Conference Proceedings N Fs 1
Conference Proceedings N Fs 1
National Conference
                                 on
     “Natural Farming Systems and
Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
           Climate Scenario”
                         5-7 December 2022
Organized by:
Extended Summaries
Organizers
Organising Co-Chairman
Dr. V.K. Gupta, Director, NRC (Pig), Rani, Guwahati, Assam
Dr. Arun Kumar Mishra, Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, Rourkela, Odisha- 769004.
Organising Secretary
Dr. Dibaker Mahanta, Senior Scientist, Division of Agronomy, ICAR-IARI, Pusa, New Delhi
- 110 012, India
Dr. R.L. Choudhury, Senior Scientist (Agronomy), ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard
Research, Bharatpur- 321 303, Rajasthan, India
Editors
M. Premi Devi, L. Sanajaoba Singh, G. Bhuvana Priya, Sabyasachi Majumdar, Pranabjyoti
Sarma and U.K. Behera
Citation
Devi, M.P., Singh, L.S, Bhuvana Priya, G., Majumdar S., Sarma P. and Behera, U.K. 2022.
National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario In: Extended Summaries of National Conference on Natural
Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing Climate Scenario. The
NAAS Regional Chapter-Barapani, Meghalaya-793105, India, pp 1-354.
The views expressed in this publication by the authors are their own and these do not
necessarily reflect those of the organizers.
                                CONTENTS
BACK GROUND                                            forest plants (Table 1.) The soil of the site
                                                       is acidic in nature with annual rainfall
         Natural ecosystems and industrial
                                                       ranging about 4000 mm.
agro-ecosystems are very different. The
latter are generally more productive but far           Economically viable Natural Farming
less diverse than the former. And unlike               System Models for the region by
natural systems, industrial agro ecosystems            considering the local and indigenous
                                                       plants/breeds
are far from self-sustaining. Their
productivity can be maintained only with                       Optimized models were developed
large additional inputs of energy and                  for natural farming systems (NFS) using
materials from external, human-produced                Lingo software (www.lingo.com) under
sources; otherwise they quickly degrade to             single objective framework to maximize
                                                       net income under a set of constraints
a much less productive level. In every
                                                       (Behera et al. 2014). We made an
respect, these two types of systems are at             optimization study to developed an
opposite ends of a spectrum. The key to                improved optimized Natural Farming
sustainability is to find a compromise                 System model under natural farming
between the two - a system that models the             systems situations taking one farmer’s
structure and function of natural                      situation as case study (Behera et al.,
                                                       2022). Various strategies were developed
ecosystems yet yields a harvest for human
                                                       by combining various crops suitable for
use. Such a system is manipulated to a                 the farm and already adapted to the agro-
high degree by humans for human ends,                  climatic    situations.    In   Table    2,
and is therefore not self-sustaining. The              performance of various models under
lower yields of natural ecosystems,                    different enterprise/crop combinations
however, are usually more than offset by               under various resource constraints are
the advantage gained in reduced                        presented. It shows are the performance of
                                                       a natural systems under a particular
dependence on external inputs and an
                                                       situations can be improved and proved
accompanying reduction in adverse                      potential to provide economic as well as
environmental impacts.                                 ecological benefits on        par with a
                                                       conventional systems. There is need to
DETAILS OF THE SITE                                    give focus for development of such
                                                       systems for better utilisation of local
       Considering the above, Natural
                                                       resources and conservation of biodiversity.
Farming System Model developed at
                                                       Such an approach also adheres to the
College of Agriculture Kyrdemkulai, Ri-
                                                       principle of Aatma Nirbhar Bharat and can
bhoi district in Meghalaya during 2020-
                                                       be potential to double the farmer’s income.
2022. The following components were
                                                       The NFS model generated a net returns of
included in 15 acres of land area with
                                                       Rs. 17.07 to 23.20 lakhs from 6.0 ha area.
                                                  1
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSION                                             REFERENCES
       The performance of natural
                                                       Behera, U.K.,Kaechele, H., France J.
systems can be improved and proved
                                                            2015. Integrated animal and
potential to provide economic as well as
                                                            cropping systems in single and
ecological    benefits   at    par    with
                                                            multi-objective frameworks for
conventional systems. There is need to
                                                            enhancing the livelihood security of
give focus for development of such
                                                            farmers        and      agricultural
systems for better utilisation of local
                                                            sustainability in Northern India.
resources and conservation of biodiversity.
                                                            Animal Production Science55:1338-
Suitable blending of the natural farming
                                                            1346.
systems with modern scientific approach is
                                                       Behera, U.K.,Singh, B. and Mishra, A.
needed to promote NFS in the region.
                                                            2022. Natural Farming Systems
                                                            Model for Livelihood Security of
                                                            Farmers in North Eastern Hill
                                                            Region of India. P-302. Book of
                                                            Abstract (Posters). World Congress
                                                            of Soil Science. Glasgow, United
                                                            Kingdom. 1004 pp.
Table 1. The components of Natural Farming systems at College of Agriculture,
Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya (in15.0-acre area).
  Components of NFS         Area       Per cent area                 Remarks
                           (Acres)      to total area
Bamboo                  2.0           13.3            Good for the region. Local and
(Bambusa vulgaris)                                    indigenous plant. Helps in checking
                                                      soil erosion and regenerative
                                                      agriculture.
Broom grass             2.0           13.3            Good for checking soil erosion.
(Thysanolaena maxima)                                 Well adapted to the local situations
                                                      and has local market demand.
Large cardamom          2.0           13.3            Grow well under forest plants. It
(Amomum subulatum)                                    has local market demand.
Black Pepper(500 m2)    1000 plants 0.05              Perennial climbing vine. Suitable
(Piper nigrum)          (0.125                        for the trees of the forest having
                        acres)                        market demand as spice.
Sisal (Agave sisalana)  1.0 acre      6.65            Check soil erosion and provides
                                                      natural fibers. Suitable for well
                                                      drained soils of NEH region.
Apiary                  20 numbers -                  Very good under NFS of hilly
                                                      ecology having variety of flower
                                                      plants.
Mithun                  3 numbers     -               Very good animal for forest
(Bos frontalis)                                       ecology. It is a large domestic cattle
                                                      distributed in Northeast India.
Forest area             8.0 acres     53.4
Total                   15.0          100
                                                  2
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Table 2. Performance of different natural farming systems models/ strategies under a North
 Eastern Hill region Scenarios
            Enterprise
                                  NFS            NFS             NFS           NFS          NFS
            combination/
                                  Model 1        Model 2         Model 3       Model 4      Model 5
            Resource use
X1          Rice                  0.5            0.5             0.5           0.5          0.5
X2          Bamboo                0.5            0.5             0.5           0.5          0.4
X3          Jackfruit             0.6            0.6             0.6           0.6          0.4
X4          Broomgrass            0.6            0.6             0.6           0.6          0.4
X5          Lemon grass (oil)     0.015          0.136           0.25          0.0          0.0
X6          Banana                0.4            0.4             0.4           0.4          0.25
X7          Pineapple             0.4            0.4             0.4           0.4          0.40
X8          Tree bean (Ha)        0.2            0.2             0.2           0.2          0.15
            100 trees
X9          Tapioca               0.25           0.25            0.25          0.25         0.25
X10         Sisal                 0              0               0             0            0
X11         Ginger                0.25           0.25            0.25          0.25         0.35
X12         Turmeric              0.25           0.25            0.25          0.25         0.35
R1          Land (ha)             3.96           4.10            4.20          3.95         3.45
R2          Capital (Rs)          300000         400,000         494,450       287,387      259,914
R3          Labour (mandays)      388            403             416           386.5        392.5
Optimized   Net Returns (Rs)      22,49,172      22,88,260       23,20,260     22,44,242    17,07,846
objective
                                                   3
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  4
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
of high yield prior to 1900 and several                climate resilient agriculture, builds skills
components of this richness are still                  for sustainable development and conserves
available with successful farmers who                  biodiversity.
practice crop production protocols without
agro-chemicals and claim high yield. A                 NATURAL FARMING—A SELF-
few among various approaches to enhance                RELIANT ALTERNATE FARMING
’farmers’ income and soil fertility are                SYSTEM: THE CONCEPT
organic       farming,   natural    farming,
ecological agriculture, low external input                     Natural farming, exemplifies agro-
sustainable agriculture, precision farming,            ecological principles, where the emphasis
etc, which are being promoted over time to             is on enhanced biomass recycling;
reduce chemical use and cost of                        strengthened immune system of a farming
production and conserve natural resources.             systems through enhanced functional
         Alternative low-input farming                 biodiversity; enhanced soil conditions by
practices have emerged in pockets across               managing organic matter and soil
the world promising reduced input costs                biological activity; minimized loss of
and higher yields for farmers, chemical-               energy,       water,     and       nutrients;
free food for consumers and improved soil              diversification of genetic resources; and
fertility. In Japan, Fukuoka started Natural           enhanced         beneficial       biological
farming by experimenting with the nature               interactions. Natural Farming (NF), as the
and following the natural ways of crop                 name indicates, is a farming method where
production. He achieved yields similar to              the cost of crop production is minimum.
those of chemical farming without soil                 The farmers need not purchase external
erosion (Andow and Hidaka, 1998).                      inputs like chemical fertilizers and
Everything in nature is useful and serves a            pesticides to grow food. The key objective
purpose in the web of life. Similar farming            of the NF is to improve soil fertility and to
system propounded by Mr Subhash                        protect the environment. Natural farming
Palekar as Zero Budget Natural Farming                 is a low-input, low--risk farming practice
(ZBNF) a form of low external input                    and a climate resilient model work in
sustainable agriculture (LEISA) and has                harmony with nature.
helped popularise these practices across
                                                               In recent decades, many of the
the country. In Andhra Pradesh data from
                                                       Indian states have adopted NF system and
RySSled CCEs in 2016 and 2017 show
                                                       realized its importance in maintaining soil
that farmers practising ZBNF earn
                                                       bio-life and farmers income (APZBNF,
considerably more than the control group
                                                       2018). In Karnataka, during the first phase,
of conventional farmers (La Via
                                                       it is proposed to carry out research on
Campesina 2016 and Tripathi et al. 2018) .
                                                       development of integrated natural farming
It is also termed as ‘Do Nothing Farming’,
                                                       systems in all the 10 Agro-Climatic zones
because the farmer is considered only to be
                                                       of the state thorough concerned State
a facilitator - the real work is done by
                                                       Agriculture/ Horticulture Universities and
nature herself. Natural farming is one such
                                                       demonstrations in ’farmer’s fields to
low-input, climate resilient type of farming
                                                       validate the Natural Farming practices.
that encourages farmers to use low cost
                                                       The University of Agricultural Sciences,
locally-sourced inputs, eliminating the use
                                                       Dharwad in collaboration with Department
of artificial fertilisers, and industrial
                                                       of Agriculture, Government of Karnataka
pesticides. The NF programme meets the
                                                       and farmers has carried out an Operational
criteria for several climate adaptation and
                                                       Research      Project   on    Comparative
mitigation funds, because it helps reduce
                                                       Evaluation of Natural Farming Systems for
poverty, promotes food security and
gender empowerment, creates models for
                                                  5
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Enhancing the Livelihood of              Farm          expressed that it helps to mitigate climate
 Families of Zone 3 of Karnataka.                       change effects mainly drought and floods
                                                        as they are able to produce more and got
 FARMER’S PARTICIPATORY                                 higher profits than neighboring chemical
 STUDIES                                                farmers. The achievers of NF expressed
                                                        the stabilization in yield and profits needs
          In order to identify main
                                                        two to three years as it demands
 differences between natural farming and
                                                        regeneration of soil and favorable
 conventional farming practices, descriptive
                                                        environment on the farm. This farmers
 statistics have been used to analyze the
                                                        participatory research and up scaling of
 primary data collected from 80 farmers
                                                        natural farming technologies in the region
 across the 8 districts of the Northern Dry
                                                        contemplate greater conservation of
 Zone of Karnataka. The study was planned
                                                        natural resources, improve their vitality
 to highlight the main characteristics of
                                                        and enhance productivity of crops and live
 these two systems to address the
                                                        stock and income of farm families.
 differences in production, cost and returns
 was       carried   out     and    resource            SOIL FERTILITY EVALUATION OF
 characterization of the farms and socio                NATURAL FARMING, ORGANIC
 economic conditions of farm families was               AND CONVENTIONAL FARMERS’
 analyzed. In NF farmers’ field, crop                   FIELDS
 diversification (intercrops, mixed crops,
 sequence crops, diverse crops) and                              Soil samples were collected from
 integrated natural farming systems was                 Natural farming, Organic farming and
 observed on the farm. They practice                    Conventional farming practicing farmers
 natural soil and crop management                       fields. Among the three farming systems,
 practices and pest and diseases managed                higher mean values of organic carbon
 on the farm and recorded higher farm                   content were recorded in natural farming
 productivity and income. The results                   and organic farmers field 9.80 and 8.79 g
 revealed that the total cost under NF was              kg-1 respectively as compared to
 observed to be lower than the conventional             conventional farmers field 5.27 g kg-
                                                        1
 farming system. The average yield realized               .Similarly, higher mean values of
 under NF system was slightly lower than a              available nitrogen, phosphorus and
 conventional farming system in all the                 potassium were recorded in natural and
 crops except pulses and millets. This                  organic farmers fields (341.39, 48.92 and
 clearly indicated that the NF system                   517.33 kg ha-1 and 338.56, 46.05 and
 performed well in millets and pulses                   497.56 kg ha-1 respectively) and lower
 cultivation under the rainfed farming                  values in conventional farmers field
 situation. And around 92 percent of the                (264.07, 40.38 and 427.88 kg ha-1
 farmers experienced that, the cost of                  respectively)which are adjacent to natural
 cultivation under NF was minimized and                 farmers field.
 net returns are higher. Farmers based on
 decade of experience with NF system,
Table1. Chemical properties of soils in NF farmer fields
                                                  7
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        Highest bacterial load and enzyme              composts, green manures etc which are
activity was observed in organic,                      locally feasible along with elements of NF
integrated natural farming and natural                 to enhance the physical, chemical and
farming systems as compared to chemical                biological quality of soil. Studies have
farming. The above observations indicate               shown that natural farming, with the
that the components implemented in these               minimum external inputs, harnessing
systems, aggregates a variety of microbial             ecological services, application of
based bioactivities which stimulates and               supplements       like     ghanajeevamruth,
improves the biological processes of                   Jeevamruth and liquid organic manures
intricate plant- microbe- soil continuum.              improves the soil fertility by increasing the
Generally        beneficial      rhizospere            soil micro and macro flora and available
microorganisms can boost plant growth via              nutrients.
multiple regulatory biochemical pathways
by manipulating the plant hormonal                             This method encourages crop
signalling preventing pathogenic microbial             intensification and biodiversity in a given
strains and increasing the bioavailability of          agro-ecology. Labour and production costs
soil –borne nutrients.                                 are minimized. Hence it can be seen by
                                                       many as eco-friendly and sustainable food
        The cost on production mainly                  production      system.    The     separate
inputs is much less in natural farming but             certification    process    and      market
the cost on labour is higher in NF as the              opportunity need to be provided and NF
system is labour intensive until the soil              system, should get premium prices for
regeneration is achieved. In natural                   their produce concerning ecology and
farming food production systems long                   environmental conservation and quality
term studies are required to establish                 food to consumers.
ecological services in production ecology
and beneficial interactions between soil-                      The agro-ecological studies, their
microbes – plant interactions and to draw              insights and experiences are lacking in
valid conclusions.                                     different farming and agro-ecological
                                                       situations. The long term studies on
SUMMARY                                                ecology and environment in relation to
                                                       agriculture need to be conducted to
         Indiscriminate use of chemical                validate the benefits in different crops and
fertilizers and pesticides posed a threat to           cropping systems. The regeneration of
the soil and environment. Many                         polluted soil, the mother earth is the need
investigations have shown their adverse                of the hour for sustaining the food
effects of change in soil quality, soil                production systems, quality of food and
contamination, ground water pollution and              prosperity of farmers. To gain acceptance
decrease in soil micro flora etc. Promote              among the scientific community and
integrated NF system as an alternate to                policy makers the multi-disciplinary
chemical farming and research centres and              scientists do long term fixed site studies on
NF farmers’ fields are schools of learning             the research stations of universities and
skills and knowledge. NF and organic                   real farm situations mainly practicing NF
farming systems are more productive,                   farmers’ fields.
profitable and sustainable than only
chemical farming and comparable with                   FUTURE LINE OF RESEARCH
integrated conventional system. The
productivity and profitability of NF system            The studies on NF and other systems,
could be enhanced by integrated                        indicated reduction in yield during
application of farm yard manure,                       conversion period of 2-3 years depends
                                                       upon crops and agro ecological situations.
                                                  8
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
As the yield is the complex and many                   2. Harnessing the benefits of ecological
factors attribute to its capacity the extent              services     and     achieving     greater
of reduction varies with crops and farming                complementarities and synergy among
situations. The results addition of crop                  the components of farming system will
residues,           green          manures,               certainly benefit and reduce the yield
ghanajeevamrutha,               Jeevamritha,              gaps in natural /organic farming
Acchadhana, legume cover crops, legume                    systems      may      be    included    in
crop rotations and crop diversification                   recommendations.
contribute nutrients. However there is need            3. Interdisciplinary research is needed in
to study the nutrient dynamics especially                 order to fully understand the likelihood
the nitrogen and phosphorus on long term                  of grower adoption and to support
basis on fixed sites. The use efficiency of               management recommendations that are
these is higher with organic / natural                    deliberately     tailored     to   unique
sources compared to chemical sources                      agroecosystem contexts.
need to be considered. Appropriate                     4. It should be flexible enough to
conclusion may be drawn about the N and                   accommodate and address the state
P deficits and management in natural                      specific (ideally location specific)
farming and its impact on yield.                          issues to make the exercise more
                                                          realistic, locally acceptable and cost
 When we documented many NF farmers’                      effective.
success stories practicing more than 5                 5. An enabling environment broadly is a
years, we observed in addition to                         set of interrelated conditions viz.,
Jeevamrith      and     Acchadhana     they               policies, investment plans, institutions,
supplement nutrients through other organic                support services and other conditions -
manures and green manures and their soil                  including legal, organisational, fiscal,
available nitrogen and OC are higher than                 informational, social, cultural and
other conventional farmers.             The               political - that individually and
Integrated Natural farming Systems on                     collectively could create or improve the
ecological           principles need to be                impact of the growth process in a
developed by addressing the following                     sustained manner.
issues/ priority areas:                                6. All these put together indicates that if
                                                          policies are made favourable and level
1. Ecological intensification of natural and
                                                          playing field is ensured through
   organic systems in a farming system
                                                          comparable financial support, natural
   mode which provide better cycling and
                                                          Framing can play its role in furthering
   recycling    of     nutrients,   release,
                                                          the cause of food security and
   acquisition and holding of nutrients in a
                                                          nutritional security in the country.
   system.
                                                  9
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 10
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Table 1: Historical Transition of Agriculture (05 Stages)
 S. No. Phases              Generation       Main features
          (SCAWI)
 1.       SubsistenceAg. I                ➢ Family Need
                                             ➢ No crop specialization
                                             ➢ Nature dependent
                                             ➢ Low productive (quantity and quality)
 ~-
 ,..,
 2.        Commercial        II              ➢ Crop specialization (Sale and buy)
 -
                                             ➢ Organizational research and management emphasis
                                             ➢ Indian Farming
 3.       Advanced           III             ➢ Improved technology age (Insurance, research,
                                                credit aaaaaaaaaaaanand
                                             management   of risk and income)
                                              ►
                                             ➢ Large financial outlay
                                             ➢► Wider geographical range
                                             ➢► Export orientation
 4.       World wide         IV              ➢► Relative advantage not the absolute (Global
                                             ➢► competition)
                                                Solely import and export
                                             ➢► Highly professional and managerial manpower
 ,_.
 5.       Agril. Industry    V               ➢► Agriculture - a perfect economic oriented activity
                                                (No population
                                             concern)
                                             ➢► Almost climate independent (less effect)
                                             ➢► Self-research and development
  -
 THE FRAMEWORK OF PARADIGM                                 sustainability and productivity. (Can
 SHIFT                                                     prospects for long term sustainability
                                                           be improved with new technologies and
 The framework of new changes in                           management?)
 agriculture is determined by:
                                                        KEY PROMISES
➢ The food demand of the growing
  population and economy (sustainability                        Creating new and sustainable food
  goals), and the supply limits set by the              systems that can support the world’s
  carrying capacities of the agro-                      population is going to mean rethinking the
  ecosystem (system capacities),                        fundamentals of farming, from the
➢ The trade-offs between agricultural                   resources used, to where it happens and its
  productivity and quality of the natural               basic relationship with nature.
  resource      base     in      different'
                                                               There are few human activities that
  regions/agro-ecosystems as assessed
                                                        have changed the world’s landscapes and
  by trends in suitable sustainability
                                                        environment more than farming. Fields of
  indicators, (Are the levels and growth
                                                        crops and pastures for animals occupy an
  1 of production sustainable?), and
                                                        extraordinary 40% of available global
➢ Emerging technologies and improved                    land. But the way we grow food on these
  management strategies that can shift the
  trade-offs towards improving both ·
                                                  11
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
vast swathes of land is putting increasing             cost of production, crop failure and
pressure on nature.                                    indebtedness among farmers besides
                                                       inequity and inequality in society and
     Growing demand for food has                       greedful competition for maximization of
polluted much of the world’s water, soil               yield and income without concerns of
and air with excess fertilizers and chemical           nature.
sprays, which are remarkably inefficient.
Up to 98% of a crop spray won’t stay on                     In this background, the concept of
the plant but will instead bounce straight             Return Towards Nature, “Family Farming”
off, accumulating in the soil and                      Alternative Agriculture, Eco-friendly
eventually running off into waterways. At              Agriculture, Organic Farming, Natural
the same time, conversion of land from                 Farming, “Green Economic Development”
wild spaces to farming is driving                      have been advocated at national and
biodiversity loss, as wild plants and                  international level.
animals have less space to live in.
                                                             Agriculture must change to meet the
     Is it possible to transform the way we            rising demand, to contribute more
farm so that agriculture doesn’t                       effectively to the reduction of poverty and
compromise the natural environment?                    malnutrition, and to become ecologically
Because of the sheer scale of the world’s              more sustainable. This transformation
agriculture, it seems like a gargantuan                will be crucial for achieving many of the
task. But farmers and researchers are                  post-2015 Sustainable Development
already developing the tools that will be              Goals (SDGs). Poverty and hunger must
needed to make it happen. The practices of             be eradicated in om generation and
natural farming based on ecological                    should therefore be a prominent stand-
principles, used wisely, is one of them.               alone goal. The contributions of
                                                       agriculture to goals on gender equality
      The country adopted the Green                    and social inclusion, health, climate
Revolution      model—an      input-    and            change and energy, ecosystem services
chemical-intensive model—in the 1960s to               and natural resources, and good
increase food production. The focus was                governance must also be recognized in
on development of new seed varieties and               specific targets and indicators for these
increased use of synthetic fertilizers and             goals.
irrigation for increasing food production.
This approach succeeded in increasing                  PRESENT STATUS OF NATURAL
food production but failed the test of                 FARMING IN INDIA
sustainability.
      UNO and FAO have urged to adopt                         Natural farming movement led by
strategies achieving sustainable goals by              farmers and civil society has spread to
2030 by all the countries. It is very                  states such as Karnataka, Tamil Nadu,
important to mention that out of 20 SDGs,              Maharashtra among others in the last few
11 SDGs are based on the overriding                    decades.    Chemical-free     agriculture,
concern for nature and protection of                   popularly known as organic agriculture,
natural resources. The modern agriculture              has been gaining importance in India since
in the world and India has resulted in high            2000. The NITI Aayog has also
productivity of crops and thereby ensuring             emphasized     on    ‘natural    farming’.
the food security but at the same time it              However, community organization and
has resulted into problems of declining soil           farmers use ‘organic’ and ‘natural’
fertility, over use of water, pesticide                farming terms interchangeably. It is
pollution, decreasing biodiversity, high               roughly estimated that around 2.5 million
                                                 12
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
farmers in India are practicing regenerative           March, 2020, The Ministry of Agriculture
agriculture. In the next 5 years, it is                and Farmers Welfare (MoAFW) proposed
expected to reach 20 lakh hectares- in any             ‘Bhartiya Prakritik Krishi Padhati’ (BPKP)
form of organic farming, including natural             as a new sub-mission under Paramparagat
farming, of which 12 lakh hectares are                 Krishi Vikas Yojna (PKVY).
under Bharatiya Prakritik Krishi Padhati
(BPKP).                                                        Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojna
                                                       is a sub-component of Soil Health
        States such as Andhra Pradesh,                 Management scheme under National
Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana,                    Mission of Sustainable Agriculture and
Karnataka and Kerala are promoting                     aims to develop sustainable models of
natural farming. Andhra Pradesh is the                 organic farming through a mix of
front runner among all states in                       traditional wisdom and modern science.
implementing natural farming programme
at a mass scale. According to the Andhra                       A proposal was submitted by the
Pradesh government, as of March 2020,                  agriculture ministry for implementation of
0.62 million farmers (10.5 per cent of all             the BPKP with a total budget of Rs 4371.7
farmers) were enrolled in the programme.               crore for 1.2 million ha, or Rs 36,430 per
Of the enrolled farmers, 0.44 million                  ha for five years. The major thrust under
farmers (7.5 per cent), were actually                  the proposed programme was capacity
practising natural farming on an area of               building of farmers through continuous
0.45 million acres, which works out to 2.9             handholding, input support, certification,
per cent of the net sown area spread across            value addition and innovations.
3,011-gram panchayats.                                         Various research institutions are
        Karnataka      recently    initiated           currently conducting the research to assess
implementation of zero budget natural                  results of natural farming. Some research
farming (ZBNF) on a pilot basis in 2,000               is based on field experiments, while others
hectares in each of the 10 agro-climatic               are based on surveys with practicing
zones of the state. Only a few farmers have            farmers. Institutions are getting mixed
been doing it at individual scale in other             results. Some show encouraging results,
states.                                                while other not so much.
        Himachal Pradesh has also set an                       Most research works are still in
ambitious target of promoting natural                  progress. Indian Council of Agricultural
farming in entire state by 2022. It is                 Research (ICAR) has also set up a
implementing the state-funded scheme                   committee to empirically validate ZBNF
Prakritik Kheti Khushal Kisan since May                and committee has emphasized about
2018.                                                  nutrient deficit, yield reduction and issue
                                                       of profit to farmers in long terms and need
       It has claimed to exceed its targets            a systematic research and phasic
of year 2019 by covering more than                     promotion.
50,000 farmer families Kerala, Gujarat,
Haryana and Rajasthan have conducted                          Research by ICAR- Indian Institute
multiple     mass      level    awareness              of Farming Systems Research (IIFSR),
programmes, trainings and workshops for                Modipuram for Subhash Palekar’s ZBNF
hundreds and thousands of farmers to                   in the rice-wheat system in north India
promote natural farming.                               showed reduction in ZBNF yield by up to
                                                       40 per cent in the initial years as compared
      As per 17th Loksabha standing                    to   chemical-based        integrated   crop
committee on agriculture report dated                  management. However, some research
                                                 13
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
institutions  indicated that  ZBNF                        production and consumption, motivate
performance was better than that of                       people and provide a structured
chemical-based farms.                                     approach to guide countries in
                                                          designing their own development paths
       Similarly, the NAAS, a think-tank                  for agriculture;
of agriculture scientists in India, in a
Policy paper-90 reported that ZBNF is an               • Monitoring agriculture and food
unproven technology and no verifiable                    systems at unprecedented level of
data or authenticated result from any                    detail;
experiment is available so far (NAAS,                  • Long-term vision and investments in
2019).                                                    capacity building and research.
                                                       For making natural farming more doable
KEY ELEMENTS
                                                       and economical, there is a need of
Major elements of a new path for                       transition step by step from conventional
agriculture in twenty first century are:               or traditional system of farming to natural
                                                       farming either on individual farmer group
• Shifting towards healthier diets;                    or community basis. Following steps
• Ensuring the supply of safe, nutritious              should be considered as way forward for
  food to all through increasing                       adoption of natural farming.
  agricultural productivity on existing
  crop and pasture land and making it                  • The first three operate at               the
  more resilient to climatic extremes;                   agroecosystem level and involve:
                                                 14
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
growth (4% annually to 2020) with                      Agriculture, Organic Farming, Natural
sustainability, by a path that will be                 Farming, “Green Economic Development”
determined by three important 1 'factors:              have been advocated at national and
technologies, globalization, and markets.              international level. These alternative forms
Agricultural research and education of the             of agriculture have been the part of on-
future must therefore address two related              going B. Sc. (Ag.) degree courses, PG &
challenges:      increasing      agricultural          Ph. D. courses implemented by different
productivity and profitability to keep pace            SAUs/ Institutions under Agriculture
with demand, and ensuring long-term                    Education Division of ICAR, New Delhi.
sustainability of production.                          However, looking to the Internationally &
                                                       Nationally perceived ‘Resource Danger’,
         In recent years, national and                 India being the country of maximum youth
international research organizations have              population, the change of mindset of youth
responded to the increasing importance of              and large population, there is a need of
sustainability in agricultural development.            realization for development of a focused
The Indian Council of Agricultural                     curricula giving overriding concern for
Research (ICAR) has also revised its                   nature and its resources as a way of
mandate; its new vision statement reads,               agriculture practices, as a way of
"to harness science to ensure sustained                profession and as a way of life. This
physical, economic, and ecological access              requires that the whole teaching and
to food and livelihood security to all                 learning environment need to get a new
through        generation,       assessment,           dimension which can lead to better
refinement, and adoption of appropriate                awareness,      skill   development      and
technologies," (ICAR, 1999). Nearly all                experience in agriculture development
institutions of ICAR and State Agricultural            through natural farming emphasizing
Universities (SAUs), which constitute the              harmonization of five basic elements of
NARS, have new vision statements                       universe (Air, Fire, Water, Land & Space).
focusing      on      "productivity     with           This includes maximization of production
sustainability". But integrating the concept           and ecosystem health and wellbeing based
of sustainability into the institutional               on ecological principles and law of nature.
strategy and design of research and                    It is a challenging one but India has a
education programmes is proving difficult              glorious ancient history in agriculture
because sustainability requires dealing                which will give the way for wholesome
with interactions between technology,                  life development for world community.
society, and environment and therefore                 We envisage & reemphasize the concept
with multiple stakeholders. It broadens the            of "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" which
both scope and scale of agriculture from               means “The world is one family” and
farm production and profitability to                   emphasizes on integration of all human
agribusiness issues that encompass                     developmental activities with nature and
regional and global development and                    lead to harmony of all components on this
environmental concerns. To address such                earth system. Proper education in society
concerns, experts agree that greater                   towards commitment for nature can bring
production must be achieved by increasing              a new paradigm shift in farming
yields while using fewer resources and                 throughout the world. New ecological
minimizing       or    reversing    negative           innovations and business models are
environmental impacts.                                 emerging throughout world to redesign the
                                                       global food system which is more
       In this background, the concept of
                                                       sustainable with zero harm to nature. In
Return Towards Nature, “Family Farming”
                                                       this background, the degree course on
Alternative    Agriculture,   Ecofriendly
                                                       Natural Farming has been envisaged.
                                                 15
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
WAY FORWARD                                              response options that can be considered
                                                         to realize or avoid specific futures?
        How blessed the countries are, as              • What are the key uncertainties that
we are surrounded by beautiful nature and                hinder      effective    decision-making
wildlife. In our surrounding, so many                    concerning ecosystems?
species are there which require a need to              • What      tools     and    methodologies
protect them as well as to conserve the                  developed and used in the MA can
environment. The exploitation of the                     strengthen      capacity      to    assess
environment can deplete the natural                      ecosystems, the services they provide,
resources and in result will make                        their impacts on human well-being, and
everyone’s survival difficult. For human                 the strengths and weaknesses of
beings to survive, the environment needs                 response options?
to be clean, fresh and eco-friendly. It has
been rightly said by Margaret Mead that                CONCLUSION
“We won’t have a society if we destroy the
environment”. Indeed, it is true and we                        Depending on the issues of
can see the effects of the exploitation in             productivity, economics, environmental
the changing environment.                              health, climate change effect, resource
                                                       availability and socio-economic factors in
       The     need     to   protect   the             India, alternative forms to substitute high
environment has arisen and it is important             input based modern agriculture are
to understand the key areas where all the              emerging and being practiced by farmers.
countries have to look upon and work.                  However, since 2000, after fatigue of
                                                       Green Revolution, ill health effect and
The main reasons for the protection are:-              global pressure to protect environmental
                                                       and soil health, conventional organic,
• Ozone depletion, greenhouse effect and               conservation chemical, natural farming,
  global warming                                       zero budget natural farming and organic
• Desertification                                      farming are prominent farming practices
• Deforestation                                        being suggested for sustainability in
• Loss of biodiversity                                 agriculture bringing a balance in all 3
• Disposal of wastes                                   pillars viz; social, economic and
                                                       environment of sustainability.
Five overarching questions, along with
more detailed lists of user needs developed                    Within the generic term ‘Natural
through discussions with stakeholders or               Farming’, there are many sets of practices
provided by governments through                        that could be labelled as agro-ecological or
international conventions, guided the                  natural is not clear as scientific validation
issues that were assessed:                             of such practices has been done as a part of
                                                       common agriculture practices or as a part
• What are the current condition and                   of organic farming but not as such based
  trends of ecosystems, ecosystem                      on the true principles being followed by
  services, and human well-being?                      many natural farming practitioners and
• What are plausible future changes in                 proponents in abroad and India. So, there
  ecosystems and their ecosystem                       is a need to codify it in a broader basket of
  services and the consequent changes in               natural farming based on the principles of
  human well-being?                                    natural farming.
• What can be done to enhance well-
  being and conserve ecosystems? What                         Under low input conditions, there
  are the strengths and weaknesses of                  are many sets of natural farming practices
                                                       which follow the law of science and agro-
                                                 16
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ecology and they are situation specific and                 India. Asian Agri–History 21 (3):
cannot be replicated as such. As the scale                  267–85.
of practices of natural farming increase in            Ravisankar, N., Ansari, M.A., Panwar,
time and scale, advantage of natural                        A.S., Aulakh, C.S., Sharma, S.K.,
farming increases. Natural farming                          Suganthy, M., Suja, G. and
principles also allows all the innovations                  Jaganathan, D. 2021. Organic
which converge with the natural processes                   farming research in India: Potential
and domain of agro-ecological landscape.                    technologies and way forward.
                                                            Indian Journal of Agronomy, 66 (5th
        There is a difference of approaches                 IAC Special issue) 142-162.
of use of external inputs and use of set of            Sharma, S.K. Jain, D., Choudhary, R., Jat,
standards between organic and natural                       G., Jain, P., Bhojiyab, A.A. Jain, R.
farming, though both have many common                       and       Yadav,      S.K.     2021.
principles and practices.                                   Microbiological and enzymatic
                                                            properties of diverse JaivikKrishi
        Community based natural farming
                                                            inputs used in organic farming.
with innovative approaches of social
                                                            Indian Journal of Traditional
linkages, institute collaborations and
                                                            Knowledge, 20(1): 237–243.
participatory sharing of resources can help
in risk management under changing                      Sharma, S. K., Ravishankar, N., Chander,
climate, complex, risk and low input                        M., Jat, G., Choudhary, R.,
driven situations. Knowledge generation                     Fagodiya, R. K. and Pathak, H.
for practices of agro-ecological design,                    2021. Organic agriculture under
biodiversity, nutrient, pest and disease                    changing climate scenario. Indian
management in mixed natural farming                         Journal of Agronomy, 66 (5th IAC
system in different niche areas of country                  Special issue), 82-94.
is the need of hour. India should take the
advantage of carbon trading, water                     Somasundaram, E., Amanullah, M.M.,
footprint, ecological footprint by adopting                Vaiyapuri, K., Thirukkumaran, K
natural farming in suitable low input and                  and Sathyamoorthi, K. 2007.
high input areas through better technical                  Influence of organic sources of
skills and resources.                                      nutrients on the yield and economics
                                                           of crops under maize based cropping
SUGGESTED READINGS:                                        system. Journal of Applied Scientific
                                                           Research, 3:1774–1777.
Bhattacharyya, P. and Chakraborty, G.
     2005. Current status of organic                   Stalin, V., Perumal K., Stanley, A.L. and
     farming in India and other countries.                   Kalaichelvan, P.T. 2010. Screening
     Indian Journal of Fertilizer, 1(9):                     and production of subtilin from
     111–23.                                                 Bacillus subtilis isolated from
Carpenter–Boggs, L., Reganold, J.P. and                      nutrient–rich      organic      and
     Kennedy, A.C. 2000. Biodynamic                          biodynamic manures. Journal of Life
     preparations: short term effect on                      Sciences, 4:34–44.
     crops, soils, and weed populations.
     American Journal of Alternative                   Swain, M.R. and Ray, R.C. 2009.
     Agriculture, 15:110–18.                                Biocontrol and other beneficial
                                                            activities of Bacillus subtilis isolated
Nene, Y.L. 2017. A critical discussion on                   from        cowdung         microflora.
     the methods currently recommended                      Microbiology Research, 164:121–
     to support organic crop farming in                     30.
                                                 17
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 18
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
nutrients were 144 kg, 72 kg, and 119 kg         components of IOFS (Bullocks, cows and
NPK from the various livestock                   their calves and goats) (Table 1).
Table 1: Quantity of available organic manures and NPK nutrients from the livestock
components of integrated organic farming system:
                                                 19
    Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
    Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Table 2: Grain Yield, Stover Yield, Gross returns, Net returns and BC ratio of foxtail millet
    as influenced by nutrient management practices through Integrated Organic Farming System
                                                          Stover      Gross
                                          Grain yield                                Net returns B:C
Treatments                                                yield       returns
                                          (kg ha-1)                                  (Rs. ha-1)  ratio
                                                          (kg ha-1)   (Rs. ha-1)
T1:Control     (No   manure, no
    jeevamrutha and no mulching 736                       5225        23396          14442           2.61
    application)
T2: Jeevamrutha + mulching      1376                      5589        42657          30408           3.48
T3: IFS compost*                          1362            5743        42306          29487           3.30
T4: IFS compost + vermicompost**          1395            6010        43362          29969           3.24
T5:Jeevamrutha + mulching + IFS 1523                      5963        47191          32158           3.14
    compost*
T6:Jeevamrutha + mulching + IFS 1360                      6096        42324          27160           2.79
     compost + vermicompost**
T7: IFS compost* + Panchagavya  1660                      6263        51366          36374           3.43
T8: IFS compost + vermicompost** + 1594                   6272        49388          34046           3.22
    Panchagavya
T9:Jeevamrutha + mulching + IFS 1717                      6856        53234          36863           3.25
  compost* + Panchagavya
T10:Jeevamrutha + mulching + IFS
    compost + vermicompost** + 1841              7066       56996       39846         3.32
    Panchagavya
S. Em±                              77           148                    2344          0.18
C. D. at 5%                         231          442                    6966          0.53
     * IFS compost equivalent to 100% RDN. In treatments T2 to T10,seeds were treated with
     beejamrutha.
     ** IFS compost (50%) + Vermicompost (50%) equivalent to 100% RDN, Foliar spray of
     Panchagavya          (3%)         at         30         and          45          DAS
    REFERENCES
    Rajesh, S.R., 2012, Studies on nutrient
         management      under     integrated
         farming system in hybrid maize (Zea
         mays L.). M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis. Univ.
         of     Agric.     Sci,      Raichur.
                                                     20
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 21
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
visitor followed by A. cerana, syrphids,               Foraging rate
Lepidopterans and wild bees, respectively.
With respect to both farming system and                        The data presented in Table V,
insect visitors, A. mellifera was observed to          revealed that A. cerana for aged
be the most abundant insect pollinator in              significantly more number of flowers in
NF system whereas, wild bees were                      one minute in comparison to the A.
minimum in all farming systems being                   mellifera. The average number of flowers
statistically like Lepidopterans also in               visited by both foragers in one minute was
control plot.                                          significantly more in SPNF system
                                                       followed by control and CF system. The
Relative abundance of insect visitors by               hive bees visited significantly more
sweep net capture                                      number of flowers per minute during 1200
                                                       h followed by 1500 and 1000 h,
        The observations in Table III,                 respectively (Fig. 2).
indicated that maximum abundance of
insect visitors was recorded in SPNF                   Foraging speed
system followed by CF system and
control, respectively. Irrespective of the                     The data on foraging speed in
farming systems, syrphids were the most                different farming systems (Table VI)
abundant insect visitor being statistically            revealed that A. mellifera spent more time
to A. mellifera. The abundance of A.                   per flower as compared to A. cerana. The
cerana was significantly more than wild                average time spent per flower by both
bees and Lepidopterans in all the farming              foragers was significantly more in CF
systems.                                               system followed by control and SPNF
                                                       system. Time spent per flower by the hive
Correlation of abundance of different                  bees was maximum during 1000 h
insect visitors of Chinese cabbage with                followed by 1500 and 1200 h, respectively
weather parameters                                     (Fig. 3).
                                                 22
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
2004; Sharma et al., 1974 and Atmowidi                 Hanson, P., Yang, R.Y., Chang, L.C.,
et al., 2007) have also reported                            Ledesma, L., and Ledesma, D. 2009.
Hymenoptera as the most dominant order                      Contents of carotenoids, ascorbic
followed by Diptera visiting the bloom of                   acid,      minerals    and     total
brassicaceae family (mustard, broccoli                      glucosinolates in leafy brassica
and cauliflower) which is in accordance                     pakchoi (Brassica rapa L. chinensis)
with the present findings.                                  as affected by season and
                                                            variety. Journal of the Science of
REFERENCES                                                  Food and Agriculture 89(5),906-
                                                            914.
Atmowidi, T.,Buchori, D., Manuwoto, S.,
    Suryobroto, B.,&Hidayat P. 2007.                   Sharma, P.L., Dhaliwal, H.S., and Kaker,
    Diversity of insect pollinators in                      K.L. 1974. Insect visitors and
    relation to seed set of mustard,                        pollinators of cauliflower seed crop
    Brassica rapa L. Hayati Journal of                      bloom. Himachal Journal of
    Biosciences 14(4), 155-161.                             Agricultural Research 2: 74-78.
Bishnoi, R.,&Bhati, A. 2017. An                        Thakur, S.S., Kumar, S., and Verma, K.S.
     Overview: Zero Budget Natural                          2004. Bloom visiting insects and
     Farming. Trends in Biosciences                         their foraging behaviour on broccoli.
     10(46),9314-9316.                                      Pest management and Economic
                                                            Zoology 12(2) 145:151.
Goswami, V., and Khan, M.S. 2014.
    Impact of honey bee pollination on                 Bhowmik, B., Mitra, B.,& Bhadra, K.
    pod set of mustard (Brassicajuncea                     2014. Diversity of insect pollinators
    L.: Cruciferae) at Pantnagar. The                      and their effect on the crop yield of
    Bioscan 9(1), 75-78.                                   mustard (Brassica juncea L.), NPJ-
                                                           93 from southern West Bengal.
                                                           International Journal of Recent
                                                           Scientific Research 5(6), 1207-1213.
                                                 23
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table. I List of insect visitors collected in chinese cabbage bloom
                                                 24
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table III. Relative abundance of insect visitors on Chinese cabbage by sweep net capture in
different farming systems
Table IV. Correlation of abundance of different insect visitors with weather parameters
                                                 25
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table V. Foraging rate of A. cerana and A. mellifera in different farming systems
                                                 26
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Figures :
                                                 27
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
30
                                                                                             A. mellifera
                     20
                                                                                             A. cerana
                                     5
                     15
Figure 2. Foraging rate of A. mellifera and A. cerana during different day hours
3.5
2.5
2 A. mellifera
                                                                                             A. cerana
                                      Time spent/flower
                     1.5
                       1
0.5
                                            0
                                                          1000 h      1200 h        1500 h
Time (hours)
Figure 3. Foraging speed of A. cerana and A. mellifera during different day hours
                                                                               28
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Control NF CF
                                         23.1
                  Eristalissp
                                           28.67
                                          25.05
                                                                               103.24
               Apis mellifera
                                                                                 109.6
                                                                                    117.16
                                                                   78.64
                 Apiscerana
                                                                    81.01
                                                                71.71 grains
                                                Number of loose pollen
 Figure 4. Number of loose pollen grains ('000) on the body of insect visitors in different
farming systems
                                                    29
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 30
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
nutrients throughout the crop growth                   500 l ha-1 + Cow urine (10 %) alternated
period which might have had higher                     with Vermiwash (10 %) spray and T8:
uptake of NPK nutrients by the crop and                FYM (50 % N basal) + VC (50 % N top
thus resulted in on par grain yield with               dress) equivalent to 75 % RDN +
FYM (100 % RDN) and FYM + VC (100                      Jeevamrutha @ 1000 l ha-1 + Cow urine
% N)                                                   (10 %) alternated with Vermiwash (10 %)
                                                       spray. Treatments receiving jeevamrutha
Profitability: Economic analysis of net                alone @ 500 and 1000 l ha-1 (T1 and T2)
returns showed significantly higher net                recorded lower soil available N, P2O5 and
returns with T6: FYM (50 % N basal) +                  K2O. (Table-2)
VC (50 % N top dress) equivalent to 50 %
RDN (Rs. 61543 ha-1) when compared to                  Pesticide residue: In kharif season, no
all other treatments except the treatments             pesticide residues were detected in both
which received combined application of                 brown rice and white rice samples,
organic manures such as FYM + VC +                     however in during rabi/summer season,
Jeevamrutha + cow urine + vermiwash in                 pesticide residues detected in brown rice
T7, T9 and T10 (Rs 58270, 58780 and                    samples in few treatments (T2 to T9) but
58313 ha-1). while T2: Jeevamrutha @                   were in below quantification level (BQL).
1000 l ha-1 recorded lowest net returns (Rs            (Data not given). Brown rice samples
51744 ha-1). With respect to benefit cost              comparatively had higher values of
ratio, significantly higher benefit cost ratio         pesticide residues than white rice samples.
was recorded with T1: Jeevamrutha @ 500
l ha-1 (3.92) followed by the treatment T2:            CONCLUSION
Jeevamrutha @ 1000 l ha-1 (3.49).
                                                               In order to realize similar benefits
Soil health: Significantly higher microbial            of grain yield and monetary returns as that
populations were recorded in treatments                of 100% RDN along with the better soil
which received combined applications of                health environment and safe food,
organics. (T7 to T10) (Data not given). At             ,blending of natural farming and organic
the end of the investigation (rabi/summer              farming practices i.e combined application
2021-22), significantly higher soil                    of FYM (50 % N basal) + Vermicompost
available N, P2O5 and K2O was reported                 (50 % N top dress) equivalent to 75 %
with T3: FYM (100 % RDN) and T4: FYM                   RDN along with seedling treatment of
(50 % N basal) + VC (50 % N top dress)                 beejamrutha at planting and soil
this was followed by treatments T5: FYM                application of jeevamrutha @ 500 l ha-1 at
(50 % N basal) + VC (50 % N top dress)                 the time of planting, 25, 50 and 75 DAT
equivalent to 75 % RDN, T7: FYM (50 %                  and foliar spray of 10 % cow urine
N basal) + VC (50 % N top dress)                       alternated with 10 % vermiwash at
equivalent to 75 % RDN + Jeevamrutha @                 flowering and panicle initiation stage
                                                       would             be            appropriate
                                                       REFERENCES:
                                                 31
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1. Grain yield, Straw yield, Gross returns, Net returns and BC ratio of transplanted
rice as influenced by different innovative natural and organic nutrient management
practices (pooled results of three seasons)
                                                                Straw     Gross     Net
                                                    Grain
                                                                yield     returns   returns B:C
Treatments                                          yield
                                                                (kg ha-   (Rs       (Rs     ratio
                                                    (kg ha-1)   1
                                                                 )        ha-1)     ha-1)
T1: Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 500 l ha-1 2846           4085      71058     52889 3.92
T2: Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 1000 l ha-
   1                                             2904           4193      72513     51744   3.49
T3: FYM equivalent to 100 % RDN as basal
                                                    3854        5349      96144     52757   2.22
   dose
T4: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)               3765        5208      93904     56731   2.53
   equivalent to 100 % RDN
T5: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)               3525        4958      87972     56269   2.78
   equivalent to 75 % RDN
T6: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)               3497        4983      87289     61543   3.40
   equivalent to 50 % RDN
T7: T5 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 500 l
   ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10 %)
                                                    3774        5329      94173     58270   2.62
   alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage
T8: T5 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 1000
   l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10 %)
                                                    3849        5360      96019     57517   2.49
   alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage
T9: T6 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 500 l
   ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10 %)
                                                    3556        5008      88725     58780   2.97
   alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage
T10: T6 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @
   1000 l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10 %)
                                                    3642        5075      90858     58313   2.79
   alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage
S.Em ±                                              45          83        -         1127    0.04
CD at 5 %                                           135         247       -         3349    0.11
Note: Jeevamrutha application at planting, 25, 50 and 75 DAT (days after transplanting)
in T1, T2, T7, T8, T9 and T10 treatments along with seedling treatment with beejamrutha at
the time of transplanting.
                                               32
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
   under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Table 2. Organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of soil as
    influenced by different innovative organic nutrient management practices in transplanted
    rice (at the end of the experiment)
                                                                N (kg ha- P2O5 (kg K2O (kg
Treatments                                         OC (%)       1
                                                                  )         ha-1)      ha-1)
T1: Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 500 l
   ha-1                                            0.58         226.11      30.41      534.78
T2: Soil application of jeevamrutha @ 1000 l
   ha-1                                            0.59         228.19      31.00      537.11
T3: FYM equivalent to 100 % RDN as basal
   dose                                            0.76         268.70      44.30      605.77
T4: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)
   equivalent to 100 % RDN                         0.74         267.46      43.57      604.47
T5: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)
   equivalent to 75 % RDN                          0.69         254.78      39.28      584.79
T6: FYM (50 % N as basal dose) followed by
   vermicompost (50 % N as top dress)
   equivalent to 50 % RDN                          0.64         244.42      35.37      575.37
T7: T5 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @
   500 l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10
   %) alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage          0.70         256.13      40.58      588.77
T8: T5 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @
   1000 l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10
   %) alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage          0.70         258.06      41.12      591.56
T9: T6 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @
   500 l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10
   %) alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage          0.65         246.68      36.53      575.83
T10: T6 + Soil application of jeevamrutha @
   1000 l ha-1 + foliar spray of cow urine (10
   %) alternated with vermiwash (10 %) at
   flowering and panicle initiation stage          0.65         247.46      37.65      577.32
S.Em ±                                             0.01         3.49        0.98       4.45
CD at 5 %                                          0.04         10.36       2.91       13.23
    Note: Jeevamrutha application at planting, 25, 50 and 75 DAT (days after transplanting)
    in T1, T2, T7, T8, T9 and T10 treatments along with seedling treatment with beejamrutha at
    the time of transplanting.
                                                 33
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
   under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Table 3. Pesticide residue in brown rice and white rice samples as influenced by different
    treatments under organic production system
                                       Syntheti
                Organo phosphorus c                                                     Fungicide
                                                  Nionicotinoids
                pesticides             pyrethro                                         s
          Tr
Rice                                   ids
          eat
sample          4-
          me
s               bromo-                            Lambda-
          nts               Chlorpyri Bifenthr                Fenpropat Imidachlo Carbenda
                2-                                Cyhaloth
                            fos        in                     hrin         prid         zim
                chloroph                          rin
                enol
          T1 ND             BQL        ND         BQL         ND           ND           ND
          T2 ND             BQL        ND         0.088       ND           ND           BQL
          T3 BQL            BQL        ND         0.012       ND           ND           ND
          T4 BQL            BQL        ND         BQL         ND           ND           BQL
Rabi
          T5 ND             BQL        ND         0.016       ND           ND           ND
brown
          T6 ND             BQL        ND         0.034       ND           ND           ND
rice
          T7 ND             BQL        ND         0.014       ND           ND           ND
          T8 ND             BQL        ND         0.015       ND           ND           ND
          T9 ND             BQL        ND         0.036       ND           ND           ND
          T10 BQL           0.012      ND         0.025       0.012        0.014        BQL
          T1 ND             ND         ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T2 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T3 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T4 ND             BQL        BQL        ND          ND           ND           ND
Rabi
          T5 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
white
          T6 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
rice
          T7 ND             ND         ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T8 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T9 ND             BQL        ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
          T10 ND            ND         ND         ND          ND           ND           ND
Kharif
rice
(brow No pesticide residue detected
n and
white)
   BQL- Below Quantification Level (quantification level ≥ 0.01 mg kg-1), ND - Not
   Detected
                                                 34
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                              35
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
I decided to put an end to the use of               Food safety in natural farming:
chemical fertilizers and pesticides and
opted for zero farming. or natural                  Agriculture promoted by artificial inputs
farming Inspired by Ramon Magsaysay                 such as chemical fertilizers leaves
award winner and natural farming                    behind carcinogenic residues in the food
pioneer Masonob Fukuwoka I started                  grown and causing the Environmental
natural farming in 1988 and has                     damages and but the crops cultivated
successfully been able to cultivate crops           by natural farming methods yield more
using less water and sunlight only under            and they are also safe from the health
natural conditions. My results have                 point    of     view      protecting     the
proved all the agricultural scientists who          Environment      and      increasing     the
claim that yields are directly related to           Biodiversity. The crops that grow under
use of hybrid varieties, chemical                   natural conditions consume the available
fertilizers and pest control techniques. I          moisture, and water under the given
have neither used hybrid seeds nor                  climatic conditions thus saving water
fertilizers but have succeeded in getting           used and electricity to irrigate the land.
yield more than the farmers who have
grown paddy using modern techniques                 Biological control in the farm: I can
and chemicals. I have even raised a                 confidently say that planting raddish
paddy crop quite successfully, getting a            between the mulberry plants will curb
yield of 25to 30 quintals per acre which            the weeds, the radish acting as a natural
varies according to the climatic                    weedicide likewise growing drumstick
conditions                                          between banana and areca to check the
                                                    weeds in the plot. Spiders and birds are
Enhancing the fertility of soil                     protecting the farm from pests. Rodents
through    alternative  farming                     are controlled by snakes and snails are
Practices.                                          controlled by ants and so on. The soil is
                                                    fertilized by microbes and other small
Symbiotic cropping pattern:                         insects using the principal of symbiosis
                                                    namely fighting and supporting each
        If one follows monoculture or               other.
one crop then pests are a sure
manifestation which leads to application            All the soil fauna and flora are the
of pesticides leading to environmental              natural instruments of the natural
problems including poisoning of the                 cultivation.
food chain but a natural farming
supports multivariety of plants which               Diversity of Farm type as a Requisite
eliminates chances of proliferation of              for Sustainability: I am cultivating
pests depending on any one species as
the food supply is restricted. In this case         Paddy (Experimental), Pulses, arecnut,
there is a pest outbreak which is counter           Mango, Coconut, Pepper, Guava,
balanced by the other species, which                Sapota, Papaya, Mandarin, Orange and
feed on them and hence the problem is               multivariety vegetables. Along with
eliminated naturally.                               these plantations about 110 Varieties of
                                                    flora are present producing a biomass
                                                    approximately about the carbon Storage
                                                    is measured in natural farming forest
                                              36
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ecosystem by measuring the area and                 was high in number in the farm which
biomass and soil carbon density. Natural            bring about various transformation in
farming increases storage in durable                soil like Sulfur, NPK, Carbon, Iron and
wood products. The wood harvested and               manganese transformation important in
converted into various utility products             maintaining the soil fertility, were
can help in sequestering atmospheric                observed by Nandini et al., 2008.
carbon.
                                                    Awareness programs for farmers,
Faunal diversity in natural farming:                Scientists and students
                                              37
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Principal investigator. Visited my farm             nut etc. was found to be 1085.556 tons in
and had done extensive research on the              6.5 acres at present. This is the result of
soil biodiversity and they have estimated           only the woody trees. Estimaton of Carbon
the amount of carbon stored in woody                sink by other plants like Lianes, herbs,
trees there by mitigating global warming            shrubs; Microbes and soil were not
and climate change.                                 calculated. If every farmer who can afford
                                                    to change his land into natural farm we can
      A work shop conducted on 30.8.08              mitigate global warming and the climate
for scientist, Farmers Agriculturist and            change and retain our soil fertility
leaders brought out the importance of               increasing the biomass (Nandini, 2008).
natural     farming    in    sustainable            Ramesh, 2008 in his report says that this
ecosystem.                                          Method of farming can be emulated by
                                                    others, which will contribute towards
     A visit to the farm by many                    amelioration of the environment. As
research    centers     scientist like              33.33% of the land area should be under
1)Indian Institute of Horticulture                  forest cover in order to conserve the
Research Bangalore (IIHR)           2)              environment; this type of farming will
University of agricultural science                  supply all the benefits of forests in addition
Bangalore (Deportment of forest) 3)                 to producing sustainable food crops. All the
Bangalore university (Deportment of                 food crops being grown here are free from
environmental    science) 4) Institute              pests and diseases. The soil structure and
for social and Economic change                      texture are excellent compared to the
Bangalore They submitted positive                   adjacent soil which is gravelly. Since no
reports.                                            chemicals are applied this system
                                                    contributes all the benefits of a forest
     All    the    above      Programs              ecosystem. This System acts like a forest
/Seminars/Lectures/Feasts/Visits    by              ecosystem by sequestering carbon-dioxide,
Foreign delegates/ Scientists/ Farmers/             supporting biodiversity of both floras, some
Students were conducted free of cost                fauna, recharging of ground water,
since 1988 spending my personal                     checking soil erosion, releasing oxygen and
money as a service to the Society and               maintaining a microclimate like a patch or
the Environment.                                    natural forest. In this patch of farm he
                                                    observed different types of birds, insects,
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
                                                    small       mammals         and       reptiles.
        Agriculture is a fundamental                Gurubasavaraju, 2008 say that about 110
component of the natural resources on               varieties      of      plants(edible       and
which rests not only the quality of human           medicinal)grow under natural conditions
life but also its very existence .If efforts to     and they are rich In nutrition and are highly
create a sustainable agriculture are                medicinal and is looking forward to educate
successful, farmers will profit and society         the Ayurvedic students by tagging the
in general will benefit in many ways.               plants for identification and utilization for
                                                    research. According to Nanjaiah, 2008, the
The total carbon sequestration in this              experiment carried out on horticultural
natural farming including all the tree              crops in this farm under natural farming is
species like; Tectona grandis, Silver oak,          highly appreciable and feels it can be
Mangifera indica, Rose wood, Neem, Areca            extendable to other crops. Radha Kale 2008
                                              38
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
feels that this natural farm at Dodinduvadi         Ikerd,   J.E.1993.Sustainable agriculture:
provides necessary, favorable environment                  Farming in Harmony with the
for Earthworms. Shivanandappa 2008 have                    biosphere.p                       12-
the opinion that the food crops grown here                 23.In:L.A.Johnson(ed).Sustainable
in the natural farm is free from all                       Agriculture        Enhancing      the
pesticides     and    chemical    fertilizers.             Environmental quality of the
According to Sidappaji 2008 Biological                     Tennessee valley region through
control is well balanced in the farm as the                Alternative     Farming    Practices.
pesticides are not used in the farm. The                   University of Tennessee, Knoxville,
objective of Zero cultivation is to improve                Tennessee.
the soil fertility, mitigate global climate         Jayashree, R., Vasudevan, N., 2007.Effect
change, to improve the air quality, to                     of Endosulfan on Soil Bacteria. J.
conserve the plant biodiversity, soil flora                Ecotoxicol.                  Environ.
and fauna, to propagate sustainable farming                Monit.17(3)295-299.
methods for food security and to protect            Dr Nandini, N.2008, “Importance of
Mother Earth from Hazardous chemicals.                     Natural farming in sustainable
Lastly       Ecology can survey without                    Agriculture systems-A case study on
economic       but economic cannot survey                  Natural farming and chemical
without ecology                                            farming”andSoil Microorganisms an
                                                           important component of sustainable
REFERENCES                                                 agriculture.(In Press).
                                                    Prof Mr Ramesh         2008, University of
Flora,       C.B.1990.Sustainability      of               Agricultural Science, Dpt of
        Agriculture and rural Communities.                 Forestry, Ponnampet, Karnataka.
        In    C.A.FrancisC.B.Flora,     and         Dr
        L.D.King(ed)            Sustainable                Sidappaji2008.Rtd.Entomologist.Un
        Agriculture       in      Temperate                iversity        of       Agricultural
        Zones.JohnWiley                 and                Scence.G.K.V.K.Bangalore
        Sons,Inc.,NewYork,N.Y.                      Singh.V.N, Prasad.C.R, 1991.Effect of
Dr   H RavishankerIndian       Institute of                phorate and gamma on BHC on
        Horticultural Research                             Mineralization of soil.JindSoc Soil
Dr     A     N     Ganesh    murthy        ;               Sci., 39:183-185.
        :………….:……………….:                             Shivanandappa 2008.Deputy Director and
Dr               N            Ramachandra                  Head.Dpt of Food Protectants
        :………….:……………….:                                    andInfestation               Control,
Dr                                Prabhakae                CFTRI,Mysore,India.
        :………….:……………….:’’……
        …….
Dr         P        N        Krishanamurty
        :………….:……………….:….
Dr    DesapandayInstitute     for     social
        Economical change
Dr   Gurubasavaraju, 2008, Chief Medical
        Officer,       JSS        Ayurvedic
        College.Mysore
                                              39
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      40
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
is a broad-spectrum insecticide which kills                CONCLUSION
insects upon contact by affecting the normal
function of the nervous system.. Natural                   These farming systems can also be practiced in
farming system was sprayed with agniastra and              the management of Spodoptera litura in
brahmastra @ 5% whereas organic farming                    soybean as a ecofriendly tool.
system was sprayed with neem oil and chilli
                                                           REFERENCE
garlic extract @ 5%.However the organic
farming and natural farming systems also have              Anonymous, 2012, Agricultural Statistics at a
been found to be efficient in managing the leaf                Glance, Directorate of Economics and
eating caterpillar on soybean. Biradaret al.,                  Statistics, Department of Agriculture and
(2006) reported that application of organic                    Cooperation, p. 104.
manures increases the yield and reduces the
pest incidence by providing balanced                       Biradar A P, 2006, “Krishi Honnu”- New
nutrients.                                                      enriched organic manure. Journal of
                                                                Ecofriendly Agriculture, 1(1):6-7.
                                                           Singh O P and Singh K S, 1990, Insect pests of
                                                                soybean and their management, Indian
                                                                Farming, 39(100): 9-14.
