Life Assurance Annuity and Pensions Administration
Life Assurance Annuity and Pensions Administration
Annuity and
Pensions
Administration
F03
Life Assurance,
Annuity and
Pensions
Administration
F03
©
The Chartered Insurance Institute of Nigeria
2020
All rights reserved. Material included in this publication is copyright and may not be
reproduced in whole or in part including photocopying or recording, for any purpose
without the written permission of the copyright holder. Such written permission must also
be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
This publication is supplied for study by the original purchaser only and must not be sold,
lent, hired or given to anyone else.
Every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication. However, no liability
can be accepted for any loss incurred in any way whatsoever by any person relying solely on
the information contained within it. The publication has been produced solely for the
purpose of examination and should not be taken as definitive of the legal position. Specific
advice should always be obtained before undertaking any investments.
ISBN 978-978-57332-2-8
Reviewer
Mr. Chilekezi, Obinna B.Sc, M.Sc, MBA, FCIB, FIIN
Obinna Chilekezi is a multi-skilled professional with background in library science, book
publishing, finance and banking, marketing and Insurance. He was once the editor of the
Nigeria Insurance Digest published by the Nigerian Insurers Association and had won the
African Insurance Organisation award for one of his published books in 2016. He is currently
an insurance researcher and consultant; having worked in the various arms of the industry.
Typesetting, page make-up and editorial services done by the Examination Directorate CIIN.
Printed in Lagos, Nigeria by Expertcity Network Ltd +234 806 079 1778, 8099825825
Course Aims and Objectives
It is expected that a good understanding of the course contents will enable the
candidates to understand:
iii
Course Outline
PART 1
Life Assurance
Chapter 1 Historical Development and Nature of Life Assurance
Chapter 2 Types and Scope of Cover of Life Assurance
Chapter 3 Introduction to Life Assurance Underwriting Procedures
Chapter 4 Introduction to Policy Documentation and Administration
Chapter 5 Life Assurance Claims Administration
Chapter 6 Introduction to Life Reassurance
PART 2
Annuities
Chapter 7 Introduction to Annuity
Chapter 8 Types of Annuities
PART 3
Introduction to Pension
Chapter 9 Historical Development of Pension and Pension Provision
Chapter 10 Types of Pension Schemes
PART 4
Pension Planning and Administration
Chapter 11 Pension Installation
Chapter 12 Trusteeship and Privately Administered Schemes
Chapter 13 The Nigerian Pension System
iv
Introduction
F03 Life Assurance, Annuity and Pensions Administration provides an overview of the life
assurance, annuity and pensions administration markets with its key elements. It will help
you to develop a knowledge and understanding of the basic principles behind these areas of
insurance, the main regulatory principles relating to them and the key measures in place to
protect consumers as well as life reassurance principles.
We shall begin by providing a brief overview of what are expected to be learnt in the
coursebook. The course book is divided into four parts.
Part 1 of the course book begins with the historical development and went ahead to explain
what life assurance is. The various types and scope of life assurance cover under each policy
type. Underwriting and claims procedures in life assurance and policy documentation as
well as life reassurance were equally considered in Part 1.
Part 2 of the course book started by introducing the students to annuity and went on to
explain various types and uses of annuity products.
Part 3 of the course book provided us with the historical development and nature of pension.
Types of pension schemes as well as the various reasons for pension provision were also
considered in Part 3.
And finally, Part 4 of the course book covered pension planning and administration in
details.
v
Contents Pages
PART 1
Life Assurance
Chapter 1 Historical Development and Nature of Life Assurance 1-4
Chapter 2 Types and Scope of Cover of Life Assurance 5 - 36
Chapter 3 Introduction to Life Underwriting Procedures 37 - 49
Chapter 4 Introduction to Policy Documentation and Administration 50 -68
Chapter 5 Claims Administration and Introduction to Life Reassurance 69- 78
Chapter 6 Introduction to Life Reassurance 79 - 85
PART 2
Annuities
Chapter 7 Introduction to Annuity 86 - 87
Chapter 8 Types of Annuities 88 - 90
PART 3
Introduction to Pension
Chapter 9 Historical Development of Pension and Pension Provision 91 - 94
Chapter 10 Types of Pension Schemes 95 - 99
PART 4
Pension Planning and Administration
Chapter 11 Pension Installation 100 - 101
Chapter 12 Trusteeship and Privately Administered Schemes 102 - 115
Chapter 13 The Nigerian Pension System 116 - 118
INDEX 126 - 128
vi
Chapter 1
Historical Development
and Nature of Life Assurance
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, one should be able to know:
the historical development of life assurance in Nigeria;
earlier life assurance companies in Nigeria;
the mortality table.
Introduction
This chapter gives us the early years history of life assurance in Nigeria as well the earliest set
of life insurance companies. The chapter later explains what life assurance is and describes
the early mortality tables in use.
Apampa (2017) talks about the old contributory savings schemes as its success depends on
the clan nature of its members. He said clans are able to pool risks and share rewards without
the strict valuation that a market system calls for or without an intricate system of laws that a
bureaucratic form of control requires. It was also discovered that clan (also called “adashe”,
“esusu”, “ajo”) are not solely Nigerian phenomenon as the concept can also be traced to some
other Africa countries. He concluded that a clan mechanism (i.e. traditional system) of
control is a simple way to improve corporate governance practices across board, which will
also help to attract sustainable investments that would contribute to the growth of this
nation. The traditional Insurance as a form of social insurance in the Nigerian society has
evolved through the existence of extended family system and social associations. These
traditional insurance policies include periodical contributions such as Ajo, Esusu, Adashe,
and Oha practiced among age grades and other unions (Ujumadu, 2017). Benefits of the
accumulated funds are taken depending on priority needs of participants or in order of turns
(Remi, 2004). Nwite (2004) opined that traditional insurance as 'brothers' keeper' fraternities
include age grades, extended family structures, social clubs, kinsman sting and other various
1
forms of communal contributions which were put in place to help victims of theft, flood, fire,
windstorm and communal clashes.
The idea of mutual assistance is not unknown to our traditional society. Various town unions
as well as social clubs have ways of showing benevolence to their members who are
bereaved. It is customary in various towns for people to pay condolence visits to the family of
the deceased and convey condolences as well. These practices are forms of mutual life
assurance. As long as a person extends such gesture to others who are bereaved, he would
expect and would surely receive reciprocal gestures when he is bereaved. The gesture one
gives amount to the premium he pays to receive reciprocation from others. This is not an
organized insurance scheme; its existence to the person depends on social consciences of our
lives.
However, life assurance as practiced today in Nigeria is part of the nation's colonial heritages.
Obviously, the British introduced life assurance into Nigeria; hence the practice closely
follows the British pattern. The earliest colonial insurance interest in Nigeria was directed to
the general insurance of goods and cargo. Few life businesses which tickled in were referred
to British home officers in London for processing. Only the affluent could afford them
because it was considered as enormous risk to insure persons living in the tropics and cost of
providing such life cover was very expensive and uneconomical.
Over the years, there had been a quite number of life assurance companies in Nigeria and as
at Year 2019, there are 29 insurance companies authorised to transact life assurance business
in Nigeria. Out of these 29 companies, 9 of them are specialist life assurance companies which
have been licenced to transact only life businesses, while the remaining 20 companies are
composite insurance companies which have been licensed to transact both life and non-life
businesses. The scope of operations of these companies covers all aspects of the globally
acceptable life assurance practice with the exception of the pensions business. The pension
aspect of the business has been moved to the pension fund administrators following the
enactment of the Pension Reform Act 2004 (which was amended in 2014).
2
The table below shows the insurance companies in Nigeria as at 2017 transacting life
assurance business in Nigeria:
Table 1.1
3
1.3 Early Mortality Tables
The early burial and funeral societies were not run on sound mathematical principles as there
were no statistics on which to base the contributions. Civilisation had not yet developed to
the extent of recording births and deaths and thus there was no real idea of what a human's
expectation of life was. The first efforts in this direction were made by the parish clerks of the
City of London, who collected record of baptisms and burials from about 1582. Their records
were later issued as 'Bills of Mortality’. These bills were studied by a London merchant,
John Graunt, who analysed them to construct the first mortality table in 1662. This was
very imprecise but was used by the Rev. Dr Assheton who founded the Life Assurance
and Annuity Association in 1699 . Unfortunately, this was not successful as premiums
turned out to be far too low.
A number of other scientists started to look into mortality, including the astronomer Edmond
Halley and Isaac Newton. In 1756, James Dodson showed that scientific life assurance was
possible by charging level premiums based on age at outset, drawn from a mortality table.
The Equitable used his principles when it was founded in 1762.
One of the earliest mortality tables was the Northampton Table based on deaths in the years
1735–80 in Northampton. This was followed by the Carlisle Table published in 1815 based on
deaths in that town from 1780 to 1787. This was used by life offices for many years. In the
nineteenth century, accurate mortality tables became possible because the Government
introduced a census in England every ten years from 1801. This gave much more reliable data
and from a whole country rather than just one town. The English Life Table No. 1 was based
on the 1841 census and further English life tables were based on subsequent censuses. These
became more comprehensive and reliable as the years passed. However, the English life
tables were based on the population as a whole and not on insured lives, where the
experience might be different, so there was a need to revise same and construct a life
mortality table which is based on the experience of insured lives.
The Nigerian Insurance industry is currently working on its own mortality table which shall
solely be based on the Nigeria experience. This is being worked on in conjunction with the
Actuarial Society of Nigeria and when this is done, it would replace the English Mortality
Tables being used in the market.
4
Chapter 2
Types and Scope of Cover of
Life Assurance
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
define the basic types of life assurance policy;
the various types of life assurance covers;
the scope of cover under each type of life assurance;
give examples of variations on all the basic types;
understand how life policies are written;
give details of income protection insurance;
list the types of group contracts available.
Introduction
This chapter explains the different types of cover available in the life assurance market today.
The life assurance market is not static and candidates should therefore endeavour to keep up
with developments from other platforms.
This chapter discusses the covers provided by the life office for the following:
death – life policies
terminal illness – life policies;
critical illness – life policies;
disability – income protection insurance;
illness or accident – income protection insurance;
income in old age – annuities.
Policies can also be effected jointly by two assureds, for example, husband and wife, on their
joint lives. Furthermore, although the vast majority of joint life policies have two lives assured,
it is theoretically possible to have more than two lives, provided insurable interest exists and
any type of policy can be effected on a joint life basis.
5
There are two basic kinds of joint life policy; these are the first death joint life policy and the
second death joint life policy. A joint life first death policy pays out on the death of the first life
assured to die. First death term assurance and family income policies are used for family
protection purposes.Whereas, a joint life second death policy pays out on the death of the
second life assured to die. These are sometimes called joint life last survivor contracts. They
are frequently used in inheritance tax planning and also sometimes for investment purposes.
A joint life first death policy will always be more expensive than a joint life second death
policy. This is because the death claim is payable at an earlier time and, therefore, the element
of premium which pays for the death risk is higher.
Term assurance policies just provide cover against death within a specified period. The
cover is pure protection with no investment element. A payout is possible but not certain, i.e.
the life assured may not die during the term of the policy.
Whole life and endowment policies are different in that a payout is certain. Thus, there is an
investment element in these policies and most have a surrender (cash-in) value. For this
reason, they are sometimes called substantive policies. A whole life policy pays out on the
death of the life assured, whenever that occurs. An endowment policy will pay out on the
maturity date, or earlier death.
6
2.2.1.2 Renewable Term Assurance
Some term assurances are 'renewable'. This means that on the expiry date there is an option to
take out a further term assurance at ordinary rates without further evidence of health, as long
as the expiry date is not beyond an earlier specified age, say, the age of 65 years. Each
subsequent policy will have the same option. Thus, instead of purchasing a 20-year term
assurance, a 45-year-old man might effect a five-year renewable term assurance which gives
him the option of renewing every five years. Whenever the policy comes up for renewal, the
premium will increase since it is based on the current age of the life assured. If the insured
elects the option, the life office cannot decline it. Renewable term assurances are used when
there is a definite initial need for cover but it is not known how long the need will last. The
policy can then be renewed as many times as required.
7
assured.
Some offices offer policies where the sum assured can be increased each year by a set
percentage (often 10%) of the original sum assured. Other offices have short-term policies
which can be renewed at the end of the term for a higher amount. For example, the holder of a
five-year level term assurance may have the right at the end of the five years to effect a new
policy for a sum assured of up to 50% more than the original. Whenever the sum assured
isincreased, the premium is correspondingly raised.
In addition, because the life office is giving the right to increase the cover substantially
without any medical evidence, the initial premiums for these increasable contracts are higher
than those for ordinary level term assurances with comparable sums assured. Furthermore,
short-term policies with renewal options usually provide for the premium to be based on the
life assured's age at renewal. Some offices have guaranteed insurability options, enabling the
sum assured to be increased on events such as marriage, birth of a child or an increase to a
mortgage. Many of these policies incorporate conversion options. Cover can usually
continue up to the age of 60 or 65 years.
The ideal type of increasing policy is an index-linked one, where the sum assured can be
increased each year by the increase in the Retail Prices Index (RPI). Some offices offer RPI-
linked policies, possibly with a maximum increase of 10% in any one year. Other offices
provide cover that is level for, say, five years with a right on expiry to effect a new policy with
a sum assured increased to match inflation over the five years. A common feature of this type
of policy is that, if a policyholder does not exercise the right to increase the cover, the sum
assured is fixed at that level and future index-linking is not allowed.
Some unit-linked protection policies are sold as “money back protection policies” or “no
claims bonus” policies. They are actually endowments with a very high death sum assured
and a maturity value which should equal the total premiums paid at the end of the term, if the
units perform as assumed. They are often sold in the direct market on the basis that if the
8
policyholder dies then the policyholder's family is paid; but if the policyholder does not die
then the money is given back to the policyholder. Such policies are aimed at clients who
perceive term assurance as a waste of money as there might not be a claim. Whilst this is not
true, there does seem to be a demand for this type of policy. The maturity value of such
policies is not guaranteed and the value of units attaching at any time would be available as a
surrender value.
However, as we have said, life assurance can have an investment content. In the case of whole
life policies, as has been explained, a pay-out will occur on the death of the life assured
whenever this takes place. On the other hand, an endowment policy will mature and pay out
a sum of money after a fixed period, usually ten years or more. Both whole life and
endowment policies may be for a guaranteed sum only, in which case they are known as non-
profit.
9
Alternatively, the return can be linked to the office's investment performance; there are two
ways in which this can be done. The first is by having a with-profits policy, where benefits are
indirectly affected by investment performance. The second is by having a unit-linked policy,
where the link with investment performance is direct. Both whole life assurance and
endowment assurance can be either with-profits or unit-linked.
However, one fundamental distinction exists between normal bonuses and terminal
bonuses. A normal bonus is declared annually and increases the value of the policy year by
year as it gets older. The bonus is usually expressed as a percentage of the sum assured and
thus the higher the sum assured, the greater the bonus. It can be either simple (based purely
on the original sum assured) or compound (based on the sum assured plus previous
bonuses). Once allocated, normal bonuses cannot be removed or reduced. While a terminal
bonus is different in concept. This is added only when a policy becomes a claim and is not
payable on surrender. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the total normal bonuses and
will vary in accordance with market conditions.
Most offices operate a system using both normal and terminal bonuses, and the eventual
amount payable will comprise of three elements, which are:
the sum assured
a normal bonus and
a terminal bonus.
Only the sum assured is guaranteed at the outset. Premiums for with-profits contracts are
always higher than those for the corresponding non-profit contracts for the same sum
assured. This is because they reflect the higher benefits which will be paid out at maturity or
death (whichever is earlier).
Under a with-profits policy, the policyholder does benefit to some extent from the
investment performance of the life fund. However, the link is not direct and it depends on the
annual valuation of the fund's assets and liabilities (where a multitude of factors are taken
into consideration) and the decision of the directors as to how to allocate any surplus. As a
result of this, the bonuses added to the policy only follow investment performance in a very
cushioned and distant fashion. Allowance must be made for the guarantees underlying the
10
basic sum assured. The bonus system therefore cannot directly reflect the value of the
underlying assets of the life fund. In addition, bonuses are only declared yearly and cannot
possibly match the daily fluctuations in the values of assets.
There is a strong trend for offices to pull out of writing conventional with-profits business, as
described above, in favour of unitised with-profits business as would be explained below.
There may often be two types of unit in any given fund: initial units and accumulation units.
