[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views5 pages

Comparative Study of Light Weight Concrete

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

ISSN (Online) 2456-1290

International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)


Special Issue
National Conference on Advances in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (NCACME 17)

Comparative Study of Light Weight Concrete


[1]
Chinmay S.M, [2] Swati G.M.
[1]
UG student ,Department of Civil Engineering, Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar - 581345
[2]
UG student, Department of Civil Engineering, AGMR College of Engineering & Technology Varur – Hubli - 581207

Abstract:- light weight concrete as become more popular in recent years owing to the tremendous advantages over the conventional
concrete. The properties of light weight concrete can vary widely and it can be used in wide variety of applications. Light weight
blocks can be used as an alternative to the conventional cement blocks that uses aerating agents like aluminum powder. concrete
which is aerated using aerating or by using some expanding agents is known as light weight concrete, it is produced by initially
making a slurry of cement + fly ash + water, which is further mixed with addition of aerators in an ordinary concrete mixer under
ambient conditions. Application of light weight concrete is civil engineering works is broad as it can be used in almost every parts
of building from superstructure right down to the substructure, including wall panels and roofing. In highway construction light
weight concrete can be applied as a soil filling for sub base, bridge abutments and embankments. It is worth nothing that the use of
light weight concrete in other countries such as Europe, Japan, and united kingdom etc.

Keywords:-- Autoclaved aerated concrete blocks, Conventional concrete, Foaming Agent, Light weight concrete.

tests were conducted on the raw materials such as normal


I. INTRODUCTION consistency test, initial & final setting time, specific gravity
etc. and the results are as follows
Since concrete is the major building material, there is a
wide scope in innovation of concrete. Now a day‟s Light Table 1: Setting time of cement
weight concrete plays an important role in construction Initial setting time 50minutes
field. Light weight concrete can be defined as a type of Final setting time 5hours 40minutes
concrete which includes an expanding agent in it that
increases the volume of the mixture while reducing the dead Table 2: Normal consistency of cement
weight. As it is lighter than a conventional concrete i.e. Weight of
35percent lower than a conventional concrete. The % weight of Penetration in
Sl. no sample in
conventional concrete made with natural aggregate water mm
gm
originating from hard rock has high density and represents 1 300 27 18
large proportion of dead load on structure and high thermal 2 300 28 11
conductivity. The main specialties of light weight concrete 3 300 29 5
as its low density, low thermal conductivity, permits greater Percentage weight of water = 29%
design flexibility and substantional cost savings, reduced Calculation of mix design of M25 by referring IS
dead load, small size structural members, less reinforcing a) Grade designation : M25
steel and lower foundations costs. The types of light weight b) Type of cement : OPC43 grade
concrete are based on their curing methods such as foamed c) Nominal size of coarse aggregate : 6mm
concrete & Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) d) Specific gravity of cement : 3.12
e) Specific gravity of coarse aggregate : 2.7
II. METHODOLOGY f) Specific gravity of fine aggregate : 2.65
In order to study the behavior of Autoclaved g) Water absorption
Aerated concrete (AAC), conventional concrete testing was CA : 0.5%
done to determine the material and structural properties of FA : 1%
each type of light weight concrete and how will these 1) Target strength:
properties differ according to different type of mixture and f'ck = fck+1.65s = 31.6 N/mm².
its composition. Once concrete has hardened it can be For coarse aggregate 6mm of 208 liters
subjected to a wide range of tests to prove its ability to Aggregate = (208 + 6) / (100 x 208) = 220.48 liters
perform as planned or to discover its characteristics. Raw For 100mm slump
materials collected are cement, fine aggregate, coarse
aggregate, fly ash, and aluminum powder. Some physical

All Rights Reserved © 2017 IJERMCE


Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar
57
ISSN (Online) 2456-1290
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)
Special Issue
National Conference on Advances in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (NCACME 17)
2) Calculation of cement content building is of height 3m.above beam 5,1m parapet wall load
W/c = 0.5 Cement content = (220.48 / 0.5) is applied and fixed supports are used.
= 440.96 Kg/m³
440.96Kg/m³ > 240K/m³
Hence safe
3) From table, volume of CA corresponding to 6mm size
aggregate and fine aggregate
(Zone 1) 0.5 = 0.44 (From referring Zone III)
Volume of CA = 0.46
Volume of FA = 1 - 0.46 = 0.54

