TM1016V User Guide 1022
TM1016V User Guide 1022
SSE/1022
Symbols Used in this Manual
TM1016V Free and Forced Vibrations
Contents
Introduction .................................................................. 1
Description ................................................................... 3
Noise Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Electrical Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Units Conversions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Speed and Angular Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Frequency, Radians and Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Beam and Spring - Small Angle Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Beam and Spring - Free Vibrations and Damping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Free Vibrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Phase of Displacement Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Viscous Damping (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Damping Ratio () . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Underdamped Oscillations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Critically Damped Oscillations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
The Logarithmic Decrement () and Calculating Damping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Overdamped Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Critically Damped Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Beam and Spring - Forced Vibrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Magnification Factor (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Phase Lag () . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Phase Lag and Damping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Simply Supported Beam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Basic Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Improved Theory (Rayleigh) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Dunkerley’s Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Simply Supported Beam - Damping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Simply Supported Beam - Forced Vibrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Safe Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Setting as a Beam and Spring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Setting as a Simply Supported Beam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Fitting or Removing the Beam Holder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Fitting or Removing the Spring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Adding Masses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Fitting the Dashpot Damper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Rigid Beam and Spring Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Simply Supported Beam Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Adjusting The Damper Disc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Fitting the Vibration Absorber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Using VDAS® with the TM1016V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Useful Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Setting Zero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Setting Sensor Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Experiment 1: Introduction to the Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Procedure 1 - Free Vibration Displacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Procedure 2 - Displacement 1st Derivative (Velocity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Procedure 3 - Displacement 2nd Derivative (Acceleration) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Procedure 4 - Measured Acceleration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Procedure 5 - Forced Vibration Displacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Procedure 6 - Damping Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Experiment 2: Rigid Beam and Spring - Added Mass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Aim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Results Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Experiment 3: Rigid Beam and Spring - Damping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Experiment 4: Simply Supported Beam - Added Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Results Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Experiment 5: Simply Supported Beam - Damping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Aim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Experiment 6: Simply Supported Beam - Vibration Absorber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Procedure 1 - Antiresonance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Typical Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Useful Textbooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Exciter Belt Guard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Displacement Span Check (needs VDAS®) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Electrical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Spare Parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Customer Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Free vibrations happen in many structures, where the structure vibrates at its natural frequency. Forced
vibrations may occur where an external force causes the structure to vibrate at any frequency including
the natural frequency of the structure. Where the forced vibration frequency equals the natural
frequency, the structure will resonate at a potentially dangerous amplitude, damaging the structure.
History has several examples of this problem. These include the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
in the US in 1940, and the temporary closure of the Millennium Bridge in London 2000-2002.
Designers need to understand how free and forced vibrations affect structures, the magnitude of the
oscillations they can cause and how to reduce (damp) them. TecQuipment’s Free and Forced Vibrations
(TM1016V) uses a metal beam, held as a simply supported beam or supported by a spring. It shows the
magnitudes of oscillations due to free and forced vibrations in simple structures and how damping affects
their vibrations.
To automatically record the experiment results and save time, the apparatus works with TecQuipment’s
Versatile Data Acquisition System (VDAS®).
Description
Control
Section
Dashpot
Damper
Displacement Sensor
The self-contained base unit has two areas - a left-hand section containing the controls and other
electrical circuits, and a right-hand ‘window’ containing the experiment parts.
The control section has a display showing the speed of the exciter disc (in rev.min-1, rad.s-1 and
frequency in Hz) when used for forced vibrations. It also has manual controls for the servomotor. Other
controls include the ‘set zero’ adjustments for the displacement and acceleration sensors.
Sockets at the back of the control section are for connection to a suitable computer (not supplied) running
TecQuipment’s VDAS® software. VDAS® is needed to see the traces of the oscillations from the sensors
around the beam.
The experiment window holds a metal beam. A low-friction bearing works as a pivot to hold the left-hand
end of the beam. A ‘beam stop’ under the right-hand end of the beam helps to prevent damage, in case
of incorrect use.
• ‘rigid beam with spring’ - a spring supports the right-hand end of the ‘rigid’ beam. It allows the
beam to vibrate through a small angle, at a frequency determined by the spring rate and beam
mass. An adjuster and locking handle adjust the spring to keep the beam level.
• ‘simply supported’ - a second low-friction bearing in a holder secures the right-hand end of
the beam, which can then oscillate due to its own flexural stiffness and mass.
A motor fixed to the beam has two rotating discs (for balance each side of the beam), each with an
eccentric rotating mass. This combination forms an ‘exciter’, providing the forced vibrations. It uses a
servometer with a controller. They work to give accurate speed control and reduced cyclical variations
caused by the inertia of its rotating (and oscillating) mass.
The exciter has sensors to measure motor speed and the rotational position of the eccentric mass.
These work with VDAS® to show the phase lag between the applied force and the beam displacement.
An extra sensor at the exciter measures beam acceleration, so the phase difference between
displacement and measured acceleration can be seen. It helps to confirm the acceleration that VDAS®
derives from the displacement.
A non-contacting sensor measures the beam displacement by detecting the distance from a powerful
magnet under the beam. This gives a measurement of the beam displacement at this position. Because
it has no physical connection, this sensor has negligible damping effect on the oscillations.
The equipment includes a set of masses and a holder. These fix under the exciter to show how added
mass affects the beam oscillations.
A dashpot damper may be connected under the beam for experiments with viscous damping of the
vibrations (TecQuipment supply damping fluid with the equipment). A vibration absorber may also be
attached, to experiment with an alternative method of reducing oscillation amplitude.
TecQuipment supply two metal ‘calibration’ blocks with the equipment. The shorter block is to check the
displacement sensor zero. The longer block is to check the displacement sensor span calibration (see
the maintenance section).
TecQuipment supply a storage tray with the equipment. This is useful to safely store the tools and other
small parts.
Sensor Zero
Sensor
Calibration
Span
The TM1016V includes VDAS® On Board data acquisition hardware that allows the unit to be directly
connected to a computer via a USB cable (provided with the unit) this connects via the socket at the rear
of the unit control section. no additional hardware is required. TecQuipment’s VDAS® software is fully
compatible and provides the following features.
• Save time
• Reduce errors
Technical Details
Part Details
Dimensions and Weight 1280 mm wide x 450 mm front to back x 800 mm high (assembled)
and 80 kg
Other parts approximately 4 kg total
Part Details
Noise Levels
The maximum sound levels measured for this apparatus are lower than 70 dB(A).
A wax coating may have been applied to parts of this apparatus to prevent
corrosion during transport. Remove the wax coating by using paraffin or white
spirit, applied with either a soft brush or a cloth.
Follow any regulations that affect the installation, operation and maintenance
of this apparatus in the country where it is to be used.
Installation
1. Put the equipment on a solid, level table or workbench.
4. Fit the threaded bar into the spring adjuster, then fit the washer, locking handle and dome shape nut
(see Figure 6).