Table 1a: Leaf eating caterpillar (Spodoptera litura) population (pooled) in soybean under soybean-
wheat cropping system
                                                      41
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1b: Leaf eating caterpillar (Spodoptera litura) population (pooled) in soybean under soybean-
wheat cropping system
*Figures in parenthesis are Arc sin transformed values (1 DBS- one day before spray, 7 DAS- 7 days
after spay, 60 DAS-days after sowing)
                         Number of larva per plant at 60
                         DAS
                                                         % foliage damage
Treatments               1 DBS                                                         Yield          B:C
                                                         at @ 60 DAS
                         @    60 7 DAS @ 60 DAS                                        kg/ha          ratio
                         DAS
                                                         13.60
T1-Natural farming       0.47     0.24                                                 2780           2.22
                                                         (21.63)
                                                         10.66
T2-Organic farming       0.39     0.20                                                 2990           1.89
                                                         (19.05)
T3-Conventional                                          5.75
                         0.28     0.14                                                 2995           2.16
farming                                                  (13.86)
T4-Chemical                                              5.49
                         0.29     0.13                                                 2701           2.27
farming                                                  (13.53)
S.Em+                    0.01     0.01                   0.14                          -              -
LSD (0.05)               0.03     0.02                   0.45                          -              -
                                                      42
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      43
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
and marginal. Horticulture and animal                      promote directly or indirectly organic and
husbandry also engage a sizeable share of the              natural farming in the state.
total population of the state. The total
cultivated area is 4.78 million ha—about 35%               CONCLUSION
of the total geographical area. The total area
                                                                   The concept of natural farming
under organic farming in Chhattisgarh was
                                                           definitely contributes towards the sustainable
71,000 hectare during 2019. However, the
                                                           growth of rural population and farming
percent net shown area under organic farming
                                                           community of Chhattisgarh. They not only get
was only 1.5%. Chhattisgarh is a very potential
                                                           the high yield of the crops in natural and
state especially in terms of its diversity
                                                           environment friendly manner but also in least
especially weather and soil types which favors’
                                                           cost or investment. Thus, the farmers of
the suitable conditions for cultivation of
                                                           Chhattisgarh can uplift their social and
tropical as well as temperate crops. The NPK
                                                           economic standards by producing agriculture
Consumption of Chaattisgarh is 86.76 kg/ha,
                                                           production in sustainable way through natural
which is far below of India’s average
                                                           farming.
consumption       128.02    kg/ha     at    2017
(Annonymous, 2018) so there is a good                      REFERENCES
possibilities of organic as well natural farming
in the state. Tribal peoples of the state very             Anonymous. 2018. https://agricoop.gov.in/
well understand natural biological systems and                   sites/default/files/agristatglance2018.pdf
using very little amount of chemical fertilizers           Carrington, D. (2019). EU Bans UK's Most-
in their fields for crop production so many                      Used Pesticide Over Health and
parts of the state are by default organic and                    Environment Fears. London: The
follow the major principles and practices of                     Guardian.
natural farming, such as Jivamrit, Beejamrit,              Chandel, R. S., Gupta, M., Sharma, S.,
and botanical pesticide, etc for growing of                      Sharma, P. L., Verma, S., and Chandel,
crops in unknowingly.                                            A. (2021). Impact of Palekar's natural
                                                                 farming on farmers' economy in
MAJOR GOVERNMENT POLICIES TO                                     Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Ecol. 48,
SUPPORT ORGANIC AND NATURAL                                      873–878.
FARMING IN THE STATE                                       Eliazer, N. A. R. L., Ravichandran, K., and
                                                                 Antony, U. (2019). The impact of the
        The Chhattisgarh Government has
                                                                 Green Revolution on indigenous crops of
launched schemes to develop Dantewada,
                                                                 India. J. Ethn. Food 6, 1–11 doi:
Bijapur, Sukma and Gariaband as ‘complete
                                                                 10.1186/s42779-019-0011-9
organic farming districts and one block from
                                                           Jannoura R, Joergensen GR, Bruns C, (2014).
each of the other districts will be developed as
                                                                 Organic fertilizer effects on growth, crop
organic    block.     The     Government      of
                                                                 yield, and soil microbial biomass indices
Chhattisgarh has implemented the national
                                                                 in sole and intercropped peas and oats
scheme BPKP and two state scheme PKVY
                                                                 under organic farming conditions. Eur. J
and JaivikKheti Mission taken for the
                                                                 Agron. 52(B):259-270.
promotion of organic and natural farming.
                                                           La Via Campesina (2010), Sustainable Peasant
Chhattisgarh government has also decided to
                                                                 and Family Farm Agriculture can Feed
promote rural livelihoods with organic farming
                                                                 the World, La Via Campesina, Jakarta,
and launched the GodhanNyay scheme in July
                                                                 Indonesia.
2020. These entire schemes are useful to
                                                      44
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Menon, P., Deolalikar, A., and Bhaskar, A.                 Palekar,                             S.,2014.
     (2008). Comparisons of Hunger across                       http://www.palekarzerobudgetspiritualfar
     States: India State Hunger Index.                          ming.org/
     International Food Policy Research                    Pawar VR, Tambe AD, Patil SP, Suryawanshi
     Institute.                                                 SU, (2013). Effect of different organic
Palekar, S. (2005), The Philosophy of Spiritual                 inputs on yield, economics and microbial
     Farming, 2nd Ed. Zero Budget Natural                       count of Sweet Corn (Zea mays Var.
     Farming Research, Development &                            Saccharata). Eco. Environ. Conser.
     Extension       Movement,      Amravati,                   19(3):865-868.
     Maharashtra, India.                                   Ramesh P, Rao AS, (2009). Organic farming:
Palekar, S. (2006), Zero Budget Natural                         Status and Research achievements.
     Farming: Five Layers Palekar’s Model                       Indian Institute of Soil Science
     (Part I). Zero Budget Natural Farming                      Bhopal,74.
     Research, Development and Extension                   Rosset, P.M. and M.E. Martinez-Torres
     Movement, Amravati, Maharashtra,                           (2012), “Rural Social Movements and
     India                                                      Agroecology: Context, Theory and
                                                                Process”, Ecology and Society, Vol.17,
                                                                No.3
                                                      45
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      46
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
microbial population in rhizosphere soil of                                                                                                               (132.72µg TPF g-1 h-1) followed by natural
coriander crop. Among the different stages of                                                                                                             farming (119.89 µg TPF g-1 h-1) at flowering
the crop, the microbial diversity was more at                                                                                                             (Table 1).Organic manure application provided
flowering stage of coriander crop than before                                                                                                             the favourable soil environment and acted as
sowing and after harvest.                                                                                                                                 substrate for enhancement of soil microbial
       Similarly, dehydrogenase activity was                                                                                                              activity and also soil enzyme activities such as
more at flowering stage than before sowing                                                                                                                dehydrogenase activity, phosphatase activity
and after harvest stage. Significantly higher                                                                                                             and soil urease activities (Zhong et al. 2010
dehydrogenase activity was in organic farming                                                                                                             and Singh and Dhar 2011).
                                  40
                                                                                                                                          T1 (POP)                                         T2 (FP)                           T3( NF)                            T4 (OF)
                                  35
                                  30
                                  25
           Microbial population
                                  20
                                  15
                                  10
                                   5
                                   0
                                                                                                          At flowering
                                                          At flowering
At flowering
At flowering
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 At flowering
                                       Before sowing
Before sowing
Before sowing
Before sowing
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Before sowing
                                                                         After harvest
After harvest
After harvest
After harvest
After harvest
                                                                                                                                         47
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSION                                                 REFERENCE
        Organic and natural farming systems                Zhong, W., Gu, T., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Lin,
encouraged the build-up of rhizospheric                       X., Huang, Q. and Shen, W. 2010. The
microorganisms as the organic inputs used in                  effects of mineral fertilizer and organic
organic and natural farming (FYM, liquid                      manure on soil microbial community and
jeevamrutha, and ghanajeevamrutha, organic                    diversity. Plant Soil 326 (1): 511-522.
mulch and biofertilizers) acted as substrate for
the     growth      and     development       of           Singh, Y.V. and Dhar, D.W. 2011. Influence
microorganisms. Thus, the ecological farming                   of organic farming on soil microbial
practices (organic and natural farming) help to                diversity and grain yield under rice-wheat-
contribute for the long term tangible benefits                 green gram cropping sequence. Oryza45
and help to overcome the ill-effects of modern                 (1): 40-46.
chemical farming practices.
                                                      48
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
  The potential impact of organic, natural and inorganic farming on quality, soil
    health and productivity of maize sweet corn, (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.)
G. MANJULATHA1, E. RAJANIKANTH2, A. KRISHNA CHAITANYA2AND B. SOWJANYA3
 1
   Agricultural Research Station, Karimnagar, Professor Jayashanker Telangana State Agricultural
                                  University, Telangana, India -505 001
  2
    Regional Agricultural Research Station, Jagtial, Polasa, ProfessorJayashanker Telangana State
                           Agricultural University, Telangana, India -505 001
    3
      Agricultural college, Jagtial, Professor Jayashanker Telangana State Agricultural University,
                                        Telangana, India -505 001
        Agriculture intensification with use of            METHODOLOGY
modern agricultural practices such as inorganic                    This field experiment was conducted in
external chemical inputs such as fertilizers and           red sandy loam soils of Agricultural Research
pesticides led to exhaustion of natural                    Station, Karimnagar, for three years during
resources (Kesavan and Swaminathan, 2008).                 Rabi, 2019-20 to 2021-22 with five treatments,
The use of such inputs exposes small holder                replicated five times in large experimental
farmers to a high degree of credit risk.                   plots of 100m2 for each treatment on maize
Increased farmer indebtedness, cost of                     sweet corn (Madhuri) which include T1:
cultivation, climate change and low farm                   Organic farming (Organic manures are applied
produce prices have aggrevated the farm crisis             on N equivalent basis), T2: Inorganic farming
(Lal, 2009). To sustain the agricultural                   (followed PJTSAU package); T3: Integrated
production without or with minimal negative                nutrient management (INM) (10 t FYM ha-1 +
impact on the ecosystems, preventing the                   rest of the N through inorganic fertilizers and
degradation of natural resources and to
                                                           rest is similar to T2); T4: Control (neither
minimise the input cost and reducing farmers               organic manures nor inorganic fertilizers are
crisis, there is need to switch over to                    applied ; T5: Natural farming. The fertilizer
alternative farming systems viz., organic                  recommendation followed is 240-80-80 Kg
farming, Natural farming that can make                     NPK/ha applied as per treatment and
efficient use of soil and water (Lal, 2008).               equivalent basis for organic and INM
Among the speciality corns, Maize Sweet                    treatment.
corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) as a source
of human food consumption usually grown for                RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
fresh or canned food industry is gaining
importance. The growing concern for human                          The impact of organic farming on
and soil health and environment were very                  maize sweet corn during Rabi revealed that
well understood by the common people who                   cob & green fodder yield (3 years pooled data)
have led to study the performance of maize                 recorded significantly higher under Integrated
sweet corn under organic, natural and                      nutrient management (INM) (9.46 & 14.9 t/ha
inorganic fertilizer application in terms of               respectively) and is on par with inorganic
quality of sweetcorn, soil health and                      treatment (9.06 & 13.8 t/ha). This was
productivity.                                              followed by the organic treatment with cob
                                                           and green fodder yield of 6.59 and 8.14 t/ha
                                                           resulting in 30.3 & 45.4% less cob & green
                                                           fodder yield respectively as compared to INM.
                                                           While, the natural farming treatment recorded
                                                      49
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
4.90 and 5.98 t/ha respectively cob and fodder             Natural farming (12.1%). While carbohydrates
yield accounting to 48% & 59.9% decreased                  percent is higher with organic (64.5%) and
cob & green fodder yield over INM. The Net                 natural farming (63.3%).
returns & B:C ratio at conventional price                        In terms of soil nutrient status after 3
resulted significantly higher with inorganic               years of experimentation, indicated organic
treatment (Rs.50580/ha & 1.88 respectively)                carbon content recorded increase in treatments
followed by INM (Rs.41765/ ha & 1.53                       of INM, organic and natural farming to the
respectively). At 100% premium price to                    tune of 9.6, 7.7 and 1.9 % respectively and
organic & natural farming sweet corn produce,              reduced in control and inorganic farming by
the Net returns of organic sweet corn                      3.8 and 1.9% as compared to the initial value.
significantly increased to Rs.65,418/ ha than              Application of external source of carbon in the
compared to all other produce. This was                    form of FYM could not help in improving the
followed        by      inorganic    treatment             soil carbon status. The Available Nitrogen
(Rs.50,580/ha); INM (Rs.41,765/ ha) & natural              status is positive in organic, inorganic and
farming (Rs.33,243/ha). While B:C ratio at                 INM farming by 10.4, 3.0 and 17.6 kg/ha
100% premium price also, the inorganic                     respectively and recorded negative in control
cultivated sweetcorn resulted higher (1.88)                and natural farming. Natural farming system
followed by organically cultivated sweetcorn               was unable to maintain available N in soil, but
(1.74). Narayanamoorty and Alli (2019)                     spraying of dhravajeevamrutham at 15 days
expressed that role of ZBNF in boosting crop               interval could fulfill plant needs to some
yields is not yet conclusive.                              extent. The available phosphorus balance
                                                           showed that P is accumulating in inorganic
      The quality parameters, crude protein in             and INM farming. While the available K,
sweetcorn recorded higher in INM (15.7%)                   resulted reduction in all the treatments
and inorganic farming (15.5%). These were                  indicates plant uptake is greater than K applied
followed by organic (13.5%) and natural                    to the soil.
farming (13.4%), unlike the crude fat resulted
higher in inorganic (13.8% ) followed by
                                     Green
                         Cob yield
                                     fodder            Crude            Crude     fat Carbohyd
Characteristics          (Without
                                     yield             Protein (%)      (%)           rates (%)
                         husk)(t/ha)
                                     (t/ha)
Organic farming          6.59        8.14              13.5             10.9           64.5
Inorganic farming        9.06        13.81             15.5             13.8           57.8
INM farming              9.46        14.91             15.7             11.7           61.3
Control                  4.12        5.29              13.3             11.9           62.1
Natural farming          4.90        5.98              13.4             12.1           63.3
S.Em+                    0.33        0.70
C.D. (5%)                1.00        2.13
                                                      50
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSION                                                       sustainability in developing Asian
                                                                 countries. Philosophical Transactions of
       The impact of organic farming in sweet                    the Royal Soceity, Biological sciences
corn indicated 30.3 & 45.4% less cob & green                     363: 877-891. DOI: 10/1098. rstb. 2007.
fodder yield respectively with organic farming                   2189.
over INM.        While, the natural farming                Lal, R. 2008 Soils and sustainable agriculture:
treatment recorded 48% & 59.9% decreased                         A review. Agronomy for sustainable
cob & green fodder yield over INM. Under                         development      28:     57–64.    DOI:
economics, if the organic & natural farming                      10.1051/agro:2007025.
sweet corn are sold at 200% premium price                  Lal, R. 2009. Soils and world food security.
than conventional price, than the net returns                    Soil and Tillage Research. 102: 1–4.
and B:C ratio are higher than the INM or                         DOI:10.1016/j.still.2008.08.001
inorganically raised sweet corn.                           Narayanamoorthy, A. and Alli, P. 2019. Is
                                                                 zero budget natural farming working?
REFERENCES:
                                                                 The Hindu Bisinessline, Daily sept 13,
Kesavan, P.C. and Swaminathan, M.S. 2008.                        2019.
     Strategies and models for agricultural
                                                      51
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      52
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
observed by Kuri (2014) who recorded higher                were reduced in natural farming treatments,
sugarcane yield, gross returns and net returns             the net returns was higher in these treatments.
under RPP compared to other nutrient                       The drastic reduction in cost of cultivation
management practices mainly due to the                     could compensate the income from reduced
application of nutrients in the form of chemical           yield in natural farming practice.
fertilizers along with FYM which was
benefitted by the better availability of nutrients         REFERENCES
for crop. OF (881 kg ha-1 and Rs. 52868 ha-1)
                                                           Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A., 1984,
and INM-NFPP (912 kg ha-1 and Rs. 54716 ha-
1                                                                Statistical procedures for agricultural
  ) were on par with each other with respect to
                                                                 research, An International Rice Research
seed cotton yield and gross returns. Net returns
                                                                 Institute Book, Wiley- Inter Science
of NF treatments were found to be on par with
                                                                 Publication, New York, USA, pp. 139-
RPP, which was mainly due to reduced cost of
                                                                 141.
cultivation in these treatments (Table 1).
                                                           Kuri, S., 2014, Response of sugarcane
Significantly lower net returns was obtained
                                                                 genotypes      to     organic     nutrient
with OF (Rs. 5742 ha-1) where in cost of bulky
                                                                 management practices with special
organic inputs was found to be expensive.
                                                                 reference to jaggery production and
Similar results were quoted by Vinay et al.
                                                                 quality. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ.
(2020) in maize.
                                                                 Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
        Among natural farming practices,                   Patil, B. O., Chandrashekara, C. P. and
NF:B+G+J+M+I (788 kg ha-1) recorded                              Manjunatha, S. B., 2021, Economics of
significantly higher seed cotton yield and was                   chickpea as influenced by natural
on par with NF:G+J+M+I, NF:B+G+J+I and                           (ZBNF) organic and conventional
NF:B+G+J+M. Significantly lower seed cotton                      farming practices in northern transitional
yield was obtained with NF:M+I and                               zone of Karnataka. Agri-innovations to
NF:B+M+I due to absence of ghanjeevamrit                         combat food and nutrition challenges In:
and jeevamrit as nutrient sources in these                       Extended Summaries of 5th International
treatments. A similar trend of gross returns                     Agronomy Congress. The Indian Society
was noticed in NF treatments (Table 1).                          of Agronomy, IARI, New Delhi, 4:
However, net returns in all NF treatments were                   2089-2090.
on par with each other due to reduced cost of              Vinay, G., Padmaja, B., Reddy, M. M.,
cultivation (Table 1). Similar work was                          Jayasree, G. and Triveni, S., 2020, Effect
reported by Patil et al. (2021) in chickpea.                     of natural, organic and inorganic farming
                                                                 methods on microorganisms and
CONCLUSION                                                       enzymes activity of maize rhizosphere.
                                                                 Int. Res. J. Pure App. Chem., 21(6): 11-
       The present study indicated that even                     16.
though the seed cotton yield and gross returns
                                                      53
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table1: Effect of different treatments on seed cotton yield, cost of cultivation, gross and net returns.
                                                      54
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
 Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
          The farmers are under stress due to               locally available biodegradable materials and
 practices in modern agriculture loaded with                combines scientific knowledge of ecology and
 chemicals whose productivity declined over                 modern technology with traditional farming
 years and have several negative consequences.              practices based on naturally occurring
 Our farmers are exposed to harmful chemicals               biological processes (Bishnoi and Bhati,
 leads to incurable diseases.           Farmer’s            2017).      Natural Farming (NF): it releases
 indebtedness keeps increasing as they buy                  nutrients locked in the soil by triggering
 inputs with barrowed resources and are unable              microbial activities and bring the earthworms
 to pay it back due to changed climate vagaries.            activities back and encourage plants to fix the
 This industrial model of agriculture is not                moisture from the air just like a rain forests do.
 sustainable. Finally consumers end up with                 NF is regenerative; it increases the carbon
 foods lazed with harmful chemicals. So we                  content in the soil and reverses ongoing
 have to transform agricultural practices to be             desertification. Increasing carbon content
 more ecologically sustainable (Anon.2020).                 allows us to retain more water in soil creating
 Natural Farming (NF) is a set of farming                   life in the soil with humus which increases the
 methods, and also a grassroots peasant                     fertility of the soil. Mulching in NF reduces
 movement, which has spread to various states               negative effects of radiation on soil biota like
 in India. It has attained wide success in                  microbes and earthworms (Palekar, 2006).
 southern India, especially the southern Indian             Government of Karnataka sponsored a project
 state of Karnataka where it first evolved                  to evaluate the performance of natural farming
 (Anon., 2020). ‘Natural farming’ refers to a               in comparison with established organic and
 farming approach that emphasizes the                       conventional farming practices in different
 importance of co-production of crops and                   zones of Karnataka since 2018. The objectives
 animals so that synergistic effects of different           of the project were to 1. Evaluation of natural
 parts of the system can be used, relying on                farming system for its productivity and
 easily available ‘ingredients’ to produce crops            profitability in different crops and cropping
 on-farm and microorganisms to build the                    systems of Zone 8. 2. To assess the soil
 fertility of the soil (Palekar, 2006). Natural             physical, chemical and biological properties in
 farming is a holistic agricultural practice that           Natural farming fields and 3. To workout the
 encounters the commercial expenditure and                  economics and livelihood security of the
 market dependency of farmers for farm inputs.              natural farming.
 Here, soil is supplemented with the microbial
 consortium like Beejamrutha and Jeevamrutha                METHODOLOGY
 to accelerate the proliferation of soil micro
                                                                    Field experiments were conducted in
 flora and indigenous pesticide decoctions of
                                                            all crops and cropping systems of zone -8 like
 leaves with cow urine are used as plant
                                                            green gram, black gram, soybean, maize and
 protection measures. This practice involves
                                                            inter cropping systems like maize + soybean,
                                                       55
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
red gram + soybean, red gram + maize, cotton               cultivation, and attracting better product price.
+ groundnut systems during Kharif season at                B: C ratio improved significantly owing to less
zone-8 (Agri), UAS, Dharwad from 2018-19 to                input cost and attracting premium price for
2021-22. Three farming practices were                      chemical-free produce. The report put forward
adopted such as, Conventional Farming                      suggestions like natural farming as an
Practices (CNF); Organic farming (OF) and                  alternative option for the producers and the
Natural Farming (NF) indifferent blocks and                consumers for chemical-free produce (Anon.,
quadratic sampling methods were followed to                2020).
draw samples and plant observations.
                                                           CONCLUSION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
                                                                   Natural Farming is being adopted by
        Among the different crops selected for             several farmers, whose experience shows
the study under NF practice showed reduction               reduced cost of production and crop can be
in the yield compared to conventional farming              grown in arid and low rainfall areas.
practices (CNF). The yield reduction were less             Chemicals can be reduced in plant protection
in green gram to the extent of 27%, black gram             can bring down the chemical residues in food
(-26%), soybean (-22%), cotton + groundnut (-              and their ill effects. Based on results of the
24 & -5%, respectively) as compared to high                experiments in different crops, the following
input demanding crops like maize (-62%),                   crops are suitable for cultivation under natural
wheat (-35%), chickpea (-34%), rabi sorghum                farming practices Green gram, Black gram,
(-37%), and inter cropping systems like maize              Groundnut, Soybean, Hence, during 2022-23,
+ soybean (-53% & -22%, respectively), red                 the Department of Agriculture, Government of
gram + soybean (-40% & -19%, respectively),                Karnataka has initiated adoption of natural
red gram + maize (-38 & -63%, respectively),               farming practices in 5000 acres in different
chickpea + linseed (-36 & -45%, respectively).             agro-climatic zones of Karnataka in different
                                                           crops and cropping system. Natural farming
The cost of production saved was about 10 to               has several benefits like higher income, better
36% in sole crops and 20 to 35% in                         health, improved soil fertility and lower costs.
intercropping systems under NF over                        So we have to encourage such natural farming
conventional farming. About 20 to 55%                      farmers as climate heroes and expand to all the
material/input costs were saved under NF in                states and union territories in India.
selected crops over CNF practice. Net return is
concerned; except Kharif black gram and                    REFERENCES
maize all other crops showed positive net
returns under NF. Net return under NF was                  Anonymous, 2020, https://naarm.org.in/ wp
lesser than CNF in green gram (39%), soybean                    content/uploads/2021/07/2020_NITI_
(-18%), wheat (-80%), chickpea (-52%),                          Natural-Farming_      NAARM-CRIDA-
sorghum (-32%) and in inter cropping systems                    1.pdf
like maize + soybean (-48%), red gram +                    Bishnoi and Bhati, 2017, An overview: Zero
soybean (-29%), red gram + maize (-67%),                        Budget Natural Farming. Trends in
cotton + groundnut (-5.6%), chickpea +                          Bioscience, 10(46): 9314-9316.
linseed (-57%). Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka                  Palekar, S., 2006, Shoonya Bandovalada
and Maharashtra field survey and personal                       Naisargika Krushi(Zero budget natural
interview reveals that the natural Farming may                  farming), Published by Swamy Anand,
not enhance the yield but helped in improving                   Agri Prakashana, Bangalore, pp.145-158.
farmers’ income by reducing cost of
                                                      56
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      57
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Genetic divergence:                                        3. Intra cluster distance
1.Mahalanobis D2 analysis                                  The intra cluster distances were calculated by
Mahalanobis (1936) D2 statistical analysis was             the formula given by Singh and Chaudhary
used for assessing the genetic divergence                  (1977).
among the test entries. The generalized                                     Square of intra cluster distance
distance between any two populations is given                ∑ Di2
by formula.                                                = n
                D2 = ∑∑λijSiSj                             Where, ∑Di2= The sum of distance between all
                                                           possible combinations
Where,D2 = Square of generalized distance,                 N = Number of all possible combinations.
λ ij= Reciprocal of the common dispersal                   4. Inter cluster distance
matrix                                                     The inter cluster distance were calculated by
Sai = (μi 1 - μi2), Saj = (μj 1 - μj2), μ = General        the formulae described by Singh and
mean                                                       Chaudhary (1977).
        The D2 values were obtained as the                                                     ∑ Di2
                                                           Square of inter cluster distance =ni×nj
corresponding uncorrelated (Ys) values of any
two genotypes as per procedure illustrated by              Where,
Rao (1952).                                                          ∑Di2 = The sum of distances between
                                                                            all possible combinations
2. Clustering of D2 values                                                  (ninj) of the entries included in
All then (n (n-1)/2) D2 values were clustered                               the cluster study.
using Tocher’s method as described by Rao
(1952).
        ni = Number of entries in cluster I, nj =
              Number of entries in cluster j
                                                      58
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2: Twenty-two traits for genetic divergence study
                                                      59
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
2. Cluster Analysis                                        segregating populations, this result was also
                                                           suggestively presented by Thakur et al. (2020).
        Clustering of twenty-five genotypes
were performed following Tocher’s method                            The D2 value derived nearest and
described by Rao, 1952. D2 values were                     furthest distance between individual cluster are
generated statistically using sum of squares               presented in table 3. Cluster I reported nearest
from Y values of each morphological trait and              to Cluster VII (123.71) and farthest with
the values observed were employed for                      Cluster XI (324.51). Cluster II was found to be
clustering resulting in eleven notable clusters            nearest with Cluster VIII (139.96) and furthest
(figure 2). Cluster I holds the maximum                    with Cluster XI (641.91). Cluster III recorded
genotypes (11), Cluster IV ranked the second               nearest distance and furthest distance with
largest group comprising of four genotypes                 Cluster V (66.04) and Cluster VIII (380.23)
followed by Cluster II. Rest of the clusters are           respectively. Cluster IV recorded nearest
represented by single genotype. The cluster                distance with Cluster III (115.5) and farthest
representing individual genotypes holds quite              with Cluster XI (479.32). Cluster VII (58.44)
unique traits and are source of potential lines.           and Cluster VIII (413.84) represents nearest
Furthest distance was recorded among Cluster               and furthest cluster from Cluster V. Cluster
XI and Cluster VIII (763.68) followed by                   VII (100.87) and Cluster VIII (432.58)
Cluster X and Cluster VIII (653.75), hence                 represents nearest and furthest cluster from
genotypes under these clusters can be                      Cluster VI. Cluster V (58.44) and Cluster VIII
exploited as diverse lines in hybrid production.           (376.87) represents nearest and furthest cluster
While, narrow distance infers low diversity                from Cluster VII. Cluster II (139.96) and
and hence individuals under such clusters must             Cluster XI (763.68) represents nearest and
positively avoid for taking up crossing                    furthest cluster from Cluster VIII. Cluster III
programme. Further, there were no close                    (66.74) and Cluster VIII (365.80) represents
association of the geographical place of                   nearest and furthest cluster from Cluster IX.
collection with the clustering pattern observed            Cluster VII (78.37) and Cluster VIII (653.75)
from the study, this observation was in close              represents nearest and furthest cluster from
coordination with the findings of Srivastava et            Cluster X. Lastly, Cluster X (93.38) and
al. (2013). Moreover, the genotypes falling                Cluster VIII (763.68) represents nearest and
under cluster XI and VIII showed widest                    furthest cluster from Cluster XI. Higher the
genetic distance revealing high divergence.                observed value more is the diversity and vice
This diverge clusters can be fully exploited for           versa. Relatively distant clusters with superior
developing       novel      hybrids     through            traits can be considered for breeding crosses in
hybridization     programme      by     utilizing          crop improvement programme.
economic recombination resulted from the
                                                      60
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      61
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 3: D2 value indicating nearest and furthest distance between the clusters
  Cluster           D2 value for nearest cluster        D2 value for furthest cluster
  Cluster I         Cluster VII (123.71)                Cluster (324.51)
  Cluster II        Cluster VIII (139.96)               Cluster XI (641.91)
  Cluster III       Cluster V (66.04)                   Cluster VIII (380.23)
  Cluster IV        Cluster III (115.50)                Cluster XI (479.32)
  Cluster V         Cluster VII (58.44)                 Cluster VIII (413.84)
  Cluster VI        Cluster VII (100.87)                Cluster VIII (432.58)
  Cluster VII       Cluster V (58.44)                   Cluster VIII (376.87)
  Cluster VIII      Cluster II (139.96)                 Cluster XI (763.68)
  Cluster IX        Cluster III (66.74)                 Cluster VIII (365.8)
  Cluster X         Cluster VII (78.37)                 Cluster VIII (653.75)
  Cluster XI        Cluster X (93.38)                   Cluster VIII (763.68)
Table 4: Average inter and intra cluster distances (D2) for eleven clusters
                                                      62
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Rao,   C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical                        for yield and bits component traits in
      Methods in Biometrical Research. John                     tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.). Plant
      Wiley and Sons, New York. 357-369.                        Arch., 13(1): 105- 112.
Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.D. (1977).                    Thakur, S., Sharma, P., Mehta, D. and Thakur,
      Biometrical methods in quantitative                       R. (2020). Studies on genetic divergence
      genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers,                     in tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.)
      New Delhi, pp, 266.                                       under mid hill conditions of Solan
Srivastava, K., Kumari, K., Singh, S.P. and                     District of Himachal Pradesh. J. Pharma.
      Kumar, R. (2013). Association studies                     Phyto., 9: 1957-1960.
                                                      63
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      64
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
environment and human beings. Hence,                       using the standard protocols. The data
present experiment was conducted over a                    associated with the experiment were confirmed
period of three years to evaluate alternate                to the assumptions of the analysis of variance
farming systems for the pest and disease                   (single factor ANOVA) through WASP
management in a Horti-silviculture eco-                    software® (developed by ICAR Research
system.                                                    complex, Goa, India) and means were
                                                           compared at < 5% probability using Duncan’s
METHODOLOGY:                                               Multiple Range Test (DMRT) (Duncan, 1951).
        Three farming systems viz., chemical               RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
farming, organic farming and natural farming
(NF) were evaluated to manage the biotic                           The pooled data of three years
stresses in an eco-friendly manner and                     presented in the table 1, clears that all the
compared      with    standard     check    i.e            farming systems were effectively manages
recommended package of practices (RPP). The                insect pests of all the three crops. Among the
field experiment was laid out in a randomized              different pest management systems chemical
block design with five replications comprising             farming involving use of novel synthetic
of four treatments. Plants were well                       chemical pesticides recorded significantly
maintained with all the agronomic practices as             lowest pest load and was at par with standard
per University's recommendations except for                check, RPP. Organic and natural farming
the plant protection measures against insect               involving pest management using plant and
pest and diseases. For each treatment, five                cow based bio-pesticides recorded moderate
plants per replication were tagged with red                level of insect pest population and their
ribbons and further observations were recorded             damage.
Table 1: Consequences of farming systems against different insect pests of crops
Farming        Banana pest*            Ginger pest*            French bean pest*
system         A          B            C          D            E              F          G
               1.60a±0.                2.07 a
                                              ±0. 3.53 a
                                                         ±0.                             2.80a±0.
T Chemical                4.40a±0.87                           5.47a±0.43 3.47a±0.31
               29                      27         43                                     40
1    farming              (2.06)                               (2.33)         (1.85)
               (1.24)                  (8.21)     (10.77)                                (9.55)
                    b           b           b          b             b
               5.30 ±0. 10.60 ±0.8 7.60 ±0. 8.20 ±0. 11.53 ±0.4                          5.80b±0.
T Organic                                                                     8.40b±0.58
               51         1            39         39           3                         37
2 farming                                                                     (2.89)
               (2.29)     (3.25)       (15.98)    (16.62)      (3.40)                    (13.91)
               3.90b±0. 10.20b±0.8 7.93c±0. 9.20b±0. 12.87b±0.7 10.20c±0.2 7.87c±0.
T Natural
               56         6            12         67           9              9          44
3    Farming
               (1.96)     (3.18)       (16.35)    (17.61)      (3.58)         (3.20)     (16.26)
                    a                       a          a
               1.50 ±0.                3.00 ±0. 4.00 ±0.                                 3.00a±0.
T                         6.00a±0.89                           6.27a±0.76 3.00a±0.42
     RPP       35                      37         15                                     37
4                         (2.42)                               (2.48)         (1.72)
               (1.18)                  (9.89)     (11.52)                                (9.90)
S.Em±          0.13       0.18         0.39       0.53         0.11           0.11       0.49
CD @ 5%        0.40       0.56         1.23       1.79         0.31           0.29       1.51
Note: A- Banana leaf eating caterpillar, B-          cent pod borer damage. *- Pooled data of three
Banana skipper, C- Per cent dead heart by            years, Figures with same alphabetical
ginger shoot borer,D- Per cent rhizome fly           superscripts are statistically non-significant
infestation, E- Aphid population per five            (p<0.05) by DMRT.
plants, F- Leaf miner per five plants, G- Per
                                                      65
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        In the present study, chemical farming             highest yield per ha in banana, it was
and RPP recorded significantly least insect                statistically on par with Chemical farming and
pest incidence which might be due to chemical              the natural farming recorded the lowest yield
pesticides having quick knock down effect on               levels. As the banana was grown under the
target pest. Kaniuczak and Matosz (1998)                   forest trees, shading effect might have resulted
stated that, imidacloprid can be potentially               in the reduced yield levels, irrespective of the
used in the IPM of faba beans, Meena et al.,               farming system. As far as the yield of ginger is
2020 inferred that different chemical                      concerned, the recommended package of
pesticidesviz., acetamiprid 20 SP (0.4g/l),                practice resulted in maximum rhizome yield
imidacloprid 17.8SL (0.33 ml/l), quinalphos                which was statistically superior over other
25EC (2.0 ml/l), thiamethoxam 25WG (0.5g/l)                treatments. The higher yield levels in organic
were effective against the against cluster bean            farming compared to the chemical farming
aphid. The same trends of results were also                might be due to the better response of the
reported by various workers viz., Ganapathy                ginger for organic manures compared to the
and Durairaj (2000), Lakshmi (2002),                       chemical fertilizers. As the ginger is a heavy
Dharmendar Singh et al., 2016 and                          feeder crop, lesser nutrition in Natural farming
Satyanarayana and Arunakumara (2017).                      might have resulted in lowest yield levels in
Organic farming and natural farming which                  Natural farming practice. The data pertaining
utilizes locally available plant and cow based             to the yield of French bean revealed the
bio-pesticides are moderately effective against            significant difference in the yield levels under
various insect pests. The plant based bio-                 different farming systems. Recommended
pesticides viz., neem oil, pongamia oil,                   package of practice recorded the maximum
neemastra, agniastra, bhramastra and ginger-               yield of French bean which was significantly
garlic paste can be used as alternative to                 superior over the other practices. The results of
chemical pesticides for the effective                      present study are in compliance with the
management of insect pests. Grdisa and Grsic,              reports of Shivamurthy and Patil (2010),
2013 reported that neem binds to acetylcholine             Prabhakar etal. (2011), Rajan and Murugesan
receptors thereby disrupting the nervous                   (2012), Kumbar et al.(2015), Kumar and
system and has different chemical properties               Devakumar (2016) for the yield levels in
viz., repellence, feeding deterrence, inhibition           different crops.
of oviposition, egg hatching and moulting. The
same trends of results were also reported by               Table 2: Yield levels of the crops under
Tomlin, et al. (2007); Yadav et al. (2021) and             different farming systems
Bhushan, et al. (2011). Cow urine and cow
dung having high urea content in it                        Farming
                                                                           Banana     Ginger
                                                                                                 French bean
which is toxic to most of organisms, the pests                             yield      yield
                                                           system                                yield (t/ ha)
                                                                           (t/ ha)    (t/ ha)
and insects etc. (Kumawat, et al., 2014) can be                 Chemical
effectively used for the pest management along             T1              9.21       7.34       7.04
                                                                farming
with plant-based bio-pesticides. The same                       Organic
                                                           T2              8.02       8.29       7.94
opinion were also given by (Gupta 2005)                       farming
against aphids and (Deka et al. 2016) against                   Natural
                                                           T3              7.03       5.73       7.72
tea mosquito bug.                                               Farming
                                                           T4 RPP          9.64       11.01      9.56
        There was a significant difference                 S.Em±           0.52       1.16       0.24
among the farming systems for the yield of the             CD @ 5%         1.59       3.57       0.75
crops tested (Table 2). Though the
recommended package of practice recorded
                                                      66
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
REFERENCES:                                                     Organic Farming. Popular Kheti, 2(2):
                                                                237-242.
Bhushan S, Singh RP, Shanker R. (2011)                     Kumbar, B., Devakumar, N. and Sheshadri, T.,
      Bioefficacy of neem and Bt against pod                    2015, Influence of Farm Yard Manure,
      borer, Helicoverp aarmigera in chickpea,                  Jeevamrutha and Panchagavya on growth
      Journal of Biopesticides; 4(1):87-89.                     and yield of French bean (Phaseolus
Deka, M.K., Rajkhowa, D., Rokozeno, Kalita, S.                  vulgaris L.). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 50(2):
      (2016). Growth regulatory effects of                      279-283.
      Pongamia pinnata and Lantana camara                  Lakshmi, P.S.R., Sekhar, P.R. and Rao, V.R.S.
      extracts on Tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis                  (2002). Bio efficacy of certain insecticides
      theivora Waterhouse. Annals of Plant                      against spotted pod borer on urdbean.
      Protection Sciences, 24(2):213-216.                       Indian Journal of Pulses Research,
Dharmendar Singh, Singh, C. K., Singh, R. K.                    15:201-202.
      and Chaudhary, A. K., 2016. Efficacy of              Meena, R.K., Meena, R.K., Singh, U. and
      insecticides against shoot borer on                       Meena, M.L. (2020). Bio-efficacy of some
      turmeric crop in North-East India.                        insecticides against bean aphid, Aphis
      Progressive Research – An International                   cracivora koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in
      Journal, 11(1): 79-81. Satyanarayana, C.                  clusterbean. Pesticide Research Journal,
      and Arunakumara, K. T., 2017. Biology                     32(1): 159-164. Ganapathy, N. and
      and biorational management of ginger                      Durairaj, C. (2000). Bio-efficacy of some
      shoot borer, Conogethes punctiferalis                     newer insecticides against pod borers of
      Guenee. The Journal of Rural and                          blackgram. Pestology, 24: 43-45.
      Agricultural Research, 17(2): 65-70.                 Prabhakar, M., Hebbar, S. S. and Nair, A. K.,
Grdiša, M. and Gršiš, K. (2013). Botanical                      2011, Growth and yield of French bean
      insecticides    in     plant     protection.              (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under organic
      Agriculturare conspectus scientificus, 2:                 farming. J. Applied Horti, 13(1):71-73.
      85-93.                                               Rajan, M. R. and Murugesan, P., 2012, Influence
Gupta, M.P. (2005). Efficacy of neem in                         of vermiwash on germination and growth
      combination with cow urine against                        of cow pea (Vigna ungiculata) and rice
      mustard aphid and its effect on coccinellid               (Oryza sativa). IOSR J. Pharmacy
      predators. Natural Product Radiance, 4(2):                Res.,2(6):31-34.
      102-106.                                             Shivamurthy, D. and Patil, B. N., 2010, Effect of
Kaniuczak, Z. and Matosz, I. (1998). The effect                 method of planting and seed treatment on
      of insecticidal seed dressings upon the                   performance of wheat genotypes under
      broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus                      rainfed condition. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,
      Boh.) in the cultivation of the field bean.               19(4):781-784.
      Journal of Plant Protection Research. 38:            Tomlin, C. (2007). The Pesticide Manual, 11th
      84-88.                                                    Edition. British crop protection council, 49
Kumar, B. and Devakumar, N., 2016, Effect of                    Downing       Street,   Farham,     Survey
      Jeevamrutha and Panchagavya on French                     GU97PH, UK.
      bean. Advances in Life Sci, 5(9): 3619-              Yadav, S.P., Singh, B., Satyajeet and Kumar, H.
      3623.                                                     (2021). Eco-friendly management of aphid
Kumawat, N., Shekhawat, P.S, Kumar Rakesh                       (Lipaphiserysimi Kalt) in Indian mustard
      and Sanwal, R.C. (2014). Agricultural,                    variety RB-50 under late sown conditions.
      Formulation of Biopesticides for Insect                   J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 9(1): 1882-1886.
      Pests and Diseases Management in
                                                      67
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                            70
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 71
  Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
  Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                practice (T1) as compared to other practices
                                                        on rabi sorghum with respect to sorghum
          Over the years of experimentation             rust (Puccinia purpurea) (8.43%, 14.37% at
  involving greengram-rabisorghum farming               90 DAS and 105 DAS respectively) as well
  system the results on greengram (Table 1)             as leaf blight (Exserohilum turcicum) of
  indicated that, all the diseases recorded             sorghum; at various growth stages (2.42%,
  significantly    higher   incidence     viz.          9.89% and 14.53% at 45 DAS, 75 DAS and
  Cercospora leaf spot (4.34%, 10.0% at 45              105 DAS respectively).
  and 60 DAS respectively), powdery mildew
  (22.84%), and yellow mosaic (2.85%)in                 REFERENCES:
  natural farming practice (T1) as compared
  to conventional farming (T3) as well as               Babalad H B, Guggari A K, Chogatapur S
  chemical farming (T4). In contrast, higher                 V, Renuka B, Gurudevi V N and
  seed yield (928 kg/ha) was recorded in                     Hiremath R, 2020, Comparative
  integrated natural farming practice (T5)                   evaluation of zero budget natural
  while, the B:C ratio (2.41) emerged as                     farming systems in green gram.
  highpoint in natural farming practice (T1)                 National Conference on Climate
  which was significantly superior over other                Resilient Agriculture for Sustainable
  practices.                                                 Production and Nutritional Security
          Similarly higher disease severity                  UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, (1-2,
  (Table 2) continued in natural farming                     February 2020) Pp-163
   Table 1: Management of greengram diseases under green gram-rabi sorghum cropping system
   evaluated under natural farming practices over years (2019-20 to 2021-22)
Treatments        Cercospora leaf spot Powdery                 Yellow        Yield B:C
                  (PDI %)                      mildew (PDI mosaic virus (kg/ha) Ratio
                  45 DAS       60 DAS          %)              (% Incidence)
T1-Natural        4.34         10.00           22.84           2.85          808   2.41
    farming       (2.31)*      (3.32)          (4.86)          (1.96)
T2-Organic        4.40         8.98            19.14           2.45          817   2.10
    farming       (2.32)       (3.16)          (3.48)          (1.86)
T3-               2.75         5.22            13.98           1.78          923   2.28
    Conventiona (1.94)         (2.49)          (3.87)          (1.67)
    l farming
T4-Chemical       2.63         5.44            14.83           1.73          643   2.39
    farming       (1.90)       (2.54)          (3.96)          (1.65)
T5-Integrated     4.75         9.36            21.22           3.28          928   2.01
    natural       (2.40)       (3.22)          (4.71)          (2.07)
    farming
S. Em.+           0.02         0.03            0.31            0.03          10.0  0.03
LSD (0.05)        0.07         0.10            0.95            0.09          32.0  0.08
  *Figures in parenthesis are [x+1] square root transformed values
                                                   72
  Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
  Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
   Table 2: Management of sorghum diseases under green gram-rabi sorghum cropping system
            evaluated under natural farming practices over years (2019-20 to 2021-22)
Treatments        Sorghum rust               Leaf blight of sorghum             Yield B:C
                  (Puccinia      purpurea) (Exserohilum turcicum) (PDI (kg/ha) Ratio
                  (PDI %)                    %)
                  90 DAS       105 DAS       45 DAS 75 DAS          105 DAS
T1-Natural        8.43         14.37         2.42       9.89        14.53       1010  1.84
   farming        (3.07)*      (3.92)        (1.85)     (3.30)      (3.94)
T2-Organic        6.81         12.10         2.81       9.14        12.97       1183  1.84
   farming        (2.81)       (3.62)        (1.95)     (3.18)      (3.74)
T3-               3.17         7.47          1.21       5.91        8.75        1328  2.09
   Conventiona (2.04)          (2.91)        (1.48)     (2.63)      (3.12)
   l farming
T4-Chemical       4.60         7.75          1.22       4.94        7.05        1258  2.27
   farming        (2.37)       (2.96)        (1.49)     (2.44)      (2.84)
T5-Integrated     6.37         13.39         2.64       8.22        11.27       1094  1.80
   natural        (2.71)       (3.79)        (1.91)     (3.04)      (3.50)
   farming
S. Em.+           0.02         0.02          0.03       0.03        0.02        43    0.11
LSD (0.05)        0.07         0.06          0.10       0.09        0.07        131   0.34
  *Figures in parenthesis are [x+1] square root transformed values
                                                   73
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                   75
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
potential bacterial isolate was selected for             In order to support Zero hunger, the second-
the 16s rRNA based molecular identification.            most significant Sustainable Development
The 16s rDNA gene-based analysis in the                 Goal established by the UNO, there are
Phylogenetic tree (Kumaret al.,2018)                    growing calls for the use of environmentally
showed that NFBDS_1isolate was clustered                safe and sustainable pest control agents like
and identified as Bacillus nakamurai and                Bacillus spp. Regarding this, a number of
submitted in the database of the National               Bacillus strains have shown the potential to
center for Biotechnology with accession                 be employed as plant growth-promoting
no.MW560473. An interesting area for                    bacteria (PGPB) and have shown to have
research would be the effect of Bacillus                antagonistic activity against a number of
species in reducing plant infections,                   phytopathogenic microbes more than ever,
improving their resistance to different biotic          the entire agro ecosystem is unsustainable.
and abiotic stresses, and increasing
productivity. The identification of Bacillus            REFERENCES
spp. top strains holds great promise for
                                                        Sharp, R.J,       Riley, P.W,      White, D,
commercialization and management of biotic
                                                              1992; Heterotrophic       Thermophilic
and abiotic challenges to enhance crop
                                                              Bacilli.              In: Thermophilic
output. Recent developments in genomes and
                                                              Bacteria. Kristjanssono, J.K., Ed.CRC
post     genomics       investigations      have
                                                              Press, Inc.: Boca Raton; pp. 19–50.
illuminated the molecular processes of the
                                                        Stein, T, 2005; Bacillus Subtilis Antibiotics:
Bacillus species' bio-control of plant diseases
                                                              Structures, Syntheses and Specific
.The quality of jeevamrutha-based fertilizers
                                                              Functions. Mol. Microbiol, 56, 845–
has enhanced, as has the potential of
                                                              857.
microorganisms existing in the soil where it
                                                        Manjunatha GS, Upperi SN, Pujari BT,
was implemented, according to the
                                                              Yeledahalli NA, Kuligod VB, 2009;
assessment of enzyme activity and
                                                              Effect of farm yard manure treated
microorganisms.        As     a    result,   the
                                                              with jeevamrutha on yield attributes,
involvement of microorganisms is crucial for
                                                              yield and economics of sunflower
the long-term viability of organic agriculture.
                                                              (Helianthus annuus L.). Kar. J Agril.
Also impacts on the health and fertility of the
                                                              Sci; 22(1):198-199.
soil.    Jeevamrutha provides significant
                                                        Islam, M, Laatsch, H,                     von
advantages to farmers, including lower costs,
                                                              Tiedemann,2016; A. Inhibitory
ease of adoption by poor farmers, increased
                                                              Effects of Macrotetrolides from
crop productivity, protection of the
                                                              Streptomycin           spp.          on
environment,       and     effective     farming
                                                              Zoosporogenesis and Motility of
practices. Farmers generally use only fresh
                                                              Peronosporomycete Zoospores are
preparations of liquid organic formulations
                                                              Likely Linked with Enhanced ATPase
because they do not know the shelf life of
                                                              Activity in Mitochondria. Front.
liquid organic formulations. We can keep
                                                              Microbiol, 7, 1824.
jeevamrutha for a week. Stored material also
                                                        Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore
has advantages such as increased nitrogen,
                                                              DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, et al.,
micronutrients, EC, and so on. We must use
                                                              1999,Current protocols in molecular
organic fertiliser to get a good crop yield and
                                                              biology. New York, NY: John Wiley
a healthy crop quality.
                                                              & Sons, Inc.
                                                   76
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Joshi, M. 2012, New Vistas of Organic                        K.2018,MEGAX:MolecularEvolution
      Farming. Scientific Publishers, New                    aryGeneticsAnalysisacross
      Delhi, 140.                                            computingplatforms.Molecular
Kumar,                                                       BiologyandEvolution, 35:1547-1549.
      S,StecherG,LiM,KnyazC,andTamura
    350
                         293
    300
    250
    200                                                               180
                                               143                                 Jeevamrutha
    150
    100                                                                            Jeevamrutha
     50       10                     5                      5                      Jeevamrutha
      0
                                                                                   Jeevamrutha
                                                                                   Jeevamrutha
                                                 77
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 78
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
esculenta,       Garcinia       anomala,              up to 15% level for LWY growing pigs.
Tabernaemontana divaricata, and Biden                 The UCFs could be utilized in preparation
biternata were suggested as substitutes of            of complete feed block and was acceptable
conventional protein ingredients; and                 to pigs. It was further concluded that
Spilanthes acmella, Manihot esculenta,                utilization of UCFs could curtail feeding
Colocasia esculenta, Ipomoea batatas,                 cost without compromising performance of
Polygonum chinense and Bidens biternata               pigs in Mizoram.
as substitutes of conventional energy
ingredients.                                          REFERENCES
                                                 79
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1. Suggested feed formula with unconventional feeds for growing pigs.
Ingredients                Grower feed formula               Finisher feed formula
                             I          II           III       I          II         III
Yellow maize                 50         54           45        54         60         52
Rice polish                  12         13           12        13         15         13
Soyabean meal                9          15           7         4          12         2
Fish meal                    4          7            3         2          5          1
Bidens biternata meal        22         -            22        24         -          24
Garcinia anomala meal        -          -            -         -          5          -
Manihot esculenta leaf -                8            -         -          -          -
meal
Vernonia cinerea meal        -          -            8         -          -          5
Dicalcium phosphate          1.40       1.40         1.40      1.40       1.40       1.40
Trace mineral mixture        1.00       1.00         1.00      1.00       1.00       1.00
Salt                         0.50       0.50         0.50      0.50       0.50       0.50
Vitamin mixture              0.10       0.10         0.10      0.10       0.10       0.10
Molasses*                    4.70       -            23.00     2.00       -          5.00
Complete feed block with Mikania micrantha L. meal and Musa paradisiaca leaf meal was
found acceptable for growing pigs with adaptation period of 7-days. Feeding trial with Mikania
micrantha L. (21.76% CP and 1708 Kcal DE/kg) meal as substitute of soyabean meal revealed
that it can be incorporated up to 15% level without any effect on performance of LWY growing
pigs.
Table 2. Performance of LWY growing pigs fed Mikania micrantha L meal (MM).
Parameter                T-I     (0% T-II      (5% T-III (10% T-IV (15%                        p-value
                         MM)         MM)             MM)           MM)
Initial body weight (kg) 20.20±3.52 20.63±3.75       20.10±3.24    20.45±4.21                  1.00
Final body weight (kg) 56.57±4.35 55.18±5.10         53.45±4.93    53.28±5.47                  0.96
Body weight gain (kg) 36.38±1.19 34.55±2.13          33.35±2.43    32.83±1.29                  0.55
Feed conversion ratio    3.07±0.30   3.21±0.33       3.16±0.28     3.14±0.34                   0.99
Total feed intake (kg)   112.32±13.5 111.13±14.45 105.77±13.7 104.13±14.9                      0.97
                         3                           4             6
Feed cost/kg gain (Rs.) 94.01±9.06 93.20±9.69        85.16±7.48    79.28±8.57                  0.60
                                                 80
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 81
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
third year experimentation over the initial            CONCLUSION
value.
                                                              Intensified natural farming, natural
         In pooled data of three years (Table          farming and organic farming systems are
1), the available nitrogen, phosphorus and             superior in getting good yield and returns.
potassium was significantly higher in                  Also soil fertility status gets enhanced.
intensified natural farming (180, 31.52 and
550 kg NPK/ha, respectively) followed by               REFERENCES
organic farming (178, 29.47 and 548.92 kg
                                                       Vidyavathi G S, Dasog, Babalad H B, Hebsur
NPK/ha, respectively) and natural farming
                                                             N S, Gali S K, Patil S G and
(176, 27.64 and 548.52 kg NPK/ha,
                                                             AlagawadiA R,2012, Nutrient status
respectively) over its initial values. Addition
                                                             of soil under different nutrient and
of ganajeevamrutha, FYM, vermicompost,
                                                             crop      management       practices.
mulching with green manures, crop residue
                                                             Karnataka Journal of Agricultural
incorporation and spraying of liquid organic
                                                             Science, 25(2):193-198.
manures directly resulted in increases of
organic carbon content of the soil, while              Tiwari, A.K. (2016). Pulses in India:
increases in nitrogen content was as a result                 Retrospect and Prospect, Govt. of
of organically bond nitrogen converted to                     India, Ministry of Agri. & Farmers
mineralizable from nitrogen, phosphorus as                    Welfare, Directorate of Pulses
a results of organic materials reducing                       Development, Vindhychal Bhavan,
phosphorus fixing capacity of the soil and                    Bhopal, MP.
available K due to release of non-
exchangeable K from the soil. This is due to
more addition of organic carbon to soil,
which       increases    the      activity   of
microorganisms and interns the biological
fixation of atmospheric N by rhizobium,
increases the nitrogen to the plant and also
fix in the soil.
                                                  82
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Pigeonpea yield and soil available nutrient status at harvest as influenced by different
       farming systems (Pooled data of 2019-2021).
pH SOC EC
                                   9                                                                                          0.6
   pH, EC(dS/m) and SOC (g kg-1)
                                   8
                                                                                                                              0.5
                                   7
                                                                                                                                    EC (dSm-1)
                                   6                                                                                          0.4
                                   5
                                                                                                                              0.3
                                   4
                                   3                                                                                          0.2
                                   2
                                                                                                                              0.1
                                   1
                                   0                                                                                          0
                                       Natural Farming Organic Farming     Conventional      Chemical    Intigrated Natural
                                                                             Farming         Farming          Farming
                                                                         Farming Systems
Fig.1: Soil pH, EC and SOC status after three years of experimentation under different farming
systems
                                                                                        83
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
   Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                    84
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
lower system productivity was recorded with           Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D., 2003.
chemical farming (18.08 kg ha-1 day-1) (Fig.               Assessing the impact of the green
1). The higher system productivity under                   revolution, 1960– 2000. Science, 300,
organic and natural farming might be due to                758–762.
application of organic manures which results          Rosset, P. M. and Martinez-Torres, M. E.,
improved microbial and nutrient dynamics in                2012, Rural social movements and agro
rhizosphere of both crops for promotion of                 ecology: Context, theory and process.
crop growth. Singh et al. (2018) recorded                  Ecology and Society, 17(3).
higher system productivity of soybean-wheat           Singh, R.K., Dhar, S., Dass, A., Sharma, V.K.,
cropping system under integrated nutrient                  Kumar, A., Gupta, G. and Kumar, B.,
application for both the crops. Significantly              2018. Productivity and profitability of
higher system profitability was recorded with              soybean (Glycine max) and wheat
conventional farming (301.83 Rs. ha-1 day-1),              (Triticum aestivum) genotypes grown in
which was followed by natural farming                      sequence under system of crop
(286.89 Rs. ha-1 day-1) and lowest with                    intensification. Indian     Journal    of
chemical farming (259.42 Rs. ha-1 day-1)(Fig.              Agricultural Sciences, 88(9): 1407-1412.
2). The higher system profitability under
conventional farming and natural farming
might be due to enhanced net returns.
Billoreet al. (2005) recorded higher system
profitability under soybean-wheat cropping
system in integrated nutrient management
practices.
CONCLUSION
        The productivity of soybean and
wheat crops increased over the years in
natural farming and organic farming systems.
Natural farming system not only enhanced the
productivity, it also resulted in higher
profitability.Besides the increased yield and
returns, natural farming systems significantly
enhanced SOC and nutrient availability.
REFERENCES
Billore, S.D., Vyas, A. K. and Joshi, O.P.,
      2005.Effect of integrated nutrient
      management on productivity, energy-use
      efficiency and economics of soybean
      (Glycine max-wheat (Triticum aestivum)
      cropping system. Indian journal of
      Agricultural Sciences, 75(10): 644-646.
                                                 85
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
   Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                  25            A                 A
           System productivity             A                                        B
              (kg ha-1 day-1)     20
15
10
                                   0
                                           NF   OF            CoF                   CF
                                                 Farming systems
                                  400
                                            B                      A
           System profitability
                                  350                                                C
                                                 D
             (Rs. ha-1 day-1)
                                  300
                                  250
                                  200
                                  150
                                  100
                                   50
                                       0
                                           NF   OF            CoF                   CF
                                                 Farming systems
Figure 2: System profitability of soybean – wheat cropping system as influenced by different farming
systems (pooled data of 3 years)
                                                     86
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  87
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
soil + 25% N by inorganic source,                     (1.77) of wheat was obtained under
M7:Jeevamrut @ 500 litre/ha at sowing 25              application of 75% N-FYM + NPK
and 50 DAS, M8: Ghanjeevamrut @ 500                   consortia @1250 ml/ha as a soil + 25%N by
kg/ha at sowing 25 and 50 were laid out in            inorganic, while among organic nutrient
randomized block design with thrice                   sources treatments, B: C ratio (1.69) of
replicated. The experiment soil was loamy             wheat     was     obtained higher    under
clay having medium in organic carbon,                 application of jeevamrut @ 500 litre/ha at
available nitrogen and phosphorus and high            sowing, 25 and 50 DASowing to lower cost
in available potassium. Wheat was sown as             of integration of organic formulation. The
rabi season in the second week of                     results corroborate with the findings of
November respectively years and harvested             Parewa et al., (2019) and Ranva et al.,
in the respectively years after attaining             (2022).
maturity. Solid organic manures were
incorporated uniformly over the field before              Soil health improve result revealed that
last ploughing and NPK liquid consortia of            significantly higher organic carbon (0.66%),
bio-fertilizer applied as soil application at         available phosphorus, potassium and
sowing time mixed with organic manures                sulphur (63.94, 432.8 and 28.21 kg/ha) and
and liquid organic manure formulation                 available zinc (0.90 mg/kg) were recorded
sprayed on standing crop at different growth          with application of 50% N-FYM + 50% VC
stages as per treatment. All the agronomic            fb 10% vermiwash spray at 25, 50 and 75
and organic plant-protection practices were           DAS over rest of the treatments in pooled
carried out uniformly as and when required.           basis. SOC and nutrients concentrations in
Yield attributes and yield of wheat were              soil were probably enhanced by continuous
workout as per standard procedure whereas,            application of carbon inputs from FYM and
economics was worked out on prevailing                vermicompost, higher root biomass and
organic market prices in local market which           stubbles,      rhizo     depositions     and
was 40-50% higher over MSP of wheat in                mineralization of organic sources and
receptively year.                                     solubilization by microbes from native
                                                      source and also more microbial population
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                that hastened decomposing of root biomass
                                                      leading to higher accumulation of carbon in
        A perusal data revealed that                  humified carbon fractions of soil, similar
application of different organic nutrient             finding was reported by Bairwa et al.,
sources significantly influenced the seed             (2021).Presumably solid and liquid organic
yield and economics of wheat. Further                 manure such as farmyard manure,
pooled data inferred that significantly               vermicompost and vermiwash increased the
higher seed yield (3756 kg/ha), gross return          micro nutrient content by supplying
( 100605/ha) and net return ( 60352/ha)               complexing agents, which formed stable
obtained with the application of 50% N-               complexes with these micronutrients.
FYM + 50% VC fb 10% vermiwash spray
at 25, 50 and 75 DAS over jeevamrut and               CONCLUSION
ghanjeevamrut and remained statistically on
par with75% N-FYM + NPK consortia                           Based on results of five years
@1250 ml/ha as soil + 25% N by inorganic              experimentation, it may conclude that
source    and     at   rest   of    organic           application of 50% N-FYM + 50% VC fb
treatments.However, the highest B: C ratio            10% vermiwash spray at 25, 50 and 75
                                                      DAS obtained significantly higher seed
                                                 88
     Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
     Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
     yield (3756 kg/ha) and gross return (                       Parewa, H.P., Ram, M., Jain, L.K.,
     100605/ha) of wheat as compared to rest of                       Choudhary, A. and Ratnoo, S.D.
     treatments. Significant and maximum net                          2019. Impact of organic nutrient
     return ( 63020/ha) and B: C ratio (1.77) of                      management practices on yield
     wheat were obtained under application of                         attributes, yield and economics of
     75% N-FYM + NPK consortia @1250                                  wheat       (Triticum      aestivumL.).
     ml/ha as soil + 25% N by inorganic source,                       International Journal of Bio-resource
     while among organic treatments, jeevamrut                        and Stress Management 10(3): 257-
     @ 500 litre/ha at sowing, 25 and 50 DAS                          260.
     gave higher B: C ratio (1.69) of wheat due                  Raahinipriya, P. and Rani, R.J. 2018.
     to low cost of cultivation.                                      Consumers’ purchasing behaviour
                                                                      towards organic products in Karur
     REFERENCES                                                       district, Tamil Nadu. International
     Bairwa, J., Dwivedi, B.S., Rawat, A.,                            Journal of Farm Sciences 8(3): 96-98.
          Thakur, R.K. and Mahawar, N. 2021.                     Ranva, S., Singh, Y.V., Jain, N., Bana, R.S.,
          Long-term     effect   of     nutrient                      Bana, R.C., Aseri, G.K., and
          management on soil microbial                                Elansary, H.O. 2022. Impact of safe
          properties and nitrogen fixation in a                       rock minerals, mineral fertilizers, and
          vertisol    under     soybean–wheat                         manure on the quantity and quality of
          cropping sequence. Journal of the                           the wheat yield in the rice–wheat
          Indian Society of Soil Science 69(2):                       cropping system. Plants 11(2): 183.
          171-178.
