0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 80 views4 pagesAlloy Selectionfor Cold Forming Part 1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Alloy Selection for
COLD FORMING
Stainless steels and high-temperature
alloys are available today for virtually
any cold heading, forming, upsetting,
or extruding operation.
Part I covers stainless steel alloys;
Part II July AM&P) will cover
high-temperature and specialty alloys.
Douglas G. Frick
Carpenter Tecnology Corporation
Renting, Penson
ally grades of stainless steel and other
Fake oieecbonceagadiorvir
tually every cold heading, forming, upset-
ting, and extruding operation. They are
necessary forthe growing number of fastener com-
ponents that must have the corrosion resistance
and strength to withstand harsh environments, high
operating temperatures, and great pressures, as
well as requirements for special magnetic properties
(Big. 1). For all such components, alloy selection has
also been governed by the need to reduce part costs
and secondary machining operations, thus im-
proving productivity.
‘This article cliscusses selection guidelines, de-
fines alloy classes, and describes the applications
_mest suitable foreach alloy class.
Selection guidelines
‘The manufacturer who meets required material
specifications has no problem selecting the right
stainless steel or high-temperature alloy for a
heading job. However, if no specifications are pro-
vided, the producer may determine the best alloy
by means of an orderly, four-step process.
“The following questions, in order of importance,
should be answered:
1, How much corrosion resistance is required?
2 What strength is needed, considering that me-
chanical properties may be affected by heading and
heat treatment?
3. Which of the alloys meeting corrosion and
strength requirements offer the best headability?
4. How available is the alloy?
‘Twoadditional variables should be considered.
One is part complexity, which determines the
severity of upset or extrusion. The second is the
heading wire coating. Especially in the case of an
alloy not easily headed, the coating is essential in
facilitating forming and providing reasonable tool
life.
Alloy classes
Before examining corrosion resistance asa scloc-
tion requirement, a brief review of the stainless steels
and high-temperature alloy classes may be helpful,
particularly as they pertain to heading and forming,
* AISI 400 series: The simplest stainless steels con-
tain a minimum of about 11% chromium, in acc
tion to iron. They generally are known as the AISI
400 series of stainless steels and, clepending on the
chromium and carbon contents, may be marten-
or ferritic. The martensitic alloys, which typi
cally contain more than 0.08% carbon, are harden
able by heat treatment. Type 410 stainless fa typical
martensitic alloy in this series.
Increasing chromium or reducing carbon results
ina ferrtic stainless steel, which cannot be hard
ceed by heat treatment. Increasing chromium also
increases corrosion resistance. Type 430 stainless
(18% chromium), a typical alloy in this family, is
more corrosion resistant than Type 410 stainless
(12% chromium).
* AISI 300 series: The AISI 300 series provides a
significant improvement in corrosion resistance.
Nickel is the most important alloying element in
the 300 series, which inclu types such as Custom
Flo 302HQ, Type 304, and Type 205 stainless steels
‘These are the 188 stainless steels, containing about
18% chromium and a minimum of 8% nickel. They
are austenitic alloys that are not hardened by heat
treatment, but they do work-harden by cold
‘working, Molybdenum may be added for greater
resistance to chloride pitting (Type 316). Stil other
alloying elements may be added to enhance fabri-
cation characteristics. For example, the 3 to 4%
Fig. 1— These are some ofthe many fasteners cold formed of specialty grades of
steels and high-temperature alos
ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES /JUNE 2003re
a 3
$l Pe
i” =>
i ee
2 =
. * Cold wad pent .
Fig. 2— Typ work adn rates of Frac speed cod nda stan
less les demonstrat the influence of alloy composition.