5. Remove the ‘keep’ from the magnet under the beam and store it safely.
6. Connect the VDAS® output (at the back of the Control Section) to a suitable PC (not supplied) as
shown in Figure 9.
7. Connect the equipment to the electrical supply as shown in Electrical Connection on page 12.
Electrical Connection
Use the cable supplied with the equipment to connect it to an electrical supply.
Theory
Notation
Symbol Details Units
B Vibration absorber m
displacement amplitude
f Frequency Hertz
L or l Length m
m Mass kg
t Time Seconds
Period Seconds
x· and ··
x Linear velocity and m.s-1 and m.s-2
acceleration
y and y· and ··
y Linear displacement, velocity m, m.s-1 and m.s-2
and acceleration
Magnification factor -
Logarithmic decrement -
Pi
Damping ratio -
Table 1 Notation
C Constants -
Matrix
F Force Matrix N
M and N Generic -
Mathematical
Constant
Y Amplitude m
Matrix
Table 2 Constants
Units Conversions
Speed and Angular Velocity
The display shows the rotational velocity (speed) of the motor in revolutions per minute (rev.min-1),
radians per second (rad.s-1) and frequency (Hz).
Frequency can be termed in ‘ordinary’ frequency (f), where something repetitive occurs in a given unit
of time, and with units of Hertz. Where it applies to something moving with a sinusoidal motion, it may
also be termed ‘angular’ frequency () or (). It has units of radians per second.
or = 2f
The period () is the time taken for a complete oscillation. It is equal to the inverse of the frequency, so
When used with the spring, this theory assumes that the beam itself does not
bend - it is sensibly ‘rigid’ in comparison with the spring.
The theory also assumes that the exciter forms a simple point mass at a given
position along the beam.
The exciter remains fitted to the beam for all experiments. Its value may be increased using the added
masses.
From Figure 10, it can be seen that the beam will oscillate about the left hand pivot through an angle .
This is an angular motion. Using the small angle approximation, this angle is approximately equal to its
sine in radians:
sin
Free vibration occurs in a system when it is given an initial input of energy. The system then vibrates at
its natural frequency until the initial energy has been dissipated to friction or some other sort of damper
or absorber.
From Figure 10, summing the moments about the pivot gives an equation of motion as:
··
I A + kx s l spring = 0
Theoretically, for a ‘slender’ beam with a uniformly distributed mass, its inertia would be based around
its centre of gravity with the addition of any parallel axis components. Also, in theory it can be assumed
the spring is light, having no affect on the total system inertia. However, because the beam becomes a
relatively long moment arm and the spring has a relatively large mass, the spring and its fixing as a point
mass must be allowed for.
The total mass moment of inertia for the complete assembly (IA) is the sum of the individual values for
the beam, the mass and the spring.
1 l beam 2 1
I beam = ------ m beam l beam + m beam ----------
2
- = --- m beam l beam 2 (2)
12 2 3
2
I exciter = m exciter l exciter (3)
Note: This theory assumes the central mass acts as a point load.
For accuracy, the theory allows for a proportion of the spring mass - that part which moves and
contributes to the overall mass of the system. According to Rayleighs theory, this is equal to 1/3 the mass
of the spring. The fixing between the spring and the beam also needs to be allowed for.
m spring
I spring = ---------------
- + m fixing l spring
2
(4)
3
x s = l spring
So
2
·· 2 ·· kl spring
I A + kl spring = 0 or + ------------------ = 0 (5)
IA
This is a second order differential equation. A general solution of this equation gives:
kl spring 2
= A cos ------------------t – (6)
IA
Where A is the amplitude and is the phase (two constants based on the initial conditions of the motion).
From the diagram, we can see the vibratory character of the motion. Cosine function is a periodic
function that repeats every 2. Thus our period of oscillation is:
2
kl spring IA
------------------T = 2 and therefore T = 2 ------------------
IA kl spring
2
This is the natural time period, determined by the spring rate and inertia (and therefore mass) in the
system. The system will continue to vibrate with this period unless an external force influences it. The
natural period in terms of frequency or angular velocity gives:
2 2 2
1 kl spring kl spring 2 kl spring
f = ------ ------------------ or = ------------------ or = ------------------ (7)
2 IA IA IA
·· 2
+ = 0
From this, it can be seen that the natural frequency of any system can be found if the equation is
arranged into that form.
The formula can be re-arranged to find the spring stiffness based on the resonant frequency.
2 2
I A 2f IA
K = --------------------
- = -----------------
-
2
l spring l 2 spring
To examine the phase relationships between displacement, velocity and acceleration of the beam as it
vibrates through a cycle, the general equation for a sine wave must be considered (Equation 6):
= A cos t –
Then
· ·· 2
= – A sin t – and = – A cos t –
This means that if the displacement of the beam is measured and its 2nd derivative (acceleration) found,
it can be compared with the acceleration measured by the accelerometer.
We know that sin and cos have a 90 degrees (/2 or T/4) phase difference, so the velocity is -90° (-/2)
out of phase to displacement. Also, acceleration is negative or 180° ( or T/2) out of phase with
displacement.
Figure 12 shows that the displacement curve and its derivatives - velocity and acceleration, obey a
sinusoidal shape. Also note that assuming displacement as the reference, velocity is 90 degrees out of
phase and acceleration is 180 degrees out of phase.
• Displacement is zero as the beam reaches equilibrium point and maximum as it reaches the
extremes of its travel.
• Velocity slows to zero as the beam reaches the extremes of its travel, but increases to
maximum as it moves past the equilibrium point.
• Acceleration (or deceleration) is zero as the beam reaches equilibrium point (velocity is
constant) and maximum when the beam reaches the extremes of its travel (velocity
approaches or leaves zero).
No vibrating system is ‘ideal’, in that without continued applied energy, vibrations will eventually reduce
to zero, due to friction or some other resistive method of dissipating or damping the energy of the
oscillations.
If a constant external influence is added to the oscillating system, such that it causes the system to lose
energy and therefore amplitude, the system has been ‘damped’.
The most common form of damping is ‘Viscous damping’ where the damping force is proportional and
in opposition to the velocity of the displacement. The dashpot damper used on the equipment uses a
fluid to provide viscous damping.
In application, the amount of viscous damping is quantified as a coefficient, with the letter (c).
As shown in Figure 13, when the damper is attached to the beam and spring, the equations of motion
become:
··
I A = – kx s l spring – cl damper x· d
2 2
cl
·· -------------------- · kl spring
+ damper + ------------------ = 0
IA IA
Introducing the decay coefficient () to show the level of damping in the system:
·· · 2
+ 2 + = 0 (8)
2
c l damper
= --------------------------
2I A
To account for the additional inertia of the damper, it can be assumed that the damper piston forms a
point mass, giving for the complete system:
Where
2
I damper = m damper l damper (10)
The displacement equation remains a second order linear differential equation. This time it is easier to
assume a solution in the standard form:
rt
= Ce (11)
2 2
r + 2r + = 0 (12)
2 2
r = – – (13)
Figure 14 Damping
• An undamped system (in theory) oscillates forever at its natural frequency. In reality, it
oscillates, losing energy to external factors (such as heat, sound and friction) until it reaches
equilibrium.