    Table 1. Impact of different organic formulation on yield, economics and available nutrients after
         harvest of wheat (pooled data of 5 years)
   Treatments                           Seed      Gross      Net       B:C     OC      Available nutrients (kg/ha)
                                        yield     Return     Return    ratio   (%)
                                        (kg/ha)   (Rs/ha)    (Rs/ha)                   PO        KO        S         Zn
                                                                                        2   5      2
                                                                                                                     (mg/kg)
   M1: 100% N-FYM + CU @ 10%
                                        3511      92573      55523     1.49
   spray at 25,50 and 75 DAS                                                   0.64    61.91     429.4     25.81     0.83
   M2: 50% N-FYM + 50% VC +
   Vermiwash @ 10% spray at 25,50 and   3756      100605     60352     1.50
                                                                               0.66    63.94     432.8     28.21     0.90
   75DAS
    M3: 100% N-FYM + NPK Consortia
                                        3412      91393      54568     1.48
   @ 1250ml/ha as soil                                                         0.63    60.55     427.0     25.11     0.82
   M4: 75% N-FYM + NPK Consortia
                                        3332      89425      55000     1.59
   @1250 ml/ha as soil                                                         0.61    60.41     425.5     24.01     0.80
   M5: 75% N-FYM + NPK Consortia
   @1250 ml/ha as soil+ CU@ 10%         3398      91029      55854     1.64
   spray at 25,50 and 75 DAS                                                   0.62    60.75     426.4     24.61     0.77
    M6: 75% N-FYM + NPK Consortia
   @1250 ml/ha as soil +25% N by        3739      98522      63020     1.77
                                                                               0.63    62.27     427.0     25.01     0.75
   inorganic
    M7: Jeevamrut @ 500 litre/ha at
                                        2961      79297      49797     1.69
   sowing, 25 and 50 DAS                                                       0.60    58.39     424.9     22.11     0.73
    M8: Ghanjeevamrut @ 500 kg/ha at
                                        2892      77378      48478     1.58
   sowing, 25 and 50 DAS                                                       0.61    58.98     425.9     23.11     0.75
   SEm ±                                155       3716       3716      0.11    0.006   0.55      4.24      0.22      0.005
C (P=0.05)                              435       10455      10455     NS      0.016   1.563     NS        0.607     0.014
                                                            89
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      90
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
requirement of direct seeded rice besides its              REFERENCES
lesser nutrient content. Apart from that
enriched vermicompost also contains 3% Ca                  Pattanayak A, Bujarbaruah KM, Sharma YP,
which improves soil structure. Table 1 & 2                       Ngachan SV, Dhiman KR, Munda GC,
revealed that increasing the doses of                            Azad Thakur NS, Satapathy K. K. and
vermicompost from 60 % to 100% markedly                          Rao M. V. 2006. Technology for
increased the N, P, & K content and uptake of                    increased production of upland rice and
direct seeded rice Similarly, increasing the                     lowland       waterlogged      rice.   In:
levels of panchagavya spray leads to                             Proceedings of Annual Rice Workshop.
significantly increased the nutrient content                     Hyderabad,April pp. 9-13.
and nutrient uptake of direct seeded rice.                 Sadhukhan, Rahul., Bohra, J. S., Kumar,
Contrastingly, there was no influence on K                       Dinesh and Sen, Suman. 2018. Effect of
content of direct seeded rice straw by the                       fertility levels and cow urine spray on
application of vermicompost and pachagavya                       nutrient uptake by rice. In: XXI Biennial
spray levels.                                                    National Symposium of Indian Society
                                                                 of Agronomy. MPUAT, Udaipur,
CONCLUSION                                                       Rajasthan, October pp. 176-177.
                                                           Upadhyay, P K; Sen, Avijit; Prasad, S
        So, it can be inferred that application                  K; Singh, Yashwant. 2018. Effect of
of100%        Recommended           Dose      of                 Panchagavya and Recommended
Vermicompost (10 t/ha) and 100 %                                 dose of fertilizers on growth, nutrient
Panchagavya Spray (400 lt/ha) had                                content       and     productivity      of
siginificantly positive influence on increase in                 transplanted rice (Oryza sativa)
N, P, & K content in grain but only                              under middle gangetic plain of India.
siginificant effect on increase in N & P                         International Journal of Agricultural
content of straw which ultimately leads to                       Sciences 88(6): 931-936.
increase nutrient uptake of direct seeded rice.             Yadav, B.K. and Christopher L. 2006.
                                                                 Effect of organic manures and
                                                                 Panchagavya        spray      on     yield
                                                                 attributes, yield and economics of
                                                                 rice. Crop Research 31(1): 1-5.
                                                      91
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table. 1. Effect of Vermicompost and Panchagavya foliar spray on total N, P and K content (%) of
direct seeded rice (CAU-R1)
RDV= Recommended dose of Vermicompost
   Treatment         N content (%)    P content (%)                         K content (%)
                             Grain     Straw       Grain        Straw       Grain       Straw
     Vermicompost levels
     60% RDV             1.332         0.379        0.394       0.098       0.318       1.254
     80% RDV             1.387         0.473        0.485       0.105       0.327       1.246
     100% RDV            1.462         0.545        0.543       0.112       0.345       1.331
     C.D. 5%             0.086         0.025        0.014       0.009       0.020       NS
     Panchagavya
     Spray (PGS)
     Control             1.346         0.417        0.248       0.105       0.314       1.205
     50% PGS             1.434         0.440        0.257       0.108       0.317       1.257
     75% PGS             1.416         0.477        0.265       0.105       0.325       1.312
     100% PGS            1.423         0.504        0.272       0.111       0.350       1.315
     C.D. 5%             NS            0.019        0.007       0.006       0.017       NS
      Treatment           N uptake (kg ha-1)        P uptake (kg ha-1)        K uptake (kg ha-1)
                      Grain             Straw       Grain         Straw       Grain           Straw
      Vermicompost levels
      60% RDV         64.517              26.274 11.843             7.171     15.012          89.936
      80% RDV         71.503              39.005 12.900             8.807     16.630          107.945
      100% RDV        77.286              45.641 14.647             9.861     18.724          108.309
      C.D. 5%         5.52                3.21      2.56            1.14      1.66            7.97
      Panchagavya Spray (PGS)
      Control         70.686              32.554    12.507          7.358     14.999          91.440
      50% PGS         71.381              35.080    12.661          8.205     16.735          94.717
      75% PGS             74.445          39.113    13.256          8.654     17.073          105.724
      100% PGS            76.152          43.601    14.493          8.902     18.811          109.911
      C.D. 5%             2.82            3.46      1.90            1.03      1.05            7.18
                                                      92
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ABSTRACT
         Natural farming popularly known as                confirm these studies, and there remain gaps in
zero budget farming is an innovative farming               literature concerning how Natural Farming
approach. It is low input based, climate resilient         changes foods capes, ecological health and
and low cost farming system because all the                farmer well-being, including the well-being of
inputs (insecticide, fungicides and pesticides)            women and landless laborers. The results
are made up of natural herbs and locally                   indicated that a crop production, farmer yield,
available inputs there by reducing the use of              ecosystem and soil health improvement. It is
chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Cow-based             found in study that Natural Farming was cost
natural farming and utilization of modern                  savings from not using chemical fertilizers and
technology is the need of the hour to enhance              pesticides, insecticide and fungicide as well as
agricultural productivity and benefit the crop             higher benefit for intercropping. Intercropping
growers the most. The farmers should shift to              with leguminous crops is considered as one of
horticulture, vegetable farming and mixed                  the most important components of natural
cropping to meet the current market demand and             farming as it increases crop productivity and
compatibility of agro-climatic zone". There are            soil fertility through the atmospheric nitrogen
most popular 4 pillars of Natural farming i.e.             fixation. Natural farming emerged as a is a
Jivamrita ,Bijamrita , Acchadana and Whapasa,              distinctive method of farming requiring no
which we will discuss later. Natural Firming is            monetary investment especially for purchase of
contemplated by its protagonist as one of the              key agricultural inputs like seeds, fertilizers and
most potential crop cultivation methods to                 plant protection chemicals from the market or
drastically cut down production costs by                   other sources. It has been observed that in recent
reducing dependence on market for purchase of              time farmer grown hardy local varieties of crops
critical inputs. Intensive crop cultivation using          without application of chemical inputs
broadly using imbalanced fertilizer, high                  (fertilizers and insecticide, fungicides and
nutrient mining through monoculture, decline in            pesticides). Using conventional techniques in
organic matter status, deficiencies of secondary           agriculture is like cancer to our soil and health.
and micronutrients in soil. The high input                 The word ‘budget’ refers to credit and expenses
systems which characterize Indian agriculture              thus the phrase Zero budget Natural Farming
can lead to negative financial, environmental              means without using any credit and without
and social outcomes from which many farmers                spending any money on purchased inputs.
seek reprieve. Farmer suicides, outmigration,              Natural Farming use of mulching, soil
and soil degradation are all severe consequences           protection techniques, natural pesticides and
from conventional farming which threaten food              fertilizers. The principal methods of Natural
security and are tied to rural well-being in India.        Farming include crop rotation, green manures
While some early indicators of Natural farming             and compost, biological pest control, and
effect on finances and yield are positive, long-           mechanical cultivation.
term and system-wide data must be collected to
                                                      93
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      94
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      95
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        Honey bees foraging plants which is                supply both nectar and pollen abundantly and
the source of nectar and pollen were surveyed              some produce plenty of nectar but little or no
continuously for two years (2020 to 2021). To              pollen and they are called honey plants. Some
identify the Apis cerana himalaya foraging                 plants produce plenty of pollen but only a
plants, develop floral calendar, determine the             trace or no nectar are known as pollen plants.
honey flow and floral dearth period in                     In order to survive, prosper and be productive,
Meghalaya, the 63 foraging plants of A.                    honeybee colonies must have a supply of both
cerana     himalaya were recorded in                       nectar and pollen in adequate quantities. Plant
kyrdemkulai. The maximum bees’ flora                       species and blooming period varies from place
blooms during January to May and December                  to place due to variation in topography,
whereas minimum bee’s flora blooms during                  climate and other cultural practices (Harugade
Jun to August. Therefore, honey flow season                and Chaphalkar, 2013).
identified from January to May and December                Honey flow period refers to the time when
whereas Jun to August was identified as lean               bees get abundant blossoming bee floral
season in kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya. Therefore                plants while floral dearth refers to that time
month of February, March and April was                     when honeybee suffers from scarcity of nectar
identified as most suitable time for honey                 and pollen due to unavailability of blooms of
harvesting.                                                bee flora. The extensive knowledge about
                                                           local floral calendar is a key for successful
Keywords: Apis cerana himalaya, Foraging                   beekeeping and play vital role to make
plants, Honey flow season, Lean season                     profitable entrepreneurship. Every region has
                                                           its own honey flow and floral dearth periods.
        Pollinators are the vital parts of a               Since the practice of modern beekeeping is
healthy environment. Apis cerana himalaya                  relatively new in India, the compilations of
which is native to North East state are the                bee-flora list are still far from complete. Study
most important group of pollinators. Varieties             on bee flora, honey flow period and floral
of plants grown under natural farming system               dearth have been neglected. Hence, the
will form an important food resource for                   present study has been undertaken to study the
honey bees. Pollinators are a diverse group of             bee flora in natural farming system of
insects. It provides an important service in our           Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya for determining the
environment by pollination of cross pollinated             honey flow season, build up season and floral
plants and ensures the growth of seeds and                 dearth or lean season and also develop floral
fruits. Native plants are undoubtedly the best             calendar of different existing plants in and
source of food for bees. Bees’ flora is                    around natural farming site.
important for sustainable beekeeping. All
foraging plant species do not contribute equal
amount food source for beekeeping. Some
                                                      96
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
MATERIALS AND METHODS                                      RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
        A survey was carried out to identify                      The natural farming sites of
prevailing bee-flora resources which serve as              Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya is endowed with
nectar and pollen sources to A. cerana                     diverse flora; 63 flora of A. cerana himalaya
himalaya and their blooming period. The                    with various blooming period which show
study was accomplished at Kyrdemkulai,                     great promises for beekeeping. The present
Meghalaya. The visual observations were                    study can be concluded as per blooming
made on the basis of collection of nectar or               period of bees’ flora, honey flow season was
pollen or both from flowers by A. cerana                   determined from month of January to May
himalaya. The observations were recorded at                and December; dearth season or lean period
weekly interval during January 2020 to                     from June to August and September to
December 2021. Observations were made as                   November was determined as build up season.
per visual observation, especially on those                Therefore, the month of February, March and
plants blooming periods which were visited                 April was identified as most suitable time for
by honeybees. The floras were categorised                  honey harvesting in this region.
into nectar producing and pollen producing or
both nectar and pollen producing flora.
                                                      97
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      98
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      99
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
 Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
REFERENCES                                                        Movement, Amravati, Maharashtra,
                                                                  India.
Palekar, S. 2005. The Philosophy of Spiritual               La Via Campesina 2010. Sustainable Peasant
      Farming I, 2nd Ed. Zero Budget                              and Family Farm Agriculture can feed
      Natural        Farming        Research,                     the World, La Via Campesina, Jakarta,
      Development & Extension Movement,                           Indonesia
      Amravati, Maharashtra, India.                         Rosset, P. M. and Martinez-Torres, M. E.
Palekar, S. 2006. Zero Budget Natural                             2012. "Rural Social Movements and
      Farming: Five Layers Palekar's Model                        Agroecology: Context, Theory and
      (Part I). Zero Budget Natural Farming                       Process", Ecology and Society 17(3).
      Research, Development and Extension
                                                      100
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
  Growth and yield of upland paddy (Oryza Sativa L.) as influenced by lime and
            poultry manure application in acid soils of Meghalaya
                        SABYASACHI MAJUMDAR1*AND U. K. BEHERA2
      1
       Assistant Professor (Soil Sc. &Agril. Chemistry), College of Agriculture, CAU (Imphal)
                             Kyrdemkulai - 793105, Meghalaya, India
  2
    Dean, College of Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai, CAU (Imphal), Kyrdemkulai - 793105,Meghalaya,
                                                India
                    *Corresponding author’s email:sabyasachiuasd@gmail.com
       Majority of acid soils (54%) are                    The region has humid climate with more than
concentrated in North Eastern Region (NER)                 1500 mm annual rainfall of which more than
of India where more than 90 per cent area is               80% occurs during June to September. The
affected by soil acidity, with around 65% of               soil was moderately acidic in nature (pH =
the area being under extreme forms of soil                 5.2). The experiment was conducted by taking
acidity (pH below 5.5) (Sharma and Singh                   6 main factors (treatments), 3 sub-factors
2002). Application of lime is the most                     (varieties) and 3 replications. The three
desirable and effective practice for                       varieties chosen were CAU R2, Sahabhagi
management of soil acidity. However, the                   Dhan and IURON 514. The details of
application rate of conventional liming                    treatments are: 1) T1 – Lime @ 0.5 t ha-1, 2)
materials is very high which ultimately leads              T2 – Lime @ 1.0 t ha-1, 3) T3 – Poultry
to higher production cost per unit area. Hence,            Manure @ 2.5 t ha-1, 4) T4 – Poultry Manure
the need of the hour is to focus research on               @ 7.5 t ha-1, 5) T5 – Poultry Manure @ 2.5 t
development of locally available resources for             ha-1 + Lime @ 0.5 t ha-1 and 6) T6 – Control.
managing soil acidity. In India, there has been            The treatments were laid out in a split plot
a demand for effective utilisation of poultry              design with three replications in a fixed plot
manure (PM) in order to avoid environmental                size of 8.0 m2. The upland paddy varieties
pollution (Behera 2009). Poultry manure is a               were sown on 25thJune, 2021 with the onset of
relatively cheap source of both macronutrients             the monsoon at 20 cm line spacing and
(N. P, K, Ca, Mg and S) and micronutrients                 harvested in 20th October, 2021. Application
(Cu, Fe, Mn, and B) and can be used as an                  of poultry manure was made before sowing of
alternative for management of acid soil.                   upland paddy on over-dry weight basis as per
Therefore, by keeping this in view, the present            treatment. The lime was applied to the plots in
study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of             the form of calcium silicate (CaSiO3). The
lime and poultry manure at different rates on              observations were recorded on yield of grain
growth and yield of upland paddy under hill                and straw from a net plot area of 4m2. The
ecology of Meghalaya.                                      crops were harvested manually 6-8 cm above
                                                           the ground and the entire harvested
METHODOLOGY                                                biomasswas removed from the plots of each
                                                           treatment. The treatment comparisons were
      A field experiment was conducted at the
                                                           made by t-test at the p ≤ 0.05 level of
farm of the College of Agriculture, CAU
                                                           significance.
(Imphal), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya during
Kharif 2021-22 from June to October on a                   RESULTS
fixed layout. The site is situated at an altitude
approximately 700 m above mean sea level                           This study revealed that there were
(MSL), 91.87 Longitude and 25.57 Latitude.                 significant differences in grain yield, straw
                                                     101
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
yield, biological yield and harvest index                  per panicle, and no of panicle/m2. However,
among the varieties. Among the varieties, the              test weight was not significantly influenced by
maximum grain yield was recorded in CAU                    different treatments. Among the different
R2 (2.20 t ha-1) followed by IURON 514 (1.96               treatments, it was observed that the highest
t ha-1). This study also indicated that the                panicle length, no of chaffy grains per panicle
different treatments in managing acid soil has             and total grains per panicle and no of
significantly improved the grain yield, straw              panicle/m2 was noticed in T4 (application of
yield, biological yield and harvest index.                 poultry manure @ 7.5 t ha-1). however, the
Among the different treatments, it was                     results were not statistically significant with
observed that maximum grain yield was                      respect to test weight. It was also observed
recorded in T4 (application of poultry manure              that the interaction between variety and
@ 7.5 t ha-1) (2.24 t ha-1) followed by T2                 treatment was found to be significant with
(application of lime @ 1.0 t ha-1) (2.16 t ha-1).          reference to all the yield attributing
Similarly, among the different treatments, the             parameters of upland rice cultivars except test
maximum straw yield was recorded in T4                     weight. (Table 2).The increase in grain yield
(application of poultry manure @ 7.5 t ha-1)               and its yield attributes with the application of
(7.96 t ha-1) followed by T3 (application of               poultry manure could be attributed to the fact
poultry manure @ 2.5 t ha-1) (5.96 t ha-1).                that PM contains high ammoniacal nitrogen
Likewise, among the different treatments, the              (NH4-N) and uric acid which is capable of
maximum harvest index was recorded in T2                   converting a large percentage of N to nitrate-
(application of lime @ 1.0 t ha-1) (0.31),                 N (NO3-N) within a week as uric acid
however, it was not statistically significant. It          metabolizes rapidly to NH4-N in soil and
was also observed that the interaction between             becomes available for plant uptake. Moreover,
variety and treatment was found to be                      the poultry birds are fed limestone as a
significant with reference to grain yield, straw           supplement to improve egg-shell hardness,
yield, biological yield and harvest index.                 and therefore their manure characteristically
(Table 1).                                                 contains considerable amounts of calcium
                                                           carbonate which is responsible for increasing
        The results of this experiment also                soil pH and helps in managing the acid soil.
indicated that there were significant                      This clearly indicated that PM is superior
differences in panicle length, no of filled                compared to lime in improving the grain yield
grains per panicle, no of chaffy grains per                and associated attributes of upland rice.
panicle, no of total grains per panicle and
number of panicle/m2 among the varieties.                  CONCLUSION
Among the varieties, the maximum panicle
length, no of filled grains per panicle, no of                    However, this study indicated that PM
total grains per panicle, no of panicle /m2 and            could be used as a viable alternative to lime
test weight was noticed in IURON 514,                      for managing the soil acidity and improving
whereas, highest number of chaffy grains per               the yield and associated attributes of upland
panicle and no of panicle/m2 was noticed in                paddy under hill ecology of Meghalaya.
CAU R2. This study also indicated that the
different treatments (viz., application of
poultry manure and lime) in managing acid
soil has significantly improved the panicle
length, no of filled grains per panicle, no of
chaffy grains per panicle, no of total grains
                                                     102
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
REFERENCES                                                 Sharma, U. C. and Singh, R. P. 2002. Acid
                                                                soils   of   India:their     distribution,
Behera, U. K. 2009. Organic manuring for soil                   management and future strategies for
     biological health and productivity of a                    higher productivity. Fertilizer News47:
     wheat-soybean cropping system in the                       45-52.
     Vertisols of central India. Crop and
     Pasture Science60: 382-393.
Table 1: Grain yield (t ha-1), straw yield (t ha-1), biological yield (t ha-1) and harvest index of
upland rice cultivar (Bhalum V) as influenced by lime and poultry manure application
                                                     103
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2: Yield attributing parameters of upland rice cultivars as influenced by lime and poultry
manure application
                                                     104
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Influence of lime and poultry manure on growth and yield of upland paddy
                    (Oryza sativa L.) in acid soils of Meghalaya
                        SABYASACHI MAJUMDAR1*AND U. K. BEHERA2
      1
       Assistant Professor (Soil Sc. &Agril. Chemistry), College of Agriculture, CAU (Imphal)
                             Kyrdemkulai - 793105, Meghalaya, India
  3
    Dean, College of Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai, CAU (Imphal), Kyrdemkulai - 793105,Meghalaya,
                                                India
                    *Corresponding author’s email:sabyasachiuasd@gmail.com
        Majority of acid soils (54%) are                   (MSL), 91.87 Longitude and 25.57 Latitude.
concentrated in North Eastern Region (NER)                 The region has humid climate with more than
of India where more than 90 per cent area is               1500 mm annual rainfall of which more than
affected by soil acidity, with around 65% of               80% occurs during June to September. The
the area being under extreme forms of soil                 soil was moderately acidic in nature (pH =
acidity (pH below 5.5) (Sharma and Singh                   5.2). In this study, seven treatments consisted
2002). Application of lime is the most                     of 2 different sources at varying rates, viz.,
desirable     and     effectivepractice      for           lime at 0.5 and 1.0 t ha-1 and poultry manure
management of soil acidity. However, the                   (PM) at 2.5 and 5.0 t ha-1 were used. In
application rate of conventional liming                    addition to this, two treatments involved
materials is very high which ultimately leads              integrated use of PM at 2.5 and 5.0 t ha-1 with
to higher production cost per unit area. Hence,            lime at 0.5 and 1.0 t ha-1, respectively. The
the need of the hour is to focus research on               treatments were laid out in a randomized
development of locally available resources for             block design (RBD) with three replications in
managing soil acidity. In India, there has been            a fixed plot size of 10.5 m2. The upland paddy
a demand for effective utilisation of poultry              (Bhalum V variety) was sown in 25thJune,
manure (PM) in order to avoid environmental                2021 with the onset of the monsoon at 20 cm
pollution (Behera 2009). Poultry manure is a               line spacing and harvested in 30thOctober,
relatively cheap source of both macronutrients             2021. Application of poultry manure was
(N. P, K, Ca, Mg and S) and micronutrients                 made before sowing of upland paddy on over-
(Cu, Fe, Mn, and B) and can be used as an                  dry weight basis as per treatment. The lime
alternative for management of acid soil.                   was applied to the plots in the form of calcium
Therefore, the present study was undertaken                silicate (CaSiO3). The observations were
to evaluate the effect of lime and poultry                 recorded on yield of grain and straw from a
manure at different rates for improving the                net plot area of 4m2. The crops were harvested
productivity of upland paddy in acid soils of              manually 6-8 cm above the ground and the
Meghalaya.                                                 entire harvested biomasswas removed from
                                                           the plots of each treatment. The treatment
METHODOLOGY                                                comparisons were made by t-test at the p ≤
                                                           0.05 level of significance.
        A field experiment was conducted at
the farm of the College of Agriculture, CAU                RESULTS
(Imphal), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya during
Kharif 2021-22 from June to October on a                          This study indicated that the different
fixed layout. The site is situated at an altitude          treatments (viz., application of poultry manure
approximately 700 m above mean sea level                   and lime) in managing acid soil has
                                                     105
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
significantly improved the grain yield, straw              and therefore their manure characteristically
yield and biological yield (Table 1) of upland             contains considerable amounts of calcium
paddy. Among the different treatments, it was              carbonate which is responsible for increasing
observed that application of poultry manure                soil pH and helps in managing the acid soil.
(PM) at 5.0 t ha-1 has significantly recorded              This clearly indicated that PM is superior
the maximum grain yield (3.11 t ha-1)                      compared to lime in improving the grain yield
followed by combined application of lime at                and associated attributes of upland rice.
0.5 t ha-1 and PM at 2.5 t ha-1 (2.71 t ha-1). The
study indicated that the grain yield of upland             CONCLUSION
paddy was influenced significantly by
                                                                   Application of lime is the most widely
different levels of poultry manure (PM) in
                                                           used practice for the management of soil
comparison to control and lime application
                                                           acidity. However, this study indicated that PM
(Table 1).
                                                           could be used as a viable alternative to lime
        The panicle length, no of panicles per             for managing the soil acidity and improving
plant, no of total grains per panicle and test             the yield and associated attributes of upland
weight of upland paddy increased with                      paddy under hill ecology of Meghalaya.
increasing rates of PM compared to control
                                                           REFERENCES
and was maximum with application of PM at
5.0 t ha-1 (Table 2).The increase in grain yield           Behera, U. K. 2009. Organic manuring for soil
and its yield attributes with the application of                  biological health and productivity of a
poultry manure could be attributed to the fact                    wheat-soybean cropping system in the
that PM contains high ammoniacal nitrogen                         Vertisols of central India. Crop and
(NH4-N) and uric acid which is capable of                         Pasture Science60: 382-393.
converting a large percentage of N to nitrate-             Sharma, U. C. and Singh, R. P. 2002. Acid
N (NO3-N) within a week as uric acid                              soils of India:their distribution,
metabolizes rapidly to NH4-N in soil and                          management and future strategies for
becomes available for plant uptake. Moreover,                     higher productivity. Fertilizer News47:
the poultry birds are fed limestone as a                          45-52.
supplement to improve egg-shell hardness,
                                                     106
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Grain yield (t ha-1), straw yield (t ha-1), biological yield (t ha-1) and harvest index of
upland rice cultivar (Bhalum V) as influenced by lime and poultry manure application
Table 2: Yield attributing parameters of upland rice cultivar (Bhalum V) as influenced by lime
and poultry manure application
                                                     107
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Ph.D Scholar, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, CAU(I), Umiam,
                              Meghalaya, rizwan.mos@gmail.com
ABSTRACT                                                  some extent. The main indicators of food
                                                          insecurity being low harvest (32.86%) and
        Wetland ecosystems are the most                   when people buy locally grown food items
diverse and productive ecosystems on Earth                (15.71%). Most households felt food secure
and include marshes, lakes, rivers, flood                 when they had perennial crops, or adequate
basins, estuarine deltas, ponds, rice fields, and         money to buy food. The prevalence of food
marine water areas where the depth at low tide            insecurity was significantly lower among
does not exceed 6 m (Convention on Wetlands               households with older and better educated
1971). Wetland ecosystems are very much                   household heads. Over 80% of the
important from conservation and sustainable               respondents reported that wetland resources
management. Tangible and intangible diverse               provide products and services that contribute
resources and products of wetland functions               enormously to their household food security.
such as fodder, fishes, fuelwood, non-timber              Besides, they also indirectly contribute to food
forest products, ecotourism, and flood control            security by providing services that foster food
have historically provided a source of income             production. Furthermore, climate change
and livelihood for human beings. The present              adaptation is becoming crucial but local
study investigated the participation of local             knowledge      regarding     climate     change
groups in wetland conservation, and assessed              adaptation is not well focused. Moreover, the
socioeconomic factors that affect dependency              study revealed crop diversification, re-digging
on wetlands along with the use of number of               of canal, construction of embankments and
livelihood tools in food security assessment              poultry rearing among many as the adaptive
along with the adaptive strategies to climate             measures in the face of climate change having
change by the wetland dwellers. A total of 70             merits which needs special consideration and
wetland resource-user households residing                 continuous research. The study recommends a
around Ranikor, Meghalaya were surveyed                   need to design appropriate food production
with the help of household questionnaire. Data            technologies that ensure sustainable use of
were analyzed using simple percentage,                    wetland resources for food security as
multiple regression, t-test and Garrett ranking           increasing population coupled with climate
technique.      The      wetland       resources          change will have drastic impact on the
contributed significantly to the household                households relying on wetland for food
economy of the local people. Each                         security and income unless alternative
household extracted wetland resources on a                livelihood options are provided.
monthly basis. Although the people
maintained a positive attitude towards
wetland conservation, their participation in
conservation efforts was inadequate. The
results also indicate that about 43% of the
households experienced food insecurity to
                                                    108
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
REFERENCE
Convention on Wetlands. (1971). Convention
      on     wetlands    of    international
      importance especially as waterfowl
      habitat. Adopted by the International
      Conference on the Wetlands and
      Waterfowl at Ramsar, Iran. UNESCO,
      Paris, France, Accessed on 23rd
      November, 2022.
                                                     109
        THEME B
    CLIMATE CHANGE-
ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION
       STRATEGIES
                                               SUB-CONTENT
context, a renewed and time bound initiative                popular here. Currently grown in around 0.267
undertaken by ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses               million hectares with production of around
Research (IIPR), Kanpur recently in                         0.233 million tons (Table 1), the productivity
association with AICRPs on Chickpea,                        of these (with one ton/ha) crops could be
Pigeonpea, MULLaRP, Arid legumes, and the                   significantly raised to 1.2-1.5 tons/ha in many
NEH Institutes/Universities to promote the                  pulses including chickpea, pigeon pea, field
pulses in NEH region during 2014-17 and                     peas, rajmash, mungbean, and lentils (and to
beyond revealed that this could be                          similar extent in minor crops, such as urdbean,
possible/achievable to a large extent. Popular              mungbean, and ricebean).
varieties of winter season pulses viz., chickpea,
field peas and lentil, and that of mungbean in              The current study showed that successful
summer were indented from the breeders and                  amalgamation of suitable varieties and
given to 8 centres namely, Basar (Arunachal                 appropriate agronomic management even in
Pradesh), ICAR centre, Imphal (Manipur),                    presence of abiotic and biotic stresses is the
Kolasib (Mizoram), Medziphema (Nagaland),                   key to optimum performance of agricultural
Tadong (Gangtok), Central Agricultural                      crops including pulses and their performance
University     (CAU),     Imphal      (Manipur),            stability in NEH region of India. This could
Lembucherra (Tripura) and Shillong ani                      certainly influence the total output and
(Nagaon, Assam). The test varieties of these                distribution of pulses in the country as a whole
pulses were evaluated along with their seed                 and the NEH region in particular. The study
production. This is discussed herein as under.              across 5-7 locations in NEH region further
                                                            revealed that higher crop performance in terms
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                      of grain yield and other attributes was recorded
                                                            with chickpea ‘PUSA372’ followed by ‘IPC
         Pulses are smart food and play an                  97-67’; lentil ‘DPL 62’;fieldpea ‘AMAN’ and
important role in achieving Sustainable                     ‘TRCP 9’ (under local condition); Fababean
Development Goals of UN. These are an                       ‘Patna 6’; and mungbean (in at least three NEH
essential source of dietary protein for a large             locations) ‘HUM 12’ and ‘IPM 2-14’. This was
population of the country, especially for                   further reinforced with adequate seed
vegetarian masses. Apart from being a potent                production/distribution under different NEH
source of energy by way of higher protein,                  programmes.
carbohydrate,        and       fat       contents,
supplementation of pulses with cereals in diets                     The major Indian NEH states including
helps in amino acid balance. Therefore, with                Asom, Nagaland, and Manipur could adopt
greater food value of pulses, these have played             modern know-hows in cultivation of pulses
a crucial role in food and nutritional security by          with ease and efficiency (including in areas of
alleviating protein hunger and malnutrition                 rice/maize fallows). The NER has overall
prevalent amongst the poor. Pulses have a                   deficit of 75.4% in pulses, ranging from 50.6%
unique ability to fix atmospheric N (40-60 kg               in Arunachal Pradesh to 83.7% deficit in
of N/ha) in their root nodules (Bhat and                    Assam. The Nagaland is the only state which
Umesh, 2016), thereby improving fertility of                has self-sufficient in pulses and have a surplus
soil through its carry-over effects. Thus,                  of 5.7 thousand tons. To reduce this demand-
inclusion of pulses in the cropping system (as a            supply gap, various programmes, like
candidate crop) reduces the need for synthetic              integrated scheme of oilseed, pulses, oil palm
fertilizers, consequently reducing greenhouse               and maize (ISOPOM), national food security
gas emissions and raising carbon sequestrations             mission (NFSM) and front-line demonstrations
(Venkatesh et al., 2013). NEH region is no                  (FLD) programme in pulses have been
exception. Therefore, these are becoming                    launched/operational. Still, prime attention is
                                                      111
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
required especially in pulse production to meet             Praharaj, C.S., Singh, Ummed, Singh, S.S. and
the    challenges/demand       of    increasing                  Kumar, N. 2018. Tactical water
population.                                                      management in field crops: the key to
                                                                 resource       conservation.    Current
CONCLUSION                                                       Science115 (7): 1262-1269.
                                                            Praharaj, C.S.and Singh, N.P. 2019. Raising
        Twin strategies concerning R & D
                                                                 productivity of pulses in diverse agro-
efforts through productivity enhancement and
                                                                 ecologies of North East Hill region of
sustainable intensification have led the
                                                                 India - A case study. Journal of Food
country's pulses production to an adequate and
                                                                 Legumes32(2): 90-96.
stable level during the last half-a-decade. The
current study inferred that when new and
                                                            Singh, N. P., Praharaj, C. S. and Sandhu, J.
improved technologies inclusive of varieties
                                                                 S.2016.Utilizing untapped potential of
and      seed    production/extension      were
                                                                 rice fallow of East and North-east India
adopted/promoted/amalgamated, this could go
                                                                 through pulse production. Indian Journal
a long way in raising the production and
                                                                 of Genetics and Plant Breeding 76: 388-
productivity of pulses even in these constraint
                                                                 98.
areas of the country, and so also meeting food
                                                            Venkatesh M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K.,
and nutritional needs of its masses (Praharaj et
                                                                 Praharaj, C.S. and Kumar, N. 2013.
al., 2018). The most daunting concern for
                                                                 Long-term effect of pulses and nutrient
global food security including pulses, is
                                                                 management on soil carbon sequestration
accomplishing stable productions under more
                                                                 in Indo-Gangetic plains of India.
severe (biotic & abiotic) production constraints
                                                                 Canadian Journal of Soil Science
including those related to the robust climatic
                                                                 93:127–136.
change. And yes, these efforts need to be
continued further in order to achieve self-
sufficiency in pulses sector in time to come
with NEH region of India of no exception.
REFERENCES
Bhat,       Shripad     and     Umesh,      K.B.
        2016.Estimating Positive Externalities of
        Nitrogen Fixation by Pulses. Estimating
        Positive Externalities of Nitrogen
        Fixation    by    Pulses.   Agricultural
        Economics Research Review29: 201-
        209.
                                                      112
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Table 1. Area, production and yield of different pulses in NEH region in India (2019-20)*
*https://statisticstimes.com/demographics/india/indian-states-population.php
                                                 113
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 114
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
     vital for the breeding of crops may be                     (Asitand Neenu, 2012; Karmakar, et
     affected relentlessly.                                     al., 2016).
3.   The adoptability and suitability of                   9.   Irregularity in rain due to climate
     present cultivars of seed spices may be                    change increased possibility of
     changed due to increase in the                             occurrence of drought and reduced the
     temperature because the particular                         availability of water.
     variety required specific temperature                 10. More variation in day and night
     for its growth and development. The                       temperature and cloudy conditions during
     area under seed spices cultivation may                    January and February favor the aphids to
     be changed due to incident of extreme                     develop faster. Seed midge is another
                                                               major pest of coriander and fennel, its
     weather condition and occurrence of
                                                               population     observed    high     when
     diseases which will reduce the crop                       temperature goes down. In case of disease
     production.                                               in seed spices cumin wilt and blight is a
4.   In case of seed spice crops, uncertain                    major challenge against changing climatic
     rains will be expected during                             conditions.
     February-March during which all the                   11. Under the changing climatic situations
     seed spices crops will be in seed                         existing fungal pathogen, bacteria,
     setting and maturity stage. If this                       viruses may cause more damage.
     rainfall occurred there will be huge                      Some of the minor pests may become
     crop losses in terms of yield and                         major pests in future.
     quality.
5.   Increased heat stress will affect                     ADAPTIVE & MITIGATION
     production, yield and quality of seed                 STRATEGIES
     spices, oil quality and its chemical profile.
6.   Increase in the average temperature                           Climate     change     is    serious
     leads to faster the growth and                        constraint, which accounts for enormous
     development and crop will mature                      losses in terms of seed yield and quality of
     before time. Plant sensitivity to salt                seed spice crops. Hence, there is an
     stress is reflected in loss of turgor,                immediate need to focus our attention on
     growth reduction, wilting, leaf                       studying the impacts of climate change on
     abscission, decreased photosynthesis                  adaptability, growth, development, yield
     and loss of cellular integrity.                       and quality of seed spice crops. In view of
7.   Change in the climate may be a vast                   these problems, horticulturists will have to
     threat to pollination services due to                 play a significant role in the climate
     reduced activity of pollinating agents.               change scenario and proper strategies have
     Among all the climatic factors,                       to be envisaged for saving spice growing
     increase in temperature has highest                   areas to sustain the production and export
     adverse      effect     on      pollinator            chain. Bellow written measures can make
     interactions. In the same way due to                  the seed spice growers more resilient to
     climate change event of cloudiness,                   changing climatic scenario.
     fog, cold winds may hamper the                        1. There is urgent need in the cut of CO2
     pollinators in their regular pollination                   emission and many countries promise
     activities.                                                to cut the emission of CO2 like China
8.   Climate change affects the formation                       pledges deep cup cut of CO2 emission,
     of soil with important implications for                    EU wants to cut carbon emission 60%
     their     development,       use      and                  by 2050, India 35% by 2030, Japan
     management          perspective       with                 35% by 2030 etc. in Paris Climate
     reference to soil structure, stability,                    Change Conference held in November
     top soil water holding capacity,                           2015.
     nutrient availability and erosion
                                                     115
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
2.  The increase in global warming may                    base of seed spices to create more
    destroy much germplasm line and                       variability in terms of adaptability,
    their wild relative so, intensive                     resistance to pest and diseases.
    germplasm collection is needed to use                 Therefore, breed such types varieties
    it in future as per need. There is an                 which can tolerant heat stress and in
    urgent need to widen the genetic base                 the high productive and can produce
    of seed spices to create more                         good yields. Some of the varieties
    variability in terms of adaptability,                 developed at ICAR-NRCSS, Ajmer
    resistance to pest and diseases.                      are showing tolerance/resistance and
3. Since the seed spice crops are having                  adoptability to climate variations
    very narrow genetic base, hence there                 (Table 1).
    is an urgent need to widen the genetic
Table1. List of some varieties tolerant to biotic/abiotic stresses.
        S.           Crop               Variety/rootstock                   Character(s)
       No.
        1 Coriander                  ACr-1& 2                    Resistant to stem gall
        2 Cumin                      GC-4                        Resistance to wilt
        3 Fenugreek                  AFg-4                       Resistant to powdery mildew
        4 Ajwain                     AA-93                       Drought tolerant, short duration
        5 Celery                     ACel-1                      Early maturity
        6 Coriander for green Ajmer Green                        Suitable for summer cultivation
             leaf                    Coriander-1
                                                 116
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 117
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 118
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Based on combined RYI and RSI, the crop production zones were categorized as given below
 Zone RYI          RSI         Category
 1      High       High        Most efficient zone
 1a     High       Medium      Most efficient zone with variation
 2      High       Low         Efficient zone
 2a     Medium     High        Efficient zone with little year to year variation
 2b     Medium     Medium      Efficient zone with medium year to year variation
 2c     Medium     Low         Efficient zone with great year to year variation
 3      Low        High        Not efficient zone with greater variation
 3a     Low        Medium      Not efficient zone with medium year to year variation
 4      Low        Low         Not efficient zone with little variation
We have classified zones for black pepper,           on sensitivity index, exposure index,
small and large cardamom and cumin that              adaptive capacity index and vulnerability
would     help     in     planning     and           index (Rama Rao et al. 2013) and reported
implementation of developmental schemes              that out of 572 districts 115, 115, 114, 114,
considering the production efficiency.               114 districts are falls in very high, high,
                                                     medium, low and very low vulnerability
VULNERABILITY AREAS DUE TO                           category, respectively. The status of North
CLIMATE CHANGE                                       East listed below (Table 1) Vulnerability is
                                                     more seen in Rajasthan (25 districts),
       National Initiative on Climate
                                                     Gujarat (14) Karnataka (14), Madhya
Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) has
                                                     Pradesh (14), Maharashtra (12), Uttar
categorised the vulnerability of districts in
                                                     Pradesh (12) and North East is relatively
Indian States for changing climate based
                                                     less.
Table 1. Degree of vulnerability in the districts of North Eastern States due to climate change
(2021 -50)
State                        Very         High         Medium       Low         Very         Total
                             high                                               Low
Arunachal Pradesh            0            0            0            5           9            14
Assam                        1            1            1            7           13           23
Manipur                      0            0            3            3           3            9
Meghalaya                    0            0            1            3           3            7
Mizoram                      0            0            1            7           0            8
Nagaland                     0            0            0            3           5            8
Sikkim                       0            0            0            2           2            4
Tripura                      0            0            0            0           4            4
North East Total             1            1            6            30          39           77
All India                    115          115          114          114         114          572
                                                 119
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
ii) Identification of Climate Analogue                     management plans for spices have been
Sites                                                      standardized for organic farming systems
                                                           and organic packages have been developed
Climate analogues tool, a web-based tool                   for black pepper, ginger and turmeric and
developed by the Research Programme on                     to some extent in seed spices integrating
climate change, agriculture and food                       composts, oil cakes, biofertilizers/ PGPRs
security (CCAFS) helps to identify,                        and biocontrol agents. Soil solarization
connect and map sites with statistically                   coupled with PGPR application showed
similar climates across space and                          good control of bacterial wilt of ginger
time(Climate analogue 2011). The                           even in sick field conditions. Similarly,
geographical coordinates of efficient zones                integrated       management        involving
under the crop in India based on relative                  application of site specific nutrient
spread index and relative yield index can                  management, PGPRs and micronutrient
be used as the input/reference site for                    application helped in sustaining the yield
finding the analogues sites. Rainfall and                  of virus affected black pepper plantations.
temperature are the main climate variables                 Anentomo           pathogenic        fungus,
used for the study under SRES (Special                     Lecanicillium psalliotae, effective in
Report on Emissions Scenarios) A1B                         controlling the cardamom thrips was
(balanced across energy sources) emission                  potentially identified and evaluated for
scenario. Similarity index with 0.75 to 1.0                agro-climatic conditions in Kerala and
could be climate analogue site as highly                   Karnataka. The technology is ideal for
likely areas and 0.5 to 0.75 as may be                     adoption in organic farming.
moderately likely areas for cultivation of                 Organically grown turmeric recorded the
spices under study in future (year 2020 to                 highest oleoresin and curcumin contents in
2049) with climate change.                                 all the years studied. The studies also have
The potential area for future changing climate             shown that varieties like IISR Suguna,
scenario (2020 to 2049), we could identify                 Sudharsana and IISR Pragati showed
climate analogues sites for black pepper,                  excellent performance under pure organic
cardamoms, cumin with similarity value of                  based management system and their
0.750 to 1.0 and .50 to 0.749 in 390 taluks                quality profile showed increase in quality
distributed in 133 districts in 17 states of India         attributes. The sustainability index of the
for black pepper, 236 taluks distributed in 104            soil measured with nutrient index,
districts in 19 states of India for small                  microbial index and crop index compared
cardamom, 234 taluks distributed in 112                    under different management systems for
districts in 15 states of India for large                  cardamom and turmeric showed that the
cardamom and 453 districts in 25 states of                 nutrient index (NI) was highest in
India for cumin cultivation where cultivation
                                                           conventional management system (1.22)
of these crops is not reported at current
situation.                                                 whereas the microbial (MI) and crop
                                                           indices (CI) were higher under fully
iii) Soil resilience and organic farming: -                organic (1.23) and integrated systems
Soil health is the key factor that                         (1.19), respectively.
determines the resilience of crop                          iv) Climate resilient varieties: The Indian
production under changing climate.                         Institute of Spices Research (ICAR-IISR)
Practice of organic farming would enhance                  and National research Centre on Seed
the resilience in the farming system,                      Spices (ICAR-NRCSS) are under ICAR
ensures better soil health with ecosystem                  dedicated to the research on major spice
services as a result sustainability in the                 crops and holds the world biggest spices
spices production.                                         germplasm collection. These institutes
Organic farming depends on the organic in                  conserve national accredited germplasm
puts for its sustainability. Nutrient
                                                     120
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
(NAG) in the country and maintain the                  Kerala. The experiments at Regional
world’s largest germplasm collection of                Station, ICAR-IISR, Appangala in Coorg
spices about 7000 accessions in spices                 revealed that basin irrigation with 50-60 L
involving 38 centers of AICRPS, develops               per vine after harvest from March 15th –
production technologies for different agro             May 15th at fortnightly intervals increased
climatic zones for 24 states of the country.           the uniform emergence of new leaves and
The institutes have developed and released             spikes in mid May-June and full spike
more than 40 improved varieties and over               setting by June. Irrigation with seven to ten
150 varieties through AICRPS system in                 litres/vine/day through drip during summer
all major spice crops with high yield,                 months (October to March) recorded higher
quality and resistance to pests and                    yield of pepper. Similarly, in the multi-
pathogens      (Nirmal    Babu      et   al.           storeyed cropping system of black pepper
2022).Climate resilient varieties of                   trained on coconut and arecanut, the ETc
turmeric viz., IISR Pragati (short duration            values of black pepper ranged from 0.31 to
variety overcoming drought) and NDH98                  0.42 mm/day and the crop coefficient of
(saline tolerant, stable yield across the              black pepper ranged from 0.07 to 0.10.
country), ginger variety-IISR Mahima                   These values will help in the estimation of
(nematode tolerant), cumin variety-GC4                 water requirement of black pepper in
(wilt tolerant), dual purpose varieties of             different cropping systems.
coriander and determinate types of
fenugreek (suitable for mechanized                     vi) Scientific crop production:-The
harvesting) played an important role in                technologies such as seed priming, seed
increasing the income of farmers.                      hardening and encapsulation helps early
                                                       germination, better growth, vigour and
v) Water harvesting and irrigation:                    drought tolerance; transplanting techniques
Spices are cultivated both in rainfed and              to reduce the main field duration and save
irrigated lands. Ground water depilation is            the seed, drip-fertigation to enhance the
at an alarming rate and urgent need for                fertilizer use efficiency and save water,
community-based                 groundwater            bio-control application for residue free
management and an understanding of how                 spices etc., has to be used on regular basis
to build and maintain the aquifers that hold           for sustaining the production. Spraying
and supply groundwater. Water harvesting               lime @1.5% or spraying Kaolin @2.0%
and recycling should be integral part of               protects the black pepper crop preventing
spices production particularly in rain fed             leaf fall and defoliation due to sun
production system. Practice of mulching                scorching. Providing sprinklers for
conserves the moisture in rain fed system.             evaporative cooling or shade net also
In irrigated system one should adopt                   reduces the heat load on plant.
efficient water management practices by                Transplanting techniques for rhizomatous
using drip and sprinkler systems etc.                  spices also useful technology for climate
Experiments conducted at Ludhiana with                 resilient spices production. The studies on
drip irrigation of turmeric indicated that             the performance of transplanted system of
irrigation     at    100%     ETo(Reference            turmeric and ginger for commercial
evapotranspiration) recorded maximum                   cultivation in comparison to conventional
processed turmeric yield which was                     planting showed that the yield in the field
statistically at par with that drip irrigation         did not vary significantly and the quality
at 80% ETo but significantly better than               parameters in the rhizomes of conventional
60% ETo. Basin irrigation of vines with                and transplant systems were also
100 L once in 10 days per vine at IW/CPE               comparable, signifying the suitability of
ratio of 0.25 from December to March                   single sprout transplant system by
increased the yield of black pepperin                  considering the reduction in seed rhizome
                                                 121
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
quantity and eventually reduced cost on                cost and easy handling and transport, no
seed rhizomes, without significant                     harmful byproducts, storage at normal
reduction in yield and quality (Prasath et             temperature with enhanced shelf life.
al. 2018).                                             Besides, this encapsulation technique can
The emergence and early growth of ginger               be used to deliver all kinds agriculturally
is inherently slow and weed growth can                 important microorganisms. Seed spices
impact on yield. A field experiment                    have major constraints like low
comprising different organic mulch viz.,               germination, slow initial growth and high
paddy straw, coir pith compost, dried                  susceptibility to diseases and frost. Seed
coconut leaves, Glycosmis pentaphylla                  coating technology using PGPR is a novel
leaves (farmer’s practice), Lantana                    process of coating efficient strains of
camara leaves, cowpea plants and plastic               PGPR on seed spices such as coriander,
mulch black, ash and white colour were                 cumin, fennel and fenugreek. The seeds
compared with non-mulched ginger grown                 coated with PGPR exhibited longer shelf
under rainfed condition. Maximum weed                  life and germination and remained intact
control efficiency (72%) was recorded by               even after1 year of storage.
the treatment application of one season old
paddy straw along with green leaf mulch.               viii) Protected cultivation & Canopy
Application of dried coconut leaves alone              architecture modification: In spices, the
at the time of planting recorded maximum               poly house / net house structures are used
benefit cost (B: C) ratio (2.04) followed by           mainly for raising quality planting
the application of one season old paddy                materials. However, many farmers taken
straw. Application of dried coconut leaves             up cultivating ginger, coriander etc., in
as a mulch for suppressing weeds in ginger             commercial      scale  using     protected
is a viable technology which can be                    cultivation techniques. It is useful for
practiced in places where coconut is being             commercially important low volume and
grown in India (Thankamani et al. 2016).               high value spices crop cultivation.
Majority of soils in the spice growing                 Experiments are underway on turmeric
areas are encountering fertility issues due            vertical farming.
to acidity, nutrient imbalances and
                                                       Spices like black pepper and nutmeg
deficiencies      of      secondary      and
                                                       exhibits dimorphic branching with straight
micronutrients that becomes yield limiting.
                                                       growing orthotropic and side branch
Crop specific, soil test / pH-based
                                                       plagiotropic shoots. The planting materials
micronutrient mixtures for foliar in spice
                                                       from side branches will grow like a bush
guarantees significant increase in yield and
                                                       and suitable for high density planting.
quality have also been developed.
                                                       Normal spacing for filed grown pepper
vii) Plant health management: Plant                    spacing is 2.5 – 3.0 x 2.5 – 3.0 m, (1100
health management is an important input                plants per ha) whereas, bush pepper can be
to reduce the persistent problem of                    planted at       2 x 1 m spacing to
insecticide/ fungicideresidues and increase            accommodate more plants. The yields of
the food safety of spices.                             normal field grown individual plants will
                                                       always be more than individual bush
Use of biologicals and biocontol agents                pepper. By growing more plants per unit
like Trichoderma harzianum, Pochonia                   area we can reduce this production gap.
chlamydosporia, a biocontrol agent against             These bush types suitable for homestead,
nematodes are highly relevant in this                  terraces, bunds and pots, also add aesthetic
context. Adoption of novel and smart                   values of the premises.
delivery of biocontrol agents through
encapsulation need to be popularised. This             ix) Cropping system(CS)/ Integrated
encapsulation process is simple, reduced               Farming System (IFS): Spices are highly
                                                 122
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
amenable for different cropping systems.               for different agro-climatic regions of India
Practice of cropping system is always                  is available that has to be adopted to
better option than monoculture and it is a             sustain the production and survival of
way to protect the farmers from vagaries               marginal and poor farmers. ICAR-IISR has
of weather / pest and diseases / market                developed and demonstrated spices-based
fluctuation. When two or more crops                    IFS model suited for small and marginal
grown along with main crop, under                      farmers involving spices, coconut,
unforeseen situations, even one crop fails,            vegetables, fruits, tuber crops, animal
some income or produce could be obtained               component and fishery, with a profit of Rs.
from other crops in the intercropping                  1.23 lakhs per annum from one-acre plot.
system. Under favourable condition                     Spices as mixed/ inter cropping in the
farmers will get additional income or other            home gardens of south India, not only
economic produces like vegetable, fodder,              sequester C in biomass and soil, but also
green manure, etc. The crop based                      reduce fossil-fuel burning by promoting
husbandry alone will not generate                      wood fuel production, and
adequate employment and income to small                Conserve agrobiodiversity. In addition,
and marginal farmers in the context of                 they help in the conservation of C stocks
climate change. It is essential to integrate           in existing natural forests by alleviating the
crops with animal husbandry, bee keeping,              pressure on these areas. Moreover, there is
mushroom production, sericulture, etc..,               no complete removal of biomass from the
There are several improved farming                     home gardens having multi species
systems model for different agro-climatic              cropping systems. The home garden
regions of India is available that has to be           system, thus, is remarkably resilient,
adopted to sustain the production and                  which is an added advantage. Conservation
survival of marginal and poor farmers.                 of agrobiodiversity is yet another
Horti-horti three-tier system suitable are             advantage and the production of timber
Areca nut + black pepper +ginger/                      and non-timber products offsets the
turmeric/ pineapple/Assam lemon and                    pressure on natural forests for these goods
Silvi-horti-three tier system are MPT +                and services. Mixed cropping under home
black pepper + ginger/turmeric/pineapple               gardens thus not only provides a win–win
are the better systems for north eastern hill          strategy for small-scale farmers in climate
(NEH) regions (Jhaet al. 2017). Ginger                 change      mitigation     and     adaptation
and turmeric are the potential horticultural           initiatives but also in agrobiodiversity
crops for NEH region and suitable to grow              conservation.
mid-hill region (<800m). In an agri-hort-
silvi-pastoral system, the highest rice                CONCLUSION
equivalent yield (REY) of 2006.5 kg was
recorded with Capsicum-Turmeric (REY)                          Spices are high value and low
cropping system. In the silvi-horticultural            volume crops, grown in an area of 4.2
system of NEH region, the lower terrace                million ha with a production of 9.89
was utilized turmeric +bottle gourd,                   million tonnes. Cumin, chillies, coriander,
turmeric + pumpkin cropping systems.                   garlic, mint, turmeric, black pepper, ginger
        The crop based husbandry alone                 and fenugreek occupies major area. In
will not generate adequate employment                  terms of production garlic, ginger, chillies,
and income to small and marginal farmers               turmeric, cumin, coriander, fenugreek,
in the context of climate change. It is                tamarind, fennel, black pepper and mint
essential to integrate crops with animal               are contributing maximum for total spices
husbandry, bee keeping, mushroom                       production. India exported around 1.76
production, sericulture, etc.., There are              million tonnes of spices and value-added
several improved farming systems model                 products to the value of around
                                                 123
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 124
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
        India is the fourth largest vegetable          develop the drought mitigation strategies
oil economy at the global level after USA,             for increasing the productivity and
China and Brazil, with 6.5% share in                   profitability of the rapeseed-mustard.
world’s oilseeds production; 3.7% of                   Climate resilient conservation agriculture-
vegetable oil production; 5.4% of oil meal             based production system along with
production; 2.5% of oil meal export;                   superabsorbent polymers (SAPs), and
18.8% of oil import and 11.3% of the                   stress alleviating chemicals like plant bio
world’s edible oil consumption, during                 regulators (PBRs) to enhance plant’s built-
2019–20 (Chauhan et al., 2021).                        in defence could be better options to adapt
Nevertheless, to meet the existing deficit             and mitigate the impact of water stress and
in edible oils (55-60%), India is currently            reduce the cost of cultivation, and enhance
importing around 13 million tonnes at a                the sustainability and profitability of the
cost of Rs. 1.17 lakh crore to the                     mustard production system. Therefore, the
exchequer. Oilseed Brassica achieved                   present study was conducted with the
significant growth in India accounting                 objectives i) to mitigate the impact of
about 23.3% area and 28.0% production of               deficit moisture stress in Indian mustard
the total oilseeds in the country during               and ii) to study interactive response of
2020-21. However, productivity of the                  different moisture stress mitigating
crop is still low due to large cultivation             strategies on resource-use efficiency,
under rain fed situation, further                      productivity and profitability of Indian
accentuated by biotic and abiotic stresses.            mustard.
Drought stress, as the most important                  METHODOLOGY
factor limiting growth and yield of crops,
affects about 40 to 60 % of global                             Afield experiment was conducted
agricultural lands (Godarzi et al., 2017).             at ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard
Water stress, an extended period of low                Research, Bharatpur during 2021-22with
water availability/ precipitation, affects             Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in
almost 40% of the 6–7 million hectares of              kharif crops-mustard cropping system.
farmland in India (Rani et al., 2021).                 Four treatment combinations of tillage,
Water stress during growing season in                  cropping systems, and moisture regimes
rapeseed-mustard could reduce the                      i.e., i) conventional tillage practices in
production by 17 to 94 % (Chauhan et al.,              pearl millet–mustard cropping system
2011). Further, water stress at the                    under deficit moisture stress (CT+PM-
important critical stages of the crop has led          M+MS); ii) conservation agricultural
to a drastic decline in growth and yields of           practices in pearl millet–mustard cropping
Indian mustard (Choudhary et al., 2021;                system under moisture stress (CA+PM-
Langadi et al., 2021). As the country’s                M+MS); iii) CA-based permanent bed
population increases, so does the demand               planting in maize–mustard cropping
for oilseed crops. Therefore, in view of the           system under moisture stress (CA+Mz-
current and future demand of edible oil,               M+MS); and iv) CT in fallow–mustard
limited water supply conditions and ever-              cropping system under normal moisture as
increasing production costs trigger to                 farmers’ practice (CT+F-M+NS) were
                                                 125
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
taken inmain-plot, and six treatment                   The maximum values of dry matter
combinations of plant bio-regulators                   production and main shoot length were
(PBRs; salicylic acid, SA 100 ppm;                     also recorded with SAP+SA which were
thiourea, TU 0.1%; potassium nitrate, PN               on par with SAP+TU and SAP+PN but
1.5%) and superabsorbent polymer-pusa                  significantly higher than rest of the
hydrogel (SAP 2.5 kg/ha) were assigned to              treatments. Similarly, SAP+SA resulted in
sub-plots of a split-plot design with three            the highest number of siliquae on main
replications. Standard packages and                    shoot as well as highest number seeds per
practices of CA and CT systems were                    siliqua than the other treatments. The
followed to establish the crops.                       interaction effects between combinations
superabsorbent polymer was drilled in the              of tillage, cropping system and moisture
furrow at the time of sowing and plant bio-            regimes, and moisture stress mitigation
regulators were sprayed at the flowering               options showed that use of SAP+SA in
and siliquae formation stages of the                   CA-based maize- mustard cropping
mustard. Moisture stress regime was                    systems under moisture stress conditions
created by with-holding the 2nd irrigation.            increased the mustard seed yield by 2.3-
Data on different growth and yield                     17.1% over the normal irrigated CT-based
parameters were recorded and analyzed                  F-M cropping system. The lowest seed
using the standard methods and protocols.              yield (1.88 t/ha) was recorded in the CT-
                                                       based PM-M cropping system under
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                 moisture stress regime with control
                                                       (without SAP or PBRs). Further CA-based
        All the growth and yield                       permanent bed planting in mustard along
parameters of the mustard were influenced              with SAP+SA under moisture stress
significantly due to different moisture                enhanced the net returns by 17.7-49.7%,
regimes and stress mitigation options. In              and reduced the total cost of cultivation by
general, imposing of post-flowering                    Rs 16505/ha with remarkable saving in
moisture stress condition in Indian mustard            labour cost (46.0%), fuel cost (83.7%)and
reduced the plant height 4-8%, dry matter              water use (62.5%)over the CT-based
production by 6-17%, main shoot length                 normal irrigated mustard production
by 7-14%, number of siliquae on main                   system.
shoot by 4-12%, number of seeds/ siliqua
by 3-11% and 1000-seeds weight by 2-9%                 CONCLUSION
over the normal moisture regime (Table 1).
Under normal moisture condition, the                           Based on the present investigation,
maximum values of plant height, dry                    the combined use of conservation
matter production per plant, main shoot                agriculture-based permanent bed planting
length, number of primary branches per                 system, superabsorbent polymer and
plant, number of siliquae on main shoot,               salicylic acid not only mitigated the deficit
seeds per siliqua and 1000-seed weight                 moisture stress but also improved the
were recorded with CT-based fallow-                    productivity and profitability and resource-
mustard cropping system. However, under                use efficiency        as    compared the
moisture stress conditions, CA-based Mz-               conventional tillage-based normal irrigated
M cropping system recorded the higher                  mustard production system. Therefore, the
values of these parameters over the CT                 said technology can be recommended and
systems (Table 1). Among the moisture                  scale-out     for    sustainable    mustard
stress mitigation options, SAP+SA being                cultivation, and to boost the mustard oil
on par with other treatments of SAP and                production and profits of the farmers in
PBRs resulted the tallest plants than                  fragile rainfed agro-ecologies.
control (without SAP or PBR) treatments.
                                                 126
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
REFERENCES                                             Godarzi, A., Bazrafshan, F., Zare, M.,
                                                             Faraji, H., Langeroodi, A.R.S. 2017.
Chauhan, J.S., Singh, K.H., Singh, V.V.                      Studying the effect of drought stress
     and Kumar, S. 2011. Hundred years                       on     yield      and      physiological
     of rapeseed-mustard breeding in                         characteristics in genotypes of
     India: accomplishments and future                       canola (Brassica napus L.). Helix8:
     strategies. Indian Journal of                           1250-1258.
     Agricultural Sciences81(12): 1093–                Langadi, A.K., Choudhary, R.L., Jat, R.S.,
     1109.                                                   Singh, H.V., Dotaniya, M.L., Meena,
Chauhan, J.S., Choudhury, P.R., Pal, S.                      M.K., Premi, O.P. and Rai, P.K.
     and Singh, K.H. 2021. An overview                       2021.Effect       of     superabsorbent
     of oilseeds and oil scenario, seed                      polymer on drought Mitigation, and
     chain and strategy to energize seed                     enhancing         productivity      and
     production.Indian     Journal      of                   profitability of Indian mustard (B.
     Agricultural Sciences91(2): 183–92.                     juncea).Journal         of     Oilseeds
Choudhary, R.L., Langadi, A.K., Jat, R.S.,                   Research38(2): 179–186.
     Anupama, Singh, H.V., Meena,                      Rani, P., Saini, I., Singh, N., Kaushik, P.,
     M.D., Dotaniya, M.L., Meena, M.K.,                      Wijaya, L., Al-Barty, A., Darwish,
     Premi, O.P. and Rai, P.K. 2021.                         H. and Noureldeen, A. 2021.Effect
     Mitigating the moisture stress in                       of potassium fertilizer on the growth,
     Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)                        physiological parameters, and water
     through polymer.Journal of oilseed                      status of Brassica juncea cultivars
     Brassica12(1): 21–27.                                   under         different       irrigation
                                                             regimes.PlosOne16(9): e0257023.
                                                             Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
                                                             0257023
                                                 127
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Table 1. Effect of tillage, cropping system& moisture regimes, and moisture stress mitigation
options on growth, yield attributes and seed yield of Indian mustard
Treatment                      Plant    Dry matter      Length of     No. of    No.     Seed
                               height   production        main      siliqua on   of     yield
                                (cm)      (g/plant)    shoot (cm)      main    seeds/ (t/ha)
                                                                       shoot   siliqa
Tillage, cropping system & moisture regimes
CT+PM-M+MS                     183.3         90.4         70.0          52.3    15.4    2.19
CA+PM-M+MS                     185.7         97.7         71.0          54.0    16.2    2.41
CA+Mz-M+MS                     191.5        102.5         76.1          57.5    16.7    2.70
CT+F-M+NM                      199.5        109.2         82.1          59.6    17.2    2.87
  LSD (p=0.05)                   8.6          3.8          5.8           2.8     1.0    0.15
Moisture stress mitigation options
SAP                            188.7         97.2         73.9          54.6    16.1    2.45
SAP+TU                         193.0        104.7         75.4          59.1    17.1    2.73
SAP+PN                         190.5        102.8         78.0          58.1    16.6    2.63
SAP+SA                         194.6        109.3         78.9          61.7    17.9    2.89
Water spray                    186.5         93.0         71.7          51.0    15.3    2.30
Control                        186.6         92.8         71.0          50.4    15.1    2.26
 LSD (p=0.05)                    6.0          9.4         4.78           4.0     0.8    0.14
                                                 128
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 129
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
landslides that level hillsides can occur              potatoes, ginger, turmeric, pineapple,
suddenly. Accelerated erosion now                      cassava, vegetables, etc. are also grown in
occurs in relation to the following human              both the seasons. Mostly fields are fallow
activities: overgrazing, cutting of forests,           during the winter season except where
jhum cultivation, poor cultivation                     irrigation facilities are available.
practices, and reduced fallow. Torrential
rainfall and steep land slopes cause                            Traditional methods of water
runoff and further soil erosion. The                   management including gully erosion
people living in these areas have                      control consist of harnessing the hill
developed management strategies to                     streams during monsoon by constructing
conserve land and water resources                      temporary check dams on stream bed for
preserving the local environment since                 diversion and conveyance of water through
time immemorial. This is also cited by                 split bamboo pipe, earthen channel, etc.
