Imp Ques CRST
Imp Ques CRST
Imp Ques CRST
In summary, statements 1, 4, and 5 are generally true, while statements 2 and 3 may
be subject to interpretation and context.
Q2. list five important areas on which an effective problem solving
focusses on
Ans. Effective problem-solving typically focuses on several key areas to ensure a
comprehensive and sustainable resolution. Here are five important areas that
effective problem-solving addresses:
1. Traditional Approach:
In a traditional problem-solving scenario, one might think about
adding more lanes to roads, optimizing traffic signal timings, or
implementing stricter traffic regulations.
2. Lateral Thinking Approach:
Random Entry: Introduce a random element. Consider the idea of "hot
air balloons" to transport people within the city. This unconventional
idea challenges the usual modes of transportation.
Provocation: Pose a provocative statement like, "What if cars had no
wheels?" This challenges the conventional concept of automobiles and
encourages thinking beyond the usual parameters.
Reverse Thinking: Instead of asking, "How can we improve traffic
flow?" ask, "How can we intentionally create traffic jams?" This prompts
thinking about ways to prevent congestion.
Metaphorical Thinking: Use metaphors like comparing traffic flow to
the circulatory system of a body. This might lead to ideas about
optimizing "arteries" or creating alternative "routes" to improve the
overall "health" of the traffic system.
Combination (SCAMPER): Combine the idea of a traditional bus with
a movie theater to create an "entertainment bus." This combines two
unrelated concepts to generate a novel idea for public transportation.
1. Suspend Judgment:
Encourage participants to suspend judgment during the idea
generation phase. Emphasize that all ideas are welcome, regardless of
how unconventional or initially impractical they may seem. Creating a
non-judgmental atmosphere promotes a free exchange of ideas and
prevents self-censorship.
2. Generate Quantity Before Quality:
Focus on generating a large quantity of ideas before evaluating or
refining them. Quantity often leads to diversity, and creative solutions
can emerge from unexpected sources. Avoid premature evaluation or
criticism, as it can stifle the creative process.
3. Encourage Wild and Unusual Ideas:
Foster a culture that embraces wild, unusual, and "out-of-the-box"
thinking. Unconventional ideas can often spark creativity and lead to
innovative solutions. Encourage participants to push beyond
conventional boundaries and consider ideas that may initially seem
impractical.
4. Build on Each Other's Ideas:
Promote collaboration by encouraging participants to build on and
expand upon each other's ideas. This helps to create a synergistic
effect, where one idea sparks another, leading to more comprehensive
and refined solutions. Collaboration enhances the richness of the
brainstorming session.
1. Observations:
Observations involve directly witnessing and documenting
events, behaviors, or conditions relevant to the problem. This
firsthand data can provide valuable insights into the actual
situation and help in identifying patterns or issues.
2. Fishbone Analysis (Ishikawa or Cause-and-Effect Diagram):
Fishbone analysis is a graphical method used to explore
potential causes of a problem. While it is a tool rather than a
direct source of data, the process of constructing a fishbone
diagram involves gathering information and insights from team
members, making it an indirect source of data.
3. Interviews:
Interviews involve direct conversations with individuals who
have knowledge or experience related to the problem.
Interviews can provide in-depth information, perspectives, and
context that may not be apparent through other means.
4. Published Materials:
Published materials, such as books, articles, reports, or research
papers, can serve as secondary sources of data. They provide
existing knowledge, theories, and insights related to the
problem. Reviewing published materials can help in
understanding the context, theories, and best practices relevant
to the problem at hand.
1. Why did you eat popcorn while watching a movie last night?
Because you enjoy eating snacks while watching movies.
2. Why do you enjoy eating snacks while watching movies?
Because it enhances the movie-watching experience and provides a
satisfying and enjoyable activity.
3. Why do you find eating snacks, specifically popcorn, enhancing the
movie-watching experience?
Because popcorn is a tasty and convenient snack that adds to the
overall enjoyment of the movie.
4. Why do you consider popcorn a tasty and convenient snack for movie
nights?
Because it has a satisfying crunch, a good balance of saltiness, and it's
easy to share and enjoy without distracting from the movie.
5. Why do you prefer snacks that are easy to share and enjoy without
distracting from the movie?
Because sharing snacks and having an easy-to-manage snack, like
popcorn, allows you to focus on the movie and enjoy a communal
experience without disruptions.
So, the root cause, in this case, might be the desire for a communal and enjoyable
movie-watching experience without distractions, and popcorn is perceived as a
suitable snack that aligns with these preferences. Keep in mind that the "Five Whys"
is a flexible technique, and the depth of analysis may vary depending on the context
and the problem at hand.
Q8. write a short note on cognition and perception in indian
knowledge system
Ans. Cognition and perception in the Indian knowledge system are integral
components that have been explored and elucidated in various ancient Indian
philosophical and scientific traditions. The Indian knowledge system, rooted in
diverse schools of thought such as Vedanta, Nyaya, and Buddhism, has provided
profound insights into the nature of cognition and perception.
