[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views28 pages

Psyc2007 Lecture 09

Uploaded by

kelly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views28 pages

Psyc2007 Lecture 09

Uploaded by

kelly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Language

PSYC2007 – Fall 2021

11/11/21 Language 1
Outline
• Psycholinguistics – The psychological study of
language

• Inputs in language processing

• Understanding words
– The word frequency effects

• Understanding sentences

• Effect of language on cognition


11/11/21 Language 2
Steven Pinker on language

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-B_ONJIEcE
11/11/21 Language 3
What is language?
• Language is a system of communication.

• Human language is creative in its nature.


– The structure of language allows for creativity.
• Hierarchical nature – Language consists of components at different
levels.
• Rule-based nature – Combination of the components is governed by
certain rules.

11/11/21 Language 4
Language acquisition device
• Noam Chomsky published Syntactic Structures in
1957.
– In addition to semantics, linguists should also study syntax,
i.e. sentence structures, in language.
– Humans are born with the capability to acquire and use
language.
– Chomsky hypothesized that we are all born with a
Language Acquisition Device (LAD).
– Chomsky’s work shaped the field of psycholinguistics.

11/11/21 Language 6
Inputs in language processing
• Language has a hierarchical structure, and consists
of units at different scales.

• Linguists study language based on two types of


hierarchy, according to the sounds or the meanings.

• The smallest units are phonemes and morphemes, in


terms of the sounds and the meanings respectively.

11/11/21 Language 7
Visualizing sounds
• We can plot sound energy as a function of time in a
speech.

“Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”
- John F. Kennedy
Image source: https://www.bespokenart.com/products/john-f-kennedy?variant=26777197505
11/11/21 Language 8
Phonemes
• A phoneme is the shortest segment of speech.
• Meaning of a word changes if a phoneme is
changed.

11/11/21 Language 9
Morphemes
• The smallest unit in a word in terms of meaning.
– Examples: “key” and “board” are two morphemes forming
the word “keyboard”.

• Free morpheme vs. bound morpheme


– A free morpheme can stand alone and function as a word.
• Examples: room, bed, house, green
– A bound morpheme needs to attach to other morphemes to
form a word.
• Examples: pre-, -ment, -ed

11/11/21 Language 10
Phonemic restoration effect
• Richard Warren (1970) replaced the first /s/ in
“legislatures” by the sound of a cough.
– It was hard to specify the moment of the cough.
– It was hard to detect that the first /s/ in “legislatures” was
missing.

• The missing phoneme was “restored” given the


context of the speech.

11/11/21 Language 12
Cross-modality influence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-lN8vWm3m0
11/11/21 Language 13
The McGurk effect
• The filling-in phenomenon in speech perception can
be influenced by visual inputs.

• Although the auditory inputs stay the same, the visual


inputs influence the perceived phoneme.

• When the auditory inputs and visual inputs conflict


with each other, the visual inputs dominate in the
McGurk effect.

11/11/21 Language 14
Word-superiority effect

• Reicher (1969) asked:


Do people perceive a letter
better when it is presented in a
word than when it is presented
alone?

• Reicher’s participants performed


better (higher accuracy) in the
word condition than in the single-
letter condition.

Reicher (1969)
11/11/21 Language 17
Word frequency effect
• Participant judges whether a presented letter string is
a word or not in the lexical decision task.

• Response time in the lexical decision task was faster


for the second list, compared to the first list in the
previous demonstration.

• The second list was compiled of more frequently


used words.

11/11/21 Language 20
Eye movements in reading
• The word frequency effect was also observed in eye-
movement studies of reading.

• Duration of fixation on a high-frequency word is


typical shorter than that on a low-frequency word.
– Why?

• Behaviors are being shaped by experience.

11/11/21 Language 21
Broca’s area and Wernicke’s area
• Broca’s area and Wernicke’s area were thought to be
responsible for language production and language
comprehension respectively.

• Recent studies have linked the two areas with two


key concepts in understanding sentences –
semantics and syntax.
– Broca’s aphasia was linked to problems with syntax.
– Wernicke’s aphasia was linked to problems with semantics.

