[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views104 pages

D STG SG01.03.2 2021 PDF e

Uploaded by

ashleymathew7777
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views104 pages

D STG SG01.03.2 2021 PDF e

Uploaded by

ashleymathew7777
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 104

ITUPublications International Telecommunication Union

Study period 2018-2021 Development Sector

Study Group 1 Question 3

Emerging technologies, including


cloud computing, m-services and
OTTs: Challenges and opportunities,
economic and policy impact for
developing countries
Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1

Emerging technologies,
including cloud computing,
m-services and OTTs:
Challenges and opportunities,
economic and policy impact
for developing countries
Study period 2018-2021
Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries: Output
Report on ITU D Question 3/1 for the study period 2018-2021

ISBN 978-92-61-34531-0 (Electronic version)


ISBN 978-92-61-34541-9 (EPUB version)
ISBN 978-92-61-34551-8 (Mobi version)

© International Telecommunication Union 2021

International Telecommunication Union, Place des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland


Some rights reserved. This work is licensed to the public through a Creative Commons Attribution-
Non- Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial
purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work,
there should be no suggestion that ITU endorses any specific organization, product or service. The
unauthorized use of the ITU name or logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must
license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a transla-
tion of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This
translation was not created by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ITU is not respon-
sible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding
and authentic edition”. For more information, please visit
https://​creativecommons​.org/​licenses/​by​-nc​-sa/​3​.0/​igo/​

Suggested citation. Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs:
Challenges and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries (ITU-D Question
3/1). Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party,
such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed
for that reuse and to obtain permission from the
copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component
in the work rests solely with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this pub-
lication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ITU or its secretariat
concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning
the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they
are endorsed or recommended by ITU in preference to others of a similar nature that are not men-
tioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial
capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by ITU to verify the information contained in this pub-
lication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either
expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the
reader. In no event shall ITU be liable for damages arising from its use.
Cover photo credits: Shutterstock
Acknowledgments
The study groups of the ITU Telecommunication Development Sector (ITU-D) provide a neutral
platform where experts from governments, industry, telecommunication organizations and
academia from around the world gather to produce practical tools and resources to address
development issues. To that end, the two ITU-D study groups are responsible for developing
reports, guidelines and recommendations based on input received from the membership.
Questions for study are decided every four years at the World Telecommunication Development
Conference (WTDC). The ITU membership, assembled at WTDC-17 in Buenos Aires in October
2017, agreed that for the period 2018-2021, Study Group 1 would deal with seven Questions
within the overall scope of “enabling environment for the development of telecommunications/
information and communication technologies.”

This report was prepared in response to Question 3/1: Emerging technologies, including cloud
computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges and opportunities, economic and policy impact
for developing countries under the overall guidance and coordination of the management team
of ITU-D Study Group 1 led by Ms Regina Fleur Assoumou-Bessou (Côte d'Ivoire), as Chairman,
supported by the following Vice-Chairmen: Ms Sameera Belal Momen Mohammad (Kuwait);
Mr Amah Vinyo Capo (Togo); Mr Ahmed Abdel Aziz Gad (Egypt); Mr Roberto Hirayama (Brazil);
Mr Vadim Kaptur (Ukraine); Mr Yasuhiko Kawasumi (Japan); Mr Sangwon Ko (Republic of Korea);
Ms Anastasia Sergeyevna Konukhova (Russian Federation); Mr Víctor Martínez (Paraguay);
Mr Peter Ngwan Mbengie (Cameroon); Ms Amela Odobašic (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Mr Kristián
Stefanics (Hungary) (resigned in 2018) and Mr Almaz Tilenbaev (Kyrgyzstan).

The report was authored by the Rapporteur for Question 3/1 Mr Nasser Kettani (Microsoft,
United States) in collaboration with Vice-Rapporteurs: Mr Geraldo Neto (Telecommunications
Management Group, Inc, United States ); Mr Christopher Hemmerlein (Facebook, United States);
Mr Franklin Makokha (Kenya); Mr Zhen Zhang (China); Mr Henri Numbi Ilunga (Democratic Republic
of Congo); Mr Charles Zoë Banga (Central African Republic); Mr Luc Servais Missidimbazi (Congo);
Mr Ahmadou Dit Adi Cisse (Mali); Mr Abdoulaye Ouedraogo (Burkina Faso); Mr Darshan
Thapa (Bhutan); Mr Serigne Abdou Lahatt Sylla (Senegal); Mr Arseny Plossky (Russian Federation);
Ms Beyhan Aygün Akyüz (Türk Telekom, Turkey) and Mr Ram Babu Jatav (India).

Special thanks go to chapter coordinators for their dedication, support and expertise.

This report has been prepared with the support of the ITU-D study group focal points, the editors
as well as the publication production team and ITU-D study group secretariat.
Table of contents
Acknowledgments�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������iii

List of figures���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������viii

Executive summary������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ix

Abbreviations and acronyms��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������xi

Chapter 1 – Introduction�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1

1.1 Background����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
1.2 Emerging technologies���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
1.3 The mobile world�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4
1.4 COVID-19 pandemic�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5

Chapter 2 – Cloud computing����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7

2.1 Background����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7
2.1.1 Previous study cycle of Question 3/1��������������������������������������������������������� 8
2.1.2 Current status of research in ITU-T������������������������������������������������������������� 8
2.2 Cloud state of the art and state of the business������������������������������������������������������ 8
2.3 New trends in cloud computing ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9
2.3.1 Cloud moving to the edge ����������������������������������������������������������������������� 10
2.3.2 Move to software as a service�������������������������������������������������������������������� 11
2.3.3 Algorithm as a service�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 13
2.3.4 IT as a service����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 13
2.4 Economics for the adoption of cloud computing ������������������������������������������������ 14
2.4.1 Enterprise cloud adoption models����������������������������������������������������������� 15
2.4.2 Different business models������������������������������������������������������������������������� 16
2.4.3 Data as business model����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 16
2.5 Considerations for cloud adoption������������������������������������������������������������������������� 17
2.6 Trust���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 18
2.6.1 Security��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19
2.6.2 Transparency����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19
2.6.3 Control��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 20
2.6.4 Business continuity������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 20
2.7 Case studies of successful cloud-computing platforms used in
developed and developing countries������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 20

iv
2.8 Guidelines to spur development and uptake of cloud computing���������������������� 21

Chapter 3 – M-services����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22

3.1 Background����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 22
3.2 M-services state of the art and state of the business���������������������������������������������� 22
3.3 New trends in m-services������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 23
3.3.1 Application integration platforms (e.g. Apple Arcade and
Google Play Pass)�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 23
3.3.2 5G������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 24
3.3.3 Gaming genres���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 24
3.3.4 Progressive web applications���������������������������������������������������������������������� 24
3.3.5 Rise of mobile health������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 25
3.3.6 Emergence of enterprise mobile apps������������������������������������������������������ 26
3.3.7 Increase in on-demand apps����������������������������������������������������������������������� 26
3.3.8 Integration of payment gateways into mobile apps��������������������������������� 26
3.3.9 Proliferation of instant apps������������������������������������������������������������������������� 26
3.3.10 Increase in virtual reality and augmented reality usage�������������������������� 26
3.3.11 Use of accelerated mobile pages development�������������������������������������� 26
3.3.12 Synchronizing wearable technology with m-services������������������������������ 26
3.3.13 Widespread use of chatbots����������������������������������������������������������������������� 27
3.4 Policies, strategies and relevant approaches in the field of m-services��������������� 27
3.5 Methods of development and deployment of m-services app economy����������� 29
3.6 Ways to promote an enabling environment for the development and
deployment of m-services���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 29
3.6.1 Government/national regulator������������������������������������������������������������������ 30
3.6.2 Ministries/government agencies���������������������������������������������������������������� 30
3.6.3 Telecommunication operators�������������������������������������������������������������������� 30
3.6.4 App developers�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
3.6.5 ICT training institutions�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
3.7 Case studies and best practices�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31
3.8 Guidelines to spur development and uptake of m-services �������������������������������� 31

Chapter 4 – Over-the-top applications��������������������������������������������������������������������������33

4.1 Background����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 33
4.2 OTT state of the art and state of the business��������������������������������������������������������� 35
4.2.1 New trends in OTT���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 37
4.2.2 Benefits of OTT���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38
4.3 Impacts of the provisioning of OTT�������������������������������������������������������������������������� 39

v
4.3.1 Regulatory frameworks�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 39
4.3.2 Network infrastructure���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 42
4.3.3 Macroeconomic and microeconomic developments, including
competition effect on the market����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44
4.3.4 Competition �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 46
4.3.5 Evolving business models���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 47
4.3.6 Legal frameworks and commercial partnerships for the
development and deployment of OTT�������������������������������������������������������������������� 49
4.3.7 Economic and business model partnerships among
telecommunication operators and OTT providers������������������������������������������������� 52
4.4 Guidelines regarding OTTs��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 54

Annexes�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������55

Annex 1: Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/ICT markets�������������� 55

Executive summary���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 55
Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 56
Context������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 57
ITU studies on OTT���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 58
ITU-D����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 58
ITU-T������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 58
Definitions������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 58
Move to digital world������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 59
The impact of OTTs on traditional telecommunications��������������������������������������������������� 60
Demand������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 61
Data traffic�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 61
Revenues���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 63
Costs����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 64
OTT infrastructure investment���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 65
MNO and OTT relationships������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 67
Measuring social impact of OTT platforms������������������������������������������������������������������������� 69
Role of regulation������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 71
Regulatory considerations ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 71
Possible objectives for regulatory action����������������������������������������������������������������� 72
Looking ahead������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 73
Conclusions���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 74
Regulators and decision-makers������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 74
Telecommunication operators and OTT providers������������������������������������������������ 75

vi
Annex 2: Country case studies relating to cloud computing��������������������������������������������������� 76

Background of cloud-service development on the part of telecommunication


operators in China����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 76
Major initiatives launched by telecommunication operators for cloud services����������� 76
Proactively promote the "cloud transformation" plan to improve cloud
computing service capabilities���������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 76
Strengthen the construction of IDC (Internet data centre) resources
and enhance the supply capacity of the infrastructure ����������������������������������������� 76
Promote the integrated development of various technologies and
enhance capacity for business innovation��������������������������������������������������������������� 76
Actively expand services at the PaaS and SaaS layers and enhance
cloud-computing application capabilities��������������������������������������������������������������� 77
Combat the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic���������������������������������������������������� 77
Summary and suggestions����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 77
Cloud-computing regulation in Saudi Arabia, by Axon Partners Group������������������������ 78
China case study�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 78
Bhutan case study������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 79
Islamic Republic of Iran case study�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 80
Nigeria case study������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 80

Annex 3: Case studies relating to m-services ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 82

Barbados case study on the m-Money service������������������������������������������������������������������� 82


M-financial services case study ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 82
Kenya case study on m-services (M-Akiba) ������������������������������������������������������������������������ 83
Kenya case study on m-farming ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 83

Annex 4: Case studies on OTT����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 85

Bahamas case study��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 85


Australia case study �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 85
Bahrain case study����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 86
Guinea case study������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 86
Côte d'Ivoire case study�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 87

vii
List of figures
Figure 1: Demand versus innovation virtuous circle�������������������������������������������������������������� 2
Figure 2: Founding emerging technologies��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3
Figure 3: Mobile – Internet – Cloud������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4
Figure 4: Cloud regulation landscape by region������������������������������������������������������������������� 7
Figure 5: Cloud regulation projection by region������������������������������������������������������������������� 7
Figure 6: Worldwide public cloud service projection (2018 – 2022)���������������������������������� 9
Figure 7: CAGR by cloud service category��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10
Figure 8: Software as a service (SaaS) market from 2008 to 2020 (in USD billions)������� 12
Figure 9: Cloud provider categories�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 14
Figure 10: Enterprise cloud strategy and types of cloud used������������������������������������������ 16
Figure 11: M-services regulation landscape������������������������������������������������������������������������� 22
Figure 12: M-services regulation by sector��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 22
Figure 13: Wearable-technology users in the United States (2014 – 2018)��������������������� 25
Figure 14: Gross app revenues in USD billions (2018 – 2019)������������������������������������������� 27
Figure 15: Application downloads on Apple App Store����������������������������������������������������� 28
Figure 16: OTT regulation landscape by region (2019)������������������������������������������������������ 34
Figure 17: OTT regulation landscape by region (2018)������������������������������������������������������ 34
Figure 18: OTT regulation projections by region (2019)���������������������������������������������������� 34
Figure 19: OTT regulation projections by region (2018)���������������������������������������������������� 35
Figure 20: OTT regulation by category and region (2019)������������������������������������������������� 35
Figure 1A: The Internet value chain and market size shares in 2015�������������������������������� 60
Figure 2A: Global mobile data traffic and usage per application������������������������������������� 62
Figure 3A: Evolution of voice traffic in comparison with revenues, investments
and mobile broadband penetration ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 63
Figure 4A: MTN’s revenues evolution by country ��������������������������������������������������������������� 64
Figure 5A: Estimation of costs associated to mobile broadband traffic��������������������������� 65
Figure 6A: Average annual total investment by region (USD billion, 2014-2017)���������� 66

viii
Executive summary

The world has entered an era of accelerated technology innovation, driven by massive research
and development investments and exponential progress in many technologies, especially digital.
The growing set of technologies emerging every day is staggering. Digital technologies such as
cloud computing, blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), mobile, virtual/mixed/augmented reality,
drones, Internet of Things (IoT) and 3D printing, are transforming every industry. And while each
of these technologies is a breakthrough in itself, when combined with other technologies, its
core potential is increased exponentially.

These technologies are innovative and disruptive by nature. They challenge incumbents in
many industries to adapt their existing businesses and business models. They also create new
opportunities for every industry to innovate, provide better products and services, bring better
customer experiences, reduce costs and improve productivity.

These technologies are global by design. This is the first time in history that technologies are
potentially made available to everyone on the planet simultaneously, not limited to the countries
or companies that invented them, but available for everyone to use and innovate. Thanks to
this global availability and scale, these technologies are affordable to many, including large
and small businesses, government institutions, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and
start-ups everywhere in the world, including in developing countries.

With this comes a set of challenges for regulators and policy-makers, who want to understand
the profound value and impact of these technologies and create an enabling environment that
promotes adoption and spurs innovation while protecting the public interest.

Mobile technology is one such disruptive technology. It has changed the world over the last two
decades by every measure. Billions of people in every corner of the planet have now access to
mobile technology and billions have access to smartphones and the Internet. Mobile technology
is used by consumers, businesses (large and small), governments, NGOs and researchers to
effect all sorts of transactions, besides placing and receiving calls. Mobile technology is used to
make payments, access social networks, attend online courses, get health services, book travel
or rent a car, and buy almost anything.

Mobile services (‘m-services’) are profoundly changing the way we do everything, especially in
developing countries. The potential for development of this industry is yet to unfold.

This report looks at that potential, the barriers and challenges for adoption and deployment
of m-services, and the policies and regulatory guidelines that can support that development
in developing countries.

The Internet, especially in combination with mobile technology, has provided an opportunity
for a new set of services: IP-based services. These are often referred to as over-the-top (OTT)
applications to users over an Internet connection, independent of the telecommunication
network operator providing the Internet connection. Consumer demand for such offerings is
growing rapidly as they want more of, and perceive large benefits from, these applications.
Consumer demand for content, applications and services is creating demand for investment in
broadband access and services. At the same time, increased broadband capacity leads to the

ix
development and deployment of new generations of services and applications, such as mobile
money transfer, m-banking, m-commerce and e-commerce. Such a virtuous circle requires
network operators to seek new business models and arrangements to maintain a high level of
infrastructure investment, particularly in developing countries.

This report also looks at the impact of OTT provisioning, the policy tools that enable the
deployment of OTT applications and the best practices that create incentives for investment,
especially in developing countries.

Cloud computing is considered by many key industry leaders to be the next technological
revolution of the twenty-first century. The potential of mobile technologies and OTT applications
as well as other technologies, such AI, blockchain and IoT, is being unleashed as a consequence
of cloud computing. Work carried out in the 2014-2017 study period explored the question of
access to cloud computing in developing countries. However, the trends in cloud computing,
be it in terms of technology, business models, investments or adoption, are evolving so rapidly
that it is important to look at those elements again and at the various tools and frameworks for
developing cloud computing in developing countries.

In preparing this report, it was decided to draft a chapter for each topic. After an introduction
and some background in Chapter 1, Chapter 2 deals with cloud computing; Chapter 3 looks
at m-services; and Chapter 4 addresses over-the-top services (OTTs).

x
Abbreviations and acronyms

Abbreviation Term
AaaS algorithm as a service

AI artificial intelligence

AMP accelerated mobile pages

API application programming interface

AR augmented reality

ASP application service provider

B2C business-to-consumer

BEPS base erosion and profit shifting

CAGR compound annual growth rate

CAPEX capital expenditure

CDN content delivery network

CSP cloud service provider

ECS electronic communications services

EECC European Electronic Communications Code

GaaS games as a service

GCC Gulf Cooperation Council

GDP gross domestic product

GSM Global System for Mobile

GSMA GSM Association

IaaS infrastructure as a service

IAP Internet access provider

ICS interpersonal communications services

ICT information and communication technology

IDC Internet data centre

IGO intergovernmental organization

IoT Internet of Things

IP Internet Protocol

ISO International Organization for Standardization

xi
(continued)
Abbreviation Term
ISP Internet service provider

ISV independent software vendor

IT information technology

ITaaS IT as a service

ITU International Telecommunication Union

ITU-D ITU Telecommunication Development Sector

ITU-T ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector

IXP Internet exchange point

LAN local area network

MNO mobile network operator

NB-ICS number-based ICS

NGN next-generation network

NGO non-governmental organization

NI-ICS number-independent ICS

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OPEX operational expenditure

OSP online service provider (an alternative term for OTT provider)

OTT over-the-top

PaaS platform as a service

PC personal computer

PPP purchasing-power parity

PWA progressive web application

RCS rich communications services

RIA rich interactive application

RMIO Rural Mobile Infrastructure Operator

SaaS software as a service

SCC smart cities and communities

SD-WAN software-defined networking (SDN) in a wide area network (WAN)

SLA service-level agreement

SMB small and medium-sized business

xii
(continued)
Abbreviation Term
SME small and medium-sized enterprise

SMS short message service

UGC user-generated content

UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

USSD unstructured supplementary service data

VAT value-added tax

VoD Video on demand

VoLTE voice over Long-Term Evolution

VR virtual reality

WTDC World Telecommunication Development Conference

XaaS x as a service

xiii
Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Chapter 1 – Introduction

1.1 Background
Cloud computing, IP-based services and m-services have emerged as major technologies.
ITU, and the ITU Telecommunication Development Sector (ITU-D) specifically, have looked at
various issues and opportunities to develop reports, policy recommendations and studies that
help Member States to understand and leverage these technologies. Yet there is still a lot of
work to be done.

During the World Telecommunication Development Conference (Buenos Aires, 2017) (WTDC-
17), ITU revised WTDC Resolution 2 on the establishment of study groups. ITU-D Study Group
1 (SG1) was tasked to address and develop a report on Question 3/1 – Emerging technologies,
including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges and opportunities, economic and
policy impact for developing countries.1

1.2 Emerging technologies


There has never been a better time in technology, especially digital technology. The progress
experienced daily is staggering. Moore’s Law2 — the prediction that the number of transistors
incorporated in a chip will approximately double every two years — has proven to be accurate
and continues to hold true, thanks to the exponential nature of the law. As Kurtzweil suggests
in his essay ‘The Law of Accelerating Returns’: “So we won’t experience 100 years of progress
in the 21st century — it will be more like 20 000 years of progress (at today’s rate)”. 3

Moore’s Law and Kurzweil’s Law apply to other aspects of technology and to any information-
driven domain. In this regard, similar progress can be seen across many emerging technologies.
This is the case, for example, of mobile computing, which has evolved from feature phones to
the very powerful smartphones of today; and networks, which have expanded rapidly from 2G
to 5G. This exponential growth is also notable, for example, in cameras, storage media and 3D
printers. The price-to-performance ratio of these technologies is falling exponentially, making
yesterday’s very sophisticated and expensive technologies available today to many at the price
point of older technologies.

Now, smartphones are as powerful as former supercomputers, and are used to access such
Internet services as videoconferencing with high fidelity, or mobile banking and stock trading,
or virtual games with players who are thousands of miles apart.

When combined, information-driven technologies such as mobile, Internet (IP-based), cloud


computing and digital cameras drive even more acceleration and disruption. Today, many such
emerging technologies are growing fast because they have established a virtuous circle that
provides a framework for development and acceleration.

1
ITU. Final Report of the World Telecommunication Development Conference (Buenos Aires, 2017) (WTDC-
17). Geneva, 2018.
2
Wikipedia. Moore’s law.
3
Ray Kurzweil. Tracking the acceleration of intelligence. Essays. The Law of Accelerating Returns. 7 March
2001.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Consider IP-based applications or over-the-top (OTT) applications. Consumer demand for


such offerings is rapidly growing as consumers want more of, and perceive large benefits from,
these offerings. Consumer demand for content, applications and services creates demand
for investment in broadband access and services as well as innovation in endpoint devices
(smartphones, tablets, game consoles, smartwatches, etc.). At the same time, increased
broadband networks and better endpoint devices also lead to the development and deployment
of new generations of services and applications, such as mobile money transfer, m-banking,
m-commerce, m-health, m-education and e-commerce. This is the virtuous circle that led to the
development of technologies such as 3G, 4G and now 5G and more sophisticated endpoints.
These technology advancements have created opportunities for applications and services that
were neither known nor imagined.

Figure 1: Demand versus innovation virtuous circle

Source: ITU

This virtuous circle applies in the same way to all these trends. Consider the cloud. Consumer
and enterprise demand for the cloud is driving more investment in cloud infrastructure and
new cloud technologies, which in turn enables new advanced services such as AI, blockchain
and big data, which are then adopted by users.

At the core of many innovations are technologies that enable others and drive accelerated
innovation and disruption: the Internet, mobile technology and the cloud. The Internet, and
especially broadband Internet, provides the backbone connectivity to everything, and nowadays
everything is potentially connectable. Mobile phones, and in particular smartphones, provide
people with the tools to access any service, anywhere, anytime, de facto enabling humans to
be more mobile. The cloud provides the computing horsepower and the home to any service.
While the cloud is one of the most important innovations of the digital era, it relies on the
Internet and broadband, and when combined with mobile technology, especially smartphones
(and many other forms of endpoints and Internet of Things (IoT)), it creates an environment of
limitless innovation and disruption for every domain, discipline and industry.

2 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 2: Founding emerging technologies

Source: ITU

Our cars, medical devices, homes, speakers, watches, cameras and all sorts of sensors in cities,
airports, malls, train stations, farms and even cows, are already connected and developers, start-
ups, businesses and governments are adding more devices every day. Billions of connected
devices are added every year to this grid.

While the number of people connected to the Internet has grown almost exponentially over
the last decade, and passed the threshold of 50 per cent of the world population, including in
every region except Africa, in 2018 for the first time the number of connected devices surpassed
the world total population, and is growing faster. Gartner4 estimated in 2017 that: 8.4 billion
connected things will be in use in 2017, up 31 per cent from 2016 and will reach 20.4 billion by
2020. Total spending on endpoints and services will reach almost USD 2 trillion in 2017.

By 2050, the world population is estimated to be almost 10 billion people. New production
techniques will be needed to grow and extract adequate resources from around the globe to
support this population’s growing needs. Emerging digital technologies are changing the way
industries respond to these challenges, helping improve the production and the distribution
of resources and people. However, many of the locations requiring these smart solutions
are remote and without communication infrastructure. Broadband connectivity and cloud
computing are directly relevant to the sustainable growth of these industries, which include
agriculture, energy, mining, transport and utilities. Thanks to broadband and cloud, they can
be more efficient and operate more safely, regardless of location.

The Internet is the critical infrastructure that makes sense of these ‘things’, such as smartphones,
tablets, game consoles, PCs and servers, that collect and send massive amounts of data to
data centres around the world for storage, processing, decision-making, monitoring and
management. The backbone that connects these things to data centres is broadband Internet
and various other connectivity tools. Consumer demand for these devices and services drive
investment in broadband, which then drives innovation in infrastructure, such as 4G, 5G, fibre
and satellite. These new technologies will in turn enable new innovations and scenarios.

4
Gartner. Newsroom. Press releases. Gartner Says 8.4 billion connected "things" will be in use in 2017, up
31 per cent from 2016. Egham, United Kingdom, 7 February 2017.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 3


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The cloud provides limitless computing power, data storage and processing, new off-the-shelf
algorithms for every service and application to potentially disrupt every industry, with important
intrinsic ingredients that are also by nature disruptive.

• This horsepower is available to everybody in the world (including developing countries),


provided they have Internet connectivity. This is a breakthrough since supercomputers,
such as those built by Cray, were only available to a few companies in the world that could
afford them. Today, anybody in the world potentially has access to the cloud anytime,
anywhere.
• It is accessible on demand, as pay-as-you-use, and at an infinitely small fraction of the cost
of the enabling capital investments.
• It is always up to date with the latest innovations.
• It is always available, which means that the time-to-market for new products and services
is reduced significantly from years to months and weeks.
• It is global, providing a scale and hence a market presence to anyone, especially young
entrepreneurs, an impossibility less than a decade ago.

1.3 The mobile world


About a third of the world population uses smartphones. Smartphones have become the most
used access to the Internet (displacing the PC) and a tool used to do almost everything, from
meetings to socializing, working, playing, entertaining, shopping, learning and getting access
to health, banks, agriculture advice and more. Smartphones have enabled mobility and made
humanity more mobile than ever before.

What makes smartphones ‘smart’ are the applications that power the mobile phone. Most of
these applications use the Internet to connect to back-end data centres or cloud services.

Figure 3: Mobile – Internet – Cloud

Source: ITU

Mobile, broadband and cloud technologies are interrelated and enable one another.
Their ecosystems work together. Therefore, it makes sense for ITU to consider these three
technologies in the same report. While each technology is at a different level of maturity and
requires a different scope of study, addressing them under the same Question helps regulators
and policy-makers to understand the intrinsic relationship of these technologies to help them
make better policy decisions.

4 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

1.4 COVID-19 pandemic


The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created an unprecedented moment in modern
history, forcing the lockdown of companies, cities and even countries. This global pandemic
has demonstrated the major importance of ICT tools and connectivity, especially the value of
m-services, OTTs and cloud applications.

As a consequence of the unprecedented lockdowns around the world hundreds of millions of


office workers have been obliged to work from home; commercial travel has been stopped for
millions of businesses, customers and partners alike; children have seen their schools close,
forcing classrooms into the home; hospitals have been forced to focus on COVID-19 victims
and find alternative solutions for people suffering from other illnesses; and courts around the
world were closed, leaving justice for thousands of people on hold.

