MAI - Final Project - Progress 04.16
MAI - Final Project - Progress 04.16
By
Muhammad Afra Irwansyah
ID No. 004202000067
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROGRAM
CIKARANG
MAY, 2023
PANEL EXAMINER APPROVAL
Panel of Examiner
…………………………………………..
Chair of Panel Examiner
…………………………………………..
Examiner 1
ii
FINAL PROJECT ADVISOR
RECOMMENDATION LETTER
iii
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
I also declare that this work, either in whole or in part, has not been submitted to
another university to obtain a degree.
iv
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION APPROVAL FOR
ACADEMIC INTEREST
for the purpose of development of science and technology, certify, and approve to
give President University a non-exclusive royalty-free right upon my final report
with the title:
v
ADVISOR APPROVAL FOR
JOURNAL/INSTITUTION’S REPOSITORY
vi
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SMART FACTORY ON
PACKOUT AREA THROUGH ADDIE
METHODOLOGY AT TOY MANUFACTURING
COMPANY
By
Muhammad Afra Irwansyah
Approved by
vii
SIMILARITY CHECKING RESULT
viii
AI BASED PLAGIARISM CHECKING RESULT
ix
ABSTRACT
x
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This acknowledgement is presented to raise the praise of the people who has been
directly or indirectly support this research.
1. Gratitude to Allah SWT who has given me the opportunity and strength to
carry out this research and complete the report.
2. My beloved self as the bigest motivation to keep on progress to finish this
research and report.
3. My beloved family who always encourage me to put the best efforts on my
responsibilities.
4. Mrs. Anastasia Lidya Maukar, S.T, M.Sc, M.MT as my lecturer who
became my final project advisor that has been supporting me a lot in this
research and report.
5. Christopher for your amazing music.
6. My company’s supervisor.
7. All industrial engineering lecturer who has been giving me a lot of
knowledge.
8. All of my friends.
9. Others.
Sincerely,
Muhammad Afra Irwansyah
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
xii
LIST OF TABLES
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
xiv
LIST OF TERMINOLOGIES
xv
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
PT TMC as one of the largest toy manufacturing company in the world also facing
the same challenges on its manufacturing system. In packout process as their
secondary process, work-in-process (WIP) parts are being assembled into one
packaged and finished product. The area of secondary production floor nearly to
10,672 m2 with length 115 meters and width 92.8 meters. This area consists of 124
active lines and 514 machines used to support the line. As the ambition of PT
TMC to become a world-class manufacturing company that optimize the
efficiency, many observations performed in order to determine the waste and
improve the efficiency.
1
understand the workflow and also analyze the shortcomings. The workflow was
determined as unefficient as the processes takes a lot of time due to the
information collection that are available on many sources such as layout
changeover summary, layout drawing, and detail of machine used are still using
paper or printed out and also for the machine location is unavailable.
Based on the explanation, it is important to develop a new system that can support
layout changeover process and machine repairment process. The first objective of
the improvement of layout changeover is to reduce the time needed to conduct
layout changeover. Meanwhile, the second objective of machine repairment
activity is to reduce the response time of the mechanics. The implementation of
smart factory become the great solution to overcome and achieve those objectives.
So, the objective of this research is to implement smart factory on packout area.
Smart factory can be defined as a relation of workers and machinery on the job
execution (Hozdic, 2015). By implementing smart factory, the objectives will be
achieved and the other aspects also can be improved since smart factory and IIoT
allow the manufacturing company to perform device connection, real-time alert
2
and monitoring, and data-analytics. As a side objective of the development of
smart factory in the field of data-analytics is to develop a model for preventive
maintenance. Preventive maintenance is one of the maintenance classification that
can be applied through smart factory. By analyzing the historical data, preventive
maintenance can be modeled based on certain conditions.
The development of smart factory refers to the development of the new system to
support the production activity. There are many methodologies and approaches
that can be used to develop new system as an Instructional System Design (ISD).
One of those is ADDIE that stands for Analysis, Design, Development,
Implementation, and Evaluation. ADDIE is a suitable methodologies since all
steps of this methodology will cover all of the scope of new system development
and all of the phase is related one to another. Moreover, ADDIE is commonly
used on instructional designer activity and also for new developer training to help
the designer and developer build the model (Aldoobie, 2015). The advantages of
ADDIE are dynamic and flexible but still effective. Using ADDIE, smart factory
3
can be developed and the most benefit is that ADDIE methodology is suitable
with the workflow of the project on PT TMC.
Based on the background, this research will focus to answer these problem
statements:
1. How to implement smart factory on packout area?
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Scope
Due to the limitation of resources, time, and company policy, there are several
limitations that affect the scope of the research:
1. The observation was performed on packout process as secondary area.
2. The observation was conducted on October 2022 - March 2023.
3. Smart factory aspects implemented are the IIoT, device connection, real-
time alert and monitoring, and data analytics.
4. Smart factory is implemented to support the machine repairment and
layout changeover activities.
5. Data analytics performed only for preventive maintenance model
development.
6. Mobile application and website are made by third parties.
7. Piloting implementation was conducted on February 2023 - March 2023.
8. Several departments are related to the software development and piloting.
1.5 Assumption
To support the calculation process and analysis of the research, there are several
assumptions applied to this research:
1. The skill of mechanics and technicians are equal.
4
2. Andon system implemented is standardized by the company.
3. Spareparts for machine repairement are always available.
Chapter I Introduction
5
answer the objectives of the research.
6
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE STUDY
Production system refers to the transformation process that revamps the resources
into finished goods or services. In the transformation process, there are common
resources required such as capital, labor, machinery, raw material, space, and
other investment referred to as the 5M’s, men, machine, method, material, and
money. The company needs an approach that can systemize the production
system, machinery, and other components with uniform semantics (Gönnheimer
et al., 2020).
In the production system, facilities became one of the component together with
the manufacturing support system. Facilities consists of the plant, machines, tools,
material handling equipments, inspection equipments, and computer system that
can manage and control the manufacturing process in the company. In the
7
facilities, the arrangement of the machine, equipment, manpower, and tool is also
included since the arrangement will affects the plant layout. Manpower
participation in the manufacturing process can be categorized into three
categories. The categories are manual work system, worker-machine system, and
automated system. Figure 2.2 shows the differences in the visualization.