4) Mix calculation:
a) Volume of concrete = 1 m³

b) Volume of cement = (44 /3.12) x (1/1000)


= 0.014m³
c) Volume of water = (220/1) x (1/100) = 0.22 m³

d) Volume of all in aggregate = a- (b + c)


= 1 - (0.014 + 0.220)
= 0.766 m³
e) Mass of CA = (0.766 x 0.54 x 2.7 x 1000)
= 1116.82 Kg
f) Mass of FA = (0.766 x 0.54 x 2.65 x 1000)
= 1096.14 Kg

5) Mix proportioning:

Cement = 440 Kg/m3 Figure 3.1 shows the 2D single bay frame of 5 storey
building.
Water = 220 Kg/m3 After creating a 2Dframe of building, beam
(450x150mm) and column (300x150mm) sizes are assigned
FA = 1097 Kg/m3 to a frame, later a uniformly distributed load is defined for a
frame, for conventional blocks UDL of 8.04kN/m is
CA = 1117 Kg/m3 assigned and UDL (parapet wall of 1m height) of 2.68kN/m
is assigned., for AAC blocks UDL of 3.19kN/m is assigned
W/c ratio = 0.5 and UDL (Parapet wall of 1m height) of 1.06kN/m is
assigned.
6) Mix ratio = 1: 2.49: 2.54
Casting, Curing And Testing Of Test Cubes WALL LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR A FRAME:
Mixing the materials according to the mix design and
pouring into the mould size of 600x200x150mm.For For Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Blocks:
Density = 7.11 kN/m3
conventional concrete blocks, cubes are casted and cured for
Wall load = width of beam x height of the wall x density of
28days and tested its compressive Strength. For AAC
block = 0.15 x 3 x 7.11
blocks, the readymade blocks taken from Ultra-tech building
= 3.19 kN/m.
products company, and its compressive strength as been
Wall load for = width of beam x height of parapet wall x
tested for 28days.
density of block
Parapet wall
MODELLING IN SAP 2000
= 0.15 x 1 x 7.11
Using SAP 2000 software wall load analysis has been done
= 1.06 kN/m
in 2D frame model for both conventional and AAC blocks.
Taking single bay of 5m width of 5storey building each

All Rights Reserved © 2017 IJERMCE 59


Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar
ISSN (Online) 2456-1290
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)
Special Issue
National Conference on Advances in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (NCACME 17)
= 2.68 kN/m

Figure 3.2 Assigned wall loads for Autoclaved Aerated


Concrete (AAC) blocks

Figure 3.4 shows the assigned wall loads for Conventional


blocks

Figure 3.3 shows the bending moment diagram for wall


load analysis for autoclaved aerated blocks.
For Conventional Blocks:
Density = 17.87 kN/m3
Wall load = (width of beam x height of the wall x density of
block)
= 0.15 x 3 x 17.87
= 8.04 kN/m
Wall load = width of beam x height of parapet wall x
density of block parapet wall Figure 3.5 shows the bending moment diagram for wall
= 0.15 x 1 x 17.87 load analysis between conventional and AAC blocks

All Rights Reserved © 2017 IJERMCE 60


Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar
ISSN (Online) 2456-1290
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)
Special Issue
National Conference on Advances in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (NCACME 17)
III. RESULTS represents the comparison of compressive strength between
Comparative Study Of Density Between Autoclaved conventional and AAC blocks.
Aerated Concrete (Aac) Blocks And Conventional COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = LOAD/AREA (N/mm²)
Concrete
The density, or more precisely, the volumetric Table 4 Comparison of support reactions for wall load
mass density, of a substance is its mass per unit volume. The analysis between conventional and AAC blocks
study of density of lightweight concrete leads important role
in understanding the effect on strength, durability and
resistance to permeability. For the determination of density
of lightweight concrete, firstly weight the sample using
weighing scale. After that we get the average weight of at
least 3 samples. Finally find out the density using known
formula-Table 3 represents the comparison of density
between conventional and Autoclaved Aerated Concrete
blocks.
DENSITY = MASS/VOLUME (Kg/m³)

Table 3 comparison of midpoint moments for wall load


analysis between conventional and aac blocks. Applications Of Light Weight Concrete
Light weight concrete can be used as follows.
1. As load bearing masonry walls using light weight
concrete blocks.
2. Structurally aerated concrete is used mostly in the
form of precast members or autoclaved blocks. It
can also be used for floor construction in place of
hallow tile floor.
3. As precast floor and roof panels in all types of
building.
4. As partition walls in all types of building as
residential, industrial, and institutional building.

