SECTION A: COMPARATIVE EDUCATION AS A DISCIPLINE:

GENERAL THEORY
Week 1
Introduction to Comparative Education

Definition of Comparative Education

Definitions of comparative education

There is no agreed definition of comparative education. Different authors have tried to come up
with definitions that have not been agreed upon by all. However, the tentative definitions that
have been propounded by the authors indicate that the discipline is still evolving .As Sharma
(2008) observes, there is no general agreement as to what comparative education comprises or
exactly what methods should be used in its study. In this context he has evaluated definitions by
different authors starting with the father of the discipline Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris in 1817,
Michael Sandler, John Griscom, Isaac Kandel and J. Dover Wilson.
Comparative education is an academic field that involves the study of educational systems,
practices, and policies across different countries or regions. The goal of comparative education is
to analyze and understand the similarities, differences, and trends in education systems around
the world. This field of study explores various aspects of education, such as curriculum
development, teaching methods, educational structures, funding models, educational outcomes,
and the social, cultural, and economic factors that influence education in different contexts.
Aims of Comparative Education
The comparative education approach allows researchers, policymakers, and educators to:

Gain Insights: By studying various education systems, researchers can identify successful
practices, policies, and strategies that have led to positive outcomes in different countries. This
can inform the improvement of education systems elsewhere.

Highlight Challenges: Comparative education can also shed light on challenges faced by
different education systems, such as disparities in access to education, quality of education, or
issues related to equity and inclusion.

Inform Policy: Policymakers can learn from the experiences of other countries when designing
or revising educational policies. Lessons learned from other contexts can help in avoiding
potential pitfalls and maximizing the effectiveness of policy decisions.

Promote Cross-Cultural Understanding: Comparative education contributes to a deeper

understanding of cultural, social, and economic factors that shape education in different parts of
the world. This understanding is important for fostering tolerance, respect, and collaboration
across diverse societies.
Research and Innovation: Comparative studies can lead to new research questions and insights
that contribute to the advancement of educational theory and practice.

Researchers in comparative education may conduct cross-country analyses, case studies, and
surveys to gather data and draw meaningful comparisons. They often consider factors such as
historical development, cultural norms, political structures, economic conditions, and social
dynamics that influence the education systems being studied.

In essence, comparative education provides a valuable framework for examining education

beyond national borders, fostering a global perspective on education systems and their impact on
societies.

Significance/ importance of Studying Comparative Education

The significance of comparative education lies in its ability to offer valuable insights, inform
policy decisions, and promote cross-cultural understanding in the field of education. Here are
some key points that highlight the significance of comparative education:

1. Identifying Best Practices: Comparative education allows for the identification of

successful educational practices, policies, and strategies from different countries. By
studying systems that have achieved positive outcomes, educators and policymakers can
adapt these practices to their own contexts to improve the quality of education.
2. Learning from Mistakes: Similarly, by examining challenges and failures in education
systems around the world, researchers and policymakers can learn from the mistakes of
others and avoid implementing policies that might have negative consequences.
3. Policy Formulation and Improvement: Comparative education research provides
policymakers with a broader perspective on the effects of different policies. They can
draw inspiration from successful policies in other countries and make informed decisions
about their own education systems.
4. Addressing Equity and Inclusion: By comparing education systems, researchers can
highlight disparities in access to education, resources, and opportunities among different
groups within a society. This can lead to efforts to make education more equitable and
inclusive.
5. Cultural Sensitivity: Comparative education fosters cross-cultural understanding by
highlighting the ways in which culture, history, and societal values impact educational
systems. This understanding is crucial for promoting tolerance and collaboration in a
globalized world.
6. Innovation and Adaptation: Through the study of different education systems,
researchers can gain fresh perspectives that may lead to innovative approaches to
teaching, learning, and educational administration. Adapting successful strategies from
 one context to another can drive positive change.
7. Professional Development: Comparative education encourages educators to explore
diverse teaching methods and curricula used in different countries. This exposure can
enhance their pedagogical skills and broaden their teaching techniques.
8. Global Education Trends: Comparative education research helps in identifying and
understanding global education trends, which can inform discussions about the future of
education and its role in addressing emerging challenges and opportunities.
9. Research and Theory Development: Comparative education contributes to the
development of educational theory by providing new research questions, insights, and
perspectives. It encourages scholars to consider a wide range of factors that influence
educational systems.
10. Evidence-Based Decision-Making: Policymakers and educators can use evidence from
comparative studies to make informed decisions about resource allocation, curriculum
development, teacher training, and other critical aspects of education.
11. International Collaboration: Comparative education fosters collaboration among
researchers, educators, and policymakers across borders, leading to the sharing of
knowledge and best practices.

In essence, comparative education helps us move beyond a narrow understanding of education

that is confined to a single national context. It encourages us to learn from the experiences of
others, adapt successful strategies, and work collaboratively to improve education on a global
scale.

Scope of comparative Education

The scope of comparative education is broad and encompasses various aspects of education
systems, practices, and policies across different countries or regions. Here are some of the key
areas within the scope of comparative education:

1. Educational Systems and Structures: Comparative education examines the

organizational structures, levels, and stages of education systems in different countries.
This includes the study of primary, secondary, tertiary, and vocational education.
2. Curriculum Development: The scope covers the design, development, and content of
curricula in different countries. Researchers analyze how subjects are chosen, structured,
and adapted to meet cultural, social, and economic needs.
3. Teaching and Learning Methods: Comparative education looks at various pedagogical
approaches, teaching methods, and classroom practices employed in different education
systems. This includes traditional methods as well as innovative teaching techniques.
4. Educational Policies: Researchers study educational policies such as funding
mechanisms, assessment methods, teacher training, and educational governance
structures. Comparative analysis helps policymakers understand the impact of different
 policies on educational outcomes.
5. Equity and Inclusion: The scope extends to examining issues related to equity, access,
and inclusion in education. Comparative education highlights disparities in educational
opportunities for different groups and explores strategies for creating more equitable
systems.
6. Educational Outcomes: Comparative studies analyze educational outcomes such as
literacy rates, graduation rates, and student performance on international assessments.
This helps identify factors that contribute to successful learning outcomes.
7. Cultural and Societal Influences: Comparative education delves into the cultural,
social, and historical factors that shape education systems. This includes exploring how
cultural values and societal norms influence educational practices.
8. Teacher Training and Professional Development: The scope covers the training,
qualifications, and ongoing professional development of teachers in different countries.
Comparative analysis can reveal effective strategies for teacher preparation.
9. Globalization and Education: Comparative education examines the effects of
globalization on education, including the adoption of international standards, the role of
technology, and the internationalization of higher education.
10. Educational Reforms: Researchers in this field study efforts to reform education
systems, including the motivations behind reforms, their implementation processes, and
their outcomes.
11. Historical Context: The historical development of education systems is an important
aspect of comparative education. Analyzing the evolution of education over time
provides insights into the current state of systems.
12. Cross-Cultural Understanding: Comparative education promotes understanding and
appreciation of cultural differences, helping to develop intercultural competence and
fostering global citizenship.
13. Methodology and Research Design: Comparative education involves developing
appropriate research methodologies for cross-country studies, including case studies,
surveys, and qualitative and quantitative analysis.
14. Policy Transfer and Adaptation: The scope includes the study of how policies and
practices from one context are transferred, adapted, and implemented in another,
considering the challenges and successes.
15. International Organizations and Agreements: Researchers examine the role of
international organizations (such as UNESCO) and agreements (like the Sustainable
Development Goals) in shaping education policies worldwide.

In essence, the scope of comparative education is interdisciplinary, encompassing fields like

education, sociology, anthropology, economics, political science, and more. It provides a
comprehensive framework for understanding and improving education systems by drawing on
the experiences of diverse countries and regions.
 Assignment
1. Using your own words define comparative education.
2. Elaborate on the view that comparative education is indispensable in the current
world characterized by Information, Communication and Technology (ICT).
3. According to you, what are some of the weaknesses of comparative education?
Answers to assessment
1. Comparative education is the study of different education systems in the world with
the view to understand their similarities and differences.
2. The second question requires the candidate to highlight the reasons for studying
comparative education. They are:
a) Planning
b) Economics of education
c) Humanitarian purpose
d) Development of education
e) Evaluation
f) Description
3. The following are some of the weaknesses of comparative education:
a) Whole sale borrowing of education systems.
b) Lack of clear methodologies to use.
c) Different terms and methodologies used in different countries.
d) Different interpretation of terms.

Week 2

Historical Development of Comparative Education: Phase 1 (Period of Travelers or Pre-

historic/Ancient Time to 1817)

1. Comparative education is the field of study that examines and compares educational systems,
processes, and outcomes across different countries or cultures. This field emerged as scholars
and educators sought to understand the influences and implications of different educational
practices, theories, and systems globally. The historical development of comparative education
can be divided into various phases, with the first phase being the Period of Travelers or Pre-
historic/Ancient Time to 1817.