In the basic term, a company needs to organize their process design, equipment,
and machines, do plan and control to the production so the result will satisfy the
target and the quality requirements. Manufacturing support system refers to the
functions to support the production facilities to operate efficiently. Manufacturing
support system refers to the procedures and people that manage the production
operation.
8
the facilities required. Product quantity refers to the number of product that
produced by the company. There are three ranges that describe the level of
product quantity.
1. Low production rate
The product being produced in the range of 1 to 100 units per year.
2. Medium production rate
The product being produced in the range of 100 to 10,000 units per year.
3. High production rate
The product being produced in the range of 10,000 to millions of units per
year.
On the other side, some companies produce a different product types. Product
variety can be defined as a different product design that has different material or
methods that being produced in one plant. There is a relation between product
quantity and product variety. Figure 2.3 shows the relation between product
quantity and product variety.
In order to provide the facilities to produce high product types, layout changeover
is adapted. Changeover refers to the activities of changing the facilities to support
production activity. In the actual implementation, changeover between production
time takes so much time and can be categorized as lost production time. The time
9
needed commonly called 3Ups that refers to the activities of clean-up, set-up, and
start-up. Production changeover can be classified as a waste that represents the
process of changing the production line to produce one product into another. In
order to overcome the changeover, there is a concept called system flexibility that
allows the facilities to cope with a certain level or stages of variation without
changeover.
10
This condition may serve as a storage location for work-in-progress to reduce the
impact of downtime during operations. A production area along the flow of the
material. Figure 2.4 shows the visualization of product layout.
The advantage of this layout is that the flexibility of the operating process is quite
high but it creates a disadvantage in material transfer systems which are very
complex and expensive because the material flow is in a zigzag pattern (zigzag
flow). This layout also requires a relatively large floor area. Figure 2.5 shows the
visualization of process layout.
11
Figure 2.6 Fixed-Position Layout
2.2 Maintenance
Over an item's life cycle, maintenance is the sum of all technical, administrative,
and management operations intended to keep it in or return it to a state where it
can fulfill its intended purpose. Maintenance can be divided into two categories:
corrective (or unscheduled) maintenance, which is performed after a malfunction,
and preventative (or scheduled) maintenance, which is carried out in advance of
failure. A subtype of preventative maintenance called condition-based
maintenance (CBM) entails condition monitoring, assessments, and subsequent
maintenance actions (Schenkelberg et al., 2020).
Planning and carrying out maintenance is a difficult undertaking for any system
with a complex structure. The interdependence of the system's constituent parts
may significantly affect the integrity of the system. The complexity of systems
and maintenance expenses have expanded quickly towards the turn of the century
12
as Industry 4.0 gained traction, and related maintenance planning efforts have
proven to be particularly time-sensitive. The effects of a complex system failure
grow more significant due to economic losses like penalty fees and incurred
environmental damages, in addition to the enormous maintenance expenses
(Özgür-Ünlüakın et al., 2021).
Corrective maintenance is one area that calls for a lot of human expertise and
effort. When a system experiences downtime, a human technician monitors the
system, examines the fault, and implements the necessary corrections by
eliminating the fault's cause (Vathoopan et al., 2018). Corrective maintenance is a
process that requires human expertise and judgment. in order to find the broken
component, fix it, and minimize downtime. There are remedial maintenance,
deferred maintenance, and shutdown corrective maintenance.
13
2.2.2.2 Predictive Maintenance
2.3.1 Scope
2.3.2 Risks
2.3.3 Technology Stack
2.3.3.1 Hardware
2.3.3.2 Software
2.3.3.3. Communication Protocols
2.3.4 Implementation in Indonesia
2.3.5 Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
14
Figure 2.10 Flow Chart Symbols
There are 5 types of flow chart that used by defferent purposes. The list of flow
chart types is follow:
1. Document Flow Chart.
2. Programm Flow Chart.
3. Process Flow Chart.
4. System Flow Chart.
5. Scematics Flow Chart.
In the manufacturing company, the flow chart used to visualize production
process is process flow chart. Figure 2.11 shows the example of process flow
chart.
15
Figure 2.11 Flow Chart Example
2.5.1 Productivity
Time study refers to the study to determine the time standard of certain process of
operation. It is important to understand the concept of time standard. Time
standard can be described as a time required to produce certain product at
manpower’s workstation with these following conditions (Stephens, 2020):
1. Well-Trained Manpower
This condition suggest time study to be conducted on a well trained
manpower to make a standard time. The common mistake of time study is
the manpower that being studied is still beginner to the process so it makes
the standard time greater than it has to be.
2. Normal pace
Normal pace means that the time study needs to be conducted in the
normal conditions where the manpower is perform their task with a normal
efforts. Normal efforst refers to the condition when the manpower can
maintain their pace and feel comfortable, not too slow and not to fast.
3. Only doing specific task
16
Manpower are trained in a certain type of task, to satisfied that, the time
study also need to be conducted by separated a task into specific task.
2.6.1 Standard Time
2.6.2 Normality Test
2.6.3 Homogeneity Test
2.6.4 Standard Time Calculation
2.7 Andon
2.8.1 ADDIE
2.8.1.1 Analyze
2.8.1.2 Design
2.8.1.3 Development
2.8.1.4 Implementation
2.8.1.5 Evaluation
2.8.2 System Architecture
2.8.3 User Interface
2.10.1 Scheduling
2.10.2 Break-Even Point
17
2.11 User Requirements
2.11.1 User Acceptance
2.11.2 User Manual
18
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
19
Figure 3.1 Research Methodology
Primary area refers to the area where raw material are being processed to become
Work-in-process (WIP). The type of layout applied in the primary area is process
layout where the production process is divided by their process. Can be seen in
Figure 3.2 with light-red color. The secondary area focuses on doll head making,
hair planting, grooming, and packing out. Can be seen in Figure 3.2 with yellow
color. The layout applied in the secondary area is process layout and product
layout. Rotocast, BBD, and rooting use process layout. Grooming and pack out
use product layout. Soft-goods area focuses on making a soft-gods parts of the
finished product such as shirt, jeans, pants, and jacket through the process of die
cut and sewing. Can be seen in Figure 3.2 with green color.