Initial units have a higher monthly management charge (say, 1/3 of 1%) than accumulation
units (say, 1/12 of 1%). Initial unit prices are thus lower than accumulation unit prices. Initial
units are commonly used for the early years of regular premium unit-linked policies, where
heavy initial expenses need to be recouped. As with the bidoffer spread, the
initial/accumulation unit structure is, in reality, a form of charge imposed by the office. An
alternative arrangement is an initial non-allocation period during which no units are
allocated.Some offices now offer products (particularly single premium ones) with no bid-
offer spread. However, these will have penalties for early surrender to recoup the heavy
expenses incurred in the early years of the contract. These products may prove more
beneficial to clients who continue their policies to the expected maturity or expiry date.
11
2.3.3.2.2 Unit-Linked Funds
Most offices offer a variety of funds to which a policy can be linked. The most usual funds are
as follows:
Many offices have more specialised funds and the fund with the best performance will vary
from time to time. This has led to the concept of the managed fund, where the office's
managers invest in a mixture of whichever of their funds they feel is best at any particular
time. An extension of this idea is the switching facility offered by many offices. This facility
gives the policyholder the option to switch their investment from one fund to another. For
example, policyholders with policies linked to the equity fund may, if they wish, switch into
another fund where they consider prospects to be better. A small charge may be levied for
this service but it does allow investors to, as it were, back their own judgment. The switch
could be of existing units or for future premiums only. Obviously, the value of units can fall as
well as rise and therefore it is possible for the policy to fall in value, unlike a with-profits
policy. Thus, while the potential yield of a unit-linked policy may be higher than a non-linked
contract, the risks are greater.
Most funds are valued daily, weekly or monthly, and the policyholders can regularly follow
the progress of their investments because unit prices are published in the applicable sections
of the Stock Exchange and other national daily newspapers. In any event, the life office will
periodically issue statements showing the number and value of units allocated.
Many offices have introduced unitised with-profits funds. These are really with-profits
investments expressed as a unit-linked policy. The main difference from the other unit-
linked funds is that the unit price is guaranteed not to fall. There are two types of with-profits
fund; these are the fixed-price and variable-price with-profits fund. Under the fixed-price
system, the unit price does not vary. When the annual bonus is declared an appropriate
number of extra units, with the same price, are allocated to the policy. These extra units
cannot then be taken away. Under the variable-price system, the unit price remains static
12
throughout the year, until the annual bonus is declared, when it will rise accordingly and is
guaranteed not to fall.
An element of the annual bonus may be guaranteed and there may also be a terminal bonus
on a claim at maturity or death. There is a wide variation between the unitised with-profits
funds of the different life offices. However, the main aim is to express the traditional with-
profits investment as a unit-linked policy, allowing the policyholder the chance to switch
between with-profits and true unit-linked funds.
Most life offices reserve the right to apply a market value reduction factor (MVR) to
surrenders and switches out of the with-profits fund. The MVR enables the life office to
reduce the surrender or switch value if it would otherwise be in excess of the value of the
underlying assets, for example, in times of stock market crashes. The objective is to protect
the interests of those staying in the funds and maintain fairness between those who cash in
early and those who stay the full term. For this reason, MVRs are not applied to claims on
death or maturity. The amount of unitised with-profits business being written is increasing
rapidly as offices are moving away from conventional with-profits business. However, it is
usual for offices not to maintain a separate unit-linked with-profits fund but to continue to
use the main with-profits fund. With-profits funds will thus contain increasing proportions
of unitised business in the future.
Generally, life offices should be able to manage their unit linked funds effectively having
spelt out the following procedures:
Policy conditions should explain how funds are managed.
Where discretion is exercised the primary requirement is treating customers fairly.
Unit prices should be calculated in a fair and transparent manner.
The pricing basis of the fund must be kept under regular review to protect continuing
policy-holders.
Transactions should be processed and settled in a timely manner.
Rounding should be kept to a minimum, should not normally exceed 0.5% of the unit
price, should be neutral and should not be used as a way of levying a charge.
All charges should be clearly defined and disclosed to policy-holders.
Errors should be quickly identified and rectified. Compensation should normally be
paid where a unit pricing error is 0.5% or greater.
Significant or persistent pricing errors should be reported to the regulatory authority.
13
2.3.4.1 Non-Profit Whole Life Policies
A non-profit whole life policy has a level premium, payable throughout life. It pays only a
fixed sum assured, whenever death occurs. There are also policies which offer a cessation of
premiums on attainment of a certain age, often 70 years. These contracts are slightly more
expensive because premiums will be payable on average for a shorter period and were also
very rarely sold over the last few decades. Some life offices now market a simple whole life
policy by direct mail offers, typically to the over 50s. The proposal form tends to be very
simple with few medical questions. The sum assured is a fixed sum with no bonus or unit
linking. However, it is common for the sum assured only to be payable if death occurs more
than two years after the start of the policy, with only a refund of premiums payable on death
within that period. There will usually be no surrender value.
Bonuses are calculated on the basic sum such that (i) above increases yearly with the
declaration of bonuses until it overtakes (ii) above. Premiums for this type of contract are
lower than for ordinary non-profit whole life contracts; the benefits will not be as high as
those of a full with-profits whole life policy. Some offices allow the difference between the
basic and guaranteed death sums assured to be converted into the basic sum assured, subject
to the appropriate increase in premium. They are used for family protection and inheritance
tax funding.
These withdrawals are achieved by cashing in however many units are needed to give the
withdrawal amount. If the annual amount withdrawn does not exceed 5% of the original
investment, the policyholder will pay no income tax at that time. There may be some liability
to higher rate income tax if the withdrawal rate exceeds 5% or its duration exceeds 20 years.
Although often described as income these payments are legally capital.
A number of offices offer distribution bonds. These are single premium unit-linked bonds
where the 'natural income' of the underlying funds (i.e. dividends, interest and rental
income) is paid out, usually half-yearly, to the bondholder. This is normally done without
cashing in units. The rate of income produced will vary, reflecting market conditions for the
underlying funds, and thus is not guaranteed.
The action taken as a result of this review varies from office to office but usually, if the actual
growth rate is higher than that assumed, the sum assured is increased; if the actual rate is
lower, either the sum assured is reduced or the premium correspondingly increased. Further
regular reviews are made, usually every five years but possibly more frequently once the life
assured reaches the age of 70 or 75 years. The level of life cover under these plans is higher
than on savings plans and, to help pay for this, unit allocation percentages in the early years
are very low, often nil for the first two years. Thus, the investment element of the policy takes
some time to build up. If the policy is cashed in the surrender value will be the bid value of the
units allocated. If the total unit value overtakes the sum assured, then the higher amount will
be payable on a death claim.The earliest policies had a fixed relationship between the
premium and the sum assured. However, most current versions allow policyholders to
choose their own sum assured, within certain limits, for any given premium. Policyholders
may then have the right to adjust their sum assured up or down (again within certain limits)
according to their circumstances. Obviously, the more premium that goes into life cover, the
less is invested in units. The attraction of this type of plan is that the level of life cover is
extremely flexible, enabling a high degree of protection to be given in the early years and then
reducing it to give higher levels of investment later in life, when protection for the family is
no longer the main aim.
15
A 'maximum cover' whole life policy provides a high level of life cover and, because it is
virtually all risk premium, is similar to a term assurance. However, it does not have an expiry
date and will have a substantial chance of an increase in premium after the first review date.
In order to maintain the qualifying status of the policy, the minimum sum assured is set no
lower than the regulatory minimum of 75% of premiums payable up to the age of 75 years
although some offices have higher limits. The maximum sum assured also varies from office
to office but is typically that which can be sustained throughout life, based on a growth rate of
6%.
If an increase in the sum assured is requested, this will be subject to fresh medical evidence
unless the policy has a guaranteed insurability provision.
The cost of the life cover is met by monthly cancellation of units. The amount cancelled is
based on the difference between the sum assured and the value of the units, and is calculated
with reference to the latest mortality tables. Enough units are cancelled each month to pay for
that month's life cover. The policyholder can thus benefit from future improvements in
mortality statistics. A further advantage is that as the value of the units builds up, the cost of
the life cover can reduce rather than increase as it would on a conventional policy. Once the
value of the units overtakes the sum assured, deductions for life cover will cease.
Some offices allow the policyholder to increase the sum assured regularly, in line with
inflation, without medical evidence. This guaranteed insurability provision is valuable
because it enables the policyholder to maintain the real value of the cover. However, some
offices cancel this option if it is not used every time it is available. The option may be available
every year, every three years, or every five years, depending on the office. This option usually
ceases at, say, age 65.
These contracts are used for family protection and inheritance tax funding. They are
available on a single life, joint life first death or joint life second death basis.
Level premiums are payable for the duration of the contract. Premiums for endowments are
generally more expensive than for whole life assurances because claim payments are
generally made earlier. The shorter the term of the endowment, the higher will be the
premium for a given sum assured because it will be payable for a smaller period. Terms of
less than ten years are rare because of the qualifying rules. However, since the abolition of life
assurance premium relief, they have become more common. With the exception of
flexidowment policies, the endowment policies described below are only suitable
16
investments if investors do not want their money before the maturity date and will not need
to cash in the policy earlier.
The best yield on an endowment policy is usually obtained by waiting until the maturity
date. The reasons for this are really twofold. First, surrender values on life policies are
generally on the low side. In many cases, the surrender value in the early years of a contract
can be less than the premiums paid in. Even in later years, the surrender value is often
substantially less than the maturity value. Second, under many offices' structures, a terminal
bonus is payable on death and maturity claims but not on surrenders. Terminal bonuses can
form a large proportion of the total claim value.
Low-cost endowment policies are written with two sums assured. The amount payable on
death is the greater of:
(i) the basic sum assured plus bonuses; or
(ii) the guaranteed death sum assured.
Bonuses are calculated on the basic sum, so that (i) increases yearly with the declaration of
bonuses until it overtakes (ii) at which point the term assurance element (the difference
between (i) and (ii)) is eliminated. The basic sum assured is pitched at such a level that, with
the addition of bonuses based on, say, 80% of the office's current normal rates, it will equal the
guaranteed death sum assured on the maturity date.
The amount payable on maturity is the basic sum assured plus bonuses and is thus not fully
guaranteed. These policies were introduced as a cheaper way of covering house purchase
loans, with the guaranteed death sum assured being equal to the loan since the basic sum
17
assured is less than it would be under a full with-profits endowment, the premiums are
cheaper. However, owing to the term assurance element, there is a guarantee that the loan
will be repaid on death. There is no such guarantee on maturity but, because of the
conservative bonus assumptions used in fixing the basic sum assured, there is every prospect
that the maturity value will comfortably exceed the amount of the loan. Many contracts of
this type carry the option for the policyholder to convert the difference between the two sums
assured (that is, the term element) into the basic sum assured.
One office offers a policy for which the initial premium is 50% of the full premium, rising by
10% of the full premium each year until the full premium is payable in the sixth and
subsequent years. Another office offers an initial premium of 50%, increasing by 5% annually
for ten years. Yet another office offers a version where the premium increases by around 4%
each year throughout a 25-year term.
The low initial premiums do not affect the sum assured or the bonuses, which continue
throughout the term of the policy on the normal low-cost basis.
2.3.5.5 Flexidowments
The drawbacks of the traditional endowment, namely its fixed maturity date and low
surrender value, led in the 1970s to the introduction of a new type of policy. This was the
open-ended endowment or flexidowment. These policies can be cashed in without the
normal surrender penalty at any time after ten years. The surrender value is usually
guaranteed or part guaranteed and is more akin to an early maturity value than to the
traditional endowment surrender value. For convenience, the policies are usually written as
longterm with-profits endowments, for 25 years, say, or to the age of 65 years. In whatever
way the policy is written, however, its real purpose will be to provide a maturity value at any
time after ten years. Often the flexidowment is issued as a number of small identical policies
with a standard premium of, say, N1.00 or N10.00 per month per policy. This allows just one
or two policies to be cashed in whenever required, giving greater flexibility.
18
Subsequent premiums will buy units at an allocation percentage, which will vary from office
to office. The basis will be that the older the life assured, the lower will be the allocation
percentage. As the policy progresses, more and more units will be bought and so its value
should continue to rise. The contract will have at least enough life cover to ensure that it is a
qualifying policy. This means that the sum assured will be at least 75% of the total premiums
payable over the full term of the contract. Thus, on death, the amount payable will be the
guaranteed death sum assured mentioned above or the bid value of the units, whichever is
the higher and as a result of this life cover, proposals will have to be underwritten. The
maturity value will be the bid value of the units. If the investor wishes to cash in his policy
before maturity, the surrender value will also be the bid value of the units. However, if
surrender occurs in the early years there may be a discontinuance charge or 'surrender
penalty', which has to be deducted from the value of the units before arriving at the final
figure. Most surrender penalty charges will apply only during the first ten years. Most
policies can be issued on a single life or a joint life basis. These plans are frequently issued as a
cluster of small, individual policies which can be dealt with separately. For example, a
N500.00 per month plan might be issued as a cluster of ten N500.00 per month policies. This
increases the flexibility of the arrangement and also has taxation advantages.
Benefits can often be added later as well as chosen at the outset. As a result of the range of
benefits offered, the policies cannot meet the qualifying rules and are thus non-qualifying.
However, this does give the policyholder great flexibility with respect to payment of
premiums. Most contracts provide for a regular premium, usually monthly, which can be
increased or reduced as required, and also allow single premiums to be paid in whenever
desired. Since the policies are non-qualifying, the payments are not tax free as they would be
on a qualifying policy. The income protection insurance (IPI) and hospital income benefits
are tax free as for IPI policies.The other benefits are free of basic rate income tax but are
subject to higher rate tax under the chargeable gains rules.
20
their normal occupation due to illness or injury. Again, this is similar to income protection
insurance, although the payment is a lump sum (the death sum assured) rather than an
income. Naturally, if payment of the sum assured is made due to permanent disablement
there will be no further payment on subsequent death.
Critical illness cover (CIC) is sold as an optional extra on whole life policies, particularly unit-
linked ones where the risk is paid for by cancellation of units. It can also be added to term
assurances and endowments (which might be useful for mortgages). A number of offices
21
now sell stand-alone critical illness policies. Stand-alone critical illness policies can be
guaranteed or unit-linked. A guaranteed policy provides a fixed benefit for a fixed premium.
The unit-linked policy will be like a unit-linked term assurance and premiums could increase
in the future due to poor investment performance or bad claims experience. A few offices
have policies which pay regular instalments of capital rather than a lump sum. There is a
trend towards reviewable CIC products as the cost of guaranteed premiums increases, due to
possible future medical advances in diagnostic techniques. Reviewable premiums are
generally 15% to 55% cheaper than guaranteed ones and the gap is widening. The policies
would be reviewed every 5 or 10 years on the current rates, based on general advances in
medical science, not on individual circumstances or individual lives assureds' health.
Improvements in medical science and treatments have led to some illnesses becoming much
less critical than previously, and so the market periodically reviews what illnesses should be
covered and how they should be defined. Insurers thus from time to time revise their policy
wordings, although any changes would not affect any policy already issued.
With the enactment of the Pension Reform Act of 2004 (as amended by the 2014 Act), Group
Life was made compulsory in Nigeria (Section 9 of the Pension Reform Act 2004 – also refer to
22
the joint release by the National Insurance Commission and the National Pension
Commission in the latter part of this chapter).
23
even if the employee may contribute to part of the cost of an associated pension scheme.
Group life policies can be costed using individual ages of the members but they are usually
costed on a unit rate system, based on the average age of those covered and the total sum
assured for the year. The employer is only concerned with the total premium which, in a large
scheme, should remain fairly constant due to the withdrawal of older members (by
retirement or death) and the influx of younger members. In schemes where the sum assured
is proportionate to salary, the initial premium might be based on current salary with an
adjustment at the end of the policy year if salaries have increased during the year.
2.3.8.6 Underwriting
Since a group of people is being insured, it is possible for insurers to underwrite on a more
lenient basis than for individual policies. Some insurance companies in this market are
prepared to offer a substantial amount of group life assurance cover without evidence of
health, provided certain conditions are fulfilled; however, evidence of health may still be
required under some circumstances.
Claims are paid to the firm on production of the credit agreement and the death certificate.
No evidence of health is required and there is no question of selection either by the office or
against it, as all the lender's credit agreements are included in the group life policy. A single
group policy is issued and each premium is calculated from a return supplied by the lender.
The lender is the policyholder and pays the premium. Borrowers are not party to the contract
and probably only know that their debt will be cancelled if they die. This is very much a
specialised niche market.
25
2.3.9.1 Incapacity
IPI policies are written so that the benefit only becomes payable whilst the insured is
incapacitated as defined in the policy. A typical definition is as follows: Incapacity for the
purpose of this policy means that the insured is totally unable by reasons of sickness or accident to
follow the occupation stated in this policy and is not following any other occupation.
The policy will state the insured's occupation and the life office has to be notified if it changes.
