[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
120 views1 page

GRRAS Checklist

The document provides guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). It outlines 15 checklist items to report on when investigating interrater or intrarater reliability or agreement, including describing the measurement process, statistical analysis used, sample characteristics, and estimates of reliability and agreement.

Uploaded by

draburgoslaura
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
120 views1 page

GRRAS Checklist

The document provides guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). It outlines 15 checklist items to report on when investigating interrater or intrarater reliability or agreement, including describing the measurement process, statistical analysis used, sample characteristics, and estimates of reliability and agreement.

Uploaded by

draburgoslaura
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

GRRAS checklist for reporting of studies of reliability and agreement

Version based on Table I in: Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajeweski BJ,
Hróbjartsson A, Robersts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for reporting reliability and
agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96-106

Section Item Checklist item Reported


# on page #
Title/Abstract 1 Identify in title or abstract that interrater/intrarater
reliability or agreement was investigated. 1
Introduction 2 Name and describe the diagnostic or measurement
device of interest explicitly. 2
3 Specify the subject population of interest. 3
4 Specify the rater population of interest (if applicable).
5 Describe what is already known about reliability and
agreement and provide a rationale for the study (if 3
applicable).
Methods 6 Explain how the sample size was chosen. State the
determined number of raters, subjects/objects, and 3
replicate observations.
7 Describe the sampling method. 4
8 Describe the measurement/rating process (e.g. time
interval between repeated measurements, availability 4
of clinical information, blinding).
9 State whether measurements/ratings were conducted
independently. 4
10 Describe the statistical analysis. 5
Results 11 State the actual number of raters and subjects/objects
which were included and the number of replicate 4, 5
observations which were conducted.
12 Describe the sample characteristics of raters and
subjects (e.g. training, experience). 3,4
13 Report estimates of reliability and agreement including
measures of statistical uncertainty.
5
Discussion 14 Discuss the practical relevance of results. 6
Auxiliary 15 Provide detailed results if possible (e.g. online).
material

You might also like