20
Facilities available in order to support the production process can be categorized
as two main categories, tangible facility and intangible facility. Tangible facility
refers to the facility provided that can be used physically including area, tools,
machines, and devices such such as computer. On the other side, intangible
facility refers to the facility provided that cannot be used physically including
tracker system and data.
One of the biggest toy manufacturers in the world, PT TMC, is likewise dealing
with the issue of efficiency on their manufacturing system. Work-in-progress
(WIP) components are put together into a single packed and finished product
during the packout process, which serves as their secondary process. The packout
production floor has a nearly 10,672 m2 surface, measuring 115 meters in length
and 92.8 meters in breadth. There are 124 active lines in this area, and 514
machines service those lines. As part of PT TMC's goal to become a leading
manufacturer that maximizes efficiency, numerous observations have been made
to identify waste and raise efficiency.
Machine downtime is another issue that must be solved if the production floor is
to operate as efficiently as possible. It is well recognized that machine downtime
21
can potentially lower production output, particularly for manufacturing that uses
product layout. So, it is evident that less machine downtime is required in order to
maximize machine availability. According to complaints of machine problems,
there were 6,294 downtimes with an average repair time of 15.92 minutes.
Nevertheless, because the current approach merely relies on Andon light, response
time is not taken into account. Moreover, the 10,672 m2 covering area of the
mechanic results in a longer response time. Several grievances were made over
the length of time it took for the mechanic to detect a machine breakdown. Even
though the average response time is 15 minutes, it can sometimes take an hour.
According to the explanation, it is necessary to create a new system that can assist
with layout changeover and machine repair processes. The reduction of layout
changeover time is the goal of the enhancement of layout changeover. Reducing
the mechanics' response time is one of the goals of machine repair. However, the
main objective is to implement the concept of smart factory. The concept of smart
factory will only be developed and implemented to machine repairment and layout
changeover. On the other side, due to the limitation of resource, time, and
company pilocy, there are several limitations and assumptions that affect the
scope of the research.
22
7. Manpower capacity and productivity.
8. Time study.
9. Andon.
10. System development (ADDIE).
11. Database development.
12. Project management.
13. User requirements.
23
manpower. There are planner, layout leader, layout personnel, piloting
technician, and industrial engineering clerk. The swimlane diagram shows
the detailed process of layout changeover workflow from the beginning
until the end.
24
The research framework discusses the detailed version of the research
methodology. In the process of conducting the research, this framework will be
the guidance. Figure 3.3 shows the research framework of this research.
The research framework shows the initial observation will gather the data
collection. ADDIE methodology is used in this research. Starts from analysis,
design, develop, implement, and evaluate the system. After that, there will be a
comparison of current condition and improved condition. Investment and cost
savings also will be calculated.
25
5. Evaluation
a. User Acceptance Test.
b. Analyze the Feedback.
26
Figure 3.3 Research Framework
27
CHAPTER IV
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
In this research, the data collection can be divided into two categories, primary
data collection and secondary data collection. Primary data collection is the data
that being taken by the researcher in order to support the research. Otherwise,
secondary data collection is the data that being taken by someone else. In this
case, secondary data is the data collected by PT TMC as their tracking data
collection.
28
line leader needs to press the red button and the red light will turned on. There are
also differences on the means of andon light. In PT TMC, red light represent a
machine downtime, yellow light represent in-house material issues, and green
light represent vendor material issues.
Figure 4.1 shows the workflow of mechanic team based on the description in
advance. Based on the figure, it can be concluded that PT TMC adapt and
implement corrective maintenance activity where the maintenance is performed
when there is an issue. Based on the figure, there will be 2 categories of time
required on mechanic workflow. The first is response time and the second is
repair time. The total of time required will be downtime.
The Microsoft Form will collect the detailed information about machine
downtime. There are data about date, shift, activity, KPK (Employee ID number),
line number, issues, start time, and finish time. This data will be transformed and
29
loaded into Microsoft Power BI to track the frequency of downtime, average time
of downtime, and the issues solved per mechanic. The Microsoft Power BI will
evaluated by Mechanic Leader, Manager of Industrial and Automation, and
Director of Engineering.
There are 5 manpower roles related to the workflow of layout team, planner,
layout leader, layout personnel, piloting technician, and industrial engineering
clerk. The planner will schedule the production including for packout area. Once
the schedule is being released, layout leader will make the summary of the layout
changeover. This summary will be shared to WhatsApp group of Layout Team
and distribute the job and responsibilities for each layout personnel. Piloting
technician will give the drawing of the layout to layout leader by attaching the
hard copy of layout drawing on the layout leader locker. Layout leader will scan
the hard copy and upload it to Google Drive. Once the schedule of changeover,
the layout personnel will perform their responsibilities.
At the end of the week, layout leader will give the actual changeover summary to
industrial engineering clerk. Industrial engineering clerk will type the summary to
Microsoft Excel. This Microsoft Excel become the database of Layout
Changeover Report on Microsot Power BI. Figure 4.2 shows the workflow of
layout team.
30
The explanation described there are several shortcomings of current workflow that
are listed below:
1. Using personal message platform as the platform to share the layout
changeover summary.
2. Sharing the confidential information through personal message platform.
3. The actual layout changeover cannot be tracked real-time.
4. The tools and machine quantity details are not provided.
5. Industrial engineering clerk needs to input the actual layout changeover
summary at the end of the week.
31
4.1.2 Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data collection consists of packout shoftly report and layout
changeover report. Packout shiftly report is a data collection for machine
downtime. On the other hand, layout changeover report is data collection for
layout changeover.
The graph shows the count of machine downtime based on week ending. Based on
the graph, the highest count of downtime happened on 11/4/2022 - 11/10/2022
with total of 493 machine downtime. Those data can be analyzed deeper to see the
pattern on the peak or busiest period of a year for machine repairment activity.
