Constitution (PA)
Constitution (PA)
Constitution (PA)
CONSTITUION
Aristotle Definition:
“Constitution is the way of life state has chosen for herself.”
Austin Definition:
“Constitution fixes the structure of supreme government.”
Types of Constitution:
Written or Unwritten
Rigid or Flexible
Unitary or Federal
Parliamentary or Presidential
America’s constitution is considered to be a relatively rigid document. This
means that it is not easily changed or amended. So far, 27 amendments
have been made. To make amendments, you need:
A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate
A convention called by two-thirds of the state legislatures. (propose
amendments directly, by passing Congress)
Any proposed amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
Separation of Powers:
Separation of power is political doctrine originating in the writings of
Montesquieu (French philosopher and political thinker).
Three separate branches of Government which have defined abilities
to check the power of other branches (the executive, legislative, and
judicial)
Heavily influence in the writing of the USA constitution.
In Pakistan, no separation of power due to parliamentary system.
In America, separation of power due to presidential system.
The executive is the part of the legislature and hence it allows for greater
coordination between them.
This system is also called 'Responsible Government' because the members
of the legislature address issues of public concern.
This system prevents autocracy as the government can be removed from
power by passing a no-confidence motion in the parliament.
Demerits-
Demerits:
Demerits:
Demerits:
Article 49 (MCQs)
If the President's seat becomes vacant (such as death, resignation, or removal
from office), the Chairman of the Senate assumes the role of Acting President
until a new President is elected (30 days) through the specified constitutional
process.
If Chairman Senate is not available then Speaker of NA will act as President.
THE PRESIDENT
Muslim-45 years-Eligible to be elected as member of NA
Procedure to elect president
Electoral college
Duration 5 years
Impeachment
President office become vacant
AUTHORITIES OF PRESIDENT
Head of the state
Administrative powers
Establishment of cabinet
Appointing other ministers
Appointments
Law making powers
Judicial powers
Sindh 14 4 4 1 23
KPK 14 4 4 1 23
Balochistan 14 4 4 1 23
Federal 2 1 1 - 4
Capital
FATA 8 - - - 8
Total 66 17 17 4 104
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
Total seats: 342 (reduce to 336 in next tenure)
Seats distribution is on the basis of population
Term: 5 years
Age: 25 minimum
Headed by speaker and Deputy speaker
Current seats allocation
Provinces General Women Non-Muslims Total
Punjab 148 35 -- 183
Sindh 61 14 -- 75
KPK 35 8 -- 43
Balochistan 14 3 -- 17
Federal 02 -- -- 02
Capital
FATA 12 -- -- 12
Total 272 60 10 342
Seats allocation in new session
Provinces General Women Non-Muslims Total
Punjab 141 32 -- 173
Sindh 61 14 -- 75
KPK 45 10 -- 55
Balochistan 16 4 -- 20
Federal 03 -- -- 03
Capital
FATA -- -- -- --
Total 266 60 10 336
Electoral College in Pakistan has the following functions:
1. Chooses the President of Pakistan through an indirect
election.
2. Comprises the Senate, National Assembly of Pakistan, and the
Provincial Assemblies of the four provinces.
3. Senators = term of six years.
4. The votes of the members of the Senate and National
Assembly are counted as single votes.
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Provincial government
1. Chief Minister (Chief executive of Province)
2. Provincial Ministers
3. Executive authority of the province shall exercise in the name
of the Governor by Provincial government
Governor
Nominal head of province
Appointment
Executive powers
Judicial powers
Duties during emergency
Law making powers
Dissolution of provincial Assembly
Chief minister
Administrative head of province
The provincial cabinet
PROVINCIAL JUDICIARY
HIGH COURT
DISTRICT COURT
REVENUE COURT
High Court
Interpretation of Law
Public Interest cases
Administrative accountability- citizens
District Court
Revenue Court
Local Government system
For devolution of power
District council
Tehsil council
Union Council
Nazim/Meir
Naib nazim/ deputy Meir
Counselor
TYPES OF WRITS
Whenever violation of fundamental right (article 8-28) happens, writ can
be filed under articles:
u/a 199 in High Court
u/a 184 in Supreme Court
Writ can also be filed against a private person. Person who files the writ is called
petitioner and who’s against is filed is called respondent.