Some offices do not specify the occupation on the policy and so their definitions state that the
insured must be unable to follow the occupation engaged in immediately prior to incapacity
or any other occupation. A number of companies state that if the insured has no occupation
the incapacity must confine the insured to their house. Many offices include that the insured
must be certified as being so incapacitated by a medical practitioner appointed or approved
by the office.
2.3.9.5 Exclusions
All companies have exclusions in their policies and no benefit will be paid for incapacity
arising from an excluded cause. The most common exclusions are as follows:
war, invasion, act of foreign enemy, riot or military or usurped power;
intentional self-inflicted injury;
taking alcohol or drugs other than under the direction of a registered medical
practitioner;
participation in any criminal act;
pregnancy, childbirth or any complications arising from these;
aviation other than as a fare-paying passenger on a normal flight;
AIDS;
failure to follow medical advice.
2.3.9.8 Assignment
Almost all offices state that the policy is not assignable or that, if it is assigned, it becomes
void.
Some offices have a guaranteed insurability option enabling the insured to increase the
benefit without medical evidence if he receives a salary rise due to promotion or a job change.
29
has a corresponding obligation to sell. The disadvantage of this method is that it means the
loss of inheritance tax business property relief on the partnership share, as it is subject to a
binding contract for sale. This may not matter if the partnership share will pass to the
deceased's widow or civil partner and thus be exempt anyway. However, if business
property relief (up to 100%) is important, the cross option method can be used.
In the cross option method, the partnership agreement contains, not a binding agreement
that the survivors will buy the share, but an option for them to do so within a specified period
after the death (say six months). The estate has a matching option to sell. This means that the
share is not subject to a binding contract for sale and thus inheritance tax business property
relief is still available.
In either case, each partner effects a term assurance to retirement date on their own life on
trust for the other partners in whatever shares the other partners will hold the business after
their death. Two or more of the partners will be appointed trustees. The sum assured under
the policy should be the value of that partner's share of the business. When one partner dies,
the policy on their life pays out to the surviving partners as beneficiaries of the trust. They use
the money to buy the dead partner's share from the dead partner's estate. The result is that the
surviving partners end up in full control of their business, and the deceased's family receive
full value for their share shortly after the death. If each partner effects such a policy as part of
the partnership agreement this will make the premiums exempt from inheritance tax as a
bona fide commercial arrangement. However, if the ages of the partners vary then this
arrangement is costlier for the older partners than the younger ones. Thus, where premiums
differ to a material extent, there may be some adjustment between the partners to achieve an
equitable distribution of cost. These schemes can also be used for limited liability
partnerships (LLPs).
30
The policies would be term assurances (or possibly whole life assurances) under trust for the
other directors. When one director dies the policy on their life will pay out and give the other
directors the cash to buy their shares from the estate. Cross option agreements are often
preferable to preserve inheritance tax business property relief on the shares.
It is therefore common for companies to effect life assurance on the life of a key person. The
company will be the assured and will have to show that it has enough insurable interest in the
life assured to warrant the level of cover requested. The life office will require details of the
company's operations, and the duties and expertise of the key person for underwriting
purposes. The office should only accept the risk if it is satisfied that the company really does
have sufficient insurable interest in the key person to support the policy. This type of policy is
growing in popularity in the UK although it has not yet reached the same high levels of sales
as in the US and in Nigeria.
The ideal type of policy is a five-year renewable term assurance. The company may be able to
obtain corporation tax relief on the grounds that the premiums are allowable business
expenses. In the UK, HMRC will allow this only if the relationship of the life assured to the
company is that of employee and employer, the policy is to meet loss of profits resulting from
the death of the employee, and it is an annual or short-term temporary assurance. If the key
person has a substantial shareholding in the company, HMRC will not allow relief. The
proceeds of the policy will usually be taxable as a trading receipt, whether or not relief has
been obtained on the premiums.
The policy may be arranged so as to provide for the sum assured to be payable by
instalments. This may be appropriate as the losses resulting from the death of a key person
may only emerge over a period of time. In addition, the ability to spread the payments could
be beneficial for taxation reasons.
31
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMMISSION NATIONAL PENSION COMMISSION
Shippers’ Plaza, Michael Okpara Street Plot 2774, Shehu Shagari Way, Maitama District
Wuse Zone 5, P.M.B 457, Garki Abuja P.M.B. 5170, Wuse, Abuja
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Section 9 (3) of the Pension Reform Act 2004 (The Act) requires every employer, to which
the Act applies, to maintain Life Insurance Policy in favour of the employee for a minimum
of three times the annual total emolument of the employee.
1.2 For the purpose of establishing uniform set of rules, guidelines and standards in relation
to the application of the provisions of Section 9 (3), the following
2.1 The employer shall fully bear all costs in relation to procurement of this policy, and this
shall be in addition to, and separate from, the contributions to be made by the employer to
each employee's Retirement Savings Account, as required by the Act.
2.2 The Life Insurance Policy shall be effected through the purchase of a Life Policy issued by
a Nigerian Registered Insurance Company, licensed and authorized to conduct Life
Insurance Business by National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) under the Insurance Act
2003.
2.3 For ease of administration, a Consortium of eligible insurance Companies, as determined
in paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 of this guideline, shall be constituted for the purpose of providing
life insurance cover for employees of the Federal Government.
2.4 Employers in the private sector shall be at liberty to engage the service of any insurance
company or group of insurance companies which satisfies the eligibility criteria in
paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 of these guidelines.
2.5 As stipulated in Section 6 (1) of the Pension Reform Act, the National Pension Commission
32
(The Commission) shall set up a Board of Inquiry for treating any case of missing employees
referred to it by employers, for insurance claim purposes.
3.1 In the first year of implementation, which is 2006, the National Pension Commission shall
provide a list of NAICOM licensed and registered insurance companies eligible to conduct
the business of provision of life insurance cover, under the provisions of the Pension Reform
Act 2004.
3.2 For subsequent years, such eligible insurance companies must have met minimum
acceptable standards to be fixed by the National Pension Commission.
3.3 The Commission shall collaborate with NAICOM to facilitate the Consortium referred to
in paragraph 2.3 of these guidelines from amongst the list of eligible insurance companies in
3.1 and 3.2 above.
4.1 The policy shall provide cover to the insured against Death.
4.2 Insurance coverage shall be for twelve (12) months, from January through December, and
shall be renewable at the end of each coverage year.
4.3 The premium payable on the policy shall be pro-rated as applicable where an employee
joins the scheme in the course of the year.
4.4 Where an employee leaves the service of the employer before the expiration of twelve (12)
months, the premium paid relating to the unexpired period, shall be returned/set aside to the
credit of the employer.
4.5 Insurance cover is mandatory for all employees as long as they are in employment.
4.6 Insurers shall be expected to ensure that employers comply with the minimum insurance
cover of three times the annual total emolument of each employee.
4.7 Notwithstanding the provisions of 4.6 above, employers that have better existing life
insurance policies for their employees, in terms of benefits, shall maintain such policies.
5.1 Each employer shall obtain an insurance certificate from the insurer.
5.2 Such certificate shall be accompanied by a schedule which shall indicate amongst other
33
things, the period of coverage, the number and details of staff at inception/ renewal date,
their total emoluments, the benefit payable and the annual premium/date of full payment.
5.3 The insurance certificate shall be issued to employers by the Insurer within a month from
the policy inception/renewal date.
5.4 Employers shall display a copy of the insurance certificate in a conspicuous place within
the premises, for the information of the employees, as evidence of having taken such policies.
5.5 Employers shall send a copy of the insurance certificate with the schedule of benefits to
the National Pension Commission, and the Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) where the
employees maintain their Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs), not later than 31st March
every year.
5.6 Employers shall be required to commence renewal negotiations in writing, within two (2)
months to the expiration of the current insurance coverage. Such negotiation must be
concluded before the last day of the current cover.
5.7 Full payment of the insurance premium shall be made, at the latest, on the first day of
insurance cover.
5.8 Where an employer fails to effect full payment of premium at the stipulated time, the
insurer shall report such failure to the National Pension Commission within fourteen (14)
days of non receipt of premium.
6.1 Operational terms of the policy shall address, amongst other issues the terms listed in
paragraphs 6.2 to 6.6 below.
6.2 Free cover limit must be established between the insurer and employers. This is the limit
of sum assured above which the insurer will require the affected individuals to undergo
medical examinations.
6.3 Until satisfactory medical results are received, cover will be restricted to the free cover
limit.
6.4 All employees shall be made to fill a non-medical form with their passport photograph
attached, to ascertain identities and existence at commencement or point of entry into the
scheme.
6.5 Procedure for filing and settlement of claims on the policy shall be clearly defined.
34
6.6 Employers are expected to negotiate premium rates payable on such life policies with the
insurer, within the rate table stipulated by NAICOM.
7.1 Where an employee dies, the employer shall immediately commence death benefit claim
on behalf of the deceased, as prescribed in the operational terms of the policy.
7.2 Employer shall notify employee's PFA and the National Pension Commission, of the
employee's death stating the claim amount receivable.
7.3 Employee's PFA shall validate claim amount and where discrepancies arise, this must be
resolved with the employer.
8.1 Where an employee is missing, the employer shall report this immediately to the
employee's PFA, Insurer and the National Pension Commission.
8.2 The Board of Inquiry established by the National Pension Commission shall stipulate the
documentary evidence required from employers to process missing person claims. This shall
include the Police Report, Employee's passport photograph, newspaper publication of the
missing employee, a letter from employer declaring him/her missing and any other
document as may be required from time to time.
8.3 The documentary evidence required by the Board of Inquiry set up by the National
Pension Commission shall be provided within fourteen (14) working days after the period of
one year, from the day the employee was declared missing.
8.4 The Board of Inquiry shall, within thirty (30) working days of receipt of complete
evidence required for its deliberations, communicate its findings to the employer, insurer
and the National Pension Commission, for appropriate action to be taken.
9.1 Claims must be settled by the Insurer within seven (7) working days of receipt of complete
documentation and acceptance of liability.
9.2 Information on any discrepancies on claims or its non-settlement within the time, as
specified in 9.1 above, shall be sent to the National Pension Commission by the employer and
employee's PFA immediately.
35
9.3 Total sums due to the employee shall not be encumbered or subject to any deductions by
the employer.
9.4 The total sum due to the deceased shall be paid directly to the credit of the deceased's
Retirement Savings Account by the insurer.
10.0 REVIEW
11.0 ENQUIRIES
All enquiries regarding these guidelines shall be directed to the National Pension
Commission
36
Chapter 3
Introduction to Life
Underwriting Procedures
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
define underwriting in life business;
understand and design a proposal form;
understand the various medical factors in life underwriting;
give details of various hazardous risks in life underwriting;
understand the various ways of dealing with under-average lives
understand the natural and level premium systems in life assurance
know the medical examinations interpretation in life
understand non-medical and free cover limits.
Introduction
This chapter explains the concept of underwriting in life assurance. Proposal form is
carefully defined.
Medical examination of the life assured in life assurance underwriting is very vital aspect of
the underwriting for sums assured in excess of either the non-medical or free cover limit.
3.1 Underwriting
Underwriting is the name given to the procedure of assessing a proposal and deciding
whether to accept the risk and, if so, at what rate of premium and terms of acceptance. Each
office has its own schedule of rates for particular types of policy. The rate is usually expressed
per N1,000.00 sum assured and varies with the age of the client and terms of the policy. These
ordinary rates are based on the average mortality experience. If a life proposed shows
features which suggest that there is an above average risk of death then these must be
investigated to decide whether the risk can be accepted at ordinary rates, or whether some
special terms might be required.
An underwriter must bear in mind that a life assurance contract is based on utmost good
faith. The proposer is in possession of all material facts relating to the risk and has a duty to
disclose them. However, material facts may be omitted or only partially disclosed. The job of
the underwriter is to recognise impairments, even if they are not specifically disclosed.
Vague answers on a proposal such as 'check-up' or 'stomach-pain' may describe some trivial
condition. On the other hand they may reveal something much more serious which may
require special underwriting treatment. The underwriter must use skill to assess whether
theproposal can be accepted at ordinary rates or, if not, at what special terms.
We shall now consider the procedure and forms used, factors influencing the assessment of
the risk and methods of dealing with under-average lives.
37
3.2 Underwriting Procedure and Forms
The basic form used to process an application for life assurance is the proposal form. This
document, which is signed by the proposer, requests the life office to issue the desired policy
to the assured and gives the basic information required to assess the application.
The declaration must be signed to declare the answers to be true and also to give the insurer
permission to approach the doctor of the life to be assured for any further information. There
is a note on omission and misstatement of facts on proposal forms and this has been included
as a result of the Statement of Long-Term Insurance Practice. An Ownership of Benefits
section must be completed if the policy is to be written on a 'life of another' basis.
The life office has, of course, to be satisfied about the existence of insurable interest, and this is
the reason for the question on the relationship of the proposer to the life to be assured. The
counter-signature of the life to be assured is required to make sure they understand that the
policy will be owned by the other, to whom all benefits will be paid.
Whilst some proposal forms are still in paper form, the vast majority are now completed
online. The questions can now be made more specific to a particular contract or age group.
Electronic signatures are now becoming acceptable to avoid delays in sending back paper
proposal forms to be signed.
Most offices have what are described as non-medical limits under which proposals will be
considered without a medical report necessarily being required. The office will, however,
reserve the right to call for a medical report if the information on the proposal warrants this.
Limits vary from office to office but a typical age limit would be under 40 years of age, and for
38
a sum assured under N500,000.00.These limits relate to the total sum assured for that life, and
not just the present proposal. Therefore, in the above example, if the proposer already had
aN20,000.00 policy, the limit for a new proposal would be N480,000.00. This procedure saves
the life office from the expense of automatic medical reports for all proposals. Long
experience has shown that comparatively few cases reveal significant medical defects.
However, lives over the limit for age or sum assured for each particular life office will
automatically require a report, and maybe an examination. Many offices now require blood
tests for certain proposals because of AIDS. Typically, blood tests are compulsory for all sums
assured over a pre-determined limit by the life office. Some offices operate free cover or
guaranteed acceptance schemes. These vary from office to office but the general principle is
that for certain classes of business up to a certain limit, a proposal form is used with either no
medical questions or just one or two simple questions such as: Are you expecting to attend any
hospital or have you done so in the last six months for any condition, or are you receiving any treatment
for a heart condition? Acceptance would be guaranteed provided the answer was 'no'. The
schemes were common practice for endowment house purchase cases where, for example,
the sum assured is within predetermined acceptable limit by the life office. This enables the
office to process large volumes of cases easily and swiftly. However, schemes of this nature
are rare these days.
Life insurers place limits on the maximum losses they are prepared to risk. Over this limit,
referred to as the retention limit, the office must then spread the risk by finding other insurers
to accept part of it and so reduce the possibility of catastrophe ruining them. This process is
known as reassurance (also referred to as reinsurance) and is covered in more detail in later
chapters.
The office may need to reassure a policy if it is over the office's retention limit. The retention
limit is the level of sum assured on any life beyond which the office will need to obtain some
reassurance. The need to reassure will affect the underwriting of the policy as the
underwriter has to agree terms with the reassuring office's underwriter.
Most offices now have two tables of rates, one for smokers and another for non-smokers. If
this is the case, then the proposal form will contain a question about smoking and also give
the office's definition of a non-smoker. These definitions may vary but a typical one might be
someone who has not smoked tobacco products (except for 20 cigars per year) for the last
year. Non-smoker rates are cheaper than smoker rates because smoking increases the
likelihood of a number of diseases and shortens the expectation of life.
39
decision which to use will depend on the circumstances of each case.
heart diseases;
circulatory diseases;
overweight;
digestive system diseases;
40
cancer;
liver diseases;
eye diseases;
tropical diseases;
respiratory diseases;
kidney diseases;
glandular disorders;
diseases of the nervous system;
mental disorders;
diabetes;
HIV/AIDS.
If the underwriter wants to see copies of the proposer's medical records, this is permitted by
the Access to Health Records Act 1990, as long as the life office has the proposer's written
authority. There is usually an Industry Best Practice on HIV and insurance. Underwriters
have to take decisions on a case-by-case basis and assess premiums fairly. They should not
ask for excessive, speculative or irrelevant information and must take account of all relevant
factors. Underwriters must also stay up to date with developments and statistics and the
company must have an agreed policy on dealing with HIV, updated at least every three years.
Occupations with above average risk of Occupations with above average risk of
death by accident a particular disease
Scaffolders
Publicans – alcohol-related diseases.
Steeplejacks
Steel erectors
Divers – the ‘bends’.
Trawlermen
Underground miners
Miners – Pneumoconiosis.
Oil rig workers
Bomb disposal workers Chemical workers – various types of
Divers poisoning.