32
Machine Downtime
600
500
Count of Machine Downtime
400
300
200
100
0
22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23
/20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20
9 8 1 1 2 7 7 8 9 9 9 1 1 2 3 3 3 4
/2 /1 /1 4/ /2 /2 /1 7/ /2 /1 9/ /2 /1 2/ /2 /1 2/ /2
<1 - 2 - 3 2 - - 4 - 5 - 6 2 - - 7 - 8 2 - - 10 - 11 - 1 - 12 - 1 3 - - 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3
02 02 20 02 02 02 20 02 02 20 22 22 02 22 02 20 02
2 /2 5/2 26/ 6/2 1/2 1/2 /2/ 3/2 3/2 /3/ /20 /20 6/2 /20 7/2 28/ 8/2
1 3/ 3/ /1 /2 /1 7 /2 /1 9 5 /5 /2 7 1/ 1/ /1
2/ 4 5 6 7 8 /1 1 1 /1 2
10 1 1 12
Week Ending
Figure 4.4 shows the machine downtime by shift. Machine downtime on shift 2
leads with the percentage of 64%, followed by on shift 1 with the percentage of
34%, and the last is shift 3 with the percentage of 2%. This historical data can be
used to determine the right and preferable time to conduct preventive
maintenance.
2%
34% S1
S2
S3
64%
33
The busiest shift for mechanic is on shift 2 which has 64% of workload of one-
day workload, followed by shift 1 with 34%. Since shift 3 is counted as an
overtime, the right time to perform preventive maintenance is on shift 1.
However, the schedule is not fixed. Preventive maintenance also can be performed
on shift 2.
The MTBF and MTTR are able to calculated using formula. Mean time between
failures are refers to the average of the time between two failure that are
consecutive. Meanwhile for mean time to repair refers to the average of time
needed to repair the machine. The following are the formulas to calculate MTBF
and MTTR.
MTBF or mean time between failure can be calculated using the following
equation.
(4-1)
PT TMC applied 6 working days per week and 8 working hours per day. Since the
data were taken from January 28th, 2022 – March 3rd, 2023. The total available
time can be calculated. On that time interval, there are 399 working days and 21
public holidays. There are also 514 machines used. The total available time in
minute can be calculated.
Total downtime can be calculated on excel using Pivot Table. The total downtime
is 237654 minutes. The number of downtime has been mentioned in advance with
9882 times. Then, the MTBF can be calculated.
93260160−237654
MTBF= =9413.32 minutes=6.53 days
9882
The MTBF is 6.53 days. This number tell the performance of the machine and
mechanic. The greater the MTBF, the better.
34
Meanwhile for calculate the MTTR or mean time to repair, following equation is
used.
Total Downtime
MTTR=
Number of Downtime
(4-2)
237654
MTTR= =24.09 minutes
9882
On the other side, since MTTR calculate the mean time to repair, the smaller the
duration the better. In this condition, the MTTR is 24.09 minutes.
The model developed for preventive maintenance will have machine list priority.
The priority will be based on figure 4.5 by considering the most time consumed
35
machine downtime. The highest machine downtime was from sealing blister
machine with 281 minutes, followed by spotwelding j-hook with 40 minutes, and
carton sealer UPLIN with 38 minutes.
On the other side, the available data also can used to calculate the manpower
productivity. There are 11 mechanics that support the machine maintenance
activity on shift 1 and 2. Manpower productivity will be calculated for each
mechanic. The manpower productivity can be calculated using Equation (4-3).
Manpower Productivity=
∑ of Repair Activity for 1 week
Available Time of 1Week
(4-3)
For the calculation of available time of 1 week in the unit of minutes, Equation (4-
4) is used.
After that, the sum of downtime duration per mechanic was calculated using
pivot. Figure 4.6 shows the manpower productivity. The orange-constant line
shows the maximum productivity per week and the bar chart shows the sum of
downtime duration.
36
Manpower Productivity
3000
2000
Sum of Downtime (min)
1000
Sum of Min
0
O H D RI KI DI AT A DI TO TO
I Average of Capacity
G A G
G AT WA SAE UL TA AY A BA AN AR
N F U U M R D IN A S I
PA AL J K M HA HI T S AD SU UG
P S JI R I S
SU U U NU OG HM KO
U AG M S O E
IY PA R ET
D M
A A
SL
Mechanic
Based on Figure 4.6, most of the manpower only use lower than 50% of their
maximum productivity. Eventhough this data was not taken real-time, this data
can be a guideline for productivity improvement by implementing smart factory.
Manpower Capacity
16%
Used Capacity
Unused Capacity
84%
Figure 4.7 shows the manpower used capacity and unused capacity. The capacity
used by mechanic in aggregate was only 16%. Because this data was not taken
real-time, it is hard to monitor on the same day. By the implementation of smart
factory, the activity and productivity of mechanics can be tracked real-time and
37
will lead to the balanced workload distribution and reduced unused capacity of
mechanic by assigning certain mechanic to support the other activities.
Total Changeover
400
300
Count of Changeover
200
100
0
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
9 /2 1/2 5/2 9/2 3/2 6/2 0/2 3/2 7/2 1/2 5/2 9/2 2/2 6/2 0/2 4/2 4/2 8/2 1/2 5/2
/2 /1 /2 7/ /2 8/ /2 9/ /1 0/ /1 /2 /1 /2 /1 /2 /1 /2 /1 /2
<5 - 6 - 6 2 - - 7 2 - - 8 2 - - 9 - 1 - 10 - 10 - 11 - 11 - 12 - 12 - 1 - 1 - 2 - 2
22 22 02 22 02 22 02 22 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 23 23 23 23
/20 /20 /3/2 /20 1/2 /20 8/2 /20 /20 202 202 202 202 202 202 /20 /20 /20 /20
5 9 7 17 /3 14 /2 11 25 9/ 3/ 6/ 0/ 4/ 8/ /8 22 /5 19
6/ 6/1 7/ 7 8/ 8 9/ 9/ 10/ 0/2 11/ 1/2 12/ 2/1 1 1/ 2 2 /
1 1 1
Week Ending
Figure 4.9 shows the preparation shift of layout team. Based on the graph, the
highest rate of preparation was on shift 3. With the percentage of 47%, followed
by shift 2 with 44%, and shift 1 with 9%.