Relative headability of common stainless steels*
Typical maximum
tensile strength, Typical
Alloy 5% cold work, MPa (ksi) workshardening rate
430 599 (86) 07
410 21 () 09
No. 10 572 (83) 14
302HQ 572,63) 13
305 641 (83) 15
316 685 (95) 16
304 655 (95) 1s
304 Mod. 59 (100) 18
Pitren 758(110) 18.
st oy mn aoa ado it Waring a
ince oe gor pt ct a gh ng
copper in Custom Flo 302HQ lowers the work-
Ne eicingrne tusimprotinghesdtiy
+ AISI 200 series: Type 204-Cu alloy, a 200 series
austenitic stainless is a recent low-nickel alterma~
tive to 18.8 stainless Type 304. The 3% copper in
‘Type 204-Cualloy gives italower work-hardening
rate and better headability than other high-
manganese, nitrogen-strengthened alloys. High
nitrogen content maintains the austenitic structure
of the 200 series grade, giving it higher annealed
yield and tensile strength than stainless Type 304,
‘with similar headabilty.
Fasteners that have been made from Type 204-
Cualloy have remained nonmagnetic after cold
forming, and have been less susceptible to galling
than fasteners formed from high-nickel 300 series
alloys. Although properties are similar to those of
Type 304 stainless, the cost of Type 204-Cu alloy is
virtually unaffected by fluctuations in nickel prices.
‘The low-nickel alloy can be considered as a re-
placement for Type 304 stainless in fasteners that
require high strength and good formability.
* Precpitation-hardening alloys: Another stainless
steel category includes the age-hardening or pre-
Cipitation-hardening alloys, such as the following
Carpenter alloys: Custom 630 (17Cr4Ni) stainless,
15-7PH stainless, Project 70+ 15Cr-5Ni stainless,
Custom 450 and Custom 455 stainless, anel Armeo’s
PHI3-8Mo alloy. They provide corrosion resistance
atstrength levels above those ofthe 300 or 400 series
stainless steels,
+ High-temperature alloys The high-temperature
alloys comprise a separate classification. Included in
this group are grades such as Carpenter Pyromet
Alloy 718, Pyromet Alloy A-286, Pyromet Alloy
'882, and Carpenter Waspaloy. Like the precipita-
tion-hardening grades, these alloys require much
more specialized heading techniques and consid-
erably more energy to head.
“Another grade used in specialized applications
is Carpenter Ni-Cu Alloy 400. This alloy has rela-
tively high strength and toughness overa wide tem-
perature range. With its relatively low work-hard-
‘ening rate, this material is easy tohead.
Headability of various alloys
The heading process is defined as forming the
head ona fastener by upsetting. Headability is de-
termined by the alloy’s mechanical properties and
its work-hardening rate, the rate at which me~
chanical properties are increased by cold working,
Tensile strength alone is not a reliable measure
of headability, Because chemical composition de-
termines the alloy’s work-hardening rate. Two al-
loys with different compositions and the same an-
nealed tensile strength may have different
work-hardening rates. I the two alloys are cold-
worked by indie drawing, the one with the higher
work-hardening rate will have higher yield and
tensile strengths. Consequently it will be more dif-
ficult to head because more force will be needed to
shape the part.
Headability depends greatly on the ratio of yield
strength to ultimate tensile strength. Yield strength
must be exceeded before material can flow; how-
cever, the ultimate tensile strength cannot be ex-
ceeded or the part will crack
Stainless graces in the 400 series cold head much
like carbon and low alloy steels. Type 430 stainless,
with the lowest work-hardening rate, is the easiest
tocold form, and Type 440-C stainless is the most
difficult. N-Cu-400 alloy, listed in the high-tem-
perature specialty alloys section, offers headability
‘comparable to that of Type 430 stainless.
‘The 200 series stainless stols are somewhat more
difficult to cold form than the 400 series, because
alloys in the 300 group have higher werk-hard-
‘ening rates (Fig. and the table). Stainless alloys in
the 300 series require more energy to head than the
400 series. Carpenter No.10 stainless and Custom
Flo 302HQ stainless, with the lowest work hard-
‘ening rates in the 300 series, are the easiest to head.
