USTP Architecture Department

ARCH311 Site Planning 01

1st Semester 2023-2024
Assignment #1

INSTRUCTOR:
Ar. Archmedes G. Wabe
GROUP MEMBERS:
Alexander Regie L. Cobrado
Charles-Rainbow E. Putian
John Lloyd Macarayo
Kent Jastin Nacua Piit
Kian Dale Manili Alacre
Segrille Maisog

I. Site Program

1. Client: Real Estate Firm

2. Design Problem:
The real estate firm is looking to develop townhouse subdivision for middle income
families who are looking for a home near their workplace. The client is finding suitable land
strategically located near lifestyle centers, commercial centers, and places to work in
Cagayan de Oro City with a minimum land area of 1 hectare.

3. Goals & Objectives:

 Maximize Land Use Efficiency: The development should balance density

with comfort, ensuring townhouses and communal areas are thoughtfully
arranged to make the most of the 1-hectare site.
 Proximity to Key Locations: The subdivision should offer easy access to
lifestyle centers, workplaces, and essential services in Cagayan de Oro City,
promoting walkability and reducing travel time for residents.
 Provide Green and Recreational Spaces: Include parks, playgrounds, and
communal areas that cater to the well-being of families, encouraging outdoor
activities and fostering a sense of community.
 Affordable Design Solutions: Prioritize cost-effective design and
construction methods, focusing on materials and layouts that reduce
expenses without compromising the quality of living spaces.
 Efficient Lot Utilization: Ensure that the layout of the townhouses and lots is
optimized to offer affordable unit sizes while maintaining comfortable living
conditions, promoting value for middle-income buyers.
4. Target Market:
A. Demographics:
 Age: 25-45 years old
 Dual-income households with children
 Employment in industries such as business process outsourcing, retail,
education, and healthcare
 Combined monthly household income of around ₱30,000 - ₱60,000
B. Living Preferences:
 Desire for affordable yet comfortable homes with good access to transportation
and key city areas
 Preference for gated communities with security
 Homes with practical layouts, two to three bedrooms, and flexible spaces for
working from home
 Access to essential services like schools, healthcare facilities, and supermarkets
C. Lifestyle:
 Active families who prioritize safety, convenience, and a balanced work-life
environment
 Interested in recreational facilities such as parks, playgrounds, and open spaces
for children
 Community engagement is valued; they prefer developments that foster a sense
of belonging
D. Needs and Behavior:
 Focus on convenience in commuting to work and school
 Practicality in home design and affordability, with preference for low-maintenance
spaces
 Expect modern amenities and reliable infrastructure (water, power, internet)
 Has various means and choices of transportation available.

5. Spatial Requirements:
A. Townhouse Units:
 2–3-bedroom layouts, approximately 60-100 sqm per unit
 Living, dining, kitchen, and utility areas
 One to two parking spaces per unit
 Options for balconies or terraces, especially for corner units
 Flexible spaces for home office or study areas
B. Parks and Playgrounds:
 Centralized Park space that serves as a focal point for the community, at least
10-15% of total land area
 Safe and shaded playground for children
 Outdoor seating areas for families and communal gathering spots
 Walking and jogging paths integrated within green spaces
C. Expandable Units:
 Offer units designed for future expansion, allowing homeowners to add an extra
room or extend the house when finances allow, making it a more flexible
investment.
 The site should also allow for future townhouse construction, accommodating the
potential demand for additional housing units as the community grows, providing
flexibility for future developments.
II. Site selection:
1. Site Selection Criteria:

Criteria SITE 1 SITE 2 REMARKS

1. LOCATION 3 5 Site 2 is ideal than Site 1
2. ACCESSIBILITY 1 5 Site 2 is ideal than Site 1
3. ZONING REGULATIONS 1 4 Site 2 is ideal than Site 1
4. ENVIRONMENTAL 2 2 Both Site is similar in flooding risks
REGULATIONS
5. POSSIBLE EXPANSION 3 3 Both Site is Possible for expansion

WEIGHTING SCALE
5 EXCELLENT
4 VERY GOOD
3 GOOD
2 WEAK
1 VERY WEAK

2. Identified Sites:
Site Information: Site (1)

LOT INFORMATION:

 Address: Butuan -
Cagayan de Oro -
Iligan Rd, Cagayan
de Oro, Northern
Mindanao

 Coordinates:
8°29'38.3"N
124°37'56.7"E

https://www.google.com/maps/@8.4942418,124.6317142,3a,75y,28.97h,88.92t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s7eC4HTHalFY
xatRwdES79Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-
pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D
1.0751798381545967%26panoid%3D7eC4HTHalFYxatRwdES79Q%26yaw%3D28.974941680427527!7i16384!8i819
2?coh=205410&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAxNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Lot Description: LOT 4046 - A - 3 Survey Number: PSD – 10 – 002262 Case
Location: KAUSWAGAN, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY, MISAMIS ORIENTAL
AREA (sq.m.): 12, 265 sq. m
Cadastral lot: 4046 C - 4 General Class: LR