38
Layout Preparation Shift
9%
S1
47% S2
S3
44%
Different with packout shiftly report that has richer data collection, the layout
changeover report only has several data that cannot be fully analyzed to become a
usefull data interpretation. Layout time was not collected so the manpower
productivity cannot be calculated.
4.2 Analysis
39
The research started with the observation and analysis of business processes in the
company. There are three main areas of production process, primary area,
secondary area, and soft-goods.
Since the focus of the research is on the secondary area, the explanation will be on
secondary area only. Figure 4.10 with yellow color. The secondary area focuses
on doll head making, hair planting, grooming, and packing out. The layout applied
in the secondary area is process layout and product layout. On packout area, there
is auto and manual. Auto refers to the process of packout using machine such as
autoblister. However, the automation is only for blister process.
The packout production floor has a nearly 10,672 m2 surface, measuring 115
meters in length and 92.8 meters in width. Figure 4.11 shows the layout of
packout area on top view. There are 124 active lines in this area, and 514
machines support those lines.
40
Figure 4.11 Packout Area
41
summarization of response time and repair time. Based on the shiftly packout
report, there is nothing wrong with the repair time that has the average of 15
minutes. After more observation, the shortocmings was found on the response
time of mechanic to relize there is machine problem on the line.
The packout process modified the product layout, with the conveyor line serving
as the assembly line. In line with product variation, the toy number also affects
how the product is set up out. This process is known as layout changeover. The
process of changing the tools, machines, and sequences in order to facilitate
production is known as layout changeover. There were 10,500 layout changes in
2022, according to the layout changeover report. While a single layout switch can
take 15 minutes on average, a simple layout switch just takes 5 minutes, and a
sophisticated layout switch takes 20 minutes. In order to comprehend the
workflow and also examine the flaws, the layout changeover workflow was
reviewed and analyzed. The workflow was found to be inefficient because it takes
a long time to gather information from different sources, such as layout
changeover summaries from the leader, layout drawings that needs to be scaned
and uploaded to personel Google Drive, and details of the machines used, which
are still on paper or printed out, and because the machine's location isn't known.
According to the explanation, it is crucial to create a new system that can assist
with layout changeover and machine repair processes. The use of smart factory
has emerged as a suitable means of overcoming and achieving those goals. The
objective is the implementation of smart factory since they enable manufacturing
companies to execute device connection, real-time alert and monitoring, and data
analytics.
42
related to the next step which is the identification of user and stakeholder
requirements.
Figure 4.12 shows the organizational chart of engineering. Since the focus of the
research is on secondary process, in organizational chart will be focus on the
Industrial and Automation. There is Manager of Industrial and Automation that
leads:
1. Associate Manager of Industrial Engineering.
2. Associate Manager of Manufacturing Engineering.
3. Senior of Tooling Engineering.
4. Senior of Industrial Engineering.
5. Senior of Automation Engineering.
6. Manager of Digital Transformation.
All of those people has their own responsibilities that are related to each other.
However, there are people that mainly responsible on machine repairment and
layout changeover. There are Senior of Tooling Engineering, Associate Manager
43
of Industrial Engineering, and Manager of Industrial and Automation itself. Based
on that, the stakeholders identified as the following list:
1. Manager of Industrial and Automation.
2. Associate Manager of Industrial Engineering.
3. Senior of Tooling Engineering.
Meanwhile for the users of the developed system, there are mechanic team and
layout team. Figure 4.13 shows the users organizational chart.
Senior of Tooling Engineering leads and supervises mechanic team and layout
team. Mechanic team consists of its leader and personnel. The same with layout
team, there is layout leader and layout personnel.
44
understand the needs of the future user. Since the user categorized as four, the
user requirements also will be grouped based on the user category. Table 4.1
shows the user requirements.
User Requirements
45
User Requirements
However, in order to support all of those user requirements, there are common
user requirements that are need to be provided, such as:
1. Usability:
46
a. The system is easy to use with coherent navigation.
b. The system is user-friendly with coherent navigation.
c. Every button on the system will appear.
d. The system built with the attention on user experience.
2. Security:
a. The system required PIN everytime the application is being
opened.
b. The system is able to reset the PIN and password by verifying the
registered e-mail.
As someone whose role is to oversee and monitor the performance of users, the
features required by a stakeholder are slightly different from those of the user. The
stakeholder requirements are in the form of report that generated from the data
collected by the system. Data analytics are required to transform the raw data into
report that represent the data. Table 4.2 represent the stakeholder requirements.
Table 4.2 Stakeholder Requirements
Stakeholder Requirements
Main Dashboard (machine problem) 1. Percentage of line availability.
2. Line utilization.
3. 24-hours trend of downtime.
4. Top 5 machine downtime.
5. Top 5 Line downtime.
6. Top 5 slowest repair time by line
(sum).
7. Top 5 slowest response time by
line (sum).
8. Top 5 slowest repair time by line
47
(average).
9. Top 5 slowest response time by
line (average).
10. 24-hours trend of response time.
11. 24-hours trend of repair time.
Line (machine problem and layout Line status with color indicator that
changeover) represent the condition of the line.
48
4.2.5 System Requirements Identification
System requirements refers to the description of the system including the
functions and capabilities that the system needs to have. System requirements will
be based on user requirements and stakeholder requirements. System requirements
playing major roles in the development since system requirements serve as a
blueprint of the system. System requirements consists the two main elements,
non-functional requirements and functional requirements.
49
Element Criteria Detail
appear.
5. The system built with the attention on
user experience.
Security 1. The system required the its user to
sign-up if they haven’t been have the
account.
2. All new user needs to be verified by
super admin. Super admin is Senior of
Tooling Engineer.
3. The system required the user to sign-in
if they have an account.
4. The system required PIN everytime the
application is being opened.
5. The system is only can be accessed
using PT TMC devices.
6. The system is able to reset the PIN and
password by verifying the registered e-
mail.
Scalability 1. The system needs to be able to be
adjusted to the needs of the user.
2. The system is able to accommodate
large number of data volumes.
Reliability 1. The system needs to be performing
well everytime at least 10 years after
being released and fully used.
Functional Common 1. The user is able to change the language
Requirements
on the application.
User 1. The new user is able to create a new
Management
account using PT TMC email.
Requirements
2. The new account needs to be verified
by super admin.
50
Element Criteria Detail
51
Element Criteria Detail
location.
2. On machine problem menu, the system
is able to be filtered by TicketID status.
3. On layout changeover menu, the
system is able to be filtered based on
the date and shift.
Machine 1. The system is able to show the
Problem Menu
TicketID released on related day on
table form with click-able ticket status.
2. Mechanic leader can assign certain
ticket to mechanic personnel.
3. The system will show the pop-up of
confirmation for accepting a ticket.
4. The mechanic is able to scan machine
barcode and the MachineID and
Machine Name will automatically
filled.
5. Once the ticket being taken and the
mechanic started to repair, the
mechanic can call a friend to help to
finish the ticket.
6. If the TicketID is still being actively on
progress when the shift is changed, the
semi finish option will appear.
7. TicketID only can be closed if the
downtime reason and detailed
downtime reason are filled.
8. Downtime reason is categorized drop-
down and detailed downtime reason
can be filled by typing.
Layout 1. Layout leader can input the changeover
52
Element Criteria Detail
4.3 Design
Design is the second stage of ADDIE methodology. On the other side, design
stage focus on the smart factory scope, system architecture, technology stack, user
interface design, data requirement, and database design.
53
the real-time monitoring is possible to happen. As mentioned on the scope of this
research, the smart factory aspects that are implemented in this research are:
1. Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
2. Device connection
3. Real-time alert and monitoring
4. Data-analytics to develop preventive maintenance model.
54
Figure 4.14 System Architecture
The line leader will interact with andon button on production line. IoT box will be
installed on andon button in order to make the andon button communicate. The
communication protocol used is Wi-Fi in the access point as a central transmitter.
The signal will be transferred to the local server and continued to PT TMC
database. The signal received will be shown on the mobile application. Then,
Mechanic team and layout team can execute their task.
Moreover, layout leader input the layout changeover schedule to the system and
mechanic leader assign the mechanic personnel. Those data will be stores on PT
TMC database and shown on mobile application. As a data-analytics process,
55
then, there will be a dashboard, visualization, log, and data report to the
stakeholders.
Use case diagram is a diagram used in the information system design to identify
the interaction between the actors and the system. Use case diagram commonly
consists of the actors, the system, and their interaction. The interaction can be
association, include, and exclude. Interaction symbolized with arrow. Meanwhile
for include and exclude symbolized by dashline. Figure 4.15 shows the use case
diagram of the mobile application.
56
not interacted directly to the mobile app but still their action affect the mobile
application. The four main actors are able to register and login. New registration
will requires validation by senior of tooling engineer. On the mobile application,
the TicketID will be created by line leader that press the button. However, line
leader is not required to login to press the button.
The action for assign TicketID, accept TicketID, and ignore TicketID will requires
the actors to login then those use case are included to login. Furthermore, leader is
also able to accept the TicketID. However, the mechanic leader is the only one
who is able to assign TicketID.
Figure 4.16 shows the use case diagram of website. There are 2 actors, layout
leader and stakeholders. All use case is included into login use case. Layout leader
is able to input the layout changeover schedule, generate summary, inspect the
TicketID status, and see the status of drawing and machine quantity. On the other
side, stakeholders are able to observe and inspect for general dashboard, line
dashboard, machine dashboard, and manpower dashboard as their reference to
decision making. On the implementation, the dashboard can be seen by all of the
user and stakeholder. For layout menu, layout leader is the only one who is able to
interact with.
On website, the actor only can login, they cannot register. Registration is only on
mobile application. Layout leader is required to login to input the layout
changeover schedule, generate summary, inspect the TicketID status, and see the
status of drawing and machine quantity. Stakeholders also required to login to
observe and inspect for general dashboard, line dashboard, machine dashboard,
and manpower dashboard. That is the reason of include relation to login.
57
Figure 4.16 Use Case Diagram of Website
Security system of mobile application consists of the sign-up and sign-in as the
boundaries of the system with unauthorized people. There are user database that is
hold all of user information. The following list is the requirements of creating the
new system:
1. Full name.
2. KPK (Employee ID).
3. PT TMC Email Address.
58
Figure 4.17 Security System of Mobile Application
After registration, there is sign-in session and input the PIN. After that, the mobile
application will display the home screen.
On the other side, there is also flow chart for machine problem menu. Figure 4.18
shows the machine problem flow chart of mobile application. The flow starts
when the line leader press red button, then the red light will be on. Right after,
TicketID for machine problem will be created and notification will be released.
The mechanic can take the TicketID by clicking on the notification or through
home screen. Besides that, the mechanic leader is able to assign the TicketID to
certain mechanic personnel. After that, there will be a confirmation pop-up for the
mechanic. This is important since the mechanic only can take 1 TicketID at one
time. If the mechanic accept the TicketID, then mechanic can go to the location
and press red button. Input MachineID is able by type or scan machine barcode.
59
Then start repairment and the data will be transferred to machine problem and
machine changeover. Start from the TicketID created until the mechanic start the
repairment, it will be counted as response time.
60
Figure 4.18 Machine Problem of Mobile Application
On certain condition, mechanic can call a friend if the work cannot be done only
by one mechanic. The notification will be released and the other mechanic is able
to accept the TicketID as a second mechanic. If the mechanic is not call a friend,
then the menu of semi-finish will be shown. After the repairment process, then
mechanic can choose the machine downtime reason. After that, close the
TicketID.
Figure 4.19 shows the layout changeover flowcart. There are 2 differents start
point which are for the planned changeover and unplanned changeover. For the
planned changeover, layout leader will input the layout changeover schedule
through website, then the TicketID created. This TicketID will be stored to layout
changeover database. On the mobile app, mechanic personnel can see the
TicketID available and see the summary of the TicketID. The mechanic can select
the TicketID. If the layout personnel confirm to accept the TicketID, the toy
number, layout drawing, and machine quantity are displayed. Those informations
come from IE New Toy Tracker database. After that, the layout personnel can
perform manual operation of layout. If finished, then they need to input
MachineID used by scan machine’s barcode or type the MachineID. Then the
conficmation pop-up shown to ensure all machine has been scanned. Now, the
TicketID is able to be closed.
On the other side, for unplanned changeover, the line leader needs to press yellow
button and the layout personel can accept the TicketID. The different is only that
the layout personnel needs to input the work order detail of the changeover.
61
Figure 4.19 Layout Changeover Flow Chart
62
4.3.4 Technology Stack
Technology stack in smart factory refers to the technology utilized in the
implementation. The main components of technology stack in smart factory
consists of hardware, software, and communication protocol.
4.3.4.1 Hardware
Hardware refers to the tangible assets that are being utilized. The utilization of
hardware can be identified by analyzing the system architecture. Figure 4.14
shows the system architecture for the smart factory. Based on the system
architecture, there are hardwares being utilized as follow:
1. Andon Button.
2. IoT Box.
3. Computer.
4. Smart Phone.
5. Smart Phone Tablet.
6. Monitor Display 50 Inch.
The detailed specification can be seen on Table 4.4. Table 4.4 shows the
specification for main hardware.
Table 4.4 Device Specification
Device Specification
Andon Button
Computer
Besides the hardware being identified by analyzing the system architecture, there
are several hardware being used to support those hardware, such as:
1. Push Button with LED Red.
2. Push Button with LED Yellow.
63
3. Push Button with LED Green.
4. Push Button with LED Blue.
5. Panel Electric Tibox.
6. Others.
The detailed specification can be seen on Table 4.5. Table 4.5 shows the
specification for supporting hardware.
Device Specification
4.3.4.2 Software
Software refers to the intangible assets that are being utilized. The utilization of
software can be identified by analyzing the system architecture. Figure 4.14
shows the system architecture for the smart factory. Based on the system
architecture, there are softwares being utilized as follow:
1. Local Server.
2. PT TMC Database.
3. Mobile Application.
4. Website.
64
Perception layer refers to the physical and concrete devices that become
cornerstone of IoT technology that has the objective to collect the information and
transform the information into a digital signal and transmit the signal to the next
layer, in this case is network layer. The physical devices includes sensors
(illumination, humidity, and temperature), RFID, and actuators (mechanical,
electrical, and hydraulic). In this research, the perception layer used is andon
button that connected to IoT box. Figure 4.20 shows the component and drawing
of IoT box.
65
network layer. Table 4.6 shows the layers and example for communication
protocols.
Table 4.6 Communication Protocols
66
Figure 4.21 Communication Protocols
67
Figure 4.22 Application Layer Security
68
2. Layout leader:
a. Shift hours refers to Table 4.1.
Table 4.7 Shift Hours
69
Figure 4.16 Layout Changeover Summary
70
Figure 4.17 Layout Changeover 1
Figure 4.17 shows the first - third cases of the interpretation of layout changeover
summary. There are 5 cases to describe the interpretation. The gantt chart of the
interpretation can be seen on figure.
71
Figure 4.18 shows the forth case of the interpretation of layout changeover
summary. The gantt chart of the interpretation can be seen on figure.
Figure 4.19 shows the fifth case of the interpretation of layout changeover
summary. The gantt chart of the interpretation can be seen on figure.
After applying user-centered design and human-centered design, the user interface
can be made. In this research, the user interface was made on Figma including
these following aspects:
1. Design.
2. Flow.
3. Prototype.
After understanding the user requirements and behaviour, the user interface can ba
developed. There are 2 system used on the smart factory that being developed,
mobile application and website. Figure 4.20 shows the mobile application user
interface. Mobile application support the dynamic workflow of mechanic team
and layout team. Mobile application consists of 4 main menu which are machine
problem menu, layout changeover menu, user menu, and setting menu. Appendix
72
1 shows and describe the features and function on mobile application’s user
interface.
Figure 4.21 shows the user interface of website. This website is being displayed
on packout mechanic modul and being inspected by stakeholders. The objective of
the dashboard is to show the analyzed data to make a decision. For example, the
mechanic leader is able to balance the workload of mechanic by assigning certain
mechanic to a TicketID.
73
Figure 4.21 User Interface of Website
74
connected with IE New Toy Tracker as the layout drawing and machine quantity
provider. Appendix 2 shows and describe the function of website.
75
Menu Actor Data Name Data Status
FinishTicketID_02 Unrefined data
Downtime Cause Unrefined data
Downtime Detail Unrefined data
TicketID Unrefined data
Current Date Unrefined data
WE of CurrentDate Unrefined data
Schedule Date Unrefined data
Run Shift Unrefined data
Preparation Date Unrefined data
Preparation Shift Unrefined data
Layout Toy Number Unrefined data
changeover on Layout leader and Line Number Unrefined data
application and layout personnel Remarks Unrefined data
website
Status Derived Data
TechnicianID_01
Unrefined data
(KPK)
TechnicianID_02
Unrefined data
(KPK)
Start Time Unrefined data
Finish Time Unrefined data
MachineID Unrefined data
XP Level Derived Data
User All actor Productivity Derived Data
KPI Derived Data
Percentage of line
Derived Data
availability.
Line utilization. Derived Data
24-hours trend of
Derived Data
downtime.
Top 5 machine
Derived Data
downtime.
Top 5 Line downtime. Derived Data
Dashboard on Top 5 slowest repair
Stakeholders Derived Data
website time by line (sum).
Top 5 slowest response
Derived Data
time by line (sum).
Top 5 slowest repair
Derived Data
time by line (average).
Top 5 slowest response
Derived Data
time by line (average).
24-hours trend of
Derived Data
response time.
76
Menu Actor Data Name Data Status
24-hours trend of repair
Derived Data
time.
Line Status Derived Data
Top 5 problematic
machine – Total of Derived Data
downtime.
Top 5 problematic
machine – Average of Derived Data
downtime.
Top 5 slowest response
Derived Data
time by machine.
Top 5 slowest repair
time by downtime Derived Data
reason.
Total layout
Derived Data
changeover trend.
Total layout
Derived Data
changeover by shift
Total layout
Derived Data
changeover by line.
Total layout
Derived Data
changeover duration.
Layout changeover
Derived Data
duration by line.
Context level diagram of data flow diagram is the highest level of data flow in the
system to describe and visualize the interation between external entities (actors)
and the system. There is an output and input that will be interacted between
thexternal entities and the system. Figure 4.23 shows the context level diagram of
data flow diagram.
77
Figure 4.23 Context Level Diagram
There are 7 entities in the context level diagram, mechanic personnel, layout
personnel, line leader, stakeholders, mechanic leader, senior tooling of engineer,
and layout leader. Line leader will release a TicketID to the system. As a user in
the system, mechanic personnel, layout personnel, stakeholders, mechanic leader,
and layout leader are required to logged in and if the account is new, then the
senior of tooling engineer will verified the account data. Mechanic team work on
the TicketID released by line leader and they need to store numerous data to the
system to close the ticket. While for layout team, the TicketID can be released by
layout leader or line leader. All of the data is shown on Figure 4.23.
4.4 Development
78
4.4.3 Preventive Maintenance Model Development
As the data collection of machine repairment on packout shiftly report that has
9882 data about machine downtime from January 28th, 2022 – March 3rd, 2023,
the prevenrive model focused on the most problematic machine type that requires
special attention. The indications are the highest duration of downtime and the
highest frequency of downtime. Data collection was summarized using Microsoft
Excel and Minitab in order to analyze the pattern of the data.
Figure 4.40 shows the downtime frequency of machine type utilized on packout
area. Based on the pareto chart, sealing blister has the highest downtime
frequency which covers 54.8% of downtime frequency with the number of
downtime 5410 times. The other machine types has percentage of downtime
frequency below 10%. It can be concluded that sealing blister requires special
attention in the aspect of downtime frequency.
79
below 15%. It can be concluded that sealing blister requires special attention in
the aspect of downtime accumulation duration.
Based on the result of the analysis of downtime frequency and the accumulation
of downtime using pareto chart, the conclusion is sealing blister is the most
problematic machine with the highest number of downtime frequency and
accumulation of downtime. The preventive maintenance model developed for
only sealing blister.
The next step is to calculate the MTBF and MTTR for sealing blister. The MTBF
and MTTR calculated by considering the distribution and scale of the data. In
order to perform those, Minitab is used. The data were filtered based on the
machine type and the Machine ID 31 since this machine has the highest frequency
of downtime.
Figure 4.42 shows the probability plot for TTR. The closest distribution value to 1
means the stronger the relationship. Figure 4.42 shows the value of the
distribution for 4 types of distribution. The data needs to be aalyzed more using
distribution overview plot to determine the distribution type.
80
Figure 4.42 Probability Plot for TTR
The scale is required in order to calculate the MTTR. The scale can be calculated
using Distribution Overview Plot on Minitab. Figure 4.43 shows the distribution
overview plot of Weibull that contains the shape and the scale. Based on the
figure, the shape is 1.30885 and the scale (θ ¿ is 18.7990.
81
Since the shape and scale are known by the distribution plot overview, then
MTTR can be calculated using Equation (4-5).
θ∗(β−1)
MTTR=
β
(4-5)
18.779∗( 1.30885−1 )
MTTR= =4.43129 minutes
1.30885
Based on the calculation, the MTTR for sealing blister is 4.43 minutes.
Figure 4.42 shows the probability plot for TBF. The closest distribution value to 1
means the stronger the relationship. Figure 4.44 shows the value of the
distribution for 4 types of distribution. The data needs to be aalyzed more using
distribution overview plot to determine the distribution type.
The scale is required in order to calculate the MTBF. The scale can be calculated
using Distribution Overview Plot on Minitab. Figure 4.45 shows the distribution
overview plot of Weibull that contains the shape and the scale. Based on the
figure, the shape is 0.71746 and the scale (θ ¿ is 48.2032.
82
Figure 4.45 Distribution Overview Plot for TBF
Since the shape and scale are known by the distribution plot overview, then
MTBF can be calculated using Equation (4-6).
1
MTBF=θ∗Г (1+ )
β
(4-6)
MTBF=48.2032∗Г 1+ ( 1
0.71746 )
=59.63 hours
Based on the calculation, the MTBF for sealing blister is 59.63 hours. However,
MTBF also can be calculated using Equation (4-7).
MTBF=θ∗exp (β∗ln ( 2 ) )
(4-7)
Since the Equation (4-7) give the more reasonable result. Then, the result of
MTBF is 79.25 hours or 3.3 days. The packout shiftly report analysis on the
beginning of this chapter mention that the preventive maintenance will focus on
shift 1 to improve the productivity of mechanics on shift 3. With that
83
consideration, the preventive maintenance for sealing blister is rounded up to 4
days as the time interval between preventive maintenance.
4.5 Implementation
4.6 Evaluation
84
4.8.2.4 Collect Data for Repair Time Standarization
85
20,938,00
0
IDR
Work Station
15 51,634,50 1 IDR 51,634,500
Edge PC
0
Rackmount
IDR
16 IR8020P - 20U + 1 IDR 8,000,000
8,000,000
FS80
Monitorin TV SAMSUNG IDR
17 1 IDR 8,500,000
g 50 Inch 8,500,000
Industrial IDR
18 Android Phone 11,300,00 3 IDR 33,900,000
Honeywell 0
Smart watch for IDR
19 Devices 6 IDR 2,434,800
notification 405,800
Microsoft IDR
20 Surface Pro 6 i5 13,100,00 1 IDR 13,100,000
128GB 0
IDR
Total Amount
696,939,300.00
86
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Recommendation
87
REFERENCES
88
APPENDIX I
USER INTERFACE OF MOBILE APPLICATION
89
7. Forgor Password Page 8. Forgot PIN Page
90
13. TicketID Information 14. Confirmation Pop-Up
91
21. Forgot PIN Page 22. Confirmation Pop-Up
92
27. Layout WO Notification 28. Work Order Detail
93
33. Setting Menu 34. Change Password
94
APPENDIX II
USER INTERFACE OF WEBSITE
General - Dashboard
95
Line - Dashboard
96
Machine Problem – Dashboard
97
Manpower – Dashboard
98
Input Layout Changeover
Changeover Summary
99
Ticket Status
100
APPENDIX III
USER MANUAL
101
APPENDIX IV
CODE OF PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
102