• A critically damped system displaces and returns to equilibrium in the shortest possible time
without oscillating.
• An over-damped system would not oscillate at all. The extra damping means that its return
to equilibrium takes longer than critical damping.
The damping ratio () is a dimensionless value found from the ratio of the actual damping coefficient and
the critical damping coefficient (cc).
Underdamped Oscillations
r 1 = – + i d
r 2 = – – i d
Adding these into the general solution Equation 11 and expressing in phase form, we can show:
– t 2 2
= Ae cos – t – d
Where A and d are amplitude and phase based on initial conditions. The cosine term represents the
free element of the motion, and the exponential term represents the damping element. Like in free
vibration, we can deduce the damped time period knowing the cosine function repeats every 2.
2 2 1 2
– d = 2 or d = 2 --------------------- = ------
2
–
2 d
2 2 2
d = – (15)
2
------d = 1–
Which is in the form of the equation of a circle. Figure 16 shows the textbook plot of this equation as the
quadrant of a circle. It shows that low damping levels giving a ratio below 0.2 have minimal effect on
frequency ratio (it remains near to unity). Therefore even non ideal systems oscillate near to the natural
frequency.
For critical damping = , which gives one repeated root. The displacement equation becomes:
– t – t
= C1 e + C 2 te
This equation has no cos or sin terms, showing that it does not describe an oscillatory system.
Overdamped Oscillations
For overdamped systems , which gives two real roots. The displacement equation becomes:
r1 t r2 t
= C1 e + C2 e
As with the critical damping, the motion is ‘aperiodic’ - meaning that it has no period of oscillation. As
damping is increased, the system takes longer to reach equilibrium. Too much damping means that the
system may never return to equilibrium.
When damping is applied to a system, the oscillation amplitude decays at an exponential rate (see
Figure 17. Equation 16 describes the curve that follows the amplitude decay.
– t
Ae (16)
To calculate a damping value based on physical properties needs so many variables that only complex
equations or computer analysis can give an answer. The answer will be very approximate because of
the many possible differences between theory and a real application. A better method is to measure the
oscillations of a system and find its damped period (d) and logarithmic decrement. This is the natural
log of the ratio of amplitude of successive peaks of j time periods apart, where:
– t
x0 Ae 0 - = e jTd = e j
---------
- = ------------------------ (17)
x0 + j Ae 0 d
– t + jt
and
1 x0 2 2
- = T d = --------- --------- for low damping levels
= --- ln --------- (18)
j x0 + j d
For the best accuracy, an average of the log of three or more ratios of successive peaks is better, unless
the amplitude reduces too quickly to obtain more than two peaks. For example, for the five peaks of
Figure 17:
1 x0
= --- ln -------------
- = Td (19)
4 x0 + 4
Overdamped Systems
2 2 2 2
r 1 = – – and r 2 = – –
For critical damping, the overdamped model can be used, as it assumes the aperiodic motion. The
VDAS® tool may predict damping ratio near to 1, where we can assume critical damping.
When the exciter turns it provides an oscillating force (Q) that causes the beam to oscillate at a frequency
that may not be the natural frequency .
·· 2 · 2
I A + cl damper + kl spring = l mass Q sin t
2
Q = m offsetmass r offsetmass
2 2
·· cl damper · kl spring
- + ------------------
l exciter Q
+ ----------------- = ------------------
- sin t
IA IA IA
·· · 2
+ 2 + = q sin t
Where
l exciter Q
and remain the same and q = ------------------
-
IA
= M cos t + N sin t
Differentiating this and substituting it into the base equations will lead two linear algebraic equations to
calculate the generic mathematical constants M and N.
Writing in the phase angle form, and introducing the magnification factor:
q
= ------2 sin t –
Where
1
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- (20)
2 2 2 2
1 – + 2
2 -
tan = -------------------------
2 2
1–
The phase relationships between displacement, velocity and acceleration remain the same for forced
vibrations.
1
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- (21)
2 2 2 2
1 – + 2
In an ideal system with no damping, C is zero, then and the damping ratio are both zero. The
magnification simplifies to:
1
= ------------------------------
2
- (22)
2
1 –
This shows that for an ideal undamped system, when the forced frequency matches the natural
frequency (resonance), the magnification factor and vibration amplitude become infinite. Looking at
Equation 21, even small amounts of damping (as in a real system) prevent the magnification factor from
reaching infinite.
Figure 19 shows the typical textbook curves for the relationship between magnification factor and
frequency ratio for a range of damping ratios. The dotted line shows that the peak of the magnification
factor moves to a lower frequency ratio with increased damping ratio. Equation 23 shows the relationship
between the frequency ratio and the damping ratio.
2
---- = 1 – 2 (23)
It would be expected that if an external force of a given sinusoidal angular frequency () causes a
structure to vibrate, then the waveform of the applied force would be in phase with the displacement
waveform of the structure. In practice, the two waveforms are not in phase. The phase of the
displacement waveform of the structure lags behind the force waveform. Figure 20 shows a phase lag
of 90 degrees as an example.
On the equipment, the exciter uses an eccentric mass to create the forced vibrations. If the angular
position of the eccentric mass is known and compared with the displacement of the beam, the forced
vibration phase lag in the system will be seen. Figure 21 shows a sketch of the exciter on the beam with
the eccentric mass at roughly 90 degrees with respect to the top position. If the displacement is at its
peak with the mass at 90 degrees, then the phase lag would be 90 degrees, as shown in Figure 20.
Equation 24 gives the phase lag of the offset mass on the exciter, allowing for damping:
2 -
tan = -------------------------
2 2
(24)
1–
0
tan = -------------------------
2
-2 (25)
1–
The value of the frequency ratio and any damping affect the phase lag. Figure 22 shows the textbook
curves of phase lag against frequency ratio with different damping. It shows that in an ideal system with
no damping ( = 0), there is no lag until resonance, where the lag changes quickly to 90° precisely, then
a full 180° past resonance. As damping increases, the change from 0 to 180° becomes slower.
Figure 23 shows the textbook plot of a tangent function to help understanding of the theory.
The exciter remains fitted to the beam for all experiments. It forms a simple point mass at mid-span of
the beam. Its value may be increased using the added masses.
From Figure 24, the beam will be seen to flex so that its mid point will move up and down in oscillation.
This is a linear motion.
This basic theory assumes that the beam mass is negligible compared to the
point mass.
It also assumes that the exciter forms a point mass.
From simply supported beam deflection theory, the static deflection depends on the flexural rigidity of the
beam, its length and the applied mass:
m exciter gl beam
st = -------------------------------
-
48EI beam
3
bd
I beam = --------
12
The flexural rigidity of the beam is directly comparable to a spring, such that it has an effective spring
constant (kbeam).