Professional boxers
Asbestos workers – asbestosis.
Handlers of radioactive materials
The occupation of the proposer may also be material for underwriting purposes. The
underwriter should look at the occupation to see whether it presents a greater than average
risk of death. Some occupations may result in a higher than average risk of death by accident.
Others may predispose a person to a higher risk of disease.
As a result of improvements in working conditions and better safety measures many
occupations have become far safer than in the early years of the twentieth century. However,
new processes may often involve the handling of dangerous substances – often found, for
example, in the chemical industry. Practices generally vary from office to office. However, a
number of occupations such as those listed above may lead to some form of special
treatment. The risks of disease are usually minimised by safety regulations and the
41
underwriting treatment will vary from office to office.
42
Many offices' policies are valid no matter in what country the life assured resides. However, if
a proposer lives abroad at the time of the proposal, the underwriter must consider whether
the area of residence presents any extra risks. The risks may arise from political instability or
warfare. This has been evident in recent years in parts of Africa, the Middle East and
Southeast Asia. Often the purpose for which the proposer lives abroad is relevant. For
example, a police inspector may merit a higher premium than an engineer.
Tropical countries may produce extra health risks because of the prevalence of tropical
diseases, poor sanitation and less sophisticated medical facilities. Occupation may be a
factor, for example, for a mineral prospector working in an isolated area. This might warrant
a higher premium than a business manager in a large city.
If there is no intention or prospect of foreign travel at the time of the proposal a world-wide
policy is usually issued at ordinary rates. The policy would then be unaffected by the life
assured's subsequent move to any country in the world. However, if the proposer is living in,
or going to, a country of extra risk, then a worldwide policy could be issued at an extra
premium. This is often removable on permanent return to the UK.
If a high value policy has been sold on a life of another basis, then the insurable interest
situation should be checked carefully. It must be shown that the proposer does have an
insurable interest in the life assured of at least the amount of the sum assured. The higher the
sum assured, the more justification the life office will be looking for. In the case of key person
proposals and other business cases, the underwriter will want full details of the company
involved, its turnover, profit levels and the significance of the key person in the business. The
underwriter must also pay heed to the possibility of a fraudulent claim.
There have been cases where individuals have insured themselves for large amounts with a
number of different life offices and then faked a death to enable an associate to defraud the
life office. For this reason, life offices are co-operating under the aegis of their respective
insurers association to try to combat such fraudsters.
Extra Risks
Increasing extra risks: the risk increases Being overweight; the effect of which
with the passing of time. tends to be greater with age.
Chronicbronchitis, which tends
to be progressive and can lead to
emphysema.
3.4.7.2 Exclusions
Under the method known as exclusion, the proposal is accepted at ordinary rates, but death
from the extra risk is excluded. For example, a proposal from an otherwise average life who
took part in amateur motorcycle racing might be accepted at ordinary rates subject to an
exclusion for death caused by motorcycle racing. The drawback of this method is that cover is
not complete and is, in fact, not available when it might be needed most. It will usually be
used for an occupational or sporting extra risk rather than a medical one.
44
3.4.7.4 Rating-Up
Rating-up is a further type of extra premium, but is calculated differently from that already
described. It is assumed that the life is x years older than the real age, and the premium for the
rated-up age is then charged. Thus, a 45-year-old man with chronic bronchitis might be rated
'plus 5' and be charged the normal premium for a 50-year-old man.
3.4.7.5 Postponement
The postponement method can be used where the initial risk is such as to render the life
virtually uninsurable, but, where once the danger period is survived, prospects will improve
substantially, so that acceptance at ordinary rates might be possible. A postponement may
thus be in the best interest of both parties.
This method is used, for example, if the proposer is having an operation in the near future.
The proposal might be postponed for a period, to allow for full recovery, when the
application can be resubmitted, and possibly accepted.
3.4.7.6 Declinature
Where the extra risk is very heavy and there is little prospect of improvement later, the
proposal may be declined outright. As a general rule, offices are loath to decline and will try
to offer some special terms if they can. The proportion of cases declined is very low, probably
around 4% of total applications. As a result of an agreement made between the ABI and the
BMA in the UK, when an insurance applicant is declined or postponed as a result of a medical
disclosure they have made on the application form, the life office will give the reason for this
to the applicant. If a new, or poorly controlled, medical condition is revealed on the General
Practitioner's Report or following a medical examination, which was not disclosed on the
application, the life office will inform the General Practitioner.
All insurers have mathematicians – called actuaries – whose job is to calculate what
premiums to charge from the mortality tables. A specimen mortality table is shown in
Appendix 3.5. According to this table, out of 100,000 male babies born, 99,402 are still living at
age one. In the next year, 44 die aged one last birthday and 99,358 survive to age two. The
numbers dying and surviving at each later age are shown until, at age 110, not a single
survivor out of the original 100,000 remains alive. The third column in the table (qx) is the
probability that a person aged x will die before reaching x + 1, and is thus the mortality rate
for that age. The fourth column (ex) is the expectation of life for a person aged x. Thus a
woman aged 40 can expect to live on average a further 41.657 years.
It should be noted that in March 2011 the European Court of Justice banned the use of
gender in determining the premiums for all types of insurance with effect from December
2012, even where there is statistical evidence to justify a difference in premiums. This
would mean that life assurance premiums and annuity rates should be the same for both
males and females of the same age.
In the early years of life assurance natural premiums were charged. However, this was not
very successful as premiums increased steeply in later years, leading people to be unable to
afford cover when it was most needed. In addition, the tendency was for the best and fittest
lives not to renew their policies. This leaves a greater percentage of inferior or unfit lives
which led to an increase in the mortality rate over and above that predicted from the
mortality tables, which are based on average lives. Premiums would then become
inadequate to meet claims, leading to further increases which would only exacerbate the
46
trend. The natural premium system was thus replaced by the level premium system, where
the premium for a given sum assured is level throughout the term of the policy.
The excess in the early years forms a reserve which can be drawn on to meet the heavier
claims in the later years. Thus, in any group of insured lives there will be just a few deaths in
the first year, causing a moderate proportion of the total premiums to be paid out in claims.
The balance will go into the reserve to be held against future claims. In the second year, a
slightly higher proportion of the premiums will be needed to pay claims and slightly lower
proportion will go into the reserve, but still increasing the total reserve. Each year the claims
cost will be slightly higher and the amount going into the reserve slightly lower. The reserve
continues to grow until the cost of one year's claims matches the premiums and nothing goes
into the reserve.
The next year's claims will slightly exceed the premiums and the difference will come from
the reserve. From then on, the reserve will steadily decrease each year as claims exceed
premiums more and more. Finally, only one life is left in our group and he pays his last
premium and dies. The last premium plus what is left of the reserve should be enough to pay
the claim. Naturally, this will only be so where the mortality assumptions drawn from the
mortality tables are matched by the actual experience. Because mortality tables are compiled
from past statistics and mortality has generally been improving historically, actual mortality
experience has tended to be better than that predicted.
It is not possible to calculate the reserve under a single policy by accumulating premiums
and subtracting claims. The insurance principle requires that policies under which claims
occur at an early date are subsidised by policies where claims occur at a later date. A single
policy cannot exist in isolation. The unit of calculation is therefore a group of policies. The
reserve under a single policy is obtained by calculating the reserve for a large group of similar
policies effected at the same time, at the same age and for the same sum assured, and then
dividing the total reserve for the group by the number of policies in force. The reserve for the
group at first increases, reaches a peak and then steadily falls to nil. The number of policies
steadily decreases as the lives assured die off. The reserve for a single policy increases
throughout its duration and almost reaches the sum assured if the life assured survives to an
advanced age.
The major loading is to cover the expenses of the life office. These would include:
salaries of employees;
commission paid to the sellers of policies;
costs of office buildings used;
computer, administration and regulatory costs;
medical fees during underwriting.
There will also be a safety margin to guard against higher than expected mortality and, of
course, a profit margin. The actuary will have to include all of these factors in his loadings to
produce the final premium charged. Whilst premiums are level throughout the contract,
expenses are not. Most of the expenses occur at the start of the policy; the initial commission
and underwriting expenses, for example. Once a policy is on the books the expenses are
much lighter. Renewal costs are minimal and claims handling costs are much lower than
initial costs. It is therefore not possible to add a percentage loading to the premium to cover
all expenses as and when they occur. The heavy initial expenses must be spread out over the
whole premium-paying period. It is normal, however, to add a policy charge to the loaded
premium to arrive at the final premium payable. This policy charge is in effect a handling fee.
48
Some offices approach it a different way and quote monthly premiums but give a discount
for paying annually in advance and a much a higher discount for paying a single premium as
a lump sum in advance for policies with at least two years as duration.
Up to – 21,000,000 A B
Note: Maximum age limit at entry is 65 years and Minimum policy term is 5 years.
Both non-medical and free cover limit mean the same, except that while the non-medical limit
is used for individual life, free cover limit is used for group life to establish the level of sum
assured which does not require medical examination.
49
Chapter 4
Introduction to Policy
Documentation and Administration
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
know how a policy document is constructed;
explain the rules relating to notices of assignment;
distinguish different types of assignment;
know how mortgages work.
Introduction
This chapter explains the life assurance policy document and its constituent parts.
Endorsements which are used effect any changes in the policy are also considered in detail.
50
of non- payment of premiums, explanation of bonus system, surrender provisions,
funds switching rights, claim procedure, charging structure, procedure for notices
of assignment.
Standard Exclusions: states what are not covered such as suicide (for life
policies), intentional self-inflicted injury (for IPI), HIV and AIDS(for IPI),
war(forIPI), participation in a criminal act (for IPI), pregnancy and childbirth (for PPI).
Definitions: defines the key terms such as life assured, sum assured; assured, bid
price, offer price, valuation date.
Signature: the policy will also usually bear a copy of the signature of one of the
directors of the life office.
4.1.2 Benefits
A particularly important condition is that relating to the payment of benefit. This will have to
describe exactly what benefit is payable when. As large sums of money could be involved
there should be no ambiguity. This is relatively simple for a straight term assurance where the
sum assured is only payable on death. However, it is more complicated for IPI policies, where
there has to be a definition of disability, and critical illness policies, where there has to be a list
of the diseases, the diagnosis of which produces benefit.
51
an own life policy. It might however be another individual (a life of another policy) or a
company, as on a key person policy. Once a policy has been issued, its ownership can be
changed in a number of ways, such as:
absolute assignment;
mortgage;
trust;
bankruptcy.
These topics are dealt with later in this course.
At law, the obligation is on the policyholder to pay premiums. The life office has no legal
obligation to send any reminder if premiums have not been paid, although in practice it will
do so. The policy will show both the amount and the due dates of the premium and
enables the policyholder to pay the premium on the due date. Normally the policy will
provide days of grace after the due date, during which the premium can still be paid. The
52
position on death of the life assured during the days of grace, but before payment of the
premium, will be specified in the policy and varies from office to office. However, the
general position is that the claim would be paid, subject to deduction of any outstanding
premiums. The usual period of grace is 30 days or one month, although if premiums are
payable monthly only fourteen days may be allowed. There is obviously a large number of
ways in which renewal premiums can be paid. The most important are renewal notices,
bankers' orders and account collections; we shall now look at each in turn.
The policy remains in force for as long as the surrender value exceeds the total of
outstanding premiums and late payment charges.
The policy remains in force for one year and then the surrender value becomes
payable and death cover ceases.
The policy is converted on the expiry of the days of grace (or after one year) to a paid-
up policy for the appropriate reduced sum assured.
The policy remains in force, with units being cancelled to pay for life cover until
thereis none left.
Most offices have automated arrears procedures so that a reminder is automatically sent out
once the policy has been in arrears for a certain time. If a policy is mortgaged, the office will
usually inform the mortgagee if premiums fall into arrears, so as to enable the mortgagee to
protect its interest.
4.2.5 Reinstatement
Once a policy has lapsed due to non-payment of premiums the office is off-risk. The office
may later receive a request from the policyholder to reinstate or revive the policy. This may be
possible but is entirely at the discretion of the office involved. The office may agree to
reinstate the policy subject to payment of all the arrears, a late payment charge and a
satisfactory declaration of health. The life assured will have to declare that he is in good
health and, as the duty of disclosure is also revived, give details of any deterioration in the
risk since the date of the proposal.If a long period has elapsed since the policy expired, the
office may not be willing to reinstate the old policy at the old premium. It may only be
willing to consider a new proposal based on the rate for the life assured's current age,
which may well be higher than the old premium. Reinstatement can have an effect on the
qualifying status of the policy.
4.3 Alterations
The office will have an alterations department whose job it is to alter policies if requested by
the policyholder. Unless the policy wording gives the policyholder a right to make the
alteration, the office does not have to agree to it and can decline if it wishes. The reasons for an
alteration request are almost infinite and the most common reasons are as follows:
Reason Implications
Increase in the sum assured May involve fresh underwriting unless
given as a policy option. It is often
required on mortgage policies when the
loan is increased and will involve an
increased premium.
54
Decrease in the sum assured Easy to arrange as no fresh underwriting
is requiredand the premium will decrease
(which may be the reason for the
alteration).
Conversion of policy For example a convertible term being
converted into whole life or endowment
(where more permanentcover is needed).
Exercising a guaranteed insura bility No medical evidence required.
option
Extension of term, increasing the period Often required for a mortgage policy if
covered by the policy the term of the loan is extended.
Reduction of a term on an endowment Will result in an increased premium if the
sum assured is maintained.
Addition of life assured, converting a Will involve fresh underwriting and an
single policy to a joint life one (e.g. on increase in premium.
marriage)
Removal of life assured Sometimes requiredon a joint life policy
after a divorce,for example.
Fund switch To improve investment prospects on a
unit-linkedpolicy.
Change of premium frequency For example, from monthly to annually.
The office will require the policyholder's written authority to make any alteration, as well as
that of any other person interested in the policy, such as a mortgagee. The policy will then be
endorsed to show the alteration made and the office's records altered appropriately.
The reduced paid-up sum assured will normally bear some relation to the number of
premiums actually paid as opposed to the total originally payable. Thus, if a 20-year
endowment was made paid-up after premiums had been paid for ten years, the reduced
paid-up sum assured would probably be half the original sum assured. Any future bonus
would be based on the reduced sum assured. The office will require completion of the
appropriate letter of authority to make this alteration. The policy will be endorsed to show
the reduced sum assured.
55
4.4 Assignments
An assignment is a transfer of ownership from one person to another. This frequently
happens with life policies, so knowledge of the legal principles involved is necessary when
dealing with claims or surrenders. An assignment may be temporary or permanent, and can
confer an absolute interest or a limited interest.The various types of assignment are as
follows:
Absolute assignments. Absolute assignments include assignments by way of sale and
by gift.
Assignments by way of mortgage.
Assignments by operation of law on bankruptcy
Assignments to trustees.
4.5.1 Notice
Section 3 of the Act details the principle of notice. The section specifies that no assignment
shall confer on the assignee or their representative any right to sue until a written notice of the
date and purport of such assignment has been given to the assurance company. The section
56
goes on to state that the date on which such notice is received by the assurer shall regulate the
priority of all claims under any assignment, and that a payment bona fide made for any
policy by an assurer before the date when such notice was received is valid against the
assignee. The Act refers to 'assignment' and not to 'absolute assignment' or 'assignment for
value', and thus covers all forms of assignment except assignment by operation of law: for
example, in bankruptcy proceedings. Therefore, an assignee who gives notice to the assurers
can claim precedence over all other interests where notice has not been given, even if the date
of the assignment is later than that of the other interests. The effect of the section can be
summarised as 'priority of notice regulates priority of claim'. There are, however, several
exceptions to this rule.
3 The rule does not apply between The equitable principle is that they are equally
assignee and assignor. affected by knowledge of the facts.
4 The rule does not apply where
If a person intending to give a loan on the
there is evidence of wilfull security of a policy has reason to suspect the
blindness on the part of an existence of a prior interest of which no notice
assignee for value. has been given, and deliberately refrains from
making enquiries, relying on notice to gain
priority over the earlier assignee, they will fail
in their attempt. The equitable principle is that a
person should not profit by their own
negligence.
5 The rule does not apply to The further advances made under the original
mortgages for unlimited deed would rank in priority to subsequent
amounts. For example, where mortgages, whether or not there had been
there is an obligation to advance notice of these. The principle is that a second
unlimited amount as the mortgagee should make proper enquiries
mortgage loan. before taking a charge on a policy.