Eric Roose, 2008. Therefore, rural                     Boulder, timber and earthen dams are used
communities        have       progressively            to build across the stream to raise the level
developed over the centuries various                   of water for diversion. Indigenous water
strategies (26 observed in the Moroccan                management practices with Yetbung
mountains) well adapted to their                       Lingang and Linkum are widely used in
conditions in order to manage water and                East Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh
soil nutrients on steep hill slopes.                   since longback. There are abundance of
Traditional conservation practices are                 stones, boulders, bamboo and tokopata
limited to stone walls if the soil is stony            which are meticulously utilized for raising
(on sandstone, quartzite and amphibolite)              these two structures used for storing of
or to stone lines, grass strips or cut-                water, irrigating the crop, laying of pipe,
branch lines in the Sudano-Sahelian                    checking erosion loss, erecting a
Areas of Western Africa (Eric Roose,                   temporary small bridge, etc.(Pattanaaik, et.
2008)                                                  al., 2012) There is a tradition of such
                                                       irrigation practices being followed by
        Water is one of the key inputs to              village/community as a whole in carrying
agriculture for obtaining high crop yield.             water from streams over large distances.
Either excess or deficit of water in plant             Based on long experience under existing
root environment constraints optimal crop              soil and climatic conditions as well as
production. Northeast India, being a high              availability of large number of hill
rainfall area coupled with steep                       streams, farmers in certain areas have
topography experiences excessive surface               developed typical systems of water
run off and floods during monsoon period               management, which are very effective
and acute water shortage for irrigation and            under the existing condition of topography
drinking purposes during winter season.                and terrain. Some of these systems are
Due to hilly nature of the terrain, major              bamboo drip irrigation system in
and medium irrigation projects are more                Meghalaya, Zabo system in Nagaland,
or less absent. As the irrigated areas lies            Apatanis ystemin Arunachal Pradesh, etc.
on the terraces of hill slopes and few in              Indigenous water conservation technology
valley lands proper water management is                was investigated, studied and documented
needed. However, the water management                  in Sumari village of Pauri district,
component has not been given due                       Uttaranchal by R. Kala &C.P. Kala in
importance. Community based land tenure                2006. Traditional knowledge, wisdom and
system dominates in the region. Rice is                experience are quite rich to conserve
the main kharif crop grown in both                     natural     resources    (Sharma,     1998).
lowland and upland conditions in the                   Conservation of biodiversity and other
region.    Maize,     millets,    soybean,             natural resources over a long period of
groundnut, linseed, pea, tapioca, mustard,             time has been possible because of the
                                                 130
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 131
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 132
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 133
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
CONCLUSION                                             REFERENCES
         Indigenous gully control structure            Chandrakanth, M.G., Bhatt, M.G.&
“Rango” has been widely used in East                         Accava, M.S., Socio economic
Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh since                    changes and sacred grooves in
long back. There are abundance of stones,                    south      India:    Protecting     a
boulders, bamboo, canes and tokopata                         community-based              resource
which are meticulously utilised for                          management institution, Natural
constructing these structures, which are                     Resource Forum, 28, (2004), 102-
used for protecting gullies, increasing                      111.
infiltration and percolation of runoff,                Gupta, Anil K., Sustainability through
checking erosion loss, etc. Local Adi                        biodiversity: Designing Crucible of
tribe have their traditional wisdom for                      culture, creativity and conscience,
constructing and using them, which                           International      conference      on
corroborates the science behind their                        biodiversity and conservation,
thoughts. Torrential rainfall coupled with                   Copenhagan, November 8, (1991),
erosive nature of light textured soil of                     8-10.
undulating topography requires such                    KalaR & Kala C.P., Indigenous Water
constructions to conserve and utilize the                    Conservation       Technology      in
natural resources like soil and water.                       Sumari Village of Uttaranchal,
Generally financial assistance for erecting                  Indian J Tradit Knowledge, 5(3)
and maintaining such structures are not                      (2006), 394-396.
provided by the Government and other                   Pattanaaik, S.K., Sen, D., Moyong, O.,
organised sectors. In this situation,                        Kumar, Naresh and Debnath, P.,
“Rango”, created in holistic way with                        Traditional System of Water
community participation has become the                       Management in Watersheds of
lifeline of the local people in the remote                   Arunachal Pradesh, Indian Journal
area of Arunachal Pradesh.                                   of Traditional Knowledge, (2012),
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT                                              11(4):719-723.
                                                       Roose, Eric, Soil Erosion, Conservation
        Local people of the watershed are                    and Restoration: A few Lessons
sincerely thanked by the authors for                         from 50 Years of Research in
providing valuable information enriching                     Africa, Advances in Geo Ecology
the study. Financial assistance from the                     39, (2008) pp: 159-180.
Central Agricultural University, Imphal,               Sharma K.N., Water-The fulcrum of
Manipur for conducting the study is duly                     ancient Indian socio religious
acknowledged.                                                traditions,    Proc.    International
                                                             conference on water, a looming
                                                             crisis at the beginning of the 21st
                                                             century, UNESCO, Paris (1998),
                                                             471-476.
                                                 134
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
      Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in Manipur
                NIVETINA LAITONJAM1, RAM SINGH2 AND VICTOR L.3
                    1
                   Project Associate, ICAR-RC NEH Region,Umiam, Meghalaya
     2
      Professor (Agricultural Economics), Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Meghalaya
         3
           Research Scholar, Department of Economics, D.M. University, Imphal, Manipur
                                                    135
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
REFERENCES
Das, A., Ghosh, P.K., Choudhury, B.U., Patel,          Reilly, J. (1999). What does climate change
      D.P.,Munda, G.C., Ngachan, S.V., and                   mean for agriculture in developing
      Chowdhury,         P. (2009). Climate                  countries? A comment on Mendelsohn
      change in North-East India: Recent facts               & Dinar.World Bank Res. Obs., 14:
      and events-worry for agricultural                      295–305.
      management. Proceeding of workshop               Rymbai, D. (2016). Adaptation to climate
      on Impact of Climate Change on                         change: An economic study of cereal
      Agriculture.Pp. 32-37, December 17-18,                 crops in Eastern Himalaya. Ph.D.
      2009, Ahmedabad, India.                                Thesis, Submitted to College of Post
Zutshi, B., and Verma, R.K. (2017).                          Graduate Studies, Central Agricultural
      Community response, preparedness and                   University, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
      disaster risk-     reduction: A case of
      Manipur floods, 2015. Eur. Sci. J.,
      Special edition, 322-346.
                                                 136
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Drought
                                              52%
                 38%                                                 Irrigation + Change in transplanting
                                                                     and harvesting time (Strategy D3)
                                              Flood
                                                                  Re-sowing + Change in
                                                                  transplanting and harvesting time
                              4%                                  (Strategy F1)
                       16%
                                        45%                       Change in transplanting and
                                                                  harvesting time (Strategy F2)
                       35%
                                                                  Re-sowing + Change in
                                                                  transplanting and harvesting time +
                                                                  Soil and plant health strategies
                                                                  (Strategy F3)
                                                                  Re-sowing (Strategy F4)
                                                    137
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Alleviating agricultural drought stress in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)
                            through soil microbes
 R.L. CHOUDHARY1*, K.V. VIKRAM2, SANGEETA PAUL2, R.S. JAT1, H.V. SINGH1,
                      M.L. DOTANIYA1 AND P.K. RAI1
      1
          ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur- 321 303 (Raj.), India,
              2
                ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110012, India
                    *Corresponding author’s email: rl.choudhary@icar.gov.in
                                                 138
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
20%) and 1000-seed weight (6-12%) were                 REFERENCES
recorded as compared to no moisture stress.
Seed inoculation with consortia of microbes            Bogati, K. and Walczak, M. 2022. The
significantly improved the aforesaid growth                 impact of drought stress on soil
and yield parameters over no inoculation.                   microbial      community,     enzyme
The seed and stover yields were                             activities and plants. Agronomy 12:
significantly decreased by 36.3 and 9.1%                    189.
under severe moisture stress, and 10.4 and                  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1201
6.8% under moderate moisture stress                         0189
conditions over no moisture stress,
                                                       Choudhary, R.L., Langadi, A.K., Jat, R.S.,
respectively. Microbial consortia improved
                                                           Anupama, Singh, H.V., Meena, M.D.,
the seed (12.2%) and stover (7.3%) yields
                                                           Dotaniya, M.L., Meena, M.K., Premi,
over the no inoculation, across the moisture
                                                           O.P. and Rai, P.K. 2021. Mitigating
regimes. Interaction effect showed that
                                                           the moisture stress in Indian mustard
microbial formulation, irrespective of strains
                                                           (Brassica juncea) through polymer.
increased the mustard seed yield
                                                           Journal of oilseed Brassica12(1): 21–
significantly under moderate moisture stress
                                                           27.
(7-19%) and severe moisture stress (9-17%)
compared to no inoculation, and saved 60-              Langadi, A.K., Choudhary, R.L., Jat, R.S.,
80mm irrigation water/ha (Fig. 1).                          Singh, H.V., Dotaniya, M.L., Meena,
                                                            M.K., Premi, O.P. and Rai, P.K. 2021.
CONCLUSION
                                                            Effect of superabsorbent polymer on
The present study highlighted that the use of               drought Mitigation, and enhancing
microbial consortia can save the irrigation                 productivity and profitability of Indian
water and alleviate the agricultural drought,               mustard (B. juncea). Journal of
and enhance the productivity of Indian                      Oilseeds Research38(2): 179–186.
mustard in the rainfed conditions.
                                                       Miloševi´c,    N.A.,Marinkovi´c,    J.B.
                                                            andTintor, B.B. 2012. Mitigating
                                                            abiotic stress in crop plants by
                                                            microorganisms. Proc Nat Sci Matica
                                                            Serpska Novi Sad123: 17–26.
                                                 139
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                   3.5
                                   3.0
                                   2.5
                                   2.0
                                   1.5
                                   1.0
                                   0.5
                                   0.0
                                              Severe stress        Moderate stress         No stress
                                                                Soil moiture regimes
                                                                    140
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
    Factors of physiological challenge during heat stress in pigs: A meta-
                                   analysis
  JAYA, SATISH KUMAR, SOUVIK PAUL, KALYAN DE, SALAM JAYACHITRA
          DEVI, MOHAN N.H., B. C. DAS* AND VIVEK KUMAR GUPTA
           ICAR-National research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati, Assam-781131
                       *Corresponding Author: bikash67@rediffmail.com
        The increase in global temperature             heat stress because of absence of sweat
due to climate change causes heat stress in            glands, presence of thick layer of adipose
pigs, which adversely affects the                      tissue and limited ventilatory mechanism.
productivity and economic efficiency of                The present meta-analysis was conducted
pig production system. The disruption of               to explore different factors that possess a
physiological well-being during thermal                significant physiological challenge mainly
discomfort compromises health and                      due to heat stress in pigs.
welfare in pigs. The present meta-analysis
was conducted to study the factors                     METHODOLOGY
affecting physiological homeostasis in heat
                                                              A meta-analysis was conducted on
stressed pigs during summer season. The
                                                       research papers available in Pubmed
analysis revealed that all categories of pigs
                                                       database and the terms like pigs, climate
irrespective of physiological stage, age,
                                                       and stress were used to filter the papers.
sex and breed were affected by heat stress.
                                                       Subsequently, individual papers were
The production losses were mainly due to
                                                       studied to collect data on country of study,
decreased weight gain, poor carcass
                                                       their climatic zone, category of pigs,
quality and low reproductive performance.
                                                       breeds, factors under study, association
Hence, ameliorative measures to combat
                                                       with heat stress and their ameliorative
the detrimental effect of heat stress should
                                                       measures.
be adopted to decrease the production loss
due to heat stress.                                    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
        Environmental extremes like high                       The number of researches on heat
temperature, increased humidity and                    stress in pigs showed an increasing trend
chilling cold weather adversely affects the            after 2008 which continues to increase
productivity pig farming. With the                     thereafter (Figure 1). The problem of heat
increasing global warming coupled to the               stress in pigs are reported by major pig
climate change, the negative effect of these           rearing countries like Australia, Brazil,
factors is predicted to worsen every year.             Canada, China, France, Japan, Korea,
Pigs form an important livestock                       Mexico, Netherlands, Serbia, Spain,
commodity worldwide and is associated                  Uganda and USA including India. Thus,
with socio-economic well-being of women                heat stress is a challenge in both tropical
and tribal population especially in North-             and temperate regions, with 45 % studies
East India (Bharati et al., 2022). Increase            on heat stress being reported from tropical
of ambient temperature beyond of 35 °C                 and 55 % from temperate countries. All the
for extended periods induces heat stress in            categories of pigs, were adversely affected
livestock, which is a complex phenomenon               by heat stress during summers season,
triggering pro-inflammatory responses, as              irrespective of their physiological stage,
dissipation of metabolic heat becomes                  age, breed and sex, which resulted in
impossible (Bharati et al., 2017). Pigs are            decrease in overall productivity of a pig
physiologically restricted to cope up with             farm (Podder et al., 2022). Pigs cope up
                                                 141
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
with environmental stress with various                 Transportation during peak summer and
kinds of adaptive responses like                       poor housing conditions aggravated the
physiological, behavioral, neuroendocrine,             physiological discomfort during heat
metabolic, along with the molecular and                stress, which proved fatal to genetically
cellular responses (Figure 2).The major                susceptible pigs. Other factors incurring
parameters affected included piglet birth              challenge during heat stress includes
weight, feed intake, body weight gain, pre-            increased vector dynamics, low quality
weaning mortality, anti-oxidant profile,               feed and water.
hormonal dysregulation, carcass quality
and reproductive efficiency (Moturi et al.,            CONCLUSIONS
2022). Heat stress compromised the health
                                                               In order to mitigate the negative
and welfare of all categories of pigs.
                                                       economic impact as the consequence of
Piglets suffer during cold season due to
                                                       heat stress, mitigation strategies like
absence of brown fat and non-shivering
                                                       selective breeding for stress tolerance,
thermogenesis, due to which high piglet
                                                       feeding of anti-oxidants and vitamin
mortality was reported during winters.
                                                       supplements along with climate-smart
However, it can be prevented with proper
                                                       management practices are need of an hour.
neonatal     care    and     managemental
interventions. Immunosuppression along
with decreased intestinal integrity and
increased endotoxin permeability were
evident     in    heat    stressed    pigs.
Figure 1. The number of publications on heat stress in pigs during timeline 1970-2022
                                                 142
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
REFERENCES
Bharati, J., Dangi, S.S., Chouhan, V.S.,               Moturi, J., Hosseindoust, A., Tajudeen, H.,
     Mishra, S.R., Bharti, M.K., Verma,                     Mun, J.Y., Ha, S.H. and Kim, J.S.,
     V., Shankar, O., Yadav, V.P., Das,                     2022. Influence of dietary fiber
     K., Paul, A. and Bag, S., 2017.                        intake and soluble to insoluble fiber
     Expression dynamics of HSP70                           ratio on reproductive performance of
     during chronic heat stress in                          sows during late gestation under hot
     Tharparkar     cattle.  International                  climatic         conditions. Scientific
     journal of biometeorology, 61(6),                      Reports, 12(1), pp.1-13.
     pp.1017-1027.                                     Podder, M., Bera, S., Naskar, S., Sahu, D.,
Bharati J, De K, Paul S, Kumar S, Yadav                     Mukherjee, J. and Patra, A.K., 2022.
     AK, Doley J, Mohan NH, Das BC.                         Physiological,     blood-biochemical
     Mobilizing Pig Resources for                           and     behavioural     changes      of
     Capacity       Development        and                  Ghoongroo pigs in seasonal heat
     Livelihood Security. In Agriculture,                   stress of a hot-humid tropical
     Livestock       Production        and                  environment. International Journal
     Aquaculture 2022 (pp. 219-242).                        of Biometeorology, 66(7), pp.1349-
     Springer, Cham.                                        1364.
                                                 143
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
           Climate change and emergence of winter coccidiosis in pigs
      SOUVIK PAUL, JUWARDOLEY, KALYAN DE, SATISH KUMAR, JAYA,
                   S. JAYACHITRA DEVI AND V.K. GUPTA
                                                 144
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
DISCUSSION                                             CONCLUSION
                                                 145
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Daytime rhythmicity of core temperature in neonatal piglet under tropical
                             monsoon zone
     KALYAN DE*, NITIN M. ATTUPURAM, SALAM JAYA CHITRA DEVI AND
                              V.K. GUPTA
                                                 146
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
showed a higher amplitude of oscillation in                   M.M., Asensio, L.A.B., Façanha,
cold   than    thermoneutrality(Refinetti,                    D.A.E., 2017. Daily rhythmicity of
2020).                                                        the thermoregulatory responses of
                                                              locally adapted Brazilian sheep in a
        In the present study, the core                        semiarid      environment.      Int   J
temperature of neonatal piglets was                           Biometeorol        61,      1221–1231.
positively (P<0.01) correlated with the                       https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-
DBT and THI. Furthermore, in the present                      1300-2
study, a negative correlation of RH with                Guerrero-Legarreta, I., Napolitano, F.,
the RT of neonatal piglets is in agreement                    Cruz-Monterrosa, R., Mota-Rojas,
with the findings of Jia et al. (2020).                       D., Mora-Medina, P., Ramírez-
                                                              Bribiesca, E., Bertoni, A., Berdugo-
CONCLUSIONS
                                                              Gutiérrez, J., Braghieri, A., 2020.
        The present study suggests that                       River buffalo meat production and
neonatal piglets maintain a rhythmicity in                    quality: Sustainability, productivity,
their core temperature in the early days of                   nutritional and sensory properties.
life in daytime. The ambient temperature                      Journal of Buffalo Science 9, 159–
of the day influences the core temperature                    169.
of neonates in the early days of life.                  Herpin, P., Damon, M., Dividich, J.L.,
Therefore; the newborn piglets need                           2002.Development                     of
special attention during the initial days                     thermoregulation       and     neonatal
after farrowing till the body mechanism                       survival       in      pigsq.Livestock
adapts to achieve homeothermy.                                Production Science 21.
                                                        Jia, G., Li, W., Meng, J., Tan, H., Feng,
REFERENCES                                                    Y., 2020. Non-Contact Evaluation of
                                                              Pigs’        Body         Temperature
Andersen, H.M.-L., Pedersen, L.J., 2016.                      Incorporating           Environmental
     Effect of radiant heat at the birth site                 Factors.Sensors         20,       4282.
     in farrowing crates on hypothermia                       https://doi.org/10.3390/s201542827,
     and behaviour in neonatal piglets.                       2026–
     Animal           10,         128–134.                    2034.https://doi.org/10.1017/S17517
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111                       31113001778
     5001913                                           Kammersgaard, T.S., Pedersen, L.J.,
Baxter, E.M., Edwards, S.A., 2018. Piglet                    Jørgensen, E., 2011. Hypothermia in
     mortality and morbidity: Inevitable                     neonatal piglets: Interactions and
     or unacceptable?, in: Advances in                       causes of individual differences.
     Pig Welfare. Elsevier, pp. 73–100.                      Journal of Animal Science89,2073–
                                                             2085.
Carroll, J.A., Burdick, N.C., Chase, C.C.,                   https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3022
     Coleman, S.W., Spiers, D.E., 2012.                 Muns Vila, R., 2013. Welfare and
     Influence       of     environmental                     management strategies to reduce pre-
     temperature on the physiological,                        weaning            mortality         in
     endocrine, and immune responses in                       piglets.UniversitatAutònoma          de
     livestock exposed to a provocative                       Barcelona.
     immune challenge. Domestic Animal                  Pedersen,      L.J.,     Larsen,     M.L.V.,
     Endocrinology             43,146–153.                    Malmkvist, J., 2016. The ability of
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.                     different thermal aids to reduce
     2011.12.008da Silva, W.E., Leite,                        hypothermia          in        neonatal
     J.H.G.M., de Sousa, J.E.R., Costa,                       piglets1.Journal of Animal Science
     W.P., da Silva, W.S.T., Guilhermino,                     94,2151–2159.
                                                 147
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
     https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-                       Ellis, M., 2020.Effect of drying
     0219                                                    and/or warming piglets at birth on
Refinetti, R., 2020. Circadian rhythmicity                   rectal temperature over the first 24 h
     of body temperature and metabolism.                     after birth. Translational Animal
     Temperature7,321–362.                                   Science           4,          txaa184.
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.20                     https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa184
     20.1743605
Vande Pol, K.D., Tolosa, A.F., Shull,
     C.M., Brown, C.B., Alencar, S.A.S.,
                                                 148
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
   Metagenomic diversity in gastrointestinal samples of pigs reared under
                      backyard production system
 NITIN M. ATTUPURAM, KALYAN DE, RAJIB DEB, R. THOMAS, S.R. PEGU, R.
                 ISLAM, N.H. MOHAN AND V.K. GUPTA
                 Animal Nutrition, ICAR-NRC on Pig, Rani, Guwahati, Assam
INTRODUCTION                                           pig saliva and rectal samples using
                                                       commercially available Qiagen DNA Mini
         The gut microbiota plays a pivotal            Kit and Qiagen stool DNA Kit. DNA
role in animals’ health and disease. In a              samples were sequenced on the
healthy state, the gut microbiota has                  IlluminaNovaSeq6000 platform shotgun
myriad positive functions, including                   metagenomic library protocol (Illumina
energy recovery from the metabolism of                 DNA         Prep).    A      diagrammatic
non-digestible components of foods,                    representation of bioinformatics workflow
protection of a host from pathogenic                   is given in fig 1.
invasion, and modulation of the immune
system ( Bull& Plummer,2014). Hence the
information on microbial diversity in pigs
is critical. Most of the reported studies in
this direction were conducted on organized
pig farms with intensive pig production
systems. Since most pigs in India,
especially in northeast India, are largely
household-based knowledge of the
gastrointestinal microbial diversity of such
animals is a matter of special interest.
Current analyses of the intestinal
microbiota are largely based on sequence-
based methodology, avoiding the time-
consuming culture-based analysis of
intestinal microbiota.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
         For the present study, ghungroo
pigs were reared under the backyard                         Fig 1: Diagrammatic representation
                                                 149
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
having more abundance. The results are                      genetic        factors.      PNAS.
shown in Fig 2., via a pie diagram and                      2010;107:18933–8.
Cronaplot.                                             Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun
                                                            Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, et al. Host
CONCLUSION                                                  genetic       variation     impacts
                                                            microbiome composition across
        In general, the development of gut
                                                            human body sites. Genome Biol.
microbiota is influenced by host genetic
                                                            2015;16:191
variation (Blekhman et al, 2015;
                                                       Bull MJ, Plummer NT. Part 1: The Human
Camarinha-Silva et al , 2017), microflora
                                                            Gut Microbiome in Health and
of grower pigs reared under environmental
                                                            Disease.          Integr       Med
factors, and stochastic events (Benson,
                                                            (Encinitas).2014Dec;13(6):17-
2010). The data provide insights into the
                                                            22.PMID:26770121;
diversity in gastrointest household
                                                            PMCID:PMC456643
backyard farming systems of northeast
                                                       Camarinha-Silva A, Maushammer M,
India.
                                                            Wellmann R, Vital M, Preuss S,
REFERENCES                                                  Bennewitz J. Host genome influence
                                                            on gut microbial composition and
Benson AK, Kelly SA, Legge R, Ma F,                         microbial prediction of complex
     Low SJ, Kim J, et al. Individuality in                 traits            in           pigs.
     gut microbiota composition is a                        Genetics.2017;206:1637–44.
     complex polygenic trait shaped by
     multiple environmental and host
                                                 150
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 151
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
     Soil organic carbon sequestration under Hevea brasiliensis (rubber)
                        plantation in Mizoram, India
 LALREMPUII HRAHSEL*, JITENDRA AHIRWAL AND UTTAM KUMAR SAHOO
        Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram, India-796004
                    *Corresponding author e-mail: lalrempuii.h@gmail.com
                                                 152
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Five plots of 25m x 25m were selected                  increases with soil depth. The SOC content
randomly in the field. Soil samples were               was found to decrease as depth increases.
collected from five random locations                   This could be due to the annual leaf litter
within the sample plots at two depths of 0-            addition in soil, which assists in build-up
15cm and 15-30cm, respectively with a                  of organic matter. A comparative
soil corer of known volume. Samples were               assessment of SOC, pH, bulk density of
collected 1m distance away from the trees.             natural forest and plantation forest with the
Bulk density was measured using corer                  study site is given in Table 2. The SOC
method where undisturbed soil cores were               content is observed as natural forest >
collected and were taken to the laboratory             plantation forest > rubber plantation. The
to be kept in the oven at 105°C for 72hours            SOC content is highest in natural forest
or till the constant weight achieved. The              due to higher net primary productivity in
soil samples were air dried and passed                 forest ecosystem compared to plantation,
through a 2mm sieve taken for analysing                hence their input to the soil may also be
the physicochemical properties. Soil pH                higher. The decline in SOC content with
was measured using soil-water suspension               increase in depth can be caused by decline
at the ratio of 1:2 using a digital pH meter.          in inputs from forest litter as these tend to
Soil moisture content was estimated by                 occupy the top layers and minute
drying 10g of fresh soil at 105°C for 24               quantities penetrating deeper into the soil.
hours. Soil organic carbon was analysed                SOC concentration can be higher in natural
using (Walkley and Black, 1934). The                   forests due to differences in root growth
SOC stock was determined by considering                and soil texture (Ahirwal et al, 2022).
SOC       concentration,     bulk     density          These variations showed SOC is highly
(corrected for coarse fraction) and soil               dependent on land management practices.
depth using the following equation:
                                                       CONCLUSION
SOC stock (Mg ha−1 )
             = [SOC%                                           The study showed that rubber
             × corrected BD (Mg m−3 )                  plantations have a significant impact on
             × T (m) × 104 (m2 ha−1 )]                 the soil properties and particularly the
             /100                                      SOC concentration. Rubber plantations
                                                       may be a potential sink of carbon but it
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS                                could not be compared to natural forests.
                                                       Our study shows us that converting forest
        The differences in soil properties             lands for plantation use may not always be
along the soil depth is given in Table 1.              beneficial. The older the rubber plantation,
The pH of soil showed moderately acidic                the carbon content increases due to
soils. Decomposition of organic matter can             biomass being returned by decomposition
play a role as pH regulation. The moisture             of leaves and branches. Rubber plantation
content of the soil was nearly 30% in both             has a high potential for sequestering
the soil depth. The thick litter layer and             carbon as seen by the SOC stock in this
shade of the matured rubbed trees retains              study. Thus, as the plantations mature,
moisture in the soil. It is estimated that             there is greater potential for carbon
with the age of plantation, the moisture               sequestration due to the higher values of
content will also increase (Das et al,                 SOC.
2021). Bulk density of rubber plantation
                                                 153
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
REFERENCES                                                   Plantations of Tripura. Journal of the
                                                             Indian Society of Soil Science, 48-
Food   and Agricultural Organization.                        260.
     (2011). Global forest resource                    Kennedy, O., Singh, B. R., & Øystein, D.
     assessment. Rome: Food and                              B. (2015). Effects of Land Cover
     Agricultural Organization of the                        Changes on Soil Organic Carbon and
     United Nations,.                                        Total Nitrogen Stocks in the Eastern
Ahirwal, J., Sahoo, U. K., Thangjam, U.,                     Mau Forest Reserve. Sustainable
     & Thong, P. (2022). Oil palm                            Intensification to Advance Food
     agroforestry enhances crop yield and                    Security.
     ecosystem carbon stock. Sustainable               Nath, A. J., Brahma, B., Sileshi, G. W., &
     Production and Consumption, 478–                        Das, A. K. (2018). Impact of land
     487.                                                    use changes on the storage of soil
Brahma, B., Sileshi, G. W., Nath, A. J., &                   organic carbon in active and
     Das, A. K. (2017). Development and                      recalcitrant pools in a humid tropical
     evaluation of robust tree biomass                       region of India. Science of the Total
     equations for rubber tree (Hevea                        Environment, 908-917.
     brasiliensis)plantations in India.                Walkley, A., & Black, A. I. (1934). An
     Forest Ecosystem.                                       examination of the degtjareff method
Choudhary, B. K., Majumdar, K., & Datta,                     for determining soil organic matter
     B. K. (2016). Carbon Sequestration                      and a proposed modification of
     Potential and Edaphic Properties                        chromic acid titration method. Soil
     Along the Plantation Age of Rubber                      Science, 29-38.
     in Tripura, Northeastern India.                   Wicke, B., Dornburg, V., Junginger, M., &
     Current World Environment, 756-                         Faaij, A. (2008). Different palm oil
     766.                                                    production systems for energy
Das, S., Deb, S., Banik, B., & Deb, D.                       purposes and their greenhouse gas
     (2021). Estimation of Soil Organic                      implications. Biomass Bioenergy,
     Carbon Pools and Biomass Carbon                         1322-1337.
     Stocks in Different Aged Rubber
     (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.)
                                                 154
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
             Microbial consortia usage to reduce ammonia volatization and
                         denitrification losses in a wheat field
     SIBANANDA DARJEE1, RENU SINGH1, MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA1, SHIVDHAR
                         MISHRA2 AND POOJA LR1
 1
     Divison of Environment Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
                                        110012, India
     2
         Divison of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012,
                                              India
ABSTRACT                                               of soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC)
                                                       and soil microbial biomass nitrogen
        Nitrogen is among the most crucial             (MBN). Tram showed MBC and MBN
elements for wheat growth and harvest. In              value 146.9 mg kg-1 and 45.2 mg kg-1
addition to lowering soil fertility and                respectively. In plot vigorous root growth
agricultural output, nitrogen losses from              was recorded, which helped in increasing
the soil and plant system can have negative            the uptake of soil available nutrient
effects on the ecosystem. The main                     ultimately it was reflected in higher
sources      of     nitrogen     losses    in          nitrogen content in wheat straw and grain.
agroecosystems are denitrification and                 The soil urease activity at flowering was
ammonia volatilisation. In order to                    found to be 24.4 mg urea g-1 soil h-1 for
enhance the nutrient delivery system by                Tram which is significantly higher
including the usage of recommended                     compare to Tr and Tc. The cumulative
dosage fertilisers in conjunction with                 emission from ammonia flux varied from
biofertilizer and lowering nitrogen losses,            10.4 to 10.6 kg ha-1 and denitrification
the integration of biofertilizers with                 losses varied from 2.4 to 2.5 kg ha-1inTram
inorganic fertiliser is considered necessary.          plot which is recorded minimal compare to
The purpose of this study is to analyse the            the plot receiving Tr treatment. The yield
impact of microbial consortia on nutrient              obtained under Tram plot recorded as 6.4 t
losses in wheat crop and determine how it              ha-1 which is higher as compare to plot
affects wheat crop output. Eight different             receiving treatment Tr i.e., 5.8 t ha-1. Thus,
treatments were used in this study,                    integration of microbial consortium with
including (unfertilized, Tc), Azotobacter              inorganic fertilizer practices proved to be
(Ta), Mycorrhiza (Tm), Azotobacter +                   reducing nitrogen losses as well as
Mycorrhiza (Tam), NPK Recommended                      increases crop yield compare to
(Tr), NPK Recommended +Azotobacter                     conventional agriculture practices.
(Tra), NPK (Recommended) + Mycorrhiza
(Trm), NPK Recommended +Azotobacter                    Keywords-Ammonia              volatization,
+ Mycorrhiza (Tram). An upsurge in soil                Denitrification, Microbial biomass carbon,
microbial activity was reflected in the form           Microbial biomass nitrogen.
                                                 155
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 156
         THEME C
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
                                               SUB-CONTENT
                                                157
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
and P. dravidii, from the northern                  Systematic surveys of all pepper growing
Western Ghats region at Maharashtra.                areas, forests of the Western Ghats and
        The important Piper species                 North Eastern regions have led to the
occurring in North East (NE) India                  establishment of black pepper germplasm
includes P. acutistigmum C. DC., P.                 conservatory at ICAR-IISR,Kozhikode.
haridasanii Gajurel, Rethy et Kumar                 Presently, ICAR- IISR holds the largest
(distributed in Arunachal Pradesh), P.              germplasm collection of black pepper in
attenuatum Hamex Miq., Piper lonchitis              the world consisting of 3465 accessions
Roem.et Sch., P. longum L. (distributed             comprising of 1799 cultivars, 1659 wild
in all NE states), P. arunachalensis                accessions and 9 exotic collections.
Gajurel et Rethy (reported from                     Twenty improved varieties of black
Arunachal Pradesh), P. aurantiacum                  pepper have been released for
Wall. (distributed in Assam and                     commercial cultivation. Panniyur-1,
Meghalaya), P. betleoides C. DC.                    Panniyur-3, Panniyur-8 and Panniyur 10
(distributed in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam            are hybrid revolved at the Pepper
and Sikkim), P. betle L.(distributed in             Research Station, Panniyur (Kerala
Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur,                  Agricultural University). IISR Girimunda
Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura and                      and IISR Malabar Excel are the two
Meghalaya), P. boemeriae folium (Miq.)              hybrids released from ICAR-Indian
C. DC.(distributed in Arunachal Pradesh,            Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode,
Assam, Sikkim, Mizoram, Nagaland,                   Kerala. Phytophthora foot rot is one of
Tripura and Meghalaya), P. diffusum                 the major constraints in pepper
Vahl, Enum., P. griffithi C. DC.                    cultivation and crop improvement
(distributed in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam            programmes has resulted in development
and Meghalaya), P. hamiltonii C. DC.                of three varieties viz., IISR Shakti, IISR
(distributed in Assam and Manipur), P.              Thevam and Panniyur 8 which are field
khasianum C.DC.           (distributed in           tolerant to this disease. Pournami is
Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Tripura,                  tolerant to root knot nematode
Tripura and Meghalaya) (Saji et al.,                (Meloidogyne incognita). Drought is one
2019)                                               of the limiting factors in black pepper
        Cultivar diversity is one of the            cultivation and varieties viz., Panniyur 6
principal components of diversity in the            and Panniyur 8 are field tolerant to water
genus Piper. The cultivars are evolved              stress. Quality of black pepper is
directly from the wild P. nigrum. Natural           measured in terms of piperine, oil and
selection and conscious related diversity           selection by humans for various traits
in cultivars. Over 75cultivars of black             have coleoresin contents. PLD 2, high
pepper are being cultivated in India.               quality variety contains oleoresin 15.45%
Karimunda is the most popular cultivar in           and essential oil 4.8%. Sreekara and
Kerala. The other important cultivars are           Subhakara are rich in essential oil with
Kottanadan (South Kerala), Narayakodi               6.0 and 7.0% respectively. Besides these
(Central Kerala), Aimpiriyan (Wayanad),             varieties developed by the Research
Neelamundi       (Idukki),     Kuthiravally         Stations and SAUs, there are over ten
(Kozhikode and Idukki), Balancotta,                 farmer’s varieties that got registered with
Kalluvally (North Kerala), Malligesara              PPVFRA (Protection of Plant Varieties
and Uddagare (Karnataka). Kuthiravally              and Farmers’ Rights Authority).
and Balancotta exhibit alternate bearing
habit. In terms of quality, Kottanadan has          The North Eastern India, Andaman &
the highest oleoresin (17.8%) content               Nicobar Islands, Odisha, West Bengal
followed by Aimpiriyan (15.7%).                     etc., are then nontraditional areas having
                                                    potential for black pepper cultivation in
                                              158
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               159
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
18 varieties which are good in different            most important cash crop cultivated in
attributes. Mudigere 1 and Mudigere 2               the sub Himalayan state of Sikkim and in
varieties are suitable to high density              the Darjeeling district of West Bengal. It
planting. Appangala 1(IISR Suvasini) is             is also cultivated in northeastern states
suitable for high production technology             and neighbouring countries, Nepal and
and responds well for nutritional inputs.           Bhutan.
Katte disease of cardamom is one of the
very important diseases and it leads to             The genus Amomumis the second largest
reduction in the yield. There are two               genus of the family Zingiberaceae with
improved         varieties/hybrids     with         150 species (Thomas et al., 2009). This
resistance to katte virus. IISR Vijetha is          species is indigenous to moist deciduous
the first katte virus resistant variety and         and semi-evergreen forests of sub-
Appangala 2 is the first hybrid tolerant to         Himalayan tracts at an altitude ranging
katte virus. IISR Avinash suitable to               from 500- 2000 m. (Sharma, 2009). The
cardamom growing regions of Karnataka               presence of wild species such as A.
and Wyanad of Kerala is tolerant to                 delbatum, A. aromaticum, A. kingir, A.
rhizome rot. Thrips is one of the major             lingriformi, A. corynostachum and the
pests in cardamom and it affects the                variability within the cultivated species
appetence and ultimate market value of              support the view of its origin in Sikkim
capsules. Research work is in progress              (Singh and Singh, 1996).There are
for the development of varieties tolerant           mainly six popular cultivars of large
to thrips and some of the genotypes are             cardamom viz., Ramsey (suited to high
under field evaluation. ICRI-5, ICRI-6              altitude), Ramla, Sawney and Varlangey
and Appangala 3 are the varieties tolerant          (suited to medium and high altitude),
to drought. Market value of cardamom is             Seremna and Dzongu Golsey (suited to
decided by its appearance and size.                 low altitude). Several other cultivars
Malabar types are characterised by                  include Chivey, Ramsey, Gardo Seto
globose-oblong shaped capsules and                  Ramnag, Madhusey, Seto Golsey, Slant
Mysore types are of ovoid, bold and dark            Golsey, Red Sawney, Green Sawney and
green capsules. Apart from these there              Mingney.
are over 20 farmers’ varieties of                           Survey was conducted by
cardamom which are popular among the                Regional Station of ICRI (Indian
cardamom growers. Njallani green gold               Cardamom Research Institute) at Sikkim
is one of the popular farmer’s varieties            to different places of Sikkim (Sumsing,
which is high input responsive variety.             Chingsa, Riew Long key) and Arunachal
Some of the farmers varieties are under             Pradesh (Upper Siangin) for collection of
AICRPS multilocation evaluation trial to            germplasm and at present about 60
test the suitability.                               genotypes have been conserved in the
                                                    germplasm of ICRI, RRS at Gangtok.
LARGE CARDAMOM                                      There are two high yielding varieties
                                                    released by ICRI viz., ICRI Sikkim 1
        Large     cardamom      (Amomum             (suitable to medium (1500 m amsl) to
subulatum Roxb.) or black cardamom,                 high (1650 m amsl) altitudes) and ICRI
indigenous to moist deciduous and                   Sikkim 2 (suited to medium (1500 m
evergreen forests of sub-Himalayan                  amsl altitude). Peliminary observations
tropics, is a highly priced aromatic spice          from the trial at Kohima, Nagaland
belonging to the family Zingiberaceae.              showed that Varlangey cultivar of large
The dried ripe fruit is the spice of                cardamom has better productivity (103.6
commerce and the seeds have similar                 g clump-1) as compared to Golsey
properties as those of small cardamom               cultivar (48.3 g clump-1). Varlangey also
(Elettaria cardamomum Maton). It is the
                                              160
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
showed better dry recovery (22%) in                 ‘Rio-de-Janeiro’ have also become very
comparison with the Golsey (16%). Oil               popular among cultivators.
profiling of 10 cultivars of large                          The ex situ gene bank of ginger at
cardamom from ICRI, Gangtok showed                  ICAR-IISR conserves 675 accessions
that ICRI Sikkim 2 has the highest oil              which consist of 632 cultivars, 9 wild
content (2.8%) and SCC-234 (Seremna)                accessions and 36 exotic collections. All
has lowest oil content (1.6%) while the             accessions are being maintained in
rest of the cultivar has the oil content in         cement tubs to protect them from
the range of 2.0-2.4 percent. The                   diseases and also to maintain the purity
principle component of essential oil in             of the genotypes. Besides ICAR-IISR,
large cardamom is 1,8-                              Kozhikode, AICRPS centres are also
cineole which forms 70.0-77.0 percent of            maintaining a sizable number of
total available oil content, while A-               germplasm. Clonal selection, somaclonal
thuene contribute the least (in range of            variants and mutation breeding has
0.19-0.35 %) in cultivated accessions               played important role in ginger
(Muhammed & Akshitha, 2016).                        improvement.       Thirteen     improved
                                                    varieties of ginger are developed by
GINGER                                              different crop improvement methods.
                                                    Varieties viz., Suprabha, Himgiri and
         Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)         IISR Varadahave low fibre and are
(Family: Zingiberaceae) is a herbaceous             suitable for fresh ginger. Essential oil is
perennial, the rhizomes of which are used           one of the major quality character of
as a spice. Maximum variability in                  ginger and varieties developed as
cultivated ginger is found in Indian and            somaclonal variants, such as Athira,
the adjoining countries of South East               Karthika and Aswathy are rich in
Asia. In India, North Eastern States and            essential of >2%. Also, IISR Vajrahas
Kerala are the principal regions of                 high essential oil and zingiberene
variability. Species diversity and varietal         content. IISR Mahima is a nematode
diversity are the principal components of           tolerant variety.
biodiversity in ginger (Mohanty and                         The released varieties of ginger
Sharma 1979; Sasikumar et al. 1999).                were introduced and popularized in
         The     family,     Zingiberaceae          Sikkim, Nagaland, Mizoram and
contains only one genus, Zingiber.                  Meghalaya through ICAR-AICRPS. Six
Gamble (1925) reported seven species                genotypes of ginger viz.,Aizol Ada
from South India. Sabu (1991) described             (Myanmar), Shing Bukir (Garo Pahar),
eight species from the Western Ghats and            Moran Ada, Am Ada/ Mango ginger
adjacent areas viz., Zingiber roseum.               (Curcuma amada), Nadia (Karbi
Rosc., Z. nimmonii Dalz., Z. wightianum             Anglong), Nadia (Nagaland) were
Thaw., Z. zerumbet (L) Smith., Z.                   collected and planted at Kahikuchi centre
neesanum (Graham) Ramamoorthy (syn.                 for evaluation and multiplication. Ten
Z. macrostachyum Dalz.), Z. cernum                  vegetable type bold gingers from Nepal
Dalz., Z. purpureum Roscoe (syn. Z.                 were introduced to Meghalaya, Mizoram,
cassumunar Thw.) and Z. officinale Rosc.            Nagaland and 15 from Arunachal
Several cultivars of ginger are grown in            Pradesh. A unique genotype of black
different ginger growing areas in India             ginger (Kaempferia parviflora) collected
and they are generally named after the              and multiplied at Nagaland centre of
localities where they are grown. Some of            ICAR-AICRPS. The ginger varieties that
the prominent indigenous cultivars are              have high yield potential and suitable for
Maran, Kuruppampadi, Ernad, Wayanad,                NER includes IISR Varada (22.6 t ha-1),
Himachal and Nadia. The exotic cultivar             IISR Mahima (23.2 t ha-1), IISR Rejatha
                                              161
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
(22.4 t ha-1) Suprabha (16.6 t ha-1 fresh),         hybridization. Clonal selection is the
GCP-49 /Mohini (14 t ha-1) and Himgiri              most common and successful method for
(13.5 t ha-1). The evaluation of the ginger         crop improvement in turmeric. Mutation
genotypes under NER revealed that                   and polyploidy breeding is for creation of
Himgiri and Nadia performed well in                 variability. Due to rare seed set and
Mizoram, Suravi and Nadia in Pasighat               sterility development of varieties through
while IISR Mahima, Maran and Nadia                  hybridization is very difficult. Thirty four
were best in Meghalaya whereas                      improved varieties of turmeric developed
Gorubathan and Bhaise are the best                  by Research Institutes. Of these IISR
ginger varieties for Arunachal Pradesh.             Prabha and IISR Prathiba are the only
                                                    varieties developed by open pollinated
TURMERIC                                            progeny selection. Suguna, Sudarshana,
        Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) is a            and IISR Pragati are short duration
rhizomatous spice propagated mainly                 varieties with high yield and over 5%
through rhizomes. The genus Curcuma                 curcumin. They are also reported to be
(family Zingiberaceae) comprising over              tolerant to rhizome rot. Curcumin is one
80 species of rhizomatous herbs is                  of the important quality parameters and
endowed with widespread adaptation                  varieties rich in curcumin content are
from sea level to altitude as high as 2000          Roma, Suroma, IISR Prathiba, IISR
m in the Western Ghats and Himalayas.               Prabha, Megha turemric-1, IISR Alleppy
Having originated in the Indo-Malayan               Supreme and IISR Pragati.
region, the genus is widely distributed in                   Twenty four high yielding
the tropics of Asia to Africa and                   released varieties were introduced in to
Australia. Species diversity, morphotype            Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and
diversity and varietal diversity are                Arunachal Pradesh through ICAR-
characteristic of this genus (Sasikumar             AICRPS and three new collections of
2005). Cultivar diversity of cultivated             Curcuma were made from Arunachal
turmeric is highest in India. In India,             Pradesh. The turmeric varieties that have
Southern India, Odisha and North East               high yield potential and suitable for NER
States are rich in varietal diversity. A            includes IISR Prathiba (39.12 t ha-1),
good number of varieties also exist in              IISR Alleppy Supreme (35.4 t ha-1), IISR
other producing countries such as                   Kedaram (34.5 t ha-1), IISR Pragati(33.19
Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam, Nepal,               t ha-1), BSR-2 (32.7 t ha-1 fresh), Roma
Myanmar, South Pacific Islands,                     (20.7 t ha-1), Suranjana (29.0 t ha-1),
Malagasy, etc.                                      Megha Turmeric - 1 (23.0 t ha-1)and
        More than 70 turmeric cultivars             Rajendra Sonia (42.0. t ha-1Pot. Yield).
are known to be under cultivation in                Megha Turmeric -1 was found to be the
India. Most of these cultivars go by local          best for Meghalaya and NDH-98 gave
names derived mostly from the place of              maximum rhizome yield (22.64 t ha-1) in
cultivation. Ex situ gene bank of                   Arunachal Pradesh. In Mizoram, turmeric
Curcuma established at ICAR- IISR,                  varieties viz.,Megha Turmeric -1,
Kozhikode, consists of 1358 accessions              Pratibha, NDH 1 and Duggirala red were
including 1342 cultivars and 16 wild                the best for yield while Rajendra Sonia,
accessions of related taxa. The NBPGR,              NDH 1, BSR 2, Duggirala red and
Regional Station, Trissur, Kerala, is also          Megha were the best for curcumin. A
maintaining about 650 accessions of                 demonstration-cum-seed production unit
turmeric besides various AICRPS                     of pure block of curcumin rich turmeric
centres. Breeding approaches followed in            variety Megha Turmeric and curcumin
turmeric are clonal selection, mutation             stable turmeric variety IISR Pragati was
breeding, polyploidy breeding and                   established in all the ICAR- AICRPS
                                              162
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               163
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
based on high quality bark and oil have             potential to expand spices production.
led to the release of two varieties, viz.           Efforts must be focused on production of
Nithyashree and Navashree from ICAR-                quality planting material of the improved
IISR, Kozhikode. A few accessions are               varieties besides disseminating the
also conserved at the Horticultural                 information on scientific cultivation
Research Station, Yercaud, Tamil Nadu               among the farming community. The
and Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli,               SAUs/CAUs located in the region may
Maharashtra.                                        take up research on spices, especially for
                                                    evolving varieties specifically suited to
CLOVE                                               the local condition along with the
                                                    location specific agro techniques. All
        Clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.)
                                                    these will augment the efforts for greater
belonging to the family Myrtaceae is a
                                                    production and productivity of the spices
native of Moluccas islands from where it
                                                    in NER and thereby improving the
has spread to many tropical countries.
                                                    financial conditions of North Eastern
The British planters introduced the first
                                                    farming community. The high-quality
trees of clove to Courtallam and Nilgiri
                                                    rich spices produced from North Eastern
areas of Tamil Nadu.           Clove of
                                                    regions of India can be labelled/ branded
commerce is the dried unopened flower
                                                    as “NER spices” which should be one of
buds. Genetic base of clove in the
                                                    the visionary development of spices in
country is very narrow because the
                                                    North East.
original number of introductions was
very few and the crop is self-pollinated.           REFERENCES
There is only one improved variety
available in the country i.e., PPI(CL) 1            Gamble, J. S. 1925. Flora of the
developed by TNAU, Tamil Nadu.                           presidency of madras (Vol. II).
Research organisations have collected                    Calcutta: Botanical Survey ofIndia.
few variants in clove from different                Kumar, E. S. S., & Mathew, S. P. 2013.
plantations. Those variants are dwarf                    Piper velaudhanii (Piperaceae), a
clove with bushy spreading habit, king                   New Name for P.pseudonigrum
and Madagascar clove with bigger flower                  Velay. &Amalraj. Journal of
buds.                                                    Scientific Research, 5(3), 579–580.
                                                    Lekhak, M. M., Kambale, S. S., &Yadav,
CONCLUSIONS                                              S. R. 2012. Piper relictumsp.nov.
                                                         (Piperaceae) from northern Western
        Good amount of variability of                    Ghats, India. Nordic Journal of
spices are collected, conserved and being                Botany, 30, 571–574.
utilized besides registering the unique             Lekhak, M. M., Kambale, S. S., &Yadav,
accessions. Trait specific collection and                S. R. 2014 A new Piper from the
conservation of cultivated diversity of                  northern WesternGhats and notes
spices are still in progress. Crop                       on economic potential of Piper
improvement programmes utilizing the                     section Muldera. Genet Resour
indigenous and exotic germplasm                          Crop Evol.(Published online- 15
conserved at ICAR-IISR and ICAR-                         May, 2014).
AICRPS is in progress for the last three            Madhusoodanan, K. J., Pradip Kumar,
decades. This has led to the development                 K., &Ravindran, P. N. 2002.
of 125 improved varieties of spices which                Botany, crop improvement and
are capable of doubling the farmer’s                     biotechnology of cardamom. In P.
income. The North Eastern Regions of                     N.       Ravindran&        K.     J.
India blessed with suitable climate and                  Madhusoodanan(Eds.),Cardamom
other production parameters have good
                                              164
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               165
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              166
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                   167
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              168
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 169
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
REFERENCE
AOAC (2000). Official methods of                            morphology,           germination
       analysis. Association of Official                    behaviour     and     propagation
       Analytical Chemists International.                   efficiency   in    three   edible
       Maryland, USA.                                       Momordica         (Cucurbitaceae)
Joseph, J.K., Antony, V.T., Jose, M. and                    species of India. Genet Resour
       Karuppaiyan, R. (2009). Tuber                        Crop Evol 56: 861- 868.
                                              170
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               171
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
cm row to row spacing and 15 cm                     per plant (SYPP) across the years was
between plant to plant in all the years,            analysed, taking the years as random
respectively. Data were recorded on yield           effects and genotypes as fixed effects.
and yield attributing traits from each plot         The results show that the genotypes (G),
on five randomly selected plants.                   environmental (E) and interaction (GEI)
Standard agronomic practices for                    effects being highly significant (p<0.01)
ricebean were followed during all the               for all the traits studied, indicating the
years.                                              prominence of all the three types of
                                                    effects which is merely not random or
MEASURES OF STABILITY USED                          due to chance. The G×E interaction
IN THE STUDY                                        component was partitioned into first two
                                                    interaction principal components (IPCA),
         The AMMI based stability
                                                    which was found non-significant. The
parameters (ASTABs) such as AMMI
                                                    IPCA1 explained 90.4% and IPCA2
stability value (ASV) as per Purchase
                                                    explained 9.6% of the G x E interaction,
(2020), sums of the absolute value of the
                                                    thus the first two principal components
IPC Scores (SIPC) and averages of the
                                                    could explain 100% of the G×E variation
squared eigen value (EV) as proposed by
                                                    (Table 2).ASV, ZA and WAAS
Sneller et al. (1997), absolute value of
                                                    parameters commonly selected Ukhrul-
the relative contribution of IPCs to the
                                                    13, BSKB-28, EC018171 and Bete-4 as
interaction (ZA) as per the procedure of
                                                    the most stable genotypes with relatively
Zali et al. (2012) and Weighted Average
                                                    high mean yield and G14 as the most
of Absolute Scores (WAAS) according to
                                                    unstable genotype. Stability measures
Olivoto et al. (2019) were calculated.
                                                    SIPC and EV selected Bete-4 as the most
MULTI-TRAIT      GENOTYPE-                          stable genotype with high mean yield and
IDEOTYPE   DISTANCE  INDEX                          IC0075376, IC002567 and Ukhrul-12 as
(MGIDI)                                             the most unstable genotypes. Bete-4
                                                    could be introduced as the most
        The multi-trait genotype-ideotype           favourable genotype with high mean
distance index (MGIDI) was used to rank             yield and stability as inferred by all the
the genotypes based on information of               five stability indexes.
multiple traits as proposed by Olivoto
and Nardino (2020). Statistical analysis            CONCLUSION
for all the stability-related parameters
                                                           Genotypes performing well in
was performed by functions available in
                                                    number of environments can be
the ‘metan’ package (v. 1.16.0) (Olivoto
                                                    considered for wide adaptation. Lines
and Lucio 2020) in R version 3.6.1
                                                    with high yield and low stability score
(http://www.r-project.org/).
                                                    can be considered for location-specific
Characterisation for morphological and
                                                    adaptation.
biochemical traits on genetic resources
selected from the core set was also done.           ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                              The authors express their gratitude to
                                                    Department of Science and Technology
        The performances with respect to
                                                    (SERB under EMEQ scheme) for the
yield and yield-related traits viz., number
                                                    financial support for this research.
of seeds per pod, number of pods per
plant and seed yield per plant is presented         REFERENCES
in Table 1. Combined ANOVA for
number of seeds per pod (SPP), number               Barthakur M., Sarma B. K., Annadurai A.
of pods per plant (PPP) and seed yield                   and    Verma     D.    K.   2001.
                                              172
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
     Performance of rice bean genotypes               Olivoto T., Lúcio A. D., da Silva J. A.,
     in mid-altitude conditions of                          Marchioro V. S., de Souza V. Q.
     Meghalaya. Indian J. Hill Farming,                     and     Jost     E.    2019.      Mean
     14(1): 150-152.                                        performance and stability in
Crossa J., Gauch H. G. and Zobel R. W.                      multi‐environment          trials    I:
     1990. Additive main effect and                         Combining features of AMMI and
     multiplicative interaction analysis                    BLUP techniques. J. Agron.,
     of two international maize cultivar                    111(6): 2949-2960.
     trials. Crop Sci., 30: 493-500                   Purchase J. L., Hatting H. and Van
Dwivedi A., Basandrai D. and A.K.                           Deventer C. S. 2000. Genotype x
     Sarial A.K. 2020. AMMI biplot                          environment interaction of winter
     analysis for grain yield of basmati                    wheat (T. aestivum) in South
     lines (Oryza sativa L.) in North                       Africa: Stability analysis of yield
     Western Himalayan Hill regions.                        performance. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil.,
     Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed.,                         17: 101-107.
     80(2):          140-146           DOI:           Sneller C. H., Kilgore-Norquest L. and
     10.31742/IJGPB.80.2.3.                                 Dombek D. 1997. Repeatability of
Gauch H. G. and Zobel R. W. 1988.                           yield stability statistics in soybean.
     Predictive and postdictive success                     Crop Sci., 37: 383-390.
     of statistical analyses of yield trials.         Zali H., Farshadfar E., Sabaghpour S. H.
     Theor. Appl. Genet., 76: 1-10.                         and     Karimizadeh        R.     2012.
Olivoto T. and Metan: An R package for                      Evaluation       of     genotype     ×
     multi-environment trial analysis.                      environment interaction in chickpea
     Methods Ecol. Evol., 11(6): 783-                       using measures of stability from
     789.Lúcio A. D. C. 2020.                               AMMI model. Ann. Biol. Res., 3:
Olivoto T. and Nardino M. 2021.                             3126-3136.
     MGIDI: toward an effective                       Zobel R. W., Wright M. J. and Gauch H.
     multivariate selection in biological                   G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a
     experiments. J. Bioinform., 37(10):                    yield trial. J. Agron., 80: 388-393.
     1383-1389.
                                                173
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Table I. Mean performance of yield and yield related traits in 30 rice bean genotypes
evaluated for three years
S.No    Genotype       Pods per plant           Hundred seed weight          Seed yield per plant
G1      EC000843                61.09                      6.51                         37.21
G2      EC012436                31.28                      5.69                         16.30
G3      EC014075                76.56                      5.63                         38.44
G4      EC016136                62.74                      5.61                         31.20
G5      EC018171                47.51                      6.53                         24.81
G6      EC018181                78.23                      8.49                         56.90
G7      IC002074                86.90                      6.28                         51.30
G8      IC002567                91.42                      7.68                         60.67
G9      IC007537-6             111.48                      7.43                         72.76
G10     IC469202                65.24                      5.40                         30.66
G11     IC469203                56.66                      5.57                         30.41
G12     IC469204                56.94                      7.57                         33.76
G13     Ukhrul-6               111.72                     14.47                         127.83
G14     Ukhrul-12              102.70                      8.62                         72.03
G15     Ukhrul-13               50.70                     11.40                         51.64
G16     Ukhrul-14              137.03                     18.47                         141.93
G17     Ukhrul-15              125.07                      7.68                         84.20
G18     Ukhrul-16               78.33                     12.60                         67.74
G19     Ukhrul-17              124.92                      7.43                         76.97
G20     Ukhrul-19               76.51                      8.46                         62.08
G21     Bete-4                 116.69                      7.17                         68.03
G22     Bete-6                 113.98                      8.41                         85.08
G23     Bete-9                  30.54                     10.70                         26.49
G24     LRGP-3                 111.88                      7.43                         68.68
G25     LRGP-4                  65.31                      7.57                         37.53
G26     LRGP-5                  68.48                      9.44                         56.29
G27     LRGP-7                  84.44                      6.61                         44.27
G28     BSKB-13                144.60                      9.04                         120.98
G29     BSKB-28                148.81                      8.31                         122.40
G30     BSKB-29                 64.74                      9.40                         61.14
                                                 174
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Table II. Additive Main effects and Multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance
for seed yield per plant (g) across three years
Source        Df Sum Sq          Mean Sq        Pr(>F)    Proportion Accumulated Explained
                                                                                    SS (%)
ENV           2      22803.2 11401.6** 0.000257                                     5.9
REP(ENV) 6           1547.557 257.9261** 1.87E-07
GEN           29 272288.2 9389.248** 3.87E-131                                      70.5
GEN:ENV 58 41923.99 722.8274** 1.48E-55                                             10.9
IPCA1         30 37887.09 1262.903                        90.4       90.4
IPCA2         28 4036.902 144.1751                        9.6        100
Residuals     174 5745.39 33.01948
Total         327 386232.3 1181.139
*significance at p≤0.05 **significance at p≤0.01
    Fig I. AMMI1 and AMMI2 biplot of 30 ricebean genotypes for seed yield per plant across
    three years
                                                 175
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 G28     G2
                                           G29                 G5
                                     G17                             G23
                               G13                                         G12
G22 G25
G19 G18
G9 G10
G21 G4
G24 G11
G14 G16
G8 G1
                               G20                                         G3
                                     G30                             G27
                                           G6                  G15
                                                 G7      G26
    Fig II. Multitrait Genotype Ideotype Distance Index for genotype ranking and selection of
    genotypes considering 10% selection intensity
                                                       176
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                     1
                         College of Agriculture, CAU(I), Kyrdemkulai, Meghalaya
                             2
                               ICAR RC for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya
        North East India, a richest                  farmers in NE states of India, which are
biodiversity hotspot having more than                described as indigenous local. Despite
60% forest coverage, also represent a                their enormous potential contribution to
enormous diversity in animal genetic                 sustainable development and to reducing
resources like Mithun (Bos frontalis),               hunger and poverty, animal genetic
Yak which are also domesticated and                  resources for food and agriculture are
wild animal species like Asian elephants,            underutilized and under conserved.
one-horned rhinoceros, brow-antlered
deer (Sangai), wild water buffalo, leaf                      Animal production contributes
deer and Tawang macaque. The NE                      about 40 per cent of the total value to
region comprises of 3,624 species of                 agriculture globally and they provide
insects, 236 fishes, 541 birds, 160                  abroad variety of meats, milk and eggs,
mammalian species etc, making it rich in             together with a broad range of other
the diversification of species apart from            goods and services, such as draught,
the     floral     diversity.    Livestock           fibre, hides, skin, manure, etc.,
biodiversity is integral to our culture,             Considering future trends in demand and
history, environment, and economy.                   supply of livestock products and services,
Thousands of livestock breeds have                   the conservation of livestock genetic
evolved over time to suit particular                 resources and maintenance of diversity
environments and farming systems.                    and the substantial increase in rate and
Livestock biodiversity is essential to food          efficiency of livestock production is the
and livelihood security, particularly in the         challenging task as the changing climate
developing world. At present, much of                scenarios will have dramatic effects on
the world’s animal genetic diversity is              livestock production. The global climate
maintained by the farmers and herders of             changes such as heat stress, inadequate
developing countries. Some of the                    availability of feed, water and fodder,
registered animal genetic resources of               vectors that transmit diseases will have a
this region are swamp buffalo, Siri cattle,          serious impact on reproduction and poses
Lakhimi cattle, Masilum cattle, Thutho               a major threat to many traditional
cattle, Bonpala sheep, Garole sheep,                 indigenous breeds of NE region to further
Tibetan sheep, Manipuri pony, Bhutia                 genetic erosion. New programmes for
pony, Sumi-Ne goat, Assam hill goat,                 breeding and exchange of animal genetic
Niang Megha pig, Tenyi Vo pig, Zovawk                resources after identifying valuable
pig, Mali pig, Doom pig, Ghoongro pig,               adaptive traits at all levels (phenotypic,
WakChambil pig, Aunachali Yak, Miri                  genotypic, DNA/RNA levels) will help in
fowl, Daothigir fowl, Kaunayen chicken,              adaptation of adaptation of livestock to
Chittagong fowl, Pati/Desi duck,                     low capacity management conditions,
Nageswari duck. Still, there are many                ability to survive, regularly reproduce
many uncharacterized farm animal                     and produce for long periods of time,
breeds/populations are reared by tribal              allows people to keep livestock under a
                                                     wide variety of environmental conditions.