1. System Thinking:
Definition: System thinking is an approach that views
problems as part of a larger, interconnected system. It
emphasizes understanding the relationships and interactions
among the components of a system and how changes in one
part can affect the entire system.
Example: Consider a traffic management system in a city.
System thinking would involve analyzing how various elements,
such as traffic lights, road designs, and public transportation,
interact. Changes in one component (e.g., adjusting traffic
signal timings) can have cascading effects on the entire system,
influencing traffic flow and congestion.
2. Design Thinking:
Definition: Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that
focuses on understanding user needs, ideating creative
solutions, and iterating through prototyping and testing. It
places a strong emphasis on empathy, iteration, and user-
centered solutions.
Example: Imagine a team tasked with improving the user
experience of a mobile banking app. Design thinking would
involve empathizing with users, defining their needs and pain
points, ideating creative solutions, prototyping different
designs, and testing these prototypes with users. The process is
iterative, with a continuous feedback loop to refine the
solution.
Key Differences:
Characteristics of a System:
Solar System:
Social System:
These examples illustrate the diverse nature of systems, each with its
unique characteristics and functions. Understanding systems is crucial for
analyzing complex phenomena in various fields.
Q11. what kind of loop the following system demonstrate
when we were kids, the more my brother pushed me, the more i pushed him back, so the
more he pushed me back, so the more i pushed him back
ans. The situation you describe demonstrates a reinforcing or positive feedback loop.
In a reinforcing loop, the output of the system reinforces the initial action, leading to
a continuous cycle of growth or escalation. This type of loop tends to amplify the
behavior or condition over time.
In your example:
This reinforcing loop can lead to an escalation of the pushing behavior, as each
action intensifies the other. Positive feedback loops can be self-reinforcing and may
continue until there is an external intervention or a change in the dynamics of the
system.
Q12. explain the working of a feedback loop in a system. Draw
the appropriate diagram.
Ans. Certainly! In systems thinking, a feedback loop is a fundamental concept that
describes how a system responds to changes. There are two main types of feedback
loops: positive feedback and negative feedback. These loops play a crucial role in
maintaining or changing the behavior of a system.
Diagram:
Explanation: In the diagram, "A" represents the initial state of the
system, and an external change or disturbance causes a shift to "B." The
feedback loop then works to counteract this change and bring the
system back to its original state.
2. Positive Feedback Loop:
Description: Positive feedback loops amplify changes and can lead to
exponential growth or decline in a system.
Diagram:
Explanation: Similar to the negative feedback loop, "A" represents the
initial state. However, in a positive feedback loop, the response to a
change reinforces that change, leading to further deviation from the
original state. This can result in rapid growth or decline.
It's important to note that both types of feedback loops can coexist within a system,
influencing its overall behavior. Understanding the dynamics of these loops is
essential in systems thinking to predict and manage the behavior of complex
systems.
Q13. explain brainstorming
Ans. Brainstorming is a creative problem-solving technique designed to generate a
large number of ideas within a group setting. It's a collaborative and structured
method that encourages participants to think freely, share their thoughts without
fear of judgment, and build upon each other's ideas. The primary goal of
brainstorming is to foster creativity, promote diverse thinking, and produce a broad
range of potential solutions to a problem.
Here are the key principles and steps involved in the brainstorming process:
Thinking out of the box often requires a shift in mindset, a willingness to question
assumptions, and the ability to see connections that others might overlook. It is a
valuable skill in various contexts, including business, problem-solving, and creative
endeavors.
Q15. explain risk management
The risk management process typically involves the following key steps:
1. Risk Identification:
Identify and document potential risks that could affect the achievement
of objectives or successful project completion. This includes
considering internal and external factors that may pose threats or
opportunities.
2. Risk Assessment:
Assess the likelihood and potential impact of each identified risk. This
involves analyzing the probability of the risk occurring and estimating
the magnitude of its consequences.
3. Risk Prioritization:
Prioritize risks based on their level of significance, combining the
likelihood and impact assessments. This helps in focusing attention on
the most critical risks that require immediate attention.
4. Risk Mitigation Planning:
Develop strategies and action plans to mitigate or manage identified
risks. This may involve implementing preventive measures, transferring
risks to third parties (such as through insurance), or developing
contingency plans to respond effectively if the risk materializes.
5. Risk Monitoring and Review:
Continuously monitor and review the identified risks throughout the
project or operational lifecycle. Regularly reassess the risk landscape to
account for changes in the internal and external environment.
6. Communication and Reporting:
Maintain open and transparent communication about risks within the
organization. Provide regular reports to stakeholders to keep them
informed about the status of risks and mitigation efforts.
7. Risk Acceptance:
Some risks may be deemed acceptable or unavoidable. In such cases,
organizations may choose to accept the risks and develop contingency
plans to manage the potential impacts if they occur.
8. Documentation:
Document all aspects of the risk management process, including the
identified risks, assessments, mitigation strategies, and monitoring
plans. This documentation serves as a reference for future projects and
helps in continuous improvement.
