‬ ‭size‬ ‭problem‬ ‭of‬ ‭comparing‬ ‭projects‬ ‭with‬
‭vastly different scales.‬
‭4. Payback Period‬
‭●‬ D
‭ efinition:‬ ‭The‬ ‭payback‬ ‭period‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭time‬ ‭it‬ ‭takes‬ ‭for‬ ‭a‬
‭project to recover its initial investment from the cash inflows.‬

‭Decision Rule:‬
‭●‬ ‭Accept projects with a payback period less than a‬
‭predetermined threshold.‬

‭Advantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Simple and easy to use.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provides insight into liquidity and risk by showing how quickly‬
‭the investment is recovered.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Ignores the time value of money.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ignores cash flows beyond the payback period.‬

‭Discounted Payback Period:‬


‭●‬ ‭Similar to the regular payback period but accounts for the time‬
‭value of money by discounting future cash flows.‬
‭Application of Methods in Decision-Making‬ ‭Crossover Rate‬
‭●‬ D ‭ efinition:‬ ‭The‬ ‭crossover‬ ‭rate‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭discount‬ ‭rate‬ ‭at‬ ‭which‬
‭Independent vs. Mutually Exclusive Projects‬
‭two‬ ‭projects‬ ‭have‬‭the‬‭same‬‭NPV.‬‭It‬‭occurs‬‭due‬‭to‬‭differences‬
‭●‬ I‭ndependent‬ ‭Projects‬‭:‬ ‭These‬ ‭projects‬ ‭do‬ ‭not‬ ‭affect‬ ‭each‬
‭in the timing of cash flows.‬
‭other.‬ ‭You‬ ‭can‬ ‭accept‬ ‭all‬ ‭projects‬ ‭that‬ ‭meet‬ ‭the‬‭criteria‬‭(e.g.,‬
‭●‬ ‭Implication:‬ ‭When‬ ‭choosing‬ ‭between‬ ‭mutually‬ ‭exclusive‬
‭NPV > 0, IRR > WACC).‬
‭projects,‬‭if‬‭the‬‭cost‬‭of‬‭capital‬‭is‬‭below‬‭the‬‭crossover‬‭rate,‬‭one‬
‭●‬ ‭Mutually‬ ‭Exclusive‬ ‭Projects:‬ ‭Only‬ ‭one‬ ‭project‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬
‭project‬ ‭is‬ ‭better,‬ ‭while‬ ‭the‬ ‭other‬ ‭project‬ ‭becomes‬ ‭preferable‬
‭selected.‬ ‭In‬ ‭this‬ ‭case,‬ ‭use‬ ‭NPV‬ ‭to‬‭maximize‬‭the‬‭firm’s‬‭value,‬
‭when the cost of capital is above the crossover rate.‬
‭as‬‭IRR‬‭may‬‭lead‬‭to‬‭incorrect‬‭decisions‬‭due‬‭to‬‭its‬‭reinvestment‬
‭assumption.‬
‭Steps in Capital Budgeting‬
‭Ranking Conflicts: NPV vs. IRR‬ ‭ .‬ E
1 ‭ stimate Cash Flows‬‭– Identify all inflows and outflows.‬
‭●‬ ‭Conflicts between NPV and IRR can arise when:‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Assess Risk‬‭– Evaluate the riskiness of these cash flows.‬
‭○‬ ‭Projects differ in scale.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Determine‬ ‭Cost‬ ‭of‬ ‭Capital‬ ‭(WACC)‬ ‭–‬ ‭Calculate‬ ‭the‬ ‭firm’s‬
‭○‬ ‭Projects have different cash flow timings.‬ ‭cost of financing.‬
‭○‬ ‭Resolution:‬‭NPV‬‭is‬‭generally‬‭preferred‬‭as‬‭it‬‭measures‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Compute‬ ‭NPV,‬ ‭IRR,‬ ‭and‬ ‭Payback‬ ‭Period‬ ‭–‬ ‭Use‬ ‭these‬
‭absolute‬ ‭value‬ ‭added‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭firm,‬ ‭while‬ ‭IRR‬ ‭can‬ ‭metrics to evaluate the project.‬
‭sometimes‬‭favor‬‭smaller‬‭projects‬‭with‬‭high‬‭percentage‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Decision‬ ‭Making‬ ‭–‬ ‭Accept‬ ‭or‬ ‭reject‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭criteria‬
‭returns but lower actual dollar value.‬ ‭mentioned above.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Monitor‬ ‭and‬ ‭Review‬ ‭–‬ ‭Continuously‬ ‭track‬ ‭the‬ ‭project’s‬
‭Types of Cash Flow Streams‬ ‭progress.‬