So:
Where
48EI beam
k beam = ---------------------
3
-
l beam
The beam deflection along the length of the beam is symmetrical about the centre and we assume its
curve obeys the equation:
3xl beam 2 – 4x 3 x 1
y = y max ---------------------------------
- -- ---
l 2
3
l beam
m exciter ··
y + k beam y = 0
·· k beam
y + -----------
-y = 0
m
Using the steps described for the rigid beam, it can be seen that:
2 k beam
= ----------------
-
m exciter
·· 2
y+ y = 0
This equation is in the same form as the one derived for the rigid beam system. Using the same steps
as before, we can show the period of oscillation is:
3
m exciter m exciter l beam
T = 2 ----------------
- = 2 ------------------------------
-
k beam 48EI beam
and:
1 48EI beam
f = ------ ------------------------------
-3 (26)
2 m l
exciter beam
y = A cos t –
This is in the same form as before. The same relationship between displacement, velocity and
acceleration is proven using the same method.
This is acceptable in most applications, but for accuracy the beam mass and inertia must be allowed for.
An English physicist - John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) experimented with frequencies of vibration and
conservation of energy. His work led to a correction of the standard beam theory when used in vibrational
analysis.
17
This gives a corrected mass that allows for the mass of the simply supported beam of ------ m beam .
35
Adding the corrected mass of the beam to the central mass (of the exciter), gives an ‘effective’ mass.
The equations then apply to the complete assembly:
17
m effective = m exciter + ------ m beam
35
1 48EI beam
f = ------ ---------------------------------
-3
2 m
effective l beam
However, in the application, it clamps a central portion of the beam, increasing its stiffness, affecting its
flexural rigidity. To allow for this it can be seen that the beam actually forms two cantilevers, one each
side of the exciter.
3 3
m effective 2 gl 3 m effective gl 3 6EI beam
st = -----------------------------------------
- = -----------------------------
- and k beam = ------------------
-
3EI beam 6EI beam l3
3
1 6EI beam
f = ------ -------------------------- (27)
2 m 3
effective l 3
k beam
= ------------ (28)
m eff
m eff
T = 2 -----------
- (29)
k beam
Dunkerley’s Method
Stanley Dunkerley - an engineer in mechanics during the late 19th Century, worked with vibrations and
whirling shafts. He discovered that the addition of the (reciprocal) angular velocities of individual
elements of a whirling shaft give the total (reciprocal) angular velocity of the shaft. Vibrating beams are
directly analogous to a whirling shaft, as both obey simple harmonic motion.
The reciprocal of the total oscillating frequency of the beam assembly (ftotal) is due to the sum of the
reciprocal oscillating frequencies of the beam (fbeam) and any masses (fmasses) that are clamped to it.
1 1 1 -
---------- = ----------
- + ------------- (30)
f total f beam f masses
Finding the natural frequency of a beam by itself is very difficult, as all the items attached would need to
be removed.
So, to find the natural frequency of just the beam, simply find its vibration frequency for a range of
additional masses and extrapolate the results down to zero mass. The intercept on a 1/f axis for zero
mass would produce 1/f of the beam itself. However the frequency and mass relationship is not linear,
so to make it linear for an easier prediction, 1/f 2 must be plotted against mass. See Figure 28. Then
simply find the square root of 1/(1/f2).
Equation 31 gives the theoretical frequency for just the beam itself.
EI beam
f beam = --- ---------------------------- (31)
2 m 3
beam 2l 3
EI beam
f = 0.5554 -------------------
-3 (32)
m beam l 3
All other equations and methods are the same as for the beam and spring,
but may need changes in notation for the different systems.
m eff ··
y + cy· + k eff = 0
Where:
17
m eff = m mass + ------ m beam + m damper
35
··
y + 2y· + y = 0
2
This time
c
= -----------
-
2m eff
– t
y = Ae cos d t – d
Again, the correlated equations mean that the relationships remain as with the rigid beam.
The theory remains the same for underdamped, critically damped and overdamped.
··
y + 2y· + y = q sin t
2
Where
Q
q = --------
-
m eff
This becomes
q Q
y = ------2 sin t – = ------- sin t – (33)
k eff
All other equations remain the same as for the beam and spring.
The vibration absorber works exactly as its name suggests. It absorbs the energy of the oscillations in
the simply supported beam assembly. In doing this, its own flexible beam vibrates and dissipates or
neutralizes the energy from the main beam, mainly to air movement (friction). It can be considered as an
auxiliary oscillating system.
Made of a centrally clamped flexible beam, the absorber has two opposing and symmetrical cantilevers
(for balance), each with a mass attached. The position of the masses may be adjusted to ‘tune’ the
absorber until it absorbs or cancels the vibrations in the main assembly.
Both the rigid beam and spring and simply supported beam are examples of ‘one degree of freedom’ (1
DOF) systems. They have one natural frequency. The addition of the vibration absorber to the simply
supported beam creates a system of two degrees of freedom (2 DOF). These systems have two natural
frequencies. They obey an amplitude and frequency relationship as shown in Figure 32. At some point
of ‘antiresonance’ between the two frequencies, the amplitude of the simply supported beam reduces to
zero. At this point, the vibration absorber will still vibrate, but at a lower value than at either of the two
natural frequencies.
If the masses on the vibration absorber are not at equal distances, then this
can create a 3DOF system.
Figure 33 shows a simplified sketch of the vibration absorber on the main beam assembly. It can be
broken into two parts, giving two equations of motion.
m 1 ··
y 1 + k beam + 2k absorber y 1 – 2k absorber y 2 = Q sin t (34)
2m 2 ··
y 2 – 2k absorber y 1 + 2k absorber y 2 = 0 (35)
Using the same methods as shown earlier in the theory, and using solutions:
y 1 = A sin t and ·· 2
y 1 = A sin t
y 2 = B sin t and ·· 2
y 1 = B sin t
2
k beam + 2k absorber – m 1 A – 2k 2 B sin t = Q sin t
2
– 2 k absorber A + 2k absorber – 2m 2 B sin t = 0
2
k beam + 2k absorber – m 1 – 2k absorber A sin t = Q sin t
– 2k absorber 2k absorber – 2m 2
2 B sin t 0
CY = F
Natural frequencies are determined with external forces set to zero. From this, the determinate of the
coefficient matrix (C) must be zero.
2
k beam + 2k absorber – m 1 – 2k absorber
= 0
2
– 2k absorber 2k absorber – 2m 2
4 2
2m 1 m 2 – 2m 1 k absorber + 2m 2 Ck beam + 2k absorber + 2k beam k absorber = 0
2
2– b b – 4ac
= -------------------------------------- (36)
2a
Where:
a = 2m 1 m 2 (37)
The purpose of the vibration absorber is to reduce the amplitude of the main beam (A) to zero.