Governments worldwide have been forced to find solutions to address the challenges raised
by the COVID-19 pandemic. In almost all cases, a combination of m-services, cloud and OTT
applications has helped to mitigate the most pressing issues and provide a solid alternative to
the physical world activities.

Over-the-top applications have connected communities, families, businesses, clients and


partners all around the world to enable them to stay informed, socialize, practise sport or Yoga
and be entertained. M-services were at the core of the pandemic response. Health authorities
developed mobile applications for COVID tracing and provided remote consultation on
telemedicine platforms using mobile networks, which also enabled the transfer of money to
the most vulnerable, and education to those who did not have computers.

Experts invited to an online panel in May 2020, 5 and another in July 2020 as part of the WSIS
2020 Forum, discussed the impact of the cloud during the pandemic, and shared lessons
learned:

• Innovation: Start-ups and innovators used the opportunity to create solutions within weeks
to address the pandemic challenges surrounding security, health, solidarity, education
and more. They leveraged the cloud to develop, scale and deploy their solutions. Large
cloud service providers (CSPs) in many cases helped these start-ups by providing free and
sponsored access to the cloud.
• Enterprise: Large and small enterprises have been using the cloud and OTTs in many
ways to address business continuity, allowing employees to work remotely, and some
companies are looking to extend this policy.
• Government: Governments have turned to the cloud and OTTs for business continuity in
areas such as education (providing remote education), health (providing telemedicine),
finance, justice and many other services. Government employees are also teleworking.
Countries with stringent cloud policies or telecommunication regulations have needed to
review these policies to allow for business continuity. Governments rapidly used the cloud
to develop COVID-19 tracing applications.
• COVID-19 research: Many researchers around the world have leveraged the power of
the cloud to conduct research on COVID-19, whether for DNA sequencing of the virus,
or molecular modelling, vaccine research, treatment research or pandemic propagation
prediction modelling. The cloud is also being used to support open data and data sharing
amongst the various COVID-19 researchers around the world.
• Consumers – citizens: Citizens are using cloud, m-services and OTTs to access
governments, banks, service providers and social networks. Consumers, as they live

5
ITU. Public Web Dialogue: Cloud for COVID-19 Response. 27 May 2020.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 5


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

through the lockdown, have organized themselves to ‘telesocialize’ with their friends and
families, take Yoga or gym courses, or access COVID-19 information streams, all made
possible through the cloud.
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs): NGOs around the world are organizing
themselves to help the undeserved and most vulnerable communities. The cloud
provides a ready-to-use platform to support their needs in terms of grant collection and
management, communication and remote implementation.
• Cloud service providers (CSPs): Most CSPs have faced high demand and pressure on their
infrastructure to serve existing customers and meet workloads as well as the very high and
unpredictable demand from new customers moving to the cloud. Some service providers
have reported close to an eight-fold increase in demand for some services.
• Infrastructure: Certainly, one of the most satisfying lessons learned during the pandemic
concerned the robustness of the Internet infrastructure. As demand grew by an order of
magnitude in a matter of days, if not hours, from government, private sector, innovators,
NGOs and citizens from around the world, the Internet infrastructure kept working and
delivered on its promise to act as a critical infrastructure. Dr Marnix Dekker from the
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) noted at a webinar organized by ITU
during the WSIS 2020 Forum “… whether it is the Internet infrastructure or the major cloud
infrastructure, it responded to the growth, it was ready for scale out when needed because
it was designed and developed for that matter…”.6
• Preparedness: This is probably the most important lesson of all. Those countries,
governments, companies and institutions who were prepared were able to migrate online
easily and faster than others. It is not only about technical readiness, but also human,
governance, policy and regulatory readiness.

To that end, it is time for Member States, especially developing countries, to:

• promote the adoption of emerging technologies of the fourth industrial revolution in order
to hasten the pace of development and socio-economic change;
• adapt legal and institutional frameworks to support the digital economy and the use of
emerging technologies;
• support study programmes, research laboratories and improved technical capacity,
including those at a regional and/or continental level, for the purpose of better
understanding and implementing applications employing emerging technologies;
• develop and implement national and international strategies to develop and share
resources as appropriate in regard to emerging technologies;
• develop effective policies for data protection and privacy in order to improve confidence
and trust in the use of innovative technology;
• develop and implement strategies to achieve universal access to telecommunication/ICT
services, including for persons with disabilities and persons with specific needs.

6
ITU. WSIS Forum 2020. Session 279 – A roadmap to a trusted Cloud for Good. 9 July 2020.

6 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Chapter 2 – Cloud computing

Cloud computing has emerged as a major technology trend of the 21st century. Cloud computing
market data reflect massive market adoption, with a projection of USD 411 billion by 2020 and
a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13 per cent according to Gartner.7

The 2019 data related to cloud computing from the annual ITU World Telecommunication/ICT
Regulatory Survey on regulatory practices is summarized in Figures 4 and 5, which provide an
overview of the trends in this area across ITU membership.

Figure 4: Cloud regulation landscape by region

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye.

Figure 5: Cloud regulation projection by region

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database www​.itu​.int/​icteye

2.1 Background
Cloud computing is a concept towards which the world is now gradually moving, in view of the
many powerful advantages it offers. This concept can be summarized as a model that enables
ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing
resources (e.g. networks, servers, storage, applications and services) that can be rapidly
provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service-provider interaction.

The key characteristics of cloud computing are broad network access, measured service, multi-
tenancy, on-demand self-service, rapid elasticity and scalability, and resource pooling. For many

7
Louis Columbus. Forbes. Cloud Computing Market Projected To Reach $411B By 2020. 18 October 2017.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 7


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

countries, cloud computing presents a possible solution to the lack of adequate computing
resources, and it has achieved remarkable growth in many of the most developed countries.
Cloud computing is considered by key industry leaders to be the next technological revolution
of the twenty-first century.

2.1.1 Previous study cycle of Question 3/1


During the previous study period (2014-2017), Question 3/1 focused on analysis of the definition
of cloud computing, the cloud-computing business model and challenges and opportunities
related to cloud computing, and provided guidance that governments can implement to lead
with cloud computing.

2.1.2 Current status of research in ITU-T


The key characteristics of cloud computing are economies of scale (infrastructure sharing) and
flexibility of use. In view of the importance of the topic, cloud computing is dealt with by two
study groups in the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T).

ITU-T Study Group 13 develops standards that detail requirements and functional architectures
of the cloud-computing ecosystem, covering inter- and intra-cloud computing and technologies
supporting XaaS (x as a service). This work includes infrastructure and networking aspects
of cloud-computing models, as well as deployment considerations and requirements for
interoperability and data portability. Study Group 13 also develops standards enabling
consistent end-to-end, multi-cloud management and monitoring of services exposed by, and
across, different service provider domains and technologies. Study Group 13 standardization
work further covers network aspects of IoT, additionally ensuring support for IoT across future
networks as well as evolving next-generation networks (NGN) and mobile networks. Cloud
computing in support of IoT is an integral part of this work.

ITU-T Study Group 20 is responsible for studies relating to IoT and its applications, and smart
cities and communities (SCC). This includes studies relating to big data aspects of IoT, SCC,
e‑services, and smart services for SCC.

2.2 Cloud state of the art and state of the business


Over the course of the last decade, cloud computing has become a disrupting force, impacting
all business functions and initiatives. Gartner defines a strategic technological trend as “one with
substantial disruptive potential that is beginning to break out of an emerging state into broader
impact and use”.8 Cloud computing has emerged as one of the key IT industry evolutions of
the twenty-first century. According to Gartner, the worldwide public cloud service is forecast
to reach a value of USD 354 billion.

In 20 years of existence, it has been found that cloud computing has stimulated innovation within
companies. New and existing functions, from customer care to cybersecurity, have progressively
shifted to public, private and hybrid cloud services. The fastest growth has been seen in software
as a service (SaaS). As early as 2016, the consultancy firm IDC predicted that close to one-third
of the world market for business applications would be based on the SaaS model by 2018,

8
Gartner. Newsroom. Press releases. Gartner identifies the top 10 strategic technology trends for 2020.
Orlando, Fla., United States, 21 October 2019.

8 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

increasing SaaS annual turnover from USD 22.6 billion in 2013 to USD 50.8 billion in 2018.
These estimates have been mostly confirmed by Skyhigh Networks data, which revealed that
the average number of cloud applications being used had nearly tripled in the three years
between 2013 and 2016.9

This very strong growth in cloud computing has forced analyst firms to revise their projections
upwards. Use of cloud computing has become so omnipresent that many companies are
adopting priority use of cloud-computing services (cloud-first policy). According to the latest
annual report on cloud computing carried out by North Bridge, a growth equity and venture
capital firm, 50 per cent of companies had a “cloud-first” or “cloud-only” strategy in place (90 per
cent were using cloud computing in some form).10

Figure 6: Worldwide public cloud service projection (2018 – 2022)

Source: Gartner11

2.3 New trends in cloud computing


Advances in cloud computing are changing the dynamic nature of the technology. On the
one hand, consumers, developers, IT managers and professionals are adopting the cloud as
a primary consumption vehicle. On the other, this adoption is pushing cloud technology to
evolve rapidly to provide more innovations and experiences to users.

As cloud computing matures in the market, major technological evolutions and frameworks are
being developed by the community such as containers, distributed computing and serverless
computing. At the same time, new significant trends are emerging, including but not limited
to the following:

• Cloud continuum to the edge.

9
McAfee. 12 Must-Know Statistics on Cloud Usage in the Enterprise. The state of cloud adoption. Blog post,
9 March 2017.
10
Contel Bradford. StorageCraft. The What and the Why Behind Cloud First Policies. Cloud technology
adoption is sky high.
11
Gartner. Newsroom. Press releases. Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Public Cloud Revenue to Grow 17% in
2020. Stamford, Conn., United States, 13 November 2019.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 9


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• Move to software as a service (SaaS) as a definitive market for many application service
providers.
• ‘Algorithms as a service’ (although this is not a standard adopted terminology); ‘IT as a
service’ (idem).

Figure 7: CAGR by cloud service category

Source: Gartner (October 2017)

2.3.1 Cloud moving to the edge


The rapid development of cloud computing in such sectors as the Internet, e-government,
finance, industry and public services, in addition to the continuous increase in data volume,
diversification of data processing and needs for data security and privacy, have posed many
challenges to cloud-based data processing. With a strong push from industrial Internet and
large-scale 5G commercialization in the making, edge computing has been growing fast, and
by addressing the last-mile supply problem facing cloud native applications, it has become a
vital pillar for implementing cloud computing in future development. The inevitable integration
of edge and cloud computing will usher in a new stage of edge-cloud collaboration.

Both cloud computing and edge computing have their own merits. Cloud computing is efficient
in global, non-real-time and long-cycle big-data processing and application; and superior in
unified resource management, business decision-making support, big data-based machine
learning and model training. Edge computing is more applicable to local, real-time and short-
cycle data processing and analysis, and can better support quick responses to local tasks, and
security.

Close collaboration between cloud and edge computing will meet the needs of a variety of use
scenarios and increase the application value of both models. Capable of satisfying the needs
for data processing and storage, edge computing can also be a collecting and preliminary
processing unit of high-value data required by the cloud. In addition, cloud computing exercises
uniform management over computing and storage resources on both the cloud and edge via
a management network; it also delivers the resources to the edge by following the business
rules and intelligent algorithms arising from big-data analysis and machine-learning training,
which facilitates application by edge computing. It is therefore important to create a continuum

10 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

between the cloud and edge in order to facilitate the development and integration of such
scenarios.

Some application scenarios of cloud-edge collaboration are outlined below:

• Industrial Internet scenarios. The intelligent devices installed and connected on the edge
enable mission-critical data processing and real-time response with near zero delays, thus
greatly reducing network traffic through decentralized data processing. The cloud can
gather edge data for unified storage and backup as well as achieve situation awareness
and policy improvement based on big data and AI; it is also responsible for unified
management of data transmission monitoring and edge devices.
• Smart transportation scenarios. By developing a smart transportation solution based
on cloud-edge collaboration featuring the integration of the urban traffic “brain”, road
edge nodes and smart vehicles, sensing devices, such as laser-radars and cameras, will be
integrated to allow collected data to interact with road edge nodes and nearby vehicles
to extend “perception” and achieve vehicle-vehicle and vehicle-road collaboration. The
urban traffic brain is responsible for collecting data from widely distributed edge nodes,
computing the operating conditions of the transportation system and giving rational
scheduling instructions to edge nodes, traffic signal systems and vehicles, based on big
data and AI algorithms, thereby increasing the operating efficiency of the transportation
system and minimizing road congestion.
• Security monitoring scenarios. The AI video analysis models carried by the edge
computing nodes are designed for business scenarios such as intelligent security, video
monitoring and face recognition, and performing local analysis, quick processing and real-
time response by taking advantage of such edge computing characteristics as low latency,
large bandwidth and quick response. The cloud performs AI training tasks, manages and
delivers various AI algorithms in a unified manner and gathers edge-side video analysis
results for convergence analysis and judgment.
• Smart home scenarios. A home local area network (LAN) of edge computing nodes (home
gateways and intelligent terminals) processes huge amounts of heterogeneous data and
uploads the processed data to a cloud platform in a unified way via the Internet or a 5G
network. Users are able to control home terminals by connecting with the edge computing
nodes via the network, and access historical data via the cloud.

2.3.2 Move to software as a service


As cloud computing gains momentum, application service providers (ASPs) for many disciplines
are adopting the cloud as their main delivery mechanism. According to Statista, the size of the
worldwide software as a service (SaaS) market is set to reach USD 157 billion in 2020.12

12
Statista. Technology & Telecommunications. IT Services Total size of the public cloud software as a service
(SaaS) market from 2008 to 2020.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 11


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 8: Software as a service (SaaS) market from 2008 to 2020 (in USD billions)

Source: Statista 2020

Existing application service providers across disciplines – human resources, customer relationship
management, enterprise resource planning, finance, communications and collaboration,
accounting and even IT (such as security, management) – are moving their technologies to the
cloud and preferring to use the cloud as their primary delivery mechanism. This move finds its
rationale in various reasons:

• Customer demand: More and more customers now prefer a public cloud-based delivery
model because they no longer have to manage any platform, they have transparent costs
(only subscription), have moved from CAPEX to OPEX, have access to the latest versions
and technologies provided by the vendor, have no need for additional hardware to deploy
these applications, and can scale up and down easily (to add or delete users). However,
additional network capacity to cater for cloud workloads and, in many cases, additional
security and governance products might be needed.
• Delivery, maintenance: When moving to a public cloud-based delivery model, ASPs
leverage the cloud to deliver applications online. They manage one version of the
application for all customers worldwide, which makes it easier for them to innovate, fix
errors or provide security updates. With this model, they can innovate very quickly and
ensure all customers are using the same version worldwide regardless of where they are
located and what version they had subscribed to at first. This has important implications
for their cost model and their capacity to innovate and grow.
• Innovation: With the cloud, ASPs can deliver new experiences that are only possible on the
public cloud. The public cloud provides scale, agility, technologies such as AI, blockchain,
and IoT management at scale, and mobility, which enable ASPs to create new products,
services and experiences that are otherwise hard or impossible to obtain using traditional
delivery models.
• Competition: Traditional ASPs are facing fierce competition from small and agile start-ups
that are leveraging the cloud to provide innovative new experiences and products, faster
and cheaper. Innovative start-ups have changed the ASP landscape, forcing the large ASP
players to reinvent themselves.

12 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• Scale: The public cloud delivery model allows large and small ASPs to scale much faster
than using the traditional on-premises delivery model. Thanks to the public cloud, there
is no need to have offices everywhere to access customers, who can be served in a matter
of minutes, and with only one version of their application to manage, the cost structure
has changed, which allows the focus to be on innovation with fewer customer challenges
to address.

2.3.3 Algorithm as a service


‘Algorithm as a service’ (AaaS) is not a term officially adopted by ITU or the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO). However, AaaS is a major trend in the market that
will have a profound impact on the innovation landscape, changing the way applications are
developed and delivered.

AI is maturing and gaining momentum, and companies are using AI technology in applications,
and providing access to AI products through application programming interface (API). This
enables large and small companies to leverage advanced research from third parties delivered
through the cloud using simple APIs. To illustrate this, consider companies that can use advanced
natural language processing, speech-recognition or image-recognition algorithms developed
by specialized companies in their applications, simply by calling on APIs. The algorithms are
delivered through the cloud because the cloud provides scale, the cloud allows AI vendors to
provide one version of their products, and customers always have access to the latest and best
algorithm as they get more mature.

2.3.4 IT as a service
Again, ‘IT as a service’ (ITaaS) is not yet a term officially adopted by ITU or ISO. However,
ITaaS is a major trend in the market that will have a profound impact on the way IT services are
delivered to IT professionals who are managing IT infrastructure for private- and public-sector
organizations.

This category of products and services includes security, backup, data governance, asset
management and cloud management.

While many IT professionals enjoy great technical expertise and experience in managing IT
infrastructure, they also experience challenges in terms of technology deployment, keeping
up to date with the latest innovations and security updates.

The cloud is providing a new set of experiences for IT managers that were not possible before.
For example, security professionals are turning to cloud computing to obtain greater visibility
and insight into the security landscape, as well as near real-time updates, and in some cases
solutions to zero-day security attacks. Cloud-based technologies are helping security experts
to track data across networks and implement new and more secure data governance models.
Advances in network architecture in the cloud are providing new solutions for security experts
to move secure workloads to the public cloud and run them there as if they were running in
on-premises data centres disconnected from the public Internet.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 13


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

2.4 Economics for the adoption of cloud computing


Cloud computing, notably the hyper-scale cloud, changes the economic equation across
the value chain and creates opportunities for new innovations, especially in business model
innovation.

Cloud computing is a multi-faceted technology. ITU-T defines cloud computing as a paradigm


for enabling network access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable physical or virtual
resources with self-service provisioning and administration on demand. The cloud-computing
paradigm is composed of key characteristics, cloud-computing roles and activities, cloud-
capability types and cloud-service categories, cloud-deployment models and cloud-computing
cross-cutting aspects. ITU sets out three cloud capabilities: application (SaaS), platform (PaaS)
and infrastructure (IaaS) as well as deployment models: public, private, community and hybrid.
The combination of these create opportunities for a number of cloud options.

Cloud computing has a specific value chain, a set of potential players and services and many
different business models, and enables new scenarios such as data-based business models.
Regulators and policy-makers are invited to deep dive into these various models and understand
the variations as they plan to develop specific policies and regulations.

Figure 9: Cloud provider categories

Source: ITU

There are various scenarios of cloud adoption:

• Cloud technology providers: Some public and private entities are implementing the
cloud in their own IT infrastructure either for their own use (organizations can run their IT
infrastructure and IT delivery processes using cloud-computing concepts) or to become
cloud service providers (CSPs), providing cloud services for others or on behalf of others;
for example, some government agencies have established shared infrastructure delivered
as a cloud to various government agencies. To support this scenario, the ecosystem is
composed of several industry players that provide technology and service components
to help organizations become CSPs. This ranges from companies building data centres to
hardware and network players, software vendors, security vendors (physical and software),
energy and governance.
• Cloud service providers (CSPs): Who delivers multipurpose cloud services? Some
organizations, local and multinational, provide cloud services, in most cases in the form
of public cloud services. These are CSPs. Services can be IaaS, PaaS or one of the various
categories and capabilities described above. Their customers will be able to consume
these services on-demand using self-service provisioning.

14 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• Application service providers (ASPs) run on multipurpose cloud infrastructure. In this


category, independent software vendors of all sizes develop cloud services for others
to use; however, they need to use the cloud infrastructure to build and operate their
cloud services rather than building their own. This category is probably the most dynamic
in the marketplace, since small, medium and large organizations can use ready-to-use
cloud infrastructure to deliver their own services to their customers, be it for consumers
or enterprises.
• Technology service providers represent a specific category of ASP that leverage the cloud
to provide applications to IT and technology users to run their own operations. This is an
important evolution of how, for instance, security, governance and business continuity are
being operated.
• Vertically integrated clouds are large-scale services (for example social networks or
search engines) that are provided to users running on the vendor’s own developed and
integrated cloud infrastructure. In many cases, the underlying technology infrastructure is
tailored to cater for the specific needs of the services they provide.
• Algorithm providers are a new dynamic category of service providers. Instead of
providing fully fledged applications running on the cloud, they provide niche ready-to-
use algorithms, developed and running on the cloud, to other application developers who
will consume them on-demand through APIs. Most AI models are delivered through this
mechanism as well as the development of other technologies such as blockchain.

While these scenarios are quite different, CSPs can provide more than one of the scenarios.
Within this very specific chain, other organizations can play important roles:

• Network infrastructure providers provide the network access required for delivering the
service. A big global challenge is the growing need for bandwidth and cloud services in
remote locations.13
• Service brokers act as the primary contacts to customers, reselling or contracting on behalf
of CSPs.
• Traditional service providers are part of a dynamic category of service providers who
provide services to organizations willing to become CSPs or to those willing to consume
cloud services such as security, audit, governance, compliance, training, change
management, architecture guiding, managed services and migration services.

2.4.1 Enterprise cloud adoption models


Enterprise organizations, large and small, in both the public and private sectors, are consuming
cloud services and recent research shows that most enterprises are using a hybrid model.

The hybrid model was identified early by ITU, but also by CSPs and enterprise organizations. This
model provides flexibility for organizations that can leverage the cloud, deploy a progressive
roadmap to adopt the cloud and comply with the regulatory obligations, or just meet their
technical constraints.

13
Use case: SES & Microsoft. See: Jennifer Sokolovsky. Microsoft. News. Azure Space partners bring deep
expertise to new venture. SES. 20 October 2020.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 15


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 10: Enterprise cloud strategy and types of cloud used

Source: Flexera 2020 State of the Cloud Report14

For example, the French NGO Syntec provided a framework to consider when adopting
the cloud, including budget, cost control, scalability that remains out of sight to achieve
transparency, improvement of effectiveness, deployment models (private, public or hybrid),
and IT departments that need to examine carefully the different approaches. They concluded
that, ultimately, a hybrid approach is often chosen for large enterprises.15

2.4.2 Different business models


Considering the value chain, various business models are being developed.

Some cloud services are designed for consumer needs and some are designed for enterprise
level (and government) needs. In most cases, enterprise-grade services and consumer-grade
services are governed by different principles, contractual clauses, service-level agreements
(SLA), business models and security and privacy rules.

Enterprise-grade cloud services are those services designed for government and enterprise
organizations. They are governed by enterprise grade contractual clauses, SLAs and security
and privacy rules as they are then integrated into the overall supply chain of the organization. In
most cases, CSPs provide an OPEX-based subscription model. The way the fees are calculated
vary among CSPs, for example by user, by size (storage, compute, network) and through SLA.

Consumer-grade cloud services are designed for individual consumers to use and are governed
by specific contractual clauses, SLAs and security and privacy rules. While a pay-as-you consume
business model is applicable, other business models may be appropriate, such as freemium
(free to a certain level and pay for more) and advertising business models (users are not the
end customers/payers).

2.4.3 Data as business model


The very nature of cloud computing is about collecting, storing and processing data at scale
with highly reduced costs compared to traditional computing models. As these new models
develop, new business models based on data are being created. These will rely on capturing
the maximum amount of data and leveraging big-data analytics, AI and new data-processing

14
Flexera. Report. Flexera 2020 State of the Cloud Report.
15
Syntec numérique. Le cloud computing. [in French]

16 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

technologies, to derive value from the data that can then be monetized. The following are
examples of how this is unfolding:

• Advertising: Companies are providing cloud-based services to consumers for free.


The purpose of the service is to collect and process data using various innovative data
technologies, especially AI, and then create value for advertisers who are the end
customers.
• Industry-specific: As many industries are transitioning to digital and are being information-
enabled, capturing and processing data is creating massive business transformation and
disruption. Many industries such as health, education, agriculture, justice, environment,
pharmaceuticals and transportation are increasingly dependent on data, and companies
are leveraging the cloud to capture and process data to create new products and services
that disrupt these industries.
• Technology-focused: The adoption of cloud computing enables some service providers
to capture technology-specific data that will create new value for users. For example, some
service providers will capture data from networks, endpoints or operating systems, etc.
that, once processed, can be turned into security services for users.

Developers are finding new ways to capture and process data, leveraging the cloud and creating
added value for users and organizations. This is only possible thanks to the power of the cloud
to capture, store and process data at scale, to provide technologies that are otherwise hard
or impossible to support outside the cloud and most importantly at a cost that makes these
innovations sustainable.

2.5 Considerations for cloud adoption


As organizations are adopting cloud computing, there are several elements that need special
consideration and attention. These include:

• reliable connectivity;
• network connection security;
• access to data;
• authentication of persons accessing data and services;
• data encryption;
• data backup;
• access traceability and traceability of data operations;
• entity certification and cloud-computing provider security procedures;
• requirement for the CSP to provide information on security incidents when possible;
• provision for regular testing of data-recovery procedures and for fall-back procedures in
the event of service interruption;
• conditions relating to contract termination.

To this end, developing countries are encouraged not only to rely on a mix of network access
technologies to ensure data storage and secure access to data, but also to follow and participate
actively in the work being done by ITU-T in the field of cloud computing.16

16
ITU-T. Focus Group on cloud computing.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 17


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

2.6 Trust
Cloud computing has emerged as an important and disruptive technology of the current
decade (2020-2030). As seen from market-penetration figures, cloud computing is gaining
momentum. For the cloud to “cross the chasm”, as in Geoffrey Moore’s technology paradigm,17
and in relation to many other aspects that need to be addressed, trust has generated many
questions from industry, users, governments and regulators.

Cloud computing is a disruptive technology that is reshaping the boundaries of companies and
institutions using the cloud, as well as consumer habits. In the business space, there are three
notable phases of IT adoption:

• Phase 1: During the first decades of information systems development, small and large
entities in the public and private sectors were mostly using in-house computers and
servers to capture, store, manage and process data and business processes. The users
of these systems were mostly company employees. The boundaries of the institutions
were well delimited inside a firewall. This protection is analogous to a 17th century castle
with large and high walls, and hard to attack. The system of trust was built essentially
around employees, vendors and some other technical controls and measures within the
boundaries of the ‘walls’.
• Phase 2: With the advance of broadband Internet, and many other technologies, the
boundaries started to shift. Employees access these systems from outside the ‘walls’ of
a company or institution. Partners access some of the systems that sit inside the ‘walls.
Customers interact with systems inside the ‘walls’ using various means including the
web or mobile apps. Objects are now connected to some of these systems and provide
data to or get orders from them. This is all using the Internet. But in most cases, these
interactions are happening with the same paradigm: the IT system is inside a ‘wall’ and
all these interactions need to cross it. The system of trust in this world is more complex.
Trust is needed for employees and vendors, but new sophisticated technical, process and
organizational measures are required to stop unauthorized access from someone sitting
anywhere in the world who could perform a cyberattack, much like a ‘catapult’. In this
environment, security and protection are still all performed by the entities themselves.
• Phase 3: Some technological advances have pushed the boundaries further and have
opened the ‘wall’ to a new form. Cloud computing is reshaping the ‘wall’, and in its
outsourced form, it invites institutions for many good technical, economic and business
reasons to move data and/or processing outside the traditional ‘wall’. Within this paradigm,
the IT system of any entity, with its new boundaries, has new stakeholders in addition to
employees and vendors: the CSPs and their ecosystem.