‭●‬ N ‭ ormal‬ ‭Cash‬ ‭Flow‬‭:‬ ‭A‬ ‭series‬ ‭of‬ ‭cash‬ ‭inflows‬ ‭following‬ ‭an‬
‭initial outflow (one sign change).‬
‭Other Important Considerations‬
‭●‬ ‭Non-normal‬‭Cash‬‭Flow‬‭:‬‭More‬‭than‬‭one‬‭sign‬‭change,‬‭leading‬ ‭●‬ R ‭ isk‬ ‭Assessment:‬ ‭Capital‬ ‭budgeting‬ ‭involves‬ ‭assessing‬ ‭the‬
‭to‬ ‭multiple‬ ‭IRRs.‬ ‭Example:‬ ‭A‬ ‭nuclear‬ ‭power‬ ‭plant‬ ‭that‬ ‭has‬ ‭riskiness‬ ‭of‬ ‭future‬ ‭cash‬ ‭flows.‬ ‭Firms‬ ‭may‬ ‭adjust‬ ‭the‬‭discount‬
‭large‬ ‭initial‬ ‭outflows,‬ ‭followed‬ ‭by‬ ‭inflows,‬ ‭and‬ ‭then‬ ‭another‬ ‭rate‬ ‭(WACC)‬ ‭upward‬ ‭for‬ ‭riskier‬ ‭projects‬ ‭to‬ ‭account‬ ‭for‬ ‭this‬
‭large outflow for decommissioning.‬ ‭uncertainty.‬
‭●‬ ‭Qualitative‬ ‭Factors‬‭:‬ ‭Apart‬ ‭from‬ ‭quantitative‬ ‭analysis,‬
‭qualitative‬ ‭factors‬ ‭like‬ ‭strategic‬ ‭alignment,‬ ‭environmental‬
‭impact,‬ ‭and‬ ‭regulatory‬ ‭requirements‬ ‭should‬ ‭also‬ ‭be‬
‭considered.‬
‭Final Decision Criteria for Students‬
‭●‬ U ‭ se‬‭NPV‬‭as‬‭the‬‭Primary‬‭Metric‬‭:‬‭NPV‬‭is‬‭the‬‭most‬‭reliable‬‭and‬
‭theoretically‬ ‭sound‬ ‭method.‬ ‭Use‬ ‭IRR‬ ‭for‬ ‭a‬ ‭secondary‬ ‭check,‬
‭but be cautious of its assumptions.‬
‭●‬ ‭Understand‬‭Payback‬‭for‬‭Risk‬‭Insight‬‭:‬‭While‬‭not‬‭as‬‭precise,‬
‭the‬ ‭payback‬ ‭period‬ ‭gives‬ ‭insight‬ ‭into‬ ‭the‬ ‭liquidity‬ ‭and‬ ‭risk‬ ‭of‬
‭projects.‬
‭●‬ ‭Be‬ ‭Mindful‬ ‭of‬ ‭Reinvestment‬ ‭Assumptions‬‭:‬ ‭IRR‬ ‭assumes‬
‭reinvestment‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭IRR‬ ‭itself,‬ ‭which‬ ‭may‬ ‭not‬ ‭always‬ ‭be‬
‭realistic.‬‭NPV‬‭assumes‬‭reinvestment‬‭at‬‭WACC,‬‭which‬‭is‬‭more‬
‭conservative.‬
‭●‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭Time‬‭Value‬‭of‬‭Money:‬‭Always‬‭discount‬‭future‬
‭cash flows to account for the time value of money.‬

‭Conclusion‬
‭ apital‬ ‭budgeting‬ ‭is‬‭essential‬‭in‬‭making‬‭sound‬‭investment‬‭decisions.‬
C
‭Understanding‬ ‭and‬ ‭correctly‬ ‭applying‬ ‭methods‬ ‭like‬ ‭NPV,‬ ‭IRR,‬ ‭and‬
‭payback‬ ‭can‬ ‭guide‬ ‭a‬ ‭company‬ ‭toward‬ ‭profitable‬ ‭and‬ ‭strategically‬
‭aligned‬ ‭investments.‬ ‭For‬ ‭students,‬ ‭mastering‬ ‭these‬ ‭methods‬ ‭will‬‭not‬
‭only help in exams but also in real-world financial analysis.‬

You might also like