2. Characteristics of the Period of Travelers (Pre-historic/Ancient Time to 1817)

 Informal Observations: During this period, the study of education was not formalized as
a distinct academic discipline. Observations were often made by travelers, merchants,
scholars, and missionaries who recorded their impressions and experiences of educational
practices in different cultures and regions.
  Descriptive and Narrative Approach: The accounts from this period were mainly
descriptive and narrative in nature. They focused on describing the educational practices
observed in various cultures without any systematic comparison or analysis.
 Lack of Systematic Methodology: The observations made were not grounded in any
systematic methodology or theoretical framework. They were based on the personal
experiences and biases of the observers.
 Ethnocentrism: Observations made during this period were often influenced by the
cultural and religious biases of the travellers. European travellers, in particular, tended to
view other educational systems through the lens of their own cultural superiority.
 Focus on Cultural Exchange: The period was characterized by the exchange of
knowledge and educational practices across different cultures. This exchange was often
facilitated by trade, exploration, and missionary activities.
 Influence of Religion and Philosophy: Educational practices during this period were
heavily influenced by religious and philosophical traditions. In many cultures, education
was intertwined with religious instruction and moral teachings.

3. Key People and Their Contributions

1. Herodotus (c. 484–425 BCE)

o Contribution: Herodotus, often referred to as the "Father of History," was one of
the earliest travellers who documented the customs, practices, and education
systems of different cultures. His writings, particularly "Histories," provided
insights into the educational practices of ancient Egypt, Persia, and other
civilizations.
o Relevance: Herodotus's work laid the foundation for the comparative study of
cultures, including educational practices. His descriptive accounts, though lacking
in systematic analysis, contributed to the understanding of how education was
conducted in different civilizations.
2. Marco Polo (1254–1324)
o Contribution: Marco Polo, a Venetian merchant and traveller, provided one of
the earliest detailed accounts of the educational practices in the Far East,
particularly in China. His travelogue, "The Travels of Marco Polo," described the
advanced educational system in China, including the use of paper and printing,
which were innovations at the time.
o Relevance: Marco Polo's observations highlighted the differences between
Eastern and Western educational practices and technologies. His work increased
European awareness of Chinese advancements, influencing later educational
exchanges and innovations.
3. Ibn Battuta (1304–1369)
o Contribution: Ibn Battuta, a Moroccan explorer, traveled extensively across the
Islamic world and beyond. His writings, particularly the "Rihla" (The Journey),
 documented the educational practices in Muslim-majority regions, including
North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia. He described the role of madrasas
(Islamic schools) and the spread of Islamic education.
o Relevance: Ibn Battuta's work provided a comprehensive view of the Islamic
educational system, highlighting the spread and influence of Islamic education
across different regions. His accounts are valuable for understanding the diversity
and commonalities in educational practices in the Muslim world.
4. Pedro de Gante (1486–1572)
o Contribution: Pedro de Gante, a Franciscan missionary in New Spain (present-
day Mexico), established some of the first schools for indigenous peoples in the
Americas. He sought to introduce European educational practices while
respecting and incorporating indigenous knowledge and languages.
o Relevance: Gante’s efforts represented an early form of intercultural education,
blending European and indigenous educational practices. His work highlighted
the challenges and opportunities of cross-cultural education, which is relevant in
today’s context of multicultural education.
5. Comenius (1592–1670)
o Contribution: John Amos Comenius, a Czech educator and philosopher, is often
considered one of the pioneers of modern education. His work "Didactica Magna"
(The Great Didactic) advocated for universal education and the systematic study
of educational methods. He also proposed the idea of comparing educational
systems to improve teaching practices.
o Relevance: Comenius’s ideas laid the groundwork for the later development of
comparative education as a formal discipline. His emphasis on the universal
principles of education and the need for systematic study influenced later
educational theorists.
6. Voltaire (1694–1778)
o Contribution: The French philosopher Voltaire traveled extensively and
observed the educational systems of different countries, particularly England and
Germany. He compared these systems with the French education system and
advocated for educational reforms based on his observations.
o Relevance: Voltaire’s comparative approach to education influenced the
Enlightenment thinkers and contributed to the growing interest in comparing
educational systems to foster improvements.

4. Relevance to Present-Day Theory and Practice

 Foundations of Comparative Education: The observations and writings of these early

travelers and scholars laid the foundational concepts of comparative education. Although
their work was not systematic, it provided the basis for later scholars to develop more
structured approaches to comparing educational systems.
  Cultural Awareness and Exchange: The focus on cultural exchange during this period
is still relevant today, as comparative education continues to emphasize the importance of
understanding different cultural contexts and the influence of cultural factors on
education.
 Ethnocentrism in Comparative Studies: The ethnocentrism present in early
comparative studies serves as a reminder of the need for objectivity and cultural
sensitivity in contemporary comparative education research. Modern comparative
education strives to avoid biases and to appreciate the value of diverse educational
practices.
 Influence of Religion and Philosophy: The impact of religious and philosophical
traditions on education during this period is still relevant today. Comparative education
continues to explore how different belief systems and philosophies shape educational
practices and policies worldwide.
 Systematic Approaches to Comparison: While the period of travelers lacked systematic
methodologies, it highlighted the need for structured comparisons in education. Today,
comparative education employs rigorous methodologies and theoretical frameworks to
analyze educational systems more systematically.

5. Conclusion The Period of Travellers or Pre-historic/Ancient Time to 1817 represents the

earliest phase in the historical development of comparative education. Although it was
characterized by informal and often biased observations, this period laid the groundwork for the
emergence of comparative education as a formal discipline. The contributions of key figures like
Herodotus, Marco Polo, Ibn Battuta, and Comenius have had a lasting impact on the field,
influencing both historical and contemporary comparative education theory and practice.
Understanding this phase provides valuable insights into the evolution of educational thought
and the importance of cross-cultural perspectives in education.

Phase 2 (Post-1817 - Period of Pioneers and Selective Education Borrowing)

The period following 1817 marks a significant era in the evolution of comparative education,
often referred to as the "Period of Pioneers and Selective Education Borrowing." This phase is
characterized by the transition from informal, descriptive observations to more systematic and
methodical studies of education across nations. Scholars began to engage in the selective
borrowing of educational practices from other countries to enhance their own education systems,
leading to the formalization of comparative education as a field of study.

2. Characteristics of the Post-1817 Period

 Systematic Approach to Comparative Studies: The post-1817 period saw the

emergence of a systematic approach to comparing educational systems. Scholars
 developed methods to analyze and compare education systems across different countries,
considering various factors such as culture, political context, and educational outcomes.
 Selective Borrowing of Educational Practices: One of the key features of this period
was the selective adoption of educational practices from other countries. Rather than
simply imitating foreign systems, educators and policymakers carefully chose elements
that would best address the needs and challenges of their own countries.
 Development of Comparative Methodology: The period witnessed the creation of
formal methodologies for comparing education systems. These methodologies aimed to
ensure that comparisons were objective, comprehensive, and context-sensitive.
 Nationalism and Education: The rise of nationalism in the 19th century influenced the
way education systems were developed and reformed. Countries sought to build strong
national identities through education, often looking to successful foreign models to
strengthen their own systems.
 Impact of Industrialization: The Industrial Revolution played a significant role in
shaping education during this period. As countries industrialized, there was an increased
demand for an educated workforce, leading to educational reforms that incorporated
elements from other successful education systems.
 Expansion of Public Education: Many countries began to establish public education
systems during this period, often drawing on successful models from other nations. This
expansion was driven by the need for universal education to support economic
development and social progress.

