Crafting a literature review in the field of Information Systems is a challenging task that requires a
thorough understanding of the subject matter, extensive research skills, and the ability to critically
analyze various sources of information. It involves synthesizing existing research, identifying gaps in
the literature, and presenting a coherent and well-structured argument.
One of the main difficulties in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of information
available. With the rapid pace of advancements in Information Systems, staying abreast of the latest
research and ensuring that all relevant literature is included can be a daunting task. Additionally,
evaluating the credibility and relevance of numerous sources can be time-consuming and requires a
discerning eye.
Another challenge is ensuring coherence and organization within the review. It's essential to
effectively categorize and summarize the literature while maintaining a clear focus on the research
question or topic at hand. Without proper structure, the literature review can become disjointed and
difficult to follow, detracting from its overall impact and credibility.
Moreover, writing a literature review requires strong analytical skills to critically evaluate the findings
and arguments presented in the literature. It's not enough to merely summarize existing research; one
must also assess its strengths, weaknesses, and implications for the field. This requires a deep
understanding of the theoretical frameworks and methodologies employed in Information Systems
research.
Given the complexities and challenges involved in writing a literature review, many individuals may
find it beneficial to seek assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
expert guidance and support to help streamline the literature review process. With a team of
experienced writers well-versed in Information Systems research, they can assist in conducting
comprehensive literature searches, synthesizing findings, and crafting well-structured and insightful
literature reviews.
By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
frustration often associated with this task and ensure that your review meets the highest standards of
quality and rigor. Whether you're a student, researcher, or industry professional, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔
is your trusted partner in navigating the complexities of literature review writing in Information
Systems.
As such, it also distinguishes itself from “ordinary” surveys of the available literature. Although the
majority of your sources will need to be recently published, an exception is typically allowed for
seminal sources. The table below compares a few different types of reviews to help you decide which
is best for you. Ranjit Singh, IIIT Allahabad COMMENTS Systematic reviews: Structure, form and
content A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.
Kraus S, Breier M, Dasi-Rodriguez S (2020) The art of crafting a systematic literature review in
entrepreneurship research. From the materials you find you will produce a literature review
Suggestions of where to find help on particular issues are made throughout the guide 1. The methods
section can be divided up into two main sections. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit
line to the material. Since there are numerous interpretations and constructs for “effective”,
“leadership” and “project team”, these terms must be particularized. The 7 steps for conducting a
systematic review are explained with an example. Locating Resources for Literature Reviews -
Conducting? To help (prospective) SLR authors successfully navigate this tension of existing
guidelines, it is thus the ambition of this paper to adopt a comprehensive SLR process model along
which an SLR project can be planned, executed, and written up in a coherent way. Mar 2017 Click
here to see a table that lists the various kinds of literature reviews that you may encounter in your
research (From Grant, M J and Booth. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an
article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the
conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. Handsearching: In addition to
searching the primary sources using databases, you’ll also need to search manually. Please include
what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this
page. Decision 5 concerns suitable literature sources and databases that need to be defined. In
Decision 3, researchers need to adopt a theoretical framework (Durach et al. 2017 ) or at least a
theoretical starting point, depending on the most appropriate theoretical approach (Seuring et al.
2021 ). Here, we find substantial guidance by Durach et al. ( 2017 ) that underlines the value of
adopting a theoretical lens to investigate SCM phenomena and the literature. These filters can
typically be used to seek out articles within a specific publication timeframe. Types of Systematic
Reviews Reading Systematic Reviews Resources for Conducting Systematic Reviews Getting Help
with Systematic Reviews from the Library History of Systematic Reviews Acknowledgements
Contact Us. Systematic reviews are so-called because they are conducted in a way that is rigorous
and replicable. Use of descriptive headings keeps the writing on track and helps the reader get to key
information quickly. As a potential alternative, Pearce ( 2018 ) proposed a set of free open-source
software (FOSS), including an elaboration on how they can be combined to perform an SLR. The
term systematic review is often conflated with narrative literature reviews, which can lead to
confusion and misunderstandings when seeking help with conducting them. The Professional
Development Collection is also useful for educators to find appropriate literature. In effect, we see
that almost all guidelines touch on the same issues and try to give a comprehensive overview.
Critical appraisal tools There are a number of tools and checklists available to help assess the quality
of studies to be included in a review. In general, the writing process for a systematic review is similar
to the process of writing any other kind of review. The other eight decisions are synthesized with
references to the guidelines that are most helpful and relevant for the respective step in our eyes.
This also aligns with the Vancouver recommendations on co-authorship ( International Committee of
Medical Journal Editors 2019 ).
Analysis: Explain what information you’ll collect from the studies and how you’ll synthesize the
data. This is critical to underlining the quality of the review but is often neglected in many submitted
manuscripts. You must have a clear understanding of the important people, series of events, places,
or times that were involved with your topic. The aim is to identify as many different synonyms as
possible for the partial terms. A precisely formulated research question facilitates the identification of
relevant search terms. In addition, keywords from particularly relevant articles support the
formulation of search terms. A document-term matrix for the topic “The influence of management
style on the performance of project teams” is shown in this example. To write a strong stand-alone
literature review, you should approach the research using a step-by-step process. Communications of
the Association for Information Systems. 34(8), 154-204. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., and Sutton,
A. (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. The following table shows the
differences between an SLR and an “ordinary” literature review. Jan 2017 Maximise the quality,
scope and appropriateness of the literature you end up reviewing Commencing a search: Determine
key concepts and. Similar to a systematic review, a scoping review is a type of review that tries to
minimize bias by using transparent and repeatable methods. It requires a transparent, reproducible
methodology which indicates how studies were identified and the criteria upon which they were
included or excluded. The first stage in carrying out a systematic literature review is to put together
your team. One of the most efficient ways to locate quality resources for literature reviews is to use
the library s subject specific databases For a more complete listing of databases categorized by
subject, please see. Tipu SAA (2022) Organizational change for environmental, social, and financial
sustainability: a systematic literature review. One of the most efficient ways to locate quality
resources for literature reviews is to use the library s subject specific databases For a more complete
listing of databases categorized by subject, please see. Touboulic A, Walker H (2015) Theories in
sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. However, we do not perform a
systematic but integrative review, which allows for more freedom and creativity (Snyder 2019 ). (3)
Method section: This section should cover the steps and follow the logic presented in this paper or
any of the reviewed guidelines so that the choices made during the research process are transparently
disclosed (Denyer and Tranfield 2009; Paul et al. 2021; Xiao and Watson 2019 ). By exporting the
title list to Excel, it is easy to calculate how many titles remain when applying the criteria for
inclusion and exclusion. Decision 2 concerns the option for a theoretical approach (i.e., the adoption
of an inductive, abductive, or deductive approach) to theory building through the literature review.