Effective risk management contributes to the overall resilience and success of an
organization by helping it navigate uncertainties and challenges. It is a dynamic and
ongoing process that requires active participation from all levels of an organization
and adapts to changing circumstances. Whether in business, project management, or
any other domain, a well-executed risk management process is essential for
achieving objectives while minimizing potential setbacks.
Q16. what are barriers in critical thinking
Ans. Critical thinking is the ability to analyze and evaluate information, arguments, or
situations in a logical and systematic way. However, various barriers can impede the
effective application of critical thinking skills. Here are some common barriers to
critical thinking:
1. Miscommunication of Preferences:
Members of a group do not openly express their true preferences,
concerns, or opinions. They may assume that others agree with a
particular course of action, even if that's not the case.
2. False Consensus:
Individuals within the group mistakenly believe that everyone else
shares the same preferences or desires. This leads to a false consensus,
where members think they are in agreement when, in fact, they are not.
3. Reluctant Agreement:
Members may agree to a decision despite having reservations or
objections. They may go along with the group, thinking it's what others
want, while assuming that their concerns are shared by others.
4. Avoidance of Conflict:
The desire to avoid conflict or confrontation can contribute to the
phenomenon. Members may choose not to voice their dissenting
opinions to maintain harmony within the group.
5. Resulting in Suboptimal Decisions:
The ultimate outcome of the Abilene Paradox is that the group makes a
decision that is suboptimal or contrary to the preferences of its
individual members. This occurs because people fail to communicate
and accurately gauge the preferences of others.
The name "Abilene" comes from an anecdote that Jerry Harvey used to illustrate the
concept. In the anecdote, a family takes a trip to Abilene, Texas, on a hot day despite
each member individually preferring to stay home. The family members assume that
the others want to go and end up making a decision that none of them truly desired.
To avoid falling into the Abilene Paradox, effective communication, open dialogue,
and an environment that encourages individuals to express their true opinions are
crucial. Encouraging dissenting viewpoints and fostering a culture where people feel
comfortable expressing their preferences can help prevent the group from making
decisions that go against the collective desires of its members.
Q18. explain fish bone analysis
Ans. Fishbone analysis, also known as Ishikawa diagram or cause-and-effect diagram,
is a visual tool used to systematically identify and analyze the root causes of a
specific problem or effect. Developed by Kaoru Ishikawa, a Japanese quality control
expert, this method helps teams explore and understand the various factors that
contribute to an issue. The diagram takes its name from its shape, which resembles a
fish skeleton.
1. Problem or Effect:
At the head of the diagram, write down the problem or effect that you
are trying to analyze. This serves as the focal point for the analysis.
2. Spine:
Draw a horizontal line extending from the problem statement,
resembling the spine of a fish. The spine represents the timeline or the
progression of the issue.
3. Categories or Causes:
Draw several lines (branches) extending diagonally from the spine. Each
branch represents a category of potential causes. Common categories
include methods, materials, machines, manpower, measurement, and
environment (often referred to as the 6Ms in manufacturing contexts).
4. Sub-Causes:
For each category, identify and list sub-causes or factors that may
contribute to the problem. These are the specific elements that need
exploration.
5. Analysis:
Discuss and analyze each sub-cause to determine its potential role in
the problem. This involves brainstorming and identifying possible
connections between the causes.
The Fishbone diagram provides a structured way to identify and visualize the
potential causes of a problem. It encourages a systematic approach to problem-
solving and helps teams consider a wide range of factors that might contribute to
the issue. By addressing the root causes identified in the analysis, teams can develop
more effective solutions to prevent the problem from recurring.
Q19. explain six thinking hats method
Ans. The Six Thinking Hats is a thinking framework developed by Dr. Edward de Bono
as a tool for group discussion and individual decision-making. It is designed to
encourage parallel thinking, where participants focus on a specific aspect of a
situation or problem at a time. Each "hat" represents a different perspective or
thinking style, guiding the participants through various facets of a problem or
decision. This method helps in exploring ideas, fostering creativity, and making more
well-rounded decisions.
Here are the six thinking hats and their associated thinking styles:
1. Hat Sequence:
Participants put on one hat at a time, and the group collectively focuses
on the same thinking style. For example, during the White Hat phase,
everyone focuses on gathering and analyzing information.
2. Structured Discussion:
The method provides a structured way to guide discussions, ensuring
that various perspectives are considered before reaching a decision.
3. Parallel Thinking:
By focusing on one thinking style at a time, the Six Thinking Hats
method avoids conflicting arguments and encourages parallel thinking,
where everyone is looking in the same direction.
4. Role Flexibility:
Participants can switch between hats, allowing for a flexible and
dynamic approach to problem-solving or decision-making.
The Six Thinking Hats method is widely used in business, education, and other
settings to improve group communication, enhance creativity, and make more
informed decisions. It promotes a balanced exploration of ideas and helps avoid
common pitfalls associated with unstructured group discussions.