CY = F
–1 adj C
Y = C F = ----------------- F
det C
2
A sin t = --1- 2k 2 – 2m 2 2k 2 Q sin t
B sin t 2 0
2k 2 k 1 + 2k 2 – m 1
1 2
A = --- 2k 2 – 2m 2 Q + 2k 2 0
1 2
B = --- 2k 2 Q + k 1 + 2k 2 – m 1 0
The undamped vibration absorber is a special case where its job is to reduce amplitude A to zero. If the
value of A is set to zero, then the frequency for the vibration absorber can be found.
1 2
0 = --- 2k 2 – 2m 2 Q
2 k
2k 2 = 2m 2 and = -----2-
m2
We can also calculate the expected amplitude of the vibration absorber (B).
1
B = --- 2k 2 Q
2 2 2
= 2k 2 – 2m 2 k 1 + 2k 2 – m 1 – 4k 2
2 k
and = -----2-
m2
2m 2 k 2 m 1 k 2
= 2k 2 – --------------
2
- k 1 + 2k 2 – ----------- – 4k 2
m2 m2
2
= 4k 2
2k Q-
B = – ---------2-2 Q = – -------
4k 2 2k 2
This shows that as the amplitude of the vibration absorber is 180° out of phase compared with the main
beam. It creates an opposing force equal and opposite to the excitation force, cancelling it out and
reducing the amplitude to zero.
3EI absorber
k 2 = -------------------------
3
- (40)
l absorber
Where the E and I values are for the material and beams of the vibration absorber.
In a similar manner to the theory for the main beam, according to Rayleighs formula, the total value of
the mass (m2) on each cantilever of the vibration absorber is the sum of the applied mass and a portion
of the vibration absorber beam mass, so that:
33
m 2 = m mass + --------- m absorberbeam
140
and
17
m 1 = m exciter + ------ m beam + m absorber
35
It is only necessary to calculate values for one side of the absorber, as the
other half is identical and is only for balance. However, the total weight of the
absorber must be allowed for when calculating the complete beam assembly
equations.
The vibration absorber only works for the simply supported beam.
1 3EI absorber
f = ------ --------------------------
-3
2 m l
2 absorber
rearranging this to find the position for the masses on the beam gives:
1
---
3EI absorber m 2 3
l absorber = ------------------------------------
2f
2
Experiments
Safe Use
lspring = 750 mm
lexciter = 400 mm
lbeam = 815 mm
l3 = 375 mm l3 = 375 mm
lexciter = 400 mm
lbeam = 800 mm
Figure 37 Make sure the Beam Holder sits Centrally, then Tighten the Fixing
Adding Masses
Fibre Washer
To add mass to the exciter, simply screw the Mass and Holder to the hole underneath the exciter.
Remember to fit the Fibre Washer.
200 mm
Figure 40 Dashpot Damper Position for Rigid Beam and Spring Experiment
*
Fill with
fluid to here
Fibre Washer
Figure 41 Fitting Dashpot Damper for Rigid Beam and Spring Experiments
*Take care not to grip or damage the cables when fitting the clamp to the
beam.
400 mm
Fibre Washer
Fully Open
Half Open
Fully Shut
The Dashpot Damper Disc has two sets of holes. As its metal shaft is turned, the two sets of holes move
relative to each other. This is done to adjust the damping. When the holes are aligned, they are fully open
and the damper produces minimum damping, as the fluid can easily pass through the holes. When the
holes are fully shut it produces maximum damping. When the holes are half open, it produces a medium
amount of damping.
Useful Notes
Use both analogue channels with this equipment. Channel 1 is the displacement. Channel 2 is the
accelerometer.
The VDAS® chart area is in two styles, based on the experiment mode:
Free vibration experiments use the ‘Timebase’ trigger. The trace window shows amplitude against a
timebase. The vertical lines indicate a time determined by the timebase. If the X and Y cursors are
moved to measure differences, Y and X will show amplitude and time.
Forced vibration experiments use the ‘Digital Encoder’ trigger from the encoder of the exciter. The trace
window shows amplitude against a complete rotation of the exciter, broken into 360 divisions of data, so
each division is 1 degree. The vertical lines indicate 45 degree divisions. If the mouse cursor is
positioned at 90 degrees, the X cursor value will show 90. If the X and Y cursors are moved to measure
differences, Y and X will show amplitude and degrees.
When recording chart data, record the normal VDAS® data field values plus 360 or 1250 data values.
The VDAS® data table can produce plots of each trace ready for print, with the horizontal axis converted
into degrees or time.
Setting Zero
Before each test, use the non-magnetic spirit level to check that the frame is level, then for the rigid beam
and spring, check that the beam is level.
Now use the SET ZERO controls to set the zero (equilibrium value) for the acceleration and
displacement sensors. Both lights above the controls will go out when zero has been set. It may also be
necessary to make some more small adjustments to set the trace in VDAS® to the centre of the chart.
The simply supported beam cannot be adjusted to make it level, just use the
SET ZERO control.
Use the spring adjuster and locking handle to adjust the beam level for the
rigid beam and spring.
To do this:
1. Use the non-magnetic spirit level (supplied) to check that the equipment and the beam is level. See
Figure 47.
2. Remove the protective ring from around the sensor. See Figure 48.
3. Adjust the Sensor so that it is possible to just slide the sensor zero block into position as shown in
Figure 49. It should just slide into position, without lifting the beam.
To use the rigid beam and spring as an introduction to help show how the equipment works.
This experiment will work for either setup, but uses the rigid beam and spring
because it has a simpler arrangement.
Channel 1 Channel 2
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Acceleration
1. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Beam and Spring on page 45.
3. Set the zero for the displacement and acceleration sensors. It may be necessary to make some
small adjustment to the SET ZERO controls so the VDAS® trace is at the centre of the chart.
4. Start VDAS® and press down the beam a few millimetres, then release start the displacement
oscillations (see Figure 51). The oscillations will slowly reduce after a few seconds. Check that it is
possible to see them on the computer screen. They should be similar to Figure 52.
150 ms = 6.67 Hz
If necessary, press down and release the beam again, then stop VDAS® to freeze the oscillation on the
screen. Use the cursor tools in VDAS® to measure the distance between oscillations as shown in Figure
52. This gives the measured natural frequency of the rigid beam with spring.
Channel 1
1st
Channel 1 Derivative Channel 2
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase (velocity) Acceleration
Displacement
Velocity
2. Start VDAS® and press down the beam to start the oscillations. Adjust the filter of the derivative to
produce a smoothed sinusoidal trace without reducing its amplitude too much. The traces should be
similar to Figure 53, showing that the velocity is 90 degrees out of phase from displacement. The
relative amplitudes are not important and will not be equal.
Channel 1
1st Channel 1 2nd
Channel 1 Derivative Derivative Channel 2
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase (velocity) (acceleration) Acceleration
2. Start VDAS® and press down the beam to start the oscillations. Adjust the filter of each derivative
to produce smoothed sinusoidal traces without reducing their amplitude too much.They should be
similar to Figure 54, showing that the derived velocity is 90 degrees out of phase from displacement
and derived acceleration is 180 degrees out of phase from displacement. The relative amplitudes
are not important and will not be equal.