A writ issued by a higher court to compel a lower court, government official, or public
authority to perform a specific duty that they are legally obligated to perform.
A writ issued by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court or tribunal to
determine whether it has exceeded its jurisdiction or made an error of law.
Writ of Quo-Warranto: (By what authority you are holding the office)
A writ issued to inquire into the legality of the claim of a person or authority to hold
an office or position of public importance.
A writ used to bring a person before a court or judge to determine whether their
detention or imprisonment is lawful, and to secure their release if it is found to be
unlawful.
Interim constitution: adaptation of government of Indian Act, 1935
Under the provisions of the Indian independence act, 1947, the government of
Indian act, 1935 became with certain adaptations, the working constitution of
Pakistan.
The Pakistan order 1947, established the federation of Pakistan which included
the four provinces of
East Bengal, West Punjab, Sindh, NWFP, Baluchistan
Karachi as capital
After death of Quaid in 1948, second GG was Khawaja Nazimuddin and Maulvi
Tamizuddin was second president of CA.
It was appointed on 12th march, 1949 when the objective resolution was passed
by the constituent assembly.
Its task was to report in accordance with the objective resolution on the main
principles of future constitutions.
The basic principal committee consists of 24 members and setup three sub
committees;
iv. Another sub committee dealing with Fundamental Rights of the Citizens of
Pakistan & Matters Relating to Minorities
Basic principal committee submitted its interim report on 07 th September, 1950
and its final report in December, 1952.
(The interim report of the Basic Principal committee had to be withdrawn because it
was undemocratic and unpopular. Few members were added in the CA, to represent
communities, such as Christians. The discussion on minorities took a long time because
of the complexity of its task and the time taken in obtaining the opinions of minority
communities. Minority community demanded that the Hindus should be given
representation in legislature not only according to their numbers but also some
weightage should be given to them. In East Bengal Hindus were 23% of entire
population, it was demanded that they should get 41% of seats in east Bengal
legislature.)
It laid the foundation of the Constitution and indicated the broad outlines of its
structure.
Initially, Objectives Resolution was part of preamble of the Constitution of
Pakistan and later on incorporated in Article 2A of the Constitution
Salient features of the Objective Resolution
i. Declaration of Pakistan as an Islamic State
ii. Sovereignty belongs to Allah (God)
iii. Supremacy of the Constitution
iv. Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms
v. Islamic principles as the basis for legislation
vi. Democratic polity
Reaction by Non-Muslims
• Prem Hari Barma proposed that the Motion be circulated for eliciting public
opinion thereon.
• Sris Chandra Chattopadhyaya vehemently supported it.
• Liaquat Ali Khan opposed the motion which was put to vote and defeated by 21
vs 10.
• After voting on amendment, the resolution was adopted on 12 March 1949
Conclusion:
Objective Resolution have sown the seeds of suspicion among the minorities
against the majority (Muslims). It cannot be denied that some of the proposed
amendments were quite reasonable and moderate and their point of view ought
to have been accommodated in the larger national interest.
After the death of Jinnah, Liaquat chose to remain PM which meant that the
Cabinet form of government was to become effective. Khawaja Nazimuddin
became GG. During that period, the position of the GG was the same, he became
the constitutional figurehead, while real power was exercised by the PM and his
cabinet. This harmony continued until the death of Liaquat on 16 Oct, 1951.
After the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan, Khawaja Nazimuddin became 2nd PM
leaving the post of GG vacant. Then, Ghulam Muhammad (Finance Minister
earlier) became 3rd Governor General.
Second draft of the Basic Principles Committee, which was presented by PM
Khawaja Nazimuddin in 1952, came under severe criticism, especially from Punjab.
Khawaja Nazimuddin imposed martial law in Lahore in 1953 (by Major General
Azam) to quell political unrest
Dismissed by Governor-General Ghulam Muhammad in 1953. On 17 Apr 1953,
Khawaja Nazimuddin was summoned by Ghulam Muhammad along with his
cabinet and ordered to resign. When Khawaja Nazimuddin declined, he was
dismissed along with his cabinet.
On the dismissal of Khawaja Nazimuddin, Bogra became 3rd PM.
BOGRA FORMULA:
It was presented to CA in 7 Oct 1953 and adopted by CA on 6 Oct 1954.