Although Type 304 Modified (Type SOSH) i ess
headable than Type 304, its high work-hardening
rate is an asset for fasteners requiring high-strength
threads, Type 304 Modified, which has been used in
construction type fasteners, can be cold worked to
about HRC 40 to 45,
‘The precipitation hardening stainless steels and
high-temperature alloys are generally more diffi-
cult to head because of the alloying elements that
impart overall greater strength at cold working tem
peratures In the case of PH stainless steels such as
‘Custom 630 stainless (17Cr-4Ni), PHI3-8Mo stain-
less, and Custom 455 stainless, formability usually
can be optimized if the materia is in the overaged
32 ‘ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES /JUNE 2003condition. For example, Custom 630 stainless, with
the lowest yield strength and tensile strength, has
best formability when in the H1150M condition.
Material processed by this method must be subse-
quently solution-treafed before aging to reach max-
imum tensile strength
Some stainless steels offer cold heaclers max-
mum fabricating characteristics for components
that require secondary operations such as ma-
chining, Carpenter 302HQ-FM stainless is a good
example of how certain grades can be modified to
‘meet specific property requirements. This alloy
combines the headabilty of Type 202HQ stainless
with the free-machining benefits of Type 303 stain-
less. Itcan be cold headed into a variety of parts,
then easily machined in secondary operations such
as drilling slotting, and tapping,
Type 409Cb stainless
the automotive industry for muffler hangers and
brackets, catalytic converter weld wire, and in
‘oxygen-sensor components. Type 409CB-FM, a free-
‘machining variation, has been chosen to improve
fabrication performance and tool life where sec-
“ondary machining operations are required.
‘Advances in steelmaking technology now make
itpossible to modify composition and processes to
‘meet more specific requirements, New techniques
facilitate better contro of grain size, yield strength,
shear strength, and surface finish. However, to jus-
tify the cost of such modifications the usual caveat
applies —the volume needed mist be significant
Selection diagram
To simplify selection of the best alloy for a
heading or forming job, Carpenter has developed
proprietary method which plots relative corrosion
resistance and headability. Fig, 3 shows a diagram
in which 27 stainless steels and high tempera-
ture /specialty alloys are positioned in accordance
with these two key characteristics.
‘To choose an alloy, simply move up for better
headability, and tothe right for better corrosion re-
sistance. The drawing indicates that stainless Type
409C’, stainless Type 430, and Ni-Cui Alloy 400
have the best headability, while Waspaloy has the
highest corrosion resistance. No. 10 stainless ane
Custom Flo 302HQ stainless provide a good com-
bination of headabilty and corrosion resistance.
Obviously, some tradeoffs may be made int
selection process, because each application has its
‘own special requirements. When considering costs,
the best choice is the lowest cost alloy that provides
the properties needed.
Relative corrosion resistance shown on the dia~
‘gram should be considered only a general guide. For
Corrosion resistance to specific environments, con-
sult with the alloy supplier. In general, if corrosion
resistance is relatively similar select the alloy offering
the best combination of headabilty and cost
* Siainess Type 409Ciand stainless Type 430 offer
the best formability ofall the stainless steels, with
slightly ess corrosion resistance than stainless Type
304. Their formability is similar to that of low alloy
steels, which are easy tolhead. Stainless Type 40Cb
hhas been used for a variety of automotive applica-
rE
ie
ae
%
ln
Tea
me | Le
| 2a) Lae es
‘ pa
i z
rea) [a
FE
Be
ee
Fig. 3— Relative corrsion resistance ad ondabiliy of commonly ede ta
les steels and high-temperatureAspecalty alloys, "Trademark of Armco In.
tions (mentioned earlier) and stainless Type 430
hhas boen selected for many types of fasteners and
bolts
* Type 410 is ahandenable tainkessstee! with the
‘same tensile strength capability as stainless Type
481 when heat treated. Itis less corrosion resistant
than stainless Type 431, and has been used! most
often for sheet metal screws, bolts, and fasteners
exposed to atmospheric conditions
* Carpenter TrimRite stainless, specified for self
drilling construction fasteners, has better corrasion
resistance than stainless Type 410, the strength of
stainless Type 420, and corrosion resistance of stain-
less Type 430.
* No. 10 Type 384) stainless and Custom Flo 302HQ
stainless offer excellent headabilty and corrosion
resistance for severely formed parts. No. 10stain-
less, with its high nickel content, remains nonmag-
netic after cold working, The 302HQ alloy, which
becomes slightly magnetic after cold work, s more
readily available than No. 10 stainless.