Displacement
Acceleration
Velocity
Figure 54 Typical Displacement with First Derivative (velocity) and Second Derivative Curves
Channel 1 Channel 1
1st 2nd
Channel 1 Derivative Derivative Channel 2
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase (velocity) (acceleration) Acceleration
2. Start VDAS® and press down the beam to start the oscillations. Adjust the filter of the derivative to
produce a smoothed sinusoidal trace without reducing its amplitude too much. The traces should be
similar to Figure 53, showing that the derived acceleration from channel 1 is similar to the real
acceleration from channel 2. The relative amplitudes and phase should be similar, confirming that
the software derived version can be trusted.
Channel 2 Acceleration
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase
Rigid Forced 5 mm -
Vibration
90°
Maximum
Amplitude
~ 20 mm
2. Start VDAS® and press the exciter motor START button. Adjust the exciter motor speed to the same
value as the natural frequency of the beam that was found earlier. Slowly adjust it up or down by a
until the displacement reaches maximum amplitude. Wait a few seconds for the oscillations to
stabilize. The oscillations should look like Figure 56. Use the cursors in VDAS® to measure the
amplitude and the angle from the start of the trace to the peak of the maximum amplitude. It should
show a phase lag of around 90 degrees from the start of the chart - triggered when the exciter mass
is at its top position. The value of the amplitude will be around 20 mm.
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase
1. Set VDAS® as shown in Table 9. Enter the natural frequency found earlier.
2. Start VDAS® and press down the beam to start the oscillations, which should be similar to Figure
57. Allow VDAS® to record at least six seconds of oscillations (just over one full screen), then stop
VDAS®. Use the horizontal scroll bar on the chart to show only the cleanest section of the waveform
(as in Figure 58).
3. It should be seen that the oscillations are underdamped. Use the channel 1 tools to choose the
underdamped model, and fit the data. VDAS® will update its damping parameter data fields
including the damping ratio. It should produce a model with the lines fitting the waveform as shown
in Figure 58. The damping model should give a value in VDAS® of around = 0.002. This should
be a very low number, proving an underdamped response.
To show how added mass affects the natural frequency of the Rigid Beam and Spring.
Procedure
Natural Frequency f
Total Exciter Imass IA (Hz)
Added Mass Mass
(kg) (kg) (kg.m2) (kg.m2) Measured Theoretical
0 4.2
Mass Holder
4.4
= 0.2 kg
400 g + 0.2 kg
4.8
= 0.6 kg
800 g + 0.2 kg
5.2
= 1.0 kg
1200 g + 0.2
kg 5.6
= 1.4 kg
1600 g + 0.2
kg 6.0
= 1.8 kg
2000 g + 0.2
kg 6.4
= 2.2 kg
1. Create a Blank results table similar to Table 10. Alternatively, VDAS® automatically creates its own
data table as data is recorded.
2. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Beam and Spring on page 45.
3. With no additional mass, find the measured natural frequency as shown in Experiment 1.
4. Add the mass holder with no masses. If necessary, readjust the spring to bring the beam back to a
level position and readjust the SET ZERO control.
5. In VDAS®, enter the mass holder value into the Added Mass field.
7. Add the 5 x 400 g masses in steps. Remember to update the Added Mass field in VDAS®. At each
step, readjust the level of the beam and find the measured natural frequency.
Results Analysis
Find the total mass using the added mass and the mass of the exciter, use this with the other values to
find the total moment of inertia of the system for each added mass.
Calculate the theoretical natural frequency of the rigid beam and spring for each additional mass.
Create a chart of frequency (vertical axis) against added mass. Add the measured and theoretical results
to compare them. Can any errors be explained?
To show the relationship between oscillation amplitude, phase lag, magnification factor and speed ratio.
To understand how damping affects the oscillations in a beam and spring assembly.
Procedure
Natural Magnification
Damping Frequency Damping Ratio factor
Condition (Hz) z b
Undamped
Fully Open
Half open
Fully Shut
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Damper
1. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Beam and Spring on page 45.
2. Fit the damper as described in Fitting the Dashpot Damper on page 51. However, do not add fluid
yet, so that there is the additional mass of the damper piston, but no damping.
3. If necessary, readjust the spring to bring the beam back to a level position and readjust the SET
ZERO control.
4. Find the measured natural frequency (free vibration) as shown in Experiment 1 and enter into
VDAS®.
6. Change VDAS® to FORCED VIBRATIONS and make sure it has the measured natural frequency,
so it can calculate the speed ratio.
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Damper
8. As shown in Figure 59, adjust the speed slowly in steps of 0.25 Hz from a speed ratio of 0.75. As
the natural frequency is approached (speed ratio of 1.0), adjust the speed in 0.1 Hz steps. This will
produce better results. At each step, wait for up to a minute for the oscillations to stabilize then use
VDAS® to measure and record the displacement amplitude, phase lag and all other values.
9. Now add fluid to the Dashpot Damper as shown and adjust the piston disc to fully open for the lowest
damping coefficient and repeat the test.
10. Repeat the test for piston disc settings of half open and fully shut. In VDAS®, start a new data series
between each level of damping coefficient used.
Results Analysis
Compare the natural frequency and damping ratio for all four conditions.
Calculate the magnification factor for a speed ratio of 1.0 for all four sets of results to compare.
Produce charts of Amplitude and Phase Lag (vertical axis) against speed ratio.
Do the results compare well with those shown in the theory? Can any differences be explained?
To show how added mass affects the natural frequency of the Simply Supported Beam.
Procedure
Channel 1 Channel 2
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Acceleration
Natural Frequency f
Total Exciter Effective (Hz)
Added Mass Mass Mass
(kg) (kg) (kg) Measured Theoretical 1/f 2
0 4.2
Mass Holder
4.4
= 0.2 kg
400 g + 0.2 kg
4.8
= 0.6 kg
800 g + 0.2 kg
5.2
= 1.0 kg
1200 g + 0.2
kg 5.6
= 1.4 kg
1600 g + 0.2
kg 6.0
= 1.8 kg
2000 g + 0.2
kg 6.4
= 2.2 kg
1. Create a Blank results table similar to Table 15. Alternatively, VDAS® automatically creates its own
data table as data is recorded.
2. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Simply Supported Beam on page 46.
4. Add the mass holder with no masses. If necessary, readjust the SET ZERO control. In VDAS®, enter
the mass holder value into the Added Mass field.
6. Add the 5 x 400 g masses in steps. Remember to update the Added Mass field in VDAS®. At each
step, readjust the SET ZERO and find the natural frequency.
Results Analysis
Use Rayleighs theory to calculate the effective mass and then find the theoretical oscillation frequency.
Compare with the measured value from experiment.
As shown in the Dunkerley’s theory, plot a chart of 1/f 2 (measured natural frequency) as a vertical axis
against total mass. Extend the line of the chart to cut the vertical axis and find the theoretical frequency
for just the beam.