Bogra recommended to make a bicameral system instead of unicameral. Proposed
a formula for the distribution of powers between the center and provinces.
When Khawaja was removed from PM office by Ghulam Muhammad (GG), then
Tamizuddin (President of CA) had proposed amendment in Sec 10 of Indian Act,
1935 (Sec 58 (2) (b) of present constitution) related to powers of GG (to dismiss
ministers)
CA did this to prevent the repetition of acts such as dismissal of Khawaja cabinet in
Apr 1953.
It could be described as an important step towards the growth of parliamentary
democracy in Pakistan, but the amendment was made in such haste that it could
be termed a “constitutional coup”.
Ghulam Muhammad (GG) dissolved CA on 24 Oct 1954 and has announced a
Proclamation of state of emergency. He did not specified any provisions of law
under which the power is exercised to proclaim state of emergency.
Ghulam Muhammad instructed M. Bogra (PM), to form a cabinet without the
benefit of Parliament. Cabinet consisted of Gen. Iskandar Mirza, Dr. Khan Sahib,
Gen. M. Ayub Khan.
The most significant point in FC’s judgement was that it did not go into the
question of whether the CA was rightly dissolved by the GG. It reversed the
judgement of Sindh High Court on technical grounds namely, that Section 223-A of
Indian Act, 1935 as adapted in Pakistan by virtue of which Sindh Court issued the
writ in favor of MTK was ‘not yet a law’ because it had not received the assent of
GG. The court held that the enactments of the CA, whether it functioned as the
central legislature or as the constitution-making body, required the assent of the
GG and since Section 223-A of Govt of India Act had not received such assent, it
was not yet law, and, therefore, the Sindh Court had no power to issue the writs.
The majority in the FC, interpreting the provision of the Indian Independence Act,
1947, concerning assent by the GG, held that it made the GG a constituent part of
the legislature in as much as the right to give assent necessarily included in it the
right to withhold assent. Every bill must, therefore, be presented to him to
provide him an occasion to exercise that right and, unless a bill was so not
function and the proposed legislation become law.
USIF PATEL’S CASE “USIF Patel ...VS... The Crown” (PLD 1955 FC
387)
Six days after the MTK judgment the GG promulgated Emergency Powers Ordinance IX
of 1955 and assumed powers to:
i. Make provisions for framing the constitution of Pakistan.
ii. Make provisions to constitute province of West Pakistan.
iii. Validate laws which had been passed by CA but had not received the assent of
GG.
iv. Authenticate the central budget.
v. Name east Bengal as east Pakistan.
Moreover, GG added Section 92-A to the Govt of Indian Act 1935
Section 92-A of the Government of India Act, 1935, empowered the Governor-
General (GG) to make ordinances for the federal legislature and constitution,
which effectively gave the GG the power to unilaterally amend the constitution
and legislative framework.
Governor of Sindh enacted a law called The Sindh control of Goondas Act,
1952.
Background
Appellants (Usif Patel) were proceeded against under Sindh Control of
Goondas Act
The appellants were declared to be Goondas
They were directed to furnish heavy security
Appellants for their failure to give security were directed to be confined
to the prison
Grounds of Appeal before the Chief Court of Sindh:
The appeal was made u/s 491of CPC, 1898
The appellants prayed that their detention was wrongful and they be set
at liberty.
Power of making constitution or ordinance lies with the CA.
Emergency order issued by GG was illegal, hence Sec-92-A is illegal and
the Goondas Act under Which Usif was arrested is also illegal. Hence, he
should be set free.
o Background:
Dosso was a commoner and charge of murder was put on him by Frontier
Crime Regulations (FCR). FCR ordered to hang him till death.
He filed appeal in Lahore High Court (LHC) against the decision of FCR.
LHC ordered that when we have our own constitution, then you cannot
convict under FCR rules.
According to decision of LHC, those who implemented martial law can be
convicted.
Ayub Khan filed writ in Supreme Court (SC) and decision was in his favor.
Thus, Dosso was convicted.
Criticism
o Ayub Khan gave the second Constitution to the country Discarding the
parliamentary system, the Constitution adopted the presidential form of
government but without the system of checks and balances which is enshrined
in democratic Presidential systems in other countries.
o Moreover, the Constitution gave over whelming powers to the President who
dominated the entire constitutional system.