Institutions and other stakeholders looking to leverage the outsourced cloud have legitimate
concerns over control and processing of data, such as: ‘I don't know where my data are’; ‘I lose
control’; ‘What happens to my data once in the cloud?’; ‘Is the cloud secure?’; ‘The public cloud
is exposed on the Internet, so everyone has access?’; ‘What are cloud service providers doing
with my data?’; ‘Which third party has access to my data and under which processes?’. Such
concerns indicate that regulators, governments and CSPs need to prepare the ground for a
new system of trust, if the full potential of this technology is to be unleashed.

Consumers are also using various cloud services, for example, to store pictures and documents,
e-mail, chat with their families and friends, read books, listen to music and watch films or socialize.

17
Geoffrey Moore. Crossing the Chasm, 3rd Edition. Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream
Customers. Collins Business Essentials. Harper Collins. New York, 28 January 2014.

18 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

During the 2018-2021 study period, a report on cloud computing prepared in response to
Question 3/1 suggested that cloud adoption requires a system of trust, and the report set out
a framework of four pillars: security, privacy, compliance and transparency. That framework
applies, in fact, to CSPs.

Building on that framework, it is suggested not only to develop it further, but also to address the
trust discussion in the present report by adding the roles and responsibilities of governments
and regulators. Many of the unanswered questions regarding a trusted cloud environment lie
with governments and regulators.

The framework proposed below is for a trusted cloud environment.

2.6.1 Security
Protecting the cloud infrastructure and data are paramount for all stakeholders, including
CSPs, customers and governments. Yet, in the cloud context, security is the business of all
these stakeholders and does not lie solely with the CSP, who still has a major responsibility:
a CSP should have accountability to protect customer data and systems. A CSP should also
demonstrate as much as possible, within certain reasonable limits, that all necessary processes
and governance are in place to protect customer data and systems, and there are international
standards such as the ISO 27000 series, HIPPA (for health), PCI-SSC (for payment) and General
Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that identify minimum security guidelines. Some countries,
such as Australia, France, Morocco, the United Kingdom and the United States, have developed
specific security standards for industries such as justice, health, finance and security.

At the same time, with the advance of the cloud and its widespread adoption by many critical
infrastructure institutions across the globe, it is important that all players should refrain from
cyberwarfare and attacking tech companies that operate the cloud. Governments and regulators
should provide confidence for both CSPs and their clients that they are not going to be
the targets of cyberwarfare attacks. Stakeholders should also consider exchanging security
information between CSPs (technology companies), and between governments and CSPs, to
avoid any proliferation of cyberwarfare. This is an area that requires intense cooperation.

2.6.2 Transparency
Transparency is one of the key components of a trusted ecosystem that will create confidence
among entities and consumers who are willing to use cloud services. In fact, they need to obtain
some level of transparency, within reasonable limits of security, on what happens to their data
once such data are in the cloud. CSPs should be able to provide a high degree of transparency
in this regard in contractual agreements with their clients, for example.

Governments and regulators have an important role to play to enable more transparency in the
ecosystem. In fact, for many legitimate reasons, governments around the globe might need to
get access to data that reside with a CSP. CSPs who are willing to invest in cloud infrastructure
are always struggling to understand local legislation and regulation with regard to government
access to data, especially data stored locally; and this in many cases prevents more investments
in cloud infrastructure by CSPs. For that matter, governments and regulators could gain by
creating legislation and regulations that provide transparency to both CSPs and their customers
in respect of the rules that govern access to data. CSPs will have more clarity on the rules and

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 19


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

processes, and clients will have more clarity as to what data they can move to the cloud and
what data they want to keep on premises.

2.6.3 Control
Entities and citizens moving data and workloads to the cloud should be confident that they are
in control of their data at all times. They should be able to leave the CSP when they want, and
to fully retrieve their data; they need to have confidence that the CSP is not using their data for
purposes other than providing the service to which they agreed. This should ideally be in their
contractual agreements. At the same time, CSPs will need to develop technologies that provide
their clients with control over data, such as encryption with personal keys and control of access.

Governments and regulators have an important role to play in this process. Legislation should
hold entities and citizens moving data to the cloud accountable for that data, not the CSP,
which is not responsible for what clients move to the cloud. Such legislation and regulation
should clarify the roles and responsibilities of the CSP and its clients. Cloud enterprise clients
should be held accountable for their data in the cloud as they are in full control of that data.
For example, governments may, for legitimate reasons, need to access data, and that access
should be gained directly through a request to the client, not the CSP.

2.6.4 Business continuity


As public and private institutions, including critical infrastructure, adopt cloud computing as
a platform, business continuity becomes a critical element of their decision framework. CSPs
should provide clear and transparent SLAs so that clients are confident that the SLA covers client
workloads running in the cloud and that client data are accessible. CSPs should provide all clarity
and transparency in their SLAs and develop clear contractual agreements that support them.

Government and regulators have also an important role to play in this process. In fact, for
many legitimate reasons, governments might need to prevent a client from running a certain
workload or accessing some important data. As entities are migrating to the cloud, they should
be accountable for their data and workloads, not the CSP. As such, legislation and regulations
should be developed that protect CSPs from being the target of government requests to stop
delivering a service to a client or a whole country. A lack of such legislation is an obstacle to
using the cloud and to all the good that the cloud provides, including lower costs, greater agility
and access to more innovation.

Other industries, such as in the electricity sector, have a trusted value chain and ecosystem. Users
plug in a device at home and trust that it will work. Governments have developed supporting
policy and regulation frameworks. Industry players and providers comply with regulation. Third-
party controls are in place to monitor compliance and consumers can use the system easily. This
is an ultimate system of trust that needs to be reached as the cloud is deployed.

2.7 Case studies of successful cloud-computing platforms used in


developed and developing countries
Several case studies were contributed during this study period. These include:

– Background of cloud-service development on the part of telecommunication operators


in China

20 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

– Cloud-computing regulation in Saudi Arabia, by Axon Partners Group


– China case study
– Islamic Republic of Iran case study
– Bhutan case study
– Nigeria case study

The details of these case studies are provided in Annex 2 to this report.

2.8 Guidelines to spur development and uptake of cloud computing


• Regulators are invited to develop their digital skills, in order to better understand and
assess the development of the telecommunication/ICT market in the context of cloud
computing. Regulators and policy-makers should adopt cloud-first policies to unleash the
potential of the cloud for their constituencies, and digital transformation roadmaps.
• Regulators are encouraged to consider the latest infrastructure technology developments
to access data in remote and unserved locations, and explore solutions provided by a mix
of technologies to ensure countrywide and secure accessibility to cloud services.
• Governments are encouraged to engage in real dialogue and consult with different
stakeholder groups before adopting new cloud policies and regulations.
• Regulators should strive to ensure that data can flow freely as a means of promoting
continued growth, especially for small and medium-sized businesses (SMB). This, in turn,
will benefit economic growth at the local, national and regional levels.
• Regulators are invited to liaise and coordinate with authorities in charge of data protection
and avoid developing new regulations in this space.
• Regulators and policy-makers are encouraged to consider regulatory environments
that support cooperation between cloud companies and telecommunication service
providers, both terrestrial and satellite; such cooperation can extend access to the cloud
to unconnected and under-connected populations.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 21


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Chapter 3 – M-services

3.1 Background
The 2019 data related to ICT applications (including mobile applications) from the annual ITU
World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory Survey on regulatory practices is summarized in
Figures 11 and 12. The survey provides an overview of the trends in this area across the ITU
membership.

Figure 11: M-services regulation landscape

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

Figure 12: M-services regulation by sector

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

Definition of m-services:

M-services are services that can be accessed through mobile handsets independent of temporal
and spatial restraints.

3.2 M-services state of the art and state of the business


Different types of m-services exist, and can be classified as follows:

• Communication services: These are services that allow interpersonal communication.


Examples include:

22 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

– messaging services;
– social media;
– calling.

• Content services: These are services that provide certain information to users. Examples
include:

– browsing services: interaction with online environment;


– gaming services;
– content retrieval and sharing services;
– multimedia services.

• Business services: These are commercial services provided via mobile handsets. They are
categorized into banking services and market services:

– Banking services include various business services such as online mobile payment and
banking transactions.
– Market services give customers the opportunity online to sell or buy products or
services, advertising and electronic commerce applications.

• Government services: These include services related to public-sector modernization,


assistance to government and national policies. such as:

– e-government;
– e-health;
– e-education;
– e-justice;
– e-agriculture.

3.3 New trends in m-services

3.3.1 Application integration platforms (e.g. Apple Arcade and Google Play
Pass)
Apple Arcade and Google Play Pass will result in innovative new games for consumers and new
revenue streams for publishers.

Game publishers are usually the early adopters in all aspects of mobile technology, with new
features and monetization models that then spread to other sectors. With subscriptions, this
is reversed. As spending using mobile technology now accounts for over 50 per cent of all
gaming revenue in the global games market, subscriptions will drive deeper engagement and
greater customer lifetime value.

This trend is picking up in the mobile sector in general. In fact, during the 12 months ending
September 2019, over 95 per cent of the top 100 non-gaming apps bought on iOS App Store
and Google Play in the United States offered subscription services directly through in-app
purchases. In addition, worldwide consumer spending on games was expected to surpass
USD 75 billion in 2020.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 23


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

For Apple Arcade, this means developers are free to design new game mechanics without the
constraint of integrating in-app purchase opportunities. For Google Play Pass, existing games
could get a second wind by finding new revenue streams beyond their existing in-app purchases
or in-app advertising.

Both Apple Arcade and Google Play Pass will be important complements to their existing app
store models. Regardless of initial performance, these subscription services will play key roles
in long-term mobile gaming strategy – providing the opportunity to further strengthen the
broader mobile gaming ecosystem. However, it will be challenging to get consumers out of
the mindset of expecting all games on mobile devices to be free to download.

3.3.2 5G
5G is the next big move, and gamers will surely be first to reap the rewards. While bandwidth has
been the main talking point around 5G, it is the low latency that excites gamers and publishers
alike. There is demand for mobile online multiplayer core games that rely on better wireless
connections.

Among the top 10 games by download in October 2019, core multiplayer online games were
also the most frequently played by users. 5G is still in its infancy, but in 2020 telecommunication
operators were moving to expand coverage, and gaming is likely to be the first test of market
validation.

The 2019 Ericsson Mobility report predicts that by 2024, 34 per cent of all global mobile traffic
will be on 5G, and 64 per cent of the world’s population will have 5G coverage. Publishers
should act now to ensure future versions of their applications can take advantage of faster 5G
connections, while looking into version updates to see which of their competitors are doing
the same.

3.3.3 Gaming genres


Auto battler games are currently the most popular genre. Their combination of strategy and
chance positions them at the mid-point between card games like Hearthstone and strategy
games like Starcraft.

The genre has already become of interest to e-sports fans, with the first Auto Chess Invitational
offering a USD 1 million prize pool, which will support adoption and growing time spent per
user on mobile devices. The rise of auto battlers calls attention to the fact that popular games
are increasingly drawing on mechanics from multiple genres. Moving forward, publishers need
to look beyond existing app store game classifications, and leverage data to create new games
that grab consumer attention.

3.3.4 Progressive web applications


Progressive web applications (PWAs) will become an important link in the consumer journey.
PWAs are mobile websites that look and feel like applications – ensuring a smooth user
experience – without requiring users to immediately take the extra step of downloading an
application. PWAs can help increase conversions by simplifying the user experience. This is
particularly important as it allows users to test or use a more limited version of an app with less
friction than a mobile website.

24 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

PWAs are a veritable bridge between mobile Internet and mobile applications. More specifically,
PWAs have faster loading times than websites. This is particularly valuable where connectivity is
poor and in developing markets where the lite version of an app has similar levels of popularity
as the full one. In India, for example, Facebook Lite had nearly 90 per cent of the downloads of
Facebook in the first half of 2019.

While PWAs are generally less valuable for applications that require sign-in to leverage full
functionality (e.g. banking and communication), they will be an important option for sectors
such as travel, retail and news – where users can test an experience before committing further.
For example, Trivago has seen a 150 per cent increase in engagement among those who used
the PWA compared to the mobile site.

3.3.5 Rise of mobile health


Digital health – specifically that driven by mobile (m-health) – is one major trend that is steadily
impacting the lives of millions of people.

There are currently over 318 000 health applications on the market, with hundreds more being
added each day. Consumers are driving this growth: they are quick to adapt! From telemedicine
to wearables and everything in between, people love the convenience of managing their health
on the go.

Figure 13: Wearable-technology users in the United States (2014 – 2018)

Source: Mary Meeker. Internet Trends 2019 report18

18
Mary Meeker. Internet Trends 2019. Bond, San Francisco, CA., United States, 11 June 2019.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 25


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

3.3.6 Emergence of enterprise mobile apps


Most mobile apps have been individual user apps. However, the current trend is development of
enterprise mobile apps, especially B2B apps. Examples include Asana for project management,
Google analytics, HootSuite app for managing company social media accounts such as
Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn; and WebEx for hosting and attending meetings on a tablet.

3.3.7 Increase in on-demand apps


On-demand apps act as mediators between providers of different services and customers. The
app ecosystem will include more providers offering on-demand apps in the market. Examples
include Uber and Taxify.

3.3.8 Integration of payment gateways into mobile apps


The convenience provided by mobile-payment options is seeing an increase in integration of
mobile wallet into various mobile apps, especially shopping apps and e-commerce apps. There
is an increase in other mobile-payment options such as Google Pay, Apple Pay, PayPal One
Touch, Venmo and Square Cash.

3.3.9 Proliferation of instant apps


An instant app is a small mobile software used directly without the need for downloading and
installation. The convenience brought by instant apps will also certainly help increase their
production and use. Examples include Skyscanner for flights and hotels, NYTimes Crossword,
Buzzfeed for news, Onefootball for information and statistics on world football leagues, Red
Bull TV for sports information.

3.3.10 Increase in virtual reality and augmented reality usage


Increased use cases for virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have led to usage in
mobile apps to produce better-quality gaming apps. Examples of mobile games using AR and
VR are: DinoTrek and VR Tank Training.

3.3.11 Use of accelerated mobile pages development


Accelerated mobile pages (AMP) is a technology that allows lightweight pages to load more
quickly on smartphones and tablets. It is spearheaded by Google and Twitter to improve the
performance of webpages on mobile devices. Mobile app developers are making more use
of this technology to speed up load times in mobile devices.

3.3.12 Synchronizing wearable technology with m-services


Due to the increase in wearable devices for health purposes, e.g. fitness bracelets, smartwatches
and healthcare monitors, there is an upsurge in the need to synchronize the data on the wearable
devices with mobile apps. This pairing increases engagement in the sense that it is easier and
convenient to access the data from the wearable devices on the mobile phone.

26 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

3.3.13 Widespread use of chatbots


It is predicted that chatbot adoption will increase over different communication lines in the
mobile app ecosystem. The increase is attributed to the need for real-time interaction between
service providers and customers. The chatbot technology eliminates the need for human-to-
human interaction.

3.4 Policies, strategies and relevant approaches in the field of


m-services
One of the key pillars of the m-services ecosystem is the application store concept, which acts
as a combination of marketplace, platform and trusted party, as well as a market gateway.

• Marketplace. For developers to make applications available to consumers and users, the
mobile application stores are actual marketplaces. In fact, these marketplaces derive value
for both the application developers (who in some cases are paid for the applications) and
the application store owners (who get a base royalty out of each application payment).
The revenue generated from these stores is growing significantly. For example, according
to SensorTower, the world’s mobile technology users spent USD 71.3 billion on apps and
games in 2018.

Figure 14: Gross app revenues in USD billions (2018 – 2019)

Source: SensorTower19

• Platform and trusted party. For mobile application developers and consumers, the mobile
application stores provide a trusted platform that is a critical demand driver. Consumers
trust application store providers to make the necessary security controls to provide them
a secure platform from which to download applications.
• Market gateway. For mobile application developers, application stores represent an
actual gateway to consumers. In fact, developers do not have an alternative to provide
applications to consumers unless they go through these gateways.

19
Sensor Tower. Global App Revenue Grew 23% in 2018 to More Than $71 Billion on iOS and Google Play.
Blog post, 16 January 2019.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 27


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 15: Application downloads on Apple App Store

Source: Statista 2019

The development of mobile services and the acceptance of these mobile applications by
consumers has reached a level where everything from health to education, finance, work,
socializing, farming, gaming and even fighting pandemics (like the COVID-19, via tracing) is
going through mobile applications. While it is fine to celebrate how fast anyone who owns an
app could potentially reach millions of consumers, it is equally important to bear in mind the
issue of equitable access to these critical platforms and avoid market distortion.

The time has come for regulators and policy-makers to ensure that both developers and
consumers enjoy equitable market access to these platforms. Special focus should be given to:

• Cost of entry for developers: It is important for application developers to be able to join
these critical platforms and ensure that the platform owners do not apply high costs to
entry for players to join.
• Freedom of choice: Developers should be able to publish their applications at the store of
their choice and not be bound to using one store or a small number of platform owners.
Hence, it is important that application store platform providers should allow for alternative
application stores to provide the service and not create a tie between their operating
system and the app store they provide.
• Providing fast pass access: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen governments
around the world wanting to provide applications to their citizens and various
constituencies in the fight against this global health crisis. However, application store
owners have applied unacceptable constraints on sovereign governments and hence
delayed the fight against the pandemic. For example, for a ministry of health to create
an account on a store, the process could take up to two months, or the publication of a
government sponsored COVID-19 tracing application could take up to two to three weeks
of review before publication. Governments should not be bound by application store
owners to publish critical applications.

28 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

3.5 Methods of development and deployment of m-services app


economy
Mobile services and applications play an important role in the vast digital ecosystem. The
development of mobile services has been largely driven by increasing demand among
consumers and emerging technologies. Grasping the potential of services can help to develop
and use them. In addition to providing economic opportunities, these services can offer valuable
assistance in the event of disasters. In this regard, governments, regulators and consumers must
understand the real development potential of mobile applications and services.

To ensure the proper development and deployment of mobile services and applications,
several fundamental criteria must be addressed such as simplicity, end-to-end automatization,
confirmation in real time and collaboration.

• Simplicity: Making m-services easy to use for consumers is the key to project success.
For example, it is important to design m-agriculture solutions to be able to interact with
farmers in simple terms and, if possible, incorporate terminology in local languages.
• End-to-end automatization: Full end-to-end automatization – from the opening of an
account to the buying and selling of securities – encourages people with busy schedules
to take part.
• Confirmation in real time: Receiving real-time feedback for each transaction executed by
users reinforces public confidence in the process.
• Collaboration: The collaborative participation and support of all industry actors are
essential for building trust in products. For example, the involvement of farmers in the
design and development of agricultural solutions is essential and can be achieved by
providing them with different ways of giving feedback on the user-friendliness of the
system. Success in fostering collaborative regulation requires focused attention on real
and potential economic advantages and the policy and regulatory parameters of the
application economy.
• Digital literacy: To promote growth in mobile services, it is essential that farmers, for
example, are provided with training in basic digital literacy skills.
• Accessibility: It is essential that m-services are designed as accessible from the outset, in
order to make sure that everybody can participate in the ecosystem, including persons
with disabilities.
• Solutions for local development: Example 1: It is important that mobile farming solutions
address a specific area of agriculture, such as only dairy farming or specific crops, e.g. tea
or coffee. This will make solutions easier to use for farmers and provide them with specific
information. Example 2: The M-Post platform provides customers with access to postal
services through their mobile phones in Kenya. The platform turns mobile phones into
formal postal addresses by allowing customers to acquire a virtual postal address, renew
subscriptions and request delivery of items from the post office at a convenient location
for them for a fee. In addition, M-Post allows customers to track their letters and packages
in real time.
• Ubiquity of banking agents and mobile operators: To accelerate the uptake of mobile
financial services, there must be a vast network of banking agents and mobile operators.

3.6 Ways to promote an enabling environment for the development


and deployment of m-services
M-services are a subset of e-services, and span many facets of human life. This ranges from
government-to-citizen services to business-to-customer services and person-to-person services.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 29


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Industries such as banking, agriculture, entertainment, education and health have benefited
from the growth of m-services.

To facilitate and promote the uptake of m-services, an enabling environment needs to be


nurtured. This requires identification and promotion of all the stakeholders involved in the
m‑services ecosystem.

3.6.1 Government/national regulator


The government and regulator have key roles to play in setting up an enabling environment for
the development and deployment of m-services. This can take the form of taxes, universal access
for basic mobile services, policies on automation of government services, policies on education
curricula with regard to ICTs, incentives for innovative m-services, and policies that facilitate the
life of start-ups and developers such as access to the latest technologies, international payment
and hiring developers.

Example of incentives and policies:

• With regard to taxes, to spur uptake of m-services, mobile terminals and ICT devices could
be exempted from taxation, which would lower the prices for ICT devices, making them
affordable to more people.
• To facilitate use of m-services, the government, through the use of universal service funds
and tax incentives for investment in underserved areas, should ensure universal access to
basic telephony services, which will enable access to m-services offered via unstructured
supplementary service data (USSD).
• For those countries with specific regulations/policies in respect of forex, it is recommended
that start-ups and developers who need access to application stores and/or cloud services
should have facilities to access these critical resources.

3.6.2 Ministries/government agencies


Ministries and government agencies should automate services and make them available via
m-services, both using mobile apps and USSD platforms. The role to be played by these entities
is mainly to ensure that as many services as possible are automated and customized for mobile
access.

Also, there are specific regulated sectors under the supervision of the government and/or
specific agencies such as finance, health and education for which it would be important for
the government to allow the use of m-services. For example, m-payment and mobile banking
are key use cases that should be developed with specific regulation under the supervision
of central banks. This will spur financial inclusion and ecosystem innovation. Yet, to support
financial inclusion, banking regulators could also allow flexible regulation to simplify the life of
target audiences. M-education is another example.

3.6.3 Telecommunication operators


To spur the uptake of m-services, the role of telecommunication operators is to ensure basic
network coverage in all places where they have been licensed to operate. Further, if they make
their services affordable (SMS, data bundle costs and USSD costs), then the price of services
provided via mobile phones will be low and encourage uptake of m-services.

30 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

3.6.4 App developers


Application developers play a key role with regard to m-services accessed via mobile apps
and USSDs. The role of app developers in providing an environment for uptake of m-services
includes developing several apps that automate and make government services /other general
services accessible via the mobile platform. In addition, platforms should be as simple as
possible to use and available in various languages that are easily understood.

3.6.5 ICT training institutions


Institutions play a key role in capacity building. To harness the role played by ICT training
institutions in m-services uptake, institutions should formulate a practical approach to training
on apps for the development of m-services. This could include getting in touch with government
entities that offer services and exploring ways of automating their services for access via mobile
platforms. The identified areas could then form projects for students to work on.

3.7 Case studies and best practices


A number of case studies were contributed during this study period. These include:

– Barbados case study on m-money service


– M-financial services case study
– Kenya case study on m-services (M-Akiba)
– Kenya cases study on m-farming

The details of these case studies are provided in Annex 3 to this report.

3.8 Guidelines to spur development and uptake of m-services


• Development of collaboration frameworks: Countries are encouraged to develop
collaborative frameworks encompassing academia, consumer organizations, app
developers, mobile service providers, utility service providers and the government ministry
for m-services research, development and roll-out.
• Accessibility of m-services: To enable high uptake, m-services should be accessible via
both feature phones and smartphones.
• Differentiation of m-services: To spur uptake of m-services, the services should be tailored
to the unique needs of the country in which they are to be used, to a niche market and
with the use of local languages in some sectors, e.g. agriculture.
• End-to-end automation: There is a need for full vertical integration with all aspects of the
process being executed via m-services, e.g. payments, for better consumer experience.
• Real-time service response: To enhance confidence in m-services, immediate or near
immediate service response is essential.
• Investments in mobile networks: Due to accessibility of m-services via mobile phones,
there is need for government and mobile networks to ensure wide and universal coverage
of GSM networks to ensure countrywide accessibility to mobile networks that will facilitate
use of m-services.
• Digital literacy: To ensure uptake in m-services that require a certain level of literacy,
governments should invest in digital literacy of citizens.
• Collaboration between the private sector and public authorities: This collaboration is
necessary to promote the adoption of mobile services.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 31


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• Cross-sector collaboration on regulations is essential: Examples include financial services,


healthcare, government services and transportation. These essential services should be
available as m-services, and regulators are invited to work together to enable them.
• Need for solutions related to certain regulatory issues: Solutions are required for issues
such as interoperability of services, fraud via the development of mobile financial services
and the absence of restrictions on the registration of multiple SIM cards.
• Need to forge partnerships between national ICT regulatory authorities and central
banks: This is necessary in order to facilitate the financing of mobile services
• Equitable market access to mobile application stores: Regulators and policy-makers
should ensure that both developers and consumers have equitable market access to
mobile application stores with a special focus on choice, cost of entry and fast access to
governments (especially in critical situations).

32 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Chapter 4 – Over-the-top applications

4.1 Background
Over-the-top (OTT) applications have been a subject of interest to the ITU membership for
several years. OTT applications have been considered as a policy matter in study groups within
ITU-D and ITU-T, at the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference, and in the ITU Council Working Group
on international Internet-related public policy issues.

Within ITU-T, the primary hub of study related to OTTs has been ITU-T Study Group 3, which
addresses tariff and accounting principles including related telecommunication economic and
policy issues. Study Group 3 studied OTTs within the scope of its Question 9/3 on “Economic
and regulatory impact of the Internet, convergence (services or infrastructure) and new services,
such as over-the-top (OTT), on international telecommunication services and networks”.

At its meeting in April 2019, ITU-T Study Group 3 adopted Recommendation ITU-T D.262, entitled
“Collaborative Framework for OTTs”. This was the first ITU Recommendation to explicitly address
the topic of OTTs. Study Group 3 further adopted Recommendation ITU-T D.266, entitled
“Enabling environment for voluntary commercial arrangements between telecommunication
network operators and OTT providers” at its meeting in August 2020. In addition to Study
Group 3, ITU-T Study Group 2 (Operational aspects) has also considered OTTs in the context
of operational aspects of numbering resources.