This is critical since a vast number of SLRs are conducted by early-stage researchers who likely
struggle to synthesize the existing guidance and best practices (Fisch and Block 2018; Kraus et al.
2020 ), leading to the frustration of authors, reviewers, editors, and readers alike. You’ve already
developed this, obviously, in the course of identifying your topic and key foundational elements.
Explain why this has been the case and how these approaches enhance or limit current
understandings of the topic. Beyond that, they elaborated on potential quality criteria that should be
applied. Another key piece of a nicely completed literature review chapter is the inclusion of
summary and synthesis segments at the end of each major section. Researchers without the available
time or number of potential co-authors may prefer to adopt a different approach, such as narrative,
scoping, or umbrella reviews. CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
The most efficient way to find articles on a topic is to search a database, which allows you to search
for articles from hundreds of journals. A literature review is a text of a scholarly paper, which
includes the current knowledge including When scholars use Bloom s fifth category evaluating they
are able to see the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, arguments. Feb 2017 There is no magic
number regarding how many sources you are going to need for your literature review, it all depends
on the topic and what. Consequently, our discipline has come a long way in crafting search strings,
inclusion, and exclusion criteria, and elaborating on the validity and reliability of an SLR. A
systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways. While this
insight might suggest merging Steps 2 and 3, we refrain from this superficial change and building yet
another SLR process model.
The latter is the danger in meta-reviews (i.e., reviews of reviews) (Aguinis et al. 2020; Carter and
Washispack 2018; Kache and Seuring 2014 ). Fourth, analyze the patterns you noted by considering
similarities and differences between sources. It’s a good idea to consider what readers will want to
know about the review methods and whether the journal you’re planning to submit the work to has
expectations on the reporting of methods. This is critical since a vast number of SLRs are conducted
by early-stage researchers who likely struggle to synthesize the existing guidance and best practices
(Fisch and Block 2018; Kraus et al. 2020 ), leading to the frustration of authors, reviewers, editors,
and readers alike. But, scholarly books and a small number of published dissertations are commonly
acceptable. Paul J, Lim WM, O’Cass A, Hao AW, Bresciani S (2021) Scientific procedures and
rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Gather your completed data tables and
PRISMA chart. Details about the kind of systematic review undertaken, i.e. thematic analysis, might
also be mentioned in the methods section.? Broadly speaking, in the results section, everything you
have done so far needs to be presented. This section describes: how studies were selected for
inclusion in the review how study data were extracted from the study reports how study data were
combined for analysis and synthesis To describe how studies were selected for inclusion, review
teams outline the screening process. This is why so many new researchers seek help from a
dissertation consultant when they hit this chapter of their studies. Troster R, Hiete M (2018) Success
of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: a comprehensive review. Visit our guide to the best
research databases for medicine and health to find resources for your systematic review. As such, the
thesis or central argument of your historiography should explain why your research on the topic
contributes to or rejects previous historical analyses of your topic. We get so many requests for
dissertation consulting around the literature review. Against this limitation, Pearce ( 2018 ) provided
a list of 20 search engines that are free of charge and elaborated on their advantages and
disadvantages. They introduce readers to the surrounding literature while also situating your work
within the larger scholarly discussion on that topic. In Business Source Complete, you must first click
on the “Share” button in the hit list, then “Email a link to download exported results” at the very
bottom and then select the appropriate format for the respective literature program. To add
headwords to your search in the Business Source Complete database, please select the Thesaurus tab
at the top. Every step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency and replicability.
The contrast between the six-step SLR process used for the analysis and the four-step process
applied by ourselves may seem surprising but is justified by the use of an integrative approach. This
should be performed by your two reviewers, using the criteria documented in your research protocol.
If a rather small body of literature is analyzed, tables providing evidence on which paper has been
coded for which construct might be helpful in improving the transparency of the research process.
These decisions are all elaborated in the reviewed papers but to substantially different extents, as the
detailed coding results in Table 3 underline. A recent example of such an approach can be found in
Khalid and Seuring ( 2019 ), building on the conceptual frameworks for SSCM of Carter and Rogers
( 2008 ), Seuring and Muller ( 2008 ), and Pagell and Wu ( 2009 ). This can be a challenging task,
but good preparation and the right tools will help you to set off in the right direction. How many
people were involved What method did you use (Covidence, spreadsheet, etc.) Summary list of the
data points you extracted Data or evidence table, displaying the data you extracted. The first section
describes how the literature search was conducted. Alternatively, an explanation might be provided
in the letter to the editor when submitting the paper. Systematic reviews follow established
guidelines and best practices to produce high-quality research. Once it has been determined that a
systematic review is the appropriate methodology for the research, and that there is sufficient time
and resources to conduct it, researchers should then spend some time developing their review topic.