                                               177
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              178
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               179
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              180
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                  181
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
viz., Haryana, West Bengal, Bihar,                  disease are in the tropical or sub-tropical
Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh,           regions of our country with climatic
Himachal Pradesh, Goa, Gujarat and                  conditions favourable for the spread of
Maharashtra (Kumar et al., 2015). The               virus through insect vector (Bemisia
states reporting the incidence of this              tabaci).     The      climatic   conditions
like a sudden rise in temperature, rainfall         and DNA-B (Ito et al., 2009., Roy et al.,
and relative humidity along with the                2019). Bipartite or monopartite genomes
intensification of the cropping system              of begomoviruses are made up of 2.6-2.8
and presence of the alternate host                  kb of genomic components known as the
enhances the vector population which                DNA-A and DNA-B or single 2.6-2.8 kb
leads to rapid spread of the virus and              of monopartite which is found to be
disease incidence (Kenyon et al., 2014).            homologous to the DNA-A of bipartite
The new biotypes of B.tabaci emerging               viruses. Most New World (NW)
due to the rapidly increasing international         begomoviruses are bipartite in nature,
market leads the spread of vector to                whereas the Old World (OW) viruses are
different countries along with the virus            known to be monopartite(Zerbiniet al.
distribution by the introduction of novel           2017). The old world begomoviruses
crops in new agricultural areas can result          consist of six genes in their genome
in the emergence of new begomovirus                 (DNA-A components) which encodes for
species due to recombination and                    the complementary sense of the
mutational changes in their genome.                 replication        associated      protein,
ChiLCV is transmitted by around 39                  transcriptional       activator    protein,
species of whiteflies (Alemandri et al.,            replication enhancement protein and (A)
2015). They feed on the phloem tissue of            C4 proteins. Majority of the old world
the plants and the viruses are transmitted          begomoviruses have ssDNA satellites
in a circulative-persistent manner. The             known as beta satellites which are half
begomoviruses have a complex nature                 the size of their helper begomoviruses
infecting the solanaceous crops in India,           and are dependent on it for the
with a diverse β-satellite which results in         replication, movement inside the plant
intra-specific recombination associated             and transmission between the plants. The
with ChiLCD (Kumar et al., 2015). The               beta satellites are highly conserved and it
distribution of ChiLCD geographically, is           consists of adenine rich sequence (A-
reported to be parallel with the                    rich), a satellite conserved sequence
population of whiteflies existing in the            (SCR), containing a predicted non-
equatorial regions of the country and also          nucleotide TAATATTAC sequence
the world.                                          structure and one single conserved
                                                    among the beta satellites gene’s ability to
ABOUT THE PATHOGEN                                  encode more than 118 amino acid
                                                    products known as β-C1. (Briddonet al.,
        The      ChiLCV      belongs     to         2003).
thebegomoviruses which are classified                       The majority of CLCD has been
into three different types:                         reported to be caused by monopartite
 a) monopartite begomoviruses which                 DNA-A         viruses     with   β-satellite
have single DNA genome that is                      molecules (George et al., 2014) and
analogous to the DNA-A genome of                    bipartite type of CLCV were limited in
bipartite begomoviruses, b) monopartite             causing the disease. The symptoms of the
begomoviruses with satellite ssDNA                  infection include upward curling of the
designated as β-satellite, and c) bipartite         leaves, crinkled appearance, puckering,
begomoviruses with two similar sizes of             vein banding, bunchy leaves and severe
ssDNA segments designated as DNA-A                  stunting of plants (Kumar et al., 2014).
                                              183
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              184
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
ROLE OF VECTOR IN DISEASES                                can be converted into dsDNA which can act
DISSEMINATION                                             on amplification and recombination
                                                          dependent replication process. The newly
        Whiteflies (B.tabaci) are the only                replicated viral ssDNA can be converted
vectors responsible for the transmission of               into dsDNA which can act as a template for
ChiLCV. For transmission of viruses,                      another round of replication or transcription,
whiteflies require a minimum of 90 minutes                wrapped by the viral movement proteins for
of acquisition and 120 minutes of                         transportation from the infected cell to the
inoculation feeding periods (Czosneket al.,               adjacent cells through plasmodesmata, or
2002). Transmission is in circulative-                    encapsidated into infectious virions for long
persistant manner. When the virus enters the              distance virus movement (Hanley-Bowdoin
vector during ingestion, it gets translocated             et al. 2013). The begomoviruses depend on
via the digestive system to hemolymph, the                the host enzymes for their replication and
salivary glands, and then expelled in the                 transcription processes, coordinate with
phloem of the plant. The vector possesses                 several cellular mechanisms to modulate the
many       proteinswhich       facilitate     the         vell division, cell cycle and manipulate the
transmission of begomoviruses. The insect                 host components at various cellular level.
vector delivers viral particles in the uncoated           The transmission of monopartite genome
form to the plant and the viral genome is                 can cause the infection, but if facilitated
transported into the host cell nucleus, during            with the presence of DNA-A and DNA-B
the infection process. The viral genome                   helper genome are known to play important
encodes only a few proteins therefore, for                role in variety of symptoms development.
their DNA replication, they largely rely on               The proteins of begomovirus have an impact
the cellular DNA replication proteins.                    on the various host cell pathways including
Begomoviruses particles of 22 x 38nm                      the changes in plasmodesmata’s functions
possesses two geminate incomplete T = 1                   and structure, defence mechanisms and
icosahedral capsid particle containing viral              ultimately resulting in the changes in the
CP and each CP is bound by seven bases of                 gene expression of the infected cells (Peele
viral ssDNA (Heskethet al. 2018). The CP                  et al., 2001).
plays a role in viral DNA transportation by
interacting with cellular transporter as                  DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
exemplified by monopartite begomoviruses
(Sharma and Ikegami, 2009). The CP of                             One of the most significant diseases
several monopartite begomoviruses contains                caused by ChiLCVhighly impacted the
a nuclear localization signal and a leucine-              global production of chillies, resulting in
rich nuclear export signal and are thus                   drastic yield reduction. Due to the
localized to the nucleus, cytoplasm and cell              polyphagous and mixed cropping systems
periphery. Many interactions have evolved                 and the dissemination factor of the
between viral proteins and host factors to                "whitefly"            vector'scharacteristics,
develop the virus proteins host factors to                begomoviruses have overlapping host
develop the virus replicative cycle. At first,            ranges. ChiLCV infects a variety of hosts,
the viral genome is released from the viral               including hibiscus, papaya, tomato, and
capsid, it enters in to the cytoplasm of the              eggplant.Examination reports of ChiLCV
host cell and enters the nucleus where it                 DNA-A's makeup, including its six ORFs
undergoes rolling-circleamplification and                 and related satellite molecules are the
recombination       dependent         replication         contributing factors behind the disease built
process. The newly replicated viral ssDNA                 up. By utilising published genomic
                                                    185
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
information, this review explains the                  Chavez et al., 2022). The ChiLCV having a
evolution and variability of the ChiLCV                ssDNA as genomic material are prone to
(whole genome and individual ORFs) and                 recombination and mutation, playing an
related satellite molecules (Zerbiniet al.,            important role in their diversity genetically
2019). Frequent recombination, which may               for infecting new host species. In summary,
significantly speed up their growth by                 to combat the ever-rising diversity of
increasing and high genetic variability of             begomoviruses like ChiLCV, there is
begomoviruses are the two main causes                  enormous need of more studies related of
concluding mutation and recombination are              the evolving nature of ChiLCV. The
major factors for the genetic variability of           devastating losses of ChiLCV faced by the
the ChiLCV populations.The pathogenicity               farmers will be eased when the agricultural
determinants for monopartite begomoviruses             scientists understand the evolution of
are the alpha and betasatellite. It is known           begomoviruses and it’s genetic variability
from the reports that the geminiviruses have           leading to higher losses in agricultural sector
high nucleotide substitution in their genome,          of our country as the possible emergence of
almost similar to the RNA viruses but lesser           ChiLCV associated satellites cannot be
than that of ds DNA viruses (Sanchez-                  neglected.
                                                 186
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and
under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               187
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                  188
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
     L.). Intl. J. Virol. 6, 246–250.doi:               Shih, S. L., Tsai, W. S., Green, S. K. and
     10.3923/ijv.2010.246.250                                 Singh, D. (2007). First report
Pandey, V., Srivastava, A., Mishra, M., and                   ofTomato leaf curl Joydebpur virus
     Gaur, R. K. (2022). Chilli leaf                          infecting chilli in India. Plant Pathol.
     curldisease populations in India are                     56:341.doi:             10.1111/j.1365-
     highly recombinant, and rapidly                          3059.2007.01540.x
     segregated.Biotech 12, 1–12. doi:                  Tahir, M., Haider, M. S., and Briddon, R.
     10.1007/s13205-022-03139-w                               W. (2010). Chilli leaf curlbetasatellite
Ranjan, K., Siddique, R. A., Bharti, M. K.,                   is associated with a distinct
     and        Singh,        J.       (2016).                recombinant begomovirus, Pepperleaf
     “Geminivirus:Indian scenario,” in                        curl Lahore virus, in Capsicum in
     Plant     Viruses:     Evolution      and                Pakistan. Virus Res. 149, 109–
     Management, eds R. K. Gaur,                              114.doi:
N. M. Nikolay Manchev Petrov, B. L. Patil                     10.1016/j.virusres.2009.12.007
     and        M.        L.        Stoyanova           Thakur, H., Jindal, S. K., Sharma, A., and
     (Berlin:Springer),      131–144.      doi:               Dhaliwal,M. S. (2018). Chili leaf curl
     10.1007/978-981-10-1406-2_8                              virusdisease: a serious threat for chilli
Senanayake, D. M. J. B., Mandal, B., Lodha,                   cultivation. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 125,
     S., and Varma, A. (2007). Firstreport                    239–249.doi:10.1007/s41348-018-
     of Chilli leaf curl virus affecting chili                0146-8
     in India. Plant Pathol. 56:1513.doi:               Venkataravanappa, V., Swarnalatha, P.,
     10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01513.x                         Reddy, C. L., Chauhan, N., and
Senanayake, D. M. J. B., Varma, A., and                       Reddy, M.K. (2016). Association of
     Mandal,       B.      (2012).      Virus–                recombinant Chili leaf curl virus with
     vectorrelationships,      host     range,                enation leaf curldisease of tomato: a
     detection and sequence comparison of                     new host for chili Begomovirus in
     Chilli leaf curlvirus associated with an                 India. Phytoparasitica44, 213–223.
     epidemic of leaf curl disease of chilli                  doi: 10.1007/s12600-016-0510-9
     in Jodhpur. IndianPhytopathol. 160,
     146–155.       doi:      10.1111/j.1439-
     0434.2011.01876.x
                                                  189
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
          The oil yielding cucurbits: Nature reserve plant for the future
    B. VANLALNEIHI1 LOINO K CHISHI2, LALHMINGSANGA1 AND SHRI DHAR3
             1
                 Assistant professor, College of Horticulture, Thenzawl, CAU (Imphal)
                 2 rd
                  3 Year student, College of Horticulture, Thenzawl, CAU (Imphal)
                       3
                         Dean, College of Horticulture, Thenzawl, CAU (Imphal)
        Kha-ûm      [Hogsonia      heteroclita         throughout the day. The gritty texture
(Roxb.) Hook f. & Thomson] is a perennial              mesocarp has a bitter flavor which induces
oil yielding cucurbits; it is frequently used          weight loss, however excess consumption
as food in its natural habitat. The plant is           may cause diarrhea. The large sized seed
cultivated since 1970s for its large edible            kernels after roasting or baking yields seed
seeds that are extremely rich in oil. This             oil (60-77 %) (Hu, 1964; Cai Xitao and
species is thought to have originated in               Hangha, 1982) for cooking food and
North-East India, China (western Yunan),               preparation of other food items, beverages,
and Malaysia (Hu, Shiu-Ying, 1964). It is              etc. In addition, high levels of unsaturated
wildly distributed in the mountain slopes of           fatty acids such as arachidic acid, linoleic
Bangladesh, China, India, Malaysia, and                acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid
Nepal between 300 to 1500 metres above                 and proteins (CSIR, 1959; Sharma, et al.,
sea level (FoC, Shin-hwa Yang, 1981;                   1991) are abundantly available in the seed
CSIR, 1986, GRIN,2007) It is known by                  kernel. The species may serves as the
several vernacular names across tribal hilly           resistant source for pests and diseases of
areas of the North East viz., Thebou-lata              Cucurbits. However, the Hogsonia sp.
(Assam), Dapuy (Arunachal Pradesh),                    becomes a rare species in Asia’s tropical
Kathai       (Manipur),      Mei-soh-mynthar           forest as a result of over exploitation for
(Meghalaya), Thaithi, Assa (Nagaland),                 medicinal purposes. Nevertheless, the tribal
Kha-um(Mizoram),Goolur(Tripura)           and          communities of NEH India are the main
Kat'hior-pot (Sikkim). Only two species,               custodian for maintaining indigenous
Hodgsonia heteroclite (Hook.f. &Thoms.)                knowledge of the species. To protect the rich
and its related species H. macrocarpa                  biodiversity of the Indian NEH region, the
(Cogn.) exist nationally and internationally.          time calls for paradigm shift in food habits
(Sharma et al., 1991; GRIN, 2007).                     that will alter the food gathering habits of
        To study the distribution and                  the tribal people.
ethnobotanical data on H. heteroclita among
the tribal communities in the NEH region, a            Key words: Kha-um, kernel oil, weight loss,
semi-structured      questionnaire     survey          energy booster.
method was used. The vine is rapidly
expanding, ferociously huge, woody,                    REFERENCES
climbing plant that can grow more than 30
metres long and supports itself on other               Cai Xitao and Hangha, A study on the
plants with tendrils. The fruit is extensively             causes to prematurely dropping of
used by numerous tribal people in the NEH                  fruit, Hodgsonia heteroclita, collected
region as food and medicine. Upon ripening,                research papers on the tropical botany
the nutty kernel is used as alternatives for               (Chinesisch), 1982.
meat in Nagaland; it also provides energy
                                                 190
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 191
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                     192
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                     193
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 194
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 195
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                  196
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
INTRODUCTION
        Rice is the most important source of           of insect fauna in rice crop, but still more
food energy for more than half of the global           research needs to be undertaken to reliably
human population. It is grown in 114                   identify and document the biodiversity in
countries across the world on an area about            rice crop ecosystem. Keeping these views in
150 million hectares with annual production            mind, the present study was conducted to
of over 525 million tons, constituting nearly          know the biodiversity of insect pests of rice
11 percent of the world’s cultivated land              crop in Ri-Bhoi district of Meghalaya which
(Rai 2006). It is the most important staple            will be helpful in developing pest
food crop grown in north eastern region of             management strategies and also as a
India, occupying an area of 3.51 million               diagnostic guide for identification of the
hectares which accounts for more than 80%              pests species in the region.
of the total cultivated area of the region and
7.8% of the total rice area in India (Ghosh et         MATERIALS AND METHODS:
al 2015). In India, about 300 species of
                                                               The study was conducted during
insects have been reported to infest the rice
                                                       kharif 2020, and the following pests’
crop alone and among them 20 species have
                                                       biodiversity was observed from the rice
been considered as major pests causing 21 to
                                                       field. During the study each plots were
51% yield loss (Arora and Dhaliwal 1996).
                                                       observed carefully and recorded the pest’s
Rice crop in North East region of India is
                                                       biodiversity. Rice field ecosystem is the
attacked by large number of insect pests,
                                                       main habitat for insects which feeds the rice
viz. yellow stem borer, leaf folder, case
                                                       crop as their food source, starting from the
worm, hispa, gundhi bug, swarming
                                                       seedlings to the harvesting phase in the rice
caterpillar, thrips, gall midge, and
                                                       field. The diversity and abundance of insects
armyworm are the important pests in the
                                                       vary in the rice ecosystem as well as the
region (Shylesha et al 2006).
                                                       growth stages of the rice crops. Several
       Insect pests damage is one of the               major pests cause damage and yield loss in
major constraints in rice production in India          the crop. The main objective of this study
including North East India. Moreover, North            was to determine the diversity of insect pests
East region is considered to be one of the             during the growing stages of the rice crop in
biodiversity hot spots in the world which is           IFSunit of College of Agriculture,
rich in insect biodiversity. The climatic              Kyrdemkulai. The procedure use in this
conditions are highly favourable for insects           study     includes     weekly    observation,
development and reproduction. Although                 identification and collection and counting of
few studies have surveyed the biodiversity
                                                 197
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 198
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                     199
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 200
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 201
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 202
      THEME D
INTEGRATED FARMING
      SYSTEMS
                                        SUB-CONTENT
                                   Division of Agronomy
               ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
                                                 203
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
on organic production and area in India is                       Among different states, Madhya
given in Table 1.                                        Pradesh is the largest producer followed by
                                                         Maharashtra, Karnataka, Rajasthan, and
        In recent years, there has been a                Uttar Pradesh. In terms of commodities,
considerable     increase    in     certified            oil seeds are the single largest category
cultivated areas in the country. It has                  followed by sugar crops, cereals and
increased from a meagre 0.24 million                     millets, tea & coffee, fibre crops, fodder,
hectares in 2010–11 to 1.49 million                      pulses, medicinal/ herbal and aromatic
hectares in 2015–16, an over 6-fold                      plants, and spices & condiments.
increase in five years. Similarly, the
certified area (including cultivated and                         Indian as well as global food safety
wild harvest area) under organic farming                 and security faces numerous challenges as
has grown from 4.43 million hectares in                  the human population continues to grow.
2010–11 to 5.71 million hectares in 2015–                In the twenty-first century, challenges will
16, a 28.9% increase in five years. Organic              continue to center on increasing food
production has also increased in the almost              security globally with food that is safe and
same proportion as the increase in area                  nutritious. One Health has the potential to
under organic cultivation in recent years.               be a holistic and systematic approach to
For example, the total certified production              solving these problems. In order to
(including cultivated and wild harvest                   accomplish this One Health education and
area) under organic farming has increased                outreach are necessary for the public as
from 0.69 million tonnes in 2011–12 to                   well as policymakers. One Health
1.35 million tonnes in 2015–16, an almost                curriculum in agriculture and food systems
two-fold increase in four years. Further, as             education programs can be a way to
of 31st March 2021 total area under the                  engage the next generation in farming, and
organic certification process (registered                agriculture and improve public health
under National Programme for Organic                     through food safety and security. The One
Production) is 4.339 million ha (2020–21).               Health approach will enable them to
This includes a 2.658 million ha cultivable              acquire the information and develop the
area and another 1.681 million ha for wild               skills needed in cooperation, teamwork,
harvest collection. Among all the states,                and communication that will be necessary
Madhya Pradesh has covered the largest                   to address these challenges.
area under organic certification followed
by Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh,                         Farmers, consumers, researchers,
Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir,                       government agencies, and consumer
and Karnataka.                                           advocacy groups play an important role in
                                                         influencing food safety policies and
         At present, India produced around               sustainable food production practices. One
3.497 million tonnes (2020–21) of                        Health practitioners need to bring
certified organic products which include                 awareness to these stakeholders and
all varieties of food products namely oil                provide them with information that allows
seeds, fibre, sugar cane, cereals & millets,             them to make data-driven decisions about
cotton, pulses, aromatic & medicinal                     food and food practices, and to enact
plants, tea, coffee, fruits, spices, dry fruits,         policies and guidelines that protect food
vegetables, processed foods etc. The                     safety and safeguard environmental
production is not limited to the edible                  sustainability. To make progress toward
sector but also produces organic cotton                  finding solutions to these challenges, we
fibre, functional food products etc.                     must continue to use foundational
(https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/organic               scientific research to inform regulations,
/Organic_Products.).                                     and practices and advance technological
                                                   204
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 applications to increase food production                Additionally, research, policy, and
 through organic farming, improve                        outreach efforts need to benefit the
 sustainable     practices,   and     assess             economic well-being of farmers so that
 environmental impact. These activities                  they can continue to produce the food
 must be supported through funding                       required to feed 9.7 billion humans by
 innovative research and collaborations                  2050. The increased demand for safe foods
 which      provide     new     information,             and agricultural products through organic
 approaches, and perspectives on food                    farming has the potential to globally
 safety, food security, and sustainable food             improve food security, nutrition, and
 production.                                             economic well-being climate change
                                                         scenario.
Table 1. Total certified production, total area and cultivated area under organic farming in India
(APEDA and NCOF)
Year                      2010     2011     2012     2013      2014    2015      2017     2018     2019
                          –11      –12      –13      –14       –15     –16       –18      –19      –20
Total production          3.88     0.69     1.34     1.24      1.10    1.35      1.70     2.64     2.75
(million tonnes)
Total area under         4.43      5.55     5.21     4.72      4.90    5.71      3.56     3.43     3.67
certification (including
wild harvest, million
ha)
Total area under         0.24      1.08     0.50     0.72      1.20    1.49      1.78     1.94     2.30
certified organic
cultivation (million
ha)
Total area under         4.19      4.47     4.71     3.99      3.70    4.22      1.78     1.49     1.37
certified wild harvest
(million ha)
                                                   205
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                     207
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Graduation
                                                     Experiential
                                                             tial Learning Programme (ELP) initiated in
                                                     2015-16
                                                          16 academic year. One semester course for
                                                     VIIIth   semester     students.   Exclusively   organic
                                                     farming module. This course includes course credit
                                                     of 20 credits. Based on performance and syllabus of
                                                                      ded this at national level. Till date
                                                     course ICAR included
                                                     6 batches with 146 beneficiaries completed
                                                                                      comple    this
                                                     course at UG level.
Post-Graduation
                                                     Organic course of Agron – 502 (2+1) Principles and
                                                     Practices of Organic Farming is included in M.Sc.
                                                     Agronomy curriculum. So far 1
                                                                                 174 students have
                                                     completed this course at PG level. Exclusive
                                                     research work on organic agriculture for Ph.D. 06
                                                                                                    0
                                                     students and for M.Sc. 22 students.
                                                     208
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
RESEARCH                                                   The compost from soybean crop residue
                                                           recorded higher content of major and minor
       This   centre  initiated  research                  nutrients and lower C:N ratio than the compost
programme      for    composting      and                  from pigeonpea stalk. PDKV composting
vermicomposting methods with the help of                   culture was found to be most effective
ATMA Akola during 2012-14.
                       14.                                 inoculants in decomposition of crop residue as
                                                           compare to other decomposing cultures. The
      Enrichment of composting                                    ndicated that, use of soybean straw
                                                           study indicated
The different methods of composting and                    compost (5 t ha-1) as an alternative source to
sources were tried for enrichment of compost.              FYM.
Vermicompost
PDKV compost
NADEP compost
                                                     209
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
In-situ
   situ crop residue management                            yield (1779 kg ha-1) was obtained from
                                                           pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) and maximum
      Identification  of     the     suitable              biomass was available for recycling from
intercropping was studied for system                       pigeonpea + sunhemp (1:2) intercropping (6.6 t
productivity and biomass available for next                ha-1) for next season cotton crop
season crop. The study indicated, the highest
                .
Figure: Pigeopea equivalent yield as influenced by various tillage practices and intercropping system.
PP+Soy(1:2)
                                                     210
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 1609                               1619
                              1650                        1586
                              1600
                                                                                                         Soybean compost
                              1550
           Yield (kg ha-1)
                              1500                                                                       FYM
                                                                         1422
                              1450                                                                       100 % N
                              1400                                                                       150% N
                              1350
                              1300
                                              Sources of compost and nutrient levels
Figure: Seed yield of Arboreum cotton as influenced by various organic nutrient sources
                                                                                sour    and levels.
                                                   Yield of soybean-wheat
                                                            soybean       sequence (kg ha-1)
                             5000                                                          4186
                                                                                  3886
                             4000                                    3341                          Control
     Yield (kg ha-1)
                                                             3024
                             3000                                                                  100 % RDN through
                                             1887 2019                      1629
                             2000                        1242                                      Vermicompost
                                       849                                                         100 % RDN through
                             1000
                                                                                                   Vermicompost + Jeevamrut
                                0
                                     Soybean seed yield Wheat grain yield (q Soybean equivalent
                                          (q ha-1)            ha-1)             yield (q ha-1)
Figure: Soybean seed yield, wheat grain yield and SEY as influenced by various organic nutrient
treatments under soybean – wheat cropping sequence (Pooled of 5 years).
     Nitrogen dose of Soybean (30kg N/ha) and Wheat (100Kg N/ha) was applied
                                                                      app     through organic
      sources only.
                                                                            211
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                      Application of Jeevamrut @ 500 L ha-1 at 30 and 45 DAS
0 Control
Source of nutrients
Figure: Seed yield of soybean as influenced by various organic nutrient treatments (Pooled of 5 years).
                                                         2134
                                        2500                         1965                                  Vermicompost 2.5 t ha-1
                                        2000                                    1407
                     Yield (kg ha-1)
Figure: Seed yield of chickpea as influenced by various organic nutrient treatments(Pooled of 5 years).
Nutrient management for summer sesame                                                    summer sesame (1151 kg ha-1) with PDKV
                                                                                         compost 5 t ha-1 + Biofertilizers + Liquid
       The study of organic nutrient sources                                             organic foliar NPK spray + Liquid organic
combinations were studied during 2015-18.
                                     2015                                                foliarr sulphur spray.
The study indicated that highest seed yield of
                                                                                  212
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                               800
                                              1078                                Biofertilizers + Liquid organic
                               600                                                NPK spray
                                                           702
                               400
                                                                                  Control
                               200
                                 0
                                     Source of nutrients
                                                           213
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7,
                             7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                       500
                       400                                                                     341
                       300                                                                                   224
                       200
                       100
                                   0
                                            Amravati     Yeotmal         Wardha             Akola        Washim     Buldhana
                                                                                Districts
                                                                                      55
                                       60
                                       50
                  No. of farmers
                                       40
                                       30
                                                                                                             17                Selected farmers
                                       20        11                                                 13
                                                           10            10
                                       10
                                       0
                                             Amravati   Yeotmal       Wardha      Akola       Washim     Buldhana
                                                                          Districts
                                                                                      214
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Vegetable waste based silage for economic pig production in NEH region
      K. BARMAN*, V.K. GUPTA, R. THOMAS, S.R. PEGU, SOUVIK PAUL AND
                              K.C. BARMAN
            ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati, Assam, India
                *Address for correspondence: Keshab.Barman@icar.gov.in
ABSTRACT                                               protein and minerals. Moreover, farmers
                                                       are unable to purchase the costly feed
        Pig farming is a very important                ingredients, as a result, performances of
component in North East India. Out of                  pig goes down and they are not getting
total pig population inIndia, 38.34 % are              good profit even by raising the good
grown in this region. Use of local feed                quality pig germplasm. Therefore,
resources to formulate nutritionally                   alternative low-cost feed formulation is
balanced economic feed is an important                 required for the farmers to boost up the pig
aspect in swine feeding as feed cost itself            production. Many alternative feed
result in 70-75 % of total cost of                     resources are available locally. Among
production. Most of the farmers in NE                  these, fruits and vegetable waste is one of
region of India have to buy imported feed              them which can also be used for pig
ingredients which add 10-15 % extra cost               feeding after appropriate treatment.
to the formulated ration. Because of high                      Large quantity of vegetable and
price of protein feeds, farmers don’t use              fruit waste are generated during the
such feeds in the diets as a result farmer             process of selling of vegetable in the
are not getting good profit because of                 markets. These wastes become a pollutant
poor productive performances of pigs.                  to the environment if dump nearby the
Deficiency of nutrients in the diet results            market. These vegetable and fruit waste if
in poor feed conversion ratio (FCR),                   collected, can be converted into a valuable
growth and reproductive performances                   feed which can be fed to pigs and other
like repeat breeders, infertility, embryonic           livestock. These will not only reduce the
mortality, poor semen quality etc. As per              environmental pollution, simultaneously
recent report, about 1.81 million tonnes of            increase the production performances of
fruit and vegetable wastes are available               pigs and also reduce the cost of
annually in India. Fruit and vegetable                 production. Use of vegetable and fruit
wastes are rich in energy and other                    waste based silage at various level in pig
micronutrients. It can either be used as               diet improve the production performance
silage or directly after boiling or drying             of pig as well as reduce the feed cost as
and pulverizing. Vegetable waste based                 reported by several researchers (Göhl,
silage in pig can be supplemented to                   1982; Hon et al.,2009 Cerisuelo et al.,
reduce the feed cost and to improve the                2010 and Montagne et al., 2003). It also
pig production in the NEH region of                    reduces the faecal Enterobacteria counts
India.                                                 (Cerisuelo et al., 2010). Therefore, in this
                                                       paper use of vegetable waste based feed
Key words: Vegetable Waste, Siage,
                                                       for pig production has been briefly
Economic, Pig, NEH Region
                                                       discussed.
INTRODUCTION:                                          Overview of vegetable and fruit waste
                                                       and its future scope
        Poor productive performances of
pig in NE region are mainly due to lack of                    The world vegetable waste
balanced feeds. Diets are deficient in                 products market currently value US$ 40
                                                       Bn and is likely to reach US$ 64.21 Bn by
                                                 217
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
2032. Out of world food wastage of 1.3                 brinjal, pumkin, bottle guard, potato skin,
billion tons annually, vegetable and fruit             cassava tubers, tomatoes, sweet potato etc.
waste constituted nearly 45 % of waste.                the composition of different fruit and
India is the second-largest producer of                vegetable waste are shown in Table 1-4.
fruits and vegetables, reportedly wasting
about 18% of its produce – valued at Rs                Collection, treatment and processing of
13,300 crore annually, according to the                vegetable waste for making silage for
Central     Institute  of    Post-Harvest              pigs
Engineering and Technology (CIPHET).
                                                               Fruit and vegetable waste are rich
Thus, India can play a crucial role in
                                                       source of energy and can be used in pig
vegetable and fruit waste market in the
                                                       diet as energy sources. Fruit and vegetable
Asia-Pacific (FMI, 2022). These waste
                                                       waste can be collected from the local
become a pollutant to the environment if
                                                       market either free of cost or at a negligible
dump nearby the market (Patel et al.,
                                                       price. After collection and transportation
2019).                                                 to the site of use, the waste should be
        The waste can be used as a source              properly washed in running water to
of     organic      fertilizer,   therapeutic          remove possible contamination of
compounds, phytochemicals, livestock                   pesticide and insecticide residues. As these
feed and pigments. As per report of FAO,               may hamper the health of pigs as well as
by the year 2050, about 75 % more milk                 human being through upon consumption of
and meat will be required to feed the                  pork and pork products. After washing, it
human population which indicates a great               should be dried to reduce the moisture
pressure on demand of feed resources for               level to 65-70 %. Then, the materials need
livestock. In such situation, vegetable and            to be cut into small pieces (1-2 cm). To a
fruit waste can meet partial requirement of            100 kg of cut waste, 3-4 kg juggery and
livestock feed. Food additives namely                  0.25 kg common salt should be added.
pectin can be produced from vegetable                  After this addition, materials should be
waste for use in beverages, bakeries, and              thoroughly mixed. The properly mixed
confectionary products. Nutraceuticals,                materials, can be packed air tightly in a
phytochemicals and other therapeutic                   silage bag or a drum. After packing the
compounds can also be produced from the                materials in the silage bags, the mouth
vegetable leftover peels, skin, seed,                  need to be closed tightly and should be
etc.These bioactive compounds can be                   kept for 21 days. If silage prepare using
utilized in different industries namely food           cassava tubers, first tubers need to peel off,
industry for the development of functional             and then cut into 1-2 cm and should be
foods, pharmaceuticals industry for                    processed as described above. However,
production of medicines and the textile                cassava tubers silage need to be stored for,
industry. The Bio-ethanol, can also be                 30 days to neutralize the hydrocyanic acid
produced from the carbohydrate rich                    content. After the 21 days of storage for
vegetable waste.                                       fruit and vegetable waste for fermentation
                                                       and 30 days storage of cassava for
Types and composition of different                     fermentation, the materials become read
vegetable and fruit waste                              for pig feeding. The silage can be
                                                       supplemented @ 3kg daily along with 1 kg
       During the process of harvesting,               rice polish or wheat bran, 100-150 g oil
marketing and for preparation of vegetable             cakes or fish meal and 2-3 tea spoonful of
for cooking and consumption, lots of waste             mineral mixture per adult pig.
available. These waste consist of of
cabbage, cauliflower, carrots, radish,
                                                 218
       Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
       Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        Table 1: Chemical composition (% DM) of different parts of banana
OM CP EE CF Ash NFE
                                                        219
    Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
    Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Table 3: Chemical composition (% DM) of cassava tubers and leaves
Pressing the materials in silage          Closing of silage bags                Final silage after 21 days
bag to remove excess air
                                                      220
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Microbiology of vegetable waste based                  affecting growth performance (Cerisuelo
silage                                                 et al., 2010). Pigs are usually given only
                                                       cooked potatoes, which are efficiently
        Barman et al., (unpublished report)            used by fattening and breeding animals.
reported that lactic acid producing bacteria           Potatoes produce firm pork. Cooked
were predominant in vegetable waste                    potatoes can be used for poultry up to 40
based silage which was confirmed by                    percent of the total ration (Edwards et
inoculating the representative sample of               al.,1986). Fresh TP can be used at 6
silage in LB broth followed by culuring in             percent and 35 percent as a supplement
LB agar plate and gram staining of                     feed in grower and finisher pigs
particular colony which is gram positive.              respectively without any adverse effect on
The predominating bacterial species in pig             their performance and by decreasing feed
gut, fed on vegetable waste based silage is            cost/kg gain. Dried TP can be introduced
Prevotella followed by Leptotrichia,                   up to 20 percent in the diet of growing
Streptococcus,               Cornebacteium,            rabbits without significantly affecting
Leptotrichia and Bateroides sp. All the                performance (Sayed and Abdel-Azeem,
species helps in fiber digestion as                    2009).Pigs did not relish dried pineapple
confirmed by metagenomic sequencing of                 bran offered ad libitum in the ration. The
faecal microbiota.                                     high crude fibre (CF) content (20 percent)
                                                       limits its use in pigs of less than 27 kg
Effect of supplementation of vegetable
                                                       body weight. However, incorporation up to
fruit waste silage on production
                                                       50 percent in the ration of older pigs (57
performances of pigs
                                                       kg BW) improved the body weight gain
        Fruits and vegetable wastes were               and feed conversion efficiency. Beyond 50
used as pig feeds by various researchers               percent in the ration these parameters were
with or without treatment at different                 depressed (Göhl, 1982). Inclusion of 15
levels depending upon the age of pigs                  percent pineapple bran in chick diets
(Rios, et al., 1975; Tartrakoon et al., 1999;          depressed the feed conversion ratio and 20
Fanimo and Odu, 2006; O’Sullivan et al.,               percent inclusion decreased weight
2003; Sotto et al. 2009; Hon et                        (Hutagalung et al., 1973) use in pigs of
al.,2009Cerisuelo et al., 2010 and                     Boiled, dehydrated and ground carrots
Montagne et al., 2003). It was reported                have been tested successfully in the
that citrus pulp silage can be included at             prophylaxis of diarrhea of weaning piglets
5−10 percent in the diet of growing pigs,              (Jugl et al., 2001). Silage containing 17
which reduced the feeding cost. Pigs                   percent carrots (with fodder beets, sugar
offered citrus pulp showed significantly               beets and potatoes) fed to replacement
lower Enterobacteria counts in faeces                  sows had a positive effect on live weight
compared with pigs in the control group.               gain, reproductive parameters and on litter
However, no difference was observed in                 performance. Similar results were obtained
the Lactobacilli count (Cerisuelo et al.,              on lactating and gestating sows fed silage
2010). Generally, increasing the amount of             containing 12 percent carrots with
fermentable fibre in the diet stimulates               pumpkins and potatoes (Yushkova and
microbial fermentation in the hindgut of               Kertieva, 2010). The main drawbacks of
pigs and fermentation generates lactic acid            using fruit–vegetable and fish wastes in
and volatile fatty acids, which are capable            the formulation of animal diets is that their
of inhibiting some intestinal pathogens e.g.           composition may be extremely variable
Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp.                   depending on the area of production and
(Montagne et al., 2003). Feeding ensiled               the period of the year when they are
citrus pulp improved meat quality, without             produced (Westendorf, 2000). Another
                                                       drawback is the high moisture content that
                                                 221
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
may make the handling difficult and                            They also reported (Unpublished)
favour microbial contamination (Garcı´a et             that supplementation of vegetable waste @
al., 2005). Then a heat treatment of these             0, 10 and 15 % level in grower crossbred
types of wastes is necessary not only to               (Hampshire x Ghungroo, Rani Variety)
ensure microbial quality but also to reduce            pigs, increased the faecal output of N and
the moisture content in order to facilitate            decreased the urinary output (P<0.05).
their inclusion in animal diets. However, a            However, N absorption significantly
heat treatment can reduce the digestibility            improved (P<0.05) with increasing level of
of the wastes, thereby decreasing the                  vegetable waste silage in the pig diets.
nutritional value of a diet including fruit–                   In another studies, Barman et al.,
vegetable and fish wastes, and can increase            (unpublished      report),    found      that
the price of the feed formulated with the              supplementation of vegetable waste @ 0,
wastes as a substitute for the cereal                  10 and 15 % level in finisher crossbred
typically used (Esteban et al., 2007).                 (Hampshire x Ghungroo, Rani Variety) did
        Dried mango peels up to 10 percent             not affect the dry matter intake across all
in the diet of finishing pigs had no                   level of supplementation. They also found
deleterious effect on feed conversion ratio            that net protein utilization, nitrogen
or performance and economized feeding                  balance was not affected at all level of
cost (Rao, et al., 2003). Pigs digest the              supplementation of vegetable waste based
beet pulp fibre well, but the pulp is so               silage in crossbred finisher pigs. The
bulky that total food consumption and                  average daily gain in weight (g/day), feed
performance will be depressed if >0.5                  conversion ratio and nutrient digestibility
kg/day is fed to fattening pigs or >1 kg/day           was not affected at 0, 10 and 15 % level of
is fed to sows. Pigs relish the moist soaked           inclusion of vegetable waste in crossbred
pulp once they acquire a taste for it. Young           finisher pigs (Table 7).
pigs do not thrive on the pulp and may
cause scouring because of the high oxalic              Effect of supplementation of vegetable
acid content and contamination by the soil.            waste on pork quality
Beet pulp has proved to be unsatisfactory                      Potshangham      et  al.    (2018)
for poultry (Wadha and Bakshi, 2013).                  incorporated     cauliflower     (Brassica
        Silage prepared using fruit and                oleracea) leaves at 10 and 20% level in
vegetables waste are palatable to pigs. In             basal feeds of growing-finishing pigs and
one of the research work Barman et al                  reported that the carcass weight (without
(unpublished       report)     found     that          head), dressing percentage and back-fat
supplementation of vegetable waste @ 0,                thickness were non-significant among the
10 and 15 % level in grower crossbred                  treatment groups. In another study,
(Hampshire x Ghungroo, Rani Variety)                   Barman et al., (unpublished report), found
pigs, reduced dry matter intake at 15 %                that supplementation of vegetable waste @
level of inclusion of vegetable waste based            0, 10 and 15 % level in finisher crossbred
silage. The dry matter intake was not                  (Hampshire x Ghungroo, Rani Variety) did
affected at 10 % level of supplementation              not the pork quality. The carcass weight,
of vegetable waste based silage in grower              dressing percentage and average back fat
crossbred pigs. The average daily gain                 thickness and proximate composition of
and feed conversion ratio were found                   pork was not affected by supplementation
similar while feed cost (Rs/kg gain) of                of vegetable waste based silage at 0, 10
production per kg live weight was reduced              and 15 % level in finisher crossbred
by Rs. 13.77 and Rs.10.52 respectively in              (Hampshire x Ghungroo, Rani Variety)
T2 and T3 groups in comparison to T1                   pigs. However, protein content of the pork
group Table 6.                                         increased with increased level of silage in
                                                       the ration.
                                                 222
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 6. Effect of vegetable waste silage on nutrient utilization in crossbred grower pigs
Parameter T1 T2 T3 P Value
Parameters             T1                    T2              T3                  P Value
DM intake              1.38±0.03             1.38±0.03       1.32±0.08           0.661
Initial weight         23.77±5.53            23.97±0.83      23.57±2.44          0.996
Final weight           84.33±2.33            83.33±0.88      79.00±4.16          0.414
ADG, g/d               403.78±31.77          395.78±11.28    369.56±11.83        0.511
FCR                    3.83±0.21             3.88±0.03       3.98±0.28           0.874
Feed cost per kg gain 109.17±6.09            99.41±0.79      96.48±6.78          0.281
T1= Finisher ration containing 0 % vegetable waste silage, T2= Finisher ration containing 10
% vegetable waste silage, T3= Finisher ration containing 15 % vegetable waste silage; a,b,c
superscript in a column differ significantly, p<0.05
                                                 223
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Fanimo, A.O. &Odu, S. 2006. Effect of                        young       non-ruminant      animals.
      ripe plantain peel (Musa cv) on                        Animal       Feed      Science     and
      growth and carcass performance of                      Technology, 108: 95–117.
      growing rabbits. Pertanika Journal of            O’Sullivan, T.C., Lynch, P.B., Morrissey,
      Tropical Agricultural Science, 19:                     P.A. & O’Grady, J.F. 2003.
      89−93.                                                 Evaluation of citrus pulp in diets for
FMI. 2022: Vegetable waste product                           sows and growing pigs. Irish Journal
      market.                   https://www.                 of Agriculture and Food Research,
      futuremarketinsights. com/reports/                     42: 243–253.
      vegetable- waste-products-market .               Patel, A., Raja, W., Parmar, S. and Popli,
Garcı´a, A.J., Esteban, M.B., Ma´rquez,                      S. 2019. Vegetable Market Waste
      M.C.,      Ramos,        P.,      2005.                Management and Potential Uses,
      Biodegradable      municipal       solid               IJSRD - International Journal for
      waste: characterisation and potential                  Scientific Research & Development|
      use as animal feedstuffs. Waste                        Vol. 7 (05): 305-307.
      Management 25, 780–787.                          Potshangbam, C., Singh, M., Sahoo, S.,
Göhl, B. 1982. Les aliments du bétail sous                   Singh, A., Gaur, G., Patel, B. and
      les tropiques. FAO, Division de                        Jadhav, S.E. (2018). Effect of
      Production et SantéAnimale, Roma,                      feeding      cauliflower     (Brassica
      Italy web icon.                                        oleracea) leaves on the growth
Hon, F.M., Oluremi, O.I.A. &Anugwa,                          performances and carcass characters
      F.O.I. 2009. The effect of dried                       of crossbred barrows (Landrace X
      sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) fruit                   Desi). International Journal of
      pulp     meal    on     the     growth                 Livestock Research, 8(10):184-196.
      performance of rabbits. Pakistan                       doi: 10.5455/ijlr.20171202060231
      Journal of Nutrition, 8: 1150−1155.              Rao, D.S., Ravi, A. &Yedukondalu, R.
Hutagalung, R.I., Webb, B.H. &Jalaludin,                     2003. Inclusion of dried mango
      S., 1973. Evaluation of agricultural                   (Mangiferaindica) peels in finisher
      products and by-products as animal                     rations of pigs on their performance.
      feeds. 1. The nutritive value of                       Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition,
      pineapple bran for chicks. Malaysian                   20: 120−123.
      Agricultural Research, 2: 39−47.                 Rios, A., Abernathy, R.E. & Nicholas, H.J.
Jugl, M., Zitterl-Eglseer, K., Beier, T.,                    1975. Banana peels as a potential
      Schilcher, F., Gabler, C., Schuh, M.,                  source of animal food and other
      Kastner, U., Guggenbichler, J.P. &                     useful        products.       Nutrition
      Franz, C. 2001. Carrot pectins for                     Reproduction             International,
      prevention of diarrhea in the rearing                  11:399−408.
      of piglets in a field study.                     Sayed, A.N. & Abdel-Azeem, A.M. 2009.
      Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G,                       Evaluation of dried tomato pomace
      Grosstiere/Nutztiere, 29: 308−312.                     as feedstuff in the diets of growing
M.B. Esteban, A.J. Garcı´a, P. Ramos,                        rabbit. International Journal for Agro
      M.C. Ma´rquez. 2007. Evaluation of                     Veterinary and Medical Sciences, 3:
      fruit–vegetable and fish wastes as                     13−18.
      alternative feedstuffs in pig diets,             Sotto, V.R., Brito, M., Lopez, B., Perez, E.
      Waste Management 27: 193–200.                          & Velazquez, F. 2009. Use of citrus
Montagne, L., Pluske, J.R. &Hampson,                         meal for feeding sows during the
      D.J., 2003. A review of interactions                   gestation and lactaction stage.
      between dietary fibre and the                          RevistaComputadorizada               de
      intestinal   mucosa,       and     their               ProduccionPorcina, 16: 45−49.
      consequences on digestive health in
                                                 224
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Tartrakoon,      T.,   Chalearmsan,   N.,                   value     added   products.    RAP
      Vearasilp, T. &Meulen, U. 1999.                       Publication 2013/04, FAO, Rome.
      The nutritive value of banana peel               Westendorf, M.L., 2000. Food waste as
      (Musa sapientum L.) in growing pig.                   animal feed: an introduction. In:
      In       Proceedings     of     the                   Westendorf, Michael L. (Ed.), Food
      DeutscherTropentag 1999, Berlin                       Waste to Animal Feed. Iowa State
      (Humboldt University of Berlin and                    University Press, Ames, pp. 3–16,
      ATSAF, Berlin), CD-ROM.                               69–90.
Wadha, M. and Bakshi, MPS.2013.                        Yushkova, L.G. &Kertieva, N.M. 2010.
      Utilization of fruits and vegetable                   Utilization of locally available
      wastes as livestock feed and as                       feedstuffs in the production and
      substrate for generation of other                     rearing of young pigs. Svinovodstvo
                                                            (Moskva),         1:         29−30.
                                                 225
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 226
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
2010). SWOT factors may be grouped as                     Lawerence and Vadakattu (2009) has
social,    technological,     economic,                   shown enhancement in soil microbial
environmental and regulatory.                             community and biological processes,
                                                          relative to conventional systems.
Strengths in organic oilseeds production               5. Improved soil health: Improvement in
                                                          soil health under organic farming is
      Strengths of organic farming
                                                          bound to come and has been well
describe the positive attributes, tangible
                                                          documented through research findings
and intangible, inherent to the system in
                                                          elsewhere in the world.
question. These are within the reach of the
                                                       6. Premium prices: The recent BIOFACH
farming community as a whole.
                                                          2012 held at Bangalore could find the
1. India is largely agro based economy                    premium prices for organic products
   with multicrop culture                                 and consumers were eager to purchase
2. Self-reliance in inputs-Low cost of                    organic products due to high self-life of
   production                                             organic produce
3. Increased above and below ground                    7. Preserves traditional varieties/species
   biodiversity: Management of an                      8. Low external inputs: The system relies
   appropriate habitat for sustenance of                  to the maximum extent on on-farm
   different life forms is an essential                   inputs and residue recycling
   component of organic farming. This can              9. Organic farming is mostly associated
   be achieved by ensuring crop diversity                 with fruits and/or vegetables, not with
   and by maintaining a wide variety of                   chicken, beef and other protein sources.
   trees and bushes as per climatic                    10.     Availability of liquid formulation
   sustainability. These tree and bushes                  of potassium mobilizing bacteria
   will not only ensure the nutrient from                 (Fraturia aurentia) (Alexander et al
   air and deep soil layers to surface layer              2009), N fixers and Phosphate
   but also attract the birds and predators,              solublising bacteria to meet crop
   friendly insects and also provide the                  demands.
   food shelter (Yadav 2010). Flohre et al.
                                                       Weaknesses:
   (2011) opined that organic farming
   appears to be more efficient in                          It includes infrastructure deficit,
   conserving        aboveground        than           market economy deficit, public investment
   belowground diversity.                              & credit deficit, and knowledge deficit.
4. House to soil biota: Strong, functioning
   soil food web allows a plethora of soil             1. Slow process:Organic farming brings
   organisms to decompose, incorporate,                   results slower than the chemical
   and redistribute carbon and other                      nutrients and thus making the process
   nutrients within the soil profile. Soil                less favorite to the farmers.
   organic matter and plant residues are               2. Transition timevaries from 3-5 years
   the sources of carbon for a cascade of                 which is a deterrent in many cases.
   feeding activity by soil fauna and                  3. Unorganized market
   microorganisms. A biologically active               4. Lack of system: Poor development of
   soil food web is essential for the                     the internal market for organic products
   success of all organic agricultural                 5. Fragmentation of lands prevents its use
   systems. Organic farming practices                     on larger consolidated areas.
   resulted in lower soil bulk densities and           6. Large quality of organic needed-FYM
   higher soil microbial activity measured                available is inadequate to meet the
   by soil respiration, and organic carbon                demand as it has multiple uses.
   (Araujo et al. 2009). Studies by
                                                 227
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
7. Labour intensiveness: The expenditure               6. Heavy metal problems – Organic
   on labor charges is comparatively high              products are suspected to have contained
   as compared to traditional farming.                 harmful substances for the human body if
8. Productivity gaps are sometimes higher              the organic manures used contain high
   in the event of insect pest outbreak.               content of heavy metals.
9. Lack of availability of green manure
   seed                                           REFERENCES
10.     Less incentives from Government
                                                       Alexander, D., Rajan, S., Rajamony, L.,
Opportunities                                               Ushakumari, K and SajanKurien
                                                            (2009) The adhoc package of
It cannot be denied that, organic farming                   practices    recommendations       for
can prove quite beneficial for the                          organic farming. Kerala Agricultural
producers as well as consumers if                           University, Thrissur. P. 1-209.
deployed in a continuous way on a large                Araujo, ASF., LFC Leite, Valdinar B.
scale. Major opportunities in organic                       Santos and RFV Carneiro (2009)
farming include,                                            Soil     microbial      activity    in
                                                            conventional        and        organic
1.      Growing         domestic       and                  agricultural systems. Sustainability
international demand for organic oilseeds.                  1, 268-276; doi: 10.3390/su 1020268
2.      Potential international market and             Flohre, A., M. Rudnick, G. Traser, T.
growing market potential                                    Tscharntke      and      T.     Eggers
3.      Growing health awareness                            (2011)Does soil biota benefit from
4.      All dryland oilseeds are default                    organic farming in complex vs.
organic                                                     simple landscapes? Agriculture,
5.      Expected to reduce the CO2                          Ecosystems and Environment 141:
emissions                                                   210-214
6.      Established National Programme                 Huang, SS, Tai, SF, Chen, TC, and Huang,
on Organic Production (NPOP) defined its                    SN (1993) Comparison of crop
regulatory framework, the National Project                  production as influenced by organic
on Organic Farming (NPOF) has defined                       and conventional farming systems.
the, promotion strategies and provide                       Taichung      District    Agricultural
necessary support for area expansion under                  improvement       station,     Special
certified organic farming (Yadav, 2008).                    Publication, 32, 109-125.
                                                       Khan, HR (2010) Issues and Challenges in
Threats
                                                            Indian      Agriculture:     Bankers’
1. Conventional         land       (intensive               Perspectives. Social address at the
agriculture) in the immediate vicinity of                   National Seminar on Agricultural
the farms and most of the fields are                        Banking, Pune on April 16 & 17,
contiguous and problem of contamination                     2010.
2. Sectors of processing and trade of                  Lawerence, L. and G. Vadakattu (2009)
organic products are limited                                The health of soils in organic
3. Costly       and    complex        organic               farming systems. Farming Ahead.
certification process                                       207, 44-46
4. Lack of infrastructure facilities (like             Subba Rao, IV (1999) Soil and
labs) and authentic certification bodies                    environmental pollution – A threat to
5. Only export regulated organic market                     sustainable agriculture, J. Indian
which is full of barried owing to                           Society of Soil Science, 47, 611-633
certification.                                         Yadav, AK (2008) Status of Organic
                                                            Farming in India and the World. In:
                                                 228
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Invited papers at winter school on               Yadav,, AK (2010) Organic Agriculture
      Organic Farming in Rainged                            (Concept, Scenario, Principles and
      Agriculture (Eds. B. Venkateswarlu                    Practices), National project on
      S.S. Balloli and Y.S. Ramakrishna)                    organic farming, Ghaziabad, p. 1960
      CRIDA, Hyderabad, P. 196.
                                                 229
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 230
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Dairy Unit                                             garden land (irrigated upland) and dry land
                                                       farming systems. Salem Black, Jamnapari,
        Livestock plays a major role in                Tellicherry are common breeds suitable to
economy, especially of small and marginal              Tamil Nadu. Of which, Salem Black goats
farmers. For a hectare area of sugarcane               are highly preferred. They are tall animals
based farming system, maintenance of two               with a lean body and a completely black
local cross Holstein Friesian (HF) with                coat. The adult body weight is about 40 kg
two calves is sufficient to support a farm             (buck) and 30 kg (doe).The space
family monthly income. The average milk                requirement for a goat is 4.5 to 5.4 m2.
yield is 4200-4500 liters per lactation. In            Goats can be maintained under stall-fed
addition the farm yard manure produced at              conditions in elevated platform (Fig 3).
this unit can be used for cropping system              Goat matures at 6-7 month after its birth.
as well. Roughage consists of pasture                  Breeding is allowed for buck after one
grasses, hay, silage, root crops, straw and            year and doe after 10 months of its age.
stover (corn stalks).                                  Gestation period is 145-155 days.
                                                       Optimum goat per hectare sugarcane based
Goat Unit                                              farming system is 13 female + 1 male.
    Goat is known as ‘Poor man’s cow’ in
India and is a very important component in
                                                 231
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Poultry cum Fish Culture                               layers up to the age of 18 months. Each
        Majority of the homestead ponds                bird lays about 200 eggs/yr.
are suitable for this purpose. Any pond                The direct discharge of fresh chicken
that retains 2.0–3.0 m water can be                    manure to the fish ponds produces enough
considered as suitable. It is advisable to             natural fish feed organisms without use of
stock the ponds with larger fingerlings of             any additional manure/fertilizer.
10-15 cm size for better survival. Fish
breed such as, and at the rate of 1 per                Mushroom production
square feet is the optimum stocking                            Mushroom cultivation is one of the
population. The stocking rates vary from               best hi-tech horticultural ventures that
0.8 to 1.0/m2and a species ratio of 40%                utilizes vertical space utilization and is
surface feeders - catla, 20% of column                 regarded as the highest protein producer.
feeders-rohu, 30% bottom feeders -                     The oyster mushroom requires a 23- 27◦C
mirgaland 10-20% weedy feeders are                     temperature range with a relative humidity
preferred for high fish yields. Final                  of 80- 85 %. Such cropping conditions
harvesting can be done at 12 months of                 can be achieved in thatched sheds with
rearing.                                               sand to one-foot height on the floor and
        In cage system, for 400 m2 fish                racks for placing mushroom beds. After 20
pond area, twenty numbers of eight weeks               to 23 days, pinheads appear, and then
old desi bird chicks were sheltered in a               onwards, sprinkling water on the beds
shed having a plinth area of 2.2 m2 and the            must be followed. First harvest takes three
bottom provided with wire mesh (5 mm x                 days after pinheads appear and the second
5 mm) to facilitate free falling of dropping           harvest in another 7 to 8 days and third
to the pond and placed over the fish pond              harvest in 5 to 6 days. The total cropping
at one corner. Egg production commences                cycle ranges from 35 to 45 days.
at the age of 18 weeks and then gradually
decline. The birds are usually kept as
Mushroom Shed
                                                 232
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 233
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                Resource flow in sugarcane based farming system
                                                                            Dairy
    Cropping - 0.9 ha                  Manure                          (2 cows + 1 calf)
    Sugarcane based                                                      And / Or
    cropping system                                                     Goat (20 + 1)
                                Cane tops & Pulse haulms &
           T
                                                                                 F
           r                          Farm House
           a                                                                     o            Pisciculture +
           s                                +                                    d
                                                                                                 Poultry
           h                         Kitchen garden                              d              (20 birds)
                                                                                 e
                                                                                 r
                                           Tank silt
  Vermicomposting
                          Production of                                         Fodder trees
         &                                               Secondary
                          Value added
     Mushroom                                            Agriculture                 +
                         Jaggery/ liquid
     Production              jaggery                      activities                 APIARY
                                                         234
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 235
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
plate method and antagonistic activity in              ERBS10 (88% and 1287.54) treated
liquid media respectively. The 12 potential            tomato seeds had the maximum
isolates were identified as Bacillus sp.               germination and vigour index respectively.
(ERBS4, ERBS10, ERBS29, ERBS47,                        Pot and field experiment were conducted
ERBS75, ERBS118), while other as B.                    with F. mosseae, G. fasciculatum,
velezensis (ERBS51), B. cereus (ERBS69                 ERBS51 (Bacillus velezensis) and
and ERBS119) and B. subtilis (ERBS80),                 ERBS10 (Bacillus sp.) both individual and
B. swezeyi (ERBS115) and B. subtilis sub               combinations as treatments. The combined
sp. spizizenii(ERBS130) using 16s rRNA                 application gave better result than
gene with bacterial universal primer                   individual microbes as treatment. Among
(27F/1492R) and Bacillus specific primers              all the treatments given as single inoculum
(BCF1/BCR2). All the 12 isolates were                  and all the possible combinations of the
grouped together in Neighbour-joining                  four      microbes,      F.     mosseae+G.
phylogenetic tree. Majority of the isolates            fasciculatum+B.       velezensis+Bacillussp.
were positive for iturin, surfactin, and               treatment as consortium with recorded
bacillomycin genes. The 12 isolates were               highest disease reduction in wilt severity
further screened for hydrolytic enzyme                 in both pot (77.44%) and field (66.74%)
production, antimicrobial and plant growth             experiments respectively. F. mosseae+G.
promotion (PGP) activities and found to                fasciculatum+B. velezensis+Bacillus sp.
have varying results. Isolate ERBS51 was               treatment also recorded high plant and
found to be positive for majority of the               yield attributes in both the conditions. F.
attributes such as siderophore, ammonia                mosseae, G. fasciculatum, B. velezensis
production, phosphate, ZnCO3, ZnCl                     and Bacillus sp. as a consortium could be
solubilisation, alpha amylase, cellulase,              used as a part of integrated management of
protease, pectinase and lipase production.             Fusarium wilt of tomato in Meghalaya.
ERBS51 (95% and 1472.50) followed by
                                                 236
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Human beings with their tampering                manures applied for organic in some cases
do something wrong and leave the damage                or both of them.
unrepaired. When the adverse results                          When the above two factors are
accumulate, work with all their might to               considered, it is clearly indicated from the
correct them. When the corrective actions              vegetable based experiment conducted for
appear to be successful, they come to view             six years, application of 6 Mg ha-1 poultry
these       measures       as      splendid            manure produced 29 and 38% higher pod
accomplishments. People do this over and               yield of gardenpea and french bean,
over again. It is the same with the                    respectively        compared      to       the
agriculture also. Before the introduction of           recommended inorganic treatment under
industrial inputs, farmers are relying on              irrigated situation.
organic and natural farming. Then,                            It is clearly indicated from the five
industrial inputs are introduced and later             years’rainfed soybean-wheat (legume-
the problems of degradation soil and                   cereal) cropping system that the optimum
environment, adverse effect on food and                wheat equivalent grain yield of 10.99 and
soil quality and ultimately on human                   11.15 Mg ha-1 through farmyard manure
health started due to the industrial inputs.           (FYM) and vermicompost (VC) were
Now, we are interested on problem-less                 produced with application of 44.5 and 45.7
agricultural production by relying on                  kg phosphorus ha-1, which were 26 and
organic and natural farming.                           27% higher than the yield recorded under
      The yield level is the key for the               recommended           inorganic    fertilizer,
acceptance of a technology by the farmers.             respectively. The levels of P required from
But, several investigations have reported              FYM and VC to achieve the same yield as
lower yields in organic conditions with                inorganic fertilizer were only 15.9 and
comparison to inorganic fertilizers. It is             15.6 kg P ha-1, respectively.
also reported that some crops respond to                      In another experiment conducted for
organic management and others do not.                  five years under rainfed system,
The situation of rainfed and irrigated also            application of 100% N equivalent through
provide different responses to organic                 FYM produced 76 and 95% higher energy
management. The different situations and               equivalent grain yield compared to
crops have been assessed to provide a clear            recommended inorganic fertilizer for
conclusion, whether the organic farming                fingermillet + black soybean-wheat +
can be sustainable in the long run in the              Indian rape and grain amaranth-wheat +
Himalayas.                                             lentil cropping systems. Similar results
Does organic agriculture provide the                   have also been recorded for rainfed
required yield level of crops?                         fingermillet-lentil cropping system.
                                                              In another six years’ irrigated
       The lower yield in the organic                  gardenpea-french bean cropping system
agriculture     in    comparison       with            experiment, the FYM level required to
conventional practices in most of the                  achieve the same yield level as
experiments in the Himalayas was due to                recommended inorganic fertilizer was 5.9
either      the     experiments       were             Mg ha-1 only, which was very less. The
conducted for 2 years only in most of the              optimum production of 31.3 Mg ha-
cases or lower level and quality of organic            1
                                                         gardenpea equivalent pod was achieved
                                                 237
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
with application of 20.0 Mg ha-1 FYM,                  Whether organic agriculture             really
which was 53% higher than the                          improves soil health?
recommended chemical fertilizer yield                         Application of 69.9 kg phosphorus
level.                                                 ha-1 through FYM provided the highest
       The cereal based cropping system of             soil quality index (SQI) value of 0.784
maize-wheat under irrigated situation for              compared to 0.456 under chemical
four years provided different information.             management in irrigated okra-gardenpea-
In the first year, the levels of nitrogen              french bean cropping system. The soil
required from FYM and VC to achieve the                quality under the recommended inorganic
same yield as the recommended chemical                 fertilizers was 42% degraded compared to
fertilizer (with 150 kg ha-1 nitrogen) were            FYM @ 69.9 kg P ha-1 and hence
260.5 and 261.3 kg ha-1, respectively.                 inorganic fertilizers should not be
While, during the fourth year these values             continued for long term as it slowly
of nitrogen were only 129.7 and 127.9 kg               deteriorated the soil health.
ha-1, respectively.
       From the above results, it can be                     The soil enzyme activity index
clearly inferred that the organic agriculture          (SEAI) was developed to provide a single
can produce more than the conventional                 comprehensive unitless value to all
system under the rainfed and legume based              estimated soil enzymes. The highest SEAI
cropping systems. The organic agriculture              of 0.427 was recorded under 100% N
can also provide higher yield compared to              equivalent application of FYM in rainfed
inorganic fertilizers in the irrigated cereal-         grain amaranth-wheat + lentil cropping
cereal based system after completion of                system, which was 66% higher than under
the transition period.                                 the recommended chemical fertilizers
                                                       application (0.256).
Whether the organic agriculture will be
profitable?                                                  The diversity of microorganisms
                                                       maintains ecological processes such as
      Application of 100% N equivalent                 decomposition of organic matter, nutrient
through FYM produced 137% higher net                   cycling, soil aggregation and controlling
returns compared to the recommended                    pathogens      within     the     ecosystem.
inorganic fertilizers (US$ 438) under                  Application of 6 Mg ha-1 poultry manure
rainfed grain amaranth-wheat + lentil                  provided     significantly    higher     soil
cropping system. The same application of               culturable microbial diversity index
FYM recorded the highest net returns                   (0.562) compared to the recommended
US$−1 invested (B:C ratio) of 1.31                     inorganic fertilizers treatment (0.325)
compared to inorganic management (0.82)                under irrigated gardenpea-french bean
in the above cropping system.                          cropping system. The highest value of soil
      In another example of irrigated                  culturable microbial dominance index was
gardenpea-french bean cropping system,                 recorded in the inorganic fertilizers applied
the optimum application rate of FYM (20                plot (0.881), which was significantly
Mg ha-1) provided 63% higher net returns               higher than PM6 (0.772). It indicates that
compared to chemical management.                       organic    amendment        enhances     soil
      It is clear that organic agriculture can         microbial diversity and reduces dominance
be more profitable than chemical                       of few organisms.
management system. Further, premium                         From the above results, it can be
price will enhance the net profit more and             concluded that organic agriculture really
will help in doubling the farmers’ income.             improves soil health.