Within ITU-D, ITU-D Study Group 1 leads the study of OTTs. The 2017 World Telecommunication
Development Conference (WTDC-17) approved the Buenos Aires Action Plan, which included
Question 3/1 on “Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs:
Challenges and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries”. This
Question was the natural successor to ITU-D Question 1/1 from the 2014-2017 study period,
which addressed “Policy, regulatory and technical aspects of the migration from existing networks
to broadband networks in developing countries, including next-generation networks, m-services,
OTT services and the implementation of IPv6”.

On 1 October 2019, ITU-D Questions 3/1 and 4/1 co-hosted a workshop on Economic
impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/ICT markets. The workshop brought together
renowned experts from across the world and across stakeholder groups ranging from academia,
governments, NGOs and independent experts to industry, including providers of OTTs and
mobile network operators (MNOs). The workshop presentations, discussions and overarching
conclusions are captured in an “annual deliverable”20 that is also contained in Annex 1 to this
report.

The interest in OTTs was also apparent at the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference (Dubai, 2018), which
adopted Resolution 206 (Dubai, 2018), simply entitled “OTTs”.21 The language in Resolution 206
(Dubai, 2018) closely mirrors that in Recommendation ITU-T D.262. Prior to the Plenipotentiary
Conference, the Council Working Group on international Internet-related public policy issues

20
ITU. ITU-D study groups. Question 3/1 and Question 4/1 Annual deliverable 2019-2020. Economic impact
of OTTs on national telecommunication/ICT markets.
21
ITU. Plenipotentiary Conference (Dubai, 2018). Resolution 206 (Dubai, 2018), on OTTs.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 33


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

conducted an open consultation in 2017on the topic of public policy considerations for OTTs.
The consultation generated 71 responses from a variety of stakeholders and regions (10 from
government and public-sector entities, 44 from the private sector and industry associations, 13
from civil society, 2 from academia and 2 from IGOs).

The 2019 data related to OTTs from the annual ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Regulatory
Survey on regulatory practices is summarized in Figures 16 to 20, which provide an overview
of the trends in this area across the ITU membership.

Figure 16: OTT regulation landscape by region (2019)

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

Figure 17: OTT regulation landscape by region (2018)

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

Figure 18: OTT regulation projections by region (2019)

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

34 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 19: OTT regulation projections by region (2018)

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

Figure 20: OTT regulation by category and region (2019)

Source: ITU World Telecommunication Regulatory Database, www​.itu​.int/​icteye

4.2 OTT state of the art and state of the business


It should be stated that there is no universally accepted definition or common understanding
of OTTs, which makes the market difficult to define. The acronym OTT has attained broad
acceptance as a standalone term referring to a wide array of online applications. Recommendation
ITU-T D.262 establishes a working definition of OTT as: “An application accessed and delivered
over the public Internet that may be a direct technical/functional substitute for traditional
international telecommunication services”, while also noting that “the definition of OTT is a
matter of national sovereignty and may vary among Member States”.22

Regardless of the definition, it can be said with certainty that the OTT landscape is large and
growing, dynamic, innovative and competitive.

According to ITU data, 2019 marked the first full year when more than half of the world was
connected to the Internet.23 An estimated 4.1 billion people used the Internet in 2019. The global
penetration rate increased from just under 17 per cent in 2005 to over 53 per cent in 2019.

22
ITU-T. Recommendation ITU-T D.262 (05/2019): Collaborative framework for OTTs.
23
ITU-D. Facts and Figures 2019. Measuring Digital Development.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 35


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

There were 3.8 billion mobile Internet users in 2019, a figure projected to reach a milestone of
5 billion by 2025.24 Critically for the OTT market, more and more people are reaching the Internet
through 4G and 5G wireless technology, which is vastly superior to previous generations in terms
of latency and capacity for the rich media common to many OTTs. The difference is especially
important for people in low-income countries, who are more reliant on mobile for Internet
access. According to GSMA, in 2019 4G became the dominant mobile technology across the
world with over 4 billion connections, accounting for 52 per cent of total connections.25

Catering to this large and growing market of broadband users are OTT application developers
virtually unfettered by barriers to market entry. Launching a new mobile app or online service
typically requires minimal staff, capital investment and infrastructure. With the rise of cloud
computing, young companies no longer need to build expensive and complex data centres;
they can rent (and seamlessly scale) computing power, dramatically decreasing the time and
capital necessary to start and grow their businesses. And new entrants can easily distribute their
applications to millions of people through app stores that provide instant access to a global
audience.

Given these market conditions, OTT applications have flourished. By 2018, the Google Play store
had roughly 3.6 million apps on offer. Its main counterpart, the Apple App store, had roughly
2.1 million iOS apps available at the end of 2017. Remarkably, less than 500 000 applications
were available on both the iOS and Android operating systems, which demonstrates the great
size and diversity of the OTT application market. In 2018, Tim Cook announced that there were
20 million registered iOS developers catering for the 500 million weekly visitors to the App
Store alone. In 2019, consumers worldwide downloaded a remarkable 204 billion apps.26,27

The OTT marketplace is also extremely innovative. Rather than offering simple substitutions for
voice and SMS, OTT applications offer consumers a wealth of functions above and beyond these
legacy services, including media and news consumption, gaming, e-commerce, payments,
access to health and education resources, and pathways to civic participation and government
engagement.

The OTT landscape is also remarkably dynamic and competitive, as users increasingly spread
their time between more and more applications. The decreasing cost of high-speed Internet
connectivity and the increasing processing power and storage space on personal devices allow
people to move easily between different apps, add new ones or use several at the same time.
There is considerable overlap between the user bases of competing applications, and OTT
technologies impose virtually no constraints on end users from using many similar applications
concurrently, a process known as ‘multihoming’. In fact, the average smartphone user has more
than 80 apps on their phone and uses close to 40 of those apps every month.28 And because so
many OTT applications are low-priced or free, users can try new technologies as often as they
like. If a user does not enjoy a product or experience, they can – and do – abandon it and explore
the myriad other options available. This creates strong competition for every OTT developer to
offer new features to attract and retain users.

24
GSMA. The Mobile Economy 2020. London, United Kingdom, 2020.
25
Ibid.
26
Business of Apps. App Download and Usage Statistics (2020). Updated 6 May 2021.
27
App Annie. Report. The State of Mobile 2020.
28
Lexi Sydow and Sam Cheney. App Annie. 2017 Retrospective: A Monumental Year for the App Economy.
17 January 2018.

36 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

In Germany, for instance, a May 2020 report by the Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network
Agency) found that 65 per cent of survey respondents practise multihoming for communication
OTT applications.29 Of those, 35 per cent do so with four or more services, further illustrating
the use of a diverse set of applications.

Some raise concerns that even with the presence of multihoming, network effects – which
are often highlighted as a key factor in assessing market power – thwart competition and
user desire to switch between services. In the Communications Market Sector Study carried
out by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACC), it was suggested that
although the potential to establish significant market power is reduced because of multihoming,
there are some types of OTTs whose characteristics present competition concerns, generally
benefiting from network effects and interoperability issues.30 This, however, would appear to
overstate the propensity of network effects to lead to market power. As noted in a paper by Dr
Catherine Tucker, Sloan Distinguished Professor of Management Science at MIT Sloan School
of Management, network effects in digital platforms may lead to instability rather than market
dominance, and can even negatively impact the latter.31 Moreover, network effects that do have
positive outcomes for platforms are often localized, stemming from user focus on connections
and use by, for instance, peers that matter to them and a desire for personalization.

4.2.1 New trends in OTT


As noted, OTT is an overly broad term that, in its most general sense, could potentially be used
to refer to any type of online content, application or service, from basic websites to complex and
large-scale services. While it is important to distinguish among the different types of OTTs, it
should also be recognized that innovation may quickly stimulate development of new categories
or shift the dynamics of existing OTTs.

Furthermore, it is important to distinguish OTTs from traditional services, recognizing that


OTTs are generally complementary to traditional services, rather than substitutes for them.
For instance, communications-based OTTs typically differ in a number of ways from traditional
telecommunication services. For example, OTTs generally do not provide connection to a public
network and instead create a type of closed-user group within the application. Thus, OTTs do
not require scarce numbering resources, nor do they require interconnection agreements with
traditional operators.

Likewise, audiovisual-based OTTs are generally viewed as complementary to traditional


broadcasting and subscription-based services. They typically do not provide real-time
programming, but focus on video-on-demand (VoD) services, which give users significantly more
choice regarding the type of content they consume, as well as how and when they consume it.
Furthermore, many audiovisual-based OTTs provide access to user-generated content (UGC),
empowering users themselves to play a more central role in the production and publication of
audiovisual content. The simplicity with which users can produce and publish their own content
creates new opportunities to reach expanded audiences more easily and at lower cost, thereby
contributing to more diverse, local and niche content offerings.

29
Bundesnetzagentur. Telekommunications. Digitization. OTT communication service. Nutzung von Online-
Kommunikationsdiensten. May 2020. [in German].
30
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACAC). Communications Sector Market Study Final
Report. 5 April 2018.
31
Catherine Tucker. Network Effects and Market Power: What Have We Learned in the Last Decade?. Antitrust,
Spring 2018.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 37


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The nature of OTTs is that they are accessed by consumers through their agreements with
network operators. This means that OTTs do not control or operate network elements, which
results in reduced barriers to entry and a greater competitive environment that does not typically
require regulatory intervention.

4.2.2 Benefits of OTT


The COVID-19 global health pandemic has thrown the benefits of OTTs into stark relief. The
pandemic has highlighted that for most people the Internet is no longer just a convenience,
but a necessity. People with reliable Internet access have been able to use OTTs to more easily
access and share critical health information, maintain contact with friends and family, work
remotely, and otherwise mitigate the adverse impact of social distancing, quarantines and
similar measures. The Digital Development Joint Action Plan and Call for Action from ITU, the
World Bank, the World Economic Forum and GSMA put it plainly: “… digital technologies offer
the only opportunity for governments, individuals and businesses to cope with social distancing,
ensure business continuity, and prevent service interruptions”.32

By creating value for consumers, OTTs stimulate demand for broadband networks and services
that, in turn, incentivize network operators to deploy and expand infrastructure as consumers
require increasing bandwidth. In other words, the availability of OTTs creates a virtuous cycle
that increases the value of broadband network services and thereby drives further take-up and
adoption of higher-value data plans.

The Commonwealth Telecommunications Organisation (CTO) published a report that analysed


the revenue trends of MTN operations across Africa. The report concludes that “MTN’s revenue
trends demonstrate two important points: (i) the overall revenue trends are positive despite
growing number of OTT users and OTT traffic; and (ii) revenues and profitability are mainly the
results of an operator’s ability to seize revenue opportunities and mitigate risks”.33 The report
elaborates on the latter point, noting that “operators may benefit from increased use of OTTs
and roll out faster broadband networks to grow data revenues or they may try and stick to the
analogue business model for as long as they can”, concluding that “both strategies are business
decisions and not the responsibility of the regulator”.

OTTs deliver significant benefits to consumers in terms of availability of innovative services,


access to diverse and low-cost or free content, enhanced connectivity, and new opportunities to
improve their lives. For instance, OTTs provide online learning tools and information exchange
to improve outcomes across a variety of sectors, including education and healthcare.

32
World Bank, ITU, GSMA and WEF. Digital Development Joint Action Plan and Call for Action – COVID-19
Crisis Response. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland, April 2020.
33
Christoph Stork et al. Commonwealth Telecommunications Organization (CTO). Over the Top (OTT)
Applications & the Internet Value Chain: Recommendations to Regulators, Policy Makers and Tax Authorities.
London, United Kingdom, 2020.

38 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

4.3 Impacts of the provisioning of OTT

4.3.1 Regulatory frameworks


The global growth and popularity of OTT applications have compelled some regulatory
authorities to consider the applicability and suitability of traditional telecommunication
regulations to the modern technological landscape.

In ITU, Recommendation ITU-T D.262 represents the clearest articulation by the membership
of how regulatory frameworks can successfully adapt to the growth and popularity of OTT
applications around the globe. The Recommendation states as follows:34

Member States should foster enabling legal and regulatory environments, and develop
policies that are fair, transparent, stable, predictable and non-discriminatory; and that
promote competition, foster technological and service innovation and encourage private
sector investment incentives, in order to ensure the continuing growth and adoption of
OTTs.

ITU consideration of OTTs has been mirrored by other multilateral institutions and the regulatory
authorities of many ITU Member States. Such regulatory consideration has commonly begun
with the identification and definition of relevant markets and examination of the technological,
economic and functional distinctions between OTTs and traditional telecommunication services.
Such distinctions include, for example, control of underlying broadband access infrastructure,
use of public numbering resources for routing calls, barriers to market entry, competitive
environment, and functional features.

Legacy regulations on traditional telecommunication service providers were designed to address


the market power resulting from incumbent control over network access facilities and resultant
risks to end users and competitors – gating and consumer-protection factors that simply do not
apply to OTTs. In contrast to traditional telecommunication operators, companies that provide
OTT applications do not control the underlying broadband access points and are engaged in
a highly competitive market and a cross-border approach to service provision. Consumers of
telecommunication services are commonly bound by long-term contracts, whereas OTT users
hold the power and can add OTT applications or stop using them at will.

Consideration of distinctions between different services and applications is exemplified by


regulatory activity in the EU. The European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) was
adopted in December 2018 and updates the regulatory framework applicable to electronic
communications services (ECS) and networks across the EU. Internet-based messaging
applications will be captured under the new framework for the first time by an expanded
definition of ECS.

The new definition of ECS now has three categories: (i) Internet access services (e.g. an ISP); (ii)
services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission of machine-
to-machine communications or broadcasting; and, critically, (iii) interpersonal communications
services (ICS), a category that includes text messaging, e-mail, and OTT messaging applications.

34
ITU-T. Recommendation ITU-T D.262 (05/2019) (op. cit.).

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 39


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The EECC applies different obligations to different categories of ICS:

• Number-based ICS (NB-ICS) – Traditional communication services that interconnect with


the public telephone network. NB-ICS are subject to greater regulation relative to NI-ICS,
but also benefit from certain rights relative to NI-ICS.
• Number-independent ICS (NI-ICS) – Online messaging services that do not interconnect
with the public telephone network. A light-touch regulatory regime applies to NI-ICS.

The EECC justifies this narrowly tailored approach on the basis of the important differences
between NI-ICS and NB-ICS. Among other things, NI-ICS, unlike NB-ICS, do not benefit from the
regulations providing for an interconnected ecosystem, such as the right to be assigned public
numbering resources. As a result, NI-ICS do not fall under the EU general authorization regime
(which triggers a broader set of obligations, including registration requirements, administrative
fees and switching/number porting) and are subject only to a limited subset of the obligations
applicable to NB-ICS, such as security of services, transparency and accessibility.

Based upon these distinctions identified by the EU and others, there has been widespread
recognition that traditional telecommunication regulations are ill-fitted and ill-equipped
to address OTT applications. Extending such regulations to OTTs would be harmful to the
communication market and, more importantly, to consumers. Arbitrarily imposing barriers
on some types of services but not others would result in cost increases and fewer choices of
innovative solutions for consumers, and at the macroeconomic level in decreases in investment,
a reduction in healthy competitiveness, and less local content production.35 The Australian
Productivity Commission has noted that: “Simply extending regulation without an assessment
of its consequences and differences in risk between traditional and new business models could
quash innovative new approaches, reducing choice and resulting in consumers paying higher
prices than they otherwise would”.36

Regarding its decision to refrain from extending new regulations to cover OTTs, Bahrain’s
Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) concluded that “… defining specific rules for
an innovative and still evolving environment may lead to undesirable outcomes: stifling further
innovation, limiting end-customer choice, and unduly influencing potential business relationships
between Licensed Operators and OTT players”. Further details on the TRA decision to forbear
on OTT regulations can be found in Annex 4 to this report (OTT case studies).

Along similar lines, Hong Kong (China) Commerce and Economic Development Bureau
(CEDB) conducted a review of its broadcasting regulatory framework in 2018. The review had
a particular focus on online videos, which were not subject to the traditional broadcast licensing
regime. Upon review, CEDB decided to maintain the status quo and did not propose to extend
legacy obligations to OTTs, in part because “… though OTT and other Internet TV and radio
programme services are gaining their prominence, traditional media…are still highly pervasive
and accessible.”37

Given the persistent innovation in the communications market exemplified by OTTs and the
dynamic preferences of consumers, one could fairly question whether maintaining legacy

35
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). DigitalEurope reponse to ITU Consultation on OTTs. Brussels, Belgium, 18 August 2017.
36
Australian Government. Productivity Commission. Public Inquiry. Telecommunications Universal Service
Obligation. (Final Report released 19 June 2017)
37
Hong Kong (China) Commerce and Economic Development Bureau (CEDB). Review of Television and Sound
Broadcasting Regulatory Regimes – Consultation Paper, p. 46. 6 February 2018.

40 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

regulations upon telecommunication companies produces the best outcomes. The United
States Council for International Business (whose member companies include traditional
telecommunication service providers and OTT companies) has noted that: “The underlying
rationale for legacy voice telecommunication regulations does not neatly apply to providers of
OTT applications that are either independent of or affiliated with networks, nor to today’s network
operators that also operate in the highly competitive markets”.38

A more productive alternative to extending traditional telecommunication regulations to new


market entrants, therefore, is considering relaxing them on incumbent carriers. For example,
Recommendation ITU-T D.266 encourages Member States to “examine the appropriate level
of regulations both to OTT providers and traditional telecommunication providers, which
may include refraining from extending legacy telecommunication regulations to providers of
OTTs and examining the reduction of the regulatory burden upon traditional networks and
telecommunication services”.39

In the same vein, a 2016 letter from several European States advised the European Commission
to “… consider deregulation of traditional telecommunication services where this does not harm
consumer interests, undermine regulatory enforcement powers or competition in the market,
or compromise national security, public security or prevention, detection and prosecution of
criminal offences.”40

Taking it one step further, regulators might consider adopting a light-touch approach
to regulating their communications markets. In some cases, existing rules may need to be
reconsidered entirely, as they may no longer be necessary given changed market conditions, or
there may be more efficient ways of delivering the intended public-policy objectives reflecting
legitimate needs of consumers and citizens.41

As regulators conduct such reviews, they must first consider the rationale behind the regulation
(for example, protecting end users and competitors from the potentially anti-competitive effects
of market power related to control of broadband access facilities), and not impose heightened
regulation that risks destroying innovation. Policy-makers and regulators should strive to create
an environment in which online content, applications and services are as widely available as
possible. Only by adopting a policy mindset that appreciates the value of the entire Internet
ecosystem, and fostering a positive environment for the development and proliferation of
compelling online content, applications and services, will the Internet remain a platform for
innovation, competition and sustainable economic growth, not only today, but also in the years
to come.42

38
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). Public Policy Considerations for OTTs. Contribution of the U.S. Council for International Business
(USCIB). 14 August 2017.
39
ITU-T. Recommendation ITU-T D.262 (05/2019) (op. cit.).
40
Joint Letter to Vice President Andrus Ansip and Commissioner Günther Oettinger of the European
Commission from Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Finland, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden
and the United Kingdom. 27 January 2016.
41
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Digital Convergence and Beyond:
Innovation, investment and competition and communication policy and regulation for the 21st century.
Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy. 24 May 2016.
42
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). Public Policy Considerations for OTTs. Microsoft's comments. 19 August.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 41


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

4.3.2 Network infrastructure


OTT companies and telecommunication service providers engender benefits for each other in
a symbiotic, complementary and mutually reinforcing manner. Richer OTT applications drive
demand and willingness to pay for enhanced network access, whilst improved access coverage
and quality enable greater use of messaging and other applications.43

OTT applications drive the demand for Internet connectivity services, thus increasing traffic
and, consequently, the revenue of telecommunication service providers.44 Broadband services
are usually offered with commercial models linked to the data usage, involving transfer speed
and traffic amount, typically tied to minimum consumption. Users who make heavy use of OTT
applications are compelled to hire plans with higher performance and capacity.45 In fact, a recent
study has found that consumers who use OTT applications were more likely to buy new plans
with higher bandwidth over the last two years, and the plans purchased are usually monthly
plans, rather than pre-payment plans.46

Because OTT companies and network operators have both enjoyed the benefits of consumer
hunger for broadband access, both sectors have invested heavily in the infrastructure to support
it. For example, according to GSMA, mobile operators will invest USD 479 billion in mobile
CAPEX worldwide between 2018 and 2020, excluding spectrum acquisitions.47

For their part, OTT providers invest billions of dollars annually in a combination of physical
facilities (such as data centres), fibre-optic networks, servers and routers. This forms an essential
part of the physical fabric of the Internet. OTTs may be accessible anywhere and anytime, but
they need to be hosted and transported by physical networks, facilities and equipment. Rather
than merely relying upon telecommunication network operators to deliver their content to end
users, OTT companies are increasingly making direct investments in network infrastructure to
improve service quality and reliability.

For example, Google invested in INDIGO undersea cable to improve cloud infrastructure in
Southeast Asia. On 30 May 2019, Google announced that the INDIGO cable system, which
connects Sydney, Perth and Singapore, was ready for service. The project was developed in
partnership with AARnet, Indosat, Singtel, SubPartners and Telstra.48

The New Cross Pacific undersea cable connects the United States, China, the Republic of Korea
and Japan, built by a consortium involving Microsoft, China Mobile, China Telecom, China
Unicom, Chunghwa Telecom and KT Corporation, among other operators.

43
Brian Williamson. Communications Chambers. Next generation communications & the level playing field –
What should be done?. June 2016.
44
Especially regarding mobile devices, the main means of accessing the Internet in developing countries,
according to the study Cisco Visual Networking Index: Mobile Data and Internet Traffic, 2013-2018 (2017),
which states that between 2013 and 2018 mobile data traffic will have an annual compound growth rate of
about 61%.
45
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). Contribution of Associação Brasileira Das Empresas De Tecnologia Da Informação E Comunicações
(Brasscom) to CWG-Internet: Online Open Consultation. 18 August 2017.
46
René Arnold et al. Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH (WIK).
Report. The Economic and Societal Value of Rich Interaction Applications (RIAs). Bad Honnef, Germany,
May 2017.
47
GSMA. The Mobile Economy 2020. London, United Kingdom. (op. cit.)
48
Brian Quigley and Michael Francois. Google Cloud. Google invests in INDIGO undersea cable to improve
cloud infrastructure in Southeast Asia. 5 April 2017.

42 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

From 2014 to 2018, online service providers (OSPs, another term for OTTs) invested over
USD 300 billion (USD 75 billion per year) in Internet infrastructure. Over 90 per cent of this has
been in hosting infrastructure as OSPs build hyperscale data centres to support the explosion
in online content and cloud services and install equipment in third-party colocation facilities.
They are also investing large sums in infrastructure to transport data between these locations,
including terrestrial fibre-optic networks and international submarine cables. Finally, OSPs are
driving investment in delivery networks to support quality of service by bringing content as close
as possible to end users.49 These investments improve the quality of access networks and the
performance of service delivery, helping network operators to extend coverage and reduce
costs, and enabling them to provide more affordable services.

These investments are typically made in parallel with investments from a variety of other
stakeholders in the global Internet landscape. Revenues from OSP activities support investments
by players including telecommunication carriers, data centre operators and Internet service
providers (ISPs), providing benefits to the whole ecosystem. Further growth in investment, both
directly by OSPs and indirectly through other service providers, can be expected in the coming
years, as OSPs strive to keep pace with the growing demand for content and cloud services
across all regions of the globe.50

Government authorities have a vital role to play in facilitating infrastructure investment


partnerships between providers of OTTs and network operators. Recommendation ITU‑T D.266
states, for example, that: “Member States are encouraged to develop policy frameworks to
enable voluntary commercial arrangements among telecommunications network operators
and providers of OTT applications so as to allow each to invest in Internet infrastructure, without
subjecting the parties to traditional telecommunications regulatory requirements”.51

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted both the unilateral and in-parallel investments made
by OSPs. Netflix, for instance, as a part of the Open Connect programme, has been deploying
its own content delivery networks (CDNs) and partnering with ISPs since 2012. Notably, from
21 March, 2020 to 21 April, 2020, Netflix reportedly added four times the normal capacity at the
peak of the pandemic.52 Microsoft, to account for the rapid increase in demand for its services
by businesses, governments and educators, among others, “… doubled capacity on one of its
own undersea cables carrying data across the Atlantic and negotiated with owners of another to
open up additional capacity”.53 As a result, it tripled deployed capacity on the America Europe
Connect cable in two weeks. These represent just two cases out of many instances where OSPs
rapidly scaled up infrastructure to account for increased demand.

OTT investment in network infrastructure generates economic value by improving the quality
of access networks and the performance of service delivery, helping network operators to
extend coverage and reduce their costs, enabling them to provide more affordable services.
For example, Facebook investments in connectivity in sub-Saharan Africa (including submarine
cables, edge network investments including caching servers and points of presence, and open
transport networks) will deliver economic benefits of over USD 50 billion over the next five

49
David Abecassis et al. Analysis Mason. Infrastructure investment by online service providers. December 2018.
50
Ibid.
51
ITU-T. Recommendation ITU-T D.266 (08/2020). Enabling environment for voluntary commercial arrangements
between telecommunications network operators and OTT providers.
52
Netflix. Reducing Netflix traffic where it’s needed while maintaining the member experience. 21 March 2020,
53
Jennifer Langston. Microsoft. Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19
pandemic. 16 June 2020.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 43


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

years (2020-2024) in nominal current GDP.54 Its investments in the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN) region will generate USD 70 billion over the same time period.55 In
addition, it is estimated that Facebook investments in Latin America will generate an estimated
USD 27 billion per year in economic growth, create an additional 178 000 new jobs in the
regional economy, and bring 30million new people online.56

For their part, governments should facilitate investment in broadband infrastructure from
OTT companies, network operators, public funds and other interested parties. This begins
by establishing a healthy investment climate for infrastructure. Taxes should be broad-based,
easily understandable and enforceable. They should not discourage investment or impact low-
income consumers by targeting ICT equipment, devices and services. Governments should
encourage investment through import-duty exemptions, tax credits and asset depreciation tax
allowances. Regulatory fees should generally cover only the administrative costs of regulation.
Market-based spectrum pricing should be reasonable and primarily serve to allocate spectrum
to the best use rather than raise revenue for the State.57

4.3.3 Macroeconomic and microeconomic developments, including


competition effect on the market
The economic benefits generated by the Internet and OTTs are well established. The Geneva
Declaration of Principles of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) notes “… these
technologies can be a powerful instrument, increasing productivity, generating economic growth,
job creation and employability and improving the quality of life of all”.58 ITU Member States also
issued the Busan Declaration in 2014, by which they agreed “to facilitate economic growth and
sociocultural development by intensively fostering the use of telecommunications/ICTs as a
growth engine. In such efforts, telecommunications/ICTs should be viewed comprehensively,
beyond the aspects of infrastructure and technology, to encompass economic development,
enhancement of the quality of people's lives and social integration”.59

ITU Member States were wise to have made such a commitment to economic development
through connectivity and the use of ICTs. For consumers and companies of all sizes, across
all industries, data flows and reliance on digital technologies have changed how domestic
commerce and international trade are conducted. Firms rely on data to engage with clients
and customers, discern market demand and adapt products and services accordingly, operate
production systems, manage workforces and expenditures, monitor supply chains, and conduct
a range of other day-to-day business activities.60 Studies estimate that about 75 per cent of
the value added by data flows on the Internet accrues to “traditional” industries, especially via

54
David Abecassis et al. Analysis Mason. The impact of Facebook's connectivity initiatives: Sub-Saharan Africa
and ASEAN. 2 July 2020.
55
Ibid.
56
NERA Economic Consulting. Assessing the Contribution of Connectivity Investments to the Development
of Latin American Societies. A report for Facebook. Madrid, Spain, 22 May 2020.
57
Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. Report of the Expert Group to the UN Broadband
Commission. A New Deal: Investing in our common future: Policy recommendations to close the broadband
gap. Geneva, Switzerland, February 2018.
58
World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). WSIS Declaration of Principles – Building the Information
Society: A global challenge in the new Millennium, paragraph 9.
59
ITU. Busan ICT Ministerial Meeting, 2014. Busan Declaration on the Future Role of Telecommunications/
ICTs in achieving sustainable development, paragraph 8. Adopted on 19 October 2014.
60
Nigel Cory. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF). The False Appeal of Data Nationalism:
Why the Value of Data Comes from How It’s Used, Not Where It’s Stored. Information Technology & Innovation
Foundation, 1 April 2019,

44 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

increases in global growth, productivity and employment.61 The United Nations Conference
on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has further estimated that 50 per cent of all traded
services are enabled by the technology sector, including by cross-border flows of information. 62
The macroeconomic impact of these trends has been well-documented, with estimates that
cross-border data flows have increased current global GDP by at least 10 per cent, adding
USD 7.8 trillion to the global economy in 2014 alone.63 By plugging into the global digital
network, technology such as OTTs enables firms across the world to access international markets
with limited asset footprints, leading to the emergence of “born-global firms” which quickly
attain global reach through reliance on existing available digital technologies and with minimal
cross-border investment.