3. Key People and Their Contributions

1. Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris (1775–1848)

o Contribution: Known as the "Father of Comparative Education," Jullien de Paris
was one of the first to propose a systematic approach to the study of education
across different countries. In his work "Esquisse et Vues Préliminaires d'un
Ouvrage sur l'Éducation Comparée" (Preliminary Outline of a Work on
Comparative Education), he outlined a framework for comparing education
systems, focusing on factors like curriculum, teaching methods, and educational
outcomes.
o Relevance: Jullien’s work laid the foundation for the development of comparative
education as a scientific discipline. His emphasis on systematic comparison and
data-driven analysis continues to influence modern comparative education
research.
2. Victor Cousin (1792–1867)
o Contribution: Victor Cousin was a French philosopher and educational reformer
who conducted a detailed study of the Prussian education system. His report,
"Rapport sur l'état de l'instruction publique dans quelques pays de l'Allemagne, et
particulièrement en Prusse" (Report on the State of Public Instruction in Some
 Countries of Germany, and Particularly in Prussia), highlighted the strengths of
the Prussian system, including its centralized organization, teacher training, and
emphasis on moral education.
o Relevance: Cousin’s work had a significant impact on educational reform in
France and other countries. His selective borrowing from the Prussian model is a
classic example of how comparative education can inform national education
policy.
3. Horace Mann (1796–1859)
o Contribution: Horace Mann, an American education reformer, is best known for
his role in establishing the public school system in the United States. Inspired by
the Prussian model, Mann advocated for free, compulsory education, standardized
curricula, and professional teacher training. His study of European education
systems, particularly Prussia’s, played a key role in shaping the U.S. education
system.
o Relevance: Mann’s work underscores the importance of selective borrowing in
educational reform. His successful adaptation of the Prussian model to the U.S.
context remains a significant example of how comparative education can drive
national educational improvements.
4. Matthew Arnold (1822–1888)
o Contribution: An English poet and cultural critic, Matthew Arnold served as an
inspector of schools and contributed to comparative education through his studies
of European education systems, particularly those in France and Germany. Arnold
emphasized the importance of moral and cultural education and advocated for
reforms that would integrate these elements into the English education system.
o Relevance: Arnold’s comparative work influenced educational reforms in
England, particularly in the areas of moral education and curriculum
development. His focus on the cultural dimensions of education remains relevant
in contemporary discussions on the role of education in shaping national identity.
5. Michael Sadler (1861–1943)
o Contribution: Michael Sadler, a British educationist, made significant
contributions to the field of comparative education through his comparative
studies of education systems in different countries. His reports provided detailed
analyses of the strengths and weaknesses of these systems, with a particular focus
on the cultural and social contexts in which they operated.
o Relevance: Sadler’s work highlighted the importance of understanding the
cultural and social contexts of education systems when making comparisons. His
approach continues to influence modern comparative education research, which
emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive and context-aware comparisons.

4. Relevance to Present-Day Theory and Practice

  Foundation of Comparative Education: The systematic approaches and methodologies
developed during this period laid the groundwork for comparative education as a formal
academic discipline. Today, comparative education continues to be a vital field that
informs education policy, practice, and research globally.
 Selective Borrowing in Education: The concept of selective borrowing remains highly
relevant in contemporary education. Policymakers and educators continue to look to
successful education models from other countries, adapting them to their own contexts
while considering cultural, social, and political factors.
 Globalization and Education: The selective borrowing practices of the post-1817 period
foreshadowed the globalization of education that is prevalent today. Comparative
education plays a crucial role in understanding and addressing the challenges and
opportunities of global educational exchanges and influences.
 Educational Reform and Innovation: The comparative studies and selective borrowing
practices of this period led to significant educational reforms and innovations. This
practice continues to be relevant as countries seek to improve their education systems by
learning from the successes and failures of others.
 Cultural Context in Comparative Education: The emphasis on cultural and social
contexts in the work of scholars like Sadler is a key principle in contemporary
comparative education. Understanding the unique contexts of different education systems
is essential for making meaningful comparisons and informed decisions.

5. Key Discussion Questions

1. What are the key factors that influenced the emergence of systematic comparative
education in the post-1817 period?
o This question encourages exploration of the historical, social, and political
contexts that led to the formalization of comparative education as a discipline.
2. How did the concept of selective borrowing shape the development of national
education systems during the 19th century?
o This question prompts a discussion on the impact of borrowing educational
practices from other countries and the factors that influenced the selection
process.
3. What role did nationalism play in the comparative education studies of the post-
1817 period?
o This question allows for an examination of how national identity and the desire to
build strong nation-states influenced the development of education systems.
4. In what ways did the Industrial Revolution impact the comparative education
practices of the 19th century?
o This question encourages an analysis of how the need for an educated workforce
during industrialization influenced education reforms and the adoption of foreign
educational models.
 5. How do the contributions of key figures like Jullien de Paris, Victor Cousin, and
Horace Mann continue to influence contemporary comparative education theory
and practice?
o This question prompts a discussion on the lasting impact of the pioneers of
comparative education on modern educational research and policy-making.
6. What are the challenges and opportunities of selective borrowing in today’s
globalized education landscape?
o This question encourages a critical discussion on the relevance and limitations of
selective borrowing in the context of globalization and cultural diversity.
7. How can modern comparative education research ensure that it remains culturally
sensitive and context-aware?
o This question highlights the importance of understanding cultural contexts in
comparative studies and encourages discussion on best practices for achieving
this.

6. Conclusion

The Post-1817 Period of Pioneers and Selective Education Borrowing marks a pivotal phase in
the historical development of comparative education. The systematic approaches, selective
borrowing practices, and contributions of key figures during this period have had a profound and
lasting impact on the field. Understanding this period is essential for appreciating the evolution
of comparative education and its relevance to contemporary educational theory, policy, and
practice. The key discussion questions provided offer a starting point for further exploration of
these themes in both historical and modern contexts

Phase 3 (1900-1945 - Period of Philosophers and Historians: Focus on Cultural Context)

The period from 1900 to 1945, known as the "Period of Philosophers and Historians," marked a
significant shift in the study of comparative education. This era emphasized the importance of
understanding the cultural, historical, and philosophical contexts of education systems. Scholars
during this period moved away from the purely functional comparisons of earlier phases and
began to explore the deeper meanings and purposes of education within different cultural and
historical contexts. This period laid the groundwork for the cultural-contextual approach that
continues to influence comparative education today.

2. Characteristics of the Period

 Emphasis on Cultural Context: During this period, scholars recognized the importance
of understanding the cultural and historical contexts in which education systems
developed. They argued that education cannot be fully understood without considering
the broader cultural, social, and philosophical foundations that shape it.
  Philosophical and Historical Analysis: The period saw a growing focus on the
philosophical and historical analysis of education systems. Scholars explored the
underlying philosophical ideas that influenced educational practices and how historical
events and movements shaped education.
 Critique of Universalism: The period was marked by a critique of the universalist
approach to education that had characterized earlier phases. Scholars argued that
education systems are deeply rooted in their cultural and historical contexts, and what
works in one context may not be applicable in another.
 Focus on National Identity: The rise of nationalism and the impact of the two World
Wars led to an increased focus on education's role in shaping national identity.
Comparative education during this period often explored how education systems
contributed to the formation of national consciousness.
 Development of Methodologies: The period saw the development of new methodologies
in comparative education that emphasized qualitative analysis and the interpretation of
cultural and historical contexts. This approach contrasted with the quantitative and
functionalist methodologies of earlier periods.

3. Key People and Their Contributions

1. Isaac Kandel (1881-1965)

o Contribution: Isaac Kandel, a prominent figure in the field of comparative
education, emphasized the importance of understanding the cultural and historical
contexts of education systems. In his work "Comparative Education," Kandel
argued that educational practices and policies should be analyzed within the
context of the cultural and social environment that produced them. He was critical
of the idea of transferring educational practices from one country to another
without considering the cultural differences.
o Relevance: Kandel's work laid the foundation for the cultural-contextual
approach in comparative education. His emphasis on the importance of cultural
understanding in educational analysis continues to influence contemporary
comparative education research.
2. Nicholas Hans (1888-1969)
o Contribution: Nicholas Hans, a Russian-born British educationist, is known for
his contributions to the historical and cultural analysis of education systems. In
his work "Comparative Education: A Study of Educational Factors and
Traditions," Hans identified key factors that influence education, including
religion, language, and national traditions. He argued that these factors must be
understood to make meaningful comparisons between education systems.
o Relevance: Hans' work highlighted the importance of considering cultural and
historical factors in comparative education. His identification of key educational
 factors continues to be a fundamental concept in the field, influencing how
comparative education is approached today.
3. George Bereday (1915-1983)
o Contribution: George Bereday, an American comparative educationist, is
credited with developing the "problem approach" in comparative education. In his
work, Bereday emphasized the importance of understanding the cultural and
historical context of educational problems before attempting to compare or
borrow solutions from other countries. He advocated for a more interdisciplinary
approach, combining history, sociology, and philosophy in the study of
comparative education.
o Relevance: Bereday's problem approach has had a lasting impact on the field of
comparative education. His work emphasized the need for a deeper understanding
of the cultural and historical context in which educational problems arise, a
principle that continues to guide comparative education research today.
4. Paul Monroe (1869-1947)
o Contribution: Paul Monroe was an influential American educationist who played
a key role in the development of comparative education as an academic discipline.
His work, "A Textbook in the History of Education," provided a comprehensive
historical analysis of education systems across different cultures. Monroe
emphasized the importance of understanding the historical development of
education in different cultural contexts and its impact on contemporary education
systems.
o Relevance: Monroe's historical approach to comparative education continues to
be relevant in contemporary research. His emphasis on the historical development
of education systems has influenced the way scholars study and compare
education today.
5. Sir Michael Sadler (1861-1943)
o Contribution: Although Sadler's work began in the previous period, his influence
extended into the early 20th century. Sadler argued that educational systems
should be understood as part of the broader cultural and social fabric of a nation.
His famous 1900 report on education in England emphasized the importance of
cultural context in understanding education systems. Sadler’s work led to a
greater focus on the cultural and social contexts of education during this period.
o Relevance: Sadler’s work remains influential in comparative education,
particularly his emphasis on the cultural context of education. His approach
continues to shape how scholars and policymakers think about the relationship
between education and culture.