                                                 238
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Is organic agriculture sustainable?                    Conclusion
       The highest sustainable yield index                    Most of the arable land in the
(SYI) for both soybean (0.567) and wheat               Himalayas is rainfed. The application of
(0.604) was recorded with application of               organic amendment will help in
52.4 kg phosphorus ha-1 through VC,                    conserving moisture for higher production,
which was considerably higher than the                 especially for rainfed rabi season crops.
application of the recommended chemical                From the results of cereals, pulses,
fertilizers (0.451 and 0.238 for soybean               oilseeds, pseudo-cereal and vegetable
and wheat, respectively) under rainfed                 crops, it can be concluded that the organic
soybean-wheat cropping system.                         agriculture provides higher yield, profit
      The SYI of irrigated gardenpea-                  and sustainability and better soil health
french bean cropping system improved as                compared to chemical management system
the application rate of FYM increased                  in the Himalayas under rainfed and
from 5 to 20 Mg ha-1, and the highest SYI              legume-based cropping systems. The
was recorded with application of 20 Mg                 irrigated cereal based systems also provide
ha-1 FYM (0.606), which was higher than                beneficial results of all the above
the chemical fertilizers applied plot                  mentioned aspects after the transition
(0.525).                                               period. The inherent richness of organic
                                                       matter in soils of the Himalayas provides
     It is clear that organic production               better response to organic management.
system is more sustainable than chemical               Hence, organic agriculture can be
management.                                            sustainable in the Himalayas in the long
                                                       run.
                                                 239
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 240
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 241
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 242
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Rice equivalent yield (REY) of (R +W) =                attributed due to supply of sufficient
(                                )
                                   +                   organic carbon and balanced nutrition to
                                                       the existing and applied microbial
rice yield                                             communities to respire efficiently. This
        Analysis of variance (ANOVA)                   finding has been further supported by
was used for distinguishing the                        Toyota and Kuninga (2006) who revealed
significance of data in a Window-based                 that repeated application of organic
SAS program (version 16.1).                            amendments like FYM increased the
                                                       substrate utilization ability of microbes
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                 enhancing the soil respiration.
Effect of different organic treatment                           Among the organic nutrient
combinations    on    soil  biological                 management practices, integration of green
properties                                             manure (SGM/LGLM) with FYM resulted
        Organic nutrient management has                significantly highest Microbial metabolic
significant effect on microbial biomass                quotient, MMQ (data not shown). The
carbon (MBC), and showed significant                   treatments        comprised      of     FYM,
differences among the different organic                SGM/LGLM+BGA/AZB,                         and
treatments combinations. Highest MBC                   SGM/LGLM+FYM+BGA/AZB                       are
was recorded in the conjoint application of            statistically at par and showed significantly
all organic manures, SGM/LGLM+                         higher MMQ than the sole green manuring
FYM+BGA/AZB              followed       by             treatment (SGM/LGLM). Higher MMQ
SGM/LGLM+BGA/AZB,             SGM/LGLM                 insoils treated with organic treatment
and FYM (data not shown). Prolong                      combinations, SGM/LGLM+FYM may be
addition of organic substrates like FYM,               due to less efficient use of available carbon
green manure may have provided steady                  by the microbes in the soil. The higher
carbon source and congenial environment                load of microbial biomass and respiration
for stimulation of microbial growth and                rate     in      soils    receiving     FYM,
their metabolic activities. Moreover,                  SGM/LGLM+BGA/AZB,                         and
addition of biofertilizers, may also have              SGM/LGLM+FYM+BGA/AZB
produce diverse growth promoting                       highlighted the efficient flow of energy
substances which lead to intense                       through the microbial biomass and resulted
proliferation of microbial growth and                  higher MMQ, which maintains a more
augmentation of MBC. These findings are                stable C-system. Same finding was also
in same line with Insam et al. (1991) and              reported by Sharma et al. (2015).
Joergensen and Wichern (2018), who                     Rice equivalent yield (REY)
reported that carbon input through organic
                                                               Combined application of all the
amendments increased MBC by enhancing
                                                       organic                            sources
microbial growth and their activities.
                                                       (SGM/LGLM+FYM+BGA/AZB) showed
        Conjoint application of all organic
                                                       significantly higher rice equivalent yield
sources, SGM/LGLM+FYM+BGA/AZB)
                                                       (REY) than the other treatments (Fig 1).
showed the highest soil basal respiration
                                                       Combine application of different types of
(BR)      followed    by     SGM/LGLM+
                                                       organic      amendments     along     with
BGA/AZB, SGM/LGLM+FYM and FYM.
                                                       biofertilizers (N-fixers) may possibly
Green manuring with SGM/LGLM
                                                       balance the C and N dynamics in soil and
showed the lowest BR in comparison to
                                                       enhance the nutrient availability to plant.
other organic treatments. Result inferred
                                                       Application of organic amendments may
that integration of all organic sources or
                                                       also possibly modify soil pH making the
increased in carbon inputs maintained
                                                       soil more favourable for microbes and
higher soil respiration, which may be
                                                       plants growth via positive impacts on soil
                                                 243
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
C and N availability(Fischerand Glaser,                2012; Agegnehuet al.,2016).
Fig 1.Long term effect of manuring and time of manuring on rice equivalent yield of rice +
wheat (Mg ha-1) under rice-wheat cropping system
CONCLUSIONS                                                 microbial biomass in soils. Soil
        From the study, it can be conclude                  Biology and Biochemistry 10(3),
that integrated application of FYM, GM                      215–221.
(Sesbania/LGLM)             and         BF             Fischer, D., Glaser, B., 2012.Synergisms
(BGA/Azotobacter)        improved      soil                 between compost and biochar for
biological properties like MBC, soil basal                  sustainable soil amelioration.In:
respiration and metabolic quotient and                      Management of Organic Waste.
productivity of rice-wheat cropping system                  Sunil, K. &Bharti, A. (Eds.), InTech,
in semi-arid subtropical India. This                        Rijeka     and     Shanghai,     167-
strategy may be replicated in similar soil                  198.https://doi.org/10.5772/31200.
and agro-climatic conditions for producing             Insam, H., Mitchell, C.C. and Dormaar,
organic cereal crops provided all the                       J.F. (1991) Relationship of soil
sources of organic nutrients are locally                    microbial biomass and activity with
available.                                                  fertilization practice and crop yield
REFERENCES                                                  of three Ultisols. Soil Biology and
                                                            Biochemistry 23, 459–464.
Agegnehu, G., Nelson, P.N., Bird, M.I.,
     2016. Crop yield, plant nutrient                  Joergensen, R. G., Wichern, F., 2018.
     uptake and soil physicochemical                        Alive and kicking: why dormant soil
     properties under organic soil                          microorganisms matter. Soil Biology
     amendments          and       nitrogen                 and Biochemistry 116, 419-430.
     fertilization on nitisols. Soil and
     Tillage Research 160, 1-13.                       Kumar, D., Purakayastha, T.J. and Shivay,
Anderson, J.P.E., 1982. Soil respiration.                  Y.S., 2015.Long-term effect of
     In: Page, A.L., et al (eds) Methods                   organic manures and biofertilizers on
     of soil analysis. Part 2, 2nd Edition,                physical and chemical properties of
     Agronomy Monograph, 9. ASA and                        soil and productivity of rice-wheat
     SSSA, Madison, 831–871.                               system. International Journal of Bio-
Anderson, J.P.E., Domsch, K.H., 1978. A                    resource          and          Stress
     physiological method for the                          Management 6(2), 176-181.
     quantitative      measurement       of
                                                 244
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Sharma, P., Singh, G., Singh, R.P. and                 Toyota K. and Kuninaga S., 2006.
     Sharma, K., 2015. Integrated                           Comparison of soil microbial
     resource management improves soil                      community between soils amended
     glucosidase, urease, and phosphatase                   with or without farmyard manure.
     activities and soil fertility during rice              Applied Soil Ecology, 33:39–48.
     cultivation      in       Indo-Gangetic           Xia, L., Lam, S.K., Yan, X., Chen, D.,
     plains. Cogent           Food          &               2017. How does recycling of
     Agriculture, 1(1), p.1030905.                          livestock manure in agroecosystems
Thangarajan, R., Bolan, N.S., Tian, G.,                     affect crop productivity, reactive
     Naidu, R., Kunhikrishnan, A.,                          nitrogen losses and soil carbon
     2013.Role of organic amendment                         balance? Environmental Science and
     application on greenhouse gas                          Technology 51, 7450.
     emission from soil. Science of the
     Total Environment 465, 72.
                                                 245
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Professor and Dean, College of Dairy and Food Technology,Maharana Pratap University of
                    Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan)
ABSTRACT                                               INTRODUCTION
         A study was conducted to evaluate                     Indigenous breeds of poultry are
different housing system for rearing of                playing an important role in Indian rural
indigenous      poultry     under    organic           economy. They play a major role for the
management system. Using three hundred                 rural poor and marginalized section of the
sixty straight run chicks (Pratapdhan) of              people with respect to their subsidiary
four weeks age of same hatch were wing                 income and also provide them with
banded and randomly divided into four                  nutritious poultry egg and meat for their
treatment groups of 90 birds each in three             own consumption. Performance of
replicates of 30 birds. The experiment was             Indigenous poultry can be improved by
conducted for a period of 12 (4 to 16                  change in housing management system.
weeks) weeks for growth performance.                   Since cage housing is the commonly used
The treatments were viz., T1: Farmers’                 housing system under conventional poultry
practice, T2: Backyard System, T3: Deep                system. As per standards of organic
Litter System and T4: Cage system. The                 poultry system, cage housing system is
body weight gains in indigenous chicken                prohibited     under    organic      poultry
at 16 weeks of age was significantly higher            production. Therefore, it cannot be used &
at 1478.48 followed by 1243.47 g in deep               recommended. However, for the purpose
litter, 1119.27 g in cage system and                   of generating data & information, cage
significantly lowest in farmers practice               housing system has also been evaluated
(699.1 g). The feed intake was                         with three other common housing systems
significantly higher in T3 and T4 as                   used in poultry production in India.
compared to T1, however, the difference
in feed intake between T3 and T4 was                   METHODOLOGY
small and non-significant. The carcass
traits namely live, dressed and eviscerated                    An experiment was carried out to
weights were highest in backyard system                evaluate different housing systems for
followed by deep litter, cage and lowest in            rearing of indigenous poultry under
farmers practice. The dressing percentage              organic farming system. The experiment
ranged between 88.05 to 89.01 different                was conducted using three hundred sixty
housing systems which did not differ                   straight run chicks (Pratapdhan) of four
significantly. The results revealed that B:C           weeks age of same hatch were wing
ratio was better in deep litter, backyard              banded and randomly divided into four
and cage and was significantly lower in                treatment groups of 90 birds each in three
farmers practice. It may be concluded that             replicates of 30 birds. The experiment was
backyard rearing system is recommended                 conducted for a period of 12 weeks for
for rearing of indigenous poultry under                growth performance. The treatments were
organic management system.                             viz., T1: Farmers’ practice, T2: Backyard
                                                       System, T3: Deep Litter System and T4:
Keywords:        Indigenous      Poultry,              Cage system. Chicks were offered
Productive Performance, Housing system.                isonitrogenous and isocaloric chicks feed
                                                 246
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
(CP- 21% and ME 2900 Kcal) up to 8                     79.32±6.62, 163.59±3.56, 108.23±27.04
weeks of age thereafter grower feed (CP-               and 134.13±16.71 g in T1, T2, T3 and T4
17% and ME - 2600 Kcal) up to 16 weeks                 respectively. The respective body weights
of agewas given. The birds had access to               gains of the chicks at 16 weeks of age in
free choice water throughout the day.                  T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 778.42±37.41,
Birds were housed in three different                   1642.0±96.33,       1351.70±227.72     and
housing systems (farmers’ practice,                    1253.4±321.36 g respectively. Results
backyard, deep litter and cage). The                   indicated that the body weight at 16 weeks
observations on daily feed intake, weekly              of age was significantly higher in T2
body weight gain, carcass traits and                   (Backyard system) as compared to other
economics were recorded. The data was                  treatments except T3. Significantly lowest
analysed as per the procedure prescribed               body weight was found in T1 (Farmers
by Snedecor and Cochran (1989).                        practices), however, difference between
                                                       T3 and T4 was found non-significant.
RESULTS &DISCUSSION                                            The body weight gains in
                                                       Indigenous chicken at 16 weeks of age was
       The ingredients and nutrient                    significantly higher at 1478.48 followed
composition of chick and grower feed used              by 1243.47 g in deep litter, 1119.27 g in
during the experiment is presented in                  cage system and significantly lowest in
Table-1.1.                                             farmers practice (699.1 g).
Table- 1.1 Ingredients         and   Nutrient
Composition of feed                                    Biweekly feed intake
                                                 247
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 55-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Fig-1.1:
     1.1: Performance of birds under different housing system
 Table 1.2: Effect of housing systems on biweekly body weight (g) & overall gain under
 organic management
                                                  248
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table-1.4 Effect of different housing systems on feed conversion ratio (FCR) under organic
management
                                                                                               SEm±
Age             Farmers’             Backyard             Deep         litter Cage
(Weeks)         practice             system               system              system
                4.42                1.76                1.84                 1.92              0.168
4                     b                     a                   a
                ±0.39               ±0.055              ±0.078               ±0.070a
                2.96                2.04                2.04                 2.11              0.132
6                     b                   a                     a
                ±0.27               ±0.08               ±0.117               ±0.105a
                4.31                2.30                2.32                 2.28              1.477
8                      b                    a                   a
                ± 3.61              ±0.115              ±0.104               ±0.091a
                3.01                2.58                2.82                 2.89              0.436
10                      b                   a                   a
                ±0.072              ±0.085              ±0.075               ±1.06a
                3.51                2.52                3.32                 3.44              0.155
12                      a                 b                     a
                ±0.091              ±0.33               ±0.098               ±0.121a
                3.65                3.38                3.42                 3.56              0.328
14                      b                 a                     a
                ±0.075              ±0.78               ±0.098               ±0.091b
                4.86                3.09                3.10                 3.19              0.320
16                    b                     a                   a
                ±0.75               ±0.104              ±0.095               ±0.140a
                3.74                3.13                3.00                 3.15              0.317
Overall FCR           b                   a                   a
                ±0.78               ±0.25               ±0.31                ±0.38a
       a, b c
              Means bearing different superscripts in a row differ significantly (P<0.05)
 Carcass traits                                        Economics of poultry production under
         Three birds from each treatment in            different housing system
all replicates were sacrificed to study
carcass traits. The data on carcass traits of                   Total     cost    was      calculated
chicken raised under four housing systems              considering cost of feed and other
are presented in Table -1.5. The carcass               miscellaneous cost calculated at 16 weeks
traits namely live, dressed and eviscerated            of age. The return per bird was calculated
weights were highest in backyard system                by considering overall body weight gain
followed by deep litter, cage and lowest in            and sale price. Total cost was significantly
farmers practice. The dressing percentage              higher in backyard as compared to other
ranged between 88.05 to 89.01 different                treatment groups while it was significantly
housing systems which did not differ                   lower in farmers practice. The benefit cost
significantly.                                         ratio at 16 weeks of age was found to be
The organ weight viz. breast, thigh,                   2.31±0.06, 2.96±0.17, 3.01±0.04 and
drumstick, liver, gizzard and heart as                 2.88±0.08 in farmers practice, backyard,
percentage of dressed weight among                     deep litter and cage system of housing
different treatment groups did not differ              respectively. The results revealed that B:C
significantly (Table-1.5).                             ratio was better in deep litter, backyard and
                                                       cage and was significantly lower in farmers
                                                       practice (Table-1.6).
                                                 249
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1.5: Effect of different housing systems on Carcass traits
                  Farmers’          Backyard        Deep         litter                        SEm±
Parameters        practice                                                  Cage system
                                    system          system
Live    weight 794.10               1770.24         1260.05                 1166.13
                                                                                               39.30
(g)               ±52.25d           ±61.17a         ±35.83b                 ±38.91c
Dressed           698.72            1575.81         1109.47                 1029.19
                                                                                               35.70
weight (g)        ±50.34d           ±59.61a         ±34.76b                 ±18.78c
Eviscerated       435.05            1161.15         802.65                  709.4
                                                                                               25.79
weight (g)        ±28.63d           ±40.12a         ±22.82b                 ±32.27c
Dressing          87.98             89.01           88.05                   88.26
                                                                                               2.13
weight (%)        ±3.74             ±2.31           ±1.87                   ±2.83
Organ wt. as percent of dressed weight
                  18.90             18.79           18.43                   18.65
Breast Wt.                                                                                     0.62
                  ±1.24b            ±0.72a          ±0.52b                  ±0.84b
                  10.07             10.35           10.25                   9.85
Thigh Wt.                                                                                      0.23
                  ±0.66             ±0.39           ±0.28                   ±0.44
                  10.64             11.02           10.75                   10.9
Drumstick Wt.                                                                                  0.28
                  ±0.63             ±0.38           ±0.30                   ±0.49
                  1.95              1.93            2.09                    2.05
Liver                                                                                          0.03
                  ±0.10             ±0.05           ±0.07                   ±0.08
                  2.89              2.95            3.05                    3.00
Gizzard                                                                                        0.07
                  ±0.12             ±0.08           ±0.09                   ±0.13
                  0.56              0.55            0.45                    0.40
Heart                                                                                          0.02
                  ±0.06             ±0.04           ±0.03                   ±0.04
Table 1.6: Economics of organic poultry production under different housing systems
                         Farmers                                           Cage
Particulars                                  Back Yard Deep litter                            SEm±
                         practice                                          System
                         2.62                4.62          3.73            3.52
Feed intake kg/Bird                                                                           0.14
                         ±0.19b              ±0.27a        ±0.05c          ±0.09c
                         0.699               1.49          1.25            1.13
Wt. gain (kg/Bird)                                                                            0.04
                         ±0.05d              ±0.89a        ±0.02b          ±0.03c
                                                                           98
Total cost (Rs./Bird)    75.5±5.48c          125.5±7.44a 103.25±1.44b                         3.97
                                                                           ±2.64b
                         174.75              371.5         311.25          282
Returns (Rs. /Bird)                                                                           10.97
                         ±12.63d             ±22.01a       ±4.23b          ±7.62c
                         2.31                2.96          3.01            2.88
B:C ratio                                                                                     0.10
                         ±0.06b              ±0.17a        ±0.04a          ±0.08a
        *Feed cost @ Rs. 25 / kg, Rs. 10 for other miscellaneous cost per bird
        **Price of chicken: Rs. 250 per kg live weight
                                                 250
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  251
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 252
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
   Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
   crop which maintains the nutrient status in            CONCLUSION
   these soils. Due to higher nutrient uptake                     Results showed that higher yield
   has resulted in higher yield was noticed in            was obtained in regional farmers practice,
   regional farming practice (1413 kg ha-1),              but increased microbial count was
   followed by organic farming system (1310               observed in organic and natural farming. It
   kg ha-1). Among cropping system,                       can help in increased nutrient availability,
   chickpea (1451 kg ha-1) recorded superior              nutrient uptake ultimately on crop yield.
   yield compared to sunflower (1071 kg ha-               Overall, less input use in natural farming
   1
     ). Continuous supply of recommended                  would help to profitable, productive and
   package of practice lead to ready                      improved soil health which can be used as
   availability of nutrients to plant along with          a best alternative farming practice over
   micronutrients increased yield of both                 conventional method.
   sunflower and chickpea.
   Table 1: Microbial count NPK uptake and grain yield as influenced by different farming
          practice on Sunflower-Chickpea cropping system. Data is average of three years.
                      Bacteria       Fungi     Actinomycetes N       P       K                      Grain
                      (106cfu/g      (104cfu/g (103cfu/g of uptake uptake uptake                    yield
                      of soil)       of soil)  soil)         (kg/ha) (kg/ha) (kg/ha)                (kg/ha)
Farming practices (M)
Natural farming       28.58          11.55       27.30              51.08     10.27      49.06      1311
Organic farming       30.52          12.12       20.33              58.63     12.15      54.61      1413
Recommended                                                                                         1177
practice              28.62          10.12       20.17              43.97     8.32       45.25
Farmers practice      22.27          7.45        14.72              0.36      0.08       0.14       11.4
S.Em. ±               0.31           0.17        0.77               1.09      0.23       0.42       34.1
C D @5%               0.93           0.52        2.31               51.08     10.27      49.06      1311
 Cropping systems (S)
Sunflower             30.17          9.08        22.44              44.81     8.75       45.51      1071
Chickpea              24.82          11.53       18.82              53.05     10.67      49.42      1451
S.Em. ±               0.61           0.21        1.49               0.61      0.11       0.59       14.7
C D @5%               1.88           0.63        4.58               1.88      0.35       1.83       45.2
Interaction M×S
S.Em. ±               0.62           0.35        1.54               0.72      0.14       0.28       22.8
C D @5%               1.86           1.05        4.62               2.17      0.47       0.84       NS
                                                    253
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 254
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                         1
protects the deprivation of natural                       ). The field experiments were laid out in
resources and maximize the yields. It aims               randomized block design (RBD) with five
at     intensifying        the      agricultural         replications. The bengralgramcrop was
sustainability by ensuring long-term soil                sown with 30 X 10 cm with JG-11
prolificacy. It is a way of getting down to              genotype. The treatment details were given
bare bones of agriculture by doing natural               in Table 1.
farming using nature’s principle and                     Production efficiency (kg day-1 ha-1) =
starting from a zero base with nil cost of               Grain yield (kg ha-1) / Total duration of
production. All the agrochemicals like
                                                         crop (days)
synthetic     fertilizers,     plant     growth
regulators, chemical pesticides and other                Rainwater use efficiency (kg ha-1 mm-1) =
additives are fully abandoned and                        Grain yield (kg ha-1) / Total cumulative
environmentally sound production of food                 rainfall during from sowing to harvest
is possible. It advocates the use of natural             (mm)
inputs to revitalize the soil fertility and
enhance rural economy by attenuating                     RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
credit risks. This method of farming is                  Effect   of  different  management
fancied by many farming communities and                  practices on yield and economics of
should be adopted widely to cure our                     Bengal gram
mother       earth        by       replenishing
environmental health (Bhosle 2019; GOI,                          Yield of Bengal gram differed
2019).                                                   significantly due to different management
      The objective of the investigation is              practices (Table 2).
given below.                                                     Package of practice (T3) recorded
                                                         significantly higher grain and haulm yield
1. To study productivity, profitability and              (1693 and 1935 ha-1, respectively) and
sustainability of Bengalgram under Zero                  next best treatment was organic farming
Budget Natural Farming (NF) system in                    (1533 and 1765 kg ha-1, respectively),
comparison with each other production                    farmers practice (1337 and 1525 kg ha-1,
methods in Zone-1 of Karnataka.                          respectively) and natural (1191 and 1366
                                                         kg ha-1, respectively). With respect to
MATERIAL AND METHODS                                     economics higher gross returns was
                                                         fetched in package of practice (Rs. 77473
        The field experiments were                       ha-1) followed by organic farming (Rs.
undertaken at Agricultural Research                      74153 ha-1), farmers practice (Rs. 60065
Station, Janawada (Bidar), University of                 ha-1) and natural farming (Rs. 59316 ha-1).
Agricultural Sciences, Raichur during                    Similar trend follows in net returns and
kharif season of 2019–20, 2020-21 and                    benefit cost ratio (on pooled basis).
2021-22. Geographically, Agricultural                            The higher yields in package of
Research Station, Janawada is situated at                practice is due to more availability of
19.910°N latitude, 77.519° E longitude                   nutrients lead to the higher growth
and altitude of 590 m MSL in the North                   parameters like plant height, number of
Eastern Transition Zoneof Karnataka and                  branches number of leaves and which
receives average annual rainfall of 850                  ultimately lead to higher yield and apart
mm. The soil was lateritic, with pH 7.72                 from it,to multiply the agriculturally
and electrical conductivity (EC) 0.32 dS                 beneficial microorganisms in sufficient
m-1, medium in organic carbon (0.53%),                   number to act upon in the soil, requires
low available N (198.02 kg ha-1), and                    few years for multiplication. It is known
medium in available phosphorus (38.10 kg                 that because of early mineralization of
ha-1) and high in potassium (479.47 kg ha-
                                                   255
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
inorganic nutrients there might be                     profitability package of practice followed
spontaneous response in case of package                by organic farming can be adopted over
of practice compared to organic farming.               the years in North Eastern Transition
Similar results were found by Gopinath                 Zone of Karnataka to ensure the
and Mina (2011) in garden pea.                         sustainability in production and soil
       The higher gross and net returns                health along with pollution free
were mainly attributes to higher yields in             environment.
package of practice and organic farming.
These findings were in close conformity                REFERENCES
with the observations of Russo and Taylor
(2006) where higher gross margin was                   Bhosle J. 2019. Budget 2019: Zero Budget
reported for conventionally produced                        farming has few takers in the state
crops than for organic crops. It might be                   where it originated. The Economic
due to higher gross income under this                       Times.          Retrieved       from
treatment and higher yields. Sarkar et al.                  https://m.economictimes.com/news/e
(2011) and Narayan et al. (2014) also                       conomy/ agriculture/budget-2019-
reported similar findings.                                  zero-budget-farming-has-few-
                                                            takersin-the-state-where-it-
Effect      of    different    management                   originated/articleshow/70089472.cm
practices on production efficiency and                      s
rain water use efficiency                              Choudhari C S, Mendhe S N, Pawar W S,
         Significantly higher rainwater use                 Angole A S and Nikam R R. 2001.
efficiency was found in package of                          Nutrient management in French
practice (41.37 kg ha-1 mm-1) followed by                   bean. Journal of Soils and Crops
organic farming (38.36 kg ha-1 mm-1),                       11(1): 137-139.
farmers practice (31.92 41.37 kg ha-1 mm-              GOI. 2019. Agriculture and Food
1
  ) and least was in natural farming (28.86                 Management. Economic Survey
kg ha-1 mm-1). Similar trend was followed                   Report 2018-19, Department of
in production efficiency (Table 2).This                     Economic Affairs, Ministry of
might be due to higher amount of rainfall                   Finance, Government of India,
during growing period and higher yield in                   Retrieved                       from
package of practice treatment. These                        https://www.thehinducentre.com/res
results are in line with findings of Meena                  ources/article28283454.ece/binary/E
(2009) in pigeonpea.                                        conomic%20Survey%20Volume%2
         This might be because of increase                  0II%20Complete%20 PDF.pdf .
in grain yield under T3 which also                     Gopinath KA and Mina B L. 2011.Effect
enhanced production efficiency per day.                     of organic manures on agronomic
These results are in conformity with the                    and economic performance of garden
results of Choudhari et al. (2001),                         pea (Pisumsativum) and on soil
Subramani and Solaimalai (2000).                            properties. Indian     Journal     of
                                                            Agricultural Sciences 81(3):236-239.
CONCLUSION                                             Goswami B, Bezbaruah M P and Mandal.
        From the results of experiments (3                  2017. Indian Agriculture after the
years data) it can be inferred that package                 green revolution: changes and
of practice treatment performing best                       challenges. Routledge.
with respect to yield, efficiency and                  Meena S L, Dhamsuddin M and Dayal D.
economics and organic farming is next                       2009.Productivity of clusterbean and
best treatment. Thus, it can be concluded                   sesamum intercropping system under
that for achieving higher productivity and                  different row ratios and nutrient
                                                            management. Indian Journal of
                                                 256
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Agricultural Science 79(11): 901-                Russo V M and Taylor M J. 2006. Soil
      905.                                                  amendments in transition to organic
Parvathamma L. 2016. Farmers Suicide                        vegetable       production      with
      and Response of the Government in                     comparison       to     conventional
      India-An Analysis.IOSRJournal of                      methods: yields and economics.
      Economics and Finance 7 (3):1–6                       Horticultural Science 41(7): 1576-
Patra S, Mishra P, Mahapatra S C and                        1583.
      Mithun S K. 2016.Modelling                       Sarkar A, Sarkar S, Jaman A and Devi
      impacts of chemical fertilizer on                     W P. 2011. Productivity and
      agricultural production: a case study                 profitability of different cultivars
      on Hooghly district, West Bengal,                     of potato (Solanum tuberosum) as
      India. Modeling Earth Systems and                     affected by organic and inorganic
      Environment 2(4):1-11                                 sources of nutrients. Indian Journal
Ramana        V,      Ramakrishna        M,                 of Agronomy 56(2): 159–63.
      Purushotham K and Reddy K B.                     Subramani M and Solaimalai A. 2000.
      2011. Effect of bio-fertilizer on                     Influence of plant populations and
      growth, yield and quality of                          methods of nutrient application on
      french bean. Vegetable Science                        growth and yield of black gram
      38(1): 35–38.                                         (Vigna mungo). Legume Research
                                                            23(3):197-198.
                                                 257
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Details of nutrient, pest, and disease management in blackgram
Nutrient management
Treatment details           Blackgram
                            Beejamrutha: Seed treatment
T1: Zero Budget Natural
                            Ghanajeevamrutha: 400 kg/acre Jeevamrutha: 200 litre/acre
farming method (ZBNF)
                            Mulching @ 2 tonn/acre
                            Seed treatment (acre): Rhizobium (200 gm) +PSB (200 gm)
T2:     Organic     farming
                            N eq. vermicompost: 660 kg/acre
practice (OF)
                            Mulching @ 2 tonn/acre
                            Seed treatment (acre): Rhizobium (500 gm) +PSB (500 gm)
T3: Package of practice
                            10:20:0 kg N:P:K/acre
(POP)
                            FYM: 2.00 tonnes/acre
                            6.61 kg Nitrogen/acre
T4: Farmers practice (FP)   16.88 kg Phosphorus/acre
                            FYM: 1.28 tonnes/acre
Pest management
T1: Zero Budget Natural Leafeating caterpillar: Agniastra @ 30ml/ liter
farming method (ZBNF)       Pod borers: Brahmastra @ 30ml/ liter
T2:     Organic     farming Leafeating caterpillar and Pod borers: Neem oil (10000 ppm) @ 5%
practice (OF)
                            Sucking pests: Seed treatment with Imidacloprid 60 FS @ 10ml/kg of
T3: Package of practice seeds
(POP)                       Leafeating caterpillar and Pod borers: Emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.3
                            g/liter
                            Leafeating caterpillar and Pod borers: Lambdacyhalothrin 5 EC @ 0.5
T4: Farmers practice (FP)
                            ml/liter
Disease management
                              Seed treatment with Beejamrutha
T1: Zero Budget Natural
                              Spray of butter milk immediate after notice of the disease
farming method (ZBNF)
                                  incidence
                              Seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 4 gm/kg
T2:     Organic     farming
                              Spray of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 10 g/l immediate after the
practice (OF)
                                  notice of disease incidence
                              Seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 5 g/kg
T3: Package of practice
                              Spray of Hexaconazole 5% SC @ 1 ml/l immediate after notice of
(POP)
                                  the disease incidence
                              No seed treatment
T4: Farmers practice (FP)     Spray of Carbendazim 50 WP @ 1 g/l immediate after notice of
                                  the disease incidence
                                                 258
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya,
India
Table 2: Effect of different management practices on productivity and economics of Bengal gram (Data pooled over 3 years)
                                                                              259
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  260
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
water retention in soil, alongside                     of 30 cm was adopted for sowing of crop
integrated     pest    management      and             with an intra row spacing of 10 cm and
intercropping (Keerthi et al., 2018).                  seed rate of 18 kg ha-1. A common
        The cost of crop production is                 fertilizer dose of 25:50:00 (N: P2O5:K2O
increasing year after year due to high                 kg ha-1, respectively) to black gram
production costs of inputs, the volatile               applied as basal dose to crop at the time of
market prices of crops, the rising costs of            sowing in package of practice treatments.
fossil fuel based inputs and private seeds.            The cultivar of black gram used in the
Debt is a major problem for farmers of all             study was TAU-1.
sizes in India. The technical advisory
committee of consultative group on                     Production efficiency (kg day-1 ha-1) =
international agriculture research also                Grain yield (kg ha-1) / Total duration of
emphasizes on efficient management of                  crop (days)
natural resources, enhance the quality of
environment and conservation of the                    Rainwater use efficiency (kg ha-1 mm-1) =
natural resources in the process to meet               Grain yield (kg ha-1) / Total cumulative
our food demand.                                       rainfall during from sowing to harvest
        In view of all the above facts                 (mm)
experiments were carried out to evaluate
                                                       RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
comparative performance of different
management practices on productivity and               Yields of blackgram
economics of blackgram.
                                                               Significantly higher grain, haulm
1.     To study productivity, profitability            and biological yield (1364, 1704 and 3068
 and sustainability of blackgram under                 kg ha-1) were recorded in package of
 Zero Budget Natural Farming (NF)                      practice treatment followed by organic
 system in comparison with each other                  farming and farmers practice. Significantly
 production methods in Zone-1 of                       lower yields were recorded in natural
 Karnataka.                                            farming (1084, 1404 and 2488 kg ha-1,
                                                       respectively) on pooled basis.
METHODOLOGY                                                    It is stated that the poor production
                                                       potential of black gram attributed to poor
Experimental site                                      photosynthetic       efficiency,    lack   of
                                                       partitioning of photosynthates to pods and
Field experiments were conducted during
                                                       seed setting (Dixit and Elamathi, 2007).
the kharif season of 2019, 2020 and 2021
                                                       Application of nutrients and control of
at Agricultural Research Station, Janawada
                                                       pests and diseases at critical stages favored
farm, Bidar, University of Agricultural
                                                       the crop growth and enhanced the
Sciences, Raichur, India.
                                                       synthesis of carbohydrates and protein and
                                                       their transport to the site of seed
Experimental design and treatment                      formation, reduce the senescence and
details                                                flower drop percentage and increase the
        The experiment on black gram
                                                       pod set by resulting in increased the yield
comprising of 4 treatments viz., T1: Zero
                                                       attributes and yield of black gram. The
Budget Natural Farming Method, T2:
                                                       higher yield attributes in package of
Organic Farming Practice, T3: Package of
                                                       practice treatment mainly due to increased
Practice (UASR), and T4: Farmers Practice
                                                       rate of photosynthesis thus contributing for
was conducted in randomized block design
                                                       greater assimilate supply to the pods and
with five replications. The treatment
                                                       ultimately resulting in increased seed
details were given in Table 1. Row spacing
                                                 261
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
weight (Table 2). The results were in                  CONCLUSION
accordance to the results obtained by                          From the results of experiments (3
Yakadri and Thatikunta (2002) and Meena                years data) it can be inferred that package
(2005) and Kumawat et al. (2013) and                   of practice performing best with respect to
(Dhaka et al. 2016).                                   growth, yields and economics followed by
                                                       organic farming. However, natural farming
Efficiency and economics of blackgram                  is next best in terms of benefit cost ratio
production                                             over the years after package of practise.
Production efficiency                                  Thus it can be concluded that, for
                                                       achieving higher        productivity and
        The       maximum        production            profitability package of practice followed
efficiency (15.68 kg day ha-1) was
                             -1
                                                       by organic farming can be adopted over
recorded in T3 which was significantly                 the years in North Eastern Transition Zone
higher compared to all other treatments.               of Karnataka.
Minimum production efficiency (12.46 Kg
day-1 ha-1) was recorded in treatment T1               REFERENCES
(Table 2) on pooled basis. This might be
because of increase in grain yield under T3            Agoramoorthy, G. (2008). Can India meet
which also enhanced production efficiency                    the increasing food demand by
per day. These results are in conformity                     2020? Futures.40: 503–506.
with the results of Choudhari et al., (2001)           Calicioglu, O., Flammini, A., Bracco, S.,
and Subramani and Solaimalai (2000).                         Bellù, L. and Sims, R. (2019). The
                                                             future challenges of food and
Rainwater use efficiency                                     agriculture: An integrated analysis of
       Package of practice recorded                          trends and
maximum rain water use efficiency (8.31                      solutions. Sustainability. 11(1): 222.
kg ha-1 mm-1) over rest of the treatments              Chaudhary, M., Singh, S., Babu, S. and
and lowest was observed in natural                           Prasad, M. (2018). Effect of
farming treatment (6.60 kg ha-1 mm-1)                        integrated nutrient management on
(Table 2).This might be due to higher                        productivity, nutrient acquisition and
amount of rainfall during growing period                     economics of blackgram (Phaseolus
and higher yield in package of practice                      mungo L.) in an inceptisol of eastern
treatment. These results are in line with                    Uttar Pradesh. Legume Research-An
findings of Meena (2009) in pigeonpea.                       International Journal. 41(5):759-762.
                                                       Choudhari, C.S., Mendhe, S.N., Pawar,
Economics                                                    W.S., Angole, A.S. and Nikam, R.
        Higher gross and net returns was                     R. (2001). Nutrient management in
found in package of practice treatment                       French bean. Journal of Soils and
(Rs.85,102 and 41,1357 ha-1 ) on pooled                      Crops. 11(1): 137-139.
basis (Table 2) followed by organic                    Dhaka, Y., Meena, R.S. and Kumar, S.
farming. However with respect to B: C                        (2016). Effect of INM on nodulation,
ratio, natural farming (1.91) was found on                   yield, quality and available nutrient
par with package of practice due to its                      status in soil after harvest of green
lower cost of inputs and less cost of                        gram.      Legume         Research-An
cultivation. The higher returns in package                   International Journal. 39(4): 590-594
were directly related to the yields. These             Dixit, P. M. and Elamathi, S. (2007).
observations were supported with the                         Effect of foliar application of DAP,
findings of Quddus et al. (2012) and also                    micronutrients and NAA on growth
by Choudhary et al. (2018).                                  and yield of green gram (Vigna
                                                             radiate L.). Legume Research--An
                                                 262
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
     International Journal.     30(4):305-                  partitioning    of     mung       bean
     307.                                                   (Vignaradiata) in arid Western
Keerthi, P., Sharma, S. K. and Chaudhary,                   Rajasthan. Journal of Environment
     K. (2018). Zero Budget Natural                         and Ecology 31 (1):131-134.
     Farming: An Introduction. In                      Meena, S. L., Dhamsuddin, M. and
     Research Trends in Agriculture                         Dayal, D. (2009). productivity of
     Sciences; AkiNik Publications: New                     clusterbean        and       sesamum
     Delhi, India. pp. 111–123.                             intercropping system under different
Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L., Kätterer,                     row ratios and nutrient management.
     T., Andrén, O. and Andersson, R.                       Indian Journal of Agricultural
     (2008).     Can      Organic     Crop                  Science. 79(11): 901-905.
     Production Feed the World? In                     Quddus, M. A., Rashid, M. H., Hossain,
     Organic       Crop       Production—                   M. A., Naser, H. M. and Abedin
     Ambitions        and      Limitations;                 Mian. J. (2012). Integrated nutrient
     Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L., Eds.;                    management for sustaining soil
     Springer:        Dordrecht,       The                  Fertility     through        chickpea-
     Netherlands, pp. 39–72.                                mungbean- t.aman Cropping pattern
Kumawat, N., Singh, R.P., Kumar, R.,                        at madaripur region. Bangladesh
     Kumari, A. and Kumar, P. (2012).                       Journal of Agricultural Research.
     Response of intercropping and                          37(2): 251–262.
     integrated nutrition management on                Subramani, M. and Solaimalai, A. (2000).
     production potential and profitability                 Influence of plant populations and
     on rainfed pigeon pea. Journal of                      methods of nutrient application on
     Agricultural Science. 4: 154-162.                      growth        and        yield       of
Mariappan, K. and Zhou, D. (2019). A                        blackgram. Legume
     Threat of Farmers’ Suicide and the                     Research. 23(3):197-198.
     Opportunity in Organic Farming for                Willer, H., Lernoud, J. (Eds.). (2017). The
     Sustainable               Agricultural                 World of Organic Agriculture:
     Development           in        India.                 Statistics and Emerging Trends,
     Sustainability, 11, 2400.                              Research Institute of Organic
Meek, D. and Anderson, C.R. (2020).                         Agriculture        (FiBL):       Frick,
     Scale and the politics of the organic                  Switzerland.
     transition in Sikkim, India. Organic              Yakadri, M. and Thatikunta, R.,
     Agriculture. 11: 27–40.                                (2002). Effect of soil application of
Meena, R.S. (2009). Effect of organic and                   potassium and DAP spray in
     inorganic sources of nutrient on                       blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Madras
     growth attributes and dry matter                       Agricultural Journal. 89: 147-149.
                                                 263
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Details of nutrient, pest and disease management in blackgram
                                              Nutrient management
Treatment details             Blackgram
                              Beejamrutha: Seed treatment
T1: Zero Budget Natural
                              Ghanajeevamrutha: 400 kg/acre Jeevamrutha: 200 litre/acre
farming method (ZBNF)
                              Mulching @ 2 tonn/acre
                              Seed treatment (acre): Rhizobium (200 gm) +PSB (200 gm)
T2: Organic         farming
                              N eq. vermicompost: 660 kg/acre
practice (OF)
                              Mulching @ 2 tonn/acre
                              Seed treatment (acre): Rhizobium (500 gm) +PSB (500 gm)
T3: Package of practice
                              10:20:0 kg N:P:K/acre
(POP)
                              FYM: 2.00 tonnes/acre
                              6.61 kg Nitrogen/acre
T4: Farmers practice (FP)     16.88 kg Phosphorus/acre
                              FYM: 1.28 tonnes/acre
                                                Pest management
T1: Zero Budget Natural       Leaf eating caterpillar: Agniastra @ 30ml/ liter
farming method (ZBNF)         Pod borers: Brahmastra @ 30ml/ liter
T2: Organic farming           Leaf eating caterpillar and Pod borers: Neem oil (10000 ppm) @ 5%
practice (OF)
T3: Package of practice Sucking pests: Seed treatment with Imidacloprid 60 FS @ 10ml/kg of seeds
(POP)                     Leaf eating caterpillar and Pod borers: Emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.3 g/liter
T4: Farmers practice (FP) Leaf eating caterpillar and Pod borers: Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC @ 0.5 ml/liter
                                          Disease management
T1: Zero Budget Natural  Seed treatment with Beejamrutha
farming method (ZBNF)       Spray of butter milk immediate after notice of the disease incidence
                            Seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 4 gm/kg
T2: Organic farming
                            Spray of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 10 g/l immediate after the notice of
practice (OF)
                               disease incidence
                            Seed treatment with Trichoderma @ 5 g/kg
T3: Package of practice
                            Spray of Hexaconazole 5% SC @ 1 ml/l immediate after notice of the
(POP)
                               disease incidence
                            No seed treatment
T4: Farmers practice (FP)   Spray of Carbendazim 50 WP @ 1 g/l immediate after notice of the disease
                               incidence
                                                 264
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2: Effect of different management practices on productivity and economics of
blackgram (Data pooled over 3 years)
                                                       Production
                             Stover      Biological                        Rainwater       Gross         Net
                 Yield                                  efficiency                                                  B:C
                              yield        yield                         use efficiency   returns      returns
  Treatments            -1                                          -1                                              ratio
                (kg ha )                                (kg day          (kg ha-1 mm-1)
                             (kg ha-1)   (kg ha-1)                                        (Rs. ha-1)   (Rs. ha-1)
                                                          ha-1)
 T1: ZBNF         1084        1404         2488             12.46            6.60          72463        34076       1.91
 T2: OF           1237        1528         2765             14.22            7.53          83411        38134       1.89
 T3: POP          1364        1704         3068             15.68            8.31          85102        41357       1.97
 T4: FP           1131        1479         2610             13.00            6.89          70510        28524       1.70
                   39          49           69              0.41             0.22            101          88        0.02
    S.Em.±
                                                      265
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 266
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
expressed in mg of triphenylformazan                    treatment produced 26.7 per cent greater
(TPF) formed per gram of soil per day.                  grain yield (1557 kg ha-1)over farmers
Soil phosphatase activity was determined                practice. Yield reduction in natural
as per the standard procedure. The                      farming treatment was 28.5% over NF
intensity of yellow colour was measured at              whereas 16.63 % over OF. The significant
420 nm against the reagent blank. The                   difference in seed yield was may be due to
samples were also analysed for NPK by                   presence of greater nutrients in regional
following standard procedures (Sparks,                  production practices as compared to rest of
Methods of Soil Analysis). Grain yield of               the treatments.
pigeonpea was estimated from net plot
area. Soil samples were analysed for                    CONCLUSION
enumeration of bacteria, fungus and
                                                                Results showed that natural
actinomycetes.
                                                        farming soils established more microbial
                                                        activities compared to other farming
RESULTS
                                                        systems       indicating     soil     health
        Results showed that significantly               conservation. Natural farming soils did not
higher population of bacteria (55.70×                   produce comparative yield due to less
106cfu/g of soil), fungi (19.40× 104cfu/g of            available nutrients but nutrient status was
soil) and actinomycetes (26.10 × 103cfu/g               believed to increase year wise thereby
of soil) were recorded in NF followed by                increasing crop yield along with less cost
treatment OF which recorded bacteria                    of cultivation. To conclude, for sustainable
(48.00× 106cfu/g of soil), fungi (17.10×                production of crop yield soils must be rich
104cfu/g of soil) and actinomycetes                     in nutrients and microorganisms which can
(20.30× 103cfu/g of soil) as compared to                be attained by regular use of combined
other treatments. The increased microbial               natural and organic farming systems.
population in NF was may be due to
continuous apply of jeevamrutha which
has vast microbial load and helps to build
up microbial population of rhizosphere.
Seed yield produced in different farming
systems showed that package of practices
Table 1: Effect of different farming systems on microbial population, enzyme activity and
grain yield of pigeon pea rhizosphere
                                                 267
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        Indian agriculture scenario has faced              sunflower and 50-25-00 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha-1
many problems after green revolution viz.,                 for rabi sorghum). The organic manures were
stagnation or even decrease in production and              applied     every    year     equivalent     to
productivity of major crops, deterioration of              recommended N in rabi sorghum and P in
soil fertility, decline in factor productivity,            sunflower. Yields and soil fertility were
low diversity of production systems and                    assessed every year in different treatments.
increasing cost of production. (Sharma and
Subehia, 2014). To mitigate all these ill                  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
effects, the possible way is through the use of
                                                                   The six crop rotation cycles were
only organics or integrated nutrient
                                                           completed in the year 2019-20. The data
management either in crops or cropping
                                                           recorded with sunflower crop after 3rd cycle
system in long term. Especially the long term
                                                           (six years) showed that treatments of
experiments which are offer a great unique
                                                           integrated system, organic system and
opportunity to test the relevance of these
                                                           recommended package were on par with each
concepts in different cropping systems. It also
                                                           other and superior over inorganic package
provides insights into the consequences of
                                                           with respect to seed yields and net returns.
land management strategies that cannot be
                                                           Whereas in sorghum after 4th cycle (4 th year)
obtained through other means. Keeping all
                                                           treatments of integrated system, organic
these in mind the present study was initiated.
                                                           system and recommended package were on
METHODOLOGY                                                par with each other and superior over
    The present investigation entitled                     inorganic package with respect to seed yields
“Productivity, profitability and soil fertility as         and net returns (Table 1). These results are in
influenced by sunflower-rabi sorghum                       conformity with the findings of Sharma and
cropping system under long term nutrient                   Subehia (2014) and Urkurkar et al. (2010).
management was studied in a vertisol. Where                The soil fertility status (Available N, P2O5
sunflower-rabi       sorghum       (2       years          and K2O) and microbial population were
rotation)being grown since 2008-09 on a                    improved substantially with organic and
fixed location at Bio-farm, Organic Farming                integrated management practices. The initial
Research Station, UAS, Raichur. Experiment                 level of organic carbon in soil was 0.45 per
consisted of five treatments viz., T1: 75 %                cent, which was increased marginally because
N/P through organics, T2: 100 % N/P                        of adoption of different nutrient management
through organics, T3: Integrated N                         systems; the higher organic carbon content
management (50 % N/P through organics and                  (0.67 %) was in 100% organic treatment,
50 % N/P through organics), T4: 100 % N                    which was on par with integrated and RPP
through       inorganics       (RDF),         T5:          treatment (Table 2). The lower organic
Recommended package of practice (RPP),                     carbon of 0.43 % was recorded in inorganic
which were replicated four times and laid out              system.
in RCBD design. The optimum NPK was i.e.,
100% NPK (35-50-35 kg N-P2O5-K2O ha-1for
                                                     268
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSIONS:                                           REFERENCES:
        Treatments of integrated system,               Sharma, Upinder and Subehia, S. K. 2014.
organic system and recommended package                      Effect of long-term integrated nutrient
were on par with each other and superior over               management on rice (Oryza sativa L.)-
inorganic package with respect to seed yields               wheat      (Triticum     aestivum     L.)
and net returns in Sunflower crop from 3rd                  productivity and soil properties in
cycle (6th year) and sorghum after 4th cycle (              North-Western Himalaya. Journal of
4th year) onwards. The soil fertility status                the Indian Society of Soil science
(Available N, P2O5 and K2O) and microbial                   62:248-254.
population were also improved substantially            Urkurkar, J. S., Tiwari, A., Chitale, S. and
with organic and integrated management                      Bajpai, R. K. 2010. Influence of long
practices. The results clearly indicated that               term use of inorganic and organic
the system can be successfully adopted with                 manures on soil fertility and sustainable
organic production under rainfed eco-system.                productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) and
                                                            wheat      (Triticum     aestivum)     in
                                                            Inceptisols.     Indian    Journal     of
                                                            Agricultural Sciences 80(3):208-12.
                                                 269
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya,
India
Table 1: Effect of different nutrient management practices on yield and economics of Sunflower - rabi sorghum cropping system
Organic
                  637       553          1252        687       335         710          688       1370           2518a          1603       2058       40876      26162      2.42
(75%N/P)
Organic
                  752       602          1494        676       368         723          860       1508           2706           1892       2898       49984      33734      2.62
(100%N/P)
Integrated
                  850b      712          1513        623       411         803          782       1873           2483           1665       2435       35227      22305      2.43
(50:50)
Inorganic (RDF) 885 723 1476 706 321 920 923 1581 2210 1480 1863 36604 24316 2.65
RDF+FYM 1050 764 1672 666 398 1220 1024 1945 2416 1700 2650 41658 27753 2.74
C.D. at 5% 130 128 231 NS 45 172 156 392 290 228 509 - - -
                                                                                  270
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2: Effect of different nutrient management practices on soil properties in
         sunflower-rabi sorghum cropping system at the end of six cycles (2019-20)
                                      Penetration
              BD          MWHC                    OC     N       P2O5 K2O Zn               Fe
Treatments                            resistance
              (Mg/m3 (%)              (MPa)       %      kg/ha                   mg/kg
Organic
              1.31        73.8        3.92        0.56 135.0 42.7         790.0 0.51       15.0
(75%N/P)
Organic
              1.29        74.6        3.82        0.67 163.0 63.15 883.5 0.61              17.0
(100%N/P)
Integrated
              1.32        73.3        3.61        0.62 163.8 66.30 884.6 0.59              16.0
(50:50)
Inorganic
              1.34        71.5        4.03        0.43 151.3 47.00 795.1 0.43              14.0
(RDF)
RDF+FYM 1.30              72.0        3.99        0.66 165.5 68.0         889.0 0.61       16.5
S. Em±         0.21       0.59        0.48        0.07 3.51 6.50          35.5   0.03      0.90
C.D. at 5% NS             1.83        NS          0.19 9.30 17.55 NS             0.07      NS
Initial        1.33       71.0        -           0.55 118.7 36.55 478.2 -                 -
                                                 271
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
   Effect of sulphur on soil fertility, nutrient use efficiency and yield of chickpea
                                   S.S. HADOLE AND P.A. SARAP
                     Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry
             Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra 444104
                                                 273
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                  compaired to control as shown by Jamal et
Soil pH                                                 al., (2010).
         The data presented in Table 1 in
                                                        Electrical conductivity
respect of pH of soil ranged from 7.91 to
7.95, indicating that soil was slightly                         The electrical conductivity is a
alkaline in reaction but not influenced                 measure of soluble salt concentration in
statistically. The higher value of pH was               soil. Higher amount of salts in soil restrict
recorded in the control treatment (T1). The             the nutrient uptake and thus affect the
lowest value soil pH was recorded in the                plant growth. The data in respect of
treatment S @ 30 kg ha-1 through                        electrical conductivity ranged from 0.27 to
Bentonite sulphur along with RDF (T6)                   0.31dS m-1. However, the data indicated
due to application of sulphur.Thesulphur                that the higher value (0.31 d Sm-1) was
applied to the soil from different sources              found in absolute control (T1) while lower
get converted into sulphate form and when               value (0.27 dS m-1) of electrical
it comes in contact with water it is                    conductivity was recorded in treatment
converted to the form of sulphuric acid                 (T6). Hence the uptake of nutrient, growth
which leads to lower down the pH of soil.               of crop was increased in treatment (T6).
Reduction in soil pH due to application of              The EC of soil was not influenced
sulphur was also reported by Mutowalet                  significantly in various treatments.
al., (2013), Motior et al., (2011). The plot
sulphur treated reduce soil pH as                               The EC of soil was not influenced
                                                        significantly in various treatments.
                                                                               pH
                        Treatments                            2017-    2018     2019-    Pooled
                                                                18      -19       20     Mean
 T1    Absolute control                                        7.94    7.95      7.97     7.95
 T2    S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                 7.95    7.93      7.95     7.94
 T3    RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                        7.96    7.92      7.93     7.94
 T4    T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur           7.94    7.93      7.95     7.94
       T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite
 T5
       Sulphur                                       7.93  7.92                  7.93     7.93
                        -1
       T2 + S @ 30 kg ha through Bento nite
 T6
       Sulphur                                       7.92  7.87                  7.89     7.90
                        -1
 T7    T2 + S @ 10 kg ha through Gypsum              7.90  7.92                  7.94     7.92
                        -1
 T8    T2 + S @ 20 kg ha through Gypsum              7.89  7.91                  7.90     7.90
                        -1
 T9    T2 + S @ 30 kg ha through Gypsum              7.87  7.92                  7.93     7.91
                                            SE (m) + 0.018 0.013                 0.018   0.010
                                            CD at 5% NS     NS                    NS     0.031
                                                  274
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2. Electrical conductivity of soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur
application
                                                                  Electrical conductivity (dS m-1)
                          Treatments                           2017-               2019-      Pooled
                                                                        2018-19
                                                                 18                   20      Mean
     T1   Absolute control                                      0.34       0.31      0.30      0.31
     T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)               0.35      0.27       0.28      0.30
     T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                      0.37       0.27      0.26      0.30
     T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur         0.35      0.26       0.25      0.29
     T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur        0.36      0.28       0.27      0.30
     T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur         0.38      0.22       0.21      0.27
     T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    0.34      0.26       0.25      0.28
     T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    0.32      0.26       0.24      0.27
     T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    0.31      0.26       0.25      0.28
                                                  SE (m) +     0.017      0.020     0.018     0.012
                                                  CD at 5%      NS         NS        NS        NS
                                                 275
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Table 3. Organic carbon of soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                             Organic carbon (g kg-1)
                               Treatments                            2017-               2019-      Pooled
                                                                              2018-19
                                                                       18                  20        Mean
       T1      Absolute control                                       3.47      5.07      4.98        4.51
       T2      S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                3.50      5.10      5.02       4.54
       T3      RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                       3.52      5.30      5.25       4.69
       T4      T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur          3.55      5.18      5.13        4.62
       T5      T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur         3.59      5.27      5.25        4.70
       T6      T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur          3.62      5.33      5.31        4.75
       T7      T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     3.53      5.15      5.19       4.62
  T8           T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     3.57      5.20      5.24       4.67
  T9           T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     3.60      5.27      5.26       4.71
                                                       SE (m) +      0.013      0.27      0.07       0.025
                                                      CD at 5%        NS        NS        NS         0.076
 Table 4. Avail. N (kg ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur
 application
                                                                              Avail. N (kg ha-1)
                           Treatments                                        2018-    2019-        Pooled
                                                                 2017-18
                                                                              19        20         Mean
  T1        Absolute control                                      171.0      190.3     192.3       184.5
 T2         S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)               178.0      204.9     204.9       195.9
 T3         RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                      182.8      221.6     225.7       210.0
 T4         T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur         188.0      218.3     221.5       209.3
 T5         T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur        194.1      226.6     227.2       216.0
 T6         T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur         198.6      238.3     233.5       223.5
 T7         T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    187.4      217.4     218.0       207.6
 T8         T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    192.5      225.8     223.2       213.8
 T9         T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                    195.3      233.3     228.7       219.1
            SE (m) +                                              9.19        7.29     8.27         2.19
            CD at 5%                                               NS         NS        NS          6.57
                                                     276
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
phosphorus status in soil of chickpea                   other hands sulphur is get react with
linearly from 14.18 to 15.87 with Bentonite             calcium as calcium sulphate and reduces
sulphur and from 14.13 to 15.72 with                    the fixation phosphorous. Similar findings
Gypsum respectively.                                    are reported by Singh et al. (2016), Islam
        Increased availability phosphorous              et al. (2013). Deshbharatar et al. (2010)
 with sulphur application may be due to                 indicated that application of S and P
 reduction of soil pH due to production of              improved soil fertility status and S alone
 sulphuric acid by soil microorganism. On               did not influence P availability.
 Table 5. Avail. P (kg ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur
 application
                                                                         Avail. P (kg ha-1)
                            Treatments                         2017-                          Pooled
                                                                        2018-19 2019-20
                                                                18                            Mean
      T1 Absolute control                                      11.25     12.92      12.40     12.19
      T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)             11.78     13.58      14.23     13.20
      T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                    12.21     14.92      15.31     14.15
      T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur       13.27     14.18      14.67     14.04
      T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur      14.64     15.13      15.54     15.10
      T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur       15.77     15.87      16.32     15.99
      T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  13.41     14.13      14.63     14.06
      T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  13.79     15.08      16.24     15.04
      T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  14.48     15.72      16.61     15.60
           SE (m) +                                             1.74      0.67       0.87     0.29
           CD at 5%                                             NS        NS         NS        0.88
                                                  277
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 6. Avail. K (kg ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur
application
                                                                          Avail. K (kg ha-1)
                           Treatments                                                2019-     Pooled
                                                               2017-18    2018-19
                                                                                       20      Mean
     T1 Absolute control                                       447.93     580.75     583.70    537.5
     T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)              454.27     581.91     585.20    540.5
     T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                     456.20     599.14     613.32    556.2
     T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur        460.00     602.41     616.92    559.8
     T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur       474.23     604.89     619.39    566.2
     T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur        489.07     608.67     623.25    573.7
     T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                   458.00     600.89     614.53    557.8
     T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                   465.07     604.18     618.04    562.4
     T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                   476.40     605.68     620.38    567.5
                                                   SE (m) +     12.93      6.42       9.45      3.35
                                                  CD at 5%       NS        NS         NS       10.03
                                                 278
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Table 7. Avail. S (kg ha-1) after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                         Avail. S (kg ha-1)
                          Treatments                          2017-    2018-     2019-      Pooled
                                                                18       19        20       Mean
     T1   Absolute control                                     9.44     9.68      9.52       9.55
     T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)              9.76     9.76     10.21       9.91
     T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                    10.83    12.51     13.44      12.26
     T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur       12.02    10.35     11.69      11.35
     T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur      14.05    12.21     14.00      13.42
     T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur       15.19    13.58     15.87      14.88
     T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  11.14    10.26     11.48      10.96
     T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  13.09    12.14     13.25      12.83
     T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                  14.35    13.29     15.21      14.28
                                                  SE (m) +     1.28     0.56      0.81       0.38
                                                 CD at 5%      3.84     1.68      2.43       1.14
DTPA Micronutrients                                    finding was also given by Cui and Wang
Zinc                                                   (2005), Malewar and Ismail (1997), Rayat
        The results in respect of available            and Skladanka (2009).
micronutrient status of soil at harvest of
                                                       Iron
chickpea are presented in Table 27. The
data showed that effect of sulphur                             The effect of sulphur application
application on available zinc content of               on available iron content of soil was found
soil was found to be non-significant.                  to be non-significant. The highest
However the highest available zinc (1.09               available iron (12.22 mg kg-1) was
mg kg-1) was observed in treatment of                  observed in treatment of application of S
application of S @ 30 kg ha-1 through                  @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite sulphur +
Bentonite sulphur + RDF (T6), whereas,                 RDF (T6). Whereas, the lowest available
the lowest available zinc (0.94 mg kg-1)               iron (10.77 mg kg-1) was recorded in
was recorded in control treatment T1. The              control treatment T1. The application of
application of increasing dose of sulphur              increasing dose of sulphur from 10 to 30
from 10 to 30 kg S per ha on sulphur                   kg S per ha on sulphur deficient soils
deficient soils increased the available zinc           increased the available iron status in soilof
status in soilof chickpea from 1.04 to 1.09            chickpea linearly from 11.47 to 11.90 mg
mg kg-1 with Bentonite sulphur and from                kg-1 with Bentonite sulphur and from 11.67
1.03 to 1.08 mg kg-1 with Gypsum,                      to 12.22 mg kg-1 with Gypsum,
respectively.                                          respectively.
        Although the results are no                            Non-significant increased in iron
significant but there is slight increased              availability was observed with sulphur
availability of Zn. According to Yoo                   application both by Bentonite S and
James (2003) Zn availability is increased              Through gypsum but slight increase in
with sulphur application is might be due               Bentonite S treatment       because it is
conversion of applied sulphur into                     readily soluble than gypsum. Similar
sulphuric acid by microorganism which                  finding was also given by Malewar and
help in reduction of soil pH. Similar                  Ismail (1997), Rahman et al.(2011).
                                                 279
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 8. Avail. Zn (g ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                             Avail. Zn (g ha-1)
                            Treatments                              2017-               2019- Pooled
                                                                             2018-19
                                                                      18                  20       Mean
     T1 Absolute control                                             0.46      1.20      1.15       0.94
     T2 S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                      0.51      1.22      1.28       1.00
     T3 RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                             0.54      1.26      1.31       1.04
     T4 T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur                0.58      1.24      1.29       1.04
     T5 T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur               0.60      1.27      1.33       1.07
     T6 T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur                0.64      1.28      1.35       1.09
                               -1
     T7 T2 + S @ 10 kg ha through Gypsum                             0.59      1.23      1.27      1.03
     T8 T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                           0.58      1.25      1.31      1.05
     T9 T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                           0.65      1.26      1.32      1.08
                                                      SE (m) +       0.05      0.07      0.07      0.016
                                                      CD at 5%       NS         NS        NS       0.047
Table 9. Avail. Fe (g ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                            Avail. Fe (g ha-1)
                                                                                                     Poole
                            Treatments                                                   2019-
                                                                2017-18     2018-19                    d
                                                                                          20
                                                                                                     Mean
     T1   Absolute control                                        10.30       11.07      10.95       10.77
     T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                 10.84       11.21      11.48       11.18
     T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                        11.32       11.59      11.81       11.58
     T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur           11.78       11.47      11.76       11.67
     T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur          12.24       11.73      11.92       11.96
     T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur           12.77       11.90      12.01       12.22
     T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                      12.36       11.36      11.68       11.80
     T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                      13.09       11.70      11.80       12.20
     T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                      13.28       11.84      11.91       12.34
                                                  SE (m) +        0.073       0.051      0.036        0.27
                                                 CD at 5%          NS          NS         NS          0.79
Manganese                                                increased the available manganese status
        The effect of sulphur application                in soilof chickpea linearly from 10.18 to
on available manganese content of soil                   10.68 mg kg-1 with Bentonite sulphur and
was found to be non-significant. The                     from 10.15 to 11.08 mg kg-1 with Gypsum,
highest available manganese (11.08 mg kg-                respectively.
1
  ) was observed in treatment of application                     Same as in Zn and Fe, manganese
of S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum + RDF                   availability was also non significantly
(T9), whereas, the lowest available                      improved with a application of sulphur by
manganese (8.22 mg kg-1) was recorded in                 different source but availability found with
control treatment T1. The application of                 Bentonite S , might be due to their higher
increasing dose of sulphur from 10 to 30                 solublities. Similar results was also given
kg S per ha on sulphur deficient soils                   by Rahman et al. (2011).