OTT providers themselves generate significant economic activity and value. For example, a
recent study found that each 10 per cent increase in usage of rich interaction applications on
the Internet (such as OTTs) has added on average USD 5.6 trillion in global GDP (0.33 per cent
of GDP). These applications generate a significant component of the socio-economic impact
of digitalization and utilization of the Internet itself.64

While it is instructive for policy-makers to understand such global trends, it is at the national
level where the impact of OTTs is truly felt. For example:

• In India, a 17 per cent increase in Internet traffic during the period 2015-2016 resulted
in an absolute increase of USD 103.9 billion (almost INR 7 trillion) in the country’s GDP
over that period. In addition to creating direct and indirect employment opportunities,
Internet-based applications contributed a minimum of USD 20.4 billion to India’s GDP
during 2015-2016 – a number that was expected to grow to USD 270.9 billion by 2020, or
nearly 8 per cent of India’s GDP.65
• Europe had an estimated 1.64 million “App Economy” jobs as of January 2016.66,67
• In Burundi, subscribers have enjoyed the benefits not only of the new services offered
by their own Internet networks, but also of less expensive or free voice and messaging
services.68
• Brazil was home to 312 000 “App Economy” jobs in 2016.69 The IT sector was predicted to
grow by 5.6 per cent in 2017, against overall predicted economic growth of 0.2 per cent.

61
Matthieu Pélissié du Rausas et al. McKinsey Global Institute. Report. Internet matters: The Net's sweeping
impact on growth, jobs, and prosperity. 1 May 2011.
62
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Information Economy Report, 2009:
Trends and Outlook in Turbulent Times. New York and Geneva, 2009: and Hosuk Lee Makiyama. European
Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE). Speech. Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economies.
2014.
63
James Manyika et al. McKinsey Global Institute. Report. Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows.
24 February 2016.
64
Rich interaction applications are “applications that are used for a wide range of functions, allowing two parties
to interact with each other in a long and growing number of ways”. René Arnold et al. Wissenschaftliches
Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH (WIK). Report. The Economic and Societal Value
of Rich Interaction Applications (RIAs). Bad Honnef, Germany, May 2017.
65
Rajat Kathuria et al. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER). Estimating the
Value of New Generation Internet Based Applications in India. July 2017.
66
Michael Mandel. Progressive Policy Institute (PPI). The App Economy in Europe: Leading Countries and
Cities. June 2016.
67
An App Economy Job is defined as: a) An ICT-related job that uses App Economy skills – the ability to
develop, maintain or support mobile applications; b) a non-ICT job (such as human resources, marketing,
or sales) that supports core App Economy jobs in the same enterprise; or c) a job in the local economy that
is supported by the income flowing to core and indirect App Economy workers.
68
ITU-D SG1 Document 1/28 from Burundi
69
Michael Mandel and Elliott Long. PPI. Brazil’s App Economy. February 2017.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 45


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• In Kenya, OTTs have acted as a catalyst by encouraging more citizens to utilize the Internet
for social and economic purposes. “Such benefits include lowered transaction costs,
flexibility, convenience and increased transactions speeds”.70

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular are increasingly utilizing the Internet
and digital tools such as OTTs to grow and drive economic growth in their communities by
overcoming traditional barriers of limited knowledge and expertise and leveraging a plethora
of low-cost or free options online to grow their businesses.71 For example, SMEs use the Internet
to gain direct access to billions of customers instantly and establish trust and international brand
awareness, which allow them to access regional and global markets. In fact, SMEs that are online
are almost four times more likely to be exporting.72

More than 90 million small businesses worldwide are on Facebook, which helps them grow
and create jobs.73 In the Africa region, 94 per cent of small businesses use Facebook to show
products and services, and 95 per cent use WhatsApp to communicate with customers and
suppliers, according to a recent survey.74 Furthermore, 93 per cent of small businesses say
Facebook helps with attracting customers, 77 per cent say Facebook allows them to sell their
products or services in other cities, states or countries, and 76 per cent say Facebook helps
with increasing revenue.

The Analysis Group has estimated that a five percentage point increase in WhatsApp penetration
alone in 2015 implies a global increase in GDP of purchasing-power parity (PPP) USD 22. billion
(2015). Regionally, this translated to an increase of USD 10.6 billion in Asia; USD 5.4 billion in
North America; USD 3.9 billion in Europe; USD 1.1 billion in the Middle East; USD 1 billion in
South America; and USD 0.8 billion in Africa.75

4.3.4 Competition
There is some debate on whether or not OTTs represent competition to traditional
telecommunication services. On the one hand, it has been noted that “consumers do not use
rich interactive applications (RIAs) and communications services as like-for-like substitutes; more
often than not, consumers use them complementarily”.76

On the other, some observers have noted that there are some similarities in functionality
between communications-oriented OTTs and traditional telecommunications. This is seen
as a boon to consumers. In general, the technological developments that have led to the
rapid increase in available OTT applications have also rendered traditional telecommunication
markets significantly more competitive.

70
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) response to ITU CWG-Internet Online Open Consultation:
Public Policy considerations for OTTs. 29 August 2017.
71
UNCTAD. Information Economy Report 2015: Unlocking the Potential of E-commerce for Developing
Countries. New York and Geneva, 2015.
72
Oxford Economics. Local Business, Global Ambition: How the Internet is Fuelling SME Exports in Asia-Pacific.
March 2017.
73
Facebook. Facebook for Business. Giving Small Businesses the Tools to Succeed on Facebook. 7 May 2019.
74
Facebook. Small businesses are growing with Facebook in Africa. Economic Impact Survey (2019), attached
at Appendix 2.
75
Greg Rafert and Rosie Mate. Analysis Group. The Global and Country Level Economic Impacts of WhatsApp.
February 2017.
76
René Arnold et al. Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH (WIK).
Report. The Economic and Societal Value of Rich Interaction Applications (RIAs). Bad Honnef, Germany,
May 2017.

46 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority, for example, has noted that OTTs have
“opened up a lot of space for competition, allowing the communication space to be occupied
by numerous and diverse players as opposed to monopolistic or oligopolistic markets. The
increased competition in the communication space has benefited the consumer in many ways.
… Because there are varied suppliers of both broadcasting content and communication modes,
the consumer enjoys the freedom to choose the quality of service they want at the price of their
choosing”.77

Further information on how one government determined that OTTs did not create any
competition issues with network operators can be found in the case study on Australia in Annex
4 to this report.

Empirical research bears this out. Research has shown that competition among businesses
(even those in different industry verticals) can deliver improvements in production efficiency
and bring newer and better products to consumers through innovation, leading to gains in
economic growth and consumer welfare.78 Therefore, regulations that prevent market entry
and expansion from OTTs may be particularly damaging for economic growth. Because more
competitive markets result in higher productivity growth, policies that lead to markets operating
more competitively, such as enforcement of competition law and removal of regulations that
hinder competition, will result in faster economic growth.

Policy-makers should therefore establish an environment conducive to competition and


investment. The goal should be for users to affordably and efficiently access the plethora of
bundled or standalone voice, data and video services in the IP-convergent world provided by
such actors as access and content providers.79

4.3.5 Evolving business models


The telecommunication market has been one of perpetual innovation. The emergence of OTTs
is not a unique phenomenon, but rather the most recent stage of the natural evolution of the
market. Just as ITU has evolved since its early days as the International Telegraph Union, so too
have its Member States and, more significantly, its Sector Members.

For decades, telecommunication carriers operated with a business model in which the product
was voice, the metric of measurement was the minute, and incremental costs (related primarily
to time and distance) resulted in incremental charges to the consumer. With today’s flat IP
networks, the product is connectivity, and the metric is bandwidth. The networks are insensitive
to time, location and distance, and consumers are either connected or they are not.

The Regulatory Authority for Communication Technologies (ARTEC) of Madagascar noted


that “network operators obviously need to update their strategies and seek a new model
better adapted to the current market”.80 This is exactly what has begun to happen. Today,
telecommunication operators are transforming their businesses into “data first” companies, with
many developed country operators now making more than 50 per cent of their revenues from

77
ITU. ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-Internet): Online Open Consultation (June-September
2017). Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority response to ITU CWG-Internet Online Open
Consultation: Public Policy considerations for OTTs. 18 August 2017.
78
OECD. Competition Assessment Toolkit: Volume 1. Principles. Paris, France, 2016.
79
OECD. OECD iLibrary. Broadband Policies for Latin America and the Caribbean. Paris, France, 21 June 2016.
80
ITU-D SG1 Document 1/36 from Madagascar

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 47


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

data services.81 This is a trend that will only continue as revenues from data services continue
to increase. In fact, it is already estimated that data services revenue for some operators will
largely offset the decline in voice service revenues, becoming the core business of the carriers.82

As the prominence of voice declines, speed and quality of broadband access has proven to be
a determining factor in consumer network preferences. Consumers who demand the most data
from their operator have been shown to spend more money on mobile contracts featuring high-
speed data.83 In Finland and Switzerland, for example, some mobile providers charge by the tier
of speed that users elect rather than the amount of data they download. The mobile providers
in these countries therefore welcome digital platforms and OTTs because they stimulate
demand for faster services with higher charges.84 Operators who have adopted data-centric tariff
structures enjoy “benefits such as reduced churn, increased net promoter scores, more stable in-
bundle revenue streams, and the ability to link returns more directly to network investment”.85 This
business model should be facilitated by regulatory authorities. Telecommunication operators
should be able to rebalance their tariffs to reduce their dependence on revenue from voice
and SMS.

In addition, many network operators have moved beyond their traditional telecommunication
businesses. For example, operators including Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica and
Vodafone have deployed advanced IP-based communication services based on the RCS (Rich
Communications Services) and VoLTE (voice over LTE) specifications that offer functionalities
that compete directly with other popular OTT messaging services.86 Such competition is
healthy for the industry and beneficial for the consumer. Regulators should afford operators
the flexibility to offer innovative communication services (such as messaging applications) that
are not subjected to traditional telecommunication regulations, so long as the services are
offered in a neutral way that do not favour proprietary applications over competitive alternatives.

A second route has been to capitalize upon the convergence of telecommunications and media,
as exemplified by the AT&T acquisitions of DirecTV and Warner Media; and the suite of media,
technology and communications that Verizon now offers under its subsidiary Verizon Media.

Further details on how a government has helped encourage new business models can be
found in the case study on the Utilities Regulation and Competition Authority of Bahamas in
Annex 4 to this report.

A third route taken by more and more operators is to form commercial partnerships with third-
party OTT companies.

81
David Abecassis et al. Analysys Mason. Broadband in Asia-Pacific: How investment, partnerships and policy
are driving a global success story. October 2015.
82
According to the Vodafone Group, in its Annual Report 2014, it is estimated that between 2013 and 2017 data
revenue from the telecommunication sector was set to grow by USD 128 billion, compared to a USD 38 billion
decline voice revenue during the same period.
83
René Arnold et al. All Communications Services Are Not Created Equal–Substitution of OTT Communications
Services for ECS from a Consumer Perspective. TPRC44 Conference, Arlington, VA, 30 Sept. - 1 Oct. 2016.
84
OECD. Key Issues for Digital Transformation in the G20. Report prepared for a joint G20 German Presidency/
OECD conference. Berlin, Germany, 12 January 2017.
85
Calum Dewar. Mobile World. Rebalancing the value from voice and SMS to data. New analysis: GSMA
Intelligence reviews new approaches to data tariffs for operators in developed markets. 2 September 2014.
86
GSMA. Network 2020. A GSMA Insight Report. The Future of Mobile Communications. London, 2020.

48 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

4.3.6 Legal frameworks and commercial partnerships for the development


and deployment of OTT
The successful development and deployment of OTTs depends in large part on stable and
predictable legal and policy environments established by government authorities. As noted in
this report, there is not yet a prevailing consensus around the world on the regulatory treatment
of OTTs, and this has led to a variety of approaches, with varying degrees of success. Beyond
the debate over the applicability of legacy telecommunication regulations to OTTs, government
approaches to tax policy and the treatment of data flows also have immense impacts on the
development and deployment of OTTs.

Tax

The prevalence of OTTs has had a major economic impact on economies around the globe.
Many businesses – even small businesses – can now use OTT applications to operate across
borders. This brings new opportunities for trade and growth, but in some jurisdictions tax
authorities have had challenges adapting to this new economic paradigm.

Some governments have responded to the growth and popularity of OTTs by establishing
consumer taxes on their use. Governments have cited several grounds for the taxes, including
curbing a perceived loss of revenue from legacy and traditional telecommunication companies;
rebalancing the “playing field” in the ICT sector; and moderating online speech for national
security reasons.

Research has demonstrated, however, that these taxes are short-sighted at best and, at worst,
produce the opposite results to those intended. Where implemented, the result is that the
additional taxes have increased the cost of data consumption and led to slower broadband
adoption. This results in lower tax revenue over the longer term as users adjust their behaviour
and use less data. OTT taxes also increase the cost to connect for all – particularly those already
struggling to afford a basic connection – and so defer until later economic advantages that
broadband access engenders, which delays further economic development.

The Alliance for Affordable Internet (A4AI) and the Commonwealth Telecommunications
Organisation (CTO) have both published principles for OTT taxation, which governments are
encouraged to recognize.

A4AI:
• First, tax policy related to Internet access (and fiscal policy in general) is not gender neutral.
Governments should therefore pay particular attention to how taxes impact women and
other groups who exhibit lower rates of Internet use than others. It is therefore imperative
that taxation policies are gender-responsive – meaning they actively consider gender
issues and the gender gap in Internet access – from conception to implementation and
monitoring.
• Second, fiscal policies that tax use of social media and other related Internet-based
services distort people’s use of the Internet. Governments should reassess the introduction
of taxes, including conducting sensitivity and gender-responsive analysis of tax measures,
considering potential harm to citizens and businesses, and re-evaluating their revenue
and behavioural targets. Failing to consider the potential harm of taxes on citizens and
businesses may ultimately lead to large social costs.
• Third, social media taxes appear to contribute to a shrinking civil-society space.
Governments must recognize that effective policy development, and the functioning

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 49


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

of society in general, depends on a strong and active civil society, including women’s
rights groups. For many of these organizations, social media and the Internet are crucial
organizing and operating tools, and such taxes undermine their work.
• Finally, tax policies, when poorly designed, can have an adverse effect on the objective of
revenue generation, harming taxpayers and failing to achieve revenue targets.

CTO:
• Broad-based: A broad base of taxation means that a lower tax rate is required to raise the
same revenue, while sector-specific taxes distort incentives and require higher levels of
taxation to obtain the same revenue.
• Consider externalities: Excise duties should be imposed on activities with negative
externalities where the objective is to lower consumption, such as alcohol or tobacco, and
should not be imposed on sectors with positive externalities, such as telecommunications.
• Simple and enforceable: Taxes should be clear, easy to understand and predictable,
thereby reducing investor uncertainty and ensuring better compliance.
• Incentives for competition and investment should be unaffected: Higher taxes for one
sector in comparison to the rest of the economy could reduce investment in that sector.
• Progressive not regressive: The tax rate should increase as the taxable amount increases.
Specific value taxes on small amounts should be avoided because they make the poor
pay more.

In addition, several multilateral bodies have begun developing new tax policies for the digital
era. OECD has initiated discussions that centre on where tax should be paid. Traditional finance
and tax rules result in most revenue being taxed by the country of domicile of a business, not
necessarily where the revenue is earned. And with the global economy becoming increasingly
digital, businesses of all types are seeing revenue in places where they have no physical
presence.

The current proposal, still being negotiated by over 135 countries and jurisdictions within
the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), will have two
pillars. The first addresses allocation of tax revenue to a broader set of countries than would
traditionally have nexus to tax that revenue. The second pillar will tighten global minimum tax
rules to make sure all income is taxed somewhere.

In addition, the European Union created a set of workable rules for VAT collection by non-
resident digital businesses. The non-resident businesses remit the VAT to the governments
where the purchasers reside, much like a resident seller would. The EU also created a “mini
one-stop-shop” for administering the new regime. Within its first year, B2C VAT on electronically
supplied services generated an additional EUR 3 billion in tax revenues for the EU, rising to
over EUR 4.5 billion by 2018.

This B2C VAT regime has been replicated in nearly 25 non-EU countries since 2015, bringing
the total to almost 50 countries, many of which are developing countries. Some regions have
seen broader adoption of the regime, for example, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), where
businesses worked with governments to implement consistent rules across the region to comply
with a newly enacted regional VAT agreement.

By and large, the countries that have worked collaboratively with taxpayers and implemented
regimes that follow best practices have seen much smoother and successful implementation.
As more of the economy goes digital, revenue collection will increase, which can be especially
valuable in countries with large informal economies. Not only does adoption of an existing

50 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

set of principles reduce friction for international businesses, it also removes the need for tax
administrations to reinvent the wheel. Countries looking to boost compliance and harness the
power of the digital economy can adopt these rules and expect increased tax revenue.

Data flows

As noted earlier in this report, the flow of data across international borders has been at the
root of substantial economic growth. Despite the economic benefits that arise from the ability
to share data easily across borders, a wide variety of countries have instituted measures that
restrict cross-border data flows, including data-residency requirements. The public policy
rationales behind such policies vary, and include fears of economic development, privacy,
security and access for data. No matter the justification, the end result is often one that inhibits
value generation, reduces exports and foreign direct investment, and results in productivity
losses for local companies that rely on a wide range of digital services, all without added benefits
in terms of privacy or data security. At the macroeconomic level, one prominent study assessing
the impact of proposed or enacted data localization legislation in seven economies estimated
negative GDP impacts in each instance: Brazil (–0.2 per cent), China (–1.1 per cent), European
Union (–0.4 per cent), India (–0.1 per cent), Indonesia (–0.5 per cent), Republic of Korea (–0.4 per
cent) and Viet Nam (–1.7 per cent). At the firm level, such restrictions can have a meaningful
impact on the cost and availability of key digital services. Specific analysis undertaken with
respect to cloud services found that data-localization policies restrict access to the most cost-
competitive global cloud providers, and significantly raise costs for local companies purchasing
cloud-computing services.

In the modern global economy, data are already an essential means of widening consumer
choice and the affordability of goods and services, helping SMEs reach global markets, and
fostering international production through global value chains – and the uses of data are
widening. Any regulatory measures restricting data flows will therefore also have detrimental
consequences for trade and economic development. These consequences are likely to be
particularly acute for SMEs, as data-restrictive policies affect access to a range of cost-efficient
digital technologies, including OTT communication applications that many small businesses rely
on. As regulators consider approaches for addressing legitimate concerns around economic
development, privacy, security and access for data, regulators should avoid policies that call
for data localization or otherwise restrict the flow of data. Instead, regulators should recognize
the enormous societal and economic benefits from innovative new technology and data-based
services and should pursue policies that promote the ability of firms and consumers to leverage
these technologies.

There is tremendous potential value in cooperation between OTT companies and


telecommunication service providers. When supported by an enabling policy and regulatory
environment, such cooperation can extend broadband access and new services to unconnected
and under-connected populations.

Recommendation ITU-T D.262 states that “Member States should encourage mutual cooperation
as far as practical between OTTs and network operators, with a view to fostering innovative,
sustainable, viable business models and their positive roles in fostering socio-economic
benefits”.87

87
ITU-T. Recommendation ITU-T D.262 (05/2019) (op. cit.).

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 51


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority notes that “Partnerships could be forged
in spaces of infrastructure development cost sharing in order to ensure seamless and fast
delivery of broadband Internet enough to carry traffic of both OTTs and traditional modes of
communications”.88

Examples of this type of collaboration abound. For example, Facebook (an OTT), Airtel and
BCS (two network operators) have completed a 770 km fibre-optic build in Uganda that
will provide backhaul to over 3 million people and enable cross-border connectivity with
neighbouring countries. Facebook and Telefónica have announced that they will be jointly
investing in bringing mobile-broadband connectivity to rural Peru based upon an innovative
legal/regulatory structure called Rural Mobile Infrastructure Operator (RMIO).

In May 2020, a broad consortium including MTN GlobalConnect, Orange, STC, Telecom Egypt,
Vodafone, Facebook and WIOCC announced that they will partner to build 2Africa, which
will be the most comprehensive undersea cable to serve the African continent and Middle
East region.89 2Africa will interconnect 23 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Europe, and
will provide nearly three times the total network capacity of all the subsea cables serving Africa
presently.

With evolved networks and 5G (SDN, virtualization and network slicing) it will become even
more important that countries have regulatory frameworks in place that foster and encourage
the development of new business models based upon collaborations and partnerships between
network operators and other industries, including OTTs. Recognizing the early stage of new
business models enabled and driven by 5G, the market and players should retain the freedom
to develop such partnerships with any potential regulatory effort being focused on identifying
possible barriers for the development hereof in existing telecommunication regulation.90

4.3.7 Economic and business model partnerships among telecommunication


operators and OTT providers
As noted, OTTs and traditional telecommunication service providers have a symbiotic, mutually
reinforcing relationship. Richer OTT applications drive demand and willingness to pay for
enhanced network access, whilst improved access coverage and quality enables greater use
of messaging and other applications. Many companies have taken one step further, by forming
commercial partnerships that bundle their services together.

GSMA has noted that “value in the digital economy comes from attracting complementary
participants, so it is more important for mobile operators to catalyse the formation of new
ecosystems and partnerships as opposed to going it alone.“91

A growing number of OTTs and traditional telecommunication operators have leveraged this
relationship by developing commercial partnerships with one another.

A 2017 analysis on The State of Digital Transformation surveyed 83 fixed-line and mobile
operators from around the world. When asked how the operators are responding to the rise of

88
ITU CWG-Internet. Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority response to the CWG Online Open
Consultation (op. cit.).
89
Cision. PR Newswire. News. 2Africa: a transformative subsea cable for future internet connectivity in Africa
announced by global and African partners. Menlo Park, Ca., United States, 14 May 2020.
90
ITU CWG-Internet. DigitalEurope reponse to the CWG Open Consultation. (op. cit.).
91
GSMA Intelligence: Mobile operators: the digital transformation opportunity. June 2016.

52 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

OTTs, 42 per cent of operators stated that they are partnering with an OTT provider, such as
WhatsApp, by bundling partner services with their own.

Some key examples include the following:

• In South Africa, Vodacom partnered with Deezer, a music streaming service to offer
subscribers unlimited music access for ZAR 59 per month (around USD 3.82).
• In India, Airtel and Vodafone have partnered with Netflix. With this partnership, the
mobile operators gain more diverse content, while Netflix further broadens its distribution
platform.
• NTT Docomo introduced a function for smartphone users to directly access LINE (the most
popular messaging and voice application in Japan with 180 million worldwide monthly
active users) from the dial screen so that the user can easily choose between legacy voice
and LINE to initiate a call.
• KDDI, the second largest mobile operator in Japan, released a mobile application that
enables Skype communications.
• EE, a mobile operator in the United Kingdom owned by BT, bundles Apple Music with its
postpaid mobile plans.
• Virgin Media, the largest cable operator in the United Kingdom, was among the first to
actively advertise Netflix by providing the service on a discount for six months to new
subscribers.

The Economic Times reports for example that, in India, “Telecom operators are expanding
further into content partnerships seeking new revenue opportunities by better utilizing the
massive infrastructure they have built. From movies and music to e-magazines, the country’s three
big telecom operators are partnering with content providers in what analysts see as a win-win for
both.” Vodafone (India's second largest telecommunication operator) offers video content from
content providers like Discovery Communications India and AltBalaji for its platform Vodafone
Play, and a free year of access to Netflix for its RED plan subscribers. Meanwhile, Idea Cellular has
partnered with Ditto TV and Yupp TV, Eros and Balaji to provide video content to its customers.

In Germany, Vodafone Deutschland has integrated Netflix in its home gateway GigaTV. The
streaming service is available both on the GigaTV 4K box and in the GigaTV app on smartphones
and tablets. Through the integration, viewers wanting to use Netflix no longer have to leave
GigaTV and launch the Netflix app, but can access the service directly on the GigaTV user
interface.

Amazon has partnered with mobile operators around the world through its Amazon Fuse
product, which offers subscribers access to Amazon Prime, Prime Video and Amazon Music
Unlimited. Amazon touts this feature as an opportunity for partner operators to “add revenue,
drive acquisition and increase loyalty” while in turn they are able to expand the reach of their
services to new customer bases.