57
4.5.3 Importance of Notice
As a result of the priority rule, it is vital for an assignee to give notice of his assignment to the
assurer as soon as possible. For this reason, s.4 of the Act requires every assurance company
to state on every policy the address of its principal place of business at which notice of
assignment can be given. Furthermore, by s.6, the assurance company must, on request,
acknowledge receipt in writing of any notice of assignment. Such acknowledgement is then
conclusive evidence of receipt of the notice referred to. An insurer must therefore have a
system of recording notices of assignment in policy records in order to comply with the Act
and to be able to make any payments to the correct person. The means used to record notices
vary. Some offices use a record card system but most use a computerised system. Whatever
system is used must be capable of recording the date that notice was received and the date of
the deed, together with the parties to the deed.
The assurer must make formal acknowledgement of every notice given, no matter what type
of interest it may concern. Sometimes the deed itself may be produced, and this is notice to
the office of its contents. Also, in the course of correspondence about one policy, a deed may
be produced which refers to another of the company's policies. Note should be made of this
on the record of the other policy, as this is implied notice to the company. Acknowledging a
notice of assignment is not the same as receiving proof of title. The notice itself does not
transfer title, only the deed of assignment does this, and there could always be an error on the
notice. For this reason, many life offices state on the acknowledgement that no opinion is
expressed as to the validity of the title. Proof of title is not generally called for until payment is
required under the policy. If an assignee requests confirmation of their title the office could
suggest that they consult their solicitor.
A similar situation exists with lost policies. Non-production of a policy at the time of
payment may suggest that the policy has been assigned and is in the hands of an assignee
who has omitted to give notice. The assurer should therefore make some investigations in
order to rebut any allegation of constructive notice. A statutory declaration coupled with an
indemnity may be required before payment can be made.
The reason for this is that the Act concerns only the priority of the right to sue, and claim
against, the life office. It does not affect the equitable title to the policy moneys. Therefore,
although an assignee in the circumstances set out in the previous paragraph may gain
priority of claim against the life office by virtue of priority of notice, he cannot gain priority
over the first assignee in the ultimate distribution of the policy moneys. This principle was
confirmed by the case of Newman v. Newman, quoted earlier. It should also be noted that
anyone who advances money on the security of a life policy which is not produced to him,
and which is held by an earlier mortgagee, has constructive notice of that earlier mortgage.
This is similar to the principle that non-production of a policy to a life office at the time of a
claim can be constructive notice of a third party's interest.
An assignment must be dated during the currency of the policy and during the lifetime of
the life assured. In Scott v. Coulson (1903), Coulson purchased a policy on the life of a third
party who at the date of assignment, and unknown to Scott or Coulson, was already dead.
It washeld the assignment was void.
An assignment must assign the whole of a policy and not merely a portion: Re McKerrell
(1912). This does not, however, mean that a policy cannot be assigned to joint assignees, or
that equitable interests cannot be held in portions of a policy under trust. It is only the legal
interest in the policy which cannot be assigned in part.
The assignor should execute a deed of assignment and the actual words used must be
adequate to transfer the legal interest in the policy. If not, the deed will act as a mere equitable
assignment. An illustration of this principle is the case of Spencer v. Clarke (1878). There it
was held that a deed that merely recited an agreement to assign did not operate to convey the
legal interest.
4.6.3 Deeds
When a deed of assignment is produced to a life office as part of a claimant's proof of title, the
deed must be examined to see if it legitimately passes title to the claimant. The assignor
should be the person legally entitled to the policy prior to the assignment and the assignee
should be the person now claiming. The signature should be that of the assignor and may be
verified against previous signatures on the office's files. The date of the deed should be
checked to see that it is during the currency of the policy. The operative wording should be
checked to see that it does convey the legal interest and it should be ensured that the policy
60
concerned has been specified in the deed. Under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 1989, a deed no longer has to be sealed if it is signed as a deed in the presence
of a witness who attests the signature. In the case of those unable to write, making one's mark
is the equivalent of a signature.
An agreement to assign is binding between the parties, even without notice to the life office.
Delivery of a policy for valuable consideration can be an equitable assignment, even without
written evidence or notice to the life office.
To perfect the equitable assignee's title against the life office, a legal assignment and notice
are required. However, if the assignment is for valuable consideration, equity will assist the
assignee to complete his title even if he does not have possession of the policy. Equity will
only help a voluntary assignee (one who has not given consideration) if the assignment is
complete as between assignor and assignee, or the assignor has constituted himself a trustee
for the assignee.
4.7 Mortgages
A mortgage is a type of assignment used in connection with a loan. If an asset is being used as
security for a loan, that asset will be mortgaged by the borrower to the lender for the duration
of the loan. It is not an absolute assignment, as once the loan (and any interest due) is repaid,
the lender must reassign the asset to the borrower. During the currency of the loan, the
borrower retains an interest in the mortgaged property in the form of their right to have the
asset reassigned to them on repayment of the loan. This right is known as the equity of
redemption. It is the equity of redemption which in essence distinguishes a mortgage from
an absolute assignment.
A legal mortgage is where the legal interest is assigned, subject to redemption, by the
borrower (mortgagor) to the lender (mortgagee) by a deed of mortgage. It is possible to have
an equitable mortgage in certain circumstances. During the term of the mortgage, the
mortgagee has certain rights which enable them to enforce their security.
There are various other types of mortgage, dealt with under the following four headings:
4.7.1.3 Sub-Mortgages
These occur when a mortgagee wishes to raise money and uses the mortgage as security for
the loan. This is different from a transfer of mortgage in that the mortgagee does not
completely part with their interest but retains an equity of redemption. The sub-mortgagee's
title rests on that of the mortgagee and, in order to protect their interest, the sub-mortgagee
should serve notice on the original mortgagor so that the latter does not repay the debt to the
mortgagee without advising the sub-mortgagee. The sub-mortgagee's proof of title is the
policy, the mortgage deed, and the sub-mortgage deed.
4.7.2.1 Repayment
The deed will contain a covenant by the borrower to repay the loan, and if they fail to do so
within the three months' notice given, the lender can sue them for breach of this covenant to
repay. The loan cannot be called in before the date specified in the deed. In practice this
remedy is very seldom used, because the borrower is unlikely to have the money.
63
4.7.2.2 Power of Sale
If the mortgage is by deed then the mortgagee has the right, without application to the court,
to sell the mortgaged property and recover the loan from the sale price, with any balance
being paid over to the mortgagor. The mortgage deed may contain an express power of sale.
Even if it does not, a statutory power of sale is conferred automatically by s.101 of the Law of
Property Act 1925.Section 104 provides that when exercising the power of sale, a mortgagee
can convey the mortgaged property free from any interests over which the mortgage had
priority, but subject to any interest which had priority over the mortgage. Section 107
provides that the receipt of the mortgagee is sufficient discharge and that the person paying
the sale price to the mortgagee does not have to concern themselves with whether the power
was properly exercised.
It is considered that a mortgagee of a life policy can surrender it to the insurer under either a
specific or statutory power of sale, on the basis that a surrender is equivalent to a sale. In
order to sell a house that is mortgaged, a lender will, in practice, often have to apply for an
order for possession. The court can suspend such an order (under s.36 of the Administration
of Justice Act 1970) if it appears that the borrower is likely to be able within a reasonable
period to pay any sums due under the mortgage. If the borrower shows they have a good
chance of repaying outstanding interest over the term of the loan, the court may well suspend
the possession order.
4.7.2.3 Receiver
The mortgagee can appoint a receiver to take possession of the property and collect any
income from it, and to apply it in reduction of the mortgage debt. This remedy may be
convenient in the case of mortgages of land where there may be rental income, or shares
where there may be dividend income, but is virtually never used in connection with life
policies.
4.7.2.4 Foreclosure
The mortgagee can apply to the court for an Order of Foreclosure, whereby the court orders
that the mortgage debt must be repaid by a specific date, which will normally be in six
months' time. If the court grants the application, it will make an order nisi. If repayment is not
made by the date set, the order becomes absolute and the mortgagee becomes the full owner
of the property. The Order of Foreclosure Absolute thus has the effect of vesting the
mortgaged property in the mortgagee absolutely, and the mortgagor's equity of redemption
is extinguished. The mortgagee can then do what they wish with the foreclosed property. If
they sell it, they do not have to account to the mortgagor for any balance over the amount of
the debt. A mortgagee's proof of title is the Order of Foreclosure Absolute, which requires
stamping as a conveyance on sale.
If the court so decides, it may order a judicial sale instead of a foreclosure. In this case, the
court arranges for the sale of the property and pays the amount owing to the mortgagee and
the balance, if any, to the mortgagor. Foreclosure is fairly unusual these days.
64
4.7.3 Rights of a Mortgagor
The mortgagor retains the equity of redemption and has the following rights:
The right at law to have the property reassigned to them on repayment of the loan plus
interest and costs.
On repayment, they can require the mortgagee to transfer the mortgage to a third
party. This is useful if the mortgagee calls in the loan and the borrower has to arrange
another loan to repay it. The mortgage can then be transferred to the new lender.
They can, at their own expense, inspect and make copies or abstracts of the documents
of title to the mortgaged property.
Most life offices are willing to grant loans on the security of their own policies. This will
apply only to certain classes of policy, where there is a surrender value. The policyholder
will execute a mortgage deed in favour of the life office and this will contain the normal
conditions outlined above. The deed may also have a clause giving the office power to
surrender the policy to itself to repay the loan if the borrower defaults on payments of
interest or premiums. An office will generally only lend if it can get a first charge on the
policy; it will not normally wish to be a second mortgagee or a sub-mortgagee.
If a policyholder whose policy is already mortgaged applies for a policy loan, the office may
suggest that it provides the funds to repay the original mortgagee and then obtains a first
charge from the policyholder for the amount paid to the original mortgagee plus the balance
lent to the policyholder. The maximum loan will usually be 90% of the surrender value, and
interest will be charged at the office's current ruling rate, which can be altered from time to
time subject to, say, one month's notice in writing. An office may often be prepared to allow
the loan to remain outstanding until the policy becomes a claim, as long as premiums and
interest are paid promptly.
4.7.6 Reassignment
On repayment of a mortgage the borrower is entitled, at their own expense, to have the
mortgaged property reassigned to them. This can be done by a separate deed of
reassignment or by a reassignment typed or printed on the original mortgage deed. Many of
the standard-form deeds of mortgage of life policies used by banks and building societies
have pre-printed reassignments on the reverse of the deed. These just need dating and
signing on behalf of the mortgagee to be effective. The Law of Property Act 1925, s.115
provides that, after 31 December 1925, on repayment of the mortgage moneys a receipt
endorsed on the mortgage deed is sufficient to re-convey the property to the person repaying
the money who is named in the receipt or, if no such person is named, then to the person
entitled to the equity of redemption. The receipt must be signed on behalf of the mortgagee. If
a statutory receipt is given, then no formal deed of reassignment is necessary. A formal
reassignment must, however, be executed if requested by the mortgagor. When repayment
has been made, the mortgagee will deliver up the mortgage deed, the statutory receipt or
reassignment, and any other documents of title held; for example, the policy document in a
mortgage of a life policy.
Where a request is made to surrender the policy under the power of sale, the life office can
accept the sole discharge of the mortgagee and does not have to satisfy itself that the power is
being properly exercised. However, the office must not allow a surrender on the sole
discharge of the mortgagee where it knows that the power of sale has been improperly
exercised: Selwyn v. Garfit (1888). In this case, a purchaser bought property from a
mortgagee under a deed which stated that the power of sale could be exercised only after
certain notice to the borrower. The purchaser bought so soon after the date of the mortgage
that it was not possible for such notice to have been given. It was held that the purchase must
be set aside as the purchaser must have known that the power of sale had not been correctly
exercised. If both mortgagor and mortgagee join in the discharge for surrender, the office is
not concerned with whether the power of sale has arisen or not.
There are a number of firms who specialise in this market, putting buyers and sellers
together. The seller has to execute a deed in favour of the buyer and hand the policy
document over to them. The buyer should serve notice of assignment on the life office. The
life office will make arrangements for the buyer to pay future premiums and any claim
would be payable to the buyer, who would have to produce the policy document and deed of
assignment in proof of title.
Please note that second-hand life policies are yet to be operational by life offices in the
Nigerian market.
4.9 Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy is the name given to the situation where a person cannot (or in some cases will
not) pay their debts. The Insolvency Act 1986 provides for a trustee in bankruptcy or the
Official Receiver to be appointed to take the bankrupt's property (with the exception of
clothes, furniture, bedding and tools of trade), sell it and distribute the proceeds to the
creditors. The bankrupt is then discharged, freed from all previous debts. When a
policyholder becomes bankrupt they can no longer deal with their policy, and no payments
should be made by the office without the permission of the trustee in bankruptcy. The trustee
will usually notify the office of their interest in the policy and the office will then note this in
its records, like a notice of assignment.
67
The trustee can surrender the policy in order to provide cash for the creditors. If so, they will
have to produce the policy, the Bankruptcy Order and either the Order for Summary
Administration or the Certificate of Appointment as Trustee in proof of their title.
Alternatively, the trustee can keep the policy in force for the benefit of the creditors in case the
bankrupt dies. Under the Enterprise Act 2002 for bankruptcies declared on or after 1 April
2004 there will normally be an automatic discharge after one year (previously the period was
three years). For bankruptcies before 1 April 2004 discharge was automatic on 1 April 2005,
unless already given. There are provisions to extend the bankruptcy period for serial
bankrupts and those who act irresponsibly or recklessly. When a policyholder receives their
discharge from bankruptcy, ownership of any life policies does not revert automatically to
the bankrupt unless and until the trustee in bankruptcy assigns them back.
68
Chapter 5
Life Assurance Claims
Administration
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter explains the job of the claims department, which is to pay claims as efficiently
and speedily as possible. However, the office must make sure that every claim is valid, and
that it is paying the right amount to the right person.
Many offices have programmed their computers to produce automatic letters for policies
maturing in “x-weeks' time”, and use these as the basis of their maturity procedures. The aim
is to receive all the requirements in advance of the maturity date, to enable the office to
release its settlement cheque to reach the policyholder by the maturity date.
On every maturity claim the office's form of discharge must be signed by the person with
69
legal title to the policy. Only the person with the legal title can give the office a good
discharge.
Forms of discharge also provide for the signature of a witness (or witnesses), although it is
very doubtful whether the office can insist on these. In any event, the office can check the
signature against the others it will have in its files, for example on the proposal form.
Production of the policy will be required and this will be the sole proof of title if the claimant
is the assured and the policy has never been assigned. If the policy has been assigned, the
relevant deed(s) of assignment will have to be produced. For a trust policy, any deeds of
appointment or retirement of trustees will have to be produced and all the trustees will have
to sign the discharge. If any trustees have died, their death certificates will be required. The
office must deal with the person who has legal power to sue, even if that person will not
ultimately keep all of the payment.
For example, if the policy is mortgaged, the office must pay the mortgagee, even though the
amount of the debt owed to it is less than the sum assured. If there is any balance left after the
mortgage debt has been repaid, it is the duty of the mortgagee to pass this to the mortgagor.
The office is not concerned to see whether this is done. Similarly, if a policy is under trust, the
office must get the discharge of the trustees, as legal owners, even though they may pass the
money to the beneficiaries. The office will have a review system to keep a check on unpaid
maturity claims.
The next step is to obtain proof of death. When this has been done the validity of the claim can
be assessed. This may depend on the cause of death. Once the office is satisfied that the claim
is valid, the claimant must be requested to prove their title. Proof of age must be obtained if
age has not already been admitted. The office will also require a form of discharge to be
signed by the claimant before making payment. The format of this will virtually be the same
as that used for maturity claims.
There have been many cases where life offices have paid death claims on policies on the lives
of those who have been presumed dead in the manner outlined above.
Also, if death has occurred within a comparatively short period since the issue of the policy,
the office should pay heed to the possibility of non-disclosure. If the office suspects that there
71
may have been non-disclosure of a material fact it will have to make further enquiries. If the
office needs to see the deceased's medical records, this is permitted under the Access to
Health Records Act 1990, as long as the office has the written authority of the deceased's
personal representatives. If the life assured died of a chronic heart disease a few months after
effecting the policy for example, in this case the office would investigate the medical history
of the deceased. If it was discovered that he had suffered heart trouble for the last five years
and had been receiving regular treatment for it, but had not disclosed this on the proposal
form, this would be a clear case of non-disclosure. The office would therefore have the right
to repudiate the claim, as it is necessary to disclose all material facts when effecting a policy.
An office will usually only repudiate a claim for non-disclosure if the non-disclosure is
related to the cause of death. If the non-disclosure was fraudulent, the claimants have no
legal right to recover premiums. If the non-disclosure was not fraudulent, then premiums
can be recovered but interest on them would not be due. Foreign death certificates do not
always show the cause of death. Therefore, medical evidence of the cause might have to be
sought if it would be relevant to the validity of the claim. Suicide can often have a bearing on
the validity of claims and is dealt with later. The place of death should also be checked, as
some policies contain restrictions as to travel or residence abroad.