4. Relevance to Present-Day Theory and Practice

  Cultural-Contextual Approach: The cultural-contextual approach developed during this
period remains a cornerstone of contemporary comparative education. Understanding the
cultural, historical, and philosophical contexts of education systems is essential for
making meaningful comparisons and for the successful adaptation of educational
practices across different cultures.
 Critique of Universalism: The critique of universalism that emerged during this period
continues to be relevant today. Comparative education scholars and policymakers are
increasingly aware of the limitations of applying educational models from one context to
another without considering cultural and historical differences.
 Interdisciplinary Methodologies: The period’s emphasis on interdisciplinary
methodologies has had a lasting impact on comparative education research. Today,
comparative education is a multidisciplinary field that draws on history, philosophy,
sociology, and anthropology to provide a deeper understanding of education systems.
 Role of Education in National Identity: The focus on education’s role in shaping
national identity during this period remains relevant in contemporary discussions on the
purpose of education. Understanding how education systems contribute to national
identity is crucial in today’s globalized world, where education often plays a key role in
maintaining cultural heritage and promoting social cohesion.
 Historical Analysis in Comparative Education: The historical analysis of education
systems, pioneered during this period, continues to be an important aspect of comparative
education research. Understanding the historical development of education systems
provides valuable insights into their current structure and challenges, helping
policymakers and educators make informed decisions.

5. Key Discussion Questions

1. How did the cultural-contextual approach developed during the 1900-1945 period
influence the study of comparative education?
o This question encourages exploration of the shift from functionalist comparisons
to a deeper understanding of the cultural and historical contexts of education.
2. What are the key differences between the universalist approach to comparative
education and the cultural-contextual approach?
o This question prompts a discussion on the strengths and limitations of each
approach and their relevance to contemporary comparative education.
3. In what ways did the philosophers and historians of this period challenge the idea of
transferring educational practices from one country to another?
o This question allows for an examination of the critiques of educational borrowing
that emerged during this period and their implications for modern education
policy.
4. How did the historical events and philosophical ideas of the early 20th century
shape the development of education systems?
 o This question encourages analysis of the impact of major historical events, such
as the World Wars, and philosophical movements on education systems during
this period.
5. How do the contributions of key figures like Isaac Kandel, Nicholas Hans, and
George Bereday continue to influence contemporary comparative education theory
and practice?
o This question prompts a discussion on the lasting impact of these scholars on the
field of comparative education.
6. What role does education play in shaping national identity, and how was this role
explored during the 1900-1945 period?
o This question encourages exploration of the relationship between education and
national identity, a key theme during this period.
7. How can modern comparative education research ensure that it remains sensitive to
cultural and historical contexts?
o This question highlights the importance of cultural and historical awareness in
comparative studies and encourages discussion on best practices for achieving
this.
8. In what ways can the interdisciplinary methodologies developed during this period
be applied to contemporary comparative education research?
o This question encourages a discussion on the value of interdisciplinary
approaches in understanding complex educational issues.

6. Conclusion

The Period of Philosophers and Historians (1900-1945) represents a critical phase in the
development of comparative education. The shift towards a cultural-contextual approach, the
critique of universalism, and the emphasis on interdisciplinary methodologies have had a
profound and lasting impact on the field. The contributions of key figures such as Isaac Kandel,
Nicholas Hans, George Bereday, Paul Monroe, and Sir Michael Sadler continue to influence
contemporary comparative education theory and practice. The key discussion questions provided
offer a starting point for further exploration of these themes, both in historical and modern
contexts

Phase 4 (Social Science Perspective: From the End of World War II in 1945 to Present)

The period from the end of World War II in 1945 to the present marks a significant shift in the
field of comparative education, characterized by the adoption of social science methodologies
and perspectives. This era is often referred to as the "Social Science Perspective" phase in the
development of comparative education. During this period, the field became increasingly
interdisciplinary, integrating theories and methods from sociology, economics, political science,
anthropology, and psychology to analyze and compare education systems. The focus shifted
from simply comparing educational structures and policies to understanding the broader social,
economic, and political contexts that shape education.

2. Characteristics of the Period

 Interdisciplinary Approach: The post-1945 period saw the integration of social science
disciplines into comparative education. Scholars began to use theories and methods from
sociology, economics, political science, anthropology, and psychology to explore the
complex relationships between education and society.
 Focus on Social, Economic, and Political Contexts: The field expanded its focus
beyond the structure and content of education systems to include the broader social,
economic, and political contexts. This included exploring issues such as social inequality,
economic development, and the role of education in nation-building and democratization.
 Use of Empirical Research Methods: There was a significant increase in the use of
empirical research methods, including quantitative and qualitative analysis, to study
education systems. Comparative education research became more data-driven, with a
focus on measuring educational outcomes and understanding the factors that influence
them.
 Globalization and Education: The post-war period was marked by the rise of
globalization, which had a profound impact on education systems worldwide.
Comparative education scholars began to explore the effects of globalization on
education, including the spread of educational models, policies, and practices across
national borders.
 Critical and Postcolonial Perspectives: The latter part of this period saw the emergence
of critical and postcolonial perspectives in comparative education. Scholars began to
challenge the dominance of Western educational models and to explore the impact of
colonialism and neo-colonialism on education systems in the Global South.
 Role of International Organizations: International organizations such as UNESCO, the
World Bank, and OECD became increasingly influential in shaping global education
policy. Comparative education research often focused on the role of these organizations
in promoting educational development and reform.

3. Key People and Their Contributions

1. Torsten Husén (1916-2009)

o Contribution: Torsten Husén was a Swedish educationist and a pioneer in the use
of empirical research methods in comparative education. He was instrumental in
the development of large-scale international assessments, such as the International
Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) studies. His
work emphasized the importance of measuring educational outcomes and using
data to inform education policy.
 o Relevance: Husén’s contributions laid the groundwork for the widespread use of
empirical research methods in comparative education today. His work continues
to influence international assessments like PISA, which play a significant role in
shaping global education policy.
2. Andreas Kazamias (1927-2022)
o Contribution: Andreas Kazamias was a Greek-American scholar who
emphasized the importance of historical and cultural contexts in comparative
education. He advocated for a "cultural-historical" approach, arguing that
education systems must be understood within the broader cultural and historical
frameworks that shape them. Kazamias also critiqued the dominance of Western
models in comparative education and called for greater attention to non-Western
education systems.
o Relevance: Kazamias’ work remains relevant in contemporary comparative
education, particularly in discussions around decolonizing the curriculum and
recognizing the diversity of educational experiences globally. His emphasis on
cultural and historical contexts continues to inform how scholars approach the
study of education systems.
3. Brian Holmes (1920-1993)
o Contribution: Brian Holmes was a British comparative educationist known for
developing the "problem-solving approach" in comparative education. Holmes
argued that comparative education should focus on solving practical educational
problems by comparing different systems. He emphasized the importance of using
a systematic, scientific approach to identify solutions that could be adapted to
different contexts.
o Relevance: Holmes’ problem-solving approach remains influential in
contemporary comparative education, particularly in the context of policy-
making. His work underscores the practical value of comparative education
research in addressing global educational challenges.
4. Martin Carnoy (1941-)
o Contribution: Martin Carnoy is an American scholar known for his work on the
economics of education and the role of education in economic development.
Carnoy’s research has explored the relationship between education, labor markets,
and economic growth, as well as the impact of globalization on education
systems. He has also been critical of the ways in which education is used to
perpetuate social and economic inequalities.
o Relevance: Carnoy’s work is highly relevant in the context of contemporary
debates on the role of education in promoting economic development and social
equity. His research continues to inform discussions on the impact of
globalization on education and the need for policies that address educational
inequalities.
 5. Robert F. Arnove (1940-)
o Contribution: Robert F. Arnove is an American comparative educationist who
has made significant contributions to the study of education and social change.
Arnove has examined the role of education in promoting social justice and
democratization, particularly in the context of Latin America. He has also
explored the influence of international organizations on education policy in
developing countries.
o Relevance: Arnove’s work remains relevant in contemporary comparative
education, particularly in discussions around education and social justice. His
focus on the role of education in promoting democracy and social change
continues to influence research and policy-making in the field.