Facebook has partnered with mobile operators in over 55 countries around the world to launch
its Free Basics programme, which provides people access to a range of basic services like news,
maternal health, travel, local jobs, sports, communication and local government information
without data charges. By enabling people to experience the benefits of connectivity, Free Basics
provides an on-ramp to the broader Internet. After giving people an opportunity to experience
connectivity, the Free Basics programme incentivizes them to begin purchasing data packages
from partner operators in order to access the broader Internet.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 53


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

For those already online but who may be under-connected and only able to afford data
intermittently, programmes like Free Basics also can provide a baseline of connectivity to help
them stay online more consistently. Rather than dropping off the Internet completely when an
individual periodically runs out of data, the baseline of connectivity can help smooth the gaps
in connectivity, keeping people connected and incentivized to continue topping up with more
data when they are able to do so. This benefits both consumers and mobile operators.

Regulatory officials are urged to support these types of innovative partnerships between OTTs
and mobile operators, as they provide a win-win-win situation for the commercial entities involved
and, most importantly, for consumers. The World Bank Digital Development Partnership has
encouraged regulators to favour “… operators initiatives to bundle or develop partnerships with
OTT service operators. This could be done with a changed regulatory framework temporarily
applied to new initiatives and development”. Partnerships are best enabled through flexible
regulation that permits innovative models for expanding connectivity and bringing more people
online and avoiding overly restrictive rules on the ability of mobile operators to offer differential
pricing or zero-rating programmes.

4.4 Guidelines regarding OTTs


Regulators are invited to develop their digital skills, in order to better understand and assess
the development of the telecommunication/ICT market in the context of OTTs.

Regulators are invited to consider the evolution of the Internet value chain and assess the
telecommunication/ICT market as a whole in order to consider relevant measures in line with
market realities.

OTT regulations, if proven necessary, should be based upon actual evidence of harm to
consumers and be designed to address that harm. They should also be based on a quantitative
analysis of the socio-economic effects of such regulation.

Tax policies associated with OTTs should properly account for potential harm for citizens and
businesses, paying particular attention to how taxes impact vulnerable communities and the
adoption and use of broadband Internet, as failing to consider such harm may ultimately lead
to large societal costs.

Governments are encouraged to engage in real dialogue with and consult different stakeholder
groups before adopting new policies and regulations.

Telecommunication operators are encouraged to consider adopting data-driven business


models and to rebalance their rate grids in order to reduce their dependence on telephone
and SMS services. Regulators should permit operators to pursue this strategy.

OTT providers and telecommunication operators are encouraged to explore different models
of partnerships and agreements including investments in network infrastructure. Regulators
should facilitate such partnership agreements and request further insight into them as necessary.

Regulators are encouraged to ensure that data can flow freely as a means of promoting
continued growth, especially for SMBs. This in turn will benefit economic growth at the local,
national, and regional levels.

54 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Annexes

Annex 1: Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/


ICT markets
Note:

The material in this Annex was first published in May 2020 as a free public paper:

ITU-D study groups – Question 3/1 and Question 4/1 Annual Deliverable 2019-2020:
Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/ICT markets.

Accordingly, it is reproduced here without further editing. Moreover, since the text was published
in all six official languages of the Union, this Annex 1 is provided in the corresponding language
in the respective editions of the Output Report on Question 3/1.

Executive summary

The big move to data

Changes in network technology and the transition from voice and SMS to a more data-centric
business model have paved the way for OTT success, transforming the way people access
resources for health, transportation, education, agriculture, government and financial services.
Increasingly, mobile network operators (MNOs) are embracing data-centric business models
as data drives the ongoing digital revolution in virtually every industry vertical.

How are OTTs impacting MNO demand, revenue and cost?

Demand: The exponential increase in data traffic and use of OTTs results both in new subscribers
for broadband services and existing subscribers upgrading their subscriptions for greater speed
and bandwidth. In terms of voice and SMS services, the picture is less clear with some countries
in Africa showing stable use or even an increase in voice traffic. These trends reflect the reality
that network traffic, and demand for legacy services, depend on a multitude of variables, not
simply on the prevalence of OTTs.

Revenue: Data services are increasingly important in MNO revenue streams but can business
opportunity and risk mitigation boost profitability? How far do OTTs contribute to MNO revenue
indirectly by boosting demand? Are changes in business model the way forward – for example
OTTs and network operators co-investing?

Cost: Data traffic accounts for a significant share of network costs. In Europe, for example,
MNOs are expected to spend hundreds of millions of Euros per year to handle Internet traffic
– in addition to incurring costs required to provide traditional services.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 55


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

How can OTT investment be boosted?

Complementary relationships exist between OTT services and network services. Hyperscale OTT
service providers are increasingly investing in infrastructure and connectivity projects to support
the availability of high-speed broadband, and numerous collaborative initiatives exist between
operators, development agencies and Internet companies aimed at co-investment in network
infrastructure. Despite these gains in connectivity, there is a continuing need for increased and
improved broadband network infrastructure. How can OTT investment into extending network
connectivity be boosted?

The huge promise of partnership

OTTs and network operators need each other to thrive in today’s communications marketplace.
OTTs provide the content that drives demand for telecoms operator services. It is not a ‘zero sum
game’ but rather a symbiotic relationship. OTT applications increase revenues for operators’
core access services by driving demand for data services. So direct commercial partnerships
between operators and OTTs have vast potential: research suggests such partnering could
increase telco free cash-flow by a massive 50 per cent.

OTT platforms: what impact?

OTTs have helped usher in economic and social transformation beyond traditional
communications services in the ever-growing digital economy. At the same time, this success
has brought with it new challenges – such as increased competition between informal vendors
on OTT and physical retailers, or the need to modernize tax codes appropriate to the new digital
economy. A number of barriers to connectivity exist in some countries, such as the high cost of
Internet data; introduction of additional taxes to raise revenue, including content license fees
and excise taxes; fiscal instruments in some countries, including new forms of taxation on the
use of OTTs – measures which may have a detrimental impact on women and their ability to
access the digital economy.

Digital transformation of network communications: challenges for regulators

OTTs are a vast and diverse collection of businesses. Regulators need to see the benefits that
OTTs deliver while adapting regimes to address new challenges. And while OTT innovation can
be rapid, regulation sometimes struggles not only to keep pace but to address large-scale OTT
operations outside of the regulator’s national mandate, thus a need for improved international
cooperation. In addition, a one-size-fits-all approach to regulating OTTs will not work. When
new service delivery models disrupt the old, regulation should be informed by evidence rather
than fear of the unknown. Is light-touch, flexible regulation the answer?

Introduction
This paper reflects on the growing importance of ‘Over-the-Top’ applications (OTTs) and
their increasing ubiquity and influence in a digital world. It is the product of a workshop that
brought together experts and stakeholder groups from regions around the world to consider
the “Economic Impact of OTTs on National Telecommunication/ICT Markets”.

It is exploratory in nature. With the transition from a voice and SMS-centric business model
to a mobile Internet access business model, the paper takes a closer look at mobile network

56 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

operator (MNO) and application service provider (ASP) relationships, finding that OTTs and
network operators need each other to thrive in the contemporary communications marketplace.

The paper also raises a number of important questions: How are OTTs impacting demand,
revenue and cost of mobile network operators? How can OTT investment in infrastructure be
boosted? What is the social impact of OTT platforms and how can it be measured? How to
build partnerships between MNOs and OTTs for maximum potential? How can ICT regulation
transition from past models to keep pace with the new and rapidly changing landscape of OTTs?

Such questions raise complex issues that stakeholders need to navigate together in the decade
to come. This paper then is a valuable first step on the pathway to balanced digital markets that
remain innovative and underwrite meaningful connectivity.

Finally, the paper proffers a number of conclusions, extracted from workshop discussions, for
governments and regulators to consider. It is hoped that this paper will help stimulate discussion
and dialogue as this important debate moves forward.92

Context
The impact of ‘Over-the-Top’ applications (OTTs) is currently one of the most discussed and
debated topics in the telecommunications/ICT industry. The demand for OTTs has reshaped
several aspects of the telecommunication/ICT market and changed the way citizens and
businesses consume digital technologies and services across the globe. This impact spans issues
of business models, infrastructure development, competitiveness and telecommunications
regulations, as well as the changing dynamics of consumer behaviour, social engagement and
the resulting social and economic changes.

This paper stems from a workshop held on 1 October 2019 on the topic of “Economic Impact
of OTTs on National Telecommunication/ICT Markets”93, which brought together renowned
experts from across the world and across stakeholder groups. The workshop was a joint effort
of the management teams of ITU-D Study Group 1,94 working on two topics: Question 3/1,
which studies “Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services, and OTTs”;
and Question 4/1, which studies “Economic policies and methods of determining the costs of
services related to national telecommunication/ICT networks”.

This paper is the product of collaboration between a wide range of stakeholders – academia,
governments, private sector, NGOs, independent experts, OTTs, Mobile network operators
(MNOs), regulators and regional and international organizations – and it reflects a balanced view
of the differing perspectives on a range of subjects. As such, the paper seeks to provide insights
on the impact of OTTs on ICT markets. Finally, it offers a number of conclusions, extracted from
workshop discussions, for governments and regulators to consider. It is also hoped that the
paper will foster further dialogue and engagement between OTTs and MNOs.

92
Disclaimer based on the discussion and decision of TDAG 2019: This report as like as another annual
deliverable will be published on the ITU-D study group website under the auspices of the Chairmen of
Study Groups 1 and 2 respectively, under a new section to be added titled “Ongoing Work.” This annual
deliverable is released to provide ITU membership with timely information on important issues to study
group participants.
93
Material from the workshop on the Economic Impact of OTTs on National Telecommunication/ICT Markets,
1 October 2019, is available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​en/​ITU​-D/​Study​-Groups/​2018​-2021/​Pages/​meetings/​
joint​-session​-Q3​-1​-Q4​-1​_oct19​.aspx.
94
https://​www​.itu​.int/​itu​-d/​study​-groups.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 57


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

ITU studies on OTT

ITU-D
A discussion in ITU-D on OTT was started at 2014 World Telecommunication Development
Conference (WTDC-14) which added the topic for the study period 2014-2017 to the scope of
ITU-D Study Group 1 Question 1/1 (Final Report on Question 1/1)95. This Report includes views
on the national experiences of Brazil, Central African Republic and People’s Republic of China
with respect to OTTs. WTDC-17 decided to move this topic to Question 3/1.

As part of the work of the Secretariat of ITU’s Development Bureau (BDT), a Digital Economy
portal96 was developed to integrate ITU’s work on policy and regulatory research, data collection
on the evolution of the digital ecosystem. Recent research and analysis have also been integrated
into the ITU Global ICT Regulatory Outlook series since 2017.

ITU-T
Initial ITU studies on OTT were started at ITU-T Study Group 3, “Tariff and accounting principles
and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues” (ITU-T SG 3) in the period
2013-2016. For this purpose, the group established Question 9/3: “Economic and regulatory
impact of the Internet, convergence (services or infrastructure) and new services, such as OTT,
on international telecommunication services and networks”. The first deliverable from the
rapporteur group of this Question was a Technical Report97 approved in 2017. The goal of this
report was to provide details about national experiences relating to OTTs. Subsequently, the
group developed ITU-T Recommendation D.26298, Collaborative Framework for OTTs, which
was approved in 2019. Currently, ITU-T SG 3 is studying additional working items related to
OTTs, although it has not adopted any other final outputs on the OTT topic.

Definitions
There is no universally accepted definition of the term ‘OTT’. ITU-T Recommendation D.262
includes a working definition for OTTs: “An application accessed and delivered over the
public Internet that may be a direct technical/ functional substitute for traditional international
telecommunications services.” It includes a footnote stating that the definition of OTT is a matter
of national sovereignty and may vary among Member States – each country is then free to define
the boundaries and scope of OTTs and formulate its own public policies and regulations.

The United Kingdom Office of Communications (Ofcom) defines OTTs as “a range of services,
including messaging services, voice services (VoIP), and TV content services.”

95
Final Report on Question 1/1: “Policy, regulatory and technical aspects of the migration from existing
networks to broadband networks in developing countries including next-generation networks, m-services,
OTT services and the implementation of IPv6”, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​pub/​D-​ STG​-SG01​.01​.1​-2017.
96
https://​www​.itu​.int/​en/​ITU​-D/​Regulatory​-Market/​Pages/​Collaborative​_Regulation/​App​_Economy​.aspx.
97
Technical Report on Study on Economic Impact of OTTs: http://​handle​.itu​.int/​11​.1002/​pub/​8106272c​-en.
98
ITU-T Recommendation D.262 “Collaborative framework for OTTs”: https://​www​.itu​.int/​rec/​T​-REC​-D​.262​
-201905​-I.

58 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) defines OTTs as
“content, a service, or an application that is provided to the end-user over the public Internet”
with three different distinctions:

• “OTT-0 as electronic communication services (ECS) that are able to terminate on fixed-line
or mobile network such as Skype-out calls”.
• “OTT-1s are not electronic communication services (ECS) but potentially competing with
them”.
• “OTT-2 encapsulates all other OTT services that are not captured by OTT-0 and OTT-1
(e-commerce, video, music streaming, etc.)”.

Many experts are of the opinion that the term itself, ‘Over the Top’, is not an accurate depiction
of the way the Internet is delivered and accessed. Most experts agree that the definition needs
to evolve to better reflect the development of the digital world (as discussed below) and an
era that sees digital transformation of every sector, domain or discipline. This massive digital
transformation will only be possible thanks to the Internet and to various online services
delivered and are yet to be developed and delivered over time to consumers and businesses.

Experts use terms such as ‘digital platform’, ‘application service provider’ (ASP), ‘online service
provider’ (OSP) or ‘content and application providers’ (CAPs) to reflect this evolution. While we
acknowledge the shortcomings of certain definitions and the popular use of different terms, for
simplicity and brevity the following paper uses the term ‘OTT’ to reflect all of these underlying
concepts and terms.

Move to digital world


For decades, telecommunications carriers operated with a business model in which the main
product was voice, the metric of measurement was the minute, and incremental costs (related
primarily to time and distance) resulted in incremental charges to the consumer. This has
changed. With today’s IP networks, the product is now connectivity, and the metric is bandwidth.
The networks are insensitive to time, location and distance, and consumers are either connected
or they are not. Under such IP networks, the value chain has evolved.

Such changes in network technology have supported the creation of an ecosystem of ‘online
applications’ (OTTs) that introduce completely new use cases including the Internet of Things
(IoT), connected cars, smart education, smart health, smart agriculture.

Consumer preferences have switched from traditional legacy services to OTTs, especially in
some use cases such as messaging. Telecommunications business models have begun to evolve
accordingly. With OTTs used increasingly for voice and message communication, the general
trend is a transition from voice and SMS towards data as a primary source of mobile network
operators (MNO) revenues. Many operators have decreased their reliance upon voice and SMS
charges and have turned towards data-centric business models. Operators who have adopted
data-centric tariff structures enjoy benefits such as reduced churn99, increased net promoter
scores, more stable in-bundle revenue streams, and the ability to link returns more directly to
network investment.

99
https://​www​.mobileworldlive​.com/​featured​-content/​home​-banner/​rebalancing​-value​-voice​-sms​-data/​.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 59


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The move from voice to data has smoothed the path for OTTs, enabling easy access
to new services – health, transportation, education, agriculture, government and
online finance. Result: MNOs are moving to data-centric business models.

The transition from a voice and SMS-centric business model to a mobile Internet access business
model is seen by many observers as inevitable and could lead to MNOs eventually becoming
essentially ‘connectivity’ providers, distinguishing their products by speed and quality of service
(QoS), and competing with other forms of access, such as public Wi-Fi and connectivity in
places of work, study and home. Some industry observers predict that eventually MNOs will
no longer charge for voice and SMS, and will change their billing model towards one based
on bandwidth and/or data consumption. This transition will coincide with the ongoing digital
revolution in virtually every industry vertical. Consumers and citizens will access resources
for health, transportation, education, agriculture, government and finance online, aided by
improved digital networks and data-centric business models. Fittingly, the last decade of mobile
network investment has gone into 2.5G, 3G, 4G, 5G technologies, which are all about data.

Other industry observers have suggested that in addition to providing access to the Internet,
network operators will seek to diversify their businesses. As illustrated in Figure 1A, the Internet
value chain offers significant commercial opportunities for market participants.

Figure 1A: The Internet value chain and market size shares in 2015

Source: GSMA100

The impact of OTTs on traditional telecommunications


There is ongoing debate on the impact of OTT services in traditional telecommunication/ICT
operators. This impact is expected to be more acute for MNOs which are more sensitive to
traffic variations. Mobile network operators face their operations being impacted under three
main dimensions:

• Demand
• Revenues
• Costs

100
GSMA “The Internet Value Chain: A study on the economics of the Internet”, May 2016, https://​www​.gsma​
.com/​publicpolicy/​wp​-content/​uploads/​2016/​09/​GSMA2016​_Report​_T​heInternet​ValueChain​.pdf.

60 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Demand
ICTs mobile network operators have highlighted that consumer demand for OTTs has led to a
booming increase in data traffic while traditional telecommunications services (non-IP voice calls
and SMS) are becoming less relevant. This demand for OTTs results in both new subscribers for
broadband services and existing subscribers upgrading their subscriptions for greater speed
and bandwidth.

BEREC states that “ultimately, it is the success of the [content and application providers] […]
which lies at the heart of the recent increases in demand for broadband access (i.e. for the ISPs’
very own access service)”101. This supports the view that without new and innovative online
content and applications, the value of Internet access to users would be severely reduced.
In fact, according to a study by Google, 69% of YouTube users say they would upgrade their
broadband connection if they thought that it would work faster102.

Data traffic
Global data traffic is growing exponentially, and some market analysts estimate that this is due
to the use of OTTs. Ericsson expects that global mobile data traffic will be multiplied by five
between 2018 and 2024 (from 28 to 131 Exabytes per month)103. Growth trends are confirmed
by the historical information of data consumption in the case of Airtel Africa104, Sonatel Senegal105
and the overall Zimbabwean market106. Additionally, there are studies indicating that in many
prominent markets, most of the data traffic handled by MNOs is associated with only a few
application categories (82% of mobile data traffic is expected to be associated with video and
social network applications107) and a few applications (the three main video applications in terms
of traffic account to 42% of mobile traffic while the three main social networking applications
account for 22% – see Figure 2A).

101
Keynote address by Dr R. Pepper, Facebook at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​
oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000040002PDFE​.pdf.
102
ICM Research “Broadband Consumption Study, France and Germany”, 2013.
103
“Ericsson Mobility Report June 2019”: https://​www​.ericsson​.com/​49d1d9/​assets/​local/​mobility​-report/​
documents/​2019/​ericsson​-mobility​-report​-june​-2019​.pdf.
104
Submission and presentation by Research ICT Solutions at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs
on national telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​
dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090001PDFE​.pdf and https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​
D071A0000090002PDFE​.pdf.
105
Presentation by Sonatel, Senegal at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​
D071A00000A/​.
106
Presentation by POTRAZ, Zimbabwe at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​
D071A00000F/​.
107
According to Sandvine’s “The Mobile Internet Phenomena Report February 2019”, the three main video
applications in terms of traffic are YouTube, Facebook Video and Netflix. The three main social networking
applications are Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram: https://​www​.sandvine​.com/​hubfs/​downloads/​
phenomena/​2019​-mobile​-phenomena​-report​.pdf.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 61


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 2A: Global mobile data traffic and usage per application

Source: Axon Partners Group from Ericsson and Sandvine’s reports

Note (*): Main apps in terms of traffic. Percentage of global download traffic of the three main apps (in
terms of traffic) per category as per Sandvine’s reports108

Voice calls and SMSs

In terms of traditional services, there is not such a clear trend. Several MNOs believe that OTTs
are associated with a decrease of international calls traffic (such as in the case of Zimbabwe and
Sonatel Senegal109). On the other hand, this effect is not necessarily transposed to the overall
voice traffic. In particular, the following behaviours have been reported:

• In the case of Zimbabwe110, overall voice traffic nearly halved between 2014 and 2016,
showing some recovery in 2018.
• Airtel Africa shows a steady increase in voice traffic from 2012 to 2018111.
• ECTEL countries show a relevant decrease of voice traffic from 2014 to 2017, and a slight
increase in 2018112.
• These trends indicate that network traffic, and demand for legacy services, depend on a
multitude of variables, not exclusively on the prevalence of OTTs.

108
Please note that Sandvine information includes only data for the countries in which they work which cover 2.5
billion subscribers (for instance it does not include China and India customers and thus their consumption).
109
Presentation by Sonatel, Senegal at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​
D071A00000A/​.
110
Presentation by POTRAZ, Zimbabwe at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​
D071A00000F/​.
111
Submission and presentation by Research ICT Solutions at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs,
Geneva, 1 October 2019, https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090001PDFE​.pdf and
https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090002PDFE​.pdf.
112
Presentation by Digicel at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/
ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​D071A000003/​.

62 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 3A: Evolution of voice traffic in comparison with revenues, investments


and mobile broadband penetration

Source: Digicel from ECTEL indicators

Revenues
In terms of revenues, there is agreement that data services are typically increasing their share
in MNO revenue streams. This trend was confirmed in the case of the Zimbabwean market as
well as MTN Nigeria, Airtel Nigeria and MTN Ghana113.

In absolute terms, some markets are reporting revenue decay (such as in the case of ECTEL
countries, with telecom services revenues falling from 2014 to 2018114, or in the figure reported
by McKinsey pointing to European operators losing 25% of revenues in the period).

On the other hand, some operators are reporting revenue increases (such as MTN in 13 out of
15 African operations).

113
Submission and presentation by Research ICT Solutions at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs,
Geneva, 1 October 2019, https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090001PDFE​.pdf and
https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090002PDFE​.pdf.
114
Presentation by Digicel at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/
ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​D071A000003/​.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 63


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 4A: MTN’s revenues evolution by country

Source: Research ICT Solutions

Therefore, it is expected that operators’ revenues and profitability associated with Internet traffic
are to some extent subject to the operator’s ability to seize revenue opportunities and mitigate
risks. Some workshop participants indicated that OTTs do contribute to MNOs’ revenues and
investment indirectly by boosting demand. However, it may be the case that increasing costs
associated with Internet traffic can be recovered by subscribers’ contributions, requiring other
revenue streams and further evolution of operator business models (such as co-investment
programs between OTTs and network operators).

Costs
There is little public information available on the impact of OTT Internet traffic on mobile network
operators’ costs. It is safe to affirm that OTT data traffic accounts for a share of the network costs,
although the actual level and relevance for operators’ financials will significantly depend on the
specificities of each operator (such as coverage levels, country’s geographic and topographic
characteristics, demand density, etc.).

A recent assessment from Axon Partners Group indicates that the cost for a hypothetical generic
operator in Europe can amount to tens of Euros per year and per subscriber115, on top of costs
associated with the provision of traditional services. In absolute terms, this means that MNOs are
expected to spend hundreds of millions of Euros per year to handle Internet traffic in addition
to the costs required to provide traditional services, which is generally in line with historical
trends for capital expenditures.

115
Estimation by Axon Partners Group (see https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​D071A000001/​) based on the model
developed for the European Commission and published on its webpage: https://​ec​.europa​.eu/​digital​-single​
-market/​en/​news/​finalisation​-mobile​-cost​-model​-roaming​-and​-delegated​-act​-single​-eu​-wide​-mobile​-voice​
-call.

64 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Figure 5A: Estimation of costs associated to mobile broadband traffic

Source: Axon Partners Group based on European Commission’s public model and Ericsson’s report

Moreover, as indicated above, data services are growing their share in operators’ revenue
streams and, therefore, they should expect to recover a bigger share of fixed and common
costs than were recovered by traditional services in the past.

How are OTTs impacting MNO demand, revenue and cost?

Demand: While OTT use is driving increased broadband subscription, some African
countries report voice traffic as stable or increasing.

Conclusion: increased network traffic arises from several drivers, not exclusively
from OTTs.

Revenues: Yes, data services are increasingly important in MNO revenue streams
but can business opportunity and risk mitigation boost profitability? How far do
OTTs contribute to MNO revenue indirectly by boosting demand? Are changes in
business model the way forward – for example OTTs and network operators co-
investing?

Costs: Data traffic accounts for significant network cost. For example in Europe,
MNOs spend hundreds of millions of Euros annually on top of costs of traditional
services.

OTT infrastructure investment


It has been recognized that a complementary relationship exists between OTT services and
network services. While telecommunications service providers highlight the need to increase
investments in infrastructure, some or a large portion of this need is generated by the data
demand spurred by consumer’s use of OTT applications and services.

Traditional telecommunications network providers have expressed concerns about revenue


streams shifting away from voice traffic subscriptions and towards mobile broadband
subscriptions and the investments that they have made in the ICT sector. As noted, the roll
out of telecommunications infrastructure has generally resided with telecommunications

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 65


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

providers, resulting in significant network investments by such providers. However, the nature
of infrastructure demand and deployment is shifting.

While most sub-scale OTTs rely on MNO infrastructure for last-mile delivery to customers,
hyperscale OTT service providers such as Facebook and Google are increasingly investing
in infrastructure and connectivity projects around the world. During the workshop, many
operators, such as Digicel and the SAMENA Telecommunications Council, acknowledged the
ASP infrastructure investments while calling for consideration of additional partnership and
financing methods to spur OTT investment into extending network connectivity.

Given the high data use of their customers, OTT providers have a growing vested interest
in supporting the availability of high-speed broadband for users around the world. As such,
they are increasingly investing in network infrastructure. According to Analysys Mason, from
2014-2017, OTTs invested over USD 23 billion in Internet infrastructure for transit and delivery,
including terrestrial fibre networks, international submarine cables, and delivery networks.
Analysys Mason indicates that the average annual OTT investment has increased from USD
33.2 billion per year (2011-2013) to USD 75.5 billion throughout 2014-2017. Investment is
increasing all over the world, although at different rates. As illustrated below, from 2014-2017
average annual total investment in North America increased by 190% whereas in the Middle
East and Africa, it increased by 150%.

Figure 6A: Average annual total investment by region (USD billion, 2014-2017)

Source: Analysys Mason

Additionally, numerous collaborative initiatives exist between operators and Internet companies
aimed at co-investment in network infrastructure. For example, Telxius deployed a submarine
cable between the US and the EU (‘Marea’) in collaboration with Microsoft, Facebook and, later,
Amazon. Telefónica Perú launched the initiative Internet para Todos (Internet for Everyone)
in collaboration with Facebook, Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF) and International
Development Bank (IDB) to bring Internet connectivity to several rural areas. Despite significant
gains in connectivity, there is a continuing need for increased and improved broadband
network infrastructure. Telecommunications service providers are challenged in increasing
their investments given their shifting revenue streams impacted by lower voice traffic revenue
and coming instead primarily from data services demand. OTTs feel direct pressure to increase
network infrastructure too, since the more affordable and better broadband access is, the easier
it is for people to use their services.

66 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

As mobile broadband subscriptions increase, telecommunications providers


face the need for increased infrastructure investment. So – how to boost OTT
investment?