Compare that with the value from the theory. Remember that the frequency of two cantilevers is being
found (375 mm) and not the entire beam.
To show the relationship between oscillation amplitude, phase lag, magnification factor and speed ratio.
To understand how damping affects the oscillations in a simply supported beam assembly.
Procedure
Natural Magnification
Damping Frequency Damping Ratio factor
Condition (Hz) z b
Undamped
Fully Open
Half open
Fully Shut
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Damper
1. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Simply Supported Beam on page 46.
2. Fit the damper as described in Fitting the Dashpot Damper on page 51. However, do not add fluid
yet, so that there is the additional mass of the damper piston, but no damping.
4. Find the measured natural frequency (free vibration) as shown in Experiment 1 and enter into
VDAS®.
6. Change VDAS® to FORCED VIBRATIONS and make sure it has the measured natural frequency,
so it can calculate the speed ratio.
Channel 1
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Damper
8. As shown in Figure 59, adjust the speed slowly in steps of 0.25 Hz from a speed ratio of 0.85. As
the natural frequency is approached (speed ratio of 1.0), adjust the speed in 0.1 Hz steps. This will
produce better results. At each step, wait for up to a minute for the oscillations to stabilize then use
VDAS® to measure and record the displacement amplitude, phase lag and all other values.
9. Now add fluid to the Dashpot Damper as shown and adjust the piston disc to fully open for the lowest
damping coefficient and repeat the test.
10. Repeat the test for piston disc settings of half open and fully shut.
Results Analysis
Compare the natural frequency and damping ratio for all four conditions.
Calculate the magnification factor for a speed ratio of 1.0 for all four sets of results to compare.
Produce charts of Amplitude and Phase Lag (vertical axis) against speed ratio.
Do the results compare well with those shown in the theory? Can any differences be explained?
To show how an auxiliary oscillating system can help to absorb the vibrations of the main assembly (a
simply supported beam).
To show the three key frequencies of the two degree of freedom (2DOF) system - antiresonance and
upper and lower system natural frequencies.
Procedure 1 - Antiresonance
Channel 1 Vibration
Beam Mode Displacement Timebase Absorber
Vibration
Absorber
Mass centre
Position Frequency Amplitude
(mm) (Hz) (mm)
7 mm (innermost) Natural =
Antiresonance =
First =
Second =
1. Set the beam as shown in Setting as a Simply Supported Beam on page 46.
2. Fit the vibration absorber as shown in Fitting the Vibration Absorber on page 54.
3. Set the masses of the vibration absorber to their innermost position (see Figure 62), so they form a
basic load, but cannot vibrate. Each mass is 14 mm thick, so their mass centre is at 7 mm.
4. Using forced vibration, slowly increase the speed to find the natural frequency of the system with
the added mass of the vibration absorber. If necessary, readjust the SET ZERO control.
6. Calculate the theoretical position of the masses to cancel the natural frequency of the system.
Remember that the theory calculates distance to the centre of the mass.
8. Using forced vibration, slowly adjust the speed again until the natural frequency is reached. Note
that the main beam oscillation amplitude is near zero. The system is now at antiresonance. Look at
the vibration absorber to see the amplitude of its oscillations (they cannot be measured).
9. Slowly adjust the speed up and down from antiresonance to see the two new system frequencies
where both the main beam and vibration absorber oscillate at relatively high amplitudes. Make a
note of these two frequencies and their amplitudes
1. With the masses set at the distance for antiresonance, adjust the exciter speed slowly in steps of
around 0.2 Hz from around 12 Hz to the maximum speed that the exciter can deliver. At each step,
record the frequency and amplitude of oscillation.
2. Plot a chart of the oscillation amplitude against frequency to compare with the 2DOF chart in the
theory.
Advanced Analysis
If comfortable with the theory, try to use the quadratic equation (36) to calculate the two new system
frequencies and compare with those found by experiment.
Typical Results
Note: These results are typical only. Actual results may differ slightly.
Natural Frequency f
Total Exciter Imass IA (Hz)
Added Mass Mass
(kg) (kg) (kg.m2) (kg.m2) Measured Theoretical
Mass Holder
4.4 0.704 1.193 6.46 6.74
= 0.2 kg
400 g + 0.2 kg
4.8 0.768 1.257 6.23 6.56
= 0.6 kg
800 g + 0.2 kg
5.2 0.832 1.321 6.10 6.39
= 1.0 kg
1200 g + 0.2
kg 5.6 0.896 1.385 5.92 6.25
= 1.4 kg
1600 g + 0.2
kg 6.0 0.96 1.449 5.77 6.11
= 1.8 kg
2000 g + 0.2
kg 6.4 1.024 1.513 5.59 5.98
= 2.2 kg
Typical calculation
Note that some values may have been rounded up compared to the typical results.
5
Frequency
4
(Hz)
Measured
3
Theory
2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Added Mass (kg)
The theoretical values should be similar to the measured values (within roughly 10%). The main causes
of error are the accuracy of the spring rate (normally +/- 10% as suggested by manufacturers) and the
assumption of a sensibly rigid beam.
18.00
16.00
14.00
Undamped
12.00 Fully Open
Half Open
10.00
Amplitude Fully Shut
(mm)
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0.750 0.850 0.950 1.050 1.150 1.250 1.350
Speed Ratio
The results should confirm the theory with reasonable accuracy. Expect low damping ratios for the
equipment, as all conditions give an underdamped response using the fluid supplied. This means that
the damping should not affect the natural frequency.
A large reduction in amplitude should be seen and therefore magnification factor between undamped
and the three other conditions.
Finally, the phase lag results should be seen to be becoming more curved as the damping levels are
increased. The undamped phase lag is similar to that of the ideal system with no damping, with friction
due to air movement being the most likely cause of any difference.
180
160
140
Undamped
120
Fully Open
100
Half Open
Phase Lag
(degrees)
80 Fully Shut
60
40
20
0
0.750 0.850 0.950 1.050 1.150 1.250 1.350
Speed Ratio
Natural Magnification
Damping Frequency Damping Ratio factor
Condition (Hz) z b
1
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
2 2 2 2
1 – + 2
At resonance / = 1, so
1
= --------------------
2
21
1
= -------------------------
- = 250
0.000016
1
= -------------------------- = 62.5
0.000256
1
= -------------------------
- = 27.8
0.001296
1
= -------------------------
- = 11.36
0.007744
Natural Frequency f
Total Exciter Effective (Hz)
Added Mass Mass Mass
(kg) (kg) (kg) Measured Theoretical 1/f 2
Mass Holder
4.4 5.20 15.28 15.2 0.004283
= 0.2 kg
400 g + 0.2 kg
4.8 5.60 14.57 14.64 0.004711
= 0.6 kg
800 g + 0.2 kg
5.2 6.00 14.11 14.15 0.005023
= 1.0 kg
1200 g + 0.2
kg 5.6 6.40 13.68 13.7 0.005344
= 1.4 kg
1600 g + 0.2
kg 6.0 6.80 13.35 13.29 0.005611
= 1.8 kg
2000 g + 0.2
kg 6.4 7.20 12.86 12.91 0.006047
= 2.2 kg
18
16
14
12
Frequency 10
(Hz) 8 Measured
6 Theory
4
2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Added Mass (kg)
0.007
0.006
y = 0.000856x + 0.000543
0.005
0.004
1/f2
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
0 2 4 6 8
Total Mass (kg)
The chart shows an intercept of 0.000543, so from Dunkerley’s theory, the frequency of the beam without
additional mass is 1/0.0005430.5 = 42.9 Hz.
