Bba Group Assignment - Group.no, 3
Bba Group Assignment - Group.no, 3
Bba Group Assignment - Group.no, 3
1
QUESTION. A
HESABU consultants (‘the firm’) on payment of their audit fees by SAKA, would likely
be considered unsecured claims in SAKA’S bankruptcy proceedings. As such they may
not receive full or immediate payment for their outstanding fee.
Therefore, the court will provide the order and manner in which unsecured creditors are
paid from available assets
QUESTION. B
the firm on the legality of the directors of MOTA Ltd and KUPWA to receive remuneration
from the partnership business. Under the Law of Contract Act, Cap 345 R.E. 2002, section
194 explains carefully the “conduct of business, mutual rights of partners and
liabilities” under (d) a partner is not entitled to receive remuneration for taking part in the
conduct of the business Concluding that the directors of MOTA Ltd and KUPWA will not
receive remuneration from the partnership business.
The one who has a right to take part in a management of the partnership business can be
seen Under the Law of Contract Act, Cap 345 R.E. 2002 section 194 explains carefully the
“conduct of business, mutual rights of partners and liabilities” under (a) every partner
has a right to take part in the management of the partnership business concluding that
MOTA Ltd and KUPWA partners are all involved in the management of the partnership
business
Dr. Zongo’s self-made rules are likely to be considered invalid as they violated the rights
of other partners, the other partners may take these rules and challenge them to recover any
violated rights that have been improperly addressed
QUESTION. C
The legal status of the contracts of employment between KUPWA and Kali and Tuwe, is
Invalid /void contract because under the company act which clearly explains the winding
process the companies act, 2002.section 425 states that once accompany is being wound
up, any transfer of shares, alteration in status of member, or any creation of any charge on
the business’s property withought the approval of court is void
contracts of employment between KUPWA and (Kali and Tuwe), in early 2019 they
entered into contracts of employment with two persons (Kali and Tuwe), but by the court
2
in October, 2018 KUPWA was already compulsorily wound up (liquidated). Meaning that
when a business is wound up, its power is limited to action necessary for beneficial wind
up of its affair.
QUESTION. D
The legality can be stated under Section 427 of company’s act,2002 provides that” after a
wind up order has been made, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be proceeded
with or commenced against the business except by the leave of court.” Concluding that
all the post windup contracts made between KUPWA and Kali and Tuwe were void
contracts
The legality of MOTA Ltd in refusing to work with Kali and Tuwe depends on the basis
and the consequences of such refusal. MOTA Ltd has a valid reason to refuse to work with
Kali and Tuwe, such as breach of contract, fraud, negligence, or misconduct, then MOTA
Ltd may be justified in terminating or suspending the relationship with Kali and Tuwe.
Leading kali and Tuwe with an advantage according to “Misrepresentation” defined by
the Law of Contract Act, Cap 345 R.E. 2002, section 18(b) which state that, “any breach
of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person
committing it, or anyone claiming under him, by misleading another to his prejudice,
or to the prejudice of anyone claiming under him”.
QUESTION. E
There was no legal remedy available to Mr. SAKA against MOTA Ltd after refusing to
take over liabilities of SAKA’s sole proprietorship business, since MOTA Ltd is a separate
legal entity and it is not obligated to assume the debts of another company, regardless there
is same directors and shareholders
QUESTION. F
REMEDIES
3
with the contract terms and conditions. Upon termination, the Council may seek compensation for
any losses incurred as a result of the termination.
2) Damages:
The Council can claim damages from Mr. SAKA company for any losses incurred as a direct
result of the breach of contract. Damages can be compensatory, which are meant to put the injured
party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed, or they can be
punitive, which are intended to penalize the breaching party for their wrongful actions.
3) Specific Performance:
If the contract was for a unique or irreplaceable product or service, such as the supply of a specific
type of fertilizer, Iguguno District Council may seek an order of specific performance. This remedy
requires the breaching party, in this case, Mr. SAKA company, to perform their contractual
obligations. However, this remedy is generally not granted if damages would be an adequate
remedy for the breach.
4) Settlement Agreements:
Another option for Iguguno District Council is to negotiate a settlement agreement with Mr. SAKA
company. This can involve the parties reaching a mutually agreeable resolution to the breach,
which may include modified terms, extensions, or partial performance.
5) Mediation or Arbitration:
In some cases, it may be more appropriate for the parties to resolve their dispute through
alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration. These methods can help
the parties come to a mutually acceptable resolution without the need for formal litigation.
In conclusion, Iguguno District Council has several contractual remedies available to them after
Mr. SAKA company’s failure to perform the contract. These remedies include termination,
damages, specific performance, settlement agreements, and alternative dispute resolution
methods. The choice of remedy will depend on the specific circumstances and the preferences of
the affected party.
QUESTION. G
Given that the creditors of KUPWA remained unpaid after winding up of the company,
the creditors may have certain rights against the shareholders of KUPWA, if KUPWA
assets are insufficient to cover the liabilities creditors may have the right to seek repayment
from the shareholders of KUPWA, particularly if it can be shown that shareholders have
acted frequently, unfairly, or in a manner that has caused harm to creditors
Seeking contribution from the shareholders of KUPWA if it is stated that they have
received a benefit from company’s assets that was not fairly distributed among the
shareholders of KUPWA
4
QUESTION. H
QUESTION. I
5
and directors. Regularly reviewing and updating this information will help maintain compliance
with Tanzanian laws and regulations.