MNO and OTT relationships


The effect of OTTs on network operator profits is a matter of some debate. Operator revenues
depend on a wide variety of factors including economic factors and regulatory environment, but
critically also on an operator’s ability to seize revenue opportunities and mitigate risk. Operators
may benefit from increased use of OTTs and roll out faster broadband networks to grow data
revenues or, conversely, maintain the analogue voice minute and SMS business model for as
long as they can. While this is ultimately a business decision, trends suggest that the former
course of action is best suited for long-term viability.

Simply put, OTTs and network operators need each other to thrive in the contemporary
communications marketplace. OTTs provide the content that drives demand for telecoms
operator services. Telecoms operators provide the connectivity and coverage that enable access
to OTTs. It is not a ‘zero sum game’ but rather a symbiotic relationship: without each other, users
would be left looking at blank screens.

There is a virtuous circle of content and access – more content brings more people online, which
drives revenue for access providers, which further increases available and relevant content. OTT
applications increase revenues for operators’ core access services by driving demand for data
services. Users also see value in faster connectivity. For example, 69% of users would upgrade
their service if they thought it would make YouTube work better116. Research in African markets117
suggests that a strategy of lower unit costs – providing prepaid products that resemble flat rate
services – is the best way to maintain operator revenues.

As mentioned above, some operators have said that consumer demand for OTTs is responsible
for decreasing volumes of international voice calling and a subsequent thinning of their high
operating margins.

Much contemporary research does not support claims that operators are either losing voice
traffic money because of OTTs. For example, voice traffic has grown every year on Airtel’s
African network since 2012. In many markets the lack of mobile broadband coverage and low
smartphone penetration are the primary reasons why many MNOs in Africa still see increasing
voice and SMS traffic118.

As a further example, since 2013, revenues have increased in 11 of the 13 African markets in
which MTN operates. The two exceptions to this general picture, MTN Liberia and MTN Guinea,
can be explained by the impact of external macroeconomic shocks, not to OTT popularity.
MTN’s revenue developments demonstrate two important points: one, the general revenue

116
ICM Research, “Broadband Consumption Study, France and Germany”, 2013.
117
Christoph Stork, Steve Esselaar, Chenai Chair and Safia Kahn - “OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African
Telcos?”, March 2016.
118
Presentation by Research ICT Solutions at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​
_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000090001PDFE​.pdf and https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​
D071A0000090002PDFE​.pdf.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 67


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

trends are positive despite growing numbers of OTT users and OTT traffic; and two, revenues
and profitability are mainly the results of an operator’s ability to seize revenue opportunities
and mitigate risk.

The French telecoms consultancy IDATE conducted research on the revenue relationships
between OTTs and telecoms operators for Europe119 and Africa120.

They found:

• Decreases in SMS revenues have been balanced by overall increases in revenue from data
tariffs – driven by consumer demand for services such as VOIP and instant messaging.
• The biggest challenges for operators have come from regulation and internal competition
in the telecom industry.
• The fastest shifts from SMS to alternate messaging platforms occurred in countries with
the highest rates for SMS. Where SMS unit costs were lower, SMS volumes remain high.

While the indirect effect of OTTs on operators’ revenues is a matter of debate, it is widely
accepted that direct commercial partnerships between operators and providers of OTTs have
vast potential for both sectors.

Such partnerships may include:

• Value-added services bundling – including OTT music or video streaming services in


operator packages – can generate new revenues, as well as increase data usage.
• Rich communications services (RCS) – the next generation of SMS, enabling B2B2C
revenues from businesses interacting with consumers through carrier channels.
• Carrier billing – enabling operators to use their strengths in customer and billing
relationships to provide billing capabilities for CAPs app stores and content.

Analysys Mason estimates that if OTTs and telecoms operators partnered more closely together,
it could increase telco operational free cash flow by almost 50% – or more than EUR 15 billion – in
Europe, the Middle East and Africa121. The World Bank’s Digital Development Partnership has
encouraged regulators to “favour operators’ initiatives to bundle or develop partnerships with
OTT service operators. This could be done with a changed regulatory framework temporarily
applied to new initiatives and development”122. Digital Service Taxes (DST) have been proposed
in a number of jurisdictions and some MNOs, like Digicel, support the idea that earmarking a
percentage of any new DST for an infrastructure fund could be considered. Individual countries
might also come up with their own models to balance ICT infrastructure investment from various
sources; such example is Vanuatu’s Universal Service Fund “Pay or Play” model under which the
Regulator can agree rollout commitments and forego levy payments.123

119
IDATE, “The impact of VoIP and instant messaging on traditional communication services in Europe”,
September 2015.
120
IDATE, “Impact of online communication services on the telecommunications market in Africa”, July 2017.
121
Analysys Mason, “Digital Transformation through Partnerships”, April 2017.
122
Digital Development Partnership, ECOWAS ICT African Regulatory Watch Initiative on Licensing Regimes,
OTTs, and International Gateway Liberalization. March 2019.
123
Presentation by Digicel at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/
ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​D071A000003/​.

68 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

The huge promise of partnership

OTTs and network operators need each other: content drives up demand and
revenue. So direct commercial partnerships between operators and OTTs have vast
potential: research suggests such partnering could increase telco free cash-flow by
a massive 50%.

Measuring social impact of OTT platforms


OTTs offer essential economic and social features beyond traditional communications services,
helping an entire ecosystem to take root and expand in the new digital economy. OTT opens
up an alternative for reducing unemployment. For example, Côte d’Ivoire observes an increase
in sales of products from Togo, Morocco, Turkey, –United Arab Emirates and China using OTT,
thus creating a new trade axis. Barriers to social and business development raised by expensive
legacy communications prices have been broken by using data.

Looking at how OTTs are used by populations, communities and businesses, there is clear
evidence that they have social and economic impact on those who use them. OTTs have become
marketplaces for the ‘gig economy’, helping young entrepreneurs leverage the power of the
platform to create new P2P (peer-to-peer) retail businesses, reducing time-to-market or the
need for a physical store. OTTs are used widely for socially relevant activities such as petitions,
status and ratings. Craftsmen or merchants (sometimes with low literacy rates) can use OTTs to
showcase their skills, and to advertise goods and services.

At the same time, this success creates new challenges – such as increased competition between
informal vendors on OTT and physical retailers, or modernizing tax codes to account for the
new digital economy.

It is difficult to measure this impact and the findings of the impact assessment would depend
on the set of criteria chosen. Some analysts are calling for a set of universal key performance
indicators (KPIs) that could measure the socio-economic impact of OTTs.

While the high cost of Internet data remains a major part of the connectivity challenge, there is
a trend in countries in East and Southern Africa to introduce additional taxes to raise revenue,
including content license fees and excise taxes. Such policies make data yet more expensive,
putting Internet access further out of reach for many124.

On another front, experience shows that policy and regulatory decisions are not neutral in
their impact on populations. Recent research by the Web Foundation125 highlighted how fiscal
instruments have impacted Internet users in a number of countries (also confirmed in the
research of Cenerva126 on countries including Tanzania, Uganda, Benin, Colombia, and Zambia
where new forms of taxation on the use of OTTs have been implemented or proposed). The

124
Sarpong, 2018: http://​webfoundation​.org/​docs/​2018/​08/​Advancing​-Womens​-Rights​-Online​_Gaps​-and​
-Opportunities​-in​-Policy​-and​-Research​.pdf. See also: https://​a4ai​.org/​why​-is​-africa​-taxing​-online​-services.
125
Presentation by Web Foundation at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national
telecommunication/ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​dms​_pub/​itu​
-d/​oth/​07/​1a/​D071A0000100001PDFE​.pdf.
126
Presentation by Cenerva at ITU workshop on the Economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunication/
ICT markets, Geneva, 1 October 2019, available at: https://​www​.itu​.int/​oth/​D071A000007/​.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 69


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Web Foundation was particularly interested in the impact of these taxes on women. Women
are less likely to access and use the Internet127, and yet there is little research looking at how
they are affected by ICT-related tax policy. Such research is important to help inform fiscal and
universal access policies.

The Web Foundation carried out research on the impacts of social media taxation in Africa
(featuring expert interviews and focus groups conducted in Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia).
Based on the experience of the participants surveyed for the study128 and existing research
on the impact of consumer-focused Internet taxes, governments in East and Southern Africa,
and elsewhere, are encouraged to consider four significant things in evaluating their ICT fiscal
policies:

• First, tax policy related to Internet access (and fiscal policy in general) is not gender neutral.
Governments should therefore pay particular attention to how taxes impact women and
other groups who use the Internet less frequently than others. It is therefore imperative
that taxation policies are gender-responsive – meaning they actively consider gender
issues and the gender gap in Internet access – from conception to implementation and
monitoring.
• Second, fiscal policies that tax use of social media and other related Internet-based
services distort people’s use of the Internet. Governments should reassess the introduction
of taxes, including conducting sensitivity and gender-responsive analysis of tax measures,
considering potential harms to citizens and businesses, and re-evaluating their revenue
and behavioural targets. Failing to consider potential harms of taxes on citizens and
businesses may ultimately lead to large social costs.
• Third, social media taxes appear to contribute to the shrinking of civil society space.
Governments must recognize that effective policy development, and the functioning of
society in general, depends on a strong and active civil society, including women’s rights
groups. For many of these organizations, social media and the Internet are crucial tools
for organizing and operating and such taxes undermine their work.

Finally, tax policies, when poorly designed, can have an adverse effect on the objective of
revenue generation; harming taxpayers and failing to achieve revenue targets. Governments
should undertake proper and representative stakeholder consultations, seeking input from
varied stakeholder groups before rolling out such fiscal measures. The lack of awareness and
confusing communication on such taxes and their rationale have eroded trust. Governments
should also pursue evidenced-based principles in the imposition of taxes and must evaluate
all revenue measures against a number of criteria – neutrality, efficiency, certainty, simplicity,
effectiveness, fairness, flexibility, and equity.

OTT platforms: what impact?

OTT success brings new challenges – like ‘click versus brick’ in retail or the need
to modernize tax codes. Perhaps we should exercise caution: some countries
introduced taxes with unintended consequences – hampering connectivity in
general and penalizing women in particular.

127
Sambuli et al., 2018: http://​webfoundation​.org/​docs/​2018/​08/​Advancing​-Womens​-Rights​-Online​_Gaps​
-and​-Opportunities​-in​-Policy​-and​-Research​.pdf.
128
Report available at https://​webfoundation​.org/​research/​who​-wins​-who​-loses​-understanding​-womens​
-experiences​-of​-social​-media​-taxation​-in​-east​-and​-southern​-africa/​.

70 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Role of regulation

Regulatory considerations
How, and if, regulatory frameworks and processes should respond to the emergence of OTTs
and the digital transformation of network communications is the subject of debate among
regulators and policy makers.

For many years, telecommunication regulatory frameworks were built around telecommunications
operators that owned and controlled underlying network infrastructure, were guarded by
high barriers to market entry, and were granted use of scarce public resources such as radio
spectrum. Accordingly, telecommunications regulation was intended to prevent consumer
harm stemming from these unique market conditions.

However, with the transformation of networking technology, the emergence of OTTs, and the
interaction between the telecommunication network operators and many other different markets
where OTTs operate, regulators have started to consider how appropriate and applicable
such regulations are in the modern communications landscape. Regulators have observed
the need to recognize that OTTs and telecoms networks operators are very different types of
business. Accordingly, new regulatory paradigms may require a clear acknowledgement and
understanding of the fully transformed value chain in the telecoms sector, and hence the need
to rethink telecoms regulation in the new world of the IP-based Internet value chain. OTTs are
just one aspect of this much-needed rethinking, not the cause itself. Some have suggested that
a ‘fresh look’ at regulation of services, regardless of the medium, may be the answer.

It is vital that regulators consider both the benefits that OTTs have brought to consumers,
societies, and economies at large, in addition to the challenges they bring. OTTs have facilitated
positive transformation by bringing connectivity and new content that has transformed lives
around the planet for the people who have access. In many markets, people cannot imagine
life without their favourite OTTs. They depend upon OTTs to search for information, shop,
plan holidays, commute, keep in touch with friends, stream music and video, and improve
career prospects. Although some incumbent network operators may at times bristle against the
reshaping communications market, the reality is that consumers and citizens enjoy the positive
externalities of this new value chain. Simply put, at the time of writing, the good that OTTs have
delivered seems to outweigh the valid concerns they actually raise. Even in scenarios where
certain OTT platforms have established a dominant market position, there is still an open debate
about whether there is tangible evidence of consumer harm as a result.

However, regulators must also consider the many new responsibilities that arise with the
emergence of OTTs in the context of the entire communication ecosystem. Depending on
the market or the OTT in question, these challenges may include negative externalities such
as increased competition in some markets or increased barriers to entry in others, cybercrime
and fraud, harmful content, fake news, potential for data breaches, or the loss/lack of control
by regulators of players in their markets. Regulators must adapt their regimes to address new
challenges to security, consumer protection, and taxation.

Regulators have been tuning their perspective to the new market realities and have identified
some of the key challenges in adapting regulations to accommodate the growth of OTTs.
However, many regulators are lacking an adequate understanding of how OTT applications
operate. This results in an information asymmetry that is not easily overcome, given the

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 71


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

magnitude, scale, and diversity of OTTs. This is a particularly challenging issue in developing
countries.

In addition, there is a challenge of speed. Innovation spurred by competition in the OTT sector
moves at an order of magnitude faster than regulation. Regulation is a lengthy process, as
regulators need to evaluate information and assess complex trade-offs and their net impact
on consumers’ welfare. These long-term decision processes did not pose great challenges in
the era of traditional telecom regulation; however, they do today in the digital ecosystem. A
further challenge is the fact that some of the most popular OTTs operate internationally, and
regulatory bodies have national jurisdiction. Complying with cultural and regulatory standards
of speech and content is a particularly acute challenge for many OTTs, as they vary wildly
between jurisdictions.

On top of those challenges, regulators must also keep in mind that OTTs are a vast and diverse
collection of businesses. A search engine is not the same as an app-store, a subscription movie
service is not the same as a social network. In a world where a substantial proportion of all
business is transacted over the Internet, it would be absurd for the nature of regulation to
be determined by a one-size-fits-all approach. An additional source of complexity lies in the
functional differentiation of many different roles playing simultaneously within the network
infrastructure, and enormous geographical variation, between and within countries and regions
– that could affect incentives towards all dimensions of competition, innovation and choice. For
example, this is reflected in the distribution of different ARPUs across countries, because of
geography, urban features, legacy infrastructures and disposable incomes.

Hence, when discussing the relevant regulatory framework, it is essential to understand that an
OTT is not merely a player in a network of simple value chain relations that regulation of access
terms and conditions can address. On the contrary, the entire set of interrelations shaping the
ecosystem has to be taken into consideration to assess the possible intended and unintended
consequences of regulation.

Let’s see past the challenges and keep the benefits

Regulators need to see the benefits that OTTs deliver while adapting regimes
to address new challenges. And while OTT innovation can be rapid, regulation
sometimes struggles not only to keep pace but to address large-scale OTT
operations outside of the regulator’s national mandate. In addition, a one-size-fits-
all approach to regulating OTTs will not work. When new service delivery models
disrupt the old, regulation should be informed by evidence rather than fear of the
unknown. Is light-touch, flexible regulation the answer?

Possible objectives for regulatory action


Workshop presentations addressed the issue of what should be included in the key regulatory
objectives for ICT markets and for OTTs. As in other industries, these should aim to achieve
sufficient levels of competition, consumer choice, innovation and investment. The different roles
played by OTTs within the communications ecosystem imply that their actions and decisions
can affect each of these key objectives. Hence, there was a view that the role and impact of

72 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

OTTs should be considered holistically from a regulatory perspective, and not from a narrow
market segmented perspective.

When considering regulation at all, regulators are encouraged to consider the aim of regulation
in general. These are twofold: 1) to seek to achieve those desirable and justified objectives for
consumers and citizens that do not arise naturally from the market; and 2) regulate where there
is ‘market failure’ and where the result brings net benefits.

Implicit in these objectives is that regulation could be enacted when a problematic behaviour
or a proof of harm is found, not as a general blanket rule. In fact, regulators shouldn't over-
regulate new markets “just in case”. Regulation should be based on evidence. For example,
there are clear calls from many stakeholder groups to ‘control’ or regulate OTTs, yet typically
some proponents neither point to any market failure nor to any evidence of consumers and
citizens being unhappy with their OTT services. A claim like MNOs lose revenues – whether
accurate or not – would not count as a good reason to regulate against significant consumer
and citizen benefits of OTT services when tested against the above key purposes of regulation.
The lesson from history is that abstract or ideologically motivated approaches are rarely a good
basis for policy.

New disruptive models of service delivery should not be regulated merely because they threaten
an existing model, since such innovation and competition serve consumer interest. Regulators
must also be cautious about the impact of their actions on innovation and competition. While
important public policy considerations need to be addressed, regulation of OTTs driven
solely by the motivation of ‘levelling the playing field’ between traditional and digital modes
of service delivery would be detrimental to consumer interests. As noted previously, recently
implemented taxes on OTTs, social media applications, VoIP phone calls, and data services
without conducting sufficient impact assessments have led to decreases in Internet access,
social unrest, and economic disruption rather than achieving policy objectives or recouping
telecom revenues.

There is an increasingly relevant debate on platform regulation. This includes contributions such
as the Furman Review129, which proposed the creation of a new ‘Digital Markets Unit’ in the UK
to consider competition issues raised by powerful online platforms, and a proposal from the UK
Government that online platforms should have a new duty of care, in order to protect users from
harmful content. This proposal, however, has not yet been implemented in UK legislation. Some
experts also urged regulators to consider OTTs in the context of a long history of regulation
punctuated by cases of regulatory failures. This risk is particularly relevant now, since all OTTs
are different, and it is important that regulation should be informed by actual evidence rather
than fear of the unknown.

Looking ahead
The Chair of BEREC shared his view that the most appropriate form of regulation to address
these complex issues remains unclear. In Europe, EU Access regulation keeps access networks
open, mandating companies owning the physical infrastructures with significant market power
(SMP) to allow other retail service providers (RSP) to access the network elements required

129
“Unlocking digital competition, Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel”, ISBN 978-1-912809-44-8,
PU2242: https://​www​.gov​.uk/​government/​publications/​unlocking​-digital​-competition​-report​-of​-the​-digital​
-competition​-expert​-panel.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 73


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

to reach end users. This is essential to allow RSPs to provide bundling like television and
telecommunications services. Similarly, relevant, is the EU net neutrality regulation130. The new
European Electronic Communications Code marginally addresses the role of OTTs, mainly
focusing on user protection provisions regulations that will apply to all the elements of bundling,
including OTTs and not simply to telecommunication services. As mentioned above, further
critical contributions towards regulatory approaches can be found in the Furman Review,
commissioned by the UK Government, which proposes the creation of a new ‘Digital Markets
Unit’ to assess competition issues raised by powerful online platforms.

There are several different facets and features of new regulatory frameworks. Many regulators
believe that the best route forward is for a light-touch, flexible approach to regulation. Such an
approach is based more on principles – including consumer protection, investment promotion,
and competition – than on codified rules that require strict adherence. Interestingly, some
have argued that if governments were to design new models of regulation that are light-touch,
flexible, and recognize the scale and quantity of market impact of an OTT player, they may
encourage more OTT players to conform to regulation. For regulation to be effective, however,
it is crucial to include an ethical dimension and to assess the main barriers and limits to its
implementation. Others have highlighted the value of OTT companies voluntarily self-regulation
and collaborating with governments to prevent online harm. Such an example is WhatsApp’s
collaboration with the Indian Government to combat fake news and misinformation131. Observers
have noted such programs can actually reduce the tendency to over-regulate online services in
response to real or perceived harm.

Many have pointed to the need for improved international cooperation. Some suggest that
multi-country agreements on handling of data may be helpful, while others point out that an
improved degree of standardization and harmonization of data protection regimes could help
governments and reduce the compliance burden on OTTs as well. Others have identified the
need for regulatory capacity building for developing countries.

Conclusions
Discussions resulting from the 1 October 2019 workshop organized jointly by the Rapporteur
Groups for Questions 3/1 and 4/1 of ITU-D Study Group 1, as well as the analysis of the information
provided on the issue of the economic impact of OTTs on national telecommunications/ICT
markets, highlighted the need to be able to draw up guidelines for the various stakeholders.

Also, the reflection deserves to be continued within the framework of the final reports on
the studies of Question 3/1 and Question 4/1 to provide a deliverable as for the requested
guidelines.

But already, some relevant lessons can be learned:

Regulators and decision-makers


• Regulators are invited to develop their digital skills, in order to better understand and
assess the development of the telecommunications/ICT market in the context of OTTs.

130
https://​berec​.europa​.eu/​eng/​netneutrality/​.
131
https://​www​.gadgetsnow​.com/​tech​-news/​whatsapp​-vs​-govt​-of​-india​-all​-you​-need​-to​-know/​articleshow/​
65541717​.cms.

74 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• Regulators are invited to consider the evolution of the Internet value chain and assess the
telecommunications/ICT market as a whole in order to consider relevant measures in line
with market realities.
• OTT regulations should be based upon actual evidence of harm from OTTs. It should also
be based on a quantitative analysis of the socio-economic effects such regulation.
• Governments should assess in advance the potentially negative effects of taxes on OTTs
for vulnerable communities, businesses and citizens in order to avoid a high social costs.
• Governments are encouraged to engage in real dialogue with and consult with different
stakeholder groups before adopting new policies and regulations.

Telecommunication operators and OTT providers


• Telecommunication operators are encouraged to adopt data-driven business models and
to rebalance their rate grids in order to reduce their dependence on telephone and SMS
services.
• OTT providers and telecom operators need each other, so these two stakeholders should
explore different models of partnerships and agreements including investments in network
infrastructure and provide insight into these partnership agreements to regulators.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 75


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Annex 2: Country case studies relating to cloud computing

Background of cloud-service development on the part of


telecommunication operators in China
As the three major telecommunication operators in China, China Mobile, China Unicom and
China Telecom have advantages in terms of network and data that other cloud-computing
service providers have difficulties to surpass. In recent years, telecommunication operators have
taken cloud services as the basis for their own business development and digital transformation
and have strengthened their overall strategy in the cloud-computing market. With the continuous
improvement of cloud service capabilities, their market shares have also increased significantly.

Major initiatives launched by telecommunication operators for cloud


services

Proactively promote the "cloud transformation" plan to improve cloud


computing service capabilities
With a rich network resource base, telecommunication operators can give full play to their
advantages of cloud network convergence and cloud network integration to build an information
infrastructure of cloud network convergence. In recent years, all major operators have put
forward their own cloud-computing development plans. For example, aiming at building a new
generation of cloud network operation system and promoting enterprise digital transformation,
they have set up leading cloud computing operation systems and management systems in line
with the deep integration of clouds, networks, terminals and systems, thus further deepening
the transformation from communication network operators to integrated information and
communication service providers.

Strengthen the construction of IDC (Internet data centre) resources and


enhance the supply capacity of the infrastructure
Major telecommunication operators are actively promoting the construction of a large number
of key data centres, such as big databases, innovation incubation bases and R&D centres,
and providing infrastructure support for the application and innovation of key sectors, such as
industrial Internet, smart cities and supercomputing centres by relying on the strong network
and localized operation service advantages of operators.

Promote the integrated development of various technologies and enhance


capacity for business innovation
The new generation of information technology is developing in the direction of deep
convergence, as are the cloud-computing strategies of the three major operators, namely
deep integration or convergence of technologies such as 5G, AI, big data, edge computing
and blockchain. Among them, the combination of ‘5G + Cloud + AI’ is the most representative:
the three are closely integrated with each other, becoming hugely powerful.

76 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Actively expand services at the PaaS and SaaS layers and enhance cloud-
computing application capabilities
While continuously developing basic services such as IaaS (infrastructure as a service) layer cloud
computing, cloud storage and cloud network, the three major operators are also gradually
enhancing their business strategic arrangements at the PaaS (platform as a service) layer
and the SaaS (software as a service) layer in accordance with their own digital transformation
requirements and related needs of the government as well as sectors such as finance, energy
and industry. Regarding the PaaS layer, the support for middleware such as database and AI
has been enhanced, and the capabilities in cloud computing, IoT, big data, blockchain and
security have been comprehensively solidified. A number of common basic application support
platforms have been developed and applied, including multi-source data processing platform,
integrated deployment and operation and maintenance platform, multi-tenant management
platform and public geographic information platform. With this, the difficulty of application
development and delivery cycle can be reduced effectively, and the government and business
customers can adapt to the requirements of the industry by acquiring one-stop smart support
for customers, which fully empowers the government and enterprise customers. At the SaaS
layer, the advantages of network and business resources are leveraged to provide differentiated
and competitive SaaS application services on the basis of a unified PaaS platform, and gradually
extend to sectors including government service, medical care and education with standardized
SaaS products to expand their market shares rapidly.

Combat the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic


Since the beginning of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been spreading across the world,
severely affecting many traditional sectors. However, it has also provided a rare opportunity
for the cloud-computing industry. Many enterprises and individuals have started to learn about
and use cloud services because of the pandemic. Telecommunication operators in China have
seized the opportunity and accelerated the expansion of related businesses, and developed a
series of cloud services and applications such as cloud supervision at the Raytheon Mountain
and Huoshenshan Hospitals, global live broadcast of cloud climbing (reaching summit of
Mount Everest), cloud medical care, cloud classroom and cloud office, turning the impact of
the pandemic into opportunities.

Summary and suggestions


This case study outlie mainly introduces the general situation of cloud-computing development
on the part of telecommunication operators in China. Concerning the evolution of cloud-
computing technology, operators rely on their own network resources to promote ‘cloud
network convergence’ and ‘cloud network integration’. At the same time, cloud computing is
deeply integrated with 5G, AI, big data, edge computing, blockchain and other technologies,
and new cloud service models such as ‘5G + cloud + AI’ have been launched. In terms of cloud-
computing business, operators have gradually shifted from only providing laaS services, such
as computing, storage and network, to the comprehensive development of IaaS, PaaS and
SaaS services.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 77


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Cloud-computing regulation in Saudi Arabia, by Axon Partners Group


Cloud computing is often regulated through a mix of non-cloud-specific provisions (e.g. on data
protection, consumer protection, law of contract, information security, intellectual property).
Even if some of these provisions exist in the country, stakeholders have voiced concerns in recent
years over legal uncertainty on the regulatory status of cloud computing, a potential need for
some form of regulatory oversight through registration or licences, applicable information-
security and data-protection rules, and the rights and obligations of each party.

The Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) – the ICT regulator
of Saudi Arabia – has addressed these gaps through the adoption of a Cloud Computing
Regulatory Framework (CCRF), which aims at the following objectives:

– Providing regulatory clarity and certainty on the rights and obligations of the providers
and users of cloud computing services.
– Establishing a clear regulatory basis to manage potential security risks connected with the
use of cloud services.
– Encouraging the improved quality of cloud services.
– Encouraging investment in a local cloud industry.