* The 302H1Q-FM stainless is a machinable modi-
fication of 3021 stainless that s suitable for both
heading and subsequent machining. It has been
run in bar form on automatic screw machines to
produce parts where thread rolling or cold form
tapping operations are critical. Similarly, 409Cb-
FMstainless, a modification of 409Cb stainless, of-
{ers good formabilty with improved machinability
in secondary operations.
* Type 05 sinless s suitable for severely formed
parts and fasteners made in multiple heading stages.
In addition to its good formabilty, the alloy is also
useful for parts that must remain nonmagnetic after
cold working, This grade resists corrosion by severe
atmospheres nitric acid, and fooctstus,
+ Type 316 stainless isan easily formed alloy that
has superior corrosion resistance, and resistance to
pitting corrosion in particular. It isa good choice
for fasteners for the chemical process industries.
+ Type 308 stainless, which resists severe corro-
sion and corrodents such as nitric acid, s frequently
selected for fasteners with simple heead design:
‘Type 304 modified stainless isthe alloy of choice for
construction type fasteners. Composition ofthis
‘grace canbe adjusted to reduce the work-hardening
ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES /JUNE 2003rate for fasteners that require more severe forming,
* Type 20-Cu stainless can be considered for ap-
plications where high strength and good formability
are required. In addition, the allay mightbe appro-
priate for fastener applications that are currently
made of Type 304 stainless, Type 204-Cui stainless
offers two additional advantages — fasteners made
from the alloy remain nonmagnetic after cold
forming, and they are ess susceptible to galling than
fasteners formed from high-nickel 300 series alloys.
* Type 431 stainless car be heat treated to hi
strength than Type 304. While Type 431 has slightly
less corrosion resistance than Type 304, ithas the best
corrosion resistance ofall the hardenable grades. Tt
has been applied in marine fasteners and aircraft fas-
teners requiring corrosion resistance and toughness.
* Type 321 annd Type 347 are also austenitic stain-
less steels that can be cold formed. They resist cor-
rosion and heat, and are suitable for aircraft fas:
tener service at 800 to 1500°F (427 to 816°O),
Corrosion resistant alloys
* Carpenter 20CB-3 stainless should be considered
for fasteners or parts that require resistance to chlo-
ride stress corrosion cracking, hot sulfuric acid,
and /or many aggressive environments that readily
attack Type 316 stainless
* Precipitation hardening alloys should be considered
if more strength is needed than possible in an alloy
such as Type 431. The tradeoff to their typically high
‘mechanical properties is somewhat less formability
* Custom 450 stainless is an age-harclenable steel
that can be cold formed in the solution-annealed
condition. It has the very good corrosion charac
teristics of Type 304, along with considerably higher
strength capability after aging, It may be harclened
toapproximately HRC 50,
* Custer 630 (17Cr-4Ni) stainless is a precipitation
hardenable stee! offering high strength and hard-
ress with excellent corrosion resistance. Its strength
level is similar to that of Custom 455 stainless.
* 15Cr-5Ni stainless isa martensitic age-harden-
able stainless with strength and corrosion resistance
similar to that of Custom 620 stainless, but with im-
proved forgeability and transverse toughness,
© 15-7PH stainless is a precipitation hardening
stainless that is more easily formed in the annealed
condition because of its austenitic structure. It is ca-
pable of high strength via cold working and/or
thermal treatment to a martensitic structure. 15-
7PH stainless has been used to produce rivets for
erospace applications.
* Type 440-C stainless, which derives its harden
ability and high tensile strength from heat treat-
ment, is the most difficult of all stainless steels to
head. thas been used primarily in applications in
which balls are headed for stainless bearings. Ml
For more information: Douglas G. Frick Specalist~ Col
Technical Serviees, Carpenter Technology Corp. P.O.
Box 14662, Reading, PA 19612-4662; tel: 610/208-2526)
fax-610/736-7298; e-mail dfrickeeartech.com,
Circle 20 or visit www.adinfo.ce