EI beam
f beam = --- ----------------------------
2 m 3
beam 2l 3
Giving an error of less than 11%, which is acceptable when considering the inaccuracy of extending the
chart to the vertical axis and the approximation of stiffness of the beam and effective central mass.
5.00
Undamped
4.00 Fully Open
Half Open
Fully Shut
Amplitude
3.00
(mm)
2.00
1.00
0.00
0.850 0.950 1.050 1.150
Speed Ratio
The results should confirm the theory with reasonable accuracy. Expect low damping ratios for the
equipment, as all conditions give an underdamped response using the fluid supplied. This means that
the damping should not affect the natural frequency.
Note the lower magnitude (amplitude) of the oscillations compared to the rigid beam. Also note that the
damping ratios for this experiment are higher than for the rigid beam and spring, mainly due to the
different system, but also due to the position of the dashpot damper.
A large reduction in amplitude and therefore magnification factor between undamped and the three other
conditions should be seen.
Finally, the phase lag results should be seen to be becoming more curved as the damping levels are
increased. The undamped phase lag is similar to that of the ideal system with no damping, with friction
due to air movement being the most likely cause of any difference.
180
160
140
120
Phase Lag
100
(degrees)
Undamped
80
Fully Open
60 Half Open
Fully Shut
40
20
0
0.850 0.950 1.050 1.150
Speed Ratio
Natural Magnification
Damping Frequency Damping Ratio factor
Condition (Hz) z b
1
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
2 2 2 2
1 – + 2
At resonance / = 1, so
1
= --------------------
2
21
1
= -------------------
- = 100
0.0001
1
= -------------------------
- = 31.25
0.001024
1
= -------------------------
- = 17.24
0.003364
1
= ----------------------
- = 5.8
0.02958
Vibration
Absorber
Mass centre
Position Frequency Amplitude
(mm) (Hz) (mm)
1
---
3EI absorber m 2 3
l absorber = ------------------------------------
2f
2
33
m 2 = m mass + --------- m absorberbeam = 125 + {(33/140) x 74.4)} = 142.5 g (0.1425 kg)
140
1 1
--- ---
3 1.125 0.1425 3 23.68 3
l absorber = ------------------------------------------
- = ---------------- = 0.141 m (141 mm)
91.73
2 8414.4
3.5
2.5
2
Amplitude
(mm)
1.5
0.5
0
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Frequency (Hz)
Advanced Analysis
m2 = 0.142 kg
a = 2m 1 m 2
= - (12883.2 + 14143.2)
= - 27026.4
c = 2k beam k absorber
= 1.14 x 108
2
2 – b + b – 4ac
For the new higher system frequency = -------------------------------------- = 103.97 rad.s-1
2a
f = 103.97/2 = 16.55 Hz
2
2 – b – b – 4ac
For the lower system frequency = -------------------------------------- = 82.78 rad.s-1
2a
f = 82.78/2 = 13.18 Hz
With the vibration absorber mass at their innermost position, the vibration absorber is simply an extra
mass, as its beam are relatively light. The main beam oscillation at the natural frequency reaches over
5 mm.
With the masses of the vibration absorber at the calculated position, the main oscillation reduces to
almost zero at the same frequency. The beams are now at antiresonance. The vibration absorber
oscillates with an amplitude of around 5 mm at its tips, but this can be subjective as the equipment does
not measure the value.
The chart of amplitude against frequency shows a similar trend to the 2DOF chart in the theory, with two
new natural frequencies for the system. Note that neither of the two new frequencies reach the same
amplitude as the initial value with the vibration absorber masses set innermost.
The quadratic equation from the theory should predict the two new system frequencies with reasonable
accuracy, allowing for tolerances in materials and masses.
Useful Textbooks
Vibration Problems in Engineering
Published by Wiley
W Weaver
S P Timoshenko
D H Young
Published by Heinemann
Maintenance
General
Regularly check all parts of the equipment for damage, renew if necessary.
When not in use, store the equipment in a dry dust-free area, preferably covered with a plastic sheet.
If the equipment becomes dirty, wipe the surfaces with a damp, clean cloth. Do not use abrasive
cleaners.
Regularly check all fixings and fastenings for tightness; adjust where necessary.
Guard
The belt of the exciter has a guard (see Figure 71). Regularly check that the guard is secure. Tighten its
fixings if necessary.
TecQuipment calibrate the non-contacting displacement sensor. It should not need adjustment when the
equipment is supplied as new. However, variances in the strength of the magnet under the beam and
the local magnetic field may cause the sensor to become less accurate over time.
The sensor has good a resolution and dynamic response, with an overall accuracy of better than 5% of
the reading. If it is suspected that the readings are not within this accuracy, then check the sensor
calibration. To do this:
1. Set the the beam as a simply supported beam (see Setting as a Simply Supported Beam on
page 46).
2. Set the sensor distance as shown in Setting Sensor Distance on page 56.
Do this carefully. Any forced deflection of the beam or sensor holder will give
inaccurate readings!
4. Now carefully lower the sensor down its mounting by around 20 to 30 mm.
5. Exchange the zero block for the longer span calibration block and repeat the procedure. This time
do not zero the reading, simply remove the block and note the displacement value from the VDAS®
software. This value should be 13 mm ±0.5 mm (as this block is 13 mm longer than the zero block).
Electrical
• Assume the apparatus is energised until it is known to be isolated from the electrical supply.
• Use insulated tools where there are possible electrical hazards.
• Confirm that the apparatus earth circuit is complete.
• Identify the cause of a blown fuse before renewing.
Fuse Location
The main fuse is on the side of the unit at the IEC inlet. Use a flat-blade screwdriver to remove the
fuseholder(s).
Spare Parts
Check the Packing Contents List to see what spare parts we send with the apparatus.
If technical help or spares are needed, please contact the local TecQuipment Agent, or contact
TecQuipment direct.
• Contact Name
• The full name and address of the college, company or institution
• Contact email address
• The TecQuipment product name and product reference
• The TecQuipment part number (if known)
• The serial number
• The year it was bought (if known)
Please give us as much detail as possible about the parts needed and check the details carefully before
contacting us.
If the product is out of warranty, TecQuipment will advise know the price of the spare parts for
confirmation.
Customer Care
We hope our products and manuals are liked. If there are any questions, please contact our Customer
Care department:
email: customer.care@tecquipment.com
www.tecquipment.com