11/11/21 Language 22
Event-related potentials (ERPs)

San Martin & Huettel (2013)

11/11/21 Language 23
ERP in semantic processing
Osterhout et al. - ERPs and language

N400
that elicit
s.
OO/SPS

propriate words:
and dog’. - The cats won’t EAT.
n new weby’.
.---- The cats won’t BAKE .
nships:
Osterhout, McLaughlin & Bersick (1997)
th prior knowledge:
• When the target word (“eat” vs. “bake”) was unexpected in
ving learned that John is
terms of the meaning, a strong N400 ERP response was
observed. ,..&-PGOOISPS
.. . .. . ., : ,* ~ ,“,

– à N400 was about semantics.


- The cats won’t EAT ‘y.f

ofproof the theorem’. ..--. *The cats won’t EATING .


N400
the stock’.
11/11/21 - T
F~.. J
Language 24
ropriate
and dog’.
words:
ERP in syntactic processing
- The cats won’t EAT.
n new weby’.
.---- The cats won’t BAKE .
ships:

h prior knowledge:
ving learned that John is

~ ,..&-PGOOISPS
.. . .. . .,,“, : ,*
- The cats won’t EAT ‘y.f

ofproof the theorem’. ..--. *The cats won’t EATING .


N400
he stock’. - T
F~.. J
nomalies: Osterhout, McLaughlin & Bersick (1997)
guests at the party were
e’. • When the target word (“eat” vs. “eating”) was unexpected in
terms of the form of the sentence, a strong P600 ERP
that Mary leaves them’. - The cats won’t EAT
response was observed.
-..-. *The cats won’t BAKING .
succeed’. – à P600 (syntactic positive
T shift) was about syntax.
eement:
mselfto
the meal’.
ement: 11/11/21 Language 25
Fig. 2 Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by lin-
What is your prediction?
• What is your prediction if we compare the ERP
responses of the following sentences (target word is
italicized)?

– he saw the group walk onto the stage and start playing
– he saw the group walk onto the guitar and start playing
– he saw the group walk onto the barn and start playing

11/11/21 Language 26
Language processing in a context
• Here is the context:
Concert Scenario
The band was very popular and Joe was sure the
concert would be sold out. Amazingly, he was able
to get a seat down in front. He couldn’t believe how
close he was when he saw the group walk onto the
(stage/guitar/barn) and start playing.

• What is your prediction on the ERP response, e.g.,


guitar vs. barn?

11/11/21 Language 27
Contextual influence

Expected à stage
Event-related à guitar
Event-unrelatedà barn

Metusalem et al. (2012)

• The word guitar was activated by the scenario, and


was less surprising, compared to the word barn.
• Therefore, guitar resulted in a smaller N400
response than barn did.

11/11/21 Language 28
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
• Edward Sapir and Benjamin Whorf hypothesized that
language could influence how people think in
different cultures.

• Jonathan Winawer and colleagues (2007) tested a


related hypothesis:
Does language influence color perception?

11/11/21 Language 29
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
• Winawer et al. (2007): Does language experience
influence color perception?
– In Russian, different shades of blue can be categorized
under two different labels (goluboy: lighter blues and siniy:
darker blues).
– Color matching task: Which of the two
test patches matches the reference?
– Within-category trials: Test patches
come from the same category in
Russian.
– Cross-category trials: Test patches
come from different categories.

Winawer et al., PNAS, 2007.


11/11/21 Language 30
Category effects on Russians only
• Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
– Russian participants responded faster in the cross-
category trials than in the within-category trials.
Russian speakers English speakers

Interference conditions:
— Spatial: to hold a spatial pattern in memory
— Verbal: to rehearse digit strings silently
Winawer et al., PNAS, 2007.
11/11/21 Language 31
Summary
• Human language is distinctive, compared to the
systems of communication used by other animals.

• Psycholinguists study comprehension, production,


representation and acquisition in language.

• Phonemes and morphemes are the smallest units in


a language, in terms of the sounds and the
meanings.

• Perception of phonemes and letters can be


influenced by the context.

11/11/21 Language 32
Summary (cont’d)
• Recent research studies suggest that the Broca’s
area and Wernicke’s area were involved in syntactic
and semantic processing respectively.

• ERP studies demonstrated the differential neural


signals of syntactic and semantic processing.

• Language can also influence other cognitive


processes.

11/11/21 Language 33
Sections from the textbook
• Chapter 11
– What is Language?
– Understanding Words: A few Complications
– Understanding Ambiguous Words
– Understanding Sentences
– Understanding Text and Stories

11/11/21 Language 34

You might also like