HYDROPONICS TECHNOLOGY
MODULE II MEDIA OPTIMIZATION
WHY OPTIMIZATION?
• Produce maximum yield of product or biomass per gram of substrate
used.
• Produce the maximum concentration of product or biomass.
• Permit the maximum rate of product formation.
• Give the minimum yield of undesired products.
• Has consistent quality
• Be readily available throughout the year.
• It will cause minimal problems during
- media making and
- sterilization
• It will cause minimal problems in other aspects of the production
process particularly in
- aeration and agitation
- extraction
- purification
- waste treatment
CLASSICAL METHOD
Changing one independent variable (nutrient, antifoam, pH, temperature, etc.) while fixing all the others at certain level.
Each possible combination of independent variable at appropriate levels could require a large number of experiments, xn
where x is the number of levels and n is the number of variables.
Three nutrients at two concentrations = 23 trials
Six nutrients at three concentrations=36 (729)
Industrially the aim is to perform the minimum number of experiments to determine optimal conditions.
Disadvantages
• Extremely time consuming
• Expensive for a large number of variables
PLACKETT BURMAN DESIGN
• This technique allows for the evaluation of X-1 variables by X experiments.
• X must be a multiple of 4, e.g. 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, etc.
• Useful when more than five independent variables are to be investigated
• Normally one determines how many experimental variables need to be included in an investigation and then selects the
Plackett-Burman design which meets that requirement most closely in multiples of 4.
• Any factors not assigned to a variable can be designated as a dummy variable. And factors known to not have any effect
may be included and designated as dummy variables
PLACKETT BURMAN DESIGN
Plackett-Burman design
for seven variables (A -G)
at high and low levels in
which two factors, E and
G, are designated as
'dummy' variables.
PLACKETT BURMAN DESIGN
• Each horizontal row represents a trial and each vertical column represents the H (high) and L (low) values of one
variable in all the trials.
• The effects of the dummy variables are calculated in the same way as the effects of the experimental variables.
• If there are no interactions and no errors in measuring the response, the effect shown by a dummy variable should be
0.
• If the effect is not equal to 0, it is assumed to be a measure of the lack of experimental precision plus any analytical
error in measuring the Response.
EXAMPLE
STEPS INVOLVED
1. Determine the difference between the average of the H (high) and L (low) responses for each independent
and dummy variable.
Therefore the difference = A (H) - A (L)
The effect of an independent variable on the response is the difference between the average response for the
four experiments at the high level and the average value for four experiments at the low level.
This value would be near zero for the dummy variables
STEPS INVOLVED
Estimate the mean square of each variable (the variance of effect).
For A the mean square will be =
The experimental error can be calculated by averaging the mean squares of the dummy effects of E and G.
Thus, the mean square for error =
This experimental error is not significant
STEPS INVOLVED
4. The final stage is to identify the factors which are showing large
effects. This can be done using for example an F-test for
Factor mean square.
error mean square
When Probability Tables are examined it is found that Factors A, Band
F show large effects which are very significant, whereas C shows a
very low effect which is not significant and D shows no effect. A, B
and F have been identified as the most important factors.
RESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMIZATION
• Response means the result of an experiment carried out at
particular values of the variables being investigated.
• The axes of the contour plot are experimental variables and
the area within axes is termed the response surface.
• To construct the contour plot, the results(responses)of a
series of experiments employing different combinations of the
variables are inserted on the surface of the plot at the points
delineated by the experimental conditions.
• Points giving the same results(equal responses) are then joined
together to make a contour line.
• The resulting contour map gives an indication of the area in
which the optimum combination of variables resides.
STEPS INVOLVED
Define a space on the plot to be explored.
Run five random experiments in this space.
Saddle
Define a new space centred upon the best of experiments and make the new space
smaller than the previous one, perhaps by cutting each dimension by one half.
Rising Ridge
Run five more random experiments in this new space.
Mound
Continue doing this until no further improvement is observed.
12
SIMPLEX SEARCH METHOD
• The simplex method attempts to optimize n variables by initially performing n+1
experimental trials.
• The results of this initial set of trials are then used to predict the conditions of the
next experiment and the situation is repeated until the optimum combination is
attained.
• After the first set of trials the optimization proceeds as individual experiments.
• The prediction is achieved using a graphical representation of the trials
• Experimental variables are plotted on axes and not the results of the experiments.
• The initial experimental conditions are chosen such that the points on the graph are
equidistant from one another and form the vertices of a polyhedron described as
simplex.
• Thus with two variables simplex will be an equilateral triangle.
• The results of the initial set of three experiments are then used to predict the next
experiment enabling a new simplex to be constructed.
EXAMPLE
X axis-concentration range of the carbon source
Y axis-concentration range of the nitrogen source
A represents the current concentrations of the two
variables which are producing best yield of antibiotic
B is planned using a new carbon-nitrogen mixture
C position of C can now be plotted on the graph using the
lengths AC and BC equal to AB
The results of the three experiments are assessed and the
worst response to antibiotic production was identified.
A=worst
B=best
EXAMPLE
A new simplex BCD is constructed opposite the worst
response i.e.A using the existing vertices B and C.
A line is drawn from A through the centroid of BC.
D(new experiment) will be on this line and the sides BD and
CD will be the same length as BC.
This process of constructing the new simplex is described as
reflection.
Once the position of D is known, the concentrations of
carbon and nitrogen sources can be determined graphically.
A series of simplexes can be constructed moving in a
crabwise way.
The procedure is continued until the optimum is located.
At this point the simplex begins to circle on itself, indicating
optimum concentration.