                                                  280
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 10. Avail. Mn (g ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                          Avail. Mn (g ha-1)
                            Treatments                           2017-    2018-    2019-        Pooled
                                                                   18       19       20         Mean
     T1   Absolute control                                        8.51     7.91     8.24         8.22
     T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                 8.90     8.70     8.92         8.84
     T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                        9.46     8.86     9.20         9.17
     T4   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur           9.87    10.10    10.58        10.18
     T5   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur         10.16    10.37    10.94        10.49
     T6   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur          10.43    10.50    11.11        10.68
     T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                      9.98    10.07    10.40        10.15
     T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     10.62    10.18    10.69        10.49
     T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     11.19    10.27    11.78        11.08
                                                   SE (m) +       0.90     0.62     0.76         0.17
                                                  CD at 5%        NS       NS        NS          0.50
Table 11. Avail. Cu (g ha-1) in soil after harvest of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                           Avail. Cu (g ha-1)
                        Treatments                                                     2019-      Pooled
                                                               2017-18     2018-19
                                                                                         20       Mean
   T1     Absolute control                                       1.38        1.41       1.39       1.39
   T2     S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)                1.44        1.49       1.57       1.50
   T3     RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                       1.47        1.61       1.66       1.58
   T4     T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur          1.49        1.64       1.70       1.61
   T5     T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through Bentonite Sulphur         1.52        1.66       1.72       1.64
   T6     T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur          1.54        1.68       1.76       1.66
   T7     T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     1.53        1.64       1.71       1.63
   T8     T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     1.55        1.65       1.74       1.65
   T9     T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                     1.57        1.67       1.75       1.66
                                                SE (m) +         0.06        0.08       0.07       0.020
                                                CD at 5%         NS          NS         NS        0.059
                                                  281
   Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
   Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
   Nutrient Use Efficiency                                 through bentonite sulphur and gypsum
           The apparent recovery efficiency                application.
   and agronomic efficiency is presented in                The highest GMR was noticed with soil
   Table 31. It revealed that the apparent                 application of S @ 30 kg ha-1 through
   recovery efficiency (REs) was found to                  Bentonite Sulphur + RDF followed by
   increase with increasing dose of sulphur.               soil application of S @ 30 kg ha-1 through
   However, it was found low in application                Gypsum + RDF. The highest B:C ratio of
   of S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite                     3.13 was found with soil application of S
   sulphur + RDF (T6) compared to                          @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite Sulphur +
   application of S @ 20 kg ha-1 through                   RDF followed by rati of 3.11 in
   Bentonite sulphur + RDF (T6). Whereas,                  treatment soil application of S @ 30 kg
   apparent recovery efficiency increased                  ha-1 through Gypsum + RDF.
   with increasing dose of sulphur application
   through Gypsum. The application of                      CONCLUSIONS
   increasing dose of sulphur from 10 to 30
                                                                   The significantly highest available
   kg S per ha on sulphur deficient soils
                                                           N, P, K, S and Micronutrients was
   increased the apparent recovery efficiency
                                                           registered with application of treatment S
   linearly from 26.20 to 29.95 % with
                                                           @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite sulphur
   Bentonite sulphur and from 17.40 to 21.90
                                                           along with RDF. Similary Maximum
   % with Gypsum, respectively. Agronomic
                                                           yield, NUE, GMR t B:C ratio was found
   efficiency (AEs) was found to decrease
                                                           with soil application of S @ 30 kg ha-1
   with increasing dose of sulphur application
                                                           through Bentonite Sulphur + RDF .
Table 12. Apparent recovery and agronomic efficiency of sulphur as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                                     Apparent        Agronomic
                                                           Yield     S uptake        recovery        efficiency
                     Treatments
                                                          (q ha-1)   (kg ha-1)   efficiency (REs)       (AEs)
                                                                                        (%)           (kg ha-1)
  T1   Absolute control                                   14.88        8.35              -                -
  T2   S free RDF (NPK through Urea, DAP, MOP)            19.05       11.60              -                  -
  T3   RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP, MOP)                   21.26       14.72            9.45              6.70
       T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Bentonite
  T4                                                      21.39       14.22           26.20             23.40
       Sulphur
       T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Bentonite
  T5                                                      23.40       17.59           29.95             21.75
       Sulphur
       T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Bentonite
  T6                                                      24.18       20.02           28.07             17.10
       Sulphur
  T7   T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                 20.76       13.34           17.40             17.10
  T8   T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                 21.91       15.93           21.65             14.30
  T9   T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through Gypsum                 23.48       18.17           21.90             14.77
                                                    282
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 13. Gross monetary returns (Rs. ha-1) and B:C ratio of chickpea as influenced by sulphur application
                                                                  Straw                              Cost of
                                                  Seed yield                                                        B:C
                    Treatments                                     yield      GMR         NMR        cultivati
                                                   (q ha-1)                                                         ratio
                                                                  (q ha-1)                              on
T1      Absolute control                             14.88         18.25      74235       38924       35311         2.10
        S free RDF (NPK through Urea,
T2                                                   19.05        23.63       95393       57776       37617         2.54
        DAP, MOP)
        RDF (NPK through Urea, SSP,
T3                                                   21.26        26.20      106473       66600       39873         2.67
        MOP)
        T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through
T4                                                   21.39        26.56      107086       69186       37900         2.83
        Bentonite Sulphur
        T2 + S @ 20 kg ha -1 through
T5                                                   23.40        28.77      116960       78660       38300         3.05
        Bentonite Sulphur
        T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through
T6                                                   24.18        30.16      121066       82366       38700         3.13
        Bentonite Sulphur
        T2 + S @ 10 kg ha-1 through
T7                                                   20.76        25.79      104018       66428       37590         2.77
        Gypsum
T8      T2 + S @ 20 kg ha-1 through
                                                     21.91        27.16      109813       72133       37680         2.91
        Gypsum
T9      T2 + S @ 30 kg ha-1 through
                                                     23.48        28.76      117471       79701       37770         3.11
        Gypsum
        SE (m) +                                     0.72          0.94       3629        3629
        CD at 5%                                     2.15          2.82       10879       10879
     *Cost of Gram as per MSP : 2017-18 – Rs. 4400/qtl, 2018-19 – Rs. 4620/qtl, 2019-20 – Rs. 4875/ qtl, *Cost of
     straw Rs. 300/qtl
                                                        283
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
REFERENCE                                                    zinc, iron, manganese and copper.
                                                             Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 42: 421-428.
Basumatary, A., J.J. Shange, D.
                                                       Patel, H.K., P.M. Patel, J.V. Suthar and
      Bhattacharya, K.N. Das and G.G.
                                                             M.R. Patel, 2014. Yield, quality and
      Kandali, 2017. Sulphur fertilization
                                                             post       harvest nutrient status of
      for increased yield of black gram and
                                                             chickpea       as     influenced      by
      soil fertility in an Inceptisols of
                                                             application       of    sulphur      and
      Assam. Annals of Plant and Soil
                                                             phosphorus fertilizer management.
      Res., 19 (4): 350-354.
                                                             Inter. J. of Scientific and Res. Publi.,
Bera, M and G.K. Ghosh, 2015. Efficacy
                                                             4 (7): 2250-3153
      of sulphur sources on green gram
                                                       Piper, C.S., 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis.
      (Vigna radiata l.) in red and lateritic
                                                             Asian Reprint, Hans Publication
      soil of west Bengal. Intel. J. of
                                                             Bombay, India.
      Plant,Animal and         Environ.
                                                       Scherer, H.W., S. Pacyna, K. Spoth and M.
      Sci., 5 (2): 2231-4490.
                                                             Schulz, 2008. Low levels of
Bhatnagar, A., 2017. Mathematical
                                                             ferredoxin,        ATP               and
      Agriculture:        Concepts      and
                                                             leghemoglobin contribute to limited
      Numericals. Kalyani Publishers,
                                                             N2 fixation of peas (Pisum
      Ludhiana, pp: 61-62.
                                                               sativum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago
Chesnin, L. and C.H. Yien., 1951.
                                                             sativa L.) under sulphur deficiency
      Turbidimetric      determination     of
                                                             conditions. Biol.Fert. Soils,44: 909-
      available sulphur. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
                                                             916.
      Proc., 15: 149-151.
                                                       Singh, O., S. Kumar, A. Dwivedi, B.P.
Deshbhratar, P.B., P.K. Singh, A.P.
                                                             Dhyani and R.K. Naresh, 2016.
      Jambhulkar and D.S. Ramteke, 2010.
                                                             Effect of sulphur          and      iron
      Effect of sulphur and phosphorus on
                                                             fertilization on performance and
      yield, quality and nutrient status of
                                                             production         potential of urdbean
      pigeonpea (Cajanascajan). J. of
                                                             [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] and
      Environ. Biol., 31 (6): 933-937.
                                                             nutrients removal under Inceptisols.
Islam M., M. Akmal and M.A. Khan,
                                                             Legume Res., 39 (6): 946-954.
      2013. Effect of phosphorus and
                                                       Sipai, A.H., J.S. Jat, B.S. Rathore, K.
      sulphur application on soil nutrient
                                                             Sevak and J.S. Jodha, 2015. Effect of
      balance under chickpea (Cicer
                                                             phosphorus, sulphur and biofertilizer
      arietinum) monocropping. Rom
                                                             on productivity and soil fertility after
      Agric. Res., 30: 223-232.
                                                             harvest of moongbean grown on
Jackson, M.L., 1973. Soil Chemical
                                                             light textured soil of Kachchh. Asian
      Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt.,
                                                             J. of Soil Sci.,10 (2): 228-236.
      Ltd., New Delhi.
                                                       Subbiah, B.V. and G.L. Asija, 1956. A
Lindsay, W.L., and W.A. Norvell, 1978.
                                                             rapid procedure for the estimation of
      Development of a DTPA soil test for
                                                             available nitrogen in soils. Current
                                                             Sci., 25: 259-260.
                                                 284
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
         Dolichos bean [(Lablab purpureus              under organic and natural farming versus
L.) Sweet] is a multi-utility and multi-               conventional farming system.
beneficial leguminous crop. It is grown for
vegetable, pulse, fodder, green manure,                MATERIAL AND METHODS
cover crop, medicine and ornamental
                                                               The partial budgeting frame work
purpose (Raghu et. al, 2018). In India, it is
                                                       was used to find out the debits and credits
popularly grown in south, east and north
                                                       of the adoption of ecological production
east parts of the country. It is the major
                                                       practices such as natural and organic
source of protein diet. With cultivated area
                                                       farming systems over conventional (based
of 0.085 million hectares and production
                                                       on the field trials conducted from 2019 to
of 0.030 million tones, Karnataka only
                                                       2022) in order to find impact/ externality
contributes about 90% of both area and
                                                       on per hectare basis.
production of Dolichos in India (Laxmi et
al., 2015). Dolichos bean produces more                RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
biomass per unit area and time, and thus
act as a very good natural mulch and thus                       The partial budgeting (Table1) is
reducing soil erosion due to runoff water.             used to highlight each of the different
Moreover, it adds biomass to soil and                  components especially highlighting the
improves soil health by enriching soil                 reduced returns or savings due to the
carbon content. Further, it fixes                      natural and organic farming technology.
atmospheric nitrogen symbiotically with                Cultivation of dolichos bean in natural
beneficial microorganism and improves                  farming does not require chemical
the soil fertility. It can also withstand              fertilizers, pesticides/fungicides and also
drought better than other legumes like                 application of FYM. Due to use of
bean and cowpea. Thus, it is an important              jeevamruth         and      ghanajeevamrut,
crop when considering food, nutritional                application of mulch reduced the cost of
and economic security to poor and                      weeding and also intern reduced the cost
marginal farmers, ecosystem stability and              of cultivation. As conventional dolichos
climate change. But, the farmer knowingly              uses 100 per cent of crop water
or unknowingly use excessive inorganic                 requirement, the dolichos bean grown
fertilizers which leads to reduction in crop           under natural farming needs only 50 per
yield, creates poor physical properties of             cent of crop water requirement. Here, 40
the     soil    and     nutrient   retention           per cent of water supplied was saved and
characteristics hence, adversely affecting             also saved 2400 m3/crop season* and 7
crop growth and yield. Keeping the above               man days for irrigation i.e. Rs. 37750 per
facts in view, the experiment was                      hectare. The results of the partial
conducted with the objective to compare                budgeting is applicable for wider area
the economics of dolichos bean cultivation             under natural farming of dolichos bean,
                                                 285
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
linear extrapolation of the benefits of Rs.                 Laxmi, K., Vaijayanthi, P.V., Keerthi,
36,698 per hectare is not tenable due to the                      C.M., Shivakumar, M.S., Ramesh, S.
operation of the law of diminishing                               and Mohan Rao, A. 2015. Genotype-
marginal returns at an early stage in                             dependent       photoperiod-induced
agriculture. These implicitly capture the                         sensitivity to flowering time in
operation of the LDMR since the field                             Dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.)
conditions are not akin to the lab                                sweet var. lignosus. Bangladesh
conditions and the farmer is different from                       Journal of Botany 45 (3): 471-476
the researcher. Accordingly the economic                    Raghu, B.R., Samuel, D.K., Mohan, N.
impact of cultivation of dolichos bean                            and Aghora, T.S. 2018. Dolichos
under natural farming, according to NRE,                          bean : An underutilized and
is weighted by the probability of                                 unexplored crop with immense
performance, rate of adoption and                                 potential. Int. J. Recent adv.
depreciation of dolichos bean in natural                          Multidisciplinary Research 05 (12):
farming works out to 36,698*0.5*0.6*0.8                           4338-4341.
= Rs.8808/ha. Similarly, the economic                       Ranjit Kumar, Sanjiv Kumar, B.S.,
impact according to environmental                                 Yashavanth, P.C., Meena,, A.K.,
economics costing works out to Rs.11130                           Indoria, Sumanta Kundu, M. and
x0.5*1 x 0.6**2 x 0.8***3 = Rs. 2,671 per                         Manjunath. 2020.       Adoption of
hectare as it includes the value of                               Natural Farming and its Effect on
environmental      benefit     from      the                      Crop Yield and Farmers' Livelihood
improvement of soil organic carbon over                           in India. ICAR-National Academy of
the years.                                                        Agricultural Research Management,
                                                                  Hyderabad, India.
CONCLUSTION                                                 Chandrakanth, M.G., Priyanka, C.N.,
                                                                  Mamatha, P. and Kiran Kumar Patil.
        This study used partial budgeting
                                                                  2013. Economic benefits from micro
framework with a synergistic involvement
                                                                  irrigation for dry land crops in
of economists and scientists for proper
                                                                  Karnataka, Indian Journal of
quantification of research innovations. It
                                                                  Agricultural Economics, 68 (3),
uses a simple, transparent and easy to
                                                                  July-Sep 2013, pp. 326-338.
understand template and infers that
dolichos bean cultivation under natural
farming is economically worthwhile as the
economic impact of the technology is Rs.
36,698 per hectare. The environmental
economic impact of dolichos bean
cultivation by considering improvement in
soil carbon is Rs. 47,848 per hectare.
REFERENCES
1
  *refers to probability of performance of dolichos
bean cultivation under natural farming system in
farmers' fields since there are no controlled
conditions as in the research station as estimated
by scientists
2
 ** refers to what percentage of technology is
adopted by farmers in the field as estimated by
scientists
3
  *** refers to depreciation of technology over
time as estimated by scientists
                                                      286
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1. Economic impact of dolichos bean cultivation under natural farming system
A. Items of added expenditure due       Cost     C. Reduced cost (or Savings) due         Cost
to cultivation of Dolichos Bean         (Rs./ha) to cultivation of dolichos bean          (Rs./ha
under Natural Farming System                     under Natural Farming System             )
(NFS)                                            (NFS)
  1. Additional cost of application      600     Savings         cost of chemical         4118
     of PPC                                      fertilizers (urea+DAP+MOP)
  2. Total additional cost due to        600     Savings cost of plant protection         6343
     cultivation of dolichos bean                chemicals
     under Natural farming system
  3. Opportunity cost of capital :      30        Saving irrigation water 2400 m3/yr 36000
     Interest on total additional                 or (40%)
     expenditure @ 5 % per year
     for 6 months
  4. Management cost @ 5% of            30        Savings of 7 man days for 1750
     additional expenditure                       irrigation
  5. Risk premium @ 5% of               30        B. Added returns due to 0
     additional expenditure                       cultivation of dolichos bean under
                                                  NFS
B. Reduced returns due to 690
cultivation of dolichos bean under
NFS
Reduced yield of 17.34q * Rs. 52020
3000over conventional dolichos
bean
Total debit side (A + B)           52710 Total credit side (C +D)        48211
Economic impact of dolichos bean cultivation under Natural farming system over
conventional (Rs. 52710 minus Rs. 48,211 = ) Rs. 4,499/ha
                                                 287
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 288
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
cluster bean when seeds were soaked in 5                during the study period from 2019 to 2022.
per cent cow urine. Since jeevamrutha                   Thus, from the above result clears that,
contains the cow urine which might have                 less nutrient exhaustive and hardy crops
influenced the growth and yield in cluster              like cluster bean could be grown both
bean. Among the four farming systems,                   under organic and natural farming system.
significantly lower cost of cultivation (Rs.
97889 / ha) was recorded in NF compare                  REFERENCES
to other treatments. In natural farming
                                                        Selvarani, K., Anushavardhini, S., Jose, J.
system inputs like FYM, inorganic
                                                               J. and Mariselvi, V. 2021. Effect of
fertilizers and chemicals were not used.
                                                               organic foliar sprays on yield of
But the higher benefit cost ratio was
                                                               cluster      bean       (Cyamopsis
recorded in OF (1.89) treatment followed
                                                               tetragonoloba L. Taub) cv.
by NF (1.80) (Table 2). The findings are in
                                                               PusaNavbahar. Scient. Res. &
agreement with Ashoka et al. (2021).                           Essays. 16 (2):8-14.
CONCLUSION                                              Ashoka, N. Raju, R..,           Ravi, Y.,
                                                               Harshavardhan,                  M.,
        Among the different farming                            ShivanandHongal, Pushpa, P.
systems, organic farming was found better                      2021. Economic Analysis of
in terms of yield followed by package of                       Cluster      Bean       [Cyamopsis
practice, natural farming and farmers                          tetragonoloba (L.)            Taub]
practice. However, in terms of economics,                      Entrepreneurs      in    Karnataka,
both organic and natural farming systems                       Legume res.,44 (12): 1465-1469.
were found superior than compare to the
other farming systems in the study area
Table1. Yield attributes in cluster bean as influenced by different farming practices (Pooled
         of four years)
                                       Pod               Pod
                            No of pods                                  Fresh      pod Yield
Treatments                             length            diameter
                            per plant                                   weight (g)     (q /ha)
                                       (cm)              (mm)
T1 : Package of practice    88.24b           10.43       6.87           3.64a             42.8b
T2 : Farmers’ practice      85.22b           9.98        7.00           3.05c             38.33c
T3 : Natural farming        92.31b           9.55        8.00           3.36b             39.18bc
T4 : Organic farming        100.04a          10.59       7.99           3.77a             47.03a
S.Em.±                      2.47             0.27        0.36           0.06              0.13
CD(p=0.05)                  7.61             NS          NS             0.19              0.39
                                                  289
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 2. Economic analysis of cluster bean as influenced by different farming systems
         (Pooled of four years)
                                                                    Percent difference
                       Package
SI.                             Farmers Natural Organic
    Particulars        of                                         (NF                        (OF
No                              Practice farming farming (FP over
                       practice                                   over                       over
                                                         POP )
                                                                  POP)                       POP)
1    Yield (q/ha)      42.8     38.33    39.18   47.03   -11.66   -9.25                      8.98
     Cost         of
2    Cultivation     113071        113073     97889      116235     0.002        -15.51      2.72
     (Rs./ha)
     Gross return
3                 173898           150165     175753     220255     -15.80       1.06        21.05
     (Rs./ha)
     Net      return
4    (Rs./ha)        60827         37092      77864      104020     -63.99       21.88       41.52
     Cost       of
     production
5                  2642            2950       2499       2472       10.45        -5.73       -6.88
     (Rs/q.)
                                                 290
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 291
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
index of soil fertility and microbial                           The field experiment was carried
functional diversity in catalyzing several             out at Natural farming project plots at
biochemical reactions which are necessary              Main Agricultural Research Station,
for the life processes of soil micro-                  University of Agricultural Sciences,
organisms, organic wastes decomposition,               Dharwad. Soil samples were drawn from
organic matter formation and nutrients                 the groundnut crop rhizosphere at
cycling.                                               flowering and harvest stage of the crop of
       Groundnut (Vigna radiata L.) also               4th year permanent plot cycle and were
called as peanut, is one of the important              analyzed for microbial population using
legume crops grown mainly for edible oil               serial dilution agar plating method and
and     widely     grown     in tropics and            dehydrogenase enzymatic activity (Casida
subtropics, being important to both small              etal., 1964).
and large commercial producers. In 2020,                        The experiment consists of four
world production of groundnut was 54                   treatments with five replications viz., 1.
million tonnes, an 8% increase over 2019               Natural farming (NF) 2. Organic farming
production. China had 34% of global                    (OF) 3. Conventional farming (CnF) 4.
production, followed by India (19%)                    Chemical farming (CF) and the results are
making India as second largest producer of             analyzed using the Quadratic sample
groundnut.                                             technique in RCBD design. The inputs
                                                       used in different treatments are as follows
                                                 292
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
        At flowering stage, among the                  harvest stage (Table 2). At flowering stage,
different practices, the bacterial population          phosphorous       solubilizing     microbial
was significantly higher in natural farming            population was significantly higher in
practice (70.25 × 105 CFU/g of soil)                   natural farming practices (36.75 × 104
followed by conventional farming practice              CFU/g of soil) followed by conventional
(66.25 × 105 CFU/g of soil) and lowest                 farming (26.50 × 105 CFU/ g of soil) and
population was observed in chemical                    lowest in chemical farming. Same trend
farming (40.00 × 105 CFU/ g of soil).                  was observed at harvest stage. At
Same trend was followed at harvest stage               flowering stage, significantly higher
(Table 1). The fungal population was                   dehydrogenase enzyme activity was
found significantly higher in conventional             observed in natural farming (107.84 µg
farming practice (6.00 × 10 4 CFU/ g of                TPF formed g-1 soil day-1), which was on
soil), which was on par with organic                   par with organic farming. Lowest was
farming and lowest was observed in                     observed in chemical farming (82.45 µg
chemical farming (1.25 × 10 4 CFU/ g of                TPF formed g-1 soil day-1). Whereas, at
soil) during flowering. The actinomycetes              harvest    stage,    significantly   higher
population was significantly higher in                 dehydrogenase enzyme activity was found
natural farming (19.50 × 103 CFU/g of                  in organic farming (99.20 µg TPF formed
soil) which was on par with organic                    g-1 soil day-1) followed by natural and
farming and lowest was recorded in                     conventional farming practices. Addition
chemical farming (11.50 × 103 CFU/g of                 of organic substances to the soil served as
soil) at flowering stage. However, at                  a carbon source that enhanced microbial
harvest stage higher actinomycetes                     biomass and enzymatic activity in organic
population was observed in organic                     farming practice (Bohem et al., 2005).
farming (8.50 × 103 CFU/g of soil)
followed by conventional farming practice              CONCLUSION
and lowest in chemical farming practice.
                                                               When compared to all the farming
         Higher microbial population in
                                                       practices, natural and organic farming
natural and organic farming practices was
                                                       practices found superior with respect to
due to the addition of natural inputs to the
                                                       biological properties such as general,
soil          through             jeevamruta,
                                                       beneficial microflora and dehydrogenase
ghanajeevamrutha, organic formulations
                                                       enzyme activity. Hence, natural and
which consists of animal guts microflora.
                                                       organic farming practices can be adopted
The addition of organic manures greatly
                                                       in farmer’s field.
influences the microbial population which
expected to cause changes in the organic               REFERENCES
matter content of soil that directly
influenced microbial dynamics of soil                  Bohem L, Langer U and Bohem F, 2005,
(De Forest et al., 2012).                                     Microbial      biomass,     enzyme
        At flowering stage, nitrogen fixers                   activities      and       microbial
were observed significantly higher in                         community structure in two
natural farming (32.25 × 105 CFU/ g of                        European        long-term      field
soil) which was on par with organic                           experiments.            Agriculture,
farming (31.50 × 105 CFU/ g of soil).                         Ecosystems and Environment,
Lowest population was observed in                             109: 141–152.
conventional (19.50 × 105 CFU/ g of soil)              Casida L E, KlienD A and Santoro T,
and chemical farming (18.50 × 105 CFU/ g                      1964, Soil dehydrogenase activity.
of soil). Similar trend was followed at                       SoilSci., 98:371-376.
                                                 293
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
De Forest J L, Smemo K A, Burke D J,                    Tripathi    S, Shruti Nagbhushan and
        Elliott H L and Becker J C, 2012,                          Tauseef Shahidi, 2018, Zero
        Soil microbial responses to                                Budget Natural Farming for the
        elevated phosphorus and pHin                               Sustainable Development Goals,
        acidic    temperate    deciduous                           Andhra Pradesh, India.
        forests. Biogeochemistry, 109:
        189-202.
                                                 294
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 295
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSION                                                    Synch Protocols. Scientific Papers:
                                                              Animal             Science        &
         The serum mineral and hormonal                       Biotechnologies/LucrariStiintifice:
profiles in post-partum anestrus cow                          ZootehniesiBiotehnologii. 51:     1-
varied significantly between normal and                       10.
postpartum anoestrus cows which showed                 Ergene O. 2013. Improving repeat breeder
lower than the normal range. An                               cows       fertility    by    estrus
improvement has been noticed in terms of                      synchronization: comparison of
serum mineral and hormonal profiles along                     PRID+ PGF2α+ GnRH and GnRH
with conception in post-partum anestrus                       + PGF2α + GnRH protocols.
cow while we used fixed timed A.I.                            Scientific Papers Series D Anim.
protocols.      Finally, concerning estrus                    Sci.56: 172-174.
response, fertility rate, costs and the                Geary TW, Whittier JC, Thrift FA,
simplicity of methods it can be concluded                     Dolezal SL. 1998. Effects of a
that the Select-synch protocol may be a                       timed     insemination following
more efficient method for fixed-time                          synchronization of ovulation using
artificial insemination program                               the Ovsynch or CO-Synch protocol
                                                              in beef cows. The Professional
REFERENCES
                                                              Animal Scientist. 14(4): 217-220.
Biradar S, Tandle MK, Suranagi MD,                     Singh M, Sharma A, Kapse S, Kashyap A,
       Usturge SM, PatilNA,Babu YH.                           Kumar P. 2019. Efficacy of
       2014. Study on efficacy of cosynch                     different estrus synchronization
       and ovsynch protocols on fertility                     protocols in repeat breeder
       in repeat breeder buffaloes. Buffalo                   cows. Indian J.Anim. Sci. 89(9):
       Bulletin. 35(4):737-743.                               958-960.
                                                       Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1994. In:
Caraba I, Pacala N, Nicula M, Droca D,                        Statistical Methods. 8th edn.Oxford
      Erina S. 2018. Stimulating                              and IBH.Pub.Cp. New Delhi.
      Reproductive Functions at Acyclic
      Cows by Ovsynch and Select
                                                 296
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  298
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Effect of vermicompost and panchagavya levels on yield attributes of Maize landrace
(Project Mimpui)
                      Yield attributes
     Treatment        No. of cobsPlant-1   Cob length (cm)       No. of kernel cob-1   Seed Index (g)
Vermicompost level
     60% RDV                 1.25                11.73                  335.41                 11.2
   80% RDV                    1.5                12.14                  350.33                11.59
100% RDV                     1.83                 12.9                  379.58                12.44
       SEm+                 0.076                0.182                   4.97                  0.18
    CD (0.05)           0.298                    0.716                  19.55                 0.714
Panchagavya spray (PGS)
         P0                         1.11               11.63               345.44                 11.15
     50% PGS                        1.55               12.11               348.11                 11.62
     75% PGS                        1.55                 12.4              358.33                 11.86
   100% PGS                         1.88               12.88               368.55                 12.35
       SEm+                     0.169                  0.278                4.580                 0.148
     CD (0.05)                  0.504                  0.827                13.61                 0.441
                                                 299
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  300
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                      302
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                   305
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 306
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
compatible reaction with fungal and                    promoter. Progressive farmers, extension
bacterial       entomopathogens        and             functionaries, FPOs, SHG members and
nematopathogens and this study helps to                tea garden managers etc were trained on
develop a consortial bioformulation with               technical aspects of the bioformulations
multiple functions. Few biocontrol agents,             and its field use. MOA has been signed
showed positive reaction in different                  with Govt. of Nagaland, Govt. Meghalaya
functional attributes like Siderophore                 and JVES, West Bengal for the potential
production, ammonia production, zinc                   formulation like Um-Comb, Um-Met, Um-
solubilization, alpha amylase activity,                Tricho further mass multiplication and
chitinase production ability, glucanse                 large scale field use.
production was found with positive
reaction. Potential isolates of biocontrol             CONCLUSION
based liquid biopesticides (Um-Tricho,
                                                               The low-cost technology of native
Um-bir,      Um-Met,      Um-Pacil,    Um
                                                       biocontrol based bioformulation has
Comb)supplemented with osmoticants,
                                                       opened up a new avenue for sustainable
adjuvents,     sticker,    spreader,   UV
                                                       plant health management and is likely to
protectants, with a shelf life of 16 months
                                                       be a boon for seed industries who would
have been proved successful in a large
                                                       like to provide protection to seeds as well
number of field, vegetable, fruit and
                                                       as plants against a large number of seed,
flowering crops for the management of
                                                       soil- borne and foliar pests.
diseases and pests with plant growth
                                                 307
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  308
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 309
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
conversion ratio were found similar while              REFERENCES
feed cost (Rs/kg gain) of production per kg
live weight was reduced by Rs. 13.77 and               AOAC.1990.       Official    Methods   of
                                                                                 th
Rs.10.52 respectively in T2 and T3 groups                      Analalysis, 15 Edition, (Eds.
in comparison to T1 group.                                     Kenneth Helrich) Association of
                                                               Official Analytical Chemists,
CONCLUSION                                                     Inc., Suite 400, 2200 Wilson
                                                               Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia
        It is concluded that vegetable waste                   22201, USA.
based silage can be supplemented to                    BIS. 1986. BIS Specifications for
grower crossbred pigs @10 % level by                           Compounded Feeds for Pigs (IS:
replacing the maize in the diet without                        7472 – 1986), Bureau of Indian
affecting the production performances in                       Standard, 1986, India.
grower crossbred pigs.                                 Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran. (1989)
                                                               Statistical Methods, 8th Edition,
                                                               Iowa University press, Ames,
                                                               Iowa (USA).
Parameter T1 T2 T3 P Value
                                                 310
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 311
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
80, 40 and 0 kg P2O5 ha–1. However,                    conclusion, application of 80 kg P2O5 ha–1
higher phosphorus use efficiency such as               under ZT-B + R should be recommended
PFP (117.6 kg kg–1), and CRE (40.6 %)                  for soybean cultivation to achieve
was observed with lower application rate               optimum N, P and K concentration and
of 40 P2O5 ha–1, whereas higher AE (15 kg              accumulation by seed and stover, higher
kg–1) and PUE (47.8 kg kg–1) was noted                 marginal yield increase and P use
with application of 80 kg P2O5 ha–1. In                efficiency.
                                                 312
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 313
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
over PSL-9 (25.11 cm) and HUL-57                 by climatic condition and cultivation
(25.09 cm), however, it was at par with          practices. The results are agreed by Pandey
PDL-1 (26.76). The reason may be due to          et al., 2011; Yadav et al., 2015 reported in
genetical traits of a variety and the location   French      bean      crop.    Dry    matter
in which it grows. These findings are            accumulation was reported significantly
agreed by Das et al., 2014; Yadav et al.,        highest after 60 DAS during entire crop
2015 and Prakash and Ram, 2014.                  season for paddy straw mulch. The dry
Significant results were also found for          weight accumulation is increasing till
branches per plant among the organic             maturity, thereafter decreases till harvest
mulches (Table.1). However, paddy straw          due to utilization of dry matter for the
mulch (4.86) has shown more branches             production of economic yield up to
number per plant then by weed mulch              harvest. The reason might be the better
(4.40), maize stover mulch (4.25) and un-        plant growth and development due to
mulch (4.12). Similar results where,             better soil moisture availability under
mulching had a significant effect on             organic mulching practices. Similar results
branches per plant over control was given        were supported by the research findings of
by Singh at al., 2019 in summer Mash             Singh and Rana, 2006; Patil et al., 2011.
(Vigna mungo). The reason may be the             Significant results were found for dry
influence of soil moisture on plant growth       matter accumulation among the varietal
under mulched treatments. The significant        treatments (Table.1). The reason might be
results were also found for number of            due to genetic variation which is inherently
branches among the varietal treatments,          affected in different genotypes and also
where the variety PL-4 (4.82) and PSL-9          influenced      by     prevailing   climatic
(4.21) were recorded highest and lowest          conditions. The results are agreed by the
number of branches per plant, respectively.      research findings of Nwadike and Vange,
The number of branches per plant is              2015; Das et al., 2014.
chiefly a genetic trait but also influenced
Table 1: Effect of organic mulching on performance of lentil varieties
Treatments              Plant      Branches       Dry matter Pods        per Economic yield BCR
                        height     No.            (g plant-1) plant          (kg ha-1)
                        (cm)
Main plot (Organic mulches)
Un-mulch                  24.19    4.12           2.28           36.21         571.3             1.41
Paddy straw mulch
                          28.18    4.86           2.61           43.57         723.3             1.81
Maize stover mulch
                          25.57    4.25           2.38           38.18         638.7             1.56
Weed mulch
                          26.04    4.40           2.54           41.29         676.2             1.73
S.E.(m) ±                 0.56     0.14           0.05           0.94          27.3              0.07
C.D.(P=0.05)              1.94     0.50           0.16           3.24          94.6
                                                                                                 0.23
Sub-plot (Varieties)
HUL-57                    25.09    4.27           2.36           40.37         604.0             1.52
PL-4                      27.03    4.82           2.61           39.78         717.5             1.79
PDL-1                     26.76    4.33           2.46           41.92         643.6             1.59
PSL-9                     25.11    4.21           2.38           37.18         644.4             1.60
S.E.(m) ±                 0.58     0.13           0.04           0.88          21.5              0.05
C.D.(P=0.05)              1.70     0.39           0.10           2.57          62.7              0.16
                                                 314
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
        The significant results were found             stover mulch (1.56) and un-mulch (1.41),
for number of pods per plant, where paddy              however, it was at par with weed mulch
straw mulch (43.57) recorded highest pod               (1.73). The variety PL-4 (1.79) reported
number and the lowest pod number was                   significantly highest BCR over the other
reported by un-mulch treatment (36.21).                varieties.
This may be due to better soil moisture
availability under mulched conditions lead             CONCLUSIONS
to better plant growth and development.
                                                                Paddy straw mulch reported higher
Monneveux et al. (2006) reported that,
                                                       values in growth and yield parameters of
water stress at reproductive stages of the
                                                       lentil. Among the different varieties of
plant reduces the yield and yield
                                                       lentil, the significantly highest yield was
parameters. The results were also found
                                                       reported by the variety PL-4. Soil moisture
significant among the varieties, where the
                                                       is most important constraint for crop
varieties PDL-1 (41.92), PSL-9 (37.18)
                                                       production during the rabi season in NER
recorded highest and lowest number of
                                                       region. Therefore, the practice of paddy
pods per plant respectively. The reason
                                                       straw mulch along with the cultivation of
might be that, there is a correlation
                                                       lentil variety PL-4 is proved to be best
between number of branches per plant and
                                                       method to increase the crop yield and to
pods per plant, where the variety PL-4
                                                       improve the cropping intensity in NER
recorded the highest branches per plant
                                                       region during the moisture deficit winters.
which is on par with PDL-1. However, the
variety PSL-9 reported the least branches              REFERENCES
number and pods per plant. Significant
results among different varieties of crop              Kumar, V., Garkoti, A. and Tripathi, H.S.
for number of pods per plant was also                       (2013). Management of vascular wilt
reported by Gupta et al., 2006; Mondal et                   of lentil through biocontrol agents
al., 2011. The significant results were                     and organic amendments in Tarai
reported among mulch treatments for                         Area of Uttarakhand State. The
economic yield (Fig 5.21). Paddy straw                      Bioscan, 8(2): 575-577.
mulch reported significantly highest                   FAO. (2014). Annual report by Ministry of
economic yield (723.3kg ha-1) over the un-                  agriculture and farmers welfare,
mulch (571.3 kg ha-1), however, it was at                   Government of India.
par with weed mulch (676.2 kg ha-1) and                Kuotsu, K., Das, A., Lal, R., Munda, G.C.,
maize stover mulch (638.7 kg ha-1). These                   Ghosh, P.K. and Ngachan, S.V.
results may be due to adequate soil                         (2014). Land forming and tillage
moisture availability which promote better                  effects on soil properties and
uptake of nutrients form soil and helps in                  productivity of rainfed groundnut
better performance of the crop. Similar                     (Arachis hypogaea L.) - rapeseed
results are supported by findings of                        (Brassica campestris L.) cropping
Karunakaran and Behera, 2013; Reddy et                      system in northeastern India. Soil
al., 2016. Among the varietal treatments,                   and Tillage Res., 142: 15-24.
significantly highest economic yield was               Sharma, R.R. and Sharma, V.P. (2003).
reported by PL-4 (717.5 kg ha-1) over                       Mulch type influences plant growth,
PSL-9 (644.4 kg ha-1), PDL-1 (643.6 kg                      albinism disorder and fruit quality in
ha-1) and HUL-57 (604.0 kg ha-1). The                       strawberry. Fruits, 58(4): 221-227.
significant results for economic yield                 Das, R., Thapa, U., Debnath, S., Lyngdoh,
among the varietal treatments of rajma                      Y.A. and Mallick, D. (2014).
crop was reported by Marwein and Ray,                       Evaluation      of    French     bean
2019. Paddy straw mulch (1.81) reported                     (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
significantly highest BCR over maize                        for seed production. J. Appl. Nat.
                                                 315
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Sci., 6(2): 594-598.                             Nwadike, C. and Vange, T. (2015). Effects
Prakash, J. and Ram, R.B. (2014). Genetic                   of planting date on performance of
      variability, correlation and path                     common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
      analysis for seed yield and yield                     L.) landraces of the Jos plateau: A
      related traits in french bean                         preliminary studies. Int. J. Curr. Res.
      (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under                         Aca. Rev., 3(8): 309-324.
      Lucknow         conditions,    Int.   J.         Monneveux, P., Sanchez, C., Beck, D. and
      Innovative Sci. Engineering and                       Edmeades, G.O. (2006). Drought
      Tech., 1(6): 41-50.                                   tolerance improvement in tropical
Yadav, B.V.S., Srinivasulu, B., Reddy,                      maize source populations: evidence
      P.S.S. and Balakrishna, M. (2015).                    of progress. Crop sci., 46(1): 180-
      Influence of sowing dates on growth                   191.
      and yield of french bean (Phaseolus              Mondal, M.M.A., Fakir, M.S.A., Islam,
      vulgaris      L.)    varieties     under              M.N. and Samad, M.A. (2011).
      Rayalaseema region of Andhra                          Physiology of seed yield in
      Pradesh. J. Agroecology and Natural                   mungbean: growth and dry matter
      Resource Manage, 2(2): 145-149.                       production. Bangladesh                 J.
Singh, S., Singh, N. and Kumar R. (2019),                   Bot., 40(2): 133-138.
      R. Effect of dates of sowing and                 Gupta, A., Sharma, V.K., Sharma, GD.
      mulching on number of branches per                    and Chopra, P. (2006). Effect of
      plant, plant height, number of pods                   biofertilizer and phosphorus levels
      per plant, pod length and number of                   on yield attributes, yield and quality
      seeds per of Summer Mash (Vigna                       of urdbean (Vigna mungo). Indian. J.
      Mungo).J. Pharma. Phytochem., 4:                      Agron., 51(2): 142-144.
      135-137.                                         Karunakaran, V. and Behera, U.K. (2013).
Pandey, Y.R., Gautam, D.M., Thapa, R.B.,                    Effect      of      tillage,     residue
      Sharma, M.D. and Paudyal, K.P.                        management and crop establishment
      (2011). Variability of french bean in                 techniques on energetics, water use
      the     Western       mid    hills    of              efficiency and economics in soybean
      Nepal. Agric. Nat. Resources, 45(5):                  (Glycine max) – wheat (Triticum
      780-792.                                              aestivum) cropping system. Indian.
Patil, S.L., Sheelavantar, M.N. and                         J. Agron., 58(1): 42-47.
      Shashidhar, K.C. (2011). Growth                  Reddy, M., Thimmegowdda, M.N.,
      and yield of winter sorghum                           Ramachandrappa, B.K. and Herbal,
      (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) as                      N. (2016) Effect of moisture
      influenced by rainwater conservation                  conservation          practices       on
      practices, organic materials and                      productivity and economics of finger
      nitrogen application in vertisols of                  millet and pigeon pea intercropping
      SemiArid Tropical India. Indian. J.                   system in the dry zone Eastern
      Soil Conserv., 39(1): 50-58.                          Karnataka. E-planet, 14 (1): 53-57.
Singh, T. and Rana, K.S. (2006). Effect of             Marwein, Y. and Ray, L.I.P (2019).
      moisture conservation and fertility                   Performance of rajma (Phaseolus
      on Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)                   vulgaris) cultivars under organic
      and      lentil     (Lens     culinaris)              mulches in Meghalayan Plateau of
      intercropping system under rainfed                    North Eastern India. Legume Res.
      conditions. Indian. J. Agron., 51(4):                 Int.         J., 42(1):         114-118
      267-270.
                                                 316
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 317
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Khushhal Kisan” was initiated with a                   ‘Ecofriendly Agriculture’ is suggested as a
budget allocation of Rs 35 crore (2019–                neoteric approach to improve both
2020). Under this scheme, peasants will be             traditional and modern agricultural
supported with training, the required                  practices, which aims to safeguard the
machinery, to achieve the objective of                 environment,       public    health,    and
sustainable farming doubling farmers'                  communities (Mishra 2013). Natural
incomes, improved soil fertility, and low              Farming is not simply farming without
input costs (Vashishat et al., 2021).                  chemical fertilizers and pesticides, but
Though the search for a better alternative             rather it is organic farming with the added
shall always remain, right now natural                 dimension of exploiting beneficial
farming is a credible alternative itself               microorganisms to enhance soil quality
(Mishra, 2018).                                        and soil health. It employs the use of
                                                       natural bio-inoculums instead of chemical
        But farming in India has been                  fertilizers and pesticides. This revives the
practiced for thousands of years and large-            soil micro biota and in turn, improves soil
scale farmer suicides are only a recent                health. Rejuvenating the soil micro-
phenomenon. So how did farmers manage                  organisms through the use of bio-
in the past, before agriculture became an              inoculums and natural pesticides helps to
industry? The answer lies in bullshit.                 enhance the nutrient content of the plant
“Carbon content in the top soil should be              leading to better bioavailability for
2% per 100 gm of soil. But in Punjab,                  humans.
Haryana and Uttar Pradesh- the granary
of the country -- the carbon content in                        Besides improving soil fertility,
the top soil is a mere 0.05%”.                         natural farming techniques are very
                                                       effective at combating pests. “Thrips –
        To feed the growing population, it             millimetre-sized insects that feed on the
is estimated that food production will need            plant’s tender leaves and buds – are a
to increase by 60 percent by 2050 (FAO,                common problem in chemical farming.
2009). This increasing food demand is                  The general belief is that if pesticide is not
promoting farmers worldwide to increase                used, you cannot save the crop from
crop production, which builds pressure on              thrips.” But farmers are realising yields of
the environment and exceeds its carrying               onion crop thrips-free using the neem-seed
capacity to repair or replace itself, leading          solution recommended in natural farming
to its serious degradation. ‘Natural                   techniques.
Farming’      or    ‘Eco-Agriculture’      or
                                                 318
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ORIGIN AND IMPORTANCE                      OF          fertility farming,      organic    farming,
NATURAL FARMING                                        sustainable    agriculture,    agroecology,
                                                       agroforestry,      eco-agriculture      and
         Natural farming is not a technique            permaculture, but should be distinguished
but a view, or a way of seeing ourselves as            from biodynamic agriculture. So called
a part of nature, it is also referred as “the          “do-nothing” technique was developed by
Fukuoka Method”, “the natural way of                   a Japanese scientist Fukuoka, who rejected
farming” or “do-nothing farming”. The                  both modern agribusiness and centuries of
title refers not to lack of effort, but to the         agricultural lore. There are four basic
avoidance of manufactured inputs and                   pillars of Zero Budget Natural Farming as
equipment. Natural farming is related to               under.
                                                 319
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 320
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
     significantly reducing the costs of                   to enhance the nutrient content of the
     cultivation.                                          plant leading to better bioavailability
4.   Ensure Better Health                                  for humans.
         NF products have a much higher                10. Livestock Sustainability
     nutritional content. Protein, amino                       Cow dung and urine are the most
     acid, crude fat and other essential                   essential components in Jivamrit and
     nutrient were about 300% higher than                  Beejamrit. Livestock can be integrated
     ordinary         products. Discontinuing              with agro ecological farming practices
     chemical pesticides and fertilizers in                to make them economically viable.
     fields will prevent run-off into water            11. Resilience
     sources,          further        reducing                Climate change poses critical risks
     communities’ exposure to such                         for farmers, and endangers the soil,
     chemicals.                                            water, and other resources on which
5.   Employment Generation                                 food production depends. Rising
         NF leads to rural employment and                  temperatures have already intensified
     increases the financial viability of                  droughts, heat waves, and cyclones,
     small farms. NF has the potential to                  making it harder to grow crops. In this
     generate employment opportunities                     context the crops grown under natural
     across the agricultural value chain,                  farming methods show great resilience
     from production, distribution, and                    to droughts and cyclones. NF impacts
     retail of natural mixtures to market                  many farmers positively by imparting
     linkages for such produce.                            resilience to the crops against weather
6.   Exclusion of Chemical Inputs                          extremities.
         The indiscriminate use of chemical
     fertilizers and pesticides is a threat to         REDESIGNING OF SUSTAINABLE
     soil and environment. This has                    INTENSIFICATION
     adversely impacted the crop response
                                                               There is growing evidence that
     ratio and created an imbalance of
                                                       sustainable intensification can increase
     nutrients in the soil. ZBNF eliminates
                                                       crop yields by redesigning ecosystems on
     the use of these chemicals.
                                                       and around farms (Garibaldi et al., 2019;
7.   Environmental Protection                          Godfray      et    al., 2010;    Pretty    &
         NF aims to reduce risks associated
                                                       Bharucha, 2018;           Reganold         &
     with uncertainties of climate change
                                                       Wachter, 2016). In some contexts,
     by promoting the adoption of an agro-
                                                       sustainable intensification is achieving
     ecology framework. It encourages
                                                       scale, reaching large numbers of farmers
     farmers to use low-cost home-grown
                                                       and hectares (Pretty et al., 2018). This
     inputs, eliminate the use of chemical
                                                       paper addresses the system of Zero Budget
     fertilizers, and industrial pesticides.
                                                       Natural Farming (ZBNF), an emerging
8.   Lowering Water Requirement                        agro-ecological practice that has spread in
         Essentially, NF helps in making
                                                       India, as a form of agricultural system
     soil porous and increases the moisture
                                                       redesign. The focus is on the south-eastern
     content in the soil since the amount of
                                                       state of Andhra Pradesh, where the state
     water in the air is 10 times that of the
                                                       government has announced the intention to
     amount of water in rivers. Natural
                                                       roll out ZBNF to all the state’s 6 million
     Farming can transform agriculture for
                                                       farmers by 2024 (UNEP, 2018). This
     drought-prone areas in the country.
                                                       represents an infrequent contemporary
9.   Soil Health Improvement                           example of a policy-led sustainability
         Rejuvenating the soil micro-
                                                       transition at significant scale in India, and
     organisms through the use of bio-
                                                       provides a number of lessons for other
     inoculums and natural pesticides helps
                                                 321
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
state-led initiatives      for    sustainable           based cropping system (e.g., tomato +
agriculture.                                            beans + cucumber and cauliflower + pea +
                                                        radish), vegetables-cereals-based cropping
        The potential for synergies between             system, and other three more cropping
agriculture and ecosystem health was first              systems discussed in this article. The
hinted at in the context of smallholders in             results indicated that a vegetable-based
less-developed countries in the use of the              cropping system has 19.68% more net
term        sustainable       intensification           return in Kharif season and 24.64% more
(Pretty, 1997). The approach is not meant               net return in Rabi season as compared to
to be prescriptive, recognizing that there is           conventional farming vegetable-based
no single form or initiative that can                   monocropping system. NF maximizes land
accomplish sustainable outcomes over all                use and reduces the chance of crop yield
types of agricultural system. Instead,                  loss. NF has resulted in increased returns
interventions as varied as crop varietal                especially in the vegetable cropping
improvements, multi-cropping, integrated                system where reduction in cost was 30.73
pest       management,          conservation            per cent (kharif) and 11.88 per cent (rabi)
agriculture,    the     system    of     crop           across all crop combinations in
intensification (starting as the system of              comparison to CF. It is found in study that
rice intensification and expanding to other             NF was cost savings from not using
crops), and the intensification of small                chemical fertilizers and pesticides, as well
patches of land have shown the potential to             as higher benefit from intercrops.
achieve positive social-ecological co-
benefits alongside healthy yields (Pretty               In NF, input costs are highly
&Bharucha, 2018; Pretty, Toulmin, &             diminished due to the abstinence from
Williams, 2011).                                pesticides, insecticides, and adoption of
                                                natural inputs such as jivamrit, bijamrit,
       Laishram et al., (2022) in a study       ghanjivamrit, and neemastra. NF inputs
(Table 2.0) shows that farmers adopted          and other natural preparations have a
five major crop combinations under              major impact due to reduced expenditure
natural farming system, i.e., vegetables-       on chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
Table 2. Crop combination-wise net returns under NF and CF systems.
                                                 322
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
CONCLUSION                                                   e, D., Muir, J.F., Toulmin, C. 2010.F
                                                             ood security: The challenge of
         Indiscriminate use of chemical                      feeding             9             billion
fertilizers and pesticides posed a threat to                 people. Science, 327(5967), 812–
the soil and environment. Many                               818.
investigations have shown their adverse                Laishram, C., Vashishat, R.K., Sharma, S.,
effects of change in soil nature, soil                       Rajkumari, B., Mishra, N., Barwal,
contamination, ground water pollution and                    P., Vaidya, M.K., Sharma, R.,
decrease in soil micro flora etc. Studies                    Chandel, R.S., Chandel, A., Gupta,
have shown that natural farming, with the                    R.K. and Sharma, N. 2022. Impact
minimum external inputs and by                               of Natural Farming Cropping System
application      of      supplements    like                 on Rural Households—Evidence
Jeevamruth, improves the soil fertility by                   From Solan District of Himachal
increasing the soil micro flora and                          Pradesh, India. Front. Sustain. Food
available      nutrients.    This    method                  Syst.          6:878015.             doi:
encourages       multi      cropping    and                  10.3389/fsufs.2022.878015
biodiversity of micro and macro flora. A               Mishra, M. 2013. Role of Eco-Friendly
survey carried out by LVC (La Via                            Agricultural Practices in Indian
Campesina) (Anon., 2013) suggests that                       Agriculture               Development.
ZBNF works not just in agronomic terms,                      International Journal of Agriculture
but also brings about a variety of social                    and Food Science Technology
and economic benefits. A majority of                         (IJAFST): Volume 4; Issue 2; Page
respondents reported that by adopting                        25-29.
ZBNF, over time they saw improvements                  Mishra, S. 2018. Zero Budget Natural
in yield, soil conservation, seed diversity,                 Farming: Are This and Similar
and quality of produce, household food                       Practices The Answers. Nabakrushna
autonomy, income, and health.                                Choudhury Centre for Development
                                                             Studies, Bhubaneswar.
REFERENCES
                                                       Pretty, J.     N. 1997. The        sustainable
Anonymous. 2013. Case study provided by                      intensification                        of
       La      ViaCampesina        Contact                   agriculture. Natural          Resources
       lvcweb@viacampesina.org                               Forum, 21, 247–256.
FAO. 2017. The future of food and                      Pretty, J.and Bharucha, Z.
       agriculture     –    Trends     and                   P. 2018. Sustainable intensification
       challenges. Rome.                                     of agriculture: Greening the world’s
Food and Agriculture Organisation. 2009.                     food economy. London: Routledge.
     How to Feed the World: Global                     Pretty, J., Benton, T.      G., Bharucha, Z.
     Agriculture Towards 2050. High                          P., Dicks, L.              V., Flora, C.
     Level Expert Forum, Food and                            B., Godfray, H.            C.          J.,
     Agriculture Organization. Retrieved                     Pierzynski, G. 2018. Global
     from www.fao.org; on 27/12/2018                         assessment of agricultural system
Garibaldi, L.                    A., Pérez-                  redesign         for         sustainable
     Méndez, N., Garratt, M.                                 intensification. Nature
     P., Gemmill-Herren, B., Miguez, F.                      Sustainability, 1(8), 441.
     E., & Dicks, L. V. 2019. Policies for             Pretty, J., Toulmin, C.,
     ecological intensification of crop                      and Williams, S. 2011. Sustainable
     production. Trends in Ecology &                         intensification        in       African
     Evolution, 34(4), 282–286.                              agriculture. International Journal of
Godfray, H.       C.     J., Beddington, J.                  Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1), 5–
     R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrenc                    24.
                                                 323
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Reganold, J.        P.,    and Wachter, J.             UNEP. 2018. Andhra Pradesh to become
      M. 2016. Organic agriculture in the                   India’s first zero budget natural
      twenty-first         century. Nature                  farming state. Press Release, 2nd
      Plants, 2(2), 15221.                                  June 2018.
Tripathi, S., and Tauseef, S. 2018. Zero               Vashishat, R. K., Laishram, C., and
      Budget Natural Farming, for the                       Sharma, S. 2021. Problems and
      Sustainable Development Goals.                        factors affecting adoption of natural
      Andhra Pradesh.                                       farming in Sirmaur District of
                                                            Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Ecol.
                                                            48, 944–949.
                                                       World Bank. 2012. Gender Equality and
                                                            Development. World Development
                                                            Report,         Retrieved       from
                                                            www.worldbank.org.
                                                 324
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Development of water production function for garden pea under mid hills of
                               Meghalaya
                 KONGA SWETHA, LALA I.P. RAY AND DEEP JYOTI DAS
                                                   325
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
significantly highest in treatment I1.                 improve farm level water management and
However, treatment I2 was statistically at par         crop yield, effective irrigation plans can be
with I1 in all the growth and yield                    developed by using knowledge of how crops
parameters with no. of pods per plant as               respond to water supply, under both full and
(11.28), pod weight per plant as (43.1 g),             limited situations. Based on maximum
and green pod yield as (7.91 t ha-1). These            allowable depletion of available soil
results are in agreement with (Yathish et al.,         moisture criterion, maximum potential
2021; Hirich et al., 2014; Dasila et al.,              yields are obtained treatment I1 (8.19 t ha-1),
2016). The increase in pod weight per plant            which was 107% higher than I4. This can be
and green pod yield was mainly due to                  recommended        under     fully    irrigated
adequate soil moisture availability at all the         conditions. Butunder water limiting
growth stages of crop leading to proper                situations I2 may be recommended where
uptake of nutrients throughout the crop                water is applied at 40% depletion of
growth stages resulted in higher yields.               available soil moisture. This treatment
                                                       results in green pod yield of 7.91 t ha-1
        The significantly highest value of             which is 100% higher over I4, eventually
water productivity was noticed treatment I4,           resulting in higher water productivity (35%
where irrigation was given at 100% of                  higher) over I1. Quadratic or second degree
Maximum allowable depletion. The water                 polynomial CWPF were developed which
productivity of treatment I4 was 14%, 11%              may be used for yield prediction in response
and 10% highest over I1, I3 and I2. Similar            to total water applied or crop water use
results were reported by (Jabow et al., 2015;          during the cropping season as y = -0.0001x2
Rao et al., 2016) The maximum water                    + 0.0633x - 1.5064; (R² = 0.96) on pooled
productivity for the four irrigation                   basis, respectively. This ensures that as
treatments were arranged as I4 (3.93 kg m-3)           irrigation amount increases the increase in
> I2 (3.56 kg m-3) > I3 (3.34 kg m-3) > I1             yield was decreasing. Hence, in order to
(2.63 kg m-3). This indicated that application         obtain maximum possible yields maintaining
of more amount of water due to frequent                field at 60% of field capacity is necessary.
irrigations in I1 increased the high moisture
loss due to evapotranspiration (Fereres and            REFERENCES
Soriano, 2007). The crop water production
function was obtained as Y = -0.0001x2 +               Yathish, V.C., Chowdhury, R.S. and Datta,
0.0633x - 1.5064; with R² = 0.96 on pooled                     S. (2021). Evaluation of Garden Pea
analysis of all cultivars which was shown in                   (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.)
Fig 1. Similar findings were reported by                       Genotypes Under Irrigated and
(Zhang, 2003) Among the cultivars highest                      Rainfed Condition Under Foothills
yield and water productivity was noticed in                    of Terai Agro-ecological Region of
V4 as 7.23 t ha-1 and 3.70 kg m-3. Similarly,                  West Bengal. 12(4):332-338.
the highest BCR was observed in main plot              Hirich, A., Choukr‐Allah, R. and Jacobsen,
treatment, I1-2.30 and in cultivar V4 – 2.06.                  S.E. (2014). Deficit irrigation and
                                                               organic compost improve growth and
CONCLUSION                                                     yield of quinoa and pea. J. Agron.
                                                               Crop Sci., 200(5): 390-398.
        A major limiting element in                    Dasila, B., Singh, V., Kushwaha, H.S.,
agricultural production systems is the                         Srivastava, A. and Ram, S. (2016).
availability of soil water. In order to                        Water use efficiency and yield of
                                                 326
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
       cowpea and nutrient loss in lysimeter                  (2016). Performance of pea under
       experiment under varying water table                   different irrigation systems, 1-3.
       depth, irrigation schedules and                 Fereres, E. and Soriano, M.A. (2007).
       irrigation     method. SAARC       J.                  Deficit irrigation for reducing
       Agric., 14(2): 46-55.5.                                agricultural      water     use.      J.
Jabow, M.A., Ibrahim, O.H. and Adam, H.S.                     experimental bot., 58(2): 147-159.
       (2015). Yield and water productivity            Zhang, H. (2003). Improving water
       of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as                    productivity       through       deficit
       influenced by different irrigation                     irrigation: examples from Syria, the
       regimes and varieties under semi                       North China Plain and Oregon,
       desert climatic conditions of                          USA. Water          productivity      in
       Sudan. Agric. Sci., 6(11): 1299.                       agriculture: limits and opportunities
Rao, K.R., Gangwar, S., Bajpai, A., Keshri,                   for improvements. CABI, 301-309.
       R., Chourasia, L. and Soni, K.
                                                 327
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Table 1: Effect of irrigation regimes on yield parameters and water productivity of garden pea
cultivars
                    7.5
                    6.5
                    5.5
                    4.5
                    3.5
                          135       185       235       285          335
                                Total water used (IW+R) mm
Fig 1: Pooled water production function of Crop yield with water used
                                                                328
    THEME E
FARMER’S PLATFORM
                                       SUB CONTENT
                                                 329
Extended Summaries: National
                        ational Con
                                Conference on Natural Farming Systems,
                                                                  Systems Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022,, India
                                               330
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
APPLICATION OF FIBRE
        Banana fibre is having elegant look
and highly versatile characteristics. As it
does not crumple easily, these fibres can
used in the manufacture of dress materials.
Paper produced from banana exhibits
superior tear resistance and tensile
strength. Banana fibres have already been            Figure 6:Pineapple plant & green leaves
tested for use as a filtration agent in the
treatment of wastewater, which is often             The name is derived from the Spanish
contaminated with oils and other organic            word ‘Pina’ meaning cone shaped. The
materials. Banana fibre performs very well          plant is widely cultivated for its fruit in the
in combination with other fibres for                tropical and sub-tropical regions. It is a
making diversified products (Figure 5).             biennial plant with a rather short life. India
VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS FROM                           is one of the major producers of pineapple
BANANA PSEUDO-STEM FIBRE:                           and cultivation is spread in various states
                                                    like Assam, Karnataka, Kerala, Manipur,
                                                    Meghalaya, Tripura and West Bengal
                                                    where as states like Maharashtra, Odisha
                                                    and Bihar, it is grown in very small area.
                                                    The total area under pineapple is
                                                    approximately 90,000 hectare and is
                                                    gradually increasing. In West Bengal alone
                                                    the area under pineapple cultivation is
                                                    12,500 hectares.
                                                    EXTRACTION
                                                            Extraction of fibre from green
                                                    pineapple leaves (manual extraction)
                                                    involves lots of drudgery of women
                                                    engaged with the process (Figure 7). The
                                                    process involves stripping off the fibre
                                                    from the green leaf. In this method a lot of
                                                    fibre is lost and the entire process is also
                                                    very laborious. Fibres of the leaf are
                                                    scrapped by means of a broken plate or
                                                    coconut shell and the yield is around 1% of
Figure 5: Bed Cover and Table Cloth from            dry fibre (App), which is about 10kg of
banana fibre blended fabric                         dry fibre from 1 tonne of pineapple leaf.
                                              331
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                  332
  Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
  Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Figure 11: Uttariya from pineapple leaf fibre Figure 12: Shawl developed from pineapple
               blended fabric                           leaf fibre blended fabric
                                                 333
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               334
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                  335
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 336
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
 Forest                                                                  Area
                       Location                            Crops                   Tribes     Season
 Range                                                                  in ha.