4. Relevance to Present-Day Theory and Practice

 Empirical Research and International Assessments: The use of empirical research

methods and international assessments, pioneered during this period, continues to be a
cornerstone of comparative education. Studies like PISA, TIMSS, and PIRLS provide
valuable data that inform global education policy and help countries benchmark their
education systems.
 Globalization and Education: The impact of globalization on education, a key theme
during this period, remains highly relevant today. Comparative education scholars
continue to explore how globalization shapes education systems, including the spread of
educational policies and practices across borders and the role of international
organizations in promoting educational reform.
 Social Justice and Equity: The focus on social justice and equity, particularly in the
work of scholars like Martin Carnoy and Robert Arnove, continues to be a critical area of
study in comparative education. Issues such as educational inequality, access to quality
education, and the role of education in promoting social change are central to
contemporary research and policy-making.
 Critical and Postcolonial Perspectives: The emergence of critical and postcolonial
perspectives during this period has had a lasting impact on comparative education.
Scholars continue to challenge the dominance of Western educational models and to
advocate for the inclusion of diverse cultural and historical perspectives in the study of
education.
 Policy-Relevant Research: The problem-solving approach and the emphasis on policy-
relevant research, championed by scholars like Brian Holmes, remain central to the field
of comparative education. Comparative education research continues to play a key role in
informing education policy and addressing global educational challenges.

5. Key Discussion Questions

1. How has the integration of social science perspectives transformed the field of
comparative education since 1945?
o This question encourages exploration of the shift towards interdisciplinary
research in comparative education and the impact of social science methodologies
on the field.
2. What are the implications of using international assessments like PISA for global
education policy?
o This question prompts a discussion on the role of international assessments in
shaping education policy and the potential benefits and drawbacks of relying on
these tools for cross-national comparisons.
3. In what ways has globalization influenced education systems, and how has
comparative education research addressed these changes?
o This question allows for an examination of the impact of globalization on
education and the ways in which comparative education research has explored the
spread of educational models, policies, and practices across borders.
4. How do critical and postcolonial perspectives challenge traditional approaches to
comparative education, and what is their relevance to contemporary research?
o This question encourages discussion on the contributions of critical and
postcolonial perspectives to the field and their implications for the study of
education systems in the Global South.
5. How can comparative education research contribute to addressing issues of social
justice and equity in education?
o This question prompts an exploration of the role of comparative education in
promoting social justice and equity, with a focus on how research can inform
policies that address educational inequalities.
6. What are the key challenges and opportunities in using empirical research methods
in comparative education today?
o This question encourages a discussion on the strengths and limitations of
empirical research methods in comparative education and their role in informing
evidence-based policy-making.
7. How do the contributions of key figures like Torsten Husén, Andreas Kazamias, and
Martin Carnoy continue to influence contemporary comparative education theory
and practice?
o This question prompts a discussion on the lasting impact of these scholars on the
field of comparative education.
8. What role do international organizations play in shaping global education policy,
and how has this role evolved since 1945?
o This question encourages exploration of the influence of international
organizations on education policy and the ways in which comparative education
research has examined this influence.
6. Conclusion

The Social Science Perspective period, from the end of World War II to the present, represents a
transformative phase in the development of comparative education. The integration of social
science perspectives, the focus on social, economic, and political contexts, and the use of
empirical research methods have significantly expanded

Assessment
1) Highlight the main phases in the development of comparative
education.
2) For each of the phases in (a) above highlight the main characteristics
prevalent in each.
3) Do these phases have any contribution to modern day theory and
practice in education?
Answers to assessment
1. Main phases in comparative education:
a) Travelers
b) Pioneers phase
c) Philosophers phase
d) Social science
2. Characteristics of each phase:
a) Travelers
 Descriptions of facts
 Unsystematic description
 Biasness and prejudice
 Cultural biasness

b) Pioneers phase
 Cultural biasness
 Selective borrowing of ideas and practices from other countries.
 Methodology was developed in comparative education
c) Philosophers phase
 Critical on methodology to be used.
 Against the selective borrowing as a methodology.
 Concern of cultural context in borrowing of education systems.
d) Social science
 Development of theories for educational interpretation
 Use of both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection.
 
Different forces have influenced the phase.

Large scale studies have been conducted in the world such as TIMSS and
PISA.
 Democratization of education in the world.
3. The phases have contributions to modern day education in various ways:
a) Travelers’ tales are still relevant in the current world where stories are used in
the classroom set ups.
b) Selective education borrowing is relevant in the present world.
c) Use of large scale studies are common in the current educational studies.
d) Emphasis on methodologies in regard to the context of the place as seen
during the philosophers phase.

Roles and Contributions of International Organizations in the Development of

Comparative Education

International organizations have played a pivotal role in shaping and advancing Comparative
Education by promoting global education standards, providing resources, conducting research,
and advocating for educational reforms. Below are detailed roles and contributions of UNESCO,
UNICEF, the World Bank, UNHCR, and WHO in the development of Comparative Education,
with relevant examples.

1. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

Roles:

 Global Education Policy Leadership: UNESCO sets global education agendas through
initiatives like the Education for All (EFA) goals and the Sustainable Development Goal
4 (SDG 4), aiming to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education for all. These
frameworks serve as benchmarks in Comparative Education.
 Research and Data Collection: Through its Institute for Statistics (UIS), UNESCO
collects, analyzes, and disseminates education data globally, providing essential resources
for Comparative Education researchers to study educational disparities, trends, and
outcomes.
 Technical Assistance and Capacity Building: UNESCO assists countries in educational
planning and policy formulation by offering expertise and facilitating knowledge
exchange between nations, often drawing from successful models in other regions.
  Promotion of Educational Equity: UNESCO advocates for education as a fundamental
human right and works to eliminate disparities, which directly influences studies in
Comparative Education focusing on equity and access.

Contributions:

 Global Education Monitoring Report (GEM): This report, published annually by

UNESCO, offers in-depth comparative analyses of education systems worldwide,
providing valuable insights for policymakers and researchers in Comparative Education.
 International Bureau of Education (IBE): UNESCO’s IBE supports curriculum
development globally by sharing comparative studies on educational content,
methodologies, and outcomes, enhancing Comparative Education research.
 Case Study - Kenya: UNESCO has collaborated with Kenya to develop and implement
policies focusing on inclusive education, comparing Kenya's practices with those of other
countries to identify and adapt best practices.

2. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)

Roles:

 Advocacy for Child Rights in Education: UNICEF focuses on ensuring that every child
has the right to education, which is a central theme in Comparative Education studies
exploring how different countries uphold children's educational rights.
 Data Collection and Research on Child Education: UNICEF provides comprehensive
data through initiatives like the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), which
researchers use to compare educational outcomes and challenges across different regions.
 Promotion of Early Childhood Education (ECE): UNICEF emphasizes the importance
of ECE in global educational policies, influencing Comparative Education research that
examines the impact of early learning on long-term educational outcomes.
 Partnerships for Educational Improvement: UNICEF partners with governments and
other organizations to implement educational programs across various contexts, offering
Comparative Education researchers insights into the effectiveness of different educational
interventions.

Contributions:

 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS): This initiative provides detailed,

comparable data on children’s well-being, including education. Comparative Education
 researchers use this data to analyze and compare educational outcomes across different
countries.
 Educational Programs in Low-Income Countries: UNICEF has implemented and
supported educational programs in low-income countries, including Kenya, where
Comparative Education research has explored the impact of these programs on
educational access and quality.
 Case Study - Kenya: UNICEF has been involved in Kenya’s Free Primary Education
(FPE) initiative, providing insights into the comparative analysis of how similar programs
have been implemented and their outcomes in different countries.

4. World Bank
Roles:

 Funding Educational Reforms: The World Bank provides significant financial support
for educational reforms in developing countries, often drawing from Comparative
Education research to guide investments in effective policies and practices.
 Policy Guidance and Technical Assistance: The World Bank offers policy advice and
technical assistance based on comparative studies of global education systems, helping
countries to adapt successful models from other regions.
 Research on Education Quality and Equity: The World Bank conducts extensive
research on education, particularly focusing on quality and equity. This research
contributes to the Comparative Education field by offering insights into how different
countries address these challenges.
 Support for Systemic Educational Changes: The World Bank promotes systemic
changes in education through comprehensive projects that are often informed by
comparative analyses of educational systems worldwide.

