DBB 307 TEXTUAL STUDIES IN A FOREIGN

LANGUAGE
1
2
Cohesion and coherence

 A sequence of sentences is a “text” when there is some kind of

dependence between the sentences. The task of textual analysis is
to identify the features that cause this dependence.

 These features have been classified in terms of COHESION and

COHERENCE
3 What is cohesion?
 Cohesion is the network of lexical, grammatical and other
relations which provide links between various parts of a text.
 „…the use of explicit linguistic devices to signal relations
between sentences and parts of texts."
 «The grammatical and lexical relationship between different
elements of a text which hold it together.»
 Cohesion is a surface relation; it connects together the actual
words and expressions that we can see or hear.
 Cohesion occurs where the interpretation of some element in
the discourse is dependent on that of another.
 There are two kinds of cohesion. First is grammatical cohesion
and second is lexical cohesion.
 Cohesion is…

• a formal feature of texts

• the glue that holds a piece of writing together
• fairly objectively verifiable
• achieved through cohesive devices
Coherence

Coherence is a semantic property of discourse formed through the

interpretation of each individual sentence relative to the
interpretation of other sentences, with "interpretation" implying
interaction between the text and the reader.
Coherence…

…is the extent to which the reader (or listener) is able to infer the
writer’s (or speaker’s) communicative intentions

…shows how meanings and sequences of ideas relate to each

other, e.g.

• allows the reader to make sense of the text

• refers to the semantic unity created between the ideas,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of a piece of writing.
 cohesion = connectivity of the surface
 coherence = connectivity of underlying contents
Coherence vs. Cohesion

Coherence: Cohesion:
 very general principle of  formal linguistic features
interpretation of language e.g repetition,reference
in context
 semantic relationships
 fewer formal linguistic between sentences and
features within sentences
e.g vocabulary choice  determined by lexically
 relationships deal with and grammatically overt
text as a whole intersentential
 based on primarily relationships
semantic relationships
 errors much more  more recognizable
obvious
 Halliday & Hasan (1976) identify five main
cohesive devices in English that signal
coherence in texts:
 Reference
 Ellipsis
Grammatical Cohesion
 Substitution
 Conjunction
 Lexical Cohesion
GRAMMATICAL COHESION

 Grammatical Cohesive devices help text hang together or be

cohesive, that means they contribute to what Hasan terms of a
text’s unity of texture.
 According to Halliday and Hasan (1976) there are four types of
grammatical cohesive devices. Those are reference, ellipsis,
substitution, conjunction.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
 Reference :
Two linguistic elements are related in what they refer to

Three types of reference:

 Personal
 Demonstrative
 Comparative
 Personal (communication goal of referent)

Demonstrative (proximity of referent)

REFERENCE

Comparative ( similarity to preceding referent)

Types of reference:
Personal Reference
 a reference by means of person includes;
Personal pronouns
Possessive pronouns
Possessive determiners

e.g. They told me you had gone by her car

14
 The following example, from Agatha Christie’s Triangle at Rhodes, illustrates
networks of personal reference in a short paragraph:
 Demonstrative Reference

 essentially a form of verbal pointing

 the speaker identifies the referent by locating it on a scale of
proximity.
 In general,
 this, these and here imply proximity to the speaker;
 that, those and there imply distance from the speaker.
Demonstrative Reference

 Like personals, the demonstratives regularly refer

exophorically to something within the context of
situation.

e.g. How do you like a cruise in that yacht?

Pick these up!
Comparative Reference

 contributes to textual cohesion by setting up a relation of

contrast
 expressed by such adjactives as same, identical, equal,
adjectives in a comparative degree such as bigger,faster
and adverbs such as identically, likewise, so, such etc.
e.g. She has a similarly furnished room to mine.
The little dog barked as noisily as the big one.
They asked me three equally difficult questions.
 Reference creates cohesion by creating links between elements.
Reference refers to system which introduces and track the identity of
participant through text (Gerot and Wignell, 1994: 170). As a general
rule, therefore, reference items may be anaphoric and cataphoric,
1.Anaphoric
2.Cataphoric
 Halliday and Hasan call within text cohesive ties endophoric,
and references, items outside the text exophoric :

REFERENCE

(Textual)
(Situational)
{
{EXO}{PHORA}
ENDO}{PHORA}
IN(SIDE)

OUT(SIDE)
{ANA}{PHORA} {CATA}{PHORA }
Halliday and Hasan call within text cohesive ties endophoric,

e.g. Wash and core six cooking apples. Put them into a fireproof dish.
 an example of an endophoric reference when them referred
back to apples.