Kuliposh Ladapani,Budhabhuin,                          Maize,           53.64    Bhuyan,      Kharif,
         Khatiabhaguni,         Haladikanchi,          Blackgram,                Munda        Rabi
         Arjunjhari,    Mukulapani,     San-           Jowar,
         Nuagaon,Tasada,        Bandhabhuin,           Niger
         Derula, Kiri, Keta, Kunu, Kundala,
         Sasa, Melani, Patamunda, Talagiria,
         Nagaria, Sanjala, Badjala, Fuljhar,
         Ranja
Barsuan Raisuan,       Kemsila,     Batgaon,       Maize,      33.92             Bhuyan,      Rabi
         Bhutuda, Sarkunda, Lasi, Randa,           Niger,                        Munda
         Langalkata, Kusumdihi, Damalu,            Blackgram,
         Fatatangar, Bahomba, Sidimba,             Paddy,
         Tentulidihi                               Jowar,
                                                   Mustard,
                                                   Horsegram
Koira       Jaribahal,      Basada,       Kodalia, Horsegram, 8.27               Bhuyan,      Kharif,
            Kriyakudar,                            Sesamum,                      Munda        Rabi
            Champuakudar,Mithirda,                 Arhar,
            Chakradhar, Kadamdihi,Naliadihi        Blackgram,
                                                   Niger,
                                                   Jowar,
                                                   Mustard,
                                                   Maize,
                                                   Foxtail
                                                   millet
Tamra       Bonaikela, Dumermunda, Jadeloi,
            Chudiposh, Kantapali, Nuriapali,                                       Kisan,
            Badgaon, Madhupur, Gurundia,                                           Oram,
            Raikelaposh,     Jhirpani,    Saplata,                                Gonda,
            Soldega,     Tamara,      Jhaksjharen,   Paddy,                       Routia,
            Jagda,     Baghiakucha,      Benuam,     Maize,                        Patra,
            Kanchida, Kadilkucha, Bhulikucha,         Jowar,                      Bhuyan,
                                                                                              Kharif,
            Pitagaon,      Gaidega,      Kulijhar, Blackgram, 58.44               Munda,
                                                                                               Rabi
            Kusumdihi,      Belte,    Kendughati, Ragi, Niger,                    Khadia,
            Pankadihi, Satatola, Tislakucha,           Toor,                       Singh,
            Rankey,      Jamdhara,       Bhurung, Greengram                       Kamar,
            Saplata,    Dharnipur,      Jagannath                                 Mahali,
            Prasad, Silikata, Jadaloi, Balabhadra                                  Kenta,
            Prasad, Baratengla, Makadchua,                                        Bhumij
            Bhaludunguri
        The hill farming is practiced by the           locations of Barsuan Forest range practised
tribals of Bonai Forest Division in an area            hill farming in an area of 33.92 ha. The
of 154.27 ha. Under Kuliposh Range,                    Bhuyan& Munda tribes grown Maize,
53.64 ha. is under hill farming with crops             black gram, Paddy, Jowar,Horsegram
like Maize, Black gram, Jowar & Niger. At              during kharif and Niger, Mustard during
23 different locations this practice is                Rabi season. Large varieties of crops like
followed by Bhuyan& Munda tribes. In 14                Horse gram, Sesamum, Arhar, Black gram,
                                                 337
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Niger, Jowar, Mustard, Maize and Foxtail              Ragi, Niger, Toor and Greengram are the
millet is grown by Munda&Bhuyan tribes                major crops. In general, the tribals after
in Koira Forest Range. In both Kharif and             meeting their own requirement, sale their
Rabi season the crops are grown in an area            produces in local market. Some part of the
of 8.27 ha. at a location. Tamara being the           produce is used as exchange for rice &
largest Forest Range, hill farming is                 salt. In true sense, although the products
practised in highest area (58.44 ha.) and             are natural, the tribal farmers are getting
locations (42) by the Kisan, Oram, Gond,              very low price and cheated by the
Routia, Patra, Bhuyan, Munda,Khadia,                  middleman. The standard of living of those
Singh, Kamar, Mahali, Kenta &Bhurnig                  peoples are very poor.
tribes. Paddy, Maize, Jowar, Black gram,
                                                338
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                               Area
                                                     No. of
                                                                in
   Block              GP              Village        farmer            Crop                 Variety
                                                               acre
                                                        s
                                                                 s
                                                     78        61   Paddy               Lusuri, Sapri,
                                                                                        Machhakanta
               Sagbahal           Sajori                                                , Kalajira
                                                     28        22      Potato           Local
                                                     17        7       Ragi             Local
                                                                                        Lusuri,
                                                                                        Kalajira,
                                                     42        33      Paddy
                                                                                        Vdokakez,
               Kiralaga           Rangiadhipa                                           Chinagoda
                                                     15        8       Blackgram        Desi
                                                     17        7       Ragi             Local
                                                     18        4       Horsegram        Desi
                                                     76        57      Paddy            Kalajira,
                                                                                        Chainagoda,
Balishankar
                                                                                        Kalam olani,
a
                                                                                        Lusuri
               Talsara            Kadopani
                                                     22        12      Potato           Desi
                                                     8         5       Blackgram        Desi
                                                     17        7       Ragi             Local
                                                     18        4       Horsegram        Desi
                                                     18        5       Til,             Desi
               Birkaldihi         Beheradihi
                                                                       Horsegram
               Deobhubanpur       Deobhubanpu        22        7       Ragi,    Til,    Desi
               a                  r                                    Redgram
                                                     49        16      Til,             Desi
               Tildega            Bramhanmara                          Redgram,
                                                                       Horsegram
                                                     30        11      TilHorsegra      Desi
               Tildega            Kendudihi
                                                                       m
                                                     12        3       Redgram          Desi
               Nuagaon            Jharen
                                                     11        4       Horsegram        Desi
Kutra
                                                     7         2       Redgram          Desi
               Tikilipara         Tikilipara
                                                     15        5       Horsegram        Desi
                                                     32        12      Paddy            Machhakanta
               Gundiadihi         Dhangergudi
                                                                                        , Jui, Bhajana
Lephripara                                           24        13      Paddy            Lusuri,
                                  Sahebdera
               Masabira                                                                 Machhakanta
                                  Laikera            12        8       Paddy            Machhakanta
               Kendudihi          Badibahal          11        3       Horsegram        Desi
                                  Khuntipani         12        4       Horsegram        Desi
Hemgir         Hemgir
                                  Kulijore           7         2       Til              Desi
               Durubaga           Katarbaga          11        3       Til              Desi
                                                  339
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
455 farmers in an area of 259 acres. The          practising natural farming with local
crops are mostly local varieties of paddy         varieties of Paddy, Til and Horsegram in
(Lusuri, Sapri, Machhakanta, Kalajira,            an      area    of      50     acres.   In
Chainagoda, Kalam Olani), potato, Ragi,           Jharen&Tikiliparavillages of Kutra Block
Blackgram, Horsegram, Til, Redgram. In            mostly Redgram&Horsegram is grown
Lephripara      Block,      Dhangergudi,          under natural condition using natural
Sahebdera, Laikera, Budapahad villages            resources. In other blocks like Tangarpali,
and in Hemgir Block Badibahal,                    Rajagangpur, Subdega natural farming is
Khuntipani, Kulijore&Katarbaga villages           practised sporadically.
                                            340
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                           341
Extended Summaries: National
                        ational Con
                                Conference on Natural Farming Systems,
                                                                  Systems Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022,, India
                                              342
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                      No.
                                                      Croppi
                                      of       Area
                                                        ng      Cops
 Block        GP          Village     Far     (Acre                          Variety
                                                      Scheme    Grown
                                      mer       s)
                                                       Year
                                       s
                                                               Paddy      Machhakat
                                                               (Indigenou a,
                                                               HYV        Khandagiri,
                                                                          Swarna
                                                               Tomato     Laxmi,
                     Raidihi,                                             Utkal
                     Kusumura,                                 Cauliflow Megha
           Kusumura
                     B.                                        er
                                                               Chilli     Nun-2074
           B.karuaba
                     Koruabahal,                                          Utkal Abha
           hal
                     Denkiguda,                                Cabbage    Green Ball,
Balisank   Tumulia                                    2021-
                     Pateimunda,      142      50                         Gold Star
ara        Balisanka                                   22
                     Sapdagar,                                 Onion      Nasik Red,
           ra
                     Mahulgram,                                           N-53
           Beheradih
                     Gidhapahadi                               Brinjal    Green Star,
           i
                     ,                                                    Blue
                     Beheradihi,                                          Star,Utkal
                                                                          Madhuri,
                                                               Groundnut
                                                               , Mustard Local
                                                               watermelo
                                                               n
         Masabira,     Laikera
         Jhurimal      Jhulendihi,
                       Chhatapali,                             Paddy,
Lephripa Chhatapal                                    2021-
                       Badkhalia,      28      11              Vegetable   Local
ra       i                                             22
                       Kulabira,                               s
         Kulabira
         Sarafgarh     Krumkela,
                       Bardihi
                       Rajabasa,                               Vegetable
                       Kutra,                                  s
                       Telighana,                     2021-    Groundnut Desi
Kutra                                 123      81
                       Domposh,                        22      ,
                       Gyanpali,                               Ahar,
                       Gairbahal                               Ragi,
                                             343
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
During the 2021-22, SEWAK a leading                    of crops were grown with organic sources
NGO of Sundargarh district with the                    of nutrients (Bio-fertilizer, Panchagavya,
support of ITDA promoted organic                       FYM) and neem based pesticides. The
farming in Balishankara, Lephripara &                  yield level were comparatively lower than
Kutra Block of Sundargarh involving 293                the chemical farming (use of chemical
farmers in an area of 142 acres                        fertilizers & pesticides).
.Indigenous, HYV &Hybrids (Vegetables)
                                                 344
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                    No.of                                  Area
                                                                                Cropping Practice
Block    Village    Farme   Crop               Variety      in      Season
                                                                                   Followed
                      rs                                   Acres
        Telighan     55   Paddy        Machhakata          15.0                Seeds treated with
        a                              Annapurna           25.0                 Beejamrut
                                       Soubhagi            20.0                Application of
        Telighan      24     Groundnut Local               20.0                 Jeevamrut @ 200
        Rajabasa      10     Ragi      Local                5.0                 lts./ acre in every
                             Kado                                               10 days interval for
        Rajabasa         2             Local                 0.5                4 months
                             Millet
        Rajabasa      3      Cowpea    Local                 0.5               Application of
        Bhogra        15     Arhar     Loal                  8.0    Kharif,     Ghana Jeevamrut
Kutra
                                                                     2022       @200 kg/ month
        Telighan
                                                                                for fourmonths.
        a,
                                                                               Spraying of natural
        Rajabasa
                                                                                pest repellant (
        ,Karmab
                    10       Vegetable     Local             3.0                Dashparniark)
        ahal
                                                                                @2ltr. / acre at
                                                                                vegetative stage.
This year during kharif, 2022 KishanSathi            and spraying of natural pest repellent
Foundation, Kutra has made a great effort            (Dashparni ark) @ 2 lts./acre at vegetative
to start natural farming in Telighana,               stage.The yield of the crops along with
Rajabasa, Bhogra, Karmabahal villages                yield attributes were compared with
under the technical guidance of KVK,                 conventional practices. The number of
Sundargarh. 55 farmers undertake local               pods in Groundnut was 14% higher in
varieties      of     paddy      cultivation         natural farming as compared to chemical
(Machhakanta, Annapurna, Soubhagi) in                farming with higher shelling (%) of 69.
70 acres; local variety of Groundnut by 24           The average no. of EBT in chemically
farmers in 20 acres; local variety of Ragi           grown paddy was 5.2 and 7.1 in naturally
by 10 farmers in 5 acres;Kodomillet by 2             grown paddy. The yield of all the crops
farmers in 0.5 acre;cowpea by 3 farmers in           under natural farming recorded higher
0.5 acre;Arhar by 15 farmers in 8acres and           yield compared to conventional practice
vegetable by 10 farmers in 3 acres. The              (use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides).
cropping practice followed was seed                  The crops showed resistance to moisture
treatment with Beejamrut, application of             stress (drought), disease pest and remained
Jeevamrut @ 200 lts/acre in every 10 days            healthy. The organoleptic test also
interval for 4 months, application of Ghana          indicated good test of products.
Jeevamrut @ 200 Kg./month for 4 months
                                               345
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                              346
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
 Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                               347
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                348
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity Conservation and under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 349
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 350
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
                                                 351
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
Meditation has been part of our culture for               journey towards inner transformation.
thousands of years. Ancient texts including               Unlike other practices, this Himalayan
the Vedas and the Patanjali sutras have                   meditation is a ‘Sanskar’ which doesn’t
expounded upon the benefits of meditation                 involve any kind of physical activities or
& Samagra Yoga in leading a holistic life.                complex techniques. It is based on an
Modern advancements in the technology                     innate live experience – an ‘Anubhuti’ –
have provided us with apparatus which                     which can be accessed by everyone,
may be leveraged to explore wider                         beyond all distinctions of race, religion,
applications of these concepts in                         language or caste.
traditional fields such as farming. It offers             H. H. Shree Shivkrupan and Swami,
us an existing platform for higher research               who first introduced this meditation to the
that can provide sustainable methods of                   masses, is himself an enlightened yogi,
farming that can enhance the overall                      having spent 16 years of his life in the
quality of life of the entire ecosystem.                  Himalayas gathering the divine wisdom
Disclaimer: Views expressed in the                        from many revered Himalayan Gurus. He
document are personal, written by the                     has been relentlessly offering this ancient
authors in their personal capacity. The                   wisdom across all sections of the society
organization bears no responsibility for                  since the last 25 years. This initiative, led
the same.                                                 by the ‘Shree Shivkrupanand Swami
                                                          Foundation’ has now evolved into a global
Author(s) and the Organization                            spiritual platform known as Gurutattva.
Anand Kolwalkar–presently working                         Over the last several years, Swamiji has
asaPrincipal Consultant at Infosys limited,               addressed several prominent assemblies,
with over 20 years of industry experience.                including a special session organized by
He has been a keen practitioner of the                    the AYUSH Mantralaya for the Members
Himalayan Samarpan Dhyan, since the last                  of the Indian Parliament, and Legislative
22 years and is presently the Zonal                       assemblies of Gujarat, Maharashtra& Goa
coordinator for the Pune zone(email -                     too. Swamiji has been a regular invitee at
anand.kolwalkar@gmail.com)                                the Theosophical Society, UK, in various
Vaishnavi Sadawarte - is a post graduate,                 forums across Europe, Canada, Australia,
MSc in Chemistry. She has been practising                 South Africa and several other countries.
the Himalayan Samarpan Dhyan since                        Within India too, he has addressed several
2013. Having served as a coordinator for                  institutions of repute, including the IIT
the foundation in Maharashtra & Gujarat                   Kharagpur, ADA Bengaluru, AIIMS
for several years, she is now the primary                 Nagpur, ICAR New Delhi, several
coordinator for Meghalaya (email -                        government and security agencies like the
vaishnavisubhash8@gmail.com )                             State Police, Armed Forces and even
About Himalayan Samarpan Dhyan &                          corporate establishments.
Gurutattva – a global spiritual platform                  All activities arranged by our foundation
Since its inception in 1994, the                          are completely free of cost.
Himalayan Samarpan meditation has                         For more information – visit the website:
guided millions of individuals in this                    https://gurutattva.org/
i
Ref – Samarpan Yog of the Himalayas (Part 1), an autobiographical account of H. H. Shivkrupanand Swamiji’s
spiritual journey in the Himalayas
                                                    352
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems, Biodiversity
Conservation and under Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, India
ii
    Studies published by the Broadcast Audience Research Council India show that by 2020, almost 21 crore out
of the 30 crore households in India now have at least 1 TV set -
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/media/rise-of-television-continues-in-
india/articleshow/82083465.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
iii
   The World Health Organization highlights the impact of the newsfeeds, increasing screen-time & social media,
on our mental health - https://www.who.int/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-
coronavirus/healthyathome/healthyathome---mental-health
iv
    National Agriculture Safety Database - https://nasdonline.org/1445/d001245/stress-management-for-the-
health-of-
it.html#:~:text=In%20addition%2C%20medical%20research%20estimates,been%20linked%20to%20stress%20f
actors
vi
    The Himalayan Samarpan Meditation has been introduced at rehabilitation centres in semi-urban areas in
Pune - https://photos.app.goo.gl/VWdiggbZNKgu1NBD8
vii
     Effects of focus of Meditation on Pain Tolerance, Compassion, and Anxiety Levels -
https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/4511/Kluck_ku_0099D_10154_DATA_1.pdf?sequence
=1
viii
    Dr. Masaru Emoto and his experiments with water- https://thewellnessenterprise.com/emoto/
ix
    Crystal pictures are available in the Research paper published by the Samarpan Research Team. (Copyright
number ome999999B222)
x
 Biofield Science: History, Terminology, concepts: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654789
xi
    Swamiji’s aura report has been captured by the Aura Photo Clinic, London. The detailed report is available
online https://issuu.com/lavanyakannathass/docs/aura_of_a_saint_da0e0b14f5cfc0
                                                     353
     THEME F
STUDENT’S PLATFORM
                                             SUB CONTENT
INTRODUCTION
        Modern innovative technologies                  further in lower crop yields and
increase theincomein-equality among the                 productivity. The deficiencies of nutrient
different sections of farming population                elements     and    inappropriate     nutrient
andprovidelarge benefitstothe semi-medium to            management practices in agricultural soils is
large farmers as compared to the small-                 one of the reasons for low crop productivity,
marginal        farmers        (Wilson,2002).           reduced nutritional quality of agricultural
Honourable Prime Minister Shri Narendra                 produce which leads to animal and human
Modi has a vision for our farmers and                   malnutrition. The entire supply chain of
agriculture sector. In a Kisan rally in                 perishable food produce is fraught with the
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh on 28th February,               issue of post-harvest losses and wastage
2016 prime minister stated his dream to see             besides slower growth in the agricultural
farmers income doubling by year 2022,                   sector. All these factors ultimately expedite
when the country would complete 75th year               undesirable consequences on Farmer’s
of independence.        Agriculture sustains            income.
livelihood of more than half of the
population of the country. Doubling                     Seven strategies for doubling farmers
farmer’s income by 2022 is quite                        income:
challenging but it is needed and is attainable.
                                                                The Government is aiming to
Challenges of Indian Agriculture                        reorient agriculture sector by focusing on
                                                        income centeredness. In order to realise net
        India has witnessed a silent                    positive returns for the farmer, schemes/ 7
revolution evolving from food deficient and             important strategies as follows, are being
import dependent nation during the early                promoted and implemented in a major way
nineteen sixties to a global agricultural               through the States/UTs.
powerhouse today. India has emerged as the
world’s largest producer of milk, pulses, jute          (i)    Focus on efficient Irrigation along
and spices; and it is the second largest                with    adequate     resource    building:
producer of rice, wheat, sugarcane, cotton,             Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana
tea, groundnut, fruits, vegetables etc. India           (PMKSY) was launched in 2015-16, with
has achieved greater milestones in the field            an objective to enhance physical access of
of agriculture during past decades. Despite             water on farm and expand cultivable area
such gains, in present case scenario Indian             under assured irrigation, improve on-farm
agriculture faces issues associated with                water use efficiency, introduce sustainable
adaption to climate change disturbances,                water conservation practices, etc. It
fragmented     landholdings,     low     farm           emphasizes on Per Drop More Crop
productivity and high food price volatility.            (PDMC).
Soil degradation under intensive agriculture            (ii)   Work on institutional loan to
is being widely documented in India results             reduce risk in agriculture sector:
                                                  354
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana                       health card (SHC) provides a thorough
(PMFBY): Government is taking effective                assessment of the soil's quality, taking into
measures to reduce the risk of agriculture             account all of its biological qualities,
sector through Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima               functional characteristics, and water and
Yojana (PMFBY) & Restructured Weather                  nutrient content. It contains remedial actions
Based Crop Insurance Scheme (RWBCIS)                   that a farmer ought to take in order to get a
so that farmers feel secure even during the            better yield. The SHC assists farmers by
occurrence of natural calamities. PMFBY                providing crop-specific recommendations
was launched from Kharif 2016 after an                 for the nutrients and fertilizers needed in
extensive review of the prevailing crop                each type of soil, as well as a well-
insurance schemes. Under PMFBY &                       researched soil report and provide
RWBCIS, Government provides extensive                  professional advice on how to improve soil
crop insurance coverage from pre-sowing to             health and increase crop output. The Soil
post-harvesting     losses    from     natural         Health Card describes the condition of soils
calamities on the very low premium rates               in relation to 12 criteria, including pH,
i.e. 2% for Kharif crops; 1.5% for Rabi                electrical conductivity, organic carbon
crops       &        5%       for       annual         (Physical parameters), N, P and K
commercial/horticulture crops.                         (macronutrients), S (secondary nutrients),
(iii)    Overcoming        deficiencies     in         and Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn and B (micronutrients).
agriculture marketing through e-NAM:                   It also offers recommendations for fertilisers
E-NAM was launched on April 14, 2016                   based on the recommended crops in addition
where 455 mandis was linked to this scheme             to status information. Besides preserving the
& online trading has already begun on 116              health of the soil, Soil Health Card aids
Mandis. Aim is to consolidate disintegrated            farmers in increasing productivity.
APMCs & create a unified national market(iii)          (v) Strengthening warehousing & cold
for agricultural commodities. E-NAM will               chain facilities: As per a study, a loss of Rs.
reduce intermediation costs to enable                  52651 crores of agriculture produce every
farmers to get better price of their produce.          year has been estimated due to lack of basic
Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act              post-harvest       infrastructure     facilities.
(APMC) was launched (which includes                    Government invested 30 to 35% of the
private market yards, direct marketing) & all          budget for the growth of cold chain
the State Governments have been directed to            infrastructure under Mission for Integrated
implement it in their states.                          Development of Horticulture. To encourage
(iv)    Increase      production     through           farmers to store their produce in
improved seeds, planting materials,                    warehousing against warehouse receipts
organic farming & soil health card:                    (storage of produce for 6 months in
Government has given priority to enhancing             warehouse at the same rate as available to
the production of wheat, rice, pulses,                 crop loan.
oilseeds & horticultural crops. Under                  (vi) Value addition through food
National Food Security Mission (NFSM)                  processing: Government has allowed 100%
more than 60% of the budget has been                   FDI in food processing & food retail.
allocated for pulses. Soil Health Card                 Ministry of Food Processing Industries has
Scheme has been launched to provide Soil               launched SAMPADA (Scheme for Agro-
Health Cards to every field in the country.            Marine Processing and Development of
The Soil health card (SHC) was first                   Agro-Processing Clusters) under which the
introduced in 19th February 2015. The soil             food processing capabilities will be
                                                 355
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
strengthened through establishment of                    farmer’s group in all locations. Crop
backward & forward linkages of agro-                     production in many parts of India is
processing clusters. More than 20 lakh                   dependent on rainfed cultivation which
farmers are to be benefited by this scheme &             sometimes led to water shortage which in
it will create employment opportunities for              turn is the major abiotic factor limiting
5.3 lakh people.                                         growth and yield of cultivated rainfed crops.
 (vii) Allied activities of agriculture like             Crop production is highly sensitive to
 Dairy development, Poultry, Beekeeping,                 climate. It is affected by long trends in
 Fisheries, Agro-forestry & Integrated                   average rainfall and temperature, inter-
 Farming System: The Government is                       annual climate variability and extreme
 working on promoting 8 other income                     weather events (IPCC, 2012). Limited
 generation activities for farmers such as               adoption of improved technology due to lack
 animal husbandry, poultry, beekeeping,                  of awareness and other socio-economic
 fisheries,    agro-forestry     &      dairy            factors among farmers affects the crop
 development.                                            production. Key constraints to agricultural
                                                         productivity in the developing country
Sources of Growth in Farmer’s Income:                    include low availability of improved or
The doubling farmer’s income strategy as                 hybrid seed, lack of seed multiplication
recommended         by      Inter-ministerial            capacity, low profitability and efficiency of
committee constituted by Government of                   fertilizer use due to the lack of
India include two sources of income growth               complimentary improved practices and seed,
                                                         and lack of irrigation and water constraints.
(i) Within agriculture source of income                  In addition, lack of transport infrastructure
     a) Improvement        in     the     crop           and market access decreases the profitability
        productivity                                     of adopting improved practices.
     b) Improvement in the livestock
        productivity                                    Reducing Cost of Cultivation
     c) Resources use efficiency or savings                            The     use     of     modern
        in the cost of production                        agricultural techniques, efficient farm
     d) Increase in the cropping intensity               planning, diversified agriculture via
     e) Diversification towards high value               demand-driven production and better
        crops                                            exposure to local as well as distant markets
(ii) Outside agriculture source of income                can help the farmers in decreasing the
     a) Improvement in real prices received              production cost of crops, creating better
        by the farmers                                   demand for their agricultural produce,
     b) Shift from farm to non-farm                      exploring additional working hours and
        occupations                                      ultimately making agriculture a profitable
                                                         occupation. Reducing the cost of cultivation
Production Constraints
                                                         can be achieved with the help of following
       Crop production in many places in
                                                         methods.
India is low and uneven. This affects food
security and rural livelihoods. Identification
                                                         Enhancing resource use efficiency
of constraints and opportunities is a first and                  Efficiency in food production
essential step in process development,                   largely depends upon extent of management
targeting higher crop productivity. Location             of different resources. Resource use
specific conditions and agronomic factors                efficiency in agriculture plays an important
were considered main constraints by
                                                  356
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
role in determining the farm production and            technique or improvements in technology.
income. Manures and fertilizers, irrigation            Some sources of changes in agricultural
facilities, manpower, seeds, bullock labor,            productivity are included below:
hired, human labour, working capital, farm
implements and machinery and crop                      Sustainable Agriculture Management:
protection measures are the major crucial                      Agriculture depends to a large extent
inputs in agriculture. The size of farm                on the services provided by ecosystems.
income depends on the efficiency with                  Sustainable      agriculture      approaches,
which farmers are able to utilize these                therefore focus on optimizing production
resources. With higher efficiency in the use           while minimizing negative environmental
of scare resources, farmers can augment                impacts and promoting actions for the
their income and savings.                              protection, conservation, enhancement and
                                                       efficient use of natural resources. It offers
Low input farming system                               solutions for the implementation of
         The    concept      of   sustainable          sustainable management systems that allow:
agriculture refers to the adoption of                  Implementation of functional social and
agricultural practices that aim at preserving          environmental management systems that can
the natural resource base, especially soil and         be adapted to the specific characteristics of
water, by relying on minimum artificial                each productive landscape; responsible
inputs from outside the farm system and                management of service providers to reduce
recovering from the disturbances caused by             the indirect impact on ecosystems and
cultivation and harvest, while being                   natural resources; increased productivity
economically and socially viable. Low Input            through an optimization of resource use; and
Farming Systems seek to optimize the                   Implementation of mechanisms to facilitate
management and use of internal production              traceability and integrity of agricultural and
inputs (i.e., on-farm resources) and to                livestock products.
minimize the use of production inputs (i.e.,
off-farm resources), such as purchased                 Resource Conservation Technology
fertilizers and pesticides, wherever and                       It is scientific practice of agriculture
whenever feasible and practicable, to lower            utilizing resource conservation/efficient
production costs, to avoid pollution of                technologies to save and conserve the
surface and groundwater, to reduce pesticide           natural resources, increase the production
residues in food, to reduce a farmer’s overall         and productivity while concurrently
risk, and to increase both short- and long-            conserving the environment. It aims to
term farm profitability                                conserve, improve and make more efficient
                                                       use of natural resources to integrate the
Increasing Productivity of Farm                        management of available soil, water and
        Agricultural productivity is an                biological resources combined with external
important component of food security.                  inputs. It contributes to environmental
Increasing agricultural productivity through           conservation as well as to enhanced and
sustainable practices can be an important              sustained agricultural production. It can also
way to decrease the amount of land needed              be referred to as resource-efficient/resource
for farming and slow environmental                     effective agriculture.
degradation and climate change through
processes like deforestation. Productivity is
driven by changes in either agricultural
                                                 357
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Efficient rainwater management:                          environmental pollution, soil salinity,
        Rainwater is the main source of                  decline farm profit and climate change.
water for agriculture but its current use                Thus, crop diversification has the sound
efficiency for crop production ranges                    capacity for achieving the goal of nutritional
between only 30 and 45%. Annually, 300-                  security, income growth, food security,
800 mm of seasonal rainfall is not used                  employment generation and sustainable
productively, as the rainfall becomes surface            agriculture development.
runoff or deep drainage. Following                       Strategies for crop diversification-
conservation of the rainwater, its efficient             i. Shifting from low yielding low value
use is achieved through choosing                         crops to high yielding high value crops.
appropriate crops, improved varieties,                   ii. Shifting toward higher water requirement
cropping systems and nutrient and pest-                  crop to lower requirement crops.
management       options     for   increasing            iii. Shifting toward low energy efficient crop
productivity and conserving natural                      to higher energy crop.
resources.                                               iv. Inclusion of legumes and oilseed crops.
                                                   358
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ground surface, which contribute to                    improved crop production and protection,
increased water and nutrient use efficiency            including weed, pest and disease, soil
and to improved and sustained crop                     fertility, water and post-harvest management
production. CA facilitates good agronomy,              practices. These could include using
such as timely operations, and improves                fertilizer, planting in rows, regular weeding
overall land husbandry for rainfed and                 or mixing with other crops.
irrigated production. Complemented by                  Adapting improved varieties to different
other known good practices, including the              agro-ecologies
use of quality seeds, and integrated pest,             Targeting       improved       varieties    and
nutrient, weed and water management, etc.,             technologies to different cropping systems,
CA is a base for sustainable agricultural              environmental factors and farmer socio
production     intensification.    It  opens           economic status, including gender
increased options for integration of                   Understanding and contributing to positive
production sectors, such as crop-livestock             environmental impacts, including improved
integration and the integration of trees and           ground cover and soil erosion control, soil
pastures into agricultural landscapes.                 fertility improvement, efficient use of
                                                       fertilizer, genetic diversity, pest and disease
Climate Smart Cropping:                                control and preventing deforestation.
        Exposure to natural disasters and
changing weather patterns caused by climate            Increasing Cropping Intensity/Land Use
change are making it harder for farmers in             Efficiency:
India to provide their families with adequate                  There are majorly two ways to
levels of food security and a decent                   satisfy the increasing food and other
household income. There by improving                   demands      of     the   country’s     rising
climate adaptive capacities, farmers improve           population—either expanding the net area
their yields, leading to increased food                under cultivation or intensifying cropping
security and economic returns. And while               over the existing area.
we cannot stop hazards from arising,                   The net sown area of the country has risen
through increasing resilience to climate               by about 20 per cent since independence and
change, and by getting the information to              has reached a point where it is not possible
those most at risk so that they can                    to make any appreciable increase. Thus,
adequately anticipate and prepare, we can              raising the cropping intensity is the only
minimize the risk of hazards turning into              viable option left.
disasters.                                             Cropping intensity refers to rising of a
                                                       number of crops from the same field during
Integrated crop management:                            one agricultural year. Higher cropping
        For farmers to achieve the most from           intensity means that a higher proportion of
their new bean varieties, they need to know            the net sown area is being cropped more
how best to manage their crop, from                    than once during one agricultural year. This
preparing their land before planting, right up         also implies higher productivity per unit of
to harvesting and storage. Food and                    arable land during one agricultural year.
agriculture organization has adopted
integrated crop management practices. ICM              Efficient residue management:
is a practice which promotes to conserve and                  Crop residue management can
enhance natural resource while producing               improve soil productivity and crop
quality food. It is a sustainable approach to          production by maintaining SOM levels. It
                                                 359
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
results in increased OM near the soil surface           Government of India launched several
and enhanced nutrient cycling and retention.            schemes and programme for benefitting
Crop residues of common agricultural crops              farmers in this direction. Important
are important resources, not only as sources            strategies to double the farmers income are:
of nutrients for succeeding crops and hence             Improvement in the crop productivity;
agricultural productivity, but also for                 Improvement in the livestock productivity;
improved air, water and soil quality.                   Resources use efficiency or savings in the
Permanent and semi-permanent crop residue               cost of production; Increase in the cropping
cover on soil (live or dead mulch) plays a              intensity; and Diversification towards high
major role in protecting soil from physical             value crops. Agronomic interventions: crop
factors as from sun, rain etc. and to feed soil         diversification, conservation agriculture,
biota that take over the tillage function and           integrated farming systems, efficient water
nutrient balancing.                                     management etc are very central to these
                                                        strategies and holds the keys to double the
Improvement in seed replacement                         farmers income.
ratio/rate (SRR):
        Seed is the critical determinant of             REFERENCE
agricultural    production     on     which
                                                        Bussa Bhargavi, Beghera U.K. and Prasad,
performance and efficiency of other inputs
                                                               S.                                2019.
depend. Quality seeds appropriate to
                                                               Cropdiversificationwithhigh-
different agro-climatic conditions and in
                                                               valuecropsforhigherproductivitya
sufficient quantity at affordable prices are
                                                               ndprofitabilityunderirrigatedecos
required to raise the productivity. SRR is a
                                                               ystem.Indian JournalofAgronomy64
measure of cropped area covered with
                                                               (4):440- 444
quality seed. Hence SRR is having a direct
                                                        NITI Aayog 2017. Doubling farmer’s
bearing on productivity augmentation and
                                                               income rationale, strategy, prospects
enhancement in farmers’ income and is one
                                                               and action plan. NITI Policy Paper
of the means for achieving doubling the
                                                               No.1/2017.
farmers’ income.
                                                        Irrigation project sponsored by government,
                                                               https://pib.gov.in/pressreleaseshare.asp
CONCLUSION                                                     x?PRID+1849951, 08 AUG 2022
        Honourable      Prime      Minister,                   5:58PM by PIB Delhi.
Government of India provides a vision and               Bihari Bankey, Singh Madan, Bhishoni,
target for doubling the farmers’ income by                     Rajesh. 2020. Issues,challenges and
2022. It is central to promote farmers                         strategies for doubling the farmers'
welfare, reduce agrarian distress and bring                    income in India–A review. Indian
parity between income of farmers and those                     Journal of Agricultural Science
working in non-agricultural professions.                       89(8):1219–24.
                                                  360
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Bee keeping - promoting natural farming for sustainable source of income for
                   farmers at Lunglei District, Mizoram
                                   TIMOTHY LALRINFELA
ABSTRACT METHODOLOGY:
       Bee keeping is one of the promising                      Survey was conducted within the
enterprises taken up by KVK Lunglei,                   district, based on the availability of
Mizoram under attracting and retaining of              floweringplants and presence of interested
youth in agriculture (ARYA) project. The               youths. Ten villages were selected from the
district has a huge potential due to                   district and eighteen units were established.
availability of different flowering trees and          Training was conducted on bee keeping,
seasonal crop flowers. Most of the bee                 importance of flowering plants and method
keepers were located at villages where there           for     maintaining     flowering     calendar
were forests flowering trees for the bees.             throughout the year was taught. Awareness
Bee keepers start their own apiary (Apis               on avoidance of chemical inputs in the form
cerena) due to their interest without much             of plant protection measures and nutrient
knowledge of scientific inputs. Marketing of           inputs     was     instructed.    Beekeeper’s
local honey was a problem due to improper              association was formed andconsidered as a
packaging within the district and outside.             unit     under     ARYA        project.   Bee
Knowing its scope and with intervention of             keepingequipments like bee box, swarming
KVK, farmers within the district have a                bag, queen excluder, bee veil, gloves and
huge interest to go forward and for                    beecap were provided based on their
horizontal spread of the enterprise. Which             requirements at each village and the uses of
became one of their sources of income by               suchequipments were demonstrated. Bee
promoting natural farming. The main                    box was constructed mostly by following
objective of this study was to promote                 Japanese and Langsroth hive. Furthermore,
natural farming using bee keeping and                  assistance for construction of a bee box
generate sustainable source of income for              stand with ant panwas provided for a firm
the farmers.                                           stand of bee box.At the time of harvesting,
Keywords: Bee keepers, marketing, natural              packagingmaterials like 250gram and
farming, flowering trees                               500gram capacity packing glass jar was
                                                       provided with labeling stickers.
                                                 361
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Name of villages     No. of No.        of      No.       of    No. of youth       No.    Honey harvest
                     youth   training          youth           implement up       of     (Kgs)
                     trained &demonstra        implement       to final product   bee
                             tion              ing      the    (Labelling,        box
                             conducted         enterprise      branding)
                                                                                          2020     2021
Thingsai 15 2 12 7 95 97 230
Thiltlang 10 2 6 3 46 76 110
Hnahthial 10 2 7 - 20 37 45
Cherhlun 10 2 6 2 35 62 113
Muallianpui 9 3 8 2 44 89 167
Rawpui 8 2 5 - 22 36 67
Hrangchalkawn 12 2 5 - 12 32 42
RESULT & DISCUSSION                                      labeling, bee keepers get a good selling rate
                                                         as it is more attractive by the customers.
        Increase in honey harvest produced               This might be due to consumers preference
by Apis cerena was observed Table 1. This                on glass packaging because of its positive
might be due to improvement in using                     relationship     with    health   and      its
modern bee box mainly Japanese hive and                  attractiveness. Similar finding was reported
langsroth hive and promotion of natural                  by Yariz and Sezgin, 2017. Selling of local
farming. Langroth hive produce more honey                quality honey is never a problem in the
and are more profitable in modern bee                    district; as a result, more villages are
keeping (Oluwatusin 2008). Japanese style                interested in taking up bee keeping as an
of hive has proven to be very profitable for             enterprise.
Apis cerena bees (Fujio 2010). Natural way
of producing crop was popularized for the                CONCLUSION
benefit of honey bees. Well packed and
labelled local honey 250gm and 500gm was                         In order to promote natural farming,
sold at a rate of ₹.350 and ₹700,                        bee keeping is one of the important
respectively. With proper packing and                    enterprises to be included in the system. As
                                                   362
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
it also has the potential for increasing                Fujio (2010) Profitable beekeeping with
farmers income with proper packaging and                     Apiscerana.Bees Development 94:8–
labeling of honey. It can lead to entry of                   11
farmers into a entrepreneur venture. With               Oluwatusin, F.M. (2008) Costs and returns
promotion of more flowering trees and                        in modern beekeeping for honey
crops, there is a huge potential for increasing              production in Nigeria. Pak Journal of
honey harvest in a sustainable manner.                       Social Sci. 5(1):310–315
                                                        Yaris A. and Sezgin, A. (2017) Food
REFERENCES                                                   packaging: Glass and plastic, Research
                                                             in Science and Art 21st Century Turkey
                                                             81:735-740
                                                  363
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 364
  Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
  Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                   365
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
identified. Some of them include Maize (green                     The future prospects of natural
cob) - Indian mustard; Rice - carrot (raised beds         farming in northeast India are growing and
in lowland); Rice - tomato (raised beds in                expanding day to day. There is an
lowland); Maize + soybean- French bean                    insignificant price difference between
(upland). However, in Sikkim, there is a                  organic and conventional food. While
different set of cropping systems that are                organic food might be a little higher on the
identified. They are Maize (green cobs) –lentil –         cost and it also offers multiple health
buckwheat; Maize + beans- vegetable pea;                  benefits and prevents our body from the
Maize + beans – rajmash; Maize + beans – toria;           needless intake of pesticides and fertilisers.
Rice – vegetable pea – maize (green cobs); Rice           The Indian Government helps in promoting
– fenugreek (leafy vegetable) – baby corn; Rice           farmers to adopt organic farming. Multiple
– sunflower – Dhaincha (green manuring); Rice             government awareness like National
– vegetable pea.                                          Mission for Sustainable Agriculture
STATUS IN NORTH-EAST INDIA                                (NMSA),        Mission      for     Integrated
                                                          Development of Horticulture (MIDH),
        The present status of natural farming             National      Food       Security     Mission
in Northeast India is motivating. However,                (NFSM)and Rastriya Krishi Vikas Yojana
natural farming can be promoted even more                 (RKVY) have been implemented to promote
in the region as North east India is the hub              the sector.      A nation-wide awareness
for growing famous and demanded crops.                    programme called National Programme for
The region accounts for almost 45% of total               organic production (NPOP) to educate
pineapple production. It is also the 4th                  farmers about organic products and their
largest producer of orange. Sikkim is the                 benefits. The growth of organic product
largest producer of large cardamom in the                 awareness      has     become      a    global
world. The region is also home for Assam                  phenomenon, it has been receiving
lemon and passion fruit. Assam tea is also                appreciation even on international platforms.
known for its quality worldwide. NE also                  India, being an agricultural country, the
has a vast availability for organic manure. A             weather and climate are perfect for natural
huge quantity of biomass is available from                farming. Due to this, export rate of organic
forests, weeds and crop fields, etc for                   food is very high.Due to rise in smartphone
recycling and produce quality compost for                 usage and the low-cost availability of the
organic crop production which is the basic                internet, access to information about natural
input of organic farming. The region also                 farming and organic product has increased.
has a biodiversity of flora and fauna. The                It acts as a sale person reaching out to its
diverse collection of both flora and fauna in             consumer across the country. E-commerce
this region is a blessing as they favour the              has increased the demand and made it
possibility of organic matter recycling for               competitive by encouraging more and more
nutrient requirement of the crop and                      start-ups entering into the market.
animals. Due to this, there is an increased
demand and high prices of organically                     SWOT ANALYSIS ON NATURAL
grown products by the consumers in the                    FARMING IN NORTHEAST REGION
local markets as well as in national and                  OF INDIA
international markets.
                                                          Strength:
FUTURE PROSPECTS                                          Nutritive food
                                                          Improve soil health
                                                    366
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
Preservation of traditional variety and                integrated nutrient management through
species                                                various organic sources (manure, composts,
Environmental sustainability                           green manure, biofertilizer, oil– cakes, rock
Low productivity gap                                   phosphate, lime, crop and weed biomass
                                                       recycling etc.), weed–and pest–management
Weakness:                                              protocol have been identified and developed
Lack of established markets                            for organic production in the region.
Disjoined producers; processors and traders            However, still rate of adoption of these
Less incentive from the government                     technologies on organic production systems
Low availability of quality input materials            by the farming community is very limited.
Lack of strategy for development of organic            Hence, state Government and other
market                                                 Government of India nodal agencies should
Opportunity:                                           come forward to popularize and promote the
Growing market potential                               real potential of the organic farming for
Growing health awareness                               making NEH region as a ‘Organic Hub’ in
High export earnings                                   India and globe.
High biomass potential
Less use of inorganic chemicals                        REFERENCES:
Threats:
High cost of organic food                              https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31
Costly and complex certification process               7011678_Organic_Farming_Problems_and_
Lack of infrastructure facilities                      Prospec
Less awareness about organic inputs                    Authors: Subhash Babu et. al. (IARI, New
Problem of field contamination                         Delhi)
                                                       Das et. al. (2017a)
CONCLUSION                                             Avastheet al. (2016)
                                                       APEDA statistics for the year 2021-2022
        The real potential of organic farming
is yet to be harnessed, especially in north–
east region where most of the farmers are
under marginal and small category. Mostly,
identification of efficient varieties of
different crops, potential cropping systems,
                                                 367
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                     368
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 369
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                 370
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  371
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
ABSTRACT
        The Orchidaceae, one of the largest            According to reports, large number of
family amongst angiosperms, comprises of               orchids are classified as rare (31),
25,000 species distributed under 800 genera.           endangered (6), vulnerable (4), threatened
About 70% of orchids found in India resides            species seeking attention for immediate
in the North-eastern part of the country, with         action for conservation. Paphiopedilum
Arunachal Pradesh having the highest                   orchids or “Lady’s slipper orchids”, the
number of species. Meghalaya is blessed                genera of the state flower are among the
with tremendous flora and fauna. Orchids               orchids that are listed on Appendix 1 of
are famous and highly exploited for their              CITES. This study was conducted to
ornamental and economic value, which                   compile the information available on
includes traditional folklore medicine,                biodiversity of orchids of Meghalaya, their
sources of hunt for new compounds                      status and prospect for conservation and
attracting the pharmaceuticals, their                  sustainable utilization. Adopting strategic in
evolutionary significance. Of 1300 species             situ and ex situ suites, propagation and
of orchids reported from India, the state is           development of conservation steps can be
home to 363 species (28 %) under 107                   taken up to conserved this rare and unique
genera and covering different habitats.                orchids.
                                                 372
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                  373
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
    Estimation of biodiversity index of plant species in the integrated farming
                 system of College of Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai
          AMAN KUMAR1*, SABYASACHI MAJUMDAR2 AND U. K. BEHERA3
1
 Under-Graduate Student, 2Assistant Professor, 3Dean, College of Agriculture, Central
Agricultural University (Imphal), Kyrdemkulai – 793105, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya
*Corresponding author’s email id: amanbarnwal1068@gmail.com, sabyasachiuasd@gmail.com
                                                 374
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
      Formula: - [𝐃 =
                          ∑𝐧(𝐧 𝟏)
                                    ]                     reveals that the species richness and
                          𝐍(𝐍 𝟏)                          species evenness i.e. overall biodiversity
 Where; n- Total no. of organism of a                     is quite significant which ensures a stable
 particular species, s- Species richness, N-              ecosystem in IFS.
 Total no. of organism of all species.                 3. For Simpson’s Diversity Index (SDI) -
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                  Based on Simpson’s index (D), the
                                                          ‘Simpson’s Diversity Index’ (SDI) can
 Based on above calculations values for                  also be calculated by subtracting the
   Shannon-Weiner and Simpson’s Index                     value of D from 1.
   will be 2.266 and 0.13 respectively. As              SDI = 1 −D
   we know that –                                      SDI = 1 – 0.13 = 0.87
1. For Shannon-Weiner index (H) –                       Contrary to Simpson’s index the value of
                                                          SDI is directly proportional to the
H = 2.266                                                 ecosystem’s diversity. Since in the
 The Shannon’s index is a way to measure                 present study the value of SDI (0.87) is
   the evenness of species in a community.                high represents higher species diversity in
   The term “evenness” simply refers to                   the ecosystem of IFS with more species
   how similar the abundance of different                 richness and evenness. It is just opposite
   species is in the community.                           to the Simpson’s index for biodiversity.
 Therefore; we have to calculate ‘Hmax’
   to get the evenness of the ecosystem:               CONCLUSION
Where, Hmax = ln(s); [s - Species richness =
   18]                                                         The IFS collection, although lower in
Hmax = 2.89                                            density, depicted higher species diversity.
Evenness (E) =         = 0.784                         The most abundant species were the Sthal
                                                       Padma, Papaya and Guava respectively;
 The value of E ranges between 0 to 1                 even we get more evenness in species
   which indicates zero species diversity and          diversity due to homogeneous composition
   infinite species diversity respectively.            of rest species. The IFS ecosystem had a
   Here we get that E= 0.784, it means the             greater species richness (18) and greater
   species richness and species evenness               species evenness due to homogeneous
   (species biodiversity is more, which                population and confirms a diverse, stable
   further ensures the stability and                   and healthy composition of ecosystem.
   sustainability of the IFS as an ecosystem.
2. For Simpson’s index (D)-                            REFERENCES
                                                       Parmita Sarma and Dhruba Das. Application
       D=           = 0.13                                  of Shannon’s Index to Study Diversity
              ×
                                                            with Reference to Census Data of
 It is known that value of D is inversely                  Assam. Asian Journal of Management
  proportional to the species diversity. The                Research.
  value of D ranges between 0 to 1 which               Ezra Angel R. Samosir, Zahidah Hasan, Lis
  indicates infinite species diversity i.e.                 Rostini, Herman Hamdani. Plankton
  homogeneous population and zero                           Community as a Bio-indicator of Water
  species diversity i.e. heterogeneous                      Quality in situ Ciburuy Padalarang,
  population. Since the of value of                         West Bandung Regency, West Java.
  Simpson’s index is 0.13 in the present                    Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
  study is closer to zero compared to 1, it                 Research.
                                                 375
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
TABLE 1. CALCULATION OF VARIOUS PARAMETERS                                         REQUIRED       FOR
ESTIMATION OF SHANNON-WEINER AND SIMPSON’S INDEX
Sl.    Name of trees in IFS       No of      (n/N)      Pi = n/N    lnPi      Pi.lnPi     (n-1)    n(n-1)
No.                             individual
                                    (n)
1.     Sthal Padma                  62       62/268      0.231     -1.465     -0.338       61       3782
       (Hibiscus mutabilis)
2.     Papaya        (Carica       56        56/268      0.208     -1.570     -0.326       55       3080
       papaya)
3.     Guava        (Psidium       41        41/268      0.152     -1.883     -0.286       40       1640
       guajava)
4.     Neem (Azadirachta           23        23/268      0.085     -2.465     -0.209       22       506
       indica)
5.     Lemon          (Citrus      17        17/268      0.063     -2.764     -0.174       16       272
       limon)
6.     Banana          (Musa       16        16/268      0.059     -2.830     -0.166       15       240
       paradisiaca)
7.     Mango (Mangifera            10        10/268      0.037     -3.296     -0.121       09        90
       indica)
8.     Plum          (Prunus       08        8/268       0.029     -3.540     -0.102       07        56
       domestica)
9.     Cardomom                    06        6/268       0.022     -3.816     -0.083       05        30
       (Elettaria
       cardamomum)
10.    Star fruit (Averrhoa        04        4/268       0.014     -4.268     -0.059       03        12
       carambola)
11.    Jamun                       04        4/268       0.014     -4.268     -0.059       03        12
       (Syzygiumcumini)
12.    Bay leaf (Laurus            03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       nobilis)
13.    Cinnamon                    03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       (Cinnamomum
       verum)
14.    Jack Fruit                  03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       (Artocarpus
       heterophyllus)
15.    Litchi         (Litchi      03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       chinensis)
16.    Elephant Apple              03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       (Dillenia indica)
17.    Tree Bean (Parkia           03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       roxburghii)
18.    Drum stick (Moringa         03        3/268       0.011     -4.509     -0.049       02        06
       oleifera)
       s = Species richness     N = 268                                     ∑𝑃𝑖. 𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑖 =            ∑𝑛(𝑛 −
       = 18                                                                  -2.266               1) =9762
                                                  376
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                           Zero budget natural farming
          ANWESHA BHATTACHARJEE, LAPKIBAI LAKIANG AND RIA
                       BHATTACHARJEE
                             B.Sc. Agriculture 3rd year 5th Sem
              College of Agriculture, Kyrdemkulai (CAU-I), Meghalaya-793105
                                                 377
 Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
 Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
 Disadvantages of Zero budget natural                    This is technically known as Zero budget
 farming:-                                                natural farming, as the food and
                                                          agriculture organization of the United
 This farming method used in some parts of               Nations calls it. This is also an attempt to
  India                                                   make small scale farming a viable
 The type of farming being debated, and                  vocation. Zero budget farming model
  there is not much scientific research under             promises to make farming expenditure
  evaluation.                                             cut down drastically and ends
 It is highly sustainable farming                        dependence on loans. It also reduces
 This farming technique used in negligible               dependence on purchased inputs as it
  areas.                                                  encourages use of own seeds and locally
 Zero Budget farming is set of farming                   available natural fertilizers. Farming is
  method that involves zero credit for                    done in sync with nature not through
  agriculture and no use of chemical                      chemical                          fertilizers.
  fertilizer.
                                                  378
  Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under
  Changing Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                     379
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
fixing actinomycetes of the genus Frankia and              1994; Sharma and Singh, 1994; Rathore et al.,
is therefore able to improve degraded jhum                 2010). Agricultural crops, together with alder
lands (Rathore et al., 2010). Frankia is a genus           trees forms a very remunerative agro-forestry
of soil actinomycetes in the family Frankiaceae            system and the ability of the trees to develop
that fix nitrogen, both under symbiotic and                and retain soil fertility is a possible promising
freeliving aerobic conditions, while most                  future if exploited with proper research
rhizobia donot (Benson and Silvester, 1993).               strategies
BNF and sustainable agriculture are by
definition synonymous with sustainability.                 CONCLUSION
Systems capable of fixing their own nitrogen
exploit their own environment less and may                          Nitrogen applied in fertilizers usually
even provide a positive contribution (Kennedy              provides benefit to plants, but it also has
and Tchan, 1992). Longterm sustainability of               serious disadvantages in causing pollution
the agricultural system must rely on the use and           when applied inefficiently. It is difficult to
effective management of internal resources.                match nitrogen supply to actual requirements of
The process of BNF offers an economically                  a crop at a given ecosite and any excess may
attractive and ecologically sound means of                 damage this or other ecosites. The occurrence
reducing external nitrogen input and improving             of significant leaching of nitrate can result into
the quality and quantity of internal resources             excessive reduction of nitrogen (ammonium) in
(Saikia and Jain, 2007). Actinorhizal plants               agricultural or forest ecosystems leading to
have the ability to develop an endosymbiosis               their acidification through the process of
with the nitrogen-fixing soil actinomycete                 nitrification (Kennedy, 1986). The present
Frankia. The establishment of the symbiotic                ‘high input’ agriculture is not sustainable. On
process results in the formation of root nodules           the other hand, BNF can be a major component
in which Frankia provides fixed nitrogen to the            in     the    improvement      of     agricultural
host plant in exchange for reduced carbon                  sustainability (Saikia and Jain, 2007). The
(Santi     et    al.,   2013).    Unlike      the          indigenous alder-based farming system holds
Rhizobiumlegumes symbiosis, where mostly                   promising sustainable agricultural models as
the host plants belong to a single large family,           crops co-cultivated with alder forms a very
Frankia can form root nodules in symbiosis                 remunerative agroforestry system through
with actinorhizal plants (Baker and Schwintzer,            BNF. Though this model may not fix all of
1990; Benson and Silvester, 1993). The                     shifting cultivation’s woes, it surely
symbiotic relationship between A. nepalensis               demonstrates convincingly how this technology
with nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes of the                  can help absorb growing populations and thus
genus Frankia has also been recognized by                  divert pressures to clear more forests for
some tribal farmers in Nagaland. Alder based               agricultural use. Done on a wide scale, this
farming is in practice since time immemorial,              could have a dramatic impact in stabilizing
such that alder trees which are more than 200              jhum cultivation and rehabilitating the damage
years are found in farming areas. The total litter         that has been done by jhum degradation (Cairns
yield of alder depends on the number of plants             2007). Alder based agroforestry, if exploited
and amount of N fixed varies between 48.3                  with proper research strategies, can become a
kg/ha (60 trees/ha) to 184.8 kg/ ha (625                   potential farming model on a global scale. In
trees/ha). Besides fixing atmospheric N, the               order to replicate this model in lower altitudes
litter added to the soil provides phosphorus,              where alder trees are not grown, certain
potassium, calcium and other nutrients through             research strategies should be developed so as to
the addition of biomass (Sharma and Prasad,                fully exploit the potential of this indigenous
                                                     380
Extended Summaries: National Conference on Natural Farming Systems and Biodiversity Conservation under Changing
Climate Scenario, December 5-7, 2022, Meghalaya, India
                                                     381
                              AUTHOR INDEX
Ahirwal Jitendra, 152                               Chandrashekhar, C. P 55, 291
Ahmed, Fazal Ali 295                                Chanu L, Joymati, 242
Ahmed, Rizwan 108                                   Chanu Soubam, Premi 371
Ajjappalavar, Prabhu 46                             Chanu, N.B. 57
Allolli, TB, 285, 288                               Chanu, Naorem Anjali 371
Altaf, KK, 252, 266                                 Chettri, Aditya 379
Anurag, TS, 349                                     Chikkalaki, Suhasini 285
Aochen C 171                                        Chishi K, Lalhmingsanga 190
Aravind, Sharon , 157                               Choudhary RL, 125,138
Assumi, S. Ruth , 168                               Choudhary, R.S, 317
Attupuram, Nitin M , 146, 149                       Chubasenla Aochen, 168
Avinash, 252                                        Das Bc 141
Avinash, 266                                        Das, Anup 300
Babalad H. B. 4, 40, 71, 74, 81, 84, 301            Das, Deep Jyoti 325
Banshan Iangrai, 171                                Das, Pranab Jyoti 195
Barman K, 217                                       Das, Priya , 240
Barman KC 217                                       Dasar, Venkatesh 285
Barman, Keshab 309                                  Deb, Lipa 306
Basavanneppa, MA, 268                               Deb, Rajib , 149
Bavidoddi, Arun Kumar 288                           Deb, SM 300
Behera, Pratishruti 354                             Debbarma, B, 373
Behera, U.K. 1, 96, 101, 105, 110, 177, 192, 197,   Debnath, D, 373
311, 374                                            Debnath, P, 129
Bezboruaah, Minakshi 354                            Deepa,74
Bhakak, Champak 300                                 Desai, BK, 252, 256
Bhale VM 206                                        Deshetti, Mallu 46, 288
Bhambri, M.C. 43                                    Deshetti, Mallu B 285
Bharose, Ram 93                                     Devarishi, Sharma L, 297
Bhat Divya 64                                       Devi, Maimom Bidyalaxmi 369
Bhat, SN 268                                        Devi, Mayengbam Premi 1, 192, 364, 368,
Bhattacharjee, Anwesha 377                          372
Bhattacharjee, Ria 377                              Devi, N Olivia 235
Bhumapati ,N. 95                                    Devi, Ngangom Uma , 1, 96, 197
Biradar A. P. 40                                    Devi, Salam Jaya Chitra 141, 144, 146
Biradar, Renuka 40                                  Devi, Tombisana RK 235
Bora, PK, 241, 308                                  Deviandn, K.Merina 95
Borang Siyang 168                                   Dhage S, Sagar 81, 84, 301
Boro, Utpal , 295                                   Dhar, Shri 90,190, 297
Buragohain, Rajat 78                                Dhuria Ankush 21
Chaitanya 49                                        Dohare A.P.S 93
                                       i
Dotaniya ML 125, 138                          Juwardoley, 144
Duradundi H. P., Sanjiv 46                    Jyothi, KS, 305
Dutta, Pranab 306                             Kalita, Girin 295
Fagodiya, R. K. 10                            Kalwaniya, Susheela 68, 87
G. Bhuvana Priya 1, 177                       Kalyan, De, 141, 144, 146, 149
Gaddanakeri, S. A. 52                         Kandiannan, K, 118
Gatphoh Emica, 168                            Kena, Takash 370
Geeta Kalaghatagi 81                          Khammuanthang, Samte 364
Geeta, Goudar, 291                            Kolwalkar, Anand 350
Geetha Kalagathagi, 301                       Konyak, Shangyo Y. 379
Geetha P, 230                                 Konyak, Wanmei M. 368
Giri, Sourav 379                              Krishna A. 49
Girish V. P 55, 291                           Krishnamurthy, Ks 118
Gogoi, Jyotim 306                             Kulkarni, Sunil 254, 260
Gondi, Shruti 288                             Kumar Aman 197, 374
Gopal Lal 114                                 Kumar Amit, 171
Goudra,Shivanand 55                           Kumar, Sanjeev 93
Gupta, Lokesh 246                             Kumar, Satish , 141, 144
Gupta, Vivek Kumar 141, 144, 146, 149, 217,   Kumar, Shiva 266
309                                           Kumar, Sunil 43
Gurav S G 64                                  Kumar, Vinay 93
Gurudevi V. Navali 40, 71                     Kumari, Sapna, 251
Gyaneshoridevi, T. 95                         Laitonjam, Nivetina , 135
Hadole, SS 272                                Lakiang, Lapkibai 377
Hajong, Chayanika 369                         Lalhmangaihsangi, Rebek 371
Handique, BK, 241, 308                        Lalhmingsanga 297
Harish GD, 168                                Lallawmsanga, 368
Hazarika B.N. 57, 129, 167                    Lalrinfela, Timothy 361
Hemochandra L 240                             Lalrinkimi 371
Hongal S 64                                   Lalrintluanga, K, 295
Hrahsel, Lalrempuii , 152                     Lalvensanga, R 365
Islamr,149                                    Limbu, Prasanga 179
Jagannath, Bonde Kuldeep 303                  Loino, Vanlalneihi B, 190
Jaiswal, Sandeep 171                          Lyngdoh, R 373
Jamadar, M. M 71                              Mahanta Dibakar 237
Jamir, Lemnaro , 168                          Mahanta, Madhusmita 306
Jat, RS, 125, 138                             Maheswarappa, H.P 64, 285, 288
Jaya 141                                      Maheswarappa, Sowmya B, 46
Jena, Manoj Kumar 335                         Majumdar, Sabyasachi 1, 101, 105, 374
Jha, Shankar , 251                            Mallesh, 252, 266
John Joseph, 168                              Manjuanth, SB, 291
                                   ii
Manjulatha G. 49                         Phatak, R 64
Manjunatha, S. B 55                      Philanim, WS, 171
Manna, MC 251                            Podder, Rubai 300
Marak Amchichi M. 368                    Pooja, Lr, 155
Marwein, Y, 241, 308                     Praharaj, Cs, 110
Mastiholi, Anand B. 46, 285, 288         Prakash H.T. 40
Meena B.S. 68, 87                        Prasad, SS, 251
Meena, Mk 125                            Prasath, D 157
Meena, Vd, 125                           Pujeri, Madhumati S. 52
Meera, K , 195                           Purakayastha, TJ 242
Meinam, Nabila 368                       Puyam, Subhas 349
Milton, AAP 177                          Raghavendra, K S 64
Mishra, Arun Kumar 335                   Rai, Aniket 365
Mishra, Shivdhar , 155                   Rai, Pk 125, 138
Mitra, K 329                             Rajanand, Hiremath 81, 84
Mohan, Nh, 141, 149                      Rajanikanth E. 49
Mohanty Jayashree 129                    Rajashree, 30
Murry, J, 373                            Ralte, L, 373
Murtem, Ekta 369                         Ramarao 254, 260
Murthy, M K Kailas 35                    Ramesh ,Kulasekaran 226
Nagar Gajendra 68, 87                    Rani, Priyanka 21
Naik, Upendra 18                         Rao, Satyanarayana 18, 30, 252, 254, 260,
Namgey, N 182                            266, 268
Nargis, Fatima 55, 291                   Rathod, Pandit S , 252, 266
Nayak, LK, 329                           Ravikumar 46
Nayak, Somanath 311                      Ray, Lala IP, 240, 241, 305, 308, 313, 325
Ngangkham, Umakanta , 171                Ray, Sanjay Kumar 300
Ningomba, Shitaljit 90                   Reang Hamtoiti 156
Palanissami, C 230                       Roy, AN 329
Pandey, AK 179                           Sadawarte, Vaishnavi 350
Panika, Tilak Prasad 354                 Sadhukhan, Rahul 90, 297
Parida, PK, 313                          Sahoo, Uttam Kumar 152
Patil MB, 301                            Saikhom, Victor, 349
Patil, B.O 55, 291                       Saji KV 157
Patil, M. B. 84                          Samadiya, Vinay 43
Patil, Soumya 40, 71                     Sanasam, S 373
Patil, Suvarna 285                       Sankalpa, C. P 55
Pattanaaik, Sk, 129                      Sarap, PA 272
Paul, Sangeeta , 138                     Saraswathi 81, 84, 301
Paul, Souvik , 141, 144, 217             Sarkar, Animesh 300
Pegu, S.R , 149, 217, 309                Sarma Pranabjyoti 57, 192
                                   iii
Sawant, CG 297                        Sreenivasulu G. 74
Shankar, Kamble Anand , 268           Srinivasan, V 118
Shantappa, T 46, 285, 288             Suma, A, 168
Shanthy, Rajula T 230                 Swami, S 305
Sharma, L. Devarishi 90               Swetha, Konga 325
Sharma, S. K. 10, 99                  Talukdar, Dibyajyoti , 295
Shesh Jayesh 43                       Tayade, AS, 230
Shilpa, C 81                          Thakur,Raj Kumar 21
Shirisha, K, 313                      Thankamani, Ck, 118
Shivakumar, 252                       Thomas, R. 149, 217, 309
Shivay, Yashbir Singh 203, 242        Uma, V, 288
Shobharani, M 254, 260                Umesh Babu 93
Shrivastava, Manoj , 155              Umesh MR, 252, 266
Shukla, YR, 303                       Venkanna, R. 268
Sibanandadarjee, 155                  Venkannar 18
Singh Bikram , 129                    Venus, Yengkhom , 197
Singh Th, Abinash 372                 Victor L 135
Singh, AK 305                         Vidyavathi, G.Y 81, 84, 301
Singh, Hv, 125, 138                   Vikram Kv, 138
Singh, L Sanajaoba 182, 371           Vishweshwar, Shripad 285
Singh, LH 241, 308                    Walia, Anamika, 303
Singh, LH, 308                        Wangshol, Konison 371
Singh, Mutum Ronaldo 90               Yadahalli, G.S 81, 84, 301
Singh, NJ, 240, 349                   Yadav, Pinky 99
Singh, PP 251                         Yamuna, Pandey, 179
Singh, Pratap 68, 87                  Youdon, Chhering, 303
Singh, R, 241, 308                    Zaman Galib Uz 195
Singh, Raghavendra , 110
Singh, Rajkumar Josmee 94
Singh, Ram 135
Singh, Renu , 155
Singh, RJ, 349
Singh, Sanjenbam Sher 94
Singh, SK, 251
Singh, SP, 251
Singh, Ummed 110
Singh, Vinay 300
Singha, Kanzam Shubhrata 369
Sowjanya B. 49
Sowjanya T V 64
Sowmy, B. 285, 288
                                 iv