Contributions:

 World Development Report (WDR) on Education: The WDR offers comparative

analyses of global education policies, trends, and outcomes, providing a valuable
resource for Comparative Education research and policy-making.
 Education Sector Strategy 2020: This strategy emphasizes learning outcomes, equity,
and efficiency, with comparative insights on how different countries achieve these
objectives, contributing to the body of knowledge in Comparative Education.
 Case Study - Kenya: The World Bank has supported various educational projects in
Kenya, such as the Kenya Secondary Education Quality Improvement Project (SEQIP).
Comparative studies have analyzed the impact of these projects by comparing Kenya’s
outcomes with those of other countries.
4. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)

Roles:

 Advocacy for Refugee Education: UNHCR advocates for the inclusion of refugees in
national education systems, which is a key area of interest in Comparative Education as
researchers examine how different countries address refugee education.
 Implementation of Educational Programs for Displaced Populations: UNHCR
develops and supports educational programs in refugee camps and host communities,
providing data and case studies for Comparative Education research on education in crisis
contexts.
 Research and Data Collection on Refugee Education: UNHCR collects and shares
data on the educational needs and outcomes of refugees, contributing to the global
understanding of how different countries manage and support refugee education.
 Promotion of Inclusive Educational Policies: UNHCR works with governments to
develop inclusive educational policies that integrate refugees, which Comparative
Education researchers often study to evaluate the effectiveness of these policies.

Contributions:

 Education Strategy 2030: UNHCR’s Education Strategy provides a framework for

improving access to quality education for refugees, offering comparative insights into
how different countries implement and adapt this strategy.
 Global Trends Reports: UNHCR’s annual Global Trends reports offer data on refugee
education, which Comparative Education researchers use to analyze trends, challenges,
and best practices in refugee education across different countries.
 Case Study - Kenya: In Kenya, UNHCR has been involved in integrating refugee
children into the national education system, particularly in areas like Dadaab and
Kakuma. Comparative studies have examined the outcomes of these initiatives compared
to similar efforts in other countries.

5. World Health Organization (WHO)

Roles:

 Linking Health and Education: WHO emphasizes the connection between health and
education, highlighting that good health is crucial for effective learning. Comparative
Education studies often explore how countries integrate health and education policies.
  Research on School Health Programs: WHO conducts research on school health
programs globally, offering insights into best practices that Comparative Education
researchers use to compare the effectiveness of health interventions in schools across
different countries.
 Advocacy for Health Education: WHO advocates for the inclusion of health education
in school curricula, and Comparative Education researchers often examine how different
countries implement health education policies.
 Global Health Initiatives and Education: WHO’s global health initiatives, such as
those targeting malnutrition or disease prevention, impact education by improving
children's health and attendance, which are key aspects of Comparative Education
studies.

Contributions:

 Global School Health Initiative: WHO’s initiative promotes health and education
integration in schools worldwide. Comparative Education research often focuses on the
outcomes of this initiative in various contexts.
 Health Promoting Schools (HPS) Framework: WHO’s HPS framework is used by
countries to create environments that promote both health and learning. Comparative
studies examine how different countries implement this framework and its impact on
student outcomes.
 Case Study - Kenya: WHO has supported school health programs in Kenya, addressing
issues like malnutrition and disease prevention. Comparative studies have looked at how
Kenya's approach compares with that of other countries in the region.

Conclusion

UNESCO, UNICEF, the World Bank, UNHCR, and WHO have significantly contributed to the
development of Comparative Education by shaping global education policies, providing financial
and technical support, conducting research, and advocating for inclusive education. Their efforts
have provided the frameworks, data, and case studies that Comparative Education researchers
rely on to analyze and compare educational systems, policies, and outcomes across different
countries. Through their work, these organizations have enriched the field of Comparative
Education, offering valuable insights into the global trends and challenges in education.

Week 4
Methods/Approaches used in Studying Comparative Education
Studying comparative education involves a range of methods and approaches that allow
researchers to systematically analyze, compare, and understand education systems across
different countries or regions. These methods help researchers gain insights into various aspects
of education, including policies, practices, outcomes, and their contextual influences. Here are
some common methods and approaches used in studying comparative education:

The debate about methodology of Comparative Education has been stimulated from time to time
by the need to produce valid answers and better understanding of the education systems, theory,
practices and problems. It became even more important after the Second World War when
Comparative Education became involved more in finding solution to education problems of the
contemporary era. In their efforts to advice nations, countries educational systems and
institutions, have sought even more vigorous for the best method

to use. The following are the methods that have been used in studying of comparative education
and they tend to correspond with the particular stage of development of this discipline:

Methods/Approaches Used in Studying Comparative Education:

Traditional Method

(i) Descriptive Method

Key Details:

 The Descriptive Method is one of the oldest approaches in comparative education,

primarily used during the early stages of the field’s development.
 It involves systematically describing educational systems, policies, curricula, and
practices in different countries or regions without necessarily analyzing or interpreting
them.
 This method aims to document and present educational data and facts in a clear, detailed,
and organized manner.

Characteristics:

 Focus on Documentation: The Descriptive Method emphasizes the collection and

presentation of factual information about different education systems.
 Lack of Analysis: This approach is more about presenting data than interpreting it. There
is minimal analysis or critique of the educational phenomena described.
 Historical Usage: Historically, the Descriptive Method was widely used during the 19th
and early 20th centuries when the field of comparative education was still developing.
 Objective Presentation: The method strives to be objective, avoiding personal biases
and interpretations, focusing purely on what is observed.
Application:

 The Descriptive Method is often used in the initial stages of comparative education
studies to provide a comprehensive overview of educational systems.
 It is useful in creating educational profiles of countries, which can then be used as a basis
for further comparative analysis.
 In contemporary practice, this method is often combined with other approaches to
provide a contextual foundation for more in-depth comparative studies.

Problems/Challenges:

 Lack of Depth: Since the Descriptive Method focuses on documentation rather than
analysis, it often lacks depth and fails to provide insights into the underlying reasons for
differences in educational systems.
 Potential for Bias: Although it aims to be objective, the selection of what to describe and
how to describe it can introduce bias.
 Limited Usefulness for Policy-Making: The method’s focus on description rather than
evaluation or critique makes it less useful for informing educational policy decisions.
 Overemphasis on Facts: There is a risk of overemphasizing the importance of factual
data at the expense of understanding the broader social, cultural, and political contexts
that shape educational systems.

(ii) Selective Education Borrowing

Key Details:

 Selective Education Borrowing refers to the practice of identifying, adapting, and

integrating specific educational policies, practices, or models from one country or context
into another.
 This approach is based on the idea that certain aspects of an education system that have
been successful in one context can be beneficial when implemented in another, provided
they are appropriately adapted to local conditions.

Characteristics:

 Targeted Selection: Unlike wholesale adoption, selective education borrowing focuses

on specific elements of an educational system rather than the entire system.
 Contextual Adaptation: The success of borrowed elements often depends on their
adaptation to fit the cultural, social, economic, and political context of the borrowing
country.
  Innovation and Reform: This method is often used as a tool for educational innovation
and reform, allowing countries to modernize their education systems by learning from
successful examples elsewhere.
 Comparative Analysis: Selective borrowing requires a comparative analysis to identify
which aspects of an education system are most relevant and adaptable.

Application:

 Selective Education Borrowing is commonly used in policy-making, particularly in

developing countries seeking to improve their education systems by adopting successful
practices from more developed nations.
 It is also used in curriculum development, teacher training, and educational technology,
where specific elements from foreign models are integrated into local practices.
 International organizations like UNESCO, the World Bank, and OECD often promote
selective borrowing as part of their educational development programs.

Problems/Challenges:

 Cultural Misalignment: One of the biggest challenges is ensuring that the borrowed
elements are culturally and contextually appropriate for the borrowing country. Failure to
adapt them properly can lead to ineffective implementation or resistance.
 Superficial Adoption: There is a risk of superficial adoption, where countries implement
policies or practices without fully understanding or integrating the underlying principles
that made them successful elsewhere.
 Dependence on Foreign Models: Over-reliance on borrowing can lead to a lack of
original thinking and innovation within the borrowing country, fostering dependence on
foreign models.
 Ethical Considerations: The practice raises ethical questions about the imposition of
educational models from more powerful or developed nations onto less developed
countries, potentially reinforcing inequalities and neocolonial dynamics

II SOCIAL SCIENCE METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

Social Science Methodology/Approach in Comparative Education

The Social Science Methodology in Comparative Education encompasses several methods

rooted in social science disciplines, which have significantly expanded the scope and options
available for educational research. This methodology integrates approaches from various social
sciences, reflecting the trends and insights from these disciplines in the study of comparative
education. The key methods under this approach include the Historical Method, the
Sociological/Analytical Explicative Method, and Philosophical Analysis. Each method offers
unique perspectives on how educational systems can be studied and compared across different
contexts

(a) Historical Method

Overview: The Historical Method focuses on understanding the causes and effects of
educational policies and practices over time. It is based on the belief that educational practices,
devices, methods, and structures cannot be directly transferred from one environment to another
without adaptation. This method seeks to uncover the underlying causes of educational practices
and establish a science of education by understanding the historical context, including
geographical, social, racial, political, religious, and linguistic factors.