72
The FOS is likely to conclude that non-disclosure is clearly reckless or deliberate if a proposer
appears not to have any regard for accuracy when completing the proposal. Typically, the
non-disclosed facts will be significant and well known by the proposer but the FOS will be
unable to establish that the non-disclosure was deliberate. In these cases, the FOS states
that the office can decline the claim and cancel the policy but should normally refund
premiums. Clearly, however, the FOS will look at each case on an individual basis.
The executors, or administrators, must produce a grant to prove their title. It is not
uncommon for an office to be requested to pay the claim before the grant is obtained. Such
requests should be declined as it is not until the grant is produced that the office will know
who the legal personal representatives are. If payment was made before the grant was
obtained, the office could not be sure that it was paying the right person(s). Therefore,
even though it may be some time before a grant can be obtained, the office should not pay
the legal personal representatives until it is produced. An original grant or a court sealed
'office copy' will be required and ordinary photocopies are not usually accepted. A legal
personal representative can obtain as many office copies as desired from the Registry on
payment ofthe appropriate fee.
Sometimes a claimant may say that, as the value of the estate is small, no grant will be applied
for, and request the office to dispense with its production. Any payment to an estate without
production of a grant will involve the office in some risk, however slight, of paying the wrong
person. Caution should therefore be exercised in dealing with such requests.
The practice of offices varies, but most will pay claims under a certain limit (for example, sum
assured up to N500,000.00 or where the value of the estate is less than N1,000,000.00) without
a grant. Often this will be done only provided payment is made to a surviving spouse. The
office would obtain an indemnity from the claimant to repay it if it has to make payment
again to a subsequent claimant who produces a grant.
73
Under a joint life/first death policy with joint assureds, the payment would be made to the
surviving assured on the basis that the assureds were joint tenants. If a claim is made under
an own life joint life second death policy, payment would be made to the estate of the second
of the assureds to die. If both lives assured under a joint life policy are killed in the same
incident it will be necessary to know, for title purposes, which of the two died first. This may
be clear from evidence but, if not, for example if both lives assured were killed in an air crash,
then s.184 of the Law of Property Act 1925 provides that:
In all cases where, after the commencement of this Act, two or more persons have died in
circumstances rendering it uncertain which of them survived the other or others, such deaths
shall (subject to any order of the Court), for all purposes affecting the title to property, be
presumed to have occurred in order of seniority, and accordingly the younger shall be
deemed to have survived the elder. Thus, if the two lives assured died in the same disaster
and there is no evidence to show who died first, s.184 would apply and the younger would be
deemed to have survived the elder. This view has been confirmed by the House of Lords in
the case of Hickman v. Peacey (1945) where two brothers were killed in a basement when a
bomb struck the house. Payment would thus be made to the estate of the younger.
However, for a person born outside the country of residence, for example, if the policy is
issued in UK and the person was born outside of the UK, proof of age can be more difficult in
that a birth certificate cannot be obtained or may not even exist. This is particularly true of
those born in countries where registration of birth is not customary, for example, many Asian
countries. In such instances the office will require the best possible evidence of age available
in the individual circumstances of the case, such as baptismal certificate, adoption
certification, passport or naturalisation certificate.
For a married woman, the marriage certificate will also have to be produced to link the name
on the birth certificate with the present name of the life assured. If it is found that the life
assured was older than stated, then, although practice may vary between offices, the most
usual course of action is to reduce the sum assured payable to that which would have been
purchased by the premium actually paid, using the rate for the true age. This may also
74
necessitate recalculating any profits on a with-profits policy, or units allocated on a unit-
linked policy. If the age was younger than that stated, again practice will vary. The most
popular treatment is probably to calculate the premium which should have been paid and
refund the excess over the premium actually paid for each premium payment.
5.2.4 Suicide
Special consideration should be given to claims where it appears that the cause of death is
suicide. Before the Suicide Act 1961, suicide committed voluntarily by a person of sound
mind was a crime; and in Nigeria, suicide committed voluntarily by a person of sound mind
is still a crime. This is because it is contrary to public policy for a person to benefit from their
own criminal act, and therefore no legal claim could be made by the estate of a life assured
who committed suicide whilst of sound mind.
Although in the UK, the Suicide Act 1961 abolished the rule that suicide was a crime, the Act
did not mention life assurance. The position of a post-1961 claim, where death is by suicide
whilst of sound mind, is not entirely free from doubt if there is no suicide clause in the policy.
One view is that, as suicide is no longer a crime, payment should be made. However, it is
widely held that it is a fundamental principle of insurance law that an insured cannot recover
if, by their own deliberate act, they cause the event insured against. This is supported by the
judgment of Lord Atkin and Lord Macmillan in the leading case of Beresford v. Royal
Insurance Co. Ltd (1938). Although this was decided before 1961, these judges considered
that the rule preventing payment was not that of public policy, but a fundamental implied
term of the contract that a man cannot by his own deliberate act cause the event on which the
insurance money is payable. It is submitted that this is the correct statement of law.
The above principle does not apply if the life assured commits suicide whilst insane, as it can
be said that he or she does not have the mental capacity to appreciate what they are doing.
Their estate would be able to recover the policy moneys in such an instance.
If the policy contains a suicide clause then the position depends on the wording of the clause.
Many offices include a clause such as “If the Life Assured shall commit suicide within one year from
the date of the policy all benefits which would otherwise have become payable shall be forfeited and
belong to the insurer”.Suicide would therefore not be covered if it occurred during the
specified period. If suicide occurs after that period, then the office would be liable for the
claim, even if the life assured was of sound mind at the time. This is because, by having a
suicide clause expressly excluding cover for a limited period, the office is implicitly insuring
that risk after that time.
Most suicide clauses protect the interests of a third party, preserving the value of the policy
for mortgagees. A typical proviso would be “this suicide condition shall not prejudice the interest
in such moneys of any third party who shall have bona fide acquired that interest for valuable
consideration”.If this is the case, the life office itself is not a third party, as was shown in Royal
London Mutual Insurance Society v. Barrett (1928). There, a life policy was mortgaged to the
life office along with leasehold property. The life assured committed suicide and the court
held that the life office was not a third party, therefore the policy was void and they could
recover their debt against the leasehold property. Where a life office can repudiate a claim on
the grounds of suicide, then, not only can the legal personal representatives not claim, but all
75
those claiming a share in the estate as beneficiaries or creditors are equally barred. This
would also extend to the trustees of a policy under trust. The burden of proving that suicide
was the cause of death is on the life office. One problem is that the coroner's findings are not
conclusive proof. The case of Walsh v. Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd (1935)
illustrates the difficulties which can arise. The life assured died when he fell from a train
during the first year of a policy which excluded suicide within the first year. There were no
other passengers in the compartment and examination of the carriage door showed no defect
that might have allowed it to open of its own accord. In view of these circumstances, the
coroner's verdict was 'suicide while of unsound mind'. Legal action was brought to claim the
sum assured. It was held that the coroner's verdict was not conclusive proof of suicide and
that, as the life office could not positively prove it was suicide, they were liable.
The case of Re K Deceased (SJ Col 129, p.132) emphasises that this rule also applies to
manslaughter where death was an unintended consequence of a deliberate act. In this case a
wife threatened her husband with a shotgun which then went off and killed him.
However, in a recent case a court applied the Forfeiture Act 1982 so as to enable the survivor
of a suicide pact to claim under a policy on the life of her partner, whom she had assisted to
commit suicide.
An interesting case on this subject is Hewitson v. The Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd (1985). In
this case Mrs. Hewitson was the assured of a policy on the life of Mr. Hewitson. Together they
took part in an armed robbery, although the guns were actually imitations. The robbery
failed and Mr. Hewitson was shot and killed in the course of trying to escape. Mrs. Hewitson
claimed under the policy.
The court decided that Mr. Hewitson's death was caused by his own criminal act, i.e. the
attempted armed robbery. It also held that as Mrs. Hewitson was an active participant in that
crime, it would be contrary to public policy to allow her to benefit as a result of that crime,
and thus the insurers were not liable.
It is probable that an office has no legal right to an indemnity, unless provided for in the
policy conditions. Therefore, an office will usually modify its requirements if it meets any
resistance to an indemnity. It is important to note that an indemnity cannot prevent a further
claim by an assignee; it can only repay the office any loss incurred thereby.
Statutory Declarations are made before a magistrate or solicitor under the Statutory
Declarations Act 1835. There are penalties if the declaration is made knowing it to be false.
Lost policy procedure will also apply to surrenders and loans, as well as to claims. Similar
procedures will apply to other lost documents of title, for example, deeds of assignment.
Sometimes a policyholder will report the loss of a policy even though no claim is being made,
and request a duplicate policy document. Life offices are very reluctant to issue duplicate
policies, because of the confusion which could arise if the original came to light and there
were two identical policies in existence. One solution to the problem is to issue the
policyholder with a policy clearly marked 'copy policy' or similar. This can then be used for
reference purposes. Sometimes a document reciting the particulars of the contract will satisfy
the policyholder's requirements.
Alternatively, the lost policy may be replaced by a new one on identical terms but with a new
number. The office will do this only if it can get a discharge from its liability under the lost
policy from all interested parties in consideration of issuing an identical policy with a new
number. The office may wish to make a charge for its expenses in doing this.
77
5.4 Surrenders
A request for payment of a surrender value is not strictly speaking a claim. However, it must
be treated in the same way as regards proof of title. The surrender value will be quoted,
subject to payment of all due premiums and proof of title. The office will require the normal
proof of title and a discharge from the policyholder. The form of discharge will be similar to
that used for maturity claims, except that it will specify that the policy is being surrendered.
The form will have to be signed by the policyholder. If the policy is being surrendered by a
mortgagee, the countersignature of the mortgagor will be required, unless the mortgagee
confirms it is surrendering under its power of sale. Trustees surrendering a policy will have
to use the surrender proceeds for the benefit of the beneficiaries. A surrender may involve a
chargeable event. Regulation requires life offices to make sure that endowment policy
holders who seek information on surrender values are made aware of the other options
available, including the fact that they may be able to sell the policy on the traded market as an
alternative to surrendering.
5.5 Loans
It is common for life offices to allow loans on the security of policies issued by them. The
usual maximum loan is 90% of the surrender value and, therefore, loans can only be taken
where there is a surrender value. Rates of interest charged will vary according to market
conditions. The borrower will have to prove their title to the policy in the normal way and
complete a mortgage deed. Under the deed, they mortgage the policy to the life office as
security for the loan, with a promise to repay the loan and to pay interest thereon while it is
outstanding. In practice, as long as premiums and interest are paid, most offices will allow a
policy loan to remain outstanding until the policy becomes a claim or is surrendered. In this
event, the loan, together with any outstanding interest, would be deducted from the
payment made.
The mortgage deed would contain a provision whereby the borrower promised to pay
premiums under the policy and to restore it if it lapsed. The office would retain possession of
the policy, any title deeds and the mortgage deed during the currency of the loan. When the
loan is repaid, the office would return the policy and any deeds to the borrower and also
reassign the policy by means of a specific reassignment, or by a receipt on the mortgage deed.
An office will normally only lend on the security of one of its policies if it can obtain a first
charge thereon, that is, if title is clear. Loans will not usually be given to policyholders under
eighteen, as they do not have full contractual capacity.
Life offices which give policy loans must have a licence under the Consumer Credit Act 1974
and comply with its regulations in their procedures.
78
Chapter 6
Introduction to Life
Reassurance
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to Life Reassurance. Reassurance is the method
whereby one life office (called the direct or principal office) assures a life assured but passes
on a part, or all, of the risk to another office (called the re-assurer or guaranteeing office).
Many offices accept reassurance business from the life offices. Some reassurance companies
are composite, while there are few reassurance companies that are life reassurance specialist
companies. Retention limit is also considered as well as Reassurance types are equally
considered.
Notice that the insured does not appear in our description of the reinsurance market place.
This is an important point to have in mind. The contract to purchase reinsurance is one
between the direct insurer and the reinsurer; the insured plays no part in it. The consequence
of this, for example, is that, even if the reinsurer should fail to meet its obligations to the direct
insurer for one reason or another, the direct insurer would still be liable to the insured. It
would be no excuse to say that the reinsurer had failed as the reinsurance contract is not part
of the contract between the insured and the insurer. In fact, the vast majority of ordinary
79
insureds will have absolutely no knowledge that reinsurance exists! The selling and
marketing rules made under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 do not apply to
reassurance, although the prudential regulation rules do.
6.2.1 Retention
All life offices have a maximum limit on the sum assured they will themselves hold on any
one life. This limit is called the office's retention. The office may accept a sum assured higher
than its retention, but only if it can reassure the excess. The reason for a retention is that,
although an office can forecast fairly accurately how many claims it can expect for any given
age group, it cannot forecast which individual policies will become claims. If a policy with a
very high sum assured became an early claim, this would affect the results adversely, and
would also impair the basic principle of spreading the risk. Hence each company will set its
retention limit, which will be revised from time to time, to reflect both the growth of the life
fund and the effects of inflation.
Retentions vary from company to company and are largely dependent on the size of the life
fund, the level of free reserves and the average sum assured. Retentions may be lower for
older lives and sub-standard risks. The class of assurance may also affect the retention. An
office may wish to reassure a sub-standard life even if the sum assured is lower than its
normal retention. Reassurers have built up a special degree of expertise in underwriting sub-
standard lives. This is because few individual life offices see enough sub-standard cases to
build up meaningful statistics on them, whereas reassurers tend to see a lot more. Thus,
reassurers are often able to assist in the underwriting of these cases. The retention of a large
well-established office nowadays can be as much as £500,000 while new offices may only
retain the first £10,000.
81
6.5.1 Original Terms Reassurance
The reassurance of a proportion of the original sum assured can be accepted on whatever
terms are agreed by the offices concerned. However, it is usual for the reassurance to be
effected at the same rate of premium and subject to the same policy conditions as those of the
principal office, hence the expression 'original terms' reassurance. Most original terms
reassurance is term assurance. The reassurer is liable for a proportion of the original policy
throughout its duration and pays its due share of any claim or surrender value. Under a with-
profits contract, the reassurer follows the rate of bonus declared by the principal office,
although with-profits business is not usually now reassured on an original terms basis.
Under the risk premium reassurance, the premium is based on a mortality table, with a
small loading to cover the expenses of the reassurer and fluctuations in mortality
experience. The premium rate thus increases each year with age, although the amount
covered decreases, and so the actual reassurance premium paid can fluctuate appreciably.
This can be seen from the following example of a risk premium reassurance for a male
aged 45 next birthday with a non-profit endowment for twenty years, where N1,000 is the
nominal sum reassured.
82
Policy year Age next Actuarial Amount at Rate of risk Reassurance
birthday reserve risk Premium premium
N N per mille N
1 45 – 1,000 5.55 5.55
2 46 42 958 5.99 5.74
3 47 84 916 6.50 5.95
4 48 128 872 7.07 6.17
5 49 172 828 7.70 6.38
6 50 218 782 8.38 6.55
7 51 264 736 9.14 6.73
8 52 312 688 9.97 6.86
9 53 360 640 10.89 6.97
10 54 410 590 11.88 7.01
11 55 461 539 12.97 6.99
12 56 514 486 14.16 6.88
13 57 567 433 15.47 6.70
14 58 623 377 16.90 6.37
15 59 680 320 18.47 5.91
16 60 739 261 20.18 5.27
17 61 800 200 22.07 4.41
18 62 864 136 24.14 3.28
19 63 930 70 26.42 1.85
20 64 1,000 – – –
As will be seen, it has been assumed that the whole of the first premium has been absorbed by
commission and expenses so that the amount at risk in the first year is the whole nominal
sum reassured. The risk premium basis is especially attractive to a new office, as premiums
are relatively small and, therefore, the premium income and the life fund develop much
more rapidly than they would if the business were reassured on original terms. Additionally,
if the life office can secure an advantageous rate of interest on its investments, it will benefit to
the extent of interest profit on the actuarial reserves.
The decision between original terms and risk premium reassurance is really an actuarial one
which will depend on the circumstances of the life office. If reassurance is arranged on
original terms, and commission is paid, this has the attraction of reducing the burden of its
expenses, and the reassurer shares the investment problems with the principal office. Even
after an office has been in business for many years, the decision must still depend on the
individual circumstances at the time.