 Them, therefore, signals to the reader that he or she needs to look

back in the text to find its meaning.
ANAPHORIC

 Anaphoric reference signifies a word or a phrase that refers to

another word or phrase used earlier in the text.
For example:
A: Can I have an egg and bacon burger?
B: Would you like cheese with that?
A: yes, …and…..a large fries please.
B: Would you like any drinks or a dessert with that?
A: No, thanks.
or
Stephen Downes denigrates restaurants and, in fact the very food
which he is, sadly, in the position of judging. He has a happy knack
of putting the reader completely off by his disgusting description.
22

 Mrs Thatcher has resigned. She announced her decision this morning.
 the pronoun she points to Mrs Thatcher within the textual world itself.
 Mrs Thatcher has resigned. This delighted her opponents.
 The reader has to go back to the previous stretch of discourse to establish
what This refers to.
CATAPHORIC

 Cataphoric reference describes the use of a word or phrase that

refers to another word or phrase which is used later in the text.
 For example:
When I told him, Bill didn’t really believe me.
Halliday and Hasan call references, items outside
the text exophoric :

e.g. For he's a good fellow

And so say all of us.
 As readers outside of this environment, we are unfamiliar
with who the he is that is being referred to,
 But, most likely, the people involved are aware of the
he.
 When the meaning is not explicit from the text itself, but
is obvious to those in a particular situation. This is called
exophoric reference.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive
Devices :
 Substitution :
Replacement of one linguistic item by another.

 somewhat different from reference in that another word

takes the place of the thing that is being discussed.

 Types of Substitution:
 Nominal
 Verbal
 Clausal
 Whereas reference is a relation between meanings, substitution is a
grammatical relationship :

Types of Cohesive Relation Linguistic Level

Reference Semantic

Substitution (including Ellipsis) Grammatical

 Types of Substitution
 Nominal Substitution:
 Nominal substitutes ;

e.g. There are some new tennis balls

These ones have lost their bounce.

Let's go and see the bears. The polar ones are over on that rock.

A: I’ll have two poached eggs on toast, please

B: I’ll have the same
In the text above the poached eggs on toast is substituted by same
  Verbal Substitution:

 The verbal substitute in English is do.

 Verbal substitutes ;
e.g. The words did not come to the same as they used to
do.
e.g. I finally called on him. I have wanted to do (so) for a
long time.
  Clausal Substitution:
 The clausal substitutes ;
 for positive : so
 for negative : not

e.g. A: Is it going to rain?

B: I don’t think so.
e.g. Is there going to be an earthquake?
It says so.
e.g. Has everyone gone home?
I hope not.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive
Devices :
 Ellipsis :
Deletion of words, expressions or phrases. Ellipsis involves the
omission of an item. In other words, in ellipsis, an item
is replaced by nothing.

 Types of Ellipsis:
 Nominal
 Verbal
 Clausal
Types of Ellipsis
Nominal Ellipsis :
 ellipsis within the nominal group.
e.g. Here are thirteen cards.
Take any (-).Now give me any three (-).
e.g. Some say one thing, others say another (-).
e.g. Which hat will you wear ?
This is the best (-).
e.g. Have another chocolate.
No thanks; that was my third (-).
e.g. Smith was the first person to leave. I was the
second (-).
 Verbal Ellipsis :

 ellipsis within the verbal group.

e.g. Have you been swimming? Yes, I have.

e.g. What have you been doing? Swimming.
e.g. Is he complaining? He may be; I don’t care.
e.g. I haven’t finished it yet. I hope you’re going to have by
tomorrow.
e.g. Some were laughing and others cyring.
e.g. Were you laughing? No I wasn’t.
e.g. John came, did not he? NO, but he will.
Clausal Ellipsis :

 Ellipsis in which an entire clause is elided from a

sentence.