Key Proponents and Contributions:

 Isaac Kandel: Emphasized the analysis of the causes behind educational problems across
various systems, considering social, political, and economic conditions.
 Nicholas Hans: Added religious, linguistic, geographical, racial, and political factors to
the historical causes of educational development.
 Friedrich Schneder: Included national character, culture, foreign influences, and
pedagogical development as factors influencing educational systems.
 Horace Mann: Reconciled historical approaches with future-oriented thinking,
emphasizing the importance of the past as a guide for future educational action.

Assumptions:

1. Educational practices and structures require adaptation when transferred to different

environments.
2. Educational problems are universal but are shaped by specific political, social, and
cultural factors unique to each situation.

Steps to Follow:

1. Study Each National System Separately: Investigate educational systems in their

historical context, considering the development of national character and culture.
2. Collect Comparative Data: Gather data across national borders, being mindful of
differences in terminology, classification, and data collection methods between countries.
3. Analyze Historical Factors: Classify factors responsible for differences between
educational systems into natural, religious, and social categories.

Challenges:
 1. Reliability of Data: Historical data may be unreliable, leading to questionable
conclusions.
2. Bias and Impartiality: Historians may conceal unfavorable aspects of their country's
history or view other countries with prejudice, distorting the truth.
3. Overemphasis on the Past: Excessive focus on historical factors may result in an
unbalanced study of comparative education.

(b) Sociological/Analytical Explicative Method

Overview:

The Sociological Method studies educational problems within their broader social context, based
on the belief that a country’s educational system is conditioned by its social, cultural, economic,
political, and religious situations. This approach considers not only past causative factors but
also current social and cultural influences that may be responsible for educational issues.

Key Proponents and Contributions:

 Michael Sandler: Emphasized the importance of understanding factors outside the

school that influence educational theory and practice.
 William Harris, H.J. Noah, M.A. Eckstein: Contributed to the development of the
sociological perspective in comparative education.

Assumptions:

1. Society is a valid subject for inquiry, and education is closely linked to societal
development.
2. Comparative education studies should focus on the dynamics of educational systems and
their relationship with other aspects of society.

Steps to Follow:

1. Identify Practical Lessons: Learn from foreign education systems to gain valuable
insights.
2. Analyze External Influences: Study how societal conditions outside the school
influence educational practices within the school.
3. Promote International Understanding: Use comparative education to foster
international understanding and reform.
4. Develop Predictive Theories: Create theories to anticipate future educational
developments based on sociological insights.

Challenges:
 1. Neglect of Individual Contributions: This method may overlook the significant
contributions of individuals to the development of educational systems.

(c) Philosophical Analysis

Overview:

Philosophical Analysis is based on the assumption that simplifying complex educational

phenomena can reduce the number of variables to consider, making comparative studies more
manageable. This method links educational practices to the dominant philosophical traditions of
a country, such as American pragmatism or French nationalism, and explores how national
philosophical orientations shape educational systems.

Key Proponents and Contributions:

 The approach emphasizes the connection between national philosophy and educational
practice, although specific key proponents are not detailed.

Assumptions:

1. Educational systems are deeply connected to a nation's philosophical orientation.

2. The dominant mode of thought in a country influences every aspect of its educational
system, from organizational structure to teaching methods.

Steps to Follow:

1. Collect Reliable International Data: Gather data on educational systems globally to

facilitate meaningful comparisons.
2. Define National Philosophical Traditions: Explore how each nation’s philosophical
orientation shapes its educational system.
3. Predict Future Developments: Use philosophical insights to predict future trends in
education based on national styles of thinking.

Challenges:

1. Over-Simplification: The method’s emphasis on reducing complex phenomena to a

single element, such as ideology, may oversimplify the relationship between educational
practice and national thought.

Conclusion
The Social Science Methodology in Comparative Education offers a robust framework for
analyzing educational systems through diverse lenses, including historical, sociological, and
philosophical perspectives. Each method brings its unique strengths and challenges, emphasizing
the importance of a balanced and multifaceted approach in the study of global education systems.
Understanding these methods allows researchers to better navigate the complexities of
educational practices across different cultural and national contexts, ultimately contributing to a
more comprehensive understanding of comparative education

Conventional Methods in Comparative Education

Overview

Conventional methods in Comparative Education are structured approaches designed to

systematically study and analyze educational systems across different countries or communities.
These methods aim to provide a deeper understanding of educational practices and issues by
comparing them within various contexts. The two primary conventional methods discussed here
are:

1. Systematic Area Study Approach (Propounded by George E. Beredy)

2. Problem-Solving Approach (Propounded by Brian Holmes)

I. Systematic Area Study Approach

Key Proponent/Contributor:

 George E. Beredy: A significant figure in Comparative Education, Beredy developed

this approach to systematize the study of educational systems through a multi-
disciplinary lens.

Assumptions:

1. The approach enables analytical surveys of education systems in different countries or

communities, providing insights into their structure and functioning.
2. Studying other education systems serves as a reflective tool for evaluating and improving
one's own system.
3. The approach is inherently multi-disciplinary, incorporating insights from sociology,
history, economics, philosophy, geography, and politics to address complex educational
issues

Steps:

1. Description:
 o Extensive reading and data collection are the starting points, utilizing various
sources:
 Primary Sources: First-hand accounts such as reports, transcripts,
eyewitness accounts, and direct observations (e.g., school visits).
 Secondary Sources: Published works like textbooks and academic papers
that provide an in-depth look into the education systems of the countries
under study.
 Auxiliary Sources: Indirect sources like novels, storybooks, magazines,
and journals that offer cultural or social insights relevant to education.

Example in Education: In analyzing the education system in Kenya, one might start by
reviewing government reports on education, visiting schools, and studying local literature
that reflects societal values and challenges.

2. Interpretation:
o The gathered data is then interpreted to explain why certain educational features
exist. The analysis considers historical, geographical, socio-cultural, economic,
and political factors.
o Example in Education: The prevalence of boarding schools in Kenya could be
interpreted through historical and socio-economic lenses, considering colonial
influences and the need for accessible education in rural areas.
3. Juxtaposition:
o The data is categorized into comparable and non-comparable features, which
helps in clearly identifying similarities and differences.
o Example in Education: When comparing the duration of primary education in
East African countries, a table could be created to show the structural differences,
such as the 8-4-4 system in Kenya versus the 7-4-2-3 system in Uganda.
4. Comparison:
o This step involves a direct comparison of the features across different education
systems, identifying the reasons behind observed similarities and differences.
o Example in Education: A comparison might reveal that Kenya’s emphasis on
STEM subjects in secondary schools is driven by economic policies promoting
technological advancement.
5. Suggestions, Generalizations, and Conclusion:
o Based on the findings, conclusions are drawn, and suggestions for new actions or
reforms are made.
o Example in Education: After comparing educational outcomes in Kenya and
Rwanda, suggestions might include adopting Rwanda’s language policy to
improve literacy rates.

Application:
  This approach is widely used in comparative studies that seek to understand the broader
context of educational systems. It is particularly useful for policymakers and researchers
aiming to draw lessons from other countries to improve their own systems.

Challenges:

 The method requires a deep understanding of multiple disciplines and access to diverse
and reliable sources.
 There may be challenges in making accurate comparisons due to the varying contexts and
unique features of each education system.

II. Problem-Solving Approach

Key Proponent/Contributor:

 Brian Holmes: A prominent figure in Comparative Education, Holmes proposed this

approach to focus on practical problem-solving through a systematic process of reflective
thinking.

Assumptions:

1. Reflective thinking, as outlined by John Dewey, is crucial in resolving confused

situations or problems.
2. The approach assumes that logical deduction and comparison between predicted
outcomes and actual events can verify or refute a hypothesis.
3. It is possible to predict the success of educational reforms by systematically analyzing the
context and outcomes.