The existence of any reassurance must be borne in mind by the administrative staff of the life
office throughout the term of a policy. If the original policy is being altered to any material
extent, the principal office will need to obtain the consent of the reassurer. When any claim is
being paid, or the policy is being surrendered, the principal office should claim the
appropriate amount from the reassurer. Copies of any necessary proofs (for example, a death
certificate) should be produced to the reassurer, along with its reassurance policy, guarantee,
or certificate for cancellation. It is important to remember that on a claim the principal office
is directly and wholly liable to the policyholder. It must pay the claimant (subject to the
normal proofs) the whole sum assured, whether it has yet received the reassurer's proportion
or not. There is now a trend towards reassurance being administered by electronic data
transfer between companies.
85
Chapter 7
Introduction to Annuity
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to annuity and its various uses. The various types of
annuity products are considered in the next chapter of the course book.
The history of annuities dates back to at least 1699 when the Life Assurance and Annuity
Association was founded. Early annuities were not scientifically based in that the age of the
purchaser was not taken into account. However, even if it was realised at that time that
younger lives should pay more for an annuity than older lives, the absence of mortality data
would have made it impossible to do the calculations. In some ways it could be said that
annuities are even older than this in that, in medieval times, churches and monastic bodies
offered life annuities to raise money. The English Government also raised money by the sale
of annuities in the late seventeenth century. Later, as mortality tables and life assurance
developed, it was realised that age was relevant. By the nineteenth century, it became
possible to predict expectation of life for a given age and thus the single premium for an
annuity of a given amount for a life of a given age could be calculated scientifically.
Since then a number of different types of annuity have developed which will be discussed in
the next chapter. Annuities are also used in pension arrangements but this is beyond the
scope of this book.
Annuities are usually expressed in terms of the annual amount payable although in practice
they can be payable monthly, quarterly, half-yearly or yearly. An annuity can be payable in
advance or in arrears. For example, where an annuity is effected on 1st January 2009, the first
86
st st
annual payment is due on 1 January 2009, if it is in advance, or on 1 January 2010, if it is in
arrears. Where an annuity is payable in arrears, it can either be with proportion or without
proportion. This is because each payment is made at the end of the period to which it relates.
Thus, when the annuitant dies there will be a period since the last instalment date for which
no payment has been made. Under a with proportion annuity, a proportionate payment will
be made to cover this period. This is not the case for a without proportion annuity, where no
payment is made.
Most annuities are paid for by a single premium which is often called the consideration for
the annuity. However, deferred annuities are often purchased by regular premiums. Annuity
rates have reduced substantially over the last few years due to declining gilt yields and
improving life expectancy.
Annuities are commonly used by retired people to provide an income that is guaranteed to
last for life. Annuities are also provided by pension arrangements and these are covered in a
separate course. This section describes the types of life annuity currently available.
Generally, annuities are regarded as the opposite of life assurance in the sense that, unlike in
life assurance when the benefit is payable upon the death of the life assured, annuity benefits
usually cease when the annuitant dies. Therefore, annuities are more of a survival benefit
rather than death benefit.
87
Chapter 8
Types of Annuities
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to the various types of annuity products after
displaying a good understanding of what an annuity is the immediate previous chapter of
the course book.
In this Chapter, we shall be considering some basic types of annuity products. A more in-
depth study shall be made on this at the Associateship Stage of the Examination under the
Life Assurance Course Module.
89
impairment and will be individually calculated.
This type of annuity contract is common between a husband and wife, whereby the
breadwinner of the family would effect it and make himself or herself the reversionary life.
The annuity payment would commence upon his or her death and be made available to the
annuitant.
These types of annuities are designed to counteract the effect of inflation on the annuity
payment and as such they have been put to preventing the future value of the annuity
payment advantage.
90
Chapter 9
Historical Development of
Pension and Pension Provision
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to the historical development of pension and
definition of pension. The factors that determine the level of pension's benefit are well
considered. Gratuity is also explained.
Pension's benefit may be expressed as a fixed amount or subject to increases throughout the
period in which it is payable. It may be payable on a quarterly or half-yearly basis, but it is
usually payable on a monthly basis. The main purpose of pension provision is to enable a
retiree enjoys some of level of standard of living he or she was enjoying while in active
service.
91
5. some employers see pensions provision as a means of carrying out their social
responsibilities.
6. pensions may be provided in order for the employer to enjoy government incentives
in the form of tax relief and exempts.
The Employer: This may be the government (for public/civil servants) or private
employers (for those in the private sector)
The Employee: Where the pensions' provision is contributory, the employee will have
to partly provide for their pension. Also, where it is a non-contributory pension
scheme, the employee may arrange for a personal pension plan.
9.5 Gratuity
Gratuity may be defined as a lump sum of money payable to an employee by his employer
after putting in a minimum qualifying period of years with a particular employer following
his or her resignation or retirement. The minimum qualifying years for gratuity is usually 5
years, though in some cases, it may be longer than this. The main purpose of a gratuity is to
keep the employees for a longer period in the services of the employer.
Please find below a specimen table for gratuity benefit which has a minimum qualifying
period of five (5) years:
92
Years of Service Completed Gratuity Benefit as a % of Employee’s
Total Emoluments
5 100%
6 108%
7 116%
8 124%
9 132%
10 140%
11 148%
12 156%
13 164%
14 172%
15 180%
16 188%
17 196%
18 204%
19 212%
20 220%
21 228%
22 236%
23 244%
24 252%
25 260%
26 268%
27 276%
28 284%
29 292%
30 300%
Thus, for an employee, who has spent 5 years of continuous service and resigned his
appointment with an organization that provides a gratuity scheme in line with the above
table, shall be entitled to 100% of his total emolument in the year he resigns as defined in the
organization's handbook for staff. Please note that the total emolument here refers to his
emoluments in the year he is leaving the organization and NOT his total emoluments in the
year he joined the organization. Furthermore, for the purpose of calculating the qualifying
years, probation period is usually included, except if exclusively excluded by the
organization concerned. Lastly on gratuity, some employers may peg the benefit at 300% of
each employee's total emolument in the year he is leaving the organization, whereas, some
others may allow it to continue graduating or once the 300% level is reached, an additional
fixed benefit is added.
93
9.6 Gratuity vs. Pensions
Gratuity Pensions
It consists of a lump sum of money It is usually in the form of a series of money
Payable on resignation or retirement or Only payable on retirement
retrenchment
Non-contributory (i.e. it is fully borne by It may be contributory or non-contributory
the employer)
The minimum qualifying service years is The minimum qualifying service years is usually
usually put at 5 years put at 10 years
Not made compulsory the legislation It may be made compulsory by the legislation
Benefits are usually expressed in terms May not necessarily be expressed in terms of
of employees’ salary employees’ salary
Retirement age not applicable Retirement age is applicable
The main advantages of a provident fund over the typical pension's scheme benefit are (a) the
benefit is payable as a lump sum on retirement as against the pension's benefit which is a
series of payments and
(b) the lump sum benefit for the provident fund is usually tax-free, whereas, pension's benefit
is subject to tax.
94
Chapter 10
Types of
Pension Schemes
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to the various types of pension generally found in
practice. Retirement age is also explained with its different types.
A major advantage of a money purchase scheme is that each employee can monitor his or her
pension's contributions fund as it grows over time and at any particular time he or she can
know the accumulated value of the fund. Furthermore, each employee does not lose
anything whenever he changes job as the accumulated value of his fund is transferrable to the
new employer.
The major shortcoming of a money purchase scheme is that each employee is not able to
predetermine with precision his pension's benefit until when he eventually retires since the
actual annuity benefit will equally be dependent upon the investment conditions prevailing
in the economy as at the time of his retirement.
Lastly, a money purchase scheme is kind of defined contribution pension scheme, but only
that the total contributions accumulated as at the time of retirement for each employee is
used to purchase annuities as against other options which might be available for a pure
defined contribution scheme.
95
10.1.2 Final Salary Scheme
In a final salary scheme, the pension's benefit for the employees is expressed as function or
percentage of each employee's final salary in the actual year of retirement. A final salary
scheme has been put a major advantage of allowing the employees to enjoy pensions in
relation to their terminal salary. Also, it may be put inflation control advantage after
retirement as salary increases over the years for the employees are expected to have taking
into consideration the negative effect of inflation.
The main disadvantage of a final salary scheme is that it does not favour early leavers before
salary increases and those employees who might have been demoted either in the year of
actual retirement or prior to their years of retirement.
Unlike the money purchase scheme which operates like a defined contribution scheme, the
final salary scheme operates like a defined benefit scheme, only that the pension's benefit
under it is defined in terms of each employee's terminal salary.
In other words, hybrid pension schemes have basically been designed to overcome problems
or challenges which are often associated with both the money purchase and final salary
pension schemes. In a money purchase scheme for instance, employees do not know with
precision the value of their pensions' benefit until when they actually retire, while in the case
of the final salary scheme, employees who leave the employer early and those who are
demoted prior to retirement are at a great disadvantage.
Therefore, with a hybrid pension scheme, the contributions are first accumulated and used
to provide pension benefits as expressed in terms of the employees' final salary in the year of
retirement.
It may equally be referred to as a 'Graded Pension Scheme'. This type of pension scheme like
the final salary scheme does not favour early leavers or those employees demoted prior to
their retirement.
The state pension scheme may sometimes be referred to as 'The Government Scheme. It is
generally considered applicable to all working in the public service irrespective of the tier of
the government the person is attached to.
97
10.1.10 Defined Contribution Pension Scheme
In a defined contribution pension scheme, the employer's contributions (and that of the
employee- where applicable) towards the pension's benefit are predetermined. That is, the
contributions are fixed at the onset. Furthermore, these contributions are accumulated for
investment and shall be used to provide for the employees' pension benefit on retirement.
A major challenge of a defined contribution pension scheme is that the pension benefit is not
known prior to each employee's retirement.
Upon retirement, the accumulated amount may be used to purchase an annuity for the
employee. A deposit administration pension scheme is regarded as outdated in most
countries of the world, especially West African Anglo-phone countries.
Generally, the normal retirement age for female and male may be put at 55 and 60 years (or 60
98
and 65 years) respectively. However, in few circumstances, the normal retirement age for
both genders may be made the same and as such everybody in the organization has the same
retirement age.
99
Chapter 11
Pension Installation
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the candidates to the process of installing a pension scheme by an
employer for his employees. The various types of retirement age applicable in practice are
also considered.
11.1 Definition
Pension Installation is a process of establishing a pension's scheme for a group or set of
employees in an organization. Generally, there are four stages involved, though the stages
may slightly vary from one country to the other. These stages are as follows:
An exchange of letter is only used as the document for the legal basis where one or two
employees are involved. However, where there are three or more employees the document
used is the “trust deed” (though, an interim trust deed may be in place pending the
perfection of the trust deed, as it may take longer time before it could be concluded).
100
11.1.2 Obtaining Approval from the Relevant Tax Authority for the Purpose of Tax
Relief and Tax-Exempt
The next stage after the creation of the legal basis for the pension scheme is seeking or
obtaining approval from the necessary tax authority for the purpose of tax relief on the
pensions' contributions and tax-exempt on the investment income accrued or earned for
investing the pension's contributions. However, please note that if the approval is not sought
for, nor sought for but not granted, it does not invalidate the pension scheme as a contract.
The only effect it would have on the scheme is that there will not be anytax relief neither will
the scheme be tax-exempt.
The following are the documents required in order to obtain the approval:
1. Receipt of the payment of the prescribed application fee.
2. Submission of a copy of exchange letter or trust deed (or an interim trust deed).
3. A copy of the Actuarial reports on the scheme.
4. Information regarding the method of funding the pension scheme.
5. Submission of the name of tax district where the employer is located
6. Information regarding the initial members of the scheme.
7. Information regarding any existing scheme
8. Information regarding the directors of the company
9. A copy of the pension scheme policy where it is insured with an insurance company.
10. A schedule showing the names of members, annual salary and contributions of both
the employer and employees.
11.1.3 Determining whether the pension scheme is to be contracted out or not of the
state pension scheme
The employer needs to decide on whether the pension scheme shall be contracted out or not
of the state (government) pension scheme. If the pension scheme is going to be contracted out
of the state pension scheme, then the employer must provide benefits higher than that of the
state and a certificate must be obtained to that effect. Furthermore, before the certificate is
released, the employer must have informed his employees of his intention to provide higher
benefits and their consent obtained.
101
Chapter 12
Trusteeship and Privately
Administered Schemes
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter introduces the institution of a trust. The legal definition of a trust is given as well
as other ways in which a trust may be defined. The various types of trusts are considered.
The nub of the arrangement is that the trustees possess the legal ownership of the trust
property, but cannot treat it as their own personal property. The trustees have to use the
property for the benefit of the beneficiaries according to the terms of the trust. In every trust
there is therefore a division of ownership. The trustees possess the legal interest; the
beneficiaries possess the beneficial or equitable interest. The beneficiaries can enforce their
rights against the trustees by legal action if necessary.
A trust can be distinguished from a contract in that there need be no agreement between the
person creating the trust and the beneficiaries, and there does not have to be any
consideration. The law of trusts originated in equity rather than in common law, and for a
long time trusts were not recognised at common law. Trust law has developed over the
102
centuries on equitable principles, although much of our trust law is now contained in the
Trustee Act 1925 and the Trustee Act 2000.
12.2.6 Settlements
Many trusts are called settlements, and the term is often used as an alternative to the word
trust. Strictly speaking however settlement is a trust where there are successive interests –
such as 'to my wife for life and thereafter our children in equal shares'. The wife is the life
tenant and is entitled to the income from the trust property, but cannot touch the capital. The
children do not get their share of the capital until their mother dies.
As well as being the name given to the person creating a settlement, the term settlor is also
used in simpler trusts to describe the person creating the trust.
The power of appointment is given to the trustees for the time being to use at their
discretion. The wording provides for a 'gift over' in case an appointment is never made.
The 'gift over' beneficiary is sometimes called the 'default' beneficiary, and has the interest in
possession forinheritance tax purposes. The interest in possession is the right to any income
of the trust, as and when it arises. This type of trust is very flexible, as it gives the trustees
power to vary the beneficiaries according to family circumstances. It can cope with deaths
and births in a way which a fixed-interest trust could not. The power can be exercised only
among the prescribed class of beneficiaries. Most life offices use a power of appointment trust
as their standard trust form for the majority of circumstances. Power of appointment trusts
without a default beneficiary have no interest in possession and are often called
discretionary trusts.
The words used must be on the whole imperative: that is, they must
unmistakably show that a trust is intended. However, as equity looks at the intent rather than
the form, no special form of words is necessary. Using the words 'on trust for' would make it
certain.
The subject matter must be certain: that is, the property to be subject to the trust
must be specified.
The objects of the trust, the beneficiaries, must be certain: This can be achieved
simply by naming the beneficiaries: for example 'on trust for X, Y and Z absolutely'. It can also
be achieved by describing the beneficiaries as a class: for example, 'on trust for the employees
for the time being of the XYZ Co. Ltd'. Whatever words are used to specify the beneficiaries; it
must be possible to ascertain with certainty at any time exactly who are the beneficiaries.
Thus, although a class of beneficiaries may fluctuate from time to time (for example, the
employees of the XYZ Co. Ltd) it is always possible to state at any time exactly who are
members of that class. This certainty is not required if a trust is exclusively for charitable
purposes.
12.4 Trustee
As has been explained previously, a trustee is the owner at law of the trust property although
they are bound to use it for the benefit of the beneficiaries. This section considers the methods
of appointment and retirement of trustees. It also explains how trusteeship is affected by the
death of a trustee, and covers their powers and duties. Anyone over 18 and sane can be a
trustee.
Under the Trustee Act 1925, s.36, a new trustee can be appointed to replace a trustee who:
• is dead;
• remains out of the UK for more than a year;
• desires to be discharged;
• refuses to act;
• is unfit or incapable of acting (e.g. has become bankrupt or insane);
• is an infant.
A trustee can appoint an attorney to act for them (Trustee Delegation Act 1999). This is useful
if the trustee is going abroad for a while or is about to have a serious operation. The period of
delegation cannot exceed a year. The power must be attested by a witness and written notice
of its execution and the reason for it must be served on the appointor and all co-trustees
within seven days. There is no limit to the number of trustees a trust can have, except that the
maximum number for a settlement of land is four (Trustee Act 1925, s.34).
The Trustee Act 1925 contains some statutory powers which can be exercised in addition to
those expressly given in the trust. Section 31 gives trustees power to apply trust income to
any infant beneficiary in order to provide for their maintenance or education. Section 32
gives trustees power to apply capital for the advancement of a beneficiary, even if that
beneficiary's interest is contingent or liable to be defeated by the exercise of a power of
appointment or revocation, or to be diminished by an increase in the class to which they
belong. Any such payment would, however, have to be brought into account as part of the
beneficiary's share if they later became absolutely entitled. These powers can be varied by the
wording of a trust.