e.g. Smith was going to take part but somebody

telephoned and asked to see him urgently so he had to
withdraw.- Who ?
e.g. Who could have broken those tiles?- I can’t think who.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive
Devices :
 Conjunctions :
a word or group of words used to connect words, phrases,
or clauses. Conjunction involves the use of formal markers
to relate sentences, clauses and paragraphs to each
other.
Four categories:
 Additive
 Adversative
 Causal
 Temporal
35
 The main relations are summarized below, with examples of
conjunctions which can or typically realize each relation.
 a. additive: and, or, or else, also, in addition, furthermore,
besides, similarly, likewise, by the way, that is, for instance;
b. adversative: but, yet, however, whereas, while, instead, on
the other hand, nevertheless, as a matter of fact;
c. causal: so, thus, hence, therefore, in that case,
consequently, it follows, for, because, under the
circumstances, accordingly, for this reason;
d. temporal: then, next, after that, on another occasion, in
conclusion, an hour later, finally, at last.
Types of Conjunction
Additive type
 The additive is a kind of conjunctive relation which is
closer to coordination.
 Additive words are such as and, or, or else, also,
furthermore, moreover, in addition, besides, by the way,
that is, likewise, similarly, for instance.
e.g. My client says he does not know his witness.
Furthermore, he denies ever having seen her.
e.g. Perhaps she missed her train. Or else she’s changed
her mind and isn’t coming.
e.g. Alice wrote the letters and Peter posted them.
 Types of Conjunction
Adversative type
 Adversative conjunctions express contrast between two
statements.
 Conjunctions of this type are such as but, yet, however,
instead, on the other hand, whereas, while, nevertheless,
although, as a matter of fact etc.
e.g. He is hardworking whereas his brother is quite the
reverse.
e.g. We bathed the dog, but we couldn’t get him clean.
Types of Conjunction
Causal type
 Causal relation involves primarily reason, result
and purpose relations between the sentences.
 Causal words are such as so, thus, hence,
therefore, arising out of this, in that case,
consequently, it follows, for, because, as a result
(of this), on this basis, accordingly.
e.g. You are not leaving, are you? Because I’ve
got something to say to you.
 Types of Conjunction
Temporal type
 The relation between two successive sentences.
 Conjunctions of this type are such as then, next,
afterward, previously, finally, at last, after that,
meanwhile, next day, first, from now on, to sum up, in
short, henceforward, hitherto, up to now, this time etc.
e.g. The weather cleared just as the party approached the
summit. Until then they had been nothing of the
panaroma around them.
e.g. At last, he finished the rehersal for his role.
 Categories of Conjunction
 Examples :

And in all this time, he met no one. ►Additive

Yet, he was hardly aware of being tired. ►Adversative
So by the night time, the valley was far below him.► Causal
Then, as dusk fell, he sat down to rest. ►Temporal
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive
Devices :
 Lexical Cohesion :
achieved by the selection of vocabulary.

 Types of Lexical Cohesion :

 Reiteration
 Collocation
LEXICAL COHESION

According to Paltridge (2000:134), lexical cohesion refers to

relationship among lexical items in – a text and, in particular, among
content words. Lexical cohesion refers to the role played by the
selection of vocabulary in
organizing relations within a text.
The main kinds of lexical cohesion are reiteration, synonymy,
antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, and collocation.
1. Reiteration refers to words that are repeated in the text.
2. Synonymy refers to the relationship between words that are
similar to meaning.
3. Antonymy refers to opposite meaning such as good and bad, happy
and sad.
LEXICAL COHESION

4. Hyponymy refers to classes of lexical items where the

relationship is one of 'general - specific' or ' a type of',
such as animal and a lion.
5. Meronymy refers to lexical items which are in a whole-
part relation.
6. Collocation describe associations between words that
tend to co-occur, such as, combinations of adjectives
and nouns, as in 'quality product', 'snide remarks' and '
discerning customers'.
Types of Lexical Cohesion
 Reiteration :
e.g. Pollution of our environment has occurred for
centuries, but it has become a significant health
problem only within the last century. Atmospheric
pollution contributes to respiratory disease, and to
lung cancer in particular. Other health problems
directly related to air pollutants include heart
disease, eye irritation and so on. Repetition
e.g. Henry’s has bought a new jaguar. He practically lives
in the car.  Superordinate/hyponym
e.g. I turned to the ascent of the peak.The climb is
perfectly is easy.  Synonym
e.g. There is a boy climbing that tree. The lad is going to fall
if he doesn’t take care.  Near-Synonym