Steps:

1. Problem Identification:
o The first step involves selecting a vaguely perceived problem that is of interest.
This could be an issue like poor examination performance, gender disparities in
education, or student unrest.
o Example in Education: In Kenya, the issue of high dropout rates among girls due
to early marriage and pregnancy can be identified as a key educational problem.
2. Problem Analysis:
o The vaguely perceived problem is then analyzed by describing the conditions
under which it exists, including related trends and factors.
 o Example in Education: The analysis might reveal that cultural practices and
inadequate school infrastructure contribute to the high dropout rates among girls
in rural Kenya.
3. Proposed Problem Solutions:
o At this stage, various reform proposals and policies that could address the
identified problem are described.
o Example in Education: Proposed solutions could include implementing school-
based support programs for pregnant girls and awareness campaigns to change
community attitudes towards girls’ education.
4. Specification of the Context:
o The next step involves identifying and describing the factors, determinants, and
conditions likely to influence the outcomes of the proposed solutions.
o Example in Education: Factors such as community involvement, availability of
resources, and government policies are specified as crucial for the success of the
proposed solutions.
5. Comparison:
o This step compares the predicted or anticipated outcomes (based on proposed
solutions) with the actual observable practices, serving as a verification stage.
o Example in Education: If the dropout rate among girls decreases following the
implementation of support programs, the solution can be considered successful.
6. Conclusion:
o Conclusions are drawn based on the findings, and new lines of action are
suggested if necessary.
o Example in Education: If the support programs prove effective, the conclusion
might recommend scaling them up to other regions or integrating them into
national education policy.

Application:

 The Problem-Solving Approach is highly applicable in educational contexts where

specific issues need to be addressed. It is particularly valuable for policymakers and
educators seeking to implement targeted reforms and assess their effectiveness.

Challenges:

 Identifying the root causes of educational problems can be complex, requiring thorough
analysis and data collection.
 The success of proposed solutions may depend on various factors beyond the control of
the researchers or policymakers, making it difficult to predict outcomes accurately.

Conclusion
The conventional methods in Comparative Education, such as the Systematic Area Study
Approach and the Problem-Solving Approach, offer structured frameworks for analyzing and
addressing educational issues. While the former provides a multi-disciplinary perspective for
comparative analysis, the latter focuses on practical problem-solving. Both approaches contribute
to the field by enabling a deeper understanding of educational systems and the factors that
influence them, although they come with challenges that require careful consideration. These
methods continue to evolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of Comparative Education and its
ongoing relevance in addressing global educational challenge

Week 5

Factors /Determinants Influencing National Education Systems

1. Economic Factors

The economic status of a country plays a critical role in shaping its education system. Countries
with advanced economies tend to have better-resourced education systems, leading to higher
levels of educational attainment.

Key Examples:

 Industrialized Nations: Countries like the USA, Japan, and Germany have robust
economies that enable them to offer free and compulsory primary education. For
instance, Japan and Germany provide universal primary and secondary education,
supported by well-funded public schools and a strong infrastructure.
 Newly Industrialized Countries: Nations like South Korea and Singapore, which have
rapidly industrialized, have achieved near-universal primary education. They invest
heavily in education as a means of sustaining economic growth.
 Developing Nations: In contrast, many African countries, such as Kenya and Uganda,
struggle with low levels of income, which impedes their ability to provide universal
primary education. In Kenya, despite the introduction of free primary education in 2003,
challenges like non-enrollment, school dropouts, and low completion rates persist due to
limited resources.

Challenges:

 Resource Allocation: In developing countries, inadequate funding leads to insufficient

educational infrastructure, overcrowded classrooms, and poorly trained teachers.
 Inequality: Economic disparities within countries often result in unequal access to
quality education, particularly between urban and rural areas.
2. Social-Cultural Factors

Education systems reflect the social and cultural norms of a society. These factors influence
everything from the curriculum to the language of instruction.

Key Examples:

 Language: In Kenya, the use of English as the medium of instruction reflects its colonial
history. However, the presence of multiple indigenous languages presents challenges in
standardizing education. Countries like India face similar challenges, with 14 main
languages and hundreds of dialects complicating the educational landscape.
 Cultural Traditions: In many African countries, post-independence educational reforms
focused on "Africanizing" curricula to better serve local needs. For example, Kenya’s
education system has integrated aspects of traditional African knowledge and values to
resonate with local communities.

Challenges:

 Language Barriers: The use of multiple languages increases the cost of education and
can hinder national unity. In Cameroon, for instance, the coexistence of English and
French as official languages complicates the education system.
 Cultural Resistance: In some regions, traditional beliefs and practices can resist
educational reforms, particularly when they challenge established social norms.

3. Political Factors

Political ideologies and government structures significantly influence education systems. The
type of political regime in power often determines the nature of educational policies and the level
of state involvement.

Key Examples:

 Democratic Regimes: In countries like the USA and the UK, education is decentralized,
with significant local control over curricula and school management. These countries
emphasize democratic participation in education, reflecting broader societal values.
 Authoritarian Regimes: In contrast, countries like China and Cuba have highly
centralized education systems. The government controls all aspects of education, using it
as a tool for ideological indoctrination.

Challenges:
  Policy Shifts: Changes in political leadership can lead to abrupt shifts in educational
policies, as seen in Kenya, where the introduction of free primary education in 2003 was
a direct result of the NARC government’s policies.
 Centralization vs. Decentralization: While centralization can ensure uniform standards,
it can also stifle innovation and local adaptability. Conversely, decentralization can lead
to disparities in educational quality.

4. Climatic and Geographical Conditions

Geographical and climatic conditions influence the accessibility and structure of education
systems, particularly in regions with extreme weather or challenging terrain.

Key Examples:

 Scandinavian Countries: In Norway and Sweden, the harsh winter climate affects the
school calendar, with long holidays in winter. Children often start school later, around
age seven, to ensure they can withstand the cold.
 Australia: The vast deserts in Australia lead to a dual education system, with well-
equipped urban schools and smaller, less-resourced rural schools. The government
provides distance education and traveling teachers for remote areas.

Challenges:

 Accessibility: In regions with extreme climates, such as North Eastern Kenya, students
often face long distances to school, leading to high dropout rates, especially among girls.
 Infrastructure Costs: Harsh climates necessitate specialized infrastructure, such as
heating in cold regions, which increases the cost of education.

5. Colonialism, Racism, and Foreign Domination

The legacy of colonialism has left a lasting impact on education systems in many countries,
particularly in Africa and Asia.

Key Examples:

 Colonial Influence: In Kenya and Uganda, the education systems are modeled after the
British system, reflecting the countries' colonial past. Similarly, Senegal and Algeria have
education systems influenced by French colonialism.
 Racial Segregation: During apartheid in South Africa, the education system was racially
segregated, with inferior education provided to the black majority. This has had long-
term consequences for educational equity in the country.
Challenges:

 Dependence on Foreign Aid: Many former colonies rely on foreign aid for educational
development, which can perpetuate dependency and limit the ability to develop
autonomous education systems.
 Cultural Displacement: The imposition of foreign education models often marginalized
indigenous knowledge systems and languages, leading to a loss of cultural identity.

6. Religious Factors

Religion has historically played a significant role in shaping education systems, influencing
everything from curricula to the structure of educational institutions.

Key Examples:

 Religious Education: In Pakistan, the education system is heavily influenced by Islamic

principles, with religious instruction integrated into the curriculum. Similarly, in England,
religious education is a statutory part of the national curriculum.
 Missionary Influence in Africa: In Kenya, Christian missionaries were instrumental in
establishing schools, particularly in high-potential areas. However, regions neglected by
missionaries, such as arid and semi-arid areas, lag behind in educational development.

Challenges:

 Secular vs. Religious Education: In countries like the USA and France, the separation
of church and state has led to the development of secular public schools, which can create
tensions in religiously diverse societies.
 Religious Conservatism: In some regions, religious conservatism can hinder educational
reforms, particularly in areas like gender equality and scientific education.

7. Historical Factors

Historical events and figures have profoundly shaped education systems worldwide, leaving
legacies that persist to this day.

Key Examples:

 Napoleon Bonaparte’s Reforms: In France, Napoleon’s reforms established a

centralized education system that remains influential today. He created the "lycée"
system for secondary education and restructured universities, laying the foundation for
modern French education.
  Colonial Legacy in Africa: The colonial legacy continues to shape education in African
countries, with many still following the education systems of their former colonial rulers.
In Kenya, for instance, the education system remains heavily influenced by British
models.

Challenges:

 Legacy of War: In countries like Belgium, repeated wars have disrupted the education
system, leading to a focus on rebuilding and reform. Similarly, post-colonial countries
often struggle with the remnants of colonial education systems that may not align with
contemporary needs.
 Resistance to Change: Historical inertia can make it difficult to reform education
systems that are deeply rooted in the past, even when they no longer meet the needs of
modern societies.

Conclusion

The factors influencing national education systems are complex and interrelated, shaped by a
combination of economic, social, political, climatic, geographical, colonial, religious, and
historical forces. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective education
policies that are responsive to the needs of diverse populations. In Kenya, as in other countries,
education systems must navigate these challenges to provide inclusive and equitable access to
quality education for all.

41 | P a g e