IV. CONCLUSION
Comparative Study Of Compressive Strength Between
Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (Aac) Blocks And The initial findings have shown that the lightweight
Conventional Block concrete has a desirable strength to be an alternative
construction material for the industrialized building
Compressive strength is the primary physical system. Lightweight concrete will be about 25 % lighter
property of concrete (others are generally derived from it). than conventional concretes. Aerated lightweight
Compressive strength is one of the most basic properties concrete is unlike conventional concrete in some mix
used for quality control for lightweight concrete. materials and properties. Aerated lightweight concrete
Compressive strength may be defined as the measured does not contain coarse aggregate, and it is possess
maximum resistance of a concrete specimen to axial many beneficial such as low density with higher
loading. It is originate by computing the uppermost strength compared with conventional concrete, reduced
compression stress that a test cylinder or cube will support. dead load in the could result several advantages in
There are three types of test that can be used to determine decrease structural elements and reduce the transferred
compressive strength; cube, cylinder, or prism test. The load to the foundations and bearing capacity. Foamed
„concrete cube test' is the most familiar test and is used as concrete is different in agent of forming air-voids as
the standard method of measuring compressive strength for compared with autoclaved aerated concrete. The air-
quality control purposes. The test voids in foamed concrete formed by foam agent, this
operation is physical processing. Against the air-voids
For determining the compressive strength is going in autoclaved aerated concrete formed by addition
to be done and is calculated by the formula-Table 4 that aluminum powder to the other materials and reaction

All Rights Reserved © 2017 IJERMCE 61


Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar
ISSN (Online) 2456-1290
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)
Special Issue
National Conference on Advances in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (NCACME 17)
between them, and this operation is chemical Research Volume 4, Issue 5, May-2013 ISSN 2229-
processing. The air-voids is homogenous distribution 5518.
within aerated lightweight concrete. Aerated [12] S. Somi, “Humidity intrusion effects on properties of
lightweight concrete is considering economy in autoclaved aerated concrete,” M.S. thesis, Eastern
materials and consumption of by-product and wastes Mediterranean University, North Cyprus, 2011.
materials such as fly ash.

REFERENCE

[1] Ali J Hamad (2014), Materials, Production, Properties


and application of aerated light weight concrete,
International journal of material science and
engineering volume 2, No 2 December 2014.
[2] Dhawal Desai, Development of light weight
concrete,www.engineeringcivcil.com
[3] E. R. Domingo, “An introduction to autoclaved aerated
concrete including design requirements using strength
design,” M.S. thesis, Kansas State University,
Manhattan, Kansas, 2008.
[4] F. Zulkarnain and M. Ramli, “Performance of foamed
concrete mix design with silica fume for general
housing construction,” European Journal of Technology
and Advanced Engineering Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.
18-28, 2011.
[5] Hemant K. Sarje, Amol S .Autade (2014), study of
performance of light weight concrete, International
journal of latest trends in engineering and technology,
volume 4, issue 4 November 2014.
[6] Handbook of aerated concrete products,Pan pacific
Engineering pty ltd. Website:http://www.litebuilt.com.
[7] Indu Susan Raj, Dr Elson John (2014), A study on the
properties of air entrained concrete for masonry blocks,
International of scientific research and technology,
volume No 3,01 November 2014,Issue No 11,pp -1367-
1370
[8] Lakshmi Kumar Minapu, M K M V Ratnam, Dr. U
Rangaraju (2014), study on light weight concrete
aggregate with Pumice stone, silica fume and fly ash as
a partial replacement of coarse aggregate. International
journal of innovation research in science, engineering
and technology, Volume 3, Issue 4 December 2014
[9] M L Gambhir, Concrete technology, Third edition,
published by Tata McGraw hill Publishing Company
limited.
[10] M. M. Alshihri, A. M. Azmy, and M. S. El-Bisy,
“Neural networks for predicting compressive strength
of structural light weight concrete,” Construct Building
Material, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2214-2219, 2009.
[11] N. Sivalinga Rao, Y.Radha Ratna Kumari, V. Bhaskar
Desai, B.L.P. Swami, (2013) “Fiber Reinforced Light
Weight Aggregate (Natural Pumice Stone) Concrete”,
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering

All Rights Reserved © 2017 IJERMCE 62


Girijabai Sail Institute of Technology, Karwar

You might also like