Property Owner: Tax Declaration:

BELLENORTH 164 – 06 – 059 21042
REALTY INC.
NORTH: NE: LOT 4370 CAD, 237
SOUTH: SW: LOT 4046 – A – 2 – SUB. D. PLAN
EAST: SE: LOT 4046 – B(LRC) PSD – 142264
WEST: NW: LOT 4330 CAD, 237
Kind: RESIDENTIAL Tie Point: BBM 10, CAD 237
AREA: 12,265 SQ. M. UNIT VALUE: 1371.50
LOT BEARINGS
POINTS BEARING DISTANCE (m) NORTHING EASTING

TIE LINE N29-15W 1202.74 40976.970 39644.220

1–2 S31-24W 150.05 42026.360 39056.540
2–3 N28-07W 153.56 41898.280 38978.370
3–4 S62-26E 28.28 42033.730 38906.020
4–5 N27-53E 59.69 42020.640 38931.090
5-1 S64-15E 108.30 42073.400 38959.010
 Site Information: Site (2)

LOT INFORMATION:

 Address:
JRM+XWJ,
Cagayan de
Oro, Misamis
Oriental

 Coordinates:
8°29'32.9"N
124°38'05.2"E

ACCESS TO SITE
6.00 WIDTH ROAD
https://www.google.com/maps/place/8%C2%B029'32.9%22N+124%C2%B038'05.2%22E/@8.4924862,124.6341093,
394m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d8.4924722!4d124.6347778?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAxNi4wIKXMDSoA
SAFQAw%3D%3D
Lot Description: 1 Survey Number: PCS – 10 – 003037 Case
Location: KAUSWAGAN, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY, MISAMIS ORIENTAL
AREA (sq.m.): 20,327 sq. m
Cadastral lot: 4046 C - 4 General Class: LR

Property Owner: Tax Declaration:

ORO SOLID C – 095779
HARDWARE INC.
TCT: T – 152445
NORTH: NE: LOT 4046 – D – 6 PSD – 10 – 002740 (ROAD)
SOUTH: SW: LOT 2 PCS – 10 – 003037
EAST: SE: LOT 1334 CAD, 237
WEST: NW: LOT 4046 – D – 6 PSD – 10 – 002740 (ROAD)
Kind: RESIDENTIAL Tie Point: BBM 10, CAD 237
AREA: 20 327 SQ. M. PIN: 164 – 06 – 059 – 21 – 077
LOT BEARINGS
POINTS BEARING DISTANCE (m) NORTHING EASTING

TIE LINE N28-08W 1035.69 40976.970 39644.220

1–2 N29-14E 49.86 41890.300 39155.870
2–3 S56-41E 43.99 41933.810 39180.220
3–4 N29-35E 30.00 41909.650 39216.980
4–5 S56-40E 4.21 41935.740 39231.790
5-6 S59-09E 94.84 41933.430 39235.310
6-7 S27-54W 78.85 41884.800 39316.730
7-8 S27-54W 45.48 41815.120 39279.840
8-9 S71-31W 34.42 41774.930 39258.560
9 – 10 S71-31W 17.45 41764.020 39225.920
10 - 11 N65-32W 73.31 41758.490 39209.370
11 – 12 N32-30E 49.87 41788.850 39142.640
12 -13 N55-40W 41.01 41830.910 39169.440
13 -1 N29-14E 41.55 41854.040 39135.580
 3. Evaluation of Site Suitability:
WEIGHTING SCHEME FOR SITE SELECTION CRITERIA
Weight Importance to Project
5 Essential
4 Very important
3 Important
2 Somewhat Important
1 Not Very Important

Criteria Weight Site #1 score WxS

1. ACCESSIBIITY 5 1 5
2. AREA 5 2 10
3. PROXIMITY TO 4 3 12
EMPLOYMENT CENTERS
4. FLOODING AND 3 2 6
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
5. SAFETY AND SECURITY 4 3 12
6. SHAPE OF THE LOT 4 1 4
7. TRANSPORTATION 4 1 4
Total: 53

Criteria Weight Site #2 score WxS

1. ACCESSIBIITY 5 4 20
2. AREA 5 5 25
3. PROXIMITY TO 4 3 12
EMPLOYMENT CENTERS
4. FLOODING AND 3 2 6
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
5. SAFETY AND SECURITY 4 4 16
6. SHAPE OF THE LOT 4 4 16
7. TRANSPORTATION 4 3 12
Total: 107

4. Selected Site:
Site 2 is the most suitable lot for building townhouses due to its larger area, providing ample space
for housing and community amenities. It boasts excellent accessibility, with nearby road access
that ensures convenient travel without being directly adjacent, which enhances security and
privacy for residents. The site’s proximity to employment, commercial, and educational centers
that makes it ideal for middle-income families seeking convenience and a short commute.
Additionally, its location offers a balance between urban accessibility and a peaceful living
environment. The site also has room for future expansion or additional facilities, making it a long-
term investment for residential development.