A trustee has a duty to invest any trust money not immediately required to be paid out. Trust
deeds often include powers to effect and maintain life policies. In exercising their duties
under a trust, trustees must use the utmost diligence to avoid any loss. If they depart from
this standard of care, the law will hold them liable for any loss caused by a breach of this duty.
Failure to act can amount to a breach of duty in some cases. However, when a trustee is
exercising a discretion as opposed to a duty, a different standard of care is required. This is to
act bona fide with the diligence that a prudent man of business would use in managing his
own affairs (Speight v. Gaunt (1883)).
Trustees must keep proper accounts of the trust property and these must be produced and
shown to the beneficiaries if required. The beneficiaries are also entitled to all reasonable
information concerning any dealings and investments of the trust fund. Where a trust
corporation is appointed as trustee, it will normally insist on there being a 'trustee charging
clause'. The powers commonly given to a trustee in a trust including a life policy are set out
107
later in the chapter.
any special knowledge or experience that they have or hold themselves out as
having; and
if acting as trustee in the course of a business or profession, to any special
knowledge or experience that it is reasonable to expect of a person acting in the
course of that kind of business or profession.
The duty of care applies to matters such as investment, acquiring land, appointing agents,
insuring and valuing trust property, subject to anything to the contrary in the trust wording.
The Act gives trustees a specific power to invest anywhere as if they were absolutely entitled
to the trust assets. This general power of investment replaced the previous system of
approved investments under the Trustee Investments Act 1961, which has been repealed.
Trustees must have regard to the standard investment criteria when exercising any power of
investment. Trustees must from time to time review investments and consider whether,
having regard to the standard investment criteria, they should be varied.
Before exercising any power of investment, trustees must obtain and consider proper advice
about the way it is exercised. They must do the same on reviews. This does not apply if the
trustees reasonably conclude in all the circumstances that investment advice is unnecessary
or inappropriate. Proper investment advice must be given by a person believed by the
trustees to be qualified to give it by ability and practical experience. The general power of
investment applies to all existing and new trusts subject to any restriction in a specific trust
wording. However, no investment restriction in a pre-3rdAugust, 1961 trust can restrict this
general power. Trustees may acquire land or property for a justifiable reason and have the
powers of absolute ownership over it, subject to any restriction in the specific trust wording.
Trustees can authorise any person to exercise any or all of their delegable functions as an
agent. However, trustees cannot delegate the functions of distributing trust assets, deciding
whether payments come out of income or capital or appointing a trustee. The agent could be
a trustee and if two or more people are agents for the same function then they must act jointly.
More so, the agent cannot be a beneficiary of the trust. The trustees have specific power to pay
an agent for work done for a trust. The trustees will not be liable for the acts or defaults of an
108
agent unless they have failed in their duty of care. If trustees delegate investment functions
they must have a written policy statement for investments and a written agreement with the
agent including compliance with the policy statement. Trustees must keep these
arrangements under review.
Any trustee who is a trust corporation or a professional (but not a sole trustee) is entitled to
reasonable remuneration for services rendered to the trust if each other trustee has agreed in
writing, even if those services could be provided by a lay trustee unless the specific trust
wording says different. Trustees are also entitled to be reimbursed from trust funds, or may
pay out of trust funds, expenses properly incurred by them acting on behalf of the trust.
Trustees may insure any trust property and pay premiums out of the trust and those
premiums can come from income or capital. The Act applies to personal representatives
administering a deceased person's estate as well as to trusts created during a settlor's
lifetime.
12.5 Beneficiaries
As we explained earlier in the Chapter, it must be possible to ascertain the beneficiaries of a
trust at any particular time. As long as this requirement is fulfilled, the beneficiaries need not
be named but can be described, either singly (for example, 'my wife') or as members of a class
(for example, 'my children'). Often a beneficiary will be named but it is common for
beneficiaries to be described as a class to gain extra flexibility. For example, if a man has three
children X, Y, and Z and wants to set up a trust for them, he may name them as beneficiaries. If
he then has another child A, this child will not be able to benefit from the trust. However, if
the original trust was for 'all my children in equal shares', then future children such as A
couldbenefit.
A contingent interest is one that is subject to a contingency and thus may not come into
possession. An example is A's interest where property is 'on trust for B if he is alive at my
death and if not for A absolutely'. A beneficiary under a power of appointment trust has a
contingent interest in the sense that an appointment to him may not be made, or if made may
be revoked. A beneficiary can be a sole beneficiary or one of several joint beneficiaries. Joint
beneficiaries will take in equal shares unless the wording of the trust says otherwise.
The beneficiaries can, in some cases, put an end to the trust under the rule in Saunders v.
Vautier (1841). Under this rule, if the beneficiaries are all ascertained, if there is no possibility
of further beneficiaries, and if they are all of full age and capacity, they can then direct the
trustees to hand the trust property over to them absolutely. This can only be done if the
beneficiaries are together entitled to the whole beneficial interest. When this is done it
effectively puts an end to the trust. A trustee who commits a breach of trust or acts
fraudulently, will be liable for any loss caused to a beneficiary. An aggrieved beneficiary can
therefore enforce their rights against such a trustee by legal action.
As the policy must be effected by a man on his own life or a woman on her own life, joint life
policies cannot be effected under the Act. If a joint life trust policy is required, it will have to
be effected under a non-statutory trust. The policy has to be a policy of assurance on life. This
phrase is not defined in the Act, but would extend to all types of life assurance except
110
annuities or income protection insurances. The policy must be expressed to be for the benefit
of husband, wife, civil partner or children. It is not necessary for the Act to be mentioned in
the policy but this is preferable for avoidance of doubt. The words used do not have to
expressly declare a trust, as long as they are such as to bring it within the Act.
An example of this principle is the case of Gladitz, Guaranty Executor and Trustee Co. Ltd v.
Gladitz (1937). Gladitz took out a policy covering death by accident and also providing
disablement benefits. The policy provided that: 'it is understood and agreed that all claims
under the policy shall be payable to Winifred Gladitz, wife of the assured, if she is living at
the happening of the event upon which the claim becomes payable'. It was held that a policy
which provides a death benefit and also provides for payment on other events is nevertheless
a policy of assurance effected by a man on his own life within the Act, even though the Act is
not mentioned in the policy. It was also held that the wording concerning claims was
sufficient to express it to be for the benefit of the wife. The policy did therefore create a valid
trust under the Act.
An example of this type of problem was the case of Re Collier (1930). The policy was expressed
to be for the benefit of the life assured's wife, but she was not named. The wife died before the
life assured, who did not remarry. The court held that the trust was for the benefit of the
person who by surviving the life assured became his widow. As on the death of the life
assured there was nobody of this description, the trust had ceased and the policy reverted to
the estate of the assured (a resulting trust).
A similar case was Re Browne's Policy, Browne v. Browne (1903), where the policy was for the
benefit of the assured's 'wife and children'. The wife living at the date of the policy died, but
the life assured remarried and was survived by his second wife and children of both
marriages. It was held that the policy moneys were for the benefit of the second wife and all
the children jointly.
The situation is different where the beneficiary is named. This was shown in the case of
Cousins v. Sun Life Assurance Society (1933). Here a husband effected a policy under the
Act for the benefit of 'my wife Lilian Cousins'. She died during his lifetime and he tried to
obtain the surrender value. It was held that as the wife was specifically named she took a
vested interest immediately the policy was effected. This interest then passed to her estate on
her death. You will thus see that the death of an absolute, named beneficiary does not
111
destroy the interest, which continues for the benefit of the estate. It is unusual to leave the
wife unnamed in modern trust wordings. However, in view of the rising incidence of
divorces this could prove advantageous as it would be the life assured's current wife who
would benefit from any policy proceeds.
If a policy is effected for the benefit of a named wife, then a subsequent divorce will not of
itself destroy her interest. However, when granting a decree of divorce, nullity or judicial
separation the court may make an order varying, for the benefit of the marriage partners and
their children, the terms of any settlement made on the partners (Matrimonial Proceedings
and Property Act 1970). Therefore, a husband can apply during divorce proceedings for the
terms of a trust policy to be varied and the court may grant this. An example of this principle
(under previous legislation) is Gulbenkian v. Gulbenkian (1927), where the court agreed to
delete the wife's interest under an MWPA policy. MWPA trust wordings involving child
beneficiaries can make the interests of children contingent on their attaining majority or
surviving the life assured. Child beneficiaries may be named or unnamed. As previously
explained, leaving children unnamed caters for the possibility of future children.
When drawing up a trust wording it is important also to consider whether the beneficiaries
are to be restricted to the children of the existing marriage, or to any legitimate child of the life
assured. Since the Family Law Reform Act 1969, where the words 'child' or 'children' are used
unqualifiedly, they will include illegitimate children. The position on the death of a child
before that of the life assured must also be determined. A deceased child's interest can be
made to pass to that child's estate or to any brothers and sisters, according to the wishes of the
settlor.
A power of appointment trust can be created under the MWPA as long as the class of potential
beneficiaries is restricted to spouse, civil partner and children. This is useful to retain
maximum flexibility for the future and if the life assured is not at present sure how he or she
wants the benefit split. A 'gift-over' provision should be inserted in case no appointment is
made.
If no appointment is made, the assured themselves will be the trustee, and if they die then
their duty passes to their legal personal representatives. They will need a grant to prove their
title and thus it is wise to ensure that there is always at least one trustee in existence at the
112
death of the life assured, in order to simplify and speed up claim settlement. After the issue of
an MWPA policy, new trustees can be appointed and existing trustees can be discharged in
the ordinary way, as earlier explained above.
A form of request, is required tom be completed at inception. The first part of the form relates
to a specific proposal. The form then goes on to name the beneficiaries and appoint the
trustees. The trustees are given wide powers to deal with the policy, and there is a trustee
charging clause in case a professional trustee is appointed. The counter-signatures of the
trustees are not legally necessary, but in practice they are valuable to show that the trustees
concur in and acknowledge their appointment. Difficulties could occur on a claim if a trustee
was not aware of their appointment. When the policy is issued, it will have a clause on the
lines of 'This Policy is effected under the Married Women's Property Act 1882 (section II) for
the benefit of X absolutely. Trustees appointed are A and B.' Often the full trust wording will
be repeated in the policy or on an attached memorandum. The trust is then fully created.
A non-statutory trust policy is similar to an MWPA policy, but whereas a policy under the Act
creates a valid trust from outset, care is needed in drafting the trust forms to ensure that a
non-statutory trust is completely constituted. If not completely constituted, the trust can be
revoked by the settlor, and this possibility could have unfortunate taxation implications.
Procedure varies from company to company but normally the proposer completes a
declaration requesting the office to issue the policy under the trusts set out in it. The
declaration would be similar to the MWPA form of request, but instead of appointing
113
trustees it would request the company to issue the policy to the assured as sole trustee. The
company might then incorporate the trust wording into the policy, possibly on its face or
more probably as a separate page or attachment. Once the policy has been issued, the
assured can appoint further trustees by means of a simple deed of assignment. This will
often be supplied by the company.
If an office is aware that the trustees' intended action is a breach of the trust, it should not
accede to their request. If it allowed the transaction to take place then it would be liable to the
beneficiaries, on the principle that a person dealing with a trustee cannot obtain a good title
under a document executed in breach of trust if that person knew of the breach. However,
there is no obligation on a life office to investigate the situation unless it has good reason to
suspect a breach. If payment is being made under a trust policy and the office knows the
purpose for which the money is required, it must be satisfied that it is within the purposes of
the trust. If the office knows that the trustees will use the money in breach of trust it will not
get a valid discharge.
114
12.9.2 Dealings by Beneficiaries
A beneficiary cannot claim against the life office, as he does not have the legal interest. A
beneficiary can, however, deal with his beneficial interest and it is possible for the beneficial
interest to be assigned absolutely or mortgaged. Any person acquiring the beneficial interest
should serve notice of this on the trustees.
When considering beneficiaries' rights, you must always remember that if the beneficiaries
are all of full age and capacity, together entitled to the whole beneficial interest, and there is
no possibility of further beneficiaries, they can put an end to the trusts or vary them under the
rule in Saunders v. Vautier (1841). The working of this rule was illustrated in Re Smith, Public
Trustee v. Aspinall (1928). In this case the trustees held a fund on trust with a discretion to
apply property for the maintenance of a wife, with gifts-over to the children. All the
beneficiaries were ascertained and were of full age and capacity. It was held that the trustees
must allow a mortgage effected by the beneficiaries, because they could require the trustees
to hand over the whole fund under the rule in Saunders v. Vautier (1841).
When the office is satisfied as to the trustees' title, it can safely pay the claim, unless it has
knowledge of a breach of trust. The discharge of all the trustees will be required. At the
outset of the claims correspondence it may be advisable for the office to confirm that the
policy was issued under trust and to name the beneficiaries. The reason for this is that it is
not uncommon, particularly under MWPA policies, for the claimant not to be aware of the
factthat the policy is under trust.
Where the trustees request payment to themselves or to the beneficiary/ies this can be safely
done, but if they request payment to be made to an apparently unconnected third party then
the office must make some investigation before payment, to satisfy itself that no breach of
trust is involved.
115
Chapter 13
The Nigerian Pension Scheme
Learning Objectives
Introduction
This chapter explains the Nigerian Pension Scheme with emphasis on the one currently in
operation.
In 1961, the National Provident Fund (NPF) Scheme was established to address pension
related issues in the organized private sector. This was because prior to that time, pension
matters were only addressed as it relates to public/civil servants. This continued until 1972
when the Udoji Commission Report presented a report that led to the establishment of the
National Providence Fund and consequently the Nigerian Pension Board. The Pension board
worked tirelessly but because of very many challenges and inefficiencies, some of which are
highlighted below, the Board was replaced with the Pension Act No. 102 along with the
Armed Forces Pension Act 103, both in 1979. The major inefficiencies are:
Lack of understanding and enlightenment about the scheme by the employees and
majority of their beneficiaries
Contribution was only by the employers and this created additional burden on the
finances of the employers
Misappropriation of funds and seemingly illiquidity when funds are required to be
assessed by employees/beneficiaries.
Over the years, the Act had been modified severally from the Pension Act No. 75 of 1987 to the
Local Government Pension Edict in the same 1987 which led to the establishment of the Local
Government Staff Pension Board. In 1993, this was replaced by the National Social Insurance
Trust Fund (NSITF) Scheme using Decree No. 73 out of such employments. During the
period, the Local Government administrators also established its own pension plan so as to
ensure that their employees are not without a pension at the end of their service with the local
116
government. This was done by the establishment of the Local Government Pension Board.
In 2004, the National Assembly passed into law the New Pension Reform Act 2004 where we
significantly changed the model of financing prior pensions plans from the unfunded
defined benefits scheme to the joint contributory scheme. The federal government initiated
this type of pension scheme to eradicate the challenges experienced during that period where
the pension fund was in huge deficits – which was mainly as a result of the fact the benefits
were usually simply budgeted for, poor administration and arbitrary changes (usually
always increases) in pension amounts.
In 2014, the Pension Reform Act was modified and it is what is currently being used in the
administration of the pensions affairs in the country as at date.
The contributory pension scheme being currently operated is a mandatory scheme that
compels both the employer and the employee in both public and private sector to collectively
save a minimum of eighteen percent of an employee's month emolument into the employee
retirement savings account (RSA) from where the employee will be paid the retirement
benefit at retirement.
After being paid the stipulated retirement benefit, the remaining amount will then be
utilized to purchase either an annuity or arrange a programmed withdrawal for the retiree,
as wouldbe chosen by the retiree.
Also in 2014, the scope of coverage of the contributory pension scheme as expanded to the
self-employed and the persons working in organizations with less than three employees.
This is because research showed that this category of workers are the larger percentage of
workers' population in the country and had been left out of the coverage areas over the years.
Eventually in March 2019, the formal launching of the micropension plan was carried out and
the first set of contributors kicked off the scheme.
Both the National Insurance Commission and the Pensions Commission have at various
times issued circulars to clarify any grey issues on the Act over the period of time. Such
circulars are crucial to the understanding and practice of pensions in Nigeria and as such
candidates are advised to keep themselves abreast of all future developments as it unfolds.
The regulator in charge of pension matters as at date is the National Pensions Commission
(PENCOM), while the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) regulates the Group Life
aspect of the Pension Reform Act making the Act to have dual regulators overseeing its
successful implementation although these two bodies are under the Federal Ministry of
Finance.
As at June 2019, the total value of pension fund assets based on audited valuation reports and
as reported by PENCOM was N9.33 trillion.
117
13.2 Current Pension Status in Nigeria
The current pension regulation in Nigeria can be further assessed bide this link:
https://www.pencom.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PRA_2014.pdf. Candidates are
advised to visit this link and familiarise themselves with the contents of the 62-paged
document as it relates to pension, life assurance and all other salient factors.
118
INDEX