1965 Indo-Pak
o The number of clashes between the Indian and Pakistani forces on the cease-
fire line in Kashmir greatly increased during 1964, and increased the fang in the
first half of 1965.
o In April and May 1965, there were serious skirmished between the armed
forces of Indian and Pakistan in the region known as the Rann of Kutch.
o Pakistan’s armed forces gave a good account of themselves which might have
given rise to misplaced confidence in the mind of the military leadership that it
could take on Indian military.
o Finally, a serious crisis in Indo-Pakistani relations precipitated on 5 Aug 1965
when freedom fighters from Azad Kashmir began entering Indian occupied
Kashmir in an unsuccessful attempt to foment revolt.
o Further parties of freedom fighters entered on 18 Aug. India protested against
what it called ‘infiltration’, but such protestations were rejected by Pakistan.
o On 16 Aug, Indian troops crossed the border and occupied Pakistani border
posts.
o In early Sept, Pakistani forces advanced into the Indian Sector, capturing a key
post on 5 Sept.
o On the same day, the Indian Defense Ministry noised a Pakistani aircraft of
attacking an Indian to force ground unit near Amritsar, without causing any
damage.
o On the following day, Indian troops launched an offensive across the Punjab
frontier into West Pakistan.
o Indian Defense Minister claimed as justification for crossing international
borders that the Indian attack had been launched in order to pre-empt an
attack by Pakistan on Indian Punjab.
o Z.A. Bhutto (Foreign Minister) and Aziz Ahmad (Foreign Secretary) assured
Ayub and Commander-in-Chief of Army that India would not cross international
borders to attack Pakistan.
o They had even suppressed a message from the Pakistani High Commission in
New Delhi sent through the Turkish Embassy to the Foreign Office in Islamabad,
that India was planning to launch an attack on Pakistani territory on 6 Sept.
o Ayub was woken up at 4 o’ clock in the morning on 6 Sept and given the news
of the Indian advanced towards Lahore.
o He telephoned General Musa, Commander-in-Chief of Pakistan Army, who said
he had also heard the news but was waiting for confirmation.
o All this badly exposed the military genius of Ayub and his army chief.
o In a broadcast on 6 Sept, Ayub declared “We are at war”, and proclaimed a
state of emergency, although an Indian govt spokesman commented: “India is
not at war with Pakistan or the Pakistani people. India’s operations are
intended to destroy Pakistan military bases from where they attack India”
o On 11 Sept, the Khem Karan counter-offensive ran around and with that
collapsed Pakistan’s entire military strategy.
o For Pakistan, the war was over.
o Fighting continued on all fronts until 23 Sept.
o The UN Security Council adopted a resolution which demanded cease-fire
should take place on Wednesday, 22 Sept 1965 at 0700 hours GMT and calls
upon both govt to issue orders for a cease-fire at that moment and a
subsequent withdrawal of all armed personnel back to the positions held by
them before 5 Aug 1965.
o Entry of PPP- Z.A Bhutto
o Ayub's Constitution lasted as long as he survived in office.
o With his departure his system was also folded.
Constitution Making:
o Constitutional Committee comprising National Assembly (NA) members from all
parties was set up in April 1972.
o Law Minister was the Chairman of this Committee.
o All parties agreed on the future political system in October 1972.
o The Committee reported on December 31, 1972. After long deliberations and
compromises final draft was approved commonly on April 10, 1973.
o Zulfikar Ali Bhutto took the oath of PM (14 Aug 1973 to 05 Jul 1977) according
to 1970 elections before new constitution was officially declared.
Bhutto Downfall
o Z.A. Bhutto appointed Zia ul Haq Army chief of Staff (superseding 7 or 8
Lieutenant Generals)
o Bhutto's rule faced challenges, including allegations of authoritarianism,
economic mismanagement, and political opposition. Tensions escalated, leading
to protests and dissent against Bhutto's government.
o On 7 Jan 1977, Bhutto announced elections.
o 7 and 10 March as polling dates on NA and PA
o PNA boycotted elections scheduled on 10 march a day before stating them
rigged and unfair.
o PNA demanded Bhutto’s resignation and new elections under impartial
auspices.
o In Feb 1979, Zia announced elections on 17 Nov 1979. This was done to fulfill
the promise made with PNA parties which were in govt.
o After execution of Bhutto in April, Zia and the PNA had separated their ways;
PNA withdrawn from government.
o Zia and his military coterie had no intentions of giving up power, after removal
of the main hurdle in their way-Bhutto.
o Zia postponed 17 Nov elections by declaring that local bodies elections would
take place first.
o 28 September 1979 local bodies elections were held on non-party basis.
o Reason: Zia did not want any party to show its strength in this election and
the people elected on non-party basis would be obliged to him. He wanted to
create a political cadre for himself.
o Local bodies elections were likely to reveal the strength and weakness of Zia’s
opponents.
o Zia indicated that the method of elections was totally un-Islamic and that there
was no concept of political parties in Islam.
o On 16 oct 1979, Zia announced postponement of elections indefinitely;
all political parties were dissolved and all political activities banned,
newspapers and journals said to be involved in anti-national activities
were closed; press censorship was imposed; the right to strike by
workers and the right to lock out by factory owners was rescinded;
criminal cases being heard in Martial Law courts could not be challenged
in civil courts; and the process of Islamization was to be speeded up.
o Plane Hijack
o Hijacking of PIA plane in March 1981 by Al-Zulfikar an organization led by one of
Bhutto’s sons, from Karachi first to Kabul and then to Damascus, deflected
people’s attention.
o The hijackers killed a young army officer while the plane was in Kabul and the
incident created reaction amongst the people against PPP once again.
o Zia arrested a large number of people and held them under preventive
detention.
o Zia ul Haq lifted martial law on 30 Dec 1985 (8.5 years longest)
o All martial law regulations and martial law orders by CMLA and MLA cancelled.
o However, 9 martial law orders and 4 martial law regulations issued by CMLA
and specified in the schedule to MLO 107 were saved with some modifications.
o 9th amendment (not approved/rejected)
o By late 1986, relationship between Zia and Junejo was marked by increasing
suspicion and mutual distrust.
o However, countdown to the 29 May operation began in Nov 1987 with the
easing out of Sahibzada Yaqub Khan as Foreign Minister. Yaqub’s exit was
followed by an informal instruction by the PM (Junejo) that henceforth no file
from the Foreign Office would be sent to President (Zia).
o On 29 May 1988, Zia dissolved assemblies.
o Death of Zia
o Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, the sixth president of Pakistan, died in a plane crash on
17 Aug, 1988, in Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Circumstances of his death include the
following:
Zia-ul-Haq was on a C-130 plane that took off from Bahawalpur Airport with
29 other people on board.
The plane crashed just two minutes into the flight, with no survivors.
The investigation into the crash was assisted by a team from the United
States Air Force.
The U.S. team concluded that a mechanical failure caused the crash, but the
Pakistani team concluded that an act of sabotage was more likely.
1084
o PML- Nawaz Sharif
o Discuss governments till present
o
o
CONSTITUTIONAL CASES
1. MOLVI TAMEEZUDDIN CASE: PLD 1955 FC 240
2. DOSSO CASE: PLD 1958 SC 533
3. ASMA JILLANI CASE: PLD1972 SC139
4. NUSRAT BHUTTO CASE: PLD 1977 SC 657
5. ZULFIQAR ALI BHUTTO CASE: PLD 1979 SC 53
6. ZAFAR ALI SHAH CASE: PLD 2000 SC 689
1. ASMA JILLANI CASE: PLD1972 SC139
Supreme Court held that Yahya khan is usurper and all his actions were also
declared illegal. Asma Jilani's case paved the way for the restoration of
democracy in the country.
2. NUSRAT BHUTTO CASE: PLD 1977 SC 657
On November 10, 1977 the Supreme Court unanimously validated the
imposition of martial law by Zia Ul Haq , under the doctrine of necessity
3. ZULFIQAR ALI BHUTTO CASE: PLD 1979 SC 53
Pakistan's Supreme Court rejected an appeal to lift the death sentence against
former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. The court uphold Bhutto's death
sentence and conviction on charges of having ordered the murder of a political
opponent.
4. ZAFAR ALI SHAH CASE: PLD 2000 SC 689
Supreme Court validated the military takeover by Pervez Musharraf by restoring
the doctrine of necessity (Hens Kelson theory).