We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Honourable High Court of Allahabad
Saleem Ahmad v. State of U.P.
2024 SCC OnLine All 1731
Honourable High Court of Allahabad has held the proceedings before
the Magistrate relating to reliefs claimed under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are essentially of a civil nature. Hence, the Magistrate before whom the application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is pending, has the jurisdiction or the power to allow the application seeking amendment in the relief clause of the original application. Magistrate can allow amendment in the complaints before criminal courts which are governed by Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 although the power to allow such amendment would have to be exercised with due caution and sparingly, in appropriate circumstances.
35. There is a marked distinction between a ‘complaint’
contemplated under the D.V. Act and the D.V. Rules, and a ‘complaint’ under the Cr. P.C.. A complaint under Rule 2(b) of the D.V. Rules, has been defined as an allegation made orally or in writing by any person to a Protection Officer, whereas a complaint under Section 2(d) Cr. P.C. is any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate with a view to taking action under Cr. P.C. that some person whether known or known has committed an offence. The Magistrate dealing with an application under Section 12 is not called upon to take action for the commission of an offence; hence what is contemplated is not a complaint but an application to a Magistrate as set out in Rule 6(1) of the D.V. Rules. The filing of an application under Section 12 of the D.V. Act, can, therefore, not be equated to the lodging of complaint or initiation of prosecution as contemplated under the provisions of the Cr. P.C.