[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views17 pages

Class1 - ES1201 - Earth Sytem Processes

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 17

While seismic refraction data can inform us of both the depth of

Discontinuities in the Earth and the variation in seismic velocities


with depth to good accuracy,
It is difficult to extract the density from seismic velocity alone.
The velocity equation for P and S waves also other variable
K and μ, so no unique solution.

Hence there is no unique solution.


It still requires K
In 1923, Two geophysicist Adams and Williamsons formulated another
Equation that eliminated K....considering how gravity and density would
Change as a result of the mass of the overlying layers,,,,self
compression
The integration begins at the top of the mantle by
Based on a density of 3200 kg/m3....taken from occasional
Mantle samples found at the Earth’s surface.

Choosing a density for the core is more hit-and-miss...

However, constraint is that total mass cannot exceed the


Known mass of the Earth, density variation through the
Core can be determined with a degree of certainty.
EARTH REFERENCE MODEL
The density of the continents is lower than that of the oceanic
Crust –
2600-2800 kg/m3 for continent....
2800-3000 kg/m3 for oceanic crust.

Crust-mantle---boundary....called as Mohorovicic discontinuity....Moho..


Region beneath the Moho and down to 220 km referred as
Low velocity zone.

In 220-400 km, velocity increases smoothly and then hits


2 discontinuity at 410 km and 670 km...known as Mantle transition zone
This is a region within the mantle where the crystal structure of
The constituent minerals olivine and pyroxene are transformed
Into a dense mineral known as perovskite.
D’ denotes 670-2700 km
D’’ denotes 2700-2900 km

D’’ is marked by reduced velocity gradients compared


With the monotonic increase in seismic velocity through D’.

Core is distinguished from the lower mantle by the


Gutenberg discontinuity, named after its discoverer.
The Sun, Meteorites and bulk composition of the Earth

How the planet formed initially?

Solar system includes- asteroids, comets and planetary


satellites.
2 types of planets-
1. Terrestrial planets, small rocky bodies orbiting close
to the SUN (e.g Earth)
2. Gas giants- follow more distant orbits in the colder
outer reaches of the Solar system.
The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is a space telescope that was launched into low Earth orbit in
1990, and remains in operation. With a 2.4-meter (7.9 ft) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments
observe in the near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared spectra. The telescope is named after
the astronomer Edwin Hubble.
To get some idea of the scale of the gas clouds, you
See in the diagram, individual columns are up to 4 light-years
Long and emerge from an even larger and more diffuse cloud
of gas and dust.

Small globules protruding from the


Ends of the gas ‘fingers’ that have
Been dubbed evaporating gaseous
Globules (EGGs) within which the
Density of the gas has increased to
Such an extent that the cloud is
Locally collapsing to form a star.
These EGGs are roughly the size of
Our Solar System.
Formation of the Solar System
It all started around 4.6 Ga.

1. Condensation of the solar nebula and accretion

Gravitational collapse of an interstellar dust cloud dominated


By Hydrogen and Helium, traces of metallic and silicate dust, H2O,
CH4, NH3....

Once the sun started to shine, the heat vaporised most of the
Dust and ices and the vapour was transported further away
From the Sun by the early intense solar wind.

Condensed particle of dust stick together ....it took ~10,000 years


In the inner orbits, these clumps would have been dominated
By silicates and metal, their composition is preserved in the most
Primitive of the chondritic meteorites...
2. Formation of Planetesimals and development of planetary embroys

Particle collision continued increasing the size of clumps


Producing a profusion of bodies ranging in size from
0.1 to 10 km in diameter, termed planetismals (tiny planets)

Slowly during accretion, larger bodies would begin to heat up


Because of the release of kinetic energy as smaller bodies impacted.

It is estimated that the planetary embryos (up to A few thousand km


in size) would have swept up any remaining planetismals within a
few thousand years.
3. Planetary Embryos, giant impacts and assembly of a planet
Next stage of growth would have been slower.
Giant impacts between 2 embryos probably fragmented both
Of the impacted bodies with the debris subsequently recombining
To form a new, larger body.

The heat released was enough to melt the newly combined mass
Creating a molten mantle of silicate material known as magma
Ocean. Metallic material sank through the
magma ocean and formed A dense
metallic core, producing a differentiated
planetary embryo.
Completion of a terrestrial planet formation
Giants impacts would have continued to take place and it
Might have taken 10 Ma for the terrestrial planet to reach
Half of the size and about 100 Ma to reach and build an
Earth sized planet.

Once the last giant impact had occurred to form Moon.....

Of course accretion continues...


but too small to be noticeable.
Even today,,,accretion rate to
the Earth today, including dust
Particles is ~10*7 kg/y.
So,,,overall, we see that following steps involved
During planet formation

-Condensation of gas to form dust particles


-Accretion of dust to form planetismals
-Larger collisions between planetismals to form planetary
embryos
-planetary embryos with giant impacts made planets

The composition of the Earth is related to the composition


Of Solar Nebula, as most of the material from the solar
Nebula condensed to form the Sun, the composition of the
Earth is also related to that of the Sun.

You might also like