The CCRF provides a definition of, among other terms, cloud-computing services, and covers
aspects such as the scope of the regulation, registration requirements, information security,
protection of customer data, unlawful and infringing content, information on cloud-computing
contracts and minimum content, customer protection and unfair contract terms, quality, and
industry standards.

China case study


In recent years, China's cloud-computing industry development, industry promotion, market
supervision and other important links of the macro-policy environment have become increasingly
successful. The State has put forward relevant policies to promote the development of industry.
At the same time, with the active promotion of ‘Internet plus’ action, application of cloud
computing in China is accelerating and expanding its penetration from the Internet industry
to traditional industries such as government affairs, finance, industry and livelihood services.

In the process of the development of cloud computing, China attaches great importance to
the establishment of a cloud-computing standard system. Relevant national authorities shall
take the lead in formulating the cloud-computing standard system. On 9 November 2015, the
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) officially issued the guidelines for the
construction of a comprehensive standardization system for cloud computing. The guidelines
are based on the technology and products in the cloud-computing ecosystem, services and
applications, such as the key link, and cloud security throughout the entire ecosystem, combined
with cloud-computing development trends both at home and abroad, and a comprehensive
standardized system for the cloud-computing framework, including the ‘cloud’, ‘cloud resources,
‘cloud services’ and ‘cloud security’. At the same time, 29 key development directions for cloud-
computing standards were published to promote standardized development of the domestic
cloud computing industry.

The cloud security standard is an important component of this system, which is used to guide
the implementation of network security, system security, service security and information security
in the cloud-computing environment. It mainly includes the standards for security management,

78 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

service security, security technology and product, security foundation and other aspects in the
cloud-computing environment. The country has issued relevant national standards and industry
standards to promote the development of this work.

On the basis of the development of cloud-computing infrastructure, the country also attaches
great importance to the promotion and application of cloud-based big-data policy. The strategic
development of big data is one of the top priorities in China’s 13th five-year plan. It is indicated
in the Outline of the 13th five-year plan that China will implement a comprehensive national
strategy for the development of big data as an essential strategic resource to expedite the
opening up and sharing of big-data resources and applications development with the aim of
pushing ahead industrial transformation and upgrade, and innovation in social governance.

Based on the requirements of the 13th five-year plan, in order to further encourage the
development of big-data technology and application, the Chinese Government has issued
a ‘Programme of action for big-data development’, a ‘Plan for the development of big-data
industry’, ‘Pilot projects’ and other relevant policy documents to encourage and promote
the development of big data. The release of these big-data industrial policies has played an
important role in promoting the development of cloud-computing applications in China.

Bhutan case study


Ever since the formulation of the country’s first IT policy in 2004, Bhutan has made major strides
in terms of ICT advancement and development. Despite late introduction of IT in comparison
to its neighbouring countries, Bhutan has achieved great feats, from digitalizing every form
of government service/information to providing Internet/cellular connectivity across different
parts of the country.

The Government Data Centre (GDC) is an unprecedented effort of the Royal Government of
Bhutan to centralize to a private cloud all government systems, e-services and m-services that
were previously hosted within agency premises. GDC is housed in the Thimphu Tech Park,
and was brought into operation in March 2017. Primarily, GDC provides hosting services to
business-critical applications of the government agencies in a secured environment with state-
of-the-art facilities to provide a more reliable source of information for the whole of government.
The infrastructure design and implementation works, including network, server and storage
facilities, were developed in compliance with TIER 2 international standards, providing a service
availability of 99.741 per cent.

The following are some of the key areas where the private cloud has had an impact:

– Improved security: A strict policy of testing services before putting them into a production
environment has allowed GDC to scrutinize systems for any bugs and security loopholes.
Moreover, during the tests and assessment the VPS/nodes are placed in the DMZ to rule
out any compromises.
– Increased accessibility: As GDC is connected to the high-speed fibre-optic government-
owned private network (known as GovNet), which connects almost all the government
agencies across the country, it has boosted the proliferation of services.
– Increase in availability of services (99.741 per cent uptime): The data centre (GDC) has
also implemented offsite backup services and ancillary facility redundancy to scale up the
reliability of its services. With these features in place, availability of services is ensured at
99.741 per cent uptime.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 79


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

– Optimized government resources: With GDC being the central platform for hosting
government systems, the Department of IT and Telecom is now able to optimize resources
by identifying and merging or reusing redundant systems with similar requirements.

Islamic Republic of Iran case study


New concepts and technology in the field of IT have created many opportunities for economic
growth. Computer games is one area in which investment can have an effective economic
impact. In this regard, computer games have been developed on the basis of new technology
– such as the cloud – in recent years. Implementing computer games in the cloud environment
or games as a service (GaaS) allows players to get service from remote servers directly to their
local devices.

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Iran Computer and Video Games Foundation was established to
lead the development process of computer game production by considering new technological
capabilities (e.g. the cloud). In this regard, planning and supporting activities in different fields
in the video and computer industry is a top priority for the country – as is identifying and trying
elites in these fields.

The main objective of the Foundation is to plan for and support the cultural, artistic, technical
and business activities in the Iranian game industry. The Foundation’s activities include policy-
making to support the development and distribution of computer games with the help of the
private sector; supporting and monitoring expansion in the production and distribution of
various types of computer and video games; and macro-planning of the gaming industry with
regard to the social and educational aspects of games.

Nigeria case study


Oil and gas sites require robust communication platforms with round-the-clock support –
from supporting remote staff and crew welfare, to enabling complex interoperability between
technologies capable of real-time, data-rich streaming that are critical to running and monitoring
operations. The operating companies are looking for digital solutions that enable them to do
everything through a seamless workflow. They are also looking to be able to utilize real-time
data on factors like rock formations, pressure and temperature monitoring, and leak detection,
in order to create a safer and more efficient work environment.

Cloud computing can best support this portfolio of smart services, provided access to secure,
reliable and resilient communication services is guaranteed. The oil and gas industry needs
robust and dedicated/secure connectivity to the cloud across the entire chain of processes of
exploration, production and distribution of natural resources. As the main connectivity providers
for offshore rigs, satellite communication companies such as SES are now building a cloud-
optimized ecosystem for them to optimize the operation of these high-value workloads. This
evolution notably provides machine learning (ML) for production equipment, which supports
diagnostic analysis in the cloud for preventive maintenance and improved yields in operation.
ML advances will lead to AI, which then helps to dramatically improve management of the
production process based on orchestration of a large volume of deep operating data.

In Nigeria, offshore rigs are prominent in the well-endowed coastal region. Together with the
exploitation of resources in the delta of the Niger River, these make Nigeria one of the few major
oil-producing nations still capable of increasing its oil output as a main source of revenue and

80 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

welfare for the country. The satellite operator SES signed a partnership with Microsoft Azure
in October 2020 that provides its customers with access to Microsoft’s new managed service,
enabling them to communicate and control their satellite capacity, process data, and scale
their operations directly within Azure. The option to route over Microsoft’s global network and
inject value-added, cloud-based managed functionalities such as enhanced security, SD-WAN
or other virtual network functions into the service chain will ultimately endow the oil and gas
sector in Nigeria with a much-improved performance, speed-to-market, flexibility and scalability
on which to capitalize.

Other satellite operators are offering similar services to support cloud computing globally.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 81


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Annex 3: Case studies relating to m-services

Barbados case study on the m-Money service


In November 2018, Bitt Digital Inc. became the first fintech company to participate in the
Barbados regulatory sandbox. Bitt’s m-Money service provides users with a digital wallet that
enables them to send, receive and store mobile money. The funds can be transferred between
users and used at various merchants across Barbados.

Since July 2019, funds can only be added to the digital wallet via cash deposits at tellers
distributed across Barbados. However, once in the wallet, the funds may be transferred freely
to anyone with the app and without any transaction fees. Verified users may transfer up to
BDS 20 000 per month and unverified users may transfer up to BDS 500 per month. While
m‑Money may be used outside of Barbados, users cannot deposit or withdraw funds outside
the country.

Digital financial services, notably m-Money, are particularly beneficial for Barbados. Electronic
payment methods are not commonly used, because the high fees associated with credit cards
and lack of infrastructure for such systems deter many local business owners from using them.
These factors also inhibit the export of goods and services, because foreign users cannot easily
purchase them.

By participating in the digital sandbox, Bitt was able to launch its m-Money service without
having to navigate the traditional licensing path that many financial institutions normally follow.
This greatly facilitated Bitt’s ability to launch its service.

M-financial services case study


Mobile financial services are monetary transactions executed by use of a mobile phone. They
fall into two categories, namely mobile banking (m-banking) and mobile money.

M-banking involves the use of USSD short codes to interact in real time with one’s bank account
to either transfer funds from one account to another or pay for services and goods.

Mobile money involves the use of a mobile network operator app to interact in real time with
one’s mobile (electronic) wallet.

– M-banking: This platform uses either an app installed on the user’s phone which requires
Internet to operate or USSD, where the user dials a certain short code in the format *ABC #
where A, B and C are numeric values. The regulator facilitates the USSD code through the
national numbering plans. Examples of services that can be executed under m-banking
include account-balance inquiry, inter-bank transfer services, loan application, purchase
of airtime, payment for utilities and withdrawal services.
– Mobile money: The mobile money platform uses a mobile network app that is normally
integrated in the SIM card toolkit and does not require Internet connection. Examples in
Kenya include Airtel Money, T-kash and M-PESA.132 Various services are provided under
this platform depending on the MNO, e.g. send money (to mobile wallet), buy airtime,
loans and savings, pay bills and utilities.
– Collaboration partners involved: Various stakeholders are involved, namely: the ICT and
banking sector regulator through licensing the service, which builds confidence for the

132
Airtel Payments Bank: Airtel Money Wallet; Safaricom: M-Pesa; Telkom Kenya: T-Kash.

82 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

users, and other key players such as banks, utility companies and goods and services
merchants.

Kenya case study on m-services (M-Akiba)


The M-Akiba Bond is a retail bond issued by the Government of Kenya to raise money to fund
infrastructural projects from time to time.133

The process for opening an account under the Central Depository System is handled through
a mobile phone and is immediate, unlike for a conventional account where a person has to visit
the Central Bank or an appointed commercial bank, a process which takes two days.

For a person to open an account, their mobile phone must be registered for mobile money
services offered by mobile network operators.

The platform offers two options to buy the bond, namely via mobile wallet (mobile money) or
via mobile banking using the PesaLink app.

Lessons learned and suggested best practices:


1) Simplicity: Making the m-service easy to use for consumers was key in enabling the
success of the project.
2) End-to-end automation: The fact that all steps in the entire process, from account opening,
through bond buying, to selling are all automated encourages people with busy schedules
to participate.
3) Real-time confirmation: Receiving feedback in real time for each transaction enhances
public confidence in the process.

Collaboration: The support and collaboration of all industry players are key in building
confidence in the product: the National Treasury, the Central Bank of Kenya, the Capital Markets
Authority, the Nairobi Securities Exchange, the Central Depository and Settlement Corporation,
the Kenya Association of Stockbrokers and Investment Banks, Safaricom and Airtel.

Kenya case study on m-farming


The mobile penetration level in Kenya stood at 106.2 per cent in December 2018.134 This means
most Kenyans rely on mobile phones not only for social communication purposes, but also as
a tool for receiving and sharing commercial information, e.g. on agriculture.

This aspect has attracted the attention of tech-savvy young people aiming to take advantage
of the sector’s popularity and profitability to address food shortages in the country, and has
thus prompted the development of applications that ease farming and allow access to vital
farming information.

Some of these applications are:

• iCow: Farmers register their cows free of charge through the iCow portal and get regular
SMSs on breeding and production patterns.135

133
Central Depository and Settlement Corporation (CDSC) (Kenya). M-Akiba Bond.
134
Communications Authority of Kenya. Second Quarter Sector Statistics Report for the financial year 2018/2019
(October-December 2018).
135
iCow. About us.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 83


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

• M-Shamba: An interactive platform accessible from smart and feature phones. SMS is
used to provide the farmer with information on production, harvesting, marketing, credit,
weather and climate. The information is customized based on location, allowing farmers
to know what to grow within the season in their region. Farmers can also share information
on various platforms.136
• M-Farm: Connects buyers and farmers around their locality to sell produce; also provides
the latest agri-trends. Uses SMS and website.137
• ArifuMkulima: Broadcast SMSs sent to registered users on weather, diseases, farm inputs
and financial advice. Uses SMS and website.138
• Kilimo Salama: Provides farmers with up-to-date and full climate data via text message.
Those with an app in addition receive information on ways to increase productivity, ensure
food security and protect their crops during bad weather.139

Lessons learned and suggested best practices:


1) Simplicity: It is important to design m-farming solutions that can interact with farmers in
basic language and if possible incorporate local language terminology.
2) Farmer-centric solutions: It is important for m-farming solutions to address a specific field
in farming, e.g. dairy farming only or a specific crop, such as tea or coffee. This will make
them easier for farmers to use and to provide farmer-specific information.
3) Digital literacy: To spur growth of m-services, it is imperative that farmers are trained in
basic digital literacy skills.

Collaboration: Involvement of farmers in the design and development of farming solutions


is key. This is done through feedback from farmers on system usability, and also through
the collaboration of an ecosystem of partners, including telecommunication companies,
independent software vendors, start-up accelerators and incubators, farmer associations,
government and academia.

136
M-Shamba. Making it happen. About us.
137
M-Farm. Connecting Farmers. Connect with buyers and farmers around you to sell your produce.
138
Heike Baumüller. Agricultural Innovation and Service Delivery through Mobile Phones: Analyses in Kenya.
PhD thesis, University of Bonn, Germany, July 2015.
139
Kilimo Salama. About Kilimo Salama.

84 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Annex 4: Case studies on OTT

Bahamas case study


The Bahamas Utilities Regulation and Competition Authority (URCA) has recognized that OTTs
can spur operators to embrace new technologies and expand into new lines of business. While
URCA noted that OTTs, particularly online voice, messaging and video services, can disrupt
traditional operators’ financial and business models, more progressive network operators are
adopting data-centric models to reduce the impact of OTTs.

As an example, URCA stated that the new entrant to the mobile market, Be Aliv, has introduced
WhatsApp customer care as one of its innovations. In URCA’s experience, the growing demands
for OTT applications in the Bahamas have not affected investments in networks and technologies
or discouraged service innovation.

URCA further noted that OTT applications are complementary to electronic communication
services and thus should not be subject to licensing requirements.

Rather than impose regulatory obligations that apply to traditional services on OTTs, URCA is
encouraging traditional players to embrace new models and compete with one another at the
network level, as well as at the OTT level.

Ultimately, URCA’s approach is to encourage traditional players to improve on the quality,


variety and prices of their services so as to remain competitive while also benefiting consumers.

Australia case study


In April 2018, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released its
Communications Market Sector Study report,140 which addressed all aspects of the communication
sector, including a focus on OTTs. With respect to competition among OSPs, ACCC generally
did not find any competition issues.

In terms of the relationship between OTTs and other areas of the communication market,
the report highlights the complementary relationship between telecommunication service
providers and OTTs in which OTTs are stimulating demand for broadband access. While
telecommunication service providers may experience some decrease in revenue due to a
number of factors, such as increased competition among telecommunication service providers
and declining consumer demand for traditional telephony services, they are making up for this
through increased data revenues. In addition, network operators are capturing new revenue
streams in the OTT content market by partnering with OTTs or expanding their own online
content service offerings.

These developments prompted ACCC to conclude that “the availability of OTT services increases
the value proposition of broadband services, which in turn is likely to drive further take-up and
adoption of higher value plans”. In addition, both telecommunication service providers and
OSPs appear to be making “complementary investments in infrastructure and technologies to
expand capacity and promote a higher quality of service”.

140
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Communications Market Sector Study. Final
report. April 2018, available here.

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 85


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Bahrain case study


In October 2016, Bahrain’s Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) released its Position
Paper on Internet and Online Applications. TRA stated that the rise of OTTs has delivered
significant benefit to end customers that not only creates new business opportunities for
innovative players, such as OTT providers, but also opens up new avenues for growth for
licensed operators.

TRA concluded that “defining specific rules for an innovative and still evolving environment
may lead to undesirable outcomes: stifling further innovation, limiting end-customer choice,
and unduly influencing potential business relationships between Licensed Operators and OTT
players”.

Instead of regulation, TRA encourages reliance on market forces, finding that “market dynamics
should, to the fullest possible extent, drive this structural shift, as such dynamics will further
promote Internet penetration along with innovation, help control prices, and deliver benefits to
end-customers”.

In March 2018, TRA released a public consultation on Traffic Management and Pricing Practices
Guidelines, which proposes basic principles for net neutrality in Bahrain. TRA stated that a
“Licensed Operator would not be allowed to degrade content, applications or services that might
compete, at the OTT level, with its own non-IP services”, even in instances where the operator
views the OTT as competing with the operator’s services.

In a highly dynamic, innovative and competitive environment, reliance on market forces


encourages investment as new and existing players explore new business formulas. Thus,
allowing the market to develop without specific rules in an evolving environment is the preferred
approach.

TRA’s approach under proposed net neutrality rules will ensure that operators do not target
certain types of OTTs. This, in turn, promotes investment in OTTs as it ensures that they will not
be blocked, throttled or otherwise degraded at the network level and instead will be available
to all consumers.

Guinea case study


With the creation of the Posts and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (ARPT), the
Guinean State took action in 2005 to liberalize the telecommunication sector, and in 2005, 2006
and 2007 granted licences to four private operators to use a GSM public telecommunication
network. This reform has led to an overall improvement in access to mobile-telephony services
in Guinea. SOTELGUI (Guinea Telecommunication Company), the historic operator, ceased to
exist in 2012 and was replaced by Guitel (Guinea Telecom).

It was only in 2013 that three licences to use the 3G network with the same expiry dates as the
2G licences were granted to three of the existing operators.

In addition to these mobile operators, there are four Internet access providers (IAPs) that are
mainly based in the capital (Conakry) and some of the country’s large towns.

86 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

Guinea was connected to the ACE submarine cable in 2013, giving operators and IAPs higher
bit rates. Through its broadband strategy, the State is in the process of laying 4 500 km of optical
fibre, of which 4 350 km has been deployed so far.

Various meetings with, and surveys of, operators have shown that use of OTTs by consumers
is increasing constantly. This new consumer behaviour, facilitated by being able to obtain
terminals at lower costs, has led to a fall in revenue from traditional services and an increase in
data traffic linked to voice, images and video. Another observation is the growing number of
agreements between operators and OTT providers.

Côte d'Ivoire case study


Social media platforms are evolving. They are implementing social features like petition
functionality, or advertisements (ads) in “Stories” or “Status”. In search of strategies to build
loyalty and profitability, OTTs are moving beyond traditional communications (voice, message)
on their platform to offer functionalities in other sectors. This shift is also observed at the level of
users: producers and consumers of goods and services, who carry out e-commerce operations
on OTTs.

In Côte d'Ivoire, OTTs are being used increasingly for e-commerce. Consumers now prefer
to buy on social media platforms. Craftsmen or merchants, sometimes with low literacy rates,
publish their articles and catalogues on OTTs. Stories are now used as a showcase.

Compared to traditional e-commerce sites, consumers now prefer to buy from OTTs because
of interactions, the ability to chat with the craftsman or merchant via messaging, to negotiate
the price in real time or to place an order for custom-made products.

An entire ecosystem, revealing the true digital economy, is taking shape around OTTs.

New marketplaces are being created. The time-to-market is considerably shorter, and there is
no longer a need for stores to display goods because OTTs become showcases. No need to use
an experienced advertiser – it is possible to become known in 10 minutes, thanks to automatic
sponsored ads of products to the target population.

Interest in smartphones from all levels is growing beyond entertainment to become a real
business tool. In Côte d'Ivoire, the smartphone is the most widely used means of accessing
social media platforms. More than 80 per cent of users access these platforms using mobile only.

The use of OTTs opens up an alternative that can serve to reduce unemployment. Many young
people waiting to get decent jobs offer goods and services, and the income can be significant.

New business connections between countries are being created beyond the established axes.
In addition to the traditional partners France and Nigeria, thanks to services via OTTs we can
now observe an increase in supplies from Togo, Morocco, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates
(Dubai) and China.

Issues identified

In Côte d'Ivoire, the e-commerce activity that is developing on social networks is mainly informal.
These new windows, which benefit from the virtual world with a relatively small installation

Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1 87


Emerging technologies, including cloud computing, m-services and OTTs: Challenges
and opportunities, economic and policy impact for developing countries

budget, compete directly with physical retailers who also have to maintain physical stores, pay
municipal taxes and manage other worries.

Countries, while taking an interest in this new economy, are considering ways of generating
income from it, maintaining competition in a fair balance without imposing a tax burden that
would risk curbing the positive impact, especially in terms of employment and professional
integration.

Beyond assumptions about infrastructure, investment and telecommunications, OTTs raise many
other questions. They occupy a certain place in developing countries that must be analysed and
measured in order to provide relevant information to stakeholders to take informed decisions.

In accordance with Resolution 206 (Dubai, 2018) of the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference,141
on the need to consider the policy issues and economic implications of OTTs, the following
recommendations are made:

– Complete the Measuring the Information Society (MIS) questionnaire in order to take into
account socio-economic indicators related to the use of OTTs; or
– Think about a new report for measuring the impact of OTTs.

141
ITU. Plenipotentiary Conference (Dubai, 2018). Resolution 206 (Dubai, 2018), on OTTs.

88 Output Report on ITU-D Question 3/1


Office of the Director Office of Deputy Director and Regional Presence
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Field Operations Coordination Department (DDR)
Telecommunication Development Bureau (BDT) Place des Nations
Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20
CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland
Switzerland

Email: bdtdirector@itu.int Email: bdtdeputydir@itu.int


Tel.: +41 22 730 5035/5435 Tel.: +41 22 730 5131
Fax: +41 22 730 5484 Fax: +41 22 730 5484

Digital Networks and Society (DNS) Digital Knowledge Hub Department Partnerships for Digital Development
(DKH) Department (PDD)
Email: bdt-dns@itu.int Email: bdt-dkh@itu.int Email: bdt-pdd@itu.int
Tel.: +41 22 730 5421 Tel.: +41 22 730 5900 Tel.: +41 22 730 5447
Fax: +41 22 730 5484 Fax: +41 22 730 5484 Fax: +41 22 730 5484

Africa
Ethiopia Cameroon Senegal Zimbabwe
International Telecommunication Union internationale des Union internationale des International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) Regional Office télécommunications (UIT) télécommunications (UIT) Union (ITU) Area Office
Gambia Road Bureau de zone Bureau de zone TelOne Centre for Learning
Leghar Ethio Telecom Bldg. 3rd floor Immeuble CAMPOST, 3e étage 8, Route des Almadies Corner Samora Machel and
P.O. Box 60 005 Boulevard du 20 mai Immeuble Rokhaya, 3e étage Hampton Road
Addis Ababa Boîte postale 11017 Boîte postale 29471 P.O. Box BE 792
Ethiopia Yaoundé Dakar - Yoff Belvedere Harare
Cameroon Senegal Zimbabwe

Email: itu-ro-africa@itu.int Email: itu-yaounde@itu.int Email: itu-dakar@itu.int Email: itu-harare@itu.int


Tel.: +251 11 551 4977 Tel.: + 237 22 22 9292 Tel.: +221 33 859 7010 Tel.: +263 4 77 5939
Tel.: +251 11 551 4855 Tel.: + 237 22 22 9291 Tel.: +221 33 859 7021 Tel.: +263 4 77 5941
Tel.: +251 11 551 8328 Fax: + 237 22 22 9297 Fax: +221 33 868 6386 Fax: +263 4 77 1257
Fax: +251 11 551 7299

Americas
Brazil Barbados Chile Honduras
União Internacional de International Telecommunication Unión Internacional de Unión Internacional de
Telecomunicações (UIT) Union (ITU) Area Office Telecomunicaciones (UIT) Telecomunicaciones (UIT)
Escritório Regional United Nations House Oficina de Representación de Área Oficina de Representación de
SAUS Quadra 6 Ed. Luis Eduardo Marine Gardens Merced 753, Piso 4 Área
Magalhães, Hastings, Christ Church Santiago de Chile Colonia Altos de Miramontes
Bloco “E”, 10º andar, Ala Sul P.O. Box 1047 Chile Calle principal, Edificio No. 1583
(Anatel) Bridgetown Frente a Santos y Cía
CEP 70070-940 Brasilia - DF Barbados Apartado Postal 976
Brazil Tegucigalpa
Honduras

Email: itubrasilia@itu.int Email: itubridgetown@itu.int Email: itusantiago@itu.int Email: itutegucigalpa@itu.int


Tel.: +55 61 2312 2730-1 Tel.: +1 246 431 0343 Tel.: +56 2 632 6134/6147 Tel.: +504 2235 5470
Tel.: +55 61 2312 2733-5 Fax: +1 246 437 7403 Fax: +56 2 632 6154 Fax: +504 2235 5471
Fax: +55 61 2312 2738

Arab States Asia-Pacific CIS


Egypt Thailand Indonesia Russian Federation
International Telecommunication International Telecommunication International Telecommunication International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) Regional Office Union (ITU) Regional Office Union (ITU) Area Office Union (ITU) Regional Office
Smart Village, Building B 147, Thailand Post Training Center Sapta Pesona Building 4, Building 1
3rd floor 5th floor 13th floor Sergiy Radonezhsky Str.
Km 28 Cairo 111 Chaengwattana Road JI. Merdan Merdeka Barat No. 17 Moscow 105120
Alexandria Desert Road Laksi Jakarta 10110 Russian Federation
Giza Governorate Bangkok 10210 Indonesia
Cairo Thailand
Egypt
Mailing address: Mailing address:
P.O. Box 178, Laksi Post Office c/o UNDP – P.O. Box 2338
Laksi, Bangkok 10210, Thailand Jakarta 10110, Indonesia

Email: itu-ro-arabstates@itu.int Email: ituasiapacificregion@itu.int Email: ituasiapacificregion@itu.int Email: itumoscow@itu.int


Tel.: +202 3537 1777 Tel.: +66 2 575 0055 Tel.: +62 21 381 3572 Tel.: +7 495 926 6070
Fax: +202 3537 1888 Fax: +66 2 575 3507 Tel.: +62 21 380 2322/2324
Fax: +62 21 389 5521

Europe
Switzerland
International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) Office for Europe
Place des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
Email: eurregion@itu.int
Tel.: +41 22 730 5467
Fax: +41 22 730 5484
International Telecommunication Union
Telecommunication Development Bureau
Place des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland

ISBN 978-92-61-34531-0

9 789261 345310

Published in Switzerland